WEBVTT - Suns' Chances vs Dallas, Bucks-Celtics Wager, Ben Simmons, and Philly Collapse

0:00:01.720 --> 0:00:04.480
<v Speaker 1>This episode is brought to you by Unstoppable. Discover the

0:00:04.519 --> 0:00:07.880
<v Speaker 1>inspiring true story about Anthony Roebliss, who defined every expectation

0:00:07.960 --> 0:00:10.840
<v Speaker 1>to become a national wrestling champion, and Unstoppable, a new

0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>original movie from Amazon MGM Studios and director William Goldenberg,

0:00:14.560 --> 0:00:17.720
<v Speaker 1>evoking the excitement and camaraderie of classic sports dramas and

0:00:17.760 --> 0:00:21.160
<v Speaker 1>thrilling wrestling matches. Unstoppable features an all star ensemble cast

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:24.759
<v Speaker 1>including Jureel Jerome, Jennifer Lopez, Don Cheatle, Michael Panya, and

0:00:24.760 --> 0:00:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Bobby Canavali. Watch Unstoppable now exclusively on Amazon Prime Video.

0:00:30.320 --> 0:00:33.200
<v Speaker 2>This episode is brought to you by all State. Some

0:00:33.240 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 2>people just know they could save hundreds on car insurance

0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 2>by checking all State first. Like you know, to check

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:42.400
<v Speaker 2>the date of the big game first before you accidentally

0:00:42.400 --> 0:00:45.440
<v Speaker 2>buy tickets on your twentieth wedding anniversary and have to

0:00:45.440 --> 0:00:47.879
<v Speaker 2>spend the next twenty years of your marriage making up

0:00:47.880 --> 0:00:51.479
<v Speaker 2>for it. Yeah, checking first is smart, So check all

0:00:51.520 --> 0:00:53.840
<v Speaker 2>State first for a quote that could save you hundreds.

0:00:53.960 --> 0:00:56.880
<v Speaker 2>You're in good hands with All States savings. Very terms apply.

0:00:56.960 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 2>All State Fire and Casualty Insurance Company and Affiliates, Northbrook, Illinois, here's.

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:05.800
<v Speaker 3>What I do want. You are urgeoning gambling problem.

0:01:06.040 --> 0:01:10.039
<v Speaker 4>Oh oh, I've made two bets in the last two days.

0:01:12.080 --> 0:01:12.399
<v Speaker 5>Listen.

0:01:12.840 --> 0:01:16.640
<v Speaker 6>There are very few things in your life that I've

0:01:16.680 --> 0:01:20.640
<v Speaker 6>said learn from my mistakes on and I've been wrong about.

0:01:21.240 --> 0:01:26.400
<v Speaker 6>Take it from me on this one. This is a

0:01:26.640 --> 0:01:32.120
<v Speaker 6>dangerous path you are walking. You're only betting with your friends, right. Yeah,

0:01:32.200 --> 0:01:35.640
<v Speaker 6>Let's say you're great at it, it's gonna cost your

0:01:35.640 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 6>friendship because eventually someone's not gonna pay. Let's say you're

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:46.080
<v Speaker 6>bad at it, It's gonna cost you a bunch of money.

0:01:46.440 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 6>Let's say you're break even at it. That's probably the

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Speaker 6>best case scenario. But then what's the point of doing

0:01:54.120 --> 0:01:55.560
<v Speaker 6>it if you're just breaking even?

0:01:55.880 --> 0:01:56.160
<v Speaker 3>Whoa?

0:01:56.280 --> 0:01:59.080
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I'm far from breaking even at this point.

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:03.240
<v Speaker 4>I'm like three hundred ninety dollars U s. Yeah, I

0:02:03.280 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 4>haven't lost a bet.

0:02:04.400 --> 0:02:08.720
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Well, mark this tape, boys and girls, you know.

0:02:09.200 --> 0:02:11.239
<v Speaker 5>With all that give it information you just give to Listen,

0:02:12.160 --> 0:02:13.160
<v Speaker 5>why do you still bet?

0:02:13.639 --> 0:02:14.800
<v Speaker 3>Do I have a gambling program?

0:02:27.160 --> 0:02:29.680
<v Speaker 6>Welcome in episode fourteen of the What's Right with Nick

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:33.600
<v Speaker 6>Right podcast and YouTube show like rate, subscribeer, review, Please

0:02:33.639 --> 0:02:36.440
<v Speaker 6>do all of those things or YouTube subscribers are growing.

0:02:36.480 --> 0:02:38.600
<v Speaker 3>I don't get to see the podcast subscribers. I hope

0:02:38.600 --> 0:02:42.079
<v Speaker 3>they're growing. Please subscribe on your favorite podcast platform. Also,

0:02:42.160 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 3>by the way, on the podcast and.

0:02:44.160 --> 0:02:47.920
<v Speaker 6>YouTube feeds, we're continuing every Sunday we release the latest

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:50.440
<v Speaker 6>and the fifty greatest players will last fifty years in

0:02:50.560 --> 0:02:54.080
<v Speaker 6>NBA history, something I am oddly passionate about, as you

0:02:54.080 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 6>will find out in just a moment. This week, one

0:02:57.040 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 6>of the most polarizing players on the entire list comes out,

0:03:00.280 --> 0:03:02.920
<v Speaker 6>So check that out this Sunday. Catch up over the

0:03:02.919 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 6>weekend because we've already done players fifty through forty. But

0:03:06.080 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 6>as we always do on the show, first we talk

0:03:08.919 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 6>about what we are not actually talking about.

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:14.800
<v Speaker 3>So here's what is not on today's show. What is

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 3>not on today's show is Jerry West being mad at HBO,

0:03:18.520 --> 0:03:21.919
<v Speaker 3>Jay Wright eyeing the NBA or j R. Smith's four

0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:24.880
<v Speaker 3>point zero gpa. But shout out to my buddy j R. Smith.

0:03:24.880 --> 0:03:26.400
<v Speaker 3>I think that is such an awesome story.

0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 6>Also not on today's show is the ongoing to me

0:03:31.560 --> 0:03:35.000
<v Speaker 6>non debate about is Kevin Durant a top ten all

0:03:35.040 --> 0:03:35.720
<v Speaker 6>time player.

0:03:36.000 --> 0:03:37.360
<v Speaker 3>That's not in today's show.

0:03:37.600 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 6>However, I have been so enraged by so many of

0:03:41.000 --> 0:03:43.760
<v Speaker 6>my colleagues flippantly calling him a top ten all time

0:03:43.760 --> 0:03:48.480
<v Speaker 6>player when you simply it's an impossibility to make it.

0:03:48.680 --> 0:03:49.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm not going to do it again.

0:03:49.720 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 6>I'm going to do it just for a second right

0:03:51.000 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 6>here on the top of my head, just real quick,

0:03:53.520 --> 0:03:55.920
<v Speaker 6>of all time. So you have Lebron, you have Fream,

0:03:56.000 --> 0:03:58.120
<v Speaker 6>you have Michael, you have Magic, you have Wilt, you

0:03:58.120 --> 0:04:01.120
<v Speaker 6>have Russell. That's six names. You have Duncan, you have Bird,

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:04.320
<v Speaker 6>you have Kobe. That's nine names. So to have Kevin

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:06.800
<v Speaker 6>Durant is top ten. That means no one else is

0:04:06.840 --> 0:04:09.280
<v Speaker 6>on the list. Oh but wait, I haven't said Shaquille O'Neil,

0:04:09.320 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 6>a Quima LaJuan. Oh my goodness. I haven't said doctor j.

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:15.480
<v Speaker 6>I haven't said Steph. I haven't said Yiannest. Oh my god,

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:18.160
<v Speaker 6>what am I gonna do here? So here's the here's

0:04:18.160 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 6>the problem, guys. I gave fourteen names, and I say

0:04:22.080 --> 0:04:25.919
<v Speaker 6>Katie's got to be ahead of five of them to

0:04:26.000 --> 0:04:31.039
<v Speaker 6>be top ten, And twenty percent of the responses are

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:35.840
<v Speaker 6>some snarky version of dude. At least do the math right.

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 6>If there's fourteen names for him to be top ten.

0:04:39.080 --> 0:04:40.800
<v Speaker 6>He's only got to be ahead of four of them.

0:04:41.960 --> 0:04:48.560
<v Speaker 6>And I'm like, these people can't even do single digit subtraction.

0:04:50.440 --> 0:04:53.200
<v Speaker 3>What's fourteen minus four? It's ten? And then you add

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:54.719
<v Speaker 3>Kevin Durant. How many do you have?

0:04:54.920 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 6>Oh, these people are so dumb. Ultimately, there is no

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:04.120
<v Speaker 6>away there. It does not exist. There's no way to

0:05:04.120 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 6>put Durant in the top ten without removing.

0:05:09.400 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 3>At a minimum.

0:05:12.080 --> 0:05:18.719
<v Speaker 6>A Keem, Shack Bird, Kobe. You got to remove a

0:05:18.800 --> 0:05:22.760
<v Speaker 6>doctor J. You have to remove three of those guys.

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:27.440
<v Speaker 6>Of those five guys, pick three to put Kevin Durant

0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:29.279
<v Speaker 6>ahead of That's what you've got to do.

0:05:29.760 --> 0:05:33.279
<v Speaker 3>Everyone will say doctor J immediately, Fine, give me the

0:05:33.320 --> 0:05:35.320
<v Speaker 3>other two. You're gonna say a Keen.

0:05:36.120 --> 0:05:40.960
<v Speaker 6>You'll be wrong, but fine, tell me the other one, Shaq, Kobe,

0:05:41.160 --> 0:05:46.120
<v Speaker 6>Larry Bird, tell me nobody can do you.

0:05:46.080 --> 0:05:52.040
<v Speaker 3>Know why this is not top ten? And then I'm

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:52.920
<v Speaker 3>gonna say something else.

0:05:53.279 --> 0:05:56.240
<v Speaker 6>I'm gonna read your tweet I got from and I

0:05:56.720 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 6>don't dislike this guy, Ben Dowset who has a verified

0:06:02.040 --> 0:06:05.119
<v Speaker 6>check mark, And I'm going to read you as Twitter

0:06:05.160 --> 0:06:10.920
<v Speaker 6>bio because it's relevant to the discussion. Bendl said, NBA

0:06:11.120 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 6>words mostly at ESPN or five thirty eight. He tweets

0:06:15.240 --> 0:06:19.159
<v Speaker 6>to me, I honestly stand in awe of your ability

0:06:19.200 --> 0:06:22.400
<v Speaker 6>to constantly find the energy to care so much about

0:06:23.200 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 6>such arbitrary irrelevant The guy is a writer about sports.

0:06:31.600 --> 0:06:36.440
<v Speaker 6>All of this is irrelevant, arbitrary shit. So I responded

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:39.240
<v Speaker 6>to him, you're smart enough to see the irony in

0:06:39.279 --> 0:06:41.880
<v Speaker 6>this tweet considering what we both do for a living.

0:06:42.960 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 6>I mean, arbitrary irrelevant is literally what both of our

0:06:46.680 --> 0:06:50.960
<v Speaker 6>careers are based on writing about. And he responds, Sure,

0:06:51.279 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 6>but I think you're smart enough to realize there are

0:06:53.440 --> 0:06:56.720
<v Speaker 6>degrees to this. Whether Katie is the ninth or fourteenth

0:06:56.720 --> 0:06:58.440
<v Speaker 6>best player of all time is.

0:06:58.400 --> 0:07:01.400
<v Speaker 3>Irrelevant, even in a world of irrelevant. Let me tell

0:07:01.440 --> 0:07:01.920
<v Speaker 3>you something.

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:06.680
<v Speaker 6>You know, the very specific scenario in which someone is

0:07:06.720 --> 0:07:10.080
<v Speaker 6>the ninth best or fourteenth best at something. If we

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:12.760
<v Speaker 6>if the question is are they in the top ten?

0:07:13.320 --> 0:07:15.960
<v Speaker 6>That is the one situation where not only is it

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 6>not irrelevant, it's actually the only relevant thing. If it

0:07:20.920 --> 0:07:23.680
<v Speaker 6>is this person top ten, Oh, well they're ninth or

0:07:23.680 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 6>their fourteenth.

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:24.840
<v Speaker 3>Who cares?

0:07:24.960 --> 0:07:26.720
<v Speaker 6>I'll tell you who cares the person who asked the

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:29.560
<v Speaker 6>questions the top ten. Okay, now we can start the

0:07:29.560 --> 0:07:31.760
<v Speaker 6>actual show. Demonse, when's the last time you heard me

0:07:31.760 --> 0:07:33.840
<v Speaker 6>curse that much? Have you ever heard me curse that

0:07:33.960 --> 0:07:38.600
<v Speaker 6>much during a Chiefs playoff loss? Maybe I've definitely heard

0:07:38.640 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 6>you curse that much. It might not have been sports related,

0:07:40.840 --> 0:07:45.280
<v Speaker 6>sports related, oh probably at you probably Demonse, high school related.

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 3>Maybe. Okay, so what are we starting with today?

0:07:47.400 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 4>Suns tate Game five against New Orleans. Yep, Mickel Bridges

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:51.840
<v Speaker 4>at Aden, have a big night.

0:07:52.040 --> 0:07:52.280
<v Speaker 3>Yep.

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:55.280
<v Speaker 4>You've gone with Dallas to win the West Cows times

0:07:55.320 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 4>five more times than you go with yok, it's.

0:07:57.240 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 3>Not being the MVP.

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:01.520
<v Speaker 4>Do you realize that's how lucky they are to be

0:08:01.560 --> 0:08:04.160
<v Speaker 4>playing the banged up Suns instead of the Grizzlies of

0:08:04.200 --> 0:08:04.760
<v Speaker 4>the Warriors.

0:08:04.800 --> 0:08:06.480
<v Speaker 6>Okay, well, they're not playing the Suns yet, and I

0:08:06.520 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 6>want to talk about the Grizzlies in just second. But

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:10.960
<v Speaker 6>I do assume the Sons are going to beat the Pelicans.

0:08:11.280 --> 0:08:14.520
<v Speaker 6>But folks, I went out on a limb and picked

0:08:14.600 --> 0:08:18.440
<v Speaker 6>Dallas when Luca was already declared out for the beginning

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:21.240
<v Speaker 6>of the series with an injury. We knew the bracket,

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:23.880
<v Speaker 6>and I knew that Grizzlies Warriors were on the other side.

0:08:23.880 --> 0:08:24.440
<v Speaker 3>Of the bracket.

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:27.320
<v Speaker 6>That's one of the reasons I picked Dallas. Another one

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 6>of the reasons I picked Dallas and wasn't afraid of

0:08:29.280 --> 0:08:32.559
<v Speaker 6>Phoenix was because of all the best teams in basketball,

0:08:32.880 --> 0:08:35.400
<v Speaker 6>the one with the biggest injury risk is the one

0:08:35.400 --> 0:08:38.080
<v Speaker 6>who's best players thirty six years old and Chris Paul.

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:40.640
<v Speaker 6>Now he's not the one who got hurt. Devin Booker

0:08:40.679 --> 0:08:42.400
<v Speaker 6>is the one who got hurt. But Chris Paul is

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:44.199
<v Speaker 6>always an injury risk. So no, I'm not going to

0:08:44.520 --> 0:08:46.840
<v Speaker 6>have any shame in the fact that I had the

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:50.440
<v Speaker 6>courage to stick with Dallas from six weeks ago, even

0:08:50.480 --> 0:08:52.960
<v Speaker 6>after Luca got hurt. And what we are seeing is

0:08:53.240 --> 0:08:57.840
<v Speaker 6>as I told you, Luke is an all time playoff performer. Tonight,

0:08:57.920 --> 0:09:00.280
<v Speaker 6>when you guys see the game when they beat you all,

0:09:01.000 --> 0:09:03.960
<v Speaker 6>what's an average Luca game, Well, he literally averages thirty

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:06.480
<v Speaker 6>four to nine and nine for his playoff career. So

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:09.160
<v Speaker 6>I think I don't know tonight close out game, probably

0:09:09.480 --> 0:09:12.600
<v Speaker 6>thirty six, eleven and eight is about what I would

0:09:12.600 --> 0:09:16.160
<v Speaker 6>anticipate for him. He's the best player on his side

0:09:16.200 --> 0:09:18.360
<v Speaker 6>of the bracket. He is the best player in the

0:09:18.400 --> 0:09:22.000
<v Speaker 6>Western Conference playoffs. He's better than step. He's better than Jaw.

0:09:22.280 --> 0:09:24.880
<v Speaker 6>But I do want to say something about Jaw because

0:09:25.440 --> 0:09:27.920
<v Speaker 6>I believe the Grizzlies are going to close out the Timberwolves.

0:09:28.080 --> 0:09:32.720
<v Speaker 6>Job was obviously unbelievable in the closing minutes against the

0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:36.320
<v Speaker 6>Timberwolves on Tuesday night, scored thirteen straight points, had one

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:39.520
<v Speaker 6>of the greatest dunks we've ever seen. I before the

0:09:39.559 --> 0:09:42.840
<v Speaker 6>playoffs picked the Grizzlies to beat the Warriors in that series.

0:09:43.880 --> 0:09:46.520
<v Speaker 6>I would be lying if I said I feel better

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:50.439
<v Speaker 6>about Memphis today than beforehand, because they have looked shaky

0:09:50.480 --> 0:09:54.440
<v Speaker 6>against the Timberwolves and the Warriors have looked phenomenal. With

0:09:54.600 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 6>that said, the Warriors are playing a team that is

0:09:57.600 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 6>drawing dead in Denver. That's not about Yokics. They are

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:04.160
<v Speaker 6>just flatly drawing dead. And the other piece of that is,

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:08.400
<v Speaker 6>in my estimation that the Warriors maybe I underrated them a.

0:10:08.320 --> 0:10:10.840
<v Speaker 3>Bit because they hadn't been healthy all year.

0:10:10.880 --> 0:10:14.240
<v Speaker 6>There is a chance the Warriors are the best team

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:16.760
<v Speaker 6>in the West, even though Dallas has the best player

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:19.840
<v Speaker 6>in the West. But I think Memphis is going to

0:10:19.840 --> 0:10:22.959
<v Speaker 6>present some issues for Golden State because of their youth

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:26.440
<v Speaker 6>and their athleticism and just the kind of frenetic style

0:10:26.520 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 6>they play, So I think that series is going to

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:32.199
<v Speaker 6>be a war. I think Dallas is going to beat Phoenix. No,

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:34.679
<v Speaker 6>I'm not backing down at all, and I'm not at

0:10:34.720 --> 0:10:37.720
<v Speaker 6>all going to apologize that I had the foresight to

0:10:37.720 --> 0:10:40.200
<v Speaker 6>believe in Luka Doncic when no one else wanted to.

0:10:40.800 --> 0:10:45.719
<v Speaker 3>Again, by the way, I told you this. I think

0:10:45.760 --> 0:10:46.360
<v Speaker 3>I told you this.

0:10:47.400 --> 0:10:51.960
<v Speaker 6>I bet before the playoffs at sixty five to one,

0:10:53.320 --> 0:10:57.520
<v Speaker 6>Bucks over mAbs in the finals and exact NBA finals

0:10:57.559 --> 0:11:01.160
<v Speaker 6>of the Buckser champions they beat the Mavericks. I right now,

0:11:01.160 --> 0:11:03.040
<v Speaker 6>if you ask me what I think the finals, what's

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:06.360
<v Speaker 6>going to happen? I would say Bucks over MAVs. Okay,

0:11:06.400 --> 0:11:07.439
<v Speaker 6>all right, what's next month?

0:11:08.000 --> 0:11:10.240
<v Speaker 4>Philly in danger of blown a three to zero lead

0:11:10.360 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 4>to Toronto in Game six on Thursday. They got a

0:11:13.840 --> 0:11:15.680
<v Speaker 4>lot of decisions to make. With hard enough for an

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:19.040
<v Speaker 4>extension yep, and bid is now injured for a second playoff,

0:11:19.400 --> 0:11:21.839
<v Speaker 4>playoff season or whatever playoff.

0:11:21.480 --> 0:11:22.319
<v Speaker 3>Run in a row.

0:11:23.000 --> 0:11:25.439
<v Speaker 4>What does Philly need to do to prove that Harden

0:11:25.600 --> 0:11:27.640
<v Speaker 4>Maxi and Embiid is worth building around.

0:11:28.000 --> 0:11:30.720
<v Speaker 6>Okay, first of all, let me talk about the stakes

0:11:30.720 --> 0:11:35.160
<v Speaker 6>in Game six for a moment, because everybody knows no

0:11:35.200 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 6>one has ever blown a three to zero lead in

0:11:37.679 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 6>NBA playoff history. Doc Rivers blown three separate three one leads,

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:44.040
<v Speaker 6>but no one's ever blown a three oh league. But

0:11:44.080 --> 0:11:49.079
<v Speaker 6>it's more dramatically, there have only been three teams ever

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:53.000
<v Speaker 6>up three to zero that they even had to play

0:11:53.000 --> 0:11:55.640
<v Speaker 6>a game separate, and one of them is the nineteen

0:11:55.800 --> 0:12:00.239
<v Speaker 6>fifty one Rochester Royals. It happened once in nineteen fifty

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:04.120
<v Speaker 6>and once in the mid nineties, and once in the

0:12:04.200 --> 0:12:07.960
<v Speaker 6>early two thousands. So down oh three, not only does

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:10.600
<v Speaker 6>no one ever win, typically you don't ever even get

0:12:10.679 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 6>to a game seven. So the fact that Philly is

0:12:13.559 --> 0:12:16.959
<v Speaker 6>now on the road in Toronto for a Game six

0:12:17.040 --> 0:12:19.680
<v Speaker 6>with no Maxi within this is.

0:12:19.800 --> 0:12:22.160
<v Speaker 5>Scary, legit scary.

0:12:22.640 --> 0:12:26.080
<v Speaker 6>Like I expected Philly to potentially lose Game four, they

0:12:26.080 --> 0:12:28.280
<v Speaker 6>go three to zero, they relax, they have a couple

0:12:28.320 --> 0:12:30.760
<v Speaker 6>of days off, they're partying in Canada. But then Game

0:12:30.800 --> 0:12:33.040
<v Speaker 6>five is when you in the series. You're back home,

0:12:33.080 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 6>you're incentivized to make sure you'll off to get another plane,

0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:37.520
<v Speaker 6>take another trip. And not only they lose, they got

0:12:37.559 --> 0:12:42.000
<v Speaker 6>blown out. So yeah, if they were to lose this series.

0:12:42.520 --> 0:12:47.440
<v Speaker 3>Then it is. The shock waves of it will be

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:51.120
<v Speaker 3>felt for years. Like Doc will obviously lose his job.

0:12:51.400 --> 0:12:53.160
<v Speaker 3>I don't know what they do with Hard, and.

0:12:53.160 --> 0:12:56.320
<v Speaker 6>Like the whole thing if they lose Game six, I

0:12:56.320 --> 0:13:00.360
<v Speaker 6>would argue the game seven in Philly Become was the

0:13:00.520 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 6>single most pressurized Round one game in NBA.

0:13:04.440 --> 0:13:07.440
<v Speaker 5>History for Rivers, especially.

0:13:07.600 --> 0:13:10.440
<v Speaker 3>For everyone involved. You will never get over the stink

0:13:10.480 --> 0:13:13.960
<v Speaker 3>of an three blowing three zero leads, especially when you

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:16.520
<v Speaker 3>have arguably the MVP on your team and the other

0:13:16.559 --> 0:13:19.679
<v Speaker 3>team it's Scotty Barnes as a rookie, Fredman Bleeds who

0:13:19.720 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 3>didn't even play in game five.

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:24.360
<v Speaker 6>The whole thing is a mess. Sorry, my phone's broken.

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:26.880
<v Speaker 6>It's making noise. I don't know if the MIC's pick

0:13:26.920 --> 0:13:31.080
<v Speaker 6>that up. But to answer the direct question, I don't

0:13:31.200 --> 0:13:35.520
<v Speaker 6>I think Phillies have. Let's just assume they don't have

0:13:36.040 --> 0:13:37.880
<v Speaker 6>the most catastrophic collapse.

0:13:37.520 --> 0:13:38.280
<v Speaker 3>In NBA history.

0:13:38.720 --> 0:13:41.600
<v Speaker 6>Embiids obviously locked up max Is on his rookie deal,

0:13:42.160 --> 0:13:44.040
<v Speaker 6>and you didn't trade all that stuff for Harden to

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:47.000
<v Speaker 6>not re sign Hard, so like that is going to be.

0:13:46.960 --> 0:13:50.640
<v Speaker 3>Their trio moving forward. There are real questions about what

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:52.240
<v Speaker 3>level of player Harden is anymore.

0:13:52.280 --> 0:13:55.160
<v Speaker 6>You just can't seem to get past people anymore. And

0:13:55.200 --> 0:13:59.440
<v Speaker 6>that's concerning. But the idea that Daryl Morey Hardens, one

0:13:59.440 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 6>of his all time favorite players, was with him in Houston,

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:04.520
<v Speaker 6>Darryl Moore is going to sign hard in whatever contract

0:14:04.760 --> 0:14:06.199
<v Speaker 6>Harden demands this offseason.

0:14:06.520 --> 0:14:09.559
<v Speaker 3>Is that going to be a good contract in four years? No?

0:14:10.320 --> 0:14:11.959
<v Speaker 3>Will it be a good contract next year?

0:14:12.040 --> 0:14:14.040
<v Speaker 6>Philly would be banking on it, but they got to

0:14:14.040 --> 0:14:16.360
<v Speaker 6>get through Toronto. But they're not showing me right now.

0:14:16.440 --> 0:14:19.520
<v Speaker 6>I picked them to beat Miami in round two. Miami

0:14:19.880 --> 0:14:22.080
<v Speaker 6>the other night just beat Atlanta with no Jimmy Butler.

0:14:22.080 --> 0:14:24.680
<v Speaker 6>They handled Atlanta in five. All right, what's next? Nope,

0:14:25.040 --> 0:14:27.800
<v Speaker 6>we're taking before a game five of Bugs Bulls. Yep,

0:14:27.920 --> 0:14:31.600
<v Speaker 6>assuming they win the series. Yeah, Milwaukee's got Boston next. Yeah,

0:14:31.640 --> 0:14:34.720
<v Speaker 6>and I'm feeling pretty good about it. I think we

0:14:34.760 --> 0:14:37.160
<v Speaker 6>can make that beneficial now, by the way, Oh okay, yeah,

0:14:37.240 --> 0:14:39.160
<v Speaker 6>especially with Middleton being banged up.

0:14:39.240 --> 0:14:42.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Yeah, So let's just hold on. So let's just

0:14:42.640 --> 0:14:43.120
<v Speaker 3>stop here.

0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:47.080
<v Speaker 6>So you want to make a buck Celtics banc Demonde's

0:14:47.120 --> 0:14:47.880
<v Speaker 6>a Celtics fan.

0:14:48.000 --> 0:14:51.960
<v Speaker 3>Celtics and six Celtics and six That's what.

0:14:51.920 --> 0:14:54.560
<v Speaker 4>I'm going with if it goes to a game seven,

0:14:54.760 --> 0:14:57.320
<v Speaker 4>I do give you if it goes to game seven.

0:14:57.560 --> 0:14:59.880
<v Speaker 5>I want to make that like a little side barkway.

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:02.640
<v Speaker 3>Those the game seven. I give it to mok if

0:15:02.720 --> 0:15:05.280
<v Speaker 3>but you know, well that's what Game seven would be

0:15:05.400 --> 0:15:06.080
<v Speaker 3>in Boston.

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:09.960
<v Speaker 6>So you're saying that the Celtics win win in six.

0:15:10.040 --> 0:15:12.480
<v Speaker 6>We again, you're trying to you want to gamble with

0:15:12.480 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 6>me on this. I don't think it's a good idea.

0:15:14.920 --> 0:15:18.040
<v Speaker 6>I understand Middleton's out. I also, so what do you

0:15:18.080 --> 0:15:19.840
<v Speaker 6>want to bet? Let's let's figure out the bet. Then

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:22.320
<v Speaker 6>I'll tell give my opinion on the series, because there

0:15:22.360 --> 0:15:23.400
<v Speaker 6>need to be real stakes in.

0:15:23.720 --> 0:15:25.600
<v Speaker 5>Celtics and six. So I give you one hundred and

0:15:25.600 --> 0:15:28.600
<v Speaker 5>fifty bucks. See can I actually you know what? I

0:15:28.640 --> 0:15:30.480
<v Speaker 5>give you one fifty, you give me five.

0:15:31.440 --> 0:15:34.320
<v Speaker 6>I'm not giving you three to one odds on what

0:15:34.440 --> 0:15:36.120
<v Speaker 6>is a coin flip series in Vegas.

0:15:36.360 --> 0:15:37.600
<v Speaker 3>See here's the deal, buddy.

0:15:38.160 --> 0:15:41.560
<v Speaker 6>We don't need betting money between us is not a

0:15:41.560 --> 0:15:44.320
<v Speaker 6>good idea because it's just naturally going to be more

0:15:44.360 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 6>painful for you than for me. There needs to be

0:15:46.640 --> 0:15:51.960
<v Speaker 6>some reputational thing involved. There needs to be something either

0:15:52.000 --> 0:15:54.960
<v Speaker 6>that we do on the show something the viewers and

0:15:55.000 --> 0:15:58.600
<v Speaker 6>listeners some embarrassment for me or embarrassment for you.

0:15:59.080 --> 0:16:01.160
<v Speaker 3>That's what the bet needs to be about.

0:16:01.600 --> 0:16:06.480
<v Speaker 6>So I I have some ideas on what we could

0:16:06.480 --> 0:16:08.800
<v Speaker 6>do here, because you're a Celtics fan and I've said

0:16:08.840 --> 0:16:10.720
<v Speaker 6>you honest and the Bucks are going to win the title.

0:16:11.160 --> 0:16:14.640
<v Speaker 6>Money is not the right answer, Okay, it's not a

0:16:14.680 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 6>financial wager that.

0:16:15.800 --> 0:16:17.440
<v Speaker 3>We need to make. What we need to make is

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:21.240
<v Speaker 3>a reputational wager. Okay.

0:16:23.080 --> 0:16:30.600
<v Speaker 6>If Boston wins the series, I will let you run

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:38.280
<v Speaker 6>my Twitter account for a day. Okay, okay if the

0:16:38.480 --> 0:16:42.360
<v Speaker 6>cel If the Bucks win the series, I get to

0:16:42.440 --> 0:16:44.240
<v Speaker 6>pick five.

0:16:45.480 --> 0:16:50.440
<v Speaker 3>Pictures of you with no say from you, to put

0:16:50.480 --> 0:16:51.080
<v Speaker 3>on this show.

0:16:53.120 --> 0:16:54.479
<v Speaker 5>Is that a bet?

0:16:55.680 --> 0:17:01.120
<v Speaker 3>Is that a bet? Oh? God? Yeah? That's locked in there.

0:17:01.160 --> 0:17:03.520
<v Speaker 6>We go, all right, I've got the Bucks, You've got

0:17:03.520 --> 0:17:06.040
<v Speaker 6>the Celtics. I think Giannis is good. You know who's

0:17:06.040 --> 0:17:09.840
<v Speaker 6>going to be a low key loser of Bucks Celtics

0:17:09.840 --> 0:17:15.640
<v Speaker 6>if the Bucks win, Kevin Duran Because if the Celtics defense,

0:17:16.000 --> 0:17:19.440
<v Speaker 6>that's Steiny kd for four games and swept them.

0:17:19.680 --> 0:17:21.720
<v Speaker 3>If Jiannis has his way with them.

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:24.920
<v Speaker 6>Right, that's a problem. All right, we have a clock

0:17:24.960 --> 0:17:27.359
<v Speaker 6>if you're watching on YouTube. We only have thirty seconds left,

0:17:27.920 --> 0:17:29.280
<v Speaker 6>but we're gonna almost hit the clock.

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:30.280
<v Speaker 3>Give me the last question.

0:17:30.560 --> 0:17:31.280
<v Speaker 5>Shams reported.

0:17:31.320 --> 0:17:33.639
<v Speaker 4>Ben Simmons told the Nets he has a mental block

0:17:33.840 --> 0:17:36.800
<v Speaker 4>after the last postseason. Ye says the mental block stress

0:17:36.880 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 4>affected his back injury. Yes, mental health is obviously a

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:43.320
<v Speaker 4>very serious issue. We don't know what's up for Ben Simmons, obviously,

0:17:43.680 --> 0:17:45.560
<v Speaker 4>But is it okay to criticize him anymore?

0:17:45.680 --> 0:17:47.600
<v Speaker 6>Okay, So I don't need a lot of time here.

0:17:47.640 --> 0:17:50.040
<v Speaker 6>I need maybe we'll go over time by one minute.

0:17:50.560 --> 0:17:53.879
<v Speaker 6>So I set on this show on other platforms that

0:17:54.119 --> 0:17:57.480
<v Speaker 6>I thought Ben's back injury was. I think the term

0:17:57.520 --> 0:18:00.440
<v Speaker 6>is psychosomatic, and that doesn't mean it's not real. It's

0:18:00.480 --> 0:18:03.480
<v Speaker 6>the same way stress can cause ulcers, stress can cause

0:18:03.520 --> 0:18:07.400
<v Speaker 6>back Then I believed his back was hurting without ever

0:18:07.480 --> 0:18:10.159
<v Speaker 6>suffering a physical back injury. I think it was the

0:18:10.240 --> 0:18:14.760
<v Speaker 6>stress of the moment. Here is why you can empathize

0:18:14.760 --> 0:18:19.120
<v Speaker 6>with Ben Simmons but also be critical of Ben Simmons.

0:18:19.119 --> 0:18:28.360
<v Speaker 6>The basketball part of being a performer, whether it's sports, theater, acting,

0:18:29.160 --> 0:18:34.919
<v Speaker 6>stand up comic, is the stress and anxiety of performing

0:18:34.960 --> 0:18:39.000
<v Speaker 6>in front of crowds and being able to perform despite

0:18:39.080 --> 0:18:43.119
<v Speaker 6>the right. So it is yes, you can, you can

0:18:43.520 --> 0:18:47.679
<v Speaker 6>empathize with someone who is dealing with legitimate mental health

0:18:47.840 --> 0:18:52.439
<v Speaker 6>or stress and anxiety struggles, but also recognize that in

0:18:52.920 --> 0:18:55.399
<v Speaker 6>we always like to say, you know, we need to

0:18:55.440 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 6>do a better job of treating you know, mental injury

0:18:59.200 --> 0:19:02.359
<v Speaker 6>or mental trauma the way we do trauma to the body.

0:19:02.880 --> 0:19:09.040
<v Speaker 6>But that correct the same way we give guys in

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:13.560
<v Speaker 6>sports more credit if they can, if they are can

0:19:13.600 --> 0:19:16.719
<v Speaker 6>play through an ankle injury that someone else couldn't. A

0:19:16.760 --> 0:19:19.280
<v Speaker 6>lot of these guys are under massive pressure. A lot

0:19:19.320 --> 0:19:21.120
<v Speaker 6>of these guys are in their massive stress. And when

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:26.520
<v Speaker 6>it comes to Ben Simmons the basketball player, his inability

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:29.440
<v Speaker 6>it would appear to handle that makes him a worse

0:19:29.520 --> 0:19:33.000
<v Speaker 6>basketball player. It's not an indictment on him as a

0:19:33.080 --> 0:19:37.600
<v Speaker 6>human being, but it is absolutely fair to say part

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:41.480
<v Speaker 6>of being a professional athlete is being able to deal

0:19:41.560 --> 0:19:45.120
<v Speaker 6>with the expectations, the pressure, the crowds, all of it

0:19:45.560 --> 0:19:49.400
<v Speaker 6>and still perform your best. If you can't do that,

0:19:49.400 --> 0:19:53.199
<v Speaker 6>that makes you a lesser professional athlete. That is not

0:19:53.280 --> 0:19:56.320
<v Speaker 6>attacking someone for going through mental health struggles. That is

0:19:56.440 --> 0:19:59.639
<v Speaker 6>recognizing what any type of live performance is.

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:00.920
<v Speaker 5>He's got a lot of time.

0:20:01.960 --> 0:20:03.359
<v Speaker 6>He's gotten a lot of time, and at this point

0:20:03.359 --> 0:20:05.239
<v Speaker 6>I do worry he's his own worst enemy on it,

0:20:05.400 --> 0:20:08.240
<v Speaker 6>and I feel badly for Ben Simmons the person, But

0:20:08.400 --> 0:20:12.720
<v Speaker 6>Ben Simmons the basketball player is it's absolutely fair to say,

0:20:13.880 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 6>just like I feel like in the Celtics Nets series,

0:20:17.440 --> 0:20:20.240
<v Speaker 6>at some point the pressure got to KD a bit.

0:20:21.000 --> 0:20:25.719
<v Speaker 3>That's a mental thing. The in the MAVs.

0:20:26.880 --> 0:20:30.120
<v Speaker 6>Heat series, when Lebron melted it down, clearly the pressure

0:20:30.200 --> 0:20:33.520
<v Speaker 6>got to it. Part of being great is overcoming that.

0:20:34.080 --> 0:20:37.080
<v Speaker 6>Right now, Ben is having issues with that. That's about

0:20:37.119 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 6>him the basketball player, not him the human being.

0:20:39.840 --> 0:20:40.639
<v Speaker 3>We'll be right.

0:20:40.520 --> 0:20:48.640
<v Speaker 6>There, all right, Welcome back in What's Right with Nick

0:20:48.640 --> 0:20:52.240
<v Speaker 6>Wright Podcast segment number two of episode number fourteen. For

0:20:52.320 --> 0:20:55.080
<v Speaker 6>those of you charting the show segment by segment, episode

0:20:55.080 --> 0:20:58.280
<v Speaker 6>by episode, which is absolutely no one. All right, Demon's

0:20:58.720 --> 0:21:01.600
<v Speaker 6>now time for two rowng's in one. Right, We're gonna

0:21:01.600 --> 0:21:02.280
<v Speaker 6>get right into it.

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:02.679
<v Speaker 3>Let's go.

0:21:03.280 --> 0:21:07.600
<v Speaker 4>Most likely been traded the far next show, Deebo, Samuel Yeah,

0:21:07.640 --> 0:21:10.360
<v Speaker 4>Baker Mayfield or Darren Waller.

0:21:10.560 --> 0:21:14.160
<v Speaker 6>Okay, so Darren Waller is the outstanding Raiders tight end

0:21:14.440 --> 0:21:16.600
<v Speaker 6>who all of a sudden popped up in some trade rumors.

0:21:16.600 --> 0:21:17.879
<v Speaker 3>We've already talked about Debo.

0:21:19.560 --> 0:21:22.760
<v Speaker 6>So the draft is by the time you guys are

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:26.119
<v Speaker 6>hearing or seeing this, the draft is today. It's Thursday.

0:21:26.320 --> 0:21:28.719
<v Speaker 6>I guess maybe it's yesterday opening when you're watching it,

0:21:28.760 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 6>but the draft is today. The draft is going to

0:21:31.840 --> 0:21:36.720
<v Speaker 6>determine Baker's destiny. So my guess is none of these

0:21:36.720 --> 0:21:39.240
<v Speaker 6>guys are traded in the next ninety six hours. But

0:21:39.359 --> 0:21:42.240
<v Speaker 6>if one of them is, my answers Baker because somebody

0:21:42.320 --> 0:21:45.199
<v Speaker 6>is going to end up targeting a quarterback, not getting it,

0:21:45.440 --> 0:21:48.000
<v Speaker 6>and then deciding, Okay, we need you know what I mean,

0:21:48.040 --> 0:21:49.480
<v Speaker 6>Baker Mayfield's our best option.

0:21:49.960 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 3>I don't know that.

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:54.760
<v Speaker 6>The Niners are gonna flinch on Deebo and the Darren

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:57.760
<v Speaker 6>Waller things seemed to kind of come out out of

0:21:57.800 --> 0:22:01.160
<v Speaker 6>whole claw, Like I'm not certain that the Raiders are.

0:22:01.760 --> 0:22:05.119
<v Speaker 6>They just added Devonte Adams, they are trying to compete

0:22:05.119 --> 0:22:07.760
<v Speaker 6>with Kansas City that I don't think all of a

0:22:07.840 --> 0:22:10.679
<v Speaker 6>sudden they're gonna get rid of one of their the

0:22:10.680 --> 0:22:12.800
<v Speaker 6>guy who last year I felt was their most dynamic

0:22:12.880 --> 0:22:16.439
<v Speaker 6>offensive weapon. And the Niners, I think they and Deebo

0:22:16.520 --> 0:22:19.600
<v Speaker 6>will end up coming to terms on something. Maybe I'm wrong, Listen,

0:22:19.600 --> 0:22:22.360
<v Speaker 6>maybe Deevo's trade a draft day, but I don't think

0:22:22.400 --> 0:22:25.240
<v Speaker 6>the Niners are in the right now in the business

0:22:25.280 --> 0:22:27.560
<v Speaker 6>when they're going to be starting not a rookie quarterback

0:22:27.600 --> 0:22:30.399
<v Speaker 6>but essentially a rookie quarterback, and Trey Lance getting rid

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:34.000
<v Speaker 6>of their most dynamic offensive weapon. Baker, we know is

0:22:34.000 --> 0:22:35.880
<v Speaker 6>not going to be a Brown, So to me, he's

0:22:35.920 --> 0:22:38.120
<v Speaker 6>the best, the best answer, the most likely answer.

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:41.399
<v Speaker 3>All right, what's an ex sense we draft strategy? You

0:22:41.440 --> 0:22:41.879
<v Speaker 3>agree with?

0:22:42.040 --> 0:22:45.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, always trade down, yep, don't draft a running back

0:22:45.200 --> 0:22:48.720
<v Speaker 4>in round one or never drafting a mid round quarterback.

0:22:48.840 --> 0:22:49.199
<v Speaker 3>Okay.

0:22:50.800 --> 0:22:56.880
<v Speaker 6>The way quarterbacks are drafted is so patently illogical, and

0:22:56.920 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 6>I'm this is gonna We're gonna spend half the segment

0:22:59.880 --> 0:23:03.879
<v Speaker 6>on this question. Okay, So here's the deal. Go back

0:23:04.840 --> 0:23:10.200
<v Speaker 6>in every draft that we've had for thirty years, and

0:23:10.280 --> 0:23:14.240
<v Speaker 6>here is what is true. If you went and redid

0:23:14.320 --> 0:23:19.960
<v Speaker 6>the draft, every single quarterback that worked out, no matter

0:23:20.000 --> 0:23:22.639
<v Speaker 6>where they were drafted, would be the first pick, the

0:23:22.720 --> 0:23:25.920
<v Speaker 6>second pick, the third pick. How if you went if

0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:29.440
<v Speaker 6>ten years after a draft there were three franchise quarterbacks

0:23:29.440 --> 0:23:31.879
<v Speaker 6>from the draft and you're like, hey, go redraft it

0:23:31.920 --> 0:23:35.399
<v Speaker 6>doesn't matter if a Hall of Fame left tackle for

0:23:36.080 --> 0:23:38.840
<v Speaker 6>Jalen Ramsey or who is in that draft you went

0:23:38.920 --> 0:23:41.639
<v Speaker 6>to redraft it with hindsight being twenty twenty.

0:23:42.440 --> 0:23:43.240
<v Speaker 3>First, the best.

0:23:43.080 --> 0:23:45.359
<v Speaker 6>Quarterback can go first, the second best quarterback go second,

0:23:45.359 --> 0:23:47.080
<v Speaker 6>the third best quarterback go third, and.

0:23:47.040 --> 0:23:48.400
<v Speaker 3>Then you'd get to everyone else.

0:23:49.080 --> 0:23:52.919
<v Speaker 6>So that brings that is just a pure fact of

0:23:52.920 --> 0:23:56.240
<v Speaker 6>the matter. You go to Patrick Mahomes's draft, it's quite simple.

0:23:56.400 --> 0:23:59.080
<v Speaker 6>Patrick Mahomes would go one, Deshaun Watson would go too,

0:23:59.440 --> 0:24:02.520
<v Speaker 6>and then we would get to the non quarterbacks. If

0:24:02.560 --> 0:24:05.680
<v Speaker 6>you went to Baker Mayfield draft, for instance, Josh Allen

0:24:05.680 --> 0:24:09.040
<v Speaker 6>would go one. Lamar Jackson would go to Baker Mayfield

0:24:09.080 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 6>for all his flaws would go three, and then we

0:24:12.119 --> 0:24:15.040
<v Speaker 6>would get to all the other players. Because a franchise

0:24:15.119 --> 0:24:17.639
<v Speaker 6>quarterback is so much more valuable than everybody else. So

0:24:17.680 --> 0:24:20.560
<v Speaker 6>why do I bring that up? Because this time of

0:24:20.680 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 6>year you hear teams or reports from teams say this,

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:28.920
<v Speaker 6>which makes no sense when it comes to quarterback. Oh, well,

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:33.000
<v Speaker 6>they wouldn't draft him in the top five, but if

0:24:33.000 --> 0:24:37.679
<v Speaker 6>he falls to twenty, they might want They might trade

0:24:37.720 --> 0:24:40.760
<v Speaker 6>back into get him if he's a success. If he's

0:24:40.800 --> 0:24:44.320
<v Speaker 6>the right pick at twenty. He would have been the

0:24:44.440 --> 0:24:48.480
<v Speaker 6>right pick at one unless there was another quarterback better

0:24:48.520 --> 0:24:52.399
<v Speaker 6>than him. So that's first point, like the idea that

0:24:52.440 --> 0:24:55.160
<v Speaker 6>there is such a thing as a quarterback that five

0:24:55.240 --> 0:24:57.359
<v Speaker 6>years after the draft, it's going to be like, oh,

0:24:57.560 --> 0:24:59.760
<v Speaker 6>glad we didn't spend the fourth pick on him. But

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:02.760
<v Speaker 6>it's real, we spent the fourteenth pick on him. That

0:25:02.880 --> 0:25:04.919
<v Speaker 6>player has never existed.

0:25:05.440 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 3>It's a myth.

0:25:07.160 --> 0:25:10.480
<v Speaker 6>Okay, So there's that. Then there's the mid round quarterback party.

0:25:11.480 --> 0:25:14.400
<v Speaker 6>I can be like, oh, Russell Wilson's a mid round quarterback. Yeah,

0:25:14.440 --> 0:25:16.600
<v Speaker 6>I understand people missed on him. He went back and

0:25:16.640 --> 0:25:19.320
<v Speaker 6>redid Russell Wilson draft. He would go number one overall,

0:25:19.440 --> 0:25:21.119
<v Speaker 6>Andrew Luck would go number two overall.

0:25:21.280 --> 0:25:22.119
<v Speaker 3>But set that aside.

0:25:23.440 --> 0:25:30.520
<v Speaker 6>These teams that spin picks in the second and third round,

0:25:30.760 --> 0:25:35.080
<v Speaker 6>where you can get starters, you expect to get starters

0:25:35.400 --> 0:25:39.920
<v Speaker 6>at every position on the field, except for quarterback, where

0:25:39.960 --> 0:25:42.480
<v Speaker 6>it's like, oh no, no, we're drafting him as a project.

0:25:42.680 --> 0:25:45.199
<v Speaker 6>We think maybe he can be a backup. That is

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:50.040
<v Speaker 6>a wasted pick. If I was running a team, here's

0:25:50.080 --> 0:25:54.440
<v Speaker 6>my rule for the GM. There are only two spots

0:25:54.480 --> 0:25:57.240
<v Speaker 6>that you're allowed to draft a quarterback in the top

0:25:57.359 --> 0:26:02.399
<v Speaker 6>ten or sixth round or later flyer picks.

0:26:02.720 --> 0:26:06.560
<v Speaker 3>Another draft rule I would have by the way, people

0:26:06.600 --> 0:26:08.520
<v Speaker 3>might say, oh, so you wouldn't have drafted Lamar at

0:26:08.600 --> 0:26:11.480
<v Speaker 3>thirty two. No, if I weren't, No, what I would

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:14.440
<v Speaker 3>have said is, guys, let's be honest, Baltimore missed on

0:26:14.520 --> 0:26:15.480
<v Speaker 3>Lamar Jackson too.

0:26:15.760 --> 0:26:18.560
<v Speaker 6>You know why because they waited until the thirty second

0:26:18.560 --> 0:26:20.560
<v Speaker 6>pick to trade up and get up. Didn't They had

0:26:20.600 --> 0:26:21.119
<v Speaker 6>no idea.

0:26:21.280 --> 0:26:23.320
<v Speaker 3>You can be like, oh, it's less risky. No, no, no,

0:26:23.920 --> 0:26:26.240
<v Speaker 3>if they know what they knew now, if they were

0:26:26.240 --> 0:26:30.360
<v Speaker 3>that much confidence in their convictions, they'd have ensured they

0:26:30.400 --> 0:26:33.400
<v Speaker 3>got him by moving up earlier. But here's another draft

0:26:33.480 --> 0:26:33.840
<v Speaker 3>rule I have.

0:26:34.520 --> 0:26:39.879
<v Speaker 6>Sixth and seventh round picks are exclusively for the following things,

0:26:41.359 --> 0:26:45.080
<v Speaker 6>the single best specialists in the draft. So kickers and

0:26:45.119 --> 0:26:47.919
<v Speaker 6>punters are to meet undervalue in the draft. Punters sometimes

0:26:47.920 --> 0:26:51.560
<v Speaker 6>we have whole drafts no punters get drafted. Punting's wildly valuable.

0:26:53.280 --> 0:26:54.120
<v Speaker 3>So it's for that.

0:26:54.440 --> 0:27:00.359
<v Speaker 6>Flyers on quarterbacks and guys who've been arrested or in so,

0:27:00.600 --> 0:27:04.359
<v Speaker 6>guys who you should save all of your end of

0:27:04.440 --> 0:27:10.560
<v Speaker 6>the draft picks for guys with a plus upside that

0:27:10.680 --> 0:27:13.840
<v Speaker 6>might never make it in the league, or specialists. So

0:27:13.880 --> 0:27:17.159
<v Speaker 6>a guy who's been arrested, a guy who popped his

0:27:17.240 --> 0:27:21.160
<v Speaker 6>achilles and hadn't been helpy in two years. That's how

0:27:21.160 --> 0:27:23.439
<v Speaker 6>you do the end of the draft, the beginning of

0:27:23.440 --> 0:27:26.080
<v Speaker 6>the draft. I explained it again. Nobody's gonna let me

0:27:26.119 --> 0:27:28.320
<v Speaker 6>run a team. I don't even really want to run anything.

0:27:29.000 --> 0:27:30.720
<v Speaker 6>Doesn't sound that I'd love to runn an NBA team,

0:27:30.800 --> 0:27:32.920
<v Speaker 6>NFL team doesn't sound that fun. But I could help

0:27:32.920 --> 0:27:34.880
<v Speaker 6>half the league in the draft room. All right, what's next?

0:27:34.880 --> 0:27:35.160
<v Speaker 3>Okay?

0:27:35.760 --> 0:27:37.600
<v Speaker 4>Ky Irving said a lot of things in his end

0:27:37.600 --> 0:27:42.280
<v Speaker 4>of the season press conference. Which statement of his is true.

0:27:42.480 --> 0:27:47.080
<v Speaker 4>He'll resign with Brooklyn, he'll help manage the franchise, or

0:27:47.119 --> 0:27:50.440
<v Speaker 4>he's not focused on individual achievements and advocates.

0:27:50.960 --> 0:27:54.760
<v Speaker 6>Oh, I actually believe the first, And you know what,

0:27:55.200 --> 0:27:57.520
<v Speaker 6>I think these are all true. I think he is

0:27:57.640 --> 0:27:59.879
<v Speaker 6>resigning with Brooklyn. I think they are gonna let him

0:27:59.880 --> 0:28:02.320
<v Speaker 6>help manage the franchise. And I don't think he's worried

0:28:02.320 --> 0:28:03.720
<v Speaker 6>about his individual.

0:28:03.240 --> 0:28:05.400
<v Speaker 5>Achievements on the show.

0:28:05.560 --> 0:28:09.000
<v Speaker 3>I actually believe Kyrie on all those things. But it

0:28:09.160 --> 0:28:12.880
<v Speaker 3>is that shit crazy of the Nets to let him

0:28:13.119 --> 0:28:18.200
<v Speaker 3>help manage the franchise. Kyrie Irving just had the worst

0:28:18.280 --> 0:28:22.520
<v Speaker 3>year of his professional career. He was barely available.

0:28:22.040 --> 0:28:25.880
<v Speaker 6>To play much less than anything else, and he surveyed

0:28:25.880 --> 0:28:28.879
<v Speaker 6>the landscape after the worst year's professional career, was like,

0:28:29.760 --> 0:28:30.880
<v Speaker 6>I've decided I.

0:28:30.880 --> 0:28:34.520
<v Speaker 3>Deserve a raise and a promotion. It's insane. Man.

0:28:36.160 --> 0:28:38.680
<v Speaker 6>Keep in mind, when he got to Brooklyn, they had

0:28:38.680 --> 0:28:41.400
<v Speaker 6>a good head coach in Kenny Atkinson. He and Katie

0:28:41.400 --> 0:28:43.520
<v Speaker 6>didn't like him, even though Katie wasn't even playing that year.

0:28:43.680 --> 0:28:45.920
<v Speaker 6>They forced Atkinson out. One of the reasons they didn't

0:28:45.960 --> 0:28:48.320
<v Speaker 6>like him was because Atkinson had the audacity to want

0:28:48.360 --> 0:28:53.160
<v Speaker 6>to play Jared Allen over fossilized DeAndre Jordan. They're like, oh,

0:28:53.040 --> 0:28:56.360
<v Speaker 6>you listen, you gotta roll with DeAndre. So they get

0:28:56.360 --> 0:29:00.200
<v Speaker 6>Atkinson out. They then hire Nash and Kate. Kyrie was

0:29:00.200 --> 0:29:03.040
<v Speaker 6>on that podcast with Kadi and says, uh, we don't

0:29:03.040 --> 0:29:05.000
<v Speaker 6>really have a head I can be the coach.

0:29:05.040 --> 0:29:05.720
<v Speaker 3>You can be the coach.

0:29:05.840 --> 0:29:09.200
<v Speaker 6>So Kyrie one year into his tenure elevated himself to

0:29:09.240 --> 0:29:13.360
<v Speaker 6>assistant head coach. Three years into his tenure, after one

0:29:13.360 --> 0:29:15.560
<v Speaker 6>of the main reasons Harden soured on the team, was

0:29:15.640 --> 0:29:19.480
<v Speaker 6>Kyrie not being there and that nonsense. Kyrie's on my

0:29:19.640 --> 0:29:22.040
<v Speaker 6>lack of continuity within the roster, like he's not the

0:29:22.040 --> 0:29:24.200
<v Speaker 6>biggest reason for it. And then he's like, you know what,

0:29:24.400 --> 0:29:29.160
<v Speaker 6>I've decided I should help build the ross. It's insane, man,

0:29:29.360 --> 0:29:34.240
<v Speaker 6>these these it's just totally insane behavior.

0:29:34.480 --> 0:29:36.120
<v Speaker 3>And I think the nets are gonna let him do it.

0:29:36.240 --> 0:29:37.400
<v Speaker 3>I think the nets are gonna let him do it.

0:29:37.400 --> 0:29:38.200
<v Speaker 3>All right, what's next?

0:29:38.400 --> 0:29:40.960
<v Speaker 4>There's so many shows about the eighties Lakers, either on

0:29:41.040 --> 0:29:44.040
<v Speaker 4>TV or coming out soon. Pick a current team that

0:29:44.080 --> 0:29:45.400
<v Speaker 4>deserves their own winning time.

0:29:45.560 --> 0:29:48.240
<v Speaker 6>Okay, that's great, and I'm really glad that happened because

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:50.239
<v Speaker 6>so that's not what the rundown says here. And that's

0:29:50.280 --> 0:29:53.360
<v Speaker 6>because Demonse just made a grievous error and Demons, no, no, no,

0:29:53.600 --> 0:29:54.400
<v Speaker 6>keep that class going.

0:29:54.440 --> 0:29:56.440
<v Speaker 3>We're gonna keep rolling, guys. No no, no, no, no, no.

0:29:56.880 --> 0:29:58.840
<v Speaker 6>This is how we learn. And I told Demonse this

0:29:58.880 --> 0:30:01.840
<v Speaker 6>moment what happened. You know, he and I used to

0:30:01.840 --> 0:30:04.440
<v Speaker 6>have a little routine before the show. We'd go over

0:30:04.480 --> 0:30:07.240
<v Speaker 6>the rundown together whatever it is. Tomansie. Now a few

0:30:07.280 --> 0:30:09.200
<v Speaker 6>weeks in he's like, don't even need to rehearse it.

0:30:09.680 --> 0:30:13.760
<v Speaker 6>I'm right, I'm rolling, let's go, And he didn't recognize

0:30:13.800 --> 0:30:18.680
<v Speaker 6>we made a little adjustment, a minor rundown adjustment, buddy,

0:30:19.000 --> 0:30:22.200
<v Speaker 6>And so we took that question out and we replaced

0:30:22.200 --> 0:30:25.120
<v Speaker 6>it with who wins an all time dunk contest? Vince Carter,

0:30:25.200 --> 0:30:27.680
<v Speaker 6>Dominique Wilkins or Jah Morant. You can put that in

0:30:27.720 --> 0:30:28.280
<v Speaker 6>there and.

0:30:28.240 --> 0:30:28.960
<v Speaker 3>I'll give the answer.

0:30:29.000 --> 0:30:29.400
<v Speaker 5>What's so?

0:30:29.600 --> 0:30:32.080
<v Speaker 4>Did I not ask you if there were any tweaks

0:30:32.120 --> 0:30:34.240
<v Speaker 4>when I was up here? While I was writing the rundown?

0:30:34.440 --> 0:30:35.800
<v Speaker 5>I was like, is there anything? And You're like, no,

0:30:35.880 --> 0:30:36.840
<v Speaker 5>it's all as is?

0:30:37.320 --> 0:30:39.760
<v Speaker 6>Well, yeah, I thought, yes, you did ask me that

0:30:40.040 --> 0:30:42.760
<v Speaker 6>it was all as is. It was in that moment,

0:30:43.160 --> 0:30:44.760
<v Speaker 6>all this I didn't know the last time you had

0:30:44.760 --> 0:30:47.560
<v Speaker 6>seen it. This tweak was made four hours ago, Pale,

0:30:47.640 --> 0:30:48.840
<v Speaker 6>So you lit'st okay?

0:30:48.880 --> 0:30:50.280
<v Speaker 5>So maybe I take my phone up.

0:30:50.640 --> 0:30:53.600
<v Speaker 3>Your phone My phone did refresh.

0:30:53.920 --> 0:30:57.960
<v Speaker 6>Oh well, blame the technology, Steve Jobs, Damn you and

0:30:58.240 --> 0:31:01.360
<v Speaker 6>I phone. But the answers men's Carter, Ben's Carter had

0:31:01.400 --> 0:31:02.920
<v Speaker 6>the single greatest dunk contest ever.

0:31:03.000 --> 0:31:06.280
<v Speaker 3>He's the greatest dunker ever. This is not up for debate, Okay,

0:31:06.560 --> 0:31:08.960
<v Speaker 3>last one assuming we're on the same pageret.

0:31:08.640 --> 0:31:11.040
<v Speaker 5>I believe it's the La Rams the winning.

0:31:11.000 --> 0:31:11.920
<v Speaker 3>Oh okay, good to know.

0:31:12.280 --> 0:31:14.719
<v Speaker 4>This is the first time in seventeen years Durant and

0:31:14.800 --> 0:31:16.880
<v Speaker 4>Lebron haven't been in the second round of the playoffs.

0:31:16.960 --> 0:31:19.160
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that's it. What about it?

0:31:19.440 --> 0:31:21.880
<v Speaker 3>Okay, no, nothing, just you're going to ask the question though,

0:31:22.720 --> 0:31:27.560
<v Speaker 3>so again, there you go, that's the question. Yeah, Rundown.

0:31:28.000 --> 0:31:30.560
<v Speaker 6>The best thing about two thousand and five was LimeWire

0:31:30.680 --> 0:31:32.160
<v Speaker 6>Larry Johnson or my youth.

0:31:32.480 --> 0:31:33.840
<v Speaker 3>Do you know what LimeWire is?

0:31:34.880 --> 0:31:37.120
<v Speaker 5>It's like it's like a software, right, do you know what?

0:31:37.160 --> 0:31:39.840
<v Speaker 3>Do you know back in my day? What was used

0:31:39.880 --> 0:31:44.480
<v Speaker 3>for the No, this is how we had to download music. Okay,

0:31:44.560 --> 0:31:47.520
<v Speaker 3>it was like napster. Do you know what napster is?

0:31:47.760 --> 0:31:47.880
<v Speaker 5>No?

0:31:48.120 --> 0:31:52.320
<v Speaker 3>See, he's so young, so young and dumb. The the

0:31:52.760 --> 0:31:54.840
<v Speaker 3>the we.

0:31:54.800 --> 0:31:59.240
<v Speaker 6>Used to have to get pirated music via LimeWire or napster.

0:31:59.480 --> 0:32:02.040
<v Speaker 6>I wasn't a big music guy. He is listening to

0:32:02.200 --> 0:32:05.040
<v Speaker 6>sports talk radio. Larry Johnson was the Chiefs running back

0:32:05.080 --> 0:32:08.680
<v Speaker 6>in five. Larry Johnson was awesome for a few years.

0:32:08.800 --> 0:32:09.360
<v Speaker 3>He is now.

0:32:09.560 --> 0:32:12.400
<v Speaker 6>You want to see a crazy twitter feed? Check Larry

0:32:12.480 --> 0:32:16.280
<v Speaker 6>Johnson's Twitter feed. Oh boy, he got toxic Internet, bring bad.

0:32:16.680 --> 0:32:19.360
<v Speaker 6>And then the best thing about five my youth. So

0:32:19.680 --> 0:32:25.360
<v Speaker 6>five was my sophomore year at Syracuse. That was good times, Hughes, Well, yeah,

0:32:25.400 --> 0:32:27.240
<v Speaker 6>you were seven. I was sophomore at Syracuse.

0:32:27.280 --> 0:32:28.320
<v Speaker 3>Those are good times.

0:32:28.720 --> 0:32:31.880
<v Speaker 6>I'm gonna say the best thing about two thousand and

0:32:31.880 --> 0:32:34.479
<v Speaker 6>five was my youth. And the best thing about this

0:32:34.560 --> 0:32:39.080
<v Speaker 6>segment was Demons realizing maybe I got over my skis

0:32:39.120 --> 0:32:41.160
<v Speaker 6>a bit in the pre show prep.

0:32:41.560 --> 0:32:43.960
<v Speaker 3>Maybe I need to dial it back to how we

0:32:44.000 --> 0:32:44.600
<v Speaker 3>had been doing it.

0:32:44.640 --> 0:32:48.800
<v Speaker 5>Hey, listen, that question's actually on the rundown. What questions?

0:32:48.840 --> 0:32:50.960
<v Speaker 4>Actually y the last thing about two thousand and five.

0:32:51.400 --> 0:32:53.560
<v Speaker 4>But I was assuming this is the first time, and

0:32:53.600 --> 0:32:55.040
<v Speaker 4>you were gonna like go off about that.

0:32:55.160 --> 0:32:56.600
<v Speaker 5>You know, I have like a little brand.

0:32:57.000 --> 0:33:06.280
<v Speaker 3>Keep your excuses to yourself. We'll be right back. Are

0:33:06.320 --> 0:33:09.280
<v Speaker 3>you ready to go? Pal? How are you feeling? Oh jeez,

0:33:09.960 --> 0:33:12.680
<v Speaker 3>how are you feeling? Feeling a bit.

0:33:14.600 --> 0:33:14.880
<v Speaker 5>Block?

0:33:15.120 --> 0:33:15.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? All right?

0:33:15.880 --> 0:33:18.760
<v Speaker 6>Well, welcome back in What's Right with Nick Right podcast

0:33:18.840 --> 0:33:22.880
<v Speaker 6>YouTube show listen. A lot of people have said the

0:33:22.920 --> 0:33:26.400
<v Speaker 6>breakout star of this show has been Young Demonse, and

0:33:26.520 --> 0:33:28.960
<v Speaker 6>like as many people are learning like Trey Young this

0:33:29.040 --> 0:33:32.920
<v Speaker 6>year's playoffs sometimes after your greatest highs come your lowest lows.

0:33:32.960 --> 0:33:35.040
<v Speaker 3>It's like, oh damn, I got a ways to go.

0:33:35.120 --> 0:33:37.240
<v Speaker 6>So you're learning here and now you're going to learn

0:33:37.240 --> 0:33:40.760
<v Speaker 6>a little more because you also off the air become

0:33:40.800 --> 0:33:44.120
<v Speaker 6>more active on Twitter, which I have endorsed until I

0:33:44.160 --> 0:33:48.840
<v Speaker 6>saw this tweet from very recently from one Demnse at

0:33:48.880 --> 0:33:51.160
<v Speaker 6>Demonse Bird if you would like to follow him. That

0:33:51.360 --> 0:33:54.440
<v Speaker 6>reads people are saying job dunk is the best in

0:33:54.480 --> 0:33:57.120
<v Speaker 6>playoff history. I say it's Kevin Johnson baseline over a

0:33:57.240 --> 0:33:58.640
<v Speaker 6>team that's from Jimmy Baker.

0:33:59.160 --> 0:33:59.880
<v Speaker 3>Demanse writes.

0:34:00.000 --> 0:34:02.000
<v Speaker 6>I'm assuming you're saying that because it was over a

0:34:02.080 --> 0:34:06.240
<v Speaker 6>Keeme having no prior knowledge to who a cheme is.

0:34:06.520 --> 0:34:10.000
<v Speaker 6>Just looking at the two dunks, John Morants is better.

0:34:11.960 --> 0:34:15.719
<v Speaker 3>Demanza, what's the problem we lived in?

0:34:16.440 --> 0:34:16.680
<v Speaker 5>Wait?

0:34:16.880 --> 0:34:20.600
<v Speaker 4>No, exactly, I knew people were going to think that

0:34:20.640 --> 0:34:22.759
<v Speaker 4>I was saying that I had no prior knowledge to

0:34:22.840 --> 0:34:23.719
<v Speaker 4>a Kim Elijah on is.

0:34:23.960 --> 0:34:25.239
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, because that's what's You're wrong.

0:34:25.600 --> 0:34:28.880
<v Speaker 4>No, No, I'm saying like, if you're a person that

0:34:29.000 --> 0:34:32.560
<v Speaker 4>has no prior knowledge to who Akeem Olaijauan is, you

0:34:32.600 --> 0:34:34.279
<v Speaker 4>look at Ja Moran's dunk and you look at the

0:34:34.320 --> 0:34:36.760
<v Speaker 4>Larry Johnson one and you're like, Ja Morance is way better.

0:34:37.040 --> 0:34:39.560
<v Speaker 4>But am Olajuan was known for being that guy in

0:34:39.600 --> 0:34:42.880
<v Speaker 4>the post defensively and all that stuff. But if you

0:34:42.960 --> 0:34:45.120
<v Speaker 4>don't know that and you look at the Ja Morant dunk,

0:34:45.160 --> 0:34:47.160
<v Speaker 4>you're like, Okay, like this one looks much better.

0:34:47.239 --> 0:34:47.560
<v Speaker 3>Okay.

0:34:47.680 --> 0:34:51.000
<v Speaker 5>That's not saying that I don't know who Akeem Elijahan is.

0:34:51.040 --> 0:34:55.200
<v Speaker 6>Okay, all right, that defense, that defense is semi believable.

0:34:55.440 --> 0:34:57.279
<v Speaker 6>It's undercut a bit by the fact that.

0:34:57.880 --> 0:35:00.120
<v Speaker 4>Would pull up to lifetime when I was at the

0:35:00.200 --> 0:35:00.920
<v Speaker 4>gym practice.

0:35:00.960 --> 0:35:03.399
<v Speaker 6>Okay, that's one of the reasons I was so dismayed

0:35:03.440 --> 0:35:06.240
<v Speaker 6>by your lack of knowledge about him. However, a few

0:35:06.440 --> 0:35:08.480
<v Speaker 6>few things we got to dig in on. First of all,

0:35:08.760 --> 0:35:10.920
<v Speaker 6>it was not the Larry Johnson dunk. It was the

0:35:11.040 --> 0:35:15.040
<v Speaker 6>Kevin Johnson. Kevin Johnson, Larry Johnson, Schmary Johnson. Okay, that's fine,

0:35:15.080 --> 0:35:18.279
<v Speaker 6>I know who you want, Okay, So that I do

0:35:18.880 --> 0:35:23.520
<v Speaker 6>feel better because I was. I was, you know, I

0:35:23.600 --> 0:35:26.120
<v Speaker 6>wasn't even mad at you. I was disappointed in myself.

0:35:26.520 --> 0:35:29.200
<v Speaker 6>If you didn't know who Akiem Olaje is, you know,

0:35:29.480 --> 0:35:31.680
<v Speaker 6>the greatest defensive player in NBA.

0:35:31.880 --> 0:35:35.560
<v Speaker 3>History, all time leader in blocks, all time all time leader,

0:35:35.560 --> 0:35:37.480
<v Speaker 3>and steals by a big man, all that stuff.

0:35:38.640 --> 0:35:43.360
<v Speaker 6>But however, this is another lesson, not just in broadcasting,

0:35:43.880 --> 0:35:45.880
<v Speaker 6>but in social media.

0:35:46.160 --> 0:35:51.799
<v Speaker 3>It is the job. If someone misinterprets a tweet, that

0:35:51.960 --> 0:35:55.560
<v Speaker 3>is the fault of the tweeter. If someone missed, if

0:35:55.840 --> 0:35:59.000
<v Speaker 3>if if you, if anyone writes something, or if I

0:35:59.080 --> 0:36:04.440
<v Speaker 3>say something on elevision and afterwards, I'm like, man, everyone

0:36:04.920 --> 0:36:07.000
<v Speaker 3>is misunderstanding what I said.

0:36:07.960 --> 0:36:08.920
<v Speaker 5>I didn't see it.

0:36:09.360 --> 0:36:12.720
<v Speaker 6>So your tweet did appear as if you were saying

0:36:12.960 --> 0:36:15.400
<v Speaker 6>having no idea, who the hell of chemolage one is?

0:36:15.440 --> 0:36:20.279
<v Speaker 3>I like the job morandom? And so maybe again, this

0:36:20.360 --> 0:36:21.000
<v Speaker 3>is all learning.

0:36:21.239 --> 0:36:23.440
<v Speaker 6>This is learning on the fly in front of you know,

0:36:23.480 --> 0:36:27.480
<v Speaker 6>a big national audience, you know, alongside America's most beloved sportscaster.

0:36:27.880 --> 0:36:30.720
<v Speaker 6>So there's a lot. There's a lot here. But okay,

0:36:30.760 --> 0:36:32.600
<v Speaker 6>I'm I'm glad. Let me ask you a question.

0:36:32.800 --> 0:36:34.520
<v Speaker 3>Do you know who this personal my shirt is?

0:36:35.640 --> 0:36:39.080
<v Speaker 5>Uh? That's okay, thank god?

0:36:39.120 --> 0:36:41.439
<v Speaker 6>All right, we were gonna buy the way we were

0:36:42.000 --> 0:36:46.480
<v Speaker 6>a one more pause of the hesitation away from posting

0:36:46.520 --> 0:36:47.880
<v Speaker 6>this position for afters.

0:36:48.080 --> 0:36:49.120
<v Speaker 3>We'll see you next week.