WEBVTT - If Climate Is a Crisis, Keep Gas Prices High

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.400
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanibek. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:09.799
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world of business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all partnising the power of Business

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:19.640
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one and twenty countries. You can

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>download Bloomberg Business Week and iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot com.

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:25.160
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:32.360
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Global News present Bond making some comments

0:00:32.360 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 1>today about climate change and his policy plans and the

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:37.320
<v Speaker 1>absence of congressional action and in keeping with that Tim

0:00:37.440 --> 0:00:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg opinion columnist Edward Reporter making the point that if

0:00:40.400 --> 0:00:44.040
<v Speaker 1>climate is a crisis, shouldn't we keep gas prices high?

0:00:44.360 --> 0:00:47.599
<v Speaker 1>Edward Report. Edwardo Porter joins us now he's a Bloomberg

0:00:47.600 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 1>opinion columnist with economic policy and immigration issues, joining us

0:00:52.240 --> 0:00:54.960
<v Speaker 1>in the Bloomberg Interactive at Broker Studio. EDWARDO. It's good

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 1>to have you with us. This is a provocative column

0:00:56.960 --> 0:01:01.000
<v Speaker 1>because you're essentially saying that old move that President Biden

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 1>could make is to find a way to put a

0:01:03.160 --> 0:01:07.160
<v Speaker 1>five dollar a gallon floor on gasoline prices, literally the

0:01:07.200 --> 0:01:09.480
<v Speaker 1>opposite of what he's trying to do in his world

0:01:09.480 --> 0:01:12.800
<v Speaker 1>travels to get you know, quote unquote allies to give

0:01:12.840 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 1>us more oil. Yeah. I mean the specific number is

0:01:15.840 --> 0:01:20.520
<v Speaker 1>not the issue, five for fifty whatever. But what's important

0:01:20.640 --> 0:01:24.880
<v Speaker 1>to note is that high energy prices, which include high

0:01:24.959 --> 0:01:28.000
<v Speaker 1>gas prices, are going to be an essential component of

0:01:28.240 --> 0:01:30.840
<v Speaker 1>any solution to climate change. I mean, if we want

0:01:30.840 --> 0:01:33.479
<v Speaker 1>to reduce carbon emissions, we have to make carbon fuels

0:01:33.480 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 1>more expensive, and this is an opportunity. Okay, what if

0:01:36.520 --> 0:01:38.280
<v Speaker 1>you said, just to push back on that a little bit,

0:01:38.480 --> 0:01:40.240
<v Speaker 1>what if you said, Okay, it's all well and good,

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:42.600
<v Speaker 1>but if President Biden were to do something like that,

0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 1>this is such a politically toxic issue that he would

0:01:47.240 --> 0:01:52.040
<v Speaker 1>get just destroyed and at the polls, because this is

0:01:52.040 --> 0:01:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the number one issue that Americans care about. Indeed, I

0:01:54.960 --> 0:01:57.320
<v Speaker 1>feel for the guy. This is a real tough one.

0:01:57.440 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 1>But any solution to climate change is going to be

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:03.200
<v Speaker 1>politically very very complicated. I mean we've been we've been

0:02:03.200 --> 0:02:06.680
<v Speaker 1>debating this issue at least since the Obama administration. And

0:02:06.720 --> 0:02:09.000
<v Speaker 1>remember what happened to his cap and trade program. It

0:02:09.120 --> 0:02:11.720
<v Speaker 1>just died in flames, didn't even get to the Senate,

0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:15.360
<v Speaker 1>um and and and and we've been trying and failing

0:02:15.360 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 1>ever since. So the question, yes, there is a very

0:02:17.760 --> 0:02:22.320
<v Speaker 1>big political cost to pay. Um, but at some point

0:02:22.360 --> 0:02:24.760
<v Speaker 1>this argument needs to be made and needs to be

0:02:24.800 --> 0:02:27.880
<v Speaker 1>turned into policy because there is no other real solution,

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:30.480
<v Speaker 1>right or I would go, you know, none of this matters,

0:02:30.600 --> 0:02:33.359
<v Speaker 1>right if the climate continues to get warmer. I mean,

0:02:33.440 --> 0:02:36.079
<v Speaker 1>just look at what's going on around the globe, right Like,

0:02:36.120 --> 0:02:40.560
<v Speaker 1>we debate about higher rates and margins and other stuff

0:02:40.600 --> 0:02:43.639
<v Speaker 1>that's you know, uh, stressing us all out. But if

0:02:43.680 --> 0:02:46.680
<v Speaker 1>the climate continues to warm, and we will have nothing

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:49.080
<v Speaker 1>to worry about because we will not be able to exist.

0:02:50.080 --> 0:02:51.799
<v Speaker 1>I don't mean to get so dark, but right like,

0:02:52.280 --> 0:02:55.480
<v Speaker 1>this is the crux of the major problem that faces

0:02:55.480 --> 0:02:57.120
<v Speaker 1>the world right now. All right, but I mean, just

0:02:57.120 --> 0:02:59.440
<v Speaker 1>look at what's going on in your across Europe just now.

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 1>And you've had versions of that in Australia, the United States,

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:05.600
<v Speaker 1>and certainly in places like Indian Bangladesh. I mean, the

0:03:05.600 --> 0:03:08.359
<v Speaker 1>the really the intensity of the climate emergency is amazing

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:13.720
<v Speaker 1>in terms of lives lost, crops lost, agricultural yields down,

0:03:13.960 --> 0:03:17.440
<v Speaker 1>longevity shortened. I mean, the cost of this are are

0:03:17.520 --> 0:03:21.720
<v Speaker 1>extremely expensive, which is in fact what justifies imposing an

0:03:21.720 --> 0:03:25.720
<v Speaker 1>economic cost to to mitigate you. You cover Latin America,

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:28.240
<v Speaker 1>you cover you as economic policy, immigration. But I think

0:03:28.240 --> 0:03:30.400
<v Speaker 1>about what Brazil did back in the seventies, Right, they

0:03:30.400 --> 0:03:33.080
<v Speaker 1>were brought to their knees because of the energy crisis,

0:03:33.120 --> 0:03:37.000
<v Speaker 1>and they basically made themselves energy independent, right, going into ethanol,

0:03:37.040 --> 0:03:40.720
<v Speaker 1>sugar based ethanol. Right, they had to address it because

0:03:40.760 --> 0:03:43.800
<v Speaker 1>they had to to economically survive. You know, the US

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 1>has the Europe has higher taxes. When it comes to guesses,

0:03:47.480 --> 0:03:50.320
<v Speaker 1>what is it that the how come the Europeans did that?

0:03:50.920 --> 0:03:52.920
<v Speaker 1>What is it that? The why aren't the US doing

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 1>is because we've had so much fuel and and you know,

0:03:56.480 --> 0:04:00.960
<v Speaker 1>fossil fuel based fuels that we don't have to you like,

0:04:01.120 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 1>what is it? Yeah, that's a big question. I mean

0:04:03.920 --> 0:04:05.720
<v Speaker 1>you could answer it in a variety of ways. I

0:04:05.720 --> 0:04:09.880
<v Speaker 1>think for one, Europe is much more welcoming of higher

0:04:09.920 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 1>taxes in the US is in any dimension, right, whether

0:04:13.000 --> 0:04:16.560
<v Speaker 1>it's taxes on energy, gasoline, or income taxes or whatnot.

0:04:16.600 --> 0:04:19.640
<v Speaker 1>They pay a higher tax burden, and they accept it

0:04:19.680 --> 0:04:22.240
<v Speaker 1>because they get a society that they like with that money.

0:04:22.600 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 1>And the United States has always been much more hostile

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:27.880
<v Speaker 1>to that. Also, the US has gotten used to very

0:04:27.960 --> 0:04:30.080
<v Speaker 1>very cheap energy for a long time. I mean it's

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 1>not just now that gas in Europe is more expensive.

0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:35.120
<v Speaker 1>It's oh, I mean since I've been around, since I

0:04:35.160 --> 0:04:37.440
<v Speaker 1>have memory, gas prices in Europe have been way higher

0:04:37.440 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 1>than they are here. Yeah, look no further than Norway,

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:41.760
<v Speaker 1>where we've seen gas prices about ten dollars a gallon,

0:04:41.800 --> 0:04:45.479
<v Speaker 1>despite the fact that the country produces so much energy. Edward,

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:47.920
<v Speaker 1>before we let you go, you ransom numbers here, talk

0:04:47.960 --> 0:04:52.239
<v Speaker 1>about how this would spur innovation for alternatives. I mean, well, basically,

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:55.679
<v Speaker 1>what you what happens is the moment that consuming fossil

0:04:55.720 --> 0:04:59.360
<v Speaker 1>fuels becomes more expensive, you'll have businesses and households looking

0:04:59.360 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 1>for alternative. It's one alternative is to use less energy,

0:05:02.400 --> 0:05:05.120
<v Speaker 1>but another alternative is defined technologies that use different sorts

0:05:05.160 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 1>of energies. And we've seen that. I mean, we see

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 1>the amount of investment in renewable energies and a new

0:05:10.839 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 1>technologies for say energy storage and whatnot has gone is

0:05:14.839 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 1>way higher. Uh precisely. I mean it's it's also stimulated

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:23.960
<v Speaker 1>by by government subsidies and so forth. But the prospect

0:05:24.040 --> 0:05:27.039
<v Speaker 1>of much higher fossil fuel cost is driving this. I

0:05:27.040 --> 0:05:29.800
<v Speaker 1>mean you even have gas companies, energy companies that are

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 1>going in to invest in nuclear fusure. Right, they know,

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 1>they know, well, it's interesting and if you wonder, if

0:05:35.120 --> 0:05:37.520
<v Speaker 1>you think that it's like, you know, bottomless pits in

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:40.280
<v Speaker 1>terms of fossil fuels. Javier blast has a great story

0:05:40.320 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 1>and the Bloomberg talking about Saudi Arabia. They're the world's

0:05:42.400 --> 0:05:45.880
<v Speaker 1>biggest creed producer and they are nearing their ceiling when

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:47.880
<v Speaker 1>it comes to output, right, So it's going to run out.

0:05:47.920 --> 0:05:50.160
<v Speaker 1>We know that, no doubt about it. Um, we gotta

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:52.840
<v Speaker 1>run come back. We loved it so great to check

0:05:52.880 --> 0:05:56.880
<v Speaker 1>in with Bloomberg Opinion columist Edward or Porta. This is

0:05:56.960 --> 0:06:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser and blue Berg Quick

0:06:00.600 --> 0:06:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. So the Bloomberg Big

0:06:04.760 --> 0:06:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Take today. It's also storing the upcoming new issue of

0:06:07.200 --> 0:06:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week add on newstands tomorrow. Already on the

0:06:10.080 --> 0:06:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg and Bloomberg dot Com Slash business Week. It's about

0:06:13.520 --> 0:06:17.840
<v Speaker 1>the wonderkin quant turned crypto billionaire and his dominance and

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:20.720
<v Speaker 1>expansion in that crypto industry. We're talking about none other

0:06:20.760 --> 0:06:24.480
<v Speaker 1>than Sam Bankman Freed of ft X. The story by

0:06:24.480 --> 0:06:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Hannah Miller and Olga careerf As Carol mentioned, it's in

0:06:27.040 --> 0:06:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the upcoming issue of Bloomberg Business Week magazine. Check it

0:06:30.320 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 1>out though at the Bloomberg Terminal and at Bloomberg dot

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 1>com slash a business Week. Hannah Miller is digital currencies

0:06:35.960 --> 0:06:38.560
<v Speaker 1>and venture capital reporter for Bloomberg new She joins us

0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:41.839
<v Speaker 1>now on the phone from our Palo Alto bureau. Hannah,

0:06:41.920 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 1>really great to have you with us. We've we've talked

0:06:43.480 --> 0:06:45.720
<v Speaker 1>a little bit in recent days, in recent weeks about

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:48.480
<v Speaker 1>the buying spree that Sam Bankman Freed went on over

0:06:48.520 --> 0:06:50.760
<v Speaker 1>the past couple of weeks as we've seen the crypto

0:06:50.839 --> 0:06:53.479
<v Speaker 1>industry just collapse or past couple of months, I should say,

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:55.919
<v Speaker 1>what are his intentions and helping prop up some of

0:06:55.920 --> 0:06:59.240
<v Speaker 1>these companies and then buying them as well. Yeah, thanks

0:06:59.240 --> 0:07:02.320
<v Speaker 1>so much for having so It's been a really exciting

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:06.240
<v Speaker 1>time within the crypto industry. Despite the market downturn, um

0:07:06.279 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Sam Bank and Fried has really spotted a lot of

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 1>opportunities here to just consolidate power over the industry. Um,

0:07:14.200 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 1>whether it's striking deals with block Fire or Voyage or Digital.

0:07:17.440 --> 0:07:21.760
<v Speaker 1>He's really, you know, just spreading his influence within this space.

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 1>All right. Remind us for those who are like, wait,

0:07:23.800 --> 0:07:26.240
<v Speaker 1>who is this dude, because he really is a standout

0:07:26.240 --> 0:07:28.720
<v Speaker 1>among those who are in this space, because he's he's

0:07:28.720 --> 0:07:31.040
<v Speaker 1>worth a lot of money, right, he's probably lost somebody.

0:07:31.080 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 1>He's still worth a lot. Yeah, he's worth about ten

0:07:34.800 --> 0:07:39.160
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars currently to our Billionaires Index UM. That's about

0:07:39.160 --> 0:07:42.640
<v Speaker 1>half of where his wealth was in April. Obviously, still

0:07:42.680 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money. But he's thirties, thirty years old.

0:07:45.560 --> 0:07:49.680
<v Speaker 1>He's taken the industry by storm. His company's ft X

0:07:49.800 --> 0:07:54.880
<v Speaker 1>and Alameda Research have really asserted power within the industry. Uh.

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 1>They work with a lot of top names. Um f

0:07:57.560 --> 0:08:00.600
<v Speaker 1>t X is one of the most used crypto exchanges

0:08:00.680 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 1>in the world. So he's doing all of this out

0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 1>of the goodness of his heart or right, he just

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:07.520
<v Speaker 1>want to dominate and be the industry. A lot of

0:08:07.520 --> 0:08:11.239
<v Speaker 1>people within the industry see him as cryptos patron saint

0:08:11.600 --> 0:08:14.520
<v Speaker 1>that he is stepping in bailing out companies out of

0:08:14.520 --> 0:08:17.480
<v Speaker 1>the goodness of his own heart, but others see a

0:08:17.560 --> 0:08:22.520
<v Speaker 1>business motivation here. Um, he's really buying companies on the cheap. Um,

0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:26.240
<v Speaker 1>he is stepping in, he's helping out. But there's also

0:08:26.280 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 1>a huge advantage in expanding his own business and gaining

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 1>customers all over the world, particularly in the US. It's remarkable.

0:08:33.800 --> 0:08:37.079
<v Speaker 1>There's a great infographic in here that really shows the

0:08:37.120 --> 0:08:39.160
<v Speaker 1>web of companies that at this point are connected to

0:08:39.200 --> 0:08:41.040
<v Speaker 1>f t X, U S f t X and then

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:45.319
<v Speaker 1>Alameda Research, all connected to Sam Bankman Freed. Yeah, I'm

0:08:45.320 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 1>wondering more about what Sam is like, and we you know,

0:08:48.640 --> 0:08:50.640
<v Speaker 1>we've had a lot of reporting around him and some

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:53.160
<v Speaker 1>profiles of him. But you know, I think for people

0:08:53.200 --> 0:08:56.000
<v Speaker 1>who might have seen his conversation yesterday with Matt Levin

0:08:56.040 --> 0:08:57.800
<v Speaker 1>at the Bloomberg Crypto Summit would see that he was

0:08:57.840 --> 0:09:00.679
<v Speaker 1>wearing his signature shorts and a T shirt, really dressed

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:02.520
<v Speaker 1>on like anyone else there, which has kind of become,

0:09:02.840 --> 0:09:05.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, a signature for him. Tell us more about

0:09:05.600 --> 0:09:07.160
<v Speaker 1>what he's like and who he is and how he

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:11.040
<v Speaker 1>got into crypto. Yeah, I know, Um, Sam is always

0:09:11.040 --> 0:09:14.360
<v Speaker 1>great to talk to. We spoke to him for this story. Um.

0:09:14.480 --> 0:09:19.560
<v Speaker 1>He is described by people as kind, nerdy, shy, a

0:09:19.600 --> 0:09:23.719
<v Speaker 1>little bit awkward. UM, but he really has a very

0:09:23.760 --> 0:09:27.640
<v Speaker 1>calculating eye when he looks at the industry. UM. He

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:32.000
<v Speaker 1>got into crypto trading UM a few years back, really

0:09:32.200 --> 0:09:35.679
<v Speaker 1>sort of climbed the ranks UM in terms of trading

0:09:35.679 --> 0:09:41.160
<v Speaker 1>performance with ALAM to research, and he really has become

0:09:41.200 --> 0:09:44.599
<v Speaker 1>a kind of a cult figure within and within the industry.

0:09:44.640 --> 0:09:47.120
<v Speaker 1>And he's also pledged to give away most of his

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:49.920
<v Speaker 1>vast personal wealth. I just love the shorts and the

0:09:49.960 --> 0:09:52.600
<v Speaker 1>T shirts. Hey. Um, One thing I found interesting is that,

0:09:53.000 --> 0:09:57.160
<v Speaker 1>well he's spending and buying and looking to dominate when

0:09:57.160 --> 0:09:59.080
<v Speaker 1>it comes to crypto. He's passed on some of the

0:09:59.160 --> 0:10:03.600
<v Speaker 1>big flops as of late. That's true. UM, we haven't

0:10:03.600 --> 0:10:07.760
<v Speaker 1>our reporting that he spoke with Terra and Celsius about

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:12.319
<v Speaker 1>potential veilouts there, but he ended up passing on both. UM.

0:10:12.440 --> 0:10:15.680
<v Speaker 1>So it shows that he does have a discriminating eye here.

0:10:15.840 --> 0:10:19.240
<v Speaker 1>He's not just bailing out whoever. UM. You know, he's

0:10:19.240 --> 0:10:22.920
<v Speaker 1>looking for advantages. He's looking at how it can help

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:25.440
<v Speaker 1>him and his companies. What about when it comes to

0:10:25.520 --> 0:10:27.920
<v Speaker 1>robin Hood and his investment in robin Hood, because this

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:29.959
<v Speaker 1>one's a little bit different than the other companies. A

0:10:30.000 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of the companies that he's investment have been interested

0:10:32.640 --> 0:10:34.720
<v Speaker 1>in those have been in the private markets. But robin Hood,

0:10:34.880 --> 0:10:39.240
<v Speaker 1>it's probably traded and wow it has gotten beat up. Yeah. No. Um,

0:10:39.280 --> 0:10:41.640
<v Speaker 1>we reported a few weeks back that he was looking

0:10:41.679 --> 0:10:45.280
<v Speaker 1>into a potential takeover at robin Hood. Uh. This shows

0:10:45.360 --> 0:10:48.600
<v Speaker 1>that he has his eyes beyond the crypto industry, that

0:10:48.640 --> 0:10:52.560
<v Speaker 1>he's looking at sort of more traditional finance players. Um.

0:10:52.600 --> 0:10:57.000
<v Speaker 1>As one of my sources said, his ambitions no no bounds. Um.

0:10:57.080 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 1>So it's really exciting to see him look at other areas,

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:02.360
<v Speaker 1>is um. I mean he's even joked about buying Goldman

0:11:02.400 --> 0:11:06.080
<v Speaker 1>in the past. That is wild. Well, he wants to

0:11:06.080 --> 0:11:08.640
<v Speaker 1>do bigger deals. It sounds like, you know, Honna, what

0:11:08.760 --> 0:11:10.920
<v Speaker 1>is it that we need to understand about this individual?

0:11:11.000 --> 0:11:14.559
<v Speaker 1>As the crypto space still many who are knowledgeable understand

0:11:14.600 --> 0:11:16.560
<v Speaker 1>how it works, who are entrenched in this industry say,

0:11:16.559 --> 0:11:19.920
<v Speaker 1>we're very early on in terms of the impact of

0:11:19.960 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 1>the digital crypto world. So why is it that we

0:11:22.960 --> 0:11:25.720
<v Speaker 1>need to keep an eye on him and what he does? Well?

0:11:25.760 --> 0:11:28.599
<v Speaker 1>I think with this current crypto winter, the industry is

0:11:28.640 --> 0:11:32.600
<v Speaker 1>at a crossroads. A lot of people want the centralized

0:11:32.640 --> 0:11:36.239
<v Speaker 1>industry where powers in the hands the people. Um that

0:11:36.280 --> 0:11:40.439
<v Speaker 1>it's based on pure to pure transactions. But Sam's influence

0:11:40.480 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 1>and that of FTX shows that there are clear centralized

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:47.640
<v Speaker 1>elements here, that there are major players to watch, and

0:11:47.679 --> 0:11:50.599
<v Speaker 1>that they are going to have continued influence as this

0:11:50.679 --> 0:11:54.000
<v Speaker 1>space grows. Speaking of influence, you mentioned that he's been

0:11:54.080 --> 0:11:56.800
<v Speaker 1>using his personal wealth and he's well, he's he's also

0:11:57.240 --> 0:12:00.000
<v Speaker 1>pledged to donate the vast majority of his personal wealth.

0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 1>What about when it comes to where he's putting his

0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:04.840
<v Speaker 1>money politically right now? And if you're reporting, showed you

0:12:04.880 --> 0:12:07.800
<v Speaker 1>at all what he's thinking when it comes to influence

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:12.000
<v Speaker 1>in Washington, well in he was one of the top

0:12:12.160 --> 0:12:15.960
<v Speaker 1>political donors to Joe Biden during the presidential campaign, uh,

0:12:16.040 --> 0:12:19.840
<v Speaker 1>falling right behind Mike Bloomberg. UM. And he's already spoken

0:12:19.840 --> 0:12:23.679
<v Speaker 1>about his commitments to donating to the Democratic Party for

0:12:23.800 --> 0:12:27.600
<v Speaker 1>the upcoming election of particularly if Donald Trump runs again.

0:12:27.720 --> 0:12:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Michael Bloomberg, of course, the founder of Bloomberg LP, Bloomberg Philanthropies,

0:12:31.440 --> 0:12:34.080
<v Speaker 1>and of course Bloomberg ALP, the home of Bloomberg Radio

0:12:34.080 --> 0:12:37.840
<v Speaker 1>and Bloomberg Business Week. Um, it is interesting, So I

0:12:37.880 --> 0:12:40.719
<v Speaker 1>think this is your world. So what are you watching

0:12:41.160 --> 0:12:44.839
<v Speaker 1>to see in terms of what he does next? Yeah,

0:12:44.880 --> 0:12:48.160
<v Speaker 1>so we already know and we reported today that f

0:12:48.280 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 1>t X and f u X f t x US

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:54.440
<v Speaker 1>are looking to raise more funding UM, which was pretty

0:12:54.480 --> 0:12:57.199
<v Speaker 1>interesting during this time because I've written a lot about

0:12:57.200 --> 0:13:00.920
<v Speaker 1>how funding from venture to capitalists has slow um when

0:13:00.920 --> 0:13:04.679
<v Speaker 1>it comes to crypto. So he is definitely looking to expand.

0:13:04.960 --> 0:13:08.960
<v Speaker 1>He has also spoken about buying assets from other distress companies,

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:12.560
<v Speaker 1>even targeting bitcoin miners. Is there some nervousness? Just got

0:13:12.559 --> 0:13:14.760
<v Speaker 1>a few seconds left here, Hannah that though there might

0:13:14.760 --> 0:13:17.319
<v Speaker 1>be too much consolidation of the crypto world in one

0:13:17.360 --> 0:13:21.560
<v Speaker 1>person's hands, especially considering that this is an industry that

0:13:21.640 --> 0:13:24.439
<v Speaker 1>is supposed to be decentralized at its core, it's kind

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:27.640
<v Speaker 1>of ironic. What a great deep dive, and it is,

0:13:27.760 --> 0:13:30.120
<v Speaker 1>as we said, the Bloomberg Big Take. And of course

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:32.600
<v Speaker 1>this is a story in the issue New issue at

0:13:32.640 --> 0:13:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week, which will be out on newstands but

0:13:34.679 --> 0:13:36.719
<v Speaker 1>already on the Bloomberg terminal, and you can find it

0:13:36.760 --> 0:13:39.600
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com. Slash Business Week Kindah Miller Digital

0:13:39.600 --> 0:13:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Currencies and Venture Capital report at Bloomberg News. On the

0:13:42.120 --> 0:13:47.200
<v Speaker 1>phone from our Palo Alto bureau. You're listening to Bloomberg

0:13:47.200 --> 0:13:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes. Tim

0:13:50.960 --> 0:13:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. Check it out shares a Biog.

0:13:54.840 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 1>They're down about six percent in today's trade following an

0:13:57.800 --> 0:14:01.319
<v Speaker 1>earnings update this morning. The company dealing with generic competition,

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:03.480
<v Speaker 1>and yet tim it did boost its guidance for the

0:14:03.520 --> 0:14:05.880
<v Speaker 1>year overall. Let's get into it with Mike Browne, managing

0:14:05.920 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 1>director and biotech healthcare specialist at a baired Mike this afternoon,

0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:11.880
<v Speaker 1>joining us on the phone from New York City. Mike,

0:14:11.880 --> 0:14:15.559
<v Speaker 1>how are you? Um? Great, Carolyn Kim thanks writing me on. Yeah,

0:14:15.600 --> 0:14:17.040
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. Okay, we've got a

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:19.520
<v Speaker 1>few hours to dig into these results. Give us your

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:24.560
<v Speaker 1>takeaways from Biogen. Yeah. So, like most biotech stocks, clinical

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:27.520
<v Speaker 1>regulatory and strategic updates tend to be more important than

0:14:27.600 --> 0:14:30.240
<v Speaker 1>quarterly earnings performance. And I think that's what you're seeing

0:14:30.240 --> 0:14:33.640
<v Speaker 1>here with Biogen today. So bad. Biotech analyst Briant Scorning,

0:14:33.640 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 1>in his preview note for Biogen last week, pointed out

0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:39.160
<v Speaker 1>there's two main issues that investors are focused on with Biogen,

0:14:39.200 --> 0:14:42.920
<v Speaker 1>and that's the CEO search, and that's also their Alzheimer's

0:14:42.920 --> 0:14:45.480
<v Speaker 1>pivotal read out of volcanamat, which is expected in the fall.

0:14:45.960 --> 0:14:48.880
<v Speaker 1>The lack of positive updates or positive commentary on any

0:14:48.880 --> 0:14:51.000
<v Speaker 1>of these two seems to be trumping what otherwise was

0:14:51.040 --> 0:14:57.400
<v Speaker 1>a really nice beaten raised by Biogen. So interested, m. Yeah, No,

0:14:57.440 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 1>it's really interesting that those two things are not actually

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:04.400
<v Speaker 1>are outweighing a beaten raised quarter from the company. Yeah.

0:15:04.480 --> 0:15:06.240
<v Speaker 1>And I'd also say, you know, if you take a look,

0:15:06.320 --> 0:15:09.920
<v Speaker 1>you are seeing some general weakness in the larger commercial

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:13.000
<v Speaker 1>biotech stocks today as we're seeing kind of a shift,

0:15:13.040 --> 0:15:15.360
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned the biotech boom, you're seeing a shift

0:15:15.360 --> 0:15:18.760
<v Speaker 1>from the safety relative safety of those cash flowing large

0:15:18.760 --> 0:15:21.400
<v Speaker 1>biotech stocks into some of the riskier areas of the

0:15:21.720 --> 0:15:24.720
<v Speaker 1>biotech Well well, so wait, so are you saying that

0:15:24.760 --> 0:15:28.880
<v Speaker 1>there's some overall biotech industry trends that are weighing down

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Biogen today? Are saying Biogen is weighing down the overall industry, Yeah, Carol,

0:15:34.680 --> 0:15:36.360
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a little bit of column an, a

0:15:36.360 --> 0:15:38.680
<v Speaker 1>little bit of Columby the performance of biogin on their

0:15:38.720 --> 0:15:42.440
<v Speaker 1>their earnings was strong. It's it's just really uh, you know,

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 1>those two issues which which need to be resolved, and

0:15:45.240 --> 0:15:47.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, there wasn't a whole lot of updates on

0:15:47.040 --> 0:15:51.120
<v Speaker 1>the CEO search and uh for the pivotal Aislezheimer's read out,

0:15:51.120 --> 0:15:53.840
<v Speaker 1>which is expecting the fall. You know, the company did

0:15:53.880 --> 0:15:56.320
<v Speaker 1>point to a broad range of potential outcomes there, which

0:15:56.360 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 1>I think, based on conversation with investors, maybe taken as

0:15:59.680 --> 0:16:01.800
<v Speaker 1>a flame negative. So help us out here, what kind

0:16:01.840 --> 0:16:04.760
<v Speaker 1>of CEO is needed for Biogen at this point? Like

0:16:05.040 --> 0:16:07.160
<v Speaker 1>I just remember years ago starting out, you know, when

0:16:07.160 --> 0:16:09.600
<v Speaker 1>you talked about biotech, it was just like the upstarts,

0:16:10.080 --> 0:16:12.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, and it's a lot of times there wasn't

0:16:12.480 --> 0:16:14.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of uh there's a lot of top line

0:16:14.960 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 1>growth maybe, but not a lot of bottom line growth. Uh.

0:16:17.480 --> 0:16:19.600
<v Speaker 1>It was tricky. I mean, this is a thirty billion

0:16:19.640 --> 0:16:22.760
<v Speaker 1>dollar market cap company. So, um, how do we think

0:16:22.760 --> 0:16:25.240
<v Speaker 1>about these these companies and what kind of CEO is

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:29.560
<v Speaker 1>needed to take this company into its next phase. Yeah,

0:16:29.600 --> 0:16:31.680
<v Speaker 1>I'll have to leave most of the commentary on Biogen

0:16:31.760 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 1>going forward to our great biotech analyst Brian scorny, but

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:37.320
<v Speaker 1>certainly needs some strong leadership there as far as some

0:16:37.400 --> 0:16:39.680
<v Speaker 1>of the stumbles over the past few years. Uh, but

0:16:40.040 --> 0:16:42.680
<v Speaker 1>I guess only the rest we can touch base and

0:16:42.720 --> 0:16:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Brian down the road. What about when it comes to

0:16:44.520 --> 0:16:48.680
<v Speaker 1>the Alzheimer struck, which you pronounced so correctly, and Carol

0:16:48.720 --> 0:16:53.320
<v Speaker 1>and I have struggled with for months. Yeah, I think

0:16:53.360 --> 0:16:55.760
<v Speaker 1>you know it's it's similar mechanism to add you holm,

0:16:55.800 --> 0:16:57.240
<v Speaker 1>which we know how it worked out, But it's a

0:16:57.240 --> 0:17:00.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a highly powered study. Uh so you know, Uh,

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:02.840
<v Speaker 1>the fact is that if there isn't a fact, they've

0:17:02.840 --> 0:17:05.400
<v Speaker 1>powered in enough to to have it have some positive

0:17:05.440 --> 0:17:07.680
<v Speaker 1>read out. But again, the commentary today that they gave

0:17:07.960 --> 0:17:12.520
<v Speaker 1>was some somewhat pointing to a broader range of potential outcomes.

0:17:12.640 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 1>All right, So you are biotech healthcare specialists, So I'm

0:17:15.560 --> 0:17:17.600
<v Speaker 1>just curious when it comes to the advice that maybe

0:17:17.600 --> 0:17:20.879
<v Speaker 1>you give to your bigger, broader team. Is biotech a

0:17:20.960 --> 0:17:23.440
<v Speaker 1>group that you think investors need to be considering at

0:17:23.440 --> 0:17:26.080
<v Speaker 1>this point? And and we're specifically, as I mentioned, it's

0:17:26.119 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 1>up about over the past month, so that's quite a

0:17:29.240 --> 0:17:31.639
<v Speaker 1>bump to the upside. Uh. I know there's been some

0:17:31.720 --> 0:17:34.080
<v Speaker 1>deal flow once again. And you know, when you think

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:36.600
<v Speaker 1>about biotech, always think about the big farmer companies where

0:17:36.600 --> 0:17:39.919
<v Speaker 1>they are looking for growth in particular. So what's the

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:42.560
<v Speaker 1>investment play, Mike in your view at this point when

0:17:42.560 --> 0:17:45.760
<v Speaker 1>it comes to biotech. Yeah, the big question a lot

0:17:45.760 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 1>of investors have on this rally is this a bear

0:17:47.880 --> 0:17:52.720
<v Speaker 1>market rally or is something that's more sustainable? And I'll say, uh, strateguous.

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:55.720
<v Speaker 1>A baired company did some really good macro research on

0:17:56.119 --> 0:17:59.879
<v Speaker 1>historical kind of biotech bear market bounces and uh, you know,

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:02.199
<v Speaker 1>they tend to be very strong and very quick. So

0:18:02.240 --> 0:18:04.159
<v Speaker 1>it's possibility that that's what we're seeing here in a

0:18:04.160 --> 0:18:07.119
<v Speaker 1>cold fade over time. But I'll tell you our fundamental

0:18:07.160 --> 0:18:10.560
<v Speaker 1>research team that Bared biotech research team did note uh,

0:18:10.600 --> 0:18:13.080
<v Speaker 1>and the Weekly a couple of weeks ago that short covering,

0:18:13.119 --> 0:18:15.600
<v Speaker 1>which drove a lot of the initial stages of the rally,

0:18:15.880 --> 0:18:18.960
<v Speaker 1>can actually lead to institutional buying as people started having

0:18:19.040 --> 0:18:21.080
<v Speaker 1>fear of missing out. Did I did I miss bottom?

0:18:21.400 --> 0:18:23.600
<v Speaker 1>The stocks are still largely cheap. I mean, as much

0:18:23.600 --> 0:18:25.960
<v Speaker 1>as we bounced off bottom, the XBI is still down

0:18:26.320 --> 0:18:28.760
<v Speaker 1>roughly or a little bit over fift from its peak

0:18:28.800 --> 0:18:33.760
<v Speaker 1>in February, so we have seen uh, some inbound calls

0:18:33.760 --> 0:18:36.720
<v Speaker 1>from clients that suggests that there's some real work being done.

0:18:36.720 --> 0:18:38.639
<v Speaker 1>It's something that's changed over the past few weeks. And

0:18:38.680 --> 0:18:41.760
<v Speaker 1>you've also seen some fund flows shift. Where biotech was

0:18:41.840 --> 0:18:45.400
<v Speaker 1>bleeding uh fund flows out for much of the year,

0:18:45.440 --> 0:18:47.320
<v Speaker 1>and over the last month or so, we've seen some

0:18:47.400 --> 0:18:50.280
<v Speaker 1>pretty positive inflows there, which means there's there's some real

0:18:50.320 --> 0:18:53.560
<v Speaker 1>buying and biotech and could prove that this is more sustainable.

0:18:53.560 --> 0:18:56.080
<v Speaker 1>All right, we gotta run. Thank you so much. Mike Prone,

0:18:56.119 --> 0:18:59.600
<v Speaker 1>managing director and biotech health care Specialists at BAIRED, joining

0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:01.520
<v Speaker 1>us on the phone in New York City, although he's

0:19:01.560 --> 0:19:10.240
<v Speaker 1>typically based in Milwaukee. I'm mac journal Yeah, but you

0:19:10.359 --> 0:19:15.040
<v Speaker 1>let me drive. Oh no, no, no no, no, honey, please,

0:19:15.119 --> 0:19:20.919
<v Speaker 1>I'll do the dravels. I want to drive. It's a

0:19:20.920 --> 0:19:28.560
<v Speaker 1>good question. This is the Drive to the Close music

0:19:28.680 --> 0:19:32.679
<v Speaker 1>well don on Bluebird Radio. All right, let's get to it.

0:19:32.720 --> 0:19:34.440
<v Speaker 1>We've just got about ten and a half minutes left

0:19:34.440 --> 0:19:36.560
<v Speaker 1>in today's trading session, getting ready to wrap up that

0:19:36.600 --> 0:19:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Wednesday trade, and we've got a new guest with us

0:19:39.040 --> 0:19:41.760
<v Speaker 1>for the Drive to the Close. Kirk McDonald's portfolio manager

0:19:41.840 --> 0:19:44.720
<v Speaker 1>at Argent Capital Management. They've got approximately three point three

0:19:44.880 --> 0:19:48.119
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars in assets under management. Kirk joining us on

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:51.640
<v Speaker 1>the phone from St. Louis Kirk, how are you. I'm

0:19:51.680 --> 0:19:53.800
<v Speaker 1>doing great and thanctually having me on the show, Curl

0:19:53.840 --> 0:19:55.560
<v Speaker 1>and Tim, Yeah, it's good to have you with us,

0:19:55.760 --> 0:19:59.480
<v Speaker 1>help us, help our our investing audience understand where the

0:19:59.520 --> 0:20:02.680
<v Speaker 1>market is right now. There's this debate going on internally

0:20:02.680 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 1>and externally about capitulation. Where do you fall? So um,

0:20:07.560 --> 0:20:11.040
<v Speaker 1>thanks for the question, Tim, And as far as capitulation goes, So,

0:20:11.080 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 1>the market, you know, had a horrible first half in

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:16.760
<v Speaker 1>the MidCap area where I where I work, it had

0:20:16.800 --> 0:20:19.960
<v Speaker 1>its third worst first half since the inception of the

0:20:20.000 --> 0:20:25.639
<v Speaker 1>Russell MidCap benchmark. So while capitulation may or may not

0:20:25.720 --> 0:20:28.160
<v Speaker 1>be upon us when the market is down twenty one

0:20:28.440 --> 0:20:31.680
<v Speaker 1>six like the Russell MidCap is, it's just an opportunity

0:20:31.760 --> 0:20:34.359
<v Speaker 1>for investors like us. So at an Argent Capital Management,

0:20:34.400 --> 0:20:37.280
<v Speaker 1>we're looking to invest in the right company with positive change,

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:40.040
<v Speaker 1>and that huge draw down in the market for us

0:20:40.080 --> 0:20:42.600
<v Speaker 1>as positive change. We can pick up some companies we've

0:20:42.640 --> 0:20:44.400
<v Speaker 1>been looking at for a long time at a much

0:20:44.400 --> 0:20:47.359
<v Speaker 1>lower price. I love the MidCap space we don't really

0:20:47.359 --> 0:20:48.960
<v Speaker 1>talk about it a lot. I feel like it gets

0:20:49.000 --> 0:20:51.639
<v Speaker 1>lost certainly between the big and small caps. But if

0:20:51.640 --> 0:20:53.639
<v Speaker 1>you look at it, uh, I'm just look at the

0:20:53.720 --> 0:20:57.240
<v Speaker 1>SMP MidCap four hundred, it's down about this year, SMP

0:20:57.320 --> 0:20:59.800
<v Speaker 1>five hundred, down almost seventeen percent, and then of course

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:03.160
<v Speaker 1>the NASTAC one hundred still uh, you know, down more

0:21:03.320 --> 0:21:06.000
<v Speaker 1>than both of those industries. How do you think about it?

0:21:06.040 --> 0:21:08.240
<v Speaker 1>And is a lot of it kind of a US

0:21:08.320 --> 0:21:12.920
<v Speaker 1>play here? Yeah, So the mid the MidCap space where

0:21:12.960 --> 0:21:15.560
<v Speaker 1>I play is really just like anything that gets stuck

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:18.040
<v Speaker 1>in the middle, It gets forgotten about and people don't

0:21:18.080 --> 0:21:19.919
<v Speaker 1>talk about it, and they don't have a middle children.

0:21:20.040 --> 0:21:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Ask one of my systems on the middle child. I

0:21:28.040 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 1>never know who might be listening and if they might

0:21:30.320 --> 0:21:33.359
<v Speaker 1>get upset. But uh, not having to live through the

0:21:33.359 --> 0:21:36.520
<v Speaker 1>middle child syndrome myself, but um. But yeah, So with

0:21:36.680 --> 0:21:39.520
<v Speaker 1>MidCap stocks, one of their advantages is they tend to

0:21:39.520 --> 0:21:42.959
<v Speaker 1>be less exposed internationally than large cap stocks. So in

0:21:43.000 --> 0:21:45.240
<v Speaker 1>the case of you know, we're in right now with

0:21:45.280 --> 0:21:48.199
<v Speaker 1>the dollar strong um and the US economy in a

0:21:48.320 --> 0:21:51.000
<v Speaker 1>better position, although you know it's a tenuous position, it's

0:21:51.040 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 1>better than some of the international UM economies, the MidCap

0:21:54.720 --> 0:21:57.320
<v Speaker 1>stocks have a good opportunity here right now to do

0:21:57.359 --> 0:21:59.560
<v Speaker 1>a better job growing earnings relative for the rest of

0:21:59.600 --> 0:22:01.879
<v Speaker 1>the their competitors. Where do you think we are in

0:22:01.960 --> 0:22:06.080
<v Speaker 1>terms of of of recessions right now? Because I'm looking

0:22:06.080 --> 0:22:09.280
<v Speaker 1>at your notes that you sent our producer, Paul Brennan

0:22:09.840 --> 0:22:13.359
<v Speaker 1>and having a hard time understanding you know, where we

0:22:13.400 --> 0:22:16.399
<v Speaker 1>are in this economy. We've got mortgage rate spiking and

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:18.800
<v Speaker 1>of course we've got demand falling for homes but they're

0:22:18.800 --> 0:22:23.280
<v Speaker 1>remaining expensive. We've got energy prices just skyrocketing, and inflation

0:22:23.359 --> 0:22:26.280
<v Speaker 1>highest it's been in forty years. Yet the job the

0:22:26.320 --> 0:22:31.480
<v Speaker 1>workforce is you know, still adding jobs. Where are we Yeah,

0:22:31.520 --> 0:22:35.200
<v Speaker 1>so right now? So UM, right now, where the economy is,

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:38.920
<v Speaker 1>it's still not technically in a recession whatsoever. UM. And

0:22:39.040 --> 0:22:41.320
<v Speaker 1>the way we invest here at Argent Capital were really

0:22:41.320 --> 0:22:43.119
<v Speaker 1>bottom up stock pickers, you know, looking for the right

0:22:43.160 --> 0:22:45.959
<v Speaker 1>company with positive change. But we do take into account

0:22:46.000 --> 0:22:47.960
<v Speaker 1>a little bit where we are in the market cycle

0:22:48.040 --> 0:22:50.879
<v Speaker 1>and we try to be one third invested, you know,

0:22:50.920 --> 0:22:53.080
<v Speaker 1>for the current market cycle, which has has been an

0:22:53.080 --> 0:22:57.400
<v Speaker 1>expansion phase lately. That involves more value type of stocks UM.

0:22:57.440 --> 0:22:59.760
<v Speaker 1>But the next phase, should it be a recession, would

0:22:59.800 --> 0:23:02.960
<v Speaker 1>it be more of the the steady growers, the companies

0:23:02.960 --> 0:23:04.960
<v Speaker 1>that can grow their earnings regardless of where we are

0:23:05.000 --> 0:23:08.000
<v Speaker 1>in the economic cycle. We keep once they're the portfolio

0:23:08.240 --> 0:23:11.119
<v Speaker 1>exposed and ready for that type of a change in

0:23:11.160 --> 0:23:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the cycle. So that's really how we look at it.

0:23:14.000 --> 0:23:16.199
<v Speaker 1>We're not going to change how we invest based on

0:23:16.480 --> 0:23:19.000
<v Speaker 1>are we going to have a recession or not prepared

0:23:19.040 --> 0:23:21.600
<v Speaker 1>for either scenario? Right, So, and you look like you

0:23:21.640 --> 0:23:24.040
<v Speaker 1>said bottoms up. So you're looking at names specifically, and

0:23:24.080 --> 0:23:26.240
<v Speaker 1>you have brought a few with us to chat about.

0:23:26.240 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 1>One is the Tickers l Eng we're talking about Sneer

0:23:28.720 --> 0:23:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Energy based in Houston, stocks up on us so far

0:23:32.280 --> 0:23:34.679
<v Speaker 1>this year. I get it like the energy play, but

0:23:34.760 --> 0:23:38.159
<v Speaker 1>they are very much involved in the infrastructure part of it, right,

0:23:38.240 --> 0:23:43.119
<v Speaker 1>the pipelines. So Chanier isn't the pipeline. So really what

0:23:43.200 --> 0:23:45.960
<v Speaker 1>they do is they create the liquefied natural gas. So

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:49.119
<v Speaker 1>they build these these huge expensive projects that cost a

0:23:49.119 --> 0:23:52.240
<v Speaker 1>billion or two billion dollars each the terminals, right, yeah,

0:23:52.480 --> 0:23:55.360
<v Speaker 1>the terminal so it is delivered by pipeline. So they're

0:23:55.359 --> 0:23:57.320
<v Speaker 1>more but they are more of the infrastructure play or

0:23:57.359 --> 0:24:01.119
<v Speaker 1>exactly right. Um, So they charge their customers a combination

0:24:01.119 --> 0:24:03.520
<v Speaker 1>it's based on the Henry Hub price of natural gas

0:24:03.840 --> 0:24:06.160
<v Speaker 1>plus a look with faction fee, so they do make

0:24:06.280 --> 0:24:09.280
<v Speaker 1>more money if the price of natural gas goes higher.

0:24:09.560 --> 0:24:11.359
<v Speaker 1>But they're really the play on the fact that in

0:24:11.359 --> 0:24:13.680
<v Speaker 1>this case, Europe and that's the change that we were

0:24:13.680 --> 0:24:16.400
<v Speaker 1>looking at, is now needs to switch their natural gas

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:19.440
<v Speaker 1>emplier from Russia to other sources, and the United States

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 1>is a natural play for that. We're a very reliable supplier,

0:24:22.040 --> 0:24:25.360
<v Speaker 1>one of the biggest producers of natural gas, and Engineer

0:24:25.480 --> 0:24:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Energy is the world's largest producer of liquefied natural gas.

0:24:29.119 --> 0:24:32.320
<v Speaker 1>All right, what about Zebra Technology z b r A.

0:24:32.560 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 1>It's a mid cap stock. Um, it's not when we

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:37.120
<v Speaker 1>talk about a lot here and you argue that that's

0:24:37.160 --> 0:24:40.840
<v Speaker 1>your advantage, Yeah, that is absolutely to my advantage. And

0:24:40.920 --> 0:24:43.399
<v Speaker 1>Zebra is a long term holding of our So the

0:24:43.400 --> 0:24:46.320
<v Speaker 1>they're the largest producer of bar code scanners and printers

0:24:46.560 --> 0:24:49.240
<v Speaker 1>um in the world and also r f I detags

0:24:49.280 --> 0:24:53.000
<v Speaker 1>for tracking inventories. And the positive change for Zebra has

0:24:53.040 --> 0:24:56.359
<v Speaker 1>been really this move to omni channel retailing. So we

0:24:56.440 --> 0:24:58.480
<v Speaker 1>like to buy things and I do it every single day.

0:24:58.480 --> 0:25:00.439
<v Speaker 1>On my phone, I get it to livered in a

0:25:00.480 --> 0:25:02.440
<v Speaker 1>day or two, or I sometimes drive by the store

0:25:02.480 --> 0:25:04.720
<v Speaker 1>and pick it up, you know, in the parking lot.

0:25:04.880 --> 0:25:08.600
<v Speaker 1>And they now produce software that enables retailers to do

0:25:08.680 --> 0:25:11.840
<v Speaker 1>that omni channel retailing. And also they produce software and

0:25:11.880 --> 0:25:14.960
<v Speaker 1>the tracking technology for the distribution centers that all of

0:25:14.960 --> 0:25:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the online retailers and now the omni channel retailers are

0:25:18.960 --> 0:25:22.439
<v Speaker 1>increasingly building as well. And Zebra, you know, really is

0:25:22.480 --> 0:25:25.080
<v Speaker 1>not well known, but it's around us every single day,

0:25:25.160 --> 0:25:26.960
<v Speaker 1>and I guarantee you most of us will come in

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:29.480
<v Speaker 1>contact to it with two or three times a week.

0:25:29.520 --> 0:25:31.160
<v Speaker 1>But I have no idea, just as I do myself

0:25:31.240 --> 0:25:33.480
<v Speaker 1>check out. But I'm curious though it Why is it

0:25:33.560 --> 0:25:38.359
<v Speaker 1>down so much almost year to date? Yeah, so Zebra

0:25:38.520 --> 0:25:40.879
<v Speaker 1>really it's down almost in sympathy with the rest of

0:25:40.920 --> 0:25:43.200
<v Speaker 1>the tech sector, which was the worst performing sector in

0:25:43.200 --> 0:25:45.200
<v Speaker 1>the Russell MidCap in the first half of the year,

0:25:45.680 --> 0:25:49.159
<v Speaker 1>And it's down largely in sympathy with that sort with

0:25:49.200 --> 0:25:51.080
<v Speaker 1>that sort of a down a lot more though, wouldn't

0:25:51.080 --> 0:25:54.199
<v Speaker 1>you say? It is down more? And part of that

0:25:54.359 --> 0:25:57.040
<v Speaker 1>is I think it had a huge run towards the

0:25:57.119 --> 0:25:59.639
<v Speaker 1>end of last year and what I saw with some

0:25:59.720 --> 0:26:02.160
<v Speaker 1>of this docks in my portfolio and in the market

0:26:02.200 --> 0:26:04.320
<v Speaker 1>in general, the names that had a huge run up

0:26:04.320 --> 0:26:06.240
<v Speaker 1>at the end of last year, we're the worst performers

0:26:06.320 --> 0:26:09.400
<v Speaker 1>early this year. But at Argent Capital Management, we really

0:26:09.400 --> 0:26:11.480
<v Speaker 1>look to own companies for the long term. We have

0:26:11.600 --> 0:26:14.800
<v Speaker 1>very low turnover about a year, so we're not as

0:26:14.800 --> 0:26:17.639
<v Speaker 1>concerned with the fact that Zebra stock prices down. What

0:26:17.720 --> 0:26:20.360
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at the quality of that business right there,

0:26:20.400 --> 0:26:23.399
<v Speaker 1>and that the positive change to omnichunnel retailing is going

0:26:23.400 --> 0:26:26.639
<v Speaker 1>to continue. So Zeber really has a tailwind for sales

0:26:26.640 --> 0:26:30.040
<v Speaker 1>growth going forward. I was just counting it's up seven

0:26:32.400 --> 0:26:35.360
<v Speaker 1>from the end of through the end of last year

0:26:35.400 --> 0:26:37.359
<v Speaker 1>or so. It has had quite a run so you're right,

0:26:37.480 --> 0:26:39.680
<v Speaker 1>all right, we gotta run uh. So good to check

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:42.560
<v Speaker 1>in with you. Thank you so much, Kirk McDonald, Argent

0:26:42.640 --> 0:26:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Capital Management. Thanks for listening to Bloomberg Business Week. Download

0:26:47.040 --> 0:26:50.359
<v Speaker 1>the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot com, and

0:26:50.400 --> 0:26:52.080
<v Speaker 1>you can also listen to our radio show at two

0:26:52.119 --> 0:26:55.040
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on YouTube.

0:26:55.160 --> 0:26:56.639
<v Speaker 1>Sarah to Bloomberg Global News