WEBVTT - Cowboys Break: Is Dak Up to the Task?

0:00:03.360 --> 0:00:05.880
<v Speaker 1>The following is a production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:05.920 --> 0:00:09.080
<v Speaker 1>and the Dallas Cowboys Football Club. Are you ready for

0:00:09.119 --> 0:00:12.799
<v Speaker 1>a break? Yours? Are you ready for a break? Absolutely

0:00:12.920 --> 0:00:17.159
<v Speaker 1>ready for a break? Yeah, and so much for that.

0:00:17.360 --> 0:00:22.520
<v Speaker 1>It's time for the break on Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:23.320 --> 0:00:28.800
<v Speaker 1>with Nick Eatman, David Hellman, and bar Garcia and Derek Eagleton.

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:38.159
<v Speaker 1>Good morning, guys, Today's Tuesday eleven. Do you stay eleven?

0:00:38.920 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 1>We have a lot to discuss today, but before we

0:00:42.720 --> 0:00:46.560
<v Speaker 1>get into it, how are you guys doing better than yesterday? Great?

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:48.240
<v Speaker 1>How are we doing? Guys? How are we doing? Guys?

0:00:48.240 --> 0:00:52.360
<v Speaker 1>You're ready to go? Okay? Great? All right, Corel Dave Okay,

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:55.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm awesome. So we have a lot to discuss, but

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 1>before we get into it, I wanted to touch on

0:00:57.800 --> 0:01:02.400
<v Speaker 1>a few things that um happened last night. Jason Witten

0:01:02.560 --> 0:01:07.759
<v Speaker 1>had his debut as a Monday night football analyst. He did,

0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:12.640
<v Speaker 1>so I wanted to see what you guys. First impression

0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:15.640
<v Speaker 1>of this was, um, I didn't know he was out there.

0:01:16.360 --> 0:01:21.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean seriously, like he he hardly ever talks. This

0:01:21.240 --> 0:01:23.640
<v Speaker 1>is me Like, I didn't realize this was such a

0:01:23.640 --> 0:01:27.720
<v Speaker 1>big deal for Booger McFarland like this, he was his show. Yeah,

0:01:29.160 --> 0:01:33.200
<v Speaker 1>nobody told him to shut the front door. Ever, I

0:01:33.240 --> 0:01:35.560
<v Speaker 1>thought he was really good. Though. I didn't mind that

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:38.840
<v Speaker 1>he kept talking. That's fine, I guess. I just the

0:01:38.840 --> 0:01:42.559
<v Speaker 1>whole point was, I was literally listening to Jason gonna

0:01:42.600 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 1>talk because it's just it seemed as though they were

0:01:45.240 --> 0:01:47.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of creating his moments for him talking. He just

0:01:47.560 --> 0:01:49.480
<v Speaker 1>didn't say anything, so I don't know. It was, yeah,

0:01:49.560 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 1>were you expecting more? Though? Yeah, this was like this

0:01:53.160 --> 0:01:55.880
<v Speaker 1>huge deal that Jason Witten is now, you know, jumping

0:01:55.880 --> 0:01:58.560
<v Speaker 1>into the booth for Monday night football. And then he

0:01:58.960 --> 0:02:02.800
<v Speaker 1>looked like the third guy, you know, like he looked

0:02:03.240 --> 0:02:06.760
<v Speaker 1>he didn't hardly ever talk. I thought. I thought McFarland

0:02:06.760 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 1>talked the whole time. It felt like Jason was the

0:02:08.720 --> 0:02:12.960
<v Speaker 1>sideline guy exactly. Booger McFarlane was the color analyst. I think,

0:02:13.680 --> 0:02:16.840
<v Speaker 1>unfortunately for Jason, Booger McFarland's got a lot more experience

0:02:16.960 --> 0:02:19.359
<v Speaker 1>doing this than he does, and it showed last night,

0:02:19.400 --> 0:02:22.160
<v Speaker 1>which you'll get better. I'm sure. I didn't think he

0:02:22.200 --> 0:02:26.440
<v Speaker 1>was bad. He did not seem comfortable to me, and

0:02:27.160 --> 0:02:29.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't yeah, like just I mean, I'm not best

0:02:29.600 --> 0:02:32.040
<v Speaker 1>friends with Jason Witten by any stretch, but knowing what

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:34.440
<v Speaker 1>I know about him, I think that's going to be

0:02:34.480 --> 0:02:38.160
<v Speaker 1>a challenge for him to adapt to what he needs

0:02:38.160 --> 0:02:40.040
<v Speaker 1>to be like to be good at that. I think

0:02:40.040 --> 0:02:42.040
<v Speaker 1>he'll get there. I think it's it's just I mean,

0:02:42.040 --> 0:02:45.000
<v Speaker 1>it's with anything, you go from one career to another one,

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:47.960
<v Speaker 1>and he's going to have to adapt to the idea

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:50.760
<v Speaker 1>that he's got to have something to say about everything. Yeah,

0:02:50.800 --> 0:02:53.240
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think that, And he might already and

0:02:53.280 --> 0:02:55.079
<v Speaker 1>he just doesn't know how to, Like he's not used

0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:57.440
<v Speaker 1>to that. He's used to maybe as a player, being

0:02:57.480 --> 0:02:59.600
<v Speaker 1>a little more reserved, but he's got to learn that

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:02.440
<v Speaker 1>every time there's an opportunity, you gotta jumping half something there.

0:03:03.280 --> 0:03:05.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it was in the first half yesterday, like

0:03:05.200 --> 0:03:08.720
<v Speaker 1>he said something and like it was so heavy in

0:03:08.760 --> 0:03:11.440
<v Speaker 1>football lingo that it didn't even make sense unless you

0:03:11.560 --> 0:03:15.840
<v Speaker 1>really follow football. When Joe Tessitur was like, expound on

0:03:15.880 --> 0:03:19.360
<v Speaker 1>that if you and like he it almost seemed like

0:03:19.440 --> 0:03:21.120
<v Speaker 1>he was like, what do you mean, expound on that?

0:03:21.320 --> 0:03:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Like that's it's football, said it, like, well, you gotta

0:03:25.000 --> 0:03:27.360
<v Speaker 1>do a little bit more for your average Joe sitting

0:03:27.400 --> 0:03:31.359
<v Speaker 1>at home, which the audience. Somebody told me a long

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:33.640
<v Speaker 1>time ago that when you're doing that, you have to

0:03:33.680 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 1>figure out a way to say the same thing fourteen

0:03:36.960 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 1>different ways, because if you keep saying it over and

0:03:39.680 --> 0:03:42.640
<v Speaker 1>over like, it'll be repetitive and it won't be good.

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 1>And there was a moment where in the first half

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 1>where he talked about a play. I remember the receivers

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:50.760
<v Speaker 1>running down the field, and he said the same thing

0:03:50.960 --> 0:03:54.080
<v Speaker 1>three times, and that's kind of his way of describing

0:03:54.080 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the play. And I just remember thinking that, like, you know,

0:03:56.800 --> 0:03:58.400
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna have to get better at that. But I

0:03:58.440 --> 0:04:00.680
<v Speaker 1>thought it was just kind of all accorded the way

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:04.160
<v Speaker 1>that that booger McFarland was talking too much. I mean,

0:04:04.680 --> 0:04:06.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe they just should need to put the three of them.

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Then then it's just fair games. I think that you're

0:04:13.520 --> 0:04:16.359
<v Speaker 1>supposed to view booger McFarland as a third member of

0:04:16.400 --> 0:04:19.120
<v Speaker 1>the booth. He's just doing in the booth. That's like

0:04:19.200 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 1>their new wrinkle is like, well, he's gonna have this

0:04:23.080 --> 0:04:26.640
<v Speaker 1>thing move. Yeah, he follows the line of scrimmage. Okay,

0:04:26.720 --> 0:04:29.960
<v Speaker 1>so he's sitting above the line of scrimmage wherever it is,

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:32.000
<v Speaker 1>seeing how he's kind of shaken them. He's on the

0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:34.719
<v Speaker 1>camera card basically is where he is, and he's just honestly,

0:04:34.720 --> 0:04:36.479
<v Speaker 1>that's a great view. I mean, yeah, you get a

0:04:36.520 --> 0:04:39.479
<v Speaker 1>better view there probably than they get upstairs. I am.

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:43.520
<v Speaker 1>I am encouraged by the first. I mean, yeah, Jason's

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:45.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna he's got some work to do, and I mean

0:04:45.480 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 1>they all do. But I like the vantage point that

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Booger's got and he offered some insight. And I don't know,

0:04:50.920 --> 0:04:54.080
<v Speaker 1>what do you guys think of the halftime what it

0:04:54.160 --> 0:04:57.560
<v Speaker 1>was they did, like the music with video Tory Kelly

0:04:57.640 --> 0:05:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Kelly and which I love both the ar Don't get

0:05:00.640 --> 0:05:03.040
<v Speaker 1>me wrong, I love boys men, I love Tory Kelly.

0:05:03.200 --> 0:05:05.320
<v Speaker 1>It was just awkward the way they did it. Yes,

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:08.040
<v Speaker 1>I know entertainment is in their name, but like ESPN

0:05:08.080 --> 0:05:10.280
<v Speaker 1>always tries to do stuff like that, they're trying to

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:12.160
<v Speaker 1>trick it up a little bit. I didn't stop. I

0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 1>remember this was years ago, but like they bait, Like

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:18.200
<v Speaker 1>when TRL on MTV was at its height, they tried

0:05:18.240 --> 0:05:20.600
<v Speaker 1>to like they were like, We're gonna have live performances

0:05:20.600 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 1>on Sports Center and it's like, no, stop, I want that.

0:05:24.279 --> 0:05:27.800
<v Speaker 1>I'll go to MTV or wherever that is. Just do it.

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Just do sports. It doesn't You don't have to cover

0:05:31.160 --> 0:05:33.160
<v Speaker 1>every Touchdow. You could have given me five minutes of

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 1>analysis on the game and I would have been just

0:05:35.160 --> 0:05:38.720
<v Speaker 1>as happy. Right, Well, let's hope that Jason Waitin thus

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:41.920
<v Speaker 1>get better as time goes on, as well as well

0:05:41.960 --> 0:05:47.080
<v Speaker 1>we hope with this twenty eighteen Cowboys version. So before

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:50.160
<v Speaker 1>we move on into that, Jerry talked on the fan

0:05:50.279 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 1>this morning and touched on a few things. I wanted

0:05:53.680 --> 0:05:58.120
<v Speaker 1>to mention Xavier Woods. He's supposed to be getting closer

0:05:58.160 --> 0:06:01.680
<v Speaker 1>to plane, although his pride to maybe get a little

0:06:01.800 --> 0:06:06.400
<v Speaker 1>limited this week. Randy Gregory seems like he is good

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:10.480
<v Speaker 1>to go. As far as health concerns and as far

0:06:10.560 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 1>as the whole suspension thing or drug thing, I think

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:18.040
<v Speaker 1>that's still in the air. I think you got it flopped,

0:06:18.720 --> 0:06:22.800
<v Speaker 1>which I thought he was good injury wise, and we'll

0:06:22.839 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 1>see as alway, especially when you're talking about a concussion,

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:28.640
<v Speaker 1>we'll see that. Jason Garrett said he's feeling better, but

0:06:29.240 --> 0:06:31.280
<v Speaker 1>I guess I gathered that from that and then seeing

0:06:31.360 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Randy tweet about it saying he was good. But then

0:06:34.520 --> 0:06:36.720
<v Speaker 1>I guess you can't hold waste. Well, the way that

0:06:36.839 --> 0:06:39.200
<v Speaker 1>goes now. Back in the day, if the player felt

0:06:39.200 --> 0:06:41.080
<v Speaker 1>great and he saw that you had two fingers in

0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 1>front of him, and then it was like all right, yeah, good.

0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:45.520
<v Speaker 1>But now there's a whole protocol they have to go

0:06:45.600 --> 0:06:48.640
<v Speaker 1>through and and in a lot of instances, the doctor

0:06:48.680 --> 0:06:51.200
<v Speaker 1>is going to be the final person to make that determination,

0:06:51.279 --> 0:06:54.520
<v Speaker 1>regardless of what the player is I guess saying now,

0:06:54.560 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 1>they could probably say they're feeling off fine and give

0:06:56.600 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 1>them a great report, but yeah, I would assume the

0:06:58.880 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 1>test that the doctors do will give him a little

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 1>bit more indication and they'll have to pass that protocol

0:07:02.920 --> 0:07:04.440
<v Speaker 1>in order to get back on the field. But I

0:07:04.480 --> 0:07:07.200
<v Speaker 1>do like what you said there with up in the

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:11.000
<v Speaker 1>air with the with the league talk, because Jerry Jones

0:07:11.040 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 1>did go on the radio today and say, you know,

0:07:13.440 --> 0:07:15.280
<v Speaker 1>as far as I know, everything's good, we're all in

0:07:15.320 --> 0:07:18.520
<v Speaker 1>the clear. And that's that's noteworthy. I mean, I mean,

0:07:18.560 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 1>if Jerry Jones is going to have a better idea

0:07:20.800 --> 0:07:22.920
<v Speaker 1>than we do about what's going on with that, at

0:07:22.920 --> 0:07:25.800
<v Speaker 1>the same time, I'm always I'm taking that with a

0:07:25.800 --> 0:07:27.960
<v Speaker 1>grain of salt basically until the end of time, Like

0:07:28.040 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 1>that's just the story with Randy Gregory is that I

0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:33.560
<v Speaker 1>don't know that it's I mean, you're never You're never

0:07:33.600 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 1>just gonna feel great about that, you know what I mean.

0:07:35.720 --> 0:07:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Although I do think it's not worthy that Jerry said,

0:07:38.320 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 1>as from a league standpoint, he expects him to be

0:07:40.520 --> 0:07:43.640
<v Speaker 1>available Sunday, which is that's news. So but you know,

0:07:43.720 --> 0:07:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Jerry's been saying since training camp that and I think

0:07:46.720 --> 0:07:49.160
<v Speaker 1>people kind of just kind of took it as a

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:50.880
<v Speaker 1>grain of salt. But he said, Hey, when you're talking

0:07:50.920 --> 0:07:54.559
<v Speaker 1>about these kind of situations where guys, guys are coming

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:58.840
<v Speaker 1>back from you know, drug rehabilitation, it is a process

0:07:58.880 --> 0:08:02.560
<v Speaker 1>that is not a okay, you're you're now go. It's

0:08:02.560 --> 0:08:05.080
<v Speaker 1>not like a broken bone, like There's gonna be times

0:08:05.520 --> 0:08:09.400
<v Speaker 1>when there may be hiccups, and so as long as

0:08:09.880 --> 0:08:11.760
<v Speaker 1>you know you have the right people around them and

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:14.520
<v Speaker 1>you're giving them the right support and they're able to

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 1>work through whatever hiccups may happen, I think that ultimately,

0:08:18.160 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I think if the league is being smart, they will

0:08:21.080 --> 0:08:23.600
<v Speaker 1>factor that in. And that's why they should have medical

0:08:23.640 --> 0:08:26.600
<v Speaker 1>people involved in this so that they can help when

0:08:26.600 --> 0:08:29.160
<v Speaker 1>there is a hiccup, get them immediate help and get

0:08:29.160 --> 0:08:31.720
<v Speaker 1>them back on the right track, because don't I think

0:08:31.760 --> 0:08:34.520
<v Speaker 1>it's foolish to assume that a person that's been addicted

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:36.719
<v Speaker 1>to any kind of substance is just going to at

0:08:36.760 --> 0:08:39.679
<v Speaker 1>some point be whole. Right, It just doesn't happen like that.

0:08:39.880 --> 0:08:43.320
<v Speaker 1>You hear anybody that's been addicted alcohol, drugs, whatever, they'll

0:08:43.360 --> 0:08:45.719
<v Speaker 1>tell you like, this is a this is a lifelong thing.

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Now I gotta deal with this for the rest of

0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:49.559
<v Speaker 1>my life because it's now part of my life, right

0:08:49.559 --> 0:08:51.760
<v Speaker 1>which as a member of the media, this whole thing

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:54.200
<v Speaker 1>with Randy makes me feel a lot of different types

0:08:54.240 --> 0:08:57.200
<v Speaker 1>of ways because I understand the value of reporting, and

0:08:57.240 --> 0:08:59.920
<v Speaker 1>if something's going on that ain't right, like that's the

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:02.600
<v Speaker 1>media's job, whether it's sports or politics, whatever, there's nothing

0:09:02.640 --> 0:09:05.240
<v Speaker 1>wrong with that. At the same time, this Randy thing

0:09:05.760 --> 0:09:10.920
<v Speaker 1>is really sketchy because basically, anybody in Randy's situation is

0:09:10.920 --> 0:09:13.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna be having There's gonna be a million things going

0:09:13.280 --> 0:09:15.760
<v Speaker 1>on with him, probably for the rest of his career.

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:17.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you're gonna be you're gonna be getting tested

0:09:18.080 --> 0:09:20.679
<v Speaker 1>maybe randomly, You're gonna be having dialogues, You're gonna have

0:09:20.720 --> 0:09:22.360
<v Speaker 1>to be going to meetings with the league, like he

0:09:22.400 --> 0:09:25.480
<v Speaker 1>did a couple weeks ago. That's probably got accountability people

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:28.800
<v Speaker 1>you're dealing with. As yet, there's just gonna be stuff

0:09:28.880 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 1>swirling with him, like that's just that's just part of

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:34.440
<v Speaker 1>his life basically, and it sucks for him. And it

0:09:34.480 --> 0:09:38.319
<v Speaker 1>seems really unfair that, you know, whether it's leaks or

0:09:38.320 --> 0:09:42.559
<v Speaker 1>whether it's reporters not being completely responsible, not pointing fingers

0:09:42.559 --> 0:09:45.080
<v Speaker 1>anybody specifically, but just the basic idea of who he

0:09:45.160 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 1>is and who he plays for. There's people trying to

0:09:48.200 --> 0:09:50.160
<v Speaker 1>pry into that. And I think about it from a

0:09:50.160 --> 0:09:52.320
<v Speaker 1>fans of mindset is like you want it to be

0:09:52.360 --> 0:09:54.200
<v Speaker 1>black or white, like is he good to go and

0:09:54.240 --> 0:09:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't have to worry about this or is he suspended?

0:09:56.559 --> 0:09:59.719
<v Speaker 1>And its not gonna be that way. And I just think,

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:02.679
<v Speaker 1>to quote Jerry, you gotta have some tolerance for ambiguity

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 1>with that, and it just sucks you in tolerance for ambiguity,

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:08.640
<v Speaker 1>you have to have a tolerance for ambiguity that this

0:10:09.480 --> 0:10:11.840
<v Speaker 1>You're probably always gonna have to have some level of

0:10:11.880 --> 0:10:15.400
<v Speaker 1>concern about Randy Gregory. But it sucks for him that

0:10:15.840 --> 0:10:18.480
<v Speaker 1>his dirty laundry, so to speak, is being leaked out

0:10:18.520 --> 0:10:21.880
<v Speaker 1>into the media. In one form or fashion, and it's

0:10:21.920 --> 0:10:25.440
<v Speaker 1>just unfortunate. But you know, for the time being, sounds

0:10:25.480 --> 0:10:29.079
<v Speaker 1>like he is okay. Yeah, right, so every week is

0:10:29.120 --> 0:10:32.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna be kind of a pending status for him. But

0:10:32.440 --> 0:10:34.720
<v Speaker 1>from what I'm gathering as of right now, it seems

0:10:34.760 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 1>that it's nothing major and it should be okay. Now,

0:10:39.120 --> 0:10:41.360
<v Speaker 1>there was a comment that I thought was really interesting

0:10:41.559 --> 0:10:45.240
<v Speaker 1>from part of Jerry Jones and yesterday we talked a

0:10:45.240 --> 0:10:48.840
<v Speaker 1>lot about Dak Prescott and yes, and this morning he

0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 1>made a comment that he saw in Dak a mixture

0:10:51.960 --> 0:10:55.880
<v Speaker 1>of Jared Goff and Canton. So I wanted to see

0:10:56.240 --> 0:11:03.640
<v Speaker 1>what y'all's opinion was on that. Yeah, I know, I

0:11:03.920 --> 0:11:06.440
<v Speaker 1>got a lot to say, just I don't know where

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:09.679
<v Speaker 1>to start so much to say, uh you know, I mean,

0:11:09.800 --> 0:11:12.080
<v Speaker 1>I can hear the smart Alec comments about you know,

0:11:12.200 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Dak's Dak's not accurate, Jeric Goff. Last night, he didn't

0:11:15.400 --> 0:11:17.400
<v Speaker 1>have a great night throwing the ball by any stretch

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:19.720
<v Speaker 1>of the imagination. I think he was about fifty percent

0:11:19.880 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 1>so and look, I've seen the tape. I know Dak

0:11:22.880 --> 0:11:24.599
<v Speaker 1>missed a lot of throws. I'm not giving him a

0:11:24.640 --> 0:11:28.959
<v Speaker 1>pass for that, um, But so yeah, I agree it

0:11:28.960 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 1>would agree. We know Dak can complete and acceptable percentage

0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:35.559
<v Speaker 1>of passes he and he did on Sunday, although not

0:11:35.600 --> 0:11:38.200
<v Speaker 1>the ones that mattered. The thing for me what jumps

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:41.560
<v Speaker 1>out to me with that is if Dak has even

0:11:41.640 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 1>augh iota of the mobility and running ability as Cam

0:11:46.520 --> 0:11:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Newton does, where was it? Well? My question would also be,

0:11:52.080 --> 0:11:54.880
<v Speaker 1>if he does have some of that, then why the

0:11:54.960 --> 0:11:58.160
<v Speaker 1>heck isn't this offensive staff figuring out a way to

0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:01.400
<v Speaker 1>have more calls mind for him to run the ball.

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:04.520
<v Speaker 1>It's painfully obvious that Cam's ability to run was a

0:12:04.520 --> 0:12:07.160
<v Speaker 1>big part of Carolina's game plan, and they knew that

0:12:07.200 --> 0:12:08.679
<v Speaker 1>they were going to lean on him to do that

0:12:08.720 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 1>to get past the Stallas defense. Happened with Dak And

0:12:13.000 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 1>if they know that, and I would hope that they do,

0:12:16.559 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 1>then that's borderline inexcusable for me that they didn't try

0:12:20.520 --> 0:12:24.559
<v Speaker 1>to implement that a little bit more. I don't really

0:12:24.600 --> 0:12:28.839
<v Speaker 1>see any kind of cross comparisons between the two. I mean,

0:12:28.880 --> 0:12:31.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I think Goff's a different type of player.

0:12:31.280 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 1>I think Cam is a different type of player. And

0:12:34.840 --> 0:12:37.600
<v Speaker 1>what Jerry wants Dad to be riding between both of them,

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:41.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, I didn't see either of that. What Cam

0:12:41.600 --> 0:12:44.840
<v Speaker 1>does best Dad didn't show, as Dave just said, and

0:12:44.880 --> 0:12:49.120
<v Speaker 1>what Goff does best, Dad didn't show and really doesn't

0:12:49.160 --> 0:12:52.240
<v Speaker 1>show that hardly at all. So I think that's the

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:55.440
<v Speaker 1>ideal to be that type that would be your prototype quarterback,

0:12:55.440 --> 0:12:58.360
<v Speaker 1>if you could be a combination with two guys. Don't

0:12:58.360 --> 0:13:08.080
<v Speaker 1>know what that was. But but can't you Okay, everybody, okay, um,

0:13:08.360 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 1>but no, I just think overall, I mean, that's the goal,

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:14.319
<v Speaker 1>and I think he was really far from it. But

0:13:15.120 --> 0:13:18.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is the biggest issue this team has,

0:13:18.760 --> 0:13:20.600
<v Speaker 1>I think right now, it's just trying to figure out

0:13:21.200 --> 0:13:23.360
<v Speaker 1>is their quarterback good enough to win games? Yeah, I

0:13:23.400 --> 0:13:25.360
<v Speaker 1>will say this, and Dave you kind of alluded to it.

0:13:25.480 --> 0:13:27.200
<v Speaker 1>We went back yesterday and I know I went and

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 1>sat down with Brian to watch a little bit of

0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:31.920
<v Speaker 1>what Dak did in this game, and Nicky came over

0:13:31.960 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 1>saw some of it as well. There was some significant

0:13:34.520 --> 0:13:37.120
<v Speaker 1>missus in that game. There were some opportunities and you

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:39.400
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about these wide receivers. Let's not talk

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:41.280
<v Speaker 1>about the wide receivers right now. And the reason why

0:13:41.320 --> 0:13:44.360
<v Speaker 1>I say that is because there were plenty of opportunities

0:13:44.559 --> 0:13:48.240
<v Speaker 1>in that game. Tight ends included where they had opened

0:13:48.400 --> 0:13:51.920
<v Speaker 1>They had open guys downfield opportunities in one instance with

0:13:52.000 --> 0:13:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Swain where it was clearly a touchdown and Dak

0:13:55.080 --> 0:13:57.000
<v Speaker 1>for whatever reason wasn't able to get them the ball,

0:13:57.040 --> 0:13:58.960
<v Speaker 1>whether he didn't see it, whether he just didn't pull

0:13:59.000 --> 0:14:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the trigger, whatever the case might have been. But they

0:14:01.520 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 1>had some opportunities that were left on the table yesterday

0:14:04.080 --> 0:14:06.800
<v Speaker 1>because of Dak's inability to get the ball to them.

0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:09.320
<v Speaker 1>And so I don't want to talk about receivers and

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:12.200
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver and tight ends for the until we see

0:14:12.320 --> 0:14:15.199
<v Speaker 1>Dak improved there. Then I don't think it's fair to

0:14:15.679 --> 0:14:18.200
<v Speaker 1>criticize this receiving group as we have in the past.

0:14:18.240 --> 0:14:21.280
<v Speaker 1>There were more than enough open men. The Jeff swam

0:14:21.760 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 1>very obvious touchdown comes to mind. How about and hey,

0:14:25.400 --> 0:14:27.640
<v Speaker 1>if you even if you're gonna say, all right, Dak's

0:14:27.640 --> 0:14:30.200
<v Speaker 1>not a great downfield thrower, don't put that on him. Okay,

0:14:30.200 --> 0:14:33.080
<v Speaker 1>how about the Michael Gallup crossing route seven yards past

0:14:33.120 --> 0:14:36.120
<v Speaker 1>the line of scrimmage, where he had guys down field,

0:14:36.120 --> 0:14:38.680
<v Speaker 1>he had green grass in front of him. It's probably

0:14:38.720 --> 0:14:42.040
<v Speaker 1>at least a twenty five yard if not more game.

0:14:42.800 --> 0:14:45.080
<v Speaker 1>If he just at full speed. It just put it

0:14:45.120 --> 0:14:47.640
<v Speaker 1>where it needs to be instead of two yards behind him.

0:14:47.920 --> 0:14:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Just not a great day at all. The play that

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:53.880
<v Speaker 1>we're referring to with the Jeff swam he actually pulled

0:14:53.920 --> 0:14:56.200
<v Speaker 1>the ball downs third and nine and it was he

0:14:56.320 --> 0:14:58.800
<v Speaker 1>had to have the play and he ended up rushing

0:14:58.880 --> 0:15:01.280
<v Speaker 1>for ten or a great and did a nice job.

0:15:01.320 --> 0:15:05.040
<v Speaker 1>But I think what needs to be addressed there in

0:15:05.080 --> 0:15:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the film room or whatever is did you see him

0:15:08.000 --> 0:15:09.800
<v Speaker 1>and it looks like he is seeing him? Because what

0:15:09.920 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 1>is he looking at? It looks like he's seeing him.

0:15:11.840 --> 0:15:13.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if he thinks he can make the

0:15:13.720 --> 0:15:17.160
<v Speaker 1>throw because we see it from up Todd like there

0:15:17.200 --> 0:15:20.560
<v Speaker 1>he is make the throw, but there's a certain type

0:15:20.560 --> 0:15:23.440
<v Speaker 1>of velocity you've got to put on that ball to

0:15:23.560 --> 0:15:25.560
<v Speaker 1>get it there. Yeah, he could, He could get the

0:15:25.600 --> 0:15:28.080
<v Speaker 1>ball to Swain, But is every safety in the league

0:15:28.080 --> 0:15:29.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna run over there and get it by that? Does

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:32.600
<v Speaker 1>that worry you if he can't make that yet, If

0:15:32.600 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 1>he can't make the throw, he doesn't need to be

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:38.200
<v Speaker 1>in the position. And I'm being honest, like that throw

0:15:38.280 --> 0:15:40.400
<v Speaker 1>out there, if it comes down to he really doesn't

0:15:40.400 --> 0:15:44.400
<v Speaker 1>trust himself. That's the job of you're not only all

0:15:44.480 --> 0:15:47.400
<v Speaker 1>you do. I mean, your job is not only to

0:15:47.480 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 1>hand off the ball to a runner. Your job as

0:15:49.680 --> 0:15:52.760
<v Speaker 1>a quarterback is to throw the ball right. But I'm

0:15:52.840 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 1>talking about making all of the throws. And yes, if

0:15:55.840 --> 0:15:59.320
<v Speaker 1>nobody's around, everybody can make that throw. It might hit

0:15:59.320 --> 0:16:01.920
<v Speaker 1>a cloud, but you're gonna get it there. He's got

0:16:01.920 --> 0:16:04.320
<v Speaker 1>to get it there on a dime and split a safety.

0:16:04.360 --> 0:16:06.280
<v Speaker 1>That might be but I guess, but I guess that's

0:16:06.320 --> 0:16:08.840
<v Speaker 1>part of the game. I'm just saying, this is what

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 1>we're finding out. Maybe he it's those type of throws

0:16:12.920 --> 0:16:16.560
<v Speaker 1>that you determine you really can't do this job. But

0:16:16.680 --> 0:16:19.840
<v Speaker 1>that's why I think, personally, I think that's not the

0:16:19.880 --> 0:16:23.120
<v Speaker 1>issue because I tend to believe he can make that throw.

0:16:23.720 --> 0:16:25.480
<v Speaker 1>I tend to believe that it was more of a

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:28.800
<v Speaker 1>situation where he didn't recognize it as it was or

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:33.080
<v Speaker 1>he felt something was he was he skittish about the pressure?

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Was it? I mean, there was nobody really on him

0:16:35.200 --> 0:16:37.240
<v Speaker 1>at that point, But was he skittish about the pressure

0:16:37.280 --> 0:16:38.680
<v Speaker 1>to where he was like, I'm gonna have to really

0:16:38.760 --> 0:16:40.400
<v Speaker 1>step into this throw. I don't think I can have

0:16:40.480 --> 0:16:42.440
<v Speaker 1>enough time to do that. And that's why, you know,

0:16:42.440 --> 0:16:44.240
<v Speaker 1>he kind of ends up taking off running. I don't

0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:46.600
<v Speaker 1>know what it was. I don't Maybe I'm just giving

0:16:46.680 --> 0:16:48.320
<v Speaker 1>him the benefit of doubt that he can make that throw,

0:16:48.360 --> 0:16:51.440
<v Speaker 1>because that's that's a that's not a tough throw where

0:16:51.440 --> 0:16:54.360
<v Speaker 1>you got a tight end basically around the hash marks

0:16:54.400 --> 0:16:57.560
<v Speaker 1>about twenty five thirty yards downfield. This was after he

0:16:57.680 --> 0:17:02.040
<v Speaker 1>shorted the throw to Jarwin, right yet, So man, Well,

0:17:02.200 --> 0:17:04.680
<v Speaker 1>but I just I will say this, and Brian point

0:17:04.720 --> 0:17:07.880
<v Speaker 1>pointed this out on this situation with Jarwin Byron. I mean,

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Brian thinks that what happened there was Dak was expecting

0:17:11.160 --> 0:17:13.560
<v Speaker 1>him to stop, and he kind of kept floating. And

0:17:13.560 --> 0:17:15.960
<v Speaker 1>if you notice, as he was running, he stopped running

0:17:16.000 --> 0:17:18.120
<v Speaker 1>full speed. Jarwin did and he was kind of just

0:17:18.480 --> 0:17:20.800
<v Speaker 1>jogging a little bit and then kind of went a

0:17:20.800 --> 0:17:22.719
<v Speaker 1>little bit too far. So he thinks there was kind

0:17:22.760 --> 0:17:25.320
<v Speaker 1>of a miscommunication there on what Dak was saying. Not

0:17:25.359 --> 0:17:27.600
<v Speaker 1>that Dak couldn't get it to him, but Dak thought

0:17:27.600 --> 0:17:30.800
<v Speaker 1>he was gonna stop, and he actually just kept floating backwards. Um,

0:17:30.840 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 1>and that's what made the ball short. That's fine, it

0:17:33.520 --> 0:17:35.800
<v Speaker 1>didn't I mean, it wasn't complete, that's all. I know,

0:17:35.960 --> 0:17:39.960
<v Speaker 1>but and that's what y'all have been talking about, is

0:17:39.960 --> 0:17:43.320
<v Speaker 1>why I said what I says, like, Okay, you don't

0:17:43.320 --> 0:17:45.879
<v Speaker 1>trust yourself to make that throw, which an NFL quarterback

0:17:45.960 --> 0:17:48.800
<v Speaker 1>should be able to make. But let's just even let's

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:51.760
<v Speaker 1>even just allow acknowledge that, Okay, you can't make that throw,

0:17:52.040 --> 0:17:55.080
<v Speaker 1>make five or six pretty easy ones and the game

0:17:55.160 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 1>is still probably different. Then there were quite a few.

0:17:57.760 --> 0:17:59.520
<v Speaker 1>I know there are five or six. There were about

0:17:59.560 --> 0:18:01.400
<v Speaker 1>five or six plays at me and Brian walked through.

0:18:01.480 --> 0:18:03.320
<v Speaker 1>He had another one. He had an opportunity to get

0:18:03.359 --> 0:18:05.080
<v Speaker 1>the ball to a guy and he just he missed

0:18:05.080 --> 0:18:08.040
<v Speaker 1>it for whatever reason. I just wonder if he's seeing ghosts.

0:18:08.280 --> 0:18:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Do you think last year from we got six six

0:18:11.640 --> 0:18:14.000
<v Speaker 1>acts this game from from last year from this year

0:18:14.520 --> 0:18:16.879
<v Speaker 1>from you know, does he trust Joe Luni and Conn Williams.

0:18:16.880 --> 0:18:19.159
<v Speaker 1>Does he trust Lyle Collins? Does he trust is he

0:18:19.400 --> 0:18:22.280
<v Speaker 1>to pick up his blitz? I don't know. But again,

0:18:22.720 --> 0:18:25.960
<v Speaker 1>I know every game we play, we get further away

0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:29.600
<v Speaker 1>from twenty sixteen. I understand that, but we still to

0:18:29.680 --> 0:18:32.520
<v Speaker 1>quote Jerry again like we've seen him do these things,

0:18:32.520 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 1>like he's made those types of throws in the past.

0:18:35.240 --> 0:18:38.720
<v Speaker 1>He has and that's what makes it even harder for

0:18:38.760 --> 0:18:42.000
<v Speaker 1>me to understand like where it went. And to me,

0:18:42.119 --> 0:18:45.399
<v Speaker 1>that comes back to that says confidence to me, or

0:18:46.400 --> 0:18:48.800
<v Speaker 1>confidence that he can make the throw, or confidence that

0:18:48.920 --> 0:18:51.520
<v Speaker 1>he's you know, is he worried about if he throws picks?

0:18:52.160 --> 0:18:55.159
<v Speaker 1>You know? Maybe is the contract in his head is

0:18:55.240 --> 0:18:56.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, I don't know. Me and Nick were

0:18:56.760 --> 0:18:59.080
<v Speaker 1>talking about that the game Sunday on another subject, but

0:18:59.119 --> 0:19:01.520
<v Speaker 1>it was the whole idea of when you're when you're

0:19:01.560 --> 0:19:04.800
<v Speaker 1>young and you you don't have much, then you're willing

0:19:04.840 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 1>to go all out because you don't really you're not

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:09.719
<v Speaker 1>worried about losing anything, right, because you don't have anything

0:19:09.720 --> 0:19:12.199
<v Speaker 1>to lose. That could be a rookie player, right. But

0:19:12.240 --> 0:19:14.480
<v Speaker 1>then you get a few years in and now you've

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:17.320
<v Speaker 1>got elect you got something built, you got a little

0:19:17.320 --> 0:19:19.679
<v Speaker 1>something built, and now you're trying to hold on. And

0:19:19.720 --> 0:19:21.320
<v Speaker 1>when you're trying to hold on, you get a lot

0:19:21.359 --> 0:19:23.359
<v Speaker 1>more conservative. And we all do it in our everyday lives.

0:19:23.600 --> 0:19:25.679
<v Speaker 1>Think about how carefree you were when you were in

0:19:25.720 --> 0:19:28.280
<v Speaker 1>your early twenties relative to how you may be when

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:30.000
<v Speaker 1>you're in your forties and you've got a wife and kids,

0:19:30.000 --> 0:19:34.040
<v Speaker 1>you gotta support, like your chance, your ability, or your

0:19:35.200 --> 0:19:39.240
<v Speaker 1>ability to take chances, or your your willingness to take

0:19:39.320 --> 0:19:42.159
<v Speaker 1>chances decreases quite a bit. And so it could be

0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:44.439
<v Speaker 1>the same thing with a player like Dak where the

0:19:44.520 --> 0:19:47.600
<v Speaker 1>most after you got that success of twenty sixteen, now

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:49.480
<v Speaker 1>he may not be maybe a little bit more tentative

0:19:49.480 --> 0:19:51.480
<v Speaker 1>because he's like, I gotta make sure I make the

0:19:51.560 --> 0:19:53.760
<v Speaker 1>right decision because I've got something I'm building here and

0:19:53.800 --> 0:19:55.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to lose what I have. You know,

0:19:55.560 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 1>all right, Well, let's take our first break and when

0:19:58.040 --> 0:20:01.520
<v Speaker 1>we come back to Cowboys do have to face the

0:20:01.760 --> 0:20:04.640
<v Speaker 1>New York Giants this weekend, So we'll get into the

0:20:04.680 --> 0:20:07.440
<v Speaker 1>giants offense when we come back. It can be hard

0:20:07.480 --> 0:20:10.920
<v Speaker 1>to find the right resource for learning about important financial matters.

0:20:11.160 --> 0:20:13.359
<v Speaker 1>You search how to build savings, you end up reading

0:20:13.359 --> 0:20:16.399
<v Speaker 1>about the one weird ingredient from supermarkets that can make

0:20:16.400 --> 0:20:19.680
<v Speaker 1>you taller. That's why Bank of America build Better Money

0:20:19.680 --> 0:20:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Habits dot Com, a safe little corner of the Internet

0:20:22.320 --> 0:20:25.639
<v Speaker 1>for answering your financial questions. Full of simple videos and tips,

0:20:25.720 --> 0:20:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Better Money Habits can show you how to make the

0:20:27.560 --> 0:20:30.480
<v Speaker 1>most of your money without resorting to random searches that

0:20:30.520 --> 0:20:33.560
<v Speaker 1>always seem to lead to unbelievable photos of childhood stars

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:36.600
<v Speaker 1>grown up. To learn more, visit better money habits dot com.

0:20:36.640 --> 0:20:39.160
<v Speaker 1>I definitely have an Instagram foody thing, but the low

0:20:39.200 --> 0:20:41.800
<v Speaker 1>light camera on my new Samsung Galaxy S nine from

0:20:41.800 --> 0:20:44.119
<v Speaker 1>ATNT is getting me a whole new world of likes

0:20:44.119 --> 0:20:47.399
<v Speaker 1>and shares. Baskets of bread by candlelight, colorful fruit plates

0:20:47.400 --> 0:20:50.000
<v Speaker 1>in full sun. Even a dimly lit Cobs salad was

0:20:50.040 --> 0:20:53.040
<v Speaker 1>recently hailed as a masterpiece. Come in now and ask

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:55.440
<v Speaker 1>how to get half off the new Samsung Galaxy S

0:20:55.560 --> 0:20:58.040
<v Speaker 1>nine from AT and T AT and T more for

0:20:58.119 --> 0:21:00.640
<v Speaker 1>your thing, that's our thing, limited time moments he store

0:21:00.640 --> 0:21:02.639
<v Speaker 1>for details or att dot com slaft Samsung pick a

0:21:02.720 --> 0:21:04.879
<v Speaker 1>dual Lapierre supports F one five x two former du

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:07.560
<v Speaker 1>labiaturs installed on the rear camera. Oh I am craving

0:21:07.560 --> 0:21:09.920
<v Speaker 1>a Doctor Pepper. I got some soda. I asked not

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:14.400
<v Speaker 1>for soda, I asked for ice, cold, cravable, Doctor Pepper.

0:21:14.760 --> 0:21:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Its flavor is more one of a kind. Been a

0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:22.000
<v Speaker 1>foretold sloth with a thirst for speed. Stop settling for

0:21:22.080 --> 0:21:28.560
<v Speaker 1>soda and start demanding Doctor Pepper. I love sloths. When

0:21:28.600 --> 0:21:31.359
<v Speaker 1>you crave a Doctor Pepper. Nothing else will do. Grab

0:21:31.359 --> 0:21:34.359
<v Speaker 1>an ice cold twenty ounce of doctor Pepper today. Doctor Pepper,

0:21:34.440 --> 0:21:37.240
<v Speaker 1>the one you crave. To work this big land. You

0:21:37.320 --> 0:21:40.440
<v Speaker 1>need equipment with values rooted as deep in Texas soil

0:21:40.480 --> 0:21:43.680
<v Speaker 1>as you are. Like John Deer compact tractors for a

0:21:43.760 --> 0:21:46.480
<v Speaker 1>six year power train, warrant to him, big features that

0:21:46.640 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 1>help you work less so you have more time to

0:21:48.840 --> 0:21:51.080
<v Speaker 1>do what you love. John Deer was first in the

0:21:51.119 --> 0:21:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Texas fields, and we're proud to be on the field

0:21:53.600 --> 0:21:56.600
<v Speaker 1>as the official agg and turf equipment of the Dallas Cowboys.

0:21:56.840 --> 0:22:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Find Texas sized deals at my John Deer dealer dot com.

0:22:00.040 --> 0:22:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Slash football terms, conditions, exclusions, and warranty limitations apply, so

0:22:03.600 --> 0:22:07.840
<v Speaker 1>you can move for details. Back to the break, all right.

0:22:07.960 --> 0:22:11.520
<v Speaker 1>One of our biggest topic every single show since we

0:22:11.680 --> 0:22:16.000
<v Speaker 1>got started this season, since training camp has been the

0:22:16.040 --> 0:22:19.679
<v Speaker 1>safety position. We've talked about it every single show. Now

0:22:20.359 --> 0:22:23.960
<v Speaker 1>to our surprise, I would say that was one of

0:22:24.000 --> 0:22:28.120
<v Speaker 1>the least things you noticed on a negative side watching

0:22:28.760 --> 0:22:31.399
<v Speaker 1>this last game, this first game of the Cowboys, So

0:22:31.400 --> 0:22:34.359
<v Speaker 1>I could say it's one of the positives. Yeah, exactly exactly,

0:22:34.440 --> 0:22:36.399
<v Speaker 1>But when gave you say it was one of the

0:22:36.440 --> 0:22:40.840
<v Speaker 1>positives with an asterisk that they got beat well, given

0:22:40.880 --> 0:22:43.440
<v Speaker 1>the fact that you expected, okay, you have these expectations

0:22:43.480 --> 0:22:45.240
<v Speaker 1>for the offense and stuff like that, and then it

0:22:45.240 --> 0:22:49.280
<v Speaker 1>turns out that right, it was very similar to practice

0:22:49.440 --> 0:22:51.960
<v Speaker 1>with the fact that and I even said this several times,

0:22:52.000 --> 0:22:54.960
<v Speaker 1>like this offense isn't going to be testing these safeties

0:22:55.080 --> 0:22:57.280
<v Speaker 1>up and down the field to be like, wow, you know,

0:22:57.400 --> 0:22:59.880
<v Speaker 1>great job. And I don't think Carolina tested the same

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:04.120
<v Speaker 1>tis vertically down the field where I mean, were these

0:23:04.119 --> 0:23:06.040
<v Speaker 1>guys could have a chance to make make a lot

0:23:06.080 --> 0:23:08.879
<v Speaker 1>of plays good or bad. So it'll get tougher for

0:23:09.000 --> 0:23:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Heath and Frasier than this game. But it certainly was

0:23:11.720 --> 0:23:13.600
<v Speaker 1>a good start, and Frasier did a nice job of

0:23:13.920 --> 0:23:15.640
<v Speaker 1>when he was around the ball, he did a nice job.

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:17.600
<v Speaker 1>But were they not tested a few times from the

0:23:17.640 --> 0:23:20.119
<v Speaker 1>standpoint of the running game with McCaffrey getting loose and

0:23:20.160 --> 0:23:21.920
<v Speaker 1>they had to get him, like none of those turned

0:23:21.920 --> 0:23:25.840
<v Speaker 1>into touchdowns, those those plays where Cam got loose, plays

0:23:25.840 --> 0:23:28.760
<v Speaker 1>where McCaffrey got loose, I think from the standpoint of

0:23:28.800 --> 0:23:31.479
<v Speaker 1>just how they played overall, yeah, like yeah, you're right,

0:23:31.480 --> 0:23:34.800
<v Speaker 1>they didn't get tested back downfield and patting the passing

0:23:34.840 --> 0:23:37.520
<v Speaker 1>game because that's not the offense of the Carolina Panthers.

0:23:37.680 --> 0:23:39.679
<v Speaker 1>But they certainly got tested in the running game, I thought, right,

0:23:39.720 --> 0:23:41.560
<v Speaker 1>But I'm just saying the running game and the short

0:23:41.560 --> 0:23:44.520
<v Speaker 1>passing game with McCaffrey, you'll be tested even more if

0:23:44.520 --> 0:23:47.240
<v Speaker 1>you're having to play you know, way back like in

0:23:47.400 --> 0:23:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Rowan Oak. You know, when you're trying to play you know,

0:23:49.280 --> 0:23:52.400
<v Speaker 1>when they get to Arlington. Seriously, Carolina, you've be way

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:55.280
<v Speaker 1>back there. I don't know Winston Salem. I didn't have

0:23:55.440 --> 0:23:58.120
<v Speaker 1>a good one for way back in Charlotte. I thought

0:23:58.160 --> 0:24:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Roan was good. Yeah, you're way got the picture, and

0:24:02.200 --> 0:24:04.520
<v Speaker 1>then all of a sudden, anybody's running. But you will

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:07.760
<v Speaker 1>play Washington and have you know Thompson that the guy,

0:24:07.720 --> 0:24:11.040
<v Speaker 1>yea Chris Thomps, Thompson, I mean somebody like that. So

0:24:11.240 --> 0:24:13.080
<v Speaker 1>when they and they do have some some little bit

0:24:13.080 --> 0:24:16.360
<v Speaker 1>more vertical passing game, But overall, I thought they played well.

0:24:16.480 --> 0:24:19.280
<v Speaker 1>My point though, I'm not one hundred percent sure Woods

0:24:19.320 --> 0:24:21.800
<v Speaker 1>comes back. I mean I don't think Woods start Woods

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:26.480
<v Speaker 1>was a given starter when we got into the season. Sorry,

0:24:26.600 --> 0:24:29.840
<v Speaker 1>before getting into the season, now, being watching the way

0:24:29.840 --> 0:24:34.320
<v Speaker 1>that Cavon played this in this game, are you guys

0:24:34.400 --> 0:24:37.240
<v Speaker 1>voting for him just to automatically just keep an in there.

0:24:37.400 --> 0:24:40.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna be really aggravated if Xavier Woods isn't the

0:24:40.960 --> 0:24:44.399
<v Speaker 1>starter when he comes back, because if Cavon freight and

0:24:44.400 --> 0:24:46.960
<v Speaker 1>they're like, oh, he's really more of a box safety,

0:24:47.080 --> 0:24:49.640
<v Speaker 1>but he played well so he can do the job. Well,

0:24:49.680 --> 0:24:52.199
<v Speaker 1>then how come Tyron Matthew's not here or any of

0:24:52.240 --> 0:24:55.960
<v Speaker 1>these other guys. If it's as interchangeable as it's as

0:24:56.119 --> 0:25:00.199
<v Speaker 1>that suggests, then why didn't you do anything before? So

0:25:00.280 --> 0:25:02.080
<v Speaker 1>because the excuse we always are was that's not our

0:25:02.119 --> 0:25:04.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of safety that I hope if it's a column

0:25:04.640 --> 0:25:07.320
<v Speaker 1>if Xavier Woods, if he comes back and they go

0:25:07.400 --> 0:25:12.479
<v Speaker 1>with that guy, that's ridiculous. So you're challenging guys. It's

0:25:12.920 --> 0:25:17.040
<v Speaker 1>against Cavon at all. I mea culpa, Cavon, I assume

0:25:17.080 --> 0:25:19.440
<v Speaker 1>you don't listen to the show, but maybe he does.

0:25:19.600 --> 0:25:21.880
<v Speaker 1>I doubt it. I've been talking. I mean, I don't.

0:25:22.000 --> 0:25:24.280
<v Speaker 1>We haven't been talking bad, but we've been doubting you

0:25:24.400 --> 0:25:27.040
<v Speaker 1>for months. And I thought he played great. I really

0:25:27.080 --> 0:25:30.159
<v Speaker 1>did for a guy making you know, uh, for a

0:25:30.160 --> 0:25:32.040
<v Speaker 1>guy making his first start. I thought he was really good.

0:25:32.080 --> 0:25:35.440
<v Speaker 1>But Xavier Woods is the free safety with the skill

0:25:35.480 --> 0:25:38.840
<v Speaker 1>set that nobody else has. And so if you just

0:25:38.880 --> 0:25:41.399
<v Speaker 1>automatically pull the plug on that because he missed a

0:25:41.440 --> 0:25:44.200
<v Speaker 1>game or two, that tells me that that was a

0:25:44.280 --> 0:25:47.719
<v Speaker 1>crock of crap. So yeah, I hope these other all

0:25:47.760 --> 0:25:51.199
<v Speaker 1>these other safeties that weren't scheme fits and all that stuff. Now,

0:25:51.280 --> 0:25:53.520
<v Speaker 1>let me change this up a little bit. Let's say

0:25:53.720 --> 0:25:57.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that our perspective change because there were so

0:25:57.920 --> 0:26:01.879
<v Speaker 1>much negative things coming from the office. Now, had the

0:26:01.960 --> 0:26:05.320
<v Speaker 1>offense played well enough and the offense was moving, now

0:26:05.440 --> 0:26:10.280
<v Speaker 1>you start pinpointing things that stand out more the way

0:26:10.320 --> 0:26:13.399
<v Speaker 1>that he played, would it be good enough to where

0:26:13.480 --> 0:26:16.200
<v Speaker 1>you would have still being like, okay, Kevin's good there,

0:26:17.040 --> 0:26:19.600
<v Speaker 1>I think. So I didn't see I didn't see plays

0:26:20.000 --> 0:26:23.240
<v Speaker 1>where Cavon missed his assignment. I didn't see plays where

0:26:23.280 --> 0:26:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Cavon miss tackles. I didn't see plays where Cavon had

0:26:26.560 --> 0:26:28.840
<v Speaker 1>a bad angle, Like I didn't see that. Maybe it

0:26:28.920 --> 0:26:30.679
<v Speaker 1>was there and I missed it. I didn't see that.

0:26:30.800 --> 0:26:33.800
<v Speaker 1>So I think he played well. I thought overall the

0:26:33.840 --> 0:26:36.560
<v Speaker 1>safeties played pretty well. Heath had a chance to get

0:26:36.560 --> 0:26:38.600
<v Speaker 1>an interception, it would have been a great play, but

0:26:38.680 --> 0:26:42.960
<v Speaker 1>he had a chance saved a touchdown. Um you don't. Yeah,

0:26:43.000 --> 0:26:44.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean he's always around the ball, but you know,

0:26:45.119 --> 0:26:47.679
<v Speaker 1>you gotta you gotta come up with that play. He

0:26:48.080 --> 0:26:51.560
<v Speaker 1>I thought he played pretty well other than that, but um,

0:26:51.600 --> 0:26:53.560
<v Speaker 1>I thought, you know, the safety were good. They'll be

0:26:53.600 --> 0:26:55.680
<v Speaker 1>tested more than they'll be tested this week. Oh yeah,

0:26:55.760 --> 0:26:58.800
<v Speaker 1>more than that time. Oh yeah, because they have a

0:26:58.880 --> 0:27:01.120
<v Speaker 1>runner that you can catch the ball out of the backfield,

0:27:01.200 --> 0:27:04.119
<v Speaker 1>and they've got receiving threats that can go down the field,

0:27:04.200 --> 0:27:05.879
<v Speaker 1>and their runner is going to get to the safety

0:27:05.920 --> 0:27:08.480
<v Speaker 1>a few times. Yeah, he'll get there. I got a

0:27:08.480 --> 0:27:10.480
<v Speaker 1>feeling he's going to get to the safety a few times.

0:27:10.520 --> 0:27:12.919
<v Speaker 1>And he's big. Yeah, he's a big dude and he

0:27:12.960 --> 0:27:16.840
<v Speaker 1>can run. Yeah. So tomorrow we'll we'll get it deep

0:27:17.320 --> 0:27:21.280
<v Speaker 1>into the Giants Tomorrow. I want Dave to tell me

0:27:21.320 --> 0:27:23.840
<v Speaker 1>whether he thinks after he reviews this team. I want

0:27:23.920 --> 0:27:26.080
<v Speaker 1>him to tell me if he thinks that the runner

0:27:26.119 --> 0:27:28.040
<v Speaker 1>in New York is better than the runner in Dallas.

0:27:28.560 --> 0:27:30.920
<v Speaker 1>I want to know I've already gotten it. Wait, save

0:27:31.000 --> 0:27:33.720
<v Speaker 1>until tomorrow. I've already gotten a john like I'm I

0:27:33.760 --> 0:27:37.960
<v Speaker 1>have started. So I'll let you know teaser times you

0:27:37.960 --> 0:27:40.200
<v Speaker 1>studied him in college soup with the draft shows. I

0:27:40.280 --> 0:27:42.280
<v Speaker 1>just want to I just want to know, like, do

0:27:42.320 --> 0:27:43.879
<v Speaker 1>you think which one you think is? We can get

0:27:43.920 --> 0:27:47.880
<v Speaker 1>into that, but after after having watched the first I've

0:27:47.920 --> 0:27:50.439
<v Speaker 1>watched the first half of the season opener, Giants and

0:27:50.520 --> 0:27:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Jacks way more worried about the guys out wide than

0:27:53.600 --> 0:27:56.639
<v Speaker 1>the guy in the ball really yes, well, yes, his

0:27:56.760 --> 0:27:58.879
<v Speaker 1>big run came later though, right. Yeah, I hope that

0:27:59.040 --> 0:28:01.959
<v Speaker 1>Zeke is is better at running back because if not,

0:28:02.000 --> 0:28:04.679
<v Speaker 1>and if you're just doing that, you know, checks on

0:28:04.720 --> 0:28:10.280
<v Speaker 1>each side offensive line, Cowboys, running back. I hope it's

0:28:10.320 --> 0:28:13.159
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys right now with Zeke at Barkley Ride receiver, it

0:28:13.200 --> 0:28:14.960
<v Speaker 1>is You're not about to win. The next two is

0:28:15.040 --> 0:28:19.840
<v Speaker 1>not tied end and it's not quarterback. I don't care

0:28:19.960 --> 0:28:23.280
<v Speaker 1>what people just kind of face them Ali man, I

0:28:23.280 --> 0:28:25.680
<v Speaker 1>think it's a push at quarterback. I personally think it's

0:28:25.680 --> 0:28:27.399
<v Speaker 1>a push. I don't know how you can say that

0:28:27.680 --> 0:28:31.960
<v Speaker 1>watching how Eli played last season and how he played

0:28:32.800 --> 0:28:34.480
<v Speaker 1>better than one of them is going to go to

0:28:34.520 --> 0:28:36.640
<v Speaker 1>the Hall of Fame. I know that. I'm saying, how

0:28:36.680 --> 0:28:39.680
<v Speaker 1>can anyone say Dak is better than Eli? Oh? Oh,

0:28:39.800 --> 0:28:41.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm I've just understood you. I thought you were saying

0:28:41.840 --> 0:28:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Dak is better than I think you're both playing. Neither

0:28:46.200 --> 0:28:49.160
<v Speaker 1>one of them is playing. I'm sorry if I said that.

0:28:49.280 --> 0:28:52.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry that Dak is not. He was two years

0:28:52.400 --> 0:28:55.160
<v Speaker 1>ago rookie year looked like, you know, Arrow was going

0:28:55.240 --> 0:28:58.640
<v Speaker 1>this way, But no, he's he's not. About two years ago,

0:28:58.680 --> 0:29:00.600
<v Speaker 1>he was playing out a pretty high light. Giants should

0:29:00.600 --> 0:29:02.880
<v Speaker 1>be last year. The Cowboys should be more worried about

0:29:02.880 --> 0:29:05.000
<v Speaker 1>what Eli can do than what that can do. Um,

0:29:05.640 --> 0:29:08.160
<v Speaker 1>definitely throwing the ball. Yeah, I don't know. I think

0:29:08.200 --> 0:29:10.200
<v Speaker 1>they got to be worried about what those receivers can do,

0:29:10.760 --> 0:29:13.080
<v Speaker 1>and that that's in some respect has to do with

0:29:13.120 --> 0:29:14.720
<v Speaker 1>the quarterback. But I also think he can get the

0:29:14.760 --> 0:29:17.080
<v Speaker 1>ball out quick, and those receivers can turn a little

0:29:17.080 --> 0:29:19.320
<v Speaker 1>bit into a ton, right, So that's the part I'm

0:29:19.360 --> 0:29:21.560
<v Speaker 1>more worried about, is that receiver. Well, you're stealing my thunder,

0:29:22.160 --> 0:29:26.200
<v Speaker 1>so it's fine. Thanks for bringing it up. Well, both

0:29:26.320 --> 0:29:30.400
<v Speaker 1>teams are oh and one right now, and if you

0:29:30.520 --> 0:29:34.720
<v Speaker 1>were talking yesterday about how important these early games can

0:29:34.880 --> 0:29:37.320
<v Speaker 1>matter when he comes down to later in the season.

0:29:37.520 --> 0:29:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Now both teams and the Cowboys playing at home I

0:29:42.040 --> 0:29:47.160
<v Speaker 1>believe they've maybe beat the Giants the last like four times.

0:29:47.280 --> 0:29:49.360
<v Speaker 1>I think they haven't lost them. Well, they lost to

0:29:49.440 --> 0:29:51.800
<v Speaker 1>him at home in twenty sixteen, and they beat him

0:29:51.920 --> 0:29:54.400
<v Speaker 1>last year, and they beat him in fifteen, and they

0:29:54.440 --> 0:30:00.480
<v Speaker 1>beat him in fourteen. But what I'm getting and it's

0:30:00.520 --> 0:30:03.920
<v Speaker 1>like at this point, this whole home field advantage that

0:30:04.120 --> 0:30:06.640
<v Speaker 1>people like to bring up, I don't think that's a

0:30:06.800 --> 0:30:10.160
<v Speaker 1>factor right now with what you have in the NFL

0:30:10.320 --> 0:30:13.320
<v Speaker 1>home field. There's probably two or three stadiums, in my opinion,

0:30:13.360 --> 0:30:16.040
<v Speaker 1>where home field really matters. In my opinion, I think

0:30:16.120 --> 0:30:19.239
<v Speaker 1>by and large in the NFL, it's you get out

0:30:19.280 --> 0:30:21.560
<v Speaker 1>there on the field and it's these teams are very

0:30:21.600 --> 0:30:25.040
<v Speaker 1>adept at being able to be able to operate their

0:30:25.080 --> 0:30:27.800
<v Speaker 1>offense and their defense even when there's noise coming from

0:30:27.840 --> 0:30:29.840
<v Speaker 1>the crowd. You look at some of the upsets this

0:30:30.040 --> 0:30:32.640
<v Speaker 1>last weekend, there was some pretty good home teams that

0:30:32.720 --> 0:30:35.760
<v Speaker 1>got beat So I just I don't believe home fiel

0:30:35.800 --> 0:30:38.760
<v Speaker 1>advantage is it's a huge a deal in this particular sport,

0:30:38.840 --> 0:30:40.640
<v Speaker 1>as it may be another like basketball, I think it's

0:30:40.640 --> 0:30:42.479
<v Speaker 1>a huge deal. I don't think so on football. I'm

0:30:42.560 --> 0:30:45.680
<v Speaker 1>conflicted about that. I think the thing with home field advantages,

0:30:45.680 --> 0:30:48.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, and you're right. I mean the Saints jump

0:30:48.240 --> 0:30:50.080
<v Speaker 1>right out to me, that is a nice home field

0:30:50.080 --> 0:30:53.000
<v Speaker 1>advantage that was good for nothing on Sunday. Yeah, and

0:30:53.080 --> 0:30:54.520
<v Speaker 1>that's one of the places I would have said and

0:30:54.600 --> 0:30:56.720
<v Speaker 1>the home field advantage actually matter. There were a couple

0:30:56.800 --> 0:30:59.680
<v Speaker 1>of others, But I do think home field advantage is

0:30:59.680 --> 0:31:02.400
<v Speaker 1>in poor but I think it's I think home field

0:31:02.400 --> 0:31:04.760
<v Speaker 1>advantage is what makes things go from bad to worse.

0:31:05.000 --> 0:31:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Like if you're you know, Cowboys, case in point, like

0:31:08.520 --> 0:31:10.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe they play a little bit better at at and

0:31:10.640 --> 0:31:12.320
<v Speaker 1>T Stadium. They might not win the game, but it

0:31:12.440 --> 0:31:14.240
<v Speaker 1>might not be that bad. And you know, the Seahawks

0:31:14.280 --> 0:31:16.080
<v Speaker 1>are the same way. I think when you get a

0:31:16.120 --> 0:31:18.760
<v Speaker 1>good thing role in that crowd helps, you know, like

0:31:19.080 --> 0:31:23.640
<v Speaker 1>it keeps the other team off their game. And but yeah,

0:31:23.760 --> 0:31:25.560
<v Speaker 1>for the most part, I don't think you're going to

0:31:25.600 --> 0:31:27.320
<v Speaker 1>lose a game because of home field advantage. I think

0:31:27.320 --> 0:31:29.560
<v Speaker 1>you can lose a game worse than you should because

0:31:29.560 --> 0:31:32.520
<v Speaker 1>of home field advantage. So right now, at this point,

0:31:32.600 --> 0:31:35.440
<v Speaker 1>we've gotten a chance to watch every team play and

0:31:35.640 --> 0:31:38.760
<v Speaker 1>get a feel of what it is like at this point,

0:31:38.960 --> 0:31:43.000
<v Speaker 1>and based on the results that we saw this whole weekend,

0:31:43.520 --> 0:31:46.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of ugly games, a lot of disappointment happening

0:31:46.720 --> 0:31:49.440
<v Speaker 1>around the league. I would say, but at this point,

0:31:49.520 --> 0:31:52.880
<v Speaker 1>where do you think the Cowboys stand versus all the

0:31:53.000 --> 0:31:57.160
<v Speaker 1>other teams in the league power rankings? They would be

0:31:57.280 --> 0:32:01.160
<v Speaker 1>in the low twenty, twenty three, twenty four. I think

0:32:02.120 --> 0:32:05.360
<v Speaker 1>they definitely did not put up the worst game of

0:32:05.480 --> 0:32:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the weekend, right, but they are in the running and

0:32:07.760 --> 0:32:09.880
<v Speaker 1>put it that way. I mean, and nobody should feel

0:32:09.920 --> 0:32:12.920
<v Speaker 1>worse than the Detroit Lions today, in my opinion, given

0:32:13.000 --> 0:32:16.440
<v Speaker 1>up fifty at home to a rookie quarterback. Five picks

0:32:16.520 --> 0:32:19.960
<v Speaker 1>from your franchise guy, who I've been a big defender

0:32:20.040 --> 0:32:22.200
<v Speaker 1>of Nick doesn't like him. Maybe he's right because that

0:32:22.320 --> 0:32:27.360
<v Speaker 1>was terrible. Matthew Stafford, who I'm talking about the Saints

0:32:27.480 --> 0:32:29.959
<v Speaker 1>again to bring them up. I mean, ten point favorites

0:32:30.080 --> 0:32:32.320
<v Speaker 1>have not. Here's the I don't think that the Saints

0:32:32.680 --> 0:32:35.400
<v Speaker 1>can look at that game and be like so worried

0:32:35.480 --> 0:32:37.600
<v Speaker 1>because they did they still did put up forty points

0:32:37.960 --> 0:32:40.920
<v Speaker 1>and so offensively they got to feel like, hey, number one,

0:32:40.920 --> 0:32:43.560
<v Speaker 1>we got to tighten up some stuff defensively, and you know,

0:32:43.640 --> 0:32:45.080
<v Speaker 1>we just got to figure out some things I don't

0:32:45.080 --> 0:32:47.160
<v Speaker 1>think they worry as much as like the Cowboys. You

0:32:47.200 --> 0:32:48.920
<v Speaker 1>look at the Cowboys, and the reason why I said

0:32:48.920 --> 0:32:51.880
<v Speaker 1>they're probably mid to low twenties is because if you

0:32:52.000 --> 0:32:53.800
<v Speaker 1>go back and look at the problems they've had over

0:32:53.880 --> 0:32:56.320
<v Speaker 1>the last span of games, not just one game, but

0:32:56.520 --> 0:32:59.320
<v Speaker 1>span of games, you start to wonder, is this offense

0:32:59.360 --> 0:33:01.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna find his mojo? And if you can't score points.

0:33:01.680 --> 0:33:03.600
<v Speaker 1>You said this yesterday, If you can't score points, you're

0:33:03.600 --> 0:33:06.840
<v Speaker 1>not gonna win games. Unless you've got a historically great defense,

0:33:07.120 --> 0:33:09.720
<v Speaker 1>the thing not going to win games. And that's the

0:33:09.800 --> 0:33:12.880
<v Speaker 1>part that probably worries the Cowboys more than any other

0:33:12.920 --> 0:33:14.960
<v Speaker 1>franchise right now. There are probably a few other teams

0:33:14.960 --> 0:33:16.360
<v Speaker 1>that are in that boat, but there are a lot

0:33:16.360 --> 0:33:18.600
<v Speaker 1>of teams to score points. This week that lost. Cowboys

0:33:18.640 --> 0:33:20.360
<v Speaker 1>weren't one of them. They lost and didn't score anything.

0:33:20.480 --> 0:33:23.680
<v Speaker 1>One more. I will eats. I will stop bringing up

0:33:23.720 --> 0:33:26.240
<v Speaker 1>the New Orleans Saints for the day after I'm done

0:33:26.280 --> 0:33:28.680
<v Speaker 1>with this. But I think it's pertinent because the stat

0:33:28.760 --> 0:33:31.120
<v Speaker 1>that's floating around right there is if you start owing

0:33:31.160 --> 0:33:34.040
<v Speaker 1>to you know what, like eighty ninety percent of teams

0:33:34.040 --> 0:33:36.720
<v Speaker 1>that do that don't make the playoffs. Well the Saints. Well,

0:33:36.960 --> 0:33:39.240
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like I'm defending the Cowboys. The Saints started

0:33:39.440 --> 0:33:42.040
<v Speaker 1>in two last year and made the playoffs. At the

0:33:42.120 --> 0:33:46.320
<v Speaker 1>problem is what the Saints have. They had the offensive

0:33:46.360 --> 0:33:48.920
<v Speaker 1>rookie of the year, their whole I mean, their draft class.

0:33:49.400 --> 0:33:52.160
<v Speaker 1>It rivals the twenty sixteen Cowboys in terms of draft

0:33:52.200 --> 0:33:54.840
<v Speaker 1>class making an impact, and Drew Brees, who was going

0:33:54.880 --> 0:33:57.000
<v Speaker 1>to the Hall of Fame, played the most efficient season

0:33:57.040 --> 0:34:00.040
<v Speaker 1>of his career. Did you see anything on Sunday that

0:34:00.120 --> 0:34:03.680
<v Speaker 1>gives you confidence that the Cowboys can can engineer a

0:34:03.800 --> 0:34:07.400
<v Speaker 1>turnaround like that? And yeah, I honestly don't know what

0:34:07.520 --> 0:34:09.920
<v Speaker 1>because I can't remember back to what New Orleans, not

0:34:10.000 --> 0:34:11.799
<v Speaker 1>that I even watch those games. What New Orleans did

0:34:11.840 --> 0:34:13.960
<v Speaker 1>in those two losses. How did they perform? Like did

0:34:14.000 --> 0:34:16.160
<v Speaker 1>they look as bad as the Cowboys offensive? I can

0:34:16.320 --> 0:34:18.360
<v Speaker 1>tell you right now that they probably didn't enter the

0:34:18.400 --> 0:34:20.600
<v Speaker 1>season just thinking that Kamara was going to be the

0:34:20.640 --> 0:34:23.440
<v Speaker 1>guy that they have to just lean on or you know,

0:34:23.880 --> 0:34:26.680
<v Speaker 1>profile him that much in the offense. He had done

0:34:26.719 --> 0:34:29.400
<v Speaker 1>some nice things. He has an expanded role. Next thing,

0:34:29.480 --> 0:34:31.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, he is one of the more dynamic players

0:34:32.040 --> 0:34:34.440
<v Speaker 1>in this league. So then the question becomes were there

0:34:34.520 --> 0:34:37.360
<v Speaker 1>guys yesterday? Did we see things from guys yesterday that

0:34:37.520 --> 0:34:40.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe could give you a reason to believe? I'm sorry, Sunday,

0:34:40.320 --> 0:34:42.640
<v Speaker 1>that maybe gives you a reason to believe. Like, let's say,

0:34:42.680 --> 0:34:45.880
<v Speaker 1>for example, did you see anything from wide receivers and

0:34:45.960 --> 0:34:48.400
<v Speaker 1>tight ends. It makes you say, hey, if this quarterback

0:34:48.560 --> 0:34:51.400
<v Speaker 1>figures out how to get the ball to the right

0:34:51.440 --> 0:34:54.200
<v Speaker 1>place at the right time, you got some some different

0:34:54.200 --> 0:34:58.400
<v Speaker 1>options in the right there. Okay, I like your questions,

0:34:58.440 --> 0:35:00.680
<v Speaker 1>but you guys can answer you when we come back

0:35:00.719 --> 0:35:04.279
<v Speaker 1>from this final break. Okay. Cowboys fans know that the

0:35:04.440 --> 0:35:06.960
<v Speaker 1>second best of anything simply won't cut it, and your

0:35:07.000 --> 0:35:09.560
<v Speaker 1>skincare should be no different. A long time locker room

0:35:09.600 --> 0:35:12.359
<v Speaker 1>favorite of the players and the official men's skincare brand

0:35:12.400 --> 0:35:15.320
<v Speaker 1>of the Dallas Cowboys, Dallas based Jack Black is the

0:35:15.440 --> 0:35:18.080
<v Speaker 1>number one best selling men's skincare brand in the country

0:35:18.239 --> 0:35:20.719
<v Speaker 1>because we make products that help guys look, smell, and

0:35:21.040 --> 0:35:24.160
<v Speaker 1>feel better. Visit get Jack Black dot com slash Cowboys

0:35:24.239 --> 0:35:26.240
<v Speaker 1>to get ten dollars off your first order of fifty

0:35:26.280 --> 0:35:30.160
<v Speaker 1>dollars or more. Jack Black Look good, Smell good, feel good,

0:35:30.280 --> 0:35:33.600
<v Speaker 1>official men's skincare brand of the Dallas Cowboys. Star Sports

0:35:33.680 --> 0:35:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Tours is the only official fan travel partner of the

0:35:36.480 --> 0:35:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys, offering exclusive game weekend travel packages with sideline

0:35:41.040 --> 0:35:44.560
<v Speaker 1>access and photo ops with current players, alumni, and cheerleaders.

0:35:44.760 --> 0:35:46.880
<v Speaker 1>That's not all, though, You'll get to talk xs and

0:35:46.920 --> 0:35:49.800
<v Speaker 1>os with Senior Director of Player Personnel Will McClay and

0:35:49.880 --> 0:35:52.759
<v Speaker 1>of course with yours truly me, Brian broad Us. You

0:35:52.840 --> 0:35:55.680
<v Speaker 1>can trust the official fan travel partner of the Dallas Cowboys,

0:35:55.719 --> 0:35:58.600
<v Speaker 1>and with us you'll travel like a pro. Visit Cowboys

0:35:58.680 --> 0:36:02.240
<v Speaker 1>travel dot com to book your travel package today. Before

0:36:02.320 --> 0:36:04.280
<v Speaker 1>there was a draft, you could size up a cowboy

0:36:04.400 --> 0:36:07.200
<v Speaker 1>by three simple factors. The crease in his hat, the

0:36:07.320 --> 0:36:10.200
<v Speaker 1>bend of his brim, and his unbending attitude a man.

0:36:10.360 --> 0:36:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Stetson didn't just protect him from what life through at him.

0:36:13.360 --> 0:36:18.080
<v Speaker 1>It projected a rugged, unstoppable spirit. Stetson hats are still American,

0:36:18.160 --> 0:36:21.000
<v Speaker 1>made with pride. Right here in Texas. There's still the

0:36:21.160 --> 0:36:25.000
<v Speaker 1>unofficial crowd of all self respecting Cowboys, and Stetson is

0:36:25.000 --> 0:36:27.799
<v Speaker 1>proud to be on the field with America's team. Find

0:36:27.840 --> 0:36:31.160
<v Speaker 1>a retailer nearest you at Stetson dot com. Slash Cowboys.

0:36:31.640 --> 0:36:33.960
<v Speaker 1>What does it mean to be a Dallas Cowboys fan,

0:36:34.360 --> 0:36:36.560
<v Speaker 1>it means you've got the passion and the heart to

0:36:36.640 --> 0:36:39.720
<v Speaker 1>do your part supporting the Boys no matter what. That's

0:36:39.800 --> 0:36:42.520
<v Speaker 1>why when the game's on the line, you're on your feet,

0:36:42.640 --> 0:36:45.359
<v Speaker 1>whether you're at home or in the stands. Actually, you're

0:36:45.440 --> 0:36:48.399
<v Speaker 1>more than a fan. You are a member of Cowboys Nation,

0:36:48.600 --> 0:36:51.400
<v Speaker 1>and so is AT and T doing their part to

0:36:51.560 --> 0:36:55.720
<v Speaker 1>keep you connected to America's team all season. Law At

0:36:55.960 --> 0:37:00.279
<v Speaker 1>and T is a proud member of Cowboys Nation. Back

0:37:00.680 --> 0:37:04.160
<v Speaker 1>to the break, this read seems appropriate based off the

0:37:04.280 --> 0:37:06.879
<v Speaker 1>last game we saw. Picking number one in the draft

0:37:07.080 --> 0:37:09.320
<v Speaker 1>is a good thing, but picking your weggies is a

0:37:09.440 --> 0:37:13.319
<v Speaker 1>bad piece. So never pick again. I didn't say I'm

0:37:13.360 --> 0:37:15.800
<v Speaker 1>talking about last night. What we saw last night, the

0:37:15.920 --> 0:37:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Lions are looking like the number one preach for Tommy

0:37:19.719 --> 0:37:23.319
<v Speaker 1>John Instead, no weggie guarantee shop exclusive Cowboys underwear at

0:37:23.320 --> 0:37:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Tommy John dot com pard slash Cowboys. You get twenty

0:37:25.520 --> 0:37:28.279
<v Speaker 1>percent off your first order. That's Tommy John dot com

0:37:28.640 --> 0:37:31.640
<v Speaker 1>board slash Cowboys. No, the Cowboys won't be picking number

0:37:31.719 --> 0:37:34.960
<v Speaker 1>one in the draft and suck you don't want. Okay,

0:37:35.360 --> 0:37:41.439
<v Speaker 1>but before Miles comes back, um, I think that right? Yeah,

0:37:42.120 --> 0:37:44.680
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a pretty big game though, for

0:37:44.840 --> 0:37:47.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of reasons. One of them is you need

0:37:48.000 --> 0:37:50.520
<v Speaker 1>to decide kind of where you're going to go if

0:37:50.520 --> 0:37:53.600
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys, if there is a trade that they still

0:37:53.680 --> 0:37:56.360
<v Speaker 1>want to make, If you're O and two and you

0:37:56.480 --> 0:37:59.279
<v Speaker 1>lost to the Giants, it changes the course of things

0:37:59.320 --> 0:38:01.000
<v Speaker 1>a little bit now out. I mean, because it's like,

0:38:01.600 --> 0:38:04.520
<v Speaker 1>what type of team are you going to have if

0:38:04.560 --> 0:38:06.400
<v Speaker 1>this is a if you're going to bring a player

0:38:06.480 --> 0:38:08.080
<v Speaker 1>in that might help you and kind of get over

0:38:08.160 --> 0:38:10.160
<v Speaker 1>the top and fit, you know, fill a hole, that's fine.

0:38:10.200 --> 0:38:13.239
<v Speaker 1>But if not, then I mean, I don't know when

0:38:13.280 --> 0:38:16.560
<v Speaker 1>your defense can't do all the work. I honestly believe though,

0:38:16.600 --> 0:38:18.919
<v Speaker 1>that that's the kind of decision that I make after

0:38:19.560 --> 0:38:21.239
<v Speaker 1>three or four games. I don't think after two. I

0:38:21.360 --> 0:38:24.560
<v Speaker 1>know what the statistics say, but I'm I still and

0:38:24.640 --> 0:38:27.440
<v Speaker 1>again maybe this is just my own personal optimism. I

0:38:27.520 --> 0:38:30.040
<v Speaker 1>don't believe after two games in a sixteen game season,

0:38:30.120 --> 0:38:34.560
<v Speaker 1>anything is determined. So okay, mister optimistic, Yeah, before we

0:38:34.680 --> 0:38:37.719
<v Speaker 1>went into break, you post the question of did you

0:38:37.800 --> 0:38:43.239
<v Speaker 1>see anything from this team that offensively Yes? Yes, that

0:38:43.400 --> 0:38:47.839
<v Speaker 1>will make you feel better going or moving forward into

0:38:47.920 --> 0:38:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the season. Yes, And my answer your own the way

0:38:50.600 --> 0:38:53.000
<v Speaker 1>I would answer that question is yes, I did not

0:38:53.239 --> 0:38:56.800
<v Speaker 1>expect that the wide receivers and tight ends would be

0:38:56.920 --> 0:38:59.920
<v Speaker 1>open as much as they were until after the game.

0:39:00.200 --> 0:39:03.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm standing there in the locker room, Cole Beasley is

0:39:03.080 --> 0:39:05.560
<v Speaker 1>talking to the media and says, go back and watch

0:39:05.680 --> 0:39:08.080
<v Speaker 1>the film. You will see that wide receivers were open.

0:39:09.200 --> 0:39:11.759
<v Speaker 1>It made my eyebrow go up because I was like, Wow,

0:39:11.880 --> 0:39:14.359
<v Speaker 1>did he just say that? And then I went back

0:39:14.719 --> 0:39:16.480
<v Speaker 1>and I talked to Brian first because I didn't have

0:39:16.480 --> 0:39:18.320
<v Speaker 1>a chance to watch watch it before he went on

0:39:18.360 --> 0:39:20.960
<v Speaker 1>the air yesterday, and he was like, he's absolutely correct.

0:39:21.160 --> 0:39:23.160
<v Speaker 1>And then after the show I went back and watched

0:39:23.200 --> 0:39:26.080
<v Speaker 1>it and he was absolutely correct. There were wide receivers

0:39:26.120 --> 0:39:29.080
<v Speaker 1>and tight ends open throughout that game. And so that

0:39:29.239 --> 0:39:32.120
<v Speaker 1>gives me, like, personally makes me think, Okay, this is

0:39:32.200 --> 0:39:35.520
<v Speaker 1>not a bigger problem, and it makes me think that

0:39:35.960 --> 0:39:38.840
<v Speaker 1>although I do think I do think offensively they probably

0:39:38.880 --> 0:39:42.400
<v Speaker 1>could have done more to create more diversity in the offense.

0:39:43.080 --> 0:39:45.520
<v Speaker 1>It does make me think that even without that, they

0:39:45.640 --> 0:39:48.600
<v Speaker 1>had opportunities. There were plays where they got guys open,

0:39:48.600 --> 0:39:52.160
<v Speaker 1>they schemed guys open on plays and for whatever reason,

0:39:52.239 --> 0:39:54.920
<v Speaker 1>they didn't get the ball. So all I'm saying is

0:39:55.160 --> 0:39:57.960
<v Speaker 1>that does make me feel better. It still means your

0:39:58.000 --> 0:40:00.080
<v Speaker 1>quarterback's gotta be good enough to do it, and we

0:40:00.200 --> 0:40:01.800
<v Speaker 1>have to see if he can do that consistent And

0:40:01.960 --> 0:40:03.840
<v Speaker 1>and this is one of my biggest pet peeves. I

0:40:03.880 --> 0:40:07.480
<v Speaker 1>always hate it when people just they start off blaming

0:40:07.560 --> 0:40:11.359
<v Speaker 1>the quarterback every time when a guy is open every time,

0:40:11.560 --> 0:40:14.759
<v Speaker 1>like it's like, well, day's open. But it's like, why

0:40:14.800 --> 0:40:16.239
<v Speaker 1>didn't you get him the ball? I mean, you don't

0:40:16.320 --> 0:40:18.920
<v Speaker 1>see all the time. You can't see he was running

0:40:18.960 --> 0:40:20.479
<v Speaker 1>for his life. You said, for whatever reason it didn't

0:40:20.480 --> 0:40:22.280
<v Speaker 1>get the ball. The reason was that the line couldn't

0:40:22.320 --> 0:40:24.839
<v Speaker 1>block him at all. Well, but there was I don't

0:40:24.880 --> 0:40:26.239
<v Speaker 1>think that's the case. I don't think you can say

0:40:26.280 --> 0:40:27.920
<v Speaker 1>that every time either, because there were some times when

0:40:27.960 --> 0:40:29.719
<v Speaker 1>he had time, He had plenty of time. There was

0:40:29.800 --> 0:40:32.440
<v Speaker 1>nobody within three yards of him, so time, Okay, I

0:40:32.520 --> 0:40:34.560
<v Speaker 1>got it, missed, he missed Gallup and met Gallup should

0:40:34.560 --> 0:40:37.360
<v Speaker 1>have made the catch. But he missed Gallup. Gallup should

0:40:37.360 --> 0:40:39.920
<v Speaker 1>have made that catch, though he dropped the ball. I mean,

0:40:40.160 --> 0:40:42.359
<v Speaker 1>that's one of the slick conditions. I don't know, maybe

0:40:42.400 --> 0:40:44.239
<v Speaker 1>maybe not, No, he should have made the catch, but

0:40:44.360 --> 0:40:45.759
<v Speaker 1>the way it was thrown, it wasn't going to be

0:40:45.840 --> 0:40:47.560
<v Speaker 1>the game then it right could have been a big game.

0:40:47.640 --> 0:40:49.640
<v Speaker 1>And that's what I think receivers do, and I think

0:40:49.680 --> 0:40:51.880
<v Speaker 1>selfish receivers do this. I'm not calling him that, but

0:40:51.960 --> 0:40:55.319
<v Speaker 1>selfish receivers sometimes will do a crossing route. They want

0:40:55.400 --> 0:40:57.319
<v Speaker 1>that ball right there, like they're Jerry Rice, so they

0:40:57.360 --> 0:40:59.040
<v Speaker 1>can go fifty yards with it, which it could have

0:40:59.080 --> 0:41:01.239
<v Speaker 1>been a forty fifty yard. That wasn't the case. He

0:41:01.280 --> 0:41:03.920
<v Speaker 1>should have stopped completely make the catch and it might

0:41:03.960 --> 0:41:06.400
<v Speaker 1>have only been ten twelve yards, but still, you know,

0:41:06.520 --> 0:41:09.080
<v Speaker 1>you have to do that. But that was a horrible throw.

0:41:09.400 --> 0:41:12.000
<v Speaker 1>All I'm saying is is that he was sacked six times.

0:41:12.200 --> 0:41:14.680
<v Speaker 1>If Dak wasn't as big and strong and agile as

0:41:14.719 --> 0:41:16.560
<v Speaker 1>he is, it could have been ten. It could have

0:41:16.600 --> 0:41:20.360
<v Speaker 1>been more than that, you know. I mean, Eli Manning

0:41:20.440 --> 0:41:22.000
<v Speaker 1>probably would well, he would have get the ball out

0:41:22.000 --> 0:41:24.319
<v Speaker 1>a lot quicker, you know, than that he hadn't taken six, right,

0:41:24.400 --> 0:41:27.120
<v Speaker 1>but he's not taken six. But all I'm saying is

0:41:27.280 --> 0:41:30.320
<v Speaker 1>is that they this offensive line. That's where the issue

0:41:30.480 --> 0:41:32.879
<v Speaker 1>was was was the line. So the receiver's getting open

0:41:33.000 --> 0:41:35.839
<v Speaker 1>is a good positive thing. Can they get it blocked. Yeah,

0:41:35.880 --> 0:41:38.719
<v Speaker 1>and I think that the here's the deal. You can

0:41:38.760 --> 0:41:40.040
<v Speaker 1>look at the offensive line. You can say you have

0:41:40.120 --> 0:41:42.360
<v Speaker 1>offensive line has some problems. But I think it was

0:41:42.440 --> 0:41:44.320
<v Speaker 1>you or Dave that was telling me yesterday when you

0:41:44.400 --> 0:41:46.600
<v Speaker 1>go back and look at it, the rookie actually only

0:41:46.680 --> 0:41:48.480
<v Speaker 1>had a few bad plays, right. I know two of

0:41:48.520 --> 0:41:50.759
<v Speaker 1>them turned into sacks, but it was only two or

0:41:50.840 --> 0:41:53.279
<v Speaker 1>three where he really had bad plays. That's what can

0:41:53.320 --> 0:41:55.239
<v Speaker 1>happen with an offensive line. Two plays can turn into

0:41:55.239 --> 0:41:57.440
<v Speaker 1>two sacks, and that means a horrible day when the

0:41:57.480 --> 0:42:00.160
<v Speaker 1>fact of the matter is it wasn't as bad as

0:42:00.160 --> 0:42:02.640
<v Speaker 1>it may have may have sounded, or may have even

0:42:02.719 --> 0:42:05.160
<v Speaker 1>looked on the field, especially when you're going up against

0:42:05.160 --> 0:42:08.040
<v Speaker 1>a guy like going short. I'm not worried about any

0:42:08.120 --> 0:42:12.000
<v Speaker 1>of this. Like the receivers were more open than they

0:42:12.040 --> 0:42:15.040
<v Speaker 1>got credit for. Dak had a bad day. I'm not

0:42:15.239 --> 0:42:18.080
<v Speaker 1>ready to just abandon all confidence that I had in Dak.

0:42:18.200 --> 0:42:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Like I think that's gonna be fine. Can and I

0:42:21.040 --> 0:42:23.680
<v Speaker 1>said this yesterday, but like can Ezekiel Elliott just be

0:42:24.800 --> 0:42:27.040
<v Speaker 1>part the part the part of this offense that he

0:42:27.160 --> 0:42:29.120
<v Speaker 1>needs to be. Like, I mean, did I know you

0:42:29.239 --> 0:42:32.120
<v Speaker 1>did we talked about it already Todd Gurley, which honestly,

0:42:32.200 --> 0:42:35.880
<v Speaker 1>like his numbers aren't that much different than what Zeke did.

0:42:36.360 --> 0:42:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Todd got targeted five game, five times in the game

0:42:39.200 --> 0:42:41.360
<v Speaker 1>last night, but it was how he was targeted. You know,

0:42:41.840 --> 0:42:43.920
<v Speaker 1>they were throwing wheel routes to him down field. He

0:42:44.040 --> 0:42:46.239
<v Speaker 1>had he scored a touchdown on a pop pass, which

0:42:46.320 --> 0:42:49.080
<v Speaker 1>is literally like a jet sweep. He goes in motion

0:42:49.160 --> 0:42:52.240
<v Speaker 1>and you just flick him the ball and yeah, no, seriously,

0:42:53.280 --> 0:42:55.239
<v Speaker 1>he only had twenty carries. He I mean, and they

0:42:55.400 --> 0:42:57.759
<v Speaker 1>diced the Rams defense up. I'm you know, that's a

0:42:57.880 --> 0:43:00.239
<v Speaker 1>different story. I don't want to compare defenses because I

0:43:00.280 --> 0:43:05.120
<v Speaker 1>don't know enough about them. Sorry, but that's that is

0:43:05.160 --> 0:43:07.360
<v Speaker 1>what's going to need to happen for the Cowboys offense

0:43:07.440 --> 0:43:10.000
<v Speaker 1>to be successful, is for Ezekiel Elliott to be the

0:43:10.120 --> 0:43:13.160
<v Speaker 1>star of the show and in a variety of ways,

0:43:13.280 --> 0:43:15.120
<v Speaker 1>and we didn't see it Sunday. Part of that is

0:43:15.160 --> 0:43:17.959
<v Speaker 1>the defense your plan. Again, it's not time to close

0:43:18.040 --> 0:43:20.239
<v Speaker 1>the book, but it's got to be better. But I

0:43:20.280 --> 0:43:21.800
<v Speaker 1>mean that's also a part of if you got a

0:43:21.840 --> 0:43:24.000
<v Speaker 1>stud player, you got to feed him, and I don't

0:43:24.000 --> 0:43:26.719
<v Speaker 1>feel like they fed him in different ways, like whether

0:43:26.719 --> 0:43:28.279
<v Speaker 1>it's in the passing game like you say yesterday, I'd

0:43:28.280 --> 0:43:30.480
<v Speaker 1>love to see them runs that Texas route more frequently.

0:43:30.680 --> 0:43:33.399
<v Speaker 1>I think that is an indefensible route unless you're gonna

0:43:33.560 --> 0:43:35.960
<v Speaker 1>zone them, unless you're gonna play zone, which then creates

0:43:36.000 --> 0:43:38.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of other opportunities for you. It is hard

0:43:38.239 --> 0:43:39.440
<v Speaker 1>for for a got to keep up in. What I

0:43:39.520 --> 0:43:42.000
<v Speaker 1>mean by Texas route basically, you flare out and then

0:43:42.080 --> 0:43:44.520
<v Speaker 1>you come back in, you get back into the middle.

0:43:44.800 --> 0:43:47.680
<v Speaker 1>It's almost impossible to cover that man to man for

0:43:47.840 --> 0:43:51.239
<v Speaker 1>most linebackers or most safeties because of the nature of

0:43:51.280 --> 0:43:52.880
<v Speaker 1>the route. And I just think they ought to use

0:43:52.920 --> 0:43:55.080
<v Speaker 1>it more when talking about what they should use a

0:43:55.120 --> 0:43:57.320
<v Speaker 1>little bit more, When did this team just decide that

0:43:57.360 --> 0:43:59.880
<v Speaker 1>they don't need a fullback? I mean, the type of

0:44:00.080 --> 0:44:03.120
<v Speaker 1>offense that they want to run, why not use a fullback?

0:44:03.320 --> 0:44:06.040
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know if Ola wallis the smashmouth fullback

0:44:06.239 --> 0:44:08.160
<v Speaker 1>that they're that they've had in the in the path,

0:44:08.280 --> 0:44:09.640
<v Speaker 1>they didn't have it. He's not the same guy as

0:44:09.719 --> 0:44:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Keith Smith. But I'm saying, you know, why does Zeke

0:44:12.640 --> 0:44:14.520
<v Speaker 1>have to do all of the work right there? I mean,

0:44:14.560 --> 0:44:16.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a different mindset. You want to spread them out

0:44:16.680 --> 0:44:18.880
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, but they don't. It'd be one thing

0:44:18.960 --> 0:44:20.680
<v Speaker 1>if they just say, we don't want the fullback because

0:44:20.680 --> 0:44:23.160
<v Speaker 1>we want to spread things out. But when Terrence Williams,

0:44:23.200 --> 0:44:25.719
<v Speaker 1>who's got zero pancakes probably in his life. He's a

0:44:25.760 --> 0:44:28.200
<v Speaker 1>good blocker, but not to the point where you should

0:44:28.239 --> 0:44:31.160
<v Speaker 1>be in the line of scrimmage and blocking. I don't

0:44:31.160 --> 0:44:34.080
<v Speaker 1>know why we're not using more of a fullback there. Well,

0:44:34.120 --> 0:44:36.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Zeke is Zeke gives this offense the

0:44:36.760 --> 0:44:40.000
<v Speaker 1>best chance to be very successful, and you got to

0:44:40.040 --> 0:44:42.080
<v Speaker 1>do more with him to make that happen. In my degree,

0:44:42.280 --> 0:44:46.360
<v Speaker 1>I hope they listen to you. They've so see tomorrow

0:44:46.440 --> 0:44:50.759
<v Speaker 1>we will dissect the Giant's offense for real and we'll

0:44:50.800 --> 0:44:53.600
<v Speaker 1>figure out what happens. It's moving on forward for Nick Eedman,

0:44:54.000 --> 0:44:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Derek Galton, David Hellman and member. This was the Break

0:44:57.920 --> 0:45:04.360
<v Speaker 1>on Dallas Scotways dot Com Radio. This has been a

0:45:04.440 --> 0:45:07.960
<v Speaker 1>production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com and the Dallas Cowboys

0:45:08.080 --> 0:45:08.719
<v Speaker 1>Football Club.