WEBVTT - Tech News: Meta Wants the Internet On Your Face

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:12.479
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from iHeartRadio. Hey there,

0:00:12.520 --> 0:00:15.920
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host, Jonathan Strickland.

0:00:15.960 --> 0:00:19.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm an executive producer with iHeart Podcasts and How the

0:00:19.560 --> 0:00:21.919
<v Speaker 1>Tech are You. It's time for the tech News for

0:00:21.960 --> 0:00:26.639
<v Speaker 1>the week ending on Friday, September twenty seventh, twenty twenty four.

0:00:27.120 --> 0:00:31.560
<v Speaker 1>And as the great professional wrestler Shane Helms used to say,

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:37.000
<v Speaker 1>stand back, there's a hurricane coming through. Because that's right,

0:00:37.040 --> 0:00:40.000
<v Speaker 1>folks here in Atlanta, Georgia where I am, we're in

0:00:40.040 --> 0:00:43.040
<v Speaker 1>the path of a hurricane, and out of an over

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:47.240
<v Speaker 1>abundance of caution, and also from some gentle prodding from

0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:51.000
<v Speaker 1>super producer Tari, we've decided to write and record the

0:00:51.040 --> 0:00:55.240
<v Speaker 1>tech News episode on Thursday. Now. I usually put these

0:00:55.280 --> 0:00:59.240
<v Speaker 1>things together on Friday morning and then record them after that,

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 1>so this means there could be some fresh tech news

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:04.920
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't make it into this lineup because Tari and

0:01:04.959 --> 0:01:09.040
<v Speaker 1>I were busy, you know, laying out sandbags or clearing

0:01:09.120 --> 0:01:11.679
<v Speaker 1>trees off the road or something along those lines. I

0:01:11.720 --> 0:01:13.640
<v Speaker 1>hope anyone else out there in the path of the

0:01:13.720 --> 0:01:16.800
<v Speaker 1>hurricane is safe and sound. I really hope you're all

0:01:16.880 --> 0:01:18.880
<v Speaker 1>safe and sound. Whether you're in the path of the

0:01:18.959 --> 0:01:22.720
<v Speaker 1>hurricane or not. It's just particularly stressful for those of

0:01:22.800 --> 0:01:26.000
<v Speaker 1>us who are looking at a big, old, massive storm

0:01:26.080 --> 0:01:30.399
<v Speaker 1>system rolling in. Anyway, let's get to the tech news first. Up.

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Meta held its Connect conference this week and CEO Mark

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Zuckerberg got up in front of the crowd, and he

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:42.199
<v Speaker 1>was his usual humble self. He wore a T shirt

0:01:42.400 --> 0:01:47.920
<v Speaker 1>that read out Zuck out nil, which I have totally mispronounced,

0:01:47.920 --> 0:01:50.640
<v Speaker 1>but that's because I didn't take Latin in school. But

0:01:50.680 --> 0:01:55.280
<v Speaker 1>it is Latin for all zuck or all nothing. Typically,

0:01:55.520 --> 0:02:00.320
<v Speaker 1>you would actually see this phrase associated with Caesar, not Zuck,

0:02:00.880 --> 0:02:05.720
<v Speaker 1>and it often was associated with a particularly humble Renaissance

0:02:05.920 --> 0:02:12.040
<v Speaker 1>prince named Caesar Borgia, known for being a little bit

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:15.359
<v Speaker 1>full of himself. I honestly think that Zuckerberg should sit

0:02:15.400 --> 0:02:17.960
<v Speaker 1>down with Francis word Coppola and the two of them

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 1>could have a nice long conversation about Hubris. Also, they

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:23.359
<v Speaker 1>could talk about the Roman Empire, because the two of

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:26.720
<v Speaker 1>them both seemed to be obsessed by it. I mean,

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Megalopolis is proof of that. Yeah. Anyway, enough commentary and

0:02:31.480 --> 0:02:35.680
<v Speaker 1>shade from yours truly, So what went down at the

0:02:35.760 --> 0:02:41.399
<v Speaker 1>Connect conference. Well, perhaps the buzziest bit was about Meta's

0:02:41.480 --> 0:02:47.040
<v Speaker 1>prototype augmented reality glasses called Orion. Zuckerberg showed them off

0:02:47.040 --> 0:02:51.400
<v Speaker 1>and good gollie, they are bulky now. The Verge gave

0:02:51.440 --> 0:02:55.400
<v Speaker 1>them some praise. The Verge said, quote, they look almost

0:02:55.440 --> 0:02:57.799
<v Speaker 1>like a trendy pair of frames you could pick up

0:02:58.000 --> 0:03:02.760
<v Speaker 1>without all the tech inside. Quote. Personally, however, I think

0:03:02.800 --> 0:03:05.640
<v Speaker 1>they look way too chonky for that. They look to

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:07.600
<v Speaker 1>me like the kind of glasses that you might see

0:03:07.600 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 1>in a comic strip where the artist drawing the comic

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:14.520
<v Speaker 1>strip uses really heavy lines for stuff like that. The

0:03:14.520 --> 0:03:18.680
<v Speaker 1>glasses house led projectors, which can beam images to display

0:03:18.680 --> 0:03:21.239
<v Speaker 1>in front of your eyes on the lenses, and that's

0:03:21.280 --> 0:03:25.040
<v Speaker 1>what gives you the augmented experience. But they're not intended

0:03:25.200 --> 0:03:29.320
<v Speaker 1>to be consumer products just yet. For one thing, even

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 1>with the bulky frame, you still have to carry a

0:03:32.360 --> 0:03:36.040
<v Speaker 1>couple of peripherals for this tech to actually work. That

0:03:36.080 --> 0:03:40.560
<v Speaker 1>includes what is called a neural wristband, which apparently is

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:44.440
<v Speaker 1>needed so that you can do some gesture controls. And

0:03:44.720 --> 0:03:49.320
<v Speaker 1>there's also a compute puck, which I'm guessing offloads some

0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:52.840
<v Speaker 1>of the processing requirements needed for the glasses to work.

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:55.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that makes sense. We are not at a

0:03:55.320 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 1>point where you can miniaturize all these elements so that

0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:02.720
<v Speaker 1>they fit solely within the frames of some even chunky glasses.

0:04:03.120 --> 0:04:05.120
<v Speaker 1>It isn't quite slimmed down to a point where the

0:04:05.120 --> 0:04:08.200
<v Speaker 1>average person would vibe with it. I think I don't

0:04:08.240 --> 0:04:10.680
<v Speaker 1>think people would want to think, Oh, here are my

0:04:10.760 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 1>cool glasses, where's my wristband and my compute puck so

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:18.839
<v Speaker 1>that I can use them. Plus, according to Casey Newton's newsletter,

0:04:19.160 --> 0:04:23.080
<v Speaker 1>each unit costs somewhere in the neighborhood of ten thousand dollars,

0:04:23.480 --> 0:04:26.720
<v Speaker 1>which means it is certainly a non starter as far

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:30.400
<v Speaker 1>as consumer tech is concerned. Meta did show off the

0:04:30.400 --> 0:04:34.240
<v Speaker 1>next generation of its ray band smart glasses. These don't

0:04:34.279 --> 0:04:37.880
<v Speaker 1>have the versatility of Oriyan, but they still incorporate some

0:04:38.080 --> 0:04:42.400
<v Speaker 1>smart technology and AR related features in them. Meta pointed

0:04:42.400 --> 0:04:45.920
<v Speaker 1>out how AI functionality means you can use these glasses

0:04:45.960 --> 0:04:47.560
<v Speaker 1>to do stuff like stay on top of your to

0:04:47.600 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 1>do list and that kind of thing. Metta also showed

0:04:50.240 --> 0:04:53.560
<v Speaker 1>off new VR headsets. In the quest line of the

0:04:53.880 --> 0:04:58.000
<v Speaker 1>one headset anyway, it's the Quest three S, and it's

0:04:58.000 --> 0:05:00.680
<v Speaker 1>intended to be kind of an entry point headset for

0:05:00.760 --> 0:05:03.880
<v Speaker 1>the VR space. It will cost two hundred ninety nine

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:07.279
<v Speaker 1>dollars and ninety nine cents, so three hundred bucks. Meta

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 1>is ditching the Quest two and the Quest pro lines

0:05:11.440 --> 0:05:14.679
<v Speaker 1>of products, so now the choices are simplified to either

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 1>the Entry three S or the more expensive Quest three,

0:05:19.760 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 1>which now moves from being six hundred and fifty bucks

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:26.280
<v Speaker 1>to five hundred bucks or technically four hundred ninety nine

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 1>and ninety nine cents. Zuckerberg also revealed that Meta is

0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:34.840
<v Speaker 1>introducing some AI generated content on Facebook and Instagram, which

0:05:34.880 --> 0:05:39.279
<v Speaker 1>sounds absolutely horrible to me. Why would I want to

0:05:39.320 --> 0:05:42.600
<v Speaker 1>go to these things and see stuff posted not even

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:45.760
<v Speaker 1>by people I've heard of, let alone people I know, right?

0:05:46.240 --> 0:05:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Why do I want to see AI generated stuff? Maybe

0:05:48.640 --> 0:05:51.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm just missing the point. I wasn't at the conference.

0:05:51.320 --> 0:05:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Maybe if I were, I'd be like, oh, I get

0:05:53.040 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 1>it now, But right now it just strikes me as

0:05:54.960 --> 0:05:58.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of cold and pointless. Anyway, It's supposed to be

0:05:58.800 --> 0:06:03.120
<v Speaker 1>in a new section called Imagined for You, and supposedly

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:06.200
<v Speaker 1>it will end up containing content the Meta thinks you

0:06:06.320 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 1>want or you need based upon your behaviors. So it's

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:13.960
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be really curated and invented essentially for you,

0:06:14.520 --> 0:06:17.880
<v Speaker 1>which yay, I don't know. This doesn't strike me as

0:06:18.160 --> 0:06:24.480
<v Speaker 1>particularly good. Metta also introduced some AI impersonations of celebrity

0:06:24.560 --> 0:06:27.479
<v Speaker 1>voices in Meta AI, so if you wanted to chat

0:06:27.880 --> 0:06:32.480
<v Speaker 1>with a robot version of say John Cena or Aquafina

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:35.320
<v Speaker 1>or Kristin Bell, then you could do that. The Kristen

0:06:35.360 --> 0:06:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Bell thing is particularly weird because not very long ago

0:06:38.920 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Bell spoke out against meta mining user data for the

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:46.800
<v Speaker 1>purposes of training artificial intelligence. But I guess she must

0:06:46.800 --> 0:06:49.320
<v Speaker 1>have hashed all that out because her voice has become

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:51.360
<v Speaker 1>one of the options that people can choose when they're

0:06:51.400 --> 0:06:54.279
<v Speaker 1>interacting with the Meta AI. There were some other stuff

0:06:54.320 --> 0:06:57.320
<v Speaker 1>going on at the Connect keynote, including a revamp of

0:06:57.360 --> 0:07:01.720
<v Speaker 1>avatar design for Meta's various platforms, which includes the Horizon

0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:05.160
<v Speaker 1>operating system, which is what they use for VR. Meta

0:07:05.200 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 1>is still seeming to push to make the metaverse happen.

0:07:09.320 --> 0:07:12.920
<v Speaker 1>I think we need to tell Gretchen that, like Fetch,

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:15.720
<v Speaker 1>the metaverse just isn't going to happen, or at least

0:07:15.720 --> 0:07:18.680
<v Speaker 1>I hope it doesn't. All right, that's enough about the

0:07:18.680 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Connect conference, but we still have a little bit more

0:07:21.360 --> 0:07:24.720
<v Speaker 1>about meta. So Mark Zuckerberg sat down for an interview

0:07:24.720 --> 0:07:27.720
<v Speaker 1>with Alex Heath of The Verge, and among other things,

0:07:28.040 --> 0:07:31.480
<v Speaker 1>he stressed that research has failed to establish a causal

0:07:31.600 --> 0:07:35.720
<v Speaker 1>relationship between social media use and a negative impact on

0:07:36.160 --> 0:07:38.760
<v Speaker 1>mental health. Now, if you've been listening to my recent

0:07:38.840 --> 0:07:42.080
<v Speaker 1>episodes on tech stuff, you probably have heard me say

0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:45.160
<v Speaker 1>something similar to this, And that doesn't mean that there

0:07:45.400 --> 0:07:49.400
<v Speaker 1>is no causal relationship between the two, but we have

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:53.679
<v Speaker 1>a lack of high quality studies that establish such a connection.

0:07:54.040 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 1>There may be correlation between poor mental health and social

0:07:57.520 --> 0:08:00.560
<v Speaker 1>media use, but that's not the same thing as causation.

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:02.920
<v Speaker 1>I still think it's a big leap to go from

0:08:03.160 --> 0:08:07.520
<v Speaker 1>studies haven't really shown a causal connection to stating outright

0:08:07.560 --> 0:08:11.240
<v Speaker 1>that there is no causal connection. Those two things are

0:08:11.280 --> 0:08:13.840
<v Speaker 1>not synonymous. I don't think we can go so far

0:08:13.920 --> 0:08:18.520
<v Speaker 1>as to deny any causal connection, particularly since studies that

0:08:18.640 --> 0:08:23.360
<v Speaker 1>involve mental health are always tricky because isolating all the

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:28.200
<v Speaker 1>variables in order to establish relationships between even like disturbing

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:31.920
<v Speaker 1>behaviors and mental health, it's not always straightforward or easy.

0:08:32.240 --> 0:08:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes that stuff is really complicated. Now, Zuckerberg did say

0:08:36.120 --> 0:08:38.400
<v Speaker 1>that he felt meta can play a part in protecting

0:08:38.440 --> 0:08:41.600
<v Speaker 1>mental health by giving parents more controls relating to how

0:08:41.640 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 1>their kids are able to access social media, which is

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:47.679
<v Speaker 1>at least a start. I recommend watching the whole interview,

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:50.600
<v Speaker 1>which is both on The Verge and also The Verg's

0:08:50.640 --> 0:08:54.679
<v Speaker 1>YouTube channel. The interview itself is titled why Mark Zuckerberg

0:08:54.720 --> 0:08:57.840
<v Speaker 1>thinks ar glasses will replace your phone? But it's way

0:08:57.920 --> 0:09:02.200
<v Speaker 1>more than just about the arglasses, all right, And back

0:09:02.240 --> 0:09:04.360
<v Speaker 1>to that whole Kristen Bell thing, because it relates to

0:09:04.400 --> 0:09:08.520
<v Speaker 1>another story. She posted a message on Instagram which I

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:11.679
<v Speaker 1>have seen going around a little bit now, and it's

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:15.120
<v Speaker 1>one in which folks attempt to stave off meta crawling

0:09:15.160 --> 0:09:18.760
<v Speaker 1>their feeds for the purposes of training AI models. So

0:09:19.280 --> 0:09:23.240
<v Speaker 1>it's essentially just a variation of other viral messages that

0:09:23.520 --> 0:09:26.600
<v Speaker 1>people were posting to their feeds, either on Instagram or

0:09:26.600 --> 0:09:29.400
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook or both, and they were meant to prevent

0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Meta from doing stuff like selling their personal information for

0:09:33.480 --> 0:09:37.400
<v Speaker 1>the purposes of advertising. But like those cases, posting this

0:09:37.520 --> 0:09:41.640
<v Speaker 1>makes no difference whatsoever. It does not prevent Meta from

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:44.760
<v Speaker 1>using your information to train AI. It doesn't prevent them

0:09:44.760 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 1>from selling your data for the purposes of ads or whatever,

0:09:48.200 --> 0:09:52.040
<v Speaker 1>or exploiting your data in any other way, because posting

0:09:52.240 --> 0:09:54.840
<v Speaker 1>that you're not giving Meta any permission to use your

0:09:54.920 --> 0:09:58.520
<v Speaker 1>data means nothing, and that's because the terms of service

0:09:58.880 --> 0:10:03.040
<v Speaker 1>already grant Meta all those permissions. The fact that you're

0:10:03.200 --> 0:10:05.599
<v Speaker 1>using the service, and in order to sign up for

0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the service, you had to agree to their terms of service,

0:10:08.000 --> 0:10:11.200
<v Speaker 1>which you're kind of grandfathered into. Like whenever they change it,

0:10:11.240 --> 0:10:15.040
<v Speaker 1>your agreement tends to be carried over into the new version,

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:18.600
<v Speaker 1>which seems odd right, like it's the whole Darth Vader,

0:10:18.640 --> 0:10:20.880
<v Speaker 1>I have altered the deal. Pray I do not alter

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:24.120
<v Speaker 1>it further. But yeah, the fact that you have agreed

0:10:24.160 --> 0:10:26.480
<v Speaker 1>to the terms of service means that Meta has that

0:10:26.520 --> 0:10:32.040
<v Speaker 1>permission already, so denying it on your feed does nothing.

0:10:32.120 --> 0:10:35.599
<v Speaker 1>In fact, the only way to prevent Meta from exploiting

0:10:35.600 --> 0:10:40.840
<v Speaker 1>your data is to either totally delete your profile and

0:10:40.960 --> 0:10:44.240
<v Speaker 1>just leave the platform entirely, or set everything to private,

0:10:44.720 --> 0:10:48.360
<v Speaker 1>at least for the purposes of crawling for AI training.

0:10:48.600 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Meta won't touch stuff that's set to private as opposed

0:10:51.960 --> 0:10:54.560
<v Speaker 1>to public, so your private messages to your friends and

0:10:54.600 --> 0:10:57.880
<v Speaker 1>stuff that is not available for Meta to use, but

0:10:57.960 --> 0:11:01.160
<v Speaker 1>everything else is fair game. All right, we've got more

0:11:01.240 --> 0:11:04.360
<v Speaker 1>tech news to cover before that, let's take a quick break.

0:11:13.720 --> 0:11:18.120
<v Speaker 1>We're back. Open ai is planning to restructure the company

0:11:18.400 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 1>and essentially ditch all pretense that it bears any resemblance

0:11:21.920 --> 0:11:25.080
<v Speaker 1>to the original concept for open ai. All right, some

0:11:25.160 --> 0:11:29.200
<v Speaker 1>explanation is needed here. So originally open ai was intended

0:11:29.240 --> 0:11:32.600
<v Speaker 1>to be a not for profit organization that would maintain

0:11:32.640 --> 0:11:36.080
<v Speaker 1>a high level of transparency while developing AI in a

0:11:36.120 --> 0:11:40.080
<v Speaker 1>responsible manner, and that it would openly share this research,

0:11:40.200 --> 0:11:42.960
<v Speaker 1>thus the name open ai. They said there was a

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:47.720
<v Speaker 1>need that AI advancements had to be helpful and cause

0:11:47.760 --> 0:11:50.360
<v Speaker 1>as little harm as possible, and to be developed in

0:11:50.559 --> 0:11:53.560
<v Speaker 1>a safe way. But it turns out being a not

0:11:53.679 --> 0:11:57.480
<v Speaker 1>for profit organization means you don't make a lot of money.

0:11:57.559 --> 0:12:02.400
<v Speaker 1>You're constantly scrambling for investment into the organization so that

0:12:02.440 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 1>you can conduct your research because AI R and D

0:12:05.600 --> 0:12:10.160
<v Speaker 1>is really expensive. So this restructuring would mean that the

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:15.200
<v Speaker 1>for profit arm of open ai, which launched several years ago,

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:20.560
<v Speaker 1>would essentially cut ties to the nonprofit board of directors,

0:12:20.960 --> 0:12:24.960
<v Speaker 1>and previously that board of directors oversaw the operations of

0:12:25.000 --> 0:12:28.920
<v Speaker 1>the company. You might even recall that an earlier incarnation

0:12:29.200 --> 0:12:33.160
<v Speaker 1>of this very same nonprofit board of directors voted to

0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:37.760
<v Speaker 1>remove open AI's CEO Sam Altman from the company, though

0:12:37.880 --> 0:12:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the board would later reverse that decision and then essentially

0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:44.240
<v Speaker 1>that board dissolved and a new one took its place.

0:12:44.600 --> 0:12:48.680
<v Speaker 1>But this restructuring would remove that particular entity from open

0:12:48.720 --> 0:12:53.800
<v Speaker 1>AI's governance entirely coincidentally, According to Altman, a few high

0:12:53.920 --> 0:12:57.240
<v Speaker 1>level executives have left open Ai. Among them are a

0:12:57.320 --> 0:13:00.600
<v Speaker 1>pair of senior research executives as well as the company's

0:13:00.760 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 1>chief technology officer. She also left, and Altman says that

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:07.599
<v Speaker 1>their resignations have nothing to do with the planned restructuring.

0:13:07.720 --> 0:13:13.240
<v Speaker 1>It's just coincidence. Maybe that's true, Julian Denistron, and I

0:13:13.320 --> 0:13:18.560
<v Speaker 1>apologize for butchering your name of Inside evs Rights that

0:13:18.679 --> 0:13:23.320
<v Speaker 1>a research company called aMCI Testing looked into Tesla's full

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:26.520
<v Speaker 1>self driving feature to determine how reliable and safe it

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:30.320
<v Speaker 1>actually is now. aMCI reportedly tested the feature in a

0:13:30.360 --> 0:13:34.240
<v Speaker 1>variety of different settings, from city streets to mountain roads,

0:13:34.400 --> 0:13:38.319
<v Speaker 1>and apparently these tests were at least fairly extensive, comprising

0:13:38.400 --> 0:13:41.920
<v Speaker 1>more than one thousand miles traveled in total. According to

0:13:41.960 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the report, aMCI drivers had to intervene approximately once every

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 1>thirteen miles driven or else risk getting into an accident. Now,

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:55.840
<v Speaker 1>to be clear, despite the name full self driving, the

0:13:56.160 --> 0:13:59.720
<v Speaker 1>feature actually requires Tesla drivers to maintain their attention on

0:13:59.720 --> 0:14:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the road and to keep their hands of the steering

0:14:01.640 --> 0:14:06.040
<v Speaker 1>wheel at all times. So, despite some arguably misleading naming

0:14:06.080 --> 0:14:10.320
<v Speaker 1>conventions here, Tesla has stated that FSD is not intended

0:14:10.320 --> 0:14:14.360
<v Speaker 1>to be a full proof autonomous driverless system, but aMCI

0:14:14.520 --> 0:14:17.520
<v Speaker 1>says FSD can still give drivers a false sense of

0:14:17.520 --> 0:14:20.440
<v Speaker 1>security and that the system can perform well enough to

0:14:20.520 --> 0:14:24.360
<v Speaker 1>make people believe it is consistently safe. However, the director

0:14:24.400 --> 0:14:29.000
<v Speaker 1>of amci's testing, a guy named guy or Gui Mangiamele,

0:14:29.640 --> 0:14:35.240
<v Speaker 1>said quote, you may watch FSD successfully negotiate a specific

0:14:35.280 --> 0:14:38.280
<v Speaker 1>scenario many times, often on the same stretch of road

0:14:38.440 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 1>or intersection, only to have it inexplicably fail the next

0:14:42.720 --> 0:14:45.680
<v Speaker 1>time end quote. Obviously, that would be a big problem,

0:14:45.760 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 1>since it might mean a Tesla owner could feel that,

0:14:47.920 --> 0:14:51.120
<v Speaker 1>at least along certain stretches of road, the FSD feature

0:14:51.200 --> 0:14:54.040
<v Speaker 1>is fully capable of handling the car's operation, and they

0:14:54.080 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 1>might let their attention wander once again. I think my

0:14:57.080 --> 0:15:00.520
<v Speaker 1>biggest problem with Tesla's approach is that the marketing conflicts

0:15:00.560 --> 0:15:04.360
<v Speaker 1>with the actual capabilities of the advanced driving assist systems,

0:15:04.640 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 1>and unfortunately, when that involves vehicles, that can lead to catastrophe.

0:15:09.280 --> 0:15:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Longtime tech stuff listeners might remember me talking about a

0:15:12.120 --> 0:15:15.800
<v Speaker 1>company called Do Not Pay Ages ago. This company is

0:15:15.840 --> 0:15:18.040
<v Speaker 1>known for doing a few different things, but one big

0:15:18.080 --> 0:15:22.960
<v Speaker 1>one is helping subscribers do stuff like fight parking tickets. Now,

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:26.040
<v Speaker 1>some of those parking tickets are probably unfair and fighting

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 1>them can be pretty intimidating, and some folks often just

0:15:29.640 --> 0:15:32.360
<v Speaker 1>resign themselves to paying off a fine that they don't

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:36.200
<v Speaker 1>actually deserve. So Do Not Pay offers to help people out.

0:15:36.480 --> 0:15:38.920
<v Speaker 1>And one way they do this, or at least that

0:15:39.000 --> 0:15:41.200
<v Speaker 1>they did do this, was that they were offering the

0:15:41.280 --> 0:15:45.960
<v Speaker 1>services of quote, the world's first robot lawyer end quote.

0:15:46.080 --> 0:15:49.240
<v Speaker 1>There's really a generative AI tool meant to help people

0:15:49.440 --> 0:15:53.320
<v Speaker 1>draft legal language in order to do things like fight

0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 1>traffic tickets or to perform other relatively uncomplicated legal tasks

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:02.160
<v Speaker 1>such as drafting a cease and desist letter. But according

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:05.680
<v Speaker 1>to the US Federal Trade Commission or FTC, Do Not

0:16:05.840 --> 0:16:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Pay failed to test the generative AI tool and didn't

0:16:09.880 --> 0:16:13.200
<v Speaker 1>even bring on human lawyers to work on the tool's

0:16:13.240 --> 0:16:17.520
<v Speaker 1>design or to ensure that it was functioning properly. Do

0:16:17.640 --> 0:16:20.720
<v Speaker 1>not Pay has since agreed to pay a fine of

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:23.120
<v Speaker 1>its own, a grand total of one hundred and ninety

0:16:23.160 --> 0:16:26.960
<v Speaker 1>three thousand dollars. I assume they're not going to follow

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the instructions that their company name states. That would likely

0:16:31.320 --> 0:16:34.160
<v Speaker 1>not go over so well with the FTC. Do Not

0:16:34.240 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Pay must also send messages out to customers alerting them

0:16:37.280 --> 0:16:40.880
<v Speaker 1>to the limitations of their services, essentially to say, hey,

0:16:41.280 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 1>turns out we can't guarantee that the stuff we produced

0:16:45.600 --> 0:16:49.600
<v Speaker 1>for you in return for your subscription actually is holding

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:53.960
<v Speaker 1>legal water. That's a rough one. According to Russian news outlets,

0:16:54.040 --> 0:16:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Google has shut down the ability for people within Russia

0:16:57.240 --> 0:17:01.080
<v Speaker 1>to create new Google accounts, and further, there has been

0:17:01.200 --> 0:17:05.280
<v Speaker 1>a sharp reduction quote in the number of SMS messages

0:17:05.320 --> 0:17:08.840
<v Speaker 1>sent by the company to Russian users end quote. That's

0:17:08.840 --> 0:17:12.439
<v Speaker 1>according to the Register. This implies that Google is not

0:17:12.640 --> 0:17:16.919
<v Speaker 1>sending out two factor authentication messages to people in Russia.

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:19.280
<v Speaker 1>So if you're signed out of your Google account and

0:17:19.320 --> 0:17:21.360
<v Speaker 1>you're in Russia, you might not be able to get

0:17:21.400 --> 0:17:23.919
<v Speaker 1>back into that account because you won't get access to

0:17:23.960 --> 0:17:26.760
<v Speaker 1>all the information you need in order to get into

0:17:26.880 --> 0:17:30.160
<v Speaker 1>your account. You won't get the multi factor authentication message.

0:17:30.280 --> 0:17:33.240
<v Speaker 1>As I record this, Google and its parent company Alphabet

0:17:33.320 --> 0:17:36.360
<v Speaker 1>have yet to comment on this story. Out of Russia,

0:17:36.480 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 1>or from what I can gather, the general belief is

0:17:38.560 --> 0:17:42.600
<v Speaker 1>that Google has escalated its withdrawal from Russia after having

0:17:42.680 --> 0:17:46.720
<v Speaker 1>to shut down numerous accounts within Russia that were spreading disinformation,

0:17:46.880 --> 0:17:50.480
<v Speaker 1>primarily about the war in Ukraine, while also refusing to

0:17:50.520 --> 0:17:54.239
<v Speaker 1>comply with Moscow's demands to remove certain other accounts that

0:17:54.480 --> 0:17:58.360
<v Speaker 1>the government has declared as illegal, and those are typically

0:17:58.400 --> 0:18:02.320
<v Speaker 1>accounts that frequently contradict the narrative coming out of the Kremlin.

0:18:02.680 --> 0:18:07.320
<v Speaker 1>So maybe this is Google making a conscious decision to

0:18:07.920 --> 0:18:10.440
<v Speaker 1>pull out of Russia entirely, which would be a real

0:18:10.520 --> 0:18:13.840
<v Speaker 1>blow to people in Russia who are dependent upon Google

0:18:14.000 --> 0:18:17.960
<v Speaker 1>services but have no control over what their government does

0:18:18.080 --> 0:18:21.920
<v Speaker 1>or doesn't do. California now has a law that requires

0:18:21.960 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 1>companies that offer access to digital media to use accurate

0:18:27.119 --> 0:18:30.200
<v Speaker 1>language for those digital goods, so for stuff like streaming

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:32.440
<v Speaker 1>media for example. So in other words, if I wanted

0:18:32.440 --> 0:18:35.440
<v Speaker 1>to pay so that I could have the UK comedy

0:18:35.480 --> 0:18:40.840
<v Speaker 1>series Spaced in my online library with a service like Amazon, Well,

0:18:40.880 --> 0:18:43.919
<v Speaker 1>then Amazon would not be allowed to use language like

0:18:44.280 --> 0:18:49.640
<v Speaker 1>buy or sell regarding that transaction. Instead, the language has

0:18:49.680 --> 0:18:51.840
<v Speaker 1>to make it clear that what I'm actually doing is

0:18:51.840 --> 0:18:56.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm purchasing a license so that I can access Spaced,

0:18:56.320 --> 0:18:59.879
<v Speaker 1>but I don't actually own a copy of Space. And

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:03.040
<v Speaker 1>that's to make it clear to consumers that ownership isn't

0:19:03.080 --> 0:19:05.880
<v Speaker 1>really that big of a thing in the digital marketplace

0:19:05.960 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of companies, and that doesn't matter if

0:19:08.359 --> 0:19:11.119
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about music or films, or video games or

0:19:11.119 --> 0:19:14.200
<v Speaker 1>other digital products and services. Companies that failed to comply

0:19:14.320 --> 0:19:16.800
<v Speaker 1>with this law could be found guilty of false advertising

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:20.000
<v Speaker 1>and face some pretty stiff penalties. Now, all that being said,

0:19:20.240 --> 0:19:23.800
<v Speaker 1>if a company does allow you to actually download a

0:19:23.880 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 1>digital file and there's no requirement for it to be

0:19:26.840 --> 0:19:30.000
<v Speaker 1>connected to some sort of online server or anything like that,

0:19:30.280 --> 0:19:33.200
<v Speaker 1>like once you purchase it, it is yours and you can

0:19:33.440 --> 0:19:35.679
<v Speaker 1>move it to whatever drive you want and access it

0:19:35.720 --> 0:19:38.400
<v Speaker 1>whenever you want, they can still use terms like buy

0:19:38.400 --> 0:19:42.720
<v Speaker 1>and sell because you are buying a digital file. That's fine,

0:19:43.160 --> 0:19:46.840
<v Speaker 1>but it's for the ones that license the access to you.

0:19:47.359 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 1>And this was kind of brought up because of some

0:19:49.640 --> 0:19:53.639
<v Speaker 1>recent developments. There was a case where Ubisoft deleted the

0:19:53.720 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 1>video game The Crew from player accounts. Ubisoft had already

0:19:58.080 --> 0:20:00.840
<v Speaker 1>shut down the online service for that game, and it

0:20:00.880 --> 0:20:04.240
<v Speaker 1>was an online only game, so you could argue that

0:20:04.320 --> 0:20:07.719
<v Speaker 1>once they shut down the servers, the game was effectively obsolete.

0:20:07.800 --> 0:20:10.520
<v Speaker 1>But gamers were still shocked to see the title getting

0:20:10.560 --> 0:20:14.320
<v Speaker 1>deleted from their library entirely because that seems to fly

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:17.800
<v Speaker 1>into the face of the whole concept of buying something,

0:20:18.040 --> 0:20:19.760
<v Speaker 1>and that's how we got to where we are now.

0:20:20.240 --> 0:20:22.760
<v Speaker 1>This law is only going to apply in California for now.

0:20:22.800 --> 0:20:26.520
<v Speaker 1>It takes effect next year. And finally, speaking of Ubisoft,

0:20:26.560 --> 0:20:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the company is facing a potential strike as workers have

0:20:29.119 --> 0:20:32.000
<v Speaker 1>objected to the company issuing a return to office mandate

0:20:32.040 --> 0:20:34.280
<v Speaker 1>that would require staff to come into the office three

0:20:34.359 --> 0:20:37.399
<v Speaker 1>days a week. The union says it had been negotiating

0:20:37.400 --> 0:20:41.080
<v Speaker 1>for profit sharing for employees and after those talks broke down,

0:20:41.119 --> 0:20:44.280
<v Speaker 1>that's when Ubisoft issued the return to office order. So

0:20:44.480 --> 0:20:47.840
<v Speaker 1>things have now escalated into a potential strike situation, which

0:20:47.880 --> 0:20:50.640
<v Speaker 1>sounds similar to what's going on over at Amazon. Amazon

0:20:50.720 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 1>gave a five days a week return to office mandate

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:56.639
<v Speaker 1>starting next year and now like ninety one percent of

0:20:56.720 --> 0:21:00.359
<v Speaker 1>Amazon's staff who were surveyed about this say they don't

0:21:00.480 --> 0:21:03.240
<v Speaker 1>like it, and I can understand that. But that's it

0:21:03.520 --> 0:21:05.640
<v Speaker 1>for the tech news for this week. I hope you're

0:21:05.680 --> 0:21:08.200
<v Speaker 1>all well. If you are in the path of a

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:12.000
<v Speaker 1>devastating hurricane, please please please be careful, be safe, be

0:21:12.200 --> 0:21:14.800
<v Speaker 1>happy and healthy, and I will talk to you again

0:21:15.640 --> 0:21:25.880
<v Speaker 1>really soon. Tech Stuff is an iHeartRadio production. For more

0:21:25.920 --> 0:21:30.680
<v Speaker 1>podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or

0:21:30.680 --> 0:21:36.040
<v Speaker 1>wherever you listen to your favorite shows.