WEBVTT - Interview Only w/ Senator Jack Danforth - Make America Decent Again: Can The GOP Be Saved From Trump's Moral Decay?

0:00:00.400 --> 0:00:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Having good life insurance is incredibly important. I know from

0:00:04.080 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>personal experience. I was sixteen when my father passed away.

0:00:07.200 --> 0:00:09.600
<v Speaker 1>We didn't have any money. He didn't leave us in

0:00:09.640 --> 0:00:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the best shape. My mother single mother, now widow, myself

0:00:14.080 --> 0:00:15.880
<v Speaker 1>sixteen trying to figure out how am I going to

0:00:15.920 --> 0:00:19.079
<v Speaker 1>pay for college and lo and behold, my dad had

0:00:19.120 --> 0:00:22.320
<v Speaker 1>one life insurance policy that we found wasn't a lot,

0:00:22.640 --> 0:00:25.360
<v Speaker 1>but it was important at the time, and it's why

0:00:25.480 --> 0:00:28.720
<v Speaker 1>I was able to go to college. Little did he

0:00:28.800 --> 0:00:32.560
<v Speaker 1>know how important that would be in that moment. Well,

0:00:32.680 --> 0:00:34.760
<v Speaker 1>guess what. That's why I am here to tell you

0:00:34.800 --> 0:00:37.720
<v Speaker 1>about Etho's life. They can provide you with peace of

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:41.159
<v Speaker 1>mind knowing your family is protected even if the worst

0:00:41.200 --> 0:00:44.160
<v Speaker 1>comes to pass. Ethos is an online platform that makes

0:00:44.200 --> 0:00:47.800
<v Speaker 1>getting life insurance fast and easy, all designed to protect

0:00:47.840 --> 0:00:51.400
<v Speaker 1>your family's future in minutes, not months. There's no complicated

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:55.320
<v Speaker 1>process and it's one hundred percent online. There's no medical

0:00:55.360 --> 0:00:58.640
<v Speaker 1>exam require you just answer a few health questions online.

0:00:58.760 --> 0:01:00.640
<v Speaker 1>You can get a quote and it's a little ten minutes,

0:01:00.680 --> 0:01:03.760
<v Speaker 1>and you can get same day coverage without ever leaving

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:06.759
<v Speaker 1>your home. You can get up to three million dollars

0:01:06.760 --> 0:01:08.920
<v Speaker 1>in coverage and some policies start as low as two

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:12.120
<v Speaker 1>dollars a day that would be billed monthly. As of

0:01:12.120 --> 0:01:15.240
<v Speaker 1>March twenty twenty five, Business Insider named Ethos the number

0:01:15.319 --> 0:01:19.679
<v Speaker 1>one no medical exam instant life insurance provider. So protect

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:23.080
<v Speaker 1>your family with life insurance from Ethos. Get your free

0:01:23.160 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 1>quoted Ethos dot com slash chuck. So again, that's Ethos

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:32.080
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash chuck. Application times may vary and the

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:35.319
<v Speaker 1>rates themselves may vary as well, but trust me, life

0:01:35.360 --> 0:01:38.560
<v Speaker 1>insurance is something you should really think about, especially if

0:01:38.600 --> 0:01:45.280
<v Speaker 1>you've got a growing family. So joining me now is

0:01:45.680 --> 0:01:49.200
<v Speaker 1>who's frankly has got the passion that I'm trying to

0:01:49.200 --> 0:01:52.880
<v Speaker 1>bring to this podcast, and you know which is to

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:55.920
<v Speaker 1>focus on how do we get out of this current

0:01:56.080 --> 0:01:58.680
<v Speaker 1>mess we're in. We all know we're in a mess.

0:01:58.720 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 1>We have disagreements about why we're polarized. We have disagreements

0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:06.720
<v Speaker 1>about whether the current situation is sort of a symptom

0:02:06.760 --> 0:02:10.280
<v Speaker 1>of something larger or whether the current actors are the

0:02:10.360 --> 0:02:14.440
<v Speaker 1>problems themselves. I've obviously been focused on the media side

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:17.079
<v Speaker 1>of things. My guest today is a very familiar name

0:02:17.120 --> 0:02:19.880
<v Speaker 1>to those of you that are political junkies. Jack dan Forth,

0:02:19.919 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 1>former Republican senator from Missouri, an episcopal priest. And I

0:02:25.320 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 1>bring that up because, as you know, as many of

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:31.280
<v Speaker 1>my listeners know, Senator, I've been yearning for what I

0:02:31.320 --> 0:02:35.920
<v Speaker 1>call for a pastor for patriotism. I feel like America

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:40.960
<v Speaker 1>needs somebody to help us. They're just sort of renew

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:47.080
<v Speaker 1>civics and renew sort of what we understood America to be.

0:02:47.280 --> 0:02:51.399
<v Speaker 1>That it was an idea, it's not an ethnicity, there's

0:02:51.400 --> 0:02:55.680
<v Speaker 1>not a religious thing. And boy, there's nobody that could

0:02:55.720 --> 0:02:57.680
<v Speaker 1>speak better to this moment. I wish you were thirty

0:02:57.720 --> 0:02:59.920
<v Speaker 1>years younger right now, and let's run you for breadth

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:02.560
<v Speaker 1>it right, trust me, we all want to be twenty.

0:03:02.400 --> 0:03:05.000
<v Speaker 2>Three other reasons. Yeah, yes, so.

0:03:06.200 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 1>But your your focus is trying to rehabilitate the Republican Party.

0:03:10.240 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Walk me through what your focus is.

0:03:14.680 --> 0:03:19.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I guess the broad picture is pretty

0:03:19.320 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 2>much as you present it. I think that a great

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:30.920
<v Speaker 2>purpose of America has been simply to hold ourselves together

0:03:31.000 --> 0:03:36.200
<v Speaker 2>as one nation, with all of our differences, with all

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:42.520
<v Speaker 2>of our conflicting opinions, but to hold ourselves together, and

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:47.760
<v Speaker 2>right now we're coming apart, and to hold ourselves together

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 2>means to me to restore that part of the country

0:03:53.640 --> 0:03:58.840
<v Speaker 2>which is a venue for bringing us together. Part of that,

0:03:58.960 --> 0:04:02.920
<v Speaker 2>I think is restore the role of Congress. Congress was

0:04:03.000 --> 0:04:07.520
<v Speaker 2>created as the place where all these different interests, all

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:14.080
<v Speaker 2>these opposing points of view came together and worked things out.

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:18.640
<v Speaker 2>It was a place of compromise. Congress has now been diminished.

0:04:19.640 --> 0:04:22.240
<v Speaker 2>And one of the things that's happened is, and this

0:04:22.400 --> 0:04:24.760
<v Speaker 2>is now an issue before the Supreme Court in that

0:04:24.880 --> 0:04:29.479
<v Speaker 2>tariff case, is the concentration of power, not just in

0:04:29.560 --> 0:04:33.480
<v Speaker 2>a few hands, which is what Madison was concerned about,

0:04:33.600 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 2>but in one person's hands, the presidency. The power to

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:42.000
<v Speaker 2>tack the Congress has withered away, so it doesn't really

0:04:42.040 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 2>amount to much of anything now, much less not being

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:49.360
<v Speaker 2>a place where different interests work things out. A lot

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:52.159
<v Speaker 2>of people, a lot of people have said that the

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:55.720
<v Speaker 2>basic role of now a member of Congress has performative

0:04:55.800 --> 0:05:00.440
<v Speaker 2>that is, self promotion rather than legislating part of it.

0:05:01.120 --> 0:05:03.880
<v Speaker 2>And then the second part of the sort of creating

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:09.440
<v Speaker 2>the venue is restoring the political center of America. And

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:14.240
<v Speaker 2>that's what doesn't exist anymore. Really, It's right now, each

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:18.920
<v Speaker 2>of the two parties has gravitated toward its extremes. And

0:05:20.000 --> 0:05:23.960
<v Speaker 2>so now people go to the polls now and they're

0:05:24.000 --> 0:05:29.680
<v Speaker 2>faced with the choice, and the choices to two alternatives,

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:32.479
<v Speaker 2>neither of which they want. You know, one would be

0:05:32.560 --> 0:05:35.880
<v Speaker 2>the far left, one would be now the Republican Party,

0:05:35.920 --> 0:05:41.000
<v Speaker 2>the maga right. And so the idea is, Okay, where

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:43.719
<v Speaker 2>do people come together? Well, most people are in the center,

0:05:44.000 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 2>So let's restore that center.

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:50.680
<v Speaker 1>So this is the conundrum I have, which is, let me,

0:05:50.800 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 1>let me. Let's deal with one of the fun riddles

0:05:53.520 --> 0:05:55.800
<v Speaker 1>that I like to throw out there about American politics today.

0:05:56.680 --> 0:06:00.159
<v Speaker 1>The two major political parties have never been weaker, and

0:06:00.240 --> 0:06:04.560
<v Speaker 1>yet are the pull of the two of the red

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:08.080
<v Speaker 1>and the blue. Right has never been stronger. Right, The

0:06:08.120 --> 0:06:12.320
<v Speaker 1>parties as institutions are super weak. They have no money,

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:15.960
<v Speaker 1>no resources, no ability to vet I mean, look, I'm

0:06:15.960 --> 0:06:17.960
<v Speaker 1>old enough to remember when the chairman of the RNC

0:06:18.160 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 1>tried to shame Donald Trump for attacking John McCain that

0:06:22.080 --> 0:06:24.680
<v Speaker 1>eventual chairman of the rn C would become the chief

0:06:24.680 --> 0:06:27.240
<v Speaker 1>of staff at the first Trump presidency. I say this

0:06:27.320 --> 0:06:29.599
<v Speaker 1>with no disrespect to rights previous. I think he's a

0:06:29.640 --> 0:06:34.640
<v Speaker 1>man with a good heart, and I think I think

0:06:34.760 --> 0:06:37.720
<v Speaker 1>if given the opportunity, would try to do, would try

0:06:37.760 --> 0:06:42.960
<v Speaker 1>to do the right thing here. But is the problem

0:06:43.400 --> 0:06:47.440
<v Speaker 1>our political parties are too weak? Is the problem too

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:50.160
<v Speaker 1>much money? And the reason I say I'm offering a

0:06:50.200 --> 0:06:52.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of choices here these answers to say, it's all

0:06:52.680 --> 0:06:57.520
<v Speaker 1>a problem, But what's solvable first? What do we need

0:06:57.560 --> 0:07:01.880
<v Speaker 1>to do first? I keep coming back to a third

0:07:01.920 --> 0:07:06.000
<v Speaker 1>party or an independent candidate temporarily because of the impact

0:07:06.040 --> 0:07:09.279
<v Speaker 1>I saw Ross Perrot have on both parties. It sobered

0:07:09.320 --> 0:07:11.560
<v Speaker 1>them both up right. It made the Democrats a little

0:07:11.560 --> 0:07:15.040
<v Speaker 1>more fiscally responsible, made the Republicans a little more sensitive

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:20.280
<v Speaker 1>to working class folks on the issue of trade. So

0:07:20.320 --> 0:07:24.880
<v Speaker 1>it actually had a moderating effect on both parties. So

0:07:24.920 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 1>I think about the various reform efforts. Where do we begin?

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Where would you begin?

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:36.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, actually, I've tried both of both approaches. I am

0:07:36.520 --> 0:07:39.720
<v Speaker 2>a Republican and I've spent so much of my life

0:07:40.280 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 2>in Republican elected politics, that's my identity. But I did

0:07:46.720 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 2>in the last senatorial election in Missouri, I did support

0:07:52.160 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 2>an independent candidate, and he was the independent candidate really

0:07:57.760 --> 0:08:02.160
<v Speaker 2>was is a true ditional Republican, you know, I mean,

0:08:02.240 --> 0:08:03.239
<v Speaker 2>you would just say Okay.

0:08:03.320 --> 0:08:05.679
<v Speaker 1>Wait, by the way, John Bailey and I work together.

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, okay, back in the day. Yeah he So

0:08:13.440 --> 0:08:17.600
<v Speaker 2>this guy was just right down the line, bright guy,

0:08:17.960 --> 0:08:25.200
<v Speaker 2>attractive guy, very well educated, and he ended up with

0:08:25.280 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 2>less than one percent of the vote.

0:08:27.520 --> 0:08:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:32.080
<v Speaker 2>So, I mean the history and the third Party is

0:08:32.120 --> 0:08:39.880
<v Speaker 2>actually winning has been pretty bad. So maybe, I mean,

0:08:39.960 --> 0:08:46.520
<v Speaker 2>maybe that's the one alternative. My approach has been within

0:08:46.559 --> 0:08:51.199
<v Speaker 2>the Republican Party because right now, of course, elections are

0:08:51.280 --> 0:08:56.240
<v Speaker 2>determined in primaries, and that means to energize the extreme base.

0:08:56.960 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 2>But I think that there are just a ton of

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 2>people out there who are essentially conservative in their outlook,

0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:09.400
<v Speaker 2>traditional Republicans in their in their way of thinking and

0:09:09.440 --> 0:09:13.800
<v Speaker 2>approaching things, and that the idea is to appeal to them.

0:09:13.880 --> 0:09:17.119
<v Speaker 2>So that's my focus has been on trying to restore

0:09:18.080 --> 0:09:25.320
<v Speaker 2>that traditional Republican party. Maybe maybe it's feudal. I don't know,

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 2>I just don't.

0:09:25.960 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, let me ask you this about the party. I

0:09:29.160 --> 0:09:34.000
<v Speaker 1>always comfort myself by reminding people that the the isolationist wing,

0:09:34.440 --> 0:09:36.599
<v Speaker 1>the sort of America First wing, whatever you want to

0:09:36.640 --> 0:09:40.079
<v Speaker 1>describe sort of in MEGA has a lot of resemblance

0:09:40.120 --> 0:09:42.760
<v Speaker 1>to it. Okay, it's not fully that, and in fact,

0:09:42.800 --> 0:09:45.120
<v Speaker 1>I think we're about to see the I think the

0:09:45.160 --> 0:09:48.600
<v Speaker 1>coalition is cracking. I think we're and part of it

0:09:48.640 --> 0:09:52.920
<v Speaker 1>is just the passage of time. I mean, I think

0:09:52.920 --> 0:09:55.240
<v Speaker 1>you've you've been through a lot of these periods where

0:09:55.640 --> 0:09:58.439
<v Speaker 1>there's these cultive personalities that have a grip on the

0:09:58.520 --> 0:10:01.920
<v Speaker 1>nation of the country or a part. But the grip

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:04.880
<v Speaker 1>basically is a decade, and it is tough to ever

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:10.960
<v Speaker 1>hold on beyond it. Right, Reagan's grip basically didn't last

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:14.280
<v Speaker 1>but half of Bush's term. Right, Clinton's grip didn't even

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:16.800
<v Speaker 1>make it to a third term. Neither did Obama's.

0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:16.960
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:10:17.040 --> 0:10:20.040
<v Speaker 1>It just and I think we're seeing that now. It's

0:10:20.080 --> 0:10:24.640
<v Speaker 1>just sort of exhaustion, We burn out. Do you think

0:10:24.679 --> 0:10:29.680
<v Speaker 1>if Trump is disappears, the the Reagan coalition comes back

0:10:30.240 --> 0:10:34.320
<v Speaker 1>and the America First sort of isolationist wing, arguably both

0:10:34.320 --> 0:10:37.480
<v Speaker 1>of Missouri senators or members of that wing, does that

0:10:37.559 --> 0:10:41.040
<v Speaker 1>fade or what do you foresee in the near term.

0:10:41.520 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, you got started in politics during the old

0:10:44.080 --> 0:10:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Taft Eisenhower disputes.

0:10:45.800 --> 0:10:51.880
<v Speaker 2>Right, Well, I'm I'm not quite that old, No.

0:10:51.760 --> 0:10:54.440
<v Speaker 1>But you were, but you were familiar with them. You

0:10:54.480 --> 0:10:55.800
<v Speaker 1>were familiar with them back then.

0:10:55.960 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, sure, yeah, yeah, you know what here's here is

0:11:06.400 --> 0:11:09.840
<v Speaker 2>and maybe this maybe I'm just Pollyanna, you know, but

0:11:11.480 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 2>I think that it's not just that. Do people say, okay,

0:11:16.559 --> 0:11:18.840
<v Speaker 2>you know the cost of living and that's going to

0:11:18.880 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 2>turn people, And yeah, I think that's part of it.

0:11:23.480 --> 0:11:29.000
<v Speaker 2>But I think mainly most people in our country are

0:11:29.040 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 2>not ugly. They're not nasty, they're not.

0:11:37.760 --> 0:11:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Mean.

0:11:40.240 --> 0:11:43.240
<v Speaker 2>And I think what's happened in politics now, and particularly

0:11:43.679 --> 0:11:48.320
<v Speaker 2>in the Maga world, in the Trump world, is it's ugly.

0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:56.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's just terribly mean and angry and aggrieve

0:11:57.080 --> 0:12:05.800
<v Speaker 2>and bitter. And look, I've been out of politics for

0:12:05.840 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 2>thirty one years now, but I don't believe human nature

0:12:10.320 --> 0:12:13.880
<v Speaker 2>has changed that much in thirty one years. And I

0:12:14.760 --> 0:12:18.920
<v Speaker 2>really knew the people of my state. I thought, really well,

0:12:18.960 --> 0:12:21.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean I for a long time. I spent so

0:12:21.520 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 2>much time with them, and you know what, they're good people.

0:12:26.360 --> 0:12:28.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean, they're just good, decent people.

0:12:29.000 --> 0:12:31.080
<v Speaker 1>And does it matter if you're in the rural parts

0:12:31.080 --> 0:12:34.719
<v Speaker 1>of Missouri seven or the inner city know, and.

0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:38.920
<v Speaker 2>They're you know, and it was and they had they

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:43.200
<v Speaker 2>they were funny, I mean, they had good senses of humor.

0:12:43.440 --> 0:12:47.520
<v Speaker 2>They laughed. Where's the laughter now in politics? Where's the

0:12:47.640 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 2>joy and adult It's all so angry and so bitter

0:12:54.320 --> 0:12:59.760
<v Speaker 2>and so outrageous cruel I would say, there's a cruel

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:03.959
<v Speaker 2>some of this immigration stuff, you know. I mean when

0:13:04.000 --> 0:13:10.240
<v Speaker 2>they're when they are sending ice agents out to break

0:13:10.320 --> 0:13:13.800
<v Speaker 2>up families. I thought our party was supposed to be

0:13:13.920 --> 0:13:20.200
<v Speaker 2>family values. Well, how about deporting the husband and what's

0:13:20.240 --> 0:13:23.040
<v Speaker 2>going to happen with a wife and children. I know

0:13:23.120 --> 0:13:25.400
<v Speaker 2>of a case like that right in my home state.

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:31.760
<v Speaker 2>This man is he's going to be deported and he

0:13:31.800 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 2>won't be able to return for a minimum of twenty years.

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:38.679
<v Speaker 2>And he's married, and he has two small daughters and

0:13:38.679 --> 0:13:42.640
<v Speaker 2>one of them is a special needs child. Are we

0:13:42.760 --> 0:13:46.160
<v Speaker 2>that kind of country? Are we that kind of country

0:13:46.200 --> 0:13:49.559
<v Speaker 2>that cheers that on, that says, oh, we got to

0:13:49.640 --> 0:13:53.560
<v Speaker 2>keep these immigrants out to the point of shoving them

0:13:53.559 --> 0:13:57.120
<v Speaker 2>out the door when they've got families. So there's a

0:13:57.240 --> 0:14:02.520
<v Speaker 2>cruelty in all of this. I think that if there's

0:14:02.600 --> 0:14:05.559
<v Speaker 2>a way, and I've been thinking about how to do

0:14:05.600 --> 0:14:08.120
<v Speaker 2>this as a matter of fact, if there's a way

0:14:08.160 --> 0:14:11.240
<v Speaker 2>to just ask the American people put the question to it,

0:14:11.720 --> 0:14:16.680
<v Speaker 2>are we really like this Are we really this angry?

0:14:16.800 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 2>This mean? You know what? This week, there's going to

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:23.600
<v Speaker 2>be a meeting in Washington. I read about it, and

0:14:23.640 --> 0:14:28.840
<v Speaker 2>it's a meeting about how Christians are being picked on,

0:14:30.800 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean crimea river. Christians are supposed to feel they're victims,

0:14:36.200 --> 0:14:40.120
<v Speaker 2>They're being pushed around. The elites are out to get them,

0:14:40.200 --> 0:14:48.040
<v Speaker 2>governments out to give them please. Are we really is it?

0:14:48.080 --> 0:14:54.479
<v Speaker 2>Is it sustainable to stoke up that kind of grievance,

0:14:54.960 --> 0:15:00.320
<v Speaker 2>feeling of grievance and anger? Is that sustainable? Or is

0:15:00.360 --> 0:15:05.760
<v Speaker 2>there some equilibrium out there where most people really are

0:15:05.920 --> 0:15:10.640
<v Speaker 2>kind and decent and caring and want to live with

0:15:10.720 --> 0:15:16.000
<v Speaker 2>their neighbors, whether their neighbors are progressive or conservative, whatever

0:15:16.040 --> 0:15:18.000
<v Speaker 2>they are them.

0:15:18.400 --> 0:15:21.760
<v Speaker 1>I was counting on that exhaustion, the exhaustion from the anger,

0:15:22.280 --> 0:15:26.240
<v Speaker 1>the exhaustion, and I think we all thought, let me

0:15:26.240 --> 0:15:28.320
<v Speaker 1>put it this way, I shouldn't do the we all.

0:15:29.080 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 1>I thought the idea of Biden's presidency was supposed to

0:15:33.640 --> 0:15:37.000
<v Speaker 1>be this they I don't want to give me the

0:15:37.120 --> 0:15:41.400
<v Speaker 1>jolly guy, right, You're in the Joe Biden I covered

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:43.320
<v Speaker 1>for most of the time, and I'm not going to

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:45.880
<v Speaker 1>count the presidency because, frankly, it was a different Joe

0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Biden than the guy I covered his vice president and

0:15:48.280 --> 0:15:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the guy I covered as a senator. And I'm sure

0:15:50.240 --> 0:15:53.160
<v Speaker 1>you probably felt the same way. Yeah, But the one

0:15:53.160 --> 0:15:55.440
<v Speaker 1>thing about Joe Biden is that guy was always joyful.

0:15:55.600 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 1>That guy was always a better he was a better

0:15:58.240 --> 0:16:01.920
<v Speaker 1>angel guy. So I do think that's what the country

0:16:02.320 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of hoped he was going to offer of a

0:16:05.480 --> 0:16:08.000
<v Speaker 1>of a moment. Frankly, I go back to my phrase

0:16:08.080 --> 0:16:10.840
<v Speaker 1>pastor for patriotism, that maybe he was going to serve

0:16:10.880 --> 0:16:14.240
<v Speaker 1>as a bit of a faith healer, you know. And

0:16:14.280 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a very religious person. I know you are,

0:16:17.000 --> 0:16:19.880
<v Speaker 1>but I kind of need we need a We need

0:16:19.920 --> 0:16:24.240
<v Speaker 1>somebody to restore faith in the idea of America. And

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:26.600
<v Speaker 1>I do think it has to end up coming from

0:16:26.640 --> 0:16:29.360
<v Speaker 1>our If our president can't do it, who can, right?

0:16:30.080 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 1>And we are we?

0:16:31.400 --> 0:16:31.600
<v Speaker 2>You know?

0:16:31.680 --> 0:16:35.440
<v Speaker 1>I think I think Obama had that ability in him.

0:16:35.920 --> 0:16:37.480
<v Speaker 1>I think he made a few errors at the end

0:16:37.920 --> 0:16:40.960
<v Speaker 1>and sort of not reading, not understanding what was happening

0:16:41.000 --> 0:16:43.520
<v Speaker 1>inside his own party, and they led them down the

0:16:43.560 --> 0:16:49.120
<v Speaker 1>wrong road there. But so I take your point on this,

0:16:50.400 --> 0:16:53.680
<v Speaker 1>is this something I mean? Do you think I know

0:16:53.720 --> 0:16:55.480
<v Speaker 1>what I think? When you say those, I think, well,

0:16:55.480 --> 0:16:58.040
<v Speaker 1>this is what social media has done. It has made

0:16:58.120 --> 0:17:00.560
<v Speaker 1>us all self centered, it is, it's made us all

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:03.640
<v Speaker 1>more it is, we're all I always joke because I'm

0:17:03.680 --> 0:17:06.520
<v Speaker 1>obsessed to try to fix local news. So I'll always say, well,

0:17:06.560 --> 0:17:08.399
<v Speaker 1>the one thing I've learned with this phone and I'm

0:17:08.440 --> 0:17:11.600
<v Speaker 1>holding it up, is we're all a little bit narcissistic,

0:17:11.960 --> 0:17:14.080
<v Speaker 1>and we all think whatever's happening right around us. We

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:17.280
<v Speaker 1>had to talk about, Hey, that's local news. Maybe people

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:20.719
<v Speaker 1>want more local news, right, let's let's get more micro.

0:17:21.760 --> 0:17:25.360
<v Speaker 1>But it does feel as if our politics changed when

0:17:25.400 --> 0:17:29.440
<v Speaker 1>the iPhone became the primary source of communication for political information.

0:17:30.880 --> 0:17:35.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I think that's right. And there's been

0:17:35.400 --> 0:17:40.000
<v Speaker 2>a lot of commentary about that. It's a great book

0:17:40.080 --> 0:17:44.359
<v Speaker 2>called The Anxious Generation. I'm just that about the effect

0:17:44.440 --> 0:17:48.399
<v Speaker 2>that the iPhone is having, especially on on younger people,

0:17:49.000 --> 0:17:52.120
<v Speaker 2>and I think that all that's true, And I don't know,

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:58.119
<v Speaker 2>I don't know that there's any antidote to that, but

0:17:58.440 --> 0:18:04.440
<v Speaker 2>I do think that there has to be a sustained

0:18:04.480 --> 0:18:10.200
<v Speaker 2>effort to focus public attention on the question of who

0:18:10.240 --> 0:18:14.520
<v Speaker 2>are we and are we really angry and mean and

0:18:15.119 --> 0:18:21.840
<v Speaker 2>cruel as people? Or are we not? And I think

0:18:21.960 --> 0:18:26.919
<v Speaker 2>that that that effort will call for a lot of us,

0:18:26.960 --> 0:18:29.000
<v Speaker 2>and it will call for the media, We'll call for

0:18:29.040 --> 0:18:30.440
<v Speaker 2>anybody who's got.

0:18:30.800 --> 0:18:32.879
<v Speaker 1>Well, what do you do if the sitting president of

0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:35.040
<v Speaker 1>the United States does not agree with that assise?

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:39.239
<v Speaker 2>Oh no, he doesn't know. He's the opposite. He is

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:47.040
<v Speaker 2>the opposite. He's the That's what he is. And that's why.

0:18:47.320 --> 0:18:50.240
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that's one of the reasons I think he's

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:53.120
<v Speaker 2>caused more damage to our country than any other person

0:18:53.160 --> 0:18:57.239
<v Speaker 2>in our history. But so now what it was, and

0:18:57.280 --> 0:18:59.959
<v Speaker 2>I think it's got to be more than just top end.

0:19:01.320 --> 0:19:03.880
<v Speaker 2>I think it's got to be bottomed up. I think

0:19:03.880 --> 0:19:06.640
<v Speaker 2>it's got to be the American people being faced through

0:19:06.680 --> 0:19:09.600
<v Speaker 2>that question of who we are and is this really right?

0:19:10.440 --> 0:19:13.119
<v Speaker 2>And does Donald Trump and what he stands for really

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:16.359
<v Speaker 2>represent us and what we stand for who we are?

0:19:17.320 --> 0:19:21.760
<v Speaker 2>And so how to sustain that well, I can think

0:19:21.800 --> 0:19:23.800
<v Speaker 2>of how to do it in bits and pieces.

0:19:23.960 --> 0:19:28.720
<v Speaker 1>In This episode of The Chuck Podcast is brought to

0:19:28.720 --> 0:19:31.760
<v Speaker 1>you by Wildgrain. Wild Grain is the first bake from

0:19:31.840 --> 0:19:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Frozen subscription box for our teasonal breads, seasonal pastries, and

0:19:37.040 --> 0:19:41.200
<v Speaker 1>fresh pastas, plus all items conveniently bake in twenty five

0:19:41.320 --> 0:19:44.600
<v Speaker 1>minutes or less. Unlike many store bought options, Wild Grain

0:19:44.720 --> 0:19:48.520
<v Speaker 1>uses simple ingredients you can pronounce and a slow fermentation

0:19:48.720 --> 0:19:51.960
<v Speaker 1>process that can be easier on your belly and richer

0:19:52.000 --> 0:19:56.240
<v Speaker 1>in nutrients and antioxidants. Wildgrain's boxes are fully customizable. They're

0:19:56.320 --> 0:19:59.800
<v Speaker 1>constantly adding seasonal and limited time products for you to enjoy.

0:20:00.320 --> 0:20:02.679
<v Speaker 1>In addition to their classic box, they now feature a

0:20:02.680 --> 0:20:06.080
<v Speaker 1>gluten free box and a plant based box. I checked

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:08.199
<v Speaker 1>out the gluten free box and let me tell you,

0:20:08.359 --> 0:20:11.000
<v Speaker 1>they have a gluten free sourdough bread.

0:20:11.560 --> 0:20:11.959
<v Speaker 2>It is.

0:20:12.280 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 1>We got two loads of it and we've done one

0:20:14.320 --> 0:20:18.360
<v Speaker 1>loaf already. It's a cranberry and almond sourdough bread. It's

0:20:18.440 --> 0:20:21.040
<v Speaker 1>like the best raisin bread you've ever had, except it's

0:20:21.080 --> 0:20:25.240
<v Speaker 1>not raisin. It's great. You're gonna love this. You know

0:20:25.320 --> 0:20:27.000
<v Speaker 1>it's hit or miss if you mess around in the

0:20:27.000 --> 0:20:30.359
<v Speaker 1>gluten free bread world. This is a hit. Seriously. I

0:20:30.440 --> 0:20:33.439
<v Speaker 1>was impressed, So look for a limited time. Wildgrain is

0:20:33.480 --> 0:20:36.439
<v Speaker 1>offering our listeners thirty dollars off your first box, plus

0:20:36.520 --> 0:20:39.120
<v Speaker 1>free croissants in every box when you go to wildgrain

0:20:39.200 --> 0:20:43.960
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash podcast to start your subscription. Follow these instructions.

0:20:44.000 --> 0:20:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Free croissants in every box thirty dollars off your first

0:20:46.760 --> 0:20:49.760
<v Speaker 1>box when you go to wildgrain dot com slash toodcast

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:53.320
<v Speaker 1>that's wildgrain dot com slash podcast, or simply use the

0:20:53.359 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 1>promo code toodcast at check out. Always use the code

0:20:57.680 --> 0:21:04.639
<v Speaker 1>get the discount. I'm telling you it's excellent, excellent. Brett, Well,

0:21:04.720 --> 0:21:07.679
<v Speaker 1>let me give you a suggestion because, and I know

0:21:07.800 --> 0:21:10.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious how much conversations you've had. There are two

0:21:10.680 --> 0:21:14.240
<v Speaker 1>senators that always jump out to me as two senators

0:21:14.280 --> 0:21:16.639
<v Speaker 1>that I would like to lead, to see lead a

0:21:16.720 --> 0:21:20.280
<v Speaker 1>conversation like the one you've described. And they're the actual

0:21:20.680 --> 0:21:23.320
<v Speaker 1>They're the two senators who are also happened to be pastors,

0:21:24.200 --> 0:21:29.400
<v Speaker 1>James Langford out of Oklahoma and Raphael Warnock go to Georgia. Langford,

0:21:29.400 --> 0:21:31.840
<v Speaker 1>to me, is the closest thing to you that exists

0:21:31.880 --> 0:21:34.919
<v Speaker 1>in this current Senate. I say that not just because

0:21:34.960 --> 0:21:41.720
<v Speaker 1>of his past being an ordained pastor, but more his

0:21:42.840 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 1>in who he is, who is his temperatip. I think

0:21:45.800 --> 0:21:47.520
<v Speaker 1>I got to think you know Langford a little bit.

0:21:48.160 --> 0:21:52.560
<v Speaker 1>He is I think a top notch human being. I

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:55.119
<v Speaker 1>think if it were politically safer, he would be speaking

0:21:55.119 --> 0:22:00.399
<v Speaker 1>out more. But I go back and forth of whether

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:03.400
<v Speaker 1>I how much grace I give certain senators. I'll give

0:22:03.480 --> 0:22:06.359
<v Speaker 1>him more grace than others because I feel like I

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 1>know who he is. Should what role could those two play?

0:22:11.040 --> 0:22:13.800
<v Speaker 1>I feel like if they chose to play a role here,

0:22:13.840 --> 0:22:17.800
<v Speaker 1>they could play a powerful role. But Langford would have

0:22:17.840 --> 0:22:20.399
<v Speaker 1>to criticize his own party, and I don't know if

0:22:20.400 --> 0:22:21.199
<v Speaker 1>he's ready to do that.

0:22:21.280 --> 0:22:25.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, I don't, yeah, But I don't think you need

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:27.639
<v Speaker 2>to start out criticizing your own party. I think you

0:22:28.080 --> 0:22:31.400
<v Speaker 2>end up. You start out as we have with our

0:22:31.520 --> 0:22:38.320
<v Speaker 2>organization called our Republican Legacy, putting forth certain points of

0:22:38.400 --> 0:22:43.360
<v Speaker 2>view or principles that are positive, that stand on their

0:22:43.400 --> 0:22:47.800
<v Speaker 2>own and if you put, if you put to the

0:22:47.800 --> 0:22:51.040
<v Speaker 2>American but who are we? How do you want to

0:22:51.080 --> 0:22:54.720
<v Speaker 2>treat your neighbors? You know? Do you? How do you

0:22:54.760 --> 0:22:58.800
<v Speaker 2>want to do that? I think there would be a response.

0:22:58.880 --> 0:23:01.040
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it's necessary. It would be wonderful it

0:23:01.040 --> 0:23:04.960
<v Speaker 2>would come for the present and wonderful of more political leaders.

0:23:05.080 --> 0:23:09.359
<v Speaker 2>Anybody with the soapbox, though, can do it. I think

0:23:09.520 --> 0:23:15.720
<v Speaker 2>that there's a real role for religious congregations to do

0:23:15.760 --> 0:23:20.880
<v Speaker 2>this bringing people together who are different, who have different opinions,

0:23:21.920 --> 0:23:26.600
<v Speaker 2>breaking bread together, you know, invite a Republican to lunch?

0:23:27.040 --> 0:23:30.199
<v Speaker 2>How about that? Right? I mean any other way around? Right?

0:23:30.240 --> 0:23:36.840
<v Speaker 2>No anything, And they're you know, so, I mean there

0:23:36.880 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 2>could be a real effort. It could be led by

0:23:41.280 --> 0:23:45.720
<v Speaker 2>religious congregations, and it should be because the root of

0:23:45.760 --> 0:23:48.639
<v Speaker 2>the word religion is the same as for ligament, holding

0:23:48.680 --> 0:23:53.600
<v Speaker 2>things together. So how do we do that? Are there

0:23:53.800 --> 0:23:58.400
<v Speaker 2>tactics for doing it? Invite a Republican to lunch? How

0:23:58.440 --> 0:24:02.080
<v Speaker 2>about if somebody that you know who has got the

0:24:02.200 --> 0:24:07.120
<v Speaker 2>opposite political view has hit something awful, happened by way

0:24:07.160 --> 0:24:11.360
<v Speaker 2>of health or family laws, call them up. Call that

0:24:11.400 --> 0:24:15.320
<v Speaker 2>person up and say I care about you. And Saint

0:24:15.320 --> 0:24:19.440
<v Speaker 2>Paul said, rejoice with those who rejoice, weep with those

0:24:19.440 --> 0:24:24.240
<v Speaker 2>who weep. And I think that that is what it takes.

0:24:24.320 --> 0:24:28.480
<v Speaker 2>I think it's I think essentially it's a question of

0:24:31.560 --> 0:24:35.359
<v Speaker 2>what we're really right and we're not like this. I

0:24:35.560 --> 0:24:41.399
<v Speaker 2>know that, I absolutely know that we as a people

0:24:42.080 --> 0:24:44.960
<v Speaker 2>are not like Donald Trump. I know that.

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:53.000
<v Speaker 1>So obviously you hope this is repairable from the inside out,

0:24:54.400 --> 0:24:56.119
<v Speaker 1>But when you look at the grip he has on

0:24:56.160 --> 0:24:58.960
<v Speaker 1>the party, like I said, I think it's a coalition

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:01.600
<v Speaker 1>that's in the midst of fract because it doesn't have

0:25:01.640 --> 0:25:07.480
<v Speaker 1>an ideological glue. Right, He's supposedly for non interventions, and

0:25:07.560 --> 0:25:10.160
<v Speaker 1>yet we're about to go on an escapade in Venezuela

0:25:10.680 --> 0:25:14.920
<v Speaker 1>where he's getting involved in the Honduran presidential election. He's

0:25:14.960 --> 0:25:18.199
<v Speaker 1>inserted it. You know, it's as whatever you think of

0:25:18.200 --> 0:25:21.639
<v Speaker 1>Marjorie Taylor Green, I think I take her at her

0:25:21.680 --> 0:25:23.960
<v Speaker 1>word that she looks at this and said, hey, I

0:25:24.000 --> 0:25:27.320
<v Speaker 1>actually voted for ideology here. And I think Trump's got

0:25:27.320 --> 0:25:30.040
<v Speaker 1>a problem. I think there's some true believers in his

0:25:30.200 --> 0:25:33.680
<v Speaker 1>movement that are like, wait a minute, we didn't vote

0:25:33.720 --> 0:25:37.440
<v Speaker 1>for this. We didn't vote for Ukraine, or Israel or Venezuela.

0:25:38.040 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 1>And we know that Trump's a transactionalist. He jumped in

0:25:41.800 --> 0:25:43.520
<v Speaker 1>front of that parade because he saw it as the

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:46.960
<v Speaker 1>fastest way to get the nomination. And now he's like, oh, well,

0:25:46.960 --> 0:25:50.360
<v Speaker 1>I can get paid helping out the Hondurans here, and

0:25:50.480 --> 0:25:52.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'll dabble in this over there, and the

0:25:52.640 --> 0:25:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Middle East Royalty loves me and so and it's actually

0:25:56.680 --> 0:25:58.800
<v Speaker 1>counter to what he promised his constituents.

0:25:58.840 --> 0:26:04.840
<v Speaker 2>But it hasn't broken our position, our position in our

0:26:04.880 --> 0:26:09.320
<v Speaker 2>Republican legacy, which is our effort to keep the ember

0:26:09.480 --> 0:26:15.800
<v Speaker 2>of traditional conservatism burning. Our position is that none of

0:26:15.800 --> 0:26:20.640
<v Speaker 2>this is conservative. None of it. It's not. I mean,

0:26:20.680 --> 0:26:24.600
<v Speaker 2>we used to think of ourselves we're the conservative party. Okay,

0:26:25.280 --> 0:26:29.240
<v Speaker 2>let's say, let's ask the Republicans that question, do you

0:26:29.400 --> 0:26:34.080
<v Speaker 2>view yourself as conservative or not? But please don't let

0:26:34.119 --> 0:26:39.160
<v Speaker 2>the conservative label be appropriated by the MAGA people, because

0:26:39.640 --> 0:26:42.440
<v Speaker 2>they are not. Jack.

0:26:42.520 --> 0:26:44.720
<v Speaker 1>I think the words lost its meaning to most. If

0:26:44.760 --> 0:26:49.040
<v Speaker 1>you ask my son, who's eight in college studying, he

0:26:49.200 --> 0:26:53.680
<v Speaker 1>thinks whatever Trump supporter is a conservative And I'm like, well,

0:26:53.720 --> 0:26:58.639
<v Speaker 1>that's it's an ideological label that doesn't fit what the

0:26:58.680 --> 0:27:00.720
<v Speaker 1>definition used to be. And I was trying to walk

0:27:00.720 --> 0:27:03.919
<v Speaker 1>them through this, and you know, right now, it's just

0:27:03.960 --> 0:27:06.040
<v Speaker 1>a label that's a fixed on anything Trump.

0:27:06.160 --> 0:27:08.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I know that's true, But I mean we've got

0:27:08.680 --> 0:27:12.719
<v Speaker 2>to reclaim it. And that's what our group of ours,

0:27:12.760 --> 0:27:17.280
<v Speaker 2>our Republican legacy, is attempting to do. I mean pointing

0:27:17.359 --> 0:27:21.800
<v Speaker 2>out there's nothing conservative about blowing out up the National

0:27:21.880 --> 0:27:30.040
<v Speaker 2>death that's not conservative. There's nothing conservative about deep Washington

0:27:30.320 --> 0:27:35.560
<v Speaker 2>involvement in the economy, which was high protective caress Ronald

0:27:35.640 --> 0:27:37.560
<v Speaker 2>Reagan rolling over in his grave?

0:27:38.240 --> 0:27:40.439
<v Speaker 1>Can you believe how many pieces of companies the US

0:27:40.520 --> 0:27:42.040
<v Speaker 1>government now has.

0:27:41.880 --> 0:27:48.200
<v Speaker 2>An owning company? That is what's conservative about government owning companies?

0:27:48.240 --> 0:27:54.720
<v Speaker 2>What's conservative about government? The Washington and the President trying

0:27:54.760 --> 0:27:59.679
<v Speaker 2>to tell universities what they should teach, or law firms

0:27:59.680 --> 0:28:04.280
<v Speaker 2>about whom they should represent, or late night comedians about

0:28:04.320 --> 0:28:08.520
<v Speaker 2>who they should not. What's conservative about that? That's not conservative?

0:28:09.160 --> 0:28:13.560
<v Speaker 2>What's conservative about cottoning up to Vladimir Putin? How does

0:28:13.600 --> 0:28:17.560
<v Speaker 2>that square with the Republican Party of Dwight Eisenhower and

0:28:17.680 --> 0:28:21.679
<v Speaker 2>Ronald Reagan? It does not. So it's not that this

0:28:21.880 --> 0:28:29.439
<v Speaker 2>is just a different part of conservatism. It's it's the

0:28:29.680 --> 0:28:34.280
<v Speaker 2>opposite of what our party was, has been, and what

0:28:34.480 --> 0:28:38.320
<v Speaker 2>I think if faced with it. But that's why I

0:28:38.360 --> 0:28:42.080
<v Speaker 2>think it's important to field candidates and hopefully in the

0:28:42.160 --> 0:28:47.240
<v Speaker 2>presidential election. Also maybe the person would lose, so he loses,

0:28:47.440 --> 0:28:55.360
<v Speaker 2>she loses, whatever, but at least present it to Republican voters.

0:28:55.840 --> 0:28:59.200
<v Speaker 2>How do you feel about huge deficits that are growing?

0:29:00.080 --> 0:29:03.200
<v Speaker 2>You feel about the Trump administration in its first term

0:29:03.600 --> 0:29:06.280
<v Speaker 2>that increased the national debt in four years by more

0:29:06.320 --> 0:29:09.720
<v Speaker 2>than almost forty percent, and that's going to increase it

0:29:09.760 --> 0:29:12.520
<v Speaker 2>by another three trillion over the next decade. How do

0:29:12.560 --> 0:29:15.920
<v Speaker 2>you feel about that? Do you think government should own businesses?

0:29:16.400 --> 0:29:20.120
<v Speaker 2>Do you favor high protective tariffs? Do you feel favor

0:29:20.200 --> 0:29:24.920
<v Speaker 2>pulling the plug on Ukraine? Put those questions to Republican voters.

0:29:25.360 --> 0:29:28.600
<v Speaker 2>Do you talk about fracturing of the Republican Party. I

0:29:28.640 --> 0:29:33.000
<v Speaker 2>don't think it would be fracturing over little stuff. I mean,

0:29:33.040 --> 0:29:38.000
<v Speaker 2>this is fundamental stuff that is defined the Republican Party

0:29:38.160 --> 0:29:43.320
<v Speaker 2>historically as the conservative party, which it isn't anymore.

0:29:43.800 --> 0:29:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Look, one of Missouri's US Senators, Josh Holly, I think

0:29:49.760 --> 0:29:55.719
<v Speaker 1>is smarter about understanding that the voter, the voter that

0:29:55.840 --> 0:30:01.280
<v Speaker 1>elects Republicans now, doesn't necessarily agree with that definition of

0:30:02.080 --> 0:30:06.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't rejected that version of the Republican Party and prefers

0:30:06.560 --> 0:30:08.760
<v Speaker 1>one that is I always say, this is not a

0:30:08.800 --> 0:30:12.040
<v Speaker 1>small government Republican party. This is a strong government.

0:30:11.680 --> 0:30:16.080
<v Speaker 2>Republican You bet. It's really remarkable as a matter of

0:30:16.080 --> 0:30:19.200
<v Speaker 2>fact that I remember when I was a kid, somebody

0:30:19.280 --> 0:30:22.160
<v Speaker 2>said this to me. There they're really it is like

0:30:22.240 --> 0:30:27.480
<v Speaker 2>a convergence in a circle of the extreme right of

0:30:27.520 --> 0:30:30.640
<v Speaker 2>the extreme life right.

0:30:30.880 --> 0:30:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Eventually they touched.

0:30:32.160 --> 0:30:38.760
<v Speaker 2>Yes, it's it's that, that's right. But here's the thing.

0:30:38.880 --> 0:30:41.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we're trying to do this in our group,

0:30:41.280 --> 0:30:44.240
<v Speaker 2>our Republican legacy, we're trying to do this. We're trying

0:30:44.280 --> 0:30:49.040
<v Speaker 2>to to plant the flag for a principle. But not

0:30:49.240 --> 0:30:52.400
<v Speaker 2>enough people are doing it. Not enough people are really

0:30:52.440 --> 0:30:56.120
<v Speaker 2>putting the issue. So that's what I think we should

0:30:56.200 --> 0:31:01.640
<v Speaker 2>do it. Maybe maybe Hally's right. We are the party

0:31:01.720 --> 0:31:07.280
<v Speaker 2>of big government and writing two thousand dollars checks to

0:31:07.440 --> 0:31:10.680
<v Speaker 2>people and all of that. Maybe we've become a maybe

0:31:10.720 --> 0:31:13.400
<v Speaker 2>that's the way to be popular. A lot of people

0:31:13.680 --> 0:31:18.640
<v Speaker 2>historically in politics think this is the way to become popular,

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:21.400
<v Speaker 2>way to win elections is to give it away.

0:31:21.320 --> 0:31:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Checking in every pot.

0:31:22.400 --> 0:31:26.840
<v Speaker 2>Right, remember that that's right. That comfrequent Hubert Humphrey used

0:31:26.880 --> 0:31:30.920
<v Speaker 2>to call it the politics of joy, just give it away.

0:31:31.480 --> 0:31:36.680
<v Speaker 2>Government intervenes and everything government should be big. Government isn't

0:31:36.720 --> 0:31:40.680
<v Speaker 2>big enough now. Government doesn't spend enough now, It isn't

0:31:40.760 --> 0:31:46.440
<v Speaker 2>powerful enough now, and it doesn't abuse your enemies the

0:31:46.480 --> 0:31:50.360
<v Speaker 2>way it should and it should do more of that.

0:31:50.560 --> 0:31:56.160
<v Speaker 2>So that yeah, So that's that, that has been I

0:31:56.200 --> 0:32:00.160
<v Speaker 2>guess the formula that they're relying on. But what if

0:32:00.200 --> 0:32:03.440
<v Speaker 2>you put the opposite to people. I mean, what if

0:32:03.480 --> 0:32:08.280
<v Speaker 2>somebody were to run for president, not caring whether this

0:32:08.360 --> 0:32:12.600
<v Speaker 2>person necessarily had to win for his or her ego,

0:32:13.560 --> 0:32:18.560
<v Speaker 2>but just put the question to people, who are we

0:32:18.680 --> 0:32:22.320
<v Speaker 2>as a people and what are we as a party?

0:32:22.920 --> 0:32:29.320
<v Speaker 2>What do we stand for? Do we stand for anything anymore? Anything?

0:32:31.160 --> 0:32:33.600
<v Speaker 1>So should we have more? I mean, do you think

0:32:33.720 --> 0:32:35.720
<v Speaker 1>you know this is?

0:32:35.920 --> 0:32:36.240
<v Speaker 2>This is?

0:32:37.120 --> 0:32:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, let me start with this. I'm obsessed with having

0:32:40.080 --> 0:32:43.520
<v Speaker 1>a constitutional convention. I think we need one, and I

0:32:43.560 --> 0:32:47.040
<v Speaker 1>think if you look at every period, every period in

0:32:47.080 --> 0:32:50.800
<v Speaker 1>our history where we've been at the brink, okay, where

0:32:50.800 --> 0:32:55.280
<v Speaker 1>we we hit a low Civil War being the lowest

0:32:55.600 --> 0:32:59.360
<v Speaker 1>we've we've actually that's always the moment we've actually amended

0:32:59.400 --> 0:33:04.000
<v Speaker 1>our Constitution. We created more equal protect Essentially, the equal

0:33:04.040 --> 0:33:06.480
<v Speaker 1>protection clause comes in after the Civil War.

0:33:06.720 --> 0:33:09.720
<v Speaker 2>We have mead the Constitution. We didn't have any convention

0:33:09.880 --> 0:33:10.400
<v Speaker 2>to do it.

0:33:10.720 --> 0:33:13.719
<v Speaker 1>No, that's true, but I don't trust this Congress actually

0:33:14.720 --> 0:33:16.960
<v Speaker 1>allow that to happen. But let's say, but either way,

0:33:17.040 --> 0:33:20.320
<v Speaker 1>we can do it in any which way. After the

0:33:20.320 --> 0:33:26.000
<v Speaker 1>debacle of the early twentieth century, when arguably the worst

0:33:26.040 --> 0:33:30.280
<v Speaker 1>scandal we ever had, teapot Dome. Well, we get the

0:33:30.320 --> 0:33:34.400
<v Speaker 1>direct election of senators, and then we get the amendment

0:33:34.440 --> 0:33:37.520
<v Speaker 1>to allow the income tax, which actually creates the property

0:33:37.520 --> 0:33:41.200
<v Speaker 1>tax structure that funds local governments to this day. And

0:33:41.240 --> 0:33:43.320
<v Speaker 1>of course we gave women the right to vote. So

0:33:44.400 --> 0:33:46.920
<v Speaker 1>I just think that we will have an opportunity in

0:33:46.960 --> 0:33:49.800
<v Speaker 1>the next ten to fifteen years to do some reforms,

0:33:50.080 --> 0:33:52.880
<v Speaker 1>because I do think there's enough shell shocked Americans like

0:33:52.960 --> 0:33:56.520
<v Speaker 1>WHOA the last ten years, right, whether it's amending the

0:33:56.560 --> 0:34:00.480
<v Speaker 1>constitution to take away the power of the part to

0:34:00.600 --> 0:34:03.000
<v Speaker 1>an individual. I mean, this is the abuse of the

0:34:03.000 --> 0:34:06.280
<v Speaker 1>pardon processes is clearly I think turned out to be

0:34:06.320 --> 0:34:10.360
<v Speaker 1>a problem. Maybe we do term limits, maybe we do this.

0:34:12.280 --> 0:34:14.520
<v Speaker 1>What do you do? You think we need a moment

0:34:14.560 --> 0:34:17.280
<v Speaker 1>here where? And if the reason, I like a constitutional

0:34:17.320 --> 0:34:20.200
<v Speaker 1>convention because I want to bring liberals and conservatives. Let's

0:34:20.239 --> 0:34:23.080
<v Speaker 1>talk about the balanced budget amendment, Let's talk about term limits,

0:34:23.280 --> 0:34:26.239
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about the pardon power, let's talk about age limits. Right,

0:34:26.600 --> 0:34:29.920
<v Speaker 1>all of that would have to be constitutional amendments, but

0:34:30.000 --> 0:34:34.440
<v Speaker 1>the process itself could be restorative for civics.

0:34:39.880 --> 0:34:40.760
<v Speaker 2>Terrible idea.

0:34:41.800 --> 0:34:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Oh, you don't want it. You think it's okay, tell

0:34:44.480 --> 0:34:44.799
<v Speaker 1>me why?

0:34:45.239 --> 0:34:45.560
<v Speaker 2>No?

0:34:45.560 --> 0:34:46.280
<v Speaker 1>No, okay?

0:34:47.440 --> 0:34:54.480
<v Speaker 2>Because I think that our constitution is a work of genius.

0:34:55.320 --> 0:34:59.880
<v Speaker 2>I do too, and I think that our guiding principle

0:35:02.120 --> 0:35:11.960
<v Speaker 2>is a principle of genius. And the principle is it's

0:35:13.280 --> 0:35:20.440
<v Speaker 2>the famous what five words and the declaration of independence.

0:35:21.080 --> 0:35:24.239
<v Speaker 2>All men are created equal. Did we depart from that

0:35:24.400 --> 0:35:30.120
<v Speaker 2>right from the beginning. Yeah, But is that our basic standard? Yes?

0:35:31.600 --> 0:35:37.480
<v Speaker 2>And we believed that we are capable, we the people,

0:35:38.800 --> 0:35:43.520
<v Speaker 2>are capable of governing ourselves. We don't have to be

0:35:43.600 --> 0:35:52.160
<v Speaker 2>governed by the powers that be. We take responsibility for

0:35:52.320 --> 0:35:58.239
<v Speaker 2>governing ourselves. And that was Jefferson's principle, and that was

0:35:58.280 --> 0:36:05.320
<v Speaker 2>what the Constitution was designed to do. No more big

0:36:05.360 --> 0:36:13.120
<v Speaker 2>deal king, no more big deal aristocracy, no more big

0:36:13.640 --> 0:36:18.680
<v Speaker 2>concentrated power in one person's hands or a few people.

0:36:19.200 --> 0:36:23.200
<v Speaker 2>We do this. That is our republican form of government.

0:36:24.280 --> 0:36:27.960
<v Speaker 2>That is what we are responsible for. And I think

0:36:28.000 --> 0:36:32.560
<v Speaker 2>we just have to insist on that. And that's it's

0:36:32.640 --> 0:36:35.600
<v Speaker 2>not a new principle, it's our principle.

0:36:35.640 --> 0:36:37.520
<v Speaker 1>It's the I don't think we disagree here. I think

0:36:37.560 --> 0:36:40.080
<v Speaker 1>we may disagree in the vehicle to amend the Constitution.

0:36:40.200 --> 0:36:42.000
<v Speaker 1>But I do think we need to freshen it up.

0:36:42.719 --> 0:36:44.160
<v Speaker 1>We need to add some amendments, do you.

0:36:44.120 --> 0:36:48.320
<v Speaker 2>Know, Well maybe yeah, amendments, But that's not counc usual convention.

0:36:49.760 --> 0:36:52.160
<v Speaker 2>What I mean the first Constitution.

0:36:52.200 --> 0:36:54.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm not interested in rewriting. I see what you're saying.

0:36:54.719 --> 0:36:57.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm not interested in rewriting it. That's what you're Okay,

0:36:57.760 --> 0:37:04.440
<v Speaker 1>the first Constitutional Convention was presided over by George Washington.

0:37:06.760 --> 0:37:11.040
<v Speaker 1>What if then another countutional convention was provided side by

0:37:11.040 --> 0:37:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump?

0:37:12.600 --> 0:37:13.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, I don't.

0:37:13.320 --> 0:37:16.799
<v Speaker 1>I've heard that. I get that. I don't want to

0:37:16.840 --> 0:37:20.320
<v Speaker 1>fear the voter. Sometimes I do think we make certain

0:37:20.480 --> 0:37:23.319
<v Speaker 1>decisions like we fear, we fear the voter.

0:37:23.440 --> 0:37:23.560
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:37:23.600 --> 0:37:27.640
<v Speaker 1>The electoral College arguably was a creation because ultimately they

0:37:27.680 --> 0:37:30.839
<v Speaker 1>feared the voters and they were like, we better have

0:37:30.880 --> 0:37:36.120
<v Speaker 1>one more check on the voters. And you know, look

0:37:36.120 --> 0:37:39.640
<v Speaker 1>at jerrymandering. Right, I would argue they fear the voter

0:37:40.760 --> 0:37:42.440
<v Speaker 1>and we need to we need to get rid of

0:37:42.440 --> 0:37:46.160
<v Speaker 1>that principle of fearing the voter and instead realizing, no,

0:37:46.280 --> 0:37:47.480
<v Speaker 1>the voter is in charge.

0:37:47.760 --> 0:37:50.600
<v Speaker 2>Okay, should please do it by months?

0:37:50.640 --> 0:37:53.800
<v Speaker 1>And now, well I what I So that's what I

0:37:53.800 --> 0:37:56.560
<v Speaker 1>I But what I could see us having is gathering

0:37:56.640 --> 0:38:01.560
<v Speaker 1>for to debate these amendments, and I think that we

0:38:01.600 --> 0:38:05.120
<v Speaker 1>should have a form for it. And I think it's

0:38:05.160 --> 0:38:08.799
<v Speaker 1>pretty clear we've got some problems, whether it's money in politics.

0:38:09.280 --> 0:38:10.840
<v Speaker 1>The courts are going to rule one way. So if

0:38:10.880 --> 0:38:12.640
<v Speaker 1>you want to have any limitation, you're going to have

0:38:12.680 --> 0:38:16.759
<v Speaker 1>to create a constitutional amendment jerry mandering, you know. I

0:38:16.800 --> 0:38:18.800
<v Speaker 1>think I happen to think the House is too small.

0:38:19.239 --> 0:38:22.120
<v Speaker 1>I actually think we don't have enough representatives in Washington

0:38:22.520 --> 0:38:26.080
<v Speaker 1>given the size of our population. I know, more politicians

0:38:26.080 --> 0:38:28.600
<v Speaker 1>doesn't sound like a reform to many people. But that's

0:38:29.719 --> 0:38:31.759
<v Speaker 1>if you if I, if I go back, I look

0:38:31.800 --> 0:38:34.759
<v Speaker 1>at it as founder's intent and the House of Representatives

0:38:34.800 --> 0:38:37.240
<v Speaker 1>is no longer the people's house, and that's a problem.

0:38:37.320 --> 0:38:41.080
<v Speaker 1>And how do you bring that mindset back to it? Yeah,

0:38:41.560 --> 0:38:43.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think the point is is that it

0:38:43.480 --> 0:38:47.880
<v Speaker 1>does feel as if we need, you know, like any house,

0:38:49.200 --> 0:38:52.920
<v Speaker 1>it needs updating, and the American House needs some updating.

0:38:55.040 --> 0:39:00.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I mean, no, I understand what you're saying, and

0:39:00.080 --> 0:39:04.759
<v Speaker 2>I think they're you know, discrete areas which would be

0:39:06.200 --> 0:39:11.640
<v Speaker 2>worth addressing. I mean, my own view is in the

0:39:11.680 --> 0:39:18.640
<v Speaker 2>same of the money in politics. I don't think that

0:39:19.120 --> 0:39:21.960
<v Speaker 2>money is the same as speech, which is basically with

0:39:23.040 --> 0:39:28.040
<v Speaker 2>the Supreme Court decided. I think that there's a right

0:39:28.120 --> 0:39:31.560
<v Speaker 2>to speak, of course, into assembly. There's not a right

0:39:31.640 --> 0:39:36.120
<v Speaker 2>to bring a bull horned into a political meeting. And

0:39:36.280 --> 0:39:40.239
<v Speaker 2>that's essentially what we have now. So now I understand

0:39:40.640 --> 0:39:47.600
<v Speaker 2>that I haven't thought about a constitutional amendment on the

0:39:47.680 --> 0:39:51.040
<v Speaker 2>germandering or increasing the sides of the House. I just

0:39:51.080 --> 0:39:51.920
<v Speaker 2>don't have any.

0:39:52.960 --> 0:39:55.280
<v Speaker 1>And I get that those are my hobby horses.

0:39:55.560 --> 0:39:59.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but I mean, maybe they're good ideas, maybe they're not,

0:40:01.040 --> 0:40:04.120
<v Speaker 2>but I don't I'm not for scrapping what we have.

0:40:04.239 --> 0:40:08.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm for restoring what we have. I think that the

0:40:08.560 --> 0:40:13.160
<v Speaker 2>Supreme Court's decision in this tariff case is really going

0:40:13.239 --> 0:40:14.520
<v Speaker 2>to be important.

0:40:15.000 --> 0:40:17.319
<v Speaker 1>How badly. Let me say, let's say this, what if

0:40:17.440 --> 0:40:21.680
<v Speaker 1>they uphold the president's authority? What does that do to

0:40:21.760 --> 0:40:23.280
<v Speaker 1>the checks and balances.

0:40:22.800 --> 0:40:27.640
<v Speaker 2>Of our It removes them, Yeah, it really removes them.

0:40:27.680 --> 0:40:33.200
<v Speaker 2>But it basically says that the president has absolute power

0:40:33.280 --> 0:40:36.399
<v Speaker 2>to do anything. He can do anything he wants if

0:40:36.440 --> 0:40:39.640
<v Speaker 2>he wants. He could paint the White House orange, and

0:40:39.680 --> 0:40:44.360
<v Speaker 2>by the way, he might decide to do that, you know, Yeah,

0:40:44.440 --> 0:40:49.000
<v Speaker 2>it's I mean, if Congress doesn't retain the power to

0:40:49.239 --> 0:40:54.239
<v Speaker 2>tax right, which is you know, an express power an

0:40:54.360 --> 0:40:58.120
<v Speaker 2>article one of the Constitutions, the power to attacks that

0:40:58.120 --> 0:41:00.160
<v Speaker 2>that can be given away.

0:41:01.960 --> 0:41:05.000
<v Speaker 1>There's a reason results matter more than promises, just like

0:41:05.080 --> 0:41:08.160
<v Speaker 1>there's a reason Morgan and Morgan is America's largest injury

0:41:08.239 --> 0:41:11.000
<v Speaker 1>law firm. For the last thirty five years, they've recovered

0:41:11.120 --> 0:41:14.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty five billion dollars for more than half a million clients.

0:41:14.840 --> 0:41:18.400
<v Speaker 1>It includes cases where insurance companies offered next to nothing,

0:41:18.680 --> 0:41:21.480
<v Speaker 1>just hoping to get away with paying as little as possible.

0:41:21.560 --> 0:41:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Morgan and Morgan fought back ended up winning millions. In fact,

0:41:24.719 --> 0:41:27.840
<v Speaker 1>in Pennsylvania, one client was awarded twenty six million dollars,

0:41:28.320 --> 0:41:31.359
<v Speaker 1>which was a staggering forty times the amount that the

0:41:31.400 --> 0:41:34.680
<v Speaker 1>insurance company originally offered. That original offer six hundred and

0:41:34.680 --> 0:41:37.680
<v Speaker 1>fifty thousand dollars twenty six million, six hundred and fifty

0:41:37.719 --> 0:41:39.920
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars. So with more than one thousand lawyers across

0:41:39.960 --> 0:41:42.400
<v Speaker 1>the country, they know how to deliver for everyday people.

0:41:42.480 --> 0:41:45.200
<v Speaker 1>If you're injured, you need a lawyer, you need somebody

0:41:45.200 --> 0:41:47.520
<v Speaker 1>to get your back. Check out for the people dot

0:41:47.560 --> 0:41:52.399
<v Speaker 1>Com slash podcast or Dow Pound law Pound five two

0:41:52.640 --> 0:41:56.359
<v Speaker 1>nine law on your cell phone. And remember all law

0:41:56.400 --> 0:41:58.560
<v Speaker 1>firms are not the same. So check out Morgan and Morgan.

0:41:58.640 --> 0:42:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Their fee is free unless they win. Why do you

0:42:04.520 --> 0:42:07.879
<v Speaker 1>think it's been so hard to get Congress to flexits?

0:42:08.800 --> 0:42:12.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I've had a theory that Congress doesn't want

0:42:12.560 --> 0:42:16.960
<v Speaker 1>the responsibility that the laws that they pass that could

0:42:16.960 --> 0:42:22.040
<v Speaker 1>come with it, so they intentionally allow the ambiguity in

0:42:22.120 --> 0:42:26.440
<v Speaker 1>the laws they pass, especially if they think the first

0:42:26.680 --> 0:42:29.719
<v Speaker 1>administration that will execute those laws is one that they

0:42:29.800 --> 0:42:33.040
<v Speaker 1>agree with. And that's how the ambiguity gets into the

0:42:33.160 --> 0:42:36.279
<v Speaker 1>lawmaking process in the first place, and then puts us

0:42:36.680 --> 0:42:40.400
<v Speaker 1>where essentially an administrative state interprets the law, and then

0:42:40.440 --> 0:42:42.360
<v Speaker 1>we end up in the courts, and then we have

0:42:42.480 --> 0:42:46.920
<v Speaker 1>this sort of over time it is essentially accumulated to

0:42:46.960 --> 0:42:48.320
<v Speaker 1>the executive's advantage.

0:42:50.080 --> 0:42:57.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Well, I mean, I think even back in ancient history,

0:42:57.320 --> 0:43:05.239
<v Speaker 2>namely when I was around, the way to bridge what

0:43:05.440 --> 0:43:09.560
<v Speaker 2>seemed to be a reconcilable differences in the writing of

0:43:09.680 --> 0:43:17.640
<v Speaker 2>legislation is to bridge it with fuzz. So ambiguity is

0:43:18.280 --> 0:43:23.919
<v Speaker 2>sort of the default in how to finally pass legislation.

0:43:24.320 --> 0:43:27.200
<v Speaker 2>So I think there's that, but I think now it's

0:43:27.239 --> 0:43:37.400
<v Speaker 2>more than that. I think that Congress, now it really

0:43:37.520 --> 0:43:43.279
<v Speaker 2>would be an interesting question to put two members in Congress.

0:43:44.440 --> 0:43:48.920
<v Speaker 2>What are you doing? Well? What is it? Please? What

0:43:49.040 --> 0:43:49.520
<v Speaker 2>is your job?

0:43:49.880 --> 0:43:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Tell me?

0:43:50.920 --> 0:43:54.600
<v Speaker 2>Tell me what you've done other than say get on

0:43:54.719 --> 0:43:59.560
<v Speaker 2>Fox News or put something on social media? What what?

0:43:59.560 --> 0:44:06.319
<v Speaker 2>What have you done other than take many many vacations?

0:44:07.680 --> 0:44:14.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean the vacation done. I mean now Thanksgiving, Christmas

0:44:14.560 --> 0:44:16.959
<v Speaker 2>is coming, then we've got the first of the year,

0:44:17.080 --> 0:44:22.040
<v Speaker 2>and then we've got whatever comes after that. But I

0:44:22.080 --> 0:44:26.719
<v Speaker 2>mean they just they go on vacation all the time. Well,

0:44:26.760 --> 0:44:27.400
<v Speaker 2>I was joking.

0:44:27.640 --> 0:44:30.120
<v Speaker 1>A three day weekend, a three day weekend for the

0:44:30.160 --> 0:44:32.160
<v Speaker 1>rest of us is always a two week.

0:44:32.080 --> 0:44:36.680
<v Speaker 2>Recess, unbelievable. And the work so called work week is

0:44:36.760 --> 0:44:42.400
<v Speaker 2>three days. Yeah, And it's what are they they're drawing

0:44:42.600 --> 0:44:51.320
<v Speaker 2>paychecks for what? I mean what they're not legislating because

0:44:51.800 --> 0:45:00.360
<v Speaker 2>legislating is controversial, So to avoid controversy, and legislating is

0:45:01.280 --> 0:45:05.240
<v Speaker 2>producing something other than what Donald Trump wants you to produce,

0:45:06.320 --> 0:45:07.319
<v Speaker 2>So don't do it.

0:45:08.280 --> 0:45:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, take take health Care's where's the legislators trying to

0:45:13.920 --> 0:45:17.600
<v Speaker 1>come up with a plan to deal with the expiring

0:45:17.760 --> 0:45:21.160
<v Speaker 1>healthcare subsidies. Where's there a health and if your publican

0:45:21.200 --> 0:45:23.759
<v Speaker 1>party is an alternative plan, show me the process.

0:45:24.880 --> 0:45:28.680
<v Speaker 2>What are you doing about the pending and solvency of

0:45:28.719 --> 0:45:33.480
<v Speaker 2>the Social Security Trust Fund? When it comes, which is

0:45:34.040 --> 0:45:40.759
<v Speaker 2>scheduled to become in eight years, social security benefits will

0:45:40.840 --> 0:45:42.960
<v Speaker 2>drop by sixty six hundred dollars.

0:45:42.719 --> 0:45:45.279
<v Speaker 1>And Senator, I'm a well aware being a member of

0:45:45.320 --> 0:45:48.279
<v Speaker 1>Gen X and not a baby boomer, that I'm going

0:45:48.320 --> 0:45:52.520
<v Speaker 1>to be the first generation Okay, because that eight years

0:45:52.800 --> 0:45:54.759
<v Speaker 1>it's about I'm getting close to when I'm going to

0:45:54.760 --> 0:45:57.719
<v Speaker 1>be eligible and my generation is going to be the

0:45:57.719 --> 0:46:00.919
<v Speaker 1>one that gets the first haircut and we didn't make

0:46:00.960 --> 0:46:03.400
<v Speaker 1>the mess.

0:46:03.960 --> 0:46:09.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and the nice thing about being my age is

0:46:09.360 --> 0:46:13.920
<v Speaker 2>it's your problem. So no, that's right, But I mean

0:46:14.000 --> 0:46:17.640
<v Speaker 2>you think about so what do you like take major

0:46:17.880 --> 0:46:24.160
<v Speaker 2>pending issues okay, the national debt and then related issues

0:46:24.960 --> 0:46:29.120
<v Speaker 2>the pending and solvency of the Social Security Trust Fund,

0:46:30.160 --> 0:46:37.839
<v Speaker 2>which will result in major reduction of benefits, and then

0:46:38.160 --> 0:46:41.120
<v Speaker 2>the pending and solvency in the same year. I think

0:46:41.160 --> 0:46:46.040
<v Speaker 2>it's twenty thirty three of the Health Insurance Trust Fund

0:46:46.400 --> 0:46:52.680
<v Speaker 2>in medicare you think we're all hospitals have suffered because

0:46:52.719 --> 0:46:58.399
<v Speaker 2>of Medicaid cuts. Wait till the Medicare cuts come. So,

0:46:58.920 --> 0:47:02.799
<v Speaker 2>I mean, these are are huge problems that are going

0:47:02.880 --> 0:47:09.080
<v Speaker 2>to affect people. And is Congress doing anything about this?

0:47:09.600 --> 0:47:14.279
<v Speaker 2>The answer is nothing, punt. You know what they'll end

0:47:14.360 --> 0:47:19.200
<v Speaker 2>up doing. They will end up appointing a condition. Now,

0:47:20.160 --> 0:47:25.600
<v Speaker 2>I was Bob carry from Nebraska and I were the

0:47:25.600 --> 0:47:29.759
<v Speaker 2>co chairs of something called the Carrie Danforth Commission in

0:47:29.880 --> 0:47:34.239
<v Speaker 2>nineteen ninety four to deal with these problems?

0:47:34.880 --> 0:47:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Was this a successor to the old wasn't there a

0:47:37.560 --> 0:47:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Moni Han Commission before that? Wasn't this yours was a

0:47:41.440 --> 0:47:44.720
<v Speaker 1>successor to what moynihan was a part of, right during Reagan?

0:47:45.280 --> 0:47:49.200
<v Speaker 1>But there was wondering Reaganimpson bowls. I remember Simpson balls

0:47:49.200 --> 0:47:49.680
<v Speaker 1>after that?

0:47:49.800 --> 0:47:51.440
<v Speaker 2>So and what happened to those?

0:47:52.440 --> 0:47:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:47:53.520 --> 0:47:59.680
<v Speaker 2>So, Tanaschel, So we have now we we have a

0:48:01.600 --> 0:48:06.799
<v Speaker 2>we have it's been created. The name of it is Congress.

0:48:07.000 --> 0:48:12.239
<v Speaker 2>It's not named carried in for their Simpson bulls. It's

0:48:12.280 --> 0:48:18.040
<v Speaker 2>called Congress. So here's my idea. What would happen if

0:48:18.080 --> 0:48:24.640
<v Speaker 2>Congress would cancel just one of its vacation times, just one,

0:48:25.680 --> 0:48:28.560
<v Speaker 2>it could keep the other eight or nine or whatever

0:48:28.640 --> 0:48:32.920
<v Speaker 2>of them. Yeah, cancel one and just deal with these problems.

0:48:33.960 --> 0:48:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Just legislate, show us and by the way, let us watch, yes,

0:48:38.680 --> 0:48:41.240
<v Speaker 1>let's watch the process. I remember one of my favorite

0:48:41.280 --> 0:48:45.920
<v Speaker 1>moments was when Obama hosted Republican senators and they debated

0:48:45.960 --> 0:48:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Obamacare in front of the American people, and everybody learned

0:48:50.920 --> 0:48:53.600
<v Speaker 1>something about that process. You didn't have to agree with

0:48:53.640 --> 0:48:56.560
<v Speaker 1>the idea or not, but it was so healthy to

0:48:56.640 --> 0:49:00.000
<v Speaker 1>see Lamar Alexander and Barack Obama going back and forth

0:49:00.040 --> 0:49:02.319
<v Speaker 1>about it. You're like, Okay, this is kind of what

0:49:02.400 --> 0:49:04.120
<v Speaker 1>our founders hoped would happen.

0:49:04.719 --> 0:49:10.840
<v Speaker 2>Or or the alternative and the alternative. Why not just

0:49:11.120 --> 0:49:17.400
<v Speaker 2>have a little back room politics among real politicians and decide, okay,

0:49:17.680 --> 0:49:19.640
<v Speaker 2>we'll come out of this with something.

0:49:20.360 --> 0:49:24.359
<v Speaker 1>Right, as you the way it worked. When people want

0:49:24.560 --> 0:49:29.000
<v Speaker 1>something to pass, you find reasons to support legislation. When

0:49:29.040 --> 0:49:31.480
<v Speaker 1>you wanted not to pass, you can find reasons not

0:49:31.520 --> 0:49:32.000
<v Speaker 1>to support.

0:49:32.040 --> 0:49:32.200
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:49:32.320 --> 0:49:35.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure every vote you cast in the affirmative you

0:49:35.200 --> 0:49:37.680
<v Speaker 1>could have made the case to go against your go

0:49:37.760 --> 0:49:41.080
<v Speaker 1>against that vote if that's what you wanted.

0:49:40.760 --> 0:49:44.279
<v Speaker 2>To do, right, Yeah, I guess I don't know.

0:49:45.000 --> 0:49:48.960
<v Speaker 1>The point is, everything's a compromise everything. How often did

0:49:49.000 --> 0:49:50.239
<v Speaker 1>you vote for a perfect bill?

0:49:51.360 --> 0:49:56.200
<v Speaker 2>Okay, No, that is exactly right. And that's how it

0:49:56.280 --> 0:50:00.279
<v Speaker 2>was designed. I mean that is how the frame that

0:50:00.320 --> 0:50:05.400
<v Speaker 2>the Constitution designed it. They designed it, They designed the

0:50:05.520 --> 0:50:07.799
<v Speaker 2>legislative process. It's a place of.

0:50:07.840 --> 0:50:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Compromise, and it was supposed to be incrementalism.

0:50:10.800 --> 0:50:15.360
<v Speaker 2>They designed it as they designed it as sausage making. Yeah,

0:50:15.400 --> 0:50:18.000
<v Speaker 2>and I happen to think sausage making is a good

0:50:18.040 --> 0:50:18.600
<v Speaker 2>thing to do.

0:50:19.160 --> 0:50:20.319
<v Speaker 1>Yes, And you don't want to worry.

0:50:20.360 --> 0:50:24.040
<v Speaker 2>And hopefully it's going to be relatively good sausage. But

0:50:24.120 --> 0:50:26.640
<v Speaker 2>it's not going to be it's not going to be,

0:50:28.200 --> 0:50:31.439
<v Speaker 2>you know, a prim rib. It's going to be sausage.

0:50:31.960 --> 0:50:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Let me get you out of here. On two questions

0:50:33.640 --> 0:50:38.600
<v Speaker 1>that always befuddle the Senate these days. One is judicial

0:50:38.640 --> 0:50:44.120
<v Speaker 1>nominations and the other is the filibuster. Yeah, I'm a

0:50:44.360 --> 0:50:49.120
<v Speaker 1>I've obsessively read Federalist seventy eight, which is Hamilton's defense

0:50:49.160 --> 0:50:54.040
<v Speaker 1>of the of the judiciary, and most importantly, of what

0:50:54.080 --> 0:50:57.960
<v Speaker 1>he thinks will make a good judiciary. He's essentially outlining

0:50:58.000 --> 0:51:01.040
<v Speaker 1>heap he comes. He comes out against the election of judges.

0:51:01.080 --> 0:51:03.920
<v Speaker 1>He says, you can't have these as elections. So why

0:51:04.200 --> 0:51:07.920
<v Speaker 1>state some states do this is beyond me, but I'm

0:51:07.960 --> 0:51:11.680
<v Speaker 1>going to set that aside. But the goal was as

0:51:11.760 --> 0:51:15.040
<v Speaker 1>neutral of arbiters as you can get, and now they don't.

0:51:15.160 --> 0:51:17.279
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't say how it should be done right. He

0:51:17.320 --> 0:51:20.320
<v Speaker 1>doesn't expressly say it should be two thirds of the Senate,

0:51:20.360 --> 0:51:22.799
<v Speaker 1>three quarters of the Senate, whatever. He just says the

0:51:22.840 --> 0:51:26.359
<v Speaker 1>goal should be that we're a long way away from

0:51:26.360 --> 0:51:29.040
<v Speaker 1>that goal. I would argue that, unfortunately, these black robes

0:51:29.480 --> 0:51:34.040
<v Speaker 1>are red and blue. Right. I'm not saying every liberal

0:51:34.239 --> 0:51:38.560
<v Speaker 1>justice it only thinks about being a liberal before being

0:51:38.600 --> 0:51:41.720
<v Speaker 1>a justice, and vice versa. But that's what the public sees,

0:51:42.000 --> 0:51:46.320
<v Speaker 1>and it feels as if the judiciary is just another

0:51:46.800 --> 0:51:52.359
<v Speaker 1>political game. How would you? And look, I can make

0:51:52.400 --> 0:51:55.320
<v Speaker 1>the case that Harry Reid did this, or Mitch McConnell,

0:51:55.600 --> 0:51:58.719
<v Speaker 1>I think they collectively broke this. Personally, I think everybody's

0:51:58.719 --> 0:52:01.680
<v Speaker 1>got dirty hands here. But what would you what would

0:52:01.719 --> 0:52:04.440
<v Speaker 1>be a better way to create our judiciary. I don't

0:52:04.520 --> 0:52:06.600
<v Speaker 1>like fifty votes. I don't. I think it's made the

0:52:06.640 --> 0:52:10.120
<v Speaker 1>judiciary more partisan than it needs to be. But I

0:52:10.160 --> 0:52:13.880
<v Speaker 1>also respect the fact that the founders, when they wanted

0:52:14.000 --> 0:52:16.680
<v Speaker 1>two thirds or three quarters. They actually said two thirds

0:52:16.760 --> 0:52:19.200
<v Speaker 1>or three quarters if they wanted super majority, they wrote

0:52:19.200 --> 0:52:22.120
<v Speaker 1>it in there, and this one they were trusting us

0:52:22.160 --> 0:52:24.920
<v Speaker 1>not to worry about a supermajority. I kind of think

0:52:24.920 --> 0:52:27.319
<v Speaker 1>it turns out we're wrong, But but what say you?

0:52:31.400 --> 0:52:43.319
<v Speaker 2>So? I think that we publicly have thought of the

0:52:43.400 --> 0:52:48.759
<v Speaker 2>judiciary is yet another policy making branch of government, and

0:52:49.280 --> 0:52:56.200
<v Speaker 2>I think that that's that goes back away. I thought that,

0:52:56.960 --> 0:52:59.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, when I was around, like Supreme Court nomination,

0:53:00.480 --> 0:53:02.920
<v Speaker 2>it was all about, Okay, what's going to be the

0:53:02.960 --> 0:53:06.920
<v Speaker 2>policy result of this judge, particularly on the issue of

0:53:06.960 --> 0:53:11.160
<v Speaker 2>abortion is there? Are they going to stick with roversus way?

0:53:11.239 --> 0:53:16.279
<v Speaker 2>Are they an row versus way? It was viewed as

0:53:16.320 --> 0:53:19.960
<v Speaker 2>a policy making branch of government. It was not created

0:53:20.080 --> 0:53:24.239
<v Speaker 2>to be that. It was crazy an arbiter right. It

0:53:24.280 --> 0:53:31.120
<v Speaker 2>was yes, And the meaning of judicial conservatism as opposed

0:53:31.160 --> 0:53:38.759
<v Speaker 2>to political conservatism is judicial restraint. It's judges saying, wait

0:53:38.800 --> 0:53:43.360
<v Speaker 2>a second, if we're going to get into deciding a case,

0:53:43.960 --> 0:53:47.160
<v Speaker 2>it has to be based on the clear understanding of

0:53:47.239 --> 0:53:52.160
<v Speaker 2>the meaning of the Constitution and not broadening the constitution

0:53:52.400 --> 0:53:55.359
<v Speaker 2>to the point where I've got a freehand to come

0:53:55.360 --> 0:54:03.560
<v Speaker 2>out with policy results. That's what's happened. I'm not sure

0:54:03.719 --> 0:54:06.760
<v Speaker 2>now they've got rid of the pillarbous fear for judges.

0:54:06.840 --> 0:54:11.160
<v Speaker 2>I know that. You know, I was very much supportive

0:54:11.200 --> 0:54:16.640
<v Speaker 2>of Clarence Thomas in his nomination. There's no way he

0:54:16.680 --> 0:54:18.680
<v Speaker 2>could have been. I think we ended up with fifty

0:54:18.719 --> 0:54:19.960
<v Speaker 2>one votes.

0:54:20.239 --> 0:54:22.400
<v Speaker 1>In a Democratic Senate. I mean, I always have to

0:54:22.440 --> 0:54:25.560
<v Speaker 1>remind people Clarence Thomas got confirmed by a Democratic Senate.

0:54:25.880 --> 0:54:28.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if that nomination even gets accepted today

0:54:28.719 --> 0:54:29.600
<v Speaker 1>right now.

0:54:29.920 --> 0:54:35.879
<v Speaker 2>It was you know, he used to work for me. Yes,

0:54:36.200 --> 0:54:40.520
<v Speaker 2>that was my involvement. He I gave him this first

0:54:40.600 --> 0:54:43.799
<v Speaker 2>job out of law school, and he worked for me,

0:54:43.840 --> 0:54:46.479
<v Speaker 2>and when I was state Attorney general, and he worked

0:54:46.520 --> 0:54:50.120
<v Speaker 2>for me when I was a senator, and I just

0:54:50.200 --> 0:54:52.880
<v Speaker 2>saw the suffering of the human being at that time.

0:54:54.080 --> 0:54:58.160
<v Speaker 2>I can say that that process was you want a

0:54:58.200 --> 0:55:03.799
<v Speaker 2>good weight loss program? Yeah? That did it? That Thamas? Yeah?

0:55:04.360 --> 0:55:10.239
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, do you did that process scar him? Do

0:55:10.280 --> 0:55:11.680
<v Speaker 1>you think it changed his views?

0:55:13.719 --> 0:55:19.400
<v Speaker 2>No? I you know, amazingly, No, I don't. I think

0:55:20.400 --> 0:55:26.719
<v Speaker 2>he is. I think the sort of the presentation of

0:55:26.800 --> 0:55:31.680
<v Speaker 2>him was sort of this scowling he's the opposite he is.

0:55:32.320 --> 0:55:34.080
<v Speaker 1>I've heard this from people who know him, his friends,

0:55:34.120 --> 0:55:35.640
<v Speaker 1>that he's a jolly guy.

0:55:35.840 --> 0:55:41.919
<v Speaker 2>He's really a good guy, the jokester guy. From people

0:55:41.960 --> 0:55:47.520
<v Speaker 2>who have clerked, from other Supreme Court justices, that Clarence

0:55:47.640 --> 0:55:51.600
<v Speaker 2>is the most popular justice among all the clerks in

0:55:51.680 --> 0:55:57.240
<v Speaker 2>the Supreme Court building. He's he's just a good guy,

0:55:58.560 --> 0:56:03.080
<v Speaker 2>and he's a very caring person. That's what he is.

0:56:03.440 --> 0:56:07.600
<v Speaker 2>That's what was so brutal about that whole yeah episode,

0:56:08.400 --> 0:56:13.040
<v Speaker 2>restoring the filibuster for justices. I don't know anybody he

0:56:13.200 --> 0:56:14.200
<v Speaker 2>confirmed anymore.

0:56:14.719 --> 0:56:17.400
<v Speaker 1>No, no, no, and I don't know. But instead of restoring

0:56:17.440 --> 0:56:21.640
<v Speaker 1>the number with it, here's what I had a friend

0:56:21.640 --> 0:56:25.319
<v Speaker 1>at the Bush who was part of Bush's Bush forty

0:56:25.360 --> 0:56:29.600
<v Speaker 1>three's White House Council's office and said, you know, when

0:56:29.600 --> 0:56:33.000
<v Speaker 1>he was making nominations, when they were finding nominees, betting

0:56:33.040 --> 0:56:36.520
<v Speaker 1>nominees for the for the federal and circuit level, you know,

0:56:36.560 --> 0:56:38.760
<v Speaker 1>he said, when you know you have to get sixty votes,

0:56:39.320 --> 0:56:41.680
<v Speaker 1>you find a certain type of person. When you know

0:56:41.719 --> 0:56:43.759
<v Speaker 1>you only need fifty votes, you can go with a

0:56:43.800 --> 0:56:47.640
<v Speaker 1>different type of person. So it has changed, whatever we think.

0:56:47.719 --> 0:56:51.879
<v Speaker 1>It has changed the makeup, right, we have more more

0:56:52.160 --> 0:56:57.000
<v Speaker 1>ideological legal thinkers now, maybe that's healthy over time, but

0:56:57.120 --> 0:56:58.480
<v Speaker 1>that can be damaging.

0:56:58.080 --> 0:57:02.719
<v Speaker 2>In the Yeah, because in different moments understand that. I

0:57:02.760 --> 0:57:09.640
<v Speaker 2>think that's right. I think, you know, necessity maybe the

0:57:09.680 --> 0:57:12.239
<v Speaker 2>mother of invention here is, how are we going to

0:57:12.280 --> 0:57:16.400
<v Speaker 2>confirm anybody? No, there are people, there are people in

0:57:16.440 --> 0:57:19.440
<v Speaker 2>the Senate now who simply vote against nominees for the

0:57:19.480 --> 0:57:25.200
<v Speaker 2>other party. They just automatic quotes against them. Right. You know,

0:57:25.280 --> 0:57:28.200
<v Speaker 2>I counted up the number of times when I was

0:57:28.240 --> 0:57:32.600
<v Speaker 2>in the Senate that I voted against any nominee for anything,

0:57:32.680 --> 0:57:37.920
<v Speaker 2>and this would be all of uh Carter and the

0:57:37.960 --> 0:57:39.520
<v Speaker 2>first part of Clinton.

0:57:40.200 --> 0:57:44.040
<v Speaker 1>And all of Reagan, so basically years of twelve years

0:57:44.080 --> 0:57:45.080
<v Speaker 1>of another right one.

0:57:45.400 --> 0:57:52.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but all of these, including like six years of

0:57:52.360 --> 0:57:55.880
<v Speaker 2>nominees for the person of the other party, only twice

0:57:55.920 --> 0:58:01.200
<v Speaker 2>I ever voted against the nominee. I mean, I just said, okay,

0:58:01.240 --> 0:58:05.960
<v Speaker 2>this is the president's now. These people just automatically, yeah,

0:58:06.480 --> 0:58:07.280
<v Speaker 2>vote against them.

0:58:08.480 --> 0:58:10.720
<v Speaker 1>So let me ask about the filibuster in general. Would

0:58:10.760 --> 0:58:15.360
<v Speaker 1>you I'm going to guess you think it's this process

0:58:15.440 --> 0:58:19.960
<v Speaker 1>is overused, Yes, which is created because what I think

0:58:20.000 --> 0:58:24.280
<v Speaker 1>the real problem with governing these days is the reconciliation process.

0:58:24.600 --> 0:58:28.720
<v Speaker 1>What was created as sort of a as you you

0:58:28.880 --> 0:58:31.600
<v Speaker 1>just use the phrase great necessities. The mother of all invention,

0:58:32.400 --> 0:58:37.320
<v Speaker 1>the reconciliation invention by Bob BYRD was essentially a mother

0:58:37.400 --> 0:58:41.240
<v Speaker 1>of you know, one of those moments where they were like, hey,

0:58:41.520 --> 0:58:43.520
<v Speaker 1>we can't ever get a budget passed if we if

0:58:43.520 --> 0:58:47.080
<v Speaker 1>we try to keep doing this with the with sixty votes.

0:58:47.600 --> 0:58:50.600
<v Speaker 1>And yet you know, I was, I certainly was raised

0:58:50.760 --> 0:58:53.200
<v Speaker 1>a part of the generation. I'm going to guess you

0:58:53.240 --> 0:58:56.840
<v Speaker 1>were too, of the mister Smith myth. And I say

0:58:57.080 --> 0:59:00.440
<v Speaker 1>that it's a myth, but there is this idea that hey,

0:59:00.760 --> 0:59:04.320
<v Speaker 1>one person can make a difference, one person can stand up.

0:59:05.040 --> 0:59:09.760
<v Speaker 1>So what should the rilibuster rule be if in your

0:59:10.120 --> 0:59:12.840
<v Speaker 1>in your vision of it, regardless of what it is, now,

0:59:12.920 --> 0:59:14.080
<v Speaker 1>what would well, how.

0:59:14.000 --> 0:59:16.640
<v Speaker 2>Would you like to see it. I do think it's

0:59:17.360 --> 0:59:21.120
<v Speaker 2>I do think it's overused. I mean, now it's commonly

0:59:21.160 --> 0:59:24.800
<v Speaker 2>said that it takes sixty votes to pass anything. Yeah,

0:59:25.520 --> 0:59:31.680
<v Speaker 2>but I do think it's overused. I think we never

0:59:31.760 --> 0:59:36.240
<v Speaker 2>thought that way. But I do think that it's important

0:59:36.280 --> 0:59:41.160
<v Speaker 2>to retain the filibuster. I do believe that because otherwise

0:59:41.320 --> 0:59:46.080
<v Speaker 2>that you just have these wild gyrations. Right, who's in

0:59:46.200 --> 0:59:51.880
<v Speaker 2>the majority at a given time, and the filibuster at

0:59:51.960 --> 0:59:57.040
<v Speaker 2>least forces some degree of bipartisanship that otherwise wouldn't exist

0:59:57.080 --> 0:59:57.400
<v Speaker 2>at all.

0:59:58.080 --> 1:00:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, what's the goal in twenty twenty six of

1:00:04.400 --> 1:00:07.360
<v Speaker 1>restore Republican legacy? What would be a good year as

1:00:07.360 --> 1:00:08.480
<v Speaker 1>far as your concern.

1:00:08.320 --> 1:00:13.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, we're so, we're working on it. We're that our

1:00:13.320 --> 1:00:18.920
<v Speaker 2>Republican legacy is really two couple of things that it's doing. One,

1:00:19.640 --> 1:00:25.000
<v Speaker 2>we're messaging. We're trying to articulate in as many forms

1:00:25.000 --> 1:00:29.720
<v Speaker 2>as we can, the basic conservative principles that define the

1:00:29.760 --> 1:00:36.960
<v Speaker 2>Republican Party. We're organizing at the statewide level, We're recruiting

1:00:37.360 --> 1:00:42.160
<v Speaker 2>state chairs, and then increasingly we're going to get in

1:00:42.280 --> 1:00:51.760
<v Speaker 2>the business of trying to influence and support conservative basic Republicans,

1:00:51.840 --> 1:00:58.919
<v Speaker 2>fundamental Republicans, traditional Republicans in elections, both for party positions,

1:00:59.080 --> 1:01:05.480
<v Speaker 2>party organizational positions, and for elections themselves. So I hope

1:01:05.520 --> 1:01:07.840
<v Speaker 2>that we will, you know, have a team on the field,

1:01:07.920 --> 1:01:10.680
<v Speaker 2>and I hope that I hope that there will be

1:01:10.800 --> 1:01:16.120
<v Speaker 2>some candidates. I just heard of one yesterday and Nebraska,

1:01:17.040 --> 1:01:22.200
<v Speaker 2>and mostly I don't know these people themselves, but that's

1:01:22.200 --> 1:01:29.120
<v Speaker 2>what we're looking for. People who are good, responsible conservatives,

1:01:29.800 --> 1:01:32.240
<v Speaker 2>which is not what mega is today.

1:01:32.840 --> 1:01:37.680
<v Speaker 1>And by conservative you mean less government, not more government, right,

1:01:37.760 --> 1:01:43.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean government not involved in business. I mean what

1:01:43.080 --> 1:01:46.439
<v Speaker 1>what what you know any other principles you would add

1:01:46.440 --> 1:01:46.760
<v Speaker 1>into that?

1:01:47.040 --> 1:01:53.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, well, I mean, uh, certainly fiscal hawks right.

1:01:54.480 --> 1:01:58.680
<v Speaker 2>Certainly limited role for government and its intervention with the

1:01:58.720 --> 1:02:03.080
<v Speaker 2>private sector and the economy, and universities at law firms

1:02:03.720 --> 1:02:07.840
<v Speaker 2>and all of that. Certainly, respect for the rule of law,

1:02:07.960 --> 1:02:13.800
<v Speaker 2>which means not weaponizing government against political enemies. Certainly, respect

1:02:14.120 --> 1:02:19.880
<v Speaker 2>for the constitutional order, which means not the extreme concentration

1:02:20.000 --> 1:02:28.760
<v Speaker 2>of power in the president. Certainly a national defense second

1:02:28.760 --> 1:02:33.040
<v Speaker 2>to none. And also a foreign policy that supports our

1:02:34.400 --> 1:02:42.040
<v Speaker 2>our friends and our allies that would include Ukraine. All

1:02:42.120 --> 1:02:49.480
<v Speaker 2>of that comprises the Republican Party as it has existed

1:02:49.680 --> 1:02:54.680
<v Speaker 2>for decades and decades and decades. All of that has

1:02:54.760 --> 1:02:59.560
<v Speaker 2>been scrapped, not modified, but I mean thrown in the

1:02:59.640 --> 1:03:05.880
<v Speaker 2>trash heap by Donald Trump, all of it. So we're

1:03:05.960 --> 1:03:08.880
<v Speaker 2>just standing for principle, and we're looking for people who

1:03:08.920 --> 1:03:12.120
<v Speaker 2>will make that stand in elections.

1:03:12.560 --> 1:03:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, I hope this conversation provides some hope to some

1:03:15.960 --> 1:03:23.000
<v Speaker 1>of my I would say demoralized conservative friends who just

1:03:23.040 --> 1:03:26.160
<v Speaker 1>look at this and the character doesn't count anymore morals

1:03:26.200 --> 1:03:27.080
<v Speaker 1>and ethics.

1:03:27.440 --> 1:03:27.680
<v Speaker 2>You know.

1:03:29.080 --> 1:03:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Look, I can tell you this, Senator dan Forth. I

1:03:31.000 --> 1:03:34.520
<v Speaker 1>always tell you as a as a high character person,

1:03:35.200 --> 1:03:37.920
<v Speaker 1>and I thought that was an asset in American politics,

1:03:38.440 --> 1:03:41.800
<v Speaker 1>and the high character people are there doesn't seem to

1:03:41.800 --> 1:03:46.000
<v Speaker 1>be room for them anymore. I hope you're I admire

1:03:46.080 --> 1:03:48.040
<v Speaker 1>that this is what you're trying to leave as a legacy.

1:03:48.960 --> 1:03:49.959
<v Speaker 2>Thank you very much.

1:03:50.840 --> 1:03:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Anyway, good luck, enjoy the rest of the holiday season,

1:03:53.600 --> 1:03:56.960
<v Speaker 1>and I'll check back in closer we get to the election.

1:03:57.400 --> 1:03:58.680
<v Speaker 2>Good thanks, Jech.

1:04:02.520 --> 1:04:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Do you hate hangovers, We'll say goodbye to hangovers. Out

1:04:05.160 --> 1:04:07.680
<v Speaker 1>of Office gives you the social buzz without the next

1:04:07.760 --> 1:04:10.080
<v Speaker 1>day regret. Their best selling out of Office gummies were

1:04:10.080 --> 1:04:13.000
<v Speaker 1>designed to provide a mild, relaxing buzz, boost your mood,

1:04:13.080 --> 1:04:16.640
<v Speaker 1>and enhance creativity and relaxation. With five different strengths, you

1:04:16.680 --> 1:04:18.880
<v Speaker 1>can tailor the dose to fit your vibe, from a

1:04:18.960 --> 1:04:23.040
<v Speaker 1>gentle one point five milligram micro dose to their newest

1:04:23.160 --> 1:04:27.120
<v Speaker 1>fifteen milligram gummy for a more elevated experience. Their THHC

1:04:27.320 --> 1:04:30.680
<v Speaker 1>beverages and gummies are a modern, mindful alternative to a

1:04:30.680 --> 1:04:33.240
<v Speaker 1>glass of wine or a cocktail. And I'll tell you this,

1:04:33.440 --> 1:04:36.400
<v Speaker 1>I've given up booze. I don't like the hangovers. I

1:04:36.640 --> 1:04:40.040
<v Speaker 1>prefer the gummy experience. Soul is a wellness brand that

1:04:40.080 --> 1:04:43.600
<v Speaker 1>believes feeling good should be fun and easy. Soul specializes

1:04:43.600 --> 1:04:47.320
<v Speaker 1>in delicious hemp derived THHC and CBD products, all designed

1:04:47.320 --> 1:04:50.360
<v Speaker 1>to boost your mood and simply help you unwine. So

1:04:50.400 --> 1:04:52.680
<v Speaker 1>if you struggle to switch off at night, Soul also

1:04:52.720 --> 1:04:55.720
<v Speaker 1>has a variety of products specifically designed to just simply

1:04:55.760 --> 1:04:58.200
<v Speaker 1>help you get a better night's sleep, including their top

1:04:58.280 --> 1:05:02.760
<v Speaker 1>selling sleepy gummies and favorite for deep restorative sleep. So

1:05:02.800 --> 1:05:05.480
<v Speaker 1>bring on the good vibes and treat yourself to Soul today.

1:05:05.800 --> 1:05:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Right now, Soul is offering my audience thirty percent off

1:05:09.400 --> 1:05:12.680
<v Speaker 1>your entire order, So go to gitsold dot com use

1:05:12.800 --> 1:05:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the promo code toodcast. Don't forget that code that's getsold

1:05:16.840 --> 1:05:20.640
<v Speaker 1>dot Com promo code podcast for thirty percent off