WEBVTT - Sean Dobson on the US Real Estate Industry

0:00:03.000 --> 0:00:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News. This is Master's in

0:00:12.280 --> 0:00:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Business with Barry rid Hoolds on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:18.800 --> 0:00:22.360
<v Speaker 2>This week on the podcast, I have an extra special guest.

0:00:22.920 --> 0:00:27.160
<v Speaker 2>Sean Dobson has really had a fascinating career as a

0:00:27.200 --> 0:00:31.040
<v Speaker 2>real estate investor, starring pretty much at the bottom and

0:00:31.120 --> 0:00:35.080
<v Speaker 2>working his way up to becoming a investor in a

0:00:35.159 --> 0:00:39.960
<v Speaker 2>variety of mortgage backed securities, individual homes, commercial real estate,

0:00:40.360 --> 0:00:46.599
<v Speaker 2>really all aspects of the finding, buying, and investing in

0:00:46.640 --> 0:00:50.000
<v Speaker 2>real estate. And on top of that, he's pretty much

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:53.440
<v Speaker 2>a quantitative geek, so he is looking at this not

0:00:53.800 --> 0:00:58.600
<v Speaker 2>simply from the typical real estate investment perspective, but from

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 2>a deep quantitative analytical basis. If you're interested in any

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:09.920
<v Speaker 2>aspect of commercial, residential, mortgage back real estate, then you

0:01:09.959 --> 0:01:12.959
<v Speaker 2>should absolutely listen to this. It's fascinating and there are

0:01:13.000 --> 0:01:16.800
<v Speaker 2>a few people in the industry who not only have

0:01:16.920 --> 0:01:21.479
<v Speaker 2>been successful as investors, but also very clearly saw and

0:01:21.560 --> 0:01:25.120
<v Speaker 2>warned about the Great financial crisis coming because it was

0:01:25.200 --> 0:01:26.840
<v Speaker 2>all there in the data if you were looking in

0:01:26.840 --> 0:01:30.520
<v Speaker 2>the right place. And continues to build and expand the

0:01:30.600 --> 0:01:34.360
<v Speaker 2>Amherst Group into a real estate powerhouse. I found this

0:01:34.400 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 2>conversation to be absolutely fascinating, and I think you will

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 2>also with no further ado my discussion with Amherst groups

0:01:42.000 --> 0:01:42.800
<v Speaker 2>Sean Dobson.

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much. It's great to be here.

0:01:44.959 --> 0:01:47.640
<v Speaker 2>So let's talk a little bit about your career in

0:01:47.680 --> 0:01:49.760
<v Speaker 2>real estate. But before we get to that, I just

0:01:49.800 --> 0:01:53.960
<v Speaker 2>got to ask on your LinkedIn under education, it says

0:01:54.520 --> 0:01:58.040
<v Speaker 2>didn't graduate none, working for a living. What does that mean?

0:01:58.520 --> 0:02:02.400
<v Speaker 1>I think I answered questions of of when did you graduate?

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:04.400
<v Speaker 1>And so I said I didn't graduate, and then that

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 1>was your what degrees did you achieve? And I said none?

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:09.840
<v Speaker 1>And then I think the question was what were you

0:02:09.880 --> 0:02:11.280
<v Speaker 1>doing or what were your interested in? So I was

0:02:11.320 --> 0:02:13.560
<v Speaker 1>working for a living, but I didn't.

0:02:13.360 --> 0:02:17.200
<v Speaker 2>Go to college, did not go to college. So that

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:19.760
<v Speaker 2>leads to the next question, what got you interested in

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:20.320
<v Speaker 2>real estate?

0:02:21.040 --> 0:02:24.680
<v Speaker 1>It was it was happenstance. I took a temporary job

0:02:25.200 --> 0:02:28.760
<v Speaker 1>at a brokerage firm in Houston, Texas the summer after

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:32.080
<v Speaker 1>high school, between high school and college. Really as the

0:02:32.160 --> 0:02:36.040
<v Speaker 1>office runner, run around picking up people's drying cleaning, grabbing lunch,

0:02:36.400 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 1>opening the mail, that sort of thing. And I took

0:02:39.200 --> 0:02:42.119
<v Speaker 1>the job really because a friend of ours a friend

0:02:42.160 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 1>of the families had worked there and just said, what

0:02:44.160 --> 0:02:47.600
<v Speaker 1>an interesting sort of industry it was. This is back

0:02:47.600 --> 0:02:49.800
<v Speaker 1>when mortgages were sort of a backwater of the fixed

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:51.440
<v Speaker 1>income market, so they were traded a little bit like

0:02:51.480 --> 0:02:55.000
<v Speaker 1>UNI bonds or not really well understood, not.

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:58.720
<v Speaker 2>Well followed nineteen nineties or eighty.

0:02:58.480 --> 0:03:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Seven, wow, nineteen eighty seven. So after that it was

0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:06.080
<v Speaker 1>I later was given some opportunities to join the research team,

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:08.639
<v Speaker 1>and then took over the research team, and then took

0:03:08.680 --> 0:03:11.480
<v Speaker 1>over the eventually took over the trading platform, and then

0:03:11.520 --> 0:03:14.080
<v Speaker 1>by nineteen ninety four a group of us had started

0:03:14.080 --> 0:03:17.800
<v Speaker 1>our own business, and that's the predecessor to Amherst, which

0:03:17.840 --> 0:03:20.440
<v Speaker 1>we bought in two thousand and have been running it

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 1>since then.

0:03:22.440 --> 0:03:24.320
<v Speaker 2>So when you say you were running the trading desk,

0:03:24.360 --> 0:03:29.440
<v Speaker 2>you're running primarily mortgage backed securities. That's mortgageback exactly. Anything

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:31.040
<v Speaker 2>else swaps, derivatives and anything wrong.

0:03:31.080 --> 0:03:32.920
<v Speaker 1>So back then it was really just mortgage back securities

0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 1>and structured products that were derivatives of mortgage backed securities.

0:03:35.680 --> 0:03:37.480
<v Speaker 1>We sort of carved out a name for ourselves in

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 1>quant analytics around mortgage risk, and that's still a big

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:45.160
<v Speaker 1>core competency of Amherst is understanding the risks of mortgages

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:47.440
<v Speaker 1>are kind of boring, but they're also very complicated. The

0:03:47.480 --> 0:03:50.160
<v Speaker 1>borrower has so many options around when the refinance, how

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:53.760
<v Speaker 1>to repay, if the repay. It takes quite a lot

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:56.960
<v Speaker 1>of research, quite a lot of modeling, quite a lot

0:03:57.000 --> 0:03:59.119
<v Speaker 1>of data to actually keep up with the mortgage market.

0:03:59.200 --> 0:04:02.440
<v Speaker 1>It's really forty million individual contracts, forty fifty million individual

0:04:02.480 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 1>contracts and a million different securities, so it takes quale.

0:04:06.080 --> 0:04:08.440
<v Speaker 1>We've built an interesting system to allow to sort of

0:04:08.480 --> 0:04:10.120
<v Speaker 1>monitor all that and price it in real time.

0:04:10.320 --> 0:04:14.720
<v Speaker 2>So if you're running a desk in the two thousands

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:16.840
<v Speaker 2>and you're looking at mortgage backed then you're looking at

0:04:16.839 --> 0:04:21.239
<v Speaker 2>securitized product. One would think, especially from Texas as opposed

0:04:21.279 --> 0:04:24.760
<v Speaker 2>to being in the thick of Wall Street, you might

0:04:24.800 --> 0:04:29.240
<v Speaker 2>have seen some signs that perhaps the wheels are coming

0:04:29.279 --> 0:04:31.680
<v Speaker 2>off the bus. Tell us about your experience in the

0:04:31.720 --> 0:04:33.440
<v Speaker 2>two thousands, what did you see? Comment?

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:37.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So from the late eighties until the really the

0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:41.560
<v Speaker 1>late nineties, we were focused primarily on prepayment related risk

0:04:41.640 --> 0:04:44.320
<v Speaker 1>in agency mortgs backed securities. By the time you get

0:04:44.320 --> 0:04:46.919
<v Speaker 1>to the early two thousands, Freddie mc fanny age and

0:04:46.960 --> 0:04:49.440
<v Speaker 1>may were losing market share. A lot of mortgages were

0:04:49.440 --> 0:04:52.400
<v Speaker 1>coming straight from originators and going and being packaged into

0:04:52.440 --> 0:04:55.600
<v Speaker 1>what later became the private label securities market. So as

0:04:55.640 --> 0:04:58.760
<v Speaker 1>part of our just growth, we attack that market. And

0:04:58.920 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 1>up until that moment in time, we didn't spend a

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:03.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of time on credit risk in mortgages. We didn't

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:05.920
<v Speaker 1>really have the model credit risk because that risk was

0:05:05.960 --> 0:05:09.720
<v Speaker 1>taken by the agencies. But in these private labels you had,

0:05:09.760 --> 0:05:11.839
<v Speaker 1>the market was taking the credit risk. So we took

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:14.799
<v Speaker 1>the exact same modeling approach, which is loan level detail,

0:05:15.279 --> 0:05:19.920
<v Speaker 1>borrower behavior, stochastic processes, options based modeling, and we said,

0:05:19.960 --> 0:05:21.640
<v Speaker 1>let's just take a little detour here and make sure

0:05:21.640 --> 0:05:24.240
<v Speaker 1>we understand the credit risk of these things before we

0:05:24.279 --> 0:05:28.159
<v Speaker 1>sort of travel start making markets and banking and making

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:29.839
<v Speaker 1>these a core part of our business. At that time,

0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:32.600
<v Speaker 1>this market was about a third of all mortgages, were

0:05:32.640 --> 0:05:34.440
<v Speaker 1>the ones where the credit risk was going into the

0:05:34.440 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 1>capital markets. So that little detour was in two thousand

0:05:37.440 --> 0:05:41.360
<v Speaker 1>and three and we found a couple of things we modeled.

0:05:42.160 --> 0:05:45.120
<v Speaker 1>We modeled defaults the same way with model prepayments, which

0:05:45.160 --> 0:05:49.719
<v Speaker 1>is an option for the consumer to not pay most.

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:50.719
<v Speaker 2>Of it rarely here it described that way.

0:05:50.800 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's a unique approach, right, and it was unique

0:05:53.680 --> 0:05:56.520
<v Speaker 1>at the time, and so we thought there were conditions

0:05:56.600 --> 0:05:59.640
<v Speaker 1>under which the option probably should be exercised. If you

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 1>have a two hours set out, if you have a

0:06:01.800 --> 0:06:04.080
<v Speaker 1>two hundred thousand dollars home and one hundred thousand dollars mortgage,

0:06:04.120 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 1>and the consequence for not paying is ding on your

0:06:07.040 --> 0:06:09.440
<v Speaker 1>credit report, you're probably not supposed to pay, is the

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 1>position we took. So through that lens, we said, okay,

0:06:12.200 --> 0:06:14.040
<v Speaker 1>let's price these securities, and we found a bunch of

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:17.880
<v Speaker 1>interesting things. For example, we found that the follow on

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:22.160
<v Speaker 1>rating surveillance for mortgage backed securities doesn't follow the same

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:25.760
<v Speaker 1>ratings methodology that the initial rating does. So over time

0:06:26.440 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 1>the risk composition of the pool which would change dramatically.

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:30.680
<v Speaker 1>So think about two thousand and three. Home price has

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 1>gone up a lot from two thousand, So mortgage position

0:06:33.480 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand were way more valuable in two thousand

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:37.440
<v Speaker 1>and three than they were they originated because they weigh

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:40.960
<v Speaker 1>less credit risk. Not the same thing couldn't be true

0:06:41.000 --> 0:06:42.280
<v Speaker 1>as you went forward.

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:44.800
<v Speaker 2>In time, each subsequent vintage became risk, and risk became

0:06:44.880 --> 0:06:47.760
<v Speaker 2>risking risk as prices went up because rates had gone

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:48.320
<v Speaker 2>lower and lower.

0:06:48.400 --> 0:06:49.520
<v Speaker 1>And that's the way we thought about it. The way

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:51.000
<v Speaker 1>we think about it when you make someone alone. This

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:53.800
<v Speaker 1>is sort of the credit oas world. So we think

0:06:53.800 --> 0:06:55.880
<v Speaker 1>about when you make someone alone on a building, whether

0:06:55.920 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 1>it's this building or or a home, you're implicitly United States,

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:02.320
<v Speaker 1>you're implicit giving them the option to send you the keys.

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:06.640
<v Speaker 1>So jingle mail is exactly and so we thought it

0:07:06.680 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 1>was least Okay, we've been pricing complicated options our whole career,

0:07:09.920 --> 0:07:12.040
<v Speaker 1>so let's just price the option to default as if

0:07:12.080 --> 0:07:14.920
<v Speaker 1>it is a financial option. When you do that, and

0:07:15.040 --> 0:07:17.400
<v Speaker 1>then you looked at the types of loans or being originated,

0:07:17.720 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 1>and this is where Amher's story is a little different

0:07:19.520 --> 0:07:21.160
<v Speaker 1>than some of the stories you've seen are on the

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:24.040
<v Speaker 1>financial crisis. What we figured out was that the premium

0:07:24.120 --> 0:07:27.560
<v Speaker 1>that you were being paid as this option seller was

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 1>way below the fair market price of their premium, meaning

0:07:30.360 --> 0:07:32.840
<v Speaker 1>that the default risk you were taking was way higher

0:07:32.880 --> 0:07:35.240
<v Speaker 1>than the market had appreciated. So they were underpricing the

0:07:35.320 --> 0:07:38.560
<v Speaker 1>fault risk dramatically. Then, as we dug in and dug

0:07:38.600 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 1>in and dug in, we realized that there were a

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:42.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of loans that were really experiments. There were financial

0:07:42.880 --> 0:07:45.960
<v Speaker 1>experiments where the bar hadn't been through dal diligence, the

0:07:46.840 --> 0:07:50.080
<v Speaker 1>LTV was very high, the underlying risk of the home

0:07:50.120 --> 0:07:51.080
<v Speaker 1>market was very high.

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:54.600
<v Speaker 2>Other of these were the no dock or Ninja.

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Loans were limited DOC no dock, no.

0:07:57.680 --> 0:08:03.680
<v Speaker 2>Income, no no assets exactly, Ninja no pulse seem seems

0:08:03.720 --> 0:08:04.720
<v Speaker 2>reasonable exactly.

0:08:04.840 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 1>So you look back at these things, you're like, how

0:08:06.360 --> 0:08:09.880
<v Speaker 1>could it happen? But we're low level people, right, so

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:12.640
<v Speaker 1>we don't see the mortgage backed securities market as a market.

0:08:12.720 --> 0:08:15.400
<v Speaker 1>We see it as like I said, about fifty million assets,

0:08:15.440 --> 0:08:17.280
<v Speaker 1>and we're modeling up the value of every home in

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:19.960
<v Speaker 1>the country every every week basically, and we're modeling with

0:08:20.040 --> 0:08:21.960
<v Speaker 1>the value of every mortgage in the country, and we're

0:08:22.000 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 1>modeling with the value every derivative of that mortgage, of

0:08:24.480 --> 0:08:26.720
<v Speaker 1>the structure, products, and so forth. So through our lens,

0:08:26.800 --> 0:08:29.120
<v Speaker 1>it was like, Okay, we've made these financial experiments. The

0:08:29.240 --> 0:08:32.360
<v Speaker 1>underlying real estate has become very volatile, so we could

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:36.160
<v Speaker 1>construct trades that had very very low premiums to sell

0:08:36.240 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 1>this volatility, to basically join the consumer on their side

0:08:39.520 --> 0:08:42.480
<v Speaker 1>of the trade, which is in essense buying insurance on

0:08:43.000 --> 0:08:45.720
<v Speaker 1>the bonds that were exposed of these great risks. Soult.

0:08:45.720 --> 0:08:47.719
<v Speaker 1>We did that for a lot of the market, so

0:08:47.760 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the headline names you see, a lot

0:08:49.559 --> 0:08:52.839
<v Speaker 1>of the stories you see about the financial crisis, a

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:58.079
<v Speaker 1>significant number of those investors we were helping in security selection,

0:08:58.240 --> 0:09:01.160
<v Speaker 1>modeling and analytics. That sort of put Amherst on a

0:09:01.240 --> 0:09:04.280
<v Speaker 1>different pack because prior to that, our core business model

0:09:04.400 --> 0:09:08.120
<v Speaker 1>was investment, banking, brokerage, market making and underwriting. By the

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:10.640
<v Speaker 1>time we got to two thousand and five and figured

0:09:10.679 --> 0:09:13.240
<v Speaker 1>out that there was such a large sector that was

0:09:13.320 --> 0:09:16.319
<v Speaker 1>so mispriced, we started hedge funds, opportunity funds. We took

0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:19.240
<v Speaker 1>sub mandates from the big global macro hedge funds, and

0:09:19.360 --> 0:09:22.760
<v Speaker 1>we started to build our model around investing in our research.

0:09:23.200 --> 0:09:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Co investing our research and earning carried interest in sort

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:28.679
<v Speaker 1>of big complicated trades that we thought we had figured

0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:31.400
<v Speaker 1>out the market, maybe the market had imprised something properly.

0:09:31.920 --> 0:09:33.319
<v Speaker 2>How did that end up working out?

0:09:34.000 --> 0:09:35.080
<v Speaker 1>It was a wild ride.

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:36.240
<v Speaker 2>It was a wild ride.

0:09:36.080 --> 0:09:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Because by the time you got so in two thousand

0:09:38.280 --> 0:09:41.000
<v Speaker 1>and five, we went on a road show trying to

0:09:41.080 --> 0:09:43.760
<v Speaker 1>tell people we had learned and there wasn't a lot

0:09:43.800 --> 0:09:44.240
<v Speaker 1>of reception.

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:46.760
<v Speaker 2>We literally, let me, let me interrupt you and ask you.

0:09:47.160 --> 0:09:48.520
<v Speaker 2>Did people laugh at you?

0:09:49.679 --> 0:09:52.200
<v Speaker 1>They were more polite than that, but they didn't invest.

0:09:53.520 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 1>So there were very few people that thought because at

0:09:57.080 --> 0:10:00.360
<v Speaker 1>that time the triling credit performers, for you, single thing

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:02.480
<v Speaker 1>mortgagees great, impeccable, peckable.

0:10:02.800 --> 0:10:05.319
<v Speaker 2>I want to say five was where we peaked in

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:08.880
<v Speaker 2>price and six's volume or am I getting that?

0:10:09.080 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 1>So six O five was six? It started to turn

0:10:11.000 --> 0:10:13.240
<v Speaker 1>over and our thesis on a lot of these mortgages

0:10:13.520 --> 0:10:17.200
<v Speaker 1>and the very very exposed securities within these structured products

0:10:17.320 --> 0:10:19.520
<v Speaker 1>wasn't that home prices needed to go down. It was

0:10:19.640 --> 0:10:21.439
<v Speaker 1>that the only way that the loan was going to

0:10:21.480 --> 0:10:24.600
<v Speaker 1>perform is that the consumer could refinance out of it quickly. Right,

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:27.439
<v Speaker 1>So you really just wanted the music to stop, right

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:29.360
<v Speaker 1>or if you mean, this whole thing was going to

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:31.800
<v Speaker 1>come down if the music stopped. So by the time

0:10:31.840 --> 0:10:33.800
<v Speaker 1>the music stopped, it was pretty apparent, but we had it.

0:10:34.080 --> 0:10:37.679
<v Speaker 1>There's a there's a big industry conference called AFS that

0:10:37.800 --> 0:10:39.880
<v Speaker 1>happens twice a year, and in the two thousand, the

0:10:39.880 --> 0:10:41.920
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and five conference, it's kind of wild. So

0:10:41.960 --> 0:10:44.320
<v Speaker 1>these big brokens frooms get together and they set up

0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:47.000
<v Speaker 1>a convention like like plumbers, and they also give out

0:10:47.080 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 1>choski's and they have a and then they give presentations

0:10:49.120 --> 0:10:51.120
<v Speaker 1>in their business. And so we participated in this. Our

0:10:51.200 --> 0:10:53.679
<v Speaker 1>choshki that year was a hard helmet, was a was

0:10:53.720 --> 0:10:55.920
<v Speaker 1>an orange hard hat, and they said beware of falling

0:10:55.960 --> 0:10:58.520
<v Speaker 1>home prices. And our whole thesis was that was what

0:10:58.559 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to describe.

0:10:59.400 --> 0:11:01.280
<v Speaker 2>Which is that's a great swag. Do you do you

0:11:01.360 --> 0:11:01.640
<v Speaker 2>still have?

0:11:01.840 --> 0:11:03.959
<v Speaker 1>I have one in my office now. I have a

0:11:04.040 --> 0:11:06.640
<v Speaker 1>helmet from Beware of Falling home Prices, and I have

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:09.559
<v Speaker 1>one for our new construction division where we build entire neighborhoods.

0:11:10.960 --> 0:11:13.559
<v Speaker 1>And that's really to sort of bring it all together

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:18.120
<v Speaker 1>with this core competency and analytics, and we're probably the only,

0:11:18.280 --> 0:11:20.839
<v Speaker 1>maybe not the only, but but I don't know of

0:11:20.920 --> 0:11:23.559
<v Speaker 1>a competitor. We're the quant shop in real estate and

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:27.360
<v Speaker 1>the quant shop in physic glasses. So with that core competency,

0:11:27.480 --> 0:11:29.480
<v Speaker 1>that's the reason we're in the single play rental business.

0:11:29.559 --> 0:11:31.520
<v Speaker 1>You followed that all the way through. There were amazing

0:11:31.640 --> 0:11:34.480
<v Speaker 1>trades to do, amazing opportunities, wild scary things to do.

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:36.480
<v Speaker 1>I got to spend a lot of time in DC

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:39.400
<v Speaker 1>consulting on the response to the financial crisis and trying

0:11:39.400 --> 0:11:41.480
<v Speaker 1>to sort out sort of what was really going on.

0:11:42.000 --> 0:11:43.880
<v Speaker 1>And what we figured out in two thousand and nine

0:11:43.920 --> 0:11:46.640
<v Speaker 1>really when we started buying homes is that we made

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:49.839
<v Speaker 1>the bet that I mean, it wasn't a very exotic bet,

0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:51.840
<v Speaker 1>but we made the bet that the sub primorgage market

0:11:51.920 --> 0:11:53.120
<v Speaker 1>wasn't coming back at all.

0:11:53.280 --> 0:11:55.480
<v Speaker 2>So wait, let me unpack some of that. Christ there's

0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:58.600
<v Speaker 2>a lot of really interesting things. When you mentioned DC,

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:02.559
<v Speaker 2>I'm aware of the Act that you briefed Congress, the

0:12:02.640 --> 0:12:06.320
<v Speaker 2>Federal Reserve, the White House. Who else did you speak

0:12:06.360 --> 0:12:08.560
<v Speaker 2>to when you were there? Well, what was that experience?

0:12:08.679 --> 0:12:10.840
<v Speaker 1>So I lived in Washington, d C. For five years,

0:12:10.920 --> 0:12:13.600
<v Speaker 1>my family and I moved to McLain, Virginia in two

0:12:13.640 --> 0:12:16.599
<v Speaker 1>thousand and eight. So we were down the street, and

0:12:16.720 --> 0:12:19.160
<v Speaker 1>we were in a pretty interesting situation because we were

0:12:19.559 --> 0:12:21.480
<v Speaker 1>we were one of the biggest, if not the only,

0:12:22.320 --> 0:12:25.600
<v Speaker 1>investment banks specializing in the core risk that the nation

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:28.760
<v Speaker 1>was facing. And we didn't need any help, right, So

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:31.440
<v Speaker 1>we weren't there looking for changing of a reg cap,

0:12:31.600 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, of anything. We weren't looking for a bailout.

0:12:34.040 --> 0:12:36.280
<v Speaker 1>We were looking for recapitalization or anything. We were just

0:12:36.960 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 1>there as a source of information. So we met a

0:12:39.840 --> 0:12:41.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of interesting people in DC, and it was the

0:12:41.840 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 1>whole gamut. We were consulted on the recapitalization in Freddie

0:12:45.080 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 1>mckin family. We participated in that with Treasury and FHFA

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:51.240
<v Speaker 1>and the regulators of the White House. And I would

0:12:51.240 --> 0:12:53.680
<v Speaker 1>say that Washington was pretty interesting because we had gone

0:12:53.920 --> 0:12:55.560
<v Speaker 1>and spoken to people in two thousand and five, two

0:12:55.600 --> 0:12:58.160
<v Speaker 1>thousand and six and to kind of let people know

0:12:58.240 --> 0:13:01.000
<v Speaker 1>that there was something these this is a trillion dollars

0:13:01.000 --> 0:13:02.120
<v Speaker 1>worth miss price risk right.

0:13:02.400 --> 0:13:08.319
<v Speaker 2>And I very vividly recall six even o seven. People were, hey,

0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:10.559
<v Speaker 2>we're in the middle of a giant boom. Why do

0:13:10.679 --> 0:13:13.360
<v Speaker 2>you have to come, you know, rain on our purrass?

0:13:13.520 --> 0:13:14.800
<v Speaker 2>But what was your experience?

0:13:15.120 --> 0:13:17.840
<v Speaker 1>It was lonely, I tell you. The analogy was something

0:13:17.960 --> 0:13:20.640
<v Speaker 1>like this, is that we had seen what had happened,

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:22.760
<v Speaker 1>and by two thousand and six it was over right.

0:13:22.840 --> 0:13:26.040
<v Speaker 1>The mortgages were defaulting. People were taking out mortgages and

0:13:26.120 --> 0:13:28.439
<v Speaker 1>defaulting in the third payment, the fourth payment.

0:13:28.679 --> 0:13:33.640
<v Speaker 2>Ninety day warranty on those non conforming non Fanny May

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:37.599
<v Speaker 2>mortgages from those private contractors, like a toaster comes with

0:13:37.679 --> 0:13:39.160
<v Speaker 2>along a warranty, it's amazing.

0:13:39.160 --> 0:13:41.200
<v Speaker 1>So eventually even that was gone, even that they wouldn't

0:13:41.200 --> 0:13:44.240
<v Speaker 1>provide nine day warranty. Eventually it was take it at

0:13:44.320 --> 0:13:47.200
<v Speaker 1>cash for keys or cash and carry. So like for us,

0:13:47.320 --> 0:13:49.079
<v Speaker 1>it was weird though, because the analogy I give is

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:50.559
<v Speaker 1>it in two thousand and six it happened. It was

0:13:50.600 --> 0:13:52.200
<v Speaker 1>over first four to two thousand and six, the market

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:56.079
<v Speaker 1>was over. The market kept issuing securities, And I think

0:13:56.080 --> 0:13:57.600
<v Speaker 1>the analogy that we think about it is that if

0:13:57.640 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 1>you're standing, if you're sitting in front of a bank,

0:13:59.720 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 1>and you know, a van rolls up and people with

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:04.360
<v Speaker 1>masks run in and they empty out the bank and

0:14:04.400 --> 0:14:06.400
<v Speaker 1>they leave with all the money, and you see it,

0:14:07.200 --> 0:14:09.040
<v Speaker 1>and then people keep coming and going from the bank

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:12.000
<v Speaker 1>for another year. You're like, yo, there's there's no money

0:14:12.000 --> 0:14:14.079
<v Speaker 1>in that bank, right, And so so we sort of

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:15.920
<v Speaker 1>felt pretty stupid for a while because we did a

0:14:15.960 --> 0:14:18.079
<v Speaker 1>lot of losing trades in two thousand and six that

0:14:18.200 --> 0:14:20.240
<v Speaker 1>were the you know, the obviously didn't come to fruition

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:23.680
<v Speaker 1>until the actual people could see the losses. So in mortgages,

0:14:23.920 --> 0:14:27.360
<v Speaker 1>the barber can stop paying maybe a year to two

0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 1>years before the lenders actually book a loss. So there's

0:14:31.560 --> 0:14:35.200
<v Speaker 1>this great lag in housing that is affecting the market,

0:14:35.600 --> 0:14:39.120
<v Speaker 1>affecting today's CPI numbers that the market doesn't do a

0:14:39.200 --> 0:14:41.800
<v Speaker 1>great job of adjusting the real time for information that

0:14:41.800 --> 0:14:43.560
<v Speaker 1>they already have. So when the barber hasn't paid in

0:14:43.600 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 1>twelve months, probably not going to get back the loan,

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 1>probably not going to start paying again. And then you

0:14:49.320 --> 0:14:51.160
<v Speaker 1>can model up what happens, like what's the home going

0:14:51.200 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 1>to sell for, what are my expenses to sell, awa,

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:54.160
<v Speaker 1>how long it's going to take, And all of a sudden,

0:14:54.200 --> 0:14:56.360
<v Speaker 1>you have a loan that was worth, you know, one

0:14:56.400 --> 0:14:58.040
<v Speaker 1>hundred cents on the dollar, and now it's worth thirty

0:14:58.080 --> 0:15:00.640
<v Speaker 1>cents on the dollar. And you knew that eight months

0:15:00.680 --> 0:15:02.200
<v Speaker 1>into the loan or eight or maybe a year ago

0:15:02.280 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 1>or two years ago, But it takes that long to

0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:05.800
<v Speaker 1>it takes that long for the losses to get through

0:15:05.800 --> 0:15:07.360
<v Speaker 1>to the securities. And so I don't know if it's

0:15:07.400 --> 0:15:10.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of just the fact that we're so myopic into

0:15:10.400 --> 0:15:13.640
<v Speaker 1>the minutia of each little detail, or if it's the

0:15:13.720 --> 0:15:15.560
<v Speaker 1>fact that the market kind of doesn't want to buy

0:15:15.640 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 1>an umbrella until it starts raining.

0:15:18.800 --> 0:15:23.560
<v Speaker 2>Really very fascinating. So so coming out of this in nine,

0:15:24.160 --> 0:15:28.560
<v Speaker 2>home prices on average across the country down over thirty percent,

0:15:28.720 --> 0:15:32.040
<v Speaker 2>but really in the worst areas like Las Vegas and

0:15:32.160 --> 0:15:35.760
<v Speaker 2>South Florida and you know, parts of California and parts

0:15:35.760 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 2>of Arizona, Phoenix.

0:15:37.320 --> 0:15:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Two thirds in Phoenix.

0:15:38.520 --> 0:15:41.960
<v Speaker 2>Unbelievable. So you say, I have an idea, Let's buy

0:15:42.000 --> 0:15:44.120
<v Speaker 2>all these distressed real estate and rent them out.

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I had. I had a very good idea. So

0:15:45.960 --> 0:15:47.520
<v Speaker 1>I have very good partners, are very patient with me,

0:15:48.080 --> 0:15:50.440
<v Speaker 1>and I said, Okay, we don't think the subprime market

0:15:50.440 --> 0:15:52.400
<v Speaker 1>to mark is coming back, which was a non consensus

0:15:52.480 --> 0:15:54.880
<v Speaker 1>view at the time. People were buying up mortgage originators

0:15:54.920 --> 0:15:56.600
<v Speaker 1>and things waiting for the machines to sort of get

0:15:56.600 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 1>turned back on. We were thinking, this is investors are

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:01.920
<v Speaker 1>never going to buy these loans again at any price.

0:16:02.760 --> 0:16:04.240
<v Speaker 1>So what's going to happen, what's going to happen to

0:16:04.240 --> 0:16:06.480
<v Speaker 1>the homes, and what's going to happen to the people

0:16:06.520 --> 0:16:09.000
<v Speaker 1>that were living these homes. And what a lot of

0:16:09.040 --> 0:16:11.480
<v Speaker 1>people I think didn't follow is that there was a

0:16:11.560 --> 0:16:14.760
<v Speaker 1>concept that job loss is called mortgage caused to mortgage defaults.

0:16:15.120 --> 0:16:17.840
<v Speaker 1>But in the Amir's view, a mortgage default can be rational,

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:20.600
<v Speaker 1>as distasteful as it may sound. And when I give

0:16:20.640 --> 0:16:23.520
<v Speaker 1>this presentation in Europe or the EU or the UK,

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:25.360
<v Speaker 1>they look at me like you're crazy. Or in Australia

0:16:25.440 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 1>or in Canada they're like, what do you mean? Mortgage

0:16:27.520 --> 0:16:29.400
<v Speaker 1>is a recourse and so like, well not in the US.

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:31.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, actually some states are recourse.

0:16:31.280 --> 0:16:32.960
<v Speaker 1>In some states I try to tell people, is that

0:16:33.120 --> 0:16:35.960
<v Speaker 1>one person's default you have, you can handle. But when

0:16:36.000 --> 0:16:38.960
<v Speaker 1>seven or eight million people default, we don't have debtors'

0:16:38.960 --> 0:16:41.880
<v Speaker 1>prisons right their recourse, I mean, they're not recourse. So

0:16:42.400 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 1>in this in this context of a mortgage now being

0:16:45.840 --> 0:16:48.840
<v Speaker 1>clear to everyone that this default risk is present, it's real,

0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:53.200
<v Speaker 1>and it's hard to price because following the borrowers economic profile,

0:16:53.520 --> 0:16:56.480
<v Speaker 1>there are defaults that are related to just life events,

0:16:56.520 --> 0:16:59.560
<v Speaker 1>but there's also defaults related to a macroeconomic event. So

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:02.160
<v Speaker 1>the position, you know what, investors are not going to

0:17:02.200 --> 0:17:06.399
<v Speaker 1>buy these loans anymore. The homes are here, and the

0:17:06.920 --> 0:17:09.760
<v Speaker 1>job loss wasn't as big as the mortgage defaults were, right,

0:17:10.160 --> 0:17:12.720
<v Speaker 1>so the people still had jobs, they slid revenue, and

0:17:12.800 --> 0:17:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the homes were very affordable now because the prices have

0:17:15.160 --> 0:17:18.480
<v Speaker 1>been reset. So we asked ourselves, Okay, we've seen this

0:17:18.600 --> 0:17:23.520
<v Speaker 1>movie before. Can we at Amherst make a three hundred

0:17:23.560 --> 0:17:27.160
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars home investible to a global financial investor? Which

0:17:27.520 --> 0:17:30.120
<v Speaker 1>we spent our whole careers turning a three hundred thousand

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 1>dollars mortgage investible in the global capital markets. So we said, okay,

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 1>this is probably not a long put for us because

0:17:36.040 --> 0:17:38.440
<v Speaker 1>we've been following the mortgage with all this minutia for

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:40.680
<v Speaker 1>thirty years. Now we're just going to follow the house

0:17:40.720 --> 0:17:42.680
<v Speaker 1>the same way. So we took our same analytic and

0:17:42.760 --> 0:17:45.400
<v Speaker 1>modeling team and we said, let's press down one more

0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:48.000
<v Speaker 1>level so we can actually price the home instead of

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:51.399
<v Speaker 1>the mortgage with precision. And then let's set up an

0:17:51.400 --> 0:17:55.240
<v Speaker 1>operating capability that allows us to acquire the homes, renovate

0:17:55.280 --> 0:17:59.359
<v Speaker 1>the homes, manage the homes, and then more importantly, scale

0:17:59.400 --> 0:18:02.439
<v Speaker 1>the homes in to an investible pool. So we created

0:18:02.480 --> 0:18:04.919
<v Speaker 1>pools of homes just the same way we created pools

0:18:04.920 --> 0:18:06.480
<v Speaker 1>and mortgages in nineteen eighty nine.

0:18:06.760 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 2>So are you keeping these homes and leasing them out

0:18:09.200 --> 0:18:10.560
<v Speaker 2>or are they flips?

0:18:11.359 --> 0:18:13.440
<v Speaker 1>So they're kept and leased out, So we're starting in

0:18:13.480 --> 0:18:16.080
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and nine. There was no flip market. There

0:18:16.160 --> 0:18:18.679
<v Speaker 1>was no one to sew them to because the mortgage

0:18:18.720 --> 0:18:22.040
<v Speaker 1>market had basically closed on a large section of the

0:18:22.040 --> 0:18:22.640
<v Speaker 1>consumer base.

0:18:22.680 --> 0:18:26.000
<v Speaker 2>So think about and that credit market was frozen pretty.

0:18:25.800 --> 0:18:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Much, and it's still frozen for most people. So really

0:18:28.600 --> 0:18:32.119
<v Speaker 1>still today, still today. Basically the barrier to entry to

0:18:32.160 --> 0:18:35.879
<v Speaker 1>getting a mortgage became irreversibly higher, and we spent a

0:18:35.920 --> 0:18:37.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of times. You mentioned my time in DC. I

0:18:38.040 --> 0:18:40.399
<v Speaker 1>got to go and brief the Fetal Reserve, which is

0:18:40.480 --> 0:18:41.919
<v Speaker 1>kind of cool. I got to go into the FMC

0:18:42.119 --> 0:18:45.040
<v Speaker 1>room and I got to sit with with Yelling and

0:18:45.119 --> 0:18:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Vernaki and walk them through kind of in our view,

0:18:48.119 --> 0:18:50.600
<v Speaker 1>how we got here and the best way out. And

0:18:50.720 --> 0:18:52.800
<v Speaker 1>I asked them not to shut down the sub prime

0:18:52.840 --> 0:18:56.240
<v Speaker 1>mortgage market because it does serve a large swath of

0:18:56.280 --> 0:18:59.840
<v Speaker 1>the American public who has a slightly higher rent in

0:19:00.160 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 1>or debt income ratio, or has defaulted on a credit

0:19:03.400 --> 0:19:05.880
<v Speaker 1>card in the past or something, but they can pay,

0:19:06.119 --> 0:19:08.600
<v Speaker 1>they've had a problem in the past, they've cured it. Well,

0:19:08.640 --> 0:19:10.440
<v Speaker 1>those people now are pretty much blocked out of the

0:19:10.440 --> 0:19:13.119
<v Speaker 1>mortgage market. So I was unsuccessful in talking people and

0:19:13.200 --> 0:19:15.720
<v Speaker 1>still to this day unsuccessful into talking to people to

0:19:15.760 --> 0:19:20.080
<v Speaker 1>get back into lending to lower credit quality consumers. Because

0:19:20.119 --> 0:19:22.440
<v Speaker 1>you can do it, you can risk base prizing. So

0:19:22.520 --> 0:19:24.280
<v Speaker 1>we took we took the view like, hey, that market's

0:19:24.280 --> 0:19:25.960
<v Speaker 1>not coming back. People are not going to listen to us.

0:19:25.960 --> 0:19:28.080
<v Speaker 1>They're not going to say there's some good subprime loans

0:19:28.119 --> 0:19:30.840
<v Speaker 1>and some bad sub loans. They're just gonna they're just

0:19:30.920 --> 0:19:33.000
<v Speaker 1>going to draw a line and say you have to

0:19:33.080 --> 0:19:35.280
<v Speaker 1>have a credit score above a certain level, you have

0:19:35.320 --> 0:19:37.119
<v Speaker 1>to have income above a certain level, you have to

0:19:37.200 --> 0:19:39.440
<v Speaker 1>have a debt load below a certain level, or the

0:19:39.520 --> 0:19:41.639
<v Speaker 1>price for you is zero. You just get the answer is.

0:19:41.680 --> 0:19:42.879
<v Speaker 2>No, you're out of the market.

0:19:43.119 --> 0:19:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Used to you would say you would pay one percent

0:19:44.720 --> 0:19:48.400
<v Speaker 1>more or two percent right now. He said no, that's

0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:49.800
<v Speaker 1>so that's how we So we said, okay, well, how's

0:19:49.800 --> 0:19:51.080
<v Speaker 1>it's going to work. And we had seen this movie

0:19:51.160 --> 0:19:55.919
<v Speaker 1>before aggregating mortgages, strapping services on them, getting them rated,

0:19:56.200 --> 0:19:59.080
<v Speaker 1>getting them available to the global capital markets. So we

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:03.840
<v Speaker 1>also so saw the conflicts and the frictions of the

0:20:03.880 --> 0:20:07.440
<v Speaker 1>mortgage market when it went under duress, the problems with

0:20:07.560 --> 0:20:10.120
<v Speaker 1>getting service to the consumers, the problem with getting service

0:20:10.200 --> 0:20:12.720
<v Speaker 1>to investors. The litigation. A lot of people don't know it,

0:20:12.800 --> 0:20:15.880
<v Speaker 1>but were We represented a large swath of the US

0:20:15.960 --> 0:20:19.520
<v Speaker 1>investor base and their litigation for buying these bus and securities.

0:20:19.880 --> 0:20:22.120
<v Speaker 1>So we said, you know what, let's just build under

0:20:22.200 --> 0:20:27.800
<v Speaker 1>one platform everything you need to originate, managed service, aggregate

0:20:28.400 --> 0:20:31.040
<v Speaker 1>and the long term service. These homes on behalf of

0:20:31.119 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 1>the residents and the investors. So that's the single platform

0:20:34.880 --> 0:20:35.200
<v Speaker 1>we built.

0:20:35.400 --> 0:20:38.480
<v Speaker 2>H absolutely fascinating. So let's talk a little bit about

0:20:38.920 --> 0:20:42.560
<v Speaker 2>who the clients are for Amherst. I'm assuming it's primarily

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:46.359
<v Speaker 2>institutional and not retail. Tell us who your clients are

0:20:46.520 --> 0:20:48.800
<v Speaker 2>and what they want to invest in. Sure.

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Over the years, we've migrated really to what I would

0:20:52.960 --> 0:20:54.960
<v Speaker 1>say is the largest customer base in the world, the

0:20:55.080 --> 0:21:00.160
<v Speaker 1>largest single investors. So we do business with most most

0:21:00.200 --> 0:21:03.200
<v Speaker 1>of the sovereign wealth funds, most of the big US

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:08.159
<v Speaker 1>national insurers, global insurers, the largest pension funds, and we

0:21:08.880 --> 0:21:12.480
<v Speaker 1>try to position ourselves as an extension of their capabilities.

0:21:12.720 --> 0:21:15.520
<v Speaker 1>And since we're smaller, more nimble, we can kind of

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:17.160
<v Speaker 1>get in there and do some of the gritty things,

0:21:17.200 --> 0:21:20.359
<v Speaker 1>the smaller things. Imagine setting up a platform with in

0:21:20.480 --> 0:21:23.040
<v Speaker 1>thirty two markets that has to buy each individual home

0:21:23.119 --> 0:21:26.600
<v Speaker 1>and execute a CAPEX plan on a thirty forty thousand

0:21:26.640 --> 0:21:29.120
<v Speaker 1>dollars CAPEX plan on a home. So these large investors

0:21:29.160 --> 0:21:31.320
<v Speaker 1>need someone like us to kind of make things investable

0:21:31.359 --> 0:21:34.159
<v Speaker 1>in scale, and so that's where we've been. So it's

0:21:34.160 --> 0:21:38.320
<v Speaker 1>all institutional investors. It's the call it five hundred largest

0:21:38.320 --> 0:21:39.160
<v Speaker 1>investors in the world.

0:21:39.320 --> 0:21:43.320
<v Speaker 2>Is that patient capital? Did they have the bandwidth to hey,

0:21:43.600 --> 0:21:44.560
<v Speaker 2>we're in this for decades.

0:21:44.640 --> 0:21:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's super patient, it's super sophisticated. Their asset allocation

0:21:49.240 --> 0:21:53.800
<v Speaker 1>model driven folks. The bulk of our investors are investing

0:21:53.880 --> 0:21:57.800
<v Speaker 1>on behalf of consumers, on behalf of taxpayers. So we're

0:21:57.840 --> 0:21:59.800
<v Speaker 1>partners with the State of Texas. The actual state of

0:21:59.800 --> 0:22:01.600
<v Speaker 1>time is not one of the pension funds, but the

0:22:01.640 --> 0:22:04.440
<v Speaker 1>state itself. So we have a lot of sovereign wealth

0:22:04.520 --> 0:22:06.359
<v Speaker 1>on types that are investing on behalf of tax payers.

0:22:06.359 --> 0:22:10.840
<v Speaker 1>So it's very long dated capital. They're lower risk tolerance,

0:22:10.880 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 1>I would say, very high standards on quality of service

0:22:14.600 --> 0:22:17.840
<v Speaker 1>and quality of infrastructure decision making. So we're very proud

0:22:17.920 --> 0:22:20.679
<v Speaker 1>that we're a partner to that type of capital.

0:22:21.040 --> 0:22:23.880
<v Speaker 2>So let's talk a little bit about the residential side.

0:22:23.920 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 2>Before we look at the commercial side. You mentioned you

0:22:27.840 --> 0:22:31.159
<v Speaker 2>are in thirty two markets buying single family homes. How

0:22:31.240 --> 0:22:32.160
<v Speaker 2>many homes have you, guys?

0:22:32.200 --> 0:22:34.560
<v Speaker 1>So their platform service is about fifty thousand units now.

0:22:34.600 --> 0:22:37.119
<v Speaker 1>So we've purchased and most of the homes were purchased

0:22:37.119 --> 0:22:40.680
<v Speaker 1>one at a time, independent due diligence, independent construction management

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:42.880
<v Speaker 1>to get the home back up to current market standards,

0:22:43.280 --> 0:22:45.280
<v Speaker 1>and we manage each home independently.

0:22:45.720 --> 0:22:48.680
<v Speaker 2>So that implies that some of the homes you're buying

0:22:48.760 --> 0:22:52.919
<v Speaker 2>are kind of project homes. A wrecked or otherwise neglected

0:22:53.200 --> 0:22:56.159
<v Speaker 2>doesn't even have to be a willf elected destruction, just

0:22:56.280 --> 0:22:57.159
<v Speaker 2>time and tide.

0:22:57.400 --> 0:22:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Just what we like to say is it's deferred cappex.

0:23:00.119 --> 0:23:01.880
<v Speaker 1>So you'll find that owners that have owned the home

0:23:01.920 --> 0:23:05.280
<v Speaker 1>for ten, fifteen, twenty years become pretty comfortable with a

0:23:05.359 --> 0:23:09.200
<v Speaker 1>smudge paint or a stained floor, or old countertops, or

0:23:09.280 --> 0:23:13.440
<v Speaker 1>appliances that may make noises at night or that or

0:23:13.560 --> 0:23:15.960
<v Speaker 1>that you know, that bathroom set that leaks and whatever,

0:23:16.000 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 1>and so people just get comfortable in their homes and

0:23:17.600 --> 0:23:19.960
<v Speaker 1>they they tend not to reinvest in real time on

0:23:20.119 --> 0:23:22.760
<v Speaker 1>keeping that home up to current market standards. So we

0:23:22.840 --> 0:23:25.080
<v Speaker 1>buy those homes that haven't really been touched in fifteen

0:23:25.119 --> 0:23:28.080
<v Speaker 1>or twenty years. They've still got the original builder interior.

0:23:29.119 --> 0:23:31.240
<v Speaker 1>We make sure that, of course that the bones of

0:23:31.280 --> 0:23:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the house are good, the foundation and the walls and

0:23:33.280 --> 0:23:35.600
<v Speaker 1>so forth, but then we pretty much trip them down

0:23:35.680 --> 0:23:37.520
<v Speaker 1>to I wouldn't say down to the studs, but down

0:23:37.560 --> 0:23:39.840
<v Speaker 1>to the sheet rock and put a brand new interier

0:23:39.920 --> 0:23:42.560
<v Speaker 1>in on. We oftentimes people don't buy a roof, they'll

0:23:42.960 --> 0:23:45.679
<v Speaker 1>let the roof go a longer than maybe the staple

0:23:46.359 --> 0:23:48.359
<v Speaker 1>exact or a third one, or bought a lot of

0:23:48.480 --> 0:23:50.520
<v Speaker 1>roofs and buy a lot of hvacs. We take out

0:23:50.560 --> 0:23:52.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of compressors that are still running on those

0:23:52.800 --> 0:23:55.480
<v Speaker 1>old toxic gases. So we basically bring the home up

0:23:55.480 --> 0:23:57.119
<v Speaker 1>to a current monitor standard and there's a there's a

0:23:57.200 --> 0:23:59.359
<v Speaker 1>profit in that that the home you get paid to

0:23:59.440 --> 0:24:00.600
<v Speaker 1>go and improve PA's real estate.

0:24:01.880 --> 0:24:04.080
<v Speaker 2>And then how do you figure out what to lease

0:24:04.160 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 2>these for? And do you ever sell any of these homes?

0:24:06.400 --> 0:24:08.560
<v Speaker 1>We do sell we do. The platform is pretty nimble.

0:24:08.640 --> 0:24:11.080
<v Speaker 1>So if for example, we were talking before the show,

0:24:11.119 --> 0:24:13.760
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about how some markets have really benefited

0:24:13.800 --> 0:24:17.840
<v Speaker 1>from the post COVID migration and it's changed their customer

0:24:17.880 --> 0:24:21.120
<v Speaker 1>based dramatically. So think about Naples, Florida and clear Water

0:24:21.240 --> 0:24:23.680
<v Speaker 1>and those types of places. So in those places, home

0:24:23.800 --> 0:24:28.359
<v Speaker 1>prices since pre COVID are up maybe forty fifty percent

0:24:28.800 --> 0:24:31.159
<v Speaker 1>and rents are up twenty twenty five percent, so they

0:24:31.200 --> 0:24:33.520
<v Speaker 1>really don't really make much sense more as a as

0:24:33.560 --> 0:24:36.320
<v Speaker 1>a rental investment. So we're cleaning those homes back up

0:24:36.359 --> 0:24:38.520
<v Speaker 1>and selling them back to the consumers. So that's an

0:24:38.520 --> 0:24:42.080
<v Speaker 1>active part of portfolio trimming and optimization, and it's cool

0:24:42.119 --> 0:24:45.159
<v Speaker 1>to have the capability to sort of execute in both markets.

0:24:45.440 --> 0:24:48.200
<v Speaker 2>So it's funny you mentioned Naples and Clearwater. A few

0:24:48.280 --> 0:24:51.760
<v Speaker 2>of the areas adjacent to those really got to lacked

0:24:51.800 --> 0:24:54.879
<v Speaker 2>by that last hurricane that came through last year. What

0:24:55.000 --> 0:24:57.119
<v Speaker 2>do you do when you have a natural disaster? Is

0:24:57.200 --> 0:25:00.920
<v Speaker 2>that does that create any interest or is it just

0:25:01.560 --> 0:25:02.280
<v Speaker 2>just too much may.

0:25:02.240 --> 0:25:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Have It's well, we've been hit by hurricanes several times,

0:25:05.119 --> 0:25:08.560
<v Speaker 1>floods several times, tornadoes several times. Given that the homes

0:25:08.600 --> 0:25:11.080
<v Speaker 1>are in thirty markets, the good news is no one

0:25:11.200 --> 0:25:13.560
<v Speaker 1>event has a big impact on the portfolio. The bad

0:25:13.640 --> 0:25:16.200
<v Speaker 1>news is all events you get to experience.

0:25:15.840 --> 0:25:19.040
<v Speaker 2>Right, So diversified, which means you're embracing every natural right.

0:25:19.280 --> 0:25:21.399
<v Speaker 1>So in Houston one year, we got hit in Houston

0:25:21.600 --> 0:25:24.680
<v Speaker 1>and in Florida at the same time, two different hurricanes.

0:25:25.160 --> 0:25:27.840
<v Speaker 1>So what's interesting is that now we have a natural

0:25:27.920 --> 0:25:31.200
<v Speaker 1>disaster of team and response unit and a playbook which

0:25:31.240 --> 0:25:32.720
<v Speaker 1>is a little bit unfortunately you have to have that,

0:25:32.800 --> 0:25:34.080
<v Speaker 1>but we use it every couple of years.

0:25:34.119 --> 0:25:34.280
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:25:35.240 --> 0:25:38.240
<v Speaker 1>We tend not to invest when those markets are busted.

0:25:39.160 --> 0:25:41.600
<v Speaker 1>We do see a lot of demand for our rentals

0:25:41.640 --> 0:25:43.920
<v Speaker 1>because when you know, a few percent of the housing

0:25:43.920 --> 0:25:46.760
<v Speaker 1>stock gets taken offline for a storm, it creates pressure

0:25:46.840 --> 0:25:49.000
<v Speaker 1>on demand. But now our job is just to go

0:25:49.080 --> 0:25:50.960
<v Speaker 1>in there and get the homes fixed as fast as

0:25:50.960 --> 0:25:52.200
<v Speaker 1>we can and get them back into service.

0:25:52.400 --> 0:25:54.520
<v Speaker 2>So fifty thousand homes, I'm going to assume you're a

0:25:54.600 --> 0:25:56.320
<v Speaker 2>self insurer on all those homes.

0:25:56.400 --> 0:25:58.879
<v Speaker 1>We do so Amerus is completely verted integrated. We own

0:25:58.920 --> 0:26:02.240
<v Speaker 1>our own insurance platform, so we're the we're you know,

0:26:02.320 --> 0:26:05.560
<v Speaker 1>we basically access our coverage through the reinsurance markets. At

0:26:05.600 --> 0:26:08.159
<v Speaker 1>our scale, it's hard to go get insurance through the

0:26:08.200 --> 0:26:10.000
<v Speaker 1>normal channels, and so we set up our own insurance

0:26:10.040 --> 0:26:13.639
<v Speaker 1>brokerage and risk attention platform and now we we insuran

0:26:13.960 --> 0:26:15.600
<v Speaker 1>through the resurance markets.

0:26:16.040 --> 0:26:19.600
<v Speaker 2>Huh really very very intriguing. Uh So let's let's talk

0:26:19.600 --> 0:26:22.720
<v Speaker 2>a little bit about some data and technology you use. Sure,

0:26:22.880 --> 0:26:25.320
<v Speaker 2>you guys created your own platform. Tell us a little

0:26:25.359 --> 0:26:28.320
<v Speaker 2>bit about what it was like developing that and what

0:26:28.560 --> 0:26:31.600
<v Speaker 2>makes it specific and unique to Amhurst.

0:26:31.840 --> 0:26:34.240
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting because you know, today we talk about AI

0:26:34.440 --> 0:26:37.680
<v Speaker 1>and and uh, you know, high speed computing, and what

0:26:38.119 --> 0:26:40.119
<v Speaker 1>I look at, what we do is being comically you know,

0:26:40.359 --> 0:26:42.080
<v Speaker 1>simple compared to what we talked what we're talking about

0:26:42.080 --> 0:26:44.600
<v Speaker 1>today with generative AI. But when we started this in

0:26:44.680 --> 0:26:46.240
<v Speaker 1>the late eighties, so that was the job I was

0:26:46.280 --> 0:26:49.119
<v Speaker 1>pronted into, which was, hey, let's figure out how to

0:26:49.240 --> 0:26:53.080
<v Speaker 1>differentiate pricing from one mortgage pool to the next. They've

0:26:53.119 --> 0:26:55.720
<v Speaker 1>got different interest rates, they've got different LTVs, they've got

0:26:55.760 --> 0:26:58.320
<v Speaker 1>different credit scores, they must have different values. So I

0:26:58.520 --> 0:27:00.879
<v Speaker 1>was part of a small or the our team was

0:27:00.960 --> 0:27:03.560
<v Speaker 1>part of a small group of people tackling this problem

0:27:03.600 --> 0:27:05.800
<v Speaker 1>in the late eighties early nineties, and what we do

0:27:05.880 --> 0:27:08.240
<v Speaker 1>today is just now growth of that original project. So

0:27:08.320 --> 0:27:11.320
<v Speaker 1>it's a quantitative analytics approach. It's highly data driven, but

0:27:11.400 --> 0:27:13.600
<v Speaker 1>we need to know the price history for us, that's

0:27:13.640 --> 0:27:16.520
<v Speaker 1>the correlation to to what drives price, and then we

0:27:16.600 --> 0:27:19.639
<v Speaker 1>have a big consumer behavior modeling infrastructure because we have

0:27:19.800 --> 0:27:22.560
<v Speaker 1>what's nice is that over the thirty years of our

0:27:22.920 --> 0:27:25.440
<v Speaker 1>history and then we purchase data that was probably twenty

0:27:25.480 --> 0:27:28.960
<v Speaker 1>five years old at the time, we can measure how

0:27:29.080 --> 0:27:32.240
<v Speaker 1>consumers behave to changes in their economic environment, and that

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:35.160
<v Speaker 1>consumer behavior will affect home prices and will affect performance

0:27:35.240 --> 0:27:38.960
<v Speaker 1>on credit. It's that So that's the core competency, and

0:27:39.000 --> 0:27:42.320
<v Speaker 1>it's just leveraged into if it's a loan, if it's

0:27:42.359 --> 0:27:44.320
<v Speaker 1>a security back by a loan, if it's the actual

0:27:44.440 --> 0:27:46.960
<v Speaker 1>estate itself. So from a data perspective, think about it

0:27:47.000 --> 0:27:48.800
<v Speaker 1>this way. So obviously the S and P five hundred

0:27:48.840 --> 0:27:51.080
<v Speaker 1>is five hundred names and they report four times a year,

0:27:51.720 --> 0:27:53.600
<v Speaker 1>and God loved the analysts that have to figure out

0:27:53.600 --> 0:27:56.159
<v Speaker 1>how to price these things with so little information. We

0:27:56.280 --> 0:27:58.240
<v Speaker 1>have one hundred million items that we're following. Is one

0:27:58.280 --> 0:28:00.520
<v Speaker 1>hundred million piece of real estate in the country. We've

0:28:00.600 --> 0:28:02.639
<v Speaker 1>gathered up all the information you would need to do

0:28:02.680 --> 0:28:05.200
<v Speaker 1>an appraisal, and we keep that information current in real time,

0:28:05.440 --> 0:28:09.600
<v Speaker 1>and we've automated the appraisal process for evaluation both intrinsic value,

0:28:10.160 --> 0:28:11.639
<v Speaker 1>meaning like where would we pay it, where would we

0:28:12.200 --> 0:28:15.560
<v Speaker 1>buy it, and where is the fair market price that asset?

0:28:15.840 --> 0:28:18.760
<v Speaker 1>From that level, from price and from consumer behavior. Now,

0:28:18.800 --> 0:28:21.000
<v Speaker 1>so now we're watching the payments on every mortgage in

0:28:21.040 --> 0:28:24.440
<v Speaker 1>the country, so you can see who paid, Did Maryland

0:28:24.480 --> 0:28:27.480
<v Speaker 1>do better than Texas last month? And more importantly, versus

0:28:27.600 --> 0:28:31.280
<v Speaker 1>the model, who outperforms, who underperformed. Because there's a schedule,

0:28:31.520 --> 0:28:34.280
<v Speaker 1>there's an expectation for not everyone to pay every month.

0:28:34.440 --> 0:28:36.800
<v Speaker 2>So when you're trying to put a value on a home,

0:28:37.040 --> 0:28:40.000
<v Speaker 2>you're not just sending a third party appraiser oute to

0:28:40.120 --> 0:28:42.080
<v Speaker 2>do a drive buy and go. Yeah, that's about two

0:28:42.160 --> 0:28:45.560
<v Speaker 2>seventy five. You're actually crunching a lot of numbers. And

0:28:45.640 --> 0:28:47.200
<v Speaker 2>this is proprietary you're running.

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:51.080
<v Speaker 1>We're running a ten year Monte Carlo. That's probably twenty thousand,

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:54.040
<v Speaker 1>ten thousand paths of outcomes on that asset. It includes

0:28:54.080 --> 0:28:57.920
<v Speaker 1>all of its changes in its property taxes, it's depreciable

0:28:58.000 --> 0:29:00.360
<v Speaker 1>life for the improvements of the assets, and course it's

0:29:00.400 --> 0:29:02.000
<v Speaker 1>revenue stream from rental demand.

0:29:02.840 --> 0:29:06.840
<v Speaker 2>So it's interesting that you started this after the financial crisis,

0:29:07.560 --> 0:29:11.880
<v Speaker 2>given your technological expertise and your unique way to value

0:29:11.960 --> 0:29:15.880
<v Speaker 2>these things. I'm curious how much of this is a

0:29:16.000 --> 0:29:20.240
<v Speaker 2>legacy of your experiences during the Great Financial Crisis. How

0:29:20.320 --> 0:29:23.560
<v Speaker 2>did that couple of years affect how you look at

0:29:23.680 --> 0:29:26.120
<v Speaker 2>risk and pricing of real estate process?

0:29:26.320 --> 0:29:30.560
<v Speaker 1>It's infecting, I would say. So the problem, the problem

0:29:30.680 --> 0:29:33.320
<v Speaker 1>for me, I'll speak for myself personally in the financial

0:29:33.440 --> 0:29:36.840
<v Speaker 1>crisis is that once you find something like that, because

0:29:36.920 --> 0:29:39.880
<v Speaker 1>literally we were saying to people these loans aren't going

0:29:39.920 --> 0:29:41.920
<v Speaker 1>to pay off in two thousand and five, two thousand

0:29:41.920 --> 0:29:44.120
<v Speaker 1>and six, and they were like, Sean, in the worst

0:29:44.160 --> 0:29:48.440
<v Speaker 1>of fault rate, it's been geographically focused. Rather it was

0:29:48.480 --> 0:29:51.120
<v Speaker 1>the farm belt crisis or the California crisis. What are

0:29:51.160 --> 0:29:53.840
<v Speaker 1>you talking about? National home prices going down? And oh,

0:29:53.960 --> 0:29:56.200
<v Speaker 1>by the way, the defaults in those micro markets were

0:29:56.240 --> 0:29:58.640
<v Speaker 1>ten or fifteen percent and the losses were five percent.

0:29:59.360 --> 0:30:01.320
<v Speaker 1>So if you we had five percent losses on a

0:30:01.880 --> 0:30:04.480
<v Speaker 1>market and the market was only five percent of a pool,

0:30:05.040 --> 0:30:07.360
<v Speaker 1>the losses are going to be nearly zero, right, And

0:30:07.440 --> 0:30:09.560
<v Speaker 1>we're like, yeah, except for none of that's going to

0:30:09.600 --> 0:30:11.120
<v Speaker 1>happen this time. And they were like sure, Sean, pat

0:30:11.200 --> 0:30:12.360
<v Speaker 1>you on the head and send you down the road.

0:30:12.640 --> 0:30:14.160
<v Speaker 1>So so one of the problems is once you see

0:30:14.200 --> 0:30:16.200
<v Speaker 1>something like that, you kind of look for them everywhere,

0:30:16.600 --> 0:30:18.280
<v Speaker 1>So we spend our time a lot of time looking

0:30:18.360 --> 0:30:22.760
<v Speaker 1>for looking for sasquatch. And so the other thing is

0:30:22.960 --> 0:30:25.959
<v Speaker 1>is that, and I think it's our core risk management culture,

0:30:26.560 --> 0:30:28.360
<v Speaker 1>is that we think that tiller risk is way more

0:30:28.440 --> 0:30:31.160
<v Speaker 1>probable than everyone else does. So we manage the business

0:30:31.240 --> 0:30:34.240
<v Speaker 1>for extreme shocks to prices, for home prices moving twenty

0:30:34.280 --> 0:30:36.520
<v Speaker 1>five to thirty percent in a year, for interest rates

0:30:36.560 --> 0:30:39.560
<v Speaker 1>moving dramatically in a short period of time. And we

0:30:39.680 --> 0:30:43.640
<v Speaker 1>found you know that check check is all these tail risks. Well,

0:30:43.640 --> 0:30:45.560
<v Speaker 1>it's like the one hundred year floods every ten years

0:30:45.640 --> 0:30:47.560
<v Speaker 1>or so. I've been doing this for thirty years, and

0:30:47.600 --> 0:30:49.920
<v Speaker 1>I've had how many hundred your floods? More than more

0:30:49.960 --> 0:30:50.560
<v Speaker 1>than point three?

0:30:51.280 --> 0:30:54.000
<v Speaker 2>You know. The fascinating thing is I have a vivid

0:30:54.120 --> 0:30:57.320
<v Speaker 2>recollection of a paper, a white paper coming out by

0:30:57.400 --> 0:31:01.680
<v Speaker 2>professors rein Hart and Rogueoff. I remembered it was five

0:31:02.120 --> 0:31:08.280
<v Speaker 2>financial crises. So it was Helsinki, it was Sweden, it

0:31:08.600 --> 0:31:12.320
<v Speaker 2>was Japan, it was Mexico, maybe US, and the Great

0:31:12.360 --> 0:31:14.560
<v Speaker 2>Depression was the fifth one. I don't remember exactly what.

0:31:14.800 --> 0:31:18.000
<v Speaker 2>By the way that paper eventually becomes this time is different.

0:31:18.080 --> 0:31:21.960
<v Speaker 2>Eight hundred years of financial folly. But the average of

0:31:22.040 --> 0:31:26.040
<v Speaker 2>the real estate drop in any modern financial we're not

0:31:26.120 --> 0:31:29.720
<v Speaker 2>talking about tulips. Right. The last century was over thirty

0:31:29.760 --> 0:31:32.520
<v Speaker 2>percent in real estate. And once you once I saw

0:31:32.600 --> 0:31:35.000
<v Speaker 2>that paper, I remember saying, hey, this is in a

0:31:35.160 --> 0:31:38.760
<v Speaker 2>theoretical possibility. This has happened once in decades.

0:31:38.840 --> 0:31:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Right. So people think of home prices as being sort

0:31:41.040 --> 0:31:44.880
<v Speaker 1>of four to five percent price movers per annum, and

0:31:45.000 --> 0:31:46.840
<v Speaker 1>that's the case most of the time. But the problem

0:31:46.920 --> 0:31:48.000
<v Speaker 1>is we don't get to live most of the time.

0:31:48.040 --> 0:31:50.640
<v Speaker 1>We get to live all the time, and so sometimes

0:31:50.720 --> 0:31:52.600
<v Speaker 1>that five percent move can be thirty five percent and

0:31:52.640 --> 0:31:55.280
<v Speaker 1>forty percent. So think about that eighty percent l TV mortgage.

0:31:55.560 --> 0:31:57.280
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't seem like a risky loan. The bar will

0:31:57.320 --> 0:31:59.280
<v Speaker 1>put up twenty percent, the lender put up eighty percent,

0:32:00.120 --> 0:32:02.440
<v Speaker 1>but there's a one in something chance that the home

0:32:02.520 --> 0:32:05.800
<v Speaker 1>price goes goes to sixty five, And if the home

0:32:05.920 --> 0:32:07.920
<v Speaker 1>goes to sixty five, the loan is no longer going

0:32:07.960 --> 0:32:10.960
<v Speaker 1>to pay off. So that was the sort of the

0:32:11.080 --> 0:32:13.640
<v Speaker 1>thing that we built that people hadn't thought through, is

0:32:13.680 --> 0:32:16.560
<v Speaker 1>how to you stochastically forecast a range of outcomes for

0:32:16.600 --> 0:32:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the asset price? Then how does it affect the repayment

0:32:19.080 --> 0:32:19.360
<v Speaker 1>risk on.

0:32:19.360 --> 0:32:22.800
<v Speaker 2>The loan, So you have to have boots on the ground.

0:32:22.880 --> 0:32:26.800
<v Speaker 2>With fifty thousand homes, how big a staff do you have?

0:32:27.080 --> 0:32:30.400
<v Speaker 2>Is it regional? How do you manage since since you're

0:32:30.480 --> 0:32:33.000
<v Speaker 2>now the landlord for these homes, how do you manage

0:32:33.080 --> 0:32:36.520
<v Speaker 2>the regular maintenance the one off you know, things break

0:32:36.640 --> 0:32:39.600
<v Speaker 2>or refrigerator stops, the toilet kits backed up. How do

0:32:39.680 --> 0:32:40.200
<v Speaker 2>you manage that?

0:32:40.600 --> 0:32:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's complicated. So we have a both of an

0:32:43.760 --> 0:32:47.000
<v Speaker 1>on balance sheet group of repairmen. So we're an investment

0:32:47.440 --> 0:32:51.000
<v Speaker 1>management platform that also has trucks with plumbers crews around

0:32:51.040 --> 0:32:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the country and fixing air conditioners. We also have a

0:32:55.920 --> 0:32:59.040
<v Speaker 1>great vendor network and we have a lot of technology

0:32:59.240 --> 0:33:02.640
<v Speaker 1>that the team, as you mentioned, is about fifteen hundred

0:33:02.680 --> 0:33:05.120
<v Speaker 1>people that are just in that single venderaial platform. This's

0:33:05.120 --> 0:33:07.280
<v Speaker 1>is one of the things Amherst does. But that fifteen

0:33:07.360 --> 0:33:10.240
<v Speaker 1>hundred person team is augmented by about two thousand vendors

0:33:10.280 --> 0:33:15.160
<v Speaker 1>of companies and we're able to handle the properties because

0:33:15.160 --> 0:33:16.960
<v Speaker 1>we have a team in the field. So we literally

0:33:17.040 --> 0:33:20.600
<v Speaker 1>have a repair and maintenance team that's assigned to a

0:33:20.640 --> 0:33:23.320
<v Speaker 1>group of homes. So that person has their three hundred

0:33:23.320 --> 0:33:25.600
<v Speaker 1>homes or something, and then they're part of a local

0:33:25.640 --> 0:33:28.400
<v Speaker 1>team that's managing about fifteen hundred units. So it's not

0:33:28.720 --> 0:33:31.160
<v Speaker 1>that different from how you would manage a multi family

0:33:31.560 --> 0:33:34.040
<v Speaker 1>an apartment complex. It's just that the rooms are further apart,

0:33:34.120 --> 0:33:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the units are further apart, and it causes our drive

0:33:36.680 --> 0:33:38.000
<v Speaker 1>time to be higher. But one of the things that

0:33:38.080 --> 0:33:39.280
<v Speaker 1>we went into this that was one of the big

0:33:39.400 --> 0:33:41.400
<v Speaker 1>questions is could you provide good service and could you

0:33:41.480 --> 0:33:43.080
<v Speaker 1>manage them? And we don't get it right all the time.

0:33:44.000 --> 0:33:46.440
<v Speaker 1>But if you think about the fact that how easy

0:33:46.440 --> 0:33:48.600
<v Speaker 1>it is to get someone out to a home, and

0:33:48.720 --> 0:33:50.560
<v Speaker 1>that's part of our filtering criteria of how we buy

0:33:50.600 --> 0:33:53.480
<v Speaker 1>a home. But think about the fact that for ten bucks,

0:33:53.560 --> 0:33:56.320
<v Speaker 1>you can have Dominoes bringing a pizza and somehow of

0:33:56.360 --> 0:33:58.680
<v Speaker 1>that ten bucks they get the delivery person from their

0:33:58.720 --> 0:34:01.760
<v Speaker 1>store to your home with a hot pizza, and they

0:34:01.800 --> 0:34:03.400
<v Speaker 1>were able to pay for the Super Bowl add out

0:34:04.160 --> 0:34:07.040
<v Speaker 1>embedded in that ten dollar cost, like the transportation cost

0:34:07.160 --> 0:34:08.719
<v Speaker 1>to get people to and from these homes, it just

0:34:08.800 --> 0:34:12.000
<v Speaker 1>isn't a barrier. It's really timing and technology to really

0:34:12.040 --> 0:34:12.480
<v Speaker 1>to rout them.

0:34:12.800 --> 0:34:15.480
<v Speaker 2>So let's talk a little bit about technology over the

0:34:15.560 --> 0:34:21.800
<v Speaker 2>past two decades, real time monitoring of things like fire, flood,

0:34:22.560 --> 0:34:28.520
<v Speaker 2>carbon monoxide break ins, whatever, they've become very inexpensive, very ubiquitous.

0:34:28.840 --> 0:34:32.640
<v Speaker 2>Everybody can have it on a phone. Is that anything

0:34:32.680 --> 0:34:33.839
<v Speaker 2>that you've explored in terms?

0:34:33.880 --> 0:34:35.600
<v Speaker 1>We spent a lot of time on it. There's big

0:34:35.640 --> 0:34:38.600
<v Speaker 1>privacy concerns. So we have families, we have fifty thousand

0:34:38.640 --> 0:34:40.600
<v Speaker 1>families living in their homes and they're their homes and

0:34:40.920 --> 0:34:43.880
<v Speaker 1>we're proud to be part of that process. So, you know,

0:34:44.120 --> 0:34:45.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of that stuff gets a little creepy to us,

0:34:45.920 --> 0:34:46.640
<v Speaker 1>and so we haven't done well.

0:34:46.680 --> 0:34:49.040
<v Speaker 2>There's a difference between a puppy cam where you're seeing

0:34:49.040 --> 0:34:52.000
<v Speaker 2>what's going on in the bedroom and I know in

0:34:52.080 --> 0:34:55.080
<v Speaker 2>my basement I have a flood.

0:34:54.800 --> 0:34:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Like a high water alarm, that sort of thing. So

0:34:56.600 --> 0:34:59.120
<v Speaker 1>that we're still on their network, we're still so that

0:34:59.239 --> 0:35:02.359
<v Speaker 1>technology for us to go at it stronger. We would

0:35:02.400 --> 0:35:06.600
<v Speaker 1>like for those devices to communicate back to us, uh directly,

0:35:07.120 --> 0:35:07.440
<v Speaker 1>not like.

0:35:07.520 --> 0:35:09.319
<v Speaker 2>A like a cell phone.

0:35:09.600 --> 0:35:11.400
<v Speaker 1>So we are looking at that. There's locks now you

0:35:11.440 --> 0:35:13.960
<v Speaker 1>can buy that have little cell phone transmitters in them, right,

0:35:14.080 --> 0:35:15.920
<v Speaker 1>So we may we may look at things like that,

0:35:16.040 --> 0:35:17.759
<v Speaker 1>but at this point we have so many people on

0:35:17.800 --> 0:35:19.799
<v Speaker 1>the field. We're touching the houses six, eight, nine times

0:35:19.840 --> 0:35:22.960
<v Speaker 1>a year. We have good relationships with our with our residents.

0:35:23.320 --> 0:35:24.480
<v Speaker 1>A lot of that stuff is a little bit of

0:35:24.520 --> 0:35:27.920
<v Speaker 1>pizaz and we see other people charging residents, you know,

0:35:28.000 --> 0:35:30.800
<v Speaker 1>fifty dollars a month for electronic door lock or something.

0:35:31.280 --> 0:35:32.719
<v Speaker 1>We don't think that that's sustainable cost.

0:35:32.760 --> 0:35:34.600
<v Speaker 2>It's a fifty dollar product. How do you chrusee fifty

0:35:34.600 --> 0:35:35.120
<v Speaker 2>dollars a month.

0:35:35.360 --> 0:35:37.120
<v Speaker 1>I no, I don't don't. I don't get it. So

0:35:37.640 --> 0:35:39.799
<v Speaker 1>we will will it's coming along. If I can get

0:35:39.960 --> 0:35:42.080
<v Speaker 1>direct cell phone connections to a high water alarm, I

0:35:42.120 --> 0:35:43.880
<v Speaker 1>would take it. But really, what we have as a

0:35:43.920 --> 0:35:45.800
<v Speaker 1>person go out there and look and touch the property

0:35:45.840 --> 0:35:47.800
<v Speaker 1>eight times a year, and that's how that's how we

0:35:47.840 --> 0:35:49.520
<v Speaker 1>do it. A lot of this is not so complicated,

0:35:49.560 --> 0:35:51.959
<v Speaker 1>but we have you know, through COVID was fascinating because

0:35:52.000 --> 0:35:54.439
<v Speaker 1>that field team and we have a big construction management team.

0:35:54.480 --> 0:35:56.920
<v Speaker 1>So these guys, those fifty thousand homes have all been renovated.

0:35:57.480 --> 0:36:00.440
<v Speaker 1>So that those teams during COVID man they up and

0:36:00.520 --> 0:36:02.400
<v Speaker 1>they went out and they made us so proud they

0:36:02.680 --> 0:36:05.359
<v Speaker 1>provide a service to the residents. They finished construction jobs.

0:36:05.360 --> 0:36:08.200
<v Speaker 1>They got homes back in service so people could move

0:36:08.280 --> 0:36:10.120
<v Speaker 1>out of wherever they were and get into a home.

0:36:11.000 --> 0:36:13.319
<v Speaker 1>So it's been fascinating to watch this business run through

0:36:14.080 --> 0:36:17.080
<v Speaker 1>a crazy COVID cycle, and then a crazy post COVID cycle,

0:36:17.120 --> 0:36:19.200
<v Speaker 1>and now an interest rate cycle. The team has had

0:36:19.239 --> 0:36:20.319
<v Speaker 1>to be pretty nimble. Huh.

0:36:20.840 --> 0:36:24.960
<v Speaker 2>Really quite intriguing. Let's talk a little bit about about

0:36:25.040 --> 0:36:27.840
<v Speaker 2>your space. What are you doing these days in mortgage

0:36:27.880 --> 0:36:31.440
<v Speaker 2>backed securities? Does that market exist remotely like it did

0:36:31.520 --> 0:36:32.360
<v Speaker 2>in the two thousands.

0:36:32.440 --> 0:36:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's great that you ask about it. So the

0:36:34.600 --> 0:36:36.719
<v Speaker 1>bulk of my career was spent in the mortgage backed

0:36:36.719 --> 0:36:40.800
<v Speaker 1>securities and structure products markets. The single family riendal of

0:36:40.880 --> 0:36:43.920
<v Speaker 1>business kept us very busy while the FED was monetizing

0:36:44.040 --> 0:36:46.239
<v Speaker 1>so many mortgages, so, as you know, they own about

0:36:46.239 --> 0:36:48.960
<v Speaker 1>a third of all mortgages that were ever issued. The

0:36:49.080 --> 0:36:53.200
<v Speaker 1>relative value for non government investors was so bad that

0:36:53.320 --> 0:36:56.000
<v Speaker 1>we wound down a lot of our capabilities in that space.

0:36:56.040 --> 0:36:59.600
<v Speaker 1>We actually sold our investment bank to Manco Santander as

0:36:59.640 --> 0:37:03.319
<v Speaker 1>part of just the frustration with how much intervention had

0:37:03.440 --> 0:37:06.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of driven down value in that space. Well, now

0:37:06.160 --> 0:37:09.160
<v Speaker 1>that's completely reversed and there's a real vacuum today, a

0:37:09.280 --> 0:37:12.919
<v Speaker 1>real vacuum. As the FED stopped buying mortgages, they bought

0:37:12.920 --> 0:37:15.719
<v Speaker 1>a third of the whole market when they stopped buying them.

0:37:15.760 --> 0:37:18.600
<v Speaker 1>I think the belief was that the market would get

0:37:18.680 --> 0:37:21.760
<v Speaker 1>back to its regulary scheduled programming and the traditional investors

0:37:21.800 --> 0:37:24.440
<v Speaker 1>would show up to buy them, and they didn't because

0:37:24.440 --> 0:37:26.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of those traditional investors don't exist anymore.

0:37:26.640 --> 0:37:30.080
<v Speaker 2>You lose a whole generation, there's no succession beyond.

0:37:30.440 --> 0:37:32.279
<v Speaker 1>This is the largest debt cautter market in the world,

0:37:32.440 --> 0:37:36.279
<v Speaker 1>the largest, most liquid, and it's lost its sponsor. So

0:37:36.360 --> 0:37:39.719
<v Speaker 1>the sponsor went from being the big investment banks, the

0:37:40.120 --> 0:37:43.680
<v Speaker 1>government agencies, the big bank balance sheets, a lot of

0:37:43.680 --> 0:37:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the insurance can be balance sheets, and the money managers.

0:37:46.080 --> 0:37:49.880
<v Speaker 1>The FED displaced all of them. Then they changed regulations

0:37:49.920 --> 0:37:52.279
<v Speaker 1>to where the investment banks can't really step in. The

0:37:52.360 --> 0:37:55.840
<v Speaker 1>agencies are no longer allowed to run balance sheets, the

0:37:55.920 --> 0:37:58.520
<v Speaker 1>reats are not really well positioned to step up in

0:37:58.560 --> 0:38:00.359
<v Speaker 1>the size, as we just saw in the four quarter.

0:38:00.960 --> 0:38:02.960
<v Speaker 1>So there's a real lack of sponsorship with the assets,

0:38:02.960 --> 0:38:06.280
<v Speaker 1>and they've become incredibly attractively priced. So we've been ginning

0:38:06.320 --> 0:38:08.840
<v Speaker 1>back up those strategies. We still we've always run strategy

0:38:08.880 --> 0:38:11.320
<v Speaker 1>that space, but they've been very sort of boring strategies,

0:38:11.360 --> 0:38:14.759
<v Speaker 1>index tracking, index outperformance, that kind of thing. But now

0:38:14.880 --> 0:38:17.399
<v Speaker 1>there's opportunity to really go in and build proper hedge

0:38:17.400 --> 0:38:20.960
<v Speaker 1>fund strategies, proper total return strategies. The relative value is

0:38:21.040 --> 0:38:22.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of startlingly attractive now.

0:38:22.920 --> 0:38:26.200
<v Speaker 2>So I always hated the term financial repression, but what

0:38:26.360 --> 0:38:31.240
<v Speaker 2>you're describing really is the FED engaging in financial repression

0:38:31.400 --> 0:38:32.919
<v Speaker 2>on that corner of the market.

0:38:33.000 --> 0:38:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Well, what I would say is that they were investing

0:38:34.640 --> 0:38:38.160
<v Speaker 1>for a non monetary focus or motivation. Right, They didn't

0:38:38.160 --> 0:38:41.160
<v Speaker 1>care what their returnal the mortgages were they trice and sensitive, right,

0:38:41.239 --> 0:38:44.280
<v Speaker 1>they cared what the lower mortgage rate did to the economy.

0:38:44.800 --> 0:38:47.520
<v Speaker 1>So as a person that's just investing for an economic return,

0:38:47.560 --> 0:38:49.440
<v Speaker 1>you can't compete with that, right, So their motivations were

0:38:49.480 --> 0:38:52.480
<v Speaker 1>totally different, and they and they basically drove down the

0:38:52.560 --> 0:38:56.480
<v Speaker 1>relative value to where on a hedge adjusted basis, if

0:38:56.520 --> 0:38:58.560
<v Speaker 1>you looked at a mortgage and you'd sort of get

0:38:58.600 --> 0:39:00.600
<v Speaker 1>it back to where it's got the same risk a treasury,

0:39:01.120 --> 0:39:03.680
<v Speaker 1>it was yielding almost half a percent less than a treasury.

0:39:04.239 --> 0:39:07.719
<v Speaker 1>They normally yield half a percent more. Now they yield

0:39:08.280 --> 0:39:10.719
<v Speaker 1>one percent more. So in fixed income terms, that's a lot.

0:39:11.200 --> 0:39:13.719
<v Speaker 1>So so now we're really focused on mortgages that we're

0:39:13.719 --> 0:39:15.319
<v Speaker 1>way more active than we have been in the past,

0:39:15.360 --> 0:39:17.440
<v Speaker 1>and we're excited about the opportunities there, and we have

0:39:17.480 --> 0:39:19.120
<v Speaker 1>a commercial morgage lending strategy as well.

0:39:19.640 --> 0:39:22.399
<v Speaker 2>Huh, that's kind of interesting. So let's talk a little

0:39:22.440 --> 0:39:26.600
<v Speaker 2>bit about what's going on in the commercial space. We

0:39:26.719 --> 0:39:29.560
<v Speaker 2>were talking earlier about sixty minutes. Did a piece recently

0:39:30.200 --> 0:39:33.160
<v Speaker 2>on the New York real estate market is never coming

0:39:33.280 --> 0:39:37.000
<v Speaker 2>back and all these big office towers are you know, empty.

0:39:37.760 --> 0:39:40.959
<v Speaker 2>I'm old enough to remember the sea through office towers right.

0:39:40.960 --> 0:39:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Dallas back in the eighties and Dulles the whole right

0:39:43.800 --> 0:39:45.759
<v Speaker 1>the Washington Dulles Quarter was full of sea through right

0:39:45.960 --> 0:39:46.640
<v Speaker 1>see through buildings.

0:39:46.800 --> 0:39:50.880
<v Speaker 2>So we're not there, but certainly the typical high rise

0:39:51.040 --> 0:39:54.000
<v Speaker 2>has you know, a vacancy rate of ten fifteen to

0:39:54.040 --> 0:39:58.880
<v Speaker 2>twenty percent, and the occupancy rate during the day is

0:39:59.080 --> 0:40:02.440
<v Speaker 2>probably another ten to fifteen percent less than that. What's

0:40:02.520 --> 0:40:03.920
<v Speaker 2>going on in the office space.

0:40:04.040 --> 0:40:07.680
<v Speaker 1>So the castle data is pretty fascinating and you can

0:40:07.760 --> 0:40:09.880
<v Speaker 1>get it on your Bloomberg terminal the castle. The castle

0:40:09.920 --> 0:40:12.520
<v Speaker 1>ocup data as we talked about before.

0:40:12.719 --> 0:40:15.600
<v Speaker 2>But by the way, that's all swipe cards of employees

0:40:15.640 --> 0:40:16.279
<v Speaker 2>literally going down.

0:40:16.680 --> 0:40:19.799
<v Speaker 1>The real time physical occupancy data is pretty and it's

0:40:19.840 --> 0:40:22.160
<v Speaker 1>not perfect, like no data set is, but it's pretty startling.

0:40:22.400 --> 0:40:24.920
<v Speaker 1>The last time I looked at it, most markets are

0:40:25.000 --> 0:40:28.960
<v Speaker 1>peaking at fifty percent physical occupancy. Remember I said before

0:40:29.000 --> 0:40:31.239
<v Speaker 1>that in the mortgage market, in the residential mortgage market,

0:40:31.280 --> 0:40:33.840
<v Speaker 1>a borrower can stop making payments and it might be

0:40:33.880 --> 0:40:37.400
<v Speaker 1>two years before the investor actually takes a loss, sometimes

0:40:37.480 --> 0:40:40.120
<v Speaker 1>five years. Well, I think that same thing's been happening

0:40:40.200 --> 0:40:43.520
<v Speaker 1>commercial now for the last since twenty twenty one. Is

0:40:43.600 --> 0:40:48.080
<v Speaker 1>that physical occupancy is the leading indicator to economic occupancy.

0:40:48.480 --> 0:40:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Economic occupancy is who's paying the rent, and in corporate

0:40:52.120 --> 0:40:55.440
<v Speaker 1>leases are of incredibly high credit quality, incredible very few

0:40:55.520 --> 0:41:00.440
<v Speaker 1>leases ever default. Those leases, however, are going to come

0:41:00.560 --> 0:41:04.080
<v Speaker 1>do and the renewal rates are tragically tragically low. So

0:41:04.239 --> 0:41:06.480
<v Speaker 1>if you model out what's going to happen to the

0:41:06.520 --> 0:41:09.600
<v Speaker 1>commercial space from an economic perspective, you don't have to

0:41:09.640 --> 0:41:13.480
<v Speaker 1>be a wizard to figure out that monetary or physical,

0:41:13.760 --> 0:41:16.840
<v Speaker 1>fiscal or financial occupancy is going to track physical accuracy.

0:41:17.239 --> 0:41:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Companies aren't going to be able to give back one

0:41:19.680 --> 0:41:21.640
<v Speaker 1>for one as much space as they're not using because

0:41:21.680 --> 0:41:24.440
<v Speaker 1>they've got this peak and load problem where everyone likes

0:41:24.480 --> 0:41:26.040
<v Speaker 1>to come to work on Wednesdays. So you still need

0:41:26.120 --> 0:41:29.120
<v Speaker 1>the space, but that quantum of space that people need

0:41:29.200 --> 0:41:31.920
<v Speaker 1>has been reduced dramatically and we're seeing it in that

0:41:32.040 --> 0:41:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Castle data. So it's a scary thing to do. But

0:41:34.640 --> 0:41:38.760
<v Speaker 1>if you forecast that the lease payments track the physical usage,

0:41:39.280 --> 0:41:42.320
<v Speaker 1>meaning that what you're seeing today, it's fifteen percent vacancy

0:41:42.400 --> 0:41:44.880
<v Speaker 1>because some leases expired and to get renewed, well, all

0:41:44.960 --> 0:41:47.759
<v Speaker 1>those leases that are being underutilized by half, if those

0:41:47.800 --> 0:41:51.440
<v Speaker 1>don't renew or they renew it much smaller spaces, you

0:41:51.520 --> 0:41:55.960
<v Speaker 1>could create thirty forty percent physical you're actually financial vacancy

0:41:56.239 --> 0:41:59.640
<v Speaker 1>in the commercial space. Now, it's dangerous to forecast that

0:41:59.760 --> 0:42:03.520
<v Speaker 1>far in the future because behavior can change. How much

0:42:03.600 --> 0:42:05.840
<v Speaker 1>space do people need or do they do out the

0:42:05.880 --> 0:42:07.600
<v Speaker 1>fact they want their whole team to get together three

0:42:07.680 --> 0:42:09.560
<v Speaker 1>days a week, so they do they just eat the

0:42:09.640 --> 0:42:13.120
<v Speaker 1>space on the Mondays and Fridays. Some companies are never

0:42:13.160 --> 0:42:15.520
<v Speaker 1>coming back, some jobs are never coming back. So the

0:42:15.560 --> 0:42:17.840
<v Speaker 1>way we look at it, we have some loans in

0:42:17.920 --> 0:42:20.920
<v Speaker 1>the office space. We do feel like it's like bottom

0:42:20.960 --> 0:42:24.920
<v Speaker 1>fishing time and we're taking back real estate. Now that

0:42:25.160 --> 0:42:28.560
<v Speaker 1>is fifty dollars sixty dollars a square foot space for big,

0:42:28.600 --> 0:42:32.800
<v Speaker 1>beautiful buildings that need to be repopulated. But so the

0:42:32.840 --> 0:42:34.680
<v Speaker 1>way we think about is this is that occupancy is

0:42:34.680 --> 0:42:36.759
<v Speaker 1>probably going to drop by a third, but it won't

0:42:36.760 --> 0:42:39.160
<v Speaker 1>be a third for everyone. Right, some places going to

0:42:39.200 --> 0:42:40.960
<v Speaker 1>go to zero, and some guys they won't, They won't

0:42:40.960 --> 0:42:43.480
<v Speaker 1>feel it. So asset selection becomes incredibly important.

0:42:43.520 --> 0:42:46.320
<v Speaker 2>So there's a huge difference between the A class buildings

0:42:46.520 --> 0:42:49.200
<v Speaker 2>and the B and C class. And I've heard people

0:42:49.280 --> 0:42:51.879
<v Speaker 2>say even within A there's a big ring.

0:42:51.880 --> 0:42:53.920
<v Speaker 1>There's the super A stuff, you know, the one Vanderbilt

0:42:53.920 --> 0:42:56.359
<v Speaker 1>thing at two hundred bucks half foot that you can't

0:42:56.440 --> 0:42:59.759
<v Speaker 1>get enough of it. But a block away some traditional

0:43:00.360 --> 0:43:03.360
<v Speaker 1>commodity office space that's just a little draft or whatever,

0:43:04.120 --> 0:43:06.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, that people just don't want it at any price.

0:43:06.520 --> 0:43:09.000
<v Speaker 1>So now that super A space is a very very

0:43:09.040 --> 0:43:10.960
<v Speaker 1>small fracture of the market. So it's not what happens

0:43:11.000 --> 0:43:13.960
<v Speaker 1>there probably isn't going to be sort of impactful, but

0:43:14.080 --> 0:43:17.080
<v Speaker 1>we think that, you know, they're people have to adjust

0:43:17.200 --> 0:43:20.640
<v Speaker 1>to a new normal of demand, like demand function for

0:43:21.040 --> 0:43:23.440
<v Speaker 1>commercial real estate has come down. Now this is, by

0:43:23.480 --> 0:43:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the way, just another domino in a long series of

0:43:26.880 --> 0:43:29.959
<v Speaker 1>what the Inrice Norwitz guys call software eating the world.

0:43:30.360 --> 0:43:32.520
<v Speaker 1>This is technology eating real estate. And so if you

0:43:32.560 --> 0:43:34.000
<v Speaker 1>look at this over longer the time, the way we

0:43:34.040 --> 0:43:37.279
<v Speaker 1>think about it is that technology eight retail and we

0:43:37.360 --> 0:43:39.600
<v Speaker 1>all kind of saw it, right. It was Amazon killed

0:43:39.640 --> 0:43:43.800
<v Speaker 1>the shopping mall. Airbnb has eaten up a lot of

0:43:43.880 --> 0:43:47.160
<v Speaker 1>hotel demand. So technology matching a home to a to

0:43:47.560 --> 0:43:50.600
<v Speaker 1>a rent or a leaser has eaten up a bunch

0:43:50.640 --> 0:43:53.439
<v Speaker 1>of the hotel demand. Now work from home is eating

0:43:53.640 --> 0:43:55.800
<v Speaker 1>is eating office. So we can we kind of have

0:43:55.880 --> 0:43:57.919
<v Speaker 1>a playbook for how this goes. And it's not great.

0:43:58.719 --> 0:44:02.120
<v Speaker 2>And all of these are technology enabled. Without tech, you

0:44:02.160 --> 0:44:04.440
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't be able to do this. The ironic thing is

0:44:05.239 --> 0:44:09.080
<v Speaker 2>the I love people discovered like screen sharing in twenty

0:44:09.160 --> 0:44:11.320
<v Speaker 2>twenty one, right, that tech has been around for a

0:44:11.440 --> 0:44:13.000
<v Speaker 2>dozen plus fifteen years.

0:44:13.200 --> 0:44:15.280
<v Speaker 1>I know, I think about the people that created Skype.

0:44:15.400 --> 0:44:17.360
<v Speaker 1>They must be sort of jumping off a bridge somewhere

0:44:17.400 --> 0:44:20.160
<v Speaker 1>because you know, you couldn't give away Skype pre covid,

0:44:20.200 --> 0:44:22.600
<v Speaker 1>and now now I don't even have calls on my phone,

0:44:22.600 --> 0:44:25.359
<v Speaker 1>my office phone ever anymore. Everything happens over teams are

0:44:25.400 --> 0:44:28.279
<v Speaker 1>over over zoom. So the behavior has changed so quickly.

0:44:28.320 --> 0:44:30.560
<v Speaker 1>But I think that, you know, the CEO from Cisco

0:44:30.640 --> 0:44:32.960
<v Speaker 1>made a good point that the home has become the enterprise,

0:44:33.320 --> 0:44:35.040
<v Speaker 1>and what it was saying is that Cisco is seeing

0:44:35.080 --> 0:44:38.920
<v Speaker 1>people buying really sophisticated communications equipment for their homes because

0:44:38.960 --> 0:44:41.960
<v Speaker 1>now they're they're they're pushing their use case. I so

0:44:42.040 --> 0:44:44.520
<v Speaker 1>for us, it's also kind of fascinating. And this is

0:44:44.560 --> 0:44:47.560
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about how the single trintal trade has

0:44:47.600 --> 0:44:52.040
<v Speaker 1>becomes interesting. Is as people stop going out to the

0:44:52.120 --> 0:44:56.440
<v Speaker 1>mall and they shop at home, as high speed communications

0:44:56.520 --> 0:44:59.799
<v Speaker 1>allows them to stream at home, as delivery allows them

0:44:59.840 --> 0:45:04.560
<v Speaker 1>to and eat at home. Right, these real estate sectors

0:45:04.600 --> 0:45:07.520
<v Speaker 1>are all seeing their demand dry up, the demand for usage.

0:45:07.840 --> 0:45:10.359
<v Speaker 1>All that demand is showing up in the home. It's

0:45:10.360 --> 0:45:13.840
<v Speaker 1>showing up in that eighteen hundred square foot three bedroom

0:45:13.880 --> 0:45:17.279
<v Speaker 1>home because and everyone's use case and demand for real

0:45:17.400 --> 0:45:19.600
<v Speaker 1>estate's changing because they're spending so much more time there.

0:45:20.120 --> 0:45:22.799
<v Speaker 2>So I kind of feel like a lot of those

0:45:23.080 --> 0:45:27.560
<v Speaker 2>big technological shifts we'll post the peak of that like,

0:45:28.080 --> 0:45:31.759
<v Speaker 2>I'm a big online shopper and I've kind of come

0:45:31.840 --> 0:45:35.279
<v Speaker 2>to recognize there's certain things that you just can't buy them.

0:45:35.360 --> 0:45:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I have all the time with clothes and things.

0:45:37.680 --> 0:45:40.600
<v Speaker 2>Close is a perfect example. A lot of times you

0:45:40.760 --> 0:45:43.760
<v Speaker 2>order certain things like it's hilarious. You think you're getting

0:45:43.760 --> 0:45:47.719
<v Speaker 2>a four foot tall you know, lamp and this miniature

0:45:47.800 --> 0:45:49.759
<v Speaker 2>and I guess the photo is what the photo is,

0:45:50.160 --> 0:45:53.640
<v Speaker 2>there's just no tape mail tape measure next to it.

0:45:53.760 --> 0:45:55.840
<v Speaker 1>But let me ask you about this, because pre COVID,

0:45:55.920 --> 0:45:58.400
<v Speaker 1>you couldn't have convinced me I could buy groceries on

0:45:58.520 --> 0:45:58.839
<v Speaker 1>an app.

0:45:58.960 --> 0:46:01.080
<v Speaker 2>Oh I was doing that, That's easy. Now.

0:46:01.080 --> 0:46:02.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I would ever go back to grocery.

0:46:02.560 --> 0:46:05.439
<v Speaker 2>In fact, Amazon began that when they bought Whole Food.

0:46:05.520 --> 0:46:07.719
<v Speaker 1>So think about what that means that grocery store, that

0:46:07.840 --> 0:46:11.840
<v Speaker 1>grocery store anchored retail. Ordinarily, the grocery store space was

0:46:11.880 --> 0:46:14.040
<v Speaker 1>undwritten at a loss by the real estate developer, right

0:46:14.320 --> 0:46:16.000
<v Speaker 1>because that was your magnet.

0:46:16.280 --> 0:46:18.720
<v Speaker 2>Now it's your distribution hub and there's no people.

0:46:18.880 --> 0:46:20.600
<v Speaker 1>So what happens to the dry clear, what happens to

0:46:20.640 --> 0:46:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the ice cream shop? What happens to the T shirt shop?

0:46:22.560 --> 0:46:24.040
<v Speaker 1>What happens to the travel agent.

0:46:24.719 --> 0:46:27.480
<v Speaker 2>They have to adapt the same technology and do pick

0:46:27.560 --> 0:46:28.160
<v Speaker 2>up and delver.

0:46:28.480 --> 0:46:31.440
<v Speaker 1>So e commerce is changing, like the footprint for a business,

0:46:31.560 --> 0:46:34.719
<v Speaker 1>it's addressable market. And so I don't think this is over.

0:46:34.920 --> 0:46:37.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that that the pricing of it kind of

0:46:37.239 --> 0:46:40.040
<v Speaker 1>like we talked about the loan starts, the loan defaults,

0:46:40.040 --> 0:46:42.480
<v Speaker 1>and then two years later someone takes a loss. Today

0:46:42.920 --> 0:46:46.760
<v Speaker 1>we're CPI prints higher than people expected because owner equivalent

0:46:46.800 --> 0:46:51.000
<v Speaker 1>rents is higher that OER number was calculable four months ago.

0:46:51.440 --> 0:46:54.600
<v Speaker 1>So the market isn't doing a good job of forecasting

0:46:54.640 --> 0:46:56.799
<v Speaker 1>what it already pricing in what it what already knows

0:46:56.840 --> 0:46:59.680
<v Speaker 1>in any cases. And I think that we're still in

0:46:59.800 --> 0:47:02.520
<v Speaker 1>the repricing phase of real estate for a new a

0:47:02.600 --> 0:47:04.360
<v Speaker 1>new type of demand.

0:47:04.560 --> 0:47:08.520
<v Speaker 2>So some of the solutions to these are wholesale changes

0:47:09.160 --> 0:47:11.400
<v Speaker 2>to the way we built out suburbia, which is so

0:47:11.560 --> 0:47:15.799
<v Speaker 2>car dependent. If we were creating these more walkable communities

0:47:16.440 --> 0:47:19.560
<v Speaker 2>like back in the Andy Griffith days, it's fascinating, suddenly

0:47:20.120 --> 0:47:24.479
<v Speaker 2>fascinating you have retailed that's survivable because everything isn't. Getting

0:47:24.520 --> 0:47:27.200
<v Speaker 2>your car and drive to Target that's right, or have

0:47:27.320 --> 0:47:28.920
<v Speaker 2>Target make a delivery exactly.

0:47:29.080 --> 0:47:31.120
<v Speaker 1>So we spend it. You think about how European cities work.

0:47:32.200 --> 0:47:34.320
<v Speaker 1>That's that's what that's how they're that's how they're designed.

0:47:34.719 --> 0:47:37.680
<v Speaker 2>So so the question is is that something we can

0:47:37.840 --> 0:47:40.400
<v Speaker 2>build here? Is there an appetite for that? Is there?

0:47:41.120 --> 0:47:43.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm spending a fair amount of time on just that is.

0:47:44.040 --> 0:47:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Can you respond to this? Should you respond to it?

0:47:46.200 --> 0:47:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Because as you said, like you know, maybe this is

0:47:48.680 --> 0:47:50.640
<v Speaker 1>a flash in the pan. If all the companies decide

0:47:50.680 --> 0:47:53.120
<v Speaker 1>that employees have to come to work every day, then

0:47:53.320 --> 0:47:55.759
<v Speaker 1>then these trends and occupancy will change and quantum of

0:47:55.800 --> 0:47:58.759
<v Speaker 1>demand will change. But I recently was given a book

0:47:58.760 --> 0:48:01.359
<v Speaker 1>and I read it. It's a companion of essays called

0:48:01.400 --> 0:48:03.160
<v Speaker 1>The City Is Not a Tree. It was written in

0:48:03.239 --> 0:48:04.960
<v Speaker 1>nineteen sixty five, and it was about this. It was

0:48:05.000 --> 0:48:09.640
<v Speaker 1>about how a city should work to optimize the experience

0:48:09.760 --> 0:48:11.800
<v Speaker 1>for its residents and think of a city as a product.

0:48:11.880 --> 0:48:13.560
<v Speaker 1>And so we give the speech to mayors when we're

0:48:13.560 --> 0:48:16.200
<v Speaker 1>asked about sort of how we think about their city

0:48:16.280 --> 0:48:19.160
<v Speaker 1>from a migration investment perspective, and we try to tell

0:48:19.239 --> 0:48:21.239
<v Speaker 1>people that a city is a product. So New York

0:48:21.280 --> 0:48:24.680
<v Speaker 1>City is a product and the customers can choose a

0:48:24.680 --> 0:48:27.480
<v Speaker 1>different product, and it's a great product. It's one of

0:48:27.480 --> 0:48:30.279
<v Speaker 1>the greatest products in the world. But like all customers,

0:48:30.680 --> 0:48:34.200
<v Speaker 1>like all businesses, in all product delivery systems, you have

0:48:34.360 --> 0:48:36.880
<v Speaker 1>to freshen your product to keep your customers happy. And

0:48:36.960 --> 0:48:38.759
<v Speaker 1>we see some cities doing that and some cities not

0:48:38.840 --> 0:48:40.719
<v Speaker 1>doing that. So you have to modify. You can't just

0:48:41.320 --> 0:48:42.560
<v Speaker 1>completely tear down and change.

0:48:42.760 --> 0:48:46.040
<v Speaker 2>So one of my favorite YouTube channels is this kind

0:48:46.080 --> 0:48:50.839
<v Speaker 2>of wacky Canadian expat who moved to Amsterdam, and it's

0:48:50.920 --> 0:48:55.400
<v Speaker 2>called Not Just Bikes, and he talks about walkable cities

0:48:55.920 --> 0:49:00.319
<v Speaker 2>and how different countries in Europe do a better job

0:49:00.400 --> 0:49:01.960
<v Speaker 2>of it, and how there are pockets of it in

0:49:02.000 --> 0:49:04.800
<v Speaker 2>the US right and North America, but they're few and

0:49:04.880 --> 0:49:05.440
<v Speaker 2>far between. It.

0:49:05.560 --> 0:49:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think it's something we're spending time on because

0:49:07.640 --> 0:49:11.920
<v Speaker 1>we're with our vertical integration of manufacturing homes, building homes,

0:49:12.160 --> 0:49:15.160
<v Speaker 1>real estate development. The ability to monetize a home either

0:49:15.200 --> 0:49:17.160
<v Speaker 1>as a cell to a consumer or a rent and

0:49:17.239 --> 0:49:19.600
<v Speaker 1>have into an investor. It gives us the ability to

0:49:19.640 --> 0:49:22.839
<v Speaker 1>think big about development and I haven't seen anyone pull

0:49:22.880 --> 0:49:25.280
<v Speaker 1>off yet. So the master plan community the United States,

0:49:26.000 --> 0:49:28.400
<v Speaker 1>other than maybe the woodlands in Houston very few of

0:49:28.440 --> 0:49:31.160
<v Speaker 1>them are actually master planned for multiple product types where

0:49:31.200 --> 0:49:37.040
<v Speaker 1>you have office, medical, civil, residential, entertainment, all kind of

0:49:37.120 --> 0:49:39.520
<v Speaker 1>thought about together the way you would the way European

0:49:39.600 --> 0:49:42.160
<v Speaker 1>cities were developed. But remember Europe, like you said, you

0:49:42.200 --> 0:49:45.680
<v Speaker 1>said a very key thing. European cities were developed before

0:49:45.760 --> 0:49:49.240
<v Speaker 1>the cars became years a lot of our cities stopped

0:49:49.320 --> 0:49:53.000
<v Speaker 1>growing as core cities and started growing as these suburban

0:49:53.080 --> 0:49:55.719
<v Speaker 1>driven cities because of the car. And so this will

0:49:55.719 --> 0:49:58.120
<v Speaker 1>be simple, this will be think if will you reverse?

0:49:58.160 --> 0:50:00.200
<v Speaker 1>And this is something that global real estate investor are

0:50:00.239 --> 0:50:02.279
<v Speaker 1>thinking about a full time basis. There was a paper

0:50:02.320 --> 0:50:04.000
<v Speaker 1>written about five years ago, I think it was put

0:50:04.040 --> 0:50:06.080
<v Speaker 1>out by the research team Prudential, and it was all

0:50:06.080 --> 0:50:09.640
<v Speaker 1>about urbanization and all of the investment themes across our

0:50:09.719 --> 0:50:12.160
<v Speaker 1>investor base, the biggest invests in the world. We're very

0:50:12.200 --> 0:50:14.759
<v Speaker 1>focused on urbanization as a global theme, and you could

0:50:14.760 --> 0:50:16.520
<v Speaker 1>see it in Southeast Asia, you could see it all

0:50:16.600 --> 0:50:19.000
<v Speaker 1>over China, you could see it. Of course, has happened

0:50:19.000 --> 0:50:20.799
<v Speaker 1>in the United States where people left the small town

0:50:20.880 --> 0:50:23.360
<v Speaker 1>to go to the big city. COVID may have reversed

0:50:23.400 --> 0:50:26.520
<v Speaker 1>one of the largest global trends in investing in the

0:50:26.640 --> 0:50:28.520
<v Speaker 1>last one hundred years. It may have turned. It may

0:50:28.600 --> 0:50:33.320
<v Speaker 1>have turned us from urbanization to de urbanization and the

0:50:33.360 --> 0:50:35.680
<v Speaker 1>impact of that. Now we're not calling that just yet,

0:50:35.760 --> 0:50:37.560
<v Speaker 1>but it is probably one of the most important things

0:50:37.600 --> 0:50:39.600
<v Speaker 1>that people can focus on, or are we going to

0:50:39.800 --> 0:50:42.960
<v Speaker 1>shrink the size of these megacities that all benefited from

0:50:43.600 --> 0:50:45.920
<v Speaker 1>urbanization for the last you know, sort of fifty years

0:50:45.960 --> 0:50:48.840
<v Speaker 1>in the US, maybe the last fifteen years in Southeast Asia.

0:50:49.600 --> 0:50:52.120
<v Speaker 1>So it's an interesting time where the I wish I

0:50:52.120 --> 0:50:54.000
<v Speaker 1>could say I was going to turn out, but there

0:50:54.160 --> 0:50:56.400
<v Speaker 1>is a the ball is bouncing around and we need

0:50:56.440 --> 0:50:57.719
<v Speaker 1>to understand which way it's going to land.

0:50:58.040 --> 0:50:59.680
<v Speaker 2>Tell us about Main Street Renewal.

0:51:00.160 --> 0:51:02.439
<v Speaker 1>Is that so that's the operating platform for the single

0:51:02.520 --> 0:51:06.600
<v Speaker 1>fundamental business. That's our construction management, our real estate brokers platform,

0:51:06.760 --> 0:51:10.360
<v Speaker 1>our leasing platform, the customer service platform. So that's the

0:51:10.480 --> 0:51:13.720
<v Speaker 1>brand name that the consumers see, that our their operating

0:51:13.760 --> 0:51:18.040
<v Speaker 1>partners see for the whole vertically integrated single family rental strategy.

0:51:18.680 --> 0:51:22.239
<v Speaker 1>That's basically analogous to the entire ecosystem of the mortgage market,

0:51:22.520 --> 0:51:24.560
<v Speaker 1>wrapped up under one one corporate label.

0:51:25.440 --> 0:51:28.040
<v Speaker 2>And we've been talking a lot about single family homes

0:51:28.120 --> 0:51:30.759
<v Speaker 2>to be purchased and rented a couple of years ago

0:51:30.920 --> 0:51:34.360
<v Speaker 2>sixty Minutes to a piece talking about, hey, is private

0:51:34.400 --> 0:51:37.920
<v Speaker 2>equity pushing out local buyers? I know you have an

0:51:37.920 --> 0:51:40.480
<v Speaker 2>opinion on this. Tell us a little bit about your

0:51:40.520 --> 0:51:42.320
<v Speaker 2>experience with sixty minutes.

0:51:42.560 --> 0:51:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Sure, sure, So, first of all, I love sixty Minutes.

0:51:45.120 --> 0:51:46.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know it's just because I'm finally old enough

0:51:46.680 --> 0:51:48.319
<v Speaker 1>to age into their demographic. But I think it's one

0:51:48.320 --> 0:51:50.880
<v Speaker 1>of the best news shows on television because in that

0:51:51.000 --> 0:51:53.640
<v Speaker 1>twelve or fifteen minute segment, they really can simplify a

0:51:53.719 --> 0:51:55.840
<v Speaker 1>topic and make it and make it understandable to everyone.

0:51:56.760 --> 0:52:00.480
<v Speaker 1>The topic of where do we fit in the system

0:52:00.520 --> 0:52:02.799
<v Speaker 1>of the single family housing market is what we're doing

0:52:02.840 --> 0:52:05.279
<v Speaker 1>a good thing or a bad thing? Obviously, you know,

0:52:05.320 --> 0:52:06.759
<v Speaker 1>I've got a couple of thousand people that wake up

0:52:06.760 --> 0:52:08.160
<v Speaker 1>every day and go to work. They don't think they're

0:52:08.160 --> 0:52:10.200
<v Speaker 1>doing a bad thing. So I can tell you our

0:52:10.239 --> 0:52:11.640
<v Speaker 1>perspective of it. I can kind of give you both

0:52:11.680 --> 0:52:13.560
<v Speaker 1>sides of the argument, and people can decide for themselves.

0:52:13.600 --> 0:52:17.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean, part of the argument is that if Sean

0:52:17.320 --> 0:52:18.920
<v Speaker 1>buys the home, or if amorist buys the home, some

0:52:19.000 --> 0:52:23.200
<v Speaker 1>family couldn't buy the home. And it's true that if

0:52:23.239 --> 0:52:24.600
<v Speaker 1>we buy the home, no one else could buy the home.

0:52:24.760 --> 0:52:27.800
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you that part. Now, in the US, we

0:52:27.960 --> 0:52:31.080
<v Speaker 1>track the home ownership rate over time. The home ownership

0:52:31.120 --> 0:52:33.399
<v Speaker 1>rate has grown to sort of mid sixties and babble around.

0:52:33.440 --> 0:52:34.960
<v Speaker 1>It got really really high when we were giving away

0:52:35.000 --> 0:52:37.319
<v Speaker 1>mortgages in two thousand and seven, and then it came

0:52:37.360 --> 0:52:40.760
<v Speaker 1>back down. But that number has been a six handle

0:52:40.880 --> 0:52:43.560
<v Speaker 1>for the last fifty years, right, So sixty something percent

0:52:43.640 --> 0:52:46.120
<v Speaker 1>of people own their homes. The inverse of that number

0:52:46.280 --> 0:52:48.120
<v Speaker 1>is the people that don't own their homes. So that

0:52:48.320 --> 0:52:52.040
<v Speaker 1>number has been between thirty and call it thirty and

0:52:53.120 --> 0:52:55.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty five percent for a very long time. So that

0:52:55.719 --> 0:52:58.879
<v Speaker 1>third of how of families in the US that rent

0:52:58.920 --> 0:53:01.440
<v Speaker 1>their home rent for a mere reasons. One of the

0:53:01.480 --> 0:53:03.600
<v Speaker 1>reasons that they rent is because they can't get amorage.

0:53:04.160 --> 0:53:07.000
<v Speaker 1>And part of our bet in two thousand and nine

0:53:07.440 --> 0:53:09.320
<v Speaker 1>was that the group of people who are going to

0:53:09.360 --> 0:53:10.759
<v Speaker 1>be locked out of the mortgage market is going to

0:53:10.800 --> 0:53:15.640
<v Speaker 1>grow substantially, partially because the standards became higher, and partially

0:53:15.680 --> 0:53:19.080
<v Speaker 1>because student loans became kind of a predatory financial product.

0:53:19.640 --> 0:53:23.160
<v Speaker 1>So having a student loan makes it way more difficult

0:53:23.200 --> 0:53:25.279
<v Speaker 1>to get a mortage. So in this argument of are

0:53:25.360 --> 0:53:27.080
<v Speaker 1>we buying a home that a family is not moving into,

0:53:27.520 --> 0:53:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I put the paradigm in a slightly different way. When

0:53:30.080 --> 0:53:33.000
<v Speaker 1>that home comes up for sale, a lot of families

0:53:33.040 --> 0:53:34.800
<v Speaker 1>show up that want to live in that home. A

0:53:34.880 --> 0:53:37.000
<v Speaker 1>group of those families show up and they can get

0:53:37.000 --> 0:53:39.399
<v Speaker 1>a mortgage and they can buy the home. A group

0:53:39.440 --> 0:53:40.719
<v Speaker 1>of those famili show up and they can't get a

0:53:40.719 --> 0:53:42.840
<v Speaker 1>mortage for that second group of families to get to

0:53:42.880 --> 0:53:44.960
<v Speaker 1>live with that home, and investors got to buy the home.

0:53:45.480 --> 0:53:47.839
<v Speaker 1>And that investor can be and historically has been very

0:53:47.880 --> 0:53:50.560
<v Speaker 1>small investors, people that own one or two homes. Maybe

0:53:50.600 --> 0:53:53.200
<v Speaker 1>they owned a home, lived there, moved away, kept it,

0:53:53.440 --> 0:53:57.239
<v Speaker 1>rented it. And now through the through technology and through

0:53:57.400 --> 0:54:00.960
<v Speaker 1>significant investment platforms like ours, allow larger investors to go

0:54:01.320 --> 0:54:04.000
<v Speaker 1>and invest in that home. So when I sit down

0:54:04.000 --> 0:54:07.000
<v Speaker 1>with policy makers and they're sort of of this mindset

0:54:07.120 --> 0:54:10.120
<v Speaker 1>that I should have stayed away and let the family

0:54:10.200 --> 0:54:12.000
<v Speaker 1>buy the home, what I like to do is say,

0:54:12.160 --> 0:54:14.400
<v Speaker 1>can you guys just put together the pictures of these

0:54:14.440 --> 0:54:17.160
<v Speaker 1>two families and who's going to get to live in

0:54:17.239 --> 0:54:19.480
<v Speaker 1>that home? If the only people who can get a

0:54:19.520 --> 0:54:21.799
<v Speaker 1>mortgage can live there? And who can live there if

0:54:21.840 --> 0:54:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Sean buys the home, because demographically they look more like

0:54:24.960 --> 0:54:27.440
<v Speaker 1>the people that get served by the home when I

0:54:27.560 --> 0:54:29.279
<v Speaker 1>buy it, look a lot more like the people the

0:54:29.320 --> 0:54:32.160
<v Speaker 1>government should be trying to help. And that usually takes

0:54:32.200 --> 0:54:33.799
<v Speaker 1>people and they step back and they go, wait a minute,

0:54:33.800 --> 0:54:35.319
<v Speaker 1>what do you mean. I'm like, well, so Shawn doesn't

0:54:35.320 --> 0:54:37.759
<v Speaker 1>live in fifty thousand homes. Someone's living in there. And

0:54:37.840 --> 0:54:39.879
<v Speaker 1>the people that live in those homes, for the most part,

0:54:40.280 --> 0:54:42.440
<v Speaker 1>are not candidates to get a mortgage in the twenty

0:54:42.719 --> 0:54:44.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty four mortgage standards.

0:54:45.400 --> 0:54:47.279
<v Speaker 2>And it's not because they don't have a jobs and

0:54:47.400 --> 0:54:48.280
<v Speaker 2>they aren't.

0:54:48.440 --> 0:54:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Currently they're paying two thousand dollars a month in rent.

0:54:51.640 --> 0:54:54.239
<v Speaker 1>Our average customer only pays twenty five percent of their

0:54:54.320 --> 0:54:57.920
<v Speaker 1>income in rent. For two thousand dollars. They cover everything,

0:54:58.080 --> 0:55:00.680
<v Speaker 1>They cover the chance that the ac breaks. They don't

0:55:00.760 --> 0:55:03.480
<v Speaker 1>have to pay for that, property taxes, insurance, the whole

0:55:03.560 --> 0:55:05.920
<v Speaker 1>nine yards. So right now, the cost to rent is

0:55:05.920 --> 0:55:08.200
<v Speaker 1>probably thirty percent cheaper than the cost to own. But

0:55:08.320 --> 0:55:10.680
<v Speaker 1>more importantly, if you're not given a chance to get

0:55:10.719 --> 0:55:13.080
<v Speaker 1>a mortgage, it doesn't matter what the cost to own is.

0:55:13.239 --> 0:55:15.200
<v Speaker 1>The cost for you is infinite because you're not allowed

0:55:15.200 --> 0:55:17.440
<v Speaker 1>to get a mortgage. So when they when Dodd Frank

0:55:17.520 --> 0:55:20.719
<v Speaker 1>passed and the standards for mortage credit became unfairly high,

0:55:21.320 --> 0:55:23.640
<v Speaker 1>we said, Okay, this is what's gonna this is what

0:55:23.719 --> 0:55:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the nation to decided it wants to do now against

0:55:25.560 --> 0:55:27.440
<v Speaker 1>my advice when I sat, when I sat at full reserve,

0:55:27.480 --> 0:55:29.480
<v Speaker 1>I said, this doesn't have to happen. This way, we

0:55:29.560 --> 0:55:31.520
<v Speaker 1>can sort out for you what the good subprime was

0:55:31.600 --> 0:55:35.000
<v Speaker 1>from the bad subprime. People are like, we agree, you can,

0:55:35.160 --> 0:55:38.680
<v Speaker 1>but that's not how policy works. That mortgage market has

0:55:38.680 --> 0:55:40.239
<v Speaker 1>been shut down and it's going to stay shut down.

0:55:40.280 --> 0:55:43.000
<v Speaker 2>So what should we do to reopen that mortgage market

0:55:43.719 --> 0:55:47.680
<v Speaker 2>for people who are currently employed have a half decent credit.

0:55:47.960 --> 0:55:49.359
<v Speaker 1>Now, you're baby, we're gonna give in the two hours

0:55:49.400 --> 0:55:50.719
<v Speaker 1>for the podcast. I got a whole list of things

0:55:50.800 --> 0:55:52.719
<v Speaker 1>need to do, but the give us a short PNT.

0:55:53.080 --> 0:55:54.880
<v Speaker 1>The primary, the primary thing you have to do is

0:55:54.920 --> 0:55:56.719
<v Speaker 1>you have to put risk. You have to make risk

0:55:56.840 --> 0:56:00.920
<v Speaker 1>based pricing legal in the US mortgage system. Dodd Frank

0:56:01.080 --> 0:56:05.000
<v Speaker 1>made risk based pricing illegal. So if someone comes in

0:56:05.120 --> 0:56:07.920
<v Speaker 1>with a lower credit score, a higher likelihood of default,

0:56:08.200 --> 0:56:11.120
<v Speaker 1>and remember the likelihood of default could mean that they

0:56:11.200 --> 0:56:13.640
<v Speaker 1>go from being five percent likely to ten percent likely,

0:56:13.800 --> 0:56:16.719
<v Speaker 1>not ninety percent likely. But if someone comes in that

0:56:17.320 --> 0:56:19.719
<v Speaker 1>that has a likelihood default above a certain level, the

0:56:19.760 --> 0:56:21.960
<v Speaker 1>answer is you can't make them the mortgage.

0:56:21.560 --> 0:56:24.719
<v Speaker 2>At any price as opposed to where it's I'll make

0:56:24.800 --> 0:56:27.200
<v Speaker 2>up a round number. If we're at five percent, they

0:56:27.239 --> 0:56:28.840
<v Speaker 2>could buy get a mortgage at six and.

0:56:28.880 --> 0:56:31.759
<v Speaker 1>Three we used the rate used to be three points

0:56:31.840 --> 0:56:34.880
<v Speaker 1>hire two points are so Dodd Frank basically carved out

0:56:34.960 --> 0:56:37.759
<v Speaker 1>the maximum premium you can charge to anyone, and then

0:56:37.800 --> 0:56:40.920
<v Speaker 1>they created recourse for the borrower. So I give this

0:56:41.040 --> 0:56:43.920
<v Speaker 1>presentation in the UK, and I gave this presentation to

0:56:43.960 --> 0:56:46.400
<v Speaker 1>France once and I said, okay, the US passed. They

0:56:46.440 --> 0:56:48.080
<v Speaker 1>were like, why is the demand for rental so high?

0:56:48.080 --> 0:56:50.560
<v Speaker 1>And I said, people can't get mortgages. He said why,

0:56:50.880 --> 0:56:53.080
<v Speaker 1>I said, well, Dodd Frank created a precedent that said

0:56:53.480 --> 0:56:55.239
<v Speaker 1>that if I lend you money to buy your home

0:56:56.360 --> 0:56:59.320
<v Speaker 1>and then you can't pay me back, you can sue me.

0:57:00.440 --> 0:57:02.200
<v Speaker 1>And even in France, the guy would say no, no, no,

0:57:02.440 --> 0:57:05.080
<v Speaker 1>you mean the other way around. I lend you the

0:57:05.120 --> 0:57:07.759
<v Speaker 1>money you don't pay, I can sue you and I'm like, no, no.

0:57:08.600 --> 0:57:11.759
<v Speaker 1>So there's there's this concept that that that was part

0:57:11.840 --> 0:57:15.279
<v Speaker 1>of the the ether in the financial crisis, that the

0:57:15.360 --> 0:57:18.480
<v Speaker 1>banks were the proximate cause for the default, and so

0:57:18.600 --> 0:57:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the bank should not be allowed to make these loans.

0:57:22.000 --> 0:57:23.360
<v Speaker 1>There were some bad back that's a.

0:57:23.400 --> 0:57:28.160
<v Speaker 2>Wild statement because as someone literally wrote a book on this,

0:57:28.920 --> 0:57:31.440
<v Speaker 2>banks did a bunch of stuff that wasn't very smart.

0:57:31.920 --> 0:57:35.640
<v Speaker 2>But it's hard to say the banks making loans were approximate,

0:57:35.720 --> 0:57:38.680
<v Speaker 2>cause now there's a handful of banks doing the ninja stuff,

0:57:38.760 --> 0:57:39.640
<v Speaker 2>and but that was.

0:57:39.640 --> 0:57:41.800
<v Speaker 1>There really enough bad acts to go around. The banks

0:57:41.840 --> 0:57:47.600
<v Speaker 1>had culpability, the securitization industry had culpability, Serving industries culpability,

0:57:47.720 --> 0:57:50.760
<v Speaker 1>The ratings agency agencies had culpability. And this is why

0:57:50.760 --> 0:57:52.600
<v Speaker 1>I spend time washing trying to explain to people. But

0:57:52.760 --> 0:57:54.920
<v Speaker 1>the consumers had culpability as well. So a lot of

0:57:54.960 --> 0:57:57.320
<v Speaker 1>people with fraudulent loans six eight loans. So we bought

0:57:57.320 --> 0:58:00.160
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of these loans. Something people don't know is

0:58:00.160 --> 0:58:02.919
<v Speaker 1>that we audited eighty thousand loan contracts that we bought,

0:58:03.400 --> 0:58:06.040
<v Speaker 1>and we there's a return to cinder clause in mortgage

0:58:06.040 --> 0:58:07.480
<v Speaker 1>contracts that most people don't know about.

0:58:07.560 --> 0:58:07.680
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:58:07.840 --> 0:58:10.000
<v Speaker 1>And if the bar were defaulted and the contracts were

0:58:10.080 --> 0:58:11.800
<v Speaker 1>in a certain way, the person that sold your loan

0:58:11.840 --> 0:58:14.200
<v Speaker 1>has to buy it back. So in these eighty thousand

0:58:14.280 --> 0:58:17.120
<v Speaker 1>loans you kind of had sort of two big populations

0:58:17.200 --> 0:58:21.360
<v Speaker 1>of predatory borrowers. One with a little mini we call

0:58:21.360 --> 0:58:23.280
<v Speaker 1>the little Minnie Donald Trump's. They would have like twenty

0:58:23.320 --> 0:58:25.880
<v Speaker 1>five or thirty or forty homes, no equity down. They're

0:58:25.880 --> 0:58:29.320
<v Speaker 1>all rented, no management, kind of like yolo of like

0:58:29.400 --> 0:58:30.960
<v Speaker 1>if they go up, we're going to refinance them. If

0:58:30.960 --> 0:58:32.320
<v Speaker 1>they don't, we're going to send the keys back in.

0:58:32.440 --> 0:58:35.760
<v Speaker 1>And these were loans that were made with no equity

0:58:35.800 --> 0:58:39.200
<v Speaker 1>from the barrower eighty percent first, twenty percent second investor loans.

0:58:40.160 --> 0:58:42.200
<v Speaker 1>And then then there were a group of people who

0:58:42.320 --> 0:58:44.480
<v Speaker 1>really just wanted a house and they were willing to

0:58:44.520 --> 0:58:47.560
<v Speaker 1>fib about their financial standards to get there, right, and

0:58:47.680 --> 0:58:49.680
<v Speaker 1>so and the banks and the mortga originators. In many

0:58:49.720 --> 0:58:52.640
<v Speaker 1>cases there's eighty thousand files. You would open up the

0:58:52.720 --> 0:58:54.680
<v Speaker 1>file and it would say the person was a dental

0:58:54.760 --> 0:58:57.760
<v Speaker 1>hygienist and made one hundred thousand dollars a year, no document,

0:58:58.000 --> 0:59:00.200
<v Speaker 1>and that loom was loans approved. Now in this you

0:59:00.280 --> 0:59:03.280
<v Speaker 1>file would be the application that got denied that said

0:59:03.320 --> 0:59:05.640
<v Speaker 1>that they were a dental assistant and they made fifty

0:59:05.680 --> 0:59:07.520
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars a year, so they would give us the

0:59:07.600 --> 0:59:08.920
<v Speaker 1>file that so they was.

0:59:09.000 --> 0:59:11.240
<v Speaker 2>So those were the I heard stories at the time

0:59:11.360 --> 0:59:15.280
<v Speaker 2>of the mortgage brokers who were able to guide an

0:59:15.360 --> 0:59:19.040
<v Speaker 2>applicant through coaching. Coach, don't write this, don't write here

0:59:19.240 --> 0:59:23.080
<v Speaker 2>what you got to say? And basically, you know, we're

0:59:23.680 --> 0:59:26.320
<v Speaker 2>co conspirators to fraud.

0:59:26.440 --> 0:59:28.600
<v Speaker 1>And you know the Mortriges broker was making five or

0:59:28.640 --> 0:59:30.560
<v Speaker 1>six percent of the loan amount, right, it's a lot

0:59:30.600 --> 0:59:31.120
<v Speaker 1>of incentives.

0:59:31.120 --> 0:59:33.480
<v Speaker 2>So I blame them much more than the person who

0:59:33.600 --> 0:59:35.800
<v Speaker 2>just did what they were told they were wrong. At

0:59:35.840 --> 0:59:37.920
<v Speaker 2>this point, really the professional is the one got a

0:59:37.920 --> 0:59:38.440
<v Speaker 2>whole scount.

0:59:38.480 --> 0:59:40.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that we're hung up on who to blame,

0:59:40.360 --> 0:59:41.840
<v Speaker 1>not you and me. But if the market is who

0:59:41.880 --> 0:59:43.480
<v Speaker 1>to blame, and the market isn't paying attention of who

0:59:43.480 --> 0:59:46.360
<v Speaker 1>got harmed, because in the first degree, the person that

0:59:46.440 --> 0:59:48.720
<v Speaker 1>got harmed was the person who got four clothes up

0:59:48.760 --> 0:59:50.440
<v Speaker 1>on and got addicted from their home, that's a very

0:59:50.480 --> 0:59:53.560
<v Speaker 1>clear harm to see. The harder harm to see is

0:59:53.680 --> 0:59:56.600
<v Speaker 1>that maybe eight million families that haven't been able to

0:59:56.640 --> 0:59:59.520
<v Speaker 1>buy a home since this law went and it's fifteen

0:59:59.600 --> 1:00:03.320
<v Speaker 1>years and there's no progress, So the rental market has

1:00:03.360 --> 1:00:06.600
<v Speaker 1>to grow. Institutional capital is going to play a part

1:00:06.720 --> 1:00:09.720
<v Speaker 1>in every home transaction. Its social capital has to be

1:00:09.760 --> 1:00:12.040
<v Speaker 1>there to make the loan if they're not going to

1:00:12.080 --> 1:00:14.880
<v Speaker 1>buy the home. Providing service to the third of American

1:00:14.920 --> 1:00:17.880
<v Speaker 1>families who rent for various reasons. Now, about a third

1:00:17.880 --> 1:00:19.800
<v Speaker 1>of our customers, or twenty percent of our customers move

1:00:19.840 --> 1:00:21.560
<v Speaker 1>out every year, so they were never like long term

1:00:21.600 --> 1:00:26.400
<v Speaker 1>committed to that location to begin with. The credit scores

1:00:26.520 --> 1:00:30.520
<v Speaker 1>of our customers suggest and the financial condition of our

1:00:30.560 --> 1:00:32.600
<v Speaker 1>customers suggests it would be very difficult. It's not it

1:00:32.680 --> 1:00:35.160
<v Speaker 1>possible for them to get a mortgage on average. So

1:00:35.840 --> 1:00:37.880
<v Speaker 1>this is the solution for people to move out of

1:00:38.560 --> 1:00:39.880
<v Speaker 1>the Other thing people think about it is that it's

1:00:39.880 --> 1:00:42.880
<v Speaker 1>okay to rent apartments. So that's socially acceptable to invest

1:00:42.960 --> 1:00:45.520
<v Speaker 1>in apartments and rent them. But apartments are primarily one

1:00:45.560 --> 1:00:48.520
<v Speaker 1>and two bedroom products, so we're a three bedroom product.

1:00:48.760 --> 1:00:50.960
<v Speaker 1>So as you age out of an apartment or you

1:00:51.080 --> 1:00:52.560
<v Speaker 1>need more space because you work from home, or you

1:00:52.600 --> 1:00:54.640
<v Speaker 1>have a family or whatever, and you age into the

1:00:54.720 --> 1:00:58.120
<v Speaker 1>single family product, which is location driven, local amenities driven

1:00:58.160 --> 1:01:00.720
<v Speaker 1>blah blah blah. So you would go and get a

1:01:00.760 --> 1:01:03.880
<v Speaker 1>mortgage and buy. But that cross section of the customer

1:01:03.960 --> 1:01:06.240
<v Speaker 1>base that the mortgage market serves has shrunk so much

1:01:07.040 --> 1:01:08.720
<v Speaker 1>that we set up this platform because we knew they

1:01:08.720 --> 1:01:10.200
<v Speaker 1>were coming. We knew that they're going to want to

1:01:10.240 --> 1:01:11.880
<v Speaker 1>live in that product and they're going to need to

1:01:11.920 --> 1:01:14.200
<v Speaker 1>get there with a different financial solution than a mortgage.

1:01:14.480 --> 1:01:17.960
<v Speaker 1>So we developed an institutional scale, securitized financing vehicle for

1:01:18.040 --> 1:01:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the pool of homes. We developed the services that wrap

1:01:20.720 --> 1:01:22.600
<v Speaker 1>around the pool of home to lower its cost to capital,

1:01:23.000 --> 1:01:25.000
<v Speaker 1>So the cost of capital for single time really today

1:01:25.080 --> 1:01:26.840
<v Speaker 1>is in the five to five and a half percent range.

1:01:27.680 --> 1:01:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Prior to us getting involved, the cost of capital for

1:01:29.840 --> 1:01:32.720
<v Speaker 1>rental was probably eight hundred over and nine hundred over

1:01:32.760 --> 1:01:36.560
<v Speaker 1>because it was provided by small investors taking very specific

1:01:36.680 --> 1:01:40.400
<v Speaker 1>location risk. Now we can have a thousand homes, all

1:01:40.400 --> 1:01:43.439
<v Speaker 1>the adiosyncratic risk is pretty much gone. So we feel

1:01:43.520 --> 1:01:45.040
<v Speaker 1>very proud of what we're doing. And I wish that

1:01:45.400 --> 1:01:48.320
<v Speaker 1>the conversation about this crowd out would focused more on

1:01:48.400 --> 1:01:51.360
<v Speaker 1>the specifics of who didn't get to buy, but who

1:01:51.440 --> 1:01:53.600
<v Speaker 1>got to live there, and when people see that and

1:01:53.680 --> 1:01:56.000
<v Speaker 1>they see that, Oh wait a minute, these are three

1:01:56.040 --> 1:01:58.720
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand OAR homes. These are not you know, these

1:01:58.760 --> 1:02:01.360
<v Speaker 1>are homes that that bar, that resident would have a

1:02:01.480 --> 1:02:05.200
<v Speaker 1>very difficult time getting into without us, and we were

1:02:05.200 --> 1:02:08.520
<v Speaker 1>able to provide a really good service at a very

1:02:08.560 --> 1:02:10.320
<v Speaker 1>effective price for that customer base.

1:02:10.760 --> 1:02:14.520
<v Speaker 2>That's a really interesting answer to a complicated question, and

1:02:15.200 --> 1:02:18.560
<v Speaker 2>it still leaves open the problem that there are eight

1:02:18.640 --> 1:02:23.240
<v Speaker 2>million people that might otherwise be on be homeowners. But

1:02:24.280 --> 1:02:25.960
<v Speaker 2>the rule change has been and the.

1:02:25.920 --> 1:02:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Way I think about it, the way you get me

1:02:27.640 --> 1:02:29.880
<v Speaker 1>a slopbox. But in the worst of the worst mortgage

1:02:29.880 --> 1:02:33.520
<v Speaker 1>pools that we were short and the dirtiest of the pools,

1:02:33.560 --> 1:02:36.560
<v Speaker 1>where everybody was lying the bar, where the banker, the securitizer,

1:02:36.560 --> 1:02:38.800
<v Speaker 1>everything age, everybody was lying the worst of the worst.

1:02:39.280 --> 1:02:42.200
<v Speaker 1>About thirty five percent of the loans defaulted, which means

1:02:42.240 --> 1:02:45.000
<v Speaker 1>that two thirds of even those dodgy things paid. So

1:02:45.120 --> 1:02:47.600
<v Speaker 1>those are two thirds of those families got to get

1:02:47.640 --> 1:02:50.920
<v Speaker 1>on the economic ladder and own the piece of America.

1:02:52.200 --> 1:02:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Because the third worked out so poorly, we shut out

1:02:55.360 --> 1:02:57.600
<v Speaker 1>the two thirds. And that's kind of the frustration I

1:02:58.000 --> 1:03:00.360
<v Speaker 1>had with Washington. It is like guys like I know

1:03:00.440 --> 1:03:01.920
<v Speaker 1>there's to throw the baby out with the bath or

1:03:01.920 --> 1:03:03.920
<v Speaker 1>what other. But you're thrown out. You're throwing out an

1:03:04.000 --> 1:03:06.160
<v Speaker 1>opportunity for people to own a piece of the country

1:03:06.960 --> 1:03:10.720
<v Speaker 1>and act as owners in their community because you don't

1:03:10.760 --> 1:03:12.400
<v Speaker 1>have a good way to manage the ones that don't

1:03:12.400 --> 1:03:14.280
<v Speaker 1>work out. So we should be focused on what to

1:03:14.360 --> 1:03:17.080
<v Speaker 1>do when they don't work out. We shouldn't prohibit the

1:03:17.120 --> 1:03:19.120
<v Speaker 1>activity because some of it doesn't.

1:03:18.920 --> 1:03:21.240
<v Speaker 2>Work out well. Congress seems to have its act together.

1:03:21.320 --> 1:03:24.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure, I'm sure it's next to the docket, right.

1:03:24.160 --> 1:03:26.720
<v Speaker 2>This will be worked out, all right, So I only

1:03:26.880 --> 1:03:29.560
<v Speaker 2>have you for a limited amount of time. Let's jump

1:03:29.640 --> 1:03:32.640
<v Speaker 2>to our favorite questions. We ask all of our guests

1:03:33.240 --> 1:03:36.480
<v Speaker 2>starting with what have you been entertained with these days?

1:03:36.520 --> 1:03:38.360
<v Speaker 2>Tell us what you're either watching or listening to.

1:03:38.720 --> 1:03:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Oh wow, So I'm a very boring person. I spent

1:03:41.000 --> 1:03:43.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of my time buried in data and analytics.

1:03:43.960 --> 1:03:46.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that I really love the whole Yellowstone series.

1:03:46.800 --> 1:03:49.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm upset that Costner backed out because I thought the

1:03:49.520 --> 1:03:51.560
<v Speaker 1>production quality was so good. So I've seen all of

1:03:51.600 --> 1:03:54.320
<v Speaker 1>the pre the you know, the prequels and so forth.

1:03:54.360 --> 1:03:56.960
<v Speaker 1>So on the entertainment side, I think that streaming has

1:03:57.000 --> 1:03:59.880
<v Speaker 1>set a whole new bar for quality of broke.

1:04:00.880 --> 1:04:04.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, that's absolutely on my list. Tell us about

1:04:04.440 --> 1:04:07.800
<v Speaker 2>your early mentors who might have helped shape your career.

1:04:08.880 --> 1:04:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Wow. Well, so I've got a big family. I'm one

1:04:10.880 --> 1:04:15.200
<v Speaker 1>of five kids. My parents were serial entrepreneurs. I've got

1:04:15.240 --> 1:04:18.880
<v Speaker 1>four big sisters, and so they're all successful in various ways,

1:04:18.880 --> 1:04:22.040
<v Speaker 1>and so the family has always been the primary motivator

1:04:22.560 --> 1:04:26.600
<v Speaker 1>and leaders. You have to this in our business. You know,

1:04:26.800 --> 1:04:29.400
<v Speaker 1>in finance, who you marry really matters. So I've been

1:04:29.440 --> 1:04:31.360
<v Speaker 1>married for twenty eight years. My wife was in finance.

1:04:31.400 --> 1:04:33.360
<v Speaker 1>She ran an investment management business, built it up and

1:04:33.440 --> 1:04:36.720
<v Speaker 1>sold it. So having support at home and having a

1:04:36.800 --> 1:04:39.560
<v Speaker 1>real partner in the business is super super important our jobs.

1:04:39.800 --> 1:04:41.960
<v Speaker 1>When you're the founder of a business, you know, the

1:04:42.040 --> 1:04:45.760
<v Speaker 1>hours are long and the mental exercise is significant. So

1:04:46.240 --> 1:04:49.520
<v Speaker 1>having the right teammate at home is absolutely paramount.

1:04:50.520 --> 1:04:51.120
<v Speaker 2>I was.

1:04:51.320 --> 1:04:54.960
<v Speaker 1>I had a high school economics teacher who later went

1:04:55.040 --> 1:04:57.040
<v Speaker 1>to work for the Federal Home Loan Bank of Dallas

1:04:57.160 --> 1:05:00.560
<v Speaker 1>named Sandy Hawkins, who was just fantastic for a high

1:05:00.560 --> 1:05:03.600
<v Speaker 1>school economics teacher. She covered everything from Milton Friedman to

1:05:04.560 --> 1:05:07.200
<v Speaker 1>free lunches in a way that made it fun for

1:05:07.280 --> 1:05:09.800
<v Speaker 1>high school kids, and I absorbed every second of that

1:05:09.880 --> 1:05:12.520
<v Speaker 1>I could. And then I had this really unusual situation

1:05:12.640 --> 1:05:14.280
<v Speaker 1>because I was at this brokerage firm when I was

1:05:14.360 --> 1:05:17.800
<v Speaker 1>very young, and mortgages were just getting some science around them,

1:05:17.840 --> 1:05:20.280
<v Speaker 1>and I was always good at math and I had

1:05:20.320 --> 1:05:22.520
<v Speaker 1>been writing code since I was in the sixth grade.

1:05:23.720 --> 1:05:27.680
<v Speaker 1>So I had real support around Wall Street because at

1:05:27.720 --> 1:05:30.280
<v Speaker 1>the time there was a small club of firms that

1:05:30.440 --> 1:05:33.320
<v Speaker 1>were helping solve this problem together. And so I had

1:05:33.920 --> 1:05:36.240
<v Speaker 1>a guy named Frank Gordon who ran mortgage research at

1:05:36.280 --> 1:05:39.040
<v Speaker 1>First Boston. That was just a great support to kind

1:05:39.040 --> 1:05:40.560
<v Speaker 1>of bring me up up the learning curve.

1:05:41.000 --> 1:05:44.640
<v Speaker 2>Huh interesting. Tell us about some of your favorite books

1:05:44.680 --> 1:05:46.440
<v Speaker 2>and what have you been reading recently.

1:05:46.800 --> 1:05:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mentioned I read A City Is Not a Tree.

1:05:48.840 --> 1:05:50.880
<v Speaker 1>It's a little bit boring, but it's fascinating because I

1:05:50.920 --> 1:05:52.960
<v Speaker 1>do think that there's an opportunity for us to rebuild

1:05:53.720 --> 1:05:58.240
<v Speaker 1>microcities instead of instead of going to the exerbs and

1:05:58.400 --> 1:06:00.160
<v Speaker 1>trying to adjoin a city. I do think that is

1:06:00.320 --> 1:06:02.600
<v Speaker 1>something that we're working on, to just PLoP in the

1:06:02.640 --> 1:06:04.800
<v Speaker 1>middle of nowhere and build a full stand up city,

1:06:04.800 --> 1:06:08.680
<v Speaker 1>which would be fascinating. My my daughter and I listened

1:06:08.680 --> 1:06:11.240
<v Speaker 1>to crime Junkies and on the entertainment side, I think

1:06:11.240 --> 1:06:13.240
<v Speaker 1>it's one of the most popular, other than Years of course,

1:06:13.280 --> 1:06:15.560
<v Speaker 1>one of the most popular podcasts in the country. It's fascinating.

1:06:15.960 --> 1:06:18.600
<v Speaker 1>It's it's a couple of young women that that tell

1:06:18.680 --> 1:06:22.400
<v Speaker 1>the story of some sort of unsolved mystery or solved

1:06:22.440 --> 1:06:25.680
<v Speaker 1>mystery of real time what they call it there, it's

1:06:25.720 --> 1:06:28.320
<v Speaker 1>a it's the real crime dramas. I think it's been

1:06:28.320 --> 1:06:30.520
<v Speaker 1>pretty fascinating. And I've got we have two kids, and

1:06:30.560 --> 1:06:33.560
<v Speaker 1>my wife and I have a freshman at Columbia and

1:06:33.720 --> 1:06:36.520
<v Speaker 1>a sophomore at Stanford, so we're spending a lot of

1:06:36.600 --> 1:06:38.400
<v Speaker 1>time learning about the college.

1:06:38.120 --> 1:06:40.840
<v Speaker 2>Experience freshmen at Columbia. Oh, so you're you're back and.

1:06:40.920 --> 1:06:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Forth, but my poor wife is on like the coast

1:06:43.440 --> 1:06:44.320
<v Speaker 1>to coast tour.

1:06:44.560 --> 1:06:47.120
<v Speaker 2>Are you are you guys in Austin?

1:06:47.160 --> 1:06:50.920
<v Speaker 1>A lot home is in Austin, so you're halfway or exactly,

1:06:51.000 --> 1:06:53.640
<v Speaker 1>we're equally it's equal travel to either place.

1:06:54.320 --> 1:06:57.160
<v Speaker 2>And uh So, our final two questions, what sort of

1:06:57.200 --> 1:07:00.680
<v Speaker 2>advice would you give a recent college grad interested in

1:07:00.760 --> 1:07:06.280
<v Speaker 2>a career in mortgages real estate cra anything along those lines.

1:07:06.600 --> 1:07:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So whenever we have interns come in or we

1:07:09.240 --> 1:07:12.400
<v Speaker 1>have young executives start, I buy them a couple things.

1:07:12.400 --> 1:07:15.760
<v Speaker 1>So I buy them the Frank Fobose Handbook on mortgagsback securities,

1:07:15.920 --> 1:07:19.760
<v Speaker 1>the Mortgage back Nerds Bible, and I buy them a

1:07:19.800 --> 1:07:23.439
<v Speaker 1>book Bernstein's book called Against the Gods. And I really

1:07:23.560 --> 1:07:26.080
<v Speaker 1>think that maybe it's just because I'm such a quant nerd,

1:07:26.520 --> 1:07:28.400
<v Speaker 1>but I think that Against the Gods it's a very

1:07:28.440 --> 1:07:32.040
<v Speaker 1>small book, a very quick read, but it does a

1:07:32.120 --> 1:07:36.080
<v Speaker 1>really good job of teaching people that you can apply

1:07:36.240 --> 1:07:39.560
<v Speaker 1>quantitative analytics and probably a theory to almost anything and

1:07:39.680 --> 1:07:42.600
<v Speaker 1>to everything, to your life decisions, to everything. And I

1:07:42.680 --> 1:07:44.840
<v Speaker 1>think it provides a nice paradigm in a world where

1:07:44.920 --> 1:07:47.760
<v Speaker 1>today it feels like, because of the political environment, people

1:07:47.760 --> 1:07:49.560
<v Speaker 1>are sort of it's black or it's white, it's zero

1:07:49.680 --> 1:07:52.080
<v Speaker 1>or it's one, and it's never zero one, right, There's

1:07:52.120 --> 1:07:55.440
<v Speaker 1>always some difference in between. So that's a book that

1:07:55.480 --> 1:07:57.280
<v Speaker 1>I think is sort of required reading at Amherst to

1:07:57.320 --> 1:07:59.680
<v Speaker 1>really understand the history of risk management, the history of

1:08:00.040 --> 1:08:03.080
<v Speaker 1>ability theory, how it first turned into what are the

1:08:03.120 --> 1:08:06.160
<v Speaker 1>big missed pricings have been? So it's not a super

1:08:06.200 --> 1:08:07.800
<v Speaker 1>complicated read, but I think it does a really good

1:08:07.880 --> 1:08:10.880
<v Speaker 1>job of taking people from thinking about the world as

1:08:10.920 --> 1:08:13.959
<v Speaker 1>trying to predict a thing, instead of saying, wait a minute,

1:08:13.960 --> 1:08:16.360
<v Speaker 1>there's a range of things. Can I be okay with

1:08:16.720 --> 1:08:19.120
<v Speaker 1>a broadery of outcomes versus just betting on that one thing?

1:08:19.320 --> 1:08:22.160
<v Speaker 2>And pretty much everything Peter Bernstein writes is great, awesome.

1:08:22.320 --> 1:08:23.760
<v Speaker 1>The gold One's even good too.

1:08:24.640 --> 1:08:26.640
<v Speaker 2>And our final question, what do you know about the

1:08:26.720 --> 1:08:29.439
<v Speaker 2>world of real estate investing today? You wish you knew

1:08:29.600 --> 1:08:32.719
<v Speaker 2>thirty so years ago when you were first getting started.

1:08:33.080 --> 1:08:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Wow, that's fascinating. The ecosystem of real estate has been

1:08:37.160 --> 1:08:39.280
<v Speaker 1>hard for me to follow, coming at it from the

1:08:39.520 --> 1:08:42.240
<v Speaker 1>fixed income markets, so just understanding the various players of

1:08:42.280 --> 1:08:44.960
<v Speaker 1>what they do and how they're motivated has been something

1:08:45.000 --> 1:08:46.679
<v Speaker 1>I wish I would have just sat down and mapped

1:08:46.680 --> 1:08:50.479
<v Speaker 1>out early on, because understanding how people are sort of

1:08:50.560 --> 1:08:54.240
<v Speaker 1>economically rewarded really helps you predict their behavior. And I

1:08:54.360 --> 1:08:56.519
<v Speaker 1>was kind of confused by that for a long time,

1:08:56.600 --> 1:08:58.320
<v Speaker 1>trying to pick the thing that was the right answer

1:08:58.400 --> 1:09:00.880
<v Speaker 1>instead of the thing that would benefited to most people.

1:09:00.920 --> 1:09:03.639
<v Speaker 1>It's like in the financial crisis, we were we were

1:09:04.800 --> 1:09:09.840
<v Speaker 1>short countrywide in scale hundreds of millions of dollars, and

1:09:10.880 --> 1:09:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Bank of America.

1:09:11.560 --> 1:09:15.240
<v Speaker 2>Bought them but for like next to nothing though right, well,

1:09:15.320 --> 1:09:16.080
<v Speaker 2>but but.

1:09:16.160 --> 1:09:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but it was worth less than nothing, and so

1:09:19.479 --> 1:09:21.360
<v Speaker 1>zero was a good was a good outcome for that thing.

1:09:21.840 --> 1:09:24.280
<v Speaker 1>So at that point we realized that the consequence of

1:09:24.320 --> 1:09:27.920
<v Speaker 1>countrywide failing was so great that the system was going

1:09:28.040 --> 1:09:31.479
<v Speaker 1>to find an alternate outcome. So we switched to our

1:09:31.600 --> 1:09:33.439
<v Speaker 1>thesis to that point to understand that the value an

1:09:33.439 --> 1:09:35.720
<v Speaker 1>asset might have more to do with the consequences of

1:09:35.760 --> 1:09:39.080
<v Speaker 1>that asset failing than the assets actually probably a failing.

1:09:39.520 --> 1:09:41.479
<v Speaker 1>And that's something I wish I would have figured out before,

1:09:41.600 --> 1:09:42.000
<v Speaker 1>because it.

1:09:42.080 --> 1:09:44.080
<v Speaker 2>Was so you and I could go down this rabbit

1:09:44.160 --> 1:09:48.679
<v Speaker 2>hole because we were short c T, we were short Leahman,

1:09:48.680 --> 1:09:55.000
<v Speaker 2>and we were short AIG and AIG similarly too systemically important.

1:09:55.439 --> 1:09:58.240
<v Speaker 2>It couldn't be allowed to crash and burn. But what

1:09:58.479 --> 1:10:03.160
<v Speaker 2>was so fascinating was, Okay, how come Leman Brothers was

1:10:03.320 --> 1:10:08.120
<v Speaker 2>left out to fall on its face, uniquely amongst the

1:10:08.280 --> 1:10:11.760
<v Speaker 2>giant financial players. And I have a pet theory which

1:10:11.800 --> 1:10:16.800
<v Speaker 2>I've never been able to validate anywhere. People forget, you know,

1:10:18.400 --> 1:10:21.880
<v Speaker 2>Warren Buffett very famously made alone to Goldman. Sachs sure

1:10:22.040 --> 1:10:25.000
<v Speaker 2>that at very advantageous price has got a nice piece

1:10:25.000 --> 1:10:28.680
<v Speaker 2>of Goldman. Great bit of business for Berkshire Hathaway. What

1:10:28.840 --> 1:10:32.439
<v Speaker 2>people forget is a few months earlier he had offered

1:10:32.439 --> 1:10:35.760
<v Speaker 2>that deal to Dick Folds, and Dick Fold said, what

1:10:35.960 --> 1:10:37.960
<v Speaker 2>is this so man trying to do? Steal the company?

1:10:38.400 --> 1:10:41.360
<v Speaker 2>Tell him to go jump? And once you turned down

1:10:41.400 --> 1:10:44.760
<v Speaker 2>Warren Buffett, how can the Treasury Department or the Fed?

1:10:45.080 --> 1:10:47.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah right, you know, all right, we're gonna bail you

1:10:47.439 --> 1:10:50.599
<v Speaker 2>out of a couple hundred billion dollars. Chuse you had

1:10:50.640 --> 1:10:53.400
<v Speaker 2>a chance to save yourself, but you waited for us.

1:10:54.040 --> 1:10:55.760
<v Speaker 1>It's super complicated. We were a little bit on the

1:10:55.800 --> 1:10:57.960
<v Speaker 1>outside looking in on that deal. We did price Leman,

1:10:58.040 --> 1:11:01.320
<v Speaker 1>We priced more than Stanley for a lot of different investors.

1:11:01.360 --> 1:11:05.160
<v Speaker 1>We priced bear Stearns. The magnitude of the losses was

1:11:05.240 --> 1:11:06.920
<v Speaker 1>hard to get your head around, but it felt like

1:11:06.960 --> 1:11:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the capital markets had it about right. So when bear

1:11:09.000 --> 1:11:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Stearns was sold, their CDs was trading thirty five points

1:11:13.000 --> 1:11:16.000
<v Speaker 1>up front for the senior unsecured piece. So it's meant

1:11:16.040 --> 1:11:18.400
<v Speaker 1>that the bond portion of the capital structure had about

1:11:18.400 --> 1:11:21.080
<v Speaker 1>a sixty five dollars recovery if you marked the market

1:11:21.120 --> 1:11:23.840
<v Speaker 1>bear Stearns, that was about right. But the consequence of

1:11:23.920 --> 1:11:27.799
<v Speaker 1>wiping out the equity, it had effects that we couldn't

1:11:27.840 --> 1:11:30.439
<v Speaker 1>even years later I figured out what the effects were.

1:11:30.960 --> 1:11:33.280
<v Speaker 1>But like the you know, it's kind of like the

1:11:33.400 --> 1:11:35.439
<v Speaker 1>old anti hall, Like there's what they're saying, and then

1:11:35.439 --> 1:11:38.280
<v Speaker 1>there's what's in the subtitles, like the macro of who

1:11:38.400 --> 1:11:40.639
<v Speaker 1>owned the equity, who was going to get crammed down,

1:11:41.040 --> 1:11:42.840
<v Speaker 1>who owned the fixed income? Who was going to end

1:11:42.920 --> 1:11:45.639
<v Speaker 1>up with control? Like there was a much bigger That's

1:11:45.680 --> 1:11:47.000
<v Speaker 1>what I'm trying to say about what to learn is

1:11:47.040 --> 1:11:50.000
<v Speaker 1>that the first instance of what you see if something

1:11:50.120 --> 1:11:52.120
<v Speaker 1>probably is a fraction of the story.

1:11:52.520 --> 1:11:56.439
<v Speaker 2>Sure, and if you remember, oh, you have a weekend

1:11:56.760 --> 1:11:59.840
<v Speaker 2>to figure this out. We expect a deal before markets open.

1:12:00.240 --> 1:12:02.719
<v Speaker 1>These trillion dollar ballance sheet's a full of complex liquid

1:12:02.720 --> 1:12:05.640
<v Speaker 1>assets and you have a weekend. So it was I

1:12:05.680 --> 1:12:07.960
<v Speaker 1>think that's the thing is, it's probably never as obvious

1:12:07.960 --> 1:12:11.320
<v Speaker 1>as it looks would be one advice, and to understand

1:12:11.360 --> 1:12:14.400
<v Speaker 1>the whole ecosystem, not just one asset's you know sort

1:12:14.439 --> 1:12:15.200
<v Speaker 1>of risk profile.

1:12:15.600 --> 1:12:18.120
<v Speaker 2>Huh. Well, Sean, thank you for being so generous with

1:12:18.200 --> 1:12:22.200
<v Speaker 2>your time. This has been absolutely fascinating. We have been

1:12:22.280 --> 1:12:26.320
<v Speaker 2>speaking with Sean Dobson. He is the chairman, chief executive

1:12:26.360 --> 1:12:31.320
<v Speaker 2>officer and chief investment officer at Amherst Group, managing about

1:12:31.360 --> 1:12:35.679
<v Speaker 2>sixteen point eight billion dollars. If you enjoy this conversation, well,

1:12:36.000 --> 1:12:38.840
<v Speaker 2>be sure and check out any of our previous five

1:12:39.000 --> 1:12:43.160
<v Speaker 2>hundred or so. You can find those at iTunes, Spotify, YouTube,

1:12:43.280 --> 1:12:47.400
<v Speaker 2>wherever you find your favorite podcasts. Check out my new

1:12:47.479 --> 1:12:52.799
<v Speaker 2>podcast at the Money ten minutes of conversation about earning, spending,

1:12:52.880 --> 1:12:56.400
<v Speaker 2>and investing your money with an expert. You can find

1:12:56.479 --> 1:12:59.120
<v Speaker 2>that in the Master's and Business feed, or wherever you

1:12:59.240 --> 1:13:03.240
<v Speaker 2>get your favorite Sign up for my daily reading list

1:13:03.280 --> 1:13:05.960
<v Speaker 2>at rehelts dot com. Follow me on What's left of

1:13:06.080 --> 1:13:09.040
<v Speaker 2>Twitter at rahelts dot com. Follow all of the Bloomberg

1:13:09.120 --> 1:13:13.559
<v Speaker 2>Family of podcasts at Podcasts. I would be remiss if

1:13:13.600 --> 1:13:15.280
<v Speaker 2>I did not thank the correct team that helps us

1:13:15.320 --> 1:13:18.760
<v Speaker 2>put these conversations together each week. Kaylie Lapara is my

1:13:18.880 --> 1:13:21.920
<v Speaker 2>audio engineer. A Tick of Albron is my project manager.

1:13:22.400 --> 1:13:26.120
<v Speaker 2>Pariswold is my producer. Short Rousso is my head of research.

1:13:26.720 --> 1:13:30.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm Barryhots. You've been listening to Masters of business on

1:13:30.800 --> 1:13:31.719
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Radio