WEBVTT - Rerun: Copyright and Fair Use

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from iHeartRadio. Hey there,

0:00:12.680 --> 0:00:16.000
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host, Jonathan Strickland.

0:00:16.040 --> 0:00:19.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm an executive producer with iHeartRadio and How the Tech

0:00:19.280 --> 0:00:24.600
<v Speaker 1>are You. This episode, originally published May seventeenth, twenty twenty one,

0:00:24.720 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 1>is called Copyright and Fair Use. I feel it's always

0:00:27.800 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 1>important to revisit this topic because it's a it's one

0:00:31.720 --> 0:00:33.720
<v Speaker 1>that's a little complicated, and I think a lot of

0:00:33.720 --> 0:00:37.959
<v Speaker 1>people have misconceptions about what fair use is and how

0:00:38.000 --> 0:00:41.360
<v Speaker 1>it works. So enjoy and I'll chat with you a

0:00:41.360 --> 0:00:46.839
<v Speaker 1>little bit at the very end. It has been a

0:00:46.840 --> 0:00:49.920
<v Speaker 1>while since I've done an episode about the concepts of

0:00:49.960 --> 0:00:54.080
<v Speaker 1>copyright and fair use, and after I keep seeing the

0:00:54.120 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 1>phrase no copyright infringement intended over and over on places

0:00:59.120 --> 0:01:02.960
<v Speaker 1>like you Tube and Instagram, I figure it's a good

0:01:03.000 --> 0:01:07.039
<v Speaker 1>time to tackle this again because people continue to pretend

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 1>like copyright infringement only applies under very specific circumstances and

0:01:14.560 --> 0:01:17.480
<v Speaker 1>that with just a little bit of verbiage you can

0:01:17.520 --> 0:01:20.920
<v Speaker 1>get around it, when really the opposite is true. And

0:01:21.000 --> 0:01:24.000
<v Speaker 1>since the Internet and technology allows for more opportunities for

0:01:24.120 --> 0:01:29.959
<v Speaker 1>copyright infringement, and because various governments and around the world

0:01:29.959 --> 0:01:33.760
<v Speaker 1>have passed legislation to, you know, specifically tackle copyright infringement,

0:01:33.840 --> 0:01:40.360
<v Speaker 1>and companies have lobbied endlessly for more restrictive copyright rules.

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:44.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it fits the scope of tech stuff, particularly

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:48.400
<v Speaker 1>since a lot of these laws were formed in reaction

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:53.440
<v Speaker 1>to changes in technology. So first, let's kind of define

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:59.400
<v Speaker 1>what copyright is now. Essentially, copyright guarantees the creator of

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:02.960
<v Speaker 1>a work or an entity that has been designated by

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:07.160
<v Speaker 1>the creator of the work, the right to profit off

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:11.840
<v Speaker 1>of that work, the right to make copies of that

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:16.400
<v Speaker 1>work and then distribute or sell them, or you know,

0:02:16.480 --> 0:02:19.720
<v Speaker 1>you just you own that intellectual property. No one else

0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:22.800
<v Speaker 1>can come and make copies of it without your permission.

0:02:23.440 --> 0:02:26.880
<v Speaker 1>The works in this case range from the written word

0:02:27.240 --> 0:02:32.919
<v Speaker 1>to music, to paintings to sculpture to digital files. I mean,

0:02:33.000 --> 0:02:35.720
<v Speaker 1>copyright now applies to lots of stuff. Clearly, it didn't

0:02:35.760 --> 0:02:38.560
<v Speaker 1>apply to all of that in the beginning, but something

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:42.600
<v Speaker 1>that has evaulved over time. It does not include inventions.

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Those are covered under patent law. And then you also

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:50.280
<v Speaker 1>have things like trademarks, which make things more complicated. I

0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:54.840
<v Speaker 1>might talk about trademarks and copyright in a future episode.

0:02:55.320 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 1>To kind of talk about how those complicate things because

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:02.360
<v Speaker 1>companies have tried to use trade in order to extend

0:03:02.440 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 1>copyright protection. But trademark's last in perpetuity. Copyright only lasts

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 1>a certain amount of time, at least in theory. We'll

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 1>get to all that. So, along with the right to

0:03:15.680 --> 0:03:20.600
<v Speaker 1>profit from intellectual property comes with it protections against others

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:22.840
<v Speaker 1>who are taking a work and profiting off of it

0:03:23.400 --> 0:03:27.200
<v Speaker 1>without permission. Now you can see the value of this

0:03:27.360 --> 0:03:31.520
<v Speaker 1>concept right away, I imagine. So let's say you are

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:35.960
<v Speaker 1>a musician and you write a song. It was your work.

0:03:36.440 --> 0:03:39.080
<v Speaker 1>You created the whole piece, You wrote the music, and

0:03:39.120 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 1>you wrote the lyrics, and you plan to earn money

0:03:42.680 --> 0:03:45.280
<v Speaker 1>through this song. Maybe you're going to record it to

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:49.120
<v Speaker 1>some form of media and then sell copies of the song.

0:03:49.440 --> 0:03:52.480
<v Speaker 1>So you file the copyright for the song, which gives

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:56.640
<v Speaker 1>you the exclusive rights to make copies of it in

0:03:56.680 --> 0:04:00.520
<v Speaker 1>whatever format you like, whether it's digital files or physical

0:04:00.600 --> 0:04:04.720
<v Speaker 1>media or even like sheet music. You can charge whatever

0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:07.680
<v Speaker 1>you like for your work, though obviously if you go

0:04:07.760 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 1>bonkers and you ask for ridiculously high price, you aren't

0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:14.120
<v Speaker 1>likely to get a lot of takers. You also have

0:04:14.240 --> 0:04:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the protection should someone else start making copies of your

0:04:18.080 --> 0:04:22.120
<v Speaker 1>song without your permission. Maybe they are performing it themselves,

0:04:22.400 --> 0:04:26.040
<v Speaker 1>in which case they should secure a license first, or

0:04:26.320 --> 0:04:29.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe they're taking your original recording and just duplicating it.

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:34.159
<v Speaker 1>So let's say that you created an MP three file

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 1>and they just copy the MP three file endlessly and

0:04:38.000 --> 0:04:40.480
<v Speaker 1>start either giving it away or selling it to people.

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:45.360
<v Speaker 1>You could sue that person, and in court you could

0:04:45.400 --> 0:04:48.719
<v Speaker 1>prove that you hold the copyright to that piece of music,

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:52.360
<v Speaker 1>and assuming the court agrees that the copyright is legitimate,

0:04:52.839 --> 0:04:56.680
<v Speaker 1>you could then seek damages against the person or entity

0:04:57.040 --> 0:05:01.200
<v Speaker 1>that made the unauthorized copies of your work. Music is

0:05:01.240 --> 0:05:04.880
<v Speaker 1>actually really a special case because you can have multiple

0:05:04.920 --> 0:05:08.720
<v Speaker 1>copyrights on the work. You could have one for the lyrics,

0:05:09.200 --> 0:05:12.080
<v Speaker 1>then you could have another for the musical composition itself,

0:05:12.600 --> 0:05:15.279
<v Speaker 1>and that would mean that someone who wanted to play

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:19.800
<v Speaker 1>your music but change the lyrics would still potentially be

0:05:19.880 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 1>liable for copyright violations. But we're going to get back

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:25.440
<v Speaker 1>to that a little bit later in this episode, but

0:05:25.480 --> 0:05:27.880
<v Speaker 1>it is something to keep in mind. However, Then there

0:05:27.920 --> 0:05:31.279
<v Speaker 1>are such things as mechanical licenses. This sets out the

0:05:31.360 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 1>rules for stuff like playing recorded music in particular places.

0:05:36.440 --> 0:05:39.560
<v Speaker 1>So if you've ever been to a restaurant or a

0:05:39.640 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 1>theater and you've heard music being played over the sound system,

0:05:44.360 --> 0:05:49.520
<v Speaker 1>chances are that that place of business has paid out

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:52.840
<v Speaker 1>a license fee in order to be able to do that.

0:05:53.000 --> 0:05:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Intellectual property rights get pretty complicated. It also depends upon

0:05:58.160 --> 0:06:00.800
<v Speaker 1>the size of the venue. I might have to do

0:06:00.839 --> 0:06:03.200
<v Speaker 1>a future episode to kind of talk about all the exceptions,

0:06:03.400 --> 0:06:06.440
<v Speaker 1>because as I said, it does get complicated, and in

0:06:06.480 --> 0:06:10.279
<v Speaker 1>some cases, if it's a very small venue, they can

0:06:10.400 --> 0:06:12.800
<v Speaker 1>sometimes be exempt from having to pay the same sort

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:16.000
<v Speaker 1>of license fees that larger venues have to pay. And

0:06:16.040 --> 0:06:18.200
<v Speaker 1>part of the argument there is that the number of

0:06:18.200 --> 0:06:22.120
<v Speaker 1>people who would actually experience the music is much smaller

0:06:22.200 --> 0:06:26.080
<v Speaker 1>because the venue is smaller. Anyway, in the old days,

0:06:26.880 --> 0:06:30.919
<v Speaker 1>as in before the printing press, copyright wasn't really that

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 1>big of a thing, Like, there wasn't a big concern

0:06:33.480 --> 0:06:38.760
<v Speaker 1>for it. There were predecessors for formal copyright, but truthfully,

0:06:38.760 --> 0:06:41.880
<v Speaker 1>there wasn't much occasion to use them because the act

0:06:41.920 --> 0:06:45.920
<v Speaker 1>of copying a work involved actually making a copy out

0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:50.159
<v Speaker 1>by hand, handwriting the copy of a written work. This

0:06:50.360 --> 0:06:53.719
<v Speaker 1>was a painstaking process and not something that could be

0:06:53.800 --> 0:06:57.559
<v Speaker 1>done on any sort of scale. And so copyright wasn't

0:06:57.600 --> 0:07:00.640
<v Speaker 1>as huge a concern just because infringement it's was not

0:07:00.800 --> 0:07:03.640
<v Speaker 1>something that was easy to do. Add to that the

0:07:03.640 --> 0:07:07.080
<v Speaker 1>fact that much of the world's population was illiterate and

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:10.160
<v Speaker 1>there just wasn't a foundation for copyright infringement to really

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:13.680
<v Speaker 1>take hold. Then a smarty pants named Johann Gutenberg had

0:07:13.720 --> 0:07:16.600
<v Speaker 1>to go and invent the movable type printing press, at

0:07:16.680 --> 0:07:20.120
<v Speaker 1>least the European version. I should stress that Europe because

0:07:20.160 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 1>other parts of the world were actually further advanced with

0:07:22.800 --> 0:07:25.360
<v Speaker 1>printing technologies than Europe was. But this is the one

0:07:26.040 --> 0:07:30.040
<v Speaker 1>that Western cultures tend to talk about because we get

0:07:30.040 --> 0:07:33.480
<v Speaker 1>a little myopic. But I'll set aside the commentary. So

0:07:33.600 --> 0:07:36.760
<v Speaker 1>with the printing press, it became possible to set the

0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:40.880
<v Speaker 1>type on the press and then print out sheets one

0:07:41.080 --> 0:07:44.400
<v Speaker 1>after the other in relatively quick succession. Now, it still

0:07:44.440 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 1>took time to set the press between pages because you

0:07:47.640 --> 0:07:49.440
<v Speaker 1>had to change all the type out right, You had

0:07:49.440 --> 0:07:53.480
<v Speaker 1>to remove all the type, set the type again, and

0:07:53.520 --> 0:07:57.200
<v Speaker 1>then print the next sheet. So you would typically use

0:07:57.200 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the press to print a bunch of the same sheet

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:03.040
<v Speaker 1>in a row before you would reset the type and

0:08:03.080 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 1>move on to the next sheet. However, you could also

0:08:05.880 --> 0:08:08.600
<v Speaker 1>use a single large sheet of paper to set out

0:08:08.720 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 1>multiple pages of text, and so you could divide up

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the quadrants of a printing press and change the type

0:08:17.520 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 1>up so that you are actually creating multiple pages per press.

0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:24.760
<v Speaker 1>And then you fold the paper in such a way

0:08:25.160 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 1>that that makes all sense, like if you fold it

0:08:27.720 --> 0:08:31.160
<v Speaker 1>once along a vertical line, so you fold it in

0:08:31.240 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 1>half vertically then or along the vertical axis, I should say,

0:08:36.840 --> 0:08:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Then you end up with a folio that was a

0:08:40.080 --> 0:08:43.440
<v Speaker 1>single large sheet of paper that would have one page

0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:46.160
<v Speaker 1>printed on the left side, one page printed on the

0:08:46.240 --> 0:08:48.840
<v Speaker 1>right side. You have a vertical fold in the middle,

0:08:49.200 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 1>and then you can just keep printing those over and

0:08:51.440 --> 0:08:53.280
<v Speaker 1>over again, and then you bind a bunch of those

0:08:53.360 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 1>together and you've got a book. Or you could do

0:08:58.040 --> 0:09:01.320
<v Speaker 1>a double fold, and you could have a quarto, which

0:09:01.360 --> 0:09:03.440
<v Speaker 1>would also involve you having to make a cut along

0:09:03.480 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the horizontal line. But then you've got four pages per sheet,

0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:10.680
<v Speaker 1>so you could do that, and that means that with

0:09:10.800 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 1>one press you're effectively printing four pages. Then you let

0:09:16.080 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 1>it dry, you flip it over, and you can print

0:09:17.559 --> 0:09:21.720
<v Speaker 1>another four pages. Very useful. So this was these were

0:09:21.760 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 1>different ways that you could end up creating books fairly quickly.

0:09:26.559 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 1>The process of publishing became much faster than with people

0:09:29.920 --> 0:09:33.080
<v Speaker 1>doing it behind, but there wasn't yet a formalized protection

0:09:33.160 --> 0:09:36.840
<v Speaker 1>in place for the creator of the works, and at

0:09:36.840 --> 0:09:39.520
<v Speaker 1>this point, the typical approach was for an author to

0:09:39.600 --> 0:09:43.040
<v Speaker 1>receive a flat fee for their work, which would then

0:09:43.440 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 1>go to a book printer to produce, so the printer

0:09:48.080 --> 0:09:51.000
<v Speaker 1>would take ownership of that work from that point forward.

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:53.319
<v Speaker 1>Then it was just a matter of time before other

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:55.720
<v Speaker 1>printers would get hold of the book and start making

0:09:55.760 --> 0:09:58.520
<v Speaker 1>their own copies, at least for books that proved to

0:09:58.520 --> 0:10:01.880
<v Speaker 1>be popular. For all, there really wasn't a whole lot

0:10:01.920 --> 0:10:05.640
<v Speaker 1>of profit in this approach. William Shakespeare, who you know

0:10:05.720 --> 0:10:09.479
<v Speaker 1>you could argue, was one of the greatest English writers,

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:13.520
<v Speaker 1>mostly known for his plays but also his poetry. He

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:17.360
<v Speaker 1>never sought out the printing of his plays. Others would

0:10:17.360 --> 0:10:19.760
<v Speaker 1>give it a shot. Either they would try to copy

0:10:19.840 --> 0:10:22.959
<v Speaker 1>down plays as they were being performed and then go

0:10:23.000 --> 0:10:26.280
<v Speaker 1>and print what they had transcribed, or they would try

0:10:26.320 --> 0:10:29.240
<v Speaker 1>to get hold of the sides that actors were using

0:10:29.240 --> 0:10:31.679
<v Speaker 1>in their roles, or a combination of the two. It

0:10:31.720 --> 0:10:35.200
<v Speaker 1>was really only after Shakespeare's death that his friends got

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:38.280
<v Speaker 1>together and did their best to gather his plays and

0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:41.679
<v Speaker 1>publish them. Now, based on what I know about Shakespeare,

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:44.439
<v Speaker 1>I suspect the reason that he did not seek out

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:47.800
<v Speaker 1>publication of his works was that it really wasn't where

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:50.640
<v Speaker 1>the money would be for him. He would get a

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:54.600
<v Speaker 1>paid the flat fee for every play he wrote, but

0:10:54.640 --> 0:10:58.720
<v Speaker 1>more importantly, he was a part owner of the theater itself.

0:10:58.840 --> 0:11:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Like the Globe the Rose Theater, he was part of

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:05.240
<v Speaker 1>the company that owned the theater, so that meant he

0:11:05.240 --> 0:11:08.360
<v Speaker 1>would actually take a share of the box office. So,

0:11:08.400 --> 0:11:11.920
<v Speaker 1>in other words, his main goal was to attract crowds

0:11:12.120 --> 0:11:15.320
<v Speaker 1>to the theater. That's where the money was. But you

0:11:15.360 --> 0:11:18.080
<v Speaker 1>can bet that if there had been serious money in

0:11:18.160 --> 0:11:21.320
<v Speaker 1>publication back in those days, Shakespeare would have been all

0:11:21.360 --> 0:11:23.240
<v Speaker 1>over it because a quick glance at some of the

0:11:23.320 --> 0:11:26.560
<v Speaker 1>lawsuits he was involved with during his lifetime indicates he

0:11:26.600 --> 0:11:30.880
<v Speaker 1>had a certain appreciation for the accumulation of wealth. So Shakespeare,

0:11:30.880 --> 0:11:35.559
<v Speaker 1>a great artist also a business guy, and had publishing

0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:38.960
<v Speaker 1>been a bigger business for the author, he certainly would

0:11:38.960 --> 0:11:41.360
<v Speaker 1>have gone that route. I'm sure of it. Now. The

0:11:41.400 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 1>printing press was a truly transformational piece of technology. It

0:11:45.360 --> 0:11:49.360
<v Speaker 1>became easier to produce many copies of a work book.

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Printing businesses, which would evolve into true publishing houses, began

0:11:54.160 --> 0:11:56.880
<v Speaker 1>to pop up all over Europe, and the powers that be,

0:11:57.520 --> 0:12:00.720
<v Speaker 1>that is, the Church and the various governments of Europe,

0:12:01.120 --> 0:12:04.800
<v Speaker 1>viewed book printers as both an asset and a potential threat.

0:12:05.600 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Through the printers, these organizations could spread information quickly. The

0:12:10.000 --> 0:12:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Bible was a very early candidate for printing, as the

0:12:13.320 --> 0:12:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Gutenberg Bible proves and governments could use printing presses to

0:12:17.440 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 1>spread information about laws and declarations and that kind of thing.

0:12:21.320 --> 0:12:24.480
<v Speaker 1>But printing presses also meant it was easier to print

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:28.560
<v Speaker 1>stuff that undermined authority. People who had a bone to

0:12:28.559 --> 0:12:31.760
<v Speaker 1>pick with the folks who were in charge could potentially

0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:35.960
<v Speaker 1>spread their ideas and maybe find sympathetic souls who shared

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:40.760
<v Speaker 1>those same beliefs. So the printing press could enable existential

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:43.719
<v Speaker 1>threats to the power structure. And this is where we

0:12:43.800 --> 0:12:49.280
<v Speaker 1>get a predecessor to copyright. Now, this predecessor wasn't so

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 1>much about making sure the author of a book was

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 1>fairly compensated. Instead, it was more about keeping printing houses

0:12:56.480 --> 0:13:00.320
<v Speaker 1>under control. The basic idea was that any business that

0:13:00.480 --> 0:13:04.199
<v Speaker 1>wished to print materials had to first secure an official

0:13:04.400 --> 0:13:09.880
<v Speaker 1>license from the government of that region. These licenses typically

0:13:09.920 --> 0:13:12.840
<v Speaker 1>meant that a specific printer would be responsible for the

0:13:12.880 --> 0:13:17.240
<v Speaker 1>printing of particular works to the exclusion of all other printers.

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:20.720
<v Speaker 1>So you might say that this one printer can print

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:24.680
<v Speaker 1>this one book, and no other printer in the region

0:13:24.800 --> 0:13:27.599
<v Speaker 1>is allowed to do that, so they have a monopoly

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:30.880
<v Speaker 1>on that specific title. In fact, they called the monopolies.

0:13:31.480 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 1>These agreements would last a set number of years, which

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:38.319
<v Speaker 1>wasn't too different from the concept of modern copyrights. If

0:13:38.360 --> 0:13:41.160
<v Speaker 1>any other printer was found to produce a work that

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:45.760
<v Speaker 1>some other printer had exclusive rights to, that matter could

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:49.119
<v Speaker 1>go to court, But this was all about the printing houses,

0:13:49.200 --> 0:13:54.280
<v Speaker 1>not authors. England passed its first actual copyright law in

0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 1>seventeen ten. This law changed things quite a bit. A

0:13:57.800 --> 0:14:01.120
<v Speaker 1>publisher would have a fourteen year period of exclusive rights

0:14:01.160 --> 0:14:04.840
<v Speaker 1>to publish any new book. Existing books that the printing

0:14:04.880 --> 0:14:09.000
<v Speaker 1>house was already printing would enjoy protection for twenty one years.

0:14:09.440 --> 0:14:12.320
<v Speaker 1>After that, the author of the work could choose to

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:16.280
<v Speaker 1>renew the copyright if the author was still alive. Otherwise

0:14:16.320 --> 0:14:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the work would enter into the public domain, meaning anyone

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:23.000
<v Speaker 1>would be legally allowed to make a copy of that

0:14:23.080 --> 0:14:26.160
<v Speaker 1>work or use it in any way they liked. There

0:14:26.160 --> 0:14:29.320
<v Speaker 1>were no longer any protections on that piece of work,

0:14:29.760 --> 0:14:33.080
<v Speaker 1>and it was available for any public use. The United

0:14:33.120 --> 0:14:36.720
<v Speaker 1>States wouldn't get its first true copyright law until nearly

0:14:36.800 --> 0:14:40.600
<v Speaker 1>a century later. But let's be fair, there was no

0:14:40.680 --> 0:14:43.200
<v Speaker 1>such thing as the United States in seventeen ten, so

0:14:43.240 --> 0:14:45.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to cut the young nation some slack here.

0:14:46.280 --> 0:14:48.840
<v Speaker 1>The copyright law of the US followed closely in the

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:52.040
<v Speaker 1>footsteps of the Copyright Act of Britain, which was also

0:14:52.080 --> 0:14:55.440
<v Speaker 1>known as the Statute of Anne as in Queen Anne.

0:14:56.200 --> 0:14:59.000
<v Speaker 1>So the way that the US law worked was that

0:14:59.040 --> 0:15:01.080
<v Speaker 1>an author would read just through their work with the

0:15:01.160 --> 0:15:05.400
<v Speaker 1>US District Court of their particular region, and they would

0:15:05.480 --> 0:15:08.800
<v Speaker 1>in return receive an exclusive copyright for fourteen years, with

0:15:08.840 --> 0:15:11.920
<v Speaker 1>the option to renew for a second fourteen year period,

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:14.880
<v Speaker 1>and after those twenty eight years, assuming that you actually

0:15:14.960 --> 0:15:18.040
<v Speaker 1>renewed your copyright, the work would then enter into the

0:15:18.080 --> 0:15:21.480
<v Speaker 1>public domain with the Statute of Ann and the Copyright

0:15:21.520 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Act of seventeen ninety in the US or at the

0:15:24.040 --> 0:15:26.320
<v Speaker 1>point where authors would get a little more protection and

0:15:26.360 --> 0:15:29.360
<v Speaker 1>a chance to benefit more from their own work. It

0:15:29.400 --> 0:15:32.480
<v Speaker 1>was no longer the case of a one time flat fee.

0:15:32.520 --> 0:15:36.200
<v Speaker 1>In every instance now I say authors, but often we're

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:40.200
<v Speaker 1>really still talking about publishers. Here. The publisher retains the

0:15:40.200 --> 0:15:42.880
<v Speaker 1>copyright because the copyright allows the publisher to, you know,

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:47.160
<v Speaker 1>publish the works. Otherwise, the author would have to grant

0:15:47.200 --> 0:15:50.040
<v Speaker 1>permission for each printing. You'd have to have a license

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:52.840
<v Speaker 1>for it. It all gets clunky, right. If the author

0:15:52.920 --> 0:15:56.640
<v Speaker 1>has exclusive copyright to their work, they have to grant

0:15:56.840 --> 0:16:01.360
<v Speaker 1>permission to whichever entity is reading copies of that work.

0:16:02.000 --> 0:16:04.840
<v Speaker 1>You often see this reflected today in ways that are

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:09.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of confusing. When you agree to certain platforms, there's

0:16:09.400 --> 0:16:12.160
<v Speaker 1>language there that seems to suggest that anything you post

0:16:12.200 --> 0:16:18.160
<v Speaker 1>on that platform is that platform's property. But usually the

0:16:18.600 --> 0:16:21.200
<v Speaker 1>reasoning for the language is to make sure that the

0:16:21.280 --> 0:16:25.480
<v Speaker 1>platform has the necessary permission to display whatever it is

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:29.600
<v Speaker 1>you're posting, because otherwise, every single time you posted, you

0:16:29.600 --> 0:16:32.400
<v Speaker 1>would have to have some sort of licensing agreement or

0:16:32.880 --> 0:16:36.680
<v Speaker 1>something that would give permission to the platform to actually

0:16:36.680 --> 0:16:40.800
<v Speaker 1>display the thing you wrote. It gets pretty complicated now.

0:16:40.840 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 1>The same would be true for most music produced in

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:47.480
<v Speaker 1>the modern era. The copyright isn't necessarily held by the

0:16:47.600 --> 0:16:51.200
<v Speaker 1>artist but by a music label. And it's kind of

0:16:51.240 --> 0:16:53.680
<v Speaker 1>like how Thomas Edison made sure that his name was

0:16:53.720 --> 0:16:57.680
<v Speaker 1>on every patent produced out of his business. He might

0:16:57.720 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 1>not have had a direct hand in the creation of reinvention.

0:17:01.040 --> 0:17:03.640
<v Speaker 1>In fact, we know that he didn't have a direct

0:17:03.640 --> 0:17:06.119
<v Speaker 1>hand in a lot of them, but he sure as

0:17:06.200 --> 0:17:08.760
<v Speaker 1>heck made sure that his signature was on the patent

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:10.440
<v Speaker 1>to every single one, so that he had a right

0:17:10.480 --> 0:17:14.560
<v Speaker 1>to each of them anyway. One of the consequences of

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:17.119
<v Speaker 1>all of this is that, to this day, getting the

0:17:17.160 --> 0:17:20.600
<v Speaker 1>permission of an author or artist in order to use

0:17:20.640 --> 0:17:25.840
<v Speaker 1>their work typically isn't enough. That's because in many cases

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:31.440
<v Speaker 1>that individual creator doesn't actually hold the copyright to the work.

0:17:31.800 --> 0:17:35.960
<v Speaker 1>It's more likely that some corporate entity will hold the

0:17:36.000 --> 0:17:39.959
<v Speaker 1>copyright on behalf of that creator. So you really have

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:43.520
<v Speaker 1>to get the permission of whatever entity holds the copyright

0:17:43.560 --> 0:17:46.560
<v Speaker 1>for any specific intellectual property. In some cases it might

0:17:46.600 --> 0:17:50.120
<v Speaker 1>be an individual creator, in other cases it might be

0:17:50.359 --> 0:17:54.720
<v Speaker 1>a big company. So let's say if you met an

0:17:54.800 --> 0:17:58.879
<v Speaker 1>artist for Disney in a cafe and this artist told you, oh,

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 1>it's totally cool if you use their drawing of a

0:18:03.160 --> 0:18:07.240
<v Speaker 1>popular Disney character for something you're doing that's probably not

0:18:07.280 --> 0:18:11.639
<v Speaker 1>good enough because that artist wouldn't even hold the copyright

0:18:12.040 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 1>for that work. Disney would, and copyright laws would evolve

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:20.760
<v Speaker 1>quite a lot over the following centuries. They expanded to

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:24.200
<v Speaker 1>include more types of works, as well as to allow

0:18:24.240 --> 0:18:27.960
<v Speaker 1>for things like licenses, and without these considerations, it might

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:31.480
<v Speaker 1>be illegal to you know, play back an album without

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:34.920
<v Speaker 1>first getting permission of the music label, which is clearly absurd.

0:18:34.960 --> 0:18:37.760
<v Speaker 1>You wouldn't have it where you bought an album, you

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:41.000
<v Speaker 1>went home, and every time you were to play the album,

0:18:41.080 --> 0:18:44.679
<v Speaker 1>you first had to get permission from the music label

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:47.560
<v Speaker 1>to do that. That just doesn't make sense. But that's

0:18:47.600 --> 0:18:50.120
<v Speaker 1>the sort of stuff that actually had to be codified

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:54.000
<v Speaker 1>into law. It's you know, it's not enough to just

0:18:54.200 --> 0:18:57.280
<v Speaker 1>everyone agree like, oh well, that's absurd. It actually had

0:18:57.280 --> 0:19:00.760
<v Speaker 1>to be written down somewhere and ratified. One of the

0:19:00.760 --> 0:19:05.320
<v Speaker 1>biggest changes to copyright has been how long that copyright

0:19:05.359 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 1>protection lasts. This also ties into how many capitalist societies

0:19:10.359 --> 0:19:16.280
<v Speaker 1>treat corporations, which is ridiculously in my mind. So here

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:19.320
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, in particular, corporations are treated legally

0:19:19.880 --> 0:19:21.840
<v Speaker 1>like a person. But if you think about it, that's

0:19:21.920 --> 0:19:25.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of bonkers. More than kind of bonkers. I should say,

0:19:25.320 --> 0:19:30.000
<v Speaker 1>people get old. People pass away corporations. Assuming that they

0:19:30.000 --> 0:19:32.720
<v Speaker 1>are run well and they provide some sort of goods

0:19:32.760 --> 0:19:37.920
<v Speaker 1>or services that people want or need, they can exist indefinitely.

0:19:38.320 --> 0:19:42.439
<v Speaker 1>And a corporation that relies heavily on intellectual property is

0:19:42.600 --> 0:19:45.920
<v Speaker 1>quite loath to give up that meal ticket. And so

0:19:46.040 --> 0:19:51.040
<v Speaker 1>corporations over the years have lobbied hard to extend copyright

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:53.840
<v Speaker 1>in order to prevent the IP that they own from

0:19:53.920 --> 0:19:56.159
<v Speaker 1>falling into the public domain. And then they can no

0:19:56.280 --> 0:20:02.360
<v Speaker 1>longer exclusively exploit that IP. They could still exploit it,

0:20:02.560 --> 0:20:05.920
<v Speaker 1>they could still sell stuff with it, just it doesn't

0:20:05.920 --> 0:20:08.960
<v Speaker 1>stop anyone else from doing the same thing. Perhaps the

0:20:09.000 --> 0:20:12.240
<v Speaker 1>most high profile of all these companies was one that

0:20:12.359 --> 0:20:16.160
<v Speaker 1>seemed fixated on a particular mouse that I've already mentioned.

0:20:16.800 --> 0:20:27.600
<v Speaker 1>I'll explain more after this quick break. Before the break,

0:20:27.680 --> 0:20:30.800
<v Speaker 1>I teased that corporations played a huge part in lobbying

0:20:30.880 --> 0:20:34.399
<v Speaker 1>Congress to extend the protections of copyright. And one of

0:20:34.440 --> 0:20:38.360
<v Speaker 1>those corporations is the Walt Disney Company and the cultural

0:20:38.400 --> 0:20:43.320
<v Speaker 1>phenomenon that is Mickey Mouse. The cartoon Steamboat Willie, which

0:20:43.400 --> 0:20:47.120
<v Speaker 1>was the first Mickey Mouse cartoon, was released in nineteen

0:20:47.240 --> 0:20:51.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight. Now, at that time, US copyright law had

0:20:51.600 --> 0:20:54.679
<v Speaker 1>a twenty eight year protection limit, which could then be

0:20:54.720 --> 0:20:58.359
<v Speaker 1>renewed for a second twenty eight year term, which would

0:20:58.359 --> 0:21:01.760
<v Speaker 1>provide a total of fis fifty six years of copyright

0:21:01.840 --> 0:21:05.560
<v Speaker 1>exclusivity to the owner of an IP, But then the

0:21:05.600 --> 0:21:09.120
<v Speaker 1>IP would enter the public domain. That means that if

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:14.640
<v Speaker 1>copyright law had remained unchanged since Steamboat Willie, Steamboat Willy

0:21:14.720 --> 0:21:18.640
<v Speaker 1>would have entered the public domain back in nineteen eighty four.

0:21:19.280 --> 0:21:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Spoiler alert, as of the recording of this podcast, Steamboat

0:21:23.240 --> 0:21:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Willie is not in the public domain yet, so things

0:21:26.840 --> 0:21:30.399
<v Speaker 1>did not remain the same. By the nineteen seventies, the

0:21:30.440 --> 0:21:34.119
<v Speaker 1>Disney Company was lobbying hard to change copyright laws, and

0:21:34.160 --> 0:21:36.639
<v Speaker 1>I want to be clear they weren't the only ones,

0:21:37.320 --> 0:21:43.120
<v Speaker 1>but you frequently hear Disney specifically in regard to lobbying

0:21:43.160 --> 0:21:47.240
<v Speaker 1>for copyright law extensions, and it worked. Congress changed the

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:51.119
<v Speaker 1>copyright protection so that copyrights that were held by individual

0:21:51.200 --> 0:21:56.119
<v Speaker 1>authors protection would last the lifetime of that author plus

0:21:56.160 --> 0:22:00.639
<v Speaker 1>another fifty years. So now we're well beyond gearuaranteeing the

0:22:00.720 --> 0:22:02.960
<v Speaker 1>right of a person to profit off of their work.

0:22:03.080 --> 0:22:07.359
<v Speaker 1>Right now, you're saying you're guaranteeing that multiple generations of

0:22:07.400 --> 0:22:10.840
<v Speaker 1>an author's family can continue to benefit from the work

0:22:11.080 --> 0:22:15.040
<v Speaker 1>of the author. The author will be dead and fifty

0:22:15.119 --> 0:22:17.880
<v Speaker 1>years will pass, and until those fifty years are up,

0:22:18.000 --> 0:22:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the estate will continue to benefit monetarily from that author's work,

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:26.840
<v Speaker 1>assuming that you know, people are still buying it. Obviously,

0:22:27.280 --> 0:22:29.720
<v Speaker 1>if it falls out of favor and no one's purchasing anything,

0:22:29.840 --> 0:22:35.040
<v Speaker 1>then those rights, while they're important, don't actually leverage into

0:22:35.080 --> 0:22:38.520
<v Speaker 1>any kind of monetary gain. But this is where I

0:22:38.560 --> 0:22:40.879
<v Speaker 1>start feeling a little weird about all this, because I

0:22:40.920 --> 0:22:43.400
<v Speaker 1>think it's one thing to want to provide for your family,

0:22:43.720 --> 0:22:48.080
<v Speaker 1>right you want to earn money and help contribute to

0:22:48.600 --> 0:22:53.080
<v Speaker 1>your family or household's well being. But it's another to

0:22:53.160 --> 0:22:57.200
<v Speaker 1>create generational wealth that removes the need for future generations

0:22:57.200 --> 0:23:01.040
<v Speaker 1>to you know, make any sort of meaningful contribution themselves.

0:23:01.480 --> 0:23:05.359
<v Speaker 1>There are lots of cases where the children of authors

0:23:05.400 --> 0:23:10.320
<v Speaker 1>who were incredibly successful have themselves gone on to do

0:23:10.480 --> 0:23:13.879
<v Speaker 1>amazing things, which is great, But there are also cases

0:23:13.920 --> 0:23:17.600
<v Speaker 1>of people who just kind of, you know, never bothered

0:23:17.600 --> 0:23:21.119
<v Speaker 1>to do anything because they didn't really have a need to.

0:23:21.440 --> 0:23:24.240
<v Speaker 1>They were all of their needs were already met because

0:23:24.920 --> 0:23:29.320
<v Speaker 1>they were earning income on something that their parents or

0:23:29.320 --> 0:23:33.600
<v Speaker 1>grandparents or great grandparents had done, and there never was

0:23:33.600 --> 0:23:38.520
<v Speaker 1>any need for them to do anything. Not super helpful

0:23:39.320 --> 0:23:43.280
<v Speaker 1>for the general society. Not very healthy in my mind anyway.

0:23:43.520 --> 0:23:47.879
<v Speaker 1>For corporations that owned IP it was a different story, right,

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:50.680
<v Speaker 1>because corporations don't die, so you can't say the life

0:23:50.680 --> 0:23:54.359
<v Speaker 1>of a corporation plus fifty years. So in this case,

0:23:54.880 --> 0:23:58.280
<v Speaker 1>the Copyright Protection extended the term for works that had

0:23:58.280 --> 0:24:01.560
<v Speaker 1>been published before nineteen seven seventy eight to a total

0:24:01.680 --> 0:24:05.879
<v Speaker 1>term of seventy five years of protection. The Copyright Extension

0:24:06.200 --> 0:24:09.200
<v Speaker 1>pushed that protection of Steamboat Willy to two thousand and

0:24:09.280 --> 0:24:11.280
<v Speaker 1>three because of that, because it was published in nineteen

0:24:11.320 --> 0:24:13.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight, seventy five years later would be up to

0:24:13.840 --> 0:24:18.080
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and three. However, in nineteen ninety eight, Congress

0:24:18.080 --> 0:24:21.560
<v Speaker 1>passed the Copyright Term Extension Act, also known as the

0:24:21.600 --> 0:24:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act, after the late congressman

0:24:25.800 --> 0:24:29.080
<v Speaker 1>and musician Sonny Bono Bono had passed away in an

0:24:29.119 --> 0:24:32.479
<v Speaker 1>accident while Congress was hashing out this extension bill, so

0:24:32.520 --> 0:24:36.560
<v Speaker 1>he was posthumously honored with the title of the act.

0:24:37.359 --> 0:24:40.920
<v Speaker 1>This Act extended the copyright protection for any work published

0:24:40.920 --> 0:24:44.560
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen twenty three or later, and the extension meant

0:24:44.840 --> 0:24:48.320
<v Speaker 1>that the copyright protection now went from the life of

0:24:48.359 --> 0:24:51.560
<v Speaker 1>the author plus fifty years to the life of the

0:24:51.600 --> 0:24:54.840
<v Speaker 1>author plus seventy years for those works that were created

0:24:54.880 --> 0:24:58.399
<v Speaker 1>by an individual artist, and it meant for works of

0:24:58.520 --> 0:25:03.240
<v Speaker 1>corporate authorship, you know, works that like Steamboat Willy from Disney,

0:25:03.560 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 1>they went from having seventy five years of protection to

0:25:06.200 --> 0:25:09.800
<v Speaker 1>either ninety five years after publication or one hundred and

0:25:09.840 --> 0:25:13.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty years from the date of creation, whichever ended earlier.

0:25:13.720 --> 0:25:18.280
<v Speaker 1>So you know, corporations might create something but not yet

0:25:18.400 --> 0:25:22.120
<v Speaker 1>publish it, so in some cases you would actually have

0:25:22.320 --> 0:25:25.240
<v Speaker 1>a shorter period between time of creation and one hundred

0:25:25.240 --> 0:25:28.200
<v Speaker 1>and twenty years than time of publication. In ninety five

0:25:28.280 --> 0:25:32.360
<v Speaker 1>years anyway, any published work before nineteen seventy eight would

0:25:32.359 --> 0:25:36.240
<v Speaker 1>get an additional twenty years of copyright protection, so it

0:25:36.320 --> 0:25:38.679
<v Speaker 1>went from seventy five years to ninety five years, And

0:25:38.720 --> 0:25:41.720
<v Speaker 1>those extra twenty years meant that Steamboat Willy will now

0:25:41.880 --> 0:25:45.080
<v Speaker 1>enter public domain essentially at the beginning of twenty twenty four,

0:25:45.720 --> 0:25:48.359
<v Speaker 1>unless between now and then there's yet another change to

0:25:48.440 --> 0:25:53.879
<v Speaker 1>copyright law, which seems highly unlikely because there is a

0:25:54.000 --> 0:25:57.919
<v Speaker 1>large opposition to that. Since the Copyright Act I've mentioned

0:25:57.920 --> 0:26:02.200
<v Speaker 1>so far retroactively protected any word published after nineteen twenty three,

0:26:02.560 --> 0:26:05.159
<v Speaker 1>it meant that we finally saw some published works go

0:26:05.240 --> 0:26:09.159
<v Speaker 1>into the public domain beginning in twenty nineteen. So on

0:26:09.240 --> 0:26:13.400
<v Speaker 1>January first, twenty nineteen, any copyrighted works that were published

0:26:13.440 --> 0:26:16.679
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen twenty three, with a few exceptions that have

0:26:16.760 --> 0:26:20.119
<v Speaker 1>to do with music because music is complicated, otherwise, they

0:26:20.240 --> 0:26:22.639
<v Speaker 1>entered the public domain at that point. This was the

0:26:22.680 --> 0:26:25.359
<v Speaker 1>first time in twenty one years that a large collection

0:26:25.400 --> 0:26:29.119
<v Speaker 1>of works fell out of copyright protection into the public domain,

0:26:29.560 --> 0:26:32.880
<v Speaker 1>only because of the timing of changes to copyright law

0:26:32.960 --> 0:26:36.360
<v Speaker 1>in the United States. So works from nineteen twenty two

0:26:36.440 --> 0:26:39.360
<v Speaker 1>had entered the public domain back in nineteen ninety eight,

0:26:39.960 --> 0:26:42.439
<v Speaker 1>but then you had the change to copyright law, and

0:26:42.480 --> 0:26:45.560
<v Speaker 1>so any works from nineteen twenty three enjoyed twenty more

0:26:45.640 --> 0:26:48.920
<v Speaker 1>years of protection because of that recent extension, and thus

0:26:49.000 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 1>they only entered the public domain in twenty nineteen. That's

0:26:51.600 --> 0:26:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the difference that a single year can make. This year,

0:26:55.520 --> 0:26:58.320
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty one, we saw works like F. Scott

0:26:58.320 --> 0:27:02.159
<v Speaker 1>Fitzgerald's The Great Gatsby go into the public domain. You

0:27:02.200 --> 0:27:04.480
<v Speaker 1>can now make as many copies of The Great Gatsby

0:27:04.560 --> 0:27:06.960
<v Speaker 1>as you like. You can hand them out for free.

0:27:07.040 --> 0:27:09.280
<v Speaker 1>You could charge for them if you want to. It's

0:27:09.359 --> 0:27:13.800
<v Speaker 1>public domain. Doctor Doolittle's Zoo also went into public domain

0:27:13.840 --> 0:27:17.199
<v Speaker 1>this year. Agatha Christie's The Secret of Chimney's made its

0:27:17.280 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 1>exit from copyright protection. The nineteen twenty five silent film

0:27:21.880 --> 0:27:25.520
<v Speaker 1>version of Ben her not the Charlton Heston version, but

0:27:25.600 --> 0:27:28.320
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen twenty five silent film version is in public domain,

0:27:28.600 --> 0:27:32.280
<v Speaker 1>as is Lawn Cheney's The Phantom of the Opera. Also,

0:27:32.359 --> 0:27:35.080
<v Speaker 1>the silent film version of Wizard of Oz again not

0:27:35.240 --> 0:27:40.119
<v Speaker 1>the big musical version, you know, not the follow the

0:27:40.160 --> 0:27:42.879
<v Speaker 1>Yellow Brick Road version, but the silent film version of

0:27:42.920 --> 0:27:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Wizard of Oz is also into public domain this year.

0:27:45.800 --> 0:27:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Now that means that if you want to make copies

0:27:48.080 --> 0:27:50.120
<v Speaker 1>of lawn Cheney's Fantom of the Opera and you want

0:27:50.160 --> 0:27:52.760
<v Speaker 1>to distribute those widely. If you want to post the

0:27:53.000 --> 0:27:56.560
<v Speaker 1>entire movie on YouTube, you can. You can do it

0:27:56.760 --> 0:28:02.359
<v Speaker 1>for free. You could also, you know, sell DVDs of

0:28:02.400 --> 0:28:05.760
<v Speaker 1>it if you wanted to. You could press DVDs with

0:28:06.240 --> 0:28:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Lawn Cheney's Venom of the Opera, and you could sell them.

0:28:09.920 --> 0:28:11.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if anyone would buy them, but you

0:28:11.600 --> 0:28:13.920
<v Speaker 1>could do it. You can do it here, you can

0:28:13.920 --> 0:28:17.119
<v Speaker 1>do it there, You can do it everywhere in the US. Anyway,

0:28:17.200 --> 0:28:21.199
<v Speaker 1>it is no longer in copyright now, backtracking just a

0:28:21.200 --> 0:28:24.480
<v Speaker 1>little bit, the printing press had made copyright protection more

0:28:24.600 --> 0:28:27.879
<v Speaker 1>or less a necessity to prevent publishers from pouncing on

0:28:27.920 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 1>each other and flooding the market with copies of various books.

0:28:32.119 --> 0:28:35.320
<v Speaker 1>But for a really long time, copyright was just something

0:28:35.320 --> 0:28:38.280
<v Speaker 1>that big companies were mostly concerned with. It was a

0:28:38.320 --> 0:28:41.400
<v Speaker 1>non factor for the average person. I mean, it affected us,

0:28:41.880 --> 0:28:45.560
<v Speaker 1>but we didn't come into any sort of conflict with

0:28:45.640 --> 0:28:49.040
<v Speaker 1>copyright protection because most of us just didn't have access

0:28:49.080 --> 0:28:53.040
<v Speaker 1>to equipment that we would need to replicate an original work.

0:28:53.640 --> 0:28:56.240
<v Speaker 1>If back in the mid nineteen twenties you managed to

0:28:56.280 --> 0:28:59.240
<v Speaker 1>get your grubby hands on a copy of The Great Gatsby,

0:28:59.360 --> 0:29:02.520
<v Speaker 1>you probably didn't have the ability to copy that work

0:29:02.560 --> 0:29:05.080
<v Speaker 1>and then sell it to people yourself, you know, like

0:29:05.240 --> 0:29:11.200
<v Speaker 1>undercutting big bookstores or whatever. Publishing houses were protecting themselves,

0:29:11.240 --> 0:29:14.600
<v Speaker 1>but they were doing so mostly from other publishing houses.

0:29:15.000 --> 0:29:17.720
<v Speaker 1>The average person was not a threat, So the nature

0:29:17.720 --> 0:29:22.360
<v Speaker 1>of copyright law was all about corporate entities protecting themselves

0:29:22.360 --> 0:29:26.400
<v Speaker 1>from each other. This, by the way, is what kind

0:29:26.440 --> 0:29:29.840
<v Speaker 1>of becomes an issue in the modern day, where you've

0:29:29.880 --> 0:29:33.480
<v Speaker 1>got the effect of like a nuclear arsenal, you know,

0:29:33.600 --> 0:29:36.880
<v Speaker 1>corporations against each other that could then be aimed against

0:29:36.880 --> 0:29:42.120
<v Speaker 1>the individual because the nature of copying has changed, so

0:29:42.960 --> 0:29:48.320
<v Speaker 1>there's a disproportionate hardship on the individual because of that.

0:29:49.120 --> 0:29:52.560
<v Speaker 1>So over time, various inventions meant more people would have

0:29:52.600 --> 0:29:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the ability to create copies of stuff, and these technological

0:29:56.720 --> 0:30:01.160
<v Speaker 1>advancements always came hand in hand with media company freaking

0:30:01.240 --> 0:30:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the heck out about it, which is not an exaggeration.

0:30:04.840 --> 0:30:09.200
<v Speaker 1>The invention of technologies like cassette tapes or VHS tapes,

0:30:09.840 --> 0:30:14.480
<v Speaker 1>burnable compact discs, and of course digital media all sent

0:30:14.800 --> 0:30:19.360
<v Speaker 1>media companies into a tizzy. Each invention prompted the companies

0:30:19.360 --> 0:30:23.800
<v Speaker 1>to object strenuously and to proclaim that should these technologies

0:30:23.840 --> 0:30:29.240
<v Speaker 1>fall into the hands of the common, unwashed masses like myself,

0:30:29.840 --> 0:30:33.280
<v Speaker 1>that the era of stuff like film or television or

0:30:33.640 --> 0:30:36.080
<v Speaker 1>popular music would all come to an end and the

0:30:36.240 --> 0:30:40.520
<v Speaker 1>entire industry would crash down on itself and we would

0:30:40.560 --> 0:30:44.959
<v Speaker 1>then be back to banging rocks together for entertainment. News Alert.

0:30:45.560 --> 0:30:48.160
<v Speaker 1>None of that happened, but in the process we saw

0:30:48.280 --> 0:30:52.920
<v Speaker 1>lots of other laws passed that expanded copyright protection by

0:30:52.920 --> 0:30:56.880
<v Speaker 1>creating a pretty extensive framework for prosecution should an IP

0:30:57.040 --> 0:31:01.240
<v Speaker 1>holder discover that someone is copied or distributed stuff that

0:31:01.320 --> 0:31:05.560
<v Speaker 1>they hold the rights to without proper authorization. I will

0:31:05.600 --> 0:31:09.680
<v Speaker 1>cover more of those in the next episode. Now, one

0:31:09.720 --> 0:31:13.280
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons the public domain is important is that

0:31:13.320 --> 0:31:16.520
<v Speaker 1>works can have a great deal of relevance and usefulness

0:31:17.120 --> 0:31:20.760
<v Speaker 1>many years after they were published. Think of all the

0:31:20.840 --> 0:31:23.520
<v Speaker 1>classics that are out there that have stood the test

0:31:23.560 --> 0:31:28.040
<v Speaker 1>of time. But if copyright lasted forever, these works would

0:31:28.040 --> 0:31:32.080
<v Speaker 1>be under a tight restriction in perpetuity. Public domain means

0:31:32.120 --> 0:31:37.320
<v Speaker 1>that eventually these works will become widely accessible. It's balancing

0:31:37.320 --> 0:31:40.800
<v Speaker 1>out the benefits that go to the IP holder against

0:31:40.800 --> 0:31:44.320
<v Speaker 1>the benefits of society as a whole. All right, But

0:31:44.400 --> 0:31:48.959
<v Speaker 1>what about fair use? Okay? So, fair use is a

0:31:49.040 --> 0:31:53.640
<v Speaker 1>concept that allows someone to use part of a copyrighted

0:31:53.720 --> 0:31:59.680
<v Speaker 1>work that without permission in one of several ways, and

0:32:00.120 --> 0:32:04.240
<v Speaker 1>it's fairly narrow in its scope. But also kind of

0:32:04.240 --> 0:32:07.080
<v Speaker 1>fuzzy at the edges, so it's narrow in scope, but

0:32:07.160 --> 0:32:10.480
<v Speaker 1>there are no hard yes or no answers to this stuff.

0:32:10.760 --> 0:32:13.800
<v Speaker 1>In general, fair use allows someone to make limited use

0:32:13.840 --> 0:32:17.320
<v Speaker 1>of a portion of a copyrighted work for the purposes

0:32:17.360 --> 0:32:23.600
<v Speaker 1>of news reporting, research, teaching, or criticism and commentary. Parody

0:32:23.680 --> 0:32:26.600
<v Speaker 1>falls into that last category as well, but we're going

0:32:26.680 --> 0:32:29.240
<v Speaker 1>to come back to that. Because it's a more specific

0:32:29.760 --> 0:32:34.320
<v Speaker 1>approach than just adding funny words to existing music. Fair

0:32:34.440 --> 0:32:37.440
<v Speaker 1>use means that you don't have to secure permission from

0:32:37.480 --> 0:32:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the copyright holder if you're using a small portion of

0:32:40.840 --> 0:32:44.320
<v Speaker 1>that original work in one of these ways. So, for example,

0:32:44.560 --> 0:32:47.960
<v Speaker 1>if I were criticizing a film, I could use small

0:32:48.000 --> 0:32:51.200
<v Speaker 1>clips of that film during my critique. Let's say I'm

0:32:51.280 --> 0:32:54.400
<v Speaker 1>uploading a video to YouTube where I am critiquing a movie.

0:32:54.800 --> 0:32:57.560
<v Speaker 1>I can include tiny clips of that film in order

0:32:57.600 --> 0:33:01.520
<v Speaker 1>to illustrate specific points of my criticis, and I wouldn't

0:33:01.600 --> 0:33:05.440
<v Speaker 1>have to get permission first. The clips I used would

0:33:05.600 --> 0:33:09.560
<v Speaker 1>need to relate directly to that criticism. However, I might

0:33:09.640 --> 0:33:13.000
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about lighting composition, and I'll use clips

0:33:13.040 --> 0:33:17.680
<v Speaker 1>from Robert Egger's film The Lighthouse, because that film had

0:33:17.800 --> 0:33:20.920
<v Speaker 1>phenomenal lighting in it. So I'd use those examples to

0:33:20.920 --> 0:33:24.840
<v Speaker 1>talk about specific lighting techniques and how they shape storytelling

0:33:24.920 --> 0:33:29.640
<v Speaker 1>and what significance they play in the unfolding of the

0:33:29.680 --> 0:33:32.080
<v Speaker 1>story of the lighthouse. But if I were to get

0:33:32.120 --> 0:33:35.280
<v Speaker 1>more lucy goosey, my protection of fair use would not

0:33:35.560 --> 0:33:39.600
<v Speaker 1>be as solid. Similarly, if I were to use very

0:33:39.680 --> 0:33:43.120
<v Speaker 1>short clips of the film in my critique, my argument

0:33:43.160 --> 0:33:46.240
<v Speaker 1>of fair use is better supported than if I were to, say,

0:33:46.360 --> 0:33:50.320
<v Speaker 1>include thirty minutes of the movie surrounded by like five

0:33:50.400 --> 0:33:53.920
<v Speaker 1>minutes of criticism. Now, does that mean there's a specific

0:33:54.000 --> 0:33:57.040
<v Speaker 1>safe amount of copyrighted material that you can use without

0:33:57.080 --> 0:34:02.200
<v Speaker 1>fear of retribution. No. There is a common misconception that

0:34:02.280 --> 0:34:05.840
<v Speaker 1>if you use less than say, fifteen seconds of audio

0:34:06.120 --> 0:34:10.279
<v Speaker 1>from a source or six seconds or whatever, that that's

0:34:10.280 --> 0:34:12.520
<v Speaker 1>small enough to be fair use and no one's gonna

0:34:12.520 --> 0:34:15.239
<v Speaker 1>come after you. That is just not true. Or rather,

0:34:15.360 --> 0:34:18.880
<v Speaker 1>it's not a guarantee. Specifically, it's not a guarantee if

0:34:18.920 --> 0:34:22.480
<v Speaker 1>you're not using that as some form of commentary or

0:34:22.560 --> 0:34:26.000
<v Speaker 1>criticism on the work itself, if you're using it as

0:34:26.040 --> 0:34:30.279
<v Speaker 1>like the button to a moment, you know, like a

0:34:30.320 --> 0:34:34.719
<v Speaker 1>SoundBite or whatever, there's very little support for a fair

0:34:34.840 --> 0:34:37.279
<v Speaker 1>use argument there. So if I just filled up this

0:34:37.400 --> 0:34:42.520
<v Speaker 1>podcast with soundbites from various films and music, TV shows

0:34:42.560 --> 0:34:45.920
<v Speaker 1>and radio spots and stuff like that, without paying a

0:34:45.960 --> 0:34:49.360
<v Speaker 1>license for all of those things, I would be flying

0:34:49.440 --> 0:34:53.399
<v Speaker 1>pretty darn close to the sun. Because unless I'm using

0:34:53.480 --> 0:34:57.839
<v Speaker 1>those snippets in very specific ways, such as to criticize

0:34:57.880 --> 0:35:01.560
<v Speaker 1>those original works that the snippet it's belonged to, or

0:35:01.600 --> 0:35:05.120
<v Speaker 1>to report on the news of those snippets, well, I

0:35:05.120 --> 0:35:09.440
<v Speaker 1>would be infringing on copyright. That doesn't necessarily mean anyone

0:35:09.560 --> 0:35:12.239
<v Speaker 1>is going to come after me. I mean chances are

0:35:12.360 --> 0:35:16.120
<v Speaker 1>for really small stuff, I'd probably be okay unless my

0:35:16.239 --> 0:35:20.080
<v Speaker 1>podcast got wildly successful, in which case I could represent

0:35:20.120 --> 0:35:23.560
<v Speaker 1>a pretty lucrative target. If the copyright holders looked at

0:35:23.560 --> 0:35:26.960
<v Speaker 1>my podcast and said, well, that show is making x

0:35:27.000 --> 0:35:30.920
<v Speaker 1>million dollars a year, and a lot of that popularity

0:35:31.080 --> 0:35:34.840
<v Speaker 1>we could argue comes from its use of our intellectual property.

0:35:35.320 --> 0:35:38.000
<v Speaker 1>We can get a piece of that pie like that.

0:35:38.000 --> 0:35:40.720
<v Speaker 1>That would be the thought process, and it could actually

0:35:40.840 --> 0:35:44.640
<v Speaker 1>work in court. So it doesn't mean I'm bulletproof if

0:35:44.640 --> 0:35:48.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm just using tiny little clips. It's not until it

0:35:48.360 --> 0:35:51.279
<v Speaker 1>goes to court that I really know if I'm going

0:35:51.320 --> 0:35:54.200
<v Speaker 1>to have to pay or not. So fair use isn't

0:35:54.239 --> 0:35:57.440
<v Speaker 1>a concept that has hard borders to it. It's all

0:35:57.560 --> 0:36:00.719
<v Speaker 1>interpretive stuff. And here's the key to all of it.

0:36:01.000 --> 0:36:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Fair use is something that gets determined in court. So,

0:36:04.600 --> 0:36:08.200
<v Speaker 1>in other words, you can't really use fair use proactively

0:36:08.560 --> 0:36:11.759
<v Speaker 1>as a defense. It's a defense that you make if

0:36:11.840 --> 0:36:15.799
<v Speaker 1>a copyright holder pursues a claim against you for copyright infringement.

0:36:16.440 --> 0:36:18.719
<v Speaker 1>So let's say that I did that critique of The

0:36:18.800 --> 0:36:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Lighthouse and the film company A twenty four, which released

0:36:23.200 --> 0:36:26.000
<v Speaker 1>and distributed the film here in the United States. Let's

0:36:26.000 --> 0:36:30.480
<v Speaker 1>say that company came after me for copyright infringement, and

0:36:30.600 --> 0:36:34.040
<v Speaker 1>I would have to defend my use of those clips

0:36:34.160 --> 0:36:36.600
<v Speaker 1>in court, and I would have to cite fair use

0:36:36.600 --> 0:36:40.479
<v Speaker 1>in that process. Throughout the court proceedings, I would likely

0:36:40.520 --> 0:36:43.160
<v Speaker 1>have to prove that the way I use those clips

0:36:43.400 --> 0:36:46.120
<v Speaker 1>was in fact to critique the film, and that the

0:36:46.160 --> 0:36:49.800
<v Speaker 1>excerpts I used were appropriate and constituted a relatively small

0:36:49.840 --> 0:36:54.360
<v Speaker 1>percentage of the overall critique and a very small percentage

0:36:54.400 --> 0:36:58.160
<v Speaker 1>of the original film. Courts decide on a case by

0:36:58.239 --> 0:37:01.799
<v Speaker 1>case basis if a particular instance is fair use or not.

0:37:02.640 --> 0:37:06.360
<v Speaker 1>There isn't a blanket fair use defense. You gotta go

0:37:06.440 --> 0:37:07.840
<v Speaker 1>in front of the courts to do it. And this

0:37:07.960 --> 0:37:10.799
<v Speaker 1>is what I meant by that nuclear arsenal. When it

0:37:10.800 --> 0:37:14.960
<v Speaker 1>comes to companies versus companies, typically you have lawyers on

0:37:15.040 --> 0:37:19.719
<v Speaker 1>both sides who are just perpetually employed by these companies

0:37:20.160 --> 0:37:22.439
<v Speaker 1>that call each other up and they work things out

0:37:22.560 --> 0:37:25.120
<v Speaker 1>and you might have a licensing agreement or you might

0:37:25.480 --> 0:37:28.640
<v Speaker 1>agree to a settlement, but it rarely goes to court.

0:37:29.560 --> 0:37:32.759
<v Speaker 1>When it comes to individuals, most of us don't have

0:37:32.880 --> 0:37:37.280
<v Speaker 1>access to that kind of legal defense. So for us,

0:37:37.480 --> 0:37:42.120
<v Speaker 1>it's like a massive, well funded company with high paid

0:37:42.239 --> 0:37:46.080
<v Speaker 1>lawyers versus the little guy, and it means that the

0:37:46.120 --> 0:37:48.840
<v Speaker 1>little guy has to shell out the big bucks in

0:37:48.960 --> 0:37:52.880
<v Speaker 1>order to defend themselves against the corporations. Even if the

0:37:52.920 --> 0:37:57.600
<v Speaker 1>little guy is totally in the right. If the use

0:37:57.840 --> 0:38:02.560
<v Speaker 1>is inarguably fair use, you don't get to that decision magically.

0:38:02.600 --> 0:38:04.680
<v Speaker 1>You have to go to court for it, and court

0:38:04.880 --> 0:38:09.000
<v Speaker 1>is expensive. We're going to pause the conversation right here,

0:38:09.600 --> 0:38:19.520
<v Speaker 1>take a quick break, and we'll be right back now.

0:38:19.560 --> 0:38:23.040
<v Speaker 1>The courts tend to look at four factors when deciding

0:38:23.160 --> 0:38:27.440
<v Speaker 1>if any given instance constitutes fair use one is the

0:38:27.440 --> 0:38:30.920
<v Speaker 1>purpose and character of the use of the original material,

0:38:31.200 --> 0:38:35.360
<v Speaker 1>including whether the use is for a commercial nature or

0:38:35.520 --> 0:38:39.200
<v Speaker 1>is nonprofit and educational. So, in other words, if I'm

0:38:39.200 --> 0:38:42.560
<v Speaker 1>making videos where I critique films and I include clips

0:38:42.600 --> 0:38:46.560
<v Speaker 1>of those films in the videos, and I'm monetizing those

0:38:46.960 --> 0:38:49.680
<v Speaker 1>critique videos, that can be a little bit of a

0:38:49.719 --> 0:38:53.880
<v Speaker 1>strike against me because I'm using someone else's work in

0:38:54.040 --> 0:38:56.959
<v Speaker 1>something on my own in order to make money. That's

0:38:57.000 --> 0:38:59.719
<v Speaker 1>not a failure rail of the gate, but it does

0:38:59.760 --> 0:39:02.840
<v Speaker 1>make my argument harder. So it doesn't mean that a

0:39:02.920 --> 0:39:07.120
<v Speaker 1>court is going to decide I'm not engaging in fair use.

0:39:07.360 --> 0:39:11.520
<v Speaker 1>But in general, if the use is nonprofit and it's educational,

0:39:11.800 --> 0:39:14.359
<v Speaker 1>it fits more easily into the fair use category, and

0:39:14.480 --> 0:39:17.560
<v Speaker 1>courts tend to be a bit more forgiving. Then there's

0:39:17.600 --> 0:39:21.319
<v Speaker 1>the nature of the copyrighted work itself. In general, it

0:39:21.400 --> 0:39:23.880
<v Speaker 1>is easier to make a fair use argument if the

0:39:23.920 --> 0:39:27.960
<v Speaker 1>thing you're sampling from is a non fictional work. Works

0:39:27.960 --> 0:39:31.920
<v Speaker 1>that are about creative expression, like novels or movies, have

0:39:31.960 --> 0:39:36.360
<v Speaker 1>a higher burden of proof than works that are nonfiction. So,

0:39:36.480 --> 0:39:40.120
<v Speaker 1>for example, in this podcast, I will sometimes quote specific

0:39:40.200 --> 0:39:44.480
<v Speaker 1>sources those are nonfiction sources and I quote from them

0:39:44.520 --> 0:39:48.920
<v Speaker 1>to establish facts. That's easier to defend as fair use

0:39:49.560 --> 0:39:52.719
<v Speaker 1>than if I were to include, say a minute long

0:39:52.800 --> 0:39:55.799
<v Speaker 1>audio clip from a science fiction television show that's a

0:39:55.840 --> 0:39:59.279
<v Speaker 1>work of fiction. It's a work of creative endeavors. That

0:39:59.400 --> 0:40:01.799
<v Speaker 1>is harder to to justify as fair use unless I'm

0:40:01.840 --> 0:40:07.319
<v Speaker 1>specifically critiquing the show itself. Then comes the amount and

0:40:07.360 --> 0:40:11.000
<v Speaker 1>substantiality of the portion of the copyrighted work that I

0:40:11.120 --> 0:40:14.080
<v Speaker 1>used in my critique of The Lighthouse. If I'm using

0:40:14.280 --> 0:40:17.719
<v Speaker 1>very short clips that just show up in my video

0:40:17.760 --> 0:40:20.000
<v Speaker 1>for like five or ten seconds each as I talk

0:40:20.040 --> 0:40:23.560
<v Speaker 1>about lighting techniques, that's easier to defend as fair use.

0:40:23.640 --> 0:40:26.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm not showing a significant part of the movie. People

0:40:26.400 --> 0:40:28.760
<v Speaker 1>aren't going to feel like they saw the entire film

0:40:28.800 --> 0:40:32.480
<v Speaker 1>by watching my critique. They're just getting a flavor of

0:40:32.560 --> 0:40:35.279
<v Speaker 1>what I'm talking about and getting an understanding of what

0:40:35.320 --> 0:40:39.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean when I'm critiquing the use of lighting. If I'm, however,

0:40:39.320 --> 0:40:43.880
<v Speaker 1>using very long stretches of the original film, particularly stretches

0:40:43.880 --> 0:40:47.080
<v Speaker 1>that don't include changes in lighting, well that's going to

0:40:47.160 --> 0:40:51.160
<v Speaker 1>be a lot harder to defend in court. And then

0:40:51.600 --> 0:40:55.120
<v Speaker 1>there's the effect of the use upon the potential market

0:40:55.280 --> 0:40:59.360
<v Speaker 1>for the copyrighted work. If my derivative work could possibly

0:40:59.440 --> 0:41:03.400
<v Speaker 1>hurt the same of the original by displacing the sales

0:41:03.480 --> 0:41:07.400
<v Speaker 1>of that original, that's a problem. And this one is

0:41:07.440 --> 0:41:10.560
<v Speaker 1>a tricky one, right because what if I'm not critiquing

0:41:10.760 --> 0:41:14.320
<v Speaker 1>the technique of a film, but the quality of a film.

0:41:14.800 --> 0:41:17.080
<v Speaker 1>And what if I present a video where I do

0:41:17.120 --> 0:41:21.080
<v Speaker 1>an extensive tear down of a movie and I explain

0:41:21.239 --> 0:41:23.920
<v Speaker 1>how I think it is not a good film, or

0:41:23.960 --> 0:41:26.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm arguing that people shouldn't go see that movie, that

0:41:27.040 --> 0:41:29.680
<v Speaker 1>it would be a waste of their time and money. Well,

0:41:29.760 --> 0:41:33.080
<v Speaker 1>if folks value my judgment, I could well be said

0:41:33.120 --> 0:41:35.600
<v Speaker 1>to have a negative impact on the sales of the

0:41:35.640 --> 0:41:40.400
<v Speaker 1>original work. However, generally that would still be protected. However,

0:41:40.640 --> 0:41:42.800
<v Speaker 1>if I were to use the original in some way

0:41:42.960 --> 0:41:45.600
<v Speaker 1>that would make people want to buy my derivative work

0:41:46.120 --> 0:41:50.400
<v Speaker 1>or consume it for free or whatever instead of the original,

0:41:50.880 --> 0:41:53.319
<v Speaker 1>well that's harder to defend. So let's say, like in

0:41:53.320 --> 0:41:56.080
<v Speaker 1>my critique of The Lighthouse, I included the entire film

0:41:56.120 --> 0:41:59.680
<v Speaker 1>of the Lighthouse in my critique. That would be very

0:41:59.680 --> 0:42:02.520
<v Speaker 1>hard to defend, not just because I'm using a substantial

0:42:02.560 --> 0:42:06.600
<v Speaker 1>amount of the original work. But also the company could argue, hey,

0:42:07.320 --> 0:42:10.600
<v Speaker 1>why would people pay to see our movie if they

0:42:10.600 --> 0:42:13.520
<v Speaker 1>can see it for free. Just wrapped up in the

0:42:13.520 --> 0:42:17.759
<v Speaker 1>context of this supposed criticism video, the copyright holder it

0:42:17.760 --> 0:42:21.040
<v Speaker 1>can make a valid claim that my derivative work would

0:42:21.040 --> 0:42:24.680
<v Speaker 1>not exist without the copyright original piece, and yet it

0:42:24.719 --> 0:42:28.839
<v Speaker 1>was essentially siphoning sales away from that original piece that

0:42:28.960 --> 0:42:34.400
<v Speaker 1>is not protected under fair use. Okay, we've got that

0:42:34.440 --> 0:42:36.480
<v Speaker 1>all established. We're going to make a couple more points

0:42:36.520 --> 0:42:40.960
<v Speaker 1>before we wrap this up. So when it comes to

0:42:40.960 --> 0:42:44.000
<v Speaker 1>stuff like music, I mentioned that you can copyright the

0:42:44.080 --> 0:42:48.480
<v Speaker 1>musical composition, and you can copyright the lyrics separately. One

0:42:48.560 --> 0:42:52.640
<v Speaker 1>other thing you can do, however, is copyright individual performances

0:42:53.040 --> 0:42:56.160
<v Speaker 1>of a piece of music. So, for example, let's say

0:42:56.560 --> 0:42:58.600
<v Speaker 1>that you're making a video and you want to make

0:42:58.760 --> 0:43:02.359
<v Speaker 1>use of a recording of Beethoven's Ode to Joy. Now,

0:43:02.360 --> 0:43:05.239
<v Speaker 1>Ode to Joy is part of Beethoven's Symphony number nine.

0:43:05.640 --> 0:43:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Beethoven composed that in the eighteen twenties, and it has

0:43:08.880 --> 0:43:12.759
<v Speaker 1>long since passed into the public domain. You can use

0:43:12.840 --> 0:43:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Ode to Joy in anything you like for free. There's

0:43:17.160 --> 0:43:20.080
<v Speaker 1>no one to pay royalties to as far as that's

0:43:20.160 --> 0:43:25.120
<v Speaker 1>concerned or licensing fees to However, that just covers the

0:43:25.200 --> 0:43:29.239
<v Speaker 1>music itself. A performance of ode to Joy will have

0:43:29.320 --> 0:43:33.560
<v Speaker 1>its own copyright which dates to the recording of that piece.

0:43:34.160 --> 0:43:37.799
<v Speaker 1>So even though the music is in public domain, a

0:43:37.880 --> 0:43:41.840
<v Speaker 1>performance likely is not unless you're using a performance of

0:43:41.880 --> 0:43:44.960
<v Speaker 1>ode to Joy that dates from before the nineteen twenties.

0:43:45.440 --> 0:43:49.719
<v Speaker 1>So you could perform ode to Joy yourself in your project,

0:43:50.120 --> 0:43:52.120
<v Speaker 1>you'd be good to go. The music is in the

0:43:52.160 --> 0:43:56.400
<v Speaker 1>public domain, the performance is yours, You're fine. But if

0:43:56.440 --> 0:43:59.920
<v Speaker 1>you wanted to, say, use a recording of the London

0:44:00.040 --> 0:44:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Philharmonic's performance that they did sometime in the nineteen nineties

0:44:04.440 --> 0:44:06.719
<v Speaker 1>of ode Joy, well then you would have to deal

0:44:06.760 --> 0:44:09.520
<v Speaker 1>with some licensing arrangements to get the proper permissions to

0:44:09.560 --> 0:44:12.920
<v Speaker 1>make use of that music. Because while the music's in

0:44:12.960 --> 0:44:16.719
<v Speaker 1>the public domain, the performance is not. Then there are

0:44:16.719 --> 0:44:19.160
<v Speaker 1>other things to consider as well. So remember when I

0:44:19.200 --> 0:44:22.480
<v Speaker 1>said parody is kind of a special case with fair use,

0:44:23.560 --> 0:44:27.040
<v Speaker 1>This one gets even more complicated than other forms. So

0:44:27.360 --> 0:44:31.680
<v Speaker 1>technically parody falls under fair use if it falls under

0:44:31.719 --> 0:44:36.320
<v Speaker 1>the criticism and comment consideration for fair use. A typical

0:44:36.320 --> 0:44:40.120
<v Speaker 1>definition of parody is quote and imitation of the style

0:44:40.200 --> 0:44:44.960
<v Speaker 1>of a particular writer, artist, or genre with deliberate exaggeration

0:44:45.120 --> 0:44:49.560
<v Speaker 1>for comic effect. End quote. But that doesn't automatically mean

0:44:49.560 --> 0:44:51.640
<v Speaker 1>that it's fair use. For it to be fair use,

0:44:52.280 --> 0:44:56.800
<v Speaker 1>that specific parody really needs to comment upon or criticize

0:44:57.239 --> 0:45:01.240
<v Speaker 1>the original work that it is parody. For that reason,

0:45:01.520 --> 0:45:05.520
<v Speaker 1>some but not all, of weird Al Yankovic's parody songs

0:45:06.080 --> 0:45:10.319
<v Speaker 1>would easily fall under fair use, and others would be questionable. Now.

0:45:10.360 --> 0:45:13.200
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned weird Al because he's the most famous parody

0:45:13.280 --> 0:45:15.560
<v Speaker 1>artist I can think of, that probably the one that

0:45:15.600 --> 0:45:18.440
<v Speaker 1>most people have heard of, and some of his parodies

0:45:18.800 --> 0:45:22.560
<v Speaker 1>do tend to target the original work. So Smells Like

0:45:22.680 --> 0:45:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Nirvana is a parody of the Nirvana song Smells Like

0:45:25.960 --> 0:45:29.479
<v Speaker 1>Teen Spirit, and it's all about critiquing the original song.

0:45:30.320 --> 0:45:33.160
<v Speaker 1>There are lyrics of what is this song all about?

0:45:33.320 --> 0:45:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Can't figure any lyrics out that comments on the lyrics

0:45:36.800 --> 0:45:39.759
<v Speaker 1>of the original work. Other verses pop fon at Kurt

0:45:39.800 --> 0:45:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Cobain's slurring and mumbling of words, making it hard to

0:45:43.600 --> 0:45:46.680
<v Speaker 1>understand what is actually being sung. So that song parody

0:45:46.800 --> 0:45:50.879
<v Speaker 1>would probably hold up under fair use. But then take

0:45:50.920 --> 0:45:55.440
<v Speaker 1>a song like Foil. Foil is a parody of Lord's

0:45:55.560 --> 0:45:59.920
<v Speaker 1>song Royals, So it's using the music and lyrical structure

0:46:00.200 --> 0:46:03.080
<v Speaker 1>of Royals. You know, they change the actual lyrics, but

0:46:03.120 --> 0:46:06.520
<v Speaker 1>it's the same rhyme, scheme and scan shin of Royals.

0:46:06.840 --> 0:46:11.560
<v Speaker 1>But the song Foil isn't a commentary on Royals. Instead,

0:46:12.000 --> 0:46:14.919
<v Speaker 1>it's a comedic song about aluminum foil. And I'm pretty

0:46:14.960 --> 0:46:18.040
<v Speaker 1>sure you couldn't make an argument that it's somehow commenting

0:46:18.160 --> 0:46:21.560
<v Speaker 1>on the original work, which means that would be harder

0:46:21.600 --> 0:46:24.040
<v Speaker 1>to defend as fair use. It's not a bad song,

0:46:24.080 --> 0:46:26.799
<v Speaker 1>by the way. This isn't a commentary on the quality

0:46:27.239 --> 0:46:30.439
<v Speaker 1>of the parody, but rather whether it would fall under

0:46:30.480 --> 0:46:33.640
<v Speaker 1>the consideration of fair use or not. Now, to be clear,

0:46:34.080 --> 0:46:36.400
<v Speaker 1>weird Al makes it a practice to get permission to

0:46:36.400 --> 0:46:40.880
<v Speaker 1>do his parodies before he does them. He licenses the songs.

0:46:41.239 --> 0:46:44.880
<v Speaker 1>In cases like smells like Nirvana, he might have been

0:46:44.920 --> 0:46:48.960
<v Speaker 1>able to skip that step, or more likely his music

0:46:49.040 --> 0:46:52.879
<v Speaker 1>label would have if they were willing to defend any

0:46:52.960 --> 0:46:56.200
<v Speaker 1>lawsuits that came their way as a result, but as

0:46:56.239 --> 0:46:59.600
<v Speaker 1>both a courtesy and kind of the necessity, he reaches

0:46:59.640 --> 0:47:04.720
<v Speaker 1>out before recording parodies. Usually there's at least one version

0:47:04.760 --> 0:47:06.960
<v Speaker 1>of this where things didn't work out though. Actually there's

0:47:07.000 --> 0:47:08.839
<v Speaker 1>a couple I can think of, but I'm gonna mention

0:47:08.920 --> 0:47:11.520
<v Speaker 1>one in particular. So, back in two thousand and six,

0:47:11.920 --> 0:47:14.120
<v Speaker 1>We're All. Yankovic was working on an album and he

0:47:14.160 --> 0:47:17.120
<v Speaker 1>wanted to include a parody of the James Blunt song

0:47:17.360 --> 0:47:22.320
<v Speaker 1>You're Beautiful. Yankovic's version was a parody called Your Pitiful,

0:47:22.400 --> 0:47:25.839
<v Speaker 1>about a middle aged dude who's seriously down on his luck.

0:47:26.360 --> 0:47:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Blunt was receptive and he gave the go ahead to Yankovic,

0:47:30.239 --> 0:47:36.560
<v Speaker 1>But as Yankovic's album neared publication, Blunt's record label, Atlantic Records,

0:47:36.920 --> 0:47:39.800
<v Speaker 1>reached out to Yankovic's label and demanded that the song

0:47:39.920 --> 0:47:43.800
<v Speaker 1>not appear on the album. And you know, music labels

0:47:43.800 --> 0:47:49.080
<v Speaker 1>typically hold the IP for the actual songs of an artist.

0:47:49.320 --> 0:47:51.560
<v Speaker 1>In this case is a little more complicated than that,

0:47:52.120 --> 0:47:56.160
<v Speaker 1>So getting permission from Blunt, while a good thing, wasn't

0:47:56.400 --> 0:48:00.520
<v Speaker 1>totally legally binding. Blunt probably could have pushed back on

0:48:00.600 --> 0:48:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Atlantic Records about this, but that's not exactly an easy

0:48:04.680 --> 0:48:06.279
<v Speaker 1>thing to do when you're an artist. I mean, you

0:48:06.600 --> 0:48:08.480
<v Speaker 1>want to work with your label. You don't want that

0:48:08.560 --> 0:48:13.480
<v Speaker 1>to be a confrontational relationship. And as I mentioned, earlier.

0:48:14.160 --> 0:48:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Defending fair use is expensive because it all goes to

0:48:18.200 --> 0:48:21.000
<v Speaker 1>that consideration of a court, and that means lawyers and

0:48:21.080 --> 0:48:24.719
<v Speaker 1>lawyers have fees, and so defending an instance as fair

0:48:24.800 --> 0:48:28.560
<v Speaker 1>use in court can mean that you're paying thousands or

0:48:28.680 --> 0:48:33.719
<v Speaker 1>tens of thousands of dollars in fees just to defend yourself.

0:48:34.280 --> 0:48:38.520
<v Speaker 1>There's a financial disincentive to the average person because again,

0:48:39.040 --> 0:48:43.680
<v Speaker 1>these laws were made with corporations in mind, big entities

0:48:43.719 --> 0:48:46.760
<v Speaker 1>that can afford these kind of things. The average person can't.

0:48:47.239 --> 0:48:52.080
<v Speaker 1>So corporations like music labels or publishers have entire teams

0:48:52.080 --> 0:48:54.560
<v Speaker 1>of lawyers who do this stuff all the time. They

0:48:54.560 --> 0:48:57.680
<v Speaker 1>can put pressure on folks with threats of lawsuits, and

0:48:57.760 --> 0:49:00.319
<v Speaker 1>even if those folks are in the right now, even

0:49:00.320 --> 0:49:04.319
<v Speaker 1>if their works clearly would fall under fair use, to

0:49:04.400 --> 0:49:08.120
<v Speaker 1>defend it in court could be way too expensive for

0:49:08.239 --> 0:49:11.120
<v Speaker 1>these individuals to afford it. There have been cases in

0:49:11.120 --> 0:49:15.000
<v Speaker 1>which people have settled out of court for thousands of dollars,

0:49:15.320 --> 0:49:17.720
<v Speaker 1>not because they felt they were legit and the wrong,

0:49:18.120 --> 0:49:20.480
<v Speaker 1>but because trying to prove that they were innocent of

0:49:20.520 --> 0:49:25.200
<v Speaker 1>infringement was more expensive than settling. It's pretty darn brutal. Now,

0:49:25.239 --> 0:49:28.439
<v Speaker 1>what about all those posts and YouTube videos that say

0:49:28.440 --> 0:49:32.520
<v Speaker 1>no copyright infringement intended, those are pretty much worthless. It's

0:49:32.520 --> 0:49:35.000
<v Speaker 1>a kin to posting on Facebook that you aren't giving

0:49:35.040 --> 0:49:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Facebook the rights to your data. That's also useless because

0:49:38.480 --> 0:49:41.000
<v Speaker 1>just by signing on to Facebook and making an account,

0:49:41.040 --> 0:49:44.000
<v Speaker 1>you have to agree to Facebook's terms of service. That

0:49:44.120 --> 0:49:46.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of supersedes your little post that says you're not

0:49:46.760 --> 0:49:50.919
<v Speaker 1>in favor of Facebook using your data. Facebook's responses too bad,

0:49:51.120 --> 0:49:53.640
<v Speaker 1>because you agreed to it by being on the platform.

0:49:54.120 --> 0:49:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Now that's part of our terms of service. If you

0:49:56.200 --> 0:49:59.880
<v Speaker 1>don't want us to take your data, don't be on Facebook.

0:50:00.320 --> 0:50:02.080
<v Speaker 1>That's kind of the way that works. So if you

0:50:02.120 --> 0:50:05.160
<v Speaker 1>come across a video that says no copyright infringement intended,

0:50:05.440 --> 0:50:09.000
<v Speaker 1>or a picture on Instagram that clearly doesn't belong to

0:50:09.040 --> 0:50:12.080
<v Speaker 1>the account that posted it, just note that that phrase

0:50:12.480 --> 0:50:16.520
<v Speaker 1>means nothing. Intent is not part of determining whether someone

0:50:16.600 --> 0:50:19.880
<v Speaker 1>is infringing copyright in the first place. It doesn't matter

0:50:19.920 --> 0:50:23.680
<v Speaker 1>what you intend. There's definitely a gradient when it comes

0:50:23.680 --> 0:50:26.560
<v Speaker 1>to copyright infringement. Like if I include half of a

0:50:26.640 --> 0:50:30.400
<v Speaker 1>music video online, that's copyright infringement, But if I include

0:50:30.400 --> 0:50:34.120
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing that is worse. And if I monetize

0:50:34.120 --> 0:50:37.319
<v Speaker 1>the video where I do it, that's even worse. But

0:50:37.560 --> 0:50:40.920
<v Speaker 1>even that smallest first example I gave is still infringing.

0:50:41.400 --> 0:50:44.279
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't matter whether I think it is or not. You know,

0:50:44.560 --> 0:50:47.399
<v Speaker 1>if I can think something's not a crime, but if

0:50:47.520 --> 0:50:50.040
<v Speaker 1>legally it's a crime, doesn't really matter what I think.

0:50:50.760 --> 0:50:52.360
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of other things I need to

0:50:52.360 --> 0:50:54.000
<v Speaker 1>say about this, but one thing I want to sum

0:50:54.080 --> 0:50:56.880
<v Speaker 1>up with right here before I close out, and we

0:50:56.920 --> 0:50:59.520
<v Speaker 1>will pick back up in the next episode, is that

0:50:59.560 --> 0:51:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Tom's Scott did a great job exploring the issues of

0:51:02.880 --> 0:51:05.799
<v Speaker 1>copyright and YouTube in particular, and I'll look more at

0:51:05.840 --> 0:51:08.120
<v Speaker 1>YouTube in the next episode. He did it in a

0:51:08.239 --> 0:51:13.080
<v Speaker 1>video titled YouTube's copyright system Isn't broken? The World's is,

0:51:13.760 --> 0:51:15.880
<v Speaker 1>And shout out to listener Kat, who first turned me

0:51:15.920 --> 0:51:18.520
<v Speaker 1>on to Tom Scott's videos. Scott does what I do,

0:51:19.120 --> 0:51:21.799
<v Speaker 1>only he does it with a British accent, so he's

0:51:21.840 --> 0:51:24.160
<v Speaker 1>better at it than I am by default. Also, he's

0:51:24.360 --> 0:51:27.440
<v Speaker 1>genuinely good at explaining stuff like this, so make sure

0:51:27.480 --> 0:51:29.879
<v Speaker 1>you check that out and we'll come back to talk

0:51:30.000 --> 0:51:33.839
<v Speaker 1>more about YouTube and copyright infringement and content ID and

0:51:33.880 --> 0:51:37.280
<v Speaker 1>some of the laws that have been passed after big

0:51:37.360 --> 0:51:40.480
<v Speaker 1>media companies have lobbied Congress in the United States that

0:51:40.520 --> 0:51:44.120
<v Speaker 1>have changed the way information gets shared on the Internet.

0:51:44.520 --> 0:51:48.200
<v Speaker 1>We'll also talk about some of the crazy movements that

0:51:48.239 --> 0:51:51.080
<v Speaker 1>companies have made against individuals and an effort to crack

0:51:51.120 --> 0:51:54.560
<v Speaker 1>down on things like piracy. Because all this is tied

0:51:54.680 --> 0:51:57.560
<v Speaker 1>up together and it's all a mess. And really what

0:51:57.600 --> 0:52:00.279
<v Speaker 1>it boils down to is that copyright law itself is

0:52:00.360 --> 0:52:06.880
<v Speaker 1>in dire need of a full rewrite. But that's dangerous

0:52:07.000 --> 0:52:10.440
<v Speaker 1>because the parties that are particularly interested in a rewrite

0:52:10.480 --> 0:52:13.400
<v Speaker 1>of copyright law are not looking to make it better,

0:52:13.680 --> 0:52:18.400
<v Speaker 1>They're looking to make it last longer. Hope you enjoyed

0:52:18.400 --> 0:52:22.760
<v Speaker 1>that episode from twenty twenty one, Copyright and fair use. Yeah,

0:52:22.960 --> 0:52:25.440
<v Speaker 1>fair use is one of those things that we can't

0:52:25.600 --> 0:52:30.560
<v Speaker 1>easily leverage ourselves, even in a podcast in a big

0:52:30.600 --> 0:52:34.719
<v Speaker 1>company like you might wonder why don't I do an

0:52:34.760 --> 0:52:38.959
<v Speaker 1>episode about a certain musical instrument like the Mogue synthesizer

0:52:39.440 --> 0:52:42.359
<v Speaker 1>and then include a whole bunch of Mogue music. Well,

0:52:42.360 --> 0:52:45.839
<v Speaker 1>it's because even though you could argue, yeah, it's fair use,

0:52:45.920 --> 0:52:48.920
<v Speaker 1>you're commenting on something and you're using it as an

0:52:48.920 --> 0:52:53.400
<v Speaker 1>example and it's the vast majority of the material is original,

0:52:53.440 --> 0:52:57.160
<v Speaker 1>it's not taken from a copyrighted work. That's still something

0:52:57.200 --> 0:53:00.360
<v Speaker 1>that comes up in court cases, right, Like, that's you

0:53:00.480 --> 0:53:03.560
<v Speaker 1>argue once you've already been sued, and ain't. Nobody wants

0:53:03.600 --> 0:53:07.600
<v Speaker 1>to get sued. So yeah, it is a complex thing,

0:53:07.680 --> 0:53:11.640
<v Speaker 1>and it's one that unless you're paying licenses to use

0:53:11.760 --> 0:53:15.279
<v Speaker 1>material for so that you can make absolutely certain that

0:53:15.320 --> 0:53:19.360
<v Speaker 1>you're not treading on any toes, you got to be

0:53:19.400 --> 0:53:22.239
<v Speaker 1>super careful. So I hope you enjoyed that episode about

0:53:22.280 --> 0:53:25.239
<v Speaker 1>copyright and fair use. I hope that was interesting and

0:53:25.320 --> 0:53:28.919
<v Speaker 1>informative to you. I'll talk to you again really soon.

0:53:35.000 --> 0:53:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Tech Stuff is an iHeartRadio production. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio,

0:53:40.000 --> 0:53:43.680
<v Speaker 1>visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen

0:53:43.719 --> 0:53:48.280
<v Speaker 1>to your favorite shows.