WEBVTT - What’s Really Causing the Labor Shortage

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.160
<v Speaker 1>I was talking to one agriculture company about whether it

0:00:02.200 --> 0:00:06.160
<v Speaker 1>would help to get prisoners to collect the harvest, and

0:00:06.200 --> 0:00:08.320
<v Speaker 1>they said there are a number of problems, including that

0:00:08.960 --> 0:00:10.880
<v Speaker 1>they might not be very good at it. They might,

0:00:11.240 --> 0:00:14.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, you need particular set of skills, especially if

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>you're picking soft fruits, for example, and also sometimes the

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:26.360
<v Speaker 1>prisoners run away, which is another problem. Hello, and welcome

0:00:26.360 --> 0:00:29.319
<v Speaker 1>to Stephanomics, the podcast that brings the global economy to you.

0:00:29.920 --> 0:00:33.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm Stephanie Flanders, and this week we're investigating why employers

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:37.560
<v Speaker 1>on different sides of the Atlantic are considering extreme solutions

0:00:37.640 --> 0:00:40.839
<v Speaker 1>to their labor shortages. But an economy with millions of

0:00:40.880 --> 0:00:43.879
<v Speaker 1>jobs they can see can still somehow be one in

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:47.960
<v Speaker 1>which unemployed people struggle to find work. It's all the

0:00:48.000 --> 0:00:51.880
<v Speaker 1>flip side, the human side of the supply chain snarl

0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:54.840
<v Speaker 1>ups we come across so often these days, the post

0:00:54.880 --> 0:00:58.800
<v Speaker 1>COVID economy with demands still gaining pace and inflation and

0:00:58.880 --> 0:01:02.640
<v Speaker 1>wages heading up, but at least four million fewer people

0:01:02.720 --> 0:01:05.679
<v Speaker 1>in work today in the US than before the pandemic.

0:01:06.440 --> 0:01:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Later on, I'll ask Jason Furman, previously President Obama's top

0:01:10.200 --> 0:01:13.360
<v Speaker 1>economic advisor, to help me solve the riddle of the

0:01:13.400 --> 0:01:18.120
<v Speaker 1>missing American worker. I'm also here why agricultural companies in

0:01:18.200 --> 0:01:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Russia are weighing the pros and cons of using prisoners

0:01:21.480 --> 0:01:24.400
<v Speaker 1>to bring in the crops. But first we asked US

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:27.840
<v Speaker 1>economy reporter Jill Sharp to give us a taste of

0:01:27.880 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the US jobs market at ground level. Well, I think

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:43.480
<v Speaker 1>that right now everybody is hiring, but they're only hiring

0:01:43.640 --> 0:01:49.080
<v Speaker 1>for lopaying job. They're hiring for positions as only one

0:01:49.160 --> 0:01:51.960
<v Speaker 1>day a week, two days a week, and people cannot

0:01:52.400 --> 0:01:55.279
<v Speaker 1>make it off of that. That's Precious Briggs, a thirty

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:57.520
<v Speaker 1>two year old whose stream of working as a Las

0:01:57.640 --> 0:02:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Vegas cocktail server came to a sudden halt last April

0:02:01.080 --> 0:02:06.680
<v Speaker 1>after COVID nineteen shut down America's gambling paradise. After restrictions lifted,

0:02:06.760 --> 0:02:09.600
<v Speaker 1>she expected her former employer to hire her back, but

0:02:09.680 --> 0:02:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the call never came. Today, Precious is among over four

0:02:13.639 --> 0:02:17.080
<v Speaker 1>million Americans who are unemployed were missing from the labor

0:02:17.120 --> 0:02:21.040
<v Speaker 1>market compared to pre pandemic levels. Like many others, she's

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:24.320
<v Speaker 1>used up her unemployment and pandemic benefits from the government,

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:28.160
<v Speaker 1>and she's getting by on rental assistance, Medicaid, and support

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:31.040
<v Speaker 1>from her family. She's hopeful that she'll land a full

0:02:31.080 --> 0:02:35.119
<v Speaker 1>time job as Vegas continues to reopen. I definitely want

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:37.639
<v Speaker 1>to be in the casino. I love the people and

0:02:37.760 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 1>I love the atmosphere there, So that's definitely something that

0:02:40.440 --> 0:02:42.080
<v Speaker 1>I love, and that's that. It was a dream of

0:02:42.120 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 1>mine to leave Little Louisiana, my little town, and come

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:52.720
<v Speaker 1>here in Tacktail emborsing here. When the pandemic arrived in

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:56.840
<v Speaker 1>the US last year, millions of American workers abruptly lost

0:02:56.880 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 1>their jobs. Now, as the economy recovers, a puzzle has

0:03:01.040 --> 0:03:04.799
<v Speaker 1>emerged in the labor market. The country at over ten

0:03:04.840 --> 0:03:07.600
<v Speaker 1>million job openings at the end of August, according to

0:03:07.639 --> 0:03:10.639
<v Speaker 1>federal government data, and that number might have increased over

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 1>the last two months. The job posting website indeed estimates

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:18.560
<v Speaker 1>there may now be as many as eleven million unfilled openings.

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 1>But while hiring is picked up just recently with over

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:26.679
<v Speaker 1>five hundred thousand jobs added in October, millions remain unemployed

0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 1>or have left the labor market since the pandemics started.

0:03:30.160 --> 0:03:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Economists and policymakers are all wondering where they've gone. Here's

0:03:34.800 --> 0:03:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Julia Pollock, chief economist at the online Jobs marketplace zip recruiter,

0:03:40.320 --> 0:03:43.440
<v Speaker 1>the labor markets, the matching market where you have to

0:03:43.640 --> 0:03:46.760
<v Speaker 1>choose something and be chosen by it, and where all

0:03:46.800 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 1>the jobs are very very differential, the works are very

0:03:48.960 --> 0:03:51.680
<v Speaker 1>very different and so having you know the same number

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 1>of job openings and of unemployed or underemployed workers does

0:03:56.360 --> 0:04:00.680
<v Speaker 1>not imply that there will be a very simple direct match.

0:04:01.520 --> 0:04:05.240
<v Speaker 1>For example, while job postings and warehousing and transportation and

0:04:05.360 --> 0:04:09.880
<v Speaker 1>e commerce related companies have exploded, there's been a decline

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:13.400
<v Speaker 1>in brick and mortar retail postings during the pandemic. Workers

0:04:13.440 --> 0:04:16.159
<v Speaker 1>can't swap out their old job for new one quickly.

0:04:16.480 --> 0:04:19.839
<v Speaker 1>It takes time for people to build up the networks

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 1>down the skills that allow them to move from one

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:26.520
<v Speaker 1>intitut chunnel. In interviews, out of work Americans described myriad

0:04:26.640 --> 0:04:29.880
<v Speaker 1>challenges preventing them from seeking or winning full time jobs

0:04:30.800 --> 0:04:34.240
<v Speaker 1>like precious. Some say employers are offering fewer hours and

0:04:34.320 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 1>lower wages. Others are caring for children or elderly family members,

0:04:39.080 --> 0:04:42.560
<v Speaker 1>limiting their ability to work. Many are scared of contracting

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:46.320
<v Speaker 1>the coronavirus, and some have rethought their careers and opted

0:04:46.320 --> 0:04:50.680
<v Speaker 1>out of traditional employment. Altogether, they're getting by through patchwork

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:55.040
<v Speaker 1>of help, state jobless benefits, federal and local safety net programs,

0:04:55.360 --> 0:05:02.159
<v Speaker 1>help from family and friends. A lucky few, like Josh

0:05:02.360 --> 0:05:05.839
<v Speaker 1>Organ of Omaha, Nebraska, of ditch their workaday lives for

0:05:05.960 --> 0:05:09.920
<v Speaker 1>riches in cryptocurrency. So it was really hard sitting in

0:05:09.960 --> 0:05:13.040
<v Speaker 1>my office making a few dollars a day or whatever

0:05:13.080 --> 0:05:18.000
<v Speaker 1>it was, and then you know, taking a trade on break,

0:05:18.360 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 1>on my lunch break and making you know, my whole

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:24.279
<v Speaker 1>day's age in five minutes. During the pandemic, the thirty

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:26.840
<v Speaker 1>one year old who used to trade crypto on the side,

0:05:26.960 --> 0:05:30.599
<v Speaker 1>began to feel increasingly frustrated with his day job. He's

0:05:30.640 --> 0:05:33.480
<v Speaker 1>trained as a pediatric nurse and was managing a hospital

0:05:33.480 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 1>dialysis unit. Last summer, he hired a financial advisor after

0:05:37.839 --> 0:05:41.520
<v Speaker 1>his wife insisted quit his job and jumped full time

0:05:41.560 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 1>into the fast paced world of crypto. I do remember

0:05:45.640 --> 0:05:49.000
<v Speaker 1>quitting my job and then the next week I made

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:51.760
<v Speaker 1>like eighty thou dollars on a trade, like in just

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:53.320
<v Speaker 1>in the first week, And I was like, okay, cool,

0:05:53.440 --> 0:05:56.919
<v Speaker 1>I just made my whole yearly salary at my job

0:05:57.000 --> 0:05:59.640
<v Speaker 1>in a week after quitting crypto. And that was right

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:03.400
<v Speaker 1>back when the market really started to boom right. Since then,

0:06:03.480 --> 0:06:06.160
<v Speaker 1>he's made more than seven figures and the family has

0:06:06.200 --> 0:06:09.039
<v Speaker 1>been able to purchase a vacation home. He loves the

0:06:09.040 --> 0:06:11.719
<v Speaker 1>flexibility of choosing his own hours and being able to

0:06:11.760 --> 0:06:14.599
<v Speaker 1>care for his newborn. He also has more time for

0:06:14.680 --> 0:06:17.760
<v Speaker 1>exercise and meditation, which he says he ignored for the

0:06:17.760 --> 0:06:20.559
<v Speaker 1>better part of the last decade. Now I'm like starting

0:06:20.600 --> 0:06:22.359
<v Speaker 1>to take care of myself a little bit more too,

0:06:22.400 --> 0:06:25.200
<v Speaker 1>and like trying to be more healthy, um so that

0:06:25.240 --> 0:06:27.840
<v Speaker 1>way I can obviously live longer, just for my family

0:06:27.880 --> 0:06:32.000
<v Speaker 1>and my son. To be sure, many aren't so fortunate,

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:34.640
<v Speaker 1>and a survey of job seekers that zip Recruiter did

0:06:34.640 --> 0:06:37.680
<v Speaker 1>in September, many people said they're relying on friends and

0:06:37.720 --> 0:06:40.680
<v Speaker 1>family to make ends meet, and more people than ever

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 1>also want a remote job, but those jobs remain concentrated

0:06:44.480 --> 0:06:48.600
<v Speaker 1>in specific industries, so that's another source of the mismatch.

0:06:48.600 --> 0:06:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Wh people are are holding out for remote work opportunities

0:06:52.200 --> 0:06:57.359
<v Speaker 1>which have exploded in business and financial services and insurance

0:06:57.400 --> 0:07:00.920
<v Speaker 1>and tech, but which are non existing in in other

0:07:00.960 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 1>industries um like. But now people actually have a realistic

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 1>prospect possibly finding a remote job. Those people are are

0:07:10.120 --> 0:07:13.080
<v Speaker 1>waiting out for those jobs in part because the labor

0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:15.800
<v Speaker 1>market is tight. People are also more empowered to be

0:07:15.880 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 1>picky about respondents in a recent ZIP recruiter survey, so

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:23.560
<v Speaker 1>they don't feel the financial pressure to accept the first

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:29.840
<v Speaker 1>job offer they receive. And one final reason Americans are

0:07:29.840 --> 0:07:33.800
<v Speaker 1>staying home their kids. Parents have pointed to the erratic

0:07:33.880 --> 0:07:36.800
<v Speaker 1>nature of school closings and the high cost of childcare

0:07:37.040 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 1>for their reluctance to re enter the workforce. Zack McGrath

0:07:41.040 --> 0:07:43.040
<v Speaker 1>is a single father of an eleven year old son

0:07:43.120 --> 0:07:45.800
<v Speaker 1>with special needs. He used to work in TV and

0:07:45.840 --> 0:07:49.000
<v Speaker 1>film production before the pandemic and is now looking outside

0:07:49.000 --> 0:07:51.840
<v Speaker 1>the industry because the hours don't give him the flexibility

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:54.720
<v Speaker 1>to look after a son. If classrooms shut down because

0:07:54.760 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 1>of COVID cases, the school closing, you know, and even

0:08:00.360 --> 0:08:04.440
<v Speaker 1>just the random four day quarantines are like the sword

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:09.520
<v Speaker 1>of Damocles. And even if I find this ideal situation,

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 1>you know that it's clearly not out there. That's something

0:08:13.040 --> 0:08:16.720
<v Speaker 1>that no employer is gonna want to deal with. You know,

0:08:16.920 --> 0:08:19.520
<v Speaker 1>just for three days, I can't come in, I can't

0:08:19.560 --> 0:08:28.400
<v Speaker 1>do anything. It's not gonna happen. So in a minute,

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:30.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to talk to the former head of President

0:08:30.600 --> 0:08:34.079
<v Speaker 1>Obama's Council of Economic Advisors, about what's happening to the

0:08:34.200 --> 0:08:38.200
<v Speaker 1>US labor market and just how this great mismatch between

0:08:38.320 --> 0:08:41.160
<v Speaker 1>jobs and workers is going to get resolved, if it

0:08:41.200 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 1>gets resolved. But first I want to head over the

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Atlantic to tell you about another country also looking for workers, Russia.

0:08:49.000 --> 0:08:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Economy reporter on your Quinn in Moscow is here

0:08:52.840 --> 0:08:56.839
<v Speaker 1>to explain on your thanks for joining Stephanomics. Russia is

0:08:57.160 --> 0:09:01.560
<v Speaker 1>facing a similar problem filling jobs across the economy. But

0:09:01.640 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 1>I guess in this case it's no mystery where the

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:08.400
<v Speaker 1>workers have gone, is it. Yeah, that's right, it's definitely so.

0:09:09.320 --> 0:09:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Russia has long had a problem with its aging population

0:09:12.920 --> 0:09:16.160
<v Speaker 1>because of low birth rates during the turmoil in the

0:09:16.240 --> 0:09:19.760
<v Speaker 1>nine nineties after the fall of the Soviet Union UM,

0:09:20.000 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 1>but now it's got more things that are adding to that.

0:09:22.920 --> 0:09:28.240
<v Speaker 1>So for a long time the UM it relied on

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:32.480
<v Speaker 1>migrant workers coming from poorer countries that were part of

0:09:32.520 --> 0:09:36.840
<v Speaker 1>the Soviet Union like Uzbekistan, Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan to fill

0:09:36.880 --> 0:09:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the gap that it couldn't fill with domestic workers. But

0:09:40.920 --> 0:09:43.720
<v Speaker 1>after the pandemic that got a lot more difficult because

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:46.760
<v Speaker 1>traveling was more difficult and countries closed borders, and a

0:09:46.760 --> 0:09:48.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of those people have gone home. So before the

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:52.880
<v Speaker 1>pandemic um it was estimated there about four point five

0:09:53.200 --> 0:09:56.320
<v Speaker 1>million migrant workers in Russia, which makes it one of

0:09:56.360 --> 0:09:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the top four destinations for migrant workers in the world.

0:10:00.400 --> 0:10:04.960
<v Speaker 1>But now we think it's about three million people um

0:10:05.000 --> 0:10:08.959
<v Speaker 1>and all that has been made worse by high death

0:10:09.080 --> 0:10:13.240
<v Speaker 1>rates from coronavirus as the government has been reluctant to

0:10:14.040 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 1>lockdown the economy and vaccine hesitancy has been a big problem.

0:10:20.320 --> 0:10:24.240
<v Speaker 1>How was it manifesting itself? This this shortage of labor?

0:10:24.320 --> 0:10:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Where where do you see that? I know you're often,

0:10:26.760 --> 0:10:30.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure talking to businesses across the economy. Yeah, so

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:35.559
<v Speaker 1>like in some other countries. At first there were big

0:10:35.600 --> 0:10:40.280
<v Speaker 1>shortages in agriculture, but now that's spreading across the economy.

0:10:40.440 --> 0:10:44.880
<v Speaker 1>So retail companies are also struggling to get enough people.

0:10:45.800 --> 0:10:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Another factor is that coreer services are growing really fast,

0:10:50.160 --> 0:10:52.920
<v Speaker 1>and they would have been staffed a lot by migrant

0:10:52.920 --> 0:10:56.000
<v Speaker 1>workers in the past, but because those people aren't around

0:10:56.040 --> 0:11:00.520
<v Speaker 1>anymore than people are shifting to work as carriers and

0:11:00.600 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 1>leaving gaps in other parts of the economy. So UM.

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:08.080
<v Speaker 1>For example, X five Group, which is one of Russia's

0:11:08.120 --> 0:11:13.600
<v Speaker 1>biggest retailers, said that high mortality rates are causing problems

0:11:13.679 --> 0:11:18.760
<v Speaker 1>for its labor supply. UM and russ Agar, which is

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:22.559
<v Speaker 1>one of Russia's biggest agriculture companies, has been increasing wages

0:11:22.640 --> 0:11:25.520
<v Speaker 1>to try and to try and get enough people and

0:11:26.440 --> 0:11:29.480
<v Speaker 1>has had to try and automate some more of its

0:11:29.520 --> 0:11:34.640
<v Speaker 1>work as it struggled to find enough stuff. And obviously

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:37.000
<v Speaker 1>one of the questions, you know, there's the there's been

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:40.840
<v Speaker 1>a talk of labor shortages and lots of different countries

0:11:41.160 --> 0:11:45.400
<v Speaker 1>and UM. One of the question marks is about how

0:11:45.480 --> 0:11:47.800
<v Speaker 1>much is going to feed into wages and how much

0:11:47.880 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 1>that will then feed inflation and make this inflation that

0:11:51.480 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing in a lot of countries not so as

0:11:53.320 --> 0:11:57.480
<v Speaker 1>not as temporary as as people were hoping. How is

0:11:57.520 --> 0:12:00.439
<v Speaker 1>that playing out in Russia? Wages go up, is that

0:12:00.520 --> 0:12:04.199
<v Speaker 1>pushing up inflation? Yeah? So, like I said, rus I

0:12:04.280 --> 0:12:09.960
<v Speaker 1>grow say they've raised wages UM up to ten percent.

0:12:10.800 --> 0:12:15.400
<v Speaker 1>In some sectors wags have been increasing more than that,

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:20.000
<v Speaker 1>and that's definitely feeding into inflation and inflation here is

0:12:20.480 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 1>UM is a political problem for put into because um,

0:12:25.080 --> 0:12:29.440
<v Speaker 1>it really hits living standards. And at the moment, uh,

0:12:30.040 --> 0:12:32.680
<v Speaker 1>it's how high is it now? At the moment, it's

0:12:32.720 --> 0:12:35.960
<v Speaker 1>at the highest in five years. It's about eight percent,

0:12:36.400 --> 0:12:39.920
<v Speaker 1>which is a way above the Bank of Russia's target.

0:12:40.520 --> 0:12:45.680
<v Speaker 1>And so Bank of Russia has been aggressively hiking rates

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:49.640
<v Speaker 1>to try and bring inflation down, but so far it

0:12:49.679 --> 0:12:52.880
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem to be having much of an effect. So

0:12:53.160 --> 0:12:57.679
<v Speaker 1>this isn't just a problem for the economy. It also

0:12:57.760 --> 0:13:02.720
<v Speaker 1>has the potential to slow down growth in Russia and

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:08.080
<v Speaker 1>even undermine Putin's popularity. Yeah, if you can't get so,

0:13:08.080 --> 0:13:10.320
<v Speaker 1>you've got some you've got inflation and wages going up.

0:13:10.320 --> 0:13:13.760
<v Speaker 1>But also the central bank kind of slamming on the brakes,

0:13:13.760 --> 0:13:17.720
<v Speaker 1>slowing economy exactly. And people remember when there was runaway

0:13:17.800 --> 0:13:21.760
<v Speaker 1>inflation in the nineties and how that hit living standards.

0:13:21.800 --> 0:13:23.360
<v Speaker 1>That means that it's much more of the front of

0:13:23.360 --> 0:13:26.880
<v Speaker 1>people's minds here and consistently and polls people say that

0:13:28.040 --> 0:13:32.679
<v Speaker 1>rising prices are the biggest problem. So one of the

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:35.080
<v Speaker 1>reasons the story had caught my eye was that there

0:13:35.200 --> 0:13:40.280
<v Speaker 1>was some pretty aggressive tactics that the Russians. Russia being Russia,

0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 1>there's been some pretty extreme solutions to this problem that

0:13:44.040 --> 0:13:45.960
<v Speaker 1>they've come up with over the years. And I guess

0:13:45.960 --> 0:13:50.680
<v Speaker 1>and maybe looking to now. Yeah, so earlier this year,

0:13:51.080 --> 0:13:56.760
<v Speaker 1>prisoners were brought in to work on railroad upgrades, UM,

0:13:56.920 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 1>for for like cold transportation. UM. And that's kind of

0:14:04.520 --> 0:14:08.280
<v Speaker 1>particularly scary here because it brings back echoes of labor

0:14:08.280 --> 0:14:11.200
<v Speaker 1>camps and Soviet times where prisoners had to work in

0:14:11.280 --> 0:14:15.480
<v Speaker 1>mining or forestry or well reconstruction. So for so far

0:14:15.640 --> 0:14:20.080
<v Speaker 1>that's on a pretty small scale, but people are consistently

0:14:20.080 --> 0:14:24.480
<v Speaker 1>talking about how to solve this with getting more prisoners

0:14:24.520 --> 0:14:28.800
<v Speaker 1>to work. UM. In agriculture, they were looking at getting

0:14:28.920 --> 0:14:32.720
<v Speaker 1>students to help with the harvest, and last year prisoners

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:37.400
<v Speaker 1>also helped with the harvest. And in some regions, UM,

0:14:37.680 --> 0:14:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the government has also looked at bringing in the army

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:45.200
<v Speaker 1>to work on some construction projects. We've gotta worry when

0:14:45.200 --> 0:14:48.840
<v Speaker 1>people start bringing the army to do anything. And I

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:50.920
<v Speaker 1>can imagine, Yeah, that's sort of shades of some of

0:14:50.960 --> 0:14:53.680
<v Speaker 1>those sort of false labor camps and everything. Yeah, well

0:14:53.720 --> 0:14:57.240
<v Speaker 1>all of those as well. I think companies aren't necessarily

0:14:57.280 --> 0:14:59.440
<v Speaker 1>that keen on these ideas. Like I remember I was

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:01.760
<v Speaker 1>talking to one agricultural company about whether it would help

0:15:01.800 --> 0:15:05.520
<v Speaker 1>to get prisoners to um collect the harvest, and they

0:15:05.520 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 1>said there were a number of problems, including that they

0:15:08.360 --> 0:15:10.640
<v Speaker 1>might not be very good at it. They might, you know,

0:15:10.680 --> 0:15:13.800
<v Speaker 1>you need particular set of skills, especially if you're picking

0:15:13.840 --> 0:15:17.680
<v Speaker 1>soft fruits, for example, and also sometimes prisoners run away,

0:15:17.680 --> 0:15:22.000
<v Speaker 1>which is another problem. Then I can see that. And

0:15:22.040 --> 0:15:25.520
<v Speaker 1>what about I mean the immigrants. Obviously it's part of

0:15:25.520 --> 0:15:28.560
<v Speaker 1>the issue is that they're not coming back from from

0:15:28.560 --> 0:15:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Central Asia in these places where they had previously come

0:15:31.560 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 1>from to work in Russia. Are there any efforts underway

0:15:34.720 --> 0:15:40.920
<v Speaker 1>to encourage them back. Yeah, so, um, they're looking at

0:15:41.480 --> 0:15:46.200
<v Speaker 1>potentially putting on charter trains that would bring migrant workers

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:49.720
<v Speaker 1>from Tasha, Kent and Uzbekistan to Russia, which would take

0:15:49.760 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 1>several days on the train. And there's also recently an

0:15:52.680 --> 0:15:57.240
<v Speaker 1>amnesty which meant that migrants who had previously been expelled

0:15:58.160 --> 0:16:02.200
<v Speaker 1>for various reasons be allowed back in now. But at

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the same time, there's a lot of stories and state

0:16:05.520 --> 0:16:10.920
<v Speaker 1>media about migrant workers and crime, which looks like it's

0:16:10.960 --> 0:16:14.720
<v Speaker 1>pushing the other way, even if the situation now is

0:16:14.800 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 1>pretty extreme. Well on you, as we said that things

0:16:18.440 --> 0:16:22.800
<v Speaker 1>are often extreme in Russia. But I appreciate you you

0:16:22.960 --> 0:16:25.880
<v Speaker 1>telling us about this, uh, this challenge that Russia is

0:16:25.920 --> 0:16:30.280
<v Speaker 1>facing on your Quinn great, Thanks very much, m H.

0:16:37.600 --> 0:16:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Now we're going to shift the focus back west to

0:16:40.160 --> 0:16:43.240
<v Speaker 1>the US and the labor market conundrum we heard about

0:16:43.280 --> 0:16:46.080
<v Speaker 1>at the start of the program, and I'm delighted to

0:16:46.160 --> 0:16:48.800
<v Speaker 1>have joining as Jason Furman, Professor of the Practice of

0:16:48.840 --> 0:16:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Economic Policy at Harvard University and the Kennedy School of

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Government and a senior researcher at the Peterson Institute in Washington,

0:16:55.560 --> 0:17:00.960
<v Speaker 1>but previously chair of President Obama's Council of Economic Advice US. Jason,

0:17:01.080 --> 0:17:04.760
<v Speaker 1>thank you for joining Stephanomics once again. And the picture

0:17:04.800 --> 0:17:07.639
<v Speaker 1>we had at the start of the program was an economy,

0:17:07.680 --> 0:17:10.840
<v Speaker 1>a US economy in which there were job vacancies everywhere,

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:14.200
<v Speaker 1>it seemed, but no work for the unemployed. How would

0:17:14.240 --> 0:17:17.760
<v Speaker 1>you characterize it? It's a labor market like none of

0:17:17.840 --> 0:17:20.640
<v Speaker 1>us have ever seen before. Where about you know, six

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:23.080
<v Speaker 1>or seven million jobs short of where we should be,

0:17:24.000 --> 0:17:28.080
<v Speaker 1>but there's still millions and millions of job openings, and

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:32.120
<v Speaker 1>so overall the problem looks more like labor supply than

0:17:32.160 --> 0:17:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the problem we're more used to normally, which is labor demand.

0:17:37.440 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 1>And of course some say this isn't when people talk

0:17:39.840 --> 0:17:46.200
<v Speaker 1>about job shortages, real worker shortages, that it's really it's

0:17:46.200 --> 0:17:49.520
<v Speaker 1>not a shortage of of workers, it's a shortage of

0:17:50.000 --> 0:17:53.040
<v Speaker 1>good jobs that if the wages will hire, people would

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:55.359
<v Speaker 1>be doing these jobs. Yeah, I mean, you do have

0:17:55.400 --> 0:17:59.800
<v Speaker 1>to ask why two years ago people were doing these

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:02.840
<v Speaker 1>jobs at a certain wage and now they don't want

0:18:02.840 --> 0:18:05.280
<v Speaker 1>to do those jobs at the same wage, only want

0:18:05.320 --> 0:18:08.080
<v Speaker 1>to do them at a higher wage. The way I

0:18:08.160 --> 0:18:11.639
<v Speaker 1>teach my introductory economics students, we would describe that as

0:18:11.640 --> 0:18:14.160
<v Speaker 1>a shift of the supply curve. To get the same

0:18:14.200 --> 0:18:17.280
<v Speaker 1>amount of labor as before. You can only get there

0:18:17.640 --> 0:18:20.119
<v Speaker 1>if you're doing it at a higher wage than it

0:18:20.280 --> 0:18:22.960
<v Speaker 1>was before. And how do you think that's going to

0:18:23.040 --> 0:18:25.960
<v Speaker 1>play Is he going to just play out in wages

0:18:26.080 --> 0:18:28.720
<v Speaker 1>reaching a higher level or are they going to be

0:18:29.280 --> 0:18:32.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, are there sort of deeper skill mismatches at

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:36.240
<v Speaker 1>work where the people who are looking for jobs are

0:18:36.280 --> 0:18:39.919
<v Speaker 1>just not the same, just not the right people for

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:43.239
<v Speaker 1>these many vacancies that are there. Right, So, first of all,

0:18:43.680 --> 0:18:47.480
<v Speaker 1>large dose of humility, as in order. No one predicted

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:50.680
<v Speaker 1>that the labor markets were gonna look nearly this extreme

0:18:50.760 --> 0:18:53.560
<v Speaker 1>at this point in time. I certainly didn't, and so

0:18:53.680 --> 0:18:55.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to tell you I know for sure

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:57.639
<v Speaker 1>what it's going to look like. UM a year or

0:18:57.680 --> 0:19:01.480
<v Speaker 1>two from now. UM, if forced to my best guess,

0:19:01.840 --> 0:19:06.240
<v Speaker 1>I think there are enough temporary factors that explain where

0:19:06.280 --> 0:19:10.400
<v Speaker 1>we are now related to COVID, coming out of COVID

0:19:10.760 --> 0:19:13.680
<v Speaker 1>and in the United States, the policy response to COVID

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:17.600
<v Speaker 1>that I think we'll get of the way back to

0:19:17.680 --> 0:19:21.240
<v Speaker 1>where we were. Um, it just may take a year

0:19:21.320 --> 0:19:24.320
<v Speaker 1>or two to get there, But you know, there's a

0:19:24.400 --> 0:19:26.040
<v Speaker 1>risk to that and a risk that this is a

0:19:26.040 --> 0:19:29.880
<v Speaker 1>more permanent change. And I guess one of the ways

0:19:29.920 --> 0:19:32.280
<v Speaker 1>that we get from here to there would be wages

0:19:32.640 --> 0:19:36.360
<v Speaker 1>going up and then inflation going up, potentially staying up.

0:19:36.760 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, we had another round of pretty eye popping

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:43.040
<v Speaker 1>US inflation numbers this week. Do you think that is

0:19:43.080 --> 0:19:45.080
<v Speaker 1>going to play a part that we will see more

0:19:45.200 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 1>during enduring inflation driven by wages another place where humility

0:19:50.680 --> 0:19:54.480
<v Speaker 1>is in order. UM, we haven't seen wage price spirals

0:19:54.520 --> 0:19:57.840
<v Speaker 1>for a very long time. If there's anything that could

0:19:57.840 --> 0:20:01.240
<v Speaker 1>bring a wage price spiral back, it is what we've

0:20:01.280 --> 0:20:07.960
<v Speaker 1>seen with extremely high inflation this past year, and um,

0:20:08.000 --> 0:20:10.960
<v Speaker 1>you know the way that's affecting workers and labor markets

0:20:11.000 --> 0:20:15.120
<v Speaker 1>and businesses. So I think that's a distinct upward risk

0:20:15.600 --> 0:20:19.399
<v Speaker 1>for inflation at this point in time. I guess we

0:20:19.400 --> 0:20:22.520
<v Speaker 1>should have a little pause just to sort of reflect

0:20:22.600 --> 0:20:27.120
<v Speaker 1>on on those latest inflation numbers, just to put them

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:29.479
<v Speaker 1>in put it in perspective for us, just what happened

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:32.920
<v Speaker 1>one month, let alone what's happened on the twelve month horizon. Yeah,

0:20:33.359 --> 0:20:36.320
<v Speaker 1>so in October the cp I went up zero point

0:20:36.400 --> 0:20:39.919
<v Speaker 1>nine percent. A bunch of that was gasoline more expensive,

0:20:40.000 --> 0:20:43.679
<v Speaker 1>that's something global. But you strip out the vaulatile components,

0:20:43.720 --> 0:20:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the core cp I was up zero point six um.

0:20:47.000 --> 0:20:50.680
<v Speaker 1>And that's a real blow to the transitory stories which

0:20:50.720 --> 0:20:53.960
<v Speaker 1>had been pointing out the slowing. Of course c p

0:20:54.119 --> 0:20:58.639
<v Speaker 1>I projecting more slowing, of course c p I. So

0:20:58.680 --> 0:21:02.360
<v Speaker 1>I think this report, broadly speaking, says, buckle your seat belts.

0:21:02.640 --> 0:21:08.359
<v Speaker 1>You know, this isn't slowing down dramatically anytime soon. And

0:21:08.400 --> 0:21:10.560
<v Speaker 1>as you suggest, I mean that's even after taking out

0:21:10.640 --> 0:21:12.400
<v Speaker 1>quite a few things. I mean, sometimes when people talk

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:14.960
<v Speaker 1>about the core and taking out the volatile things, you know,

0:21:15.440 --> 0:21:17.399
<v Speaker 1>for some people that's taking out all the things they

0:21:17.440 --> 0:21:21.240
<v Speaker 1>actually want to buy on a given day. Oh yeah. Oh. Politically,

0:21:22.240 --> 0:21:24.880
<v Speaker 1>what matters actually is almost the opposite of core. It's

0:21:24.920 --> 0:21:29.320
<v Speaker 1>what's happening to food prices and gasoline prices. UM. Core

0:21:29.400 --> 0:21:32.840
<v Speaker 1>is a good construct analytically because it gives you a

0:21:32.880 --> 0:21:35.600
<v Speaker 1>better prediction of where inflation will be a year from now.

0:21:35.880 --> 0:21:39.360
<v Speaker 1>But to understand what people have experienced over the last year, Um,

0:21:39.359 --> 0:21:44.159
<v Speaker 1>they've experienced prices up six point two percent, and and

0:21:44.240 --> 0:21:47.760
<v Speaker 1>they hate that. And I know we're going to you're

0:21:47.760 --> 0:21:51.479
<v Speaker 1>gonna start talking about humility again. But when you have

0:21:51.640 --> 0:21:54.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, you're sitting in sitting at Harvard at least

0:21:54.000 --> 0:21:56.720
<v Speaker 1>some of the time, and you know, with your with

0:21:56.840 --> 0:21:59.840
<v Speaker 1>that more academic kind of long term perspective, I just

0:22:00.080 --> 0:22:03.119
<v Speaker 1>under what you were thinking now about the legacy of

0:22:03.359 --> 0:22:05.800
<v Speaker 1>COVID for the for the labor market. I mean, when

0:22:05.800 --> 0:22:07.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people lose their jobs, and it was

0:22:07.520 --> 0:22:10.679
<v Speaker 1>a really a lot of unprecedented number of people in

0:22:10.720 --> 0:22:13.680
<v Speaker 1>a short time last year, we tend to worry about

0:22:13.760 --> 0:22:17.440
<v Speaker 1>not just the immediate loss of output that they aren't

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:19.600
<v Speaker 1>able to produce because they're not in work, but the

0:22:19.800 --> 0:22:22.160
<v Speaker 1>know how that they've built up in those jobs which

0:22:22.240 --> 0:22:25.720
<v Speaker 1>might be lost forever might affect their human capital and

0:22:25.760 --> 0:22:28.920
<v Speaker 1>the human capital of the country. UM. We had hoped

0:22:28.920 --> 0:22:31.000
<v Speaker 1>that that would not be such a factor this time,

0:22:31.080 --> 0:22:34.960
<v Speaker 1>because not least because it was a relatively brief crisis,

0:22:35.040 --> 0:22:38.840
<v Speaker 1>but also a lot of the most affected sectors were

0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:42.040
<v Speaker 1>places where there weren't a lot of specific skills to

0:22:42.119 --> 0:22:44.960
<v Speaker 1>be lost. UM, what do you what do you think

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:48.840
<v Speaker 1>one year on about the sort of human capital cost

0:22:49.000 --> 0:22:51.680
<v Speaker 1>of that enormous spike in unemployment we had last year.

0:22:52.240 --> 0:22:55.719
<v Speaker 1>I think it's likely meaningful. There's been a lot of

0:22:55.800 --> 0:23:00.360
<v Speaker 1>long term unemployment. People really do lose skills, they lose

0:23:00.400 --> 0:23:03.479
<v Speaker 1>out on the training they were getting on the job,

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:07.720
<v Speaker 1>they get dislocated in a certain way. All the evidence

0:23:07.720 --> 0:23:10.200
<v Speaker 1>we've had from the past is that can have long

0:23:10.320 --> 0:23:15.960
<v Speaker 1>term impacts on sustainable unemployment rates, on wages, and on

0:23:16.119 --> 0:23:20.639
<v Speaker 1>productivity in the economy. That's compounded by the fact that

0:23:20.640 --> 0:23:23.840
<v Speaker 1>we've had low business investment for the last year and

0:23:23.840 --> 0:23:26.479
<v Speaker 1>a half and some of the steps you'll need to

0:23:26.520 --> 0:23:30.400
<v Speaker 1>take to harden against COVID. It's possible that work from

0:23:30.440 --> 0:23:35.040
<v Speaker 1>home and you know, doing teleconferences rather than flying places

0:23:35.400 --> 0:23:39.440
<v Speaker 1>will make up for all of that, But I would

0:23:39.440 --> 0:23:42.199
<v Speaker 1>go with the evidence we have from the past, and

0:23:42.200 --> 0:23:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the evidence we have from the past says experience here

0:23:46.320 --> 0:23:49.520
<v Speaker 1>is quite negative. There's a bit of hope. Um, I

0:23:49.560 --> 0:23:52.440
<v Speaker 1>hope that hope triumphs over experience, but I wouldn't I

0:23:52.480 --> 0:23:55.240
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't count on it. But it's interesting. This was something

0:23:55.280 --> 0:23:59.080
<v Speaker 1>that that I had thought about for some papers that

0:23:59.080 --> 0:24:01.480
<v Speaker 1>we've put together for for the New Economy Forum that

0:24:01.520 --> 0:24:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg's holding in Singapore next week. At this sense of

0:24:05.280 --> 0:24:08.800
<v Speaker 1>this idea of whether what the long term impact on

0:24:08.840 --> 0:24:11.960
<v Speaker 1>productivity and output might be of this crisis, and whether

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:14.680
<v Speaker 1>it might be different from other recessions. As you say,

0:24:14.920 --> 0:24:17.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, the lesson usually is recessions always cause some

0:24:17.640 --> 0:24:22.160
<v Speaker 1>permanent damage, especially to human capital, but also the investment

0:24:22.240 --> 0:24:25.119
<v Speaker 1>base of the country. But you do have you know,

0:24:25.160 --> 0:24:29.760
<v Speaker 1>the International Monetary Fund and some other important forecasters now

0:24:29.840 --> 0:24:32.840
<v Speaker 1>suggesting some kind of COVID dividend for at least some

0:24:32.960 --> 0:24:36.639
<v Speaker 1>of the advanced economies, including the US that actually whether

0:24:36.720 --> 0:24:41.000
<v Speaker 1>it's the infrastructure investments by the US administration post COVID,

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:44.840
<v Speaker 1>or some of the productivity changes that you talked about

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:49.000
<v Speaker 1>working from home, faster digitalization all of US, or maybe

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:51.880
<v Speaker 1>companies using automation more. But all of us using kind

0:24:51.920 --> 0:24:55.359
<v Speaker 1>of teller teller working and all the things more that

0:24:55.480 --> 0:24:57.600
<v Speaker 1>all of that was actually going to put the economy,

0:24:57.680 --> 0:25:00.760
<v Speaker 1>the economy at least in a better place than it

0:25:01.080 --> 0:25:04.720
<v Speaker 1>than we would have expected pre COVID. Do you does

0:25:04.800 --> 0:25:06.760
<v Speaker 1>that make any sense to you? Or do you think

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:09.919
<v Speaker 1>that there's an we're underestimating some of the negatives that

0:25:09.960 --> 0:25:13.720
<v Speaker 1>you just mentioned. Yeah, I think that's certainly possible. Um,

0:25:13.760 --> 0:25:16.720
<v Speaker 1>we could have a COVID dividend coming out of this. Now.

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:18.520
<v Speaker 1>I should point out the I, M F and other

0:25:18.560 --> 0:25:22.000
<v Speaker 1>forecasters we're expecting for the United States that we'd see

0:25:22.000 --> 0:25:26.040
<v Speaker 1>that dividend as soon as Q four of one. They

0:25:26.080 --> 0:25:29.119
<v Speaker 1>had a forecast for g d P post pandemic that

0:25:29.240 --> 0:25:33.280
<v Speaker 1>was higher than their pre pandemic forecast. Um, that's not

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:37.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to materialize. So the schedule for this dividend materializing,

0:25:37.640 --> 0:25:42.200
<v Speaker 1>at least in the United States m keeps getting pushed out.

0:25:42.240 --> 0:25:47.280
<v Speaker 1>But I do broadly think that anyone saying that is

0:25:47.520 --> 0:25:50.600
<v Speaker 1>has a sort of hopeful narrative about the present that

0:25:50.680 --> 0:25:53.360
<v Speaker 1>we don't really have any evidence or data for this logic,

0:25:53.440 --> 0:25:56.359
<v Speaker 1>this theory. There's intuition, but there's no hard data, and

0:25:56.359 --> 0:25:59.119
<v Speaker 1>that that's going to overcome the very very strong data

0:25:59.160 --> 0:26:02.880
<v Speaker 1>we have about what's happened historically when we've had periods

0:26:02.880 --> 0:26:08.120
<v Speaker 1>of prolonged high unemployment and under investment. Clearly there has

0:26:08.240 --> 0:26:13.879
<v Speaker 1>been great concern that during the pandemic, but potentially also

0:26:13.920 --> 0:26:17.840
<v Speaker 1>in the legacy of the pandemic, inequalities that we already

0:26:17.840 --> 0:26:21.600
<v Speaker 1>had are going to have been entrenched and even accelerated

0:26:21.640 --> 0:26:25.320
<v Speaker 1>intensified in some cases, and you've almost highlighted them in

0:26:25.359 --> 0:26:27.520
<v Speaker 1>some of the things that you've You've said, you know

0:26:27.560 --> 0:26:31.040
<v Speaker 1>that the potential for people to lose human capital having

0:26:31.080 --> 0:26:35.119
<v Speaker 1>lost jobs, just as actually some of the more skilled

0:26:35.520 --> 0:26:39.359
<v Speaker 1>and well positioned members of the workforce are actually enjoying

0:26:39.400 --> 0:26:44.399
<v Speaker 1>more productivity, enjoying working from home, potentially even relocating to

0:26:45.000 --> 0:26:48.920
<v Speaker 1>bigger houses outside the city and other things. So how

0:26:48.920 --> 0:26:53.280
<v Speaker 1>do you see that sort of inequality impact of COVID. Yeah,

0:26:53.359 --> 0:26:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the last two years have been a huge blow to

0:26:55.760 --> 0:27:00.960
<v Speaker 1>market incomes for households towards the bottom of the economics spectrum,

0:27:01.000 --> 0:27:05.200
<v Speaker 1>but a hugely progressive response that at least temporarily helped

0:27:05.240 --> 0:27:08.320
<v Speaker 1>them much more than it helped anyone else. Um, of course,

0:27:08.359 --> 0:27:11.880
<v Speaker 1>that response is mostly ending except for money for children,

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:14.600
<v Speaker 1>which looks like it will last at least another year.

0:27:14.760 --> 0:27:19.679
<v Speaker 1>I hope longer than that. Um, you have seen faster

0:27:19.760 --> 0:27:23.000
<v Speaker 1>wage growth for lower wage workers than higher wage workers.

0:27:23.040 --> 0:27:26.159
<v Speaker 1>We saw that before the pandemic, We've seen that during

0:27:26.200 --> 0:27:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic, So you know, all in I think it

0:27:32.160 --> 0:27:36.959
<v Speaker 1>will be roughly neutral for income inequality and has raised

0:27:37.000 --> 0:27:40.960
<v Speaker 1>wealth inequality because we've seen what's happened to equity markets

0:27:41.200 --> 0:27:45.359
<v Speaker 1>and the like. And finally, I think we spoke at

0:27:45.359 --> 0:27:48.959
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of the year when the history of the

0:27:49.160 --> 0:27:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Biden administration was a book that had still all empty

0:27:52.600 --> 0:27:57.040
<v Speaker 1>pages and there was we were thinking about how transformational

0:27:57.240 --> 0:28:04.520
<v Speaker 1>their President Biden's economic policies might be and considering the

0:28:04.560 --> 0:28:07.439
<v Speaker 1>economic yeah, the economic impact of this one year and

0:28:07.480 --> 0:28:10.200
<v Speaker 1>the programs that were unveiled in the first few months

0:28:10.240 --> 0:28:13.560
<v Speaker 1>of the administration, it's it's been a pretty hard slog

0:28:14.640 --> 0:28:16.480
<v Speaker 1>I know, you won't want to knock the people who

0:28:16.480 --> 0:28:18.119
<v Speaker 1>are doing some of the jobs that you've done in

0:28:18.119 --> 0:28:20.199
<v Speaker 1>the past, but we know where are where do you

0:28:20.200 --> 0:28:23.480
<v Speaker 1>think we are now? And how are we doing relative

0:28:23.560 --> 0:28:26.679
<v Speaker 1>to that kind of transformative hope that some people might

0:28:26.720 --> 0:28:29.240
<v Speaker 1>have had at the beginning of the year, given the

0:28:29.359 --> 0:28:33.880
<v Speaker 1>political hand the White House has been dealt. They're running

0:28:33.880 --> 0:28:37.600
<v Speaker 1>ahead of my expectations for what they'd be able to pass.

0:28:37.720 --> 0:28:41.320
<v Speaker 1>They need to get unanimity for one part of their agenda,

0:28:41.360 --> 0:28:43.120
<v Speaker 1>which is going to be really hard to do, but

0:28:43.200 --> 0:28:45.080
<v Speaker 1>it looks like they're probably going to do it. And

0:28:45.080 --> 0:28:48.640
<v Speaker 1>they actually got bipartisan support, especially in the Senate um

0:28:48.720 --> 0:28:51.600
<v Speaker 1>for another part of their agenda. So they're getting more

0:28:51.640 --> 0:28:56.040
<v Speaker 1>done than I expected. They're getting, you know, of what

0:28:56.120 --> 0:28:58.800
<v Speaker 1>the President wanted done, and he wanted quite a lot,

0:28:58.880 --> 0:29:02.120
<v Speaker 1>and of a lot art is still a decent amount.

0:29:02.480 --> 0:29:05.280
<v Speaker 1>But no, it's not going to change everything. Um. It's

0:29:05.320 --> 0:29:08.080
<v Speaker 1>not going to set climate change. It's not going to

0:29:08.200 --> 0:29:11.960
<v Speaker 1>make even preschool universal, so um. But it's it's I

0:29:12.000 --> 0:29:14.080
<v Speaker 1>think it's a good start, um for in terms of

0:29:14.160 --> 0:29:17.760
<v Speaker 1>medium and long run fiscal fillers. A good note to it.

0:29:17.960 --> 0:29:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Jason Firman, thank you very much. Thank you. That's it

0:29:31.840 --> 0:29:34.560
<v Speaker 1>for this episode of Stephanomics. Next week we'll be in

0:29:34.640 --> 0:29:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Singapore with special episodes from the Bloomberg New Economy Forum, including,

0:29:39.680 --> 0:29:43.360
<v Speaker 1>among other highlights, Larry Summers on inflation and the dangers

0:29:43.440 --> 0:29:47.200
<v Speaker 1>of woke central banking, the future of cities, where the

0:29:47.280 --> 0:29:50.680
<v Speaker 1>green finance really can save the world, So tune in

0:29:50.680 --> 0:29:53.480
<v Speaker 1>for all that and follow at economics on Twitter for

0:29:53.560 --> 0:29:56.520
<v Speaker 1>more news and analysis from Bloomberg Economics, from the New

0:29:56.520 --> 0:30:00.160
<v Speaker 1>Economy Forum and around the world. This episode, it was

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:02.880
<v Speaker 1>produced by Mangus Hendrickson, and the story from the US

0:30:03.000 --> 0:30:07.240
<v Speaker 1>was reported by Jill Shah and Katia Dmitrieva. Special thanks

0:30:07.280 --> 0:30:11.320
<v Speaker 1>also to Anya Quinn and Jason Furman. Mike Sasso is

0:30:11.360 --> 0:30:14.560
<v Speaker 1>executive producer of Stephanomics and the head of Bloomberg Podcast

0:30:14.800 --> 0:30:15.680
<v Speaker 1>is Francesco Levi.