WEBVTT - Dialects, Accents, and Linguistic Dexterity – Lab 069

0:00:00.520 --> 0:00:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Did you see Chet Hanks on Z Way, Yes, unfortunately.

0:00:06.680 --> 0:00:10.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I just don't understand why anyone would want

0:00:10.600 --> 0:00:12.760
<v Speaker 2>to make a fool out of themselves like that.

0:00:13.000 --> 0:00:14.080
<v Speaker 1>It's just embarrassing.

0:00:14.280 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 2>And I am a huge fan of Thomas Jeffrey Hanks,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:20.599
<v Speaker 2>and I cannot believe that this is the spawn of

0:00:20.680 --> 0:00:24.599
<v Speaker 2>an American treasure. So Chet Hanks is out there doing

0:00:24.800 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 2>patois and he thinks it.

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:28.520
<v Speaker 1>What he thinks is patois.

0:00:29.240 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 2>Yes, And he said he thinks he put it on

0:00:31.400 --> 0:00:34.720
<v Speaker 2>the map. That's colonizer language. You can't put something on

0:00:34.760 --> 0:00:35.919
<v Speaker 2>the map that was already on.

0:00:35.920 --> 0:00:36.880
<v Speaker 1>The map map.

0:00:37.360 --> 0:00:40.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And so I think it really makes me think

0:00:40.040 --> 0:00:46.120
<v Speaker 2>about people laying claim to other people's language and culture

0:00:46.640 --> 0:00:49.800
<v Speaker 2>and the way they speak. We see this with people saying, oh,

0:00:49.840 --> 0:00:52.199
<v Speaker 2>this is TikTok talk and I'm like, no, it's not.

0:00:52.960 --> 0:00:55.960
<v Speaker 1>No, it's not. And it's just really got.

0:00:55.760 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 2>Our wheels turning right, And I think it's time we

0:00:58.280 --> 0:01:01.040
<v Speaker 2>put it under the microscope. I think this is very important.

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:04.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm t T and I'm Zachiah and from Spotify.

0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:19.760
<v Speaker 3>This is Dope Labs.

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Dope Labs, a weekly podcast that mixes hardcore science,

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:30.520
<v Speaker 2>pop culture and a healthy dos of friendship. You know,

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:35.280
<v Speaker 2>on the show, we love to talk too much, and

0:01:35.440 --> 0:01:38.319
<v Speaker 2>this week we're talking all about how much we love

0:01:38.400 --> 0:01:40.440
<v Speaker 2>to talk and how it influences how we talk.

0:01:40.640 --> 0:01:41.200
<v Speaker 1>All of it.

0:01:41.520 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 2>Yes, from you know, where we were born, from where

0:01:44.440 --> 0:01:45.520
<v Speaker 2>our parents are from.

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Everything influences how we talk.

0:01:48.160 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 2>And so this week we're talking all about linguistics specifically.

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:54.960
<v Speaker 2>We really wanted to know more about how the science

0:01:55.000 --> 0:01:58.320
<v Speaker 2>of linguistics shows up in our everyday lives and some

0:01:58.400 --> 0:02:00.520
<v Speaker 2>of the reasons that we speak the way we do.

0:02:00.840 --> 0:02:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Yes, let's jump right into the recitation. So what do

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:14.079
<v Speaker 1>we know? Tt?

0:02:14.440 --> 0:02:17.280
<v Speaker 2>I think one thing that we know is that language

0:02:17.600 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 2>is complex. I mean, when you think about the number

0:02:21.680 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 2>of languages in the world and how many languages can

0:02:26.040 --> 0:02:30.840
<v Speaker 2>appear in like small sections of the world, it's really wild.

0:02:31.080 --> 0:02:34.360
<v Speaker 2>It's such a big part of our culture and how

0:02:34.400 --> 0:02:35.239
<v Speaker 2>we move.

0:02:35.160 --> 0:02:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Through the world.

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:40.480
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I think we also know that there's so much

0:02:41.120 --> 0:02:44.640
<v Speaker 2>nuance even in the same words that you might say

0:02:45.080 --> 0:02:47.240
<v Speaker 2>how you say them. This is reminded me of like

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:52.320
<v Speaker 2>a tweet that while where people were saying okay, oh, okay, okay,

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:55.240
<v Speaker 2>like it was all the different things like bruh, yeah, bruh,

0:02:55.360 --> 0:02:58.000
<v Speaker 2>Like you know, the same word all these different ways.

0:02:58.000 --> 0:03:02.359
<v Speaker 2>So even like intonation and emphasis in different areas can

0:03:02.400 --> 0:03:03.600
<v Speaker 2>mean so many different things.

0:03:04.280 --> 0:03:05.560
<v Speaker 1>And what we also.

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 2>Know is is that language is influenced by everything that

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:13.640
<v Speaker 2>is happening around us. So when we were younger, you know,

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 2>we spoke a little bit differently what you knew hip

0:03:16.960 --> 0:03:22.280
<v Speaker 2>young whipper snappers are saying these days, we're still trying

0:03:22.280 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 2>to catch up. Oh my goodness, t T is one

0:03:27.919 --> 0:03:33.120
<v Speaker 2>thirty two years old. Even if we take all of

0:03:33.160 --> 0:03:36.920
<v Speaker 2>those things into account, right, there's still so much more

0:03:37.160 --> 0:03:40.840
<v Speaker 2>I want to understand, like what does it mean, like

0:03:40.880 --> 0:03:44.240
<v Speaker 2>when we consider linguistics as a field, Like what's the

0:03:44.240 --> 0:03:48.080
<v Speaker 2>difference between a dialect and an accent? And is there

0:03:48.080 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 2>a such thing as an American accent? Right, you know,

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:52.760
<v Speaker 2>like because it's just a melting pot.

0:03:52.880 --> 0:03:53.720
<v Speaker 1>That's a good point.

0:03:53.880 --> 0:03:59.000
<v Speaker 2>I want to know the linguistic history in the United States,

0:03:59.040 --> 0:04:02.760
<v Speaker 2>and I think specifically for us, I want to know

0:04:03.240 --> 0:04:08.480
<v Speaker 2>some of the roots of black or African American vernacular English,

0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:12.160
<v Speaker 2>like where we got some of our terminology from. Yes,

0:04:12.440 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 2>it's reminded me of when my friend from the Midwest

0:04:15.040 --> 0:04:17.839
<v Speaker 2>recently said, well better lick your caf over and I

0:04:17.960 --> 0:04:25.320
<v Speaker 2>was like, this is a real cowboys were long line cowboys.

0:04:28.040 --> 0:04:38.599
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so let's jump into the dissection. Our guest for

0:04:38.640 --> 0:04:40.679
<v Speaker 1>today's lab is doctor John Ball.

0:04:41.160 --> 0:04:46.080
<v Speaker 4>I'm the Margaret Bush Wilson Distinguished University Professor at Washington

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:50.719
<v Speaker 4>University in Saint Louis, and I am currently President of

0:04:50.760 --> 0:04:52.960
<v Speaker 4>the Linguistic Society of America.

0:04:53.040 --> 0:04:55.840
<v Speaker 2>Doctor Ball has written several books on linguistics and is

0:04:55.880 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 2>known for his theory on linguistic profiling, which happens when

0:04:59.000 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 2>people discriminate agains others based on the way that they talk.

0:05:02.400 --> 0:05:06.720
<v Speaker 2>So let's start with some linguistics basics. We act doctor

0:05:06.720 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 2>bad to break down what he means by linguistic science.

0:05:10.200 --> 0:05:15.719
<v Speaker 4>Linguistics is the science that tries to evaluate what all

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:19.919
<v Speaker 4>human languages have in common, including sign language, and to

0:05:20.520 --> 0:05:26.600
<v Speaker 4>evaluate those commoniolies through some shared scientific principles and methodologies.

0:05:26.960 --> 0:05:31.599
<v Speaker 4>And my own specialty is called socio linguistics, which takes

0:05:31.680 --> 0:05:35.040
<v Speaker 4>all of this linguistic science and then looks at it

0:05:35.160 --> 0:05:38.800
<v Speaker 4>in a social realm. It really is a science you

0:05:38.960 --> 0:05:42.680
<v Speaker 4>can measure and break down all of the elements in language.

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:45.920
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So linguistics is the study of languages, and there

0:05:45.960 --> 0:05:48.560
<v Speaker 2>are thousands of different languages in the world. Many of

0:05:48.560 --> 0:05:51.039
<v Speaker 2>them are very different from one another, but doctor Boss

0:05:51.080 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 2>says they all have certain elements in common.

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:58.080
<v Speaker 4>They all have a sound system produced through articulation that

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:02.479
<v Speaker 4>divides into me meaningful units of sound, whether it's full

0:06:02.480 --> 0:06:05.960
<v Speaker 4>words or prefixes or suffixes, and then they have to

0:06:06.000 --> 0:06:11.000
<v Speaker 4>be strung together in a grammatical sequence to have meaningful leutterances.

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 2>Doctor Bab says that we can see this in English

0:06:14.120 --> 0:06:18.880
<v Speaker 2>with the prefix un un by itself doesn't mean anything,

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 2>but when you use it as a prefix, it means

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:26.480
<v Speaker 2>not so like unfulfilled means not fulfilled, or unreal means

0:06:26.720 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 2>not real. And whether you're a fan of prefixes or not,

0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:32.000
<v Speaker 2>one thing that we know is that where you grew

0:06:32.080 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 2>up in the world can determine how you speak a language.

0:06:35.760 --> 0:06:37.359
<v Speaker 1>Right, we were just talking about this.

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:39.920
<v Speaker 2>I feel like if I'm on the phone with somebody

0:06:39.960 --> 0:06:42.040
<v Speaker 2>for like thirty seconds, I can figure out, Oh, this

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:43.880
<v Speaker 2>person is from the East coast, or they're from the

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:46.239
<v Speaker 2>West coast, or they're from the South, like my friend

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:51.760
<v Speaker 2>who is Southern, Okay. And sometimes even when I hear

0:06:51.839 --> 0:06:54.680
<v Speaker 2>Southern folks h depending on what we're talking about. There

0:06:54.760 --> 0:06:56.640
<v Speaker 2>might be some key words in there, and if I

0:06:56.680 --> 0:06:59.280
<v Speaker 2>listen long enough, I can maybe narrow down the state.

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:03.760
<v Speaker 2>And I feel the same way about folks that are

0:07:03.880 --> 0:07:06.240
<v Speaker 2>from the area of the country where I'm from. So

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm from Maryland, and so they call the DC, Maryland

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:12.520
<v Speaker 2>and Virginia area the DMV. And there's some slang or

0:07:12.680 --> 0:07:16.480
<v Speaker 2>ways of speaking that people from the DC metro area

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:19.280
<v Speaker 2>the way they speak, so I can usually I hear

0:07:19.280 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 2>that and I'm like, oh, what's up. I have seen

0:07:23.760 --> 0:07:26.120
<v Speaker 2>her say that person is from DC, that person is

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:30.680
<v Speaker 2>from the neighboring county, Okay, PG County, and then this

0:07:30.720 --> 0:07:34.040
<v Speaker 2>other person is from Baltimore. Yeah, because Baltimore is not

0:07:34.120 --> 0:07:35.720
<v Speaker 2>a part of what I'm talking about.

0:07:35.760 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore is on separate state. I feel like we have

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 1>different accents.

0:07:43.280 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 2>But somebody recently told me that they can't tell the

0:07:45.400 --> 0:07:47.680
<v Speaker 2>difference between us on the podcast, and so I want

0:07:47.720 --> 0:07:48.960
<v Speaker 2>you to yes, So I.

0:07:48.920 --> 0:07:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Really want you to let that sink in. I don't

0:07:51.600 --> 0:07:56.720
<v Speaker 1>know what. Welcome to the South, you know what, I'll

0:07:56.720 --> 0:07:57.760
<v Speaker 1>take it as a compliment.

0:07:58.360 --> 0:08:01.640
<v Speaker 2>I feel like we have very different acts and speak

0:08:01.760 --> 0:08:03.280
<v Speaker 2>very different dialects at times.

0:08:03.760 --> 0:08:07.840
<v Speaker 1>But doctor All explain to us the difference between dialect

0:08:08.080 --> 0:08:08.679
<v Speaker 1>and accent.

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:13.400
<v Speaker 4>When someone speaks a dialect of a language, that means

0:08:13.440 --> 0:08:17.520
<v Speaker 4>that they do so in a way that has unique

0:08:17.720 --> 0:08:22.880
<v Speaker 4>grammatical properties, and that often intersects with the fact that

0:08:23.120 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 4>speakers of different dialects will also have shared accents. But

0:08:29.040 --> 0:08:31.240
<v Speaker 4>accents are based on your pronunciation.

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So some examples of different accents in English are

0:08:35.480 --> 0:08:40.640
<v Speaker 2>Southern United States, that's your girl, Midwestern New England, and

0:08:40.800 --> 0:08:41.280
<v Speaker 2>New York.

0:08:41.600 --> 0:08:43.760
<v Speaker 1>And there's a bunch of other ones too. Yeah.

0:08:43.880 --> 0:08:47.240
<v Speaker 2>Some examples of dialects of English in the United States

0:08:47.280 --> 0:08:53.040
<v Speaker 2>are Southern again, African American English, and Appalachian English. And

0:08:53.080 --> 0:08:58.840
<v Speaker 2>within these accents and dialects, there's still even finer kind

0:08:58.840 --> 0:09:05.120
<v Speaker 2>of differences. So there's variation based on region, generation, socioeconomic status,

0:09:05.160 --> 0:09:07.840
<v Speaker 2>so many other factors that we can't even name. So

0:09:08.040 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 2>let's take a minute for a pole, because tt I

0:09:10.559 --> 0:09:13.040
<v Speaker 2>know you have a very good ear and you can

0:09:13.080 --> 0:09:16.440
<v Speaker 2>tell somebody's accent in the United States where they're from.

0:09:16.679 --> 0:09:18.720
<v Speaker 1>But I wonder if everybody else can too. I feel

0:09:18.760 --> 0:09:20.480
<v Speaker 1>like it's easy for a lot of people.

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So check the app right now and tell us

0:09:24.080 --> 0:09:28.840
<v Speaker 2>which one of these accents. Can you easily distinguish no problem,

0:09:28.880 --> 0:09:31.559
<v Speaker 2>no trouble, just hands down, I know this person's from

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:33.839
<v Speaker 2>the Midwest, hands down, I know they're from the southern US.

0:09:34.320 --> 0:09:37.520
<v Speaker 1>I want to hear from you.

0:09:40.240 --> 0:09:43.600
<v Speaker 2>Doctor bad told us about the concept of linguistic dexterity,

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:47.400
<v Speaker 2>and that's when people have the ability to modify their

0:09:47.400 --> 0:09:49.160
<v Speaker 2>speech based on their environment.

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:51.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a really great point, tt and I

0:09:52.040 --> 0:09:55.560
<v Speaker 1>really like the term linguistic dexterity because it feels like

0:09:55.640 --> 0:09:58.880
<v Speaker 1>it's dignifying the skill that it takes to use language

0:09:58.920 --> 0:10:02.160
<v Speaker 1>in different ways to connect and communicate with people from

0:10:02.280 --> 0:10:03.200
<v Speaker 1>different backgrounds.

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:06.440
<v Speaker 2>And we see this happening also with Native English speakers

0:10:06.440 --> 0:10:07.680
<v Speaker 2>depending on their environment.

0:10:08.000 --> 0:10:09.560
<v Speaker 1>We call this code switching.

0:10:09.600 --> 0:10:13.319
<v Speaker 2>But doctor Boss, it's technically a little bit of a misnomer.

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:17.840
<v Speaker 4>Code switching is a term that's used quite commonly by

0:10:17.960 --> 0:10:21.240
<v Speaker 4>a lot of Americans. But if you're looking at it

0:10:21.280 --> 0:10:24.880
<v Speaker 4>from a scientific point of view, what most people mean

0:10:24.880 --> 0:10:28.080
<v Speaker 4>when they're talking about black people who code switch is

0:10:28.240 --> 0:10:33.800
<v Speaker 4>in linguistics either called bi dialectalism or style shifting, and

0:10:33.840 --> 0:10:36.359
<v Speaker 4>that's because you're not changing languages.

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 3>MM.

0:10:37.920 --> 0:10:40.320
<v Speaker 1>We talk about style shifting a lot.

0:10:40.520 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 2>Yes, absolutely, Like when we started doing dope labs. That

0:10:44.120 --> 0:10:47.839
<v Speaker 2>was really important to us to not style shift, yes,

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:51.679
<v Speaker 2>and to speak authentically to who we are based off

0:10:51.679 --> 0:10:53.840
<v Speaker 2>of our life experiences and where.

0:10:53.600 --> 0:10:57.000
<v Speaker 1>We grew up, right, and to be honest. We've received

0:10:57.000 --> 0:10:57.640
<v Speaker 1>some pushback.

0:10:57.840 --> 0:11:01.160
<v Speaker 2>Right, people have said, oh, you should more academic or

0:11:01.200 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 2>more scholarly, and I'm like, this is what a scholar

0:11:03.600 --> 0:11:06.719
<v Speaker 2>sounds like exactly, you know, like, oh, you know, it

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:11.080
<v Speaker 2>sound like a vad Well, I have one, so by defaults.

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:12.920
<v Speaker 1>It is.

0:11:13.440 --> 0:11:17.040
<v Speaker 2>Doctor Bab helped highlight the difference between the two. Style

0:11:17.080 --> 0:11:20.360
<v Speaker 2>shifting is happening more along a continuum, whereas code switching

0:11:20.720 --> 0:11:23.319
<v Speaker 2>is when you have complete switching of languages.

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:27.560
<v Speaker 4>And then even with code switching, there are distinctions between

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:33.000
<v Speaker 4>something like Spanglish, which is a mixture of Spanish and English,

0:11:33.040 --> 0:11:36.520
<v Speaker 4>and code switching where part of the sentence might be

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 4>English and then you flip and then have the other

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 4>part of the sentence exclusively in Spanish, whereas Spanglish actually

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:49.040
<v Speaker 4>kind of combines elements of some English words with Spanish words.

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:54.319
<v Speaker 2>Who that is a lot to wrestle, Honestly, it's a lot.

0:11:54.440 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 2>And when you think about it, I mean in the

0:11:57.280 --> 0:12:00.880
<v Speaker 2>linguistic dexterity of it all. What we are able to

0:12:00.920 --> 0:12:05.480
<v Speaker 2>achieve through language is fascinating, and people are able to

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:08.680
<v Speaker 2>do it at the drip of a dime so quickly.

0:12:09.080 --> 0:12:11.600
<v Speaker 2>It makes me think about people from immigrant communities who

0:12:11.800 --> 0:12:15.240
<v Speaker 2>speak English as a second or third or even fourth language.

0:12:15.320 --> 0:12:17.959
<v Speaker 2>They're going to have a lot more linguistic dexterity than

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:20.920
<v Speaker 2>someone who was born in the US and raised in

0:12:20.960 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 2>an English only household. If you've ever tried to learn

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:28.080
<v Speaker 2>a language, you know that the sentence structure changes, how

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:31.400
<v Speaker 2>we handle verbs are differently than a lot of other languages,

0:12:31.440 --> 0:12:35.440
<v Speaker 2>and so it doesn't always overlay perfectly.

0:12:35.040 --> 0:12:38.240
<v Speaker 1>And so it can be really tough.

0:12:38.559 --> 0:12:41.040
<v Speaker 2>I think it sounds like a superpower to have this

0:12:41.160 --> 0:12:44.440
<v Speaker 2>type of linguistic dexterity and the ability to styleship at

0:12:44.480 --> 0:12:46.800
<v Speaker 2>the drip of a dime. But that's not how folks

0:12:46.920 --> 0:12:50.520
<v Speaker 2>are treated like in everyday life, and it's just like

0:12:50.559 --> 0:12:54.280
<v Speaker 2>everything in our society. Racism plays a huge role in

0:12:54.320 --> 0:12:59.040
<v Speaker 2>how society deems people who are in the linguistic majority

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:00.800
<v Speaker 2>versus the minority.

0:13:01.160 --> 0:13:08.040
<v Speaker 4>You have many well educated speakers of mainstream, dominant forms

0:13:08.160 --> 0:13:13.680
<v Speaker 4>of American English who have very little linguistic dexterity. But

0:13:13.800 --> 0:13:17.760
<v Speaker 4>because they speak from a position of linguistic privilege, they

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:21.880
<v Speaker 4>are not penalized for their lack of linguistic dexterity. Right,

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:25.560
<v Speaker 4>The burden is always upon the group who is not

0:13:25.720 --> 0:13:28.760
<v Speaker 4>the dominant group. And we could take it international. You

0:13:28.800 --> 0:13:31.720
<v Speaker 4>can go to France or Germany or England, and the

0:13:31.760 --> 0:13:35.720
<v Speaker 4>well educated speech of the upper classes is the norm

0:13:35.840 --> 0:13:39.280
<v Speaker 4>by which everyone else is judged. And then that's true

0:13:39.320 --> 0:13:42.760
<v Speaker 4>here in the United States except for one wonderful exception,

0:13:43.080 --> 0:13:47.600
<v Speaker 4>and that's the fact that many very wealthy educated Americans,

0:13:48.000 --> 0:13:50.800
<v Speaker 4>most of them tend to be white, often speak with

0:13:50.880 --> 0:13:55.920
<v Speaker 4>different regional dialects. We see this beautifully displayed in Congress

0:13:55.960 --> 0:14:00.480
<v Speaker 4>and the Senate. You don't see somebody saying to Lindsay Graham, oh,

0:14:00.559 --> 0:14:03.800
<v Speaker 4>you need to sound more like a TV broadcaster. Right,

0:14:04.040 --> 0:14:07.200
<v Speaker 4>Lindsey Graham's going to sound like the southern senator he is.

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:09.520
<v Speaker 4>And oh, by the way, that's helpful to him in

0:14:09.520 --> 0:14:10.920
<v Speaker 4>his political context.

0:14:11.080 --> 0:14:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:14.560
<v Speaker 2>You know when sometimes people say, oh, there are sometimes terms,

0:14:14.559 --> 0:14:21.280
<v Speaker 2>there are sometimes accents, those are the hidden signals that, oh,

0:14:21.360 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 2>this person is like me. You know, where we get

0:14:24.120 --> 0:14:28.840
<v Speaker 2>different people associating grouping and social grouping when they hear

0:14:28.880 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 2>someone speak. This also makes me think about the linguistic

0:14:33.720 --> 0:14:36.800
<v Speaker 2>heritage when we talk about the South, right, Yeah, the

0:14:36.920 --> 0:14:41.680
<v Speaker 2>heritage and what has happened historically and how that's influenced linguistics.

0:14:41.760 --> 0:14:43.480
<v Speaker 2>And so, you know, we both want to learn more

0:14:43.480 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 2>about the linguistic heritage of black people in the United

0:14:45.720 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 2>States and understand how history has shaped the words and

0:14:48.760 --> 0:14:53.040
<v Speaker 2>phrases that show up in African American dialects, specifically in

0:14:53.080 --> 0:14:54.320
<v Speaker 2>the past and the present.

0:14:54.640 --> 0:15:00.560
<v Speaker 4>There are unique properties to the linguistic dexterity exhibited by

0:15:00.920 --> 0:15:04.600
<v Speaker 4>African Americans. And then we need to take into account

0:15:04.840 --> 0:15:09.560
<v Speaker 4>that at this point in time, not all African Americans

0:15:10.120 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 4>are slave descendants, right, So the linguistic legacy that we're

0:15:14.520 --> 0:15:18.720
<v Speaker 4>speaking of has to do with the fact that slavery

0:15:19.800 --> 0:15:25.920
<v Speaker 4>created a unique set of linguistic circumstances that are not

0:15:26.760 --> 0:15:29.160
<v Speaker 4>shared by any other group that came.

0:15:29.560 --> 0:15:33.880
<v Speaker 2>The Transatlantic slave trade stole people from their lives in Africa,

0:15:34.160 --> 0:15:37.840
<v Speaker 2>taking away their freedom, family, culture, and languages, and so

0:15:38.000 --> 0:15:42.040
<v Speaker 2>much more. This experience is unique to the victims of

0:15:42.080 --> 0:15:42.840
<v Speaker 2>the slave trade.

0:15:43.320 --> 0:15:46.320
<v Speaker 4>Every immigrant group that's come to the United States had

0:15:46.360 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 4>their own volition. In other words, they decided, come on, y'all,

0:15:49.920 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 4>we're going to back up. We're moving to America right

0:15:53.000 --> 0:15:56.280
<v Speaker 4>where it was their decision. Where they were not enslaved,

0:15:56.680 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 4>they did so with others who spoke their same language.

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:07.440
<v Speaker 4>That's why we have communities where Polish, Italian, German, Korean, Russian, Japanese, Vietnamese.

0:16:08.080 --> 0:16:12.240
<v Speaker 4>They all came to America intact. So how come no

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:16.840
<v Speaker 4>African language made it across. Some people with racist stereotypes

0:16:16.880 --> 0:16:19.240
<v Speaker 4>would say, well, because well, the black people aren't smart

0:16:19.360 --> 0:16:20.720
<v Speaker 4>enough to remember their language.

0:16:20.800 --> 0:16:24.200
<v Speaker 2>No. When African people were captured during the Atlantic slave trade,

0:16:24.280 --> 0:16:27.720
<v Speaker 2>they were often separated by language to restrict and limit

0:16:27.840 --> 0:16:30.560
<v Speaker 2>their ability to communicate and to prevent uprisings.

0:16:30.720 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 4>One of the very first things they did, even before

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:37.560
<v Speaker 4>the Atlantic crossing, was let's divide them up. Who speaks Tweet,

0:16:37.600 --> 0:16:41.400
<v Speaker 4>who speaks Ebo, separate them And so that created a

0:16:41.440 --> 0:16:45.320
<v Speaker 4>situation where you've already got dislocation from the mother tongue

0:16:45.800 --> 0:16:49.120
<v Speaker 4>even before you board the slave ships. You've already snatched

0:16:49.160 --> 0:16:52.440
<v Speaker 4>somebody from their family. You're about to put them into

0:16:52.480 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 4>slavery for the rest of their lives. They're going to

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:57.400
<v Speaker 4>be trying to figure out out to escape. Well, if

0:16:57.440 --> 0:17:00.320
<v Speaker 4>everybody speaks the same language, they're going to be firing

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:01.040
<v Speaker 4>pretty quickly.

0:17:01.320 --> 0:17:05.560
<v Speaker 2>This intentional separation and denial of language continued once enslave

0:17:05.600 --> 0:17:07.200
<v Speaker 2>people arrived in America.

0:17:07.280 --> 0:17:10.960
<v Speaker 4>Once you get to America and you're put on the

0:17:11.040 --> 0:17:15.159
<v Speaker 4>auction block, it's illegal to teach you to read and write. Okay,

0:17:15.440 --> 0:17:17.440
<v Speaker 4>you don't get to go to school. There's no such

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:20.200
<v Speaker 4>thing as a public school for slaves. You're out there

0:17:20.200 --> 0:17:23.480
<v Speaker 4>into plantation. We need you picking cotton. So where do

0:17:23.520 --> 0:17:26.560
<v Speaker 4>you get exposed to English? You get exposed to English

0:17:26.640 --> 0:17:28.920
<v Speaker 4>by the white slave over here. Well, it turns out

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:32.480
<v Speaker 4>most of them they didn't get here by their own choice.

0:17:32.560 --> 0:17:35.760
<v Speaker 4>They happened to be, for the most part, indentured servants

0:17:36.200 --> 0:17:40.359
<v Speaker 4>from Scotland and Ireland, and they would say things like

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:44.760
<v Speaker 4>the bucket done be over yonder in their brogue. Well

0:17:44.840 --> 0:17:48.520
<v Speaker 4>that done be over yonder. You hear black people say

0:17:48.560 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 4>all the time, I'll be done. Told you that. That's

0:17:51.680 --> 0:17:55.000
<v Speaker 4>from the Scots Irish. And the fact that we were

0:17:55.040 --> 0:18:01.000
<v Speaker 4>denied access to schools for hundreds of years. That linguistic fossilization,

0:18:01.840 --> 0:18:06.359
<v Speaker 4>which is grammatically productive, is passed from one generation to

0:18:06.440 --> 0:18:08.000
<v Speaker 4>the next in a very useful way.

0:18:08.359 --> 0:18:09.439
<v Speaker 1>I really like that phrase.

0:18:09.480 --> 0:18:13.520
<v Speaker 2>Grammatically productive people understand it and when you think about

0:18:13.560 --> 0:18:15.119
<v Speaker 2>the words, they make sense.

0:18:15.520 --> 0:18:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely.

0:18:16.880 --> 0:18:18.920
<v Speaker 2>Let's take a break and when we come back we'll

0:18:18.920 --> 0:18:41.400
<v Speaker 2>get into more of the linguistic nuances of Black American English.

0:18:42.480 --> 0:18:45.440
<v Speaker 2>We're back, and don't get too sad, but next week

0:18:45.440 --> 0:18:46.600
<v Speaker 2>we're going to be out of the lab.

0:18:46.880 --> 0:18:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Don't worry. Don't worry.

0:18:47.960 --> 0:18:50.399
<v Speaker 2>We've got you covered with one of our favorite labs

0:18:50.480 --> 0:18:53.760
<v Speaker 2>until we return. Before the break, we talked about the

0:18:53.840 --> 0:18:56.600
<v Speaker 2>linguistic heritage of black people in the United States and

0:18:56.640 --> 0:18:59.879
<v Speaker 2>how the legacy of slavery shows up in our speech today.

0:19:00.160 --> 0:19:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Now that we understand that the slave trade was integral

0:19:03.680 --> 0:19:07.159
<v Speaker 1>to the way African American dialects formed in resistance to

0:19:07.200 --> 0:19:10.080
<v Speaker 1>the violence of white supremacy, we want to understand some

0:19:10.160 --> 0:19:13.720
<v Speaker 1>of the linguistic differences that we hear in these dialects.

0:19:13.960 --> 0:19:18.800
<v Speaker 4>So African Americans who are familiar with the colloquial vernacular

0:19:18.920 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 4>dialect will know well that one of the common words

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:27.840
<v Speaker 4>used in ways that are not similar to other dialects

0:19:27.840 --> 0:19:31.679
<v Speaker 4>of English is the word be as in you know,

0:19:32.320 --> 0:19:37.199
<v Speaker 4>they be talking right, or she be sick. And what

0:19:37.320 --> 0:19:40.600
<v Speaker 4>a lot of people don't realize is that doesn't mean

0:19:40.640 --> 0:19:45.880
<v Speaker 4>the same thing as she is sick. Or sometimes that

0:19:45.960 --> 0:19:50.440
<v Speaker 4>particular expression where is would be used, the word is

0:19:50.520 --> 0:19:52.720
<v Speaker 4>doesn't appear. They just say she's sick.

0:19:53.240 --> 0:19:56.880
<v Speaker 2>Like we learned earlier, different dialects have their own unique grammar,

0:19:57.080 --> 0:19:59.080
<v Speaker 2>and it's not as simple as swapping out one word

0:19:59.119 --> 0:20:02.720
<v Speaker 2>for another. The grammar allows for meaning to change, and

0:20:02.800 --> 0:20:04.880
<v Speaker 2>we see people doing it wrong on the internet all

0:20:04.920 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 2>the time.

0:20:05.359 --> 0:20:09.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, that's not that's not for you. Talk about

0:20:09.880 --> 0:20:10.600
<v Speaker 1>what you know about.

0:20:10.880 --> 0:20:14.359
<v Speaker 4>Oh, come on, somebody, So what's the difference between he

0:20:15.000 --> 0:20:19.000
<v Speaker 4>happy and he'd be happy? He be happy means he's

0:20:19.119 --> 0:20:22.720
<v Speaker 4>usually happy all the time. It's an habitual state of affairs.

0:20:23.040 --> 0:20:27.000
<v Speaker 4>He happy, or he's happy, or he is happy could

0:20:27.040 --> 0:20:30.480
<v Speaker 4>be a momentary state. Unfortunately, because of the history of

0:20:30.480 --> 0:20:34.360
<v Speaker 4>the country, when people didn't know anything about linguistics and

0:20:34.520 --> 0:20:38.080
<v Speaker 4>slaves would say things like, you know, i'd be going

0:20:38.160 --> 0:20:41.840
<v Speaker 4>to the store or we be jumping, they would say, oh,

0:20:42.040 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 4>you know, they're not educated. They don't understand English properly.

0:20:46.200 --> 0:20:48.480
<v Speaker 2>And this just goes back to that myth where people

0:20:48.520 --> 0:20:52.240
<v Speaker 2>think that they can tell how educated someone is based

0:20:52.280 --> 0:20:53.200
<v Speaker 2>on the way that they talk.

0:20:53.720 --> 0:20:55.160
<v Speaker 1>The next example is ben.

0:20:55.680 --> 0:20:59.400
<v Speaker 2>Doctor Ba discusses the research of his colleague, doctor John Rickford,

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:02.240
<v Speaker 2>a professor of linguistics at Stanford University.

0:21:02.760 --> 0:21:08.040
<v Speaker 4>The difference between the emphasis on the word ben as

0:21:08.080 --> 0:21:12.560
<v Speaker 4>in b e n as in we've been to the movies,

0:21:13.080 --> 0:21:16.679
<v Speaker 4>and the difference that he pointed out is if you

0:21:16.840 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 4>ask someone is your sister married? If you answered, oh,

0:21:22.040 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 4>she'd been married, okay, that means not only is she

0:21:26.640 --> 0:21:28.959
<v Speaker 4>married now, she's been married a long time. But if

0:21:29.000 --> 0:21:32.960
<v Speaker 4>you said she'd been married, that means she's no longer married, but.

0:21:32.960 --> 0:21:33.560
<v Speaker 1>She used to be.

0:21:34.359 --> 0:21:37.480
<v Speaker 2>In this example, the difference in meaning comes from the

0:21:37.520 --> 0:21:41.240
<v Speaker 2>tonal difference in the word ben. English is not a

0:21:41.320 --> 0:21:46.160
<v Speaker 2>tonal language, but some African languages are tonal languages.

0:21:46.520 --> 0:21:51.800
<v Speaker 4>So the slaves hearing the word ben began to impose

0:21:51.840 --> 0:21:56.800
<v Speaker 4>a grammatical distinction using tone that was not part of English.

0:21:57.080 --> 0:21:58.920
<v Speaker 4>And again, because they weren't going to school, it wasn't

0:21:58.920 --> 0:22:00.000
<v Speaker 4>anybody correcting them.

0:22:00.359 --> 0:22:02.840
<v Speaker 2>It's so amazing how black people are able to maintain

0:22:02.920 --> 0:22:05.679
<v Speaker 2>that tonal aspect of their native languages in the creation

0:22:05.760 --> 0:22:08.600
<v Speaker 2>of this new dialect of English. Like one of my

0:22:08.600 --> 0:22:13.000
<v Speaker 2>favorite words that has a lot of different intonations, I

0:22:13.000 --> 0:22:19.320
<v Speaker 2>guess or tonalities is all right, like all right, like

0:22:19.400 --> 0:22:22.160
<v Speaker 2>all right, that kind of like all right, we're gonna

0:22:22.320 --> 0:22:24.680
<v Speaker 2>keep messing around, is gonna be a problem, all right,

0:22:25.880 --> 0:22:27.960
<v Speaker 2>all right, I got you.

0:22:28.400 --> 0:22:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Like, it's just so many things. Ah, I feel like okay.

0:22:33.160 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 2>Too, and bet and baby baby. The next example is

0:22:41.640 --> 0:22:44.239
<v Speaker 2>one that a lot of people have opinions on the

0:22:44.280 --> 0:22:48.879
<v Speaker 2>way we say ask, so ask and how Some folks

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:50.080
<v Speaker 2>say acts.

0:22:51.160 --> 0:22:53.960
<v Speaker 1>So, like different pronunciations for the same word yes.

0:22:53.880 --> 0:22:56.280
<v Speaker 2>So ask and how some people say, oh, can I

0:22:56.359 --> 0:22:59.680
<v Speaker 2>ask you a question? The linguistic term for this is metathesis,

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:01.640
<v Speaker 2>where you invert to sounds.

0:23:02.119 --> 0:23:04.960
<v Speaker 4>If you're a parent of a child, when your child

0:23:05.040 --> 0:23:09.040
<v Speaker 4>was growing up, they said pasketti rather than spaghetti. Now

0:23:09.040 --> 0:23:14.639
<v Speaker 4>why would they do that? Well, Technically, having the syllable

0:23:14.920 --> 0:23:18.439
<v Speaker 4>S before a P and then a vowel sound is

0:23:18.480 --> 0:23:24.200
<v Speaker 4>difficult to produce, whereas pasketti has a consonant followed by

0:23:24.240 --> 0:23:27.159
<v Speaker 4>a vowel then followed by an S sound. Well, it

0:23:27.240 --> 0:23:31.879
<v Speaker 4>turns out that ask a vowel and then what we

0:23:31.920 --> 0:23:35.399
<v Speaker 4>in linguistics call a sibilant consonant and then a stop

0:23:35.520 --> 0:23:41.159
<v Speaker 4>consonant is more difficult to produce than a vowel followed

0:23:41.160 --> 0:23:47.200
<v Speaker 4>by a stop consonant. So ax versus ask is easier

0:23:47.240 --> 0:23:50.199
<v Speaker 4>to pronounce in terms of just the phonology of it.

0:23:51.240 --> 0:23:54.280
<v Speaker 4>And some people say, oh, well, on't they get confused

0:23:54.320 --> 0:23:59.359
<v Speaker 4>because an ax is a tool, Well, an ax is

0:23:59.400 --> 0:24:04.920
<v Speaker 4>also and ask is a verb. So therefore, if I say,

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:08.320
<v Speaker 4>let me ask you a question, unless you don't speak English,

0:24:08.400 --> 0:24:11.160
<v Speaker 4>you're not going to assume that the person has substituted

0:24:11.200 --> 0:24:15.480
<v Speaker 4>a noun for a verb. Those two pronunciations live quite compatibly.

0:24:15.920 --> 0:24:19.959
<v Speaker 2>Let me tell you something, Hey, I want to go

0:24:20.000 --> 0:24:21.240
<v Speaker 2>all the way back to the fifth grade.

0:24:21.359 --> 0:24:27.320
<v Speaker 1>No, actually it was second grade, missus Schmidt and shot

0:24:27.359 --> 0:24:27.959
<v Speaker 1>to fire.

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:32.160
<v Speaker 2>And I would always always say asks, Oh, I want

0:24:32.160 --> 0:24:32.760
<v Speaker 2>to ask the question.

0:24:32.800 --> 0:24:35.119
<v Speaker 1>She'd be like, no, I don't want you to ask me.

0:24:35.840 --> 0:24:38.680
<v Speaker 1>And I'd be like, that's okliating.

0:24:38.840 --> 0:24:43.119
<v Speaker 2>And just like we talked about exactly like you were

0:24:43.119 --> 0:24:45.840
<v Speaker 2>talking about a now and a verb and you know,

0:24:46.400 --> 0:24:50.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, And so language is a tool to communicate

0:24:50.960 --> 0:24:55.840
<v Speaker 2>how everything, and when folks try and box you in

0:24:55.880 --> 0:24:58.880
<v Speaker 2>to only speak it in a certain way, it prevents

0:24:58.920 --> 0:25:02.959
<v Speaker 2>that dexter that doctor Ball was talking about. So when

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:04.760
<v Speaker 2>we're talking about I knew what you were talking about

0:25:04.760 --> 0:25:06.040
<v Speaker 2>nomadic productivity.

0:25:06.320 --> 0:25:08.080
<v Speaker 1>You knew what I was talking about, and you knew

0:25:08.119 --> 0:25:10.320
<v Speaker 1>it made sense. You were just giving me a hard time.

0:25:12.560 --> 0:25:16.359
<v Speaker 2>Doctor Bo's next example is about the linguistics of hip hop.

0:25:16.840 --> 0:25:20.480
<v Speaker 4>Not only do people notice these linguistic differences, you get

0:25:20.480 --> 0:25:26.040
<v Speaker 4>some pride taking place. Right, So this slang term fat

0:25:26.080 --> 0:25:31.160
<v Speaker 4>comes into existence. Oh that's fat, but it spelled phat

0:25:31.800 --> 0:25:35.080
<v Speaker 4>in rap culture. Let's think about that. Did those young

0:25:35.119 --> 0:25:37.320
<v Speaker 4>brothers that came up with that, were they really thinking, oh,

0:25:37.320 --> 0:25:41.960
<v Speaker 4>that's pahat. No, they had taken the English classes that

0:25:42.119 --> 0:25:46.320
<v Speaker 4>showed them that Philip was spelled pH and they're like, oh,

0:25:46.400 --> 0:25:49.719
<v Speaker 4>so pH is the F sound okay? Well, if pH

0:25:49.880 --> 0:25:52.720
<v Speaker 4>is f and fat is a slang term and I

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:55.880
<v Speaker 4>spell it with pH, but I pronounced it fat, I'm

0:25:56.200 --> 0:26:00.640
<v Speaker 4>reinforcing my linguistic loyalty too much. Culture.

0:26:01.000 --> 0:26:04.879
<v Speaker 2>That's another great one that I like, reinforcing my linguistic

0:26:05.040 --> 0:26:08.480
<v Speaker 2>loyalty to my culture. And when you learn about that

0:26:08.720 --> 0:26:12.600
<v Speaker 2>rich linguistic culture and heritage, it just makes you feel

0:26:12.600 --> 0:26:15.879
<v Speaker 2>even stronger that those phrases and dialects should be preserved

0:26:16.040 --> 0:26:20.360
<v Speaker 2>and that we should continue to exercise our linguistic dexterity.

0:26:20.680 --> 0:26:22.200
<v Speaker 1>It also makes me think about.

0:26:22.119 --> 0:26:26.480
<v Speaker 2>Mmm, oh my god when we see non black people

0:26:26.520 --> 0:26:28.560
<v Speaker 2>trying to use phrases or words in a dialect that

0:26:28.600 --> 0:26:30.479
<v Speaker 2>they didn't grow up with. And so we see them

0:26:30.520 --> 0:26:31.960
<v Speaker 2>doing this a lot. I see it a lot on

0:26:32.000 --> 0:26:34.359
<v Speaker 2>social media, but they're using it in the wrong way,

0:26:34.960 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 2>trying to look cool.

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Ooh Chile, Yes, you mean woo child.

0:26:40.800 --> 0:26:44.480
<v Speaker 2>Yes. And we talked about cultural appropriation in black music

0:26:44.640 --> 0:26:47.199
<v Speaker 2>in last week's episode. Yes, but we wanted to know

0:26:47.240 --> 0:26:50.600
<v Speaker 2>what doctor Bob thought from a linguistic perspective about the

0:26:50.640 --> 0:26:54.360
<v Speaker 2>mainstream consumption and use of African American English and its

0:26:54.400 --> 0:26:56.919
<v Speaker 2>impact on the dialect and meaning of the words.

0:26:57.160 --> 0:27:00.159
<v Speaker 4>So as a linguist, one of the things that it's

0:27:00.200 --> 0:27:05.760
<v Speaker 4>important to realize is that all languages constantly undergo change,

0:27:06.359 --> 0:27:12.560
<v Speaker 4>and so when people adopt a style of speaking that's

0:27:12.640 --> 0:27:17.320
<v Speaker 4>not native to them, you have to ask what's their motivation.

0:27:18.000 --> 0:27:20.560
<v Speaker 4>And when I was a child, and we're talking in

0:27:20.600 --> 0:27:24.359
<v Speaker 4>the nineteen fifties and nineteen sixties, the vast majority of

0:27:24.440 --> 0:27:29.800
<v Speaker 4>times that you would see white's imitating black speech was

0:27:30.280 --> 0:27:34.480
<v Speaker 4>in a very overt racist and discriminatory way. That's very

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:38.080
<v Speaker 4>different than fourteen year old white boys that trying to

0:27:38.119 --> 0:27:41.639
<v Speaker 4>sound like Tupac, who they think of as kind of

0:27:41.680 --> 0:27:45.800
<v Speaker 4>an urban hero. And they're not coming from a place

0:27:45.840 --> 0:27:47.880
<v Speaker 4>of racism when they try to say it.

0:27:47.960 --> 0:27:50.280
<v Speaker 2>But it's still not right. Yeah, it might not be

0:27:50.280 --> 0:27:52.160
<v Speaker 2>coming from a place of racism, but it's still not right.

0:27:52.200 --> 0:27:54.520
<v Speaker 2>And I think it makes me think about On z

0:27:54.680 --> 0:27:59.360
<v Speaker 2>Way's show recently, she talked to Chitt Hanks about him

0:27:59.400 --> 0:28:03.200
<v Speaker 2>saying that he thought he was putting Patois on the map.

0:28:04.080 --> 0:28:11.119
<v Speaker 2>Kind sir, that's how you being generous. Yeah, you're totally oblivious.

0:28:11.359 --> 0:28:15.800
<v Speaker 2>You're not appreciating the rich linguistic heritage here. No, he's

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:20.440
<v Speaker 2>just doing a caricature of it and for clicks and likes,

0:28:20.800 --> 0:28:23.359
<v Speaker 2>which is not what it's about. And nobody's saying he

0:28:23.440 --> 0:28:26.080
<v Speaker 2>must be dumb because he's not speaking in a certain

0:28:26.119 --> 0:28:29.639
<v Speaker 2>way the way they would if a native Patois speaker

0:28:29.720 --> 0:28:34.959
<v Speaker 2>was speaking right. Same thing for the adoption of different

0:28:35.000 --> 0:28:37.240
<v Speaker 2>phrases from Black American English.

0:28:37.359 --> 0:28:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Let me tell you, I think those.

0:28:38.640 --> 0:28:42.040
<v Speaker 2>Examples really point to how aspects of black culture and

0:28:42.120 --> 0:28:45.320
<v Speaker 2>speech have become popular and valuable in mainstream media, but

0:28:45.920 --> 0:28:48.720
<v Speaker 2>it's often non black people who are profiting off of

0:28:48.760 --> 0:28:49.880
<v Speaker 2>that culture and history.

0:28:49.880 --> 0:28:51.560
<v Speaker 1>That we created and experienced.

0:28:52.040 --> 0:28:55.000
<v Speaker 2>Doctor Bod told us about a concept he coined called

0:28:55.200 --> 0:28:59.600
<v Speaker 2>econo linguistics, and that's when your linguistic behavior has economic

0:28:59.720 --> 0:29:00.720
<v Speaker 2>realfe events.

0:29:00.760 --> 0:29:06.600
<v Speaker 4>From an econo linguistic perspective, the slave descendant dialects have

0:29:06.800 --> 0:29:14.240
<v Speaker 4>historically been devalued, but in the contemporary context, the econo

0:29:14.360 --> 0:29:19.280
<v Speaker 4>linguistics of the ability to wrap can actually make you

0:29:19.360 --> 0:29:24.040
<v Speaker 4>a lot of money. Jay Z is a billionaire. I'm

0:29:24.080 --> 0:29:26.560
<v Speaker 4>old enough that I remember the difference in reaction to

0:29:26.720 --> 0:29:32.400
<v Speaker 4>Vanilla ice as opposed to eminem right, and eminem is

0:29:32.440 --> 0:29:35.280
<v Speaker 4>seen as being more authentic. Right. He grew up in

0:29:35.320 --> 0:29:39.040
<v Speaker 4>Detroit in eight Mile. He knows what to say and

0:29:39.200 --> 0:29:43.920
<v Speaker 4>enough about black culture that his adoption of the vernacular

0:29:44.800 --> 0:29:50.080
<v Speaker 4>is seen as respectful. But there's a white woman who's

0:29:50.120 --> 0:29:54.200
<v Speaker 4>from Australia who tries to wrap in black dialect.

0:29:54.840 --> 0:30:00.520
<v Speaker 2>That's Iggy Iggy.

0:30:00.920 --> 0:30:03.360
<v Speaker 1>I think that's what he's talking about. Yes, that is

0:30:03.400 --> 0:30:04.360
<v Speaker 1>what he's talking about.

0:30:05.000 --> 0:30:10.040
<v Speaker 2>It's strange and it's problematic, you know, Iggy Azalia, because why.

0:30:09.840 --> 0:30:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Do you talk like it just doesn't even make sense.

0:30:12.120 --> 0:30:15.640
<v Speaker 2>You would think that she would rap like an Australian

0:30:15.760 --> 0:30:20.240
<v Speaker 2>would rap, but she doesn't how she's rapping like she

0:30:21.040 --> 0:30:24.280
<v Speaker 2>grew up with Trina and mia X and I'm like,

0:30:24.360 --> 0:30:26.040
<v Speaker 2>you don't know naw one of them.

0:30:26.320 --> 0:30:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Okay, oh my goodness.

0:30:30.280 --> 0:30:33.160
<v Speaker 2>But I think that nuance about Eminem and Iggy Azelia

0:30:33.440 --> 0:30:36.080
<v Speaker 2>is really important to recognize. This feels like a little

0:30:36.120 --> 0:30:38.640
<v Speaker 2>bit of the conversation I've seen online about Jack Harlow,

0:30:38.760 --> 0:30:40.360
<v Speaker 2>Like I think a lot of black folks feel like

0:30:40.400 --> 0:30:42.400
<v Speaker 2>if you didn't grow up in these neighborhoods, then you

0:30:42.400 --> 0:30:45.920
<v Speaker 2>don't understand. And sometimes people are overdoing it and it's like,

0:30:45.960 --> 0:30:47.120
<v Speaker 2>are you making fun of us?

0:30:47.160 --> 0:30:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Like, you know, what is it really about?

0:30:48.840 --> 0:30:51.320
<v Speaker 2>But then there are also people that feel like they're

0:30:51.360 --> 0:30:54.440
<v Speaker 2>really respecting the art and the culture and the history.

0:30:54.480 --> 0:30:56.640
<v Speaker 2>So I think about mac Miller, who had a very

0:30:56.640 --> 0:30:59.320
<v Speaker 2>different reception, you know, And so it can just really

0:30:59.320 --> 0:31:02.400
<v Speaker 2>be contentious, and it really depends on how you came up.

0:31:08.880 --> 0:31:12.040
<v Speaker 2>There's so much to talk about when it comes to linguistics,

0:31:12.040 --> 0:31:15.480
<v Speaker 2>and we've only talked about us small slice today, but

0:31:15.520 --> 0:31:17.640
<v Speaker 2>before we wrapped up with Doctor Bob, we wanted to

0:31:17.720 --> 0:31:20.520
<v Speaker 2>learn about the linguistics behind sign language.

0:31:20.880 --> 0:31:25.400
<v Speaker 4>The basic thing with sign language is that when a

0:31:25.520 --> 0:31:30.360
<v Speaker 4>baby can't hear, their brain still has the capacity to

0:31:30.400 --> 0:31:35.160
<v Speaker 4>process language, and if they're fortunate enough to be in

0:31:35.200 --> 0:31:39.360
<v Speaker 4>an environment where they're exposed to sign language users, that

0:31:39.680 --> 0:31:45.440
<v Speaker 4>developing brain will then begin to process visually what the

0:31:45.840 --> 0:31:50.560
<v Speaker 4>developing child processes through their brain auditorially. If you're too young,

0:31:50.600 --> 0:31:52.840
<v Speaker 4>you don't know how to read and write, well, if

0:31:52.880 --> 0:31:55.440
<v Speaker 4>you're a young signer, you don't know how to finger spell,

0:31:55.880 --> 0:32:01.640
<v Speaker 4>so finger spelling comes in later. But it's just as complex,

0:32:01.720 --> 0:32:06.800
<v Speaker 4>if not more complex, than speech, and it goes through

0:32:06.840 --> 0:32:12.120
<v Speaker 4>a different modality. So sign language, you know, encoded through

0:32:12.160 --> 0:32:14.400
<v Speaker 4>your eyes, it uses gesture.

0:32:14.880 --> 0:32:17.320
<v Speaker 2>Doctor Boss said is very important for brain development for

0:32:17.440 --> 0:32:20.400
<v Speaker 2>children to start learning a language, regardless of if it's

0:32:20.400 --> 0:32:23.160
<v Speaker 2>sign language or spoken language, and this will help them

0:32:23.240 --> 0:32:25.680
<v Speaker 2>later when they learn to read and write. Doctor Boss

0:32:25.720 --> 0:32:28.040
<v Speaker 2>shared that deaf and hard of hearing people have their

0:32:28.080 --> 0:32:31.320
<v Speaker 2>own experiences with linguistic bias and discrimination.

0:32:31.880 --> 0:32:36.800
<v Speaker 4>All of them, regardless of background, are strong proponents of

0:32:36.880 --> 0:32:42.120
<v Speaker 4>linguistic human rights. Deaf people get linguistic discrimination right because

0:32:42.160 --> 0:32:46.040
<v Speaker 4>they're at McDonald's signing and depending upon how people react

0:32:46.040 --> 0:32:48.360
<v Speaker 4>to them, I mean, for heaven's sakes, people used to

0:32:48.400 --> 0:32:52.480
<v Speaker 4>say deaf and dumb right, So the stereotype that if

0:32:52.520 --> 0:32:56.720
<v Speaker 4>you can't hear, you're less intelligent is very similar to oh,

0:32:56.800 --> 0:32:59.440
<v Speaker 4>if you speak with a slave descendant dialect, you must

0:32:59.520 --> 0:33:00.600
<v Speaker 4>not be smart.

0:33:00.880 --> 0:33:04.000
<v Speaker 1>And doctor Ball also revealed a little more history within

0:33:04.040 --> 0:33:07.440
<v Speaker 1>the deaf community, sharing that African Americans tended to be

0:33:07.560 --> 0:33:10.760
<v Speaker 1>isolated from white Americans and develop their own dialect of

0:33:10.800 --> 0:33:11.640
<v Speaker 1>sign language.

0:33:11.760 --> 0:33:17.080
<v Speaker 4>There's actually a black dialect of sign language. Essentially. The

0:33:17.120 --> 0:33:20.680
<v Speaker 4>best way that I can describe the differences there is

0:33:21.560 --> 0:33:25.760
<v Speaker 4>it's got more soul, it's got more movement. Black signers

0:33:26.120 --> 0:33:30.400
<v Speaker 4>are just using a lot more emphasis in their gestures.

0:33:30.480 --> 0:33:32.320
<v Speaker 4>There's a lot more body movement.

0:33:32.800 --> 0:33:35.320
<v Speaker 2>That's so amazing to hear. It shows that black folks,

0:33:35.600 --> 0:33:39.440
<v Speaker 2>no matter our circumstance, we persist, We push through and

0:33:39.520 --> 0:33:42.600
<v Speaker 2>have the mental fortitude to make a way for ourselves.

0:33:42.640 --> 0:33:43.680
<v Speaker 1>And I love that.

0:33:44.080 --> 0:33:49.080
<v Speaker 4>If you take anything away from this conversation today, one

0:33:49.120 --> 0:33:54.680
<v Speaker 4>thing is please appreciate the unique linguistic heritage of slave descendants.

0:33:55.120 --> 0:33:57.760
<v Speaker 4>It is different than any of every other immigrant group.

0:33:58.080 --> 0:34:04.840
<v Speaker 4>Please try to accepting of others whose linguistic backgrounds are

0:34:04.920 --> 0:34:09.000
<v Speaker 4>different from your own, and that applies to everybody. And

0:34:09.600 --> 0:34:13.040
<v Speaker 4>if we can be more accepting, not just that you

0:34:13.120 --> 0:34:16.640
<v Speaker 4>tolerate these people, but do you actually accept the fact that,

0:34:16.680 --> 0:34:20.160
<v Speaker 4>if you live in the United States, your fellow citizens

0:34:20.600 --> 0:34:24.640
<v Speaker 4>are going to come from very diverse linguistic backgrounds. If

0:34:24.680 --> 0:34:27.240
<v Speaker 4>we all do our best to try to understand one another,

0:34:27.840 --> 0:34:30.000
<v Speaker 4>that will be progress of a certain kind.

0:34:42.640 --> 0:34:44.600
<v Speaker 2>All right, all right, it is time for one thing?

0:34:44.719 --> 0:34:47.640
<v Speaker 2>Tt what's your one thing this week? My one thing

0:34:47.680 --> 0:34:50.200
<v Speaker 2>this week is a clothing brand that is definitely new

0:34:50.280 --> 0:34:53.120
<v Speaker 2>to me. It's called Kids of Immigrants and it was

0:34:53.280 --> 0:34:57.120
<v Speaker 2>founded by Daniel Buazo and Wayle Dennis and they are

0:34:57.160 --> 0:35:01.239
<v Speaker 2>based in Los Angeles. In the mission statement is Kids

0:35:01.239 --> 0:35:03.279
<v Speaker 2>of Immigrants is a movement to recognize that we are

0:35:03.320 --> 0:35:05.799
<v Speaker 2>all cut from different fabrics, but together we make a whole.

0:35:05.960 --> 0:35:08.719
<v Speaker 2>And it's such an amazing brand. I really love all

0:35:08.760 --> 0:35:10.840
<v Speaker 2>the stuff that they put out. Things sell out very quickly,

0:35:10.840 --> 0:35:12.279
<v Speaker 2>but if you can get your hands on something, it

0:35:12.360 --> 0:35:15.239
<v Speaker 2>is really great. Street where on almost all of their

0:35:15.400 --> 0:35:18.480
<v Speaker 2>items they have this little patch that says, shout out

0:35:18.480 --> 0:35:21.239
<v Speaker 2>to immigrant parents who came here with nothing but gave

0:35:21.320 --> 0:35:24.120
<v Speaker 2>us everything, which I love. You know, my parents are

0:35:24.120 --> 0:35:26.520
<v Speaker 2>both immigrants. Yes, shout out to all the immigrant kids.

0:35:26.760 --> 0:35:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Love it. What's your one thing?

0:35:28.400 --> 0:35:32.279
<v Speaker 2>My one thing is a book this week back on

0:35:32.360 --> 0:35:33.360
<v Speaker 2>my reading cheeks.

0:35:33.480 --> 0:35:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yes, I want to hear it. I want to

0:35:35.080 --> 0:35:35.720
<v Speaker 1>hear it. Okay.

0:35:35.760 --> 0:35:39.560
<v Speaker 2>So you know we did this episode before about science denial, Yes,

0:35:39.600 --> 0:35:41.840
<v Speaker 2>and people ask us all the time like, how do

0:35:41.920 --> 0:35:44.600
<v Speaker 2>you help people understand this is the science?

0:35:44.640 --> 0:35:44.839
<v Speaker 1>You know?

0:35:44.880 --> 0:35:48.400
<v Speaker 2>We talked to doctor Barbara Hofer and Gail Sinatra, Yes,

0:35:48.440 --> 0:35:50.160
<v Speaker 2>and they had a book about science denial.

0:35:50.320 --> 0:35:53.040
<v Speaker 1>There's a new book out that's called How Mind's Change.

0:35:53.120 --> 0:35:55.480
<v Speaker 2>It's from David mcgrainey, who hosts the podcast You Are

0:35:55.520 --> 0:35:56.280
<v Speaker 2>Not So Smart.

0:35:56.440 --> 0:35:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Okay. I think it feels like the next step.

0:35:58.520 --> 0:36:02.600
<v Speaker 2>So once we figure out what's making people believe certain things,

0:36:02.760 --> 0:36:04.360
<v Speaker 2>how do we get them to change their mind and

0:36:04.400 --> 0:36:06.400
<v Speaker 2>what's the science behind that? So I just got that

0:36:06.440 --> 0:36:08.640
<v Speaker 2>book in the mail and I'm reading it now. So

0:36:08.719 --> 0:36:10.759
<v Speaker 2>that's my one thing this week. I can't wait to

0:36:10.800 --> 0:36:12.960
<v Speaker 2>hear all about it and read it myself. Yes, you know,

0:36:13.000 --> 0:36:15.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to pass it to cats, it to your neighbor.

0:36:27.320 --> 0:36:29.799
<v Speaker 2>All right, that's it for this lab. Did this make

0:36:29.840 --> 0:36:32.279
<v Speaker 2>you think about anything? Did it make you look at

0:36:32.320 --> 0:36:35.640
<v Speaker 2>some of your favorite Internet personalities who are adopting some

0:36:35.880 --> 0:36:37.600
<v Speaker 2>different dialects accents?

0:36:37.640 --> 0:36:39.200
<v Speaker 1>If it did let us know. If it didn't, we

0:36:39.200 --> 0:36:39.879
<v Speaker 1>want to know that too.

0:36:40.000 --> 0:36:42.399
<v Speaker 2>Call us at two zero two five six seven seven

0:36:42.520 --> 0:36:44.160
<v Speaker 2>zero two eight and tell us what you thought about

0:36:44.200 --> 0:36:46.479
<v Speaker 2>this lab, and don't forget you can always give us.

0:36:46.360 --> 0:36:48.160
<v Speaker 1>An idea for a lab that you want to hear

0:36:48.200 --> 0:36:48.760
<v Speaker 1>this semester.

0:36:49.200 --> 0:36:52.840
<v Speaker 2>That's two zero two five six seven seven zero two eight.

0:36:52.800 --> 0:36:53.600
<v Speaker 1>And don't forget that.

0:36:53.640 --> 0:36:56.759
<v Speaker 2>There is so much more to dig into on our website.

0:36:56.920 --> 0:36:59.759
<v Speaker 2>There'll be a cheap keeper today's lab, additional links and

0:36:59.800 --> 0:37:02.439
<v Speaker 2>re sources in the show notes. Plus you can sign

0:37:02.520 --> 0:37:04.720
<v Speaker 2>up for our newsletter check it out at Dope Labs

0:37:04.760 --> 0:37:08.680
<v Speaker 2>podcast dot com. Special thanks to today's guest expert, doctor

0:37:08.800 --> 0:37:11.399
<v Speaker 2>John Ba. You can find out more about his work

0:37:11.520 --> 0:37:15.760
<v Speaker 2>and his ted talk on our website Dope labspodcast dot com,

0:37:15.800 --> 0:37:17.960
<v Speaker 2>and you can find us on Twitter and Instagram at

0:37:18.000 --> 0:37:21.440
<v Speaker 2>Dope Lab Podcast. TT's on Twitter and Instagram at dr

0:37:21.600 --> 0:37:25.520
<v Speaker 2>Underscore t Sho, and you can find Zakia at z

0:37:25.560 --> 0:37:29.239
<v Speaker 2>said So. Dope Labs is a Spotify original production from

0:37:29.280 --> 0:37:32.400
<v Speaker 2>Mega Ownmedia Group. Our producers are Jenny radlit Mass and

0:37:32.520 --> 0:37:36.359
<v Speaker 2>Lydia Smith of WaveRunner Studios. Our associate producer from Mega

0:37:36.360 --> 0:37:38.360
<v Speaker 2>Ohmedia is Brianna Garrett.

0:37:38.160 --> 0:37:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Editing in sound design by Rob Smerciak, Mixing by Hannis Brown.

0:37:42.960 --> 0:37:46.800
<v Speaker 2>Original music composed and produced by Taka Yasuzawa and Alex

0:37:46.920 --> 0:37:52.319
<v Speaker 2>Sugier from Spotify. Creative producer Miguel Contreras. Special thanks to

0:37:52.400 --> 0:37:57.920
<v Speaker 2>Shirley Ramos, Jess Bison, Jasmine Afifi, camu Elolia, tillcrat Key

0:37:58.080 --> 0:38:01.640
<v Speaker 2>and Brian Marquis, Executive producers from Mega Own Media Group,

0:38:01.760 --> 0:38:26.040
<v Speaker 2>all Right US, T T Show, Dia and Zekiah Wattley