WEBVTT - P&L: This Holiday May Be the Best in a Decade for Retailers

0:00:04.760 --> 0:00:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg P and L Podcast. I'm Pim Fox.

0:00:08.119 --> 0:00:11.159
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Abramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.280 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:14.520 --> 0:00:16.880
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether at the grocery store or

0:00:16.920 --> 0:00:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg P L Podcast on iTunes,

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:29.400
<v Speaker 1>SoundCloud and at Bloomberg dot com. All right, Craig Johnson,

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:31.160
<v Speaker 1>tell us what's going on in the world of Nike,

0:00:31.240 --> 0:00:35.800
<v Speaker 1>and then we'll get to other stores in a second. Yeah. Um, So, anyway,

0:00:35.880 --> 0:00:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Nike is having a little bit of a rebound, and

0:00:38.080 --> 0:00:40.680
<v Speaker 1>not that they've been in bad shape, but Nike remains,

0:00:40.760 --> 0:00:43.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, one of the two or three strongest, most

0:00:43.520 --> 0:00:46.519
<v Speaker 1>recognized brands in the world, very very powerful, and so

0:00:46.600 --> 0:00:49.720
<v Speaker 1>they had a you know, they had a perfectly solid

0:00:49.800 --> 0:00:53.240
<v Speaker 1>quarter and uh, both profits and top line up. I

0:00:53.280 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 1>think the top line was about eight percent or so.

0:00:56.040 --> 0:00:59.200
<v Speaker 1>So they're they're doing okay. Um now in the meantime,

0:00:59.760 --> 0:01:02.440
<v Speaker 1>uh under armor. You know, we don't do stock prices,

0:01:02.440 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 1>but you know, the stock has got a pulled back

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:06.880
<v Speaker 1>for this year. But it's not that they're having any

0:01:07.000 --> 0:01:09.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, great giant troubles. You know, their sales are

0:01:09.520 --> 0:01:14.000
<v Speaker 1>up over profits up I think fift at their last

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:16.959
<v Speaker 1>quarter they reported maybe a month month and a half ago.

0:01:17.800 --> 0:01:20.240
<v Speaker 1>And then the UH the folks whould really come on

0:01:20.360 --> 0:01:23.920
<v Speaker 1>quite strong as Audi doc and UH and that brand

0:01:23.959 --> 0:01:29.880
<v Speaker 1>has been as by the way people do anyway, they

0:01:29.920 --> 0:01:32.120
<v Speaker 1>they they a D S let's call it that because

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:34.639
<v Speaker 1>it's called by the symbol. So they they've been doing fine.

0:01:35.360 --> 0:01:37.319
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, you've had night's rebound in the in

0:01:37.360 --> 0:01:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the marketplace. Customers like them, and they've they've moved their

0:01:40.880 --> 0:01:44.679
<v Speaker 1>R and D effort locally in the US from Germany

0:01:44.720 --> 0:01:47.800
<v Speaker 1>to be more current with a kind of US taste

0:01:47.800 --> 0:01:50.040
<v Speaker 1>and interests in the preferences. And of course for those

0:01:50.080 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 1>who lived in New York area, they've opened this huge,

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:55.960
<v Speaker 1>rually magnificent flagship on Fifth Abo right about about a

0:01:56.040 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 1>forty six trade. It's really spectacular, quite quite something. You know, Craig,

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:03.880
<v Speaker 1>you in your in your outlook that so far, the

0:02:03.920 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 1>retail UH scene seems to be the best in many years.

0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:10.120
<v Speaker 1>This has been the best season for shopping in a

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:13.560
<v Speaker 1>long time. UM. And yet we're still seeing stories about

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:17.400
<v Speaker 1>stories like J J Crew, which just can't seem to

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:20.280
<v Speaker 1>get out of its death spiral. You know, what do

0:02:20.320 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 1>you expect as far as the bankruptcy is going, is

0:02:23.040 --> 0:02:29.520
<v Speaker 1>uh this year's positive development enough to stave off bankruptcy

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:33.080
<v Speaker 1>for some of these firms. Well, Um, what we're seeing

0:02:33.120 --> 0:02:36.920
<v Speaker 1>overall is is kind of a two giant migrations in retail.

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 1>One is the migration from a channel point of view

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:43.079
<v Speaker 1>from from store based retail to online and online we're

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 1>predicting is going to be about eighteen percent of total

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:48.960
<v Speaker 1>sales over the holiday season and and that's really quite something,

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 1>is growing in about four plus a year of a

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:56.440
<v Speaker 1>year UM. And the second migration is internally within within

0:02:56.720 --> 0:02:59.800
<v Speaker 1>within stores and there's there has been a migration away

0:02:59.800 --> 0:03:03.359
<v Speaker 1>from apparel stores including J Crew, but not only J

0:03:03.520 --> 0:03:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Crew UM to UH non apparel uses of spending and

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:10.520
<v Speaker 1>UH and that's just that's a long term trun it's

0:03:10.520 --> 0:03:14.200
<v Speaker 1>been exacerbated to in recent years. And UM, and that

0:03:14.280 --> 0:03:16.840
<v Speaker 1>means there's going to be a raft of both winners

0:03:16.840 --> 0:03:20.000
<v Speaker 1>and losers in apparel land. And that's just it's the

0:03:20.040 --> 0:03:23.680
<v Speaker 1>world we live in. Craig, Let's talk about bed Beth

0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:25.840
<v Speaker 1>and beyond. They are going to report their results after

0:03:25.880 --> 0:03:29.119
<v Speaker 1>the close of trading today. How's their business faring well.

0:03:29.360 --> 0:03:31.280
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of interesting. Now there is a tale of

0:03:31.320 --> 0:03:34.720
<v Speaker 1>two cities in the third quarter of being much different

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:37.839
<v Speaker 1>than in the fourth quarter. We've seen quarters to date. Um.

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:40.320
<v Speaker 1>And you know, their quarter wrapped right after the Black

0:03:40.320 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Friday U weekend I think in November, and the third

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:47.440
<v Speaker 1>quarter will be not that great, and they were very

0:03:47.440 --> 0:03:50.520
<v Speaker 1>soft for for much of the fall um and then

0:03:50.560 --> 0:03:54.480
<v Speaker 1>but things did pick up across retail. Things picked up

0:03:54.520 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 1>after the election about by mid about November, mid November,

0:03:57.880 --> 0:04:00.120
<v Speaker 1>and so they were able to capture because they have

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 1>that you know, delayed quarter that they're going into November

0:04:03.920 --> 0:04:06.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight UM. Uh, so they're able to capture some

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 1>of the rebound then and then months to date, I mean,

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 1>you know this is they're still very early into the

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 1>into the Q four UM. They have been doing uh

0:04:15.640 --> 0:04:18.359
<v Speaker 1>really quite well. Along with the almost the entirety of

0:04:18.360 --> 0:04:23.320
<v Speaker 1>the home sector, whether it's home improvement guys like Depo

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:26.160
<v Speaker 1>and Lows or weather home furnishings. Where we've seen a

0:04:26.200 --> 0:04:30.039
<v Speaker 1>lot of strength across the board, uh is restoration hardware

0:04:30.440 --> 0:04:32.960
<v Speaker 1>an asterisk. I would call that a little bit of

0:04:33.000 --> 0:04:35.320
<v Speaker 1>an exception that may prove the rule. They've they've had

0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:38.599
<v Speaker 1>some challenges. Um. Uh. You know, we think they're getting

0:04:38.600 --> 0:04:41.480
<v Speaker 1>their their ducks in a row together, but they they've

0:04:41.480 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 1>been a little bit challenged for for many months now

0:04:43.960 --> 0:04:47.040
<v Speaker 1>with some supply chain issues. You know. One thing I'm

0:04:47.040 --> 0:04:51.040
<v Speaker 1>struck by is that in the corporate credit world, we're

0:04:51.080 --> 0:04:53.120
<v Speaker 1>definitely are a lot of people think we're getting to

0:04:53.120 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 1>a later stage where it's a lot of these companies

0:04:56.640 --> 0:04:59.920
<v Speaker 1>are starting to build on leverage and they've already overextended.

0:05:00.560 --> 0:05:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Looking into consumer credit, I'm trying to figure out as

0:05:03.600 --> 0:05:06.640
<v Speaker 1>you talk about the different sectors uh, and then and

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:10.919
<v Speaker 1>then better than expected shopping season, where what does this

0:05:11.000 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 1>indicate about where we are in the consumer credit cycle. Well,

0:05:16.839 --> 0:05:19.279
<v Speaker 1>there we're seeing a situation where personal savings rates are

0:05:19.360 --> 0:05:23.560
<v Speaker 1>still quite high, about five and a half plus percent.

0:05:23.920 --> 0:05:28.159
<v Speaker 1>We think that starting to come down consumer credits. Household

0:05:28.200 --> 0:05:30.560
<v Speaker 1>balance sheets are much much are the healthiest they've been

0:05:30.600 --> 0:05:34.880
<v Speaker 1>in years, um, and so with incomes gradually rising over

0:05:34.920 --> 0:05:37.800
<v Speaker 1>the last year or so, things are looking better now.

0:05:37.839 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 1>The implications though for distressed uh that retailers, Um, that's

0:05:44.560 --> 0:05:46.880
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a different animal because there were

0:05:46.880 --> 0:05:50.320
<v Speaker 1>seeing some people that are having strong performance, such as

0:05:50.560 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 1>like toys or US. And then we have other folks,

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:57.160
<v Speaker 1>whether it's UH crew you mentioned, whether it's players UM

0:05:57.320 --> 0:05:59.320
<v Speaker 1>and some of the other players out there that that

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:02.880
<v Speaker 1>have had UH we'll just say a few more challenges. Craig,

0:06:03.400 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 1>just can we go back to UH Adidas or Audidas

0:06:08.320 --> 0:06:12.440
<v Speaker 1>and their success because they've now got the number two position,

0:06:12.600 --> 0:06:16.960
<v Speaker 1>they've surpassed under Armour I believe is this rebound from

0:06:17.040 --> 0:06:19.480
<v Speaker 1>where they were? Is this for real? Because they noticed

0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:24.159
<v Speaker 1>the Stan Smith, the heritage brands, UH partnerships with Kanye West.

0:06:24.839 --> 0:06:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Is that going to mean that Adidas is going to

0:06:27.160 --> 0:06:30.279
<v Speaker 1>just continue to go to another strength. Well, they have,

0:06:30.680 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, we we think they really have stepped on

0:06:32.800 --> 0:06:35.240
<v Speaker 1>the gas and as you might know, they have a

0:06:35.279 --> 0:06:39.480
<v Speaker 1>new CEO in there. UM over the past year and UH,

0:06:39.720 --> 0:06:42.240
<v Speaker 1>we've already seen an improvement there. Now most of their

0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:44.440
<v Speaker 1>strength has been you know, again on the footwear side

0:06:44.440 --> 0:06:47.039
<v Speaker 1>of things under oarm Our Apparel, we think, we we

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:50.440
<v Speaker 1>believe is still very very strong. H The performance where

0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:54.680
<v Speaker 1>UM but UH A d S has been has been

0:06:54.720 --> 0:06:56.720
<v Speaker 1>really coming on quite strong, and we think a lot

0:06:56.720 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 1>of reflection, you know, the new managements that's on board

0:06:59.760 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 1>and the fact that they're becoming much more in tune

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:05.880
<v Speaker 1>with the US market. Originally some market research they've done,

0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:08.680
<v Speaker 1>and now as I mentioned that they've they've cited that

0:07:08.800 --> 0:07:11.720
<v Speaker 1>in an R and d UH center right here in

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 1>the US versus trying to monitor the US market from

0:07:16.360 --> 0:07:18.520
<v Speaker 1>back in Germany. Thank you so much for joining us.

0:07:18.560 --> 0:07:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Craig Johnson, president of Customer Growth Partners, coming to us

0:07:22.040 --> 0:07:25.640
<v Speaker 1>from New Canaan, Connecticut. Just want to mention Adida's shares

0:07:25.640 --> 0:07:31.080
<v Speaker 1>of fifty so far this year, Nike shares down, this

0:07:31.560 --> 0:07:48.880
<v Speaker 1>is bloom. The shares of FedEx are down about two

0:07:48.920 --> 0:07:52.920
<v Speaker 1>and a half percent after profit at the air freight

0:07:53.000 --> 0:07:56.400
<v Speaker 1>carrier that took a hit from rising investment in its

0:07:56.520 --> 0:07:59.120
<v Speaker 1>ground delivery business. And here to tell us more is

0:07:59.160 --> 0:08:02.000
<v Speaker 1>to teach Jin. Though he is the president of s

0:08:02.120 --> 0:08:06.520
<v Speaker 1>J Consulting Group, he joins us from Swickly, Pennsylvania, So

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:10.080
<v Speaker 1>teach always a pleasure tell us about FedEx and the

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:13.960
<v Speaker 1>challenges that the company faces, not necessarily just from ups

0:08:14.720 --> 0:08:19.800
<v Speaker 1>but from the likes of Amazon as well as Uber. Well,

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:24.040
<v Speaker 1>this is a very interesting time for watching this company

0:08:24.080 --> 0:08:29.160
<v Speaker 1>and the industry. And as you commented, Uh, people think

0:08:29.200 --> 0:08:33.120
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of investment. The growth of Farcel business

0:08:33.400 --> 0:08:36.560
<v Speaker 1>is of a kind that in my being in it

0:08:36.600 --> 0:08:39.880
<v Speaker 1>for twenty plus years, I have not seen. And the

0:08:39.960 --> 0:08:44.800
<v Speaker 1>peak is becoming higher and higher and more difficult because

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:48.160
<v Speaker 1>when you have packaged volume increasing in the B two

0:08:48.200 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 1>B space, you don't add extra stuffs, but when you

0:08:51.440 --> 0:08:54.439
<v Speaker 1>do it for consumers, you're going to new addresses, and

0:08:54.559 --> 0:08:58.520
<v Speaker 1>that affects performance and productivity in service of a kind

0:08:58.559 --> 0:09:01.319
<v Speaker 1>that people can't understand and who are used looking at

0:09:01.360 --> 0:09:06.319
<v Speaker 1>annual statements and ten case for FedEx to have incorporated

0:09:06.360 --> 0:09:11.120
<v Speaker 1>and built hundred and five facilities, and I've been involved

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:14.640
<v Speaker 1>with them, it is a remarkable edition. And if they

0:09:14.640 --> 0:09:17.840
<v Speaker 1>don't do it, then they continue to risk losing the

0:09:17.920 --> 0:09:21.600
<v Speaker 1>business of these big online retailers that they are handling.

0:09:21.880 --> 0:09:25.600
<v Speaker 1>And people don't realize they think Amazon doesn't use few

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:29.080
<v Speaker 1>pious and FedEx. They still move millions of packages for

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Amazon and other online retailers. And if they're going to

0:09:33.160 --> 0:09:37.359
<v Speaker 1>stay as a good option for them for these online retailers,

0:09:37.400 --> 0:09:39.959
<v Speaker 1>they have to be able to handle it throughout the year,

0:09:40.240 --> 0:09:43.400
<v Speaker 1>but more importantly, during a peak that is also not

0:09:43.520 --> 0:09:48.680
<v Speaker 1>becoming bigger but also getting spread out over several weeks.

0:09:48.720 --> 0:09:50.839
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to go back you made an interesting point.

0:09:50.920 --> 0:09:54.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, people think that Amazon and other online retailers

0:09:54.880 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 1>have their own channels for distributing packages other than FedEx

0:10:00.360 --> 0:10:04.920
<v Speaker 1>or ups, but they are really reliant on uh these companies.

0:10:05.679 --> 0:10:08.840
<v Speaker 1>What about drones? I mean, we've heard plenty about delivery

0:10:08.920 --> 0:10:11.640
<v Speaker 1>drones and sort of Amazon trying to create their own

0:10:12.280 --> 0:10:15.960
<v Speaker 1>horde of these flying self self flying vehicles. Is this

0:10:16.000 --> 0:10:20.040
<v Speaker 1>it all threat? You know, not for at least a

0:10:20.080 --> 0:10:24.480
<v Speaker 1>few years, for various reasons. I do believe that the

0:10:24.480 --> 0:10:28.640
<v Speaker 1>next five years, or maybe a little longer, we will

0:10:29.280 --> 0:10:33.160
<v Speaker 1>ourselves has seen them with our eyes, packages being dropped

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 1>off at people or places that we know of. However,

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:40.480
<v Speaker 1>there are few limitations. One is the regulatory that moves

0:10:40.520 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 1>at a very slow pace and can't keep up with

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:45.880
<v Speaker 1>the pace that twist technologies moving. But the other thing

0:10:46.000 --> 0:10:49.720
<v Speaker 1>is that drones are first going to be only used

0:10:49.840 --> 0:10:53.160
<v Speaker 1>in rural areas where they don't have to deal with

0:10:53.200 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 1>all the wires and everything else that comes in the

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:58.600
<v Speaker 1>way of coming down to the lower level to drop

0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:01.480
<v Speaker 1>a package in someone's front out. The other thing is

0:11:01.600 --> 0:11:05.280
<v Speaker 1>that they are still limited in handling certain items that

0:11:05.360 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 1>have to be small, that have to be lightweight, and

0:11:08.360 --> 0:11:11.360
<v Speaker 1>all that is going to take time to evolve, and

0:11:11.400 --> 0:11:14.920
<v Speaker 1>then some things required signature. You can't get a signature

0:11:14.920 --> 0:11:19.520
<v Speaker 1>from a drone, not yet. I think that's the quote

0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:22.680
<v Speaker 1>of the day. You can't get a signature from a drone.

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:25.240
<v Speaker 1>I love it. So I was just going to give

0:11:25.280 --> 0:11:28.960
<v Speaker 1>you some detail, just to put this into perspective because FedEx,

0:11:29.040 --> 0:11:32.640
<v Speaker 1>as you just describe this massive six hundred and fifty aircraft,

0:11:32.640 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and fifty thousand vehicles, moves twelve million packages

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:40.920
<v Speaker 1>a day. UPS moves even more more than eighteen million

0:11:40.960 --> 0:11:44.440
<v Speaker 1>packages a day. Can you explain this saying in the

0:11:44.480 --> 0:11:50.199
<v Speaker 1>world of supply chain that density equals profitability. Well, you

0:11:50.240 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 1>know what that is true, There is an element of density.

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:54.760
<v Speaker 1>But when you've got in the twelve million you set

0:11:54.800 --> 0:11:58.160
<v Speaker 1>for FedEx and about seventeen for UPS, that is in

0:11:58.240 --> 0:12:02.520
<v Speaker 1>the normal day to February March April. During this month

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:06.760
<v Speaker 1>of December, fed X is handling seventeen million and UPS

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:10.880
<v Speaker 1>is handling millions, okay, And to put it in perspective,

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:17.880
<v Speaker 1>that is in between one billion origin destra nation points.

0:12:18.520 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 1>And for people who are listening when they fly, they

0:12:20.880 --> 0:12:25.600
<v Speaker 1>don't realize the airlines perform at on time when they

0:12:25.600 --> 0:12:29.160
<v Speaker 1>only have to fly between four airports, that comes to

0:12:29.200 --> 0:12:32.240
<v Speaker 1>only eighteen thousand days. So that is the complexity you're

0:12:32.280 --> 0:12:36.800
<v Speaker 1>talking about. And they have a network that is unique,

0:12:37.080 --> 0:12:39.640
<v Speaker 1>and which is why you find that other people can't

0:12:40.080 --> 0:12:42.760
<v Speaker 1>create a network like that and they can't compete with them.

0:12:42.800 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Which is why ups, fed X and Post Office, between

0:12:46.320 --> 0:12:50.319
<v Speaker 1>three of them, deliver ninety seven of all the packages

0:12:50.600 --> 0:12:53.160
<v Speaker 1>for all the shippers. And it seems like there's a

0:12:53.160 --> 0:12:55.600
<v Speaker 1>pretty big barrier to entry for the Amazons of the

0:12:55.640 --> 0:12:58.720
<v Speaker 1>world to create their own fleet, a huge and I

0:12:58.760 --> 0:13:01.800
<v Speaker 1>don't think Amazon people will talk about it. Amazon has

0:13:01.840 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 1>no interest in being a transporation company because of the

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 1>market that you cater to. Start to think of them

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:12.080
<v Speaker 1>as a transportation company. There be ratio, it's going to plummet,

0:13:12.400 --> 0:13:15.839
<v Speaker 1>and it's start off with trading at seven dollars, it's

0:13:15.880 --> 0:13:20.760
<v Speaker 1>going to trade it hundred dollars. Sat Jindell, president of

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:25.080
<v Speaker 1>s J Consulting Group from Siwickly, Pennsylvania, Thank you so

0:13:25.160 --> 0:13:38.760
<v Speaker 1>much for being with us. A story caught my I

0:13:38.960 --> 0:13:43.840
<v Speaker 1>from Fox that highlights the difficulties the U. S. Government

0:13:43.920 --> 0:13:47.000
<v Speaker 1>is facing as it tries to tackle the massive amount

0:13:47.080 --> 0:13:52.920
<v Speaker 1>of student loans outstanding, including some that perhaps were extended

0:13:53.040 --> 0:13:56.840
<v Speaker 1>under fraudulent assumptions. I want to bring in Shahin Nasira Poor,

0:13:57.760 --> 0:14:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News reporter the for US core cases and crime.

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:04.679
<v Speaker 1>He is here in our Bloomberg eleven three oh studio.

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for joining us. Uh, So, can you talk

0:14:07.120 --> 0:14:10.000
<v Speaker 1>to us a little bit about what the core issue

0:14:10.160 --> 0:14:12.679
<v Speaker 1>is here? For the US government? They have said they

0:14:12.720 --> 0:14:19.760
<v Speaker 1>would forgive some student loans that were underwritten under false pretenses, right, Uh,

0:14:19.920 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 1>but then they're going out they're actively pursuing uh, the

0:14:22.960 --> 0:14:26.560
<v Speaker 1>debt collections from those students at this point. What's going

0:14:26.600 --> 0:14:29.200
<v Speaker 1>on here? Well, thanks for having me on. It's a

0:14:29.280 --> 0:14:32.000
<v Speaker 1>it's a hard it's a hard question to ask. You know.

0:14:32.040 --> 0:14:34.360
<v Speaker 1>The thing that I keep coming back to is this,

0:14:35.400 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, apparent conflict of interest within the US Apartment

0:14:38.280 --> 0:14:41.240
<v Speaker 1>of Education, where they are both you know, the lender

0:14:41.720 --> 0:14:44.440
<v Speaker 1>um as well as a servicer. And so their job

0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 1>on one hand is to maximize collections and minimize the

0:14:47.640 --> 0:14:50.760
<v Speaker 1>cost of the federal student loan program two taxpayers. But

0:14:50.840 --> 0:14:54.120
<v Speaker 1>on the other hand they're running the largest student debt

0:14:54.160 --> 0:14:58.840
<v Speaker 1>forgiveness scheme in US history. And so that that apparent

0:14:58.880 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 1>conflict man infests itself in ways. You know, in one

0:15:02.160 --> 0:15:05.640
<v Speaker 1>way in which where the federal government has decided that

0:15:05.680 --> 0:15:08.440
<v Speaker 1>by and large, tens of thousands of you know, former

0:15:08.520 --> 0:15:11.720
<v Speaker 1>students who attended schools owned by Corinthian Colleges, Inc. Were

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:16.520
<v Speaker 1>defrauded with false job placement rates and they were duped

0:15:16.560 --> 0:15:18.760
<v Speaker 1>into taking out these loans, and therefore these loans should

0:15:18.760 --> 0:15:21.640
<v Speaker 1>be canceled. But on the other hand, the department and

0:15:21.720 --> 0:15:25.840
<v Speaker 1>the Education Department is not proactively canceling this debt. It's

0:15:25.880 --> 0:15:29.120
<v Speaker 1>not proactively reaching out to these borrowers. And you could

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:32.600
<v Speaker 1>argue that if they were a private sector creditor, that

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:36.240
<v Speaker 1>their collection tactics would amount to a violation of laws

0:15:36.280 --> 0:15:39.240
<v Speaker 1>banning unfair and deceptive acts and practices because they are

0:15:39.280 --> 0:15:41.880
<v Speaker 1>collecting on debt that they have reason to believe need

0:15:41.920 --> 0:15:45.920
<v Speaker 1>not be repaid um. And so far they're they're not

0:15:46.000 --> 0:15:49.800
<v Speaker 1>really saying much about it. If you are an eligible

0:15:50.320 --> 0:15:55.360
<v Speaker 1>UH borrower, what is the process by which you would

0:15:55.400 --> 0:16:01.960
<v Speaker 1>have your fraudulent or allegedly fraudulent loan forgiven? What's the process?

0:16:02.000 --> 0:16:04.840
<v Speaker 1>It's actually really simple. There is a form that the

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Education Department is created where all you need to do

0:16:07.960 --> 0:16:10.720
<v Speaker 1>is fill out you know some biographical information, name, address,

0:16:10.760 --> 0:16:15.080
<v Speaker 1>telephone number, etcetera. UM, you say you know, you list

0:16:15.280 --> 0:16:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the campus that you attended in the program you were

0:16:18.120 --> 0:16:21.800
<v Speaker 1>enrolled in in the dates of your attendants. UM, and

0:16:21.840 --> 0:16:25.160
<v Speaker 1>you simply check a box where you attest to the fact,

0:16:25.200 --> 0:16:27.760
<v Speaker 1>under penalty of perjury, that you relied on these job

0:16:27.800 --> 0:16:30.440
<v Speaker 1>placement rates when you enrolled. You sign your name at

0:16:30.440 --> 0:16:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the bottom of the form, you return it, and your

0:16:32.280 --> 0:16:34.760
<v Speaker 1>loans should be forgiven. That is what the Education Department

0:16:34.760 --> 0:16:36.680
<v Speaker 1>has said the process. That's how it's supposed to work.

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:40.440
<v Speaker 1>But it's not working that way. No, it's not. They

0:16:40.440 --> 0:16:42.560
<v Speaker 1>are sending they've sent a few letters and a few

0:16:42.600 --> 0:16:45.320
<v Speaker 1>emails to borrowers informing them of this. Right, But they

0:16:45.360 --> 0:16:47.920
<v Speaker 1>also send these folks monthly bills in which there is

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:51.560
<v Speaker 1>no disclosure of any kind. Same same department, same depart Well,

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:53.520
<v Speaker 1>but you're right, and this is an important point. So

0:16:53.560 --> 0:17:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Corinthian College has filed for bankruptcy after being accused of fraud. UM.

0:17:00.880 --> 0:17:04.639
<v Speaker 1>If the US were to eliminate debt of all of

0:17:04.680 --> 0:17:08.959
<v Speaker 1>those who are potentially eligible for debt really from justice

0:17:08.960 --> 0:17:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Corinthian College, right, it could cost the federal government nearly

0:17:12.800 --> 0:17:15.639
<v Speaker 1>four billion dollars. This sort of speaks to your point

0:17:15.680 --> 0:17:18.439
<v Speaker 1>checking about the sort of push pull element of the

0:17:18.480 --> 0:17:21.159
<v Speaker 1>same agency overseeing both the forgiveness as well as the

0:17:21.160 --> 0:17:25.600
<v Speaker 1>debt collection, of managing the collection exactly. And and here's

0:17:25.800 --> 0:17:27.879
<v Speaker 1>the thing about it is, you know, look, the education

0:17:27.920 --> 0:17:30.719
<v Speaker 1>departments run by a lot of political appointees. If they

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:33.440
<v Speaker 1>were to forgive this debt, there would be a ton

0:17:33.600 --> 0:17:37.000
<v Speaker 1>of outcry about the cost to taxpayers. And the question

0:17:37.040 --> 0:17:40.040
<v Speaker 1>evitably would be, well, how did the department allow this

0:17:40.119 --> 0:17:42.240
<v Speaker 1>learning to go on in the first place? Where were

0:17:42.280 --> 0:17:44.119
<v Speaker 1>they when all these loans were being made? There were

0:17:44.160 --> 0:17:47.679
<v Speaker 1>all these warning signs that this chain of schools was

0:17:47.720 --> 0:17:51.880
<v Speaker 1>engaged in suspect behavior and suspect practices. They had previously

0:17:51.920 --> 0:17:54.880
<v Speaker 1>been sued by state Attorney's General over you know, there

0:17:55.520 --> 0:17:59.120
<v Speaker 1>allegedly deceptive advertising to students. And so they make all

0:17:59.119 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 1>these loans, they book you know, expected revenues off these loans,

0:18:03.560 --> 0:18:05.600
<v Speaker 1>and then they come back and cancel them later at

0:18:05.600 --> 0:18:09.120
<v Speaker 1>this huge cost of taxpayers, and folks will inevitably say,

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 1>where were you when these loans are being made? Thanks

0:18:12.080 --> 0:18:16.320
<v Speaker 1>very much for enlightening us. Shaheen Nasirapor he is a

0:18:16.480 --> 0:18:21.399
<v Speaker 1>US court cases and crime reporter for Bloomberg News. Much appreciated.

0:18:33.240 --> 0:18:35.720
<v Speaker 1>It is my honor now to bring in Dan Fuss,

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:39.679
<v Speaker 1>vice chairman of Loomis Sales. Uh. Dan, I'm grateful for

0:18:39.760 --> 0:18:43.960
<v Speaker 1>you joining us today, and I have an important question

0:18:44.000 --> 0:18:48.199
<v Speaker 1>to ask you. We've been hearing from a lot of

0:18:48.240 --> 0:18:52.120
<v Speaker 1>big bond fund managers, whether it's Jeff Gunlock, whether it's

0:18:52.119 --> 0:18:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Mark uisil Over at Pimco, now is the time to

0:18:56.600 --> 0:19:01.879
<v Speaker 1>be building cash and de risking. Do you agree? No,

0:19:03.000 --> 0:19:09.000
<v Speaker 1>not completely. I understand why, you know from reading your

0:19:09.080 --> 0:19:13.800
<v Speaker 1>column and others least, Um, I understand why they're doing it.

0:19:13.880 --> 0:19:19.000
<v Speaker 1>I share the general view that the odds are that

0:19:19.440 --> 0:19:23.680
<v Speaker 1>in the US dollar, uh, interest rates are starting their

0:19:23.760 --> 0:19:27.800
<v Speaker 1>seclical rise. I agree with that, how far how long?

0:19:28.520 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 1>There you get a wide spectrum of guessing, because that's

0:19:32.840 --> 0:19:36.560
<v Speaker 1>all you can do about the future. But um, there's

0:19:36.640 --> 0:19:40.440
<v Speaker 1>a sort of a fatal flaw if if you go

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:44.040
<v Speaker 1>to the let's build a lot of cash, and then

0:19:44.160 --> 0:19:48.479
<v Speaker 1>in some cases people might say I've heard it, Uh

0:19:48.640 --> 0:19:52.040
<v Speaker 1>that just in case, they'll they'll bar bellow it, and

0:19:52.240 --> 0:19:57.359
<v Speaker 1>uh they'll they'll you know, buy some long whatever. Um

0:19:58.080 --> 0:20:01.120
<v Speaker 1>that that gets away from the theme that you're supposed

0:20:01.160 --> 0:20:06.680
<v Speaker 1>to make money. UM. As cash returns rise, and they've

0:20:06.760 --> 0:20:11.480
<v Speaker 1>risen somewhat to be fair, um, it gets easier to

0:20:11.640 --> 0:20:15.879
<v Speaker 1>do the short end of that because you're rolling over

0:20:15.920 --> 0:20:18.919
<v Speaker 1>every three months or whatever you're doing, and your yield

0:20:19.000 --> 0:20:22.840
<v Speaker 1>is going up. That's the general idea, But you have

0:20:22.960 --> 0:20:27.600
<v Speaker 1>to take into account the shape of the yield curve

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:32.399
<v Speaker 1>and the dispersion the yield spreads around the old curve.

0:20:32.560 --> 0:20:36.000
<v Speaker 1>And more importantly than either one of those is the

0:20:36.080 --> 0:20:39.119
<v Speaker 1>fact that the world is now filling up with discount

0:20:39.240 --> 0:20:44.080
<v Speaker 1>bonds as opposed to premium bonds. And that's a world

0:20:44.119 --> 0:20:49.080
<v Speaker 1>of difference when you put those things together. Um. If

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:51.720
<v Speaker 1>if you're not concerned about day to day or week

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:54.960
<v Speaker 1>to week or even months to month, you say, well

0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:56.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to do then is I'm going to go

0:20:57.000 --> 0:21:01.359
<v Speaker 1>ride the old curve just like the Meuning people to Uh.

0:21:01.440 --> 0:21:05.280
<v Speaker 1>And that is a very very good idea. Well, hold

0:21:05.280 --> 0:21:08.960
<v Speaker 1>on a sect. So since November eighth, a lot of

0:21:08.960 --> 0:21:11.840
<v Speaker 1>people we've talked to have said that they've pretty significantly

0:21:11.920 --> 0:21:16.080
<v Speaker 1>changed their thesis or even started to change how they invest.

0:21:16.160 --> 0:21:22.119
<v Speaker 1>Have you not since November eight? Uh? Actually, uh, we

0:21:22.240 --> 0:21:26.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of unfortunately beat the rush uh and build up

0:21:27.520 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 1>some cash. I'm talking now in reference to the mutual

0:21:31.640 --> 0:21:37.560
<v Speaker 1>funds because we're anticipating withdrawals. Is this indexation thing and

0:21:37.680 --> 0:21:42.119
<v Speaker 1>et F goes on UM, so we we built it

0:21:42.240 --> 0:21:46.040
<v Speaker 1>for that. And but the rest of the portfolio is

0:21:46.760 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 1>the basic structure of it is shorter and it used

0:21:50.560 --> 0:21:53.560
<v Speaker 1>to be ex the cash shorter iteration in other words,

0:21:53.600 --> 0:21:57.920
<v Speaker 1>looking for a shorter maturity of the shorter and average maturity. No,

0:21:58.440 --> 0:22:02.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to confuse uh all the cf A students

0:22:02.560 --> 0:22:06.359
<v Speaker 1>with this. Do you have to be careful on using

0:22:06.520 --> 0:22:11.880
<v Speaker 1>duration when you're in a period of time where interest

0:22:11.960 --> 0:22:16.320
<v Speaker 1>rates are are moving rather strong or you know, directionally,

0:22:16.440 --> 0:22:19.240
<v Speaker 1>it may not be a lot of uh, you know,

0:22:19.560 --> 0:22:23.480
<v Speaker 1>a multi your move. But if your rates are trending

0:22:23.600 --> 0:22:27.320
<v Speaker 1>up and you're pretty sure the central bank has the

0:22:27.400 --> 0:22:33.439
<v Speaker 1>same idea or trending down, UM, then you you have

0:22:33.520 --> 0:22:38.240
<v Speaker 1>to say, whoops win Uh. Duration that's fine for liability matching.

0:22:38.280 --> 0:22:42.320
<v Speaker 1>But let's use average maturity and let's look at our

0:22:42.359 --> 0:22:50.119
<v Speaker 1>dispersion around the mean uh. And essentially to put into

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:55.840
<v Speaker 1>math forms, UH, what we're doing is we're fattening the

0:22:55.920 --> 0:23:00.720
<v Speaker 1>middle uh, just like the waist lines around Christmas time

0:23:00.800 --> 0:23:03.040
<v Speaker 1>there with all the good ease. So otherwise you like

0:23:03.119 --> 0:23:07.800
<v Speaker 1>the sort of five to ten year treasury No, oh yeah,

0:23:07.880 --> 0:23:10.920
<v Speaker 1>you can do it with treasuries you have now treasuries,

0:23:11.359 --> 0:23:14.119
<v Speaker 1>you don't have any excess spread. So you like it

0:23:14.160 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 1>for like five to ten year corporates. Yes, and uh,

0:23:18.119 --> 0:23:23.880
<v Speaker 1>if it's a taxable account with a high incriminal tax. Uh,

0:23:23.960 --> 0:23:27.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, once you had the state onto it. Uh.

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:32.440
<v Speaker 1>You do the same thing in muni's and uh it's

0:23:32.480 --> 0:23:35.960
<v Speaker 1>easier to see over there. But you do the same

0:23:36.000 --> 0:23:39.160
<v Speaker 1>thing in corporates. And you you know your fear when

0:23:39.280 --> 0:23:42.240
<v Speaker 1>rates go up as you say, oh my god, we're

0:23:42.280 --> 0:23:44.840
<v Speaker 1>at the end of all the credit cycles now, you know,

0:23:45.760 --> 0:23:48.880
<v Speaker 1>and get the parachutes out we go. No, no, no,

0:23:49.240 --> 0:23:52.040
<v Speaker 1>you don't do that. You do have to be much

0:23:52.080 --> 0:23:57.720
<v Speaker 1>more careful on the credit side. That's a given you

0:23:57.840 --> 0:24:02.119
<v Speaker 1>have to be because people who are financing are going

0:24:02.160 --> 0:24:05.520
<v Speaker 1>to have more trouble as rates go up if they're

0:24:05.560 --> 0:24:10.919
<v Speaker 1>not a fairly strong uh you know business and uh,

0:24:11.200 --> 0:24:16.120
<v Speaker 1>but if they've handled refinance already and the basic business

0:24:16.320 --> 0:24:20.120
<v Speaker 1>is a good business, not dependent on borrowing a ton

0:24:20.160 --> 0:24:25.440
<v Speaker 1>of money at lower rates, it's an important qualifier. Um,

0:24:25.640 --> 0:24:29.639
<v Speaker 1>then your best place to be is with the most

0:24:29.680 --> 0:24:34.040
<v Speaker 1>spread and call protection. And uh, this is where high

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:37.159
<v Speaker 1>yield comes into play. Normally, high yield, when rates have

0:24:37.200 --> 0:24:39.919
<v Speaker 1>gone down quite a bit, is a loser's game because

0:24:40.240 --> 0:24:42.719
<v Speaker 1>if it works, you get called, and if it doesn't,

0:24:42.720 --> 0:24:47.439
<v Speaker 1>you get stuck. Uh and uh, Now you're in a

0:24:47.520 --> 0:24:52.280
<v Speaker 1>different setting because an early call gets more and more

0:24:52.359 --> 0:24:57.000
<v Speaker 1>expensive if you're buying this stuff, saying the eighties or

0:24:57.040 --> 0:24:59.879
<v Speaker 1>low nineties in the issue, who decides to call it

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:02.920
<v Speaker 1>one oh four? Well, that's all right, you're not shedding

0:25:02.960 --> 0:25:05.760
<v Speaker 1>any tears. You wish you hadn't done that because you

0:25:05.840 --> 0:25:08.520
<v Speaker 1>have to, you know, work a little late the next night.

0:25:08.960 --> 0:25:13.560
<v Speaker 1>But uh, and that's it's a different market when the

0:25:13.640 --> 0:25:17.800
<v Speaker 1>direction is up. Now, the flaw on this whole thing

0:25:17.920 --> 0:25:20.560
<v Speaker 1>is you can say, I'll say to myself in the

0:25:20.600 --> 0:25:23.840
<v Speaker 1>mirror in the morning, right after I've cut myself shaving,

0:25:23.880 --> 0:25:26.720
<v Speaker 1>I'll say, now, listen, listen up. That's a good warning.

0:25:26.960 --> 0:25:31.080
<v Speaker 1>We're talking US dollar base. Everything I've set up to

0:25:31.200 --> 0:25:34.800
<v Speaker 1>now is US dollar base. Let's not forget the rest

0:25:34.880 --> 0:25:37.080
<v Speaker 1>of the world because that's going to impact what the

0:25:37.160 --> 0:25:40.480
<v Speaker 1>FED does. So don't buy any you know, don't draw

0:25:40.520 --> 0:25:43.960
<v Speaker 1>any straight lines here. Well, we're gonna all be uh

0:25:44.119 --> 0:25:47.360
<v Speaker 1>watching our fattening medals, and perhaps that is the way

0:25:47.400 --> 0:25:50.480
<v Speaker 1>to go for a bun fund uh him. I'm just

0:25:50.560 --> 0:25:54.240
<v Speaker 1>taking notes. That's the last point, Dan, Can you answer

0:25:54.240 --> 0:25:56.280
<v Speaker 1>this in ten seconds? Lisa Brahmins wants to know do

0:25:56.320 --> 0:26:01.639
<v Speaker 1>you still like energy? How you debt some of it? All? Right,

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:03.680
<v Speaker 1>well there's an answer for you. Thank you very much,

0:26:03.960 --> 0:26:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Dan fuzz Is, Vice chairman of Loomis Sales. Thanks for

0:26:14.320 --> 0:26:16.919
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Bloomberg P and L podcast. You can

0:26:16.960 --> 0:26:21.400
<v Speaker 1>subscribe and listen to interviews at iTunes, SoundCloud, or whatever

0:26:21.680 --> 0:26:25.200
<v Speaker 1>podcast platform you prefer. I'm pim Fox. I'm out there

0:26:25.240 --> 0:26:28.240
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm out there on Twitter

0:26:28.400 --> 0:26:31.320
<v Speaker 1>at Lisa Abramo. It's one before the podcast. You can

0:26:31.359 --> 0:26:33.879
<v Speaker 1>always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio.