WEBVTT - March Q&A

0:00:02.040 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the solid verbal. Come that for me. I'm

0:00:06.920 --> 0:00:09.680
<v Speaker 1>a man, I'm forty. I've heard so many players say, well,

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:11.639
<v Speaker 1>I want to be happy. You want to be happy

0:00:11.680 --> 0:00:16.040
<v Speaker 1>for day? Edith State is that woo whoom? And Dan

0:00:16.360 --> 0:00:21.200
<v Speaker 1>and Tye, welcome back to the solid verbal boys and girls.

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:24.159
<v Speaker 1>My name is ty Hildebrand. Joining me over there in

0:00:24.280 --> 0:00:27.520
<v Speaker 1>rainy yet still fatherly New York City.

0:00:28.240 --> 0:00:31.320
<v Speaker 2>My man feeling a bit under the weather. Dan Rubinstein, sir,

0:00:31.360 --> 0:00:31.800
<v Speaker 2>how you doing?

0:00:32.680 --> 0:00:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I am reinvigorated. Tyler Okay, I am feeling good. It's

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:41.080
<v Speaker 1>it's been a successful day both as a father and

0:00:41.159 --> 0:00:44.160
<v Speaker 1>as a general human. We've got good college basketball on TV.

0:00:44.200 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 1>We're recording this at around five pm Eastern. Yeah.

0:00:47.080 --> 0:00:50.320
<v Speaker 2>Man, hey, dogs are barking out there. The dogs are

0:00:50.520 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 2>barking in your brackets. Hope you picked a bunch of underdogs.

0:00:53.120 --> 0:00:56.080
<v Speaker 2>Hope you got in on the solid verbal bracket pool.

0:00:56.120 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 2>We had I lost count several hundred entries that.

0:01:00.400 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's pushing into a thousand.

0:01:01.760 --> 0:01:04.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, with a crush at the last second, as per usual,

0:01:04.480 --> 0:01:08.200
<v Speaker 2>but started off on the right foot by killing off

0:01:08.280 --> 0:01:12.320
<v Speaker 2>one of my NCAA's survivor pool entries in Louisville going down.

0:01:12.160 --> 0:01:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Loullville, loa. But yeah, off to a good start. Absolutely.

0:01:18.880 --> 0:01:21.800
<v Speaker 1>It is a fun time of year as what we

0:01:21.880 --> 0:01:25.120
<v Speaker 1>have teams practicing, you know, spring practice. I know Oregon

0:01:25.160 --> 0:01:26.640
<v Speaker 1>I think is on a break right now. Has Notre

0:01:26.720 --> 0:01:29.959
<v Speaker 1>Dame started? I have no idea. It's a good to

0:01:29.959 --> 0:01:32.560
<v Speaker 1>go there. I have no idea. That's a good answer.

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Has Penn State started? No idea. Yeah, we have a

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:40.160
<v Speaker 1>number of questions both about college football and I don't know,

0:01:40.200 --> 0:01:42.760
<v Speaker 1>it just felt right now. I'm just getting lazier and

0:01:42.840 --> 0:01:45.640
<v Speaker 1>lazier about what topics I ask for. I just got

0:01:45.640 --> 0:01:49.280
<v Speaker 1>a haircut, Like, all right, ask about haircuts? Newborn baby, yep,

0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:51.480
<v Speaker 1>check got that going on in my life. We got

0:01:51.480 --> 0:01:53.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of shows about TV shows, which I didn't

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:55.000
<v Speaker 1>ask for, but we got a lot of that. We

0:01:55.040 --> 0:01:58.080
<v Speaker 1>got some grilling questions. Yeah, there's a lot of good stuff. Oh,

0:01:58.120 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 1>I said third dates. I was just curious to see

0:02:00.400 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 1>how people would take that. But we have third date

0:02:02.960 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 1>questions ty terrific, terrific.

0:02:05.120 --> 0:02:08.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, as you know, it is the college football off season,

0:02:08.040 --> 0:02:10.400
<v Speaker 2>and what we're trying to do is basically what we

0:02:10.440 --> 0:02:12.600
<v Speaker 2>did last year, where we did one Q and a

0:02:12.760 --> 0:02:16.239
<v Speaker 2>show per month. These are typically among the more popular

0:02:16.280 --> 0:02:18.440
<v Speaker 2>offseason shows that we do because we get to give

0:02:18.480 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 2>back to the verbaler hood and answer some questions that

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:21.360
<v Speaker 2>are out there.

0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Dan.

0:02:23.040 --> 0:02:26.040
<v Speaker 2>As you know, you put out some specific topics of

0:02:26.080 --> 0:02:28.640
<v Speaker 2>which we received a number of different questions, but we

0:02:28.680 --> 0:02:30.640
<v Speaker 2>also got a bunch of college football ones.

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:33.120
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's where we're where we're going to start,

0:02:33.200 --> 0:02:35.639
<v Speaker 1>because that's where we typically like to start. And maybe

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 1>we'll even play a little bit of a chime as

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:40.560
<v Speaker 1>we go through this to alert people when we maybe

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:43.560
<v Speaker 1>make that awkward transition over to non football or more

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:47.760
<v Speaker 1>non football material solid verbal after hours, all right, shall

0:02:47.800 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 1>we dance? Ah, Let's congratulations, Skippy, you've got mail, You've

0:02:53.000 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 1>got mail. On the solid verbal, let's dust off that

0:02:57.320 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 1>sound Dan. As often as we can, we like to

0:02:59.560 --> 0:03:01.720
<v Speaker 1>pay homage.

0:03:03.200 --> 0:03:05.240
<v Speaker 2>Thank you to those of you who write in Solverble

0:03:05.360 --> 0:03:08.520
<v Speaker 2>at gmail dot com, to those of you who tweet us,

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:12.080
<v Speaker 2>who send us notes on Facebook, on Instagram, on Reddit,

0:03:12.160 --> 0:03:15.120
<v Speaker 2>you name it, anywhere you put the messages. We did

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:18.920
<v Speaker 2>our best to go through those, digest them, and for

0:03:18.960 --> 0:03:21.280
<v Speaker 2>the first time ever, we actually went through and highlighted

0:03:21.280 --> 0:03:24.639
<v Speaker 2>some of our favorites before hitting the record button, which

0:03:24.680 --> 0:03:27.000
<v Speaker 2>means we're growing as adults.

0:03:27.400 --> 0:03:30.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that's right. I think that means what was

0:03:30.800 --> 0:03:33.120
<v Speaker 1>the I guess this is growing up. That's right. Have

0:03:33.200 --> 0:03:35.080
<v Speaker 1>these moments every now and then we have our damn

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 1>at moments, and here we are. Do you want to

0:03:38.080 --> 0:03:40.560
<v Speaker 1>start with transfer talk? I want to start with Quinn.

0:03:41.400 --> 0:03:47.520
<v Speaker 2>Quinn says, does Tate Martel being eligible immediately at Miami

0:03:48.200 --> 0:03:52.480
<v Speaker 2>opened the door for more slash all transfers not having

0:03:52.520 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 2>to sit out a year in the future. So Tate Martel,

0:03:57.360 --> 0:04:02.680
<v Speaker 2>highly regarded recruit from Ohio State, after the coaching move,

0:04:02.800 --> 0:04:05.880
<v Speaker 2>after the Justin Fields transfer, Tate Martel decides that he's

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:09.440
<v Speaker 2>going to go elsewhere, picks Miami, files a case with

0:04:09.480 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 2>the NCAA, is granted immediate eligibility. This is now, I guess,

0:04:14.560 --> 0:04:19.479
<v Speaker 2>the third high profile transfer in just two seasons to

0:04:19.640 --> 0:04:23.960
<v Speaker 2>be named immediately eligible, starting with Shaye Patterson, Justin Fields,

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:24.920
<v Speaker 2>and now Tate Martel.

0:04:25.040 --> 0:04:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Dan, does this open the door for more of the same?

0:04:28.720 --> 0:04:36.920
<v Speaker 1>It's slippery slope tie right? Yes and no. My assumption, well,

0:04:36.920 --> 0:04:38.680
<v Speaker 1>first of all, we don't know what was in Tate

0:04:38.720 --> 0:04:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Martell's appeal. We have somewhat of an idea that what

0:04:41.560 --> 0:04:45.280
<v Speaker 1>was in Justin Field's appeal, and we have a good

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 1>idea of what was in Shape Patterson's appeal. I would say,

0:04:47.800 --> 0:04:51.719
<v Speaker 1>assume the three most the highest profile cases of appealing

0:04:51.839 --> 0:04:55.880
<v Speaker 1>for immediate eligibility in the past couple of years, right, correct.

0:04:55.880 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 1>I hope I'm not leaving anybody out, but I might be.

0:04:58.120 --> 0:05:00.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. So one, we don't know what's in

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:02.839
<v Speaker 1>Tate Martell's actual appeal, but we do know that his

0:05:02.920 --> 0:05:06.600
<v Speaker 1>head coach retired, and we do know that a quarterback

0:05:06.600 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 1>transferred in which doesn't feel like a good enough reason

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:14.480
<v Speaker 1>to be immediately eligible elsewhere. But without fully knowing the case,

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:18.880
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to fully comment. I also want to believe

0:05:19.600 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 1>that many quarterbacks want to succeed at the place they go,

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:26.719
<v Speaker 1>that it's not their choice to leave to start over

0:05:26.800 --> 0:05:30.560
<v Speaker 1>again with a new system, with new friends, new classes,

0:05:31.160 --> 0:05:34.760
<v Speaker 1>new dating, new social life, learning everything new. And I

0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:37.719
<v Speaker 1>understand that for somebody as high profile as these guys,

0:05:37.720 --> 0:05:40.400
<v Speaker 1>it's in their heads a kind of business decision. I

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:42.320
<v Speaker 1>got to start. I got to put myself in position

0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 1>to be seen and to succeed and maybe get the

0:05:45.200 --> 0:05:46.880
<v Speaker 1>attention of NFL scouts.

0:05:46.880 --> 0:05:49.240
<v Speaker 2>The old silas red business decision.

0:05:49.279 --> 0:05:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Sure. Correct, Yes, but there is a part of me

0:05:53.440 --> 0:05:56.159
<v Speaker 1>that says, well, this sort of changes the dynamic where

0:05:56.440 --> 0:05:58.679
<v Speaker 1>a player is unhappy and he just leaves. I don't

0:05:58.720 --> 0:06:01.480
<v Speaker 1>believe players want to be unhappy. I don't players. I

0:06:01.520 --> 0:06:04.440
<v Speaker 1>don't think players want to just go when they're like

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:06.680
<v Speaker 1>not happy for a day. I don't think a lot

0:06:06.680 --> 0:06:10.320
<v Speaker 1>of these decisions are just impulsive and I'm not happy here,

0:06:10.320 --> 0:06:12.560
<v Speaker 1>I want to start there. I think a lot goes

0:06:12.600 --> 0:06:15.479
<v Speaker 1>into these decisions. So to look at it as if

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 1>like the paradigm is changing and college football is ruined,

0:06:18.720 --> 0:06:22.159
<v Speaker 1>I think sort of misses it a little bit. That said,

0:06:22.680 --> 0:06:25.800
<v Speaker 1>I understand the fear. I understand we're like, we have

0:06:25.880 --> 0:06:28.400
<v Speaker 1>this four star receiver and he's not starting, he's gonna leave.

0:06:28.560 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 1>We have this five star quarterback and he's not starting

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:33.039
<v Speaker 1>as a true freshman, he's gonna leave. It sucks to

0:06:33.080 --> 0:06:37.039
<v Speaker 1>have like your future be in doubt constantly. I just

0:06:37.080 --> 0:06:40.800
<v Speaker 1>don't I'm somewhere I understand that because if an Oregon

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:44.560
<v Speaker 1>player were to do this because he was unhappy sitting

0:06:44.600 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 1>behind an incumbent starter, like, oh that sucks. It was

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 1>nice to have that depth and have him be the

0:06:49.920 --> 0:06:53.480
<v Speaker 1>future someday. But at the same time, you're like, kid

0:06:53.480 --> 0:06:55.599
<v Speaker 1>realized he made a mistake when he was sixteen, or

0:06:55.680 --> 0:06:58.839
<v Speaker 1>kid couldn't have seen his offensive coordinator leaving, or his

0:06:58.880 --> 0:07:03.200
<v Speaker 1>coach retiring, or you know, they're leaving their conference, you know,

0:07:03.320 --> 0:07:05.120
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of changes that are out of his hands.

0:07:05.200 --> 0:07:07.840
<v Speaker 1>So I get both sides of it. I really think

0:07:07.880 --> 0:07:10.840
<v Speaker 1>it's overblown that suddenly we're going to see, you know,

0:07:10.960 --> 0:07:13.640
<v Speaker 1>all these players transferring without having to sit out a year.

0:07:13.800 --> 0:07:16.480
<v Speaker 1>I think people are just panicking with sort of a

0:07:16.520 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 1>recency bias. It's also March. It is also a lot

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 1>of panic.

0:07:20.640 --> 0:07:24.400
<v Speaker 2>We got a question from Derek who asks, to your point,

0:07:24.520 --> 0:07:26.720
<v Speaker 2>is a transfer rule out of control? Are there any

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:30.560
<v Speaker 2>real consequences for leaving early? And I think I agree

0:07:30.600 --> 0:07:33.480
<v Speaker 2>with you now a little bit of recency bias if

0:07:33.520 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 2>you want to call it that, given that, again, we've

0:07:35.440 --> 0:07:40.440
<v Speaker 2>had three very high profile quarterbacks in under two seasons

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:43.560
<v Speaker 2>now transfer and be ruled immediately eligible.

0:07:43.960 --> 0:07:47.000
<v Speaker 1>And to reset things, this is Tate Martel immediately eligible

0:07:47.040 --> 0:07:50.840
<v Speaker 1>transferring from Ohio State, former five star quarterback to Miami

0:07:50.960 --> 0:07:52.280
<v Speaker 1>to Miami. Yes, thank you.

0:07:53.600 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't think that we are spiraling out of control

0:07:58.320 --> 0:08:00.920
<v Speaker 2>with this rule. But there's no doubt if you look

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 2>at what's transpired over the last year or so now,

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:07.480
<v Speaker 2>that it seems more attainable. If you're a recruit out

0:08:07.520 --> 0:08:09.360
<v Speaker 2>there and you're thinking I might want to go elsewhere,

0:08:09.400 --> 0:08:12.880
<v Speaker 2>it seems like this is at least maybe more doable

0:08:12.880 --> 0:08:16.560
<v Speaker 2>than it's been in recent memory. So the door has

0:08:16.600 --> 0:08:20.640
<v Speaker 2>been somewhat opened. I am with you, though I don't

0:08:20.680 --> 0:08:22.840
<v Speaker 2>think we're quite at the point where it's gotten out

0:08:22.880 --> 0:08:25.520
<v Speaker 2>of control. And I do think college football is going

0:08:25.600 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 2>to need to take a look at this and figure

0:08:27.320 --> 0:08:29.600
<v Speaker 2>out a way that you can be fair to players

0:08:30.080 --> 0:08:32.960
<v Speaker 2>right in a way that you know gives them the

0:08:32.960 --> 0:08:35.640
<v Speaker 2>amount of flexibility. Maybe not to the same degree as

0:08:35.679 --> 0:08:38.240
<v Speaker 2>coaches who can just leave whenever they want and go elsewhere,

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:40.959
<v Speaker 2>but Dixie chicks room to make the big mistake that

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:43.559
<v Speaker 2>sort of thing. College football needs to figure out a

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:44.920
<v Speaker 2>way to accommodate that.

0:08:45.160 --> 0:08:47.760
<v Speaker 1>And I think there are probably considerations we don't know

0:08:47.800 --> 0:08:50.720
<v Speaker 1>about in these appeals process, that is, that are presented

0:08:51.200 --> 0:08:54.400
<v Speaker 1>to the NCAA. If you know, a player gets as

0:08:54.520 --> 0:08:57.440
<v Speaker 1>good grades and he has never had discipline issues, and

0:08:57.520 --> 0:09:01.319
<v Speaker 1>there are extenuating circumstances outside of what the public knows,

0:09:01.440 --> 0:09:03.400
<v Speaker 1>be it with and you know, these sorts of things

0:09:03.400 --> 0:09:06.040
<v Speaker 1>do leak if it's an illness in the family or whatever.

0:09:06.800 --> 0:09:10.319
<v Speaker 1>There there's always more to the story than sure, And

0:09:10.440 --> 0:09:13.280
<v Speaker 1>this is my assumption. Then, yeah, I was unhappy. I

0:09:13.360 --> 0:09:15.240
<v Speaker 1>want to go to this school now and I want

0:09:15.240 --> 0:09:17.280
<v Speaker 1>to play tomorrow. Like, I don't think it's a Violet

0:09:17.320 --> 0:09:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Boregard situation.

0:09:18.200 --> 0:09:22.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, there is usually more nuance to a situation than

0:09:22.480 --> 0:09:24.360
<v Speaker 2>what you read in the news, and that's probably the

0:09:24.400 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 2>case here. There just has to be a happy medium

0:09:27.480 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 2>between the old rule where you can't go anywhere without

0:09:31.960 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 2>sitting out a year and a full on transfer market.

0:09:35.800 --> 0:09:37.640
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think we're going to basketball either. I

0:09:37.640 --> 0:09:39.400
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's going to be a situation where you

0:09:39.400 --> 0:09:42.199
<v Speaker 1>know somebody's going to play for three four different schools.

0:09:42.720 --> 0:09:45.880
<v Speaker 1>I think that the Tate for CA's and shout out

0:09:45.880 --> 0:09:48.199
<v Speaker 1>to all the Tate quarterbacks out there that are a

0:09:48.240 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 1>little bit shorter for we're going to have to make

0:09:50.800 --> 0:09:52.640
<v Speaker 1>these jokes if there's a new Tate coming along in

0:09:52.720 --> 0:09:56.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty one or something. Sure, but it was unfortunate

0:09:56.720 --> 0:09:59.640
<v Speaker 1>that you know, this is the start of this conversation

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:03.520
<v Speaker 1>another tape transferring from the West coast. So yeah, I

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:06.920
<v Speaker 1>think that's right, And I really don't see this as

0:10:08.080 --> 0:10:10.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, the breaking of the dam.

0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:13.080
<v Speaker 2>Breaking of the dam. All right, let's move on, let's

0:10:13.080 --> 0:10:17.319
<v Speaker 2>go to Graylen. He says, what would be more surprising

0:10:18.400 --> 0:10:21.480
<v Speaker 2>Arkansas finishing in the top three in the SEC West

0:10:21.960 --> 0:10:28.160
<v Speaker 2>or Alabama finishing somewhere other than first in the West. Daniel, Yeah,

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:30.360
<v Speaker 2>I think this is sort of a no brainer.

0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:36.520
<v Speaker 1>I think Arkansas finishing in the top three. I hate

0:10:36.559 --> 0:10:40.640
<v Speaker 1>when the radio hosts say I will eat my hat. Yeah,

0:10:41.160 --> 0:10:44.760
<v Speaker 1>I will eat my shoe. But Arkansas finishing in the

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:48.880
<v Speaker 1>top three this year would mean for some pretty apocalyptic

0:10:49.120 --> 0:10:52.520
<v Speaker 1>goings on in the SEC West, which I don't want

0:10:52.520 --> 0:10:54.960
<v Speaker 1>to joke about. I don't want to run through. But

0:10:55.000 --> 0:10:59.679
<v Speaker 1>you're you're obviously talking about weird unforeseen coaching changes and injuries.

0:11:00.160 --> 0:11:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Because with what Arkansas put on the field last year,

0:11:03.600 --> 0:11:06.599
<v Speaker 1>I get it changing to a more open offense and

0:11:06.640 --> 0:11:10.320
<v Speaker 1>a pro style system and getting you know, Chad Morris's

0:11:10.360 --> 0:11:12.199
<v Speaker 1>guys in the program, and they had what they bring

0:11:12.240 --> 0:11:14.640
<v Speaker 1>in a top twenty five recruiting classes year nine ten

0:11:14.720 --> 0:11:17.840
<v Speaker 1>eleven blue chip kids coming in including a four star

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:21.560
<v Speaker 1>quarterback and some transfers at quarterback including Nick Starkele from

0:11:21.600 --> 0:11:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Texas A and m Ben Hicks from SMU. There's just

0:11:26.440 --> 0:11:27.200
<v Speaker 1>it's not there.

0:11:27.720 --> 0:11:30.840
<v Speaker 2>It's no well, hey right now, oh and eight in

0:11:30.960 --> 0:11:35.000
<v Speaker 2>conference last year, two and eight. Overall, you look around

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:39.840
<v Speaker 2>the west side of the SEC, Alabama's Alabama, lsu A,

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:44.000
<v Speaker 2>and M Auburn, all of them are pretty stocked. I'm

0:11:44.000 --> 0:11:46.199
<v Speaker 2>not going to say Auburn is looking like a ten

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:50.040
<v Speaker 2>win team, but all those teams are already starting from

0:11:50.080 --> 0:11:53.199
<v Speaker 2>a place where they're pretty stocked. Mississippi State and Ole

0:11:53.320 --> 0:11:56.040
<v Speaker 2>Miss Yeah, I think both in a much better spot

0:11:56.080 --> 0:12:01.120
<v Speaker 2>than than Arkansas. Again, amid the transition, you would expect

0:12:01.160 --> 0:12:05.160
<v Speaker 2>some bumps, but to jump into the top three, like

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:09.240
<v Speaker 2>you said, it would somehow need to involve an apocalyptic scenario.

0:12:09.559 --> 0:12:13.400
<v Speaker 1>I agree and twenty twenty, twenty twenty one, twenty twenty two.

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 1>It's conversation we can have, especially if there's a promising quarterback.

0:12:17.440 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 1>But right now, it's going to take a lot. It's

0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:23.880
<v Speaker 1>going to take a lot for that kind of seismic

0:12:23.920 --> 0:12:27.720
<v Speaker 1>shift because there's just there's too much. There's just too

0:12:27.760 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 1>much in the West right now. That is not necessarily

0:12:30.120 --> 0:12:31.840
<v Speaker 1>excellent in the way that it was I believe in

0:12:31.960 --> 0:12:36.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty fourteen, but impressively competent. All right, Dan, let's go

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:41.440
<v Speaker 1>over to Bob. What a Bob? He says two questions.

0:12:41.640 --> 0:12:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Do you know I almost named the solid baby Bob? No,

0:12:44.520 --> 0:12:47.839
<v Speaker 1>and by almost I pitched it. It was immediately shot

0:12:47.920 --> 0:12:50.600
<v Speaker 1>down with where are you? Are you serious? Did you

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:53.520
<v Speaker 1>like Robert or Bob? That's not nice to are Robert

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:57.400
<v Speaker 1>and Bob and Bobby listeners? No? I wanted it. Did

0:12:57.480 --> 0:13:01.920
<v Speaker 1>you pitch Robert or did you pitch Bob? Straight Bob? Huh?

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Straight baby Bob. I felt like it would catch people

0:13:05.240 --> 0:13:08.439
<v Speaker 1>off guard. I felt like it could, at least in

0:13:08.640 --> 0:13:11.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe his social group, like, oh, I like that, so

0:13:11.679 --> 0:13:14.760
<v Speaker 1>you would have gone Bob not Rob. I don't like

0:13:14.840 --> 0:13:16.880
<v Speaker 1>it as much. I don't like Bob as much as

0:13:16.880 --> 0:13:20.080
<v Speaker 1>his actual name, but like in the pitch sessions, it

0:13:20.160 --> 0:13:24.160
<v Speaker 1>came up as something I liked. Let's go to Bob. Yeah.

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:30.720
<v Speaker 1>My questions, can we in all caps? Can we win

0:13:30.760 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 1>a playoff game with Brian Kelly as a head coach?

0:13:34.640 --> 0:13:37.040
<v Speaker 1>This is a notre damer here? Can we win? Who's

0:13:37.080 --> 0:13:39.640
<v Speaker 1>to say? Mexico State fan.

0:13:39.920 --> 0:13:42.960
<v Speaker 2>With Brian Kelly as our head coach. I know he

0:13:43.000 --> 0:13:46.040
<v Speaker 2>can get us there, and he's one hundred times better

0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:50.000
<v Speaker 2>than Charlie Weiss, But can he do it? Secondly, what

0:13:50.160 --> 0:13:54.160
<v Speaker 2>are proper expectations for the third date? And should they

0:13:54.200 --> 0:13:56.280
<v Speaker 2>be revised if a person was born in a Latin

0:13:56.320 --> 0:13:57.120
<v Speaker 2>American We'll get.

0:13:57.040 --> 0:13:57.520
<v Speaker 1>To that question.

0:13:57.640 --> 0:14:00.400
<v Speaker 2>We will get to the third A lot there, Yeah,

0:14:00.400 --> 0:14:02.520
<v Speaker 2>a lot of meat on that bone. We'll get to

0:14:02.600 --> 0:14:04.360
<v Speaker 2>that in Soliverble after hours.

0:14:04.600 --> 0:14:07.199
<v Speaker 1>May I before you answer yes, may I ask it

0:14:07.280 --> 0:14:11.360
<v Speaker 1>in a serious voice? Please serious? Xm ty? Can Brian

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Kelly get over that hump? Does Brian Kelly have a

0:14:16.120 --> 0:14:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Clemson and Alabama problem? Can he get Notre Dame from

0:14:21.200 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 1>great to elite? Sure?

0:14:26.960 --> 0:14:30.920
<v Speaker 2>It's such a loaded question right now. I think there

0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:34.400
<v Speaker 2>is such a golf between Alabama and Clemson and the

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:36.720
<v Speaker 2>rest of college football. I don't know if Notre Dame.

0:14:37.360 --> 0:14:39.200
<v Speaker 1>I think George's waiting at Georgia.

0:14:39.320 --> 0:14:42.200
<v Speaker 2>George is getting there. They're kind of swimming across the

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:43.520
<v Speaker 2>gulf to join the other two.

0:14:44.080 --> 0:14:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but they're peering in like what was it Billy

0:14:47.120 --> 0:14:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Madison or was it Happy gilm or peering in at

0:14:48.960 --> 0:14:52.040
<v Speaker 1>prom Oh? I think that would be Billy Madison. Okay, there,

0:14:52.200 --> 0:14:55.760
<v Speaker 1>George's not at prom as a as a top tier team,

0:14:56.160 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 1>but they're looking in longingly.

0:14:57.800 --> 0:15:01.360
<v Speaker 2>That's right, they're getting they're swimming across the whatever metaphor

0:15:01.440 --> 0:15:05.800
<v Speaker 2>you'd like to use, Georgia's knocking on that door. Notre

0:15:05.880 --> 0:15:10.080
<v Speaker 2>Dame finds itself in pretty good company in that next

0:15:10.080 --> 0:15:13.320
<v Speaker 2>tier of college football now. I happen to think they

0:15:13.320 --> 0:15:16.360
<v Speaker 2>need higher level quarterback play than what they got from

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:19.560
<v Speaker 2>ian Book. Ian Book was a limiting factor. They've done

0:15:19.600 --> 0:15:22.760
<v Speaker 2>a lot of work, really good work. Recruiting along the

0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:26.040
<v Speaker 2>offensive line. Was tough to go up against Clemson because

0:15:26.080 --> 0:15:30.520
<v Speaker 2>they had four NFL starters, but by and large doing

0:15:30.600 --> 0:15:33.960
<v Speaker 2>work in the trenches, both offensive and defensive. I think

0:15:33.960 --> 0:15:36.680
<v Speaker 2>that's a step forward. We still need a little bit

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:39.800
<v Speaker 2>more depth, need to see more depth in the secondary

0:15:40.840 --> 0:15:42.760
<v Speaker 2>because I think that's been an achilles heel for them

0:15:42.760 --> 0:15:46.040
<v Speaker 2>as well, and they need to find a way to

0:15:46.160 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 2>get more playmaking from their guys out wide. I could

0:15:49.840 --> 0:15:52.400
<v Speaker 2>check the boxes here. A good year, though, we could

0:15:52.440 --> 0:15:55.560
<v Speaker 2>go we could go for eons about what Notre Dame

0:15:55.600 --> 0:15:58.520
<v Speaker 2>could tweak to get better. But they made the playoff.

0:15:59.040 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 2>They had an undefeated regular season. This is still a

0:16:01.880 --> 0:16:05.200
<v Speaker 2>good team with a good coach. Bob, You're right, Brian

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:07.400
<v Speaker 2>Kelly's one hundred times better than Charlie Weis. I know

0:16:07.480 --> 0:16:09.400
<v Speaker 2>people dog them all the time, and that's fine, I

0:16:09.440 --> 0:16:12.680
<v Speaker 2>get it. But there are a few elements of that

0:16:12.760 --> 0:16:15.200
<v Speaker 2>team that need to be taken up a notch in

0:16:15.320 --> 0:16:18.360
<v Speaker 2>order for them to really get to that status maintaining

0:16:18.400 --> 0:16:20.560
<v Speaker 2>it once you get to a Clemson level. If you

0:16:20.600 --> 0:16:24.160
<v Speaker 2>can get to a Clemson level, maintaining that level is

0:16:24.200 --> 0:16:25.479
<v Speaker 2>a different story altogether.

0:16:25.840 --> 0:16:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Very few teams can do that. Two points slash questions. One,

0:16:31.000 --> 0:16:33.040
<v Speaker 1>if you want us to talk about Notre Dame less,

0:16:33.720 --> 0:16:37.760
<v Speaker 1>ask about your team, Come on. Two, that was a joke.

0:16:37.960 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 1>I apologize. Two, you should as I want to say

0:16:43.760 --> 0:16:47.840
<v Speaker 1>this politely. As a fan who roots for a team

0:16:47.880 --> 0:16:50.360
<v Speaker 1>who's won a playoff game, I feel like maybe I

0:16:50.360 --> 0:16:52.440
<v Speaker 1>should be the one to jump in, Oh please, then

0:16:52.520 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 1>go ahead, kind of know what it takes. No. Two,

0:16:55.640 --> 0:16:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Ian Book had a good year. Ian Book was one

0:16:58.920 --> 0:17:04.560
<v Speaker 1>of the top fourteen fifteen quarterbacks in the country. That's good, absolutely, okay,

0:17:04.600 --> 0:17:07.720
<v Speaker 1>absolutely so. I don't know if it's all on Ian

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:08.119
<v Speaker 1>Book now.

0:17:08.119 --> 0:17:09.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm not putting it all. I'm not putting it all

0:17:09.800 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 2>on Ian Brooks. I'm saying that his skill set was

0:17:12.640 --> 0:17:15.000
<v Speaker 2>a limiting factor. You can only throw so many ten

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 2>yard outs or pop passes over the middle or screen

0:17:19.040 --> 0:17:22.480
<v Speaker 2>passes out wide before a defense catches on him throwing deep.

0:17:22.600 --> 0:17:26.840
<v Speaker 1>But is there a quarterback outside of like this year,

0:17:27.000 --> 0:17:31.520
<v Speaker 1>was there a quarterback outside of Tua? Maybe Haskins, Greer,

0:17:32.840 --> 0:17:35.800
<v Speaker 1>I guess we can start having a from conversation. But

0:17:35.920 --> 0:17:39.560
<v Speaker 1>beyond that that you would have swapped into the Notre

0:17:39.680 --> 0:17:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Dame lineup and said, Okay, he was good. No, I'm

0:17:42.480 --> 0:17:44.919
<v Speaker 1>not going to play the game where I would rather have. No,

0:17:44.960 --> 0:17:47.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying rather have what I'm saying realistically, if

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Will Greer or Jake from or Dwayne Haskins is the

0:17:50.760 --> 0:17:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Notre Dame quarterback, are they Is that game a game

0:17:54.720 --> 0:17:59.359
<v Speaker 1>with two minutes left? He any one of those got

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:02.320
<v Speaker 1>what was the final score? Thirty to three? Thirty to three?

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:06.160
<v Speaker 2>Any one of those guys gives Notre Dame more pop

0:18:06.200 --> 0:18:09.200
<v Speaker 2>on offense because they can throw a better deep ball.

0:18:09.760 --> 0:18:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Are they within four points with two minutes left? Probably? No?

0:18:13.040 --> 0:18:15.399
<v Speaker 1>Probably not. And then if you look at I just

0:18:15.440 --> 0:18:17.239
<v Speaker 1>while you were talking You're not the only one who

0:18:17.280 --> 0:18:18.640
<v Speaker 1>can do things while the other person.

0:18:18.920 --> 0:18:21.080
<v Speaker 2>The problem wasn't so much ian Book as it was

0:18:21.119 --> 0:18:22.439
<v Speaker 2>trying to stop Trevor Lawrence.

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Right, So if you go back and ian Book could

0:18:26.920 --> 0:18:29.520
<v Speaker 1>have for certain done more in that game to keep

0:18:29.560 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 1>it close, But I don't. I think it was sort

0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:34.240
<v Speaker 1>of just a foregone conclusion. The two best Notre Dame

0:18:34.320 --> 0:18:37.840
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks in two thousand and nine, Deshaun Kaiser in twenty

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:41.320
<v Speaker 1>fifteen and Jimmy Classon in two thousand and nine. Do

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:45.000
<v Speaker 1>either of them make a difference. I think I'd rather

0:18:45.040 --> 0:18:48.840
<v Speaker 1>have either of those in ian Book, Okay, but do

0:18:48.920 --> 0:18:53.200
<v Speaker 1>they make a Is it a competitive situation with them? Again,

0:18:53.200 --> 0:18:56.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering if it's Probably not. Probably not, because.

0:18:57.520 --> 0:18:59.800
<v Speaker 2>They were up against a buzz saw, a buzz saw

0:18:59.800 --> 0:19:02.359
<v Speaker 2>that destroyed Alabama in the second half.

0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Do you think it's a Brian Kelly quarterback thing that

0:19:05.359 --> 0:19:09.399
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks you know are pretty good and have you know,

0:19:09.400 --> 0:19:11.800
<v Speaker 1>well you can make you could make that case, Dan

0:19:12.000 --> 0:19:14.400
<v Speaker 1>and two thousand and nine wasn't Clawson was not Brian

0:19:14.480 --> 0:19:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Kelly by the way.

0:19:15.320 --> 0:19:18.600
<v Speaker 2>Right, No, no, agreed, But you could make a very

0:19:18.600 --> 0:19:22.160
<v Speaker 2>strong case that no quarterback under his watch has truly

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:23.240
<v Speaker 2>lived up to their potential.

0:19:24.680 --> 0:19:27.439
<v Speaker 1>The short answer, after we just gave long answers, is

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 1>can Notre Dame win a playoff game? Yeah? When they

0:19:30.760 --> 0:19:33.399
<v Speaker 1>don't have to play Clemson or Alabama? They can win

0:19:33.440 --> 0:19:37.160
<v Speaker 1>a playoff game if they draw Washington, if they draw

0:19:37.680 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Michigan State, if they draw Texas Oklahoma, if it's not

0:19:41.880 --> 0:19:45.199
<v Speaker 1>Baker Mayfield or Kyler Murray, if they draw whoever, if

0:19:45.200 --> 0:19:49.639
<v Speaker 1>they're Florida State or Florida. Yes, right now, Clemson and

0:19:49.680 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Alabama are nearly impossible, especially with time to prepare, unless

0:19:55.359 --> 0:19:57.320
<v Speaker 1>you are Clemson or Alabama.

0:19:57.800 --> 0:20:01.120
<v Speaker 2>All right, Well, on that note, Dan, speaking of Clemson,

0:20:01.240 --> 0:20:05.200
<v Speaker 2>speaking of Alabama, Jay with one of my favorite questions

0:20:05.200 --> 0:20:09.359
<v Speaker 2>of all time, Oh Spice, at what point does a

0:20:09.440 --> 0:20:14.520
<v Speaker 2>team win enough games to transition from lovable underdog to

0:20:14.680 --> 0:20:19.960
<v Speaker 2>a full bond villain? At what point did slash? Does

0:20:20.680 --> 0:20:24.439
<v Speaker 2>Clemson switch over? This is I love this question, A

0:20:24.600 --> 0:20:27.360
<v Speaker 2>terrific question, Jay, Thank you so much for listening.

0:20:27.840 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's back up to you. What is your ideal lovable team?

0:20:32.400 --> 0:20:36.159
<v Speaker 1>What composes an ideal lovable team in not like A

0:20:36.400 --> 0:20:39.800
<v Speaker 1>They're scrappy and weird to watch two am, not like that?

0:20:40.400 --> 0:20:43.360
<v Speaker 1>What is your like, I really enjoy everything that's happening

0:20:43.400 --> 0:20:46.199
<v Speaker 1>with this program and team, specifically on the field, off

0:20:46.240 --> 0:20:50.160
<v Speaker 1>the field, whatever what goes into that. For Tyler Hildemrant,

0:20:50.280 --> 0:20:53.760
<v Speaker 1>the underdog component is pretty big to me. Okay, And

0:20:53.800 --> 0:20:56.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking back to some of those Boise State teams

0:20:56.119 --> 0:21:00.439
<v Speaker 1>when Boise was really revving up its program. You'll member,

0:21:01.080 --> 0:21:04.240
<v Speaker 1>bois wasn't always a dog, but they had that underdog

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 1>appeal because they were a group of five team and

0:21:06.840 --> 0:21:10.359
<v Speaker 1>they came from from Idaho with the blue turf, and

0:21:10.440 --> 0:21:13.119
<v Speaker 1>they ran a lot of trick plays that to me,

0:21:13.240 --> 0:21:15.359
<v Speaker 1>was very lovable a lot of teams, a lot of

0:21:15.359 --> 0:21:17.760
<v Speaker 1>people were rooting for Boise, I think because of that.

0:21:17.880 --> 0:21:20.880
<v Speaker 1>But the second component of that, even though they had

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:24.119
<v Speaker 1>the underdog appeal, when you actually watched them play, some

0:21:24.200 --> 0:21:24.720
<v Speaker 1>of those.

0:21:24.520 --> 0:21:29.240
<v Speaker 2>Boise teams balled out on defense. It wasn't just smoking mirrors.

0:21:29.280 --> 0:21:32.040
<v Speaker 2>They were good. To the old Jared Zabranski like, those

0:21:32.080 --> 0:21:36.120
<v Speaker 2>were good teams sure that played and won against high

0:21:36.200 --> 0:21:39.600
<v Speaker 2>level competition. So I think for me as a starting point,

0:21:40.040 --> 0:21:44.399
<v Speaker 2>it's a combination of having that underdog appeal with not

0:21:44.560 --> 0:21:47.000
<v Speaker 2>feeling like you're a fluke when you actually watched them

0:21:47.040 --> 0:21:47.800
<v Speaker 2>out there on the field.

0:21:47.840 --> 0:21:49.119
<v Speaker 1>But if I did to guess you didn't watch a

0:21:49.160 --> 0:21:52.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of Boise games unless it was a huge one.

0:21:52.720 --> 0:21:55.840
<v Speaker 2>You bite your tongue, sir. I watched a lot of

0:21:55.880 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 2>Boise State football.

0:21:57.240 --> 0:21:59.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to tell you I sat and watched

0:21:59.200 --> 0:22:02.399
<v Speaker 1>all of boys see Utah or BYU if it was

0:22:02.440 --> 0:22:04.840
<v Speaker 1>a down matchup against one of those teams. Didn't, you know,

0:22:04.880 --> 0:22:08.199
<v Speaker 1>sit and watch all of Boise, New Mexico whoever. I

0:22:08.200 --> 0:22:10.399
<v Speaker 1>would see a score in the third, middle of the

0:22:10.440 --> 0:22:12.359
<v Speaker 1>third quarter, like, oh wow, it's thirty five to thirty one.

0:22:12.400 --> 0:22:14.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to watch the rest of this. I didn't

0:22:14.600 --> 0:22:16.560
<v Speaker 1>sit down and watch a lot of games that didn't

0:22:16.560 --> 0:22:19.639
<v Speaker 1>have initial appeal unless it was that early, you know,

0:22:19.720 --> 0:22:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Virginia Tech, Georgia whoever. And so I think you're right.

0:22:23.359 --> 0:22:25.440
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a lot of lovability about that team,

0:22:25.440 --> 0:22:28.440
<v Speaker 1>but I think it's more to me. What makes the

0:22:28.480 --> 0:22:30.800
<v Speaker 1>team lovable is one I like when teams get over

0:22:30.800 --> 0:22:33.280
<v Speaker 1>the hump. I like that a lot. And I refer

0:22:33.280 --> 0:22:35.600
<v Speaker 1>a team once again that never got over the national

0:22:35.680 --> 0:22:38.560
<v Speaker 1>championship winning hump, but they got over the hump, and

0:22:38.560 --> 0:22:40.720
<v Speaker 1>that they finally got to that game after coming up

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:43.640
<v Speaker 1>short with Mike Bolattia a couple times. I like when

0:22:43.640 --> 0:22:48.959
<v Speaker 1>a coach has personality that's not condescending, which is tough

0:22:49.320 --> 0:22:52.000
<v Speaker 1>because that's that's sort of built into the DNA for

0:22:52.040 --> 0:22:54.399
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these guys. And so as it relates

0:22:54.400 --> 0:22:57.320
<v Speaker 1>to Clemson, do Clemson get over a hump? Yeah, they did.

0:22:57.480 --> 0:22:59.720
<v Speaker 1>I think we are uniquely qualified to talk about Clemson

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:02.560
<v Speaker 1>getting over certain humps that is for the course of the season. Yeah.

0:23:03.200 --> 0:23:06.439
<v Speaker 1>I think Clemson there is a likability factor, there's a

0:23:06.480 --> 0:23:09.560
<v Speaker 1>style of play factor that they check both of those boxes.

0:23:10.359 --> 0:23:12.679
<v Speaker 1>You got your trick plays. They like the large man plays,

0:23:12.800 --> 0:23:15.280
<v Speaker 1>you know Christian Wilkins, where they're just they don't take

0:23:15.359 --> 0:23:19.480
<v Speaker 1>themselves so so seriously that they're willing to get creative.

0:23:19.760 --> 0:23:22.480
<v Speaker 1>You have Deshaun Watson, who was a very fun quarterback

0:23:22.520 --> 0:23:26.160
<v Speaker 1>to watch. And there was something about Clemson at least

0:23:26.320 --> 0:23:31.359
<v Speaker 1>playing probably two to three competitive close games every year

0:23:31.680 --> 0:23:34.720
<v Speaker 1>that even when they're excellent, you we still know that

0:23:34.800 --> 0:23:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Clemson has down weeks, whereas the machine that is Alabama football,

0:23:39.960 --> 0:23:42.359
<v Speaker 1>they would have their Ole Miss week or their Mississippi

0:23:42.359 --> 0:23:44.640
<v Speaker 1>State week where it would get strange, or a low

0:23:44.640 --> 0:23:48.800
<v Speaker 1>scoring LSU game but where they stand now to say

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Alabama football is in a fun, lovable place. It's impressive,

0:23:53.520 --> 0:23:58.080
<v Speaker 1>it's excellent, but lovable probably not.

0:23:58.600 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 2>Yes, there's a lovability yeah factor that I think weighs

0:24:04.760 --> 0:24:08.400
<v Speaker 2>pretty heavily here. It's like, you know, we talk about

0:24:08.440 --> 0:24:12.320
<v Speaker 2>this a lot with the NFL. The NFL feels corporate

0:24:12.359 --> 0:24:13.960
<v Speaker 2>and soulless compared to college football.

0:24:14.000 --> 0:24:15.360
<v Speaker 1>You gotta give me some charm.

0:24:15.560 --> 0:24:17.480
<v Speaker 2>You got to have some personality, You got to have

0:24:17.520 --> 0:24:22.080
<v Speaker 2>something to latch onto. Alabama unless you're already a fan,

0:24:22.840 --> 0:24:26.000
<v Speaker 2>doesn't really give you that. Whereas Clemson, despite the fact

0:24:26.040 --> 0:24:30.280
<v Speaker 2>that they've clearly gotten over that proverbial hump, there's still

0:24:30.280 --> 0:24:33.280
<v Speaker 2>a lot of personality there. Yeah, you're right, and I

0:24:33.280 --> 0:24:35.359
<v Speaker 2>think it makes it harder to declare them in that

0:24:35.480 --> 0:24:39.000
<v Speaker 2>bond villain stage is and.

0:24:39.000 --> 0:24:42.280
<v Speaker 1>This is I'm not gonna use lovable. Is Dabo likable

0:24:42.400 --> 0:24:44.880
<v Speaker 1>charming to you? Do you think do you swing more

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:47.919
<v Speaker 1>on the you know, putting up a front full of

0:24:47.920 --> 0:24:52.160
<v Speaker 1>crap kind of thing with Dabo or genuinely likable charming,

0:24:52.720 --> 0:24:55.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, is what he projects himself to be. It's

0:24:55.359 --> 0:24:58.119
<v Speaker 1>the Tebow dilemma. I have no idea who Tim Tebow

0:24:58.240 --> 0:24:58.720
<v Speaker 1>is I.

0:24:58.680 --> 0:25:03.400
<v Speaker 2>Would say that there is still enough personality and still

0:25:03.480 --> 0:25:08.400
<v Speaker 2>enough authenticity with Dabbo. Okay that, Yeah, he's lovable, he's likable,

0:25:08.400 --> 0:25:09.560
<v Speaker 2>there's something to latch onto.

0:25:10.480 --> 0:25:12.720
<v Speaker 1>I think I swing that way as well, but it's

0:25:12.800 --> 0:25:15.080
<v Speaker 1>nothing that really has had. Like the dancing in the

0:25:15.080 --> 0:25:17.119
<v Speaker 1>locker room great. I don't go either way on that.

0:25:17.160 --> 0:25:21.080
<v Speaker 1>It's fun. Sure, the interviews, the catchphrases to bring your

0:25:21.080 --> 0:25:24.040
<v Speaker 1>own guts, it's fine. That's nothing bad. It's nothing great.

0:25:24.720 --> 0:25:26.640
<v Speaker 1>The thing that I liked a lot about him where

0:25:26.640 --> 0:25:29.080
<v Speaker 1>there's like these there's a couple of moments. Remember when

0:25:29.200 --> 0:25:33.080
<v Speaker 1>he played Steve Spurrier's voicemails to him for a story. Yeah,

0:25:33.119 --> 0:25:35.360
<v Speaker 1>I love that. That was great. We're like, oh, okay,

0:25:35.680 --> 0:25:39.320
<v Speaker 1>this guy is not super self serious all of the time.

0:25:39.920 --> 0:25:42.359
<v Speaker 1>You know, this guy just you know, can let down,

0:25:42.560 --> 0:25:44.400
<v Speaker 1>was let down. His hair is not a great example

0:25:44.440 --> 0:25:47.359
<v Speaker 1>because it doesn't have long hair, but I like that

0:25:47.440 --> 0:25:50.000
<v Speaker 1>there is that element to him. So right now, I

0:25:50.000 --> 0:25:53.520
<v Speaker 1>think Clemson is not necessarily lovable. I think they're swinging

0:25:53.600 --> 0:25:56.480
<v Speaker 1>in the machine direction. You know, Trevor Lawrence doesn't have

0:25:56.520 --> 0:25:59.480
<v Speaker 1>a big personality excellent to watch. I'm not gonna he

0:25:59.480 --> 0:26:02.320
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have a bad personalities eighteen nineteen years old. Nobody does.

0:26:03.520 --> 0:26:05.800
<v Speaker 1>But I don't know the personalities yet for this coming

0:26:05.840 --> 0:26:09.679
<v Speaker 1>season where I can say, Okay, this guy's great, this

0:26:09.840 --> 0:26:12.800
<v Speaker 1>style is great. The way they're going about this is great.

0:26:13.160 --> 0:26:15.160
<v Speaker 1>I just want to see what they look like and

0:26:15.200 --> 0:26:18.800
<v Speaker 1>how they respond to being down three or four early

0:26:18.840 --> 0:26:20.800
<v Speaker 1>in the fourth quarter. I want that. That, to me

0:26:20.920 --> 0:26:23.679
<v Speaker 1>is lovable. If you're never in competitive games because you're

0:26:23.720 --> 0:26:26.760
<v Speaker 1>either terrible or you're just far and away more talented

0:26:26.880 --> 0:26:29.880
<v Speaker 1>and better coached and more of a machine than everybody else,

0:26:30.400 --> 0:26:32.480
<v Speaker 1>it's just it's hard for me to love.

0:26:32.680 --> 0:26:35.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Clemson right now is James Bond. They're not the villain.

0:26:36.000 --> 0:26:39.600
<v Speaker 1>I think, yeah they are. They are the coolest team

0:26:40.200 --> 0:26:42.520
<v Speaker 1>in this moment, I would say, right, I would agree

0:26:42.520 --> 0:26:45.560
<v Speaker 1>with that. Okay, wow, what a weird path we've taken

0:26:45.600 --> 0:26:48.400
<v Speaker 1>with this, What a weird path. Indeed, by the way,

0:26:48.440 --> 0:26:51.200
<v Speaker 1>if you want to blurb us in the twenty nineteen

0:26:51.320 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Clemson media guy, Yeah, the coolest team right now or here,

0:26:54.160 --> 0:26:57.240
<v Speaker 1>just even put it on the walls of your facility. Sure,

0:26:57.560 --> 0:26:59.520
<v Speaker 1>just give us credit, just give us, just download the

0:26:59.680 --> 0:27:02.159
<v Speaker 1>pie and we're good. I can't believe we've come this

0:27:02.200 --> 0:27:04.160
<v Speaker 1>far with Clemson. But yeah, and you know what, here's

0:27:04.160 --> 0:27:07.720
<v Speaker 1>another factor, and this doesn't tell the whole story. How

0:27:07.760 --> 0:27:11.480
<v Speaker 1>are teams fans and it's impossible to paint a fan

0:27:11.560 --> 0:27:14.920
<v Speaker 1>base with a single paint swipe, brother, hold on, hold on,

0:27:15.080 --> 0:27:16.280
<v Speaker 1>gold On, hold on, hold on.

0:27:16.359 --> 0:27:20.600
<v Speaker 2>As a Notre Dame fan, yeah, I am uniquely qualified

0:27:20.640 --> 0:27:21.480
<v Speaker 2>to talk about this.

0:27:22.720 --> 0:27:25.320
<v Speaker 1>And you're right, your fans are not the worst.

0:27:26.000 --> 0:27:29.400
<v Speaker 2>They're not the worst. No, but there is a perception

0:27:29.760 --> 0:27:33.240
<v Speaker 2>among non Notre Dame fans that they're among the worst,

0:27:33.880 --> 0:27:36.119
<v Speaker 2>and that the program has a bit of a machine

0:27:36.960 --> 0:27:41.000
<v Speaker 2>institutional quality to it, that some of the personality is

0:27:41.040 --> 0:27:41.760
<v Speaker 2>boiled off.

0:27:41.840 --> 0:27:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Notre Dame is not likable. Notre Dame does not do

0:27:43.960 --> 0:27:45.600
<v Speaker 1>much in the likability department. For me.

0:27:45.800 --> 0:27:47.560
<v Speaker 2>There are a lot of factors there that make Notre

0:27:47.640 --> 0:27:51.240
<v Speaker 2>Dame a lot less likable. Now, right, doesn't affect me,

0:27:51.800 --> 0:27:52.520
<v Speaker 2>but I get it.

0:27:52.800 --> 0:27:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, No, I'm with you. There's a preachiness to Notre

0:27:55.240 --> 0:27:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Dame in general that has nothing really to do with

0:27:58.320 --> 0:28:00.800
<v Speaker 1>the fact that there are a Catholic institute. Hell, there's

0:28:00.840 --> 0:28:04.439
<v Speaker 1>a preachiness to Dabbo Sweeney. There is, there is, there is,

0:28:04.480 --> 0:28:07.439
<v Speaker 1>and that's that's a demerit to me, and I get it,

0:28:07.480 --> 0:28:09.600
<v Speaker 1>and you know, you take in the whole story. But

0:28:10.119 --> 0:28:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Notre Dame is a tough ask because of the the

0:28:14.280 --> 0:28:18.960
<v Speaker 1>in Stuto shutting, you know, like the the the baggage

0:28:19.000 --> 0:28:22.040
<v Speaker 1>that comes with Notre Dame. And there's a self importance

0:28:22.080 --> 0:28:25.560
<v Speaker 1>there that I on one level definitely understand accomplished a

0:28:25.560 --> 0:28:28.919
<v Speaker 1>lot over time, but it's it's a tough ask. Is

0:28:28.920 --> 0:28:31.439
<v Speaker 1>this a good transition into the like if an alien

0:28:31.480 --> 0:28:34.080
<v Speaker 1>came down from Earth, and who should you tell this

0:28:34.160 --> 0:28:36.920
<v Speaker 1>alien to root for in each conference? Well? Okay, here

0:28:36.960 --> 0:28:37.960
<v Speaker 1>you go. Yeah.

0:28:38.080 --> 0:28:41.360
<v Speaker 2>This one from Wes the Runner on Twitter. Hello Wes, Yeah,

0:28:41.400 --> 0:28:44.720
<v Speaker 2>if you had zero prior attachment to college football, what

0:28:44.960 --> 0:28:47.600
<v Speaker 2>team would you root for in each conference?

0:28:47.960 --> 0:28:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Yep? So to your question, Dan, let's start with the American.

0:28:52.040 --> 0:28:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's start with the American. Yeah, pull up the college

0:28:55.040 --> 0:28:58.400
<v Speaker 1>football standings. Refamiliarize yourself with who's in what conference. Because

0:28:58.800 --> 0:29:04.440
<v Speaker 1>it's late March, I'm picking from the American right now? Yeah,

0:29:04.720 --> 0:29:07.120
<v Speaker 1>say it, say it. I guess it's Yen yef right,

0:29:07.320 --> 0:29:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Nea Matello, It's either or Houston? Yeah, uh, Houston. I

0:29:14.800 --> 0:29:17.280
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I'm fine with them. They fired their coach

0:29:17.320 --> 0:29:21.800
<v Speaker 1>real quickly. The Luke Fickle story at Cincinnati is really good.

0:29:22.400 --> 0:29:25.160
<v Speaker 1>They're chilly at side. Cincinnati's likable if we.

0:29:25.240 --> 0:29:28.120
<v Speaker 2>Frame this though in the context of the alien coming

0:29:28.160 --> 0:29:33.080
<v Speaker 2>down from outer space, wide eyed looking around college football?

0:29:33.080 --> 0:29:36.320
<v Speaker 2>Who to root for? The Dana Holgerson Angle at Houston

0:29:36.360 --> 0:29:39.440
<v Speaker 2>is pretty damn fun. Yeah, no, they're They're going to

0:29:39.520 --> 0:29:40.960
<v Speaker 2>look fun on offense for sure.

0:29:41.240 --> 0:29:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Can we agree on Houston? I'm gonna go Memphis. To me,

0:29:45.120 --> 0:29:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Memphis is the most likable. They've played a ton of

0:29:47.080 --> 0:29:50.120
<v Speaker 1>fun games. They play a wide open offense. I like

0:29:50.160 --> 0:29:52.880
<v Speaker 1>their quarterbacks. They've put players in the NFL recently, and

0:29:52.960 --> 0:29:58.600
<v Speaker 1>well Memphis, acc okay, acc, who's the most likable? Lovable?

0:29:58.760 --> 0:30:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Get on this train and you'll at least enjoy yourself

0:30:01.640 --> 0:30:03.360
<v Speaker 1>more often than you won't at a minimum.

0:30:03.360 --> 0:30:06.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, we just talked about Clemson. Yeah, there is a

0:30:07.280 --> 0:30:09.680
<v Speaker 2>there's a likability with Clemson.

0:30:10.000 --> 0:30:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Now, that's that's too bandwagony.

0:30:13.240 --> 0:30:16.520
<v Speaker 2>Miami could be fun. We don't know which direction that's going. Yeah,

0:30:16.560 --> 0:30:19.840
<v Speaker 2>that's true, but there's a swagger there. There's a bit

0:30:19.840 --> 0:30:22.960
<v Speaker 2>of any which is weird for Miami, but it's kind

0:30:23.000 --> 0:30:26.960
<v Speaker 2>of there. I like Manny Diaz Many, even with the

0:30:27.000 --> 0:30:31.640
<v Speaker 2>departure real quick. The Q's thing is interesting because I

0:30:31.720 --> 0:30:34.760
<v Speaker 2>like Dino, I like the style. I like that they

0:30:34.880 --> 0:30:37.080
<v Speaker 2>weirdly play in a dome. I mean, I understand it's

0:30:37.120 --> 0:30:37.800
<v Speaker 2>Western New York.

0:30:38.520 --> 0:30:41.520
<v Speaker 1>But the Syracuse thing is they're competitive. They take good

0:30:41.560 --> 0:30:45.160
<v Speaker 1>teams down to the wire or they beat them. And

0:30:45.480 --> 0:30:48.120
<v Speaker 1>they are a team who was super down and now

0:30:48.160 --> 0:30:51.240
<v Speaker 1>they've become pretty competitive most of the time. I did

0:30:51.280 --> 0:30:54.720
<v Speaker 1>watch the Notre Dame game and that was Syracue.

0:30:54.120 --> 0:30:55.840
<v Speaker 2>Sort of is the team that you would pick if

0:30:55.840 --> 0:30:56.880
<v Speaker 2>you are an alien, isn't it?

0:30:57.400 --> 0:31:01.120
<v Speaker 1>I think so? Yeah, it's moved. Yeah, okay, next, Big twelve.

0:31:01.160 --> 0:31:02.920
<v Speaker 1>I think this is easy. Big twelve. Who are you

0:31:03.000 --> 0:31:05.920
<v Speaker 1>going with? I go clones and I don't think twice. Yeah,

0:31:06.000 --> 0:31:09.720
<v Speaker 1>that quarterback who became an All American linebacker there, they

0:31:09.720 --> 0:31:16.760
<v Speaker 1>were terrible or just maddeningly maddeningly inconsistent. They take down giants.

0:31:17.400 --> 0:31:20.360
<v Speaker 1>They play a fun style, at least defensively. They switched

0:31:20.360 --> 0:31:21.880
<v Speaker 1>over to that dime a couple of years ago. On

0:31:21.920 --> 0:31:24.880
<v Speaker 1>board that was pretty difficult. Big twelve has a lot

0:31:24.880 --> 0:31:28.240
<v Speaker 1>of pretty likable teams, fun teams to get behind, you

0:31:28.400 --> 0:31:30.760
<v Speaker 1>throw out Oklahoma and Texas just because then you're just

0:31:30.840 --> 0:31:33.160
<v Speaker 1>jumping on. It's got to be Iowa State. I think

0:31:33.160 --> 0:31:37.280
<v Speaker 1>it's Iowa State. TCU's kind of close for me, but

0:31:37.360 --> 0:31:39.960
<v Speaker 1>I know you have too much in the in your

0:31:39.960 --> 0:31:49.120
<v Speaker 1>past with TCU. Big ten is Perdue. I'm scanning Wisconsin's

0:31:49.160 --> 0:31:51.760
<v Speaker 1>real fun. If you're gonna pick Iowa State, you gotta

0:31:51.760 --> 0:31:55.520
<v Speaker 1>pick Perdue. I like Purdue, and I like the strides

0:31:55.520 --> 0:31:57.760
<v Speaker 1>that they've taken. I like the big upset from last year.

0:31:58.120 --> 0:32:00.400
<v Speaker 1>But if I'm telling somebody to get on board with

0:32:01.200 --> 0:32:04.360
<v Speaker 1>the culture and the experience of being a fan of

0:32:04.360 --> 0:32:09.200
<v Speaker 1>this team, you just picked Syracuse. I know. But right now,

0:32:09.240 --> 0:32:12.120
<v Speaker 1>as it stands, right now, they are enjoyable. Purdue is

0:32:12.360 --> 0:32:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Purdue beats Ohio State, and then they lose to some

0:32:14.400 --> 0:32:18.120
<v Speaker 1>to three somebodies in a dumb way. I don't know

0:32:18.400 --> 0:32:22.040
<v Speaker 1>if they're a Paul Abdul team. I think it steps forward,

0:32:22.080 --> 0:32:25.480
<v Speaker 1>one step back. I just do Okay, so agree to disagree.

0:32:26.040 --> 0:32:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Conference USA. I'm going to stay North Texas. Yeah, it's

0:32:29.560 --> 0:32:33.560
<v Speaker 1>a good answer. I think it. Yeah. I do like

0:32:33.560 --> 0:32:38.560
<v Speaker 1>the North Texas answer. We won't count. We won't count

0:32:37.800 --> 0:32:42.480
<v Speaker 1>in real early with Charlotte, right now Mid American Conference

0:32:43.160 --> 0:32:45.600
<v Speaker 1>or the MAC as it's known, root for this team.

0:32:45.600 --> 0:32:48.360
<v Speaker 1>They're likable, they're fun, they're an enjoyable watch. You're not

0:32:48.440 --> 0:32:52.640
<v Speaker 1>jumping on a bandwagon, you're not killing yourself. The turnaround

0:32:52.680 --> 0:32:55.680
<v Speaker 1>that Eastern's had these past few years makes it interesting

0:32:55.720 --> 0:32:59.080
<v Speaker 1>for me as well as Buffalo. Buffalo's gotten. I think

0:32:59.080 --> 0:33:01.479
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo's my answer and that yes, they won their division

0:33:01.560 --> 0:33:04.520
<v Speaker 1>last year and they've recruited well, but the fact that

0:33:04.600 --> 0:33:08.480
<v Speaker 1>their coach comes over from what Wisconsin Whitewater and immediately

0:33:08.520 --> 0:33:12.480
<v Speaker 1>transforms a super down program, and Buffalo's good answer. We're

0:33:12.480 --> 0:33:17.960
<v Speaker 1>sticking with what is it Western New York? Yeah? Great? Uh.

0:33:18.000 --> 0:33:20.880
<v Speaker 2>Boise State is my Mountain West team. I know it's cliche,

0:33:21.000 --> 0:33:24.200
<v Speaker 2>but I just waxed poetic about how I love Boise

0:33:24.280 --> 0:33:27.160
<v Speaker 2>State back in the days of Jared Zebranski, I have

0:33:27.200 --> 0:33:28.520
<v Speaker 2>to go with the Broncos.

0:33:29.200 --> 0:33:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Utah State would have been interesting with them keeping their coach,

0:33:33.440 --> 0:33:36.479
<v Speaker 1>but going back to Gary Anderson, I don't know about that.

0:33:37.560 --> 0:33:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Hawaii I like Rolovich, I'm fine with it. I think

0:33:41.960 --> 0:33:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Fresno State and what Jeff Tedford has done. I've always

0:33:44.360 --> 0:33:48.000
<v Speaker 1>liked the San Joaquin Valley Central California. Fresno's my pick.

0:33:48.560 --> 0:33:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the PAC twelve here, and I just

0:33:50.400 --> 0:33:54.040
<v Speaker 1>I have I have a fondness for Pat Hill. Yeah, okay, okay,

0:33:54.160 --> 0:33:55.840
<v Speaker 1>PAC twelve. PAC twelve.

0:33:55.960 --> 0:33:59.560
<v Speaker 2>I feel like because I went Houston, mm hmm, and

0:34:00.520 --> 0:34:03.800
<v Speaker 2>because we also talked about the alien quality of Syracuse,

0:34:04.280 --> 0:34:06.640
<v Speaker 2>Washington State is a pretty strong selection here.

0:34:07.480 --> 0:34:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Washington State's not bad. You have a ceiling, but you're

0:34:10.200 --> 0:34:12.560
<v Speaker 1>your fun a fun watch. You are in every game

0:34:12.880 --> 0:34:17.719
<v Speaker 1>you should be except perhaps the Apple Cup. Lazzo is

0:34:17.719 --> 0:34:20.319
<v Speaker 1>a very good answer. I think Arizona State's also a

0:34:20.320 --> 0:34:24.520
<v Speaker 1>good answer, buying into that Herm mentality, aren't you. I

0:34:24.560 --> 0:34:27.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know if it's because of Herm's that's I like

0:34:27.640 --> 0:34:31.600
<v Speaker 1>that there is potential at Arizona State for winning the South,

0:34:32.000 --> 0:34:36.359
<v Speaker 1>especially with some Ustula and USC down I like, I mean,

0:34:36.400 --> 0:34:40.040
<v Speaker 1>I like everything about the Greater Phoenix, Tempe, Scottsdale, that

0:34:40.120 --> 0:34:45.360
<v Speaker 1>whole area. So if I'm picking one, it's probably Wazoo.

0:34:45.920 --> 0:34:49.600
<v Speaker 1>And if after year one Mel Tucker has this team

0:34:49.640 --> 0:34:53.480
<v Speaker 1>at seven and five, eight and four, I love Colorado.

0:34:54.120 --> 0:34:57.880
<v Speaker 1>I just can't in late March twenty nineteen, but Colorado

0:34:57.920 --> 0:35:01.160
<v Speaker 1>would be my answer. Probably who is decent Colorado fan.

0:35:01.520 --> 0:35:03.880
<v Speaker 1>And finally, who is the most I guess not Finally,

0:35:03.880 --> 0:35:06.880
<v Speaker 1>We've got one other one. Who is the most exciting team?

0:35:07.040 --> 0:35:11.360
<v Speaker 1>If you're an alien in the SEC, in the SEC,

0:35:11.880 --> 0:35:13.640
<v Speaker 1>get on board now, you go have a good time

0:35:13.760 --> 0:35:17.959
<v Speaker 1>rooting for them. You're not jumping on a bandwagon. O. God,

0:35:18.040 --> 0:35:21.600
<v Speaker 1>this is rough. I think it might be Florida. I'll

0:35:21.600 --> 0:35:23.840
<v Speaker 1>take Mississippi State, all right with Joe Moorehead. I know

0:35:24.160 --> 0:35:26.840
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna say Florida or Mississippi State. I don't know.

0:35:26.840 --> 0:35:29.640
<v Speaker 1>If you got the klanga klanga you have, you know

0:35:29.640 --> 0:35:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Florida's not bad. But again, you're talking about a team

0:35:31.600 --> 0:35:34.000
<v Speaker 1>that's won two national championships in the last you know,

0:35:34.080 --> 0:35:38.120
<v Speaker 1>a little over a decade. Yeah, as it stands now,

0:35:38.200 --> 0:35:41.880
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't mind. God, it is weird to say it,

0:35:41.920 --> 0:35:45.440
<v Speaker 1>but Mississippi State for me, with the creativity of Joe Moorehead,

0:35:45.480 --> 0:35:49.840
<v Speaker 1>with the unique nature of fandom and Starkville, I wouldn't

0:35:49.880 --> 0:35:53.360
<v Speaker 1>hate that situation. If they continue their trajectory of winning

0:35:53.880 --> 0:35:57.400
<v Speaker 1>eight nine games, if they remain a comfortable team, I

0:35:57.400 --> 0:35:58.440
<v Speaker 1>would love to be on board.

0:35:58.520 --> 0:36:02.640
<v Speaker 2>I think the argument against Mississippi State, quite frankly, is

0:36:02.719 --> 0:36:07.479
<v Speaker 2>that Joe moorehead may not be there five years from now.

0:36:07.560 --> 0:36:10.000
<v Speaker 1>It's hard to keep top top guys, Whereas I think

0:36:10.080 --> 0:36:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Dan Mullen will be at Florida it's totally reasonable. And

0:36:15.000 --> 0:36:18.359
<v Speaker 1>finally the Sun Belt. Dan, Yeah, you're gonna go app State.

0:36:18.480 --> 0:36:23.359
<v Speaker 1>Your boy left, You're gonna go app State. We had

0:36:23.400 --> 0:36:26.480
<v Speaker 1>turnover turnover at app State. Then we have turnover at

0:36:26.480 --> 0:36:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Troy with Neil Brown leaving. Sure, yeah, uh, I mean

0:36:32.280 --> 0:36:34.160
<v Speaker 1>I think I like Eli Drinkwitz. I don't know a

0:36:34.200 --> 0:36:39.160
<v Speaker 1>lot about him at app State. Georgia Southern is scratching

0:36:39.200 --> 0:36:42.880
<v Speaker 1>an itch for me. I've liked Blake. The Blake Anderson

0:36:42.920 --> 0:36:46.400
<v Speaker 1>thing at Arkansas State has also been a secretly pretty

0:36:46.400 --> 0:36:48.680
<v Speaker 1>fun watch. Couldn't tell you I'm an expert on all

0:36:48.719 --> 0:36:50.600
<v Speaker 1>things Blake Anderson. But the job he's done with the

0:36:50.600 --> 0:36:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Red Wolves. Let's go Redman. Let's pickin Arkansas State, maybe

0:36:54.200 --> 0:36:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Georgia Southern.

0:36:55.080 --> 0:36:58.400
<v Speaker 2>All right, So we disagree on Houston or Memphis. We

0:36:58.480 --> 0:37:01.600
<v Speaker 2>disagree on Boise or Fresno, on Wazoo or Colorado, although

0:37:01.600 --> 0:37:05.440
<v Speaker 2>you kind of agreed with Wazoo, yeah, or Mississippi State,

0:37:06.640 --> 0:37:10.280
<v Speaker 2>but otherwise we sort of agree on Qes Iowa State,

0:37:10.400 --> 0:37:17.520
<v Speaker 2>Purdue North Texas, Buffalo in Arkansas State. Yes, correct, All right, Dan,

0:37:17.600 --> 0:37:23.160
<v Speaker 2>before we go any further, what is your motto in life?

0:37:23.640 --> 0:37:26.520
<v Speaker 1>You're only as comfortable as your feet tie. That is right, sir,

0:37:27.640 --> 0:37:31.080
<v Speaker 1>I am. I'm no joke wearing the product that you

0:37:31.120 --> 0:37:32.959
<v Speaker 1>were about to talk about as we speak.

0:37:33.000 --> 0:37:35.360
<v Speaker 2>I don't know how often people out there talk about

0:37:35.360 --> 0:37:36.799
<v Speaker 2>their socks dand.

0:37:36.920 --> 0:37:39.759
<v Speaker 1>It should be a lot more for like we used

0:37:39.800 --> 0:37:39.960
<v Speaker 1>to be.

0:37:40.040 --> 0:37:41.640
<v Speaker 2>Maybe you didn't talk about it a whole lot, but

0:37:41.800 --> 0:37:45.239
<v Speaker 2>then we discovered Bombas. Bombas has been a sponsor of

0:37:45.280 --> 0:37:50.799
<v Speaker 2>the show for eons now eons, one of our earliest sponsors,

0:37:51.600 --> 0:37:54.960
<v Speaker 2>and we have had the good fortune of wearing Bomba sucks.

0:37:54.960 --> 0:37:56.359
<v Speaker 2>I'm actually wearing mine right now.

0:37:56.880 --> 0:38:00.279
<v Speaker 1>Wow, and company men, believe me.

0:38:00.400 --> 0:38:03.239
<v Speaker 2>I'm not just making that up. They are the most

0:38:03.239 --> 0:38:05.360
<v Speaker 2>comfortable socks in the history of feet, as they like

0:38:05.440 --> 0:38:08.960
<v Speaker 2>to say. They're made of super soft, natural cotton. Every

0:38:09.040 --> 0:38:13.120
<v Speaker 2>pair comes with arch support, a seamless toe, a cushion

0:38:13.160 --> 0:38:16.440
<v Speaker 2>footbed that's comfortable but not too thick. They've got a

0:38:16.480 --> 0:38:19.600
<v Speaker 2>bunch of different colors, patterns, lengths, styles, you name it.

0:38:19.800 --> 0:38:21.640
<v Speaker 2>They look great at the gym. I wear them to

0:38:21.680 --> 0:38:24.680
<v Speaker 2>the office. Not a shame to admit that.

0:38:24.680 --> 0:38:25.640
<v Speaker 1>That's fine. You should.

0:38:26.440 --> 0:38:29.800
<v Speaker 2>They're very comfortable to travel out of town with whatever

0:38:29.840 --> 0:38:33.880
<v Speaker 2>the situation. They've got you covered. They are what feet

0:38:34.040 --> 0:38:37.920
<v Speaker 2>daydream about. They've got me saying that here on the script,

0:38:37.920 --> 0:38:41.040
<v Speaker 2>But I'm telling you if feet could daydream, it would

0:38:41.040 --> 0:38:45.239
<v Speaker 2>not surprise me. Best of all, every time you buy

0:38:45.280 --> 0:38:47.080
<v Speaker 2>a pair of Bombas is going to donate a pair

0:38:47.120 --> 0:38:49.080
<v Speaker 2>to somebody in need, which is a really cool thing.

0:38:49.120 --> 0:38:53.200
<v Speaker 2>Hell yeah, I cannot emphasize this enough. By yourself a

0:38:53.239 --> 0:38:58.360
<v Speaker 2>pair of Bombas socks at Bombas dot com slash Solid

0:38:58.360 --> 0:39:01.480
<v Speaker 2>today and you're gonna get twenty percent off your very

0:39:01.480 --> 0:39:06.640
<v Speaker 2>first purchase. It's Bombas bom Bas dot com slash Solid.

0:39:06.640 --> 0:39:10.800
<v Speaker 2>You're gonna get twenty percent off one more time. Bombas

0:39:10.880 --> 0:39:15.120
<v Speaker 2>dot Com. Bombas dot Com Slash Solid, the most comfortable

0:39:15.160 --> 0:39:18.120
<v Speaker 2>socks in the history of feet. Dan, You're gonna look

0:39:18.120 --> 0:39:20.319
<v Speaker 2>into your sock drawer and say to yourself, you know what.

0:39:20.360 --> 0:39:23.680
<v Speaker 1>These shouldn't be here anymore. These need to be replaced,

0:39:23.800 --> 0:39:26.719
<v Speaker 1>but you might not have that solution in your head,

0:39:26.840 --> 0:39:29.360
<v Speaker 1>and so they just stay in your drawer. They just

0:39:29.440 --> 0:39:31.560
<v Speaker 1>stay there and stay there and stay there. Check your

0:39:31.600 --> 0:39:34.200
<v Speaker 1>text messages, Ty, what do you see? You know what,

0:39:34.239 --> 0:39:36.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't have my phone on me first time. Okay,

0:39:36.400 --> 0:39:39.239
<v Speaker 1>so when you goog go check your messages after the show,

0:39:39.280 --> 0:39:40.840
<v Speaker 1>you will see I sent you a picture of my

0:39:40.880 --> 0:39:43.560
<v Speaker 1>feet because I know you're into that. Okay, they are

0:39:43.640 --> 0:39:47.000
<v Speaker 1>wearing Bombas socks. I gave you proof. Wow, you can

0:39:47.080 --> 0:39:49.880
<v Speaker 1>check the time stamp. It all adds up. There you go,

0:39:50.239 --> 0:39:52.440
<v Speaker 1>do it, Bambus Bombas.

0:39:52.880 --> 0:39:54.600
<v Speaker 2>Do we want to go to this question from Ted

0:39:55.239 --> 0:39:56.359
<v Speaker 2>at the very top of the dock?

0:39:57.200 --> 0:39:59.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Can we go to Let's go to Ted momentarily.

0:40:00.000 --> 0:40:02.160
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask Yeah, I'll ask you this question

0:40:02.239 --> 0:40:04.440
<v Speaker 1>that I'll try my best answered as well from Patrick

0:40:04.920 --> 0:40:11.239
<v Speaker 1>came to the inbox the Jersey Mics eat thoroughly box. Uh,

0:40:13.200 --> 0:40:16.319
<v Speaker 1>That's the best I could do. Patrick wants to say, Hi, guys,

0:40:16.400 --> 0:40:20.000
<v Speaker 1>big fan of the podcast. Yeses, I had a question

0:40:20.040 --> 0:40:22.080
<v Speaker 1>for your upcoming Q and A show. Several times I've

0:40:22.200 --> 0:40:26.040
<v Speaker 1>heard Dan use the term quote infrastructure when describing either

0:40:26.120 --> 0:40:29.200
<v Speaker 1>problems deep within a program or a new coaches from

0:40:29.280 --> 0:40:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the ground up rebuild for a program or of a program.

0:40:32.760 --> 0:40:36.160
<v Speaker 1>What does that term mean to you? Ty? What kinds

0:40:36.160 --> 0:40:38.360
<v Speaker 1>of things are you referring to that might not be

0:40:38.480 --> 0:40:41.000
<v Speaker 1>obvious to the casual fan. I gather it goes beyond

0:40:41.040 --> 0:40:44.400
<v Speaker 1>player evaluation and on field coaching staff. What else is involved?

0:40:44.480 --> 0:40:47.760
<v Speaker 1>What other personnel is it? Buildings, facilities, aspects of the program,

0:40:47.920 --> 0:40:50.279
<v Speaker 1>like academic support. If you're talking about the bones of

0:40:50.320 --> 0:40:54.120
<v Speaker 1>the program, what does that skeleton look like? Well, he

0:40:54.239 --> 0:40:55.120
<v Speaker 1>hit on a number of things.

0:40:55.200 --> 0:40:57.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he covered a lot of things in his question.

0:40:58.680 --> 0:41:03.320
<v Speaker 2>On a very fundamental level, to me, it is commitment

0:41:03.440 --> 0:41:08.560
<v Speaker 2>to the program, and oftentimes commitment to a program translates

0:41:08.600 --> 0:41:13.600
<v Speaker 2>to dollars definitely. What kind of financial commitment is an

0:41:13.680 --> 0:41:17.680
<v Speaker 2>institution willing to put forth to better their football program.

0:41:18.560 --> 0:41:22.399
<v Speaker 2>We've got very obvious examples like Texas. We've got very

0:41:22.440 --> 0:41:26.480
<v Speaker 2>obvious examples like Georgia, like Clemson, schools that have very

0:41:27.360 --> 0:41:30.840
<v Speaker 2>notably put forth a pretty large commitment to the football program.

0:41:31.120 --> 0:41:33.320
<v Speaker 2>A lot of D one schools fall into that category.

0:41:33.360 --> 0:41:36.799
<v Speaker 2>But it starts there, and oftentimes it trickles down into

0:41:36.960 --> 0:41:41.719
<v Speaker 2>actual infrastructure things that we might talk about, such as facilities.

0:41:42.400 --> 0:41:43.920
<v Speaker 2>Using the Clemson example, No.

0:41:44.000 --> 0:41:45.440
<v Speaker 1>I think all that is right. I would say, if

0:41:45.440 --> 0:41:47.200
<v Speaker 1>I had to boil it down to what what does

0:41:47.320 --> 0:41:51.040
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure mean? To you, it is from the top down,

0:41:51.200 --> 0:41:53.840
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be a vision, whether it's athletic director,

0:41:53.880 --> 0:41:56.239
<v Speaker 1>whether it's president of the school, whether it's chancellor, all

0:41:56.280 --> 0:41:58.879
<v Speaker 1>the way down, and then obviously to the head coach

0:41:58.920 --> 0:42:02.160
<v Speaker 1>and how empowered the head coaches to both have a

0:42:02.880 --> 0:42:07.480
<v Speaker 1>solid good vision, a winning vision, a sensical vision, and

0:42:07.600 --> 0:42:10.600
<v Speaker 1>how well he is supported. Like you mentioned, in every

0:42:10.760 --> 0:42:14.279
<v Speaker 1>facet of making players want to be there, want to

0:42:14.360 --> 0:42:17.520
<v Speaker 1>commit to the team, whether it's academics, whether it's the

0:42:17.640 --> 0:42:21.080
<v Speaker 1>coach is very clear to his assistance about what he expects,

0:42:21.200 --> 0:42:24.960
<v Speaker 1>both as you know, as for player development, as for recruiting,

0:42:25.400 --> 0:42:28.480
<v Speaker 1>as for academics, as for staying on this player about this,

0:42:29.080 --> 0:42:31.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, as for hiring a strength coach and say

0:42:31.360 --> 0:42:32.840
<v Speaker 1>this is what I want out of them, X, Y

0:42:32.920 --> 0:42:35.520
<v Speaker 1>and Z. This is how we're going to discipline. This

0:42:35.680 --> 0:42:38.440
<v Speaker 1>is how we are going to communicate with our players

0:42:38.480 --> 0:42:40.600
<v Speaker 1>about what we're doing, why we're doing it, This is

0:42:40.640 --> 0:42:42.759
<v Speaker 1>how we're going to meet. This is when we're going

0:42:42.800 --> 0:42:44.320
<v Speaker 1>to meet. This is how we're going to practice. This

0:42:44.440 --> 0:42:47.040
<v Speaker 1>is why we're practicing this way. You know, this is

0:42:47.960 --> 0:42:50.640
<v Speaker 1>you know our schedule on Mondays, Tuesdays, Wednesdays, what is

0:42:50.840 --> 0:42:54.759
<v Speaker 1>what is the actual organization. Does everybody understand what is

0:42:54.840 --> 0:42:58.600
<v Speaker 1>expected of them and how well is that supplied for

0:42:58.760 --> 0:43:04.200
<v Speaker 1>the players, whether it's nutrition, academics, facilities, whatever, it's a

0:43:04.280 --> 0:43:07.600
<v Speaker 1>commitment to the vision. And you know, when we had

0:43:07.920 --> 0:43:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Andy Staples on to talk about I think Dabosweeney. We

0:43:12.160 --> 0:43:14.400
<v Speaker 1>talked about Dabosweeny a while back and whether or not

0:43:14.640 --> 0:43:16.879
<v Speaker 1>he was buying into this, and I was like, why

0:43:16.920 --> 0:43:20.000
<v Speaker 1>don't coaches leave Clemson. We don't leave Clemson because they

0:43:20.040 --> 0:43:23.000
<v Speaker 1>have a good life, They get paid, their families are

0:43:23.040 --> 0:43:25.040
<v Speaker 1>welcomed at like Family Night. Not to talk about how

0:43:25.080 --> 0:43:27.520
<v Speaker 1>cool Clemson is once again, but there is a clear

0:43:27.600 --> 0:43:31.360
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure where everybody understands what the program is and is

0:43:31.480 --> 0:43:34.200
<v Speaker 1>trying to do. And when you look at programs that

0:43:34.400 --> 0:43:37.440
<v Speaker 1>lose a lot, it can be money, it can be

0:43:37.680 --> 0:43:40.880
<v Speaker 1>lack of vision, it can be lack of communication, and

0:43:41.239 --> 0:43:44.240
<v Speaker 1>it can be lack of support for all of the above,

0:43:44.560 --> 0:43:49.200
<v Speaker 1>and oftentimes it is and so it's bad hiring, it

0:43:49.360 --> 0:43:53.360
<v Speaker 1>is bad communication, and it is trying to cut corners

0:43:53.480 --> 0:43:55.719
<v Speaker 1>because of Okay, it's going to cost too much or

0:43:56.200 --> 0:43:59.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, something went wrong along the chain. And if

0:43:59.680 --> 0:44:02.479
<v Speaker 1>a pro has that solid chain and it's become harder

0:44:02.520 --> 0:44:05.080
<v Speaker 1>and harder to because there is such a crazy arms

0:44:05.160 --> 0:44:08.440
<v Speaker 1>race with everything. Then they are most likely going to

0:44:08.520 --> 0:44:10.960
<v Speaker 1>be not only a consistent Bowl team, but they're going

0:44:11.040 --> 0:44:14.719
<v Speaker 1>to beat more good teams than not. And to me,

0:44:15.840 --> 0:44:17.839
<v Speaker 1>that is what infrastructure is. And I will take at

0:44:17.920 --> 0:44:20.040
<v Speaker 1>least a four on this infrastructure ap test.

0:44:20.400 --> 0:44:23.960
<v Speaker 2>I would echo your sentiment around vision. The budget can

0:44:24.040 --> 0:44:27.240
<v Speaker 2>buy you the tools that you need to put together

0:44:27.320 --> 0:44:30.160
<v Speaker 2>a successful program, you need the vision to tie it

0:44:30.239 --> 0:44:34.320
<v Speaker 2>all together. Case in point, Texas has a huge budget,

0:44:34.920 --> 0:44:37.160
<v Speaker 2>you could argue they haven't had that vision or at

0:44:37.239 --> 0:44:39.400
<v Speaker 2>least the vision wasn't successful.

0:44:39.000 --> 0:44:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Right, A good vision, A good vision.

0:44:41.480 --> 0:44:43.919
<v Speaker 2>I would also argue that Tom Herman's got them going

0:44:43.960 --> 0:44:46.520
<v Speaker 2>in a good direction, that we're going to start sending

0:44:47.880 --> 0:44:50.719
<v Speaker 2>a better return on that investment in the years to come.

0:44:51.360 --> 0:44:54.400
<v Speaker 2>But you can trast a school like a Texas with

0:44:54.640 --> 0:44:56.960
<v Speaker 2>a school like in Ohio State, with a school like

0:44:57.120 --> 0:45:00.360
<v Speaker 2>a Clemson where clearly the commitment is there and the

0:45:00.480 --> 0:45:03.880
<v Speaker 2>vision is also there or has been there leading that

0:45:03.960 --> 0:45:06.000
<v Speaker 2>program to new heights, and.

0:45:06.040 --> 0:45:09.279
<v Speaker 1>You can't talk about Tom Herman tearing down and restarting

0:45:09.280 --> 0:45:12.720
<v Speaker 1>the infrastructure at Texas without a clip of him struggling

0:45:12.760 --> 0:45:16.520
<v Speaker 1>with a sledgehammer. That's right, that's right. Set infrastructure literally

0:45:17.040 --> 0:45:19.040
<v Speaker 1>in the locker room. So very good question. There is

0:45:19.080 --> 0:45:21.520
<v Speaker 1>that commitment. Yeah, next, we have Ted right.

0:45:21.920 --> 0:45:25.600
<v Speaker 2>Ted says, you guys often answer questions from the same

0:45:25.960 --> 0:45:31.280
<v Speaker 2>folks I assume unknowingly. For instance, this week, the Audible

0:45:31.360 --> 0:45:35.439
<v Speaker 2>podcast and podcast Ain't Played Nobody both addressed a question

0:45:35.760 --> 0:45:41.120
<v Speaker 2>on Tennessee and Nebraska being sleeping giants. In past episodes,

0:45:41.200 --> 0:45:44.200
<v Speaker 2>the Solid Verbal and podcast Ain't Played Nobody both answered

0:45:44.280 --> 0:45:49.239
<v Speaker 2>questions from regular submitters, which leads me to ask, do

0:45:49.320 --> 0:45:52.600
<v Speaker 2>you not have the time or ability to listen to

0:45:52.840 --> 0:45:57.160
<v Speaker 2>each other's podcasts despite knowing each other and being friendly?

0:45:57.280 --> 0:46:01.800
<v Speaker 2>From what I observe, my question, either for here or

0:46:02.040 --> 0:46:06.319
<v Speaker 2>on your respective shows, is do you listen to other

0:46:06.520 --> 0:46:11.160
<v Speaker 2>podcasts college football podcasts? And if so, even if it

0:46:11.320 --> 0:46:14.320
<v Speaker 2>is taboo to say in fear that you drive away listeners?

0:46:14.960 --> 0:46:15.919
<v Speaker 1>Which one.

0:46:16.080 --> 0:46:18.319
<v Speaker 2>So there's a lot to unpack here. I would also

0:46:18.400 --> 0:46:21.520
<v Speaker 2>add that Ted did not just send this email to us,

0:46:21.680 --> 0:46:24.880
<v Speaker 2>He also addressed it to our friends over at podcasting

0:46:24.920 --> 0:46:26.879
<v Speaker 2>and played Nobody as well as the Audible Dan.

0:46:27.000 --> 0:46:31.560
<v Speaker 1>So a lot here. Where do you want to start with? Honesty, tie,

0:46:31.960 --> 0:46:36.840
<v Speaker 1>I guess I have, and I still do sometimes, but

0:46:36.960 --> 0:46:40.319
<v Speaker 1>I do far less than I used to. And it's

0:46:40.400 --> 0:46:43.279
<v Speaker 1>not I like a lot like Bill c and Godfree

0:46:43.360 --> 0:46:46.920
<v Speaker 1>and Stu and Bruce Chip Patterson does a wonderful podcast

0:46:47.000 --> 0:46:50.680
<v Speaker 1>for CBS. My problem is one, I have less time.

0:46:51.719 --> 0:46:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Two I get to listen to my favorite college football

0:46:55.320 --> 0:46:59.200
<v Speaker 1>podcasts with better audio than anybody else. And that's this

0:46:59.320 --> 0:47:05.680
<v Speaker 1>one and three. I'm a comedy nerd as an unfunny person,

0:47:05.760 --> 0:47:08.480
<v Speaker 1>I say this, and I read a lot of interviews

0:47:08.520 --> 0:47:11.400
<v Speaker 1>with comedians and comedic actors and writers and stuff like that,

0:47:11.640 --> 0:47:14.080
<v Speaker 1>and there's something that a lot of them say that

0:47:14.160 --> 0:47:16.880
<v Speaker 1>they don't watch a lot of comedies. They really like

0:47:17.160 --> 0:47:20.560
<v Speaker 1>dramas or thrillers or horror movies or whatever because they

0:47:20.640 --> 0:47:23.239
<v Speaker 1>don't want to feel bad about their own show. They

0:47:23.280 --> 0:47:26.640
<v Speaker 1>don't want jokes, you know, through osmosis or whatever creeping

0:47:26.680 --> 0:47:30.600
<v Speaker 1>into their brain. And I find myself agreeing that I

0:47:30.680 --> 0:47:34.400
<v Speaker 1>don't want Godfrey's opinion about something or Bruce's opinion about

0:47:34.440 --> 0:47:38.600
<v Speaker 1>something changing how I feel about something organically, because he

0:47:38.719 --> 0:47:40.719
<v Speaker 1>planted a seed, one of them planted a seed in me.

0:47:40.800 --> 0:47:44.080
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a ton of use in other college

0:47:44.120 --> 0:47:48.400
<v Speaker 1>football podcasts for whatever you're into about college football, But

0:47:49.520 --> 0:47:52.400
<v Speaker 1>I just like listening to other things. College football is

0:47:52.600 --> 0:47:55.440
<v Speaker 1>how I spend so much of my time professionally that

0:47:55.719 --> 0:47:58.480
<v Speaker 1>I like going in a complete different direction. I love

0:47:58.640 --> 0:48:01.560
<v Speaker 1>NBA podcasts. I will recommend Open Floor with our friends

0:48:01.600 --> 0:48:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Ben Golliver and Andrew Sharp until I'm blue in the face.

0:48:04.239 --> 0:48:09.360
<v Speaker 1>But for college football, I just that's not where I

0:48:09.480 --> 0:48:13.360
<v Speaker 1>go generally podcast wise. I'm with you. I like the

0:48:13.400 --> 0:48:14.680
<v Speaker 1>solid verbal. I'm with you.

0:48:15.719 --> 0:48:19.640
<v Speaker 2>I too, prefer the solid verbal. I dabble with other shows,

0:48:19.960 --> 0:48:23.640
<v Speaker 2>and not just not just the two that are on

0:48:23.800 --> 0:48:26.000
<v Speaker 2>this list. I like to dabble with college football shows

0:48:26.080 --> 0:48:27.239
<v Speaker 2>just to see what people are doing.

0:48:27.600 --> 0:48:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Do you like sending me snarky text messages about their

0:48:29.880 --> 0:48:30.880
<v Speaker 1>audio quality? Sometimes?

0:48:30.920 --> 0:48:33.520
<v Speaker 2>I do that sometimes sometimes, But I do like to dabble,

0:48:33.640 --> 0:48:35.440
<v Speaker 2>and I like to see what other people are doing,

0:48:35.600 --> 0:48:40.479
<v Speaker 2>just from a raw idea standpoint. Sure, I always feel,

0:48:40.520 --> 0:48:43.279
<v Speaker 2>if I'm being honest, like I don't have the kind

0:48:43.360 --> 0:48:45.920
<v Speaker 2>of time that I need to be fully up to

0:48:46.000 --> 0:48:49.040
<v Speaker 2>speed with the information the way others are. And that's

0:48:49.080 --> 0:48:51.480
<v Speaker 2>because I have the mysterious day job. Right, you just

0:48:51.760 --> 0:48:54.520
<v Speaker 2>run out of time. If I'm listening to other shows.

0:48:54.719 --> 0:48:57.920
<v Speaker 2>It is generally not about college football, and it is

0:48:58.000 --> 0:48:59.440
<v Speaker 2>generally not even about sports.

0:49:00.080 --> 0:49:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Now, before you go on, do you want to play

0:49:02.480 --> 0:49:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the solid verbal after hours music? So anybody who's done

0:49:06.880 --> 0:49:07.879
<v Speaker 1>who only wants to hear.

0:49:07.800 --> 0:49:10.120
<v Speaker 2>That, we can play it the after hours music. Yeah,

0:49:16.080 --> 0:49:19.279
<v Speaker 2>and we're back there you go, yeah, no, yeah, you

0:49:19.400 --> 0:49:22.120
<v Speaker 2>are free to go. If you were here for college football.

0:49:22.080 --> 0:49:24.399
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, take take off. Thanks for the download, Thanks for listening.

0:49:24.440 --> 0:49:26.640
<v Speaker 1>We treasure and appreciate you. Thank you. Give me your

0:49:26.719 --> 0:49:33.800
<v Speaker 1>favorite space show. How's Neil de grass Tyson's.

0:49:34.360 --> 0:49:36.480
<v Speaker 2>Neil de grass Tyson. He's got a huge podcast, right,

0:49:36.600 --> 0:49:39.360
<v Speaker 2>that has a huge podcast. Yeah, I listened to that

0:49:39.440 --> 0:49:40.080
<v Speaker 2>one for a while.

0:49:40.239 --> 0:49:41.320
<v Speaker 1>That was sort of my go to.

0:49:41.880 --> 0:49:45.480
<v Speaker 2>Okay, it's not even space based shows. It's just anything

0:49:45.560 --> 0:49:46.880
<v Speaker 2>that pertains to outer space.

0:49:46.880 --> 0:49:50.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll listen to. So what are you most excited space

0:49:50.040 --> 0:49:51.360
<v Speaker 1>wise when a new episode goes up?

0:49:51.440 --> 0:49:55.520
<v Speaker 2>If you could give me anything on space travel, if

0:49:55.560 --> 0:49:58.960
<v Speaker 2>you could give me anything on like aliens, if you

0:49:59.000 --> 0:50:01.520
<v Speaker 2>can give me anything in that vein, I'll pump it

0:50:01.640 --> 0:50:02.239
<v Speaker 2>right into the vein.

0:50:02.400 --> 0:50:08.919
<v Speaker 1>Black holes, wormholes, Let's do it, anti matter, let's do it. Okay, fair,

0:50:09.880 --> 0:50:13.680
<v Speaker 1>I like Malcolm Gladwell's podcast A good deal Revision's History. Yeah,

0:50:13.680 --> 0:50:17.239
<v Speaker 1>think it does a good job with that. I like listen.

0:50:17.280 --> 0:50:19.759
<v Speaker 1>I don't love media criticism, and I try to stay

0:50:19.760 --> 0:50:22.239
<v Speaker 1>away from a lot of media naval gazing. But our

0:50:22.280 --> 0:50:25.319
<v Speaker 1>pal Jimmy Traina does a nice job at sh Jimmy Sure, Sure.

0:50:26.239 --> 0:50:29.719
<v Speaker 1>I really enjoyed the startup podcast Gimblet who now they're

0:50:29.719 --> 0:50:35.279
<v Speaker 1>all wearing gold chains. Ray podcast Money I like. I

0:50:35.520 --> 0:50:38.879
<v Speaker 1>found I find podcasts on YouTube more than I ever did.

0:50:39.520 --> 0:50:41.719
<v Speaker 1>There's a there's like a group of comedians in LA

0:50:42.400 --> 0:50:45.080
<v Speaker 1>and I don't watch them all that much, but I

0:50:45.239 --> 0:50:47.880
<v Speaker 1>find Tom Sagora to be really funny, and so I

0:50:48.000 --> 0:50:50.279
<v Speaker 1>found his podcasts Your Mom's House, that he does with

0:50:50.320 --> 0:50:54.719
<v Speaker 1>his wife, Chris Positski. They're both comedians. They're great when

0:50:54.800 --> 0:50:57.160
<v Speaker 1>if chemistry is the secret sauce a married couple, if

0:50:57.200 --> 0:51:00.359
<v Speaker 1>they can pull it off, is great. So I really

0:51:00.440 --> 0:51:03.000
<v Speaker 1>like Your Mom's House. It's not safe for work, and

0:51:03.040 --> 0:51:05.000
<v Speaker 1>they go into I don't agree with everything, they go

0:51:05.080 --> 0:51:08.920
<v Speaker 1>into places that are just wonderful. Who else do I

0:51:09.040 --> 0:51:10.160
<v Speaker 1>like in terms of podcasts?

0:51:10.239 --> 0:51:12.800
<v Speaker 2>I like, Yeah, obviously my brother, my brother and me,

0:51:12.880 --> 0:51:15.440
<v Speaker 2>we've talked about them. Love my Bam bam yep, until

0:51:15.560 --> 0:51:18.359
<v Speaker 2>we're you know, blue in the face. We've talked about them, YEA.

0:51:18.520 --> 0:51:20.160
<v Speaker 2>Love to go to a live show if they ever

0:51:20.239 --> 0:51:26.120
<v Speaker 2>come up in the world. Ben, I started listening to

0:51:26.200 --> 0:51:28.960
<v Speaker 2>fantasy baseball podcasts because it's that time of year again.

0:51:29.440 --> 0:51:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, are you in a league?

0:51:31.719 --> 0:51:34.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm in many, many leagues, Dan, I'm in three leagues.

0:51:35.080 --> 0:51:37.520
<v Speaker 2>It's too many. I shouldn't be in three leagues.

0:51:38.320 --> 0:51:40.600
<v Speaker 1>What's the best fantasy baseball podcast? The best one that

0:51:40.680 --> 0:51:45.240
<v Speaker 1>I found is on CBS Sports. Who does it? Adam

0:51:45.280 --> 0:51:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Aser and some of the other guys that write for CBS.

0:51:48.960 --> 0:51:50.040
<v Speaker 1>How long is is it daily?

0:51:50.440 --> 0:51:53.360
<v Speaker 2>I think it's daily. I haven't listened long enough to know.

0:51:54.080 --> 0:51:59.840
<v Speaker 2>But it's questionable audio quality at times, but really good information,

0:52:00.680 --> 0:52:02.440
<v Speaker 2>which is really the only time I'm willing to make

0:52:02.520 --> 0:52:07.719
<v Speaker 2>that trade off. But right, good chemistry, great information. That

0:52:07.840 --> 0:52:09.879
<v Speaker 2>has sort of been my go to on the fantasy side.

0:52:11.719 --> 0:52:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Have you listened to Business Wars on occasion? It's good,

0:52:14.800 --> 0:52:18.640
<v Speaker 1>it's good boundary network does it? Business Wars highly recommend

0:52:18.800 --> 0:52:21.120
<v Speaker 1>they just like, Hey, it's Monster Energy versus Red Bull.

0:52:21.200 --> 0:52:23.839
<v Speaker 1>Did you listen to did you listen to Doctor Death?

0:52:24.000 --> 0:52:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of wondery. I have not, but I've heard wonderful things. Yeah,

0:52:27.719 --> 0:52:30.719
<v Speaker 1>I listened to that A good job. Yeah, I think

0:52:30.719 --> 0:52:33.000
<v Speaker 1>they're the same network. They do Dirty John as well. Right, yep, yep,

0:52:33.080 --> 0:52:35.760
<v Speaker 1>listen to that one too, good stuff. That's uh Jody

0:52:35.800 --> 0:52:39.680
<v Speaker 1>with And I is currently listening to the Farrah Noose. Okay,

0:52:41.040 --> 0:52:44.399
<v Speaker 1>the what's her name Elizabeth Holmes? Yeah, yeah, I haven't

0:52:44.400 --> 0:52:47.520
<v Speaker 1>watched the HBO documentary about Elizabeth Holmes and Therapnose yet,

0:52:48.040 --> 0:52:49.560
<v Speaker 1>but I've listened to the podcast, and I watched the

0:52:49.680 --> 0:52:54.839
<v Speaker 1>ABC like twenty twenty special. Yeah it rules. Okay, it's

0:52:54.960 --> 0:52:57.520
<v Speaker 1>so good, this whole thing. I don't know why I

0:52:57.640 --> 0:52:59.960
<v Speaker 1>appreciate a good fraud story. Oh is it good?

0:53:00.239 --> 0:53:03.000
<v Speaker 2>It's the fire Festival of Technology essentially.

0:53:03.320 --> 0:53:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Indeed it is ty, Indeed it is. I'm trying to

0:53:05.640 --> 0:53:08.560
<v Speaker 1>think if there's any other You mentioned what Kate likes

0:53:08.600 --> 0:53:12.080
<v Speaker 1>the was it Dax Shepherd's Shack Shepherd Armchair Expert. Yeah, yeah,

0:53:12.120 --> 0:53:13.719
<v Speaker 1>that's what you said. I haven't listened yet, but no,

0:53:13.800 --> 0:53:16.319
<v Speaker 1>apparently it's good. So yeah, those are some All right, Well,

0:53:16.360 --> 0:53:18.920
<v Speaker 1>write in give us suggestions. Let's go to give suggestions.

0:53:18.920 --> 0:53:19.680
<v Speaker 1>We're open to everything.

0:53:19.800 --> 0:53:25.320
<v Speaker 2>Jonathan I love this question from Jonathan. Let's imagine you

0:53:25.480 --> 0:53:28.400
<v Speaker 2>had the opportunity to guarantee your team a spot in

0:53:28.480 --> 0:53:30.720
<v Speaker 2>the college football playoff next season.

0:53:31.080 --> 0:53:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh man, I know where we're going.

0:53:32.800 --> 0:53:34.680
<v Speaker 2>But in order to do so, you have to choose

0:53:34.719 --> 0:53:39.680
<v Speaker 2>between one of the below options. One with no control

0:53:39.920 --> 0:53:42.960
<v Speaker 2>or advanced notice on your end. One day each month,

0:53:43.400 --> 0:53:46.920
<v Speaker 2>you will go through an entire day with a wedgie.

0:53:47.360 --> 0:53:50.400
<v Speaker 2>Uh huh, a wedgie that is visible to all and

0:53:50.560 --> 0:53:53.040
<v Speaker 2>cannot be picked or adjusted, So.

0:53:53.080 --> 0:53:55.479
<v Speaker 1>Your underwear is coming out of your pants. Everybody sees

0:53:55.520 --> 0:53:59.160
<v Speaker 1>it and like in an aggressive and dramatic way, and

0:53:59.239 --> 0:54:00.680
<v Speaker 1>you can do nothing to change it.

0:54:01.000 --> 0:54:04.960
<v Speaker 2>Or perhaps you're at your mysterious day job and it's

0:54:05.040 --> 0:54:07.360
<v Speaker 2>such a weggie that you can kind of see it

0:54:07.400 --> 0:54:09.759
<v Speaker 2>from the outside, not just the underpants, but maybe your

0:54:09.840 --> 0:54:11.279
<v Speaker 2>khaki's just.

0:54:11.320 --> 0:54:13.759
<v Speaker 1>Wedged up in there. Or two.

0:54:14.680 --> 0:54:18.440
<v Speaker 2>One day during the year, you will be victim of

0:54:18.560 --> 0:54:22.759
<v Speaker 2>a public melvin aka atomic weggie. It can be at

0:54:22.800 --> 0:54:25.760
<v Speaker 2>any moment of the day, and Andy's setting, a job interview,

0:54:25.840 --> 0:54:30.400
<v Speaker 2>a church service, etc. And again you have no advanced notice.

0:54:30.440 --> 0:54:31.360
<v Speaker 2>Which do you choose?

0:54:31.480 --> 0:54:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Dan to me, this is sort of a no brainer.

0:54:34.480 --> 0:54:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Is an atomic wedgie still a thing without wearing your

0:54:39.120 --> 0:54:43.040
<v Speaker 1>traditional boxer shorts or tidy whities. Can it be still

0:54:43.080 --> 0:54:47.759
<v Speaker 1>a thing with boxer briefs the way they're structured. I'm

0:54:47.800 --> 0:54:52.440
<v Speaker 1>not sure. I'm old and washed. I believe it could be.

0:54:52.600 --> 0:54:53.360
<v Speaker 1>It probably is.

0:54:53.920 --> 0:54:57.120
<v Speaker 2>I was hard a time and layout distinguishing between just

0:54:57.200 --> 0:54:59.160
<v Speaker 2>a regular wedgie and an atomic.

0:54:59.080 --> 0:55:01.719
<v Speaker 1>Atomic goes olders are ahead, you pull it up, way

0:55:01.880 --> 0:55:05.520
<v Speaker 1>way up. You're stretching the bands to sort of give

0:55:05.600 --> 0:55:07.960
<v Speaker 1>yourself or give not yourself but the other person, like

0:55:08.000 --> 0:55:11.640
<v Speaker 1>a Cornholio with said underpants.

0:55:12.800 --> 0:55:15.400
<v Speaker 2>I think i'd go atomic weggie. I think you have

0:55:15.480 --> 0:55:17.920
<v Speaker 2>to go atomic weggie one day during the year. It

0:55:18.040 --> 0:55:22.080
<v Speaker 2>just says one day day pay versus one day each

0:55:22.280 --> 0:55:24.200
<v Speaker 2>month where you have to go through a full day,

0:55:24.400 --> 0:55:28.160
<v Speaker 2>Like that's something the CIA does to get information out

0:55:28.200 --> 0:55:30.240
<v Speaker 2>of people. Well, I mean we've both had our teams

0:55:30.280 --> 0:55:34.640
<v Speaker 2>in the playoff, right, sure, so this is not you

0:55:35.040 --> 0:55:38.279
<v Speaker 2>as a North Carolina State fan me as a cal fan,

0:55:38.920 --> 0:55:43.040
<v Speaker 2>where like it really hasn't been close and saying, oh man,

0:55:43.239 --> 0:55:46.160
<v Speaker 2>what I would do for me the playoff game sort

0:55:46.200 --> 0:55:47.560
<v Speaker 2>of was the atomic weggie.

0:55:48.000 --> 0:55:53.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's that's a pretty clear concept. I take the

0:55:53.360 --> 0:55:55.640
<v Speaker 1>one day and I'll I mean, it's just it's a day,

0:55:55.760 --> 0:55:58.600
<v Speaker 1>it's more violent. But here's the other thing. I am

0:55:59.080 --> 0:56:02.399
<v Speaker 1>never in a play. So I work for a number

0:56:02.440 --> 0:56:05.200
<v Speaker 1>of companies now, but I'm never really in a place

0:56:05.239 --> 0:56:08.560
<v Speaker 1>where I would be embarrassed about much. I'm either working

0:56:08.600 --> 0:56:11.360
<v Speaker 1>for my apartment or I now work at an office,

0:56:11.400 --> 0:56:14.200
<v Speaker 1>but it's like a coworking space type of office. And

0:56:14.280 --> 0:56:16.080
<v Speaker 1>if you were to say, hey, do you know anybody?

0:56:16.120 --> 0:56:18.600
<v Speaker 1>What are their names? I would tell you Nope, and

0:56:18.760 --> 0:56:21.759
<v Speaker 1>couldn't tell you. So the embarrassment factor for me is

0:56:21.840 --> 0:56:24.880
<v Speaker 1>pretty low, So I would take the one day that's wild.

0:56:25.360 --> 0:56:27.520
<v Speaker 1>I would probably not show up the next day, and

0:56:27.880 --> 0:56:30.399
<v Speaker 1>the day after that we're like, are you the maybe

0:56:30.480 --> 0:56:32.960
<v Speaker 1>not maybe I don't remember, and that would be that. See.

0:56:33.000 --> 0:56:36.279
<v Speaker 2>But once you get to our ripe old age, Dan, right,

0:56:36.960 --> 0:56:40.440
<v Speaker 2>the wedgie stops being a funny thing. Like if somebody

0:56:40.520 --> 0:56:45.160
<v Speaker 2>came and pulled my underwear up to my shoulders unannounced. Iff, Yeah,

0:56:45.560 --> 0:56:47.640
<v Speaker 2>some guys with trench coats got out of a van

0:56:48.200 --> 0:56:51.840
<v Speaker 2>right and just did this to me. In most places

0:56:51.920 --> 0:56:55.040
<v Speaker 2>that I think i'd find myself, people will be alarmed

0:56:55.080 --> 0:56:57.919
<v Speaker 2>by that. I wouldn't even need to feel embarrassed. People

0:56:57.920 --> 0:56:59.000
<v Speaker 2>would feel sorry for me.

0:57:00.120 --> 0:57:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Remember the time in I mean, we're roughly the same

0:57:03.200 --> 0:57:09.080
<v Speaker 1>age in popular TV shows and cartoons where pantsing was

0:57:09.120 --> 0:57:11.880
<v Speaker 1>a thing, and not only would it be a pantsing,

0:57:12.120 --> 0:57:15.880
<v Speaker 1>it would reveal hilarious heart boxer shorts. Yeah that's right,

0:57:16.000 --> 0:57:18.760
<v Speaker 1>that's right. That was the thing, you know, across many shows.

0:57:18.920 --> 0:57:19.840
<v Speaker 1>So let's let's do this.

0:57:20.920 --> 0:57:24.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Weggie versus pantsing, which is worse.

0:57:26.760 --> 0:57:29.400
<v Speaker 1>It's definitely Weggie. There's no pain in pantsing. You're like, oh,

0:57:29.480 --> 0:57:31.760
<v Speaker 1>you pulled out my pants and yep, it considerable that

0:57:31.800 --> 0:57:34.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm wearing black boxer briefs all fact. Well, you're saying

0:57:34.680 --> 0:57:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Weggi's worse. Yeah, but I mean, as try to answer

0:57:38.840 --> 0:57:44.920
<v Speaker 1>this question if you're fourteen. Weggie versus the feared Tapper.

0:57:46.200 --> 0:57:50.840
<v Speaker 2>Tapper's rough the aka the Bangkok. I went probably two

0:57:50.960 --> 0:57:55.520
<v Speaker 2>years of my adolescent life in constant fear of the Tapper.

0:57:58.000 --> 0:58:00.720
<v Speaker 1>What one specific person doing it or that just became

0:58:00.920 --> 0:58:04.080
<v Speaker 1>the culture. It was just I was just the culture. Yeah. Oh,

0:58:04.640 --> 0:58:10.680
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure at Northampton High School. Yeah, a lot to be control. Nope, zero,

0:58:11.720 --> 0:58:12.680
<v Speaker 1>what else do we got here?

0:58:14.720 --> 0:58:18.520
<v Speaker 2>Tapper versus falling asleep and having someone drow in your face?

0:58:20.400 --> 0:58:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Uh, oh man. In high school, middle school, probably tappers

0:58:25.360 --> 0:58:28.000
<v Speaker 1>over quickly, you don't. If you're not watching that off,

0:58:28.240 --> 0:58:30.800
<v Speaker 1>you're you might be known as like, hey, you have

0:58:30.920 --> 0:58:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the butt cheek, but your sharpy butt cheek guy right

0:58:33.040 --> 0:58:37.080
<v Speaker 1>for like three straight years. So yeah, probably tapper tapper

0:58:37.160 --> 0:58:40.480
<v Speaker 1>versus dead leg Oh god, I got so many dead

0:58:40.520 --> 0:58:42.200
<v Speaker 1>legs in high school. Yeah, I know, people are just

0:58:42.280 --> 0:58:45.480
<v Speaker 1>shocked to hear this. That was the big thing at

0:58:45.520 --> 0:58:47.880
<v Speaker 1>my school. It was dead legs and dead arms. Yeah,

0:58:48.520 --> 0:58:50.600
<v Speaker 1>and it was the freaking worst. Where do you want

0:58:50.600 --> 0:58:56.440
<v Speaker 1>to go next? All right? I asked people to ask

0:58:56.520 --> 0:58:58.640
<v Speaker 1>us about haircuts. How much you pay for your haircut

0:59:00.000 --> 0:59:05.560
<v Speaker 1>dollars plus tip? Okay, I pay thirty one probably, I

0:59:05.600 --> 0:59:08.479
<v Speaker 1>mean you adjust for New York. But how much would

0:59:08.480 --> 0:59:11.440
<v Speaker 1>you how much do you tip on twenty not twenty percent?

0:59:12.480 --> 0:59:15.560
<v Speaker 1>So you're thrown in four bucks? Usually? Yeah? Yeah, I

0:59:15.640 --> 0:59:18.360
<v Speaker 1>do five, six, seven, depending on how happy I am

0:59:18.440 --> 0:59:21.120
<v Speaker 1>with it. I think that's pretty nice. Where's the question

0:59:21.240 --> 0:59:25.840
<v Speaker 1>about timing a haircut? Oh? Okay? Yeah, so the question

0:59:26.120 --> 0:59:30.040
<v Speaker 1>was what is the timing like of a haircut? Like,

0:59:30.160 --> 0:59:32.000
<v Speaker 1>let's say you have a graduation, you have a wedding,

0:59:32.320 --> 0:59:35.080
<v Speaker 1>you have some you're going on TV. You're appearing on

0:59:35.160 --> 0:59:39.000
<v Speaker 1>camera for whatever reason you are, you know, going on

0:59:39.080 --> 0:59:40.840
<v Speaker 1>a first date that you know about a week or

0:59:40.880 --> 0:59:42.800
<v Speaker 1>two ahead, and you know you need a haircut and

0:59:42.840 --> 0:59:45.720
<v Speaker 1>you want to look good. What how far in advanced

0:59:45.760 --> 0:59:48.480
<v Speaker 1>you get that haircut that your hair looks optimal to

0:59:48.760 --> 0:59:51.760
<v Speaker 1>U to I guess both look great. Recover from a

0:59:51.840 --> 0:59:54.200
<v Speaker 1>bad haircut or a bad part of your haircut. You

0:59:54.240 --> 0:59:56.280
<v Speaker 1>need to have that recovery built in. Look like your

0:59:56.320 --> 0:59:58.800
<v Speaker 1>truest self. Because I should have done. I did a

0:59:58.840 --> 1:00:00.880
<v Speaker 1>week before my wedding, and I should it done.

1:00:00.920 --> 1:00:03.320
<v Speaker 2>Toot gotta go a week and a half. Yeah, I

1:00:03.400 --> 1:00:06.280
<v Speaker 2>think the half week and a half for me is

1:00:06.480 --> 1:00:08.200
<v Speaker 2>right in the sweet spot. But this, by the way,

1:00:08.280 --> 1:00:11.520
<v Speaker 2>this might be my favorite question we received all years.

1:00:11.360 --> 1:00:15.840
<v Speaker 1>So far from Todd. What's the worst haircut you've received

1:00:16.720 --> 1:00:18.680
<v Speaker 1>When I was younger? I had When I was younger,

1:00:18.720 --> 1:00:20.440
<v Speaker 1>I had a bowl cut that I was very proud of.

1:00:21.280 --> 1:00:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Was it and from an actual hair cuttery or was

1:00:25.400 --> 1:00:27.880
<v Speaker 1>it from a family member? No, No, it was from

1:00:28.120 --> 1:00:33.040
<v Speaker 1>a licensed haircutter person. Where was it given?

1:00:33.680 --> 1:00:35.600
<v Speaker 2>It was given at the old place he used to

1:00:35.600 --> 1:00:36.400
<v Speaker 2>go to get my haircut.

1:00:36.960 --> 1:00:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I was really hoping you like was good.

1:00:38.840 --> 1:00:43.200
<v Speaker 2>But here to your point, The worst haircut I got

1:00:44.000 --> 1:00:46.440
<v Speaker 2>was when I first started going to this place. It

1:00:46.600 --> 1:00:49.360
<v Speaker 2>was going to a new place after the old woman

1:00:49.400 --> 1:00:53.000
<v Speaker 2>who cut my hair retired from cutting hair. Yep, And

1:00:53.120 --> 1:00:55.520
<v Speaker 2>I walked into this joint and I had a bowl

1:00:55.560 --> 1:00:57.720
<v Speaker 2>cut I was very proud.

1:00:57.480 --> 1:01:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Of mm hmmm. And she proceeded to cut it off

1:01:01.440 --> 1:01:04.760
<v Speaker 1>and I was crestfallen. Dan, have you ever gotten a

1:01:04.800 --> 1:01:07.960
<v Speaker 1>haircut that was so bad where you look at it

1:01:08.000 --> 1:01:09.960
<v Speaker 1>and you're like, just buzz it all. I've never had that.

1:01:10.520 --> 1:01:11.720
<v Speaker 1>I've never that was your hair.

1:01:12.000 --> 1:01:14.240
<v Speaker 2>No, but that was probably the closest I've ever been.

1:01:14.960 --> 1:01:17.360
<v Speaker 1>I've done that my worst haircut. When I moved to

1:01:17.400 --> 1:01:19.360
<v Speaker 1>New York. I made the mistake of going to a

1:01:19.440 --> 1:01:22.160
<v Speaker 1>place that it's just like, oh, it has good YELP reviews. Yeah,

1:01:22.560 --> 1:01:26.000
<v Speaker 1>and the person cutting my hair, I could not communicate

1:01:26.080 --> 1:01:27.800
<v Speaker 1>with them in the way that I wanted to about

1:01:27.840 --> 1:01:31.760
<v Speaker 1>what I wanted, and I ended up with a pretty significant,

1:01:31.920 --> 1:01:36.520
<v Speaker 1>like high top fade. It was. It was it was

1:01:36.720 --> 1:01:40.120
<v Speaker 1>bad enough that, like, you never really noticed when somebody

1:01:40.120 --> 1:01:42.960
<v Speaker 1>gets a bad haircut, unless it's a really bad haircut,

1:01:43.440 --> 1:01:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Unless it's noticeably and dramatically different than a person's normal look.

1:01:48.640 --> 1:01:51.760
<v Speaker 1>And I remember I went to like a backyard cookout,

1:01:51.880 --> 1:01:56.560
<v Speaker 1>barbecue whatever. I don't care about the nomenclature. And my

1:01:56.640 --> 1:01:59.120
<v Speaker 1>friend Lindsey, who by the way, tied it to the

1:01:59.200 --> 1:02:04.040
<v Speaker 1>solid verbal, did the voice for our first Was it

1:02:04.120 --> 1:02:08.240
<v Speaker 1>the fantasy things? Who did? It? Wasn't fantasy things? Yeah?

1:02:08.320 --> 1:02:12.040
<v Speaker 2>Well I forget what it was. Yeah, it was fantasy thing,

1:02:12.240 --> 1:02:15.160
<v Speaker 2>I forget, but she did think it was maybe.

1:02:15.560 --> 1:02:17.800
<v Speaker 1>She looked at me, and I didn't think. I thought

1:02:17.840 --> 1:02:20.959
<v Speaker 1>I looked different, but not dramatically different. And she looked

1:02:21.000 --> 1:02:26.000
<v Speaker 1>at me and she started laughing hysterically, and she said,

1:02:27.040 --> 1:02:30.080
<v Speaker 1>who did you hurt to have this done to you?

1:02:31.160 --> 1:02:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Who held you down against your will and tortured your scalp?

1:02:36.680 --> 1:02:38.880
<v Speaker 1>It was really bad. It was very bad. I wore

1:02:38.960 --> 1:02:40.400
<v Speaker 1>hats for a couple of weeks.

1:02:40.760 --> 1:02:43.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, week and a half, though you get what you

1:02:43.240 --> 1:02:48.280
<v Speaker 2>paid half week and half. Yeah, okay, let's.

1:02:48.040 --> 1:02:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Go to this one. Well we can ask me and

1:02:51.120 --> 1:02:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Sean asked a question like that because we were talking

1:02:52.800 --> 1:02:55.479
<v Speaker 1>about fantasy things. Yeah, please name your top five solid

1:02:55.520 --> 1:02:57.600
<v Speaker 1>verbal episodes. Let's pat ourselves on the back. What are

1:02:57.600 --> 1:02:59.919
<v Speaker 1>you most proud of? Either recently or in the history

1:03:00.080 --> 1:03:02.720
<v Speaker 1>the show I am very proud of. I can't rank

1:03:02.800 --> 1:03:05.840
<v Speaker 1>them from one to but the history of the solid

1:03:05.920 --> 1:03:10.360
<v Speaker 1>verbal time go back in the history of the solid verbal.

1:03:10.400 --> 1:03:12.920
<v Speaker 1>What's your favorite the show where we talked about the history.

1:03:13.040 --> 1:03:15.480
<v Speaker 1>I love that episode. It was fun. It was a

1:03:15.560 --> 1:03:15.960
<v Speaker 1>fun one.

1:03:16.200 --> 1:03:20.240
<v Speaker 2>I love that episode history of I really enjoyed the

1:03:20.360 --> 1:03:22.600
<v Speaker 2>Live Fantasy Things show that we did in Chicago.

1:03:22.840 --> 1:03:26.080
<v Speaker 1>That was wonderful. Shout out Nate Stanley. Yeah, this past August.

1:03:26.160 --> 1:03:27.160
<v Speaker 1>That was a good one for me.

1:03:28.160 --> 1:03:31.640
<v Speaker 2>I really enjoyed speaking of like the serial and s

1:03:31.760 --> 1:03:37.160
<v Speaker 2>Town mold of podcasting. I really enjoyed the recruiting show

1:03:37.160 --> 1:03:37.360
<v Speaker 2>that we.

1:03:37.440 --> 1:03:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Did, Yes, absolutely with Lindsay Theory and Brendan Huffman. We

1:03:42.600 --> 1:03:45.520
<v Speaker 1>had a dad of a Blue Chipper on. Yeah. Really

1:03:45.600 --> 1:03:48.360
<v Speaker 1>enjoyed doing that show. But Elliott was on that. Yep,

1:03:49.080 --> 1:03:53.440
<v Speaker 1>what else? I love the verbies from Radio City Musical. Oh,

1:03:53.600 --> 1:03:56.200
<v Speaker 1>that was so good. I thought that was a revelation.

1:03:56.840 --> 1:03:59.680
<v Speaker 2>That's right, that was our first pray into the like

1:04:00.520 --> 1:04:01.960
<v Speaker 2>world of post production.

1:04:02.440 --> 1:04:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I thought that was a tremendous show. I thought

1:04:04.880 --> 1:04:10.400
<v Speaker 1>the Emo Show with Bill Barnwell was exceptionally fun. My

1:04:10.520 --> 1:04:13.960
<v Speaker 1>favorite shows are the ones that aren't necessarily themed. But

1:04:14.160 --> 1:04:16.760
<v Speaker 1>sometimes we will randomly just hit a groove with a

1:04:16.840 --> 1:04:21.040
<v Speaker 1>show in like a week seven recap show or a

1:04:21.200 --> 1:04:25.040
<v Speaker 1>week eleven preview show where I catch you shot out

1:04:25.080 --> 1:04:28.160
<v Speaker 1>of a cannon. I feel good and we are just

1:04:28.640 --> 1:04:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Stockton and stocked in. We're just we're just passing the

1:04:32.480 --> 1:04:35.800
<v Speaker 1>ball back and forth and nobody's really taking good shots,

1:04:36.240 --> 1:04:37.920
<v Speaker 1>but we are. We're running the two man, we even

1:04:37.960 --> 1:04:40.400
<v Speaker 1>a fun way. Those are generally my favorites, but in

1:04:40.480 --> 1:04:42.560
<v Speaker 1>terms of theme shows, those are up. I love the

1:04:42.640 --> 1:04:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Secret Garbage Show. Yeah, yeah, right. The Secret Garbage Show

1:04:45.840 --> 1:04:47.919
<v Speaker 1>with a secret garbage bracket was quite fun. I remember

1:04:48.080 --> 1:04:49.840
<v Speaker 1>exactly where I was when we recorded it, which is

1:04:49.880 --> 1:04:52.800
<v Speaker 1>a good sign. So we are going to we have

1:04:52.880 --> 1:04:54.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of time before the season start, so we're

1:04:54.720 --> 1:04:57.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna be doing more fun shows. I thought last year's

1:04:57.120 --> 1:04:59.720
<v Speaker 1>show so last year. I believe it was last year

1:05:00.240 --> 1:05:02.240
<v Speaker 1>where I did it solo, and believe me, it was

1:05:02.320 --> 1:05:04.720
<v Speaker 1>not my favorite show because of me, one of my favorites.

1:05:04.760 --> 1:05:07.240
<v Speaker 1>But when we had Chrispy Brown on to talk about

1:05:07.320 --> 1:05:11.080
<v Speaker 1>communication in terms of recent shows, like where you really

1:05:11.200 --> 1:05:14.040
<v Speaker 1>got nerdy information, that was that was one of my

1:05:14.120 --> 1:05:16.440
<v Speaker 1>favorites to just be involved and not to actually host.

1:05:17.160 --> 1:05:20.680
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's close it out with this one. Yeah,

1:05:20.800 --> 1:05:22.280
<v Speaker 2>unless you've got a bunch more you want to get

1:05:22.280 --> 1:05:22.720
<v Speaker 2>to this one.

1:05:22.720 --> 1:05:24.600
<v Speaker 1>I got a bunchy. We'll do it quickly.

1:05:24.760 --> 1:05:28.080
<v Speaker 2>Let me close out my portion of this with this question.

1:05:29.520 --> 1:05:33.200
<v Speaker 2>Got any favorite moments from the old NCAA video game series?

1:05:33.280 --> 1:05:37.440
<v Speaker 2>A favorite game you played? Building a Bama crushing powerhouse

1:05:37.520 --> 1:05:41.520
<v Speaker 2>out of a lollly G five team, et cetera, et cetera.

1:05:42.120 --> 1:05:45.960
<v Speaker 2>I had a situation. I found a glitch back in

1:05:46.040 --> 1:05:49.720
<v Speaker 2>the day. Yeah, I was in college. I want to

1:05:49.720 --> 1:05:52.400
<v Speaker 2>say it was my sophomore or junior year, and I

1:05:52.480 --> 1:05:54.680
<v Speaker 2>did the thing that I'm sure a lot of guys

1:05:54.720 --> 1:05:58.360
<v Speaker 2>did in college. We started a group dynasty. Everyone picked

1:05:58.400 --> 1:06:00.960
<v Speaker 2>their team. You would trade off and on with the

1:06:01.000 --> 1:06:03.720
<v Speaker 2>controller recruiting your guys, handed off to someone else, and

1:06:03.800 --> 1:06:06.840
<v Speaker 2>move move on. Sometimes you'd be up till three am.

1:06:07.240 --> 1:06:07.880
<v Speaker 1>You know how it is.

1:06:08.080 --> 1:06:12.200
<v Speaker 2>Back in the day, Dan, I picked Arizona State, huh,

1:06:12.720 --> 1:06:14.320
<v Speaker 2>because I think there was a limit on the number

1:06:14.360 --> 1:06:16.400
<v Speaker 2>of stars your program could have. Maybe they were like

1:06:16.480 --> 1:06:18.800
<v Speaker 2>a three star, two star at the time. I don't remember,

1:06:19.520 --> 1:06:22.000
<v Speaker 2>but I found a glitch I didn't like most of

1:06:22.080 --> 1:06:24.720
<v Speaker 2>my players. You're a big glitch finder, that's low key

1:06:25.320 --> 1:06:28.560
<v Speaker 2>what defines you. You're about finding life's glitches and exploit

1:06:28.720 --> 1:06:31.400
<v Speaker 2>I sort of am yeah now that you mention it. Yeah,

1:06:32.720 --> 1:06:36.240
<v Speaker 2>I found a glitch and I didn't mean to. But

1:06:36.360 --> 1:06:38.840
<v Speaker 2>the glitch was that if you cut too many players,

1:06:39.760 --> 1:06:44.560
<v Speaker 2>you could sort of implode a program m. I didn't

1:06:44.720 --> 1:06:47.400
<v Speaker 2>like most of my team, and I cut more than

1:06:47.440 --> 1:06:49.680
<v Speaker 2>I had to. What was the number fifty four or

1:06:49.720 --> 1:06:50.640
<v Speaker 2>fifty five you had to.

1:06:50.640 --> 1:06:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Get down to?

1:06:51.720 --> 1:06:53.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I took my team all the way down to

1:06:53.600 --> 1:06:54.560
<v Speaker 2>about thirty six.

1:06:54.720 --> 1:06:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Oh god. And I never really recovered from that, dan

1:06:57.840 --> 1:06:58.160
<v Speaker 1>uh huh.

1:06:58.520 --> 1:07:01.480
<v Speaker 2>Never really recovered from that, And I found myself in

1:07:01.560 --> 1:07:05.160
<v Speaker 2>a situation where I had essentially broken the game. That

1:07:05.360 --> 1:07:07.600
<v Speaker 2>to me was probably my favorite moment.

1:07:07.480 --> 1:07:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Not because of Donkey Kong killscreen.

1:07:09.360 --> 1:07:12.920
<v Speaker 2>Exactly, not because I had any great accomplishment right on

1:07:13.080 --> 1:07:16.480
<v Speaker 2>the field, but because I had done something that nobody

1:07:16.520 --> 1:07:19.560
<v Speaker 2>else there could have ever envisioned, and I literally broke

1:07:19.640 --> 1:07:20.200
<v Speaker 2>the team.

1:07:21.880 --> 1:07:24.080
<v Speaker 1>The only real like, I don't have any fond memories

1:07:24.080 --> 1:07:26.360
<v Speaker 1>about playing it by myself or playing it online against people.

1:07:26.400 --> 1:07:29.800
<v Speaker 1>It's fine. It's fun in college with the original tie

1:07:30.040 --> 1:07:32.600
<v Speaker 1>shout out Mike, who was my co host on the

1:07:32.640 --> 1:07:35.480
<v Speaker 1>college radio show Morning Wood at the University of Oregon.

1:07:36.000 --> 1:07:39.880
<v Speaker 1>We would play all the time, and he liked after

1:07:39.960 --> 1:07:43.520
<v Speaker 1>he would intercept a ball, he would say interception special, like,

1:07:43.680 --> 1:07:47.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, he had a secret play that couldn't help

1:07:48.120 --> 1:07:50.400
<v Speaker 1>but have an interception as a result of the play.

1:07:51.120 --> 1:07:55.280
<v Speaker 1>And I caught onto it, and it was like he

1:07:55.400 --> 1:07:57.320
<v Speaker 1>just would call it quarters coverage or something like that.

1:07:58.720 --> 1:08:01.720
<v Speaker 1>He would basically call whatever had the most colorful circles

1:08:02.120 --> 1:08:04.440
<v Speaker 1>in the defensive backfield. Sure, and I would just run

1:08:04.520 --> 1:08:08.800
<v Speaker 1>down his throat and then he effectively stopped saying interception

1:08:08.920 --> 1:08:11.240
<v Speaker 1>special after saying it for like a year, and it

1:08:11.640 --> 1:08:14.640
<v Speaker 1>angered him to such a crazy degree. Not a huge,

1:08:14.720 --> 1:08:17.280
<v Speaker 1>huge football fan, but he thought he had stumbled upon

1:08:18.000 --> 1:08:20.519
<v Speaker 1>his own personal glitch, that's right, And then I just

1:08:20.760 --> 1:08:23.360
<v Speaker 1>murdered him. The other thing is I would it was

1:08:23.520 --> 1:08:27.120
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and four, so it would have been NCAA

1:08:27.160 --> 1:08:29.000
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and four, So the year is two thousand

1:08:29.000 --> 1:08:32.320
<v Speaker 1>and three. It was a simpler time, ty us. He

1:08:32.439 --> 1:08:35.040
<v Speaker 1>was unbeatable. And if you would call like a wide

1:08:35.080 --> 1:08:38.800
<v Speaker 1>receiver screen followed up by neither a slant or like

1:08:38.880 --> 1:08:42.480
<v Speaker 1>a go route with not Mike Williams, but Ang Williams.

1:08:43.640 --> 1:08:47.400
<v Speaker 1>He was just unbeatable. And that was again against Mike

1:08:47.960 --> 1:08:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the non interception special and it just tortured him. It

1:08:52.000 --> 1:08:52.519
<v Speaker 1>was wonderful.

1:08:52.840 --> 1:08:56.439
<v Speaker 2>Back in about maybe two thousand and six, two thousand

1:08:56.479 --> 1:09:02.080
<v Speaker 2>and seven, I had a group dynasty and online dynasty

1:09:02.560 --> 1:09:06.120
<v Speaker 2>type of setup and my team I think was Penn

1:09:06.160 --> 1:09:08.240
<v Speaker 2>State at the time, playing with about six or seven

1:09:08.320 --> 1:09:14.519
<v Speaker 2>other guys mm hmm. I recruited Leon Johnson, a dual

1:09:14.560 --> 1:09:20.160
<v Speaker 2>threat quarterback class was a tank, a t bow build. Yeah,

1:09:20.680 --> 1:09:23.800
<v Speaker 2>and he was virtually unstoppable. That that singular moment that

1:09:23.920 --> 1:09:27.759
<v Speaker 2>recruit changed the history of my program forever. Leon Johnson.

1:09:27.800 --> 1:09:30.040
<v Speaker 2>You still remember his face. I still remember his fake

1:09:30.120 --> 1:09:30.800
<v Speaker 2>name to this day.

1:09:31.520 --> 1:09:33.800
<v Speaker 1>What was the name of it was, Jerem It was

1:09:33.880 --> 1:09:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Jeremy Liggins. Ask you remember Jeremy Liggins. I do. He

1:09:36.760 --> 1:09:39.439
<v Speaker 1>was pushing three three bills and playing quarterback and I

1:09:39.479 --> 1:09:41.960
<v Speaker 1>think he was a JC and that went to Ole Miss. Yeah.

1:09:42.000 --> 1:09:45.640
<v Speaker 1>So you had the proto Jeremy Lincolns. I did you

1:09:45.680 --> 1:09:46.439
<v Speaker 1>had proto Jeremy.

1:09:46.439 --> 1:09:48.400
<v Speaker 2>I still remember his name and think about him fondly.

1:09:48.960 --> 1:09:53.719
<v Speaker 1>Have you ever played in a video game tournament. No really,

1:09:54.120 --> 1:09:57.559
<v Speaker 1>that's a shocking answer. Not an official tournament. But you've

1:09:57.640 --> 1:10:01.439
<v Speaker 1>never gone to like an arcade or a baseball card store,

1:10:02.000 --> 1:10:07.520
<v Speaker 1>or never have I have? I thought I was amazing

1:10:08.000 --> 1:10:11.280
<v Speaker 1>at Techmo super Bowl. I just beat up the computer

1:10:11.439 --> 1:10:13.400
<v Speaker 1>all day, every day, beat up my brothers all day.

1:10:13.439 --> 1:10:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Every day I went to It was like a comic

1:10:15.479 --> 1:10:17.240
<v Speaker 1>card store. They set up a bunch of TVs just

1:10:17.320 --> 1:10:19.920
<v Speaker 1>in my neighborhood, just in the San Fernando Valley, and

1:10:20.680 --> 1:10:23.240
<v Speaker 1>played in a Techmo super Bowl tournament. They wiped the

1:10:23.360 --> 1:10:26.280
<v Speaker 1>floor with me. I was the mop. I got killed

1:10:26.479 --> 1:10:29.599
<v Speaker 1>so thoroughly every time there was like a loser's bracket. Nope,

1:10:29.720 --> 1:10:33.240
<v Speaker 1>gone that that that humbled me. Tie. Also played in

1:10:33.280 --> 1:10:36.559
<v Speaker 1>a Magic the Gathering tournament there, okay, sure how about that? Yeah,

1:10:37.080 --> 1:10:40.040
<v Speaker 1>also didn't fare super well. Okay, but you know what

1:10:40.120 --> 1:10:42.439
<v Speaker 1>you gotta try. You gotta you know, shoot or shoot.

1:10:42.840 --> 1:10:46.639
<v Speaker 1>That's what I did. Let's go rapid fire. You got like, okay,

1:10:47.640 --> 1:10:49.880
<v Speaker 1>soliverbal after hours, I got a few of these, Okay,

1:10:50.120 --> 1:10:53.599
<v Speaker 1>this one I really liked. Well, hold on, I got

1:10:53.640 --> 1:10:56.559
<v Speaker 1>a couple. Let's rapid fire. We got one about snaps

1:10:56.640 --> 1:11:00.760
<v Speaker 1>versus buttons for baby like onesies and outfits. Okay, I'm

1:11:00.760 --> 1:11:05.439
<v Speaker 1>gonna take you one step further. Magnets. They're a thing.

1:11:05.960 --> 1:11:10.080
<v Speaker 1>They have magnetic baby onesies where you just basically get

1:11:10.600 --> 1:11:15.000
<v Speaker 1>the two sides of the top close and they just snapshot. Eventually,

1:11:15.040 --> 1:11:16.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna have to teach the solid baby how to

1:11:16.560 --> 1:11:19.840
<v Speaker 1>button up and snap up shirt or whatever. Right but

1:11:20.600 --> 1:11:25.759
<v Speaker 1>right now it's magic. What is them? Random slash best

1:11:25.920 --> 1:11:29.479
<v Speaker 1>slash TV show movie whatever? Dan has watched while up

1:11:29.479 --> 1:11:31.720
<v Speaker 1>at odd hours with the new baby. I watch a

1:11:31.840 --> 1:11:36.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of YouTube on my TV. I watch food shows.

1:11:36.320 --> 1:11:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Munchies does a really good job. Bonappetite does a great job.

1:11:39.920 --> 1:11:42.879
<v Speaker 1>There's a show called It's Alive with Brad Leoni. It's amazing,

1:11:43.560 --> 1:11:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Binging with Babbish, he does a great job. I watch

1:11:45.960 --> 1:11:49.639
<v Speaker 1>food shows the most random though. Those all food shows.

1:11:49.720 --> 1:11:52.479
<v Speaker 1>Food video that seems obvious for me to answer with,

1:11:52.600 --> 1:11:55.719
<v Speaker 1>and just everybody knows that exists. I had a stretch

1:11:55.760 --> 1:11:58.800
<v Speaker 1>where I was up pretty consistently at like three four am,

1:11:59.479 --> 1:12:05.280
<v Speaker 1>feeding and soothing whatever, and I stumbled on, conservatively it's

1:12:05.360 --> 1:12:06.920
<v Speaker 1>an hour and a half, it might be an hour

1:12:07.080 --> 1:12:12.320
<v Speaker 1>forty a. Essentially, it's a documentary that do you know

1:12:12.360 --> 1:12:14.840
<v Speaker 1>what Ernie Ball is. No, I have no idea. Ernie

1:12:14.880 --> 1:12:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Ball is a company that makes guitar strings. Okay, Ernie

1:12:17.840 --> 1:12:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Ball did it documentary, and I assume they've done a

1:12:19.720 --> 1:12:21.639
<v Speaker 1>bunch of these with a bunch of different guitar players

1:12:21.680 --> 1:12:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and musicians and stuff. They did it documentary with and

1:12:25.000 --> 1:12:28.200
<v Speaker 1>about and it's all first person. So he participated with

1:12:28.400 --> 1:12:33.479
<v Speaker 1>Tom DeLong Blink onin eighty two, and this is relatively recently,

1:12:33.680 --> 1:12:36.600
<v Speaker 1>long after he left Blink, and it was about the

1:12:36.800 --> 1:12:39.760
<v Speaker 1>entire Blink history with photos and videos and everything like

1:12:39.840 --> 1:12:43.920
<v Speaker 1>that and stories and then talking about the breakup essentially,

1:12:43.920 --> 1:12:47.640
<v Speaker 1>I know Blink still exists with Matt Skiba, but it

1:12:47.760 --> 1:12:52.320
<v Speaker 1>got pretty heavy and then he went into like his

1:12:52.560 --> 1:12:56.680
<v Speaker 1>new gig, the new company he started basically trying to

1:12:56.840 --> 1:13:02.240
<v Speaker 1>uncover CIA secrets about aliens and goes completely off off kilter.

1:13:02.880 --> 1:13:05.240
<v Speaker 1>And this was over the course of whatever it is,

1:13:05.280 --> 1:13:08.120
<v Speaker 1>four or five six feedings where I'm just nerding out

1:13:08.200 --> 1:13:12.360
<v Speaker 1>watching a Tom DeLong documentary on YouTube. Those are the

1:13:12.520 --> 1:13:16.000
<v Speaker 1>depths that you will go to just like play with

1:13:16.120 --> 1:13:19.639
<v Speaker 1>your brain just enough to stay awake. But also, okay, yes,

1:13:20.800 --> 1:13:23.800
<v Speaker 1>you're dealing with the bottle cool. So I think that's

1:13:23.880 --> 1:13:26.120
<v Speaker 1>the most random thing. I also watch a lot of photography,

1:13:26.200 --> 1:13:29.439
<v Speaker 1>like really nerdy photography videos like Jody with and I

1:13:29.600 --> 1:13:32.599
<v Speaker 1>will walk into the room and I'm watching a light

1:13:32.680 --> 1:13:35.800
<v Speaker 1>room tutorial on our TV about how to play with

1:13:35.880 --> 1:13:39.519
<v Speaker 1>the tone curve. I know what you're thinking. It's really

1:13:39.600 --> 1:13:43.240
<v Speaker 1>good that you found somebody to marry and deal with

1:13:43.400 --> 1:13:48.639
<v Speaker 1>your dumbness. So that's probably. In terms of shows, sex

1:13:48.760 --> 1:13:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Education on Netflix, really really good British Jillian Anderson, sort

1:13:53.400 --> 1:13:57.120
<v Speaker 1>of John Hughes Ish Dating Around also on Netflix. And

1:13:57.200 --> 1:13:59.559
<v Speaker 1>I also enjoyed the Missus Maisle Show. I was good.

1:13:59.600 --> 1:14:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Great baking show over here. Oh, great British bake off

1:14:02.400 --> 1:14:05.720
<v Speaker 1>baking show, wonderful. All right, give me one more one

1:14:05.840 --> 1:14:08.519
<v Speaker 1>one or two more goes. Yes, do a three hour show.

1:14:08.600 --> 1:14:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Let's Joe Rogan this um okay. Somebody asked about the

1:14:13.920 --> 1:14:17.880
<v Speaker 1>souved movement. I know you're pro I'm in. Somebody asked

1:14:17.960 --> 1:14:21.360
<v Speaker 1>us about cast iron ver stainless steel. I know you're

1:14:21.479 --> 1:14:24.200
<v Speaker 1>you're all in on that, that beautiful seer of cast iron.

1:14:24.240 --> 1:14:27.479
<v Speaker 1>All in on cast iron. Yeah, let's finish here. We

1:14:27.600 --> 1:14:30.559
<v Speaker 1>got a number of good questions. Third dates. I don't

1:14:30.560 --> 1:14:33.160
<v Speaker 1>think we've quite gotten to. Just ask a lot of questions.

1:14:33.200 --> 1:14:34.920
<v Speaker 1>You'll get to a third date. Don't be creepy. You'll

1:14:34.960 --> 1:14:37.840
<v Speaker 1>get to a third date, and don't expect anything on

1:14:37.920 --> 1:14:39.920
<v Speaker 1>any date. Just let the game come to you, like

1:14:40.000 --> 1:14:42.960
<v Speaker 1>a good game manager, let the game come to you.

1:14:43.120 --> 1:14:47.000
<v Speaker 1>You just got to read, read, and react. The last

1:14:47.080 --> 1:14:48.960
<v Speaker 1>question comes to us from I think is a Gary.

1:14:50.520 --> 1:14:53.840
<v Speaker 1>No excuse me, Justin Gary did ask a question about

1:14:53.920 --> 1:14:57.880
<v Speaker 1>limited space child rearing in big cities. It's rough. Go

1:14:57.960 --> 1:14:59.920
<v Speaker 1>outside as often as you can. That's my answer to Gear.

1:15:01.479 --> 1:15:05.479
<v Speaker 1>Justin says, I'm diabetic, so my choices for picking out

1:15:05.560 --> 1:15:11.439
<v Speaker 1>on Saturdays are generally limited, which means carbohydrates. I assume sugars, breads,

1:15:11.520 --> 1:15:13.479
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that, which are key to a lot of

1:15:13.560 --> 1:15:18.240
<v Speaker 1>sauces and vehicles. Wings, however, are always available and can

1:15:18.280 --> 1:15:20.240
<v Speaker 1>fit in my diet. What do you think are the

1:15:20.320 --> 1:15:23.280
<v Speaker 1>best rubs or sauces to add to wings? I tend

1:15:23.320 --> 1:15:27.280
<v Speaker 1>to gravitate to jerk glazes or sauces for mine. Love

1:15:27.320 --> 1:15:30.320
<v Speaker 1>a good jerk. Yeah, that's what the phrasing I understand.

1:15:30.439 --> 1:15:32.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm into the rubs, man, rubbin and jerkin. That's right,

1:15:32.920 --> 1:15:35.320
<v Speaker 2>that's what we're talking about here. What is doing the

1:15:35.640 --> 1:15:36.160
<v Speaker 2>craft show.

1:15:36.479 --> 1:15:38.960
<v Speaker 1>What is your what is your your seasoning choice?

1:15:39.400 --> 1:15:43.280
<v Speaker 2>First and foremost, with wings, you gotta go with the flats.

1:15:44.840 --> 1:15:46.719
<v Speaker 2>You got it out of the flats. Now, I didn't

1:15:46.800 --> 1:15:48.320
<v Speaker 2>know until last summer that I.

1:15:48.320 --> 1:15:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Could do this. Yeah, this is all pretty new to

1:15:51.120 --> 1:15:51.519
<v Speaker 1>me as well.

1:15:52.200 --> 1:15:55.439
<v Speaker 2>And I think it's only the places that are, you know,

1:15:55.600 --> 1:15:59.559
<v Speaker 2>a little bit more popular with the wing eating crowd, right,

1:16:00.520 --> 1:16:02.479
<v Speaker 2>that know how to handle this. But if you go

1:16:02.600 --> 1:16:04.400
<v Speaker 2>and ask for the flats as opposed to the trum,

1:16:04.560 --> 1:16:06.360
<v Speaker 2>you go to a butcher, you go to no, no, no,

1:16:06.479 --> 1:16:08.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm talking, I go to the restaurant in order flats.

1:16:08.320 --> 1:16:10.519
<v Speaker 2>Oh okay, but what about But I'm saying, if you

1:16:10.600 --> 1:16:13.240
<v Speaker 2>prefer the rub, what is the rub that you like?

1:16:13.439 --> 1:16:16.559
<v Speaker 1>The rub? So, first and foremost you need the flats. Yeah,

1:16:16.640 --> 1:16:20.439
<v Speaker 1>that's true surface area. But secondly, I prefer a good

1:16:20.520 --> 1:16:24.519
<v Speaker 1>old bay rub. Ooh, I like that answer. Prefer good

1:16:24.600 --> 1:16:26.080
<v Speaker 1>old bay rub, glery salt.

1:16:26.840 --> 1:16:30.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, a little bit of an old bay rub doesn't

1:16:31.000 --> 1:16:33.720
<v Speaker 2>quite have the messy quality that you get from any

1:16:33.760 --> 1:16:37.080
<v Speaker 2>of the sauces, but also gives you enough of that kick,

1:16:37.680 --> 1:16:39.920
<v Speaker 2>You get enough of that crispiness that comes with the

1:16:39.960 --> 1:16:42.720
<v Speaker 2>wing if it's been done correctly. For me, it's the

1:16:42.800 --> 1:16:45.280
<v Speaker 2>flats with the combination of an old bay rub Dan.

1:16:45.720 --> 1:16:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Sure, I think it's a great answer. You can go

1:16:48.800 --> 1:16:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Asian without the honey or brown sugar element and do

1:16:52.439 --> 1:16:55.240
<v Speaker 1>like a soy garlic ginger sort of. I don't know

1:16:55.280 --> 1:16:56.760
<v Speaker 1>if you marinade, but you know, I think you can

1:16:56.800 --> 1:16:58.400
<v Speaker 1>make a sauce out of that if you look that up.

1:16:59.280 --> 1:17:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Lemon pepper a classic. I don't know if you've watched

1:17:02.320 --> 1:17:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta at all. I know about like JR Crickets, the

1:17:05.680 --> 1:17:09.679
<v Speaker 1>famous wing place in Atlanta. Yep, but there's lemon pepper

1:17:09.680 --> 1:17:12.000
<v Speaker 1>and there's lemon pepper wet. I'm, you know, the worst

1:17:12.040 --> 1:17:14.200
<v Speaker 1>person to be the one describing it and talking about it.

1:17:14.560 --> 1:17:18.439
<v Speaker 1>But lemon pepper is delicious as a combination as a rub.

1:17:18.479 --> 1:17:20.320
<v Speaker 1>And you can add lemon pepper seasoning to like a

1:17:20.360 --> 1:17:25.479
<v Speaker 1>buffalo sauce. That adds a nice little twist. I would say,

1:17:25.600 --> 1:17:29.519
<v Speaker 1>aside from wings specifically, if you're looking for ways to

1:17:30.920 --> 1:17:33.920
<v Speaker 1>eat well in terms of eat like deliciously on game day,

1:17:34.439 --> 1:17:36.760
<v Speaker 1>just throw everything that you can on a grill on

1:17:36.920 --> 1:17:39.360
<v Speaker 1>a grill. I would love I wouldn't love to have

1:17:39.439 --> 1:17:41.560
<v Speaker 1>diabetes let's be clear. But to have an excuse me

1:17:41.680 --> 1:17:43.760
<v Speaker 1>like I have to eat as much actual real food

1:17:43.800 --> 1:17:45.960
<v Speaker 1>as possible. If I can just grill a bunch of

1:17:46.040 --> 1:17:49.559
<v Speaker 1>giant green onions and chicken and carnea soada and throw

1:17:49.640 --> 1:17:52.640
<v Speaker 1>tortillas on there and throw onions on there and just

1:17:52.800 --> 1:17:56.439
<v Speaker 1>really get good at grilled Mexican food whatever. And I

1:17:56.520 --> 1:17:58.519
<v Speaker 1>believe corn tortillas are gluten free and they don't have

1:17:58.680 --> 1:18:03.599
<v Speaker 1>carbohydrates so minute, so that's a good option there. But uh, yeah,

1:18:03.640 --> 1:18:06.400
<v Speaker 1>I was just anything you can throw on a grill that,

1:18:06.880 --> 1:18:09.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, an excuse to pile up vegetables and meat

1:18:09.800 --> 1:18:11.880
<v Speaker 1>is not the worst thing in the world. There you go.

1:18:12.080 --> 1:18:16.400
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Yeah, covered a lot of ground here today, Daniel,

1:18:16.760 --> 1:18:21.240
<v Speaker 2>Yes it is though. That's real good squarely the off season.

1:18:21.320 --> 1:18:23.360
<v Speaker 2>Soliverble at gmail dot com is always how you can

1:18:23.400 --> 1:18:25.040
<v Speaker 2>get in touch with us. We're also on Twitter, We're

1:18:25.120 --> 1:18:28.519
<v Speaker 2>on Facebook, We're on Instagram. We also have a subreddit,

1:18:28.560 --> 1:18:32.360
<v Speaker 2>Reddit dot com slash r slash solid verbal. We didn't

1:18:32.400 --> 1:18:34.639
<v Speaker 2>start it. It was started by Oh it's great though.

1:18:34.640 --> 1:18:37.920
<v Speaker 2>We're in there some superverbowlers. Yeah, we moonlight over there

1:18:37.960 --> 1:18:39.720
<v Speaker 2>from time to time. But if you're a fan of

1:18:39.800 --> 1:18:42.719
<v Speaker 2>the show. It's read at dot com slash r slash

1:18:42.880 --> 1:18:45.439
<v Speaker 2>solid verbal if we pop in there for some Rubin

1:18:45.479 --> 1:18:45.880
<v Speaker 2>and Jerkin.

1:18:45.960 --> 1:18:46.360
<v Speaker 1>That's right.

1:18:46.400 --> 1:18:50.240
<v Speaker 2>They've got some exciting conversations that go on around the

1:18:50.320 --> 1:18:52.280
<v Speaker 2>shows after we post them, So go on and check

1:18:52.360 --> 1:18:53.200
<v Speaker 2>that out if you're a fan.

1:18:54.280 --> 1:18:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Uh, hopefully you got in on the bracket pool. M hmm.

1:18:59.360 --> 1:19:01.160
<v Speaker 1>If you did, we will be.

1:19:01.240 --> 1:19:03.599
<v Speaker 2>Watching like a hawk to see who comes in firster,

1:19:03.840 --> 1:19:05.599
<v Speaker 2>maybe second, third, I don't know. We want to give

1:19:05.640 --> 1:19:07.479
<v Speaker 2>some shirts away, Dan, this is the way this works.

1:19:08.320 --> 1:19:10.040
<v Speaker 2>But we did get a great response to that. Will

1:19:10.080 --> 1:19:14.479
<v Speaker 2>be following along with your Oregon Ducks, hopefully over the

1:19:14.520 --> 1:19:16.839
<v Speaker 2>course of the next couple of weeks and not just tomorrow.

1:19:16.920 --> 1:19:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Do you like anybody because you have? You know you're

1:19:19.160 --> 1:19:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Alma Mater and Notre Dame, both not in the tournament.

1:19:21.439 --> 1:19:24.040
<v Speaker 1>I haven't watched a minute of college basketball this year.

1:19:24.120 --> 1:19:26.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm the wrong person task I did watch.

1:19:26.880 --> 1:19:32.160
<v Speaker 2>I did lose the Loulville Wouiville survivor pick that I had,

1:19:32.280 --> 1:19:34.360
<v Speaker 2>so I've got a couple others that I can rely on,

1:19:34.600 --> 1:19:36.720
<v Speaker 2>but for now I'm down a man.

1:19:37.720 --> 1:19:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Richard Patino, right, I've been doing a lot of March

1:19:41.200 --> 1:19:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Madness content for ESPN Plus Action Network. So I actually

1:19:44.600 --> 1:19:46.880
<v Speaker 1>I am now caught up to speed. I'm rooting for Oregon,

1:19:47.400 --> 1:19:49.800
<v Speaker 1>but there's I just want fun, I just want fun times.

1:19:49.800 --> 1:19:51.760
<v Speaker 1>I actually I watched for the first time in a

1:19:51.800 --> 1:19:54.760
<v Speaker 1>long time, I watched non conference college basketball because I

1:19:54.800 --> 1:19:57.600
<v Speaker 1>wanted to watch Bull Bowl for the Ducks. And I

1:19:57.680 --> 1:20:00.960
<v Speaker 1>was like, oh, man, Oregon beats Syracuse sitting fifty four

1:20:01.040 --> 1:20:03.479
<v Speaker 1>percent of his threes. This is up. Nope, he's hurt,

1:20:03.840 --> 1:20:06.320
<v Speaker 1>he is done. Oh so then I picked it up

1:20:06.360 --> 1:20:09.720
<v Speaker 1>in the back twelve tournament. All right, Well, thank you

1:20:09.800 --> 1:20:11.960
<v Speaker 1>to everyone out there for downloading the show.

1:20:12.040 --> 1:20:15.559
<v Speaker 2>We will be back next week. Talk more college football.

1:20:16.200 --> 1:20:19.040
<v Speaker 2>In the meantime, stay tuned to us on social and

1:20:19.120 --> 1:20:21.120
<v Speaker 2>if you've got anything to say, give us a holler.

1:20:21.680 --> 1:20:24.680
<v Speaker 2>Yes silverblat gmail dot com for that guy over there,

1:20:24.720 --> 1:20:27.639
<v Speaker 2>my good friend Dan Rubinstein, for myself, Ty hilde.

1:20:27.479 --> 1:20:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Brandt, while we're here in eastern Pennsylvania. Will catch you

1:20:30.760 --> 1:20:32.960
<v Speaker 1>on everythion times. Base Peace,