WEBVTT - LISTEN: Did OpenAI Kill What Disney's 'Super App' Needs Most? 

0:00:10.720 --> 0:00:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to another episode of Strictly Business, the podcast in

0:00:13.880 --> 0:00:16.079
<v Speaker 1>which we speak with some of the brightest minds working

0:00:16.160 --> 0:00:20.200
<v Speaker 1>in the media business today. I'm Andrew Wallenstein, chief insights

0:00:20.280 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>officer at Illuminate and a variety contributor. Disney is embracing

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 1>a super app strategy. That's what new CEO Josh Tomorrow

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:33.560
<v Speaker 1>signaled last week, sharing his vision for evolving Disney Plus

0:00:33.600 --> 0:00:37.479
<v Speaker 1>into what he referred to as a quote immersive, interactive,

0:00:37.560 --> 0:00:41.920
<v Speaker 1>digital centerpiece end quote that brings together everything from theme

0:00:42.000 --> 0:00:46.559
<v Speaker 1>park tickets to merchandise and much more. Sounds fascinating and

0:00:46.640 --> 0:00:49.640
<v Speaker 1>also the perfect home for a feature the company, up

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:53.680
<v Speaker 1>until very recently, was poised to include the ability to

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:57.040
<v Speaker 1>allow consumers to make their own videos with Disney IP

0:00:57.640 --> 0:01:01.639
<v Speaker 1>from Mickey Mouse to Princess Leiah. That, however, is no

0:01:01.760 --> 0:01:05.560
<v Speaker 1>longer the case, considering open AI's stunning announcement back in

0:01:05.640 --> 0:01:08.440
<v Speaker 1>March that it was ending its partnership with Disney and

0:01:08.600 --> 0:01:12.119
<v Speaker 1>discontinuing the Sora app that would have used the magic

0:01:12.160 --> 0:01:14.880
<v Speaker 1>of AI to let fans bring more than two hundred

0:01:14.920 --> 0:01:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Disney characters to life. And that leaves a question I've

0:01:18.800 --> 0:01:22.600
<v Speaker 1>been asking myself ever since, with or without Disney Plus

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:27.240
<v Speaker 1>or Open AI, will we ever see realize the groundbreaking

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:31.479
<v Speaker 1>potential their deal promised to unlock. To help me sort

0:01:31.520 --> 0:01:35.840
<v Speaker 1>through this, I've enlisted Jeremy Toeman, SVP of AI Innovation

0:01:35.959 --> 0:01:40.760
<v Speaker 1>at JWX, the video technology platform for publishers. He is

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:43.480
<v Speaker 1>just the right person to hash this out with me

0:01:43.640 --> 0:01:46.360
<v Speaker 1>because he doesn't just know AI, he's got more than

0:01:46.400 --> 0:01:50.280
<v Speaker 1>thirty years of experience building media tech and convergence products

0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 1>at companies like Warner Brothers, CBS, and numerous startups.

0:02:01.120 --> 0:02:03.560
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for talking with me, Jeremy, It's good to see Andrew.

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 2>Good to see you.

0:02:05.240 --> 0:02:07.160
<v Speaker 1>And let me ask you right off the bat.

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:09.160
<v Speaker 2>Were you a Sora user at all?

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:09.400
<v Speaker 3>Did?

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 1>What did you think of it?

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:12.360
<v Speaker 2>What did you do with it? Yeah?

0:02:12.400 --> 0:02:15.799
<v Speaker 4>I jumped on the platform because the truth is I

0:02:15.840 --> 0:02:20.080
<v Speaker 4>started building an AI video startup, not in the generative space,

0:02:20.800 --> 0:02:25.079
<v Speaker 4>but in the video editing side of things before Chat

0:02:25.160 --> 0:02:29.040
<v Speaker 4>to BT and Etcetera launched and so ever since kind

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 4>of this LLM revolution happened and jen A I became feasible,

0:02:33.160 --> 0:02:35.880
<v Speaker 4>I've been wanting to play with every tool that's out there,

0:02:36.480 --> 0:02:39.520
<v Speaker 4>both for personal use and to figure out business opportunities.

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:42.079
<v Speaker 4>What bets would I make, wouldn't I make?

0:02:42.200 --> 0:02:42.400
<v Speaker 2>You know?

0:02:42.560 --> 0:02:45.920
<v Speaker 4>And and so I got a chance to play with Sora.

0:02:46.760 --> 0:02:49.960
<v Speaker 4>I had a lot of fun exploring it. I'll be honest,

0:02:50.080 --> 0:02:54.919
<v Speaker 4>I think sure. The craziest thing to me is how

0:02:55.040 --> 0:02:59.600
<v Speaker 4>much we saw examples of like insane creativity combined with

0:02:59.760 --> 0:03:03.919
<v Speaker 4>just like wrote you know, the most basic prompt ever

0:03:04.040 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 4>kind of thing.

0:03:04.880 --> 0:03:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Sure, sure, I mean I have to confess I wasn't

0:03:07.760 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 1>a regular user, but I used it enough to really

0:03:10.240 --> 0:03:14.760
<v Speaker 1>be entranced by the possibilities, particularly when Disney entered the picture.

0:03:15.080 --> 0:03:17.440
<v Speaker 1>I thought the notion that fans could make their own

0:03:17.480 --> 0:03:20.480
<v Speaker 1>short videos using characters, the notion that some of these

0:03:20.520 --> 0:03:24.520
<v Speaker 1>videos would eventually find a place on Disney Plus really interesting,

0:03:24.919 --> 0:03:26.760
<v Speaker 1>and if done right, I thought it could open up

0:03:26.760 --> 0:03:29.800
<v Speaker 1>a whole new revenue stream. But just the same I

0:03:29.840 --> 0:03:32.680
<v Speaker 1>also couldn't get my head around exactly how this would

0:03:32.720 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 1>possibly work, given how protective Disney is of its IP.

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Did any of these things strike you as well? Oh?

0:03:40.040 --> 0:03:42.120
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, I'll be honest.

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:46.560
<v Speaker 4>Even Disney's a particular example because they are so they

0:03:46.600 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 4>are so protective of their IP. But the truth is,

0:03:49.040 --> 0:03:52.600
<v Speaker 4>you could pick almost any IP and start scratching your

0:03:52.600 --> 0:03:56.400
<v Speaker 4>head pretty quickly at the what if we let anybody

0:03:56.440 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 4>do anything with this?

0:03:58.040 --> 0:03:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:03:58.360 --> 0:04:02.840
<v Speaker 4>And you see some area, some creators, etc. Where fanfic

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:05.440
<v Speaker 4>et cetera is is sort of part. It's like the

0:04:05.480 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 4>de regard. It's part of the culture.

0:04:08.080 --> 0:04:08.680
<v Speaker 2>And there are other.

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:11.640
<v Speaker 4>Areas where it's like, ooh, that would make me really

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 4>uncomfortable to see something weird happen here. You know, it

0:04:16.480 --> 0:04:19.040
<v Speaker 4>is very reminiscent of me in the mid nineties working

0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:22.520
<v Speaker 4>at a local video store that had the beaded curtain

0:04:22.640 --> 0:04:25.960
<v Speaker 4>adult room and that people would every now and then

0:04:26.040 --> 0:04:30.279
<v Speaker 4>have the parody versions of mainstream movies. So to me,

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:31.960
<v Speaker 4>it was like that was the first thing that jumped

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:35.240
<v Speaker 4>in my head, is all of those crazy titles coming

0:04:35.320 --> 0:04:38.799
<v Speaker 4>to life. And I don't think most IP holders really

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 4>want to see that.

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:44.039
<v Speaker 1>No, yes, I can only imagine what certain minds would

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:47.479
<v Speaker 1>do to Mickey Mouse and other characters of great purity.

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:51.600
<v Speaker 1>But I always figured what we would see is Disney

0:04:51.600 --> 0:04:54.560
<v Speaker 1>would put I do hate to use the word restrictive,

0:04:54.600 --> 0:04:58.359
<v Speaker 1>because I'm sympathetic to where they're coming from, but to me,

0:04:58.480 --> 0:05:01.160
<v Speaker 1>it was like they would sort of maybe you know,

0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:03.680
<v Speaker 1>strangle the baby and the crib, so to speak. Put

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:06.680
<v Speaker 1>too much controls on it, and then it's like, well,

0:05:06.839 --> 0:05:08.480
<v Speaker 1>will anyone want to use this?

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:12.039
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think you're dead on right, And that's where

0:05:12.080 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 4>the tricky nuance comes in.

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:17.679
<v Speaker 2>One thing I noticed using sora is it was very quick.

0:05:18.360 --> 0:05:20.680
<v Speaker 4>It was very very quick to see users in the

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:25.680
<v Speaker 4>comment section just lamb basing open AI for any restrictions.

0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:29.880
<v Speaker 4>It was like the fact that you couldn't show I

0:05:29.880 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 4>don't know, Mickey Mouse murdering somebody or some ridiculous thing, right.

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:35.640
<v Speaker 4>The fact that you weren't allowed to show that was

0:05:35.680 --> 0:05:40.599
<v Speaker 4>offending people from day one, Like there was over all

0:05:40.640 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 4>across the comment section, and people were actually making videos

0:05:45.600 --> 0:05:51.600
<v Speaker 4>of Sam Altman like deliberately like restricting content creation, etc.

0:05:52.400 --> 0:05:55.480
<v Speaker 4>So I can only imagine if they actually had been

0:05:55.520 --> 0:05:59.400
<v Speaker 4>given the floodgate to hey, do something cool with iron

0:05:59.440 --> 0:06:03.160
<v Speaker 4>Man or or whoever, but not too cool. These are

0:06:03.200 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 4>your you know, you you can have iron Man, you know,

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:09.919
<v Speaker 4>fight bad guys, but you cannot have iron Man fight

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:12.560
<v Speaker 4>say Mickey Mouse or something like. I don't know, I

0:06:12.560 --> 0:06:14.839
<v Speaker 4>don't know where the rules would be. Could you make

0:06:14.880 --> 0:06:17.560
<v Speaker 4>it like like the like the punch Out. Could you

0:06:17.560 --> 0:06:20.600
<v Speaker 4>make it like so comedic that it that it goes

0:06:20.640 --> 0:06:23.600
<v Speaker 4>into satire and it's actually kind of funny. Or are

0:06:23.600 --> 0:06:26.359
<v Speaker 4>you're still going to be stepping onlines and it's a

0:06:26.520 --> 0:06:27.760
<v Speaker 4>it's a huge question.

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:28.719
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:06:28.800 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 1>And so I thought where this was going to go

0:06:32.000 --> 0:06:35.920
<v Speaker 1>was that the version of Sora that we saw, which

0:06:36.000 --> 0:06:37.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to I don't want to give.

0:06:37.160 --> 0:06:37.880
<v Speaker 2>A short shrift.

0:06:37.960 --> 0:06:41.360
<v Speaker 1>I thought there was a lot to commend for sort

0:06:41.400 --> 0:06:46.080
<v Speaker 1>of a first wave product could subsist.

0:06:45.800 --> 0:06:47.360
<v Speaker 2>But just deprived.

0:06:47.720 --> 0:06:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, let me ask you, do you feel that there

0:06:49.680 --> 0:06:52.200
<v Speaker 1>was a version of Sora that could have worked just

0:06:52.560 --> 0:06:56.560
<v Speaker 1>without any actual I p except for brave souls like

0:06:56.800 --> 0:06:58.920
<v Speaker 1>mister Altman who was willing to put his own face

0:06:58.960 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 1>out there.

0:07:00.440 --> 0:07:04.120
<v Speaker 4>I saw works of creativity people were doing, like fantasy

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:08.800
<v Speaker 4>and sci fi like I saw inventive ships, space stuff

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:12.680
<v Speaker 4>and stars and cosmic patterns. And then I saw other

0:07:12.720 --> 0:07:15.040
<v Speaker 4>things like people bringing like food to life, and we've

0:07:15.040 --> 0:07:18.800
<v Speaker 4>actually seen those, like those Pixar style foody things. I

0:07:18.800 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 4>think they've gotten a little too Pixar style to be canon.

0:07:22.600 --> 0:07:26.679
<v Speaker 4>But I definitely saw people doing creative things. I also

0:07:26.720 --> 0:07:29.920
<v Speaker 4>saw creative use of sort of the retro cams, like

0:07:30.280 --> 0:07:34.160
<v Speaker 4>people opening kids of the Christmas tree in the seventies

0:07:34.320 --> 0:07:38.280
<v Speaker 4>kind of style era things people doing like clever takes

0:07:38.320 --> 0:07:42.880
<v Speaker 4>on a ring, security camera catching like a unicorn running

0:07:42.920 --> 0:07:46.560
<v Speaker 4>by and stuff like that. But I you know those

0:07:46.600 --> 0:07:49.640
<v Speaker 4>ones took real effort, and so I think this also

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:54.440
<v Speaker 4>goes into this whole what's wrong slash right about Generator

0:07:54.480 --> 0:07:57.840
<v Speaker 4>TODAYI is that low effort content is quickly going into

0:07:57.920 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 4>our slop bucket, which we which I don't think it's

0:08:00.920 --> 0:08:04.920
<v Speaker 4>even bucket sized anymore. It's now like a slop ocean

0:08:05.000 --> 0:08:07.800
<v Speaker 4>of sorts. But those who are using the tools with

0:08:07.840 --> 0:08:11.320
<v Speaker 4>true creativity and like figuring out how do I make

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:16.640
<v Speaker 4>my skeleton creature thing haunt the night and with eerie

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:19.400
<v Speaker 4>music like, I love seeing some of that stuff. So

0:08:19.880 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 4>I hope we aren't in the baby with the bathwater

0:08:22.840 --> 0:08:23.760
<v Speaker 4>stage of things.

0:08:24.480 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, we know that open Ai made the

0:08:28.160 --> 0:08:33.160
<v Speaker 1>decision to kill to kill Sora for reasons. It probably

0:08:33.160 --> 0:08:35.079
<v Speaker 1>had nothing to do with what was going on on

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:38.320
<v Speaker 1>the platform itself. They had to be focused on that IPO.

0:08:38.679 --> 0:08:42.680
<v Speaker 1>They are cost issues, no question. But I guess the

0:08:42.760 --> 0:08:46.440
<v Speaker 1>disappearance of Sore from the marketplace makes me wonder whether

0:08:46.600 --> 0:08:49.439
<v Speaker 1>do you think that there is a vacuum that can

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:52.200
<v Speaker 1>be filled or maybe maybe you and I are being

0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 1>too generous here and it's withdrawal is a testament to

0:08:55.920 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 1>the reality that maybe there was no mark that Sora

0:08:59.240 --> 0:09:01.400
<v Speaker 1>made and it just wasn't really a product.

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:03.959
<v Speaker 4>I don't know that I'm going to agree with that one.

0:09:04.080 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 4>I think there's something, there's a there there. I don't

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:09.359
<v Speaker 4>yet know what it is. I look at the analogy,

0:09:09.440 --> 0:09:13.720
<v Speaker 4>as you know, we once drew on caves with sticks

0:09:13.720 --> 0:09:16.000
<v Speaker 4>that we that were burnt, and that was the beginning

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:19.520
<v Speaker 4>of drawing, right, and there was a time where crayons

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 4>were new technology. And then if we fast forward to

0:09:21.880 --> 0:09:24.760
<v Speaker 4>the nineties, a little tool called render Man by of

0:09:24.800 --> 0:09:29.319
<v Speaker 4>course Pixar changed the game yet again. And nowadays when

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 4>we look at some of the movies, whether it's did

0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:34.560
<v Speaker 4>you ever see Kubo in the Two Strings?

0:09:34.559 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 2>I believe it was called I've heard of it, but

0:09:36.160 --> 0:09:36.920
<v Speaker 2>I haven't seen it.

0:09:37.520 --> 0:09:39.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it was a style of animation I'd never seen before.

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:44.560
<v Speaker 4>Gorgeous requires computers to make it all work. So I

0:09:44.600 --> 0:09:49.520
<v Speaker 4>do think that the notion that a creative person could

0:09:49.640 --> 0:09:52.880
<v Speaker 4>use AI to generate the thing they want to see,

0:09:53.679 --> 0:09:57.360
<v Speaker 4>it's sort of the latest version of these tools. Right,

0:09:57.400 --> 0:10:00.280
<v Speaker 4>we're moving from a person has to learn and had

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:02.040
<v Speaker 4>to do three D rendering and modeling and etc.

0:10:02.480 --> 0:10:03.880
<v Speaker 2>To prompt your way there.

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:06.880
<v Speaker 4>The problem with all these things is by taking out

0:10:07.360 --> 0:10:10.440
<v Speaker 4>both the guardrails as well as sort of the work

0:10:10.520 --> 0:10:12.840
<v Speaker 4>to be done. You know, maybe it's we made it

0:10:12.880 --> 0:10:16.559
<v Speaker 4>too cheap, right. Maybe you know my daughter is studying

0:10:16.640 --> 0:10:20.119
<v Speaker 4>design at Rizdy and she has to go buy art supplies,

0:10:20.600 --> 0:10:23.800
<v Speaker 4>and so if she's going to go buy some paint,

0:10:24.360 --> 0:10:26.360
<v Speaker 4>she has to decide is this like for the final

0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:29.320
<v Speaker 4>project or am I just sort of sketching around? And

0:10:29.360 --> 0:10:31.360
<v Speaker 4>if I'm just sketching around, what kind of texture do

0:10:31.440 --> 0:10:34.600
<v Speaker 4>I want? And things like that. So I wonder if

0:10:35.000 --> 0:10:39.160
<v Speaker 4>we need certain different kinds of tools and instruments that

0:10:39.240 --> 0:10:43.120
<v Speaker 4>work with the creators to let them explore interesting stuff.

0:10:43.640 --> 0:10:45.960
<v Speaker 4>I do think if I had to make the choice

0:10:45.960 --> 0:10:49.360
<v Speaker 4>of there's no more slop, but there's also no more generative,

0:10:49.960 --> 0:10:52.080
<v Speaker 4>I think I might make that choice, at least in

0:10:52.120 --> 0:10:55.520
<v Speaker 4>the today of decisions. I might regret saying that one day,

0:10:56.000 --> 0:11:00.440
<v Speaker 4>but I think we'd rather see high caliber put that's

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:03.280
<v Speaker 4>not being doubted right Like now, every video someone sends

0:11:03.320 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 4>me of like Cat's doing weird things at night. The

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:11.040
<v Speaker 4>first comment is ai ai ai, and you know maybe

0:11:11.040 --> 0:11:11.520
<v Speaker 4>it was.

0:11:11.559 --> 0:11:12.079
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:11:12.360 --> 0:11:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean when you when you use the example

0:11:15.520 --> 0:11:18.960
<v Speaker 1>of your daughter, I do wonder whether maybe the version

0:11:19.000 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 1>of Sora that is meant to be and one that

0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:26.400
<v Speaker 1>is inclusive of IP is something that is more sort

0:11:26.440 --> 0:11:30.360
<v Speaker 1>of like a professional class product that people would pay

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:34.080
<v Speaker 1>for and not what the Sora we knew meant to be,

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:36.679
<v Speaker 1>which was throw the doors open, let everyone do what

0:11:36.720 --> 0:11:40.000
<v Speaker 1>they want for free. What do you think of that.

0:11:40.040 --> 0:11:43.400
<v Speaker 4>We should be experimenting with that? I think the missing

0:11:43.480 --> 0:11:45.520
<v Speaker 4>part of it all, and this goes to where slop

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:49.320
<v Speaker 4>is coming from, is the notion of curation. Right, slop

0:11:49.360 --> 0:11:53.840
<v Speaker 4>works because it's profitable, just the same for the slopper.

0:11:54.080 --> 0:11:56.800
<v Speaker 4>I guess it's sort of like spam.

0:11:56.960 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:11:57.200 --> 0:11:59.439
<v Speaker 4>My kids asked me why, well, why do we get

0:11:59.640 --> 0:12:02.520
<v Speaker 4>like why spam? And I'm like, well, because if you

0:12:02.640 --> 0:12:05.080
<v Speaker 4>send the same thing to ten million people and one

0:12:05.080 --> 0:12:06.000
<v Speaker 4>of them clicks.

0:12:05.720 --> 0:12:08.200
<v Speaker 2>It was a prophet, that's the answer. Right.

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:11.160
<v Speaker 4>The same is good is true in slop the first

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:14.040
<v Speaker 4>person too. And if you sell you we did the video.

0:12:14.360 --> 0:12:16.320
<v Speaker 4>There's a bunch of these styles now where someone will

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:19.040
<v Speaker 4>run around from sort of room to room taking a

0:12:19.080 --> 0:12:22.640
<v Speaker 4>selfie with like yeah, yeah, like the first person who

0:12:22.640 --> 0:12:25.120
<v Speaker 4>did that. It's creative, it's interesting. It's like the first

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:27.960
<v Speaker 4>all white painting. I don't remember what that's called that,

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:31.520
<v Speaker 4>or the banana duct tape to the wall. But if

0:12:31.559 --> 0:12:33.120
<v Speaker 4>you come into my house and I just go duct

0:12:33.120 --> 0:12:35.560
<v Speaker 4>tape a bunch of fruit to the wall, you know,

0:12:35.640 --> 0:12:37.960
<v Speaker 4>I'm sort of doing a different version of the slop

0:12:38.000 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 4>And I would argue that the same thing's true digitally.

0:12:41.000 --> 0:12:43.480
<v Speaker 4>So as long as we sort of can say, well,

0:12:43.559 --> 0:12:48.440
<v Speaker 4>slop goes here, quality stuff goes here, creators go there.

0:12:48.800 --> 0:12:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:12:49.160 --> 0:12:52.800
<v Speaker 4>If there's a combination of like a Patreon and a

0:12:52.920 --> 0:12:56.599
<v Speaker 4>Sora where you know there's an incentive in place to

0:12:56.880 --> 0:13:01.200
<v Speaker 4>not make more slop, that's a probably a good thing.

0:13:01.720 --> 0:13:03.120
<v Speaker 4>And at the same time, I don't want to overly

0:13:03.240 --> 0:13:07.320
<v Speaker 4>burn and artists who are trying to create. So it's

0:13:07.520 --> 0:13:09.199
<v Speaker 4>like Facebook said, it's complicated.

0:13:10.080 --> 0:13:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Sure, well, you know, I think the when you're describing

0:13:13.160 --> 0:13:15.760
<v Speaker 1>it that way, it doesn't even sound all that different

0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:19.880
<v Speaker 1>than say a YouTube, where there are some very small

0:13:19.880 --> 0:13:25.240
<v Speaker 1>percentage that are the creators and the rest are basically

0:13:25.320 --> 0:13:28.720
<v Speaker 1>the audience. I'm probably oversimplifying it, though.

0:13:29.400 --> 0:13:32.080
<v Speaker 4>You're dead on right, Like, there's been this historic ratio

0:13:32.440 --> 0:13:35.440
<v Speaker 4>of one percent create, one to two percent create, eight

0:13:35.520 --> 0:13:39.640
<v Speaker 4>to nine percent engage that's some form of commenting, re sharing,

0:13:40.040 --> 0:13:43.000
<v Speaker 4>doing something, and then about ninety percent just consume and

0:13:43.120 --> 0:13:46.400
<v Speaker 4>lurk and do very little. And that's been true since

0:13:46.720 --> 0:13:49.800
<v Speaker 4>I wrote my first blog post twenty something years ago.

0:13:50.080 --> 0:13:51.800
<v Speaker 2>Is that that's those are the ratios.

0:13:52.400 --> 0:13:56.160
<v Speaker 4>And when I was looking at Sora engagement, one of

0:13:56.160 --> 0:13:59.440
<v Speaker 4>the things I noticed is commenting was really low, right,

0:13:59.520 --> 0:14:02.720
<v Speaker 4>So my hunch is what was going wrong sort of

0:14:02.720 --> 0:14:05.960
<v Speaker 4>the wrong pyramid of sorts was being formed. Is that

0:14:06.800 --> 0:14:10.800
<v Speaker 4>way too many people creating lots of audience and not

0:14:11.040 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 4>of that, not a lot of that true deep engagement

0:14:13.559 --> 0:14:16.040
<v Speaker 4>or like like I would follow people who I thought

0:14:16.040 --> 0:14:17.960
<v Speaker 4>made cool stuff, but then that might have been the

0:14:18.000 --> 0:14:20.200
<v Speaker 4>only thing they ever did on sore and maybe they

0:14:20.240 --> 0:14:23.400
<v Speaker 4>used up all their credits or I don't know what happened, right,

0:14:23.480 --> 0:14:26.760
<v Speaker 4>So I think maybe we need and by need, I

0:14:26.800 --> 0:14:29.960
<v Speaker 4>wonder what will be the system that evolves into that, right,

0:14:30.080 --> 0:14:33.840
<v Speaker 4>like YouTube could have a YouTube.

0:14:33.720 --> 0:14:35.200
<v Speaker 2>AI only zone.

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:38.680
<v Speaker 4>I think I think this is one suggestion I make

0:14:38.800 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 4>is that you know, much like I remember being in

0:14:41.200 --> 0:14:43.360
<v Speaker 4>the days where you go to a restaurant or an airplane,

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:47.560
<v Speaker 4>there'd be a cigarette section that did its job fairly well.

0:14:47.760 --> 0:14:51.000
<v Speaker 4>I wonder if YouTube probably has the right strength of

0:14:51.080 --> 0:14:53.840
<v Speaker 4>brand to pull off a AI stuffs that over here if

0:14:53.840 --> 0:14:58.920
<v Speaker 4>you want to, it's all over here. Enjoy, here's AI remixes,

0:14:58.960 --> 0:15:03.440
<v Speaker 4>here's AI real life things, here's AI animations here, et cetera.

0:15:04.000 --> 0:15:06.600
<v Speaker 4>That could probably work, and then let people make their choices.

0:15:06.640 --> 0:15:09.200
<v Speaker 4>And let's because we do need people to have time

0:15:09.280 --> 0:15:11.280
<v Speaker 4>with all this media to figure out what we do

0:15:11.360 --> 0:15:11.560
<v Speaker 4>with it.

0:15:11.960 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Right, Yeah, I think you're onto something there. I think that,

0:15:17.200 --> 0:15:19.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, especially when we put this in the in

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the context of like a Disney plus and where this

0:15:23.240 --> 0:15:27.640
<v Speaker 1>could have lived. I don't think the way SOA was

0:15:27.640 --> 0:15:31.920
<v Speaker 1>was there is just one and only functionality that exists,

0:15:32.000 --> 0:15:35.440
<v Speaker 1>and that is the raison to etra of the entire platform,

0:15:35.800 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 1>when in fact it probably should be one of a

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:42.320
<v Speaker 1>number of things, and that's how it perhaps could have

0:15:42.400 --> 0:15:46.200
<v Speaker 1>worked on a on a Disney or YouTube as you

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:48.080
<v Speaker 1>put it. I mean, to some degree, I think what

0:15:48.080 --> 0:15:51.880
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about here is the classic quibi mistake, where

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:55.400
<v Speaker 1>you know quibis we've got to that point of the podcast.

0:15:55.440 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 1>We must mention Quibi where you know, maybe Quibi if

0:16:00.000 --> 0:16:01.680
<v Speaker 1>if the content was good, and I know that's a

0:16:01.720 --> 0:16:05.560
<v Speaker 1>debate and of itself. If the content was good, there

0:16:05.560 --> 0:16:07.880
<v Speaker 1>would have been a business there. If it wasn't just

0:16:08.160 --> 0:16:12.479
<v Speaker 1>that content, if it existed along the side of other things.

0:16:13.600 --> 0:16:14.360
<v Speaker 2>I fully agree.

0:16:14.360 --> 0:16:18.040
<v Speaker 4>I mean it, look, it's hard to argue, especially at

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:21.400
<v Speaker 4>this stage of the evolution of the media, that we actually

0:16:21.440 --> 0:16:24.760
<v Speaker 4>needed Quiby as its own sort of bespoke app If

0:16:24.840 --> 0:16:27.720
<v Speaker 4>Quibi had instead simply been like a fast network and

0:16:27.800 --> 0:16:31.720
<v Speaker 4>they had had microdramas on TikTok, which are obviously now

0:16:31.760 --> 0:16:35.520
<v Speaker 4>trending and doing very well, and had the fire TV

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:38.840
<v Speaker 4>had a channel there like they didn't have to do

0:16:39.800 --> 0:16:42.080
<v Speaker 4>like the rotating tech and all these other things. Those

0:16:42.080 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 4>weren't necessary, right If they had just gotten the content

0:16:45.040 --> 0:16:47.080
<v Speaker 4>mixed together, that could have been really interesting.

0:16:47.560 --> 0:16:49.480
<v Speaker 2>But to your point, this.

0:16:49.560 --> 0:16:53.320
<v Speaker 4>Is these sort of a siloed, monolithic kind of approaches.

0:16:53.880 --> 0:16:56.160
<v Speaker 4>I wonder if Sora would have been better off if

0:16:56.200 --> 0:16:59.960
<v Speaker 4>they had hand picked users, gone to places like DV

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:02.080
<v Speaker 4>and tard and read it and find people who are

0:17:02.080 --> 0:17:06.000
<v Speaker 4>off creating things in their own time, and and welcome

0:17:06.040 --> 0:17:07.960
<v Speaker 4>them in as a new tool to explore and help

0:17:08.040 --> 0:17:11.320
<v Speaker 4>us get it right right. I think there's a there

0:17:11.359 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 4>is an opportunity here, but it takes a lot of thoughtfulness.

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:20.680
<v Speaker 4>It's not a mass blast approach. The notion of guardrails

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:26.720
<v Speaker 4>and some usage limitation isn't a bad thing necessarily, right,

0:17:27.200 --> 0:17:29.520
<v Speaker 4>But when you then tell the whole world they can't

0:17:29.560 --> 0:17:34.600
<v Speaker 4>have Superman beating up Minnie Mouse being watched by Bell

0:17:34.760 --> 0:17:37.080
<v Speaker 4>from you to to be, you can't have that combo

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:40.600
<v Speaker 4>that that just consumer or end users don't want to

0:17:40.640 --> 0:17:41.200
<v Speaker 4>deal with that.

0:17:42.000 --> 0:17:43.280
<v Speaker 2>The stickiness there.

0:17:43.480 --> 0:17:45.880
<v Speaker 4>At a company I was want one of the media

0:17:45.920 --> 0:17:48.720
<v Speaker 4>companies I once worked at, we had been envisioning building

0:17:48.760 --> 0:17:52.159
<v Speaker 4>a tool that would let a person come into a

0:17:52.400 --> 0:17:56.720
<v Speaker 4>special office we had and basically deep fake themselves into

0:17:56.800 --> 0:18:00.840
<v Speaker 4>one of our IP properties. I think that's fun. I

0:18:00.840 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 4>think being able to walk a ready again. I'll just

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:05.119
<v Speaker 4>use the same example like if I can make me

0:18:05.240 --> 0:18:08.280
<v Speaker 4>look be the Superman in the actual Superman movie and

0:18:08.800 --> 0:18:12.200
<v Speaker 4>fighting off the beasts or whatever, and it actually looks

0:18:12.240 --> 0:18:14.399
<v Speaker 4>cool and I can get that as a thirty second

0:18:14.440 --> 0:18:16.840
<v Speaker 4>clip to share with my kids, that's fun.

0:18:17.200 --> 0:18:19.480
<v Speaker 2>You know, that feels like fun?

0:18:19.640 --> 0:18:23.800
<v Speaker 4>Use of this technology right, like photo booth style, you know.

0:18:24.320 --> 0:18:27.159
<v Speaker 1>But totally and by the way, I mean, that was

0:18:27.359 --> 0:18:30.160
<v Speaker 1>what SOA was to some degree, you had the ability

0:18:30.200 --> 0:18:34.399
<v Speaker 1>to inject yourself into these videos. I first of all,

0:18:34.440 --> 0:18:36.159
<v Speaker 1>let me ask you, did you do that? Did you

0:18:36.200 --> 0:18:37.440
<v Speaker 1>put yourself into any of it?

0:18:38.160 --> 0:18:41.879
<v Speaker 4>I refuse to, Yeah, I refuse to put up my

0:18:42.000 --> 0:18:45.080
<v Speaker 4>own I assume the internet has all my personal info

0:18:45.200 --> 0:18:47.880
<v Speaker 4>to begin with already. I just felt like the three

0:18:48.000 --> 0:18:50.960
<v Speaker 4>D rendering of my face might be the last thing

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 4>I don't want to give up to a company that

0:18:53.680 --> 0:18:56.440
<v Speaker 4>has not yet announced any form of what motivates them,

0:18:56.520 --> 0:18:59.680
<v Speaker 4>or their their guidelines or their own guardrails, which seem

0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:02.320
<v Speaker 4>to be I felt like I could skip that one.

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:03.520
<v Speaker 2>But you did it. Huh.

0:19:03.640 --> 0:19:06.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, you're far smarter and more sensible than

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 1>I am. I just at first I did not for

0:19:09.560 --> 0:19:12.679
<v Speaker 1>the same reasons that you did. And then I just

0:19:12.760 --> 0:19:16.119
<v Speaker 1>broke down because I was so entranced by the thought of,

0:19:16.680 --> 0:19:19.320
<v Speaker 1>well would I look like doing this, and what would

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:23.480
<v Speaker 1>I look like that, you know, precautions be damned. Luckily,

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:26.119
<v Speaker 1>at least at this point, I don't think anyone is

0:19:26.160 --> 0:19:30.560
<v Speaker 1>having their way with my likeness in an inappropriate way.

0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:35.919
<v Speaker 1>But I do think this is where this technology goes.

0:19:36.119 --> 0:19:41.680
<v Speaker 1>That the deep thinking yourself into interactions with characters is

0:19:41.800 --> 0:19:43.040
<v Speaker 1>uniquely powerful.

0:19:43.320 --> 0:19:46.679
<v Speaker 4>Totally agreed, like, why how far are we from like

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:50.080
<v Speaker 4>someone making a choose your own adventure game that is

0:19:50.119 --> 0:19:54.080
<v Speaker 4>all video, it's all generative, it's all using just upload

0:19:54.119 --> 0:19:55.920
<v Speaker 4>a couple of things here and there, and now you're

0:19:56.080 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 4>in this you're looking for the sacred idol on the

0:19:59.320 --> 0:20:03.880
<v Speaker 4>temple or whatever other thing. I'm curious, Andrew, how was you?

0:20:03.920 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 4>How were the videos you were able to make with

0:20:06.119 --> 0:20:07.040
<v Speaker 4>yourself in them?

0:20:07.280 --> 0:20:10.280
<v Speaker 1>It was fascinating. They ran the gamut. Some of them

0:20:10.359 --> 0:20:14.400
<v Speaker 1>were like, Okay, I don't look like that, so what's

0:20:14.480 --> 0:20:15.320
<v Speaker 1>going on here?

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:16.439
<v Speaker 2>And then there were.

0:20:16.320 --> 0:20:18.919
<v Speaker 1>Others where I was like, oh my god, this is

0:20:19.160 --> 0:20:23.159
<v Speaker 1>eerie and look, I never look. You make a video,

0:20:23.320 --> 0:20:25.800
<v Speaker 1>you publish it on the platform, anyone could see it.

0:20:25.840 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 1>But it wasn't like I was deliberately trying to shine

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:32.560
<v Speaker 1>a light on it. I was literally just like making

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:35.959
<v Speaker 1>the link, sending it to some friends and family and

0:20:36.480 --> 0:20:38.840
<v Speaker 1>they got a good laugh out of it. But yeah,

0:20:38.880 --> 0:20:41.479
<v Speaker 1>there's a version of maybe I wouldn't be laughing if

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:42.960
<v Speaker 1>it got into the wrong hand.

0:20:43.560 --> 0:20:46.159
<v Speaker 4>It's a fun time. I mean, I love seeing all

0:20:46.200 --> 0:20:49.520
<v Speaker 4>this tech coming out. There are other platforms people can

0:20:49.520 --> 0:20:51.840
<v Speaker 4>play with, by the way, So if you're listening and

0:20:51.880 --> 0:20:53.840
<v Speaker 4>you still want to be playing with AI Video, which

0:20:53.880 --> 0:20:57.159
<v Speaker 4>I don't blame you, Google Video's really interesting and powerful.

0:20:57.720 --> 0:20:59.320
<v Speaker 4>You can do a lot of stuff these days now

0:20:59.440 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 4>with Claw and Canva too, by the way, Canva and

0:21:02.880 --> 0:21:05.600
<v Speaker 4>even the Adobe has some pretty good video generation stuff.

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:10.040
<v Speaker 4>So definitely go play around a little and see what

0:21:10.040 --> 0:21:12.239
<v Speaker 4>do you think of it. How do we embrace how

0:21:12.240 --> 0:21:14.679
<v Speaker 4>do we get a new generation of brad Birds and

0:21:14.720 --> 0:21:17.960
<v Speaker 4>other picks? And the picks are creatives, so that we're

0:21:18.040 --> 0:21:22.360
<v Speaker 4>just making whether it's infotainment, entertainment, whatever, the thing is

0:21:22.880 --> 0:21:26.480
<v Speaker 4>that we're giving people more to enjoy as opposed to

0:21:27.200 --> 0:21:30.240
<v Speaker 4>things that they instantly reject, right I maybe it was

0:21:30.280 --> 0:21:33.240
<v Speaker 4>an uncanny Valley thing, you know. I don't know yet,

0:21:33.480 --> 0:21:34.600
<v Speaker 4>it's too soon to tell.

0:21:34.960 --> 0:21:37.920
<v Speaker 1>That brings me back to sort of the very premise

0:21:37.920 --> 0:21:41.600
<v Speaker 1>of this conversation, which is I cannot help wondering whether

0:21:41.680 --> 0:21:46.200
<v Speaker 1>the dissolution of Disney and Open Ai and Sora, there's

0:21:46.280 --> 0:21:48.480
<v Speaker 1>still a vacuum in this marketplace and maybe some of

0:21:48.480 --> 0:21:51.560
<v Speaker 1>the very players you just mentioned are going to walk

0:21:51.600 --> 0:21:53.840
<v Speaker 1>into it. And they're gonna do so hand in hand

0:21:53.880 --> 0:21:58.040
<v Speaker 1>with If not Disney, maybe it's Powa Amount, maybe it's

0:21:58.200 --> 0:22:00.280
<v Speaker 1>lions Gate. What do you think?

0:22:00.680 --> 0:22:03.680
<v Speaker 4>One thing I definitely believe is that I think if

0:22:03.720 --> 0:22:07.719
<v Speaker 4>so proved Soura as an experiment proved something other than

0:22:07.760 --> 0:22:08.840
<v Speaker 4>the We don't want slop.

0:22:08.880 --> 0:22:11.600
<v Speaker 2>We want curation, all the stuff about what makes content good.

0:22:12.280 --> 0:22:15.720
<v Speaker 4>I also wonder if we have become if we are

0:22:15.800 --> 0:22:18.840
<v Speaker 4>just sort of done with new platforms to be on right, Like,

0:22:19.320 --> 0:22:21.600
<v Speaker 4>would people have taken more to SOA if it was

0:22:21.680 --> 0:22:26.200
<v Speaker 4>embedded inside say a TikTok right or or an HBO

0:22:26.280 --> 0:22:28.560
<v Speaker 4>Max or a Powerment or any of these apps. And

0:22:28.640 --> 0:22:31.520
<v Speaker 4>I don't know, right it does seem like a centralized

0:22:31.520 --> 0:22:34.520
<v Speaker 4>app for slop is not a good idea, right, But

0:22:34.720 --> 0:22:37.600
<v Speaker 4>do we want it distribute it everywhere? Do we want

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:40.920
<v Speaker 4>each brand to let their audiences play with their content

0:22:40.960 --> 0:22:43.679
<v Speaker 4>in a way like Disney Plus you made a good example.

0:22:43.680 --> 0:22:45.600
<v Speaker 4>I see it on all of the platforms now. Is

0:22:45.600 --> 0:22:49.520
<v Speaker 4>that it's aligning all of my things together, right, which

0:22:49.560 --> 0:22:52.200
<v Speaker 4>is fun and good and helpful. By the way, I'd

0:22:52.200 --> 0:22:54.920
<v Speaker 4>love to get report updates on just when my hockey

0:22:54.960 --> 0:22:57.240
<v Speaker 4>team's playing. I don't need all the rest. I don't

0:22:57.280 --> 0:22:59.760
<v Speaker 4>know if it needs a dedicated home. I think that's

0:22:59.760 --> 0:23:03.119
<v Speaker 4>an The big question in the mix is is it

0:23:03.280 --> 0:23:06.199
<v Speaker 4>sort of more like email where you just you just

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:09.520
<v Speaker 4>have a client of You can use Gmail, hot Mail, AOL,

0:23:09.640 --> 0:23:12.600
<v Speaker 4>if your old school web, you can use lots of

0:23:12.600 --> 0:23:14.080
<v Speaker 4>different apps to do it all. You can have an

0:23:14.280 --> 0:23:19.240
<v Speaker 4>iCloud account, you know. Is so is genet Video almost

0:23:19.280 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 4>more like a protocol, like just something that's just there

0:23:22.080 --> 0:23:25.320
<v Speaker 4>for all the stuff? Or does it need dedicated places?

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:27.560
<v Speaker 4>And that's again too soon to tell.

0:23:27.600 --> 0:23:31.119
<v Speaker 1>I think yeah, I mean I'm wondering though you know,

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:34.880
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about this notion about it can't be sort

0:23:34.920 --> 0:23:38.320
<v Speaker 1>of the sole reason for putting a platform out there

0:23:38.400 --> 0:23:40.720
<v Speaker 1>needs to be embedded out there. But are there other

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:45.320
<v Speaker 1>things that you think a media company or a hyper

0:23:45.320 --> 0:23:48.159
<v Speaker 1>scaler may want to experiment with in terms of a

0:23:48.200 --> 0:23:51.840
<v Speaker 1>different approach than what little we knew about what Disney

0:23:51.840 --> 0:23:53.080
<v Speaker 1>and open AI we're going to do.

0:23:53.359 --> 0:23:55.400
<v Speaker 4>Oh I think at least one of them should play

0:23:55.440 --> 0:23:58.400
<v Speaker 4>with things like deep baking and remixing and doing it

0:23:58.800 --> 0:24:01.520
<v Speaker 4>maybe in an isolated maybe in a place where you

0:24:01.560 --> 0:24:04.560
<v Speaker 4>can't you know, it's in some kind of walled garden

0:24:04.640 --> 0:24:07.920
<v Speaker 4>or gated community where there are some controls in place.

0:24:07.960 --> 0:24:10.800
<v Speaker 4>And I think this is also a key thing, is

0:24:10.840 --> 0:24:16.000
<v Speaker 4>somehow we need to get the message to the users that, like,

0:24:16.000 --> 0:24:19.200
<v Speaker 4>like people worked hard to create IP, respecting IP.

0:24:19.160 --> 0:24:21.520
<v Speaker 2>Matters, don't blow it all up.

0:24:21.960 --> 0:24:24.760
<v Speaker 4>Use it in a way that's that's healthy in advancing

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:27.760
<v Speaker 4>the medium, not sort of pillaging from it. And I

0:24:27.800 --> 0:24:30.000
<v Speaker 4>do think there's a line in there that really does matter.

0:24:30.600 --> 0:24:33.600
<v Speaker 4>But I think to your point, like letting the let's

0:24:33.640 --> 0:24:36.639
<v Speaker 4>see the new Mandalorian movies coming out. We know that

0:24:36.680 --> 0:24:40.280
<v Speaker 4>the Mandalorian was entirely done with new digital sets and

0:24:40.320 --> 0:24:44.439
<v Speaker 4>et cetera, seems like an opportune place for like a

0:24:44.640 --> 0:24:47.240
<v Speaker 4>whether it's maybe it's a game, right, maybe we're using

0:24:47.280 --> 0:24:50.600
<v Speaker 4>generative stuff inside gaming. I think about some of those

0:24:50.640 --> 0:24:53.000
<v Speaker 4>games that came out a few years ago, was called Spawn.

0:24:53.119 --> 0:24:55.159
<v Speaker 4>I believe it was called where you can sort of

0:24:55.160 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 4>make your own creature and every creature was perfectly unique

0:24:59.080 --> 0:25:02.040
<v Speaker 4>in some way. Like those are kind of neat things

0:25:02.080 --> 0:25:05.440
<v Speaker 4>to experiment with. What what does general video bring to that?

0:25:05.960 --> 0:25:07.640
<v Speaker 4>So maybe we don't need an app that we can

0:25:07.680 --> 0:25:10.240
<v Speaker 4>just prompt have a unicorn run by my ring camera,

0:25:10.680 --> 0:25:13.959
<v Speaker 4>but we do need general video to get woven inside

0:25:14.080 --> 0:25:16.520
<v Speaker 4>other tools and technologies we're using all the time.

0:25:16.960 --> 0:25:19.399
<v Speaker 1>That's an interesting suggestion. I hadn't even thought about it

0:25:19.400 --> 0:25:22.480
<v Speaker 1>in the context of gaming, But who's to say that

0:25:22.560 --> 0:25:25.000
<v Speaker 1>gaming isn't the place where this might take off as

0:25:25.000 --> 0:25:28.640
<v Speaker 1>opposed to we've been talking about just video all along,

0:25:28.800 --> 0:25:30.760
<v Speaker 1>and I think there's something to that.

0:25:31.119 --> 0:25:33.160
<v Speaker 4>I'll tell you another area that I think is interesting,

0:25:33.320 --> 0:25:37.440
<v Speaker 4>like what about being able to use general video for yourself,

0:25:37.520 --> 0:25:41.159
<v Speaker 4>like for a personal training app, for style apps, for

0:25:41.320 --> 0:25:45.560
<v Speaker 4>those haircutting apps, right, or use generat video to project

0:25:45.600 --> 0:25:49.040
<v Speaker 4>what a recipe's going to look like. There's a lot

0:25:49.080 --> 0:25:53.200
<v Speaker 4>of things we could do where the tech itself brings

0:25:53.320 --> 0:25:56.680
<v Speaker 4>value along the journey. Maybe it's just a sort of again,

0:25:56.760 --> 0:25:59.640
<v Speaker 4>not a destination app, but an ingredient of one.

0:26:00.160 --> 0:26:05.040
<v Speaker 1>But another good point maybe that these videos are less random,

0:26:05.080 --> 0:26:10.480
<v Speaker 1>mindless entertainment but actually very utilitarian, very specific neat use

0:26:10.560 --> 0:26:13.240
<v Speaker 1>cases like hey, I want to know I'm going to

0:26:13.320 --> 0:26:16.800
<v Speaker 1>look like with this haircut or with these clothes on,

0:26:17.160 --> 0:26:20.119
<v Speaker 1>And I just go back to there was something in

0:26:20.240 --> 0:26:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Sora that entranced me to the point where I was like,

0:26:23.240 --> 0:26:26.480
<v Speaker 1>this can't be the end point just because AI doesn't

0:26:26.480 --> 0:26:29.639
<v Speaker 1>want to do it this way. But I mean, have

0:26:29.800 --> 0:26:33.840
<v Speaker 1>you ruled out open AI from this? Do you think

0:26:34.040 --> 0:26:37.760
<v Speaker 1>they're the IPO version of them means where they're not

0:26:37.800 --> 0:26:40.080
<v Speaker 1>going to play in this playground Again.

0:26:40.960 --> 0:26:44.000
<v Speaker 4>Well, again, we don't know all the reasons why a

0:26:44.040 --> 0:26:47.439
<v Speaker 4>shutdown happen, So if anything had to do with things

0:26:47.520 --> 0:26:50.639
<v Speaker 4>like copyright and lawsuit my hunches, we don't see it.

0:26:50.680 --> 0:26:51.000
<v Speaker 2>Again.

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:53.760
<v Speaker 4>If, on the other hand, it was maybe the Apples

0:26:54.119 --> 0:26:57.280
<v Speaker 4>was costing more than it was making, which is probable

0:26:57.640 --> 0:27:00.840
<v Speaker 4>just based on how much you could do for free,

0:27:01.160 --> 0:27:04.280
<v Speaker 4>including on the consumption side, So maybe it was a

0:27:04.280 --> 0:27:07.560
<v Speaker 4>cost structure. Maybe it was a conservative move in advance.

0:27:07.640 --> 0:27:11.240
<v Speaker 4>They shut down a few other things in a similar timeframe,

0:27:11.600 --> 0:27:13.119
<v Speaker 4>but they did it in a way where it didn't

0:27:13.119 --> 0:27:15.360
<v Speaker 4>seem like, oh, we're just killing all these other projects.

0:27:15.400 --> 0:27:17.880
<v Speaker 4>But reality is, in like forty five days, they killed

0:27:17.920 --> 0:27:20.520
<v Speaker 4>at least five things that they were that they had announced.

0:27:20.960 --> 0:27:23.960
<v Speaker 4>So maybe it was just sort of tightening the ship

0:27:24.080 --> 0:27:27.720
<v Speaker 4>up in advance of IPOs et cetera. I read rumors

0:27:27.760 --> 0:27:29.960
<v Speaker 4>like they have too many products, they need to be

0:27:30.080 --> 0:27:32.600
<v Speaker 4>more focused. If there were a lot of things we

0:27:32.720 --> 0:27:36.800
<v Speaker 4>don't really know, that could be the thing. Personally, my

0:27:36.960 --> 0:27:41.560
<v Speaker 4>gut talks a bit, but sits in the copyright slash costs.

0:27:42.480 --> 0:27:44.560
<v Speaker 4>You know, ven diagram of that is terrible.

0:27:45.520 --> 0:27:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Sure, although you know, we'll never really know what Disney

0:27:51.000 --> 0:27:54.480
<v Speaker 1>thought of, what little work went into the partnership that

0:27:54.560 --> 0:27:57.080
<v Speaker 1>they had. Part of me does wonder when you bring

0:27:57.160 --> 0:28:00.560
<v Speaker 1>up copyright whether lawyers were whisp we're in in Josh

0:28:00.600 --> 0:28:04.159
<v Speaker 1>Tomorrow's ear like, there's no version of this that is

0:28:04.200 --> 0:28:07.760
<v Speaker 1>going to not get us into legal hot water. But

0:28:07.840 --> 0:28:08.399
<v Speaker 1>we'll never know.

0:28:09.400 --> 0:28:12.920
<v Speaker 4>We have the Internet, so every bit of me assumes

0:28:12.960 --> 0:28:16.160
<v Speaker 4>that that no matter what rules are put in, somebody

0:28:16.200 --> 0:28:18.280
<v Speaker 4>would be on the crusade to do something with Mickey

0:28:18.280 --> 0:28:21.919
<v Speaker 4>and Minnie like it. Just it's too obvious, you know

0:28:21.920 --> 0:28:25.360
<v Speaker 4>what I mean? And like and if there's one thing

0:28:25.400 --> 0:28:27.879
<v Speaker 4>I've ever learned is that no matter how many locks

0:28:27.880 --> 0:28:32.480
<v Speaker 4>you put in place, there are keys. Right, So somebody

0:28:32.560 --> 0:28:35.359
<v Speaker 4>had figured out that video would leak and that would

0:28:35.400 --> 0:28:37.600
<v Speaker 4>be a day of reckoning, per se.

0:28:38.600 --> 0:28:41.200
<v Speaker 1>No truer words have been spoken about the nature of

0:28:41.240 --> 0:28:44.320
<v Speaker 1>the Internet. Jeremy, thank you very much for talking to

0:28:44.360 --> 0:28:48.600
<v Speaker 1>me through this. Perhaps we'll have another conversation at some point,

0:28:48.760 --> 0:28:51.440
<v Speaker 1>not in the distant future, where we are seeing what

0:28:51.480 --> 0:28:55.120
<v Speaker 1>this next iteration is, and we'll be able to assess

0:28:55.600 --> 0:28:58.640
<v Speaker 1>whether this is a move in the right direction for

0:28:58.680 --> 0:29:01.280
<v Speaker 1>a technology that I think it's just too interesting to

0:29:01.400 --> 0:29:03.200
<v Speaker 1>just vanish.

0:29:03.280 --> 0:29:03.480
<v Speaker 2>Well.

0:29:03.480 --> 0:29:05.760
<v Speaker 4>See, I'm very curious to see how many things we

0:29:05.760 --> 0:29:08.800
<v Speaker 4>were wrong about. No later than thirty days from today.

0:29:08.960 --> 0:29:12.080
<v Speaker 4>That's at the pace this world's moving. I have a

0:29:12.160 --> 0:29:15.240
<v Speaker 4>hunch we'll know a lot more. You know, any rolling

0:29:15.320 --> 0:29:15.960
<v Speaker 4>thirty day.

0:29:15.840 --> 0:29:17.920
<v Speaker 2>Basis absolutely okay.

0:29:17.920 --> 0:29:21.280
<v Speaker 3>Thanks again, thanks for listening. Be sure to leave us

0:29:21.280 --> 0:29:24.200
<v Speaker 3>a review at the podcast platform of your choice. We

0:29:24.320 --> 0:29:27.600
<v Speaker 3>love to hear from listeners. Please go to Variety dot

0:29:27.600 --> 0:29:32.280
<v Speaker 3>com to sign up for the free weekly Strictly Business newsletter,

0:29:32.960 --> 0:29:36.080
<v Speaker 3>and don't forget to tune in next week for another

0:29:36.160 --> 0:29:37.760
<v Speaker 3>episode of Strictly Business.