WEBVTT - Smart Talks with IBM and Malcolm Gladwell: Quantum Computing is Tomorrow’s Computing, Today

0:00:04.760 --> 0:00:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Hello, Hello. This is Smart Talks with IBM, a podcast

0:00:08.920 --> 0:00:13.319
<v Speaker 1>from Pushkin Industries, High Heart Media and IBM about what

0:00:13.320 --> 0:00:16.240
<v Speaker 1>it means to look at today's most challenging problems in

0:00:16.280 --> 0:00:22.960
<v Speaker 1>a new way. I'm Malcolm Gladwell. In this episode, I'll

0:00:22.960 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 1>be discussing the capabilities of quantum computing with Dr Dario

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:31.520
<v Speaker 1>gil Dr Gill is the senior Vice president and director

0:00:31.840 --> 0:00:36.440
<v Speaker 1>of IBM Research. He's also recognized globally as one of

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:41.400
<v Speaker 1>the brightest minds in the quantum computing industry. But what

0:00:41.560 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 1>we know is that is theoretically sound and possible, and

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:48.560
<v Speaker 1>that we are making very significant progress towards achieving good goal.

0:00:48.600 --> 0:00:51.280
<v Speaker 1>And that's why this is a quest of doing something

0:00:51.320 --> 0:00:54.240
<v Speaker 1>that has never been done before, but it is definitely possible.

0:00:54.720 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Earlier this year, at the Wall Street Journals Virtual CIO

0:00:58.040 --> 0:01:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Network Summit, Dr Gil pro claimed that the next ten

0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 1>years will be the decade in which quantum really comes

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:08.920
<v Speaker 1>of age. So what is quantum computing and how will

0:01:08.920 --> 0:01:12.520
<v Speaker 1>it transform over the next decade and in what ways

0:01:12.560 --> 0:01:17.400
<v Speaker 1>will quantum computers change the way we interact with technology.

0:01:18.800 --> 0:01:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's dive in. Thanks for joining us. Start to kill.

0:01:29.440 --> 0:01:32.600
<v Speaker 1>It's a real pleasure thank you for having me, Malcolm,

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 1>it's a pleasure to be with you. I wanted to

0:01:35.720 --> 0:01:37.880
<v Speaker 1>start my talent us a little bit about yourself. You

0:01:37.920 --> 0:01:41.160
<v Speaker 1>did your graduate work at m I T. What did

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 1>you study there? I studied nanotechnology at m i T.

0:01:46.440 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 1>I joined the Nanostructure's laboratory. It was in the Department

0:01:49.440 --> 0:01:53.520
<v Speaker 1>of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science and their professor Hank Smith,

0:01:54.000 --> 0:01:56.840
<v Speaker 1>who was one of the pioneers of the field of

0:01:56.920 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 1>nano fabrication. You know, how do you manipulate and build

0:02:00.640 --> 0:02:04.640
<v Speaker 1>incredibly small part of our world? And so that sets

0:02:04.680 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 1>you up for the world that you're in now. Right

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:14.520
<v Speaker 1>this the quantum computing flows naturally out of the idea

0:02:14.560 --> 0:02:17.400
<v Speaker 1>that this plenty of room at the bottom. Yes, it

0:02:17.560 --> 0:02:22.160
<v Speaker 1>is because of the different theories of physics. One that

0:02:22.280 --> 0:02:25.040
<v Speaker 1>is of course extraordinarily irrelevant for the world of the

0:02:25.160 --> 0:02:29.960
<v Speaker 1>small is quantum physics. So if we are to understand

0:02:31.280 --> 0:02:35.720
<v Speaker 1>how matter behaves at the atomic scale and electronic structure

0:02:35.720 --> 0:02:38.760
<v Speaker 1>and the interactions and uh what occurs at the level

0:02:38.760 --> 0:02:42.440
<v Speaker 1>of materials, you have to understand what is happening in

0:02:42.480 --> 0:02:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the world of quantum physics. For those who are not

0:02:46.440 --> 0:02:49.720
<v Speaker 1>from a technical background, can you give us the give

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:53.880
<v Speaker 1>me this the simplest definition of what quantum computing is.

0:02:54.840 --> 0:02:57.799
<v Speaker 1>You know, we're all accustomed to using computers today, and

0:02:57.840 --> 0:03:01.200
<v Speaker 1>at the foundation of the computers we use every day

0:03:01.240 --> 0:03:05.720
<v Speaker 1>and our smartphones is the idea of bits or binary digits.

0:03:05.919 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 1>And interestingly, this is an idea that the fascination that

0:03:09.600 --> 0:03:12.640
<v Speaker 1>all the complexity in the world we could reuse it

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:15.640
<v Speaker 1>in a mode of communication, which is zeros and ones

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:18.920
<v Speaker 1>dates back as far back as Lightnings, but it was

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:22.320
<v Speaker 1>really in the twenty century. In the nineteen fourties and fifties,

0:03:22.400 --> 0:03:26.360
<v Speaker 1>a Cloud Shannon, which is one of the great leaders

0:03:26.360 --> 0:03:29.640
<v Speaker 1>in the world of computing, told us we could create

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:34.560
<v Speaker 1>these incredibly sophisticated modes of communication and computation just by

0:03:34.600 --> 0:03:37.560
<v Speaker 1>being able to map all the complexity and information in

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:39.920
<v Speaker 1>the world to strings of zeros and ones, and computers

0:03:39.920 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 1>are machines that manipulate zeros and ones very very efficient.

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:48.120
<v Speaker 1>So in quantum computing it actually revisits that idea. It

0:03:48.160 --> 0:03:51.480
<v Speaker 1>turns out that the most fundamental building block of computation

0:03:51.600 --> 0:03:53.800
<v Speaker 1>is not the zero on one, not the bit. That's

0:03:53.840 --> 0:03:57.560
<v Speaker 1>something known as the cubit sure for quantum bit, and

0:03:57.720 --> 0:04:00.920
<v Speaker 1>at its heart it melts that idea ye of information

0:04:01.760 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 1>with the idea of physics. So what quantum computers do

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 1>is they manipulate information, exploiting the loss of quantum physics

0:04:12.680 --> 0:04:17.119
<v Speaker 1>to be able to do calculations that are simply impossible

0:04:17.160 --> 0:04:20.640
<v Speaker 1>to do if you just use the binary digit the

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:24.240
<v Speaker 1>zeros and ones. It's a richer way to represent information

0:04:24.760 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 1>and manipulate information by exploiting the properties of quantum mechanics

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:33.480
<v Speaker 1>to do things are impossible classically. Yeah, would you say

0:04:34.200 --> 0:04:37.120
<v Speaker 1>you can tackle problems now that would be impossible mechanically.

0:04:37.480 --> 0:04:41.160
<v Speaker 1>What is that? Could you represent the difference in capacity

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:44.080
<v Speaker 1>of these two ways of computing, like how how much

0:04:44.120 --> 0:04:47.640
<v Speaker 1>of a gap is here between quantum and conventional computer?

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:50.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, and it's full potential the gaps it's an

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:54.280
<v Speaker 1>exponential So let me let me explain what I mean

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 1>by that. If you want to simulate nature, so let's

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:02.240
<v Speaker 1>say very practical that you want to build a better

0:05:02.279 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 1>battery technology for electric cons right, so those are based

0:05:05.880 --> 0:05:09.360
<v Speaker 1>on lithium chemistry. And if you want to say, build

0:05:09.960 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 1>a battery that is longer lasting or safer, contract faster.

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:16.560
<v Speaker 1>So now you have in front of your material science

0:05:16.600 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 1>problems and what you can do is go through the

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:22.440
<v Speaker 1>periodic table and see all the different elements and figure

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:24.919
<v Speaker 1>out how you are going to combine them to create

0:05:24.920 --> 0:05:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the material that has the properties you like. Okay, so

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 1>how can you go about doing that? Well? One approach

0:05:31.240 --> 0:05:34.480
<v Speaker 1>is to, uh, do it empirically, just try and humans

0:05:34.480 --> 0:05:37.000
<v Speaker 1>have been doing that since time me memorial right, combine

0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 1>elements and see hy works. Another methodological approach is if

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:43.520
<v Speaker 1>you have a theory of how things work, you could

0:05:43.560 --> 0:05:46.120
<v Speaker 1>try to solve the problem long form and see if

0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:48.839
<v Speaker 1>you can have a close form solution to the problem.

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 1>And a third angle that really came about with the

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:54.960
<v Speaker 1>advent of computers is you could simulate it. Right. You

0:05:55.000 --> 0:05:59.440
<v Speaker 1>could use computers to mimic how atoms behave and use

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:01.880
<v Speaker 1>those equation issues and try to do the calculations to

0:06:02.000 --> 0:06:05.599
<v Speaker 1>see what the properties would be. What's the problem. The

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:09.640
<v Speaker 1>problem is that no matter how big computers we use today,

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the number of variables that we have to compute over

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:18.600
<v Speaker 1>is roughly correlated to the number of electrons and electron

0:06:18.720 --> 0:06:24.240
<v Speaker 1>orbitals present in those elements. So the more sophisticated and

0:06:24.279 --> 0:06:28.160
<v Speaker 1>material we've gotta make, the more interactions between these electrons

0:06:28.240 --> 0:06:31.920
<v Speaker 1>we gotta be able to calculate, and that number grows exponentially,

0:06:32.120 --> 0:06:36.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, pretty soon we need to have a computer,

0:06:36.560 --> 0:06:39.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, with more components than there are atoms in

0:06:39.360 --> 0:06:42.200
<v Speaker 1>the universe. Right, so it's impractical. So what do we do.

0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:44.920
<v Speaker 1>We approximate place, and when we approximate, we don't get

0:06:44.920 --> 0:06:47.880
<v Speaker 1>the right answer. So we are in this stock loop

0:06:48.279 --> 0:06:51.880
<v Speaker 1>of rate of progress. What is interesting on quantum is

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:55.760
<v Speaker 1>that for modeling those kinds of problems, instead of having

0:06:56.360 --> 0:06:59.680
<v Speaker 1>an exponential meaning the more electrons we add, you know,

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:04.240
<v Speaker 1>the number of calculations blowing up. Now it's a relation

0:07:04.320 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 1>that looks more like linear, meaning I only need one

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:12.800
<v Speaker 1>more cubit roughly speaking, to model another electron. So even

0:07:12.840 --> 0:07:16.000
<v Speaker 1>even have a complex molecule where I need you know,

0:07:16.280 --> 0:07:21.000
<v Speaker 1>dozens or hundreds of of orbital calculations and I need

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:23.520
<v Speaker 1>to do I would need a machine with dozens of

0:07:23.600 --> 0:07:29.080
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of cubits rather than a classical machine with ten

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 1>trillion transistors. Right that we don't know how to make.

0:07:33.280 --> 0:07:36.320
<v Speaker 1>It's not an extension or a derivative from the kind

0:07:36.320 --> 0:07:39.400
<v Speaker 1>of computers that we've been using. It's an entirely new

0:07:39.480 --> 0:07:42.920
<v Speaker 1>class of computers. That's exactly right, And that is what's

0:07:42.920 --> 0:07:46.560
<v Speaker 1>so interesting. So there will be classical computing and quantum computing.

0:07:47.080 --> 0:07:50.200
<v Speaker 1>That's how important this is, right, that you phrased it

0:07:50.320 --> 0:07:54.040
<v Speaker 1>very nicely, which is not just another evolution. Is we've

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 1>actually left no element of the assumption of the current

0:07:56.880 --> 0:08:00.840
<v Speaker 1>information on computational model as sacred. Right, not even the

0:08:00.920 --> 0:08:05.720
<v Speaker 1>bit has survived the quantum information view of the world. Right,

0:08:05.880 --> 0:08:09.240
<v Speaker 1>the very foundation had to be revisited. So where are

0:08:09.360 --> 0:08:13.960
<v Speaker 1>we How close are we having quantum computers? Actually that

0:08:14.040 --> 0:08:17.280
<v Speaker 1>you you describe that that task kept trying to figure

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:19.280
<v Speaker 1>out how to make a better battery. When do you

0:08:19.320 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 1>think we'll be able to use quantum computers for a

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:26.600
<v Speaker 1>task like that? We already have built quantum computers. Actually,

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Iban was the first company in the world in two

0:08:28.600 --> 0:08:30.840
<v Speaker 1>thousand and sixteen to build a small quantum computer and

0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:34.200
<v Speaker 1>making universally available. So the first part of the answer

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:36.960
<v Speaker 1>is like, we already have quantum computers, so you can

0:08:37.040 --> 0:08:39.960
<v Speaker 1>learn how to program them. You can start mapping problems

0:08:40.080 --> 0:08:42.560
<v Speaker 1>around how you do it. The challenge we have is

0:08:42.600 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 1>that very difficult to build these machines, so we have

0:08:45.920 --> 0:08:50.040
<v Speaker 1>not yet crossed the path where they can do things

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:54.000
<v Speaker 1>that are of practical value that or classical machines cannot.

0:08:54.320 --> 0:08:56.640
<v Speaker 1>So we gotta keep an eye now of when that

0:08:56.720 --> 0:08:59.439
<v Speaker 1>crossover is going to happen, and that is something that

0:08:59.559 --> 0:09:03.000
<v Speaker 1>is this tier of information and computation that would likely

0:09:03.040 --> 0:09:07.080
<v Speaker 1>happen in the next few years, and then that begins,

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:10.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, a whole a whole new space right of opportunity. Yeah,

0:09:11.480 --> 0:09:14.520
<v Speaker 1>you had said earlier with the stage now where the

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:17.640
<v Speaker 1>machines make errors, what's the source of the difficulty at

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:22.400
<v Speaker 1>the moment. Yeah, then you can build these machines that

0:09:22.520 --> 0:09:26.200
<v Speaker 1>have special properties to represent information in unique ways that

0:09:26.240 --> 0:09:30.199
<v Speaker 1>gives them exponential power compared to classical machines. The massines

0:09:30.360 --> 0:09:34.280
<v Speaker 1>are subject to errors, but there's both a theory and

0:09:34.320 --> 0:09:37.880
<v Speaker 1>a way to implement an error correction technique that would

0:09:37.880 --> 0:09:42.080
<v Speaker 1>allow us to compute in definitely and with like minimum

0:09:42.160 --> 0:09:44.560
<v Speaker 1>levels of errors. That's that it would be a practical value.

0:09:45.040 --> 0:09:49.600
<v Speaker 1>But realizing that large scale machine is still a significant

0:09:49.640 --> 0:09:52.320
<v Speaker 1>journey with a lot of scientific and engineering breakthroughs need

0:09:52.360 --> 0:09:54.679
<v Speaker 1>to occur. But what we know is that it's theoretically

0:09:54.720 --> 0:09:58.520
<v Speaker 1>sound and possible, and that we are making very significant

0:09:58.559 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 1>progress towards achieving the goal. And that's why this is

0:10:01.040 --> 0:10:04.360
<v Speaker 1>a quest of doing something that has never been done before,

0:10:04.400 --> 0:10:08.480
<v Speaker 1>but it is definitely possible. Yeah, you began with the

0:10:08.720 --> 0:10:12.240
<v Speaker 1>example of the electric battery. Give me another example of

0:10:12.320 --> 0:10:16.480
<v Speaker 1>a of an industry or a problem which would be

0:10:16.520 --> 0:10:22.080
<v Speaker 1>well served by using a quantum computer. These three categories

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:24.920
<v Speaker 1>that quantum is going to make a difference similar in nature.

0:10:25.400 --> 0:10:28.600
<v Speaker 1>The world of mathematics, linear algebra that matters to maschine

0:10:28.640 --> 0:10:31.200
<v Speaker 1>learning and other problems. And the third is world of

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 1>search and graphs and what you can do with them

0:10:33.960 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 1>that matter a great deal. But I want to give

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 1>an example that's very famous of the consequences of quantum computing,

0:10:40.720 --> 0:10:42.680
<v Speaker 1>which is some of the implications that it will have

0:10:42.760 --> 0:10:46.720
<v Speaker 1>for cybersecurity and for security in general. And this came

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:51.000
<v Speaker 1>from a very very famous algorithm that gave re energizing

0:10:51.160 --> 0:10:54.640
<v Speaker 1>of the field of quantum in the ninety nineties called

0:10:54.679 --> 0:10:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Short's algorithm, and it came from Peter Short, who was

0:10:58.400 --> 0:11:01.000
<v Speaker 1>then at bad LAPS and now is a professor at

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:06.000
<v Speaker 1>m I T. And he published an algorithm that took

0:11:06.040 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 1>a problem that has to do with factoring. So basically,

0:11:10.400 --> 0:11:13.440
<v Speaker 1>the problem is if you take two prime numbers that

0:11:13.520 --> 0:11:17.439
<v Speaker 1>are say large, and you multiply those two prime numbers together,

0:11:18.120 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 1>and you get the product, the final number of the

0:11:20.840 --> 0:11:25.520
<v Speaker 1>product of those of those two If doing the multiplication,

0:11:25.760 --> 0:11:27.720
<v Speaker 1>it's very easy to do. Anybody can do it, right.

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:30.040
<v Speaker 1>It's just multiplying two numbers. But if I give you

0:11:30.080 --> 0:11:33.280
<v Speaker 1>the product and I ask you, can you tell me,

0:11:33.800 --> 0:11:38.200
<v Speaker 1>given this number, what two prime numbers composed? That product

0:11:38.200 --> 0:11:42.520
<v Speaker 1>turns out to be very, very computationally expensive. And he

0:11:42.840 --> 0:11:45.559
<v Speaker 1>in his algorithm, he showed that if you had a

0:11:45.600 --> 0:11:49.160
<v Speaker 1>sufficient in large quantum computer you could do this efficiently.

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:52.120
<v Speaker 1>And you say, well, what does that matter, Well, it

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:54.840
<v Speaker 1>turns out it matters is because as the basis of

0:11:54.880 --> 0:11:58.439
<v Speaker 1>how we do encryption today and how we secure all

0:11:58.520 --> 0:12:03.360
<v Speaker 1>forms of communications and financial systems and everything, where basically

0:12:03.960 --> 0:12:07.680
<v Speaker 1>your private key is your prime number. Malcome, I would

0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:10.240
<v Speaker 1>have another private key which is my prime number. Those

0:12:10.240 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 1>two numbers are secret, and when we multiply them, that's

0:12:13.960 --> 0:12:16.240
<v Speaker 1>the public key that we share over the Internet and

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:19.440
<v Speaker 1>so on the protocol. Everybody sees our public key, but

0:12:19.520 --> 0:12:22.560
<v Speaker 1>they cannot calculate or private keys. But if you had

0:12:22.600 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 1>a large enough quantum computer, now you could. So there's

0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:30.360
<v Speaker 1>a big implication that the encryption protocols of the world

0:12:30.720 --> 0:12:36.520
<v Speaker 1>need to be changed to prevent future quantum computers from decryption.

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 1>So that's not the fault of quantum computers, but it's

0:12:40.160 --> 0:12:43.920
<v Speaker 1>an example of the consequences we build all sorts of

0:12:43.960 --> 0:12:46.400
<v Speaker 1>assumptions in the world about what problems are easy and

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:50.360
<v Speaker 1>hard to do mathematically, and uh, and this technology will

0:12:50.400 --> 0:12:54.440
<v Speaker 1>alter that equation. Yeah. Yeah, But there was something I

0:12:54.480 --> 0:12:57.439
<v Speaker 1>was thinking about when you were talking. I was imagining

0:12:57.960 --> 0:13:01.920
<v Speaker 1>the world of clinical trials of a promising new drug,

0:13:02.240 --> 0:13:06.200
<v Speaker 1>which are now conducted in exactly the same way basically

0:13:06.240 --> 0:13:09.120
<v Speaker 1>as they were conducted hundred years ago. You put it

0:13:09.120 --> 0:13:13.160
<v Speaker 1>in people and observe differences between you know, the experimental

0:13:13.160 --> 0:13:17.280
<v Speaker 1>i'm and a control are. And it's because the task

0:13:17.360 --> 0:13:23.960
<v Speaker 1>of modeling drugs interaction with very very different human beings

0:13:24.080 --> 0:13:26.680
<v Speaker 1>is too complicated. This is the kind of thing that

0:13:26.760 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 1>down the road we might be able to simulate a

0:13:29.880 --> 0:13:36.560
<v Speaker 1>drug trial. Yes, some the opportunities of of these advancements

0:13:36.600 --> 0:13:41.200
<v Speaker 1>is to accelerate discovery, the rate of time from invention

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:46.320
<v Speaker 1>to realizing the capability to compress it very significantly, perhaps

0:13:46.400 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 1>by a factor of ten x in time or ten

0:13:49.600 --> 0:13:54.040
<v Speaker 1>x in cost. So um, yeah, you're You're absolutely right,

0:13:54.440 --> 0:13:58.719
<v Speaker 1>Uh that the only path that we have to improve

0:13:59.280 --> 0:14:02.640
<v Speaker 1>or expert mental capacity to be able to determine and

0:14:02.720 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 1>compress how efficient we can do it is to be

0:14:04.840 --> 0:14:07.280
<v Speaker 1>more sophisticated as to how much we need to test,

0:14:08.080 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 1>and they trade off. The thing that you can balance

0:14:11.080 --> 0:14:14.479
<v Speaker 1>is if I can compute essentially to do virtual experiments,

0:14:15.080 --> 0:14:17.200
<v Speaker 1>but to do it with the level of accuracy that

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:20.600
<v Speaker 1>is required and the revel of fidelity that we would

0:14:20.600 --> 0:14:23.000
<v Speaker 1>see in the real world, then it's a net game.

0:14:23.480 --> 0:14:26.760
<v Speaker 1>And indeed that is going to be you know, one

0:14:26.760 --> 0:14:29.240
<v Speaker 1>of the main vectors of use cases and applications for

0:14:29.360 --> 0:14:32.240
<v Speaker 1>quantum computer. I was thinking about the the m R

0:14:32.280 --> 0:14:36.480
<v Speaker 1>and A COVID vaccines, which were conceived, they developed using

0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:42.120
<v Speaker 1>the most cutting edge science imaginable, and then tested using

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 1>the least cut edge science. Right. You went from this

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:51.640
<v Speaker 1>dazzling feed of century, you know, genetic biomedicine, and then

0:14:51.720 --> 0:14:57.280
<v Speaker 1>you painstakingly rounded up people, brought them in, gave them shots,

0:14:57.480 --> 0:14:59.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, ask them questions, had them fill out fill

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 1>out four. I mean, it's like and that's also an

0:15:02.600 --> 0:15:05.160
<v Speaker 1>example of this. You just you just brought this this

0:15:05.360 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 1>thing about what happens when we combine this new technology

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:12.840
<v Speaker 1>with existing technologies. In that hypothetical case, that's a combination.

0:15:12.880 --> 0:15:18.800
<v Speaker 1>You're taking this brand new field of biomedicine and marrying

0:15:18.840 --> 0:15:22.840
<v Speaker 1>it to a a way of of revolutionizing the clinical

0:15:22.880 --> 0:15:28.000
<v Speaker 1>aspect of medicine. That's two systems in combination create a

0:15:28.080 --> 0:15:33.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of exponential change in your outcome. Yeah, and and

0:15:33.240 --> 0:15:36.080
<v Speaker 1>and that's the part that we always struggle as humans,

0:15:36.160 --> 0:15:39.560
<v Speaker 1>right because since you know, time progresses linearly for us,

0:15:40.080 --> 0:15:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the fact that there's these exponentials in the form of

0:15:42.600 --> 0:15:45.560
<v Speaker 1>technology is an example. But we've also seen exponentials. I

0:15:45.560 --> 0:15:48.680
<v Speaker 1>think people are understanding a little bit better, uh, you know,

0:15:48.760 --> 0:15:51.480
<v Speaker 1>tragically in this case the power of exponentials in the

0:15:51.520 --> 0:15:55.320
<v Speaker 1>context of a pandemic. But the fact that these exponentials

0:15:55.360 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 1>are present in our in our world and our universe,

0:15:58.400 --> 0:16:02.359
<v Speaker 1>and that through technology you get these combinations of technology

0:16:02.360 --> 0:16:06.320
<v Speaker 1>that allows you to create them. It's something that is

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:09.920
<v Speaker 1>both the source of massive opportunity and aspects that have

0:16:10.000 --> 0:16:12.720
<v Speaker 1>to do with with with governance of how we need

0:16:12.760 --> 0:16:15.320
<v Speaker 1>to be smart enough to be able to guide them properly.

0:16:15.640 --> 0:16:17.640
<v Speaker 1>But you're right, I mean, that's a good example where

0:16:17.640 --> 0:16:20.880
<v Speaker 1>you brought up in terms of an experimental capability of

0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:23.920
<v Speaker 1>m R n A and UH and and interestingly enough,

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:27.880
<v Speaker 1>the sort of more theoretical unification or some of these

0:16:27.880 --> 0:16:31.720
<v Speaker 1>ideas is that MR and A technology is again rooting

0:16:31.760 --> 0:16:36.440
<v Speaker 1>on the idea that biology is information and and that

0:16:36.840 --> 0:16:40.520
<v Speaker 1>if we're able to in this case UH the code

0:16:40.640 --> 0:16:43.640
<v Speaker 1>like in this case involves in the genetic sequencing of

0:16:43.760 --> 0:16:46.840
<v Speaker 1>the virus and from there figure out what parts of

0:16:46.880 --> 0:16:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the code I need to bring back into your immune

0:16:49.040 --> 0:16:51.360
<v Speaker 1>system to be able to find it efficiently in a

0:16:51.440 --> 0:16:55.200
<v Speaker 1>ways about being able to read information, process information, send

0:16:55.240 --> 0:16:58.360
<v Speaker 1>it back to you and you yourself are are the

0:16:58.440 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 1>computer right with this new program to deal with the

0:17:01.440 --> 0:17:05.200
<v Speaker 1>biology of it, So bringing information on that and how

0:17:05.200 --> 0:17:08.440
<v Speaker 1>efficiently we computed, you know, how you conduct clinical trials.

0:17:08.640 --> 0:17:11.160
<v Speaker 1>All of that aspect of it is is the opportunity

0:17:11.200 --> 0:17:16.639
<v Speaker 1>to have more mastery overall environments. Can you ask a

0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:21.120
<v Speaker 1>personal question if you look over the history of technology,

0:17:21.400 --> 0:17:24.000
<v Speaker 1>every now and again, there are people who are in

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:27.840
<v Speaker 1>these magical moments where they are aware that the thing

0:17:27.880 --> 0:17:31.760
<v Speaker 1>they're working on is going to dramatically transform the world

0:17:31.760 --> 0:17:35.400
<v Speaker 1>I live in. You can imagine someone working in Edison's

0:17:35.480 --> 0:17:39.479
<v Speaker 1>lab or someone working in the Manhattan project in the

0:17:39.520 --> 0:17:44.480
<v Speaker 1>desert in you know, in or you know that we

0:17:44.480 --> 0:17:49.160
<v Speaker 1>can all identify you're in that position. You know, I

0:17:49.200 --> 0:17:52.800
<v Speaker 1>believe that to my core, and I indeed like I

0:17:53.160 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 1>feel that way, and the team feels this way. That

0:17:57.040 --> 0:18:00.399
<v Speaker 1>we have assembled a team that is a fine esteem

0:18:00.440 --> 0:18:04.480
<v Speaker 1>in the world that it is designing and imagining and

0:18:04.520 --> 0:18:08.520
<v Speaker 1>creating these quantum computers. And there's not a doubt in

0:18:08.520 --> 0:18:11.560
<v Speaker 1>our mind that as difficult as this quest is, it

0:18:11.720 --> 0:18:14.560
<v Speaker 1>has that potential. It's one of those things that it

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:18.240
<v Speaker 1>answers the equation of what is possible to do with technology.

0:18:18.320 --> 0:18:20.640
<v Speaker 1>It is one of these things that will be definitely

0:18:21.040 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 1>in the history books in terms of information and computation

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:28.119
<v Speaker 1>and what it means. And I think that that brings

0:18:28.240 --> 0:18:32.040
<v Speaker 1>us an enormous amount of energy into us, right because

0:18:32.040 --> 0:18:34.080
<v Speaker 1>when we come to work every day and when we

0:18:34.080 --> 0:18:37.480
<v Speaker 1>see the progress we're making, is this feeling of being

0:18:37.520 --> 0:18:40.159
<v Speaker 1>absolutely at the cutting edge where every day that the

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 1>team makes progress is the actual boundary of knowledge and

0:18:44.960 --> 0:18:48.800
<v Speaker 1>possibilities in the field. And it just feels magical, right,

0:18:48.920 --> 0:18:51.919
<v Speaker 1>And both our successes and the challenges as as we

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:57.000
<v Speaker 1>push forward, you know, are colored by this this passion

0:18:57.040 --> 0:18:59.480
<v Speaker 1>of saying boy, but this is this is a frontier

0:18:59.520 --> 0:19:03.000
<v Speaker 1>of human and uh, you know, and we're all working

0:19:03.000 --> 0:19:05.120
<v Speaker 1>together to uh you know, do it as well as

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:09.160
<v Speaker 1>we know how to. Let's explore this idea, the potential

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:13.760
<v Speaker 1>of combining these different computing forms. Give me some more

0:19:13.760 --> 0:19:18.399
<v Speaker 1>practical examples of what combinations look like if we're gonna

0:19:18.640 --> 0:19:22.639
<v Speaker 1>put them in the proper context. What's happening with technologies

0:19:22.640 --> 0:19:27.320
<v Speaker 1>like quantum and AI. I'd like to say that they

0:19:27.359 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 1>need to fit in the context of a method. And

0:19:30.240 --> 0:19:33.439
<v Speaker 1>the method that we're most passionate about, it's not a

0:19:33.480 --> 0:19:37.160
<v Speaker 1>new one, is the scientific method. Or thesis is that

0:19:37.320 --> 0:19:42.120
<v Speaker 1>we should expand the reach of the scientific method, and

0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:45.520
<v Speaker 1>for the most important problems that we're confronting. Let's take

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:51.560
<v Speaker 1>global warming or fighting pandemics. Accelerating the right of discovery

0:19:52.760 --> 0:19:58.119
<v Speaker 1>is incredibly important right this aspect of time. So here's

0:19:58.119 --> 0:20:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the question, how can this advances in computing accelerate the

0:20:01.960 --> 0:20:05.679
<v Speaker 1>scientific method? So let's peel the layer. What is behind

0:20:05.720 --> 0:20:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the scientific method? If we look at it very very simply,

0:20:09.200 --> 0:20:12.199
<v Speaker 1>we would say is the act of learning from the past.

0:20:12.800 --> 0:20:16.040
<v Speaker 1>So you gotta you know, know and exploit the knowledge

0:20:16.040 --> 0:20:18.920
<v Speaker 1>that has been accumulated that is typically in the form

0:20:19.000 --> 0:20:23.560
<v Speaker 1>of documents, uh, books, etcetera. You need to then be

0:20:23.640 --> 0:20:28.200
<v Speaker 1>able to generate hypothesis that can be verified or nullified.

0:20:28.880 --> 0:20:31.919
<v Speaker 1>You've gotta conduct experiments and then you gotta share it

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:35.679
<v Speaker 1>with a community for feedback and go through the loop again.

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 1>You say, well, how can these technologies help you? Take

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:42.000
<v Speaker 1>the first one to search and learn from the past.

0:20:42.200 --> 0:20:45.720
<v Speaker 1>So AI in the form of natural language processing, in

0:20:45.760 --> 0:20:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the form of being able to process documents and build

0:20:49.000 --> 0:20:52.520
<v Speaker 1>huge graphs with which to search knowledge that already existed.

0:20:53.520 --> 0:20:56.159
<v Speaker 1>It's greatly helping us. I mean we we live it

0:20:56.359 --> 0:20:58.520
<v Speaker 1>in a day to day life by you know, like

0:20:58.600 --> 0:21:01.480
<v Speaker 1>the power of search right of information the web. But

0:21:01.560 --> 0:21:05.240
<v Speaker 1>as as scientists, you can do this if you can

0:21:05.560 --> 0:21:09.200
<v Speaker 1>greatly enhance the ability to read scientific literature and see

0:21:09.200 --> 0:21:12.800
<v Speaker 1>its connections and help you as a scientist acquire information fast.

0:21:13.080 --> 0:21:15.920
<v Speaker 1>So that's a use of AI for the search. Then

0:21:15.920 --> 0:21:19.600
<v Speaker 1>you go the next step generate a hypothesis. Well, to

0:21:19.680 --> 0:21:23.639
<v Speaker 1>generate hypothesis, there's a beautiful new area in and I

0:21:23.800 --> 0:21:27.040
<v Speaker 1>called generative models. We may be a little bit more

0:21:27.040 --> 0:21:30.040
<v Speaker 1>familiar with the use of neural networks in SATURAI to

0:21:30.080 --> 0:21:34.159
<v Speaker 1>do the task of classification. Right. If I give you images,

0:21:34.280 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 1>you give me labels. Right, I said, well, this is

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:38.560
<v Speaker 1>a yellow car, a red car, and so on, and

0:21:38.600 --> 0:21:40.919
<v Speaker 1>it gets done with an all network. Perhaps people are

0:21:40.960 --> 0:21:44.040
<v Speaker 1>less familiar with using now some of these new networks

0:21:44.080 --> 0:21:47.680
<v Speaker 1>to do generation in terms of classification. So I give

0:21:47.720 --> 0:21:50.040
<v Speaker 1>you you know, I say, hey, designed to me a

0:21:50.160 --> 0:21:54.160
<v Speaker 1>chair that looks like an avocado, right, and the system

0:21:54.280 --> 0:21:57.760
<v Speaker 1>can automatically give you hundreds of thousands of different designs

0:21:57.760 --> 0:22:00.760
<v Speaker 1>and so on. Right. So, so now you can use

0:22:00.920 --> 0:22:05.399
<v Speaker 1>this generative capability to imagine new molecules back to connect

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:08.119
<v Speaker 1>it to our idea about chemistry and lithium chemistries that

0:22:08.320 --> 0:22:11.640
<v Speaker 1>have these properties. I want give me molecules that may

0:22:11.680 --> 0:22:15.600
<v Speaker 1>fit that criteria. And if I have an eye that

0:22:15.640 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 1>creates these generative models, I want to verify whether they

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:20.320
<v Speaker 1>may work as they want. So now I can use

0:22:20.359 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 1>a quantum computer right in the future to say do

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:25.680
<v Speaker 1>they work like they like? They say, because I'm simbulating

0:22:25.720 --> 0:22:28.240
<v Speaker 1>a model of of chemistry is now and combining AI

0:22:28.440 --> 0:22:31.879
<v Speaker 1>and quantum and simulation to be able to do this better.

0:22:32.240 --> 0:22:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Then the next step says, well, let's realize it in practice.

0:22:34.640 --> 0:22:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Let's do experimentation now, so I can have robots that

0:22:38.760 --> 0:22:42.720
<v Speaker 1>synthesized with chemistry that are AI guided to optimally create

0:22:42.760 --> 0:22:46.240
<v Speaker 1>the synthetic round, and the programming steps with which to

0:22:46.280 --> 0:22:49.879
<v Speaker 1>create the molecules and so on. So I like to

0:22:49.920 --> 0:22:52.560
<v Speaker 1>think about it is take a method that we know works,

0:22:52.800 --> 0:22:56.159
<v Speaker 1>the scientific method, think about it as a method, and

0:22:56.200 --> 0:22:59.200
<v Speaker 1>now ask yourself how the loop of technologies that we're

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:03.000
<v Speaker 1>creating can enhance it and improve it in concert with

0:23:03.040 --> 0:23:06.280
<v Speaker 1>scientists and humans. And that is what I think is

0:23:06.280 --> 0:23:09.760
<v Speaker 1>going to have revolutionary potential because I'm I'm closed with

0:23:09.800 --> 0:23:12.400
<v Speaker 1>the idea of what a difference it made you brought

0:23:12.480 --> 0:23:14.840
<v Speaker 1>up m r n A, What a difference it made

0:23:15.080 --> 0:23:18.000
<v Speaker 1>to have the tools available to us to compress the

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:20.760
<v Speaker 1>time to discovery from the average time of fourteen years

0:23:20.760 --> 0:23:23.600
<v Speaker 1>for a vaccine to under one. And think of the

0:23:23.600 --> 0:23:29.159
<v Speaker 1>implications that happen well in future pandemics, in in climate change.

0:23:29.680 --> 0:23:32.359
<v Speaker 1>How are we going to compress a time to discovery?

0:23:33.000 --> 0:23:34.680
<v Speaker 1>And and that's going to be the power of the

0:23:34.720 --> 0:23:39.919
<v Speaker 1>scientific methods supercharged with computing, including quantum and act mm HM.

0:23:40.720 --> 0:23:43.760
<v Speaker 1>When I ask a question, it sounds like it is

0:23:43.760 --> 0:23:47.080
<v Speaker 1>impossible to be a pessimist and work on quantum computing.

0:23:50.359 --> 0:23:54.199
<v Speaker 1>I like that so so uh probably true, you know,

0:23:54.680 --> 0:23:58.840
<v Speaker 1>because when you have so many challenges and uh and

0:23:58.960 --> 0:24:02.119
<v Speaker 1>so many difficulty it takes a particular type of people

0:24:02.280 --> 0:24:05.760
<v Speaker 1>to have the courage to be able to overcome them.

0:24:05.760 --> 0:24:09.480
<v Speaker 1>But it gets combined when when you know that the

0:24:09.480 --> 0:24:14.679
<v Speaker 1>theory is very sound and correct, the fact that we

0:24:14.760 --> 0:24:18.119
<v Speaker 1>haven't been able to realize the technology that allows that

0:24:18.280 --> 0:24:22.840
<v Speaker 1>theory to be expressed is in itself a source of energy,

0:24:23.040 --> 0:24:26.919
<v Speaker 1>right And indeed, like you, you cannot be, you know,

0:24:27.160 --> 0:24:29.440
<v Speaker 1>a pessimist if you want to be at the banguard

0:24:29.640 --> 0:24:33.120
<v Speaker 1>of the creation of this technology. And also the implications

0:24:33.160 --> 0:24:35.360
<v Speaker 1>of it are so profound for some of the most

0:24:35.359 --> 0:24:39.040
<v Speaker 1>fundamental problems that that that is another source of optimism

0:24:40.080 --> 0:24:44.240
<v Speaker 1>required for the technology. Yeah, this has been so fascinating.

0:24:44.320 --> 0:24:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much. I've really enjoyed this, Dr Gil,

0:24:48.040 --> 0:24:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much. Thank you again to Dr Dario

0:24:53.920 --> 0:24:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Gil for his insights about the future of quantum computing.

0:24:58.520 --> 0:25:01.880
<v Speaker 1>It will be fascinating see how the conversions of old

0:25:01.920 --> 0:25:05.399
<v Speaker 1>and new can revolutionize the way we live and communicate.

0:25:07.280 --> 0:25:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Smart Talks with IBM is produced by Emily Rostack with

0:25:11.280 --> 0:25:18.359
<v Speaker 1>Carlie Migliori and Katherine Girrado, edited by Karen shakerge engineering

0:25:18.400 --> 0:25:23.240
<v Speaker 1>by Martin Gonzalez, mixed and mastered by Jason Gambrel. Music

0:25:23.600 --> 0:25:29.000
<v Speaker 1>by Gramsco. Special thanks to Molly Sosha, Andy Kelly Mia Label,

0:25:29.119 --> 0:25:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Jacob Weisberg had a Fane, Eric Sandler and Maggie Taylor,

0:25:33.160 --> 0:25:37.280
<v Speaker 1>and the teams at eight Bar and IBM. Smart Talks

0:25:37.280 --> 0:25:40.679
<v Speaker 1>with IBM is a production of Pushkin Industries and I

0:25:40.840 --> 0:25:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Heart Media. You can find more episodes at IBM dot

0:25:45.600 --> 0:25:50.840
<v Speaker 1>com slash smart Talks. You'll find more Pushkin podcasts on

0:25:50.880 --> 0:25:55.040
<v Speaker 1>the I Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you

0:25:55.160 --> 0:25:59.080
<v Speaker 1>like to listen. I'm Malcolm Gladwell, See you next time.

0:26:02.960 --> 0:26:04.280
<v Speaker 1>The Beginning