1 00:00:04,760 --> 00:00:08,640 Speaker 1: Hello, Hello. This is Smart Talks with IBM, a podcast 2 00:00:08,920 --> 00:00:13,319 Speaker 1: from Pushkin Industries, High Heart Media and IBM about what 3 00:00:13,320 --> 00:00:16,240 Speaker 1: it means to look at today's most challenging problems in 4 00:00:16,280 --> 00:00:22,960 Speaker 1: a new way. I'm Malcolm Gladwell. In this episode, I'll 5 00:00:22,960 --> 00:00:27,360 Speaker 1: be discussing the capabilities of quantum computing with Dr Dario 6 00:00:27,480 --> 00:00:31,520 Speaker 1: gil Dr Gill is the senior Vice president and director 7 00:00:31,840 --> 00:00:36,440 Speaker 1: of IBM Research. He's also recognized globally as one of 8 00:00:36,440 --> 00:00:41,400 Speaker 1: the brightest minds in the quantum computing industry. But what 9 00:00:41,560 --> 00:00:44,720 Speaker 1: we know is that is theoretically sound and possible, and 10 00:00:44,800 --> 00:00:48,560 Speaker 1: that we are making very significant progress towards achieving good goal. 11 00:00:48,600 --> 00:00:51,280 Speaker 1: And that's why this is a quest of doing something 12 00:00:51,320 --> 00:00:54,240 Speaker 1: that has never been done before, but it is definitely possible. 13 00:00:54,720 --> 00:00:57,880 Speaker 1: Earlier this year, at the Wall Street Journals Virtual CIO 14 00:00:58,040 --> 00:01:01,480 Speaker 1: Network Summit, Dr Gil pro claimed that the next ten 15 00:01:01,560 --> 00:01:05,080 Speaker 1: years will be the decade in which quantum really comes 16 00:01:05,080 --> 00:01:08,920 Speaker 1: of age. So what is quantum computing and how will 17 00:01:08,920 --> 00:01:12,520 Speaker 1: it transform over the next decade and in what ways 18 00:01:12,560 --> 00:01:17,400 Speaker 1: will quantum computers change the way we interact with technology. 19 00:01:18,800 --> 00:01:29,240 Speaker 1: Let's dive in. Thanks for joining us. Start to kill. 20 00:01:29,440 --> 00:01:32,600 Speaker 1: It's a real pleasure thank you for having me, Malcolm, 21 00:01:32,640 --> 00:01:34,720 Speaker 1: it's a pleasure to be with you. I wanted to 22 00:01:35,720 --> 00:01:37,880 Speaker 1: start my talent us a little bit about yourself. You 23 00:01:37,920 --> 00:01:41,160 Speaker 1: did your graduate work at m I T. What did 24 00:01:41,160 --> 00:01:45,800 Speaker 1: you study there? I studied nanotechnology at m i T. 25 00:01:46,440 --> 00:01:49,440 Speaker 1: I joined the Nanostructure's laboratory. It was in the Department 26 00:01:49,440 --> 00:01:53,520 Speaker 1: of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science and their professor Hank Smith, 27 00:01:54,000 --> 00:01:56,840 Speaker 1: who was one of the pioneers of the field of 28 00:01:56,920 --> 00:02:00,000 Speaker 1: nano fabrication. You know, how do you manipulate and build 29 00:02:00,640 --> 00:02:04,640 Speaker 1: incredibly small part of our world? And so that sets 30 00:02:04,680 --> 00:02:08,680 Speaker 1: you up for the world that you're in now. Right 31 00:02:08,760 --> 00:02:14,520 Speaker 1: this the quantum computing flows naturally out of the idea 32 00:02:14,560 --> 00:02:17,400 Speaker 1: that this plenty of room at the bottom. Yes, it 33 00:02:17,560 --> 00:02:22,160 Speaker 1: is because of the different theories of physics. One that 34 00:02:22,280 --> 00:02:25,040 Speaker 1: is of course extraordinarily irrelevant for the world of the 35 00:02:25,160 --> 00:02:29,960 Speaker 1: small is quantum physics. So if we are to understand 36 00:02:31,280 --> 00:02:35,720 Speaker 1: how matter behaves at the atomic scale and electronic structure 37 00:02:35,720 --> 00:02:38,760 Speaker 1: and the interactions and uh what occurs at the level 38 00:02:38,760 --> 00:02:42,440 Speaker 1: of materials, you have to understand what is happening in 39 00:02:42,480 --> 00:02:46,280 Speaker 1: the world of quantum physics. For those who are not 40 00:02:46,440 --> 00:02:49,720 Speaker 1: from a technical background, can you give us the give 41 00:02:49,800 --> 00:02:53,880 Speaker 1: me this the simplest definition of what quantum computing is. 42 00:02:54,840 --> 00:02:57,799 Speaker 1: You know, we're all accustomed to using computers today, and 43 00:02:57,840 --> 00:03:01,200 Speaker 1: at the foundation of the computers we use every day 44 00:03:01,240 --> 00:03:05,720 Speaker 1: and our smartphones is the idea of bits or binary digits. 45 00:03:05,919 --> 00:03:09,440 Speaker 1: And interestingly, this is an idea that the fascination that 46 00:03:09,600 --> 00:03:12,640 Speaker 1: all the complexity in the world we could reuse it 47 00:03:12,919 --> 00:03:15,640 Speaker 1: in a mode of communication, which is zeros and ones 48 00:03:15,919 --> 00:03:18,920 Speaker 1: dates back as far back as Lightnings, but it was 49 00:03:19,000 --> 00:03:22,320 Speaker 1: really in the twenty century. In the nineteen fourties and fifties, 50 00:03:22,400 --> 00:03:26,360 Speaker 1: a Cloud Shannon, which is one of the great leaders 51 00:03:26,360 --> 00:03:29,640 Speaker 1: in the world of computing, told us we could create 52 00:03:29,760 --> 00:03:34,560 Speaker 1: these incredibly sophisticated modes of communication and computation just by 53 00:03:34,600 --> 00:03:37,560 Speaker 1: being able to map all the complexity and information in 54 00:03:37,560 --> 00:03:39,920 Speaker 1: the world to strings of zeros and ones, and computers 55 00:03:39,920 --> 00:03:43,960 Speaker 1: are machines that manipulate zeros and ones very very efficient. 56 00:03:44,000 --> 00:03:48,120 Speaker 1: So in quantum computing it actually revisits that idea. It 57 00:03:48,160 --> 00:03:51,480 Speaker 1: turns out that the most fundamental building block of computation 58 00:03:51,600 --> 00:03:53,800 Speaker 1: is not the zero on one, not the bit. That's 59 00:03:53,840 --> 00:03:57,560 Speaker 1: something known as the cubit sure for quantum bit, and 60 00:03:57,720 --> 00:04:00,920 Speaker 1: at its heart it melts that idea ye of information 61 00:04:01,760 --> 00:04:06,240 Speaker 1: with the idea of physics. So what quantum computers do 62 00:04:06,320 --> 00:04:12,440 Speaker 1: is they manipulate information, exploiting the loss of quantum physics 63 00:04:12,680 --> 00:04:17,119 Speaker 1: to be able to do calculations that are simply impossible 64 00:04:17,160 --> 00:04:20,640 Speaker 1: to do if you just use the binary digit the 65 00:04:20,720 --> 00:04:24,240 Speaker 1: zeros and ones. It's a richer way to represent information 66 00:04:24,760 --> 00:04:29,200 Speaker 1: and manipulate information by exploiting the properties of quantum mechanics 67 00:04:29,200 --> 00:04:33,480 Speaker 1: to do things are impossible classically. Yeah, would you say 68 00:04:34,200 --> 00:04:37,120 Speaker 1: you can tackle problems now that would be impossible mechanically. 69 00:04:37,480 --> 00:04:41,160 Speaker 1: What is that? Could you represent the difference in capacity 70 00:04:41,200 --> 00:04:44,080 Speaker 1: of these two ways of computing, like how how much 71 00:04:44,120 --> 00:04:47,640 Speaker 1: of a gap is here between quantum and conventional computer? 72 00:04:48,120 --> 00:04:50,480 Speaker 1: You know, and it's full potential the gaps it's an 73 00:04:50,480 --> 00:04:54,280 Speaker 1: exponential So let me let me explain what I mean 74 00:04:54,320 --> 00:04:59,400 Speaker 1: by that. If you want to simulate nature, so let's 75 00:04:59,440 --> 00:05:02,240 Speaker 1: say very practical that you want to build a better 76 00:05:02,279 --> 00:05:05,880 Speaker 1: battery technology for electric cons right, so those are based 77 00:05:05,880 --> 00:05:09,360 Speaker 1: on lithium chemistry. And if you want to say, build 78 00:05:09,960 --> 00:05:13,960 Speaker 1: a battery that is longer lasting or safer, contract faster. 79 00:05:14,400 --> 00:05:16,560 Speaker 1: So now you have in front of your material science 80 00:05:16,600 --> 00:05:19,520 Speaker 1: problems and what you can do is go through the 81 00:05:19,560 --> 00:05:22,440 Speaker 1: periodic table and see all the different elements and figure 82 00:05:22,480 --> 00:05:24,919 Speaker 1: out how you are going to combine them to create 83 00:05:24,920 --> 00:05:27,800 Speaker 1: the material that has the properties you like. Okay, so 84 00:05:27,839 --> 00:05:30,760 Speaker 1: how can you go about doing that? Well? One approach 85 00:05:31,240 --> 00:05:34,480 Speaker 1: is to, uh, do it empirically, just try and humans 86 00:05:34,480 --> 00:05:37,000 Speaker 1: have been doing that since time me memorial right, combine 87 00:05:37,080 --> 00:05:41,120 Speaker 1: elements and see hy works. Another methodological approach is if 88 00:05:41,120 --> 00:05:43,520 Speaker 1: you have a theory of how things work, you could 89 00:05:43,560 --> 00:05:46,120 Speaker 1: try to solve the problem long form and see if 90 00:05:46,160 --> 00:05:48,839 Speaker 1: you can have a close form solution to the problem. 91 00:05:48,880 --> 00:05:52,200 Speaker 1: And a third angle that really came about with the 92 00:05:52,200 --> 00:05:54,960 Speaker 1: advent of computers is you could simulate it. Right. You 93 00:05:55,000 --> 00:05:59,440 Speaker 1: could use computers to mimic how atoms behave and use 94 00:05:59,480 --> 00:06:01,880 Speaker 1: those equation issues and try to do the calculations to 95 00:06:02,000 --> 00:06:05,599 Speaker 1: see what the properties would be. What's the problem. The 96 00:06:05,680 --> 00:06:09,640 Speaker 1: problem is that no matter how big computers we use today, 97 00:06:09,760 --> 00:06:13,520 Speaker 1: the number of variables that we have to compute over 98 00:06:14,200 --> 00:06:18,600 Speaker 1: is roughly correlated to the number of electrons and electron 99 00:06:18,720 --> 00:06:24,240 Speaker 1: orbitals present in those elements. So the more sophisticated and 100 00:06:24,279 --> 00:06:28,160 Speaker 1: material we've gotta make, the more interactions between these electrons 101 00:06:28,240 --> 00:06:31,920 Speaker 1: we gotta be able to calculate, and that number grows exponentially, 102 00:06:32,120 --> 00:06:36,200 Speaker 1: you know, pretty soon we need to have a computer, 103 00:06:36,560 --> 00:06:39,320 Speaker 1: you know, with more components than there are atoms in 104 00:06:39,360 --> 00:06:42,200 Speaker 1: the universe. Right, so it's impractical. So what do we do. 105 00:06:42,240 --> 00:06:44,920 Speaker 1: We approximate place, and when we approximate, we don't get 106 00:06:44,920 --> 00:06:47,880 Speaker 1: the right answer. So we are in this stock loop 107 00:06:48,279 --> 00:06:51,880 Speaker 1: of rate of progress. What is interesting on quantum is 108 00:06:51,920 --> 00:06:55,760 Speaker 1: that for modeling those kinds of problems, instead of having 109 00:06:56,360 --> 00:06:59,680 Speaker 1: an exponential meaning the more electrons we add, you know, 110 00:07:00,040 --> 00:07:04,240 Speaker 1: the number of calculations blowing up. Now it's a relation 111 00:07:04,320 --> 00:07:08,080 Speaker 1: that looks more like linear, meaning I only need one 112 00:07:08,120 --> 00:07:12,800 Speaker 1: more cubit roughly speaking, to model another electron. So even 113 00:07:12,840 --> 00:07:16,000 Speaker 1: even have a complex molecule where I need you know, 114 00:07:16,280 --> 00:07:21,000 Speaker 1: dozens or hundreds of of orbital calculations and I need 115 00:07:21,000 --> 00:07:23,520 Speaker 1: to do I would need a machine with dozens of 116 00:07:23,600 --> 00:07:29,080 Speaker 1: hundreds of cubits rather than a classical machine with ten 117 00:07:29,200 --> 00:07:31,600 Speaker 1: trillion transistors. Right that we don't know how to make. 118 00:07:33,280 --> 00:07:36,320 Speaker 1: It's not an extension or a derivative from the kind 119 00:07:36,320 --> 00:07:39,400 Speaker 1: of computers that we've been using. It's an entirely new 120 00:07:39,480 --> 00:07:42,920 Speaker 1: class of computers. That's exactly right, And that is what's 121 00:07:42,920 --> 00:07:46,560 Speaker 1: so interesting. So there will be classical computing and quantum computing. 122 00:07:47,080 --> 00:07:50,200 Speaker 1: That's how important this is, right, that you phrased it 123 00:07:50,320 --> 00:07:54,040 Speaker 1: very nicely, which is not just another evolution. Is we've 124 00:07:54,080 --> 00:07:56,880 Speaker 1: actually left no element of the assumption of the current 125 00:07:56,880 --> 00:08:00,840 Speaker 1: information on computational model as sacred. Right, not even the 126 00:08:00,920 --> 00:08:05,720 Speaker 1: bit has survived the quantum information view of the world. Right, 127 00:08:05,880 --> 00:08:09,240 Speaker 1: the very foundation had to be revisited. So where are 128 00:08:09,360 --> 00:08:13,960 Speaker 1: we How close are we having quantum computers? Actually that 129 00:08:14,040 --> 00:08:17,280 Speaker 1: you you describe that that task kept trying to figure 130 00:08:17,320 --> 00:08:19,280 Speaker 1: out how to make a better battery. When do you 131 00:08:19,320 --> 00:08:21,320 Speaker 1: think we'll be able to use quantum computers for a 132 00:08:21,320 --> 00:08:26,600 Speaker 1: task like that? We already have built quantum computers. Actually, 133 00:08:26,680 --> 00:08:28,600 Speaker 1: Iban was the first company in the world in two 134 00:08:28,600 --> 00:08:30,840 Speaker 1: thousand and sixteen to build a small quantum computer and 135 00:08:30,880 --> 00:08:34,200 Speaker 1: making universally available. So the first part of the answer 136 00:08:34,280 --> 00:08:36,960 Speaker 1: is like, we already have quantum computers, so you can 137 00:08:37,040 --> 00:08:39,960 Speaker 1: learn how to program them. You can start mapping problems 138 00:08:40,080 --> 00:08:42,560 Speaker 1: around how you do it. The challenge we have is 139 00:08:42,600 --> 00:08:45,760 Speaker 1: that very difficult to build these machines, so we have 140 00:08:45,920 --> 00:08:50,040 Speaker 1: not yet crossed the path where they can do things 141 00:08:50,120 --> 00:08:54,000 Speaker 1: that are of practical value that or classical machines cannot. 142 00:08:54,320 --> 00:08:56,640 Speaker 1: So we gotta keep an eye now of when that 143 00:08:56,720 --> 00:08:59,439 Speaker 1: crossover is going to happen, and that is something that 144 00:08:59,559 --> 00:09:03,000 Speaker 1: is this tier of information and computation that would likely 145 00:09:03,040 --> 00:09:07,080 Speaker 1: happen in the next few years, and then that begins, 146 00:09:07,200 --> 00:09:10,680 Speaker 1: you know, a whole a whole new space right of opportunity. Yeah, 147 00:09:11,480 --> 00:09:14,520 Speaker 1: you had said earlier with the stage now where the 148 00:09:14,600 --> 00:09:17,640 Speaker 1: machines make errors, what's the source of the difficulty at 149 00:09:17,640 --> 00:09:22,400 Speaker 1: the moment. Yeah, then you can build these machines that 150 00:09:22,520 --> 00:09:26,200 Speaker 1: have special properties to represent information in unique ways that 151 00:09:26,240 --> 00:09:30,199 Speaker 1: gives them exponential power compared to classical machines. The massines 152 00:09:30,360 --> 00:09:34,280 Speaker 1: are subject to errors, but there's both a theory and 153 00:09:34,320 --> 00:09:37,880 Speaker 1: a way to implement an error correction technique that would 154 00:09:37,880 --> 00:09:42,080 Speaker 1: allow us to compute in definitely and with like minimum 155 00:09:42,160 --> 00:09:44,560 Speaker 1: levels of errors. That's that it would be a practical value. 156 00:09:45,040 --> 00:09:49,600 Speaker 1: But realizing that large scale machine is still a significant 157 00:09:49,640 --> 00:09:52,320 Speaker 1: journey with a lot of scientific and engineering breakthroughs need 158 00:09:52,360 --> 00:09:54,679 Speaker 1: to occur. But what we know is that it's theoretically 159 00:09:54,720 --> 00:09:58,520 Speaker 1: sound and possible, and that we are making very significant 160 00:09:58,559 --> 00:10:01,040 Speaker 1: progress towards achieving the goal. And that's why this is 161 00:10:01,040 --> 00:10:04,360 Speaker 1: a quest of doing something that has never been done before, 162 00:10:04,400 --> 00:10:08,480 Speaker 1: but it is definitely possible. Yeah, you began with the 163 00:10:08,720 --> 00:10:12,240 Speaker 1: example of the electric battery. Give me another example of 164 00:10:12,320 --> 00:10:16,480 Speaker 1: a of an industry or a problem which would be 165 00:10:16,520 --> 00:10:22,080 Speaker 1: well served by using a quantum computer. These three categories 166 00:10:22,360 --> 00:10:24,920 Speaker 1: that quantum is going to make a difference similar in nature. 167 00:10:25,400 --> 00:10:28,600 Speaker 1: The world of mathematics, linear algebra that matters to maschine 168 00:10:28,640 --> 00:10:31,200 Speaker 1: learning and other problems. And the third is world of 169 00:10:31,240 --> 00:10:33,880 Speaker 1: search and graphs and what you can do with them 170 00:10:33,960 --> 00:10:35,920 Speaker 1: that matter a great deal. But I want to give 171 00:10:36,120 --> 00:10:40,360 Speaker 1: an example that's very famous of the consequences of quantum computing, 172 00:10:40,720 --> 00:10:42,680 Speaker 1: which is some of the implications that it will have 173 00:10:42,760 --> 00:10:46,720 Speaker 1: for cybersecurity and for security in general. And this came 174 00:10:46,760 --> 00:10:51,000 Speaker 1: from a very very famous algorithm that gave re energizing 175 00:10:51,160 --> 00:10:54,640 Speaker 1: of the field of quantum in the ninety nineties called 176 00:10:54,679 --> 00:10:58,240 Speaker 1: Short's algorithm, and it came from Peter Short, who was 177 00:10:58,400 --> 00:11:01,000 Speaker 1: then at bad LAPS and now is a professor at 178 00:11:01,120 --> 00:11:06,000 Speaker 1: m I T. And he published an algorithm that took 179 00:11:06,040 --> 00:11:10,360 Speaker 1: a problem that has to do with factoring. So basically, 180 00:11:10,400 --> 00:11:13,440 Speaker 1: the problem is if you take two prime numbers that 181 00:11:13,520 --> 00:11:17,439 Speaker 1: are say large, and you multiply those two prime numbers together, 182 00:11:18,120 --> 00:11:20,800 Speaker 1: and you get the product, the final number of the 183 00:11:20,840 --> 00:11:25,520 Speaker 1: product of those of those two If doing the multiplication, 184 00:11:25,760 --> 00:11:27,720 Speaker 1: it's very easy to do. Anybody can do it, right. 185 00:11:27,760 --> 00:11:30,040 Speaker 1: It's just multiplying two numbers. But if I give you 186 00:11:30,080 --> 00:11:33,280 Speaker 1: the product and I ask you, can you tell me, 187 00:11:33,800 --> 00:11:38,200 Speaker 1: given this number, what two prime numbers composed? That product 188 00:11:38,200 --> 00:11:42,520 Speaker 1: turns out to be very, very computationally expensive. And he 189 00:11:42,840 --> 00:11:45,559 Speaker 1: in his algorithm, he showed that if you had a 190 00:11:45,600 --> 00:11:49,160 Speaker 1: sufficient in large quantum computer you could do this efficiently. 191 00:11:49,520 --> 00:11:52,120 Speaker 1: And you say, well, what does that matter, Well, it 192 00:11:52,160 --> 00:11:54,840 Speaker 1: turns out it matters is because as the basis of 193 00:11:54,880 --> 00:11:58,439 Speaker 1: how we do encryption today and how we secure all 194 00:11:58,520 --> 00:12:03,360 Speaker 1: forms of communications and financial systems and everything, where basically 195 00:12:03,960 --> 00:12:07,680 Speaker 1: your private key is your prime number. Malcome, I would 196 00:12:07,720 --> 00:12:10,240 Speaker 1: have another private key which is my prime number. Those 197 00:12:10,240 --> 00:12:13,920 Speaker 1: two numbers are secret, and when we multiply them, that's 198 00:12:13,960 --> 00:12:16,240 Speaker 1: the public key that we share over the Internet and 199 00:12:16,240 --> 00:12:19,440 Speaker 1: so on the protocol. Everybody sees our public key, but 200 00:12:19,520 --> 00:12:22,560 Speaker 1: they cannot calculate or private keys. But if you had 201 00:12:22,600 --> 00:12:26,160 Speaker 1: a large enough quantum computer, now you could. So there's 202 00:12:26,160 --> 00:12:30,360 Speaker 1: a big implication that the encryption protocols of the world 203 00:12:30,720 --> 00:12:36,520 Speaker 1: need to be changed to prevent future quantum computers from decryption. 204 00:12:37,320 --> 00:12:40,160 Speaker 1: So that's not the fault of quantum computers, but it's 205 00:12:40,160 --> 00:12:43,920 Speaker 1: an example of the consequences we build all sorts of 206 00:12:43,960 --> 00:12:46,400 Speaker 1: assumptions in the world about what problems are easy and 207 00:12:46,480 --> 00:12:50,360 Speaker 1: hard to do mathematically, and uh, and this technology will 208 00:12:50,400 --> 00:12:54,440 Speaker 1: alter that equation. Yeah. Yeah, But there was something I 209 00:12:54,480 --> 00:12:57,439 Speaker 1: was thinking about when you were talking. I was imagining 210 00:12:57,960 --> 00:13:01,920 Speaker 1: the world of clinical trials of a promising new drug, 211 00:13:02,240 --> 00:13:06,200 Speaker 1: which are now conducted in exactly the same way basically 212 00:13:06,240 --> 00:13:09,120 Speaker 1: as they were conducted hundred years ago. You put it 213 00:13:09,120 --> 00:13:13,160 Speaker 1: in people and observe differences between you know, the experimental 214 00:13:13,160 --> 00:13:17,280 Speaker 1: i'm and a control are. And it's because the task 215 00:13:17,360 --> 00:13:23,960 Speaker 1: of modeling drugs interaction with very very different human beings 216 00:13:24,080 --> 00:13:26,680 Speaker 1: is too complicated. This is the kind of thing that 217 00:13:26,760 --> 00:13:29,800 Speaker 1: down the road we might be able to simulate a 218 00:13:29,880 --> 00:13:36,560 Speaker 1: drug trial. Yes, some the opportunities of of these advancements 219 00:13:36,600 --> 00:13:41,200 Speaker 1: is to accelerate discovery, the rate of time from invention 220 00:13:41,360 --> 00:13:46,320 Speaker 1: to realizing the capability to compress it very significantly, perhaps 221 00:13:46,400 --> 00:13:49,400 Speaker 1: by a factor of ten x in time or ten 222 00:13:49,600 --> 00:13:54,040 Speaker 1: x in cost. So um, yeah, you're You're absolutely right, 223 00:13:54,440 --> 00:13:58,719 Speaker 1: Uh that the only path that we have to improve 224 00:13:59,280 --> 00:14:02,640 Speaker 1: or expert mental capacity to be able to determine and 225 00:14:02,720 --> 00:14:04,800 Speaker 1: compress how efficient we can do it is to be 226 00:14:04,840 --> 00:14:07,280 Speaker 1: more sophisticated as to how much we need to test, 227 00:14:08,080 --> 00:14:11,000 Speaker 1: and they trade off. The thing that you can balance 228 00:14:11,080 --> 00:14:14,479 Speaker 1: is if I can compute essentially to do virtual experiments, 229 00:14:15,080 --> 00:14:17,200 Speaker 1: but to do it with the level of accuracy that 230 00:14:17,360 --> 00:14:20,600 Speaker 1: is required and the revel of fidelity that we would 231 00:14:20,600 --> 00:14:23,000 Speaker 1: see in the real world, then it's a net game. 232 00:14:23,480 --> 00:14:26,760 Speaker 1: And indeed that is going to be you know, one 233 00:14:26,760 --> 00:14:29,240 Speaker 1: of the main vectors of use cases and applications for 234 00:14:29,360 --> 00:14:32,240 Speaker 1: quantum computer. I was thinking about the the m R 235 00:14:32,280 --> 00:14:36,480 Speaker 1: and A COVID vaccines, which were conceived, they developed using 236 00:14:37,160 --> 00:14:42,120 Speaker 1: the most cutting edge science imaginable, and then tested using 237 00:14:42,200 --> 00:14:45,440 Speaker 1: the least cut edge science. Right. You went from this 238 00:14:45,640 --> 00:14:51,640 Speaker 1: dazzling feed of century, you know, genetic biomedicine, and then 239 00:14:51,720 --> 00:14:57,280 Speaker 1: you painstakingly rounded up people, brought them in, gave them shots, 240 00:14:57,480 --> 00:14:59,520 Speaker 1: you know, ask them questions, had them fill out fill 241 00:14:59,560 --> 00:15:02,560 Speaker 1: out four. I mean, it's like and that's also an 242 00:15:02,600 --> 00:15:05,160 Speaker 1: example of this. You just you just brought this this 243 00:15:05,360 --> 00:15:08,960 Speaker 1: thing about what happens when we combine this new technology 244 00:15:09,000 --> 00:15:12,840 Speaker 1: with existing technologies. In that hypothetical case, that's a combination. 245 00:15:12,880 --> 00:15:18,800 Speaker 1: You're taking this brand new field of biomedicine and marrying 246 00:15:18,840 --> 00:15:22,840 Speaker 1: it to a a way of of revolutionizing the clinical 247 00:15:22,880 --> 00:15:28,000 Speaker 1: aspect of medicine. That's two systems in combination create a 248 00:15:28,080 --> 00:15:33,240 Speaker 1: kind of exponential change in your outcome. Yeah, and and 249 00:15:33,240 --> 00:15:36,080 Speaker 1: and that's the part that we always struggle as humans, 250 00:15:36,160 --> 00:15:39,560 Speaker 1: right because since you know, time progresses linearly for us, 251 00:15:40,080 --> 00:15:42,560 Speaker 1: the fact that there's these exponentials in the form of 252 00:15:42,600 --> 00:15:45,560 Speaker 1: technology is an example. But we've also seen exponentials. I 253 00:15:45,560 --> 00:15:48,680 Speaker 1: think people are understanding a little bit better, uh, you know, 254 00:15:48,760 --> 00:15:51,480 Speaker 1: tragically in this case the power of exponentials in the 255 00:15:51,520 --> 00:15:55,320 Speaker 1: context of a pandemic. But the fact that these exponentials 256 00:15:55,360 --> 00:15:58,000 Speaker 1: are present in our in our world and our universe, 257 00:15:58,400 --> 00:16:02,359 Speaker 1: and that through technology you get these combinations of technology 258 00:16:02,360 --> 00:16:06,320 Speaker 1: that allows you to create them. It's something that is 259 00:16:06,360 --> 00:16:09,920 Speaker 1: both the source of massive opportunity and aspects that have 260 00:16:10,000 --> 00:16:12,720 Speaker 1: to do with with with governance of how we need 261 00:16:12,760 --> 00:16:15,320 Speaker 1: to be smart enough to be able to guide them properly. 262 00:16:15,640 --> 00:16:17,640 Speaker 1: But you're right, I mean, that's a good example where 263 00:16:17,640 --> 00:16:20,880 Speaker 1: you brought up in terms of an experimental capability of 264 00:16:21,160 --> 00:16:23,920 Speaker 1: m R n A and UH and and interestingly enough, 265 00:16:24,560 --> 00:16:27,880 Speaker 1: the sort of more theoretical unification or some of these 266 00:16:27,880 --> 00:16:31,720 Speaker 1: ideas is that MR and A technology is again rooting 267 00:16:31,760 --> 00:16:36,440 Speaker 1: on the idea that biology is information and and that 268 00:16:36,840 --> 00:16:40,520 Speaker 1: if we're able to in this case UH the code 269 00:16:40,640 --> 00:16:43,640 Speaker 1: like in this case involves in the genetic sequencing of 270 00:16:43,760 --> 00:16:46,840 Speaker 1: the virus and from there figure out what parts of 271 00:16:46,880 --> 00:16:49,040 Speaker 1: the code I need to bring back into your immune 272 00:16:49,040 --> 00:16:51,360 Speaker 1: system to be able to find it efficiently in a 273 00:16:51,440 --> 00:16:55,200 Speaker 1: ways about being able to read information, process information, send 274 00:16:55,240 --> 00:16:58,360 Speaker 1: it back to you and you yourself are are the 275 00:16:58,440 --> 00:17:01,400 Speaker 1: computer right with this new program to deal with the 276 00:17:01,440 --> 00:17:05,200 Speaker 1: biology of it, So bringing information on that and how 277 00:17:05,200 --> 00:17:08,440 Speaker 1: efficiently we computed, you know, how you conduct clinical trials. 278 00:17:08,640 --> 00:17:11,160 Speaker 1: All of that aspect of it is is the opportunity 279 00:17:11,200 --> 00:17:16,639 Speaker 1: to have more mastery overall environments. Can you ask a 280 00:17:16,800 --> 00:17:21,120 Speaker 1: personal question if you look over the history of technology, 281 00:17:21,400 --> 00:17:24,000 Speaker 1: every now and again, there are people who are in 282 00:17:24,040 --> 00:17:27,840 Speaker 1: these magical moments where they are aware that the thing 283 00:17:27,880 --> 00:17:31,760 Speaker 1: they're working on is going to dramatically transform the world 284 00:17:31,760 --> 00:17:35,400 Speaker 1: I live in. You can imagine someone working in Edison's 285 00:17:35,480 --> 00:17:39,479 Speaker 1: lab or someone working in the Manhattan project in the 286 00:17:39,520 --> 00:17:44,480 Speaker 1: desert in you know, in or you know that we 287 00:17:44,480 --> 00:17:49,160 Speaker 1: can all identify you're in that position. You know, I 288 00:17:49,200 --> 00:17:52,800 Speaker 1: believe that to my core, and I indeed like I 289 00:17:53,160 --> 00:17:56,800 Speaker 1: feel that way, and the team feels this way. That 290 00:17:57,040 --> 00:18:00,399 Speaker 1: we have assembled a team that is a fine esteem 291 00:18:00,440 --> 00:18:04,480 Speaker 1: in the world that it is designing and imagining and 292 00:18:04,520 --> 00:18:08,520 Speaker 1: creating these quantum computers. And there's not a doubt in 293 00:18:08,520 --> 00:18:11,560 Speaker 1: our mind that as difficult as this quest is, it 294 00:18:11,720 --> 00:18:14,560 Speaker 1: has that potential. It's one of those things that it 295 00:18:14,680 --> 00:18:18,240 Speaker 1: answers the equation of what is possible to do with technology. 296 00:18:18,320 --> 00:18:20,640 Speaker 1: It is one of these things that will be definitely 297 00:18:21,040 --> 00:18:24,560 Speaker 1: in the history books in terms of information and computation 298 00:18:24,640 --> 00:18:28,119 Speaker 1: and what it means. And I think that that brings 299 00:18:28,240 --> 00:18:32,040 Speaker 1: us an enormous amount of energy into us, right because 300 00:18:32,040 --> 00:18:34,080 Speaker 1: when we come to work every day and when we 301 00:18:34,080 --> 00:18:37,480 Speaker 1: see the progress we're making, is this feeling of being 302 00:18:37,520 --> 00:18:40,159 Speaker 1: absolutely at the cutting edge where every day that the 303 00:18:40,200 --> 00:18:44,520 Speaker 1: team makes progress is the actual boundary of knowledge and 304 00:18:44,960 --> 00:18:48,800 Speaker 1: possibilities in the field. And it just feels magical, right, 305 00:18:48,920 --> 00:18:51,919 Speaker 1: And both our successes and the challenges as as we 306 00:18:52,040 --> 00:18:57,000 Speaker 1: push forward, you know, are colored by this this passion 307 00:18:57,040 --> 00:18:59,480 Speaker 1: of saying boy, but this is this is a frontier 308 00:18:59,520 --> 00:19:03,000 Speaker 1: of human and uh, you know, and we're all working 309 00:19:03,000 --> 00:19:05,120 Speaker 1: together to uh you know, do it as well as 310 00:19:05,119 --> 00:19:09,160 Speaker 1: we know how to. Let's explore this idea, the potential 311 00:19:09,200 --> 00:19:13,760 Speaker 1: of combining these different computing forms. Give me some more 312 00:19:13,760 --> 00:19:18,399 Speaker 1: practical examples of what combinations look like if we're gonna 313 00:19:18,640 --> 00:19:22,639 Speaker 1: put them in the proper context. What's happening with technologies 314 00:19:22,640 --> 00:19:27,320 Speaker 1: like quantum and AI. I'd like to say that they 315 00:19:27,359 --> 00:19:30,040 Speaker 1: need to fit in the context of a method. And 316 00:19:30,240 --> 00:19:33,439 Speaker 1: the method that we're most passionate about, it's not a 317 00:19:33,480 --> 00:19:37,160 Speaker 1: new one, is the scientific method. Or thesis is that 318 00:19:37,320 --> 00:19:42,120 Speaker 1: we should expand the reach of the scientific method, and 319 00:19:42,200 --> 00:19:45,520 Speaker 1: for the most important problems that we're confronting. Let's take 320 00:19:45,640 --> 00:19:51,560 Speaker 1: global warming or fighting pandemics. Accelerating the right of discovery 321 00:19:52,760 --> 00:19:58,119 Speaker 1: is incredibly important right this aspect of time. So here's 322 00:19:58,119 --> 00:20:01,960 Speaker 1: the question, how can this advances in computing accelerate the 323 00:20:01,960 --> 00:20:05,679 Speaker 1: scientific method? So let's peel the layer. What is behind 324 00:20:05,720 --> 00:20:08,520 Speaker 1: the scientific method? If we look at it very very simply, 325 00:20:09,200 --> 00:20:12,199 Speaker 1: we would say is the act of learning from the past. 326 00:20:12,800 --> 00:20:16,040 Speaker 1: So you gotta you know, know and exploit the knowledge 327 00:20:16,040 --> 00:20:18,920 Speaker 1: that has been accumulated that is typically in the form 328 00:20:19,000 --> 00:20:23,560 Speaker 1: of documents, uh, books, etcetera. You need to then be 329 00:20:23,640 --> 00:20:28,200 Speaker 1: able to generate hypothesis that can be verified or nullified. 330 00:20:28,880 --> 00:20:31,919 Speaker 1: You've gotta conduct experiments and then you gotta share it 331 00:20:32,640 --> 00:20:35,679 Speaker 1: with a community for feedback and go through the loop again. 332 00:20:36,160 --> 00:20:39,520 Speaker 1: You say, well, how can these technologies help you? Take 333 00:20:39,520 --> 00:20:42,000 Speaker 1: the first one to search and learn from the past. 334 00:20:42,200 --> 00:20:45,720 Speaker 1: So AI in the form of natural language processing, in 335 00:20:45,760 --> 00:20:48,960 Speaker 1: the form of being able to process documents and build 336 00:20:49,000 --> 00:20:52,520 Speaker 1: huge graphs with which to search knowledge that already existed. 337 00:20:53,520 --> 00:20:56,159 Speaker 1: It's greatly helping us. I mean we we live it 338 00:20:56,359 --> 00:20:58,520 Speaker 1: in a day to day life by you know, like 339 00:20:58,600 --> 00:21:01,480 Speaker 1: the power of search right of information the web. But 340 00:21:01,560 --> 00:21:05,240 Speaker 1: as as scientists, you can do this if you can 341 00:21:05,560 --> 00:21:09,200 Speaker 1: greatly enhance the ability to read scientific literature and see 342 00:21:09,200 --> 00:21:12,800 Speaker 1: its connections and help you as a scientist acquire information fast. 343 00:21:13,080 --> 00:21:15,920 Speaker 1: So that's a use of AI for the search. Then 344 00:21:15,920 --> 00:21:19,600 Speaker 1: you go the next step generate a hypothesis. Well, to 345 00:21:19,680 --> 00:21:23,639 Speaker 1: generate hypothesis, there's a beautiful new area in and I 346 00:21:23,800 --> 00:21:27,040 Speaker 1: called generative models. We may be a little bit more 347 00:21:27,040 --> 00:21:30,040 Speaker 1: familiar with the use of neural networks in SATURAI to 348 00:21:30,080 --> 00:21:34,159 Speaker 1: do the task of classification. Right. If I give you images, 349 00:21:34,280 --> 00:21:36,280 Speaker 1: you give me labels. Right, I said, well, this is 350 00:21:36,280 --> 00:21:38,560 Speaker 1: a yellow car, a red car, and so on, and 351 00:21:38,600 --> 00:21:40,919 Speaker 1: it gets done with an all network. Perhaps people are 352 00:21:40,960 --> 00:21:44,040 Speaker 1: less familiar with using now some of these new networks 353 00:21:44,080 --> 00:21:47,680 Speaker 1: to do generation in terms of classification. So I give 354 00:21:47,720 --> 00:21:50,040 Speaker 1: you you know, I say, hey, designed to me a 355 00:21:50,160 --> 00:21:54,160 Speaker 1: chair that looks like an avocado, right, and the system 356 00:21:54,280 --> 00:21:57,760 Speaker 1: can automatically give you hundreds of thousands of different designs 357 00:21:57,760 --> 00:22:00,760 Speaker 1: and so on. Right. So, so now you can use 358 00:22:00,920 --> 00:22:05,399 Speaker 1: this generative capability to imagine new molecules back to connect 359 00:22:05,400 --> 00:22:08,119 Speaker 1: it to our idea about chemistry and lithium chemistries that 360 00:22:08,320 --> 00:22:11,640 Speaker 1: have these properties. I want give me molecules that may 361 00:22:11,680 --> 00:22:15,600 Speaker 1: fit that criteria. And if I have an eye that 362 00:22:15,640 --> 00:22:18,600 Speaker 1: creates these generative models, I want to verify whether they 363 00:22:18,640 --> 00:22:20,320 Speaker 1: may work as they want. So now I can use 364 00:22:20,359 --> 00:22:22,600 Speaker 1: a quantum computer right in the future to say do 365 00:22:22,640 --> 00:22:25,680 Speaker 1: they work like they like? They say, because I'm simbulating 366 00:22:25,720 --> 00:22:28,240 Speaker 1: a model of of chemistry is now and combining AI 367 00:22:28,440 --> 00:22:31,879 Speaker 1: and quantum and simulation to be able to do this better. 368 00:22:32,240 --> 00:22:34,560 Speaker 1: Then the next step says, well, let's realize it in practice. 369 00:22:34,640 --> 00:22:38,600 Speaker 1: Let's do experimentation now, so I can have robots that 370 00:22:38,760 --> 00:22:42,720 Speaker 1: synthesized with chemistry that are AI guided to optimally create 371 00:22:42,760 --> 00:22:46,240 Speaker 1: the synthetic round, and the programming steps with which to 372 00:22:46,280 --> 00:22:49,879 Speaker 1: create the molecules and so on. So I like to 373 00:22:49,920 --> 00:22:52,560 Speaker 1: think about it is take a method that we know works, 374 00:22:52,800 --> 00:22:56,159 Speaker 1: the scientific method, think about it as a method, and 375 00:22:56,200 --> 00:22:59,200 Speaker 1: now ask yourself how the loop of technologies that we're 376 00:22:59,280 --> 00:23:03,000 Speaker 1: creating can enhance it and improve it in concert with 377 00:23:03,040 --> 00:23:06,280 Speaker 1: scientists and humans. And that is what I think is 378 00:23:06,280 --> 00:23:09,760 Speaker 1: going to have revolutionary potential because I'm I'm closed with 379 00:23:09,800 --> 00:23:12,400 Speaker 1: the idea of what a difference it made you brought 380 00:23:12,480 --> 00:23:14,840 Speaker 1: up m r n A, What a difference it made 381 00:23:15,080 --> 00:23:18,000 Speaker 1: to have the tools available to us to compress the 382 00:23:18,080 --> 00:23:20,760 Speaker 1: time to discovery from the average time of fourteen years 383 00:23:20,760 --> 00:23:23,600 Speaker 1: for a vaccine to under one. And think of the 384 00:23:23,600 --> 00:23:29,159 Speaker 1: implications that happen well in future pandemics, in in climate change. 385 00:23:29,680 --> 00:23:32,359 Speaker 1: How are we going to compress a time to discovery? 386 00:23:33,000 --> 00:23:34,680 Speaker 1: And and that's going to be the power of the 387 00:23:34,720 --> 00:23:39,919 Speaker 1: scientific methods supercharged with computing, including quantum and act mm HM. 388 00:23:40,720 --> 00:23:43,760 Speaker 1: When I ask a question, it sounds like it is 389 00:23:43,760 --> 00:23:47,080 Speaker 1: impossible to be a pessimist and work on quantum computing. 390 00:23:50,359 --> 00:23:54,199 Speaker 1: I like that so so uh probably true, you know, 391 00:23:54,680 --> 00:23:58,840 Speaker 1: because when you have so many challenges and uh and 392 00:23:58,960 --> 00:24:02,119 Speaker 1: so many difficulty it takes a particular type of people 393 00:24:02,280 --> 00:24:05,760 Speaker 1: to have the courage to be able to overcome them. 394 00:24:05,760 --> 00:24:09,480 Speaker 1: But it gets combined when when you know that the 395 00:24:09,480 --> 00:24:14,679 Speaker 1: theory is very sound and correct, the fact that we 396 00:24:14,760 --> 00:24:18,119 Speaker 1: haven't been able to realize the technology that allows that 397 00:24:18,280 --> 00:24:22,840 Speaker 1: theory to be expressed is in itself a source of energy, 398 00:24:23,040 --> 00:24:26,919 Speaker 1: right And indeed, like you, you cannot be, you know, 399 00:24:27,160 --> 00:24:29,440 Speaker 1: a pessimist if you want to be at the banguard 400 00:24:29,640 --> 00:24:33,120 Speaker 1: of the creation of this technology. And also the implications 401 00:24:33,160 --> 00:24:35,360 Speaker 1: of it are so profound for some of the most 402 00:24:35,359 --> 00:24:39,040 Speaker 1: fundamental problems that that that is another source of optimism 403 00:24:40,080 --> 00:24:44,240 Speaker 1: required for the technology. Yeah, this has been so fascinating. 404 00:24:44,320 --> 00:24:47,160 Speaker 1: Thank you so much. I've really enjoyed this, Dr Gil, 405 00:24:48,040 --> 00:24:53,840 Speaker 1: Thank you so much. Thank you again to Dr Dario 406 00:24:53,920 --> 00:24:57,760 Speaker 1: Gil for his insights about the future of quantum computing. 407 00:24:58,520 --> 00:25:01,880 Speaker 1: It will be fascinating see how the conversions of old 408 00:25:01,920 --> 00:25:05,399 Speaker 1: and new can revolutionize the way we live and communicate. 409 00:25:07,280 --> 00:25:11,040 Speaker 1: Smart Talks with IBM is produced by Emily Rostack with 410 00:25:11,280 --> 00:25:18,359 Speaker 1: Carlie Migliori and Katherine Girrado, edited by Karen shakerge engineering 411 00:25:18,400 --> 00:25:23,240 Speaker 1: by Martin Gonzalez, mixed and mastered by Jason Gambrel. Music 412 00:25:23,600 --> 00:25:29,000 Speaker 1: by Gramsco. Special thanks to Molly Sosha, Andy Kelly Mia Label, 413 00:25:29,119 --> 00:25:32,800 Speaker 1: Jacob Weisberg had a Fane, Eric Sandler and Maggie Taylor, 414 00:25:33,160 --> 00:25:37,280 Speaker 1: and the teams at eight Bar and IBM. Smart Talks 415 00:25:37,280 --> 00:25:40,679 Speaker 1: with IBM is a production of Pushkin Industries and I 416 00:25:40,840 --> 00:25:45,520 Speaker 1: Heart Media. You can find more episodes at IBM dot 417 00:25:45,600 --> 00:25:50,840 Speaker 1: com slash smart Talks. You'll find more Pushkin podcasts on 418 00:25:50,880 --> 00:25:55,040 Speaker 1: the I Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you 419 00:25:55,160 --> 00:25:59,080 Speaker 1: like to listen. I'm Malcolm Gladwell, See you next time. 420 00:26:02,960 --> 00:26:04,280 Speaker 1: The Beginning