WEBVTT - From the Vault: Burned from the Mind’s Eye, Parts 1 & 2

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind. My name

0:00:07.920 --> 0:00:11.320
<v Speaker 1>is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick, and hey, Happy Halloween.

0:00:11.720 --> 0:00:13.560
<v Speaker 1>That's right, we have a special treat for you. We

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:16.680
<v Speaker 1>normally have a Vault episode for you on Saturday, but

0:00:16.760 --> 0:00:20.680
<v Speaker 1>since this Saturday is also Halloween itself, we thought we

0:00:20.720 --> 0:00:23.920
<v Speaker 1>would feature a two parter from last year. Right, So

0:00:24.040 --> 0:00:27.159
<v Speaker 1>this was parts one and two of our episode on

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:30.960
<v Speaker 1>psychic photography. This belief some people have that you could

0:00:30.960 --> 0:00:35.000
<v Speaker 1>project images from the brain onto photographs. And so that

0:00:35.040 --> 0:00:37.840
<v Speaker 1>we get into the ring. We talked about some real

0:00:38.240 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 1>strange para psychology research. We talked about vision and I

0:00:42.520 --> 0:00:44.920
<v Speaker 1>remember this being a lot of fun. All right, let's

0:00:44.960 --> 0:00:50.360
<v Speaker 1>dive right in. Welcome Stuff to Blow your Mind, a

0:00:50.440 --> 0:00:59.240
<v Speaker 1>production of I Heart Radios How Stuff Work. Hey you,

0:00:59.280 --> 0:01:01.040
<v Speaker 1>welcome to Stuff to Alow your Mind. My name is

0:01:01.120 --> 0:01:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick, and it's October. So

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:09.199
<v Speaker 1>we're continuing with our Halloween spooky, ghostly kind of theme,

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:12.520
<v Speaker 1>and today we wanted to explore a somewhat ghostly topic

0:01:12.840 --> 0:01:16.960
<v Speaker 1>that ties into neuroscience to stuff we've talked about recently

0:01:16.959 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 1>on the Invention Podcast with the history of photography. But

0:01:20.360 --> 0:01:22.160
<v Speaker 1>before we get into that, I wanted to start with

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:24.840
<v Speaker 1>a question to kind of orient us here, And that

0:01:24.959 --> 0:01:28.759
<v Speaker 1>question is, what is it that makes somebody skilled at

0:01:28.800 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 1>an art like realistic drawing or realistic sculpture. I should say,

0:01:32.800 --> 0:01:35.240
<v Speaker 1>by the way, I am not skilled at this at all.

0:01:35.280 --> 0:01:38.959
<v Speaker 1>I cannot draw realistically for the life of me. In fact,

0:01:39.240 --> 0:01:41.920
<v Speaker 1>when I try to draw pictures of people, it's the

0:01:43.400 --> 0:01:46.119
<v Speaker 1>it's a source of great amusement to Rachel. Oh yeah, yeah,

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:48.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm the same way. I can. I can draw a

0:01:48.000 --> 0:01:52.120
<v Speaker 1>pretty mean goblin, but um, I can't really draw a human.

0:01:52.480 --> 0:01:56.720
<v Speaker 1>My my son whose seven, is already a better better

0:01:57.000 --> 0:01:59.560
<v Speaker 1>artist when it comes to depicting actual human beings than I.

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:02.160
<v Speaker 1>But obviously so a huge part of what's going on

0:02:02.280 --> 0:02:05.720
<v Speaker 1>here is is practice, right, you gotta learn techniques. But

0:02:05.800 --> 0:02:08.200
<v Speaker 1>another part of this I think could just be thought

0:02:08.200 --> 0:02:13.200
<v Speaker 1>of as some kind of motor power of translation, Like

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:16.560
<v Speaker 1>how do you take an image represented in your brain

0:02:16.960 --> 0:02:19.560
<v Speaker 1>and it's in your brain either way, whether you're currently

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:22.320
<v Speaker 1>looking at it or calling up out of a memory

0:02:22.560 --> 0:02:26.760
<v Speaker 1>or an imagination. Either way, the images coming from your brain,

0:02:26.800 --> 0:02:30.120
<v Speaker 1>and then it's being translated somehow through a series of

0:02:30.240 --> 0:02:33.520
<v Speaker 1>hand motions into a physical object in the world, whether

0:02:33.560 --> 0:02:36.799
<v Speaker 1>that's a sculpture, painting, or drawing. Like, there's some kind

0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 1>of skill there that I think remains ineffable to us.

0:02:40.440 --> 0:02:43.600
<v Speaker 1>It's mysterious. Sometimes it's even kind of spooky because we

0:02:43.639 --> 0:02:48.080
<v Speaker 1>don't understand what's happening with that translation process. But what

0:02:48.320 --> 0:02:52.520
<v Speaker 1>if there were no translation process? What if there were

0:02:52.639 --> 0:02:56.960
<v Speaker 1>no way for clumsy arms and hands and failures of

0:02:57.040 --> 0:03:01.080
<v Speaker 1>technique to impede the physical manifestation and of what you've

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:03.760
<v Speaker 1>got in your mind's I what if we could just

0:03:03.960 --> 0:03:08.200
<v Speaker 1>project the objects of the mind's eye directly onto the

0:03:08.200 --> 0:03:12.000
<v Speaker 1>physical world. Would such a thing be possible? And if so,

0:03:12.480 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 1>would such a power be in a way terrifying, sort

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:19.200
<v Speaker 1>of godlike in the worst and most ancient sense. Ah,

0:03:19.240 --> 0:03:23.639
<v Speaker 1>And here you're getting into the uh, the Halloween aspects

0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 1>of this topic. This is the reason that we have

0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:29.720
<v Speaker 1>decided to approach this during the month of October, exactly

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:32.839
<v Speaker 1>because this power does show up in horror fiction. One

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 1>place that you might have encountered it is in the

0:03:34.920 --> 0:03:37.920
<v Speaker 1>books or the movies. Uh. There have been several different

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:40.040
<v Speaker 1>series at this point, but The Ring, the story of

0:03:40.080 --> 0:03:43.880
<v Speaker 1>The Ring, the the scary ghost girl who can print

0:03:44.200 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 1>media with her brain. She can psychically print images onto

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:52.880
<v Speaker 1>photographs or onto o the wall of a barn, or

0:03:52.960 --> 0:03:56.520
<v Speaker 1>onto a videotape. She can just make a videotape without

0:03:56.560 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 1>filming it, just straight out of her mind's eye. Of course,

0:03:59.800 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 1>this played up for horror in the film, and I

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:04.520
<v Speaker 1>I sort of stand by taking it in that direction.

0:04:04.560 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 1>I think if anybody actually had this power, it would

0:04:07.080 --> 0:04:10.000
<v Speaker 1>be horrifying, and it would be it would be a

0:04:10.040 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 1>little irritating to everyone who's has put a lot of

0:04:12.760 --> 0:04:17.840
<v Speaker 1>time and effort into honing their craft. Right, Um, so

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:21.560
<v Speaker 1>it's possible you're you're familiar with The Ring via Gore

0:04:21.720 --> 0:04:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Rabinski's two thousand and two remake The Ring. This is

0:04:25.240 --> 0:04:27.640
<v Speaker 1>where I saw it for the first time. But you

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:31.919
<v Speaker 1>also may have seen it by watching the original Japanese

0:04:31.920 --> 0:04:35.680
<v Speaker 1>horror film directed by Hideo Nakata. This came out in

0:04:36.960 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 1>and I severely hope that if you, if you did

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:43.159
<v Speaker 1>see the original Japanese version back in the late nineties,

0:04:43.360 --> 0:04:46.880
<v Speaker 1>you watched it on a crumb a dubbed VHS, because

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:50.080
<v Speaker 1>that would be most appropriate, right, because either way, if

0:04:50.120 --> 0:04:53.000
<v Speaker 1>you haven't seen the movies or read the see. The

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 1>original Japanese movie was also based on a book by

0:04:57.440 --> 0:05:00.919
<v Speaker 1>by Koji Suzuki, but in any case, the story is

0:05:00.960 --> 0:05:04.679
<v Speaker 1>about a cursed videotape that is made by this ghost girl.

0:05:05.040 --> 0:05:08.280
<v Speaker 1>She uses the psychic power of projecting her thoughts directly

0:05:08.720 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 1>onto media to make a videotape that kills the people

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:16.120
<v Speaker 1>who watch it. Yeah, a curse videotape containing disturbing it's

0:05:16.160 --> 0:05:20.799
<v Speaker 1>basically a disturbing surrealistic art video kills you in seven days.

0:05:21.120 --> 0:05:24.080
<v Speaker 1>So there's kind of a uh what do you call

0:05:24.200 --> 0:05:29.240
<v Speaker 1>in the medicinal terms, uh, delayed react effects effects. Uh.

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:31.200
<v Speaker 1>It takes that alone to work through your system, you know,

0:05:31.240 --> 0:05:33.920
<v Speaker 1>time to release. Sometimes artists like that it's time released.

0:05:34.000 --> 0:05:35.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, you go, you want to see it at

0:05:35.760 --> 0:05:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the museum, and you're like, I don't really know what

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:40.080
<v Speaker 1>what I how I feel about this or or you know,

0:05:40.160 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 1>how I think about this piece and how it relates

0:05:42.760 --> 0:05:45.359
<v Speaker 1>to me, and then seven days later it kicks in

0:05:45.400 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 1>and you die. Uh weird, look at it, fist. But yeah,

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:50.680
<v Speaker 1>this is basically an update of a very old notion,

0:05:50.839 --> 0:05:54.520
<v Speaker 1>right of a haunted object, or of haunted media, only

0:05:54.560 --> 0:05:57.760
<v Speaker 1>instead of a dark and magical book instead of something

0:05:57.800 --> 0:06:01.200
<v Speaker 1>like you know, the Necronomicon or you know the Book

0:06:01.240 --> 0:06:04.359
<v Speaker 1>of Sand or any of these other treatments. We have

0:06:04.440 --> 0:06:07.960
<v Speaker 1>a dark and magical video recording and it unleashes a

0:06:08.000 --> 0:06:11.400
<v Speaker 1>world of terror and death. It's an inherently compelling idea

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:14.279
<v Speaker 1>in horror. I think actually some piece of media, whether

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:17.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a book or now a movie, I think there

0:06:17.120 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 1>there's some There's Stephen King's story with like a painting

0:06:20.600 --> 0:06:25.440
<v Speaker 1>that kills you or something. There's the representage Herror, and

0:06:25.480 --> 0:06:28.080
<v Speaker 1>it's one of one of King's best short stories. I

0:06:28.120 --> 0:06:30.039
<v Speaker 1>highly recommend. I agree. Maybe that is what I was

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 1>thinking of. That is a fantastic story. Um, but yeah,

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:36.119
<v Speaker 1>I mean obviously the idea of like a a work

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:39.279
<v Speaker 1>of art or something that cannot be experienced without cursing

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:42.080
<v Speaker 1>or killing you. Yeah, that's scary. It's also fertile ground

0:06:42.120 --> 0:06:44.240
<v Speaker 1>for any kind of metaphor that the artist wants to

0:06:44.279 --> 0:06:48.720
<v Speaker 1>sew about, you know, about art itself, and art does

0:06:48.800 --> 0:06:51.240
<v Speaker 1>have an effect on us. I mean, there's an old

0:06:51.279 --> 0:06:53.520
<v Speaker 1>episode of Stuff to Blow Your Mind where Julie and

0:06:53.520 --> 0:06:57.919
<v Speaker 1>I discussed Stendahl syndrome and some of its related alleged syndromes.

0:06:57.920 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, it deals with the reality that, yes, sometimes

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:04.120
<v Speaker 1>times great works of art, Uh. You know, with great

0:07:04.120 --> 0:07:07.560
<v Speaker 1>works of art with appropriate priming, UH can overwhelm us,

0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:10.360
<v Speaker 1>can have a physical reaction on us. So uh you

0:07:10.400 --> 0:07:13.920
<v Speaker 1>know it's it's not unrealistic. Um. Yeah, you know. I

0:07:14.000 --> 0:07:17.000
<v Speaker 1>want to say about the gor Verbinsky remake of The Ring, well,

0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:20.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't inherently love the idea of just like American

0:07:20.600 --> 0:07:24.120
<v Speaker 1>remakes of foreign films just to sort of americanize it,

0:07:24.960 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 1>because it had only been like a few years since

0:07:27.120 --> 0:07:29.200
<v Speaker 1>the original film had been made at that point, and

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:33.080
<v Speaker 1>they americanized the heck out of it exactly. But at

0:07:33.120 --> 0:07:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the same time, one thing I will defend about it

0:07:35.640 --> 0:07:39.520
<v Speaker 1>is it is a very um visually imaginative film. Like

0:07:39.560 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 1>it's got great creepy abstract imagery in it. Oh yeah, great,

0:07:44.360 --> 0:07:49.120
<v Speaker 1>great visuals, great performances, uh, and wonderful special effects. Uh.

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:51.600
<v Speaker 1>That remake I remember really had an effect on it.

0:07:51.640 --> 0:07:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Was so the last time a horror film like made

0:07:55.400 --> 0:07:58.360
<v Speaker 1>me sleep with the lights on. Uh. So I look

0:07:58.440 --> 0:08:01.480
<v Speaker 1>back fondly on it for that reason. However, I have

0:08:01.560 --> 0:08:04.480
<v Speaker 1>to say certain aspects of the film stuck with me

0:08:04.560 --> 0:08:06.720
<v Speaker 1>and others. I kind of forgot about. Like some of

0:08:06.760 --> 0:08:08.800
<v Speaker 1>you might be like, oh, yeah, I guess that girl

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:12.240
<v Speaker 1>did write video tapes with her mind like that I

0:08:12.320 --> 0:08:14.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of forgot about. I also kind of forgot that

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:19.400
<v Speaker 1>it had this that it's essentially adoption sploitation horror, not

0:08:19.440 --> 0:08:22.560
<v Speaker 1>the only yeah, basically, yeah, basically, because the whole idea

0:08:22.680 --> 0:08:26.040
<v Speaker 1>is that this this couple that adopts this child, and

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the child is troubled, and I forgot that she was adopted. Yeah,

0:08:29.680 --> 0:08:34.000
<v Speaker 1>So you know, I have a very queasy attitude towards

0:08:34.440 --> 0:08:36.320
<v Speaker 1>that kind of horror at this point in my life.

0:08:36.320 --> 0:08:40.800
<v Speaker 1>For sure, totally. But but still those are the things

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:43.520
<v Speaker 1>I tend to forget about it. I remember, you know,

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:47.440
<v Speaker 1>those scenes with Samara Um climbing out of the television

0:08:48.200 --> 0:08:50.000
<v Speaker 1>with the creepy walk where they think they filmed her

0:08:50.040 --> 0:08:52.840
<v Speaker 1>backwards and then made it go forwards. I remember, I

0:08:52.840 --> 0:08:55.520
<v Speaker 1>think Hans Zimmer did the music, and it's very effective

0:08:55.600 --> 0:08:58.960
<v Speaker 1>horror music. Um. And then on and then on the

0:08:59.120 --> 0:09:01.480
<v Speaker 1>on top of that, you have some performances. Uh, did

0:09:01.520 --> 0:09:04.360
<v Speaker 1>you ever see the sequel? I did spoil it all

0:09:04.400 --> 0:09:07.640
<v Speaker 1>as I saw it in the theater even um and

0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:12.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't recommend it, but but no, it's a it

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:14.840
<v Speaker 1>is a film that is still both films are considered

0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:17.600
<v Speaker 1>classics in their own way, and I think they earned

0:09:17.600 --> 0:09:21.200
<v Speaker 1>that that reputation just if nothing else, by just scaring

0:09:21.320 --> 0:09:27.080
<v Speaker 1>us so terribly and really connecting with our relationship with media.

0:09:27.200 --> 0:09:29.480
<v Speaker 1>And at that time it was it was dealing with

0:09:29.640 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the VHS and UH and and and how we were

0:09:32.960 --> 0:09:36.000
<v Speaker 1>connecting with with this kind of you know, physical media.

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:38.480
<v Speaker 1>And I should say also, you know, getting into that

0:09:38.559 --> 0:09:42.520
<v Speaker 1>idea of finding weird things, finding weird footage. And at

0:09:42.559 --> 0:09:44.400
<v Speaker 1>that point it was most of us through like tape

0:09:44.400 --> 0:09:47.320
<v Speaker 1>trading or I guess as to a certain extent, downloads,

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:52.800
<v Speaker 1>but I definitely remember ordering up like weird dubs of

0:09:52.960 --> 0:09:56.920
<v Speaker 1>the Japanese laser disc of say um El Topo or

0:09:56.960 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Holy Mountain, and there was this weird you know, well,

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:02.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, you have you're not really sure exactly how

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:04.560
<v Speaker 1>this got to you. You know, what are the hands

0:10:04.640 --> 0:10:07.080
<v Speaker 1>that dubbed it from this format to this format and

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:09.560
<v Speaker 1>then re dubbed it here and then finally it's in

0:10:09.600 --> 0:10:11.480
<v Speaker 1>my hands. I think that is actually one of my

0:10:11.559 --> 0:10:16.280
<v Speaker 1>favorite types of story forms for horror is the the

0:10:16.280 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 1>creepy found piece of media. I can remember One of

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:22.320
<v Speaker 1>my favorite horror short stories I've read in a long

0:10:22.400 --> 0:10:25.320
<v Speaker 1>time was won by Laird Baron. I think it's called

0:10:25.440 --> 0:10:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Mysterium Tremendum, where the narrator of the story you just

0:10:29.840 --> 0:10:32.800
<v Speaker 1>finds this travel guide and I think some weird use

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:35.000
<v Speaker 1>bookstore or something, but it turns out to be a

0:10:35.080 --> 0:10:38.679
<v Speaker 1>nefarious sort of magic travel guide that leads to very

0:10:38.760 --> 0:10:41.880
<v Speaker 1>dark places. So yeah, I love that nowadays though, and

0:10:42.160 --> 0:10:43.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe they do this, and I think maybe they did

0:10:43.760 --> 0:10:46.040
<v Speaker 1>this one of the recent Ring movies. It's like, essentially,

0:10:46.040 --> 0:10:48.719
<v Speaker 1>it's gotta be on YouTube, which takes the punch out

0:10:48.720 --> 0:10:51.400
<v Speaker 1>of it because it's like, you have the dark media,

0:10:51.640 --> 0:10:53.640
<v Speaker 1>but then the dark media is on an even more

0:10:54.679 --> 0:10:58.120
<v Speaker 1>deplorable social media you know, bum or format. But it

0:10:58.120 --> 0:11:00.720
<v Speaker 1>also takes away the ironic distance that makes the horror

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:03.560
<v Speaker 1>fun because YouTube just will melt your brain and kill you.

0:11:03.640 --> 0:11:06.360
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't it doesn't need any like horror upgrades. The

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:09.560
<v Speaker 1>real actual YouTube is just waiting to destroy you at

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:12.320
<v Speaker 1>the moment. Yeah, though it is. I it is kind

0:11:12.320 --> 0:11:15.160
<v Speaker 1>of comforting to think that that all the commentators at

0:11:15.160 --> 0:11:18.680
<v Speaker 1>the bottom of the Ring video then YouTube died seven

0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:23.800
<v Speaker 1>days later. So like the guy says that WTF is disreal? Yes, yes,

0:11:24.720 --> 0:11:27.080
<v Speaker 1>as long as we're just talking about the Ring, though

0:11:27.360 --> 0:11:29.600
<v Speaker 1>the American remake, we should point out again that that

0:11:29.679 --> 0:11:35.200
<v Speaker 1>cast is tremendous. Um talking about Samara. Her mom is

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:39.520
<v Speaker 1>played by Shannon cochrane who plays who played Pam's mother

0:11:39.600 --> 0:11:42.560
<v Speaker 1>on the Office, and then her father is played by

0:11:42.600 --> 0:11:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Brian Cox, the legendary Brian Cox. Brian Cox one of

0:11:46.200 --> 0:11:48.520
<v Speaker 1>my favorite actors of all time. He he kind of

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 1>makes the movie and in the the the the young

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:54.560
<v Speaker 1>actor playing Samara herself. I don't know if we said

0:11:54.559 --> 0:11:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Samara is the ghost Girl and the Ghost Girl, she's

0:11:56.600 --> 0:11:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Samara and the American version, and she's a Sedaco in

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:03.360
<v Speaker 1>the Japanese version, so that the name changes. But anyway,

0:12:03.600 --> 0:12:06.839
<v Speaker 1>in the in the even the remake, Devey case Chase,

0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:09.240
<v Speaker 1>I hope I'm saying her name right. Uh. This actor

0:12:09.280 --> 0:12:13.080
<v Speaker 1>played Samara, and she also voiced Lilo in Lilo in

0:12:13.280 --> 0:12:16.520
<v Speaker 1>and Stitching Disney film about the you know, the the

0:12:16.559 --> 0:12:19.880
<v Speaker 1>alien visiting Hawaii. Going to her IMDb page is hilarious

0:12:19.880 --> 0:12:22.160
<v Speaker 1>because I found out she also is the girl in

0:12:22.200 --> 0:12:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the Sparkle Dance Troupe in Donnie Dark and she's the

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 1>voice of the main character in the in the English

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:33.240
<v Speaker 1>dub of Spirited Away. Ah, yeah, the Manzaki film great. Okay, So,

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:37.520
<v Speaker 1>first of all, the idea that Samara can create a

0:12:37.600 --> 0:12:41.360
<v Speaker 1>surrealistic film that she can pour like all the the

0:12:41.480 --> 0:12:47.280
<v Speaker 1>nihilistic misanthropic visions in her head into a videotape and

0:12:47.320 --> 0:12:50.800
<v Speaker 1>make it so potent that it can kill people, either

0:12:50.920 --> 0:12:52.880
<v Speaker 1>just through the sheer power of the art or you know,

0:12:52.960 --> 0:12:56.720
<v Speaker 1>probably through some sort of supernatural um you know whatever. Uh.

0:12:56.920 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 1>That's a really cool trick and one that I would

0:12:59.280 --> 0:13:02.880
<v Speaker 1>think could have been put to much more profitable use, right, Um, Like,

0:13:02.960 --> 0:13:05.360
<v Speaker 1>why isn't there a sequel where like the U. S

0:13:05.440 --> 0:13:08.439
<v Speaker 1>Military ends up acquiring Samara Like it, that would be

0:13:08.440 --> 0:13:10.000
<v Speaker 1>great because since she ends up killing all the like

0:13:10.040 --> 0:13:13.240
<v Speaker 1>the evil mk Ultra gate dudes, it basically rights itself, right,

0:13:13.720 --> 0:13:16.160
<v Speaker 1>but sort of a crossover with The Ring and Stranger

0:13:16.200 --> 0:13:19.679
<v Speaker 1>Things would have been. Yeah. Now to to go a

0:13:19.679 --> 0:13:22.600
<v Speaker 1>little deeper though, I think in a way this concept

0:13:22.679 --> 0:13:24.720
<v Speaker 1>really really works though, Like you can think of any

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:28.839
<v Speaker 1>creative endeavor, especially filmmaking, as an attempt to bring that

0:13:28.960 --> 0:13:32.920
<v Speaker 1>ideal image that mentally imagine your head into the world,

0:13:33.400 --> 0:13:35.600
<v Speaker 1>and of course for a number of reasons we generally

0:13:35.640 --> 0:13:38.480
<v Speaker 1>don't succeed in pulling that off. And part of the reason,

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:40.319
<v Speaker 1>of course, is that is that the idea in our

0:13:40.360 --> 0:13:43.320
<v Speaker 1>mind is rarely as fully formed as we think it is.

0:13:43.440 --> 0:13:46.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that's exactly right. I mean an experience I

0:13:46.679 --> 0:13:48.960
<v Speaker 1>definitely have when writing, and I think you've said you

0:13:49.000 --> 0:13:51.640
<v Speaker 1>have this before, is I don't necessarily know what I'm

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:53.880
<v Speaker 1>going to write until I start writing, Like if I'm

0:13:53.880 --> 0:13:57.040
<v Speaker 1>writing a scene in fiction, you know like that it's

0:13:57.080 --> 0:14:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the process of writing that helps bring out the content. Yeah, exactly. Uh,

0:14:01.679 --> 0:14:03.319
<v Speaker 1>you know in other issues coming to play as well,

0:14:03.320 --> 0:14:06.800
<v Speaker 1>in the final version perhaps feels a bit lacking. So

0:14:07.840 --> 0:14:09.599
<v Speaker 1>you know, you can forgive a lot of us we

0:14:09.840 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 1>we wonder, you know, imagine how perfect it would it

0:14:12.800 --> 0:14:14.960
<v Speaker 1>would have been if you've been able to simply beam

0:14:15.000 --> 0:14:18.440
<v Speaker 1>your vision directly onto a video tape. You don't have

0:14:18.480 --> 0:14:21.880
<v Speaker 1>to worry about casting it where you're gonna film all

0:14:21.920 --> 0:14:24.200
<v Speaker 1>your weird art, film your artifacts. How are you going

0:14:24.240 --> 0:14:26.400
<v Speaker 1>to get that that chair to go upside down? No,

0:14:26.640 --> 0:14:29.320
<v Speaker 1>you can just beam it directly onto the onto the

0:14:29.360 --> 0:14:32.960
<v Speaker 1>tape um. And so maybe the power then of your

0:14:33.040 --> 0:14:35.920
<v Speaker 1>vision would be so pure and uncut that it would

0:14:35.960 --> 0:14:39.200
<v Speaker 1>just literally slay table. Well, I like that, But on

0:14:39.240 --> 0:14:40.720
<v Speaker 1>the other hand, I mean, I think it's sort of

0:14:41.520 --> 0:14:45.360
<v Speaker 1>trying to imagine. This highlights the unreality of what it

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:47.880
<v Speaker 1>is you're trying to imagine. I mean, I feel like

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:50.440
<v Speaker 1>our image of the thing we want to create is

0:14:50.640 --> 0:14:53.680
<v Speaker 1>never really fully formed, even when it seems like it is.

0:14:54.520 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if even people who have extremely vivid mental

0:14:58.120 --> 0:15:02.840
<v Speaker 1>imagery can actually see a full completed painting that they

0:15:02.840 --> 0:15:06.240
<v Speaker 1>haven't finished painting yet. Uh and and and not just

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:09.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of like see glimpses of little bits of color

0:15:10.040 --> 0:15:13.760
<v Speaker 1>and shape that that ultimately add up to something concrete

0:15:13.760 --> 0:15:16.280
<v Speaker 1>and finalized once you've you know, translated through your hand

0:15:16.360 --> 0:15:19.920
<v Speaker 1>movements into that painting. I kind of doubt that people

0:15:19.960 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 1>can actually see a full painting that they haven't painted yet, right.

0:15:23.800 --> 0:15:25.960
<v Speaker 1>And maybe we may be part of his linguistic you know,

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:29.280
<v Speaker 1>like we we tend to say. A sculptor might say,

0:15:29.320 --> 0:15:32.560
<v Speaker 1>I see the horse trapped in this block, and I

0:15:32.600 --> 0:15:34.600
<v Speaker 1>wish to free it. I'm just going to remove all

0:15:34.600 --> 0:15:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the pieces around the finished piece that I envisioned within

0:15:37.600 --> 0:15:39.680
<v Speaker 1>it with In reality, it's more like I see the

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:42.440
<v Speaker 1>inspiration for the thing that I am going to create, yeah,

0:15:42.480 --> 0:15:46.400
<v Speaker 1>a kind of fuzzy, low resolution suggestion of the thing

0:15:46.480 --> 0:15:48.880
<v Speaker 1>that you will create maybe, Yeah, And then comes the

0:15:48.920 --> 0:15:51.920
<v Speaker 1>hard work. Then comes the talent, uh, and the skill.

0:15:52.960 --> 0:15:54.960
<v Speaker 1>One more one more thing about the Ring, and then

0:15:54.960 --> 0:15:58.880
<v Speaker 1>I'll I'll mostly let it go. But ultimately, what is

0:15:58.920 --> 0:16:02.360
<v Speaker 1>the message of this film? It's seen because basically the

0:16:02.400 --> 0:16:05.600
<v Speaker 1>whole plot is, oh, this these tanks are killing people?

0:16:05.600 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Why is it killing people? Always? Because of this little

0:16:07.400 --> 0:16:10.040
<v Speaker 1>girl that died? And then they go on this question like, oh,

0:16:10.080 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 1>we can set her spirit free, should be happy, and

0:16:12.760 --> 0:16:15.240
<v Speaker 1>everyone will be saved, and then you realize, oh, no,

0:16:15.360 --> 0:16:17.760
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't work because she can't be saved. She's just

0:16:17.840 --> 0:16:21.560
<v Speaker 1>evil to the core, and everybody's gonna keep on dying. Right. Well,

0:16:21.600 --> 0:16:23.840
<v Speaker 1>but they do figure out a way to get around

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 1>the curse, which is just keep passing it, keep spreading it.

0:16:27.120 --> 0:16:29.520
<v Speaker 1>So right, if you spread the curse to more people,

0:16:29.600 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 1>she won't kill you. Yeah, basically the plot of of

0:16:34.000 --> 0:16:37.200
<v Speaker 1>it follows as well, right, but yeah, but ultimately in

0:16:37.200 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 1>the Ring, well, you only get temporarily spared, and it follows, right,

0:16:40.880 --> 0:16:42.640
<v Speaker 1>But then I think in the Ring they acknowledge what

0:16:42.720 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 1>happens when like you know that didn't mind come back

0:16:45.040 --> 0:16:48.200
<v Speaker 1>to them as well. But maybe that's in the sequels. No, No,

0:16:48.320 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that was it was kind of at least

0:16:50.200 --> 0:16:52.840
<v Speaker 1>hinted at in the first Yeah. I don't really trying

0:16:52.840 --> 0:16:56.120
<v Speaker 1>to think about the sequels. But but ultimately, like the messages,

0:16:56.200 --> 0:16:58.720
<v Speaker 1>don't try to help people, don't try and fix the world,

0:16:58.960 --> 0:17:02.880
<v Speaker 1>like everybody's gonna that's so just so bleak and nihilistic. Uh,

0:17:03.080 --> 0:17:04.959
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's just too bleak and nihilistic for me now.

0:17:05.000 --> 0:17:06.680
<v Speaker 1>It's the kind of thing I would have loved when

0:17:06.680 --> 0:17:10.040
<v Speaker 1>I was younger. But but yeah, that's such a harsh

0:17:10.400 --> 0:17:13.760
<v Speaker 1>way to land it, isn't it. Yeah, Um, it's not

0:17:13.800 --> 0:17:17.240
<v Speaker 1>an inspiring story on close examination. But but I do

0:17:17.600 --> 0:17:20.080
<v Speaker 1>still stand by a lot of the visual imagery in

0:17:20.080 --> 0:17:21.919
<v Speaker 1>the film, which I think holds up really well. And

0:17:21.920 --> 0:17:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Brian Cox is just an absolute treat absolutely. All Right,

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:27.840
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna take a quick break when we come back.

0:17:28.040 --> 0:17:30.560
<v Speaker 1>We're going to move on from just discussing the Ring

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:33.480
<v Speaker 1>in general, and we're going to discuss this this thing

0:17:33.600 --> 0:17:36.440
<v Speaker 1>that she is supposed to do, this idea that a

0:17:36.600 --> 0:17:41.000
<v Speaker 1>mind could somehow imprint an image on something or in

0:17:41.160 --> 0:17:44.640
<v Speaker 1>something or in like on Cape on Film. Uh, and

0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:46.640
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be one of these topics that I think,

0:17:47.119 --> 0:17:49.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, draws in from a number of past episodes

0:17:49.960 --> 0:17:56.080
<v Speaker 1>of both stuff to blow your mind and invention. All right,

0:17:56.119 --> 0:18:01.800
<v Speaker 1>we're back. So we're exploring the topic of kick photography,

0:18:02.000 --> 0:18:05.920
<v Speaker 1>or just generally being able to print the mind's eye

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:09.640
<v Speaker 1>into some manifestation in the physical world without going through

0:18:09.680 --> 0:18:14.320
<v Speaker 1>any kind of normal motor translation process like drawing with

0:18:14.400 --> 0:18:17.280
<v Speaker 1>your hand or explaining a mental image with your mouth,

0:18:17.720 --> 0:18:21.760
<v Speaker 1>just printing the mind's eye directly onto film or onto

0:18:21.760 --> 0:18:24.160
<v Speaker 1>a piece of paper. Yes, and this is a topic

0:18:24.240 --> 0:18:26.760
<v Speaker 1>that if you're if you're already thinking, well that just

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:31.639
<v Speaker 1>sounds silly. Um, well, hang with us, because you know, ultimately,

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:33.359
<v Speaker 1>I I think it's pretty safe to say this is

0:18:33.400 --> 0:18:36.480
<v Speaker 1>not actually occurring. This is not a power that human

0:18:36.480 --> 0:18:41.240
<v Speaker 1>beings actually have. But but by looking at it and considering,

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:42.960
<v Speaker 1>like how we get to this point of thinking that

0:18:43.000 --> 0:18:45.639
<v Speaker 1>it's possible in some cases, Uh, you know what it

0:18:45.720 --> 0:18:50.280
<v Speaker 1>reveals about our relationship with our own mind and considerations

0:18:50.320 --> 0:18:52.719
<v Speaker 1>of our own mind and mental states, as well as

0:18:52.760 --> 0:18:56.840
<v Speaker 1>our understanding of photography itself. Yeah, this episode made me

0:18:56.960 --> 0:18:59.560
<v Speaker 1>keep thinking back to the series on photography that we

0:18:59.600 --> 0:19:02.040
<v Speaker 1>did on our other podcast, Invention, which if you're not

0:19:02.080 --> 0:19:04.600
<v Speaker 1>subscribed yet, go subscribe to Invention. That's right, it's a

0:19:04.680 --> 0:19:07.199
<v Speaker 1>journey through human techno history. And yeah, we did a

0:19:07.200 --> 0:19:10.840
<v Speaker 1>whole series on photography, also stuff before photography, like the

0:19:10.880 --> 0:19:14.359
<v Speaker 1>camera obscura, and then also on motion picture technology afterwards.

0:19:14.800 --> 0:19:19.080
<v Speaker 1>And really, you know, we can't, uh you know, overstate

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:23.200
<v Speaker 1>the degree to which photography changed the world. It changed

0:19:23.240 --> 0:19:25.160
<v Speaker 1>the way we thought about the world, how we thought

0:19:25.160 --> 0:19:29.239
<v Speaker 1>about ourselves. It gave us new metaphors for uh, you know,

0:19:29.359 --> 0:19:33.520
<v Speaker 1>thinking about our own minds and how we're perceiving the world.

0:19:34.040 --> 0:19:38.360
<v Speaker 1>And uh also arguably made the modern celebrity possible. Uh

0:19:38.400 --> 0:19:40.720
<v Speaker 1>so we can lay that crime at its feet as well,

0:19:41.480 --> 0:19:44.359
<v Speaker 1>but it also lent itself well to a number of

0:19:44.400 --> 0:19:49.679
<v Speaker 1>pseudo scientific ideas and ultimately downright occult notions about what

0:19:49.760 --> 0:19:53.560
<v Speaker 1>photography was and what it might capture. Well. Sure, because

0:19:53.840 --> 0:19:58.200
<v Speaker 1>if you are, say, somebody who is adamant that there

0:19:58.320 --> 0:20:01.680
<v Speaker 1>is a type of reality that we can't normally see,

0:20:02.760 --> 0:20:05.879
<v Speaker 1>a very commonplace to go to try to find bits

0:20:05.880 --> 0:20:08.680
<v Speaker 1>of evidence of that reality that we can't normally see

0:20:09.040 --> 0:20:11.919
<v Speaker 1>is some kind of objective recorded media. I mean, I

0:20:11.960 --> 0:20:15.639
<v Speaker 1>think about the people who do e VP ghost recordings

0:20:15.640 --> 0:20:18.919
<v Speaker 1>electronic voice phenomena. Again, this is not something that I

0:20:18.920 --> 0:20:20.840
<v Speaker 1>think is real evidence of ghosts, but a lot of

0:20:20.840 --> 0:20:23.760
<v Speaker 1>people think, Okay, you know, I take my tape recorder

0:20:23.800 --> 0:20:26.240
<v Speaker 1>to a haunted graveyard and I just leave it going,

0:20:26.280 --> 0:20:28.520
<v Speaker 1>and then I play it back and in through the

0:20:28.560 --> 0:20:31.480
<v Speaker 1>static and the rustling in the wind, I hear voices

0:20:31.520 --> 0:20:34.320
<v Speaker 1>saying things. If I can be psychological for a minute,

0:20:34.320 --> 0:20:37.440
<v Speaker 1>I think what's mostly going on is that drawing from

0:20:37.600 --> 0:20:41.560
<v Speaker 1>objective recording media like that allows people to generate the

0:20:41.640 --> 0:20:45.359
<v Speaker 1>noise into which they can read a signal yes. And

0:20:45.359 --> 0:20:48.080
<v Speaker 1>of course photography when it was new, provided a whole

0:20:48.119 --> 0:20:51.160
<v Speaker 1>new way of doing something like this, right, And then

0:20:51.160 --> 0:20:53.200
<v Speaker 1>other technologies that were coming out around, you know, in

0:20:53.240 --> 0:20:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the same era we all said the X ray, which

0:20:55.840 --> 0:20:58.679
<v Speaker 1>we also have an episode of Invention about which deals

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:03.040
<v Speaker 1>with invisible um, you know, processes, you know, invisible rays,

0:21:03.160 --> 0:21:06.600
<v Speaker 1>an invisible world, and and also was a big game

0:21:06.680 --> 0:21:10.160
<v Speaker 1>changer and how we we thought about reality. Sure, So

0:21:10.320 --> 0:21:12.240
<v Speaker 1>I was reading a little more about this, and I

0:21:12.359 --> 0:21:15.280
<v Speaker 1>ran across a two thousand five book titled The Perfect

0:21:15.320 --> 0:21:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Medium by Shiro at All, and it it gets into

0:21:19.840 --> 0:21:24.560
<v Speaker 1>the intersections between the occult and photography, which are numerous, numerous,

0:21:24.600 --> 0:21:27.400
<v Speaker 1>but the author's point out that they generally generally fall

0:21:27.400 --> 0:21:31.280
<v Speaker 1>into three categories. First of all, photographs of spirits, in

0:21:31.320 --> 0:21:34.119
<v Speaker 1>which a spirit entity shows up in the photograph. I

0:21:34.119 --> 0:21:37.960
<v Speaker 1>think we're mover with examples of this, uh uh. And

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:41.800
<v Speaker 1>then another is photographs of mediums in which the spirit medium,

0:21:41.800 --> 0:21:43.560
<v Speaker 1>which is a you know, human like us who is

0:21:43.640 --> 0:21:47.639
<v Speaker 1>leading a seance or something, is doing something supernatural. Okay,

0:21:47.680 --> 0:21:50.119
<v Speaker 1>so it might be like a photograph that shows that

0:21:50.240 --> 0:21:54.880
<v Speaker 1>during a seance this medium was levitating, or that this medium,

0:21:55.200 --> 0:21:58.679
<v Speaker 1>during some kind of session was generating ectoplasm, right, And

0:21:58.720 --> 0:22:02.720
<v Speaker 1>that's the next one. Photographs of fluids and and this

0:22:02.760 --> 0:22:06.720
<v Speaker 1>one is interesting because the obvious subject matter here is exoplasm,

0:22:06.840 --> 0:22:11.080
<v Speaker 1>some weird substance emerging from the individual, and in reality

0:22:11.119 --> 0:22:14.560
<v Speaker 1>it's generally wet sheep's cloth or or something like that. Uh.

0:22:14.600 --> 0:22:16.800
<v Speaker 1>And it's easy to just think of this as ghost

0:22:16.840 --> 0:22:21.200
<v Speaker 1>slime and a ghostbuster's fashion. Maybe we should explain ectoplasm

0:22:21.280 --> 0:22:23.440
<v Speaker 1>just a little bit more so. It was this phenomenon

0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:27.639
<v Speaker 1>where a medium would claim that they can generate some

0:22:27.760 --> 0:22:31.119
<v Speaker 1>kind of physical manifestation of the spirit world that shows

0:22:31.200 --> 0:22:33.200
<v Speaker 1>up when you take a picture of them in the dark.

0:22:33.320 --> 0:22:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Maybe uh, and it would yeah, so it would look

0:22:36.119 --> 0:22:38.960
<v Speaker 1>like some kind of weird cloth or slime beside their

0:22:39.000 --> 0:22:42.040
<v Speaker 1>head or on their body, like like a big like

0:22:42.280 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 1>mucus something like. No, it doesn't even generally it just

0:22:45.560 --> 0:22:48.080
<v Speaker 1>looks like some sort of weird mucasy cloth they got

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:51.480
<v Speaker 1>slimed or slimber exactly. I mean, that's where that comes from.

0:22:51.680 --> 0:22:54.000
<v Speaker 1>But it's also a bit more more complex in this

0:22:54.080 --> 0:22:56.920
<v Speaker 1>society and the fluids in these photographs, as Sharrow and

0:22:56.960 --> 0:22:58.760
<v Speaker 1>I'll point out, you know, it's dealing with this the

0:22:59.000 --> 0:23:01.240
<v Speaker 1>idea that you're capturing a sense of the vital force,

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:05.360
<v Speaker 1>the soul, the thoughts, feelings, dreams, etcetera. All this directly

0:23:05.400 --> 0:23:08.280
<v Speaker 1>captured on a photographic plate without the use of a

0:23:08.359 --> 0:23:11.480
<v Speaker 1>camera in some cases. So it has a strong connection

0:23:11.480 --> 0:23:13.200
<v Speaker 1>to what was going on at the time and observation

0:23:13.240 --> 0:23:16.960
<v Speaker 1>of X rays and radioactivity. They point out that in France,

0:23:16.960 --> 0:23:20.400
<v Speaker 1>so Luis darg and others quote sought to photograph their

0:23:20.400 --> 0:23:23.800
<v Speaker 1>own vital energy or thoughts simply by placing their fingers

0:23:23.880 --> 0:23:29.480
<v Speaker 1>or foreheads on the census eze plate. Despite numerous refutations

0:23:29.520 --> 0:23:32.600
<v Speaker 1>by scientists who demonstrated that the traces thus obtained were

0:23:32.600 --> 0:23:35.879
<v Speaker 1>no more than photographic artifacts arising out of the experimental

0:23:35.880 --> 0:23:40.119
<v Speaker 1>conditions themselves. Attempts to record human fluids continued throughout the

0:23:40.160 --> 0:23:43.399
<v Speaker 1>twentieth century. And so this these fluids would not just

0:23:43.480 --> 0:23:46.400
<v Speaker 1>be like blood or something, that would be these these

0:23:46.440 --> 0:23:48.880
<v Speaker 1>spiritual fluids. Yeah, and it gets beyond just like mere

0:23:48.960 --> 0:23:52.760
<v Speaker 1>fluids and into also things like horrors. Um so in

0:23:52.760 --> 0:23:56.639
<v Speaker 1>other words, and then people still do photographing as absolutely

0:23:56.680 --> 0:23:59.440
<v Speaker 1>that's like big business. Yeah, so, you know, in other words,

0:23:59.440 --> 0:24:02.040
<v Speaker 1>in the midst of all this what was essentially future shock,

0:24:02.160 --> 0:24:05.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, uh, at this emerging technology and the hidden

0:24:05.640 --> 0:24:09.200
<v Speaker 1>world's exposed through X rays. This idea of capturing thoughts

0:24:09.200 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 1>through photography carried a fair amount of weight, no matter

0:24:12.119 --> 0:24:15.159
<v Speaker 1>what the science said and is still saying about it.

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:18.520
<v Speaker 1>So the author's point to to uh to a couple

0:24:18.600 --> 0:24:21.800
<v Speaker 1>of examples, one of which is the work of Simon

0:24:22.359 --> 0:24:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Kurlean in the nineteen forties. Uh. Kurlan, of course, is

0:24:26.600 --> 0:24:31.080
<v Speaker 1>where we get Kurlean photography. He lived ninety eight, and

0:24:31.080 --> 0:24:33.560
<v Speaker 1>it's the process in which an image is obtained by

0:24:33.600 --> 0:24:36.840
<v Speaker 1>the application of a high frequency electric field to an

0:24:36.840 --> 0:24:40.360
<v Speaker 1>object so that it radiates a characteristic pattern of luminescence

0:24:40.640 --> 0:24:44.200
<v Speaker 1>that is recorded on photographic film. And it ultimately has

0:24:44.240 --> 0:24:46.800
<v Speaker 1>to do with moisture and other factors. But but claims

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:50.040
<v Speaker 1>were made that it captured some aspect of an individual's health,

0:24:50.119 --> 0:24:54.080
<v Speaker 1>their essence, or their vital bodily energy. So there's some

0:24:54.200 --> 0:24:56.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of like invisible quality they have this showing up

0:24:56.760 --> 0:24:59.480
<v Speaker 1>when you run this electric current and take a picture, right,

0:24:59.560 --> 0:25:01.920
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's still factors into some sort of

0:25:02.160 --> 0:25:05.879
<v Speaker 1>as to some like alternative like new age of systems.

0:25:06.520 --> 0:25:09.280
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not saying there's anything wrong with that. I mean,

0:25:09.320 --> 0:25:12.240
<v Speaker 1>it's ultimately you're you're dealing with something that is perhaps

0:25:12.280 --> 0:25:19.800
<v Speaker 1>a a what you know, supernatural interpretation of some visual

0:25:19.880 --> 0:25:23.399
<v Speaker 1>data that you've created, which you know, as long as

0:25:23.400 --> 0:25:26.960
<v Speaker 1>you're not not you know, claiming that it's scientific, I guess,

0:25:27.320 --> 0:25:29.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, go for it. Um. It just falls under

0:25:30.000 --> 0:25:34.240
<v Speaker 1>the domain of of of of of spiritualism and religion.

0:25:34.800 --> 0:25:36.959
<v Speaker 1>They also point to a man by the name of

0:25:36.960 --> 0:25:40.560
<v Speaker 1>ted Sirius, who we will come back to in a bit. Yes,

0:25:40.800 --> 0:25:43.040
<v Speaker 1>because we before we get to Sirius, we have to

0:25:43.200 --> 0:25:47.760
<v Speaker 1>explore the origins of this very act that Samara in

0:25:47.800 --> 0:25:52.399
<v Speaker 1>the Ring is is engaging in. Uh, this idea that

0:25:52.600 --> 0:25:56.160
<v Speaker 1>human beings are capable not only of photography, which photography

0:25:56.200 --> 0:25:59.680
<v Speaker 1>in and of itself is an amazing accomplishment. This, this,

0:25:59.680 --> 0:26:02.359
<v Speaker 1>this much have seemed magic when it was new, Oh, absolutely,

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:05.040
<v Speaker 1>because at least we discussed an invention. You know. It's

0:26:05.440 --> 0:26:10.200
<v Speaker 1>it's this perfect convergence of of optical expertise and chemical

0:26:10.240 --> 0:26:14.000
<v Speaker 1>expertise and artistic expertise, all of it coming together in

0:26:14.080 --> 0:26:17.280
<v Speaker 1>this new way of of of of dealing with the

0:26:17.359 --> 0:26:21.080
<v Speaker 1>visual world. Um. But then we have this added idea

0:26:21.240 --> 0:26:26.639
<v Speaker 1>that people can also engage in thought ptography, right, thoughtography. Uh,

0:26:27.000 --> 0:26:31.720
<v Speaker 1>it goes by several names, now, psychic photography maybe thoughtography,

0:26:31.760 --> 0:26:35.240
<v Speaker 1>and it's modern origins are I think you could you

0:26:35.240 --> 0:26:38.000
<v Speaker 1>could argue that they are in Japan. So I want

0:26:38.000 --> 0:26:42.159
<v Speaker 1>to talk about a researcher named Fukuai Tomochichi, who is

0:26:42.200 --> 0:26:45.600
<v Speaker 1>a Japanese psychologist who lived from eighteen sixty nine to

0:26:45.760 --> 0:26:50.440
<v Speaker 1>nineteen fifty two. He was educated at Tokyo Imperial University

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:53.360
<v Speaker 1>in the eighteen nineties. He studied in their philosophy department.

0:26:53.359 --> 0:26:55.719
<v Speaker 1>Because this would have been when psychology was brand new

0:26:55.760 --> 0:26:58.840
<v Speaker 1>there weren't like psychology departments, you know that there there

0:26:58.960 --> 0:27:00.880
<v Speaker 1>would have been many of the were any at the time,

0:27:00.960 --> 0:27:04.760
<v Speaker 1>and he received his PhD after doing a dissertation on hypnotism.

0:27:05.080 --> 0:27:09.480
<v Speaker 1>And according to the History of Japanese Psychology by Brian J. McVeigh,

0:27:09.520 --> 0:27:12.000
<v Speaker 1>which is my source on most of this about Fukurai,

0:27:12.480 --> 0:27:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Fukarai played an important role in introducing the work of

0:27:15.840 --> 0:27:20.639
<v Speaker 1>the pioneering American psychologist William James to Japanese scholars. Of course,

0:27:20.680 --> 0:27:24.359
<v Speaker 1>William James would have been a contemporary of Fuguais. James

0:27:24.480 --> 0:27:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Is The Principles of Psychology came out in eighteen ninety

0:27:27.880 --> 0:27:31.000
<v Speaker 1>and his lectures which became the Varieties of Religious Experience,

0:27:31.040 --> 0:27:32.920
<v Speaker 1>which we've talked about a number of times on the show.

0:27:33.040 --> 0:27:35.640
<v Speaker 1>That those happened around nineteen o one and nineteen o two,

0:27:35.680 --> 0:27:37.639
<v Speaker 1>I think, But so this would have been around the

0:27:37.680 --> 0:27:40.480
<v Speaker 1>same time that Fukurai was working and uh and doing

0:27:40.520 --> 0:27:45.120
<v Speaker 1>his dissertation and doing his early research. Now, according to McVeigh,

0:27:45.280 --> 0:27:49.359
<v Speaker 1>Fukarai also published work on the subject of education, and

0:27:49.440 --> 0:27:52.439
<v Speaker 1>he became a lecturer and an associate professor in the

0:27:52.440 --> 0:27:55.479
<v Speaker 1>field of abnormal psychology, which today we would just call

0:27:55.640 --> 0:27:58.639
<v Speaker 1>the study of mental illnesses and he so he was

0:27:58.720 --> 0:28:01.640
<v Speaker 1>a lecturer at Tokyo and Real University on these subjects.

0:28:01.720 --> 0:28:05.640
<v Speaker 1>But from here his interests apparently took a turn for

0:28:05.760 --> 0:28:11.640
<v Speaker 1>the paranormal. So, beginning sometime around nineteen ten, Farai became

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:17.640
<v Speaker 1>extremely interested in spiritualism, especially in the subject of clair voyance. Now,

0:28:17.680 --> 0:28:19.560
<v Speaker 1>of course, we should note that he would not have

0:28:19.640 --> 0:28:24.080
<v Speaker 1>been alone in this at the time. Interest in spiritualism, mediums,

0:28:24.080 --> 0:28:28.320
<v Speaker 1>and the paranormal enjoyed extreme popularity and elite circles all

0:28:28.359 --> 0:28:32.200
<v Speaker 1>around the world at this time. Now today, clair voyance

0:28:32.280 --> 0:28:35.480
<v Speaker 1>is usually understood to be a special kind of psychic power.

0:28:35.680 --> 0:28:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Common definition of it is quote the supposed faculty of

0:28:39.240 --> 0:28:42.680
<v Speaker 1>perceiving things or events in the future or beyond normal

0:28:42.760 --> 0:28:47.800
<v Speaker 1>sensory contact. Now, like a lot of psychic concepts, I

0:28:47.840 --> 0:28:51.720
<v Speaker 1>see claire voyance invoked to refer to a sort of

0:28:51.760 --> 0:28:54.560
<v Speaker 1>a broad range of things. H So I think it

0:28:54.640 --> 0:28:58.200
<v Speaker 1>can include all manner of cases of remote viewing. So

0:28:58.280 --> 0:29:01.960
<v Speaker 1>like seeing things that are hind physical barriers. You know,

0:29:02.040 --> 0:29:04.040
<v Speaker 1>you shouldn't be able to see through the closed door

0:29:04.080 --> 0:29:06.680
<v Speaker 1>into the next room, but you can seeing things that

0:29:06.720 --> 0:29:09.360
<v Speaker 1>are far away, you know, maybe seeing things that are

0:29:09.360 --> 0:29:12.440
<v Speaker 1>happening in another country, seeing things that are separated in

0:29:12.600 --> 0:29:16.080
<v Speaker 1>time in the future or the past. Uh, And sometimes

0:29:16.120 --> 0:29:19.280
<v Speaker 1>but less often, seeing things that can't normally be seen

0:29:19.320 --> 0:29:22.800
<v Speaker 1>at all, such as spiritual essences or the contents of

0:29:22.840 --> 0:29:25.800
<v Speaker 1>other people's thoughts, or otherwise having knowledge that you just

0:29:25.840 --> 0:29:29.000
<v Speaker 1>couldn't acquire by normal means. Now, of course, it's worth

0:29:29.120 --> 0:29:34.440
<v Speaker 1>noting that all of these things as psychic phenomenon, they

0:29:34.520 --> 0:29:39.400
<v Speaker 1>are basically exaggerations of things that the human mind does

0:29:40.000 --> 0:29:44.080
<v Speaker 1>through um, you know, through mental time travel, for instance,

0:29:44.200 --> 0:29:47.040
<v Speaker 1>imagining what the future will be like, or remembering what

0:29:47.120 --> 0:29:50.480
<v Speaker 1>the past was. The idea of not being able to

0:29:50.480 --> 0:29:52.400
<v Speaker 1>see through a wall into the next room and see

0:29:52.400 --> 0:29:55.480
<v Speaker 1>what's going on there, but perform but you know, conceiving

0:29:55.520 --> 0:29:58.080
<v Speaker 1>a mental picture of what it might be like. Like

0:29:58.160 --> 0:30:00.719
<v Speaker 1>for instance, there's another recording studio here or in the office.

0:30:01.200 --> 0:30:03.320
<v Speaker 1>I cannot see in there with my mind, but with

0:30:03.440 --> 0:30:06.680
<v Speaker 1>my mind I can imagine that the guys from stuff

0:30:06.720 --> 0:30:08.720
<v Speaker 1>they don't want you to know are in there right

0:30:08.760 --> 0:30:12.320
<v Speaker 1>now recording something. But you cannot imagine what they are doing.

0:30:13.600 --> 0:30:15.960
<v Speaker 1>But I can form a pretty basic idea that of

0:30:16.040 --> 0:30:18.280
<v Speaker 1>setting around a table talking it will not fit in

0:30:18.280 --> 0:30:21.040
<v Speaker 1>your brain. When they're doing it's it's it looks just

0:30:21.080 --> 0:30:24.200
<v Speaker 1>like what we're doing. This the subject matter is slightly different.

0:30:24.400 --> 0:30:26.840
<v Speaker 1>But but at any rate, what I'm saying is I

0:30:27.320 --> 0:30:29.920
<v Speaker 1>can form a pretty good idea, but I know that

0:30:29.920 --> 0:30:34.960
<v Speaker 1>that is just my brain creating a simulation of my environment, right.

0:30:35.000 --> 0:30:37.000
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, I think a lot of this clairvoyant

0:30:37.000 --> 0:30:40.560
<v Speaker 1>stuff hinges on the concept of generating accurate knowledge. It's

0:30:40.600 --> 0:30:42.920
<v Speaker 1>like all the stuff we can do with our imagination,

0:30:43.000 --> 0:30:47.120
<v Speaker 1>except they can do it to see reality. Um And

0:30:47.160 --> 0:30:49.680
<v Speaker 1>the kind of clear voyants that Fukurai was most interested

0:30:49.680 --> 0:30:51.600
<v Speaker 1>in I think would be covered by the first two

0:30:51.640 --> 0:30:54.440
<v Speaker 1>categories of things I said, so mostly like seeing things

0:30:54.440 --> 0:30:58.440
<v Speaker 1>that are far away and seeing across physical barriers. According

0:30:58.440 --> 0:31:01.960
<v Speaker 1>to McVeigh, he was focused on something called toshi, which

0:31:02.000 --> 0:31:05.480
<v Speaker 1>meant something like seeing through, as in seeing through barriers,

0:31:05.880 --> 0:31:10.000
<v Speaker 1>and on syndrigan, which meant the far seeing eye. And

0:31:10.120 --> 0:31:13.000
<v Speaker 1>in this parapsychology phase of his life, Fukurai was aided

0:31:13.000 --> 0:31:18.440
<v Speaker 1>by another Japanese researcher named Imamura Shinkichi. Now Fukuai studied

0:31:18.920 --> 0:31:24.000
<v Speaker 1>a reputed Japanese clairvoyant named Mfuni Chizuko and another named

0:31:24.120 --> 0:31:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Nagao Ikuko, and McVeigh writes that in nineteen ten, Fukurai

0:31:28.440 --> 0:31:31.280
<v Speaker 1>performed a series of experiments in front of a panel

0:31:31.320 --> 0:31:35.360
<v Speaker 1>of scholars and experts that he believed would demonstrate Mfuna

0:31:35.440 --> 0:31:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Chizuko's power to read out written messages even after they

0:31:39.320 --> 0:31:43.840
<v Speaker 1>had been sealed inside envelopes and then placed inside lead containers,

0:31:44.320 --> 0:31:47.720
<v Speaker 1>and apparently an attempt to replicate these experiments the following

0:31:47.760 --> 0:31:51.080
<v Speaker 1>year in nineteen eleven was not as successful as Fukurai

0:31:51.120 --> 0:31:54.040
<v Speaker 1>and Mfuni had hoped, and a lot of people considered

0:31:54.080 --> 0:31:59.160
<v Speaker 1>that Fugarais research was clearly misguided After some failed demonstrations

0:31:59.600 --> 0:32:02.560
<v Speaker 1>and he in his supposed clairvoyant subjects like Nigau and

0:32:02.640 --> 0:32:06.000
<v Speaker 1>mfune were criticized in the press, and at least I

0:32:06.000 --> 0:32:08.480
<v Speaker 1>think it's implied that partially as a result of these

0:32:08.480 --> 0:32:12.760
<v Speaker 1>failures in subsequent criticism, McVeigh writes that both mufuney and

0:32:13.080 --> 0:32:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Nigau Ikuko committed suicide in the year nineteen eleven, but

0:32:17.680 --> 0:32:22.200
<v Speaker 1>before I've also seen another cause of death attributed to Nagaikuko,

0:32:22.320 --> 0:32:24.640
<v Speaker 1>so I'm not sure about that, But McVeigh says that

0:32:24.760 --> 0:32:27.360
<v Speaker 1>that she also died by suicide. But before she died

0:32:27.880 --> 0:32:32.520
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen eleven, Nagaikuko appeared to demonstrate a novel form

0:32:32.680 --> 0:32:36.160
<v Speaker 1>of psychic power that fascinated Fukurai, and this was apart

0:32:36.200 --> 0:32:41.880
<v Speaker 1>from traditional clairvoyance. This was the power that Fukurai called ninsha,

0:32:41.960 --> 0:32:46.720
<v Speaker 1>which would have roughly translated as thoughtography. The Japanese term

0:32:46.840 --> 0:32:50.000
<v Speaker 1>ninha comes from the combination of nin meaning like sense

0:32:50.080 --> 0:32:53.960
<v Speaker 1>or feeling, and shah meaning picture, and in concrete terms,

0:32:54.080 --> 0:32:56.280
<v Speaker 1>this just means that Fukua I believe that Nigau had

0:32:56.320 --> 0:32:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the power to use her mind's eye to expose a

0:32:59.760 --> 0:33:03.600
<v Speaker 1>draw I played a photographic film, essentially burning her thoughts

0:33:04.080 --> 0:33:07.600
<v Speaker 1>directly onto the physical substrate, the same way that light

0:33:07.680 --> 0:33:11.040
<v Speaker 1>prints and image onto a piece of film. After Mifunei

0:33:11.080 --> 0:33:14.280
<v Speaker 1>and Nagau died, Fukurai continued his research and he published

0:33:14.280 --> 0:33:18.080
<v Speaker 1>a book about clairvoyance and photography in nineteen thirteen, which

0:33:18.200 --> 0:33:21.960
<v Speaker 1>was widely criticized as credulous and unscientific, and fugura I

0:33:22.000 --> 0:33:25.640
<v Speaker 1>eventually lost his university position moved on to other things

0:33:25.640 --> 0:33:29.120
<v Speaker 1>that he apparently continued to be interested in paranormal research

0:33:29.200 --> 0:33:33.760
<v Speaker 1>well into his retirement in the nineteen forties and nineteen fifties. Um.

0:33:33.960 --> 0:33:37.040
<v Speaker 1>One weird thing is Before he was publicly ridiculed and

0:33:37.120 --> 0:33:41.360
<v Speaker 1>ousted from his position at Tokyo University, Fugaray was considered

0:33:41.400 --> 0:33:44.280
<v Speaker 1>an elite scholar at the head of Japanese psychology. He

0:33:44.320 --> 0:33:46.880
<v Speaker 1>was not, you know, just some crank writing pamphlets in

0:33:46.920 --> 0:33:50.760
<v Speaker 1>his basement. He was. He was a top scholar, and

0:33:50.840 --> 0:33:54.040
<v Speaker 1>his his academic exile had consequences. I was reading in

0:33:54.040 --> 0:33:57.840
<v Speaker 1>the Oxford Handbook of the History of Psychology Global Perspectives

0:33:57.840 --> 0:34:01.520
<v Speaker 1>by David B. Baker that, in action to the Fukarai affair,

0:34:01.920 --> 0:34:05.200
<v Speaker 1>a new head of the psychology department at Tokyo Imperial

0:34:05.280 --> 0:34:10.160
<v Speaker 1>University decided that the department could rehabilitate its reputation by

0:34:10.200 --> 0:34:15.839
<v Speaker 1>only focusing on quote normal psychology, ignoring both of fucharais

0:34:15.880 --> 0:34:19.239
<v Speaker 1>areas of study meaning parapsychology like the study of psychics

0:34:19.239 --> 0:34:22.920
<v Speaker 1>and quote abnormal psychology, which again would amount to the

0:34:22.960 --> 0:34:26.439
<v Speaker 1>study of mental illness. Uh. Now, of course, saying we're

0:34:26.440 --> 0:34:29.400
<v Speaker 1>not going to study mental illnesses is a huge limitation

0:34:29.480 --> 0:34:32.839
<v Speaker 1>on academic psychology, which the authors right in this book

0:34:33.280 --> 0:34:36.160
<v Speaker 1>a quote stunted the rise of clinical psychology and pre

0:34:36.200 --> 0:34:40.320
<v Speaker 1>war Japan. Yeah, absolutely though, because, yeah, studying an mental

0:34:40.440 --> 0:34:43.360
<v Speaker 1>illness is a way not only of understanding how to

0:34:43.400 --> 0:34:47.400
<v Speaker 1>trade mental illness, but also to understand, like what, you know,

0:34:47.719 --> 0:34:50.920
<v Speaker 1>how the mind is functioning in individuals who are are

0:34:51.000 --> 0:34:55.280
<v Speaker 1>not experiencing mental illness, right, I mean it. It provides

0:34:55.360 --> 0:34:59.080
<v Speaker 1>a frame of reference. Yeah, A lot of the For example,

0:34:59.120 --> 0:35:01.719
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the biggest breakthroughs in the history of

0:35:01.760 --> 0:35:05.120
<v Speaker 1>psychology have come from studying patients who have brain injuries

0:35:05.200 --> 0:35:08.759
<v Speaker 1>or legions some kind that like they show you how

0:35:08.840 --> 0:35:12.360
<v Speaker 1>the brain changes when certain or how the mind changes

0:35:12.400 --> 0:35:15.560
<v Speaker 1>and how behavior changes when certain physical changes are made

0:35:15.560 --> 0:35:18.200
<v Speaker 1>to the brain. And of course, I I've seen it

0:35:18.239 --> 0:35:21.279
<v Speaker 1>alleged by a number of writers that the stories of

0:35:21.360 --> 0:35:25.400
<v Speaker 1>people like me Funi Chizuko and Nagai Kuko inspired the

0:35:25.440 --> 0:35:28.279
<v Speaker 1>fictional ghost in the original Ring by Suzuki Koji. I

0:35:28.480 --> 0:35:30.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know if that's uh correct, but it's at least

0:35:31.000 --> 0:35:34.319
<v Speaker 1>been alleged that there's some threat of inspiration there um.

0:35:34.600 --> 0:35:36.440
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I want to be a little bit

0:35:36.520 --> 0:35:40.680
<v Speaker 1>sympathetic to Fukurai and consider the historical context, Like in

0:35:40.680 --> 0:35:44.680
<v Speaker 1>the year nineteen ten, it was only fifteen years previous

0:35:44.719 --> 0:35:47.320
<v Speaker 1>that X rays and X ray photography had been discovered.

0:35:47.360 --> 0:35:50.520
<v Speaker 1>We sort of alluded to this earlier right. The German

0:35:50.520 --> 0:35:54.800
<v Speaker 1>physicist Wilhelm Runkin. He discovered X rays by accident in

0:35:54.840 --> 0:35:58.480
<v Speaker 1>the year eighteen when he was performing experiments with a

0:35:58.520 --> 0:36:01.280
<v Speaker 1>type of early cathode ray tube, which was an electrical

0:36:01.320 --> 0:36:05.120
<v Speaker 1>device that shoots a beam of electrons across space inside

0:36:05.120 --> 0:36:09.120
<v Speaker 1>an evacuated tube from one electrode to another. And Runkin

0:36:09.239 --> 0:36:11.760
<v Speaker 1>noticed when he was running these experiments he'd put current

0:36:11.800 --> 0:36:14.440
<v Speaker 1>through the cathode ray tube in the darkened room, it

0:36:14.440 --> 0:36:17.800
<v Speaker 1>would make this particular screen in the room. It was

0:36:17.840 --> 0:36:20.960
<v Speaker 1>a screen of barium platinum cyanide, which is like a

0:36:21.000 --> 0:36:24.480
<v Speaker 1>type of photographic plate. It would make that glow. And

0:36:24.560 --> 0:36:26.640
<v Speaker 1>this puzzled him, of course, so he tried to run

0:36:26.640 --> 0:36:29.359
<v Speaker 1>some more experiments, and he discovered that he could use

0:36:29.440 --> 0:36:34.120
<v Speaker 1>the cathode ray tube to expose photographic plates inside a

0:36:34.200 --> 0:36:38.360
<v Speaker 1>completely dark room, except the photos were nothing like anybody

0:36:38.360 --> 0:36:41.360
<v Speaker 1>on Earth had ever seen. A human hand placed in

0:36:41.400 --> 0:36:44.200
<v Speaker 1>front of the tube between the tube and the plate

0:36:45.080 --> 0:36:49.040
<v Speaker 1>would create an exposure almost completely ignoring the fleshy parts

0:36:49.080 --> 0:36:53.200
<v Speaker 1>of the hand, but showing the bones hidden underneath the flesh.

0:36:53.280 --> 0:36:56.120
<v Speaker 1>And when Runkin created an X ray exposure of his

0:36:56.160 --> 0:36:58.680
<v Speaker 1>wife's hand. She reportedly looked at the images of her

0:36:58.719 --> 0:37:02.439
<v Speaker 1>bones and said, I have seen my death. Uh yeah.

0:37:02.520 --> 0:37:04.239
<v Speaker 1>And if you want more about this, we talked about

0:37:04.239 --> 0:37:06.200
<v Speaker 1>this in our X ray episode of Invention. But the

0:37:06.560 --> 0:37:09.640
<v Speaker 1>X ray photo was a radically completely new way of

0:37:09.800 --> 0:37:12.920
<v Speaker 1>imaging the hidden reality inside the body. It had been

0:37:12.960 --> 0:37:15.879
<v Speaker 1>discovered almost completely by accident, and it had been only

0:37:15.920 --> 0:37:19.080
<v Speaker 1>like fifteen years before this. Of course, photography itself was

0:37:19.120 --> 0:37:21.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe like eighty to ninety years old at the time,

0:37:22.000 --> 0:37:23.839
<v Speaker 1>And so you add to that the fact that people

0:37:23.880 --> 0:37:27.640
<v Speaker 1>were proposing all kinds of other hypothetical classes of raise

0:37:27.800 --> 0:37:30.000
<v Speaker 1>at the time. You remember we talked about in rays.

0:37:30.840 --> 0:37:33.799
<v Speaker 1>Those didn't exist, but people were just thinking that they

0:37:33.840 --> 0:37:36.759
<v Speaker 1>were all kinds of rays we didn't detect or understand

0:37:36.840 --> 0:37:40.800
<v Speaker 1>yet invisible forces beaming out from one object to another.

0:37:41.320 --> 0:37:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Um Fukurai was wrong. I think he. I think he

0:37:43.719 --> 0:37:46.160
<v Speaker 1>was misguided, But I don't think it was crazy at

0:37:46.160 --> 0:37:49.400
<v Speaker 1>the time, or certainly not as crazy as it seems

0:37:49.440 --> 0:37:53.080
<v Speaker 1>now to think that the hidden anatomy that governed the

0:37:53.120 --> 0:37:55.680
<v Speaker 1>mind's eye and the brain might leave some kind of

0:37:55.760 --> 0:37:59.040
<v Speaker 1>print on a piece of film Via raise projected out

0:37:59.040 --> 0:38:01.319
<v Speaker 1>of the head. I don't know, does that make sense

0:38:01.320 --> 0:38:03.319
<v Speaker 1>to you? Yeah? Yeah, I mean we have to put

0:38:03.320 --> 0:38:06.640
<v Speaker 1>ourselves in the framework of the time and uh and

0:38:06.640 --> 0:38:09.400
<v Speaker 1>and and really again in the sense of future shock

0:38:09.520 --> 0:38:12.279
<v Speaker 1>that would have would have still been resonating and to

0:38:12.360 --> 0:38:14.360
<v Speaker 1>a certain extence still resonates. Because I think one of

0:38:14.400 --> 0:38:16.239
<v Speaker 1>the one of the things that we're going to keep

0:38:16.680 --> 0:38:19.799
<v Speaker 1>seeing in these episodes is that and I think this

0:38:19.920 --> 0:38:23.600
<v Speaker 1>was revealed again in our our photography series on Invention,

0:38:23.760 --> 0:38:28.240
<v Speaker 1>is that photography is a complicated process that brings in uh,

0:38:28.400 --> 0:38:31.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, at least two different fields the third if

0:38:31.239 --> 0:38:36.000
<v Speaker 1>you count the artistic world as well, but certainly optics

0:38:36.040 --> 0:38:40.400
<v Speaker 1>and chemistry and not everyone really has a firm grasp

0:38:40.640 --> 0:38:42.600
<v Speaker 1>on that like it too. For a lot of us,

0:38:42.600 --> 0:38:46.440
<v Speaker 1>it's still kind of feels like magic. A polaroid camera, uh,

0:38:46.520 --> 0:38:49.880
<v Speaker 1>you know where you know, instantly gives you the images

0:38:50.400 --> 0:38:54.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of magic. Uh. And when we when we don't

0:38:54.640 --> 0:39:00.000
<v Speaker 1>understand something completely, it it allows us to engage in uh,

0:39:00.280 --> 0:39:04.439
<v Speaker 1>unrealistic modes of thought about what is going on with

0:39:04.760 --> 0:39:08.799
<v Speaker 1>the camera, What is going on with photography? All Right,

0:39:08.800 --> 0:39:11.040
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna keep talking about all this, but we're gonna

0:39:11.040 --> 0:39:17.759
<v Speaker 1>take one quick break first. Alright, we're back. So I

0:39:17.760 --> 0:39:20.000
<v Speaker 1>want to talk just a little bit about this idea

0:39:20.000 --> 0:39:24.239
<v Speaker 1>of remote viewing, which which Fukarai was definitely involved in. Yeah,

0:39:25.040 --> 0:39:26.879
<v Speaker 1>this idea that you know, you could just you could

0:39:26.920 --> 0:39:29.759
<v Speaker 1>see what's going on in another place, either in another room,

0:39:30.120 --> 0:39:33.800
<v Speaker 1>another part of the world, sealed envelope, sealed envelope, or

0:39:33.840 --> 0:39:37.480
<v Speaker 1>another planet. And you know, another example of an accomplished

0:39:37.480 --> 0:39:41.000
<v Speaker 1>individual in their field who is also a prominent UH

0:39:41.320 --> 0:39:46.400
<v Speaker 1>proponent of remote viewing is Atlanta's own Courtney Brown, an

0:39:46.400 --> 0:39:50.000
<v Speaker 1>associate professor in the Political Science department at Emory University.

0:39:50.400 --> 0:39:54.160
<v Speaker 1>It also works in non linear mathematics. So we see

0:39:54.520 --> 0:39:58.360
<v Speaker 1>in Fukarai an interest in hypnosis uh. And then Brown

0:39:58.760 --> 0:40:03.400
<v Speaker 1>is versed in meditation shan UH. Meditation induced light experiences

0:40:03.480 --> 0:40:06.480
<v Speaker 1>can occur and have been linked to similar experiences in

0:40:06.560 --> 0:40:10.239
<v Speaker 1>sensory deprivation uh. And and I've seen things like that

0:40:10.280 --> 0:40:13.319
<v Speaker 1>in yoga meditation as well, where you will be you know,

0:40:13.360 --> 0:40:17.000
<v Speaker 1>you're you're you're seeing lights or shapes or or some

0:40:17.080 --> 0:40:21.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of imagery that feels as if it is it

0:40:21.320 --> 0:40:24.040
<v Speaker 1>is arising and it is not called forth. You know

0:40:24.080 --> 0:40:26.640
<v Speaker 1>what I'm saying like, it doesn't feel like it's something

0:40:26.680 --> 0:40:29.719
<v Speaker 1>that you are consciously imagining. It doesn't feel like something

0:40:29.719 --> 0:40:32.640
<v Speaker 1>that is dictated by the default mode network, you know,

0:40:32.880 --> 0:40:35.840
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't feel like the sort of images um or

0:40:35.920 --> 0:40:38.920
<v Speaker 1>thoughts that are normally bombarding our brain. Well, I think

0:40:38.920 --> 0:40:42.960
<v Speaker 1>about how often in psychedelic experiences people talk about believing

0:40:43.000 --> 0:40:46.160
<v Speaker 1>they have encountered an other where if you just I mean,

0:40:46.440 --> 0:40:48.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's impossible to know for sure, but it

0:40:48.280 --> 0:40:50.440
<v Speaker 1>seems like probably what's going on is they're having an

0:40:50.440 --> 0:40:53.960
<v Speaker 1>internal experience with their own brain. But there are some

0:40:54.080 --> 0:40:58.280
<v Speaker 1>types of experiences that we've just for whatever reason, feel

0:40:58.440 --> 0:41:03.000
<v Speaker 1>our exogenous. It feels like it's coming from outside you, right,

0:41:03.080 --> 0:41:06.920
<v Speaker 1>and so with with the right amount of of priming, expectation,

0:41:07.040 --> 0:41:11.239
<v Speaker 1>and ultimately consolidation, Like any one of these experiences, be

0:41:11.280 --> 0:41:14.240
<v Speaker 1>it something that is due to the use of psychedelics

0:41:14.360 --> 0:41:18.760
<v Speaker 1>or something that is acquired through meditation, hypnosis, etcetera um,

0:41:18.800 --> 0:41:22.040
<v Speaker 1>because as we've discussed before, like even normal, our normal

0:41:22.080 --> 0:41:27.759
<v Speaker 1>sensory view of the world is inherently hallucinatory, you know,

0:41:27.800 --> 0:41:29.680
<v Speaker 1>it is in its in its own way and illusion.

0:41:30.239 --> 0:41:32.120
<v Speaker 1>It's not the way things are. It's just like a

0:41:32.320 --> 0:41:35.360
<v Speaker 1>useful sort of movie that we can interact with the

0:41:35.360 --> 0:41:37.880
<v Speaker 1>world through. Right. So if you're having an experience like

0:41:37.920 --> 0:41:41.759
<v Speaker 1>that and it feels real, right, and then you can

0:41:41.800 --> 0:41:46.080
<v Speaker 1>see how even like certainly very intelligent people, uh can

0:41:46.520 --> 0:41:50.120
<v Speaker 1>can can come to believe that that they are actually

0:41:50.560 --> 0:41:54.920
<v Speaker 1>perceiving the reality of a distant location and become very

0:41:54.920 --> 0:41:57.840
<v Speaker 1>convinced of it. And then certainly if you have a

0:41:58.000 --> 0:42:00.600
<v Speaker 1>name for this as well, you know, becomes kind of

0:42:00.719 --> 0:42:04.799
<v Speaker 1>established in parapsychology. Than than that also helps that gives

0:42:04.800 --> 0:42:08.440
<v Speaker 1>you even more like priming and conditioning, uh too, in

0:42:08.440 --> 0:42:11.920
<v Speaker 1>which to frame this experience. And and also I mean

0:42:11.920 --> 0:42:13.600
<v Speaker 1>just to go back to psychedelics too, and certainly our

0:42:13.640 --> 0:42:16.960
<v Speaker 1>episode on psychedelics, like we see that trend uh in

0:42:17.040 --> 0:42:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the twentieth century, right, this this counterculture emerge, this idea

0:42:21.000 --> 0:42:27.040
<v Speaker 1>taking shape that secular individuals can have a essentially a

0:42:27.080 --> 0:42:32.200
<v Speaker 1>mystical experience that is not due to the imachinations of

0:42:32.239 --> 0:42:36.400
<v Speaker 1>gods or angels, you know, um And and so you know,

0:42:36.440 --> 0:42:38.600
<v Speaker 1>it's it's not surprising that we see all, you know,

0:42:39.480 --> 0:42:42.040
<v Speaker 1>cases like this arising. So I also say on top

0:42:42.080 --> 0:42:45.200
<v Speaker 1>of that, there's just I think there's a very respectable

0:42:45.280 --> 0:42:49.080
<v Speaker 1>humility impulse that says like, Okay, you know, we should

0:42:49.080 --> 0:42:51.440
<v Speaker 1>always accept that there may be forces at work in

0:42:51.440 --> 0:42:54.120
<v Speaker 1>our day to day surroundings that we don't fully understand.

0:42:54.560 --> 0:42:57.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, we don't have a scientific theory that accounts

0:42:57.320 --> 0:42:59.640
<v Speaker 1>for them yet. And I think that's a good thing

0:43:00.000 --> 0:43:02.400
<v Speaker 1>to start from. But I think a lot of like

0:43:02.440 --> 0:43:06.680
<v Speaker 1>parapsychology and paranormal type people jump from there too, because

0:43:06.840 --> 0:43:09.439
<v Speaker 1>we we should acknowledge that there are lots of things

0:43:09.520 --> 0:43:12.640
<v Speaker 1>about the world we don't understand yet. Therefore remote viewing

0:43:12.719 --> 0:43:16.400
<v Speaker 1>is real, you know, or like therefore, you know, you

0:43:16.440 --> 0:43:20.319
<v Speaker 1>can't discount thoughtography and finding the right balance there, I

0:43:20.320 --> 0:43:23.600
<v Speaker 1>think is part of the difficulty of living the skeptical life.

0:43:23.640 --> 0:43:25.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, you don't want to live a life of

0:43:25.040 --> 0:43:29.200
<v Speaker 1>denialism where you just like, anytime something is strange, you're unexplained,

0:43:29.239 --> 0:43:31.840
<v Speaker 1>you just say like, oh, that's nonsense. But at the

0:43:31.840 --> 0:43:34.400
<v Speaker 1>same time, you want to maintain a high standard of evidence,

0:43:34.440 --> 0:43:36.960
<v Speaker 1>and that's that's the tightrope walk I guess you've got

0:43:36.960 --> 0:43:39.200
<v Speaker 1>to do if you want to be a scientific investigator,

0:43:39.520 --> 0:43:41.680
<v Speaker 1>if you want to try to have the most accurate

0:43:41.760 --> 0:43:44.319
<v Speaker 1>view you can of the world. And they're always going

0:43:44.360 --> 0:43:47.759
<v Speaker 1>to be these edge cases where somebody's presenting you know,

0:43:47.880 --> 0:43:52.279
<v Speaker 1>evidence that maybe maybe seems compelling for some kind of

0:43:52.280 --> 0:43:55.800
<v Speaker 1>phenomenon that doesn't really seem like it like it fits

0:43:55.840 --> 0:43:59.240
<v Speaker 1>with well tested theories that otherwise predict the physical world.

0:43:59.560 --> 0:44:01.359
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's the case that some of these

0:44:01.360 --> 0:44:05.400
<v Speaker 1>investigators have run into with psychic photography, especially in the

0:44:05.400 --> 0:44:08.600
<v Speaker 1>cases we'll talk about with Ted serious. Absolutely. I should

0:44:08.640 --> 0:44:11.000
<v Speaker 1>also point out that we always have to remember that

0:44:11.040 --> 0:44:14.120
<v Speaker 1>the c i A sunk something like twenty million dollars

0:44:14.560 --> 0:44:17.440
<v Speaker 1>into the Stargate project in the nine nineties and an

0:44:17.440 --> 0:44:21.640
<v Speaker 1>attempt to ascertain the effectiveness and military potential of remote viewing,

0:44:22.000 --> 0:44:25.000
<v Speaker 1>and this project was ultimately terminated in remote viewing was

0:44:25.040 --> 0:44:32.040
<v Speaker 1>found unfruitful to their needs. But maybe it was a conspiracy, No, No,

0:44:32.200 --> 0:44:34.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean yeah, I tend to think like if there.

0:44:34.920 --> 0:44:37.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, first of all, I've got major objections to

0:44:37.440 --> 0:44:41.600
<v Speaker 1>remote viewing just on like a plausibility basis. Like you know, again,

0:44:41.880 --> 0:44:44.080
<v Speaker 1>you can't rule things out just because you don't know

0:44:44.160 --> 0:44:46.480
<v Speaker 1>the mechanism. But if you've got a pretty good picture

0:44:46.520 --> 0:44:49.480
<v Speaker 1>of how physics works, and they just you know, their

0:44:49.520 --> 0:44:52.640
<v Speaker 1>powers proposed that don't seem to fit in any way

0:44:52.760 --> 0:44:57.240
<v Speaker 1>with any you know, any physical forces that you could identify.

0:44:57.440 --> 0:44:59.839
<v Speaker 1>That's that should definitely be a red flag to start with.

0:45:00.200 --> 0:45:02.120
<v Speaker 1>And then on top of that, I think there are

0:45:02.160 --> 0:45:05.759
<v Speaker 1>additional plausibility problems with remote viewing, which is like, if

0:45:05.880 --> 0:45:08.479
<v Speaker 1>it is, if it does exist, why isn't it being

0:45:08.520 --> 0:45:12.560
<v Speaker 1>taken better advantage of Yeah? Uh, and that thing said,

0:45:12.600 --> 0:45:14.560
<v Speaker 1>I do come back to like what I said earlier, like,

0:45:15.280 --> 0:45:19.400
<v Speaker 1>even though it's not scientifically feasible as far as we

0:45:19.480 --> 0:45:22.279
<v Speaker 1>understand it, um, you know, that doesn't mean that you know,

0:45:22.280 --> 0:45:25.560
<v Speaker 1>people shouldn't be interested in it and uh or even

0:45:25.800 --> 0:45:28.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, practice it, but it needs to be more

0:45:28.040 --> 0:45:30.120
<v Speaker 1>of I feel like it is more definitely in the

0:45:30.160 --> 0:45:34.000
<v Speaker 1>line of like a spiritual or religious practice, you know. Um.

0:45:34.040 --> 0:45:36.120
<v Speaker 1>But that's my just my two cents on it. And

0:45:36.160 --> 0:45:38.279
<v Speaker 1>I think that's one of the problems that and we're

0:45:38.280 --> 0:45:39.839
<v Speaker 1>going to see that with a lot of these these

0:45:39.840 --> 0:45:43.400
<v Speaker 1>people that are they're claiming these abilities, is they are

0:45:43.440 --> 0:45:47.000
<v Speaker 1>not presenting them as something that is uh, you know,

0:45:47.080 --> 0:45:50.400
<v Speaker 1>ultimately like the domain of the spiritual, something that can't

0:45:50.400 --> 0:45:53.160
<v Speaker 1>really be proven or disproven. But they're but they're agreeing

0:45:53.200 --> 0:45:57.880
<v Speaker 1>to test, they're agreeing to uh to uh performances of

0:45:57.920 --> 0:46:02.200
<v Speaker 1>their ability and in fighting in some cases experts, to

0:46:02.200 --> 0:46:04.439
<v Speaker 1>to see what they're doing and to to to try

0:46:04.480 --> 0:46:08.879
<v Speaker 1>and find the problems in it. Uh. So Um, it's

0:46:08.880 --> 0:46:11.640
<v Speaker 1>something to keep in mind as we've moved forward. All Right,

0:46:11.680 --> 0:46:13.839
<v Speaker 1>So let's come back to a figure that we've We've

0:46:13.840 --> 0:46:17.800
<v Speaker 1>mentioned the name already, uh ted Sirius. That's s c

0:46:18.000 --> 0:46:23.040
<v Speaker 1>r iOS. Is it serious or Sirios Sirius? With Sirius,

0:46:23.040 --> 0:46:26.480
<v Speaker 1>well you say that, I'll say Sirius just confusing like

0:46:26.520 --> 0:46:31.680
<v Speaker 1>serious black Um. So. Sirius lived through two thousand six,

0:46:32.320 --> 0:46:35.319
<v Speaker 1>and he claimed to be able to create thoutographs on

0:46:35.400 --> 0:46:41.359
<v Speaker 1>polaroid film. So, um, this is an interesting figure, um

0:46:41.840 --> 0:46:45.799
<v Speaker 1>to say the least. So um. I was reading a

0:46:45.800 --> 0:46:47.920
<v Speaker 1>little bit about this in that in that book The

0:46:47.920 --> 0:46:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Perfect Medium, paras psychologist Stephen E. Broad writes about him

0:46:53.200 --> 0:46:57.920
<v Speaker 1>who brought is also a philosophy professor, uh, and he

0:46:58.000 --> 0:47:01.200
<v Speaker 1>contends that Sirius is photograph fee is perhaps the best

0:47:01.239 --> 0:47:04.000
<v Speaker 1>documented and perhaps the most impressive. Does he seem a

0:47:04.000 --> 0:47:09.680
<v Speaker 1>little uh sympathetic to maybe he did have some psychic powers? Um?

0:47:09.920 --> 0:47:14.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean I encourage everyone to read Broad's work for

0:47:14.560 --> 0:47:20.480
<v Speaker 1>themselves because he um. He certainly is more inclined to

0:47:20.480 --> 0:47:25.799
<v Speaker 1>to criticize some of the the individuals who have been

0:47:25.840 --> 0:47:29.359
<v Speaker 1>attributed as being like solid debunkers. At the very least,

0:47:29.360 --> 0:47:33.480
<v Speaker 1>he seems to be saying, look, whatever Ciris was doing,

0:47:33.880 --> 0:47:36.000
<v Speaker 1>it's not nearly as debunked as you think it is.

0:47:36.760 --> 0:47:39.319
<v Speaker 1>Um And I'm and he is a para psychologist. He

0:47:39.400 --> 0:47:42.040
<v Speaker 1>is a para psychologist. So so I want to stress

0:47:42.080 --> 0:47:45.080
<v Speaker 1>all of that, but it's still an interesting read. He

0:47:45.120 --> 0:47:48.480
<v Speaker 1>does seem to be more inclined to um entertain the

0:47:48.520 --> 0:47:53.560
<v Speaker 1>possibility though. So. Sirius was a Chicago bellhop who had

0:47:53.560 --> 0:47:57.600
<v Speaker 1>experimented with with hypnosis and uh. He claims that during

0:47:57.640 --> 0:48:00.200
<v Speaker 1>this time he found that he could use his trying

0:48:00.200 --> 0:48:04.759
<v Speaker 1>to project images onto camera film in later instant polaroid film.

0:48:04.800 --> 0:48:07.680
<v Speaker 1>And he apparently demonstrated this to various folks and was

0:48:07.760 --> 0:48:11.799
<v Speaker 1>quite convincing. And this caught the attention of Denver psychiatrist

0:48:11.880 --> 0:48:16.560
<v Speaker 1>and researcher Jewel Eisenbudd, who took a strong interest in

0:48:16.600 --> 0:48:21.000
<v Speaker 1>his work and conducted numerous trials resulting in hundreds of images. Yeah,

0:48:21.040 --> 0:48:23.200
<v Speaker 1>and I've read that Eisenbudd is one of the main

0:48:23.280 --> 0:48:26.359
<v Speaker 1>reasons that people really know about Ted Seriously, he sort

0:48:26.360 --> 0:48:29.040
<v Speaker 1>of took up the cause like or at least from

0:48:29.080 --> 0:48:33.440
<v Speaker 1>what I read, Eisenbudd claimed he was initially skeptical of

0:48:33.440 --> 0:48:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Ted Serious his abilities, but then after spending time with

0:48:36.800 --> 0:48:39.840
<v Speaker 1>him and seeing his photographs, he he came more and

0:48:39.880 --> 0:48:42.319
<v Speaker 1>more to believe that these powers were real and that

0:48:42.600 --> 0:48:45.839
<v Speaker 1>Serious really could project his mind's eye onto a piece

0:48:45.880 --> 0:48:50.120
<v Speaker 1>of film. Yeah, Eisenbud at one point believed that Sirius

0:48:50.440 --> 0:48:54.560
<v Speaker 1>was seeing the essentially remote viewing the surface of the

0:48:54.680 --> 0:49:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Jovian moon Ghannamede, and then using photography to imply at

0:49:00.239 --> 0:49:03.399
<v Speaker 1>that image on onto film. Right, And it gets more

0:49:03.400 --> 0:49:06.120
<v Speaker 1>complex than that, actually, because I was reading that so

0:49:07.120 --> 0:49:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Serious apparently made these images that Eisenbudd later said, oh,

0:49:10.640 --> 0:49:13.319
<v Speaker 1>this is the surface of Ganymede, because he said that

0:49:13.400 --> 0:49:16.799
<v Speaker 1>Serious was very interested in space exploration and had been

0:49:16.840 --> 0:49:20.000
<v Speaker 1>thinking about the voyager to probe and that must have

0:49:20.040 --> 0:49:22.680
<v Speaker 1>been what triggered his generation of this image of the

0:49:22.680 --> 0:49:26.400
<v Speaker 1>surface of of Ganymede. But at the time he generated

0:49:26.400 --> 0:49:29.719
<v Speaker 1>the image, the photographs from the voyager probe had not

0:49:29.840 --> 0:49:34.200
<v Speaker 1>been taken yet. So I think Eisenbudd is suggesting that

0:49:34.239 --> 0:49:38.640
<v Speaker 1>if these photos are real, serious actually not only projected

0:49:38.680 --> 0:49:42.120
<v Speaker 1>his thoughts directly on the film, but also pre cognitively

0:49:42.320 --> 0:49:48.680
<v Speaker 1>remote viewed the surface of of wait, precognitively. Well, I

0:49:48.719 --> 0:49:50.960
<v Speaker 1>guess it wouldn't have mattered whether the voyager probe got

0:49:51.000 --> 0:49:53.200
<v Speaker 1>there yet he was seeing the surface of the moon

0:49:53.239 --> 0:49:55.440
<v Speaker 1>before the probe got there, right, And I've seen this

0:49:55.480 --> 0:49:59.560
<v Speaker 1>in other uh you know, accounts of remote viewing, where

0:49:59.600 --> 0:50:02.960
<v Speaker 1>they have they have essentially seen other worlds or have

0:50:03.120 --> 0:50:06.600
<v Speaker 1>encountered historic figures, that sort of thing. Right now, Another

0:50:06.640 --> 0:50:09.680
<v Speaker 1>thing worth noting about Cirios here is that is that

0:50:09.880 --> 0:50:14.120
<v Speaker 1>even eisenbud like points out that that that ted it

0:50:14.200 --> 0:50:17.640
<v Speaker 1>was definitely an alcoholic and that's sort of part of

0:50:17.680 --> 0:50:21.239
<v Speaker 1>the thing, but also displayed like a lot of you know,

0:50:21.400 --> 0:50:23.960
<v Speaker 1>at times kind of like irrational behavior and seemed to

0:50:23.960 --> 0:50:28.560
<v Speaker 1>have you know, definite uh you know, psychological issues. So

0:50:29.360 --> 0:50:34.239
<v Speaker 1>but but anyway, this was basically Sirius is process. So

0:50:34.600 --> 0:50:38.400
<v Speaker 1>he generally he needed to be drunk, generally very drunk

0:50:38.760 --> 0:50:42.120
<v Speaker 1>to perform this art, which I mean, I guess that's

0:50:42.160 --> 0:50:45.080
<v Speaker 1>fair enough, right, I mean, I mean, really even podcasting,

0:50:45.080 --> 0:50:48.080
<v Speaker 1>I remember when when when we first started podcasting, um,

0:50:48.719 --> 0:50:50.799
<v Speaker 1>Jerry told us like, have a little to drink before

0:50:50.800 --> 0:50:53.120
<v Speaker 1>you go into the podcast, but if it'll help. Jerry

0:50:53.160 --> 0:50:56.319
<v Speaker 1>Ever told me that, well maybe maybe I just look

0:50:56.360 --> 0:50:58.480
<v Speaker 1>like I needed to drink at the time. I don't know.

0:50:58.760 --> 0:51:00.840
<v Speaker 1>But wait, are you serious? Serious? Yeah? I mean I

0:51:00.880 --> 0:51:04.240
<v Speaker 1>think she's joking. But at any rate, like the idea

0:51:04.400 --> 0:51:08.560
<v Speaker 1>that you would need a social lubricant to essentially to

0:51:08.640 --> 0:51:14.680
<v Speaker 1>perform something, um either you know, a legitimate psychic ability,

0:51:14.840 --> 0:51:17.680
<v Speaker 1>or to perform some sort of a trick, some sort

0:51:17.719 --> 0:51:22.400
<v Speaker 1>of a um an illusion or even a confidence trick. Right, um,

0:51:22.480 --> 0:51:25.520
<v Speaker 1>So that's one part of it. Also, he preferred to

0:51:25.680 --> 0:51:28.239
<v Speaker 1>hold a quota he called a gizmo in his hand

0:51:28.719 --> 0:51:32.560
<v Speaker 1>to help him focus his powers. And it was a short,

0:51:32.640 --> 0:51:36.000
<v Speaker 1>open cylinder about an inch in diameter. And of course

0:51:36.080 --> 0:51:38.920
<v Speaker 1>this is highly suspicious. You don't have to be Sherlock

0:51:38.920 --> 0:51:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Holmes to suspect that the gizmo is either the heart

0:51:42.320 --> 0:51:45.520
<v Speaker 1>of the trick that he is going to perform, or

0:51:45.600 --> 0:51:49.160
<v Speaker 1>it's a decoy to distract onlookers from the actual trick.

0:51:50.200 --> 0:51:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Because he'd often placed this in front of the camera lens,

0:51:53.640 --> 0:51:56.640
<v Speaker 1>like he'd get up into the into the camera lens

0:51:56.680 --> 0:51:59.800
<v Speaker 1>with the gizmo and then also like you know, mugging

0:52:00.120 --> 0:52:02.920
<v Speaker 1>or the camera, placing his forehead in the way and

0:52:03.200 --> 0:52:07.120
<v Speaker 1>somehow using the gizmo allegedly to focus his thoughts into

0:52:07.160 --> 0:52:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the camera. Yeah, he said he needed to connect his

0:52:09.640 --> 0:52:12.799
<v Speaker 1>body to the camera. Uh. Though there are allegations also

0:52:12.880 --> 0:52:16.319
<v Speaker 1>that he was able to produce autographs and uh and

0:52:16.320 --> 0:52:19.600
<v Speaker 1>and actually make images on a camera while being far

0:52:19.640 --> 0:52:22.719
<v Speaker 1>away from the camera. That at least is alleged. But

0:52:22.800 --> 0:52:25.560
<v Speaker 1>he most of the time, it has said, would like

0:52:25.640 --> 0:52:28.239
<v Speaker 1>put his forehead right on this thing and stick it

0:52:28.280 --> 0:52:32.080
<v Speaker 1>in the camera camera lyn So, Yeah, raises some red flags, right,

0:52:32.320 --> 0:52:35.120
<v Speaker 1>But then the idea is that he's essentially taking a

0:52:35.160 --> 0:52:37.719
<v Speaker 1>snapshot of the mental image that he is forming in

0:52:37.760 --> 0:52:41.200
<v Speaker 1>his mind. The be it a mental image that is

0:52:41.239 --> 0:52:45.800
<v Speaker 1>formed via memory or just sort of general mental imaging,

0:52:45.960 --> 0:52:48.200
<v Speaker 1>or it's something that is that he has acquired through

0:52:48.680 --> 0:52:52.400
<v Speaker 1>um uh you know, sending his consciousness to a to

0:52:52.800 --> 0:52:55.399
<v Speaker 1>the moons of Jupiter. Yeah. And now I read some

0:52:55.920 --> 0:52:59.880
<v Speaker 1>conflicting reports that sometimes it seems like the images he produced,

0:52:59.880 --> 0:53:03.080
<v Speaker 1>he claimed, were like not what he was thinking about consciously,

0:53:03.160 --> 0:53:06.160
<v Speaker 1>but just would be these unconscious kind of associative images.

0:53:06.560 --> 0:53:11.440
<v Speaker 1>That's what's suggested by Eisenbud uh, the Galilean moon, right,

0:53:12.280 --> 0:53:14.560
<v Speaker 1>is that he just had the Voyager two probe on

0:53:14.640 --> 0:53:17.080
<v Speaker 1>his mind and happened to generate an image of the

0:53:17.120 --> 0:53:19.919
<v Speaker 1>surface of Ganymede. And so if we're approaching it from

0:53:19.960 --> 0:53:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the you know, the pro psychic side, we can say, well,

0:53:22.440 --> 0:53:25.360
<v Speaker 1>that makes sense. The mind is difficult to control. Mental

0:53:25.400 --> 0:53:28.040
<v Speaker 1>images may form in the mind that you're not trying

0:53:28.080 --> 0:53:30.239
<v Speaker 1>to summon. Certainly we can all attest to that. On

0:53:30.280 --> 0:53:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the other hand, from a purely skeptical point of view,

0:53:32.880 --> 0:53:35.279
<v Speaker 1>if you're going to be drawn in and put to

0:53:35.320 --> 0:53:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the test by asking, you know, being asked to think

0:53:38.120 --> 0:53:41.200
<v Speaker 1>of a particular thing, how convenient would it be if

0:53:41.239 --> 0:53:43.200
<v Speaker 1>you could say, well, I tried to think of that

0:53:43.680 --> 0:53:45.760
<v Speaker 1>that that bird feeder that you wanted me to imagine,

0:53:45.760 --> 0:53:48.040
<v Speaker 1>but I'm just so obsessed with space travel right now,

0:53:48.600 --> 0:53:51.080
<v Speaker 1>I give you Ganymede instead, right. I mean that makes

0:53:51.360 --> 0:53:54.759
<v Speaker 1>that suggests that maybe you've already got an image of

0:53:54.840 --> 0:53:57.120
<v Speaker 1>something that looks like a moon's surface on hand with

0:53:57.160 --> 0:53:59.400
<v Speaker 1>you or something, right, And I guess that gets to

0:53:59.680 --> 0:54:01.759
<v Speaker 1>what the actual trick would be if there is a

0:54:01.800 --> 0:54:05.279
<v Speaker 1>trick here, which I assume there probably is right now

0:54:05.400 --> 0:54:08.200
<v Speaker 1>now in that article in the Perfect Medium, A broad

0:54:08.360 --> 0:54:11.799
<v Speaker 1>certainly focuses on the aspects of Ted's art that kind

0:54:11.800 --> 0:54:14.160
<v Speaker 1>of continue to mystify, as he mentions, for instance, that

0:54:14.200 --> 0:54:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Eisenbudd offered a cash reward for anyone able to replicate

0:54:17.239 --> 0:54:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Ted's results quote under conditions similar to those prevailing during

0:54:20.600 --> 0:54:23.040
<v Speaker 1>the during the experiments. Now I've read that there was

0:54:23.120 --> 0:54:27.680
<v Speaker 1>serious dispute about like them negotiating with skeptics about what

0:54:27.719 --> 0:54:31.439
<v Speaker 1>would be acceptable for those uh conditions, Like I think

0:54:31.440 --> 0:54:34.920
<v Speaker 1>I read that James Randy wanted to try to replicate it,

0:54:34.960 --> 0:54:37.680
<v Speaker 1>but that Eisenbudd said, well, you have to be really drunk,

0:54:37.800 --> 0:54:41.120
<v Speaker 1>because Ted is always really drunk when he does it. Yeah,

0:54:41.120 --> 0:54:44.560
<v Speaker 1>the famous debunker James Randy, who we had the privilege

0:54:44.600 --> 0:54:48.600
<v Speaker 1>to meet, um but last year. Um. It definitely plays

0:54:48.600 --> 0:54:51.600
<v Speaker 1>into some of this, And it's kind of if you

0:54:51.800 --> 0:54:54.960
<v Speaker 1>if you read some of the more pro serious material,

0:54:55.520 --> 0:54:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Randy's kind of portrayed as a villain. Oh all, Randy

0:54:58.760 --> 0:55:01.160
<v Speaker 1>is always the villain of some thing written by pro

0:55:01.280 --> 0:55:05.960
<v Speaker 1>psychic powers people. Uh so so Yeah, some of these

0:55:06.000 --> 0:55:09.319
<v Speaker 1>account like brought accountants to highlight the things that were

0:55:09.320 --> 0:55:13.520
<v Speaker 1>not you know, they're still a little mysterious or or

0:55:13.760 --> 0:55:19.160
<v Speaker 1>or certainly accounts of replications that don't meet the same

0:55:19.200 --> 0:55:22.080
<v Speaker 1>degree of replication, Like you weren't able to do exactly

0:55:22.160 --> 0:55:25.879
<v Speaker 1>what Sirius is doing, therefore you didn't fully debunk him.

0:55:26.120 --> 0:55:28.640
<v Speaker 1>I've I've read some of his defenders say, Okay, people

0:55:28.719 --> 0:55:32.640
<v Speaker 1>have used tricks to replicate what serious was doing, but

0:55:32.680 --> 0:55:35.480
<v Speaker 1>they couldn't do it without those tricks being evident to

0:55:35.520 --> 0:55:38.879
<v Speaker 1>people who were watching, right. Um. I mean the other

0:55:38.880 --> 0:55:41.839
<v Speaker 1>way to think about it is, can I can I

0:55:41.880 --> 0:55:45.680
<v Speaker 1>paint the Mona Lisa? No? I cannot. Can I demonstrate

0:55:45.760 --> 0:55:50.040
<v Speaker 1>some of the techniques personally that that that the artists

0:55:50.120 --> 0:55:54.279
<v Speaker 1>used to create the Mona Lisa? Uh? Certainly, Uh. We

0:55:54.360 --> 0:55:57.160
<v Speaker 1>have to take it into account that Sirius, assuming again

0:55:57.239 --> 0:56:00.319
<v Speaker 1>that he's not a psychic, that he's not a not

0:56:00.680 --> 0:56:05.320
<v Speaker 1>capable of photography, that he's just a performer, an illusionist, Uh,

0:56:05.360 --> 0:56:08.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, a trickster, there is still an art to

0:56:08.080 --> 0:56:10.640
<v Speaker 1>what he is doing. Uh. There is still a performance

0:56:10.680 --> 0:56:13.880
<v Speaker 1>aspect of charismatic aspect to it, and their aspects of

0:56:13.920 --> 0:56:16.640
<v Speaker 1>that that are going to depend in part on like

0:56:17.080 --> 0:56:21.440
<v Speaker 1>innate charisma, but also in in practice, in in like

0:56:21.520 --> 0:56:25.880
<v Speaker 1>sheer devotion to to the trick and I think you

0:56:25.920 --> 0:56:28.759
<v Speaker 1>can't discount that and on likewise, you can't expect a

0:56:28.800 --> 0:56:32.719
<v Speaker 1>debunker to rise to that level of performance. Well, I

0:56:32.719 --> 0:56:34.640
<v Speaker 1>guess you can expect them to try. But I mean

0:56:35.239 --> 0:56:38.120
<v Speaker 1>that's one thing that you know, as long as we're

0:56:38.800 --> 0:56:42.560
<v Speaker 1>probing the depths of the unexplained, you could say, well,

0:56:42.640 --> 0:56:44.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's some kind of mystical power that this

0:56:44.960 --> 0:56:46.799
<v Speaker 1>person has that we just don't have the power to

0:56:46.840 --> 0:56:49.840
<v Speaker 1>explain it. Or you could say that there's an extreme

0:56:49.880 --> 0:56:53.320
<v Speaker 1>talent this person has for performing a trick that hasn't

0:56:53.400 --> 0:56:55.920
<v Speaker 1>been explained yet. Yeah, because certainly one of the things

0:56:55.920 --> 0:56:58.080
<v Speaker 1>that would come into play is slight of hand, right,

0:56:58.120 --> 0:57:03.719
<v Speaker 1>because the main charge is that is that Sirios had it.

0:57:03.800 --> 0:57:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Kind of varies. Sometimes they talk of just using the

0:57:05.719 --> 0:57:10.360
<v Speaker 1>microfilm um or using microfilm affixed to a marble or

0:57:10.840 --> 0:57:13.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, a film affixed to the end of a

0:57:13.280 --> 0:57:17.120
<v Speaker 1>tiny tube like inside the quote gizmo that her up

0:57:17.160 --> 0:57:19.520
<v Speaker 1>against the camera, because that's the obvious, right, is that

0:57:19.560 --> 0:57:22.560
<v Speaker 1>the gizmo contains something, And if it contains something, some

0:57:22.640 --> 0:57:25.680
<v Speaker 1>film would be ideal because then you have that pre

0:57:25.720 --> 0:57:28.960
<v Speaker 1>existing photograph that can be the thing that he imprints.

0:57:29.720 --> 0:57:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Um skeptic Karen's Hines also charged that Ted used a

0:57:34.200 --> 0:57:37.880
<v Speaker 1>secondary tube about one inch long with a tiny magnifying

0:57:37.960 --> 0:57:40.360
<v Speaker 1>lens that could hold a small slide, and then he

0:57:40.400 --> 0:57:43.480
<v Speaker 1>would conceal this within the gizmo, but also he could

0:57:43.560 --> 0:57:46.000
<v Speaker 1>use it when the gizmo was taken away, again getting

0:57:46.000 --> 0:57:49.280
<v Speaker 1>into that idea that the gizmos not merely useful as

0:57:49.920 --> 0:57:53.960
<v Speaker 1>something to um to hide the trick, but also can

0:57:54.000 --> 0:57:56.240
<v Speaker 1>be used as a distraction, can be the thing that, oh,

0:57:56.240 --> 0:57:58.320
<v Speaker 1>when it's taken away, look I can still do it.

0:57:58.520 --> 0:58:00.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't even have the gizmo on me, right, And

0:58:00.680 --> 0:58:03.560
<v Speaker 1>it was alleged that sometimes he could, I mean usually

0:58:03.560 --> 0:58:05.960
<v Speaker 1>he used the gizmo, but it's alleged that sometimes he

0:58:06.000 --> 0:58:08.760
<v Speaker 1>did it without the gizmo. Now, there were a number

0:58:08.840 --> 0:58:11.160
<v Speaker 1>of expose a s at the time that claimed to

0:58:11.200 --> 0:58:14.360
<v Speaker 1>show that Ted Sirius was a fraud. The entry in

0:58:14.400 --> 0:58:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the Skeptics Dictionary by Robert Todd Carroll suggests that two

0:58:17.240 --> 0:58:21.800
<v Speaker 1>amateur magicians and photographers named Charlie Reynolds and David Eisendraft

0:58:22.600 --> 0:58:26.320
<v Speaker 1>exposed Serious as a fraud. Basically, they would and spend

0:58:26.320 --> 0:58:28.680
<v Speaker 1>a weekend with him and jewel Iz and bud and

0:58:28.720 --> 0:58:31.840
<v Speaker 1>they saw his stuff, and they came to the conclusion

0:58:31.840 --> 0:58:33.560
<v Speaker 1>that he was a fraud and wrote this up in

0:58:33.600 --> 0:58:36.840
<v Speaker 1>the article. Uh and Reynolds and Eisendraft claimed to have

0:58:36.840 --> 0:58:42.360
<v Speaker 1>spotted Serious quote slipping something inside his little gizmo before demonstrations,

0:58:42.680 --> 0:58:44.800
<v Speaker 1>and they think it was a picture of something that

0:58:44.880 --> 0:58:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Sirius wanted to show up in the camera exposure. They

0:58:48.200 --> 0:58:52.320
<v Speaker 1>also published an article explaining their findings in October nineteen

0:58:52.400 --> 0:58:56.600
<v Speaker 1>sixty seven issue of Popular Photography. It was a photography magazine. Now,

0:58:56.640 --> 0:59:00.560
<v Speaker 1>according to the skeptic investigator Joe Nichols account of Serious

0:59:00.680 --> 0:59:03.920
<v Speaker 1>is confrontation with magicians and sleight of hand experts. Quote.

0:59:04.160 --> 0:59:07.439
<v Speaker 1>At one point during the session, after an exposure was made,

0:59:07.720 --> 0:59:10.640
<v Speaker 1>a magician asked to examine the paper tube to see

0:59:10.680 --> 0:59:13.200
<v Speaker 1>if there was anything inside. This would be the gizmo, right,

0:59:13.240 --> 0:59:16.720
<v Speaker 1>the gizmo. Uh. Serious backed away, putting his hand in

0:59:16.800 --> 0:59:21.160
<v Speaker 1>his pocket. Now that's suspicious behavior. But then, weirdly, during

0:59:21.200 --> 0:59:24.520
<v Speaker 1>this session, Serious was unable to produce the autographs, so

0:59:24.520 --> 0:59:27.040
<v Speaker 1>apparently he had been using the gizmo. They said, let

0:59:27.040 --> 0:59:29.120
<v Speaker 1>me see the gizmo, he wouldn't show it to them,

0:59:29.200 --> 0:59:31.280
<v Speaker 1>And then none of the pictures came out anyway, there

0:59:31.280 --> 0:59:34.760
<v Speaker 1>were no autographs. Uh, And he and Eisenbudd blamed the

0:59:34.880 --> 0:59:38.720
<v Speaker 1>quote hostile atmosphere for interfering with Serious his powers. This

0:59:38.760 --> 0:59:41.920
<v Speaker 1>is always a red flag also, I think. But there's

0:59:41.920 --> 0:59:44.280
<v Speaker 1>still plenty of people, I think, who hold out for

0:59:44.320 --> 0:59:48.520
<v Speaker 1>psychic photography, claiming that Ted Serious's powers were real and

0:59:48.600 --> 0:59:51.880
<v Speaker 1>could not be explained. And he's got defenders who say

0:59:52.000 --> 0:59:55.160
<v Speaker 1>that some of his feats are just impossible to explain.

0:59:55.240 --> 0:59:58.320
<v Speaker 1>For example, I was reading claims in an article in

0:59:58.320 --> 1:00:01.360
<v Speaker 1>the Chronicle of Higher Education which about a gallery exhibit

1:00:01.360 --> 1:00:04.240
<v Speaker 1>of Serious as thoutographs which I would like to see that.

1:00:04.680 --> 1:00:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, I mean they're interesting images, certainly when you

1:00:07.520 --> 1:00:09.920
<v Speaker 1>know the background for them, especially if you just think

1:00:09.920 --> 1:00:12.080
<v Speaker 1>about him as works of art, not as like displays

1:00:12.080 --> 1:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>of real psychic powers. Um. But to quote from this

1:00:14.880 --> 1:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>article quote, on occasion, volunteers were asked to attend the

1:00:17.960 --> 1:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>experiment with a photograph sealed and a cardboard back to

1:00:21.040 --> 1:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Manila envelope. Serious then managed to reproduce the image with

1:00:24.960 --> 1:00:27.800
<v Speaker 1>no prior knowledge of it. So again, that's like double

1:00:27.840 --> 1:00:31.040
<v Speaker 1>psychic powers. That's not just the photography, which would be

1:00:31.080 --> 1:00:33.160
<v Speaker 1>a feat even if he was looking directly at what

1:00:33.200 --> 1:00:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the photo should be. Um. But also I guess seeing

1:00:36.640 --> 1:00:39.400
<v Speaker 1>into this envelope if I'm reading that right, I don't know.

1:00:39.440 --> 1:00:41.760
<v Speaker 1>That might also be suggesting that they just arrived with

1:00:41.800 --> 1:00:43.560
<v Speaker 1>it sealed and then showed it to him and he

1:00:43.680 --> 1:00:46.560
<v Speaker 1>reproduced it. Either way, I mean, if you saw that,

1:00:46.600 --> 1:00:48.640
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't say that would prove it was real, but

1:00:48.680 --> 1:00:50.720
<v Speaker 1>that would be impressive. You know, you'd be like, wow,

1:00:50.760 --> 1:00:54.200
<v Speaker 1>that that's either real or some impressive trickery. I'd lean

1:00:54.240 --> 1:00:57.440
<v Speaker 1>toward the ladder. Um. But in other cases, he apparently

1:00:57.480 --> 1:00:59.840
<v Speaker 1>managed to produce what appeared to be images of land

1:01:00.040 --> 1:01:03.240
<v Speaker 1>arcs from up above, like aerial views that his supporters

1:01:03.280 --> 1:01:06.960
<v Speaker 1>claimed could not be explained through trickery. But it seems

1:01:06.960 --> 1:01:10.240
<v Speaker 1>like he stopped doing his thing after the late nineteen sixties,

1:01:10.280 --> 1:01:12.840
<v Speaker 1>which seems a little weird, Yeah, especially consider he lived

1:01:13.240 --> 1:01:15.560
<v Speaker 1>until two thousand and six. You know, I mean, that's

1:01:15.600 --> 1:01:18.040
<v Speaker 1>that's a lot of time to not at least not

1:01:18.120 --> 1:01:22.720
<v Speaker 1>be publicly doing this displaying this uh this ability. Uh.

1:01:22.920 --> 1:01:25.000
<v Speaker 1>But then again, UM, you know, we do have to

1:01:25.080 --> 1:01:29.160
<v Speaker 1>come back to you. The fact that Eisenbud himself wrote

1:01:29.160 --> 1:01:33.560
<v Speaker 1>that serious was you know, psychologically disturbed. Alcoholic, So you know,

1:01:34.520 --> 1:01:36.720
<v Speaker 1>you can come up with various, you know, reasons that

1:01:36.840 --> 1:01:40.400
<v Speaker 1>somebody with that kind of with with those kind of

1:01:40.400 --> 1:01:44.400
<v Speaker 1>demons would not engage in their art. Now, he wasn't

1:01:44.440 --> 1:01:46.600
<v Speaker 1>the only one in the later twentieth century to get

1:01:46.600 --> 1:01:48.800
<v Speaker 1>in on the psychic photography thing. Over the years, a

1:01:48.840 --> 1:01:52.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of figures, including Uri Geller, got into psychic photography.

1:01:53.000 --> 1:01:55.920
<v Speaker 1>One of one of Geller's many demonstrations was that he

1:01:55.920 --> 1:01:58.720
<v Speaker 1>would leave the lens cap on a camera, placed the

1:01:58.760 --> 1:02:01.880
<v Speaker 1>camera to his forehead, then take a picture, supposedly saying,

1:02:02.000 --> 1:02:03.800
<v Speaker 1>you know the same kind of thing. I'm using my

1:02:03.880 --> 1:02:06.960
<v Speaker 1>mind's eye to imprint upon the film, and then the

1:02:07.000 --> 1:02:10.240
<v Speaker 1>photo would reveal whatever he had been imagining. Again, James

1:02:10.360 --> 1:02:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Randy shows up, as he often does whenever Uri Geller

1:02:13.000 --> 1:02:17.120
<v Speaker 1>claims something. James Randy criticized this and other psychic photography

1:02:17.200 --> 1:02:21.160
<v Speaker 1>is having two main explanations, either using a handheld device

1:02:21.240 --> 1:02:23.560
<v Speaker 1>to project the image into the camera lens as the

1:02:23.560 --> 1:02:27.600
<v Speaker 1>photo was taken, or loading the camera with pre exposed

1:02:27.600 --> 1:02:31.400
<v Speaker 1>film already bearing the desired image, and the latter seems

1:02:31.400 --> 1:02:34.640
<v Speaker 1>to be the case with a later twentieth century alleged

1:02:34.640 --> 1:02:38.840
<v Speaker 1>psychic named Matsuaki Kyota, who claimed to be able to

1:02:38.880 --> 1:02:42.360
<v Speaker 1>produce photographs on film again, and skeptical critics such as

1:02:42.440 --> 1:02:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Joe Nicole have pointed out that when Massaaki Kyoto was

1:02:45.640 --> 1:02:49.720
<v Speaker 1>asked to perform his thoughtography under controlled conditions for a

1:02:49.800 --> 1:02:53.400
<v Speaker 1>TV crew in London, he couldn't produce the images, and

1:02:53.520 --> 1:02:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Nicol claims that it was only times when he was

1:02:56.120 --> 1:02:59.920
<v Speaker 1>able uh to get the film and have it alone

1:03:00.040 --> 1:03:02.600
<v Speaker 1>one with him, like basically to get hold of the

1:03:02.640 --> 1:03:05.640
<v Speaker 1>film and have it in a private place before the test,

1:03:06.000 --> 1:03:09.120
<v Speaker 1>that he could demonstrate his powers, which again makes you

1:03:09.160 --> 1:03:11.160
<v Speaker 1>think he was doing something to the film before it

1:03:11.200 --> 1:03:13.920
<v Speaker 1>was loaded in the camera. Alright, Well, on that note,

1:03:14.120 --> 1:03:16.800
<v Speaker 1>we are going to have to call it for episode

1:03:16.840 --> 1:03:20.440
<v Speaker 1>one of this exploration, but we are going to return

1:03:20.480 --> 1:03:23.320
<v Speaker 1>in a second episode where we're going to continue to

1:03:23.320 --> 1:03:26.280
<v Speaker 1>explore this idea, like how would it work if this

1:03:26.320 --> 1:03:30.360
<v Speaker 1>were possible? Like what what what can we grasp onto

1:03:30.400 --> 1:03:33.720
<v Speaker 1>in the labyrinth of the human mind and the complexity

1:03:33.760 --> 1:03:38.120
<v Speaker 1>of our our our sensory perception, but also what can

1:03:38.200 --> 1:03:41.480
<v Speaker 1>this question reveal about the reality of of mental imagery

1:03:41.520 --> 1:03:45.480
<v Speaker 1>and how that happens in the brain, Which is fascinating

1:03:45.480 --> 1:03:48.120
<v Speaker 1>mysterious and even spooky topic on its own, even though

1:03:48.160 --> 1:03:51.680
<v Speaker 1>we don't necessarily credit the reality of psychic photography. There's

1:03:51.680 --> 1:03:54.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of spooky stuff going on when you picture

1:03:54.080 --> 1:03:56.800
<v Speaker 1>something right. And we'll probably talk about the Ring a

1:03:56.800 --> 1:03:59.200
<v Speaker 1>little bit more, and we'll probably bring up a few

1:03:59.200 --> 1:04:03.800
<v Speaker 1>other film such as Scanners, so hey, be sure to

1:04:03.840 --> 1:04:05.560
<v Speaker 1>tune in for that episode. Tune in for all of

1:04:05.600 --> 1:04:09.040
<v Speaker 1>our episodes in October, which are going to be Halloween flavored.

1:04:09.600 --> 1:04:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Uh and we encourage you again to check out Invention

1:04:12.160 --> 1:04:13.840
<v Speaker 1>if you haven't already, can find it wherever you get

1:04:13.880 --> 1:04:16.760
<v Speaker 1>your podcast. You can find the website at inventioned pod

1:04:16.880 --> 1:04:19.160
<v Speaker 1>dot com. If you want to support our show, the

1:04:19.160 --> 1:04:20.760
<v Speaker 1>best thing you can do is rate and review it

1:04:20.800 --> 1:04:22.240
<v Speaker 1>wherever you have the power to do so, and make

1:04:22.280 --> 1:04:25.160
<v Speaker 1>sure you have subscribed. Huge thanks as always to our

1:04:25.280 --> 1:04:28.760
<v Speaker 1>awesome audio producer Seth Nicholas Johnson. If you would like

1:04:28.800 --> 1:04:30.600
<v Speaker 1>to get in touch with us with feedback on this

1:04:30.640 --> 1:04:33.240
<v Speaker 1>episode or any other, to suggest a topic for the future,

1:04:33.400 --> 1:04:36.360
<v Speaker 1>just to say hello, you can email us at contact

1:04:36.440 --> 1:04:46.480
<v Speaker 1>at stuff to Blow your Mind dot com. Stuff to

1:04:46.480 --> 1:04:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Blow Your Mind is a production of iHeart Radio's How

1:04:48.480 --> 1:04:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Stuff Works. For more podcasts from my Heart Radio, visit

1:04:51.000 --> 1:04:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the iHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen

1:04:53.840 --> 1:04:58.560
<v Speaker 1>to your favorite shows. Bla bla bla bla bla bl

1:04:58.600 --> 1:05:18.560
<v Speaker 1>bl blah blah blah blad. Welcome to Stuff to Blow

1:05:18.560 --> 1:05:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Your Mind, a production of I Heeart Radios How Stuff Works. Hey,

1:05:27.960 --> 1:05:30.040
<v Speaker 1>welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind. My name is

1:05:30.160 --> 1:05:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick, and we are back

1:05:33.320 --> 1:05:36.720
<v Speaker 1>with part two of our discussion of psychic photography the

1:05:37.640 --> 1:05:40.520
<v Speaker 1>press of the Mind's eye. That's right. We kicked off

1:05:40.600 --> 1:05:46.000
<v Speaker 1>last episode talking about the ring in which a psychically gifted,

1:05:46.760 --> 1:05:51.280
<v Speaker 1>disturbed little girl is able to use her the power

1:05:51.280 --> 1:05:55.720
<v Speaker 1>of her mind to burn images into things, including into

1:05:55.840 --> 1:06:00.120
<v Speaker 1>the film of a VHS tape. Sure, but all so

1:06:00.160 --> 1:06:02.919
<v Speaker 1>into all kinds of surfaces, right, Yeah, But but she's

1:06:02.960 --> 1:06:08.040
<v Speaker 1>most famous for her her video work is the video artist. Yeah,

1:06:08.040 --> 1:06:12.280
<v Speaker 1>she's a video artist, true artist and true artist Harrington. Yeah,

1:06:12.400 --> 1:06:14.800
<v Speaker 1>so that's where we started out. But we use that

1:06:14.880 --> 1:06:18.920
<v Speaker 1>then to get into this idea of photography of uh,

1:06:19.000 --> 1:06:23.800
<v Speaker 1>this this alleged psychic power by which certain individuals were

1:06:23.840 --> 1:06:27.040
<v Speaker 1>able to use the powers of their mind, uh to

1:06:27.240 --> 1:06:33.160
<v Speaker 1>either you know, focused mental images into say, undeveloped camera film,

1:06:33.320 --> 1:06:36.040
<v Speaker 1>or make it so they could like point a camera

1:06:36.080 --> 1:06:39.480
<v Speaker 1>at their own forehead and take a picture of the

1:06:39.520 --> 1:06:43.680
<v Speaker 1>interior imaging of their mind. Things of that nature. Yeah.

1:06:43.680 --> 1:06:46.800
<v Speaker 1>The idea was that somehow mental imagery, you know, things

1:06:46.880 --> 1:06:50.720
<v Speaker 1>that you are picturing in your brain, could be projected

1:06:50.840 --> 1:06:53.880
<v Speaker 1>out onto the world without being translated through you know,

1:06:54.000 --> 1:06:58.000
<v Speaker 1>you putting them into language or you sketching with a hand. Um.

1:06:58.160 --> 1:07:00.880
<v Speaker 1>And so I was wondering if you try to take

1:07:00.880 --> 1:07:04.640
<v Speaker 1>this idea seriously and say, okay, if this really did work,

1:07:04.880 --> 1:07:08.760
<v Speaker 1>how would it work. I was having trouble coming across

1:07:08.880 --> 1:07:11.880
<v Speaker 1>anything that seemed all that plausible to me. Uh, you know,

1:07:11.920 --> 1:07:15.520
<v Speaker 1>I found one article with somebody's talking about how, well,

1:07:15.600 --> 1:07:20.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe consciousness is like an electromagnetic field. I'm not sure

1:07:20.880 --> 1:07:22.640
<v Speaker 1>if I buy that. But even if you did buy

1:07:22.680 --> 1:07:26.280
<v Speaker 1>the consciousness as an electromagnetic field, how exactly would that

1:07:26.360 --> 1:07:30.200
<v Speaker 1>translate into you thinking about an image physically pressing the

1:07:30.280 --> 1:07:32.560
<v Speaker 1>image onto a thing outside your brain, Because there's no

1:07:32.600 --> 1:07:35.600
<v Speaker 1>reason to think that the electromagnetic field would be like

1:07:35.640 --> 1:07:38.640
<v Speaker 1>a two dimensional image that's the same as the thing

1:07:38.720 --> 1:07:42.680
<v Speaker 1>you're picturing. Yeah, and then I mean there's so many

1:07:42.680 --> 1:07:45.800
<v Speaker 1>problems with it's almost difficult to roll out individual problems,

1:07:45.880 --> 1:07:49.360
<v Speaker 1>like what would be the evolved necessity of doing that?

1:07:50.040 --> 1:07:52.160
<v Speaker 1>You know why we would have to just be like

1:07:52.240 --> 1:07:56.200
<v Speaker 1>an accidental byproduct or something, you know, random mutation? Uh?

1:07:56.240 --> 1:07:58.680
<v Speaker 1>And then would there be a survival advantage to having

1:07:58.720 --> 1:08:04.520
<v Speaker 1>that mutation? It gets it gets really sticky, really fast. Yeah,

1:08:04.520 --> 1:08:09.040
<v Speaker 1>and I think it highlights a kind of like shallow

1:08:09.160 --> 1:08:12.080
<v Speaker 1>understanding of what mental image rey is. So yeah, and

1:08:12.120 --> 1:08:15.560
<v Speaker 1>then specifically what photography is concerning those examples of the

1:08:15.560 --> 1:08:19.360
<v Speaker 1>photography we discussed in the last episode, Yes, exactly. So

1:08:19.400 --> 1:08:22.200
<v Speaker 1>I thought maybe we should start today by thinking about

1:08:22.960 --> 1:08:26.760
<v Speaker 1>what is the physical reality of an image in the

1:08:26.800 --> 1:08:29.679
<v Speaker 1>mind's eye? When you okay, so you stopping, you picture

1:08:29.800 --> 1:08:35.160
<v Speaker 1>something you picture Garfield Garfield in mind? What is happening

1:08:35.280 --> 1:08:39.559
<v Speaker 1>in your brain when you picture Garfield? Like, is there

1:08:39.640 --> 1:08:42.920
<v Speaker 1>some two dimensional grid of brain cells that's like a

1:08:43.040 --> 1:08:46.639
<v Speaker 1>screen where colors fill in like pixels on a computer

1:08:46.720 --> 1:08:51.080
<v Speaker 1>screen and they form Garfield. It seems kind of implausible,

1:08:51.120 --> 1:08:54.080
<v Speaker 1>but you know, entertained that for a second. If there

1:08:54.120 --> 1:08:57.480
<v Speaker 1>were a way for a mental image to be projected

1:08:57.600 --> 1:09:01.360
<v Speaker 1>into a physical space, what would be the physical nature

1:09:01.360 --> 1:09:04.280
<v Speaker 1>of the original signal in the brain and how would

1:09:04.320 --> 1:09:08.120
<v Speaker 1>it be transferred to the physical form without being interpreted

1:09:08.160 --> 1:09:10.280
<v Speaker 1>through the body. So I was looking at a couple

1:09:10.280 --> 1:09:13.360
<v Speaker 1>of papers on the subject of like research and thought

1:09:13.520 --> 1:09:16.400
<v Speaker 1>about mental imagery. And one one of the ones I

1:09:16.439 --> 1:09:19.480
<v Speaker 1>was looking at was called Unpicturing a Candle The Prehistory

1:09:19.520 --> 1:09:22.640
<v Speaker 1>of Imagery science, and this was published in Frontiers and

1:09:22.720 --> 1:09:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Psychology by Matthew mckissicks, Susan Aldworth, Fiona McPherson, John Onion's,

1:09:29.320 --> 1:09:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Crawford Winlove, and Adam Zema and this lot of names.

1:09:32.600 --> 1:09:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Uh In and the authors here focus on the history

1:09:37.080 --> 1:09:42.760
<v Speaker 1>of scholarship and philosophy concerning visual imagination before modern neuroscience,

1:09:42.760 --> 1:09:46.599
<v Speaker 1>but they also cover some modern neuroscience with a specific

1:09:46.640 --> 1:09:50.680
<v Speaker 1>focus on the idea of imagining a concrete object, for

1:09:50.720 --> 1:09:55.840
<v Speaker 1>example picturing a candle. And so the authors explored the

1:09:55.920 --> 1:09:58.680
<v Speaker 1>history and so for example, they start by looking at

1:09:58.720 --> 1:10:01.400
<v Speaker 1>like Plato and Aristotle, and they point out that Plato

1:10:01.479 --> 1:10:04.240
<v Speaker 1>actually did not hold a very high regard for the

1:10:04.280 --> 1:10:09.600
<v Speaker 1>importance of mental imagination uh Like. For Plato, mental imagery

1:10:09.640 --> 1:10:11.800
<v Speaker 1>is a copy of a copy. It is a sort

1:10:11.800 --> 1:10:15.439
<v Speaker 1>of imperfect fac simile of an object in the world

1:10:15.800 --> 1:10:19.639
<v Speaker 1>which is already merely an imperfect copy of a perfect

1:10:19.800 --> 1:10:22.880
<v Speaker 1>divine form that we're getting into the idea of the

1:10:22.880 --> 1:10:26.960
<v Speaker 1>realm of forms, the idea that a chair, that there's

1:10:26.960 --> 1:10:28.840
<v Speaker 1>a perfect version of a chair that exists in the

1:10:28.840 --> 1:10:31.599
<v Speaker 1>realm of forms. The chair we can build is an

1:10:31.600 --> 1:10:36.000
<v Speaker 1>imperfect interpretation of that. But then the then his view

1:10:36.200 --> 1:10:38.880
<v Speaker 1>is because I'm more likely to think of it the

1:10:38.880 --> 1:10:41.600
<v Speaker 1>other way, like I'm thinking, then, well, the version of

1:10:41.600 --> 1:10:43.880
<v Speaker 1>the chair in our mind, that's the realm of forms.

1:10:43.920 --> 1:10:47.760
<v Speaker 1>But he's saying, no, that's that's even another level removed

1:10:47.800 --> 1:10:50.439
<v Speaker 1>from the realm of forms. It's an imperfect version of

1:10:50.439 --> 1:10:53.840
<v Speaker 1>the imperfect chair that is in itself an imperfect version

1:10:53.880 --> 1:10:57.160
<v Speaker 1>of the ideal chair. Absolutely, your mental image of a

1:10:57.240 --> 1:11:00.840
<v Speaker 1>pineapple is a flawed copy of some act wold pineapple,

1:11:01.040 --> 1:11:05.080
<v Speaker 1>which is an imperfect realization of eternal pineapple nous. Yeah,

1:11:05.120 --> 1:11:07.639
<v Speaker 1>and I and I think I think he is correct here, because,

1:11:08.000 --> 1:11:11.280
<v Speaker 1>as we stayed in the last episode, we often we

1:11:11.360 --> 1:11:14.599
<v Speaker 1>often attribute a lot of detail and accuracy to our

1:11:14.640 --> 1:11:19.040
<v Speaker 1>mental images when they're when it's really not there. It's

1:11:19.160 --> 1:11:23.760
<v Speaker 1>it's often a lot more obscure and unfinished than we

1:11:23.800 --> 1:11:26.040
<v Speaker 1>give it credit. Yeah, I mean I almost wouldn't think

1:11:26.080 --> 1:11:28.439
<v Speaker 1>about it in terms of accuracy, but in terms and

1:11:28.520 --> 1:11:31.479
<v Speaker 1>maybe this is more specific to the way my brain works,

1:11:31.520 --> 1:11:34.760
<v Speaker 1>but I think about it even in terms of completeness,

1:11:34.800 --> 1:11:37.200
<v Speaker 1>like that, when I have a mental image of something,

1:11:37.520 --> 1:11:40.439
<v Speaker 1>it's not the same as looking at the thing, because

1:11:40.479 --> 1:11:45.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm not I'm only vaguely grasping the totality of the image.

1:11:45.200 --> 1:11:48.800
<v Speaker 1>When I'm mentally picture something, it's not like it's just

1:11:48.880 --> 1:11:51.920
<v Speaker 1>not like looking at a fixed version of the image.

1:11:51.920 --> 1:11:55.479
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of like a hazy scanning of different little

1:11:55.560 --> 1:11:58.320
<v Speaker 1>elements of the image that I can picture in a

1:11:58.400 --> 1:12:02.240
<v Speaker 1>moment against a field of a general impression of the

1:12:02.360 --> 1:12:04.559
<v Speaker 1>larger image. Does that make sense? Yeah? Yeah, I believe.

1:12:04.680 --> 1:12:07.599
<v Speaker 1>An example that's often used here is that of a bicycle.

1:12:07.640 --> 1:12:10.800
<v Speaker 1>If I say, hey, imagine a bicycle. Easy done. I'm

1:12:10.800 --> 1:12:12.960
<v Speaker 1>imagining a bicycle right now. But if we go to

1:12:13.000 --> 1:12:16.439
<v Speaker 1>the next step and say that bicycle you're imagining, describe

1:12:16.439 --> 1:12:19.040
<v Speaker 1>for me the functionality of its of the of the

1:12:19.040 --> 1:12:22.719
<v Speaker 1>wheels and the gears and the pedals and everything. Explain

1:12:22.800 --> 1:12:24.920
<v Speaker 1>to me how that works. Oh yeah, This goes back

1:12:24.960 --> 1:12:29.200
<v Speaker 1>to our illusion of explanatory depth. Episodes where everybody can

1:12:29.240 --> 1:12:32.640
<v Speaker 1>picture a bicycle, but can you draw a bicycle? And

1:12:32.760 --> 1:12:35.720
<v Speaker 1>it turns out it's just try it. You might end

1:12:35.800 --> 1:12:38.240
<v Speaker 1>up laughing really hard at yourself because you think you

1:12:38.240 --> 1:12:41.160
<v Speaker 1>can draw a bicycle, but there's a decent chance you can't.

1:12:41.400 --> 1:12:45.479
<v Speaker 1>I don't know where the bars go, which wheel connects

1:12:45.479 --> 1:12:48.080
<v Speaker 1>to what? You just don't know even though you think

1:12:48.120 --> 1:12:51.600
<v Speaker 1>you can picture it right now. So again, Plato, I

1:12:51.600 --> 1:12:54.360
<v Speaker 1>think was definitely onto something here. I think Plato hit

1:12:54.400 --> 1:12:57.559
<v Speaker 1>this one out of the park. Yeah. But Aristotle, to

1:12:57.680 --> 1:13:01.679
<v Speaker 1>the contrary, he thought that not only was mental imagery important,

1:13:02.040 --> 1:13:05.280
<v Speaker 1>he thought that you literally could not think without it.

1:13:05.720 --> 1:13:10.040
<v Speaker 1>They quote him saying, the soul never thinks without a fantasma,

1:13:10.080 --> 1:13:12.799
<v Speaker 1>and the phantasma is like some kind of mental image,

1:13:13.240 --> 1:13:15.599
<v Speaker 1>which I'm sure this would come as news to our

1:13:15.640 --> 1:13:19.280
<v Speaker 1>many listeners who tell us about their experiences with a fantasia,

1:13:19.360 --> 1:13:22.519
<v Speaker 1>meaning that they say they don't have the ability to

1:13:22.760 --> 1:13:26.080
<v Speaker 1>form mental images, they can't picture something in their heads.

1:13:26.280 --> 1:13:28.519
<v Speaker 1>And yet you know, we've got no reason to disbelieve

1:13:28.560 --> 1:13:30.439
<v Speaker 1>them on that, And at the same time they seem

1:13:30.479 --> 1:13:34.280
<v Speaker 1>perfectly capable of thinking. So it seems perfectly clear to

1:13:34.320 --> 1:13:37.760
<v Speaker 1>me that mental imagery is not necessary for thought, right,

1:13:38.040 --> 1:13:41.320
<v Speaker 1>it is necessary for choosing the form of the Destroyer.

1:13:41.920 --> 1:13:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Should Gozer uh the Traveler appear to you. I have

1:13:46.120 --> 1:13:49.360
<v Speaker 1>to think back of that scene and Ghostbusters. Uh, that's

1:13:49.360 --> 1:13:52.439
<v Speaker 1>how they choose the stay Puff marshmallow man form. But

1:13:52.800 --> 1:13:55.480
<v Speaker 1>you have all of the Ghostbusters that had a fantasia,

1:13:55.880 --> 1:13:59.160
<v Speaker 1>then the the Destroyer would not have been able to manifest.

1:13:59.400 --> 1:14:02.000
<v Speaker 1>I think you of that in the original episode. Probably did.

1:14:02.160 --> 1:14:04.400
<v Speaker 1>I haven't thought about it since then. But that's great

1:14:04.760 --> 1:14:07.240
<v Speaker 1>unless goes Are the Destroyer is even more nefarious than

1:14:07.280 --> 1:14:10.920
<v Speaker 1>we imagine, and he can also manifest in the shape

1:14:11.040 --> 1:14:15.559
<v Speaker 1>of something that you put together through, say words or whatever. Maybe,

1:14:15.680 --> 1:14:18.559
<v Speaker 1>but I kind of like the idea that it's being

1:14:18.600 --> 1:14:22.439
<v Speaker 1>an interdimensional entity. It's it's limited, and it really like it.

1:14:22.520 --> 1:14:26.000
<v Speaker 1>It cannot venture into this form unless there is a

1:14:26.040 --> 1:14:29.960
<v Speaker 1>clear visual image that it can draw from, Like that

1:14:30.040 --> 1:14:33.360
<v Speaker 1>has to be the uh, the foothold for it to

1:14:33.760 --> 1:14:36.519
<v Speaker 1>climb back in and begin destroying. Well, to tie it

1:14:36.560 --> 1:14:39.559
<v Speaker 1>back to psychic photography, actually, this is what the case

1:14:39.600 --> 1:14:41.960
<v Speaker 1>of goes Are taking the form you imagine would be

1:14:42.080 --> 1:14:45.679
<v Speaker 1>exactly like thoughtography would be the case of mental imagery

1:14:45.720 --> 1:14:49.400
<v Speaker 1>being manifested as a physical object in the world. Yeah,

1:14:49.520 --> 1:14:51.599
<v Speaker 1>but but it would also it would make more sense

1:14:52.000 --> 1:14:56.120
<v Speaker 1>that a god can read your mind, then your mind

1:14:56.439 --> 1:15:01.160
<v Speaker 1>can blast a photo, blast an image. John Toison undeveloped

1:15:01.200 --> 1:15:04.800
<v Speaker 1>sel I agree. Uh So, picking up again with the

1:15:05.120 --> 1:15:08.519
<v Speaker 1>history of mental imagery. Uh, Descartes had thoughts about visual

1:15:08.560 --> 1:15:12.320
<v Speaker 1>imagination apparently placed it on par with the senses as

1:15:12.439 --> 1:15:16.639
<v Speaker 1>manifestations of the body, which, of course, for in Descartes's view,

1:15:16.680 --> 1:15:19.240
<v Speaker 1>that makes them fallible because of course they can always

1:15:19.280 --> 1:15:23.080
<v Speaker 1>be mistaken, unlike in his view pure logical deduction. If

1:15:23.120 --> 1:15:27.320
<v Speaker 1>you recall like the fight between Descartes and the the empiricists,

1:15:27.320 --> 1:15:29.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, the empiricists thought that the senses should be primary,

1:15:29.960 --> 1:15:32.240
<v Speaker 1>but deck Heart thought, no, you can't ever fully trust

1:15:32.280 --> 1:15:34.280
<v Speaker 1>the senses. You've got to go on just like pure

1:15:34.400 --> 1:15:37.759
<v Speaker 1>logical proofs. I'm not quite sure why, for some reason

1:15:37.800 --> 1:15:40.519
<v Speaker 1>that that seems like a funny belief looking back on

1:15:40.600 --> 1:15:43.559
<v Speaker 1>it now. Of course, later mental imagery became the domain

1:15:43.600 --> 1:15:46.200
<v Speaker 1>of psychology. Uh. And of course you know that that

1:15:46.240 --> 1:15:48.599
<v Speaker 1>would be treated in different ways depending on the different

1:15:48.640 --> 1:15:51.200
<v Speaker 1>schools of psychology. One thing that I think is interesting

1:15:51.240 --> 1:15:54.360
<v Speaker 1>in the history of psychology is the behaviorist school of course,

1:15:54.520 --> 1:15:58.320
<v Speaker 1>not being interested in mental imagery because it's not an

1:15:58.360 --> 1:16:03.240
<v Speaker 1>outwardly measurable behavior. So J. B. Watson apparently referred to

1:16:03.320 --> 1:16:08.240
<v Speaker 1>mental imagery as quote motor habits in the larynx, which

1:16:08.280 --> 1:16:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I think is a behaviorist way of saying something you

1:16:11.080 --> 1:16:15.200
<v Speaker 1>only know about because people talk about it. I am

1:16:15.320 --> 1:16:19.639
<v Speaker 1>continually fascinated by thinking about behaviorism because we occasionally hear

1:16:19.680 --> 1:16:22.479
<v Speaker 1>from people, uh we We've gotten a couple of listener

1:16:22.560 --> 1:16:25.280
<v Speaker 1>emails over the years, people responding to topics from a

1:16:25.320 --> 1:16:29.679
<v Speaker 1>behaviorist point of view, essentially not crediting anything that's about

1:16:29.760 --> 1:16:33.920
<v Speaker 1>the inner experiences or consciousness of people. It's only you know,

1:16:34.000 --> 1:16:38.240
<v Speaker 1>the psychology can only be about outwardly measured behaviors. Yeah,

1:16:38.320 --> 1:16:40.439
<v Speaker 1>it's a statement like that. Though. It makes me wonder

1:16:40.520 --> 1:16:44.400
<v Speaker 1>if J. B. Watson was perhaps perhaps had a fantasia.

1:16:44.520 --> 1:16:47.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, I mean this idea because we this lines

1:16:47.120 --> 1:16:48.840
<v Speaker 1>up with what we've heard from a lot of people

1:16:49.000 --> 1:16:51.920
<v Speaker 1>who's claimed to have a fantasia. And they'll say, oh, yeah,

1:16:51.960 --> 1:16:54.439
<v Speaker 1>I heard people talking about picturing something in their mind

1:16:54.439 --> 1:16:56.599
<v Speaker 1>when they read a book, and I thought they were

1:16:56.640 --> 1:16:59.599
<v Speaker 1>just being you know, just figurative. You know, they weren't

1:17:00.000 --> 1:17:02.519
<v Speaker 1>saying that they actually saw something in their head like

1:17:02.560 --> 1:17:06.680
<v Speaker 1>it's it seems like it is difficult to imagine the

1:17:06.720 --> 1:17:09.360
<v Speaker 1>mental image if you have no frame of reference for it,

1:17:09.439 --> 1:17:12.320
<v Speaker 1>you know. Uh yeah, Except I would say that for Watson,

1:17:12.320 --> 1:17:15.720
<v Speaker 1>it's not just mental imagery. It's all internal mental phenomenon.

1:17:15.880 --> 1:17:19.479
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's everything that's not outward behavior. So it

1:17:19.560 --> 1:17:21.800
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be just I think he would probably think that

1:17:21.880 --> 1:17:23.920
<v Speaker 1>mental imagery is not the only thing that's just a

1:17:23.960 --> 1:17:26.920
<v Speaker 1>motor habit in the larynx. That uh that, I don't know,

1:17:27.080 --> 1:17:30.960
<v Speaker 1>imagination that, like anything inside your head, is a motor

1:17:31.000 --> 1:17:33.240
<v Speaker 1>habit in the larynx. Do you think Ether would have

1:17:33.320 --> 1:17:37.639
<v Speaker 1>changed his mind at all? I don't know. Then again,

1:17:37.680 --> 1:17:39.400
<v Speaker 1>maybe I'm not being fair. I don't want to put

1:17:39.400 --> 1:17:42.760
<v Speaker 1>words in Watson's mouth, but uh yeah, So I think

1:17:42.800 --> 1:17:45.880
<v Speaker 1>we don't need to feel bound by the behaviorist view

1:17:45.880 --> 1:17:47.720
<v Speaker 1>of this thing, and we can entertain the idea of

1:17:47.760 --> 1:17:51.320
<v Speaker 1>mental imagery. You experience it, other people say they experience it.

1:17:51.360 --> 1:17:53.479
<v Speaker 1>You've got no reason to disbelieve them. So I think

1:17:53.560 --> 1:17:58.040
<v Speaker 1>humans probably have mental imagery. But but long in history,

1:17:58.400 --> 1:18:02.040
<v Speaker 1>it has clearly been assumed that there is some kind

1:18:02.120 --> 1:18:08.519
<v Speaker 1>of physical representation space and perceiver within the brain for

1:18:08.640 --> 1:18:11.680
<v Speaker 1>mental imagery. Uh. And one thing I'm thinking about that

1:18:11.720 --> 1:18:14.120
<v Speaker 1>I came across while preparing for this episode is an

1:18:14.160 --> 1:18:18.280
<v Speaker 1>illustration by the sixteenth seventeenth century English physician and occultist

1:18:18.800 --> 1:18:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Robert Flood spelled f l U d D kind of

1:18:23.040 --> 1:18:26.320
<v Speaker 1>like Elmer Flood Flood with an L flood, also like

1:18:26.400 --> 1:18:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Randall Flag. Oh yeah, that's true. Maybe this is one

1:18:30.360 --> 1:18:34.320
<v Speaker 1>of the incarnations of the Man from the Desert. But anyway,

1:18:34.320 --> 1:18:38.559
<v Speaker 1>And one of Robert Flood's tracts he illustrated the eye

1:18:38.600 --> 1:18:43.439
<v Speaker 1>of imagination or the oculus imagination onis, which was this

1:18:43.680 --> 1:18:46.880
<v Speaker 1>third eye inside the brain which, getting it wrong and

1:18:46.920 --> 1:18:51.439
<v Speaker 1>backwards in multiple ways, projected mental images onto some kind

1:18:51.479 --> 1:18:55.200
<v Speaker 1>of screen or representation space in the back or like

1:18:55.280 --> 1:18:57.200
<v Speaker 1>in the back of the head or behind the head,

1:18:57.600 --> 1:19:01.160
<v Speaker 1>where mental images would take form after being projected by

1:19:01.200 --> 1:19:03.680
<v Speaker 1>this third eye. And now, of course we know that

1:19:03.720 --> 1:19:06.439
<v Speaker 1>the eye does not project a beam of seeing, but

1:19:06.560 --> 1:19:11.120
<v Speaker 1>receives incoming light. So even yeah, I think we're we're

1:19:11.160 --> 1:19:13.519
<v Speaker 1>confused in more ways than one here. Yeah, Like if

1:19:13.520 --> 1:19:17.000
<v Speaker 1>there really were a tiny viewing screen inside the brain

1:19:17.120 --> 1:19:18.800
<v Speaker 1>and an eye to see it, it would be too

1:19:18.840 --> 1:19:21.760
<v Speaker 1>dark to watch the movie, right, so that would be

1:19:21.760 --> 1:19:24.120
<v Speaker 1>a problem. But but yeah, I mean, like I think

1:19:24.320 --> 1:19:28.519
<v Speaker 1>third eye views are are popular throughout history. People kind

1:19:28.560 --> 1:19:31.479
<v Speaker 1>of think there's an observer in the observer, right, And

1:19:31.479 --> 1:19:34.760
<v Speaker 1>and granted, we do have a pennial gland, which is

1:19:34.840 --> 1:19:39.160
<v Speaker 1>essentially an atrophied photo receptor with some connections to the

1:19:39.240 --> 1:19:44.000
<v Speaker 1>parietal eye of reptiles. But but it produces uh a melotonin,

1:19:44.200 --> 1:19:47.360
<v Speaker 1>a serotonin derived hormone, and is not involved in the

1:19:47.400 --> 1:19:50.120
<v Speaker 1>generation of mental images, or at least I don't think

1:19:50.120 --> 1:19:53.200
<v Speaker 1>there's any evidence that, not that I've ever seen. Uh.

1:19:53.760 --> 1:19:55.719
<v Speaker 1>This is funny because I was reading that deck Cart

1:19:55.800 --> 1:19:58.880
<v Speaker 1>believed that the pineal gland was the point of interaction

1:19:59.000 --> 1:20:01.880
<v Speaker 1>between the body and the immaterial soul. That did you

1:20:01.920 --> 1:20:05.320
<v Speaker 1>know this, um? And may we did. We did episode

1:20:05.320 --> 1:20:07.680
<v Speaker 1>on the pineal gland way back in the day, so

1:20:07.720 --> 1:20:11.040
<v Speaker 1>it's possible, Okay, I came across this. Yeah, but I'm

1:20:11.080 --> 1:20:13.200
<v Speaker 1>thinking back to this idea of having, yeah, a viewer

1:20:13.240 --> 1:20:16.839
<v Speaker 1>inside the viewer, like an internal I inside the brain

1:20:17.040 --> 1:20:21.120
<v Speaker 1>for mental imagery. And there are reasons I think that

1:20:21.320 --> 1:20:24.400
<v Speaker 1>there are problems with this because if in order to

1:20:24.439 --> 1:20:28.960
<v Speaker 1>see mental images we have to project them physically somewhere

1:20:29.000 --> 1:20:32.320
<v Speaker 1>inside the brain. What is the part of the brain

1:20:32.439 --> 1:20:35.479
<v Speaker 1>that is looking at the image? Is that another brain

1:20:35.840 --> 1:20:40.360
<v Speaker 1>with eyes inside the brain? Uh? Incognitive philosophy. This is

1:20:40.400 --> 1:20:43.720
<v Speaker 1>sometimes called the homunculous theory. That's a you know, a

1:20:43.840 --> 1:20:46.360
<v Speaker 1>name of ridicule for it, like the idea that there

1:20:46.360 --> 1:20:48.400
<v Speaker 1>has to be somebody inside your brain to see what

1:20:48.520 --> 1:20:51.080
<v Speaker 1>your brain is seeing or thinking. Right, as with like

1:20:51.120 --> 1:20:54.439
<v Speaker 1>the homunculous ideas and human reproduction where there's a tiny

1:20:54.520 --> 1:20:58.120
<v Speaker 1>little version of you inside of a sperm cell. Yes,

1:20:58.160 --> 1:21:01.439
<v Speaker 1>And like the homunculous idea of of reproduction, it's an

1:21:01.439 --> 1:21:04.400
<v Speaker 1>infinite regress, right, because if there's a little eyes and

1:21:04.439 --> 1:21:06.840
<v Speaker 1>a brain inside your head in order to see what

1:21:06.880 --> 1:21:09.479
<v Speaker 1>you're thinking, then that brain must have little eyes and

1:21:09.520 --> 1:21:11.920
<v Speaker 1>a brain inside that brain to see what that brain

1:21:12.040 --> 1:21:15.479
<v Speaker 1>is thinking about. And it goes on forever. And another

1:21:15.600 --> 1:21:18.640
<v Speaker 1>version of this, extended to total brain function, is what

1:21:18.760 --> 1:21:22.799
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Dennet calls the Cartesian theater. Again, this is something

1:21:22.880 --> 1:21:28.400
<v Speaker 1>he's he's ridiculing. Basically, it's uh imagining or implicitly assuming

1:21:28.439 --> 1:21:31.320
<v Speaker 1>that the brain has some sort of little pilot inside

1:21:31.320 --> 1:21:35.639
<v Speaker 1>who witnesses all of our sense data and controls our reactions. Um,

1:21:35.760 --> 1:21:38.679
<v Speaker 1>and again it's basically a reduct, you ad absurdam because

1:21:38.680 --> 1:21:41.559
<v Speaker 1>it leads to this infinite regress. Who's seeing the images

1:21:41.600 --> 1:21:44.519
<v Speaker 1>inside the brain, and the homunculus or the pilot or

1:21:44.560 --> 1:21:47.840
<v Speaker 1>the Cartesian theater must be another smaller one. So I

1:21:47.840 --> 1:21:50.320
<v Speaker 1>don't think it can be that inside the brain mental

1:21:50.360 --> 1:21:53.840
<v Speaker 1>images are seeing the same way our eyes see things

1:21:53.880 --> 1:21:57.240
<v Speaker 1>in the world. So what actually is happening in the

1:21:57.280 --> 1:22:00.000
<v Speaker 1>brain when you're asked to imagine a concrete image. Maybe

1:22:00.000 --> 1:22:01.720
<v Speaker 1>we should take a break and then explore that when

1:22:01.720 --> 1:22:05.519
<v Speaker 1>we come back. Yes, everyone think of a bicycle during

1:22:05.560 --> 1:22:10.960
<v Speaker 1>this commercial break. Alright, we're back, and hopefully you still

1:22:11.000 --> 1:22:14.360
<v Speaker 1>have that bicycle floating around inside your mind. We should

1:22:14.360 --> 1:22:19.240
<v Speaker 1>give them something more interesting to picture concretely, something with details.

1:22:19.840 --> 1:22:23.879
<v Speaker 1>Picture a democorgan democgorgan is good. Yeah, It's just interesting

1:22:23.920 --> 1:22:30.800
<v Speaker 1>how many like fabled unreal entities are good things to

1:22:30.840 --> 1:22:32.880
<v Speaker 1>focus your mind on. And I think it perhaps it's

1:22:32.920 --> 1:22:37.040
<v Speaker 1>because there are there are combinations, they're they're hybrids with

1:22:37.080 --> 1:22:40.479
<v Speaker 1>different elements. So you you're you're you know what, you're

1:22:40.520 --> 1:22:43.559
<v Speaker 1>kind of thinking of a list and compiling that list

1:22:43.960 --> 1:22:48.240
<v Speaker 1>into this single mental image and ultimately gives you something

1:22:48.280 --> 1:22:51.479
<v Speaker 1>to focus on, right, but the details are provided to you.

1:22:51.960 --> 1:22:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Whereas the bicycle, you're just saying bicycle, we're not saying,

1:22:54.960 --> 1:23:00.320
<v Speaker 1>imagine a contraption with two wheels and its etcetera. Two

1:23:00.360 --> 1:23:04.680
<v Speaker 1>wheels and nine tentacles and three baboon heads. Yes, yes,

1:23:04.760 --> 1:23:06.400
<v Speaker 1>and in one hand the sun and in the other

1:23:06.400 --> 1:23:09.760
<v Speaker 1>hand and move. Okay, Now, when you do picture the demogorgon,

1:23:10.040 --> 1:23:13.560
<v Speaker 1>what is actually happening in your brain? Has modern neuroscience

1:23:13.640 --> 1:23:18.280
<v Speaker 1>discovered any answers to this question? Actually the answer is yes,

1:23:18.360 --> 1:23:20.439
<v Speaker 1>we do know a decent amount. We don't know everything,

1:23:20.520 --> 1:23:22.479
<v Speaker 1>we know a decent amount about what happens in the

1:23:22.520 --> 1:23:26.799
<v Speaker 1>brain when you picture mental imagery. Um, So, brain cells

1:23:26.920 --> 1:23:30.080
<v Speaker 1>in the temporal lobe, and this is the temporal lobes

1:23:30.080 --> 1:23:32.439
<v Speaker 1>are at the bottom and sides of the brain, sort

1:23:32.439 --> 1:23:37.040
<v Speaker 1>of around the ears. They become activated. And previous research

1:23:37.120 --> 1:23:41.360
<v Speaker 1>has shown that the temporal lobes are involved in attributing

1:23:41.400 --> 1:23:46.920
<v Speaker 1>and storing information about the visual characteristics of objects. So normally,

1:23:47.000 --> 1:23:50.760
<v Speaker 1>like when you see something, uh, information might there might

1:23:50.800 --> 1:23:53.160
<v Speaker 1>be activity in the temporal lobes that seems to be

1:23:53.560 --> 1:23:57.720
<v Speaker 1>creating associations with the thing you're looking at right, like

1:23:58.479 --> 1:24:02.280
<v Speaker 1>the foam on the walls in our studio, they look

1:24:02.320 --> 1:24:04.960
<v Speaker 1>like tiny pyramids. So I can look at one of those,

1:24:04.960 --> 1:24:07.720
<v Speaker 1>and then I can I can't help but imagine a

1:24:07.800 --> 1:24:10.880
<v Speaker 1>great pyramid. Yes, And so what's happening there when you're

1:24:10.960 --> 1:24:13.639
<v Speaker 1>using your eyes is probably the lights coming through the eyes.

1:24:14.080 --> 1:24:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Signals are passing from your optic nerve, from your retina's

1:24:18.120 --> 1:24:20.800
<v Speaker 1>the optic nerve, and uh, they're ending up in the

1:24:20.880 --> 1:24:23.600
<v Speaker 1>visual processing areas and the back of your head, and

1:24:23.720 --> 1:24:26.599
<v Speaker 1>that's known as the occipital cortex, the back of the head,

1:24:27.080 --> 1:24:30.720
<v Speaker 1>and then that start signals that cascade out to other

1:24:30.760 --> 1:24:34.080
<v Speaker 1>brain regions. Where you form those associations probably has a

1:24:34.080 --> 1:24:37.120
<v Speaker 1>lot to do with your temporal lobes. But when you're

1:24:37.120 --> 1:24:40.000
<v Speaker 1>asked to picture something concrete, like I say, picture the

1:24:40.120 --> 1:24:43.320
<v Speaker 1>great Pyramids of Gizah, we seem to be starting with

1:24:43.400 --> 1:24:47.040
<v Speaker 1>activity that involves visual memory. So there's stuff going on

1:24:47.120 --> 1:24:50.679
<v Speaker 1>in the temporal lobes, and the excitation of these cells

1:24:50.680 --> 1:24:54.360
<v Speaker 1>then triggers activity in the visual cortices of the occipital lobe.

1:24:54.360 --> 1:24:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Again that's the very back of the head. And of

1:24:57.040 --> 1:24:58.800
<v Speaker 1>course this is the same part of the brain that

1:24:58.880 --> 1:25:02.000
<v Speaker 1>receives and begins to process visual information received by the

1:25:02.040 --> 1:25:05.559
<v Speaker 1>retina transmitted by the optic nerve when you normally see something.

1:25:06.080 --> 1:25:08.280
<v Speaker 1>And the authors of this paper I mentioned earlier, they

1:25:08.400 --> 1:25:11.760
<v Speaker 1>they point out that when you conjure mental imagery, it's

1:25:11.800 --> 1:25:15.280
<v Speaker 1>not exactly but it's sort of roughly an inversion of

1:25:15.360 --> 1:25:18.960
<v Speaker 1>the process of seeing with the eyes. Basically, it's similar

1:25:19.000 --> 1:25:23.080
<v Speaker 1>cascades going in opposite directions. And it also, i would say,

1:25:23.080 --> 1:25:25.919
<v Speaker 1>seems to suggest that if it were possible to project

1:25:25.960 --> 1:25:29.799
<v Speaker 1>an image from ted serious head onto film, if anything,

1:25:30.120 --> 1:25:32.519
<v Speaker 1>he should have been holding the gizmo and the camera

1:25:32.600 --> 1:25:35.040
<v Speaker 1>on the back of his head rather than the forehead.

1:25:35.040 --> 1:25:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Because it seems like the activity is going from a

1:25:37.840 --> 1:25:41.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of beginning with uh, with executive function. Of course,

1:25:41.400 --> 1:25:44.920
<v Speaker 1>that's uh, you know, intentionally causing the memories. Then there's

1:25:45.120 --> 1:25:48.400
<v Speaker 1>memory stuff in the temporal lobes, and then it's going

1:25:48.439 --> 1:25:50.559
<v Speaker 1>to the occipital lobe in the back of the head.

1:25:50.680 --> 1:25:52.280
<v Speaker 1>I'll see, if you'd only known that, it would have

1:25:52.320 --> 1:25:57.120
<v Speaker 1>worked every time. Now, why do you need executive function

1:25:57.160 --> 1:25:59.559
<v Speaker 1>in the front of the brain as well? Well? Apparently

1:25:59.600 --> 1:26:03.040
<v Speaker 1>that's involved in intentionally trying to call up and hold

1:26:03.240 --> 1:26:07.320
<v Speaker 1>mental images. So like conscious management of what's happening in

1:26:07.360 --> 1:26:10.639
<v Speaker 1>the brain tends to be thought that that's executive function.

1:26:10.680 --> 1:26:15.240
<v Speaker 1>It's deliberate thinking and maintenance of attention, and that entails

1:26:15.280 --> 1:26:18.120
<v Speaker 1>activity in the frontal and parietal regions of the brain.

1:26:18.200 --> 1:26:21.240
<v Speaker 1>So stuff up front and to the front and sides. Uh.

1:26:21.280 --> 1:26:25.040
<v Speaker 1>And mental imagery may also involve executive function because it

1:26:25.160 --> 1:26:31.080
<v Speaker 1>requires the suppression of incoming imagery from the eyes, or

1:26:31.120 --> 1:26:36.280
<v Speaker 1>at least the diversion of visual processing resources from quote

1:26:36.360 --> 1:26:39.840
<v Speaker 1>signals based on light entering the eyes. Right now, two

1:26:40.360 --> 1:26:44.200
<v Speaker 1>images generated from memory. It's crazy to think about the

1:26:44.560 --> 1:26:46.360
<v Speaker 1>and I'm thinking about it in this terms because we're

1:26:46.400 --> 1:26:48.719
<v Speaker 1>also researching an episode that has to do with driving

1:26:49.240 --> 1:26:51.320
<v Speaker 1>and the what's going on in your mind when you

1:26:51.400 --> 1:26:55.320
<v Speaker 1>drive an automobile? And isn't it crazy that we can

1:26:55.360 --> 1:27:01.360
<v Speaker 1>engage in the cognitively demanding job of say, driving up

1:27:01.439 --> 1:27:05.519
<v Speaker 1>a speeding automobile down an interstate, watching what all the

1:27:05.560 --> 1:27:08.759
<v Speaker 1>cars are doing, and you know, reading an occasional sign

1:27:08.800 --> 1:27:11.200
<v Speaker 1>looking up for speed traps, all of these things that

1:27:11.240 --> 1:27:13.679
<v Speaker 1>we're doing, and at the same time, we might have

1:27:14.439 --> 1:27:17.880
<v Speaker 1>an audio book playing that is filling our head with

1:27:18.040 --> 1:27:21.240
<v Speaker 1>like with a you know a rich visual world, and

1:27:21.280 --> 1:27:24.080
<v Speaker 1>we're entertaining both of these at the same time. I

1:27:24.120 --> 1:27:27.439
<v Speaker 1>would say that that is, while I accept that we

1:27:27.520 --> 1:27:29.680
<v Speaker 1>can handle those things both at the same time, I

1:27:29.720 --> 1:27:32.960
<v Speaker 1>would say it is not without costs to uh to

1:27:33.080 --> 1:27:35.439
<v Speaker 1>either one. Like I would say that you probably have

1:27:35.640 --> 1:27:39.840
<v Speaker 1>a more rich experience of the book and mental image

1:27:39.840 --> 1:27:42.519
<v Speaker 1>reassociated with the book if you were not driving, and

1:27:42.560 --> 1:27:44.840
<v Speaker 1>you'd probably be better at driving if you were not

1:27:44.920 --> 1:27:48.480
<v Speaker 1>listening to the book, because there is actually a competition

1:27:48.520 --> 1:27:51.800
<v Speaker 1>for resources going on. Yeah, yeah, no doubt. I mean,

1:27:52.520 --> 1:27:54.960
<v Speaker 1>of course that I think a lot of us tended

1:27:55.120 --> 1:27:58.760
<v Speaker 1>to read in environments where there are other distractions. Maybe

1:27:58.840 --> 1:28:03.479
<v Speaker 1>not is cognitively demanding as piloting an automobile, but but still,

1:28:03.520 --> 1:28:05.120
<v Speaker 1>this would be an interesting one to get some feedback

1:28:05.120 --> 1:28:06.840
<v Speaker 1>from listeners, because I know that we have a number

1:28:06.880 --> 1:28:09.240
<v Speaker 1>of listeners who who are on the road a lot

1:28:09.320 --> 1:28:11.080
<v Speaker 1>and listen listen to us on the road and listen

1:28:11.120 --> 1:28:14.720
<v Speaker 1>to to other bits of audio as well. Yeah, that's

1:28:14.720 --> 1:28:17.280
<v Speaker 1>a good point. Please only listen to our podcast if

1:28:17.439 --> 1:28:22.080
<v Speaker 1>if it is safe to do so. It's don't devote

1:28:22.080 --> 1:28:25.280
<v Speaker 1>too much mental resources to us. If if you're piloting

1:28:25.280 --> 1:28:27.439
<v Speaker 1>a dangerous vehicle. But then again, even if you're not

1:28:27.560 --> 1:28:30.439
<v Speaker 1>listening to a podcast or an audio book, oh yeah,

1:28:30.439 --> 1:28:33.040
<v Speaker 1>your mind's want your mind's gonna wander. And then I mean,

1:28:33.080 --> 1:28:35.719
<v Speaker 1>it's not even going to necessarily be a situation where

1:28:35.720 --> 1:28:38.800
<v Speaker 1>you're consciously choosing things to imagine. You know, you're you're

1:28:38.800 --> 1:28:43.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna be subject to the visual summonings of the default

1:28:43.240 --> 1:28:46.160
<v Speaker 1>mode network where uh, you know, mental images from the

1:28:46.520 --> 1:28:48.920
<v Speaker 1>past or the physy future are going to you know,

1:28:49.040 --> 1:28:53.400
<v Speaker 1>venture into your mind like Victorian ghosts. But speaking of ghosts,

1:28:53.400 --> 1:28:55.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I do think it's a little bit spooky

1:28:55.400 --> 1:28:58.200
<v Speaker 1>that once I read this, this does in fact seem

1:28:58.240 --> 1:29:00.160
<v Speaker 1>true to me. I just had never really thought of

1:29:00.160 --> 1:29:04.360
<v Speaker 1>it this way, that when you mentally picture something, you're

1:29:04.400 --> 1:29:07.680
<v Speaker 1>you are intentionally using your brain. You're performing some kind

1:29:07.680 --> 1:29:12.080
<v Speaker 1>of internal brain resources management with the executive function mostly

1:29:12.080 --> 1:29:15.000
<v Speaker 1>in your frontal lobe. I think to say, turned down

1:29:15.120 --> 1:29:19.760
<v Speaker 1>resolution on incoming mint visual imagery and devote some of

1:29:19.800 --> 1:29:23.360
<v Speaker 1>those resources to mental imagery. And if you, if you

1:29:23.439 --> 1:29:25.920
<v Speaker 1>practice it right now, I think you'll probably notice the

1:29:25.920 --> 1:29:28.479
<v Speaker 1>same thing. You just like, look at something and then

1:29:28.520 --> 1:29:32.080
<v Speaker 1>try to picture something mentally, and you'll notice that you're

1:29:32.200 --> 1:29:37.120
<v Speaker 1>looking kind of gets downgraded in like quality and and arrested.

1:29:37.479 --> 1:29:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Are are you feeling this? Yeah? I mean, but this

1:29:39.800 --> 1:29:43.679
<v Speaker 1>is also kind of the It kind of goes both ways, right,

1:29:43.960 --> 1:29:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Like both cannot have have complete dominance at the same time.

1:29:48.640 --> 1:29:52.160
<v Speaker 1>So you might be able to to dim the thermist

1:29:52.240 --> 1:29:55.880
<v Speaker 1>that you're staring at by allowing mental images to you know,

1:29:55.960 --> 1:29:57.840
<v Speaker 1>to to be summoned into your mind. But on the

1:29:57.880 --> 1:30:04.320
<v Speaker 1>same level, if you feel haunted by various visual imagery ghosts,

1:30:04.560 --> 1:30:07.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, the visualizations that are in some way troubling

1:30:07.960 --> 1:30:10.519
<v Speaker 1>or traumatic, uh, you know, one of the exercises is

1:30:10.560 --> 1:30:13.880
<v Speaker 1>to focus your awareness on something, uh that that is

1:30:13.920 --> 1:30:17.200
<v Speaker 1>a physically present be at the ambient environment or a

1:30:17.200 --> 1:30:20.960
<v Speaker 1>specific object. I think that that would probably absolutely work,

1:30:21.000 --> 1:30:23.000
<v Speaker 1>at least based on what I've read, that you can

1:30:23.040 --> 1:30:26.240
<v Speaker 1>that you can greatly lessen the power of mental image

1:30:26.320 --> 1:30:30.160
<v Speaker 1>ory just by using your senses. Yeah, Like it reminds

1:30:30.200 --> 1:30:32.639
<v Speaker 1>me of meditation practices. Like, certainly they are closed eye

1:30:32.640 --> 1:30:36.320
<v Speaker 1>meditation practices, which in that environment you're really opening it

1:30:36.400 --> 1:30:39.400
<v Speaker 1>up to the visual way of seeing, you know, uh,

1:30:39.640 --> 1:30:42.400
<v Speaker 1>to to the mental image alone. But there are plenty

1:30:42.439 --> 1:30:45.599
<v Speaker 1>of open eye practices where you know, the instructor will say,

1:30:45.640 --> 1:30:47.559
<v Speaker 1>you know, pick something in the room, doesn't matter what

1:30:47.640 --> 1:30:50.200
<v Speaker 1>it is. It can be an electrical socket. But stare

1:30:50.200 --> 1:30:53.439
<v Speaker 1>at that electrical socket. Stare long and hard at that

1:30:53.520 --> 1:30:56.519
<v Speaker 1>electrical socket, and that becomes kind of the you know,

1:30:56.560 --> 1:31:01.439
<v Speaker 1>the visual mantra that will force out the other other ghosts. Yeah.

1:31:01.680 --> 1:31:04.200
<v Speaker 1>I like this metaphor for thinking about it, that there's

1:31:04.280 --> 1:31:07.200
<v Speaker 1>this war in your brain, this war for control of

1:31:07.240 --> 1:31:10.040
<v Speaker 1>the resources in your brain, and one of them is

1:31:10.720 --> 1:31:14.320
<v Speaker 1>things in your immediate surroundings, your sense perceptions, and the

1:31:14.360 --> 1:31:17.400
<v Speaker 1>other is things conjured by the void, which could be good,

1:31:17.400 --> 1:31:19.840
<v Speaker 1>things could be bad, things could be useful, things could

1:31:19.880 --> 1:31:23.000
<v Speaker 1>be debilitating things. I mean, it's just what comes up

1:31:23.040 --> 1:31:26.160
<v Speaker 1>out out of you know, either the intentional use of

1:31:26.240 --> 1:31:29.120
<v Speaker 1>mental imagery by the executive part of your brain, or

1:31:29.400 --> 1:31:33.599
<v Speaker 1>just you know, things that are subconsciously arising from the depths.

1:31:34.040 --> 1:31:36.560
<v Speaker 1>And your brain has to have some kind of partitioning

1:31:36.560 --> 1:31:40.240
<v Speaker 1>system for this, this sort of visual processing, right. Uh.

1:31:40.640 --> 1:31:43.800
<v Speaker 1>It uses regions in the occipital lobe to process image

1:31:43.880 --> 1:31:46.439
<v Speaker 1>data coming from your eyes, but you also use some

1:31:46.520 --> 1:31:50.680
<v Speaker 1>of the same regions to process images generated based on

1:31:50.760 --> 1:31:53.280
<v Speaker 1>your memories or based on your imagination, which I think

1:31:53.320 --> 1:31:56.759
<v Speaker 1>involves the memories, and these two processes are just constantly

1:31:56.840 --> 1:32:01.479
<v Speaker 1>going on simultaneously and competing for the same neural resources. Yea,

1:32:01.600 --> 1:32:05.360
<v Speaker 1>most of the time, most people, uh, this is an

1:32:05.360 --> 1:32:07.920
<v Speaker 1>interesting thing. Most of the time, most people manage not

1:32:08.040 --> 1:32:11.720
<v Speaker 1>to get confused. Isn't that interesting too, Like what kind

1:32:11.720 --> 1:32:14.240
<v Speaker 1>of partitioning must be going on in the brain, because

1:32:14.320 --> 1:32:17.920
<v Speaker 1>you can picture a pineapple on the desk in front

1:32:17.960 --> 1:32:20.880
<v Speaker 1>of you right now, and you can picture that, But

1:32:21.160 --> 1:32:23.960
<v Speaker 1>most of the time you don't become confused and think

1:32:23.960 --> 1:32:27.840
<v Speaker 1>you're actually seeing a pineapple there. Yeah, not even awareness

1:32:27.920 --> 1:32:30.360
<v Speaker 1>is focused, you know, certainly, certainly we all have those

1:32:30.479 --> 1:32:32.840
<v Speaker 1>those situations where you walk into a room and out

1:32:32.840 --> 1:32:34.880
<v Speaker 1>of the corner of your eye you think, for a second,

1:32:35.080 --> 1:32:37.120
<v Speaker 1>there's a there's a goblin standing in the corner, or

1:32:37.160 --> 1:32:40.080
<v Speaker 1>there's a cat, or or something's out of place, and

1:32:40.120 --> 1:32:42.280
<v Speaker 1>then you know a second glance, you realize, oh, it's

1:32:42.320 --> 1:32:45.559
<v Speaker 1>just the way that the shadow is following, or it's

1:32:45.560 --> 1:32:48.360
<v Speaker 1>the way that the drape is positioned, etcetera. Like we

1:32:48.720 --> 1:32:51.800
<v Speaker 1>come back to it again, like our awareness doesn't just

1:32:52.360 --> 1:32:54.360
<v Speaker 1>do a single take. It as a double take, and

1:32:54.400 --> 1:32:57.720
<v Speaker 1>it you know, you confirms or denies the presence of

1:32:57.720 --> 1:32:59.639
<v Speaker 1>the thing you thought was there initially, right. I think

1:32:59.680 --> 1:33:03.320
<v Speaker 1>the the persistence of the stimulus is one key there

1:33:03.360 --> 1:33:06.080
<v Speaker 1>that like, you can keep looking at something and your

1:33:06.200 --> 1:33:09.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, your imagination will fluctuate, but the light coming

1:33:09.360 --> 1:33:11.040
<v Speaker 1>into your eyes is going to stay about the same.

1:33:11.960 --> 1:33:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Um and some beautiful lyrics there that could be an

1:33:14.360 --> 1:33:20.400
<v Speaker 1>eagle song. I just tried to sing some eagles. But

1:33:20.439 --> 1:33:22.360
<v Speaker 1>we don't want to get night cheese, so we're not

1:33:22.360 --> 1:33:24.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna leave it in. Uh Now, Now, it does appear

1:33:24.960 --> 1:33:28.519
<v Speaker 1>that there's a possibility for some bleed over in the

1:33:28.880 --> 1:33:33.880
<v Speaker 1>visual processing between mental imagery and actual uh uh seeing

1:33:33.880 --> 1:33:37.640
<v Speaker 1>with the eyes. For example, this thing called the Perky effect.

1:33:38.160 --> 1:33:41.680
<v Speaker 1>This is named after the American psychologist C. W. Perky.

1:33:41.840 --> 1:33:44.559
<v Speaker 1>So how does this work? Well? Uh Perky She she

1:33:44.600 --> 1:33:48.879
<v Speaker 1>would have somebody try to visualize something like a leaf

1:33:49.000 --> 1:33:52.439
<v Speaker 1>or a banana while looking at a blank screen, and

1:33:52.479 --> 1:33:57.320
<v Speaker 1>then meanwhile she would project a very faint, soft focus

1:33:57.479 --> 1:34:01.040
<v Speaker 1>image of something like a leaf or a banana onto

1:34:01.080 --> 1:34:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the screen at just about the threshold brightness of visual perception.

1:34:06.920 --> 1:34:11.120
<v Speaker 1>And in these experiments, Perky found that subjects would incorporate

1:34:11.360 --> 1:34:15.520
<v Speaker 1>visual features of the actual image that was faintly projected

1:34:16.080 --> 1:34:20.240
<v Speaker 1>thinking that these were features of their imagined image, for example,

1:34:20.520 --> 1:34:24.360
<v Speaker 1>the type of leaf or the orientation of the banana.

1:34:24.479 --> 1:34:27.080
<v Speaker 1>And there have been various attempts to replicate this finding,

1:34:27.200 --> 1:34:30.599
<v Speaker 1>some successful and some unsuccessful, so I think we're not

1:34:30.720 --> 1:34:34.439
<v Speaker 1>totally sure how robust this effect is. But I think

1:34:34.479 --> 1:34:37.960
<v Speaker 1>now a common assessment of what of this effect is

1:34:38.000 --> 1:34:40.360
<v Speaker 1>that what's really being detected here is the fact that

1:34:40.680 --> 1:34:47.280
<v Speaker 1>using visual imagination steals processing resources from normal visual perception,

1:34:47.320 --> 1:34:49.360
<v Speaker 1>like we were talking about earlier, So if you're trying

1:34:49.400 --> 1:34:53.240
<v Speaker 1>to imagine something, you're less likely to notice consciously than

1:34:53.280 --> 1:34:56.080
<v Speaker 1>an image is being faintly projected in front of you,

1:34:56.160 --> 1:34:59.240
<v Speaker 1>even though you might pick up some visual cues such

1:34:59.280 --> 1:35:02.960
<v Speaker 1>as color shape from that image and just hold them

1:35:02.960 --> 1:35:05.800
<v Speaker 1>in mind to think they're part of your imagination, which

1:35:05.800 --> 1:35:08.080
<v Speaker 1>again is creepy. I mean, this isn't the only finding

1:35:08.160 --> 1:35:11.360
<v Speaker 1>like this that that you can like give people cues

1:35:11.439 --> 1:35:13.960
<v Speaker 1>from the outside that people come to believe or just

1:35:14.080 --> 1:35:17.200
<v Speaker 1>part of their own imagination. But I guess maybe it's

1:35:17.240 --> 1:35:19.920
<v Speaker 1>needless to say that after looking through all this, I

1:35:19.960 --> 1:35:23.720
<v Speaker 1>don't think there's any evidence at all that representation of

1:35:23.760 --> 1:35:27.519
<v Speaker 1>an image in the mind involves the brain building a

1:35:27.560 --> 1:35:31.519
<v Speaker 1>physical two dimensional picture of the image which could be

1:35:32.160 --> 1:35:35.720
<v Speaker 1>projected onto an external substrate like film. It's kind of

1:35:35.760 --> 1:35:39.320
<v Speaker 1>like imagining that you could save a JPEG of Garfield,

1:35:39.360 --> 1:35:42.000
<v Speaker 1>to say, got Garfield and a jpeg, and that's not

1:35:42.080 --> 1:35:45.759
<v Speaker 1>an old computer floppy disk, and then you could somehow

1:35:46.320 --> 1:35:50.040
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to project the image of Garfield physically from

1:35:50.040 --> 1:35:54.040
<v Speaker 1>the floppy disk onto a photograph or a piece of paper.

1:35:54.560 --> 1:35:58.240
<v Speaker 1>The two D pixel layout of Garfield is not found

1:35:58.320 --> 1:36:01.160
<v Speaker 1>anywhere on the disc. You know, it's broken down and

1:36:01.280 --> 1:36:04.439
<v Speaker 1>encoded as information which can later be read by a

1:36:04.479 --> 1:36:07.240
<v Speaker 1>program to create a copy of the same original image

1:36:07.240 --> 1:36:10.000
<v Speaker 1>on a computer screen. But the image of Garfield can

1:36:10.080 --> 1:36:12.360
<v Speaker 1>be seen anywhere on the disk. You can't pull it

1:36:12.360 --> 1:36:16.080
<v Speaker 1>out by projecting something through it, even with the strongest microscope.

1:36:16.400 --> 1:36:19.479
<v Speaker 1>It's encoded as information that only yields the image when

1:36:19.560 --> 1:36:24.759
<v Speaker 1>decoded correctly, and as best I can tell, imageries works

1:36:24.800 --> 1:36:27.960
<v Speaker 1>a similar way. In the brain. It's somehow coded through

1:36:28.040 --> 1:36:31.080
<v Speaker 1>neuronal activity. It's it's not an image that you could

1:36:31.160 --> 1:36:35.600
<v Speaker 1>find anywhere in the brain. You've touched on. One of

1:36:35.600 --> 1:36:39.880
<v Speaker 1>my big problems with David Cronenberg scanners, which is a

1:36:39.920 --> 1:36:43.120
<v Speaker 1>movie I love otherwise. Uh, there's a lot to love

1:36:43.120 --> 1:36:46.120
<v Speaker 1>about Crona about about scanners and not just you know,

1:36:46.160 --> 1:36:50.320
<v Speaker 1>people's heads exploding and Michael ironsides of you know, fabulous

1:36:50.680 --> 1:36:54.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, psychic facial strains. But but there is this

1:36:54.760 --> 1:36:57.439
<v Speaker 1>with this one section of the film where the character

1:36:57.520 --> 1:37:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Cameron Veil can cyberpath thickly scan a computer hide hard

1:37:02.160 --> 1:37:06.040
<v Speaker 1>drive with his brain. Uh. And that always bugged me

1:37:06.120 --> 1:37:09.160
<v Speaker 1>because I'm like, Okay, it's one thing to imagine one

1:37:09.240 --> 1:37:13.240
<v Speaker 1>brain speaking to another brain, you know, even though there's

1:37:13.360 --> 1:37:18.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's no defined way that that would actually occur, uh,

1:37:18.439 --> 1:37:20.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, at least in terms of like the human

1:37:20.680 --> 1:37:23.639
<v Speaker 1>mind talking to another human mind. But but it's even

1:37:23.680 --> 1:37:26.599
<v Speaker 1>a greater stretch than to imagine that he is scanning

1:37:26.680 --> 1:37:29.960
<v Speaker 1>a computer hard drive. Yeah, because his brain does not

1:37:30.120 --> 1:37:34.320
<v Speaker 1>it can't execute the code right, Like, in order for

1:37:34.360 --> 1:37:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the data on the hard drive to be read correctly

1:37:37.160 --> 1:37:40.480
<v Speaker 1>has to be executed somehow. There's like a decoding procedure

1:37:40.920 --> 1:37:43.920
<v Speaker 1>that yields the text or the sound files or whatever

1:37:43.960 --> 1:37:47.320
<v Speaker 1>it is he's trying to discover, and presumably his brain

1:37:47.439 --> 1:37:51.280
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have that decoding function within it. Yeah. Yeah, so

1:37:51.720 --> 1:37:55.280
<v Speaker 1>it's the same problem with this idea of photography, that

1:37:55.280 --> 1:37:57.479
<v Speaker 1>that somehow you could you could put the mental image

1:37:57.520 --> 1:38:01.559
<v Speaker 1>in your mind onto the film. That's why I prefer one.

1:38:01.560 --> 1:38:05.719
<v Speaker 1>A great example of a far more believable system of

1:38:05.760 --> 1:38:09.840
<v Speaker 1>telepathic communication would be that used by the Gelflings in

1:38:09.960 --> 1:38:13.519
<v Speaker 1>the Dark Crystal and also in the the new so

1:38:13.600 --> 1:38:19.080
<v Speaker 1>far really fabulous Netflix of prequel series. Oh I also

1:38:19.120 --> 1:38:22.479
<v Speaker 1>started it, haven't finished great loving it so far. But

1:38:22.600 --> 1:38:26.120
<v Speaker 1>the the Gelflings are able to to dream vast where

1:38:26.160 --> 1:38:29.760
<v Speaker 1>they're able to u to to like touch grasp hands,

1:38:29.840 --> 1:38:33.719
<v Speaker 1>and in doing so, they share their mental images mental

1:38:33.760 --> 1:38:36.880
<v Speaker 1>images of you know, their memories with each other so

1:38:36.920 --> 1:38:40.080
<v Speaker 1>that they can share an inexperience and uh, you know,

1:38:40.200 --> 1:38:42.880
<v Speaker 1>that's a version of mental image sharing that you know.

1:38:42.920 --> 1:38:45.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure exactly what the you know, the biological

1:38:45.920 --> 1:38:50.280
<v Speaker 1>explanation would be for it, but it's conceivable. It's conceivable

1:38:50.320 --> 1:38:53.840
<v Speaker 1>that these two um you know, you know, neural systems

1:38:53.880 --> 1:38:58.760
<v Speaker 1>in the same species could link up to share information

1:38:59.080 --> 1:39:01.240
<v Speaker 1>and that would also have that would have a survival

1:39:02.040 --> 1:39:04.000
<v Speaker 1>that would be a survival adaptation as well. Like that's

1:39:04.000 --> 1:39:07.160
<v Speaker 1>something that would be uh, you know, supported through natural selection. Well,

1:39:07.200 --> 1:39:09.080
<v Speaker 1>you can think about it as another form of language.

1:39:09.120 --> 1:39:12.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we've got language to code experiences and share

1:39:12.160 --> 1:39:15.320
<v Speaker 1>them between each other. So you could imagine creatures could

1:39:15.360 --> 1:39:19.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, project electromagnetic symbols or something to each other,

1:39:19.920 --> 1:39:22.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, pulses of stuff that would encode and decode

1:39:22.800 --> 1:39:25.880
<v Speaker 1>information across brains the same way. I don't think there's

1:39:25.920 --> 1:39:28.559
<v Speaker 1>any good evidence that humans can do that, but you

1:39:28.560 --> 1:39:32.400
<v Speaker 1>could imagine a species that did do that. Right. Likewise,

1:39:32.560 --> 1:39:35.080
<v Speaker 1>it's and perhaps there's a science fiction Surely there's a

1:39:35.080 --> 1:39:37.360
<v Speaker 1>science fiction or fantasy treatment of this out there somewhere.

1:39:37.680 --> 1:39:42.160
<v Speaker 1>You can imagine something with the chromatophores along the lines

1:39:42.200 --> 1:39:45.840
<v Speaker 1>of cuttlefish, or you know, an octopus being able to

1:39:46.840 --> 1:39:49.720
<v Speaker 1>take a ntal image in its head and recreated on

1:39:49.800 --> 1:39:52.880
<v Speaker 1>its body. Oh, I love that that. Somebody has surely

1:39:52.920 --> 1:39:54.600
<v Speaker 1>done that before, and that would be that would be

1:39:54.640 --> 1:39:57.280
<v Speaker 1>an interesting way to do it. And of course humans

1:39:57.320 --> 1:40:01.320
<v Speaker 1>have a similar ability through language and uh and and

1:40:01.320 --> 1:40:05.240
<v Speaker 1>an artistic skill. We can take a mental image and

1:40:05.320 --> 1:40:09.280
<v Speaker 1>we can recreate some version of it outside of our

1:40:09.320 --> 1:40:12.760
<v Speaker 1>body in a way that that stays stationary. But it

1:40:12.920 --> 1:40:15.800
<v Speaker 1>is not uh, it is not the you know the

1:40:15.960 --> 1:40:21.040
<v Speaker 1>art of of of telepathy. Or or or the thoughtography

1:40:21.120 --> 1:40:23.720
<v Speaker 1>or whatever it is. It is the the the it

1:40:23.880 --> 1:40:25.640
<v Speaker 1>is the arts themselves. It is that it is the

1:40:25.720 --> 1:40:28.160
<v Speaker 1>use of language. I think that's dead on. I mean,

1:40:28.680 --> 1:40:31.400
<v Speaker 1>we're used to it, so it seems less astounding to us.

1:40:31.400 --> 1:40:33.920
<v Speaker 1>But I try to make people remember all the time

1:40:33.920 --> 1:40:36.360
<v Speaker 1>that language is like magic. I mean, the language is

1:40:36.400 --> 1:40:41.160
<v Speaker 1>the most is the most astounding, strangest thing you can.

1:40:41.280 --> 1:40:44.040
<v Speaker 1>You can use words, you make sounds with your mouth

1:40:44.160 --> 1:40:47.839
<v Speaker 1>to change what's in somebody else's brain. And it works.

1:40:47.960 --> 1:40:50.920
<v Speaker 1>It works almost all the time. Now quickly, before we

1:40:50.960 --> 1:40:52.840
<v Speaker 1>go to another break, I just wanted to mention I

1:40:52.880 --> 1:40:56.320
<v Speaker 1>was looking at another paper about a recent research in

1:40:56.880 --> 1:40:59.960
<v Speaker 1>mental imagery, and this is called mental imagery, Functional Mechanisms

1:41:00.120 --> 1:41:03.559
<v Speaker 1>and Clinical Applications. This is in Trends and Cognitive Sciences

1:41:03.600 --> 1:41:08.680
<v Speaker 1>from but Joel Pearson, Thomas Nasa Lauris, Emily Holmes, and

1:41:08.760 --> 1:41:12.479
<v Speaker 1>Stephen Kostlin Um. And one of the things that they

1:41:12.520 --> 1:41:14.560
<v Speaker 1>said in the paper it echoes a lot of the

1:41:14.560 --> 1:41:18.080
<v Speaker 1>stuff we were talking about already. But um, one thing

1:41:18.120 --> 1:41:21.320
<v Speaker 1>they say that stuck with me is that the authors

1:41:21.400 --> 1:41:25.960
<v Speaker 1>conclude that the existing research suggests mental imagery should be

1:41:26.000 --> 1:41:31.479
<v Speaker 1>considered quote a weak form of perception. And that's interesting

1:41:31.479 --> 1:41:35.360
<v Speaker 1>because you don't normally think about mental imagery as perception. Normally,

1:41:35.360 --> 1:41:37.800
<v Speaker 1>perception is what you know, your five senses, or maybe

1:41:37.800 --> 1:41:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the other senses, if you know about the weirder ones. Um.

1:41:41.040 --> 1:41:43.519
<v Speaker 1>But here they're saying, no, it is like a form

1:41:43.600 --> 1:41:49.080
<v Speaker 1>of perception. It's almost like a lower resolution form of seeing. Now,

1:41:49.160 --> 1:41:52.000
<v Speaker 1>why is it a weak form of perception? Well, visual

1:41:52.040 --> 1:41:55.800
<v Speaker 1>regions in the brains show less blood flow and less

1:41:55.840 --> 1:41:59.599
<v Speaker 1>excitation of neurons during the generation of mental imagery than

1:41:59.640 --> 1:42:02.639
<v Speaker 1>they do in the actual viewing of images with the eyes,

1:42:02.800 --> 1:42:05.599
<v Speaker 1>even though you use some of the same regions for both.

1:42:05.920 --> 1:42:08.520
<v Speaker 1>And I also just wanted to mention some interesting questions

1:42:08.560 --> 1:42:11.600
<v Speaker 1>that the authors bring up as sort of unresolved in

1:42:11.640 --> 1:42:15.200
<v Speaker 1>this review. Again, this was from so there maybe development

1:42:15.280 --> 1:42:18.400
<v Speaker 1>since then. But um. One of the things they ask is,

1:42:18.400 --> 1:42:21.639
<v Speaker 1>we know that there are strong similarities between normal visual

1:42:21.640 --> 1:42:25.120
<v Speaker 1>perception seeing with the eyes and mental imagery. What are

1:42:25.280 --> 1:42:29.480
<v Speaker 1>the major differences. Another thing that I was really interested

1:42:29.520 --> 1:42:33.240
<v Speaker 1>in is they asked the question of can mental imagery

1:42:33.240 --> 1:42:37.880
<v Speaker 1>be unconscious? And if you try to understand that for

1:42:37.880 --> 1:42:42.360
<v Speaker 1>a second, is it possible to picture something without being

1:42:42.400 --> 1:42:46.400
<v Speaker 1>aware that you're picturing it or is mental imagery something

1:42:46.439 --> 1:42:50.519
<v Speaker 1>that only occurs consciously? Can you only picture something if

1:42:50.560 --> 1:42:53.719
<v Speaker 1>you're aware that you're picturing it? So? Well, what would

1:42:53.720 --> 1:42:56.280
<v Speaker 1>be what would be an example then, based on that

1:42:56.360 --> 1:43:00.720
<v Speaker 1>logic of someone picturing something without realizing they pick drink something. Well,

1:43:00.760 --> 1:43:02.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I mean that that's sort of the

1:43:02.240 --> 1:43:05.640
<v Speaker 1>tough question, like is because it would be difficult to

1:43:05.720 --> 1:43:09.200
<v Speaker 1>measure that. I think it. Would it be like an hallucination? Well, no,

1:43:09.400 --> 1:43:12.960
<v Speaker 1>because you'd be presumably you'd be conscious of an hallucination.

1:43:13.520 --> 1:43:15.559
<v Speaker 1>So the idea would have to be that, you know,

1:43:15.840 --> 1:43:19.439
<v Speaker 1>you can show unconscious things going on in the brain

1:43:19.600 --> 1:43:22.280
<v Speaker 1>just by like asking people if they're aware of things,

1:43:22.280 --> 1:43:25.080
<v Speaker 1>but tracking their behaviors that realize, you know, the show

1:43:25.120 --> 1:43:27.599
<v Speaker 1>they are aware of this thing or that thing. But

1:43:28.160 --> 1:43:31.320
<v Speaker 1>it's difficult to say, can people imagine a picture of

1:43:31.360 --> 1:43:35.920
<v Speaker 1>something without knowing that they're picturing it? I would think,

1:43:36.040 --> 1:43:38.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, I would say the default answer would probably

1:43:38.360 --> 1:43:40.760
<v Speaker 1>be no, because it's hard to imagine what that would be.

1:43:40.840 --> 1:43:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Like you tend to think, Okay, the only times I

1:43:42.880 --> 1:43:46.280
<v Speaker 1>know that I'm picturing something or when I'm conscious of it, Well,

1:43:46.280 --> 1:43:49.320
<v Speaker 1>for that matter, is it possible to unconsciously look at

1:43:49.400 --> 1:43:52.439
<v Speaker 1>something with your visual perception. Like I think maybe that

1:43:52.600 --> 1:43:55.880
<v Speaker 1>is possible, Like because if I'm but I'm looking at something,

1:43:55.960 --> 1:43:58.880
<v Speaker 1>I am looking at something, right, I mean, it seems

1:43:58.920 --> 1:44:01.920
<v Speaker 1>like it follows the same process. Well, I don't know

1:44:01.960 --> 1:44:04.800
<v Speaker 1>what about Like there could be some stuff along the

1:44:04.800 --> 1:44:08.559
<v Speaker 1>lines of like the Invisible Guerillas experiment that indicate that

1:44:08.680 --> 1:44:11.320
<v Speaker 1>sometimes you can see things without being aware that you're

1:44:11.360 --> 1:44:13.800
<v Speaker 1>seeing them, right, Or certainly we've already touched on what

1:44:13.880 --> 1:44:16.439
<v Speaker 1>happens if you are looking at something in the physical

1:44:16.439 --> 1:44:19.479
<v Speaker 1>world but focus focusing far more intently on something that

1:44:19.640 --> 1:44:24.120
<v Speaker 1>is just a mental image. But yeah, I mean I

1:44:24.120 --> 1:44:26.080
<v Speaker 1>can see why it's an unanswered question, but it is

1:44:26.160 --> 1:44:28.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of it's a tricky question too. Yeah. Now, I

1:44:28.800 --> 1:44:31.479
<v Speaker 1>think what does seem pretty clear is that there can

1:44:31.479 --> 1:44:34.920
<v Speaker 1>be unconscious reasons for the generation of mental imagery. I

1:44:34.920 --> 1:44:37.920
<v Speaker 1>mean that this is a huge thing in mental imagery research.

1:44:38.000 --> 1:44:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Is like the origins of mental imagery, for example, intrusive

1:44:41.600 --> 1:44:44.640
<v Speaker 1>unwanted mental images. Yeah, I think that's that's that's an

1:44:44.640 --> 1:44:47.559
<v Speaker 1>example that I imagine a lot of us can relate to.

1:44:48.320 --> 1:44:52.120
<v Speaker 1>But also in terms of say meditative states, you know,

1:44:52.160 --> 1:44:56.000
<v Speaker 1>the idea of encountering an image that isn't at least

1:44:56.080 --> 1:44:58.599
<v Speaker 1>consciously summoned. You know, not to say that it comes

1:44:58.640 --> 1:45:01.960
<v Speaker 1>from the outside. It's still coming from sort of the

1:45:01.960 --> 1:45:06.599
<v Speaker 1>the internal contents of your your psychic library, but but

1:45:06.800 --> 1:45:11.040
<v Speaker 1>not in a way that feels um lately you assembled

1:45:11.040 --> 1:45:13.920
<v Speaker 1>it hands on. Uh And then likewise, there's a domain

1:45:13.960 --> 1:45:17.280
<v Speaker 1>of hallucination and dream. Yeah, I've got another maybe weird

1:45:17.360 --> 1:45:20.599
<v Speaker 1>question about mental imagery. See if this makes any sense.

1:45:21.080 --> 1:45:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Um So, the authors in these studies find strong links

1:45:23.920 --> 1:45:27.640
<v Speaker 1>between visual imagery and things like working memory. But I

1:45:27.720 --> 1:45:32.840
<v Speaker 1>wonder does the ability to recall visually recognized features of

1:45:32.840 --> 1:45:38.160
<v Speaker 1>a thing always or even usually rely on mental imagery?

1:45:38.320 --> 1:45:41.120
<v Speaker 1>And uh? So? For example, if I ask you to

1:45:41.400 --> 1:45:44.519
<v Speaker 1>picture a character from a movie, you've seen a picture

1:45:44.960 --> 1:45:50.400
<v Speaker 1>the Chamberlain from the Dark Crystal or let's see, Actually, uh,

1:45:50.680 --> 1:45:52.880
<v Speaker 1>I think I screwed that up. Okay, No, actually, don't,

1:45:52.920 --> 1:45:55.080
<v Speaker 1>don't picture him yet. It's too late. I've done it

1:45:55.200 --> 1:45:58.000
<v Speaker 1>like twice. Okay, Well, I just want you to list

1:45:58.080 --> 1:46:04.400
<v Speaker 1>physical characteristics of the Chamberlain from the Dark Crystal. Okay, um,

1:46:04.600 --> 1:46:16.360
<v Speaker 1>bird like, um, sneaky, serpentine um, splendid, decade, I guess

1:46:16.400 --> 1:46:19.479
<v Speaker 1>I bring this up because my question is, when you

1:46:19.560 --> 1:46:23.599
<v Speaker 1>recall visual characteristics of a thing you've seen, do you

1:46:23.640 --> 1:46:27.519
<v Speaker 1>recall them exclusively by calling up a mental image of

1:46:27.520 --> 1:46:30.720
<v Speaker 1>the thing and examining it like you would a thing

1:46:30.760 --> 1:46:33.840
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at currently, or do you have other ways

1:46:33.920 --> 1:46:37.799
<v Speaker 1>of remembering the visual characteristics of something other than by

1:46:37.840 --> 1:46:40.720
<v Speaker 1>picturing it and then examining what you're looking at in

1:46:40.760 --> 1:46:43.519
<v Speaker 1>your mind's eye. Well, with the Chamberlain, I think I

1:46:44.080 --> 1:46:48.040
<v Speaker 1>draw specifically on just visuals. Now, it would be different

1:46:48.040 --> 1:46:50.240
<v Speaker 1>if I was described, if it was asked to describe

1:46:50.240 --> 1:46:54.240
<v Speaker 1>a literary character in which the character is is like

1:46:54.280 --> 1:46:58.040
<v Speaker 1>initially build out of language, but that the Chamberlain is

1:46:58.080 --> 1:47:02.120
<v Speaker 1>all is all visual and does not, at least in

1:47:02.160 --> 1:47:08.000
<v Speaker 1>anything I remember, describe itself. So because there are characters

1:47:08.000 --> 1:47:11.400
<v Speaker 1>that one encounters visually where that the character is going

1:47:11.439 --> 1:47:13.560
<v Speaker 1>to describe itself or there's gonna be some voice to

1:47:13.600 --> 1:47:16.360
<v Speaker 1>describe it, but there's no language attached to it. So yeah,

1:47:16.400 --> 1:47:19.920
<v Speaker 1>I would say almost purely visual. Yeah, I noticed most

1:47:19.960 --> 1:47:22.800
<v Speaker 1>of the time when I'm trying to recall visual characteristics

1:47:22.800 --> 1:47:25.800
<v Speaker 1>of something, I picture it first. But yeah, it gets

1:47:25.880 --> 1:47:30.320
<v Speaker 1>especially complicated when you're thinking about characteristics of something that

1:47:30.360 --> 1:47:34.840
<v Speaker 1>you've imagined from writing but not from seeing. Yeah, Like

1:47:35.040 --> 1:47:36.680
<v Speaker 1>when you asked me to think of the Chamberlain, too,

1:47:36.680 --> 1:47:39.680
<v Speaker 1>I found myself doing it in two ways. Like basically

1:47:39.720 --> 1:47:43.800
<v Speaker 1>a mental image of a scene from the film, like

1:47:43.840 --> 1:47:46.799
<v Speaker 1>where I'm seeing in my mind not only the character,

1:47:46.920 --> 1:47:50.559
<v Speaker 1>but the backdrop, the lighting, everything. And then there's kind

1:47:50.560 --> 1:47:53.919
<v Speaker 1>of a mental image of, say, the head of the creature,

1:47:54.160 --> 1:47:56.360
<v Speaker 1>as if it were in the room with me, you know.

1:47:57.120 --> 1:48:00.120
<v Speaker 1>So that makes me wonder too, Yeah, do we have

1:48:00.200 --> 1:48:03.760
<v Speaker 1>different different sorts of mental imagery. Mental imagery that's more

1:48:04.520 --> 1:48:07.320
<v Speaker 1>based on thinking. Maybe in a way, it's kind of

1:48:07.360 --> 1:48:09.760
<v Speaker 1>like thinking about the way we uh we think about

1:48:09.800 --> 1:48:11.920
<v Speaker 1>the past and the future, a way of thinking about

1:48:11.960 --> 1:48:15.000
<v Speaker 1>the way something was and then imagining the way something

1:48:15.080 --> 1:48:16.880
<v Speaker 1>would be, what it would be like if it were

1:48:16.960 --> 1:48:19.759
<v Speaker 1>here or if I were encountering it in the near future.

1:48:20.400 --> 1:48:22.640
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if that plays into it at all. All Right,

1:48:22.680 --> 1:48:24.160
<v Speaker 1>on that note, we're gonna take a quick break, but

1:48:24.200 --> 1:48:29.200
<v Speaker 1>we'll be right back. Thank alright, we're back. Okay. So

1:48:29.240 --> 1:48:34.400
<v Speaker 1>we've been talking about psychic photography or thoughtography, this alleged

1:48:34.560 --> 1:48:37.960
<v Speaker 1>ability that some people have to project the contents of

1:48:38.000 --> 1:48:41.840
<v Speaker 1>their mental imagery onto film or onto objects in the

1:48:41.880 --> 1:48:44.920
<v Speaker 1>external world. And I think we're probably in agreement that

1:48:45.160 --> 1:48:47.720
<v Speaker 1>even though a lot of people have claimed to have

1:48:47.880 --> 1:48:50.800
<v Speaker 1>this power or claim to have demonstrated this power, this

1:48:51.000 --> 1:48:54.120
<v Speaker 1>probably is not really going on in in some ways,

1:48:54.200 --> 1:48:57.400
<v Speaker 1>the mechanism of it seems incoherent, right, And that's what

1:48:57.520 --> 1:49:00.720
<v Speaker 1>it basically, the mechanism is in going are It's it's

1:49:00.760 --> 1:49:04.800
<v Speaker 1>again like imagining the psychics and scanners being able to

1:49:04.840 --> 1:49:08.439
<v Speaker 1>read hard drives, like this just doesn't make sense. But

1:49:09.280 --> 1:49:13.160
<v Speaker 1>there are a number of experiments that sort of would

1:49:13.200 --> 1:49:17.400
<v Speaker 1>find a way around this incoherence. We're talking about through

1:49:17.520 --> 1:49:21.840
<v Speaker 1>another layer of encoding and decoding of brain activity that

1:49:22.280 --> 1:49:26.719
<v Speaker 1>that could be learned through brain computer interfaces and machine learning.

1:49:27.160 --> 1:49:31.080
<v Speaker 1>And this we're getting into into the creation of a

1:49:31.160 --> 1:49:34.840
<v Speaker 1>of a technological translator. Yes exactly. It kind of the

1:49:34.840 --> 1:49:37.680
<v Speaker 1>same way that you would use language to translate the

1:49:38.040 --> 1:49:41.479
<v Speaker 1>contents of your mind's eye into something in the outside world.

1:49:42.000 --> 1:49:46.200
<v Speaker 1>A computer could potentially translate the brain activity that it

1:49:46.240 --> 1:49:48.760
<v Speaker 1>reads off of your scalp or in blood flow in

1:49:48.760 --> 1:49:52.080
<v Speaker 1>your brain through fm r I into something in the

1:49:52.120 --> 1:49:55.760
<v Speaker 1>outside world that could be trained to correlate with your

1:49:55.800 --> 1:49:59.639
<v Speaker 1>mental imagery. Now, I think I've got lots of questions

1:49:59.640 --> 1:50:02.960
<v Speaker 1>about how accurate and how realistic this project actually is.

1:50:03.360 --> 1:50:05.720
<v Speaker 1>But there are at least these experiments that that have

1:50:05.840 --> 1:50:08.360
<v Speaker 1>purported to get part of the way there, and they're

1:50:08.400 --> 1:50:11.040
<v Speaker 1>they're kind of freaky. I won't lie. I would say

1:50:11.200 --> 1:50:12.880
<v Speaker 1>this starts to get me a little bit worried. I

1:50:12.960 --> 1:50:16.400
<v Speaker 1>want to start with a news piece in Science from January.

1:50:17.479 --> 1:50:20.320
<v Speaker 1>The news piece was by Matthew Hudson and it covers

1:50:20.600 --> 1:50:23.600
<v Speaker 1>the brain computer interface work of a group of researchers

1:50:23.640 --> 1:50:28.639
<v Speaker 1>including uh u Kiasu Kamitani, a neuroscientist at Kyoto University

1:50:28.640 --> 1:50:32.519
<v Speaker 1>in Japan, and a computer scientist named Zoe ming Lu

1:50:32.800 --> 1:50:36.320
<v Speaker 1>at Purdue University in the United States. And this work

1:50:36.400 --> 1:50:40.240
<v Speaker 1>is focused on it's using brain computer interfaces to directly

1:50:40.400 --> 1:50:43.720
<v Speaker 1>read and record mental imagery, which is the imagining of

1:50:43.760 --> 1:50:47.280
<v Speaker 1>a picture. So you try to imagine, like, why would

1:50:47.280 --> 1:50:49.400
<v Speaker 1>anybody be doing this? You know, what would be the

1:50:49.439 --> 1:50:53.880
<v Speaker 1>supposed benefits of a technology to read people's mental imagery. Well,

1:50:54.000 --> 1:50:56.639
<v Speaker 1>we're asked to imagine in this article, maybe being able

1:50:56.680 --> 1:51:00.240
<v Speaker 1>to search through a collection of digital images simply by

1:51:00.280 --> 1:51:03.439
<v Speaker 1>mentally picturing the image we want Okay, that might be

1:51:03.479 --> 1:51:06.360
<v Speaker 1>a thing like I bet you've tried before to Google

1:51:06.400 --> 1:51:08.920
<v Speaker 1>an image that you've seen before, but you didn't know

1:51:09.000 --> 1:51:12.720
<v Speaker 1>what search terms to use and couldn't find it. Yeah, yeah,

1:51:12.800 --> 1:51:16.880
<v Speaker 1>there's I could see where that could have an application. Well, granted,

1:51:16.920 --> 1:51:19.640
<v Speaker 1>it's not something that is really life or death, and

1:51:20.240 --> 1:51:22.640
<v Speaker 1>it would be more like, Oh, I vaguely remember a

1:51:22.720 --> 1:51:28.400
<v Speaker 1>really cool advertisement for a community college on television in

1:51:28.439 --> 1:51:31.479
<v Speaker 1>the summer in my childhood, and they played a song

1:51:31.560 --> 1:51:33.400
<v Speaker 1>on it that kind of sounded like Boards of Canada.

1:51:33.439 --> 1:51:35.800
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if it was actually Boards of Canada. Like

1:51:35.880 --> 1:51:38.080
<v Speaker 1>that is a legit thing that I think about from

1:51:38.080 --> 1:51:39.880
<v Speaker 1>time to time, and there's no way for me to

1:51:39.920 --> 1:51:43.960
<v Speaker 1>look it up. But true enough, if a machine could

1:51:44.000 --> 1:51:48.000
<v Speaker 1>look at my mental imagery of that memory of watching

1:51:48.040 --> 1:51:51.599
<v Speaker 1>that TV spot, then it's conceivable that it could then

1:51:51.720 --> 1:51:56.040
<v Speaker 1>look into some vast database and find that footage for me. Yeah.

1:51:56.080 --> 1:51:58.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying that will necessarily ever get there, but

1:51:58.880 --> 1:52:01.080
<v Speaker 1>that that is the kind of thing they're asking you

1:52:01.120 --> 1:52:05.120
<v Speaker 1>to imagine. Another one, this is probably more straightforward drawing

1:52:05.120 --> 1:52:08.680
<v Speaker 1>without the hands, straight from imagination too, recorded two D

1:52:08.800 --> 1:52:11.280
<v Speaker 1>media that might be interesting. I mean, I wonder if

1:52:11.280 --> 1:52:14.479
<v Speaker 1>I could open up whole other realms of visual art

1:52:15.120 --> 1:52:17.920
<v Speaker 1>for people who are not good at drawing with their hands, right,

1:52:18.040 --> 1:52:20.759
<v Speaker 1>or or for people who are disabled to some degree.

1:52:20.920 --> 1:52:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Right that I could see that being advantageous as well.

1:52:23.560 --> 1:52:25.559
<v Speaker 1>And it can go further than that. I mean, technically,

1:52:25.600 --> 1:52:28.320
<v Speaker 1>you could imagine something like this allowing people without the

1:52:28.360 --> 1:52:31.840
<v Speaker 1>power of speech you're writing to share their thoughts. Uh,

1:52:31.880 --> 1:52:33.600
<v Speaker 1>you know you can't Maybe if you can't speak, you

1:52:33.640 --> 1:52:36.360
<v Speaker 1>can't describe your visual imagery, maybe you could share it

1:52:36.400 --> 1:52:39.679
<v Speaker 1>with something like this. But I want to say, Okay,

1:52:39.720 --> 1:52:42.240
<v Speaker 1>those are the positive versions of what we're imagining. We

1:52:42.479 --> 1:52:46.000
<v Speaker 1>could explore negative versions later on. And so the researchers

1:52:46.040 --> 1:52:49.360
<v Speaker 1>here have been working on computer algorithms that are trained

1:52:49.400 --> 1:52:53.799
<v Speaker 1>through machine learning to match patterns of brain activity recorded

1:52:53.800 --> 1:52:56.680
<v Speaker 1>through things like fm r I with imagery that a

1:52:56.760 --> 1:53:00.640
<v Speaker 1>subject is looking at. And because actually looking at an

1:53:00.680 --> 1:53:03.840
<v Speaker 1>image and then mentally imagining the same image are sort

1:53:03.880 --> 1:53:06.040
<v Speaker 1>of similar in the brain, They're not exactly the same,

1:53:06.080 --> 1:53:09.680
<v Speaker 1>but there's some similar stuff going on, researchers have experimented

1:53:09.720 --> 1:53:12.640
<v Speaker 1>with measuring activity in the visual processing areas of the

1:53:12.680 --> 1:53:15.040
<v Speaker 1>brain with f m R I while person is looking

1:53:15.080 --> 1:53:18.360
<v Speaker 1>at different images and then using that data about blood

1:53:18.360 --> 1:53:21.679
<v Speaker 1>flow in the brain to later guess what a person

1:53:21.800 --> 1:53:24.960
<v Speaker 1>is looking at without knowing now ideally what you would

1:53:24.960 --> 1:53:27.799
<v Speaker 1>have at the end of this kind of research. Multi

1:53:27.840 --> 1:53:31.200
<v Speaker 1>stage process is an algorithm that could read the activity

1:53:31.240 --> 1:53:35.479
<v Speaker 1>of a person's visual processing center and materialize an image

1:53:35.560 --> 1:53:38.840
<v Speaker 1>directly on the screen that corresponds to what the person

1:53:38.960 --> 1:53:42.880
<v Speaker 1>is either looking at or imagining. Uh and again, to

1:53:42.960 --> 1:53:46.000
<v Speaker 1>whatever extent the technology will ever fully be realized, it's

1:53:46.000 --> 1:53:48.880
<v Speaker 1>still in the very early stages. Um. But in the

1:53:48.960 --> 1:53:51.280
<v Speaker 1>example sided in this article, I should say that the

1:53:51.320 --> 1:53:54.879
<v Speaker 1>image generation portion was not carried out on real brains.

1:53:55.000 --> 1:53:58.519
<v Speaker 1>The data acquired from human subjects was instead used to

1:53:58.640 --> 1:54:01.720
<v Speaker 1>train a deep neural net work that stood in for

1:54:01.800 --> 1:54:05.840
<v Speaker 1>an actual brain while they tested their image generating program.

1:54:05.880 --> 1:54:09.160
<v Speaker 1>And to quote from Hudson's article here quote the system

1:54:09.200 --> 1:54:13.040
<v Speaker 1>starts with something random similar to TV static, and slowly

1:54:13.080 --> 1:54:16.000
<v Speaker 1>refines its painting over the course of two hundred rounds

1:54:16.360 --> 1:54:19.280
<v Speaker 1>to get closer to the ideal image. The system calculates

1:54:19.320 --> 1:54:22.519
<v Speaker 1>the difference between the deep neural network activity and the

1:54:22.600 --> 1:54:26.600
<v Speaker 1>templated deep neural network activity. Those calculations cause it to

1:54:26.720 --> 1:54:30.000
<v Speaker 1>nudge one pixel this way and another pixel that way

1:54:30.240 --> 1:54:33.520
<v Speaker 1>until it gets closer to the ideal image. Now, apparently

1:54:33.520 --> 1:54:35.880
<v Speaker 1>at the stage, the algorithms are not very good at

1:54:35.920 --> 1:54:38.680
<v Speaker 1>all at guessing what imagery people have in mind when

1:54:38.720 --> 1:54:42.280
<v Speaker 1>they're imagining realistic photos, but they are pretty good at

1:54:42.320 --> 1:54:45.720
<v Speaker 1>picking out when people imagine abstract shapes. And that makes

1:54:45.720 --> 1:54:49.040
<v Speaker 1>sense because I think those would be like clearer signals

1:54:49.080 --> 1:54:53.040
<v Speaker 1>in the brain probably. But yeah, there's some images along

1:54:53.040 --> 1:54:58.200
<v Speaker 1>with this article that are the paintings generated by this algorithm. Uh,

1:54:58.240 --> 1:55:01.480
<v Speaker 1>and then they're they're compared with the images that originally

1:55:01.520 --> 1:55:06.120
<v Speaker 1>gave rise to them, and the comparisons are wonderfully creepy. Yeah.

1:55:06.200 --> 1:55:09.400
<v Speaker 1>They look like like psychedelic entities that have come to

1:55:10.120 --> 1:55:14.760
<v Speaker 1>convey some sort of occult knowledge under the listener. Like

1:55:14.960 --> 1:55:17.839
<v Speaker 1>there's a there's one that's originally a picture of an owl,

1:55:18.040 --> 1:55:20.920
<v Speaker 1>and then the approximation of it is some kind of

1:55:20.960 --> 1:55:27.640
<v Speaker 1>like like primordial worm walrus from the center of the earth. Yeah. Yeah,

1:55:27.240 --> 1:55:32.640
<v Speaker 1>a red mailbox becomes this kind of alien burning crimson pillar.

1:55:32.880 --> 1:55:35.560
<v Speaker 1>So there are some patterns that seems like they're picking

1:55:35.640 --> 1:55:39.760
<v Speaker 1>up in in this version, where like some basic shapes emerge,

1:55:39.880 --> 1:55:44.080
<v Speaker 1>some color patterns seem like detectable. It seems like you

1:55:44.080 --> 1:55:47.600
<v Speaker 1>can detect when something is basically a face. But I

1:55:47.640 --> 1:55:50.680
<v Speaker 1>have questions about the ultimate potential of this technology, like

1:55:50.720 --> 1:55:53.720
<v Speaker 1>the versions that exist today have limitations such as relying

1:55:53.760 --> 1:55:56.560
<v Speaker 1>on training and feedback. And also I wonder about the

1:55:56.720 --> 1:56:00.600
<v Speaker 1>rules for reading mental imagery, like how transfer are they

1:56:00.720 --> 1:56:04.960
<v Speaker 1>from one person to another? How idiosyncratic is your brain

1:56:05.160 --> 1:56:08.040
<v Speaker 1>looking at an image versus somebody else's brain looking at

1:56:08.080 --> 1:56:11.320
<v Speaker 1>the same image. It makes me think of the holophoner

1:56:11.480 --> 1:56:15.000
<v Speaker 1>from Futurama. Do you remember this instrument? It's a musical

1:56:15.040 --> 1:56:18.000
<v Speaker 1>instrument that Fry attempts to learn at one point and

1:56:18.040 --> 1:56:22.560
<v Speaker 1>at one point masters thanks to the parasitic worms living

1:56:22.560 --> 1:56:25.120
<v Speaker 1>inside his gut that have made him super intelligent. Uh,

1:56:25.320 --> 1:56:27.760
<v Speaker 1>but then he pleases that ability. But anyway, it's it's this.

1:56:28.280 --> 1:56:32.600
<v Speaker 1>It's basically like a small musical instrument, like a woodwind instrument,

1:56:33.080 --> 1:56:36.760
<v Speaker 1>but it has the technologically capability to take a mental

1:56:36.800 --> 1:56:39.040
<v Speaker 1>image in your mind and projected into the air for

1:56:39.080 --> 1:56:42.800
<v Speaker 1>others to see. But it takes It's like it's notably

1:56:42.840 --> 1:56:45.640
<v Speaker 1>difficult to learn and takes a lot of intense training

1:56:45.640 --> 1:56:49.640
<v Speaker 1>and concentration to even form a very vague image in

1:56:49.680 --> 1:56:51.919
<v Speaker 1>the air, and so some of the like the initial

1:56:51.960 --> 1:56:55.240
<v Speaker 1>images that Fry is able to summon using the holophone

1:56:55.400 --> 1:56:59.160
<v Speaker 1>are basically as abstract as these examples we've discussed in

1:56:59.160 --> 1:57:03.080
<v Speaker 1>this study. Uh. But I mean, so on one hand,

1:57:03.080 --> 1:57:04.840
<v Speaker 1>you could say, well, maybe this kind of thing will

1:57:04.880 --> 1:57:07.800
<v Speaker 1>just never get very accurate in any way that's applicable.

1:57:07.880 --> 1:57:11.520
<v Speaker 1>That's possible. But also if this technology ever does get

1:57:11.520 --> 1:57:14.920
<v Speaker 1>more accurate, can you imagine this would I mean, I'm

1:57:15.000 --> 1:57:18.320
<v Speaker 1>thinking about the way it would be incorporated into machine

1:57:18.400 --> 1:57:24.960
<v Speaker 1>learning user feedback mechanisms that serve us content on social media. Um,

1:57:25.200 --> 1:57:28.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, imagine a Facebook news feed that could not

1:57:28.120 --> 1:57:30.320
<v Speaker 1>only fine tune itself based on what you do with

1:57:30.360 --> 1:57:32.840
<v Speaker 1>your mouse cursor and how you scroll and what you

1:57:32.880 --> 1:57:35.360
<v Speaker 1>click on and how long you look at things, but

1:57:35.480 --> 1:57:38.920
<v Speaker 1>based on neurofeedback that allows it to detect how you're

1:57:39.040 --> 1:57:42.920
<v Speaker 1>using your visual imagination, you know, so they sell you

1:57:42.920 --> 1:57:45.000
<v Speaker 1>on the good stuff, right draw without your hands, and

1:57:45.320 --> 1:57:47.720
<v Speaker 1>you get this kind of interface that that hooks up

1:57:47.720 --> 1:57:50.480
<v Speaker 1>to your brain and then it can sense patterns and

1:57:50.600 --> 1:57:54.000
<v Speaker 1>what users are picturing in their mind's eye and reaction

1:57:54.040 --> 1:57:57.280
<v Speaker 1>to media stimuli at a massive scale. Even if this

1:57:57.360 --> 1:58:01.400
<v Speaker 1>can't be used to pull images accurate directly from your brain.

1:58:02.080 --> 1:58:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Just imagine what it could do based on the brain

1:58:04.360 --> 1:58:09.120
<v Speaker 1>activity correlations across populations alone. Uh. And also I'm imagining

1:58:09.160 --> 1:58:11.880
<v Speaker 1>if it ever did get good enough at reading brain activity,

1:58:12.640 --> 1:58:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the brain activity underlying mental imagery, and turning that directly

1:58:16.320 --> 1:58:19.879
<v Speaker 1>into physical images outside the brain, what kind of crazy

1:58:19.920 --> 1:58:23.600
<v Speaker 1>cyber feedback processes could that lead to? Yeah, I mean,

1:58:23.640 --> 1:58:30.360
<v Speaker 1>anyway you shake it, it's a it's a nightmare. Yeah. Yeah.

1:58:30.360 --> 1:58:33.600
<v Speaker 1>I really don't like the idea of machines being able

1:58:33.640 --> 1:58:36.640
<v Speaker 1>to look inside our head and do anything with our

1:58:36.680 --> 1:58:39.680
<v Speaker 1>our mental images and draw them out. I mean, that's

1:58:39.680 --> 1:58:44.320
<v Speaker 1>that's just pure dystopia juice right there. Anyway, anyway you

1:58:44.360 --> 1:58:46.360
<v Speaker 1>shake it, I mean, it seems like even the positives

1:58:46.440 --> 1:58:50.040
<v Speaker 1>I have to like really construct an artificial scenario where

1:58:50.080 --> 1:58:52.400
<v Speaker 1>it's like, okay, there's been a kidnapping and we have

1:58:52.520 --> 1:58:54.720
<v Speaker 1>to draw the mental images out of the the only

1:58:54.760 --> 1:58:58.200
<v Speaker 1>so you know, you get into ridiculous scenarios like that, which, okay, yes,

1:58:58.280 --> 1:59:01.560
<v Speaker 1>given that very particular scenario, perhaps it would make sense.

1:59:01.840 --> 1:59:05.520
<v Speaker 1>But then you get into just basic considerations of of

1:59:05.560 --> 1:59:08.600
<v Speaker 1>privacy to like, would you ever have the right to

1:59:08.960 --> 1:59:12.760
<v Speaker 1>look inside someone's head and draw out their mental images.

1:59:13.040 --> 1:59:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Depends on who writes the laws, and I would think

1:59:15.160 --> 1:59:17.360
<v Speaker 1>it is the big corporation with all the lawyers that

1:59:17.400 --> 1:59:19.920
<v Speaker 1>will write the laws. And I guess looking at the

1:59:20.680 --> 1:59:23.240
<v Speaker 1>like sort of certainly the social media examples too, it's like,

1:59:23.280 --> 1:59:26.120
<v Speaker 1>are you It depends to are you born into a

1:59:26.200 --> 1:59:30.560
<v Speaker 1>world in which it's normal for your machines to look

1:59:30.600 --> 1:59:33.640
<v Speaker 1>inside your brain and draw from your mental images, probably

1:59:33.640 --> 1:59:36.360
<v Speaker 1>with some sort of an agreement. Uh. In the same

1:59:36.400 --> 1:59:39.320
<v Speaker 1>way that you know, our emails are read by machines,

1:59:39.400 --> 1:59:42.080
<v Speaker 1>but they're not actually read by people, there would be

1:59:42.120 --> 1:59:45.440
<v Speaker 1>this idea like, oh yeah, nobody's actually watching your mental images.

1:59:45.480 --> 1:59:47.840
<v Speaker 1>It's just our algorithms are keeping track on them so

1:59:47.880 --> 1:59:51.280
<v Speaker 1>we can better serve you content. I mean, I think

1:59:51.560 --> 1:59:56.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of times we have overestimated our people's desire

1:59:56.400 --> 2:00:01.640
<v Speaker 1>for privacy. Uh. Like, I just think about how years

2:00:01.680 --> 2:00:05.200
<v Speaker 1>ago if you had told people here's all the things

2:00:05.240 --> 2:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>people will be sharing on social media and all the

2:00:07.760 --> 2:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>kinds of privileges they will be allowing these companies to

2:00:11.560 --> 2:00:14.320
<v Speaker 1>have and learning about their lives and learning about their data,

2:00:14.480 --> 2:00:17.760
<v Speaker 1>people will be like, no way, nobody will ever surrender

2:00:17.840 --> 2:00:20.800
<v Speaker 1>that amount of you know, privacy and autonomy about their

2:00:20.800 --> 2:00:23.080
<v Speaker 1>lives and their data. But people just gave it up

2:00:23.120 --> 2:00:27.560
<v Speaker 1>so willingly. Yeah, and so many are still seemingly fine

2:00:27.600 --> 2:00:30.640
<v Speaker 1>with it. Yeah. So I wonder if I don't know,

2:00:30.760 --> 2:00:33.400
<v Speaker 1>maybe it has to do with something about the advertising,

2:00:33.440 --> 2:00:35.760
<v Speaker 1>the marketing, how these things are are rolled out to

2:00:35.800 --> 2:00:39.840
<v Speaker 1>the public that that breaks down our defenses and and

2:00:40.040 --> 2:00:42.640
<v Speaker 1>has us ending up being like, ah, yeah, you know whatever,

2:00:42.680 --> 2:00:45.880
<v Speaker 1>I'll get the brain device. You know, Jeffrey's got one.

2:00:45.960 --> 2:00:49.360
<v Speaker 1>He likes it, you know, Yeah. Yeah, Well, I hold

2:00:49.360 --> 2:00:50.840
<v Speaker 1>out hope that it would be a you know, the

2:00:50.880 --> 2:00:54.360
<v Speaker 1>bridge too far, and that that humans would would rise

2:00:54.440 --> 2:00:57.240
<v Speaker 1>up and reject it so as well. But but I

2:00:57.240 --> 2:00:59.960
<v Speaker 1>also feel like we're already at that point where humans

2:01:00.000 --> 2:01:03.840
<v Speaker 1>should rise up and reject what is being presented to them. Uh,

2:01:04.000 --> 2:01:06.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, certainly by the large social media companies and

2:01:07.160 --> 2:01:10.000
<v Speaker 1>um and uh, I don't know. Some people are rising up,

2:01:10.320 --> 2:01:12.240
<v Speaker 1>but we're not quite rising up in the numbers so

2:01:12.360 --> 2:01:17.080
<v Speaker 1>far to limit their power. Protect your mental imagery instead,

2:01:17.400 --> 2:01:20.040
<v Speaker 1>if you want to have more power in sharing your

2:01:20.040 --> 2:01:22.920
<v Speaker 1>mental imagery in the cases where you actually do want

2:01:22.920 --> 2:01:26.080
<v Speaker 1>to share it, when your powers of translation, that means

2:01:26.120 --> 2:01:29.440
<v Speaker 1>practice becoming better at language, better at drawing, better at

2:01:29.600 --> 2:01:32.440
<v Speaker 1>art of whatever kind. Yeah, and indeed, I don't want

2:01:32.440 --> 2:01:35.520
<v Speaker 1>to in this on a you know, too pessimistic note

2:01:35.760 --> 2:01:38.840
<v Speaker 1>dystopian and note is, etcetera, because ultimately, like what all

2:01:38.920 --> 2:01:43.160
<v Speaker 1>this reveals, it's just like just how incredible our brain's

2:01:43.280 --> 2:01:47.280
<v Speaker 1>capacity for mental imagery really is. Because you know, certainly,

2:01:47.320 --> 2:01:50.400
<v Speaker 1>these technologies that attempt to understand it or even replicated

2:01:50.760 --> 2:01:55.440
<v Speaker 1>these uh pseudo scientific or outright superstitious ideas about what

2:01:55.480 --> 2:01:57.840
<v Speaker 1>a mental image is and how it might be you know,

2:01:57.880 --> 2:02:01.040
<v Speaker 1>inflicted on the world, they all get. They're all circle

2:02:01.160 --> 2:02:04.760
<v Speaker 1>circling the mystery and the wonder uh that we all

2:02:04.800 --> 2:02:08.040
<v Speaker 1>experience every day. It's yet another case where you know,

2:02:08.080 --> 2:02:12.440
<v Speaker 1>there's a purported magical ability that is actually maybe less

2:02:12.480 --> 2:02:15.960
<v Speaker 1>fascinating than the reality that we're just so used to

2:02:16.080 --> 2:02:19.760
<v Speaker 1>of the fact that we have something like language. Absolutely

2:02:20.760 --> 2:02:22.960
<v Speaker 1>all right, Well, there you have it are two part

2:02:23.040 --> 2:02:27.120
<v Speaker 1>look at the mental image and various ideas surrounding it.

2:02:27.160 --> 2:02:30.440
<v Speaker 1>And I think we we crammed a fair number of

2:02:30.440 --> 2:02:34.800
<v Speaker 1>of horror film and other uh you know, horror related

2:02:34.880 --> 2:02:38.120
<v Speaker 1>ideas in there, so I think it's it's firmly implanted

2:02:38.240 --> 2:02:42.120
<v Speaker 1>in our October offerings, but if you're new to the show,

2:02:42.360 --> 2:02:44.760
<v Speaker 1>we do this every October. Every October is wall to

2:02:44.800 --> 2:02:48.440
<v Speaker 1>wall Halloween related content. Uh So, if you want to

2:02:48.480 --> 2:02:50.200
<v Speaker 1>you want more, you can go to stuff to Blow

2:02:50.240 --> 2:02:53.839
<v Speaker 1>your Mind dot com and check out past October's. Likewise,

2:02:54.080 --> 2:02:55.920
<v Speaker 1>if you want to check out some of our Invention

2:02:56.080 --> 2:02:59.000
<v Speaker 1>episodes that are October theme, go check that out as well.

2:02:59.040 --> 2:03:01.880
<v Speaker 1>That's our other show. It's a journey through human techno history,

2:03:02.200 --> 2:03:06.080
<v Speaker 1>and indeed we are rolling out October episodes as well

2:03:06.080 --> 2:03:09.280
<v Speaker 1>over there, so help both shows out. Make sure you

2:03:09.320 --> 2:03:12.640
<v Speaker 1>have subscribed and rate in review huge thanks as always

2:03:12.680 --> 2:03:16.000
<v Speaker 1>to our excellent audio producer Seth Nicholas Johnson. If you

2:03:16.000 --> 2:03:17.879
<v Speaker 1>would like to get in touch with us with feedback

2:03:17.880 --> 2:03:20.280
<v Speaker 1>on this episode or any other, to suggest topic for

2:03:20.280 --> 2:03:23.120
<v Speaker 1>the future, just to say hello, you can email us

2:03:23.240 --> 2:03:34.240
<v Speaker 1>at contact at stuff to Blow your Mind dot com.

2:03:34.360 --> 2:03:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Stuff to Blow Your Mind is a production of iHeart Radios.

2:03:36.560 --> 2:03:38.920
<v Speaker 1>How Stuff Works for more podcasts from my Heart Radio

2:03:39.080 --> 2:03:41.640
<v Speaker 1>is a the iHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever

2:03:41.680 --> 2:04:00.960
<v Speaker 1>you listen to your favorite shows. By No No No