WEBVTT - Daybreak Weekend: US Housing, Europe Data, Yen Intervention  

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:12.920
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend, our global look at the

0:00:12.960 --> 0:00:15.520
<v Speaker 2>top stories in the coming week from our Daybreak anchors

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:18.040
<v Speaker 2>all around the world. Straight Ahead on the program, we

0:00:18.079 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 2>looked to some key housing data in the US. I'm

0:00:20.800 --> 0:00:22.360
<v Speaker 2>Nathan Hager in Washington.

0:00:22.480 --> 0:00:24.599
<v Speaker 3>I'm Stephen Caron and London, who are looking ahead the

0:00:24.640 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 3>next economic indicators for Europe and what it signals about

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:31.120
<v Speaker 3>the trajectory for stocks on the economy for the rest

0:00:31.160 --> 0:00:31.600
<v Speaker 3>of the year.

0:00:31.920 --> 0:00:34.480
<v Speaker 4>I'm Doug Prisner looking at the fate of the Japanese

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:37.520
<v Speaker 4>yen and a reality check for Hong Kong.

0:00:38.360 --> 0:00:42.400
<v Speaker 1>That's all straight ahead on Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend on Bloomberg

0:00:42.400 --> 0:00:46.120
<v Speaker 1>eleven three year, New York, Bloomberg ninety nine to one, Washington, DC,

0:00:46.600 --> 0:00:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg ninety two nine, Boston, DAB Digital Radio, London, Syrias,

0:00:51.920 --> 0:00:55.440
<v Speaker 1>XM one twenty one, and around the world on Bloomberg Radio,

0:00:55.480 --> 0:00:57.640
<v Speaker 1>dot Com and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:01:02.760 --> 0:01:04.520
<v Speaker 5>Good day to you. I'm Nathan Hager.

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 2>We begin today's program with a look at the US

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:09.880
<v Speaker 2>housing market. This week, we get figures on housing starts

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:12.319
<v Speaker 2>and pending home sales for the month of July. For

0:01:12.400 --> 0:01:14.880
<v Speaker 2>more on this and the latest in the home building sector,

0:01:14.920 --> 0:01:18.000
<v Speaker 2>we are joined by Drew Redding, us homebuilding analyst for

0:01:18.080 --> 0:01:21.000
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Intelligence. Great as always to speak with you, Drew,

0:01:21.040 --> 0:01:23.480
<v Speaker 2>And of course it's been a pretty hot summer, so

0:01:23.800 --> 0:01:26.120
<v Speaker 2>are we expecting many projects to have gotten off the

0:01:26.160 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 2>ground in the last month.

0:01:28.160 --> 0:01:31.319
<v Speaker 6>So when we think about housing starts, you know, we're

0:01:31.360 --> 0:01:33.800
<v Speaker 6>down about five percent year to date on the single

0:01:33.840 --> 0:01:37.400
<v Speaker 6>family side, and we expect to see further pressure from

0:01:37.400 --> 0:01:39.560
<v Speaker 6>that side of the market. You know, we see builders

0:01:39.600 --> 0:01:44.200
<v Speaker 6>that are continuing to scale back production, giving in an

0:01:44.240 --> 0:01:47.000
<v Speaker 6>already elevated supply of speck home inventory that they still

0:01:47.040 --> 0:01:49.639
<v Speaker 6>need to work through. And you know, we've got sales

0:01:49.640 --> 0:01:51.520
<v Speaker 6>in the new home market that are up just about

0:01:51.560 --> 0:01:53.720
<v Speaker 6>two percent year to date, so it's a little taken

0:01:53.760 --> 0:01:57.560
<v Speaker 6>a little bit longer to clear that inventory. You know. Now,

0:01:57.760 --> 0:02:00.240
<v Speaker 6>the large public homebuilders have done a pretty good job

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:04.120
<v Speaker 6>in drawing down their complete at home inventories. Of course,

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:06.880
<v Speaker 6>they've had to remain pretty aggressive in their use of

0:02:06.920 --> 0:02:10.160
<v Speaker 6>incentives to do so. But we are starting to see

0:02:10.360 --> 0:02:13.240
<v Speaker 6>more of a shift away from that spec production model,

0:02:13.280 --> 0:02:16.920
<v Speaker 6>which is building the home before you have a buyer

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:19.400
<v Speaker 6>you know, many of the builders are looking for a

0:02:19.400 --> 0:02:21.640
<v Speaker 6>better balance, so they're what they're trying to do is

0:02:21.680 --> 0:02:26.200
<v Speaker 6>basically match production with the sales pace rather than you know,

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:28.360
<v Speaker 6>putting more specs into a slow market.

0:02:28.639 --> 0:02:31.320
<v Speaker 2>Sounds like that speaks to an overall trend of the

0:02:31.800 --> 0:02:36.160
<v Speaker 2>home market in general moving away from a buying toward renting.

0:02:36.400 --> 0:02:38.600
<v Speaker 2>Is that kind of what you're pointing to as an

0:02:38.639 --> 0:02:39.640
<v Speaker 2>overall trend here?

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:42.120
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, So I think when you look at the for

0:02:42.360 --> 0:02:46.239
<v Speaker 6>sale market relative to rentals, when you think about affordability,

0:02:46.320 --> 0:02:49.640
<v Speaker 6>the high price of the homes, mortgage rates back towards

0:02:49.680 --> 0:02:53.919
<v Speaker 6>seven percent. You know, the math certainly does favor renting

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 6>over over owning. We've done some survey work that shows

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:01.640
<v Speaker 6>the same. And it's not that it's that current renters

0:03:02.919 --> 0:03:05.240
<v Speaker 6>don't want to own. We find a majority of them do.

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:08.760
<v Speaker 6>It's simply the economics of it don't make sense right now.

0:03:09.040 --> 0:03:11.680
<v Speaker 2>So what does that do for the overall sentiment in

0:03:11.720 --> 0:03:15.560
<v Speaker 2>the home building market when we're seeing a trend toward

0:03:16.200 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 2>more of those multi family projects as opposed to the

0:03:18.760 --> 0:03:22.320
<v Speaker 2>single families that you would think have better profit margins.

0:03:23.200 --> 0:03:26.080
<v Speaker 6>Well, it's a good question, and you know I mentioned

0:03:26.120 --> 0:03:28.760
<v Speaker 6>that in the new home market, we have sales paces,

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:32.360
<v Speaker 6>you know, they're down significantly from last year. The market

0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:34.639
<v Speaker 6>as a whole is up only about two percent year

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:37.680
<v Speaker 6>to date. And really the way builders are having to

0:03:37.760 --> 0:03:40.680
<v Speaker 6>grow is to expand their community count, so they're not

0:03:40.680 --> 0:03:44.000
<v Speaker 6>seeing it on the pace side, but really by increasing

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:48.040
<v Speaker 6>the number of subdivisions that they're operating from. You know.

0:03:48.080 --> 0:03:51.600
<v Speaker 6>So it's really a tough growth environment on the single

0:03:51.640 --> 0:03:55.000
<v Speaker 6>family side. And you know, if you think about the market,

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:58.640
<v Speaker 6>certainly there are pockets of relative strength and relative weakness.

0:03:58.720 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 6>When you think about you know, the entry level buyer,

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:04.320
<v Speaker 6>who is typically someone that may be coming out of

0:04:04.360 --> 0:04:07.720
<v Speaker 6>a rental situation, we see more stress as you would

0:04:07.760 --> 0:04:10.080
<v Speaker 6>expect to cross that part of the market because those

0:04:10.160 --> 0:04:13.920
<v Speaker 6>tend to be the most priced sensitive home buyers. On

0:04:13.960 --> 0:04:17.000
<v Speaker 6>a relative basis, we have seen more strength at the

0:04:17.120 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 6>move up in luxury segments. These are typically the buyers

0:04:20.200 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 6>that are coming out of an existing home, so they've

0:04:23.560 --> 0:04:27.040
<v Speaker 6>built up equity over the last couple of years. In

0:04:27.080 --> 0:04:29.520
<v Speaker 6>the luxury side, they're benefiting from the run up in

0:04:29.640 --> 0:04:33.000
<v Speaker 6>equity markets. They tend to be less sensitive to mortgage rates.

0:04:33.240 --> 0:04:36.200
<v Speaker 6>We're seeing relative strength on that side, but you know,

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:38.560
<v Speaker 6>there's really not a parket part of the market that

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:42.200
<v Speaker 6>is completely immune, you know, to what's happening in the

0:04:42.200 --> 0:04:47.880
<v Speaker 6>broader economy, you know, affordability, economic and political uncertainty. So

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:51.000
<v Speaker 6>you know, there's broad challenges, but there are pockets of

0:04:51.040 --> 0:04:51.719
<v Speaker 6>relative strength.

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:53.560
<v Speaker 2>Oh, we are going to hear from one of those

0:04:53.720 --> 0:04:57.240
<v Speaker 2>luxury home builders when Toll Brothers reports earnings this week.

0:04:57.279 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 2>Are we expecting some positive signs there in terms of

0:05:01.880 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 2>a lot of the factors you've just been talking about.

0:05:04.440 --> 0:05:07.760
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so we like the relative position of Toll Brothers.

0:05:07.800 --> 0:05:10.520
<v Speaker 6>You know, as you know, they cater to the luxury market,

0:05:10.839 --> 0:05:15.480
<v Speaker 6>so their buyer is more affluent. You know, they're, as

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:17.880
<v Speaker 6>I said, the customers are less sensitive to interest rates

0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:19.840
<v Speaker 6>compared to the entry level. About a quarter of their

0:05:19.880 --> 0:05:23.120
<v Speaker 6>buyers pay cash. For those that do take out a mortgage,

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:25.279
<v Speaker 6>they put about thirty percent down, So the buyer is

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 6>very strong. So they're certainly more insulated to the macro.

0:05:29.440 --> 0:05:32.039
<v Speaker 6>In terms of the upcoming print, I think, you know,

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:35.640
<v Speaker 6>the the KPIs will be looking at our order growth

0:05:35.680 --> 0:05:39.120
<v Speaker 6>and gross margin, and we particularly are interested in hearing

0:05:39.120 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 6>how demand has trended intra quarter, you know, with mortgage

0:05:42.680 --> 0:05:46.080
<v Speaker 6>rates climbing back up towards seven percent. But that being said,

0:05:46.080 --> 0:05:48.400
<v Speaker 6>you know, we still expect Toll to report high single

0:05:48.400 --> 0:05:52.480
<v Speaker 6>digit growth in orders, and importantly, you know, that's being driven,

0:05:52.600 --> 0:05:55.120
<v Speaker 6>as we mentioned before, by community count growth, which is

0:05:55.160 --> 0:05:58.520
<v Speaker 6>helping to offset muted sales absorptions. And that's really what

0:05:58.760 --> 0:06:02.600
<v Speaker 6>sets Toll Brothers apart from a growth perspective, both for

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:05.599
<v Speaker 6>twenty twenty six and looking out into twenty twenty seven. Now,

0:06:06.120 --> 0:06:09.080
<v Speaker 6>on the margin side, gross margins have been very strong.

0:06:09.160 --> 0:06:11.760
<v Speaker 6>The outlook's really going to come down to how aggressive

0:06:12.320 --> 0:06:14.760
<v Speaker 6>they've had to be on their use of sales incentives.

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:19.520
<v Speaker 6>Bull primarily prescribes to a price over paced strategy, so

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:22.120
<v Speaker 6>we do think that near term margins should hold pretty well.

0:06:22.400 --> 0:06:24.640
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for this, Drew, great having you on with us.

0:06:24.720 --> 0:06:28.719
<v Speaker 2>That's Drew Redding, us home building analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 2>Let's take a look now add some stocks making news

0:06:31.640 --> 0:06:34.000
<v Speaker 2>in the week ahead. I'm Nathan Hager, joined by Bloomberg

0:06:34.000 --> 0:06:37.919
<v Speaker 2>Equities reporter Avalon Purnell. We're sort of winding down earning

0:06:37.960 --> 0:06:40.280
<v Speaker 2>season here Avalon, but we're going to hear from some

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:43.760
<v Speaker 2>of the biggest names in big box retail this week,

0:06:43.839 --> 0:06:47.720
<v Speaker 2>starting with Target on Wednesday. There has been a lot

0:06:47.720 --> 0:06:49.760
<v Speaker 2>of drama around this stock.

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:51.239
<v Speaker 5>What are we expecting this week?

0:06:51.600 --> 0:06:53.919
<v Speaker 7>Absolutely, We're definitely gonna get a lot of visibility on

0:06:53.960 --> 0:06:57.520
<v Speaker 7>the state of the American shopper, sales trends, and progress

0:06:57.560 --> 0:07:00.320
<v Speaker 7>on Target's broader recovery will definitely be tough top of

0:07:00.360 --> 0:07:03.120
<v Speaker 7>mind for investors, especially as they head into their second

0:07:03.160 --> 0:07:06.120
<v Speaker 7>quarter earnings next Wednesday. The company is still really trying

0:07:06.160 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 7>to regain its sparkle and pinpoint what exactly made the

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:14.040
<v Speaker 7>company tarje as opposed to just Target. One thing of

0:07:14.080 --> 0:07:16.880
<v Speaker 7>note though, is that definitely analysts remain remixed on the

0:07:16.880 --> 0:07:20.240
<v Speaker 7>company's performance moving forward, especially giving guidance they had in

0:07:20.280 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 7>their earnings call last quarter, noting that they did have

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:26.200
<v Speaker 7>a little bit of concerns about tougher comparisons moving forward.

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:30.400
<v Speaker 7>You have ubs as Michael Lasser remaining quite bullish expecting

0:07:30.400 --> 0:07:32.920
<v Speaker 7>the results to provide the next proof point that broader

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:36.480
<v Speaker 7>recovery may actually be sticking around for the company, whereas

0:07:36.560 --> 0:07:40.560
<v Speaker 7>Barclays Seth Sigmund saying that you know, meaningful upside to

0:07:40.600 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 7>results will really be needed to push the stock from here.

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:46.400
<v Speaker 7>He notes also that he believes a big box store

0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:49.880
<v Speaker 7>likely had a solid quarter. However, he still views improvement

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:52.560
<v Speaker 7>as just recovering from last year's issues as opposed to

0:07:53.120 --> 0:07:57.120
<v Speaker 7>moving forward into the next chapter. So Worth noting that

0:07:57.160 --> 0:07:59.320
<v Speaker 7>the options data that we're currently seeing at the moment

0:07:59.400 --> 0:08:02.160
<v Speaker 7>is implying about a six point two percent move after

0:08:02.200 --> 0:08:02.840
<v Speaker 7>those results.

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:04.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, you wonder if we're going to see something of

0:08:05.000 --> 0:08:09.520
<v Speaker 2>a similar move from Walmart when they report on Thursday.

0:08:09.560 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 2>If you think about some kind of indicator of the

0:08:13.480 --> 0:08:16.880
<v Speaker 2>American consumer, it's hard to think of a company that's

0:08:16.960 --> 0:08:18.240
<v Speaker 2>more of one than Walmart.

0:08:18.720 --> 0:08:21.880
<v Speaker 7>Absolutely, and a similar story that we were seeing in

0:08:21.960 --> 0:08:25.200
<v Speaker 7>Target definitely still playing a role here for Walmart as well.

0:08:25.440 --> 0:08:28.760
<v Speaker 7>Analysts still quite mixed on how exactly this big box stores,

0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:32.880
<v Speaker 7>e commerce and also delivery businesses will perform as they

0:08:32.880 --> 0:08:36.160
<v Speaker 7>report second quarter earnings. Key Bank is expecting pretty healthy

0:08:36.200 --> 0:08:38.840
<v Speaker 7>results from the store, noting that the company remains one

0:08:38.880 --> 0:08:42.320
<v Speaker 7>of their top picks as growth initiatives and also further

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:46.400
<v Speaker 7>share gains continue to build momentum despite a fairly volatile

0:08:46.559 --> 0:08:50.200
<v Speaker 7>macro and geopolitical environment. They also expect Walmart to be

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:53.560
<v Speaker 7>fairly vocal about how exactly they're using those tariff refunds

0:08:53.559 --> 0:08:58.000
<v Speaker 7>to fund rollbacks and ultimately drive future business gains by

0:08:58.000 --> 0:09:00.719
<v Speaker 7>bringing people back into the store with slightly lower prices.

0:09:01.200 --> 0:09:04.480
<v Speaker 7>Others are not necessarily as rosy about the company's outlook,

0:09:04.760 --> 0:09:07.600
<v Speaker 7>Barclay's noting that the optics don't look too great given

0:09:07.679 --> 0:09:11.839
<v Speaker 7>expectations for sales moderation from the last quarter. Barclays, though

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:14.199
<v Speaker 7>still saying that they believe this could be the trough

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:18.120
<v Speaker 7>as price investments in other initiatives support accelerating share gains

0:09:18.160 --> 0:09:20.600
<v Speaker 7>in the second half of the year. Worth noting, like

0:09:20.760 --> 0:09:23.480
<v Speaker 7>retaillers are still expecting you know, back to school sales

0:09:23.559 --> 0:09:26.200
<v Speaker 7>and Black Friday, which obviously won't be penciled in for

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:27.360
<v Speaker 7>the start of the year.

0:09:27.520 --> 0:09:30.640
<v Speaker 2>Right, but definitely something to keep an eye on as

0:09:30.679 --> 0:09:33.200
<v Speaker 2>we wait to see what the outlook is going to

0:09:33.240 --> 0:09:38.080
<v Speaker 2>be from both Target and Walmart. Also on Thursday, we're

0:09:38.080 --> 0:09:39.839
<v Speaker 2>going to hear from one of the biggest names in

0:09:39.880 --> 0:09:43.280
<v Speaker 2>the AG sector. What are we expecting from Deer in company?

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:47.840
<v Speaker 7>Yes, investors will be looking for more data that reinforces

0:09:47.880 --> 0:09:50.640
<v Speaker 7>Deer's view that twenty twenty six will be the trough,

0:09:50.920 --> 0:09:55.400
<v Speaker 7>the bottom of this quite complicated situation for the company.

0:09:55.600 --> 0:09:58.839
<v Speaker 7>The world's biggest farm machinery makers second quarter results are

0:09:58.880 --> 0:10:02.160
<v Speaker 7>expected to be slightly mixed again this quarter, Bloomberg Intelligence

0:10:02.160 --> 0:10:05.240
<v Speaker 7>expecting the results to still reinforce that expectation that twenty

0:10:05.280 --> 0:10:08.720
<v Speaker 7>twenty six will mark a trough in large ag demand

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 7>as attention shifts towards how fast will that recovery be

0:10:12.960 --> 0:10:15.800
<v Speaker 7>next year. However, that analyst is also noting that they're

0:10:15.840 --> 0:10:20.080
<v Speaker 7>still expecting large agriculture retail cells to remain quite soft,

0:10:20.400 --> 0:10:22.600
<v Speaker 7>though they do appear to be tracking better than industry

0:10:22.640 --> 0:10:27.160
<v Speaker 7>forecasts as inventories continue to normalize. RBC also highlighting that

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:30.280
<v Speaker 7>their big question is continuing to be what exactly does

0:10:30.280 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 7>the pace of deer's recovery look like, especially as there

0:10:34.200 --> 0:10:36.920
<v Speaker 7>continues to be a lot of holatility in the macro environment,

0:10:37.320 --> 0:10:40.560
<v Speaker 7>and also the tariff situation that is somewhat improved but

0:10:41.120 --> 0:10:45.120
<v Speaker 7>still kind of in the balance o previously kind of interesting,

0:10:45.200 --> 0:10:48.080
<v Speaker 7>especially with the Iran war in the background, as to

0:10:48.280 --> 0:10:50.760
<v Speaker 7>how exactly that's going to be impacting farmers who are

0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:55.360
<v Speaker 7>continuing to struggle to manage prices, not necessarily keeping pace

0:10:55.400 --> 0:10:59.360
<v Speaker 7>with very elevated cost in the options market, also continuing

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:02.320
<v Speaker 7>to price She'll move of nearly five percent after the

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:03.679
<v Speaker 7>company reports learnings.

0:11:03.840 --> 0:11:05.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, still a lot of back and forth when it

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:08.040
<v Speaker 2>comes to that situation in the Middle East and of

0:11:08.080 --> 0:11:10.000
<v Speaker 2>the post tariff.

0:11:09.679 --> 0:11:10.680
<v Speaker 5>Situation as well.

0:11:11.400 --> 0:11:14.120
<v Speaker 2>Just time to talk about another stock that's reporting this week,

0:11:14.360 --> 0:11:17.600
<v Speaker 2>Esday Lotder. There is a lot more competition in the

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:19.720
<v Speaker 2>beauty space. How are we thinking Esday Lotter is going

0:11:19.800 --> 0:11:20.520
<v Speaker 2>to be handling it?

0:11:20.800 --> 0:11:20.959
<v Speaker 1>There?

0:11:21.040 --> 0:11:23.280
<v Speaker 7>Sure is, And I mean to say the least, this

0:11:23.320 --> 0:11:27.400
<v Speaker 7>company has had a rollercoaster ride of a quarter. I mean,

0:11:27.840 --> 0:11:30.120
<v Speaker 7>just a couple of months ago they were talking about

0:11:30.160 --> 0:11:33.480
<v Speaker 7>merger talks with the Spanish brand Pooch, which was on

0:11:33.520 --> 0:11:36.560
<v Speaker 7>the table and then later scrapped after investors were quite

0:11:36.679 --> 0:11:39.959
<v Speaker 7>negative on that idea. And like a lot of other

0:11:40.000 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 7>companies that we've already mentioned, they are in the midst

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:45.959
<v Speaker 7>of a broader recovery as consumers are continuing to kind

0:11:45.960 --> 0:11:49.200
<v Speaker 7>of pull back from spending on these various like luxury

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:52.880
<v Speaker 7>brands that are under the Stay Ltder umbrella. That being said,

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:56.800
<v Speaker 7>RBC does continue to favor their turnarounds, say noticing that

0:11:57.120 --> 0:12:01.560
<v Speaker 7>potentially important brands continue to outperform, and they also noted

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:05.200
<v Speaker 7>that the broader turnaround at MAC continues to kind of

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:07.839
<v Speaker 7>bode well for the company, though they do still question

0:12:08.080 --> 0:12:11.559
<v Speaker 7>how Esday Lauder will continue to fare with holding onto

0:12:11.760 --> 0:12:14.960
<v Speaker 7>smash Box and two Face, which are fairly popular brands

0:12:15.000 --> 0:12:19.040
<v Speaker 7>amongst maybe millennial crowds, and whether it still makes sense

0:12:19.080 --> 0:12:20.920
<v Speaker 7>for es Day Lauder to hold on to them or

0:12:21.040 --> 0:12:23.679
<v Speaker 7>maybe look for a play to sell them at some point.

0:12:23.960 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 2>We'll see, Yeah, we'll see if a lot of those

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:28.600
<v Speaker 2>sales are happening in Tarjay as well. Thanks for Evlon,

0:12:28.760 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 2>as always good to have you with this. That's Avlon Parnell,

0:12:31.320 --> 0:12:34.440
<v Speaker 2>Equities reporter for Bloomberg News, and coming up on Bloomberg

0:12:34.480 --> 0:12:38.040
<v Speaker 2>Daybreak weekend, we'll look at whether Europe's future economic data.

0:12:37.800 --> 0:12:40.679
<v Speaker 5>Can live up to the promise of a bumper second.

0:12:40.480 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 2>Quarter when it comes to Europe's earnings. I'm Nathan Hager

0:12:43.440 --> 0:12:57.800
<v Speaker 2>and this is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg Day Break Weekend,

0:12:57.880 --> 0:13:00.080
<v Speaker 2>our global look ahead at the top stories for our

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:02.760
<v Speaker 2>investors in the coming week are Nathan Higer and Washington.

0:13:03.120 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 5>Later in the program.

0:13:04.080 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 2>Will take a closer look at the feet of the

0:13:05.840 --> 0:13:09.920
<v Speaker 2>Japanese yen, plus how Hong Kong's competitiveness as a financial

0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:13.680
<v Speaker 2>center is about to be tested. But first Europe's Biggest

0:13:13.679 --> 0:13:17.680
<v Speaker 2>Economies report of inflation and Purchasing Managers Index data next

0:13:17.679 --> 0:13:22.000
<v Speaker 2>week against a backdrop of geopolitical uncertainty and higher energy

0:13:22.000 --> 0:13:25.040
<v Speaker 2>costs driven by the Warriner ran. Let's get more now

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:28.280
<v Speaker 2>from Bloomberg Daybreak europe banker Stephen Carroll Nathan.

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:32.560
<v Speaker 3>European economies and companies have defied the doom laden forecast

0:13:32.640 --> 0:13:35.760
<v Speaker 3>that the Iran war would tip the continent into stagflation.

0:13:36.000 --> 0:13:38.640
<v Speaker 3>We've seen the best earning season in nearly four years,

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:42.400
<v Speaker 3>pushing keystock indexes to new records, and the signals for

0:13:42.400 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 3>the months ahead look strong too. In the coming days,

0:13:44.880 --> 0:13:47.800
<v Speaker 3>PMIS and the Zew survey in Germany will give fresh

0:13:47.800 --> 0:13:50.600
<v Speaker 3>insight into how the biggest economies are performing, along with

0:13:50.679 --> 0:13:54.480
<v Speaker 3>updated readings on inflation. And investors seem bullish on European

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 3>stocks too. Benedict's Low is equity derivative strategist at BMP Pariba.

0:13:59.280 --> 0:14:02.199
<v Speaker 3>Here's what she tells Bloomberg's Tom McKenzie earlier this week.

0:14:02.520 --> 0:14:05.760
<v Speaker 8>So it's undeniable that the macro story is speaking up

0:14:05.760 --> 0:14:06.200
<v Speaker 8>in Europe.

0:14:06.320 --> 0:14:07.439
<v Speaker 9>We've got growth that.

0:14:07.480 --> 0:14:10.520
<v Speaker 8>Is surprising to the upside, activity on the right, and

0:14:10.640 --> 0:14:14.319
<v Speaker 8>earnings that have been good actually, earnings have been exceptionally

0:14:14.360 --> 0:14:17.040
<v Speaker 8>strong in the US but also very good in Europe.

0:14:17.040 --> 0:14:19.360
<v Speaker 8>It's been one of the best earning seasons over the

0:14:19.400 --> 0:14:22.120
<v Speaker 8>past few years. And all of this is happening in

0:14:22.160 --> 0:14:26.160
<v Speaker 8>the context where positioning is low to neutral, So that

0:14:26.240 --> 0:14:29.120
<v Speaker 8>points a positive picture of stocks. Now, the comfort point

0:14:29.120 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 8>to that is that a lot of positive news is

0:14:31.320 --> 0:14:34.800
<v Speaker 8>already in the price and with seasonality that is not

0:14:34.880 --> 0:14:37.400
<v Speaker 8>supportive for higher stock price up until the end of

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 8>September October. We like to position for what we call

0:14:41.000 --> 0:14:43.960
<v Speaker 8>a grind higher in stocks, and we like to minimize

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:47.000
<v Speaker 8>the premiums that investor are spending on website positioning.

0:14:47.160 --> 0:14:49.400
<v Speaker 10>How do you mitigate risks around inflation, whether it's soft

0:14:49.440 --> 0:14:52.080
<v Speaker 10>commodities where there's these or where there's gas oil prices.

0:14:52.240 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 10>If this is the status quo right now around Iran

0:14:55.120 --> 0:14:57.640
<v Speaker 10>and that is prolonged, how do you hedge around that.

0:14:58.240 --> 0:15:00.920
<v Speaker 8>So one of our top pick at the moment is

0:15:00.920 --> 0:15:04.160
<v Speaker 8>the banking sectors. We think the banking sectors is one

0:15:04.200 --> 0:15:07.720
<v Speaker 8>of the best sector position for end of your First

0:15:07.720 --> 0:15:09.600
<v Speaker 8>of all, pmis are on the rise. As I mentioned

0:15:09.640 --> 0:15:12.680
<v Speaker 8>activity speaking up, earnings that have been good, but also

0:15:12.800 --> 0:15:15.600
<v Speaker 8>higher inflation mean higher rates. We're expecting the UCB to

0:15:15.720 --> 0:15:18.760
<v Speaker 8>rise rates concept number meeting, and that is positive for

0:15:18.840 --> 0:15:22.240
<v Speaker 8>the banking sector, a cyclical sector that has yes really

0:15:22.240 --> 0:15:24.320
<v Speaker 8>performed well over the past few years. But we think

0:15:24.320 --> 0:15:26.120
<v Speaker 8>this is some website poler sector.

0:15:26.440 --> 0:15:29.680
<v Speaker 3>So Betexil from Bimpe Parriba optimistic there, but there are

0:15:29.760 --> 0:15:32.440
<v Speaker 3>risks to the outlet, not least from oil and gas

0:15:32.480 --> 0:15:36.200
<v Speaker 3>prices grinding higher. Let's discuss now with David Powell, Bloomberg's

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:39.680
<v Speaker 3>senior Euro Area economist, and Sagarika Jackson Ghani, who covers

0:15:39.920 --> 0:15:44.600
<v Speaker 3>EMEA Equities, macro and investment strategy. David, let's start with you.

0:15:44.720 --> 0:15:48.000
<v Speaker 3>We're looking ahead to these economic surveys coming in the

0:15:48.040 --> 0:15:50.560
<v Speaker 3>next few days. What are we expecting to learn about

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 3>the state of europe'svegas economies.

0:15:52.400 --> 0:15:55.560
<v Speaker 9>Well, essentially, we're going to be focusing on the PMI

0:15:55.760 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 9>survey and that's going to give us sy indications to

0:15:58.200 --> 0:16:01.880
<v Speaker 9>whether the strong growth we saw the second quarter continued

0:16:01.920 --> 0:16:05.320
<v Speaker 9>in the third quarter. Your area GDP spended by zero

0:16:05.360 --> 0:16:08.400
<v Speaker 9>point four percent in the second quarter this year. That

0:16:08.520 --> 0:16:11.920
<v Speaker 9>was basically double consensus. Part of that is because of

0:16:11.960 --> 0:16:17.000
<v Speaker 9>a rebound in Ireland, but even without that distortion caused

0:16:17.000 --> 0:16:21.600
<v Speaker 9>by iris GDP, the economy probably would have expanded by

0:16:21.600 --> 0:16:24.760
<v Speaker 9>about zero point three, which is above expectations and is

0:16:24.800 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 9>certainly defying the negative forecasts or the gloomy forecasts that

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:34.400
<v Speaker 9>were put out after the sharp rise and commodity prices

0:16:34.440 --> 0:16:35.280
<v Speaker 9>earlier this year.

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:38.600
<v Speaker 3>Zagreca, we've just wrapped up, or just wrapping up rather

0:16:38.760 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 3>a very strong earning season in Europe. But can you

0:16:41.640 --> 0:16:44.040
<v Speaker 3>give us a sense of perspective on this. How good

0:16:44.040 --> 0:16:46.040
<v Speaker 3>has it been when we look back at how European

0:16:46.040 --> 0:16:47.320
<v Speaker 3>companies have reported.

0:16:47.280 --> 0:16:50.560
<v Speaker 11>It's taken a lot of market participants, both investors and

0:16:50.800 --> 0:16:53.640
<v Speaker 11>sell side strategists by surprise. And I want to put

0:16:53.640 --> 0:16:56.360
<v Speaker 11>that in context a little bit, because European companies in

0:16:56.400 --> 0:16:59.520
<v Speaker 11>the last two years have had essentially zero profit growth,

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:03.280
<v Speaker 11>and that was underpinned by poor economic growth, both a

0:17:03.320 --> 0:17:06.119
<v Speaker 11>lot of it domestically. But this year what happened was

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:09.520
<v Speaker 11>European stock started off the year on a really solid footing. Right.

0:17:09.600 --> 0:17:12.679
<v Speaker 11>You had the AI trade cracking in the US, but

0:17:12.800 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 11>at that time Europe was turning attractive because it had

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:18.800
<v Speaker 11>these There was a new buzzword on Wall Street at

0:17:18.800 --> 0:17:22.280
<v Speaker 11>the time. It was called halo heavy assets low obselescence.

0:17:22.600 --> 0:17:26.960
<v Speaker 11>So suddenly the asset heavy old economy stuff was becoming attractive.

0:17:27.440 --> 0:17:30.720
<v Speaker 11>But before that could really take off, you had the

0:17:30.960 --> 0:17:34.760
<v Speaker 11>US Iran war, and that exposed a lot of European

0:17:34.800 --> 0:17:38.280
<v Speaker 11>companies to the potential for higher oil prices. Would it

0:17:38.840 --> 0:17:42.240
<v Speaker 11>there were worries that European economies would tip into stagflation,

0:17:42.760 --> 0:17:47.000
<v Speaker 11>so expectations had on the macro front been tempered a bit.

0:17:47.480 --> 0:17:51.480
<v Speaker 11>But coming into the second quarter earning season, unless expectations

0:17:51.480 --> 0:17:55.880
<v Speaker 11>were incredibly strong, and as we're expecting MSCI Europe companies

0:17:55.880 --> 0:17:59.200
<v Speaker 11>to post a twelve percent increase in profits versus a

0:17:59.280 --> 0:18:02.080
<v Speaker 11>year earlier. As I said previously, after two years of

0:18:02.119 --> 0:18:05.400
<v Speaker 11>no growth, that was already a high bar. What's been

0:18:05.480 --> 0:18:08.840
<v Speaker 11>astounding is that not only have the companies met that bar,

0:18:08.920 --> 0:18:12.240
<v Speaker 11>they've actually beaten it by quite a wide margin. So

0:18:12.280 --> 0:18:16.159
<v Speaker 11>they've posted seventeen percent increase in profits, and that's the

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:19.640
<v Speaker 11>best since late twenty twenty two. Of course, the economy

0:18:19.680 --> 0:18:23.199
<v Speaker 11>has been surprisingly resilient to the oil price shock. We

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:26.480
<v Speaker 11>haven't quite seen that feed through to inflation to a

0:18:26.560 --> 0:18:29.080
<v Speaker 11>degree that had been feared, So that's been underpinning that.

0:18:30.080 --> 0:18:32.680
<v Speaker 11>But the really big takeaway for US this season has

0:18:32.720 --> 0:18:35.440
<v Speaker 11>been that. You know, the typical pattern in a year

0:18:35.960 --> 0:18:39.480
<v Speaker 11>is generally that analysts start the year really bullish and

0:18:39.520 --> 0:18:43.520
<v Speaker 11>then through the year they downgrade earnings expectations. This year,

0:18:43.560 --> 0:18:45.760
<v Speaker 11>it's been the opposite. Not only have they come in bullish,

0:18:45.800 --> 0:18:49.400
<v Speaker 11>but they've actually raised earnings expectations for twenty twenty six

0:18:49.440 --> 0:18:52.760
<v Speaker 11>by five percent, which is really atypical. So that bodes

0:18:52.800 --> 0:18:54.120
<v Speaker 11>well for further bullishness.

0:18:54.280 --> 0:18:57.640
<v Speaker 3>Okay, I mean the inflation concerns, David, really are central

0:18:57.240 --> 0:19:00.200
<v Speaker 3>to what things look like for the rest of the

0:19:00.280 --> 0:19:03.760
<v Speaker 3>year as well. We've talked about the resilience in the

0:19:03.760 --> 0:19:06.880
<v Speaker 3>European economies that we've seen so far, but given that

0:19:07.119 --> 0:19:10.440
<v Speaker 3>energy prices still remain elevated, how big is the inflation

0:19:10.640 --> 0:19:13.760
<v Speaker 3>risk when we're thinking about the picture for the coming months.

0:19:13.920 --> 0:19:16.439
<v Speaker 9>There were these fears of stagflation. We haven't had the

0:19:16.480 --> 0:19:19.240
<v Speaker 9>stag but we've had the flation. So if we look

0:19:19.320 --> 0:19:22.600
<v Speaker 9>back at headline CPI in January, it was one point

0:19:22.680 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 9>seven percent. Commodity prices started to rise in February and

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:30.240
<v Speaker 9>anticipation of a conflict in the Middle East, and then

0:19:30.280 --> 0:19:33.920
<v Speaker 9>when it actually began at the very end of February,

0:19:34.040 --> 0:19:37.359
<v Speaker 9>commodity price is shot up, and the latest inflation reading

0:19:37.440 --> 0:19:40.680
<v Speaker 9>is two point nine percent, so well above the ECB's

0:19:41.280 --> 0:19:45.679
<v Speaker 9>two percent target, and that is really what's driving the

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:50.480
<v Speaker 9>ECB's decisions right now. We expect another hike from the

0:19:50.480 --> 0:19:56.160
<v Speaker 9>ECB in September, and that's universally expected by most economists

0:19:56.160 --> 0:19:59.080
<v Speaker 9>and priced into the market. And really what's going to

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:03.840
<v Speaker 9>drive their decision after that is how commodity prices are

0:20:03.880 --> 0:20:07.600
<v Speaker 9>affecting inflation, and that of course is tied up with

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:10.240
<v Speaker 9>the outcome of the conflict in the Middle East, and

0:20:10.280 --> 0:20:12.439
<v Speaker 9>no one can say with exact certainty where we're going

0:20:12.480 --> 0:20:14.359
<v Speaker 9>to be at the end of the year in terms

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:18.960
<v Speaker 9>of that, but on track for another hike, and if

0:20:19.000 --> 0:20:22.440
<v Speaker 9>this persists, we could have more tightening as the ECB

0:20:22.640 --> 0:20:26.440
<v Speaker 9>worries about worries about inflation. However, the good news is

0:20:26.440 --> 0:20:31.480
<v Speaker 9>is that core inflation is unlikely to rise as much.

0:20:31.560 --> 0:20:37.280
<v Speaker 9>We have had some increase things that are particularly vulnerable

0:20:37.320 --> 0:20:40.720
<v Speaker 9>to commodity prices like airfares have gone up, but the

0:20:40.760 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 9>weakness in the labor market is unlikely to allow workers

0:20:45.920 --> 0:20:49.160
<v Speaker 9>to ask for huge increases in pay that we saw

0:20:49.200 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 9>after the pandemic that really boosted inflation. Keeping underlying inflation

0:20:53.680 --> 0:20:55.879
<v Speaker 9>pressures limited this year.

0:20:56.119 --> 0:20:58.240
<v Speaker 3>Indeed, so that the risk of a wage price spiral

0:20:58.320 --> 0:21:01.840
<v Speaker 3>not looking at looming large at the moment, Sagrico in

0:21:01.880 --> 0:21:04.680
<v Speaker 3>the earnings pictures, did we hear much from companies about

0:21:04.680 --> 0:21:05.800
<v Speaker 3>their inflation fears?

0:21:06.600 --> 0:21:10.600
<v Speaker 11>I think in terms of inflation, the sentiment from management

0:21:10.600 --> 0:21:15.119
<v Speaker 11>has been really positive. They have sounded really confident on

0:21:15.200 --> 0:21:17.600
<v Speaker 11>profit margins and actually a really key part of that,

0:21:17.800 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 11>and this goes back to the AI story in the US.

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:24.000
<v Speaker 11>One of the other fundamental reasons why this polishness toward

0:21:24.040 --> 0:21:27.440
<v Speaker 11>European companies and the European stock market is that changing

0:21:27.560 --> 0:21:31.400
<v Speaker 11>attitude from investors on who are the next AI winners?

0:21:31.840 --> 0:21:34.439
<v Speaker 11>So that was a key focus for how are companies

0:21:34.520 --> 0:21:38.919
<v Speaker 11>in Europe being able to monetize productivity efficiency from AI?

0:21:39.320 --> 0:21:42.560
<v Speaker 11>And we're seeing nascent signs of that now. Initially in

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:44.360
<v Speaker 11>the first leg of the AI rally, it was all

0:21:44.359 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 11>focused on the big spenders on AI, on developing AI,

0:21:48.080 --> 0:21:50.520
<v Speaker 11>and those companies are based in the US, so Europe

0:21:50.560 --> 0:21:54.400
<v Speaker 11>had been at a disadvantage then it had underperformed US

0:21:54.400 --> 0:21:57.640
<v Speaker 11>indexes because you don't have those big AI developers here,

0:21:57.880 --> 0:22:01.159
<v Speaker 11>but what you do have are both sides of the

0:22:01.240 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 11>other sides of that supply chain, where you've got the

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:08.120
<v Speaker 11>semiconductor paths makers that allow for AI to be deployed.

0:22:08.400 --> 0:22:11.119
<v Speaker 11>But you then also have companies in Benedict was mentioning

0:22:11.119 --> 0:22:14.400
<v Speaker 11>this earlier in her snippet, you have companies like banks

0:22:14.440 --> 0:22:17.400
<v Speaker 11>who have already started to show that they can monetize

0:22:17.440 --> 0:22:21.639
<v Speaker 11>AI in a way that is translating into earnings growth

0:22:21.720 --> 0:22:25.440
<v Speaker 11>and margin growth, and they're confident that they can defend

0:22:25.480 --> 0:22:28.640
<v Speaker 11>that going forward. So that's keeping optimism alive as well.

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:32.439
<v Speaker 3>What about the other asset classes. We're talking specifically about

0:22:32.600 --> 0:22:36.280
<v Speaker 3>equities so far, but I mean in terms of other

0:22:36.320 --> 0:22:39.000
<v Speaker 3>European assets, are there interesting trends to be watched at.

0:22:38.960 --> 0:22:42.800
<v Speaker 11>Watching out for Definitely. We were looking into this theme

0:22:42.840 --> 0:22:47.680
<v Speaker 11>earlier with Micross asset colleagues and it's quite notable. Economically speaking,

0:22:47.920 --> 0:22:54.080
<v Speaker 11>or economicsly speaking, stocks and bonds generally behave in opposite directions.

0:22:54.080 --> 0:22:58.040
<v Speaker 11>That's the fundamental rule of economics. This time around, we

0:22:58.160 --> 0:23:00.320
<v Speaker 11>noticed that European stocks are rallying at the same time

0:23:00.359 --> 0:23:03.760
<v Speaker 11>as this growing polishness on bonds and the reason for

0:23:03.840 --> 0:23:06.160
<v Speaker 11>that is that and David mentioned this earlier as well.

0:23:06.720 --> 0:23:09.480
<v Speaker 11>The economy isn't a sweet spot at the moment where

0:23:09.600 --> 0:23:12.480
<v Speaker 11>economic momentum is picking up from lows. So there's a

0:23:12.520 --> 0:23:15.880
<v Speaker 11>City Group index which measures the degree to which data

0:23:15.920 --> 0:23:19.200
<v Speaker 11>are coming in better than expected, and that economic momentum

0:23:19.240 --> 0:23:22.080
<v Speaker 11>is the highest since March twenty twenty three. But at

0:23:22.080 --> 0:23:26.480
<v Speaker 11>the same time, absolute growth figures are still trailing the US,

0:23:26.760 --> 0:23:30.040
<v Speaker 11>and there is more policy certainty at the moment in Europe,

0:23:30.080 --> 0:23:33.200
<v Speaker 11>at least it's been viewed that way versus the US,

0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:37.240
<v Speaker 11>so investors are certainly bullish on stocks and bonds at

0:23:37.240 --> 0:23:38.560
<v Speaker 11>the same time, which is really rare.

0:23:38.840 --> 0:23:41.480
<v Speaker 3>David, we're sort of belying the dismal science of economics

0:23:41.480 --> 0:23:44.680
<v Speaker 3>by being so positive about the picture going ahead for

0:23:44.720 --> 0:23:46.680
<v Speaker 3>the rest of the year. I just wonder what risks

0:23:46.920 --> 0:23:49.000
<v Speaker 3>we should have our eyes on when we're thinking about

0:23:49.119 --> 0:23:52.399
<v Speaker 3>what could derail this momentum and this resilience for the

0:23:52.400 --> 0:23:53.320
<v Speaker 3>European economy.

0:23:53.600 --> 0:23:56.639
<v Speaker 9>Probably the biggest risk is the obvious one of commodity

0:23:56.680 --> 0:24:01.119
<v Speaker 9>prices shooting higher and much higher again the conflict in

0:24:01.119 --> 0:24:04.520
<v Speaker 9>the Middle East were to escalate, And beyond that, it's

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:08.560
<v Speaker 9>probably that the increase in commodity process that's driving up

0:24:08.600 --> 0:24:12.760
<v Speaker 9>headline inflation. If that starts to appear more strongly in

0:24:12.880 --> 0:24:16.800
<v Speaker 9>underlying inflation, even though the labor market is weaker than

0:24:16.840 --> 0:24:19.680
<v Speaker 9>it was several years ago, because that would probably cause

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:23.800
<v Speaker 9>the ECB to tighten much more aggressively than we currently

0:24:23.840 --> 0:24:24.520
<v Speaker 9>think it will.

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:29.840
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Zachary, The question of investors diversifying away from the US,

0:24:29.840 --> 0:24:31.760
<v Speaker 3>looking for other options away from the US hasn't something

0:24:31.800 --> 0:24:34.920
<v Speaker 3>that's benefited Europe in the past. Is there any sign

0:24:34.960 --> 0:24:37.520
<v Speaker 3>that that momentum could continue or be a theme as

0:24:37.520 --> 0:24:38.640
<v Speaker 3>we're looking towards the rest.

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:38.840
<v Speaker 9>Of the year.

0:24:39.440 --> 0:24:42.840
<v Speaker 11>Absolutely, and that underpins the broadening trade that has been

0:24:42.880 --> 0:24:45.600
<v Speaker 11>going on this year. So investors are looking out of

0:24:45.960 --> 0:24:49.040
<v Speaker 11>They're looking within the US but outside of tech. But

0:24:49.160 --> 0:24:53.120
<v Speaker 11>that is also leading them to other more attractively valued

0:24:53.160 --> 0:24:55.639
<v Speaker 11>stocks which are in Asia or Europe. And again it

0:24:55.680 --> 0:24:58.480
<v Speaker 11>goes back to the economic momentum, because Europe is chock

0:24:58.560 --> 0:25:01.840
<v Speaker 11>full of sector is that are very closely linked with

0:25:01.960 --> 0:25:06.960
<v Speaker 11>the economic cycle. Again, banks, industrials, miners, these companies tend

0:25:06.960 --> 0:25:10.439
<v Speaker 11>to do well when the economic growth is sustainable and

0:25:10.520 --> 0:25:14.520
<v Speaker 11>it's resilient. That's what's drawing investors this time around, and

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:17.199
<v Speaker 11>we've seen that in the earnings picture as well. It

0:25:17.280 --> 0:25:21.920
<v Speaker 11>is the miners' energy, industrial's financials which have really contributed

0:25:21.920 --> 0:25:23.119
<v Speaker 11>the most to profit growth.

0:25:23.240 --> 0:25:27.359
<v Speaker 3>Okay, zagrec Jason Ghanny, who is covering EMEA Equity's macro

0:25:27.400 --> 0:25:28.800
<v Speaker 3>and investment strategy at Bloomberg.

0:25:28.840 --> 0:25:29.200
<v Speaker 5>Thank you.

0:25:29.240 --> 0:25:33.800
<v Speaker 3>And from Bloomberg Economics, David Powell, our senior Euro Era economist. Well,

0:25:33.840 --> 0:25:36.119
<v Speaker 3>have more on those data points on the PMI surveys

0:25:36.119 --> 0:25:38.520
<v Speaker 3>for France, Germany in the Euro Area on Bloomberg Radio

0:25:38.720 --> 0:25:41.280
<v Speaker 3>this week. I'm Stephen Carroll in London. You can catch

0:25:41.359 --> 0:25:44.000
<v Speaker 3>us every weekday morning for Bloomberg Daybreak Europe, beginning at

0:25:44.080 --> 0:25:46.840
<v Speaker 3>six am in London and one am on Wall Street.

0:25:47.040 --> 0:25:50.399
<v Speaker 2>Nathan, Thanks Stephen, and coming up on Bloomberg Daybreak weekend,

0:25:50.480 --> 0:25:51.640
<v Speaker 2>we'll take a closer.

0:25:51.320 --> 0:25:54.240
<v Speaker 5>Look at the feet of the Yen. I'm Nathan Hager,

0:25:54.400 --> 0:25:56.000
<v Speaker 5>and this is Bloomberg.

0:26:06.840 --> 0:26:09.800
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg day Break Weekend, our global look ahead

0:26:09.880 --> 0:26:12.000
<v Speaker 2>at the top stories for investors in the coming week.

0:26:12.080 --> 0:26:15.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm Nathan Hager in Washington. The persistent weakness of the

0:26:15.680 --> 0:26:20.200
<v Speaker 2>yen continues to be a troubling issue for Japanese policymakers.

0:26:20.640 --> 0:26:22.240
<v Speaker 2>For a closer look, let's get to the host of

0:26:22.240 --> 0:26:24.920
<v Speaker 2>the Bloomberg Daybreak Asia Podcast Doug.

0:26:24.800 --> 0:26:28.800
<v Speaker 4>Chrisner, Thanks Nathan. The yen's weakness is a problem for

0:26:28.880 --> 0:26:31.840
<v Speaker 4>the US as well, so much so. The two weeks ago,

0:26:31.880 --> 0:26:35.679
<v Speaker 4>the US and Japan's surprised markets with a coordinated effort

0:26:35.720 --> 0:26:38.760
<v Speaker 4>to strengthen the yen for the first time since nineteen

0:26:38.880 --> 0:26:42.359
<v Speaker 4>ninety eight. The problem is since that intervention, half of

0:26:42.359 --> 0:26:45.520
<v Speaker 4>the EN's gains have been wiped out. Now several factors

0:26:45.560 --> 0:26:49.640
<v Speaker 4>are weighing on Japan's currency, including the gap between Japan's

0:26:49.840 --> 0:26:52.600
<v Speaker 4>ultra low interest rates and those in the US and

0:26:52.640 --> 0:26:56.119
<v Speaker 4>other major economies. Now, the situation could be remedied to

0:26:56.160 --> 0:26:58.960
<v Speaker 4>some extent if the Bank of Japan were to raise rates.

0:26:59.280 --> 0:27:01.919
<v Speaker 4>We know that in inflation in Japan has been above

0:27:02.000 --> 0:27:04.720
<v Speaker 4>target for years now. In the week ahead, we'll get

0:27:04.720 --> 0:27:08.720
<v Speaker 4>fresh price data for Japan with the GDP deflator for

0:27:08.800 --> 0:27:11.440
<v Speaker 4>a look at the dynamics. I spoke with Bloomberg News

0:27:11.440 --> 0:27:15.479
<v Speaker 4>macro strategist Michael ball. I started the conversation by asking

0:27:15.600 --> 0:27:19.280
<v Speaker 4>whether the intervention was a watershed moment or whether we're

0:27:19.280 --> 0:27:20.720
<v Speaker 4>making too much of this move.

0:27:21.119 --> 0:27:22.520
<v Speaker 12>No, I don't think we're making too much of it.

0:27:22.560 --> 0:27:24.800
<v Speaker 12>I think again, we've crept up back to this one

0:27:24.960 --> 0:27:27.480
<v Speaker 12>sixtieth area, and again that seems to be the line

0:27:27.480 --> 0:27:29.399
<v Speaker 12>in the sand that the market has in mind.

0:27:29.480 --> 0:27:30.679
<v Speaker 5>For that's where.

0:27:31.000 --> 0:27:33.720
<v Speaker 12>Coordinated intervention, both the Treasury and them OFF and the

0:27:33.720 --> 0:27:36.359
<v Speaker 12>BOJ together all have to basically signal that this is

0:27:36.359 --> 0:27:38.960
<v Speaker 12>where we're going to defend until we get to September

0:27:39.040 --> 0:27:41.600
<v Speaker 12>or potentially October, where you could see rate hikes from

0:27:41.600 --> 0:27:45.240
<v Speaker 12>the BOJ to again give a more fundamental story why

0:27:45.280 --> 0:27:47.760
<v Speaker 12>the yen should appreciate and to change this feedback loop.

0:27:47.760 --> 0:27:50.159
<v Speaker 12>It's just a negative feedback loop of weaker yen be

0:27:50.200 --> 0:27:51.840
<v Speaker 12>getting weaker yen because of positioning.

0:27:52.000 --> 0:27:56.000
<v Speaker 4>So from the US position, is Treasury Secretary Besnt looking

0:27:56.040 --> 0:27:58.439
<v Speaker 4>more at what's happening in the US treasury market than

0:27:58.480 --> 0:28:01.080
<v Speaker 4>he is the currency market, and he's concerned that we

0:28:01.200 --> 0:28:02.919
<v Speaker 4>may see a backup in US fields.

0:28:03.000 --> 0:28:04.879
<v Speaker 12>Yes, I think that's the primary goal here, and I

0:28:04.920 --> 0:28:07.439
<v Speaker 12>think he signaled that in several ways. One obviously for

0:28:07.560 --> 0:28:10.639
<v Speaker 12>his worry that the intervention will not only be the

0:28:10.720 --> 0:28:12.720
<v Speaker 12>selling of bills, which has been up to date now

0:28:12.800 --> 0:28:15.600
<v Speaker 12>how they've done it, but more on actually the long end.

0:28:15.640 --> 0:28:18.000
<v Speaker 12>So again, if they didn't have access, let's say to

0:28:18.080 --> 0:28:21.000
<v Speaker 12>the THEEMA kind of facility as a backstop, or they

0:28:21.040 --> 0:28:23.400
<v Speaker 12>didn't have access to the international repel market or even

0:28:23.440 --> 0:28:25.920
<v Speaker 12>the repo facilities, the other ones that are available at

0:28:25.920 --> 0:28:28.200
<v Speaker 12>the FED, then they would have to sell longer end

0:28:28.800 --> 0:28:30.920
<v Speaker 12>treasuries what are the tens or thirties, and the curve,

0:28:30.920 --> 0:28:33.760
<v Speaker 12>which has already been under pressure since July FMC would

0:28:33.760 --> 0:28:36.359
<v Speaker 12>come under further pressure and that would actually force the hands.

0:28:36.640 --> 0:28:39.320
<v Speaker 4>So you mentioned FEMA, just to unpack that a little bit,

0:28:39.360 --> 0:28:41.719
<v Speaker 4>this is a vehicle that it was essentially allowed Japan

0:28:41.800 --> 0:28:45.920
<v Speaker 4>to borrow dollars to post US treasuries essentially as a

0:28:45.920 --> 0:28:48.680
<v Speaker 4>form of collateral, so they wouldn't be net sellers of

0:28:48.800 --> 0:28:52.120
<v Speaker 4>US treasuries to dump that inventory into the market and

0:28:52.200 --> 0:28:54.920
<v Speaker 4>run the risk of pushing US yields even higher, right exactly.

0:28:54.960 --> 0:28:56.760
<v Speaker 12>And there is a limit to that amount. I think

0:28:56.760 --> 0:28:59.120
<v Speaker 12>it's around sixty billion, which in its sense is a

0:28:59.160 --> 0:29:01.480
<v Speaker 12>little bit small for what is needed, because let's keep

0:29:01.480 --> 0:29:04.440
<v Speaker 12>in mind the initial intervention that happened last week saw

0:29:04.480 --> 0:29:08.400
<v Speaker 12>about eighty billion dollars of bill selling buy the moth

0:29:08.520 --> 0:29:12.080
<v Speaker 12>to actually support and buy yen. So this one itself

0:29:12.160 --> 0:29:14.840
<v Speaker 12>is more of a backstop. It hasn't been used yet

0:29:14.840 --> 0:29:17.800
<v Speaker 12>because it's more expensive. It's about twenty five basis points

0:29:17.840 --> 0:29:19.560
<v Speaker 12>over what a normal repo rate would be to do

0:29:19.640 --> 0:29:22.880
<v Speaker 12>something like this, but in its signaling effect it's much

0:29:22.960 --> 0:29:25.520
<v Speaker 12>larger because again what we may see from best in

0:29:25.640 --> 0:29:28.479
<v Speaker 12>with you know, the new FED leader Kevin Warsh is

0:29:28.200 --> 0:29:30.720
<v Speaker 12>to lift the limit there, which then would be a

0:29:30.760 --> 0:29:33.920
<v Speaker 12>much bigger signaling effect. And overall, with all the other tools,

0:29:33.920 --> 0:29:35.880
<v Speaker 12>the Japanese then could just have this as well as

0:29:35.880 --> 0:29:36.440
<v Speaker 12>a backstop.

0:29:36.680 --> 0:29:38.960
<v Speaker 4>So take me back to the currency market. What this

0:29:39.120 --> 0:29:42.280
<v Speaker 4>means for not only the dollar but the Japanese yanic gas.

0:29:42.280 --> 0:29:42.840
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, exactly.

0:29:42.840 --> 0:29:44.760
<v Speaker 12>And again there's other things going on in Japan that

0:29:44.840 --> 0:29:47.600
<v Speaker 12>is making us worry that they'll be selling treasury holdings,

0:29:47.840 --> 0:29:50.760
<v Speaker 12>and as they sell treasury holdings, obviously then they weaken

0:29:50.880 --> 0:29:53.040
<v Speaker 12>sort of the dollars they bring money back into the end.

0:29:53.520 --> 0:29:56.240
<v Speaker 12>But specific to what this intervention was about, again, it

0:29:56.400 --> 0:29:59.840
<v Speaker 12>was to initially stop official account selling of the treasury

0:29:59.800 --> 0:30:02.480
<v Speaker 12>mark market. And what it really means for the dollars,

0:30:03.160 --> 0:30:05.680
<v Speaker 12>you know, for that cross itself, it would weaken the

0:30:05.720 --> 0:30:08.360
<v Speaker 12>dollar against the end and effectively put more pressure even

0:30:08.400 --> 0:30:10.360
<v Speaker 12>on long end real rates, which is counterintuitive because the

0:30:10.440 --> 0:30:12.400
<v Speaker 12>rate differential story would be off there, but then it's

0:30:12.400 --> 0:30:14.600
<v Speaker 12>a capital flow account thing, or basically you're just seeing

0:30:14.640 --> 0:30:16.760
<v Speaker 12>selling of dollar assets by Japanese holders.

0:30:16.880 --> 0:30:20.040
<v Speaker 4>So we know what the disinflation or deflation story in

0:30:20.120 --> 0:30:22.680
<v Speaker 4>Japan has been like for three decades, and we know

0:30:22.920 --> 0:30:26.520
<v Speaker 4>that the boj these days has been very very conservative,

0:30:26.760 --> 0:30:30.160
<v Speaker 4>moving very gradually. You could make a case, given the

0:30:30.200 --> 0:30:32.720
<v Speaker 4>level of inflation now in Japan, that the BOG needs

0:30:32.760 --> 0:30:34.960
<v Speaker 4>to be a little bit more aggressive. That's not happening.

0:30:36.120 --> 0:30:38.720
<v Speaker 4>Is there the risk though, that if they begin to

0:30:38.880 --> 0:30:42.000
<v Speaker 4>lean into more of a tightening, that we could see

0:30:42.040 --> 0:30:46.600
<v Speaker 4>a repatriation of Japanese assets leaving global markets like the

0:30:46.720 --> 0:30:48.080
<v Speaker 4>US and coming back to Japan.

0:30:48.280 --> 0:30:49.880
<v Speaker 12>Well, it might actually be the interesting I think you

0:30:49.920 --> 0:30:52.000
<v Speaker 12>actually nailed on the head. I think they took so

0:30:52.200 --> 0:30:54.240
<v Speaker 12>long for them to get inflation to kind of get

0:30:54.400 --> 0:30:56.560
<v Speaker 12>going again, and it has gotten going again. Obviously they

0:30:56.560 --> 0:30:58.920
<v Speaker 12>have more energy sensitivity and we know what's going on there,

0:30:59.200 --> 0:31:01.160
<v Speaker 12>But it took them so long to get rates off

0:31:01.200 --> 0:31:03.760
<v Speaker 12>the zup and get them off the floor and get

0:31:03.800 --> 0:31:05.800
<v Speaker 12>it inflation back in grain and sort of the day

0:31:05.800 --> 0:31:08.200
<v Speaker 12>to day consumer that they're very worried that if they

0:31:08.320 --> 0:31:10.000
<v Speaker 12>sort of even tighten a little bit, they're going to

0:31:10.080 --> 0:31:12.720
<v Speaker 12>lose that progress. But to your point, if they do tighten,

0:31:12.760 --> 0:31:14.760
<v Speaker 12>if they come out and say September and they issue

0:31:14.760 --> 0:31:17.400
<v Speaker 12>Maymi a statement that's more hawkish and expected in october's

0:31:17.440 --> 0:31:19.640
<v Speaker 12>getting priced up again because right now September is about

0:31:19.640 --> 0:31:21.840
<v Speaker 12>two third price for a hike, and if they don't go,

0:31:21.880 --> 0:31:24.080
<v Speaker 12>then the expectation to be one hundred percent for October.

0:31:24.320 --> 0:31:25.880
<v Speaker 12>But let's say they just do back to back, you

0:31:25.880 --> 0:31:28.320
<v Speaker 12>would see that curve flattened, so you'd see the long

0:31:28.400 --> 0:31:31.080
<v Speaker 12>end of the treasury curve, their treasury curve over there

0:31:31.360 --> 0:31:33.640
<v Speaker 12>come off and get a rally, and that actually would

0:31:33.640 --> 0:31:37.600
<v Speaker 12>give you less incentive to repatriate back into the Japanese assets,

0:31:37.720 --> 0:31:41.720
<v Speaker 12>effectively into their bonds, because one, liquidity is not great there,

0:31:42.000 --> 0:31:43.960
<v Speaker 12>two then you're just your rate differential story is not

0:31:44.000 --> 0:31:46.680
<v Speaker 12>as compelling anymore because by hiking in the front end,

0:31:46.680 --> 0:31:49.840
<v Speaker 12>they're effectively showing that they have more responsibility towards the

0:31:49.840 --> 0:31:51.200
<v Speaker 12>back end as far as monetary policies.

0:31:51.320 --> 0:31:54.480
<v Speaker 4>So what's your sense in terms of yend weakness is

0:31:54.520 --> 0:31:56.440
<v Speaker 4>the worst over at least in the near term.

0:31:56.800 --> 0:31:58.360
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, I mean that's a great question. I think a

0:31:58.400 --> 0:32:00.600
<v Speaker 12>lot of that has to do maybe with enery as well.

0:32:00.640 --> 0:32:03.320
<v Speaker 12>Obviously they have some sort of well not some sort

0:32:03.360 --> 0:32:05.400
<v Speaker 12>of they have a higher correlation here with oil prices

0:32:05.440 --> 0:32:06.840
<v Speaker 12>of oil where it is now and the rate to

0:32:06.920 --> 0:32:09.120
<v Speaker 12>change their state stable, then it's less of a pressure

0:32:09.160 --> 0:32:11.200
<v Speaker 12>on them there. I think you're right. I think in

0:32:11.240 --> 0:32:12.720
<v Speaker 12>a lot of ways, well, not that you're right, but

0:32:12.760 --> 0:32:14.480
<v Speaker 12>what you're hinting at is that the worst could be

0:32:14.520 --> 0:32:18.200
<v Speaker 12>over if we see this coordinated intervention lead to basically

0:32:18.280 --> 0:32:20.960
<v Speaker 12>hold a period of time before you see actual rate hikes.

0:32:21.280 --> 0:32:24.840
<v Speaker 4>To what extent could the market be surprised right now?

0:32:25.360 --> 0:32:29.360
<v Speaker 4>Is the trade so crowded that we risk maybe a

0:32:29.600 --> 0:32:31.640
<v Speaker 4>kind of a not I don't want to say violent adjustment,

0:32:31.720 --> 0:32:33.680
<v Speaker 4>but something that could be dramatic, So.

0:32:33.600 --> 0:32:35.680
<v Speaker 12>The trades come off. To your point, I think a

0:32:35.760 --> 0:32:37.880
<v Speaker 12>lot of that was last week was that people were

0:32:37.880 --> 0:32:41.080
<v Speaker 12>caught off sides by the coordination and now obviously the

0:32:41.160 --> 0:32:43.360
<v Speaker 12>size it was a somewhat large imprint they had in

0:32:43.400 --> 0:32:46.479
<v Speaker 12>the market, and people were basically still leaning very short end,

0:32:46.520 --> 0:32:48.720
<v Speaker 12>and that's cleaned up nicely. We get to see FTC data,

0:32:48.760 --> 0:32:50.160
<v Speaker 12>that's one way to look at it. But also we're

0:32:50.160 --> 0:32:52.680
<v Speaker 12>hearing sort of from flow traders that a lot of

0:32:52.680 --> 0:32:54.560
<v Speaker 12>that has come off, and it's a much flatter position.

0:32:54.600 --> 0:32:57.160
<v Speaker 12>People are more nervous now there's two sided risks to

0:32:57.160 --> 0:32:58.720
<v Speaker 12>where the end can go. And again this one to

0:32:58.760 --> 0:33:00.760
<v Speaker 12>sixty level is sort of the pivot where if we

0:33:00.840 --> 0:33:03.040
<v Speaker 12>drift above one sixty, I think people will be mourned

0:33:03.080 --> 0:33:05.440
<v Speaker 12>and powered to short it. Traders will think that the

0:33:05.440 --> 0:33:08.040
<v Speaker 12>intervention was a one off and they're not really disciplined

0:33:08.080 --> 0:33:10.320
<v Speaker 12>or committed to it. And if it goes lower then

0:33:10.360 --> 0:33:12.640
<v Speaker 12>the feedback loop actually people will probably try and rush

0:33:12.640 --> 0:33:15.000
<v Speaker 12>into it to get ahead of maybe a more structural change,

0:33:15.040 --> 0:33:16.920
<v Speaker 12>which it will again be real rate hikes coming down

0:33:16.920 --> 0:33:17.240
<v Speaker 12>the road.

0:33:17.480 --> 0:33:19.720
<v Speaker 4>Michael will leave it there. Thanks for your perspective on

0:33:19.760 --> 0:33:23.080
<v Speaker 4>the yen story that is, Bloomberg macro strategist, Michael Ball.

0:33:23.440 --> 0:33:26.680
<v Speaker 4>We turn next to Hong Kong and how its competitiveness

0:33:26.760 --> 0:33:29.320
<v Speaker 4>as a financial center is about to be tested by

0:33:29.360 --> 0:33:34.040
<v Speaker 4>two opposing forces. Bloomberg opinion columnist July Wren is based

0:33:34.080 --> 0:33:36.640
<v Speaker 4>in Hong Kong and she has been writing about what

0:33:36.680 --> 0:33:40.480
<v Speaker 4>she calls a reality check. Truly joins us now from

0:33:40.520 --> 0:33:43.440
<v Speaker 4>Hong Kong. Thank you for being here. You've been writing

0:33:43.520 --> 0:33:47.480
<v Speaker 4>in your latest piece that last year Hong Kong overtook

0:33:47.480 --> 0:33:51.320
<v Speaker 4>Switzerland as the world's largest cross border wealth hub. I

0:33:51.360 --> 0:33:54.920
<v Speaker 4>didn't realize that. Talk to me about the positive forces

0:33:55.440 --> 0:33:57.600
<v Speaker 4>that could further cement that position.

0:33:58.400 --> 0:34:01.920
<v Speaker 13>What we are seeing is rebounded in Hong Kong's asset

0:34:02.000 --> 0:34:05.600
<v Speaker 13>management industry. Last year, a lot of global hetch fans

0:34:05.640 --> 0:34:08.640
<v Speaker 13>they were opening shop in Hong Kong and they were

0:34:08.680 --> 0:34:13.600
<v Speaker 13>actually expanding their office space. We're talking about Citadel James

0:34:13.640 --> 0:34:18.919
<v Speaker 13>Street point seventy two. One reason is that they want

0:34:18.920 --> 0:34:22.120
<v Speaker 13>to be close to the deep talent in mainland China.

0:34:22.600 --> 0:34:26.200
<v Speaker 13>For educated the small mainland Chinese to move to Hong Kong,

0:34:26.280 --> 0:34:29.279
<v Speaker 13>it's very easy, whereas it would be very difficult for

0:34:29.320 --> 0:34:31.920
<v Speaker 13>them to move to say London or New York. And

0:34:32.160 --> 0:34:36.880
<v Speaker 13>with global hedge fens stuck in a very heated talent

0:34:37.040 --> 0:34:41.680
<v Speaker 13>fight and paying more and more money to young analysts,

0:34:41.719 --> 0:34:44.360
<v Speaker 13>they find Hong Kong quite attractive.

0:34:44.920 --> 0:34:48.400
<v Speaker 4>So when you look at the possibility that things could change,

0:34:48.520 --> 0:34:51.240
<v Speaker 4>let's go to the negative side of the equation now,

0:34:51.360 --> 0:34:56.000
<v Speaker 4>which would maybe erode Hong Kong's standing in terms of

0:34:56.040 --> 0:34:59.680
<v Speaker 4>the asset management industry. What could be a negative in

0:34:59.719 --> 0:35:00.280
<v Speaker 4>this story.

0:35:00.960 --> 0:35:03.120
<v Speaker 13>At the end of the day, Hong Kong is still

0:35:03.239 --> 0:35:08.920
<v Speaker 13>very integrated into China. Sure, Hong Kong is the world's

0:35:09.040 --> 0:35:13.320
<v Speaker 13>largest cross border wealth management hub, but according to Boston

0:35:13.360 --> 0:35:17.160
<v Speaker 13>Consulting Group estimates, sixty percent of the money still came

0:35:17.160 --> 0:35:20.560
<v Speaker 13>from mainland China. And right now the problem is that

0:35:20.640 --> 0:35:24.520
<v Speaker 13>the Chinese government is a bit short out catch, so

0:35:24.600 --> 0:35:29.040
<v Speaker 13>they want the mainland Chinese to cough up unpaid capital

0:35:29.040 --> 0:35:32.200
<v Speaker 13>gains taxes. The Chinese government is a little bit short

0:35:32.239 --> 0:35:34.960
<v Speaker 13>on catch, so they want to so they're in a

0:35:35.000 --> 0:35:39.719
<v Speaker 13>global tax hunt for capital gangs that mainland Chinese made overseas,

0:35:39.880 --> 0:35:42.000
<v Speaker 13>and a lot of that money is in Hong Kong.

0:35:42.160 --> 0:35:45.920
<v Speaker 13>So we're talking about billions of the dollars of unpaid

0:35:45.960 --> 0:35:51.320
<v Speaker 13>tax bills that mainland Chinese will somehow have to cough

0:35:51.400 --> 0:35:55.120
<v Speaker 13>up to liquidate the existing assets in Hong Kong, and

0:35:55.239 --> 0:35:57.680
<v Speaker 13>that hurts Hong Kong's asset management industry.

0:35:57.960 --> 0:36:01.880
<v Speaker 4>So we've talked about the polarity here the two opposing polls.

0:36:02.200 --> 0:36:04.719
<v Speaker 4>One that would prove to be very positive for the

0:36:04.760 --> 0:36:09.680
<v Speaker 4>asset management industry in Hong Kong that tax reform. The

0:36:09.719 --> 0:36:12.799
<v Speaker 4>other is obviously the influence on the negative side that

0:36:12.840 --> 0:36:15.880
<v Speaker 4>Beijing would have in terms of the crackdown on a

0:36:15.920 --> 0:36:20.760
<v Speaker 4>lot of cross border activity, including a leveon overseas capital gains,

0:36:20.760 --> 0:36:23.480
<v Speaker 4>which I think is twenty percent. Do you have a

0:36:23.560 --> 0:36:26.120
<v Speaker 4>sense of how this may shake out and what may

0:36:26.200 --> 0:36:27.359
<v Speaker 4>happen at the end of the day.

0:36:28.280 --> 0:36:32.320
<v Speaker 13>I think what will happen is that traditional investment banking

0:36:32.400 --> 0:36:37.080
<v Speaker 13>services for instance, clime brokerages, sales and trading, they will

0:36:37.120 --> 0:36:40.480
<v Speaker 13>do very well. On the other hand, private wealth management,

0:36:40.800 --> 0:36:45.440
<v Speaker 13>which has been the fastest growing sector, they're likely to

0:36:45.520 --> 0:36:46.279
<v Speaker 13>have peaked.

0:36:46.560 --> 0:36:49.439
<v Speaker 4>So it's an issue of whether or not Hong Kong

0:36:49.560 --> 0:36:54.240
<v Speaker 4>is going to preserve its competitive edge as a financial center.

0:36:54.600 --> 0:36:57.160
<v Speaker 4>Do we need to talk about what's happening with the

0:36:57.200 --> 0:37:01.880
<v Speaker 4>IPO market, particularly as mainline Chinese companies are concerned.

0:37:02.320 --> 0:37:05.080
<v Speaker 13>Well that the IPO market is doing very well, and

0:37:05.560 --> 0:37:08.200
<v Speaker 13>that's the thing the Chinese government is happy with that.

0:37:08.280 --> 0:37:11.600
<v Speaker 13>They think, oh it's great. You know, Hong Kong could

0:37:11.640 --> 0:37:16.800
<v Speaker 13>be a good capital allocation hub for mainland Chinese companies

0:37:16.920 --> 0:37:22.120
<v Speaker 13>to get financing, to develop their AI capabilities, etc. And

0:37:22.280 --> 0:37:26.200
<v Speaker 13>that is where Hong Kong politically stands on the good

0:37:26.239 --> 0:37:30.000
<v Speaker 13>side of Beijing. On the other side, Hong Kong shouldn't

0:37:30.000 --> 0:37:33.439
<v Speaker 13>be shouldn't continue to be seen as a place where

0:37:33.480 --> 0:37:37.719
<v Speaker 13>wealthy Chinese hide their assets from the government, from their

0:37:37.760 --> 0:37:39.040
<v Speaker 13>government's watchful eye.

0:37:39.360 --> 0:37:41.720
<v Speaker 4>So you know very well, when we talk about talent

0:37:41.840 --> 0:37:44.600
<v Speaker 4>in the financial services industry, we have to talk about

0:37:44.640 --> 0:37:47.839
<v Speaker 4>the technology that some of these firms are using. Talk

0:37:47.880 --> 0:37:51.520
<v Speaker 4>to me about the extent to which asset managers in

0:37:51.560 --> 0:37:54.560
<v Speaker 4>Hong Kong are using artificial intelligence these days.

0:37:55.360 --> 0:37:58.960
<v Speaker 13>Well, this is an interesting development because you know, like

0:37:59.160 --> 0:38:05.440
<v Speaker 13>the Western artificial intelligence labs, they don't allow to people

0:38:05.440 --> 0:38:07.920
<v Speaker 13>in Hong Kong to use their products. For instance, we

0:38:08.000 --> 0:38:12.960
<v Speaker 13>can now use open AI or anthropics products. So what

0:38:13.000 --> 0:38:16.520
<v Speaker 13>will happen is that these global assem managers will end

0:38:16.600 --> 0:38:19.919
<v Speaker 13>up using cheap Chinese models because they have no choice, right,

0:38:20.600 --> 0:38:24.200
<v Speaker 13>And I think that actually might help the proliferation of

0:38:24.520 --> 0:38:27.320
<v Speaker 13>Chinese models in the assem management industry.

0:38:27.560 --> 0:38:29.680
<v Speaker 4>Truly, we'll leave it there, thank you so very much.

0:38:29.760 --> 0:38:33.680
<v Speaker 4>That is Bloomberg opinion columnist Shuly Wren her latest piece,

0:38:33.800 --> 0:38:37.719
<v Speaker 4>Hong Kong's low tax lure is getting a reality check.

0:38:38.040 --> 0:38:40.200
<v Speaker 4>I'm Doug Prisner. You can catch us weekdays for the

0:38:40.280 --> 0:38:45.239
<v Speaker 4>Daybreak Asia podcast. It's available wherever you get your podcast Nathan.

0:38:45.440 --> 0:38:47.560
<v Speaker 2>Thanks Doug, And that does it for this edition of

0:38:47.560 --> 0:38:51.080
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend. Join us again Monday morning at five

0:38:51.120 --> 0:38:54.120
<v Speaker 2>am Wall Street Time for the latest on markets overseas

0:38:54.280 --> 0:38:56.520
<v Speaker 2>and the news you need to start your day. I'm

0:38:56.600 --> 0:39:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Nathan Hager. Stay with us stop stories and global business

0:39:00.120 --> 0:39:01.719
<v Speaker 2>lines are coming up right now.