Speaker 1: All right, Leonards kinn it's simple man. That can only
Speaker 1: mean one thing on this radio program. That is all things.
Speaker 1: So proclaimed simple man that means all things Bill O'Reilly,
Speaker 1: all things Bill O'Reilly at billoreilly dot com. By the way,
Speaker 1: we are waiting Bill O'Reilly's soon to be best selling
Speaker 1: book Confronting Evil Assessing the Worst of the Worst. The
Speaker 1: only offensive part is he put my picture on the cover,
Speaker 1: along with the iotolical Mayne and others. I'm a so
Speaker 1: offended by that, I don't even know if I'm going
Speaker 1: to give you a cupcake interview.
Speaker 2: You know, you are disguised, as see I had told.
Speaker 1: Hannity in the minds of something, you know, so as
Speaker 1: I'm with Patrick bed David, who I really like. I
Speaker 1: know you've been on this podcast before yesterday and on
Speaker 1: the show, and you know it was it was very
Speaker 1: obvious that you know, some people that former colleagues, including yourself,
Speaker 1: that they were interested if I didn't like you guys,
Speaker 1: And I'm like, no, I mean, I get along great
Speaker 1: with Bill. You're on my radio show. I have nothing
Speaker 1: against anybody that has opinions that are different than mine.
Speaker 1: Some people that made other career decisions that I made.
Speaker 1: I mean, have all said to me that you've told
Speaker 1: me many times you're very happy with how your career
Speaker 1: has turned out, and you like doing your own thing
Speaker 1: right now, and it's doing very very well. But but
Speaker 1: I just want you to know I went to bad
Speaker 1: for you.
Speaker 2: Well likes me, you know. But all of these podcasters
Speaker 2: are looking for headlines, and that is the quickest way
Speaker 2: to get them, because then they get clicks, you know
Speaker 2: the game. So I gave President Trump a report card
Speaker 2: yesterday for six months how he did in various important categories.
Speaker 1: Well, I saw that, but that's not my question for
Speaker 1: you today. I don't care about your report card.
Speaker 2: You don't care you know about my report card?
Speaker 1: No, not even I. I saw you did it, and
Speaker 1: I guess you went on with Cloma. Do you like
Speaker 1: the only the only person that I got there doesn't.
Speaker 2: Maly one point about this. The headline said, O'Reilly gives
Speaker 2: Trump a mediocre Okay, that was not true. And now
Speaker 2: let's seguay back into your point. It is foolish for
Speaker 2: any former employee of any American corporation to attend the
Speaker 2: corporation publicly. You will not win your case, will not
Speaker 2: be accurately reported by anyone. So you are a fool
Speaker 2: if you get into that. If you've got a beef,
Speaker 2: get a lawyer. Now, in my case, this was ultimately
Speaker 2: the best thing that could happen. And I'll tell you
Speaker 2: something I haven't told anybody else, but you're my pal.
Speaker 2: I got to spend ten times more with my son
Speaker 2: who is twelve when I left FNCA, and if I
Speaker 2: had continued that grueling and enough ruling it is situation,
Speaker 2: I never would have been able to spend that time
Speaker 2: with him.
Speaker 1: All right, here's what I do want to talk to
Speaker 1: you about, because I think it matters. There is now
Speaker 1: officially opened by the FBI he ran conspiracy investigation into
Speaker 1: deep state operatives and whether they've been putting cement blocks
Speaker 1: on the scales of not one, not two, but three
Speaker 1: presidential elections. I'll try to make this quick, but I've
Speaker 1: got to give a little foundation. Then I promise I
Speaker 1: hand the ball to you and I will shut up.
Speaker 1: I promise. If you go back to twenty sixteen, we
Speaker 1: now know that there was damning information that was completely ignored.
Speaker 1: According to the release by Tulsea Gabbard and new documents
Speaker 1: that have been revealed that call Me totally ignored documents
Speaker 1: that were very damning for Hillary Clinton, and then his
Speaker 1: famous July twenty sixteen press conference no reasonable prosecutor would
Speaker 1: ever prosecute and basically gave her a get out of
Speaker 1: jail free card. As it relates to the servers and
Speaker 1: bleach bit and of course broken devices with hammers and
Speaker 1: sim cards removed. But also what happened that year is
Speaker 1: they were warned call Me in particular, was Warren warned
Speaker 1: and as early as August of twenty sixteen not to
Speaker 1: use the Hillary Clinton bought and paid for dirty Russian
Speaker 1: disinformation dossier. It became the basis of four fi's applications
Speaker 1: to ruin Carter Page's life. But also that represented because
Speaker 1: of his relationship with Trump, a backdoor just by on
Speaker 1: the Trump campaign, his transition team, and later his presidency
Speaker 1: because there were three renewals, that's a full year of
Speaker 1: spying that went on. They but the bulk of information
Speaker 1: was now the debunked and they knew at the time
Speaker 1: it was questionable dirty dossier that Hillary Clinton paid for
Speaker 1: to me, that is, putting cinderblocks on the scale of
Speaker 1: an election. And then it evolved into Shortly thereafter, the
Speaker 1: intelligence declassified by Tulsea Gabbert showed that that career intelligence
Speaker 1: officials had determined that there was no Trump Russia collusion.
Speaker 1: They were very very clear about it. The only Russia
Speaker 1: collusion information came from the dossier that Hillary paid for,
Speaker 1: the Russian dossier. And then once the higher ups within
Speaker 1: these three letter agencies got a hold of this information,
Speaker 1: they turned it on its head, they polluted it, they
Speaker 1: corrupted it, and they made it the exact opposite of
Speaker 1: what it said. We learned that through these documents. Okay,
Speaker 1: that to me is deep state operators putting cinderblocks on
Speaker 1: the scale of an election. That is a grand conspiracy.
Speaker 1: That is part of Cash's investigation. Fast forward and we'll
Speaker 1: go to twenty twenty, and we know that in March
Speaker 1: of twenty twenty, to give the exact timeline, that the
Speaker 1: FBI had verified the authenticity of the very real laptop
Speaker 1: from Hell of Hunter Biden. And yet they went on
Speaker 1: a mission of debunking that laptop by meeting weekly with
Speaker 1: every big tech company all throughout the summer of twenty twenty,
Speaker 1: warning them that they may be victims of a Russian
Speaker 1: disinformation campaign. It may be about Joe Biden, maybe about
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden, maybe about Barisma Lo and behold. They all
Speaker 1: knew at the time that Bob Costello, who was then
Speaker 1: Rudy Giuliati's attorney, had a copy of that laptop and
Speaker 1: he would drop it. In other words, it would be
Speaker 1: made public. The New York Post drops the story. Those
Speaker 1: big tech companies, especially Mark Zuckerberg, to his credit and
Speaker 1: to Jack Dorsey's credit, it was running Twitter. They said,
Speaker 1: is this what you were warning us about? They knew
Speaker 1: that the laptop was real, but they wouldn't confirm what
Speaker 1: they knew to be true, which they should have. That
Speaker 1: suppressed the story that otherwise would have killed Joe Biden's
Speaker 1: presidential aspirations. Now fast forward to everything that happened between
Speaker 1: twenty twenty and twenty twenty four in terms of weaponization
Speaker 1: at the DOJ and law fair. The rated mar a
Speaker 1: Lago Statute of limitations had run out in New York
Speaker 1: City on a legal non disclosure agreement labeled as such
Speaker 1: and and paid is a legal expense. And they come
Speaker 1: up with a novel legal theory by a DA that
Speaker 1: ran on a platform to get Trump okay, putting more
Speaker 1: cinder blocks now on the third presidential election. That is
Speaker 1: the grand conspiracy that is being investigated. I will use
Speaker 1: your words, what say you about all of this? In Toto,
Speaker 1: mister O'Reilly?
Speaker 2: All right, I'm leading with this on the No Spin
Speaker 2: News my TV broadcast tonight, and I'm going to run
Speaker 2: down methodically. So the big villain as far as what
Speaker 2: Gabbert made public late last night, is John Brennan, the
Speaker 2: former CID director. Brennan, I'm going to predict, will be indicted. Now,
Speaker 2: there are a variety of crimes you can charge him with,
Speaker 2: but there's no own question according to these documents all right,
Speaker 2: that were classified for four or five years, that Brennan
Speaker 2: knew some of the stuff that he was making public
Speaker 2: was false and did it anyway, And it's quoted in
Speaker 2: the report. So that's number one. He's in serious, serious trouble.
Speaker 2: Comy's in trouble, but not as bad as Brennan, because
Speaker 2: Comie can make an argument that he corrected his mistakes
Speaker 2: with Hillary Clinton. And you know, because that's why he
Speaker 2: did that CYA in the last week of the sixteen
Speaker 2: elections saying oh, we're reopening the case because Comy was
Speaker 2: shrewd enough to know he had criminal exposure, so he
Speaker 2: reversed it. Now his lawyer is going to go in
Speaker 2: and say, oh, you know, when he found out X
Speaker 2: and Y, he corrected it. So that could go either way.
Speaker 2: The Hunter Biden stuff is a to criminal prosecution by
Speaker 2: the federal government, even though you're correct it did have
Speaker 2: a direct influence on twenty elections.
Speaker 1: It's not that the Hunter Biden laptop existed. They had
Speaker 1: verified its authenticity. They pre bunked it with big tech
Speaker 1: as a means of suppressing the story when they knew
Speaker 1: it would come out because Bob Costello had a copy
Speaker 1: of it and they knew he would release it.
Speaker 2: But I'm talking about federal indictments here.
Speaker 1: Well, if you is that not election interference by definition?
Speaker 2: The fifty one people who signed on to that phony
Speaker 2: Hunter Biden this is Russian disinformation where civilians at the time,
Speaker 2: they're going to go in and say that was my opinion,
Speaker 2: and I don't think they're going to even be charged
Speaker 2: because the government knows what they're going to do. The
Speaker 2: other guy that has not really been thrown out here
Speaker 2: is the Director of National Intelligence, Clapper, James Clapper. You
Speaker 2: remember CNN just put Brennan and Clapper on all the
Speaker 2: time to push this.
Speaker 1: Well, Clapper, I think got hired by fake news CNN
Speaker 1: and Brennan by fake you know, fake news MSDNC.
Speaker 2: But Clapper is I think Clapper's got some problems too. See,
Speaker 2: you're gonna get them when they were wor Yeah.
Speaker 1: I even think. But I think it's deeper than that.
Speaker 1: I think they all got problems.
Speaker 2: Do you think they all are going to get invited?
Speaker 1: I'll give you an example. Let me let me take
Speaker 1: this now. Remember I spent three years of my life
Speaker 1: digging deep into this. You know some idiot posts today, Well,
Speaker 1: Hannity said that there was no Russian interference in the
Speaker 1: twenty sixteen election. When I have a book bill, O'Reilly,
Speaker 1: I had my staff research today and all the times
Speaker 1: I said that there was never any Trump Russia collusion.
Speaker 1: That that, But the Russia hoax was a hoax. The
Speaker 1: only Russian interference was Hillary Clinton's bought and paid for
Speaker 1: Russian disinformation dossier. But if you go back just at
Speaker 1: the end of the Obama administration and a meeting just
Speaker 1: weeks before Donald Trump is to take the presidency, you
Speaker 1: have all of these people Obama and Biden and Susan
Speaker 1: Rice and Comy and Clapper and Brennan at all meeting
Speaker 1: and then minutes before Trump is sworn in, that's when
Speaker 1: Susan Rice did the famous Cya memo. Barack Obama on
Speaker 1: that meeting weeks ago said to do everything by the book.
Speaker 1: James Comy said, do everything by the book. Obviously they
Speaker 1: were afraid what would be discovered.
Speaker 2: Okay, let me jump in here. I hate to say this, Hannity,
Speaker 2: but you weren't wrong on anything that you reported for
Speaker 2: more than a year that I can see. And you
Speaker 2: know me, if I thought you were wrong, I put
Speaker 2: it right between your eyes. So you had this story correct.
Speaker 2: That's number one. Number two. I'm a detailed guy. I'm
Speaker 2: a report I know, I'm a news analyst and that's
Speaker 2: why I'm famous, But I'm a reporter at heart. Okay,
Speaker 2: what I'm looking for from Gabbart is if Gabbert's going
Speaker 2: to go out and say Barack Obama did xtion and Y,
Speaker 2: you got to back it up. It is not backed
Speaker 2: up in these documents here. You can surmise it absolutely.
Speaker 1: But if you have you done a deep read into
Speaker 1: what Gabbart released. The rank and file within the Intel community.
Speaker 1: Career Intel community people said that the Russia hoax didn't exist.
Speaker 1: It's only when it got in the hands at according
Speaker 1: to reports, at the express desire of then President Obama
Speaker 1: that he got the clappers, the comes, the Brennan's involved,
Speaker 1: that it literally even though it said one thing, they
Speaker 1: said the exact opposite that had occurred, and they created
Speaker 1: this narrative that led to a three year which hunt
Speaker 1: based on a phony dossier and based on lies from
Speaker 1: their own intelligence community and assessments.
Speaker 2: Listen to me, you can lay it out, but you
Speaker 2: can't prove it. In the corner lots solus. They're not
Speaker 2: going to indicet Obama because he's gonna cite executive privilege
Speaker 2: and he's gonna say, look, my advisors led me astray.
Speaker 2: The hell you want me to do about it. They're not.
Speaker 2: They're not. If anybody thinks Barack Obama's going to get indicted,
Speaker 2: they're crazy. He's not. All right.
Speaker 1: Well, I'm not making predictions about indictments. I will say this.
Speaker 1: I think what they did is they I've got to roll.
Speaker 1: You have two choices. You can stay and or you
Speaker 1: can go.
Speaker 2: It's up to you set the record straight here because
Speaker 2: it's such an important story.
Speaker 1: All right, stay right there more with all things simple man,
Speaker 1: Bill O'Reilly, all things O'Reilly a billoreilly dot com. All right,
Speaker 1: I wanted to I didn't want to rush Bill O'Reilly's
Speaker 1: final conclusion on whether or not there has been a
Speaker 1: grand conspiracy. And this new information being dropped by Tulca
Speaker 1: Gabbard now declassified, and this now encompasses not one, not two,
Speaker 1: but three presidential elections in different ways twenty sixteen about
Speaker 1: Russia collusion, a double standard with Hillary Clinton in top
Speaker 1: secret information, whether it was a complete setup from the beginning,
Speaker 1: And we now have declassified information that shows that rank
Speaker 1: and file career intelligence officials did not think that Putin
Speaker 1: was favoring Donald Trump over Hillary Clinton. The only Russian
Speaker 1: interference that we see is from Hillary Clinton's bought and
Speaker 1: paid for Russian dossier, which again most of the lamestream
Speaker 1: state run legacy media mob ignored. Then, of course the
Speaker 1: pre bunking of the laptop that they had verified its
Speaker 1: authenticity of in March of twenty twenty, and then of
Speaker 1: course the law fair and the weaponization issues involving the
Speaker 1: twenty twenty four election. You know, are they are deep
Speaker 1: state operator is putting cinder blocks on the scales of
Speaker 1: presidential elections, and who will be account held accountable hopefully
Speaker 1: for what? Mister O'Reilly your conclusion to all of this.
Speaker 2: Okay, I know you're trying to get rid of me, Hannity.
Speaker 2: I'm not offended. I'm a simple man, so I'm going
Speaker 2: to keep it really tight, all right. Number One, when
Speaker 2: people look at this story, they should read what the
Speaker 2: committee found out when they interviewed the associate of Vladimir Putin.
Speaker 2: That is a very key part of this that has
Speaker 2: not really been heightened by the press. Guys have flat
Speaker 2: out putting in care one and you can read it
Speaker 2: for yourself. That's number one. Number two on the head
Speaker 2: of the FBI. What do I do, Hannity, all right,
Speaker 2: here's what I do. I Indicte Brennan, the former CIA director,
Speaker 2: right away. You got enough evidence to take it to court.
Speaker 2: You might lose, but you probably won't, all right, because
Speaker 2: he did it. Then on Comy, I might indict on Kmy,
Speaker 2: but I'm not one hundred percent on it. On Adam Schiff,
Speaker 2: who's now the Senator from California. He was the head
Speaker 2: of the committee that did all of these interviews, wrote
Speaker 2: the classified report. I would send FBI agents in to
Speaker 2: interview Shiff again right now. If you lie to an
Speaker 2: FBI agent, that is a felony.
Speaker 1: But remember Biden gave him a preempted pardon.
Speaker 2: Bill Okay, doesn't matter. Though he gave him a preempted
Speaker 2: part of her past actions. You lie now, that does
Speaker 2: not count if.
Speaker 1: He lies now. Now, the interesting thing is is if
Speaker 1: he is brought before Congress, because he got the preemptive pardon,
Speaker 1: he does not have the ability to plead the Fifth Amendment,
Speaker 1: as you know.
Speaker 2: But I'm looking for criminals here, I'm not looking. Look,
Speaker 2: if you think that Adam Shiff is an honest man,
Speaker 2: then you're out of the rational zone for me.
Speaker 1: He was saying, there is a reason we do refer
Speaker 1: to him as the congenital liar. But go ahead.
Speaker 2: But look, I'm the FBI director. I send my guys in.
Speaker 2: Shift tells me everything that he knew. Why he said
Speaker 2: all of these lies? Ships lied about forty times. Why
Speaker 2: do you lie about this? Why do you lie about it?
Speaker 1: I think that's a low estimate. But yes, he and
Speaker 1: Devin Newness, I mean, was called the liar by the
Speaker 1: mainstream media. Everything he wrote was true.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and the same thing with you, as I said earlier,
Speaker 2: So you got attacked. I remember those attacks all right
Speaker 2: by the other media. The other media is we don't
Speaker 2: have to worry about them anymore because they're just collapsing.
Speaker 2: But I think that the FBI is a big role here,
Speaker 2: but don't overreach.
Speaker 1: Go very I agree with that. I think that listen,
Speaker 1: they're very they're very it, being very methodical and how
Speaker 1: they're releasing this information. This is the class information. And
Speaker 1: I think the country needs to know. There's a great
Speaker 1: danger to our constitutional republic if, in fact, you have
Speaker 1: people in these high positions of power and they're putting
Speaker 1: cinderblocks on the scales of a presidential election. The country
Speaker 1: had a right to know. Yet fifty one former Intel
Speaker 1: agents that knew nothing about Hunter Biden's laptop that had
Speaker 1: been verified as authentic by the FBI in March of
Speaker 1: twenty twenty. This is October of twenty twenty when the
Speaker 1: New York Post drops the story. They did it for
Speaker 1: political purposes. Now they lied to the country purposefully. In
Speaker 1: the case of the Russia, collusion hoax. There never was
Speaker 1: any interference, And according to the release of Tulsa Gabbard,
Speaker 1: just the opposite was the case. There wasn't Trump Russia
Speaker 1: collusion that they determined existed until it got in the
Speaker 1: hands of these quote higher up deep state operatives. Then
Speaker 1: the narrative flipped on purpose. That's to put a cinderblock.
Speaker 1: And I'm using my analogy on the scale of an election.
Speaker 1: All of the law, fair, we saw from twenty to
Speaker 1: twenty four was to prevent Donald Trump from ever having
Speaker 1: a shot to be president again. Again. Cinder blocks would
Speaker 1: be my example on the scales of an election. Do
Speaker 1: you disagree with any of that?
Speaker 2: No, But to advance the story, the President Trump, if
Speaker 2: he wants to be considered a great president, has to
Speaker 2: order his Justice Department to indict when necessary, okay, and
Speaker 2: to expose the entire thing to the American people, and
Speaker 2: whoever gets hurt gets hurt.
Speaker 1: Fair, Fair, I think I think you did a good
Speaker 1: job today, mister O'Reilly. I'm going to give you a
Speaker 1: grade of a B minus.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I'd never take it class anyway.
Speaker 1: You wouldn't take my class. You'd be too disruptive. I
Speaker 1: have to throw you out and give you a demerit.
Speaker 1: All right, Bill, O'Reilly all things O'Reilly Bill Oreilly dot com.
Speaker 1: We appreciate your time, sir, Thank you. All right, let's
Speaker 1: head back to our busy phones. Eight hundred and nine
Speaker 1: to four one, Sean. If you want to be a
Speaker 1: part of the program, let's go to Paul my Free
Speaker 1: State of Florida. Paul, Hey, how are you glad you called?
Speaker 1: Thanks for being with us.
Speaker 3: Wonderful, Thank you, mister Hannity. Yesterday there was talk about
Speaker 3: you running for the presidency, which we think is a
Speaker 3: great idea. But we also think you've got a running mate,
Speaker 3: a possible running mate that would clean house, detailed, oriented,
Speaker 3: absolutely wonderful person. I think miss Linda would be the person.
Speaker 1: Oh jeez, seriously, do you realize how one of the
Speaker 1: great reasons our relationship works so well is she's in
Speaker 1: the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and I'm in the Free state
Speaker 1: of Florida. Do you underst stand if we're in the
Speaker 1: same room for that long period of time, it's only
Speaker 1: a matter of time until she kills me.
Speaker 4: I haven't killed you so far in twenty years. I mean,
Speaker 4: all hail the Chief. I'll be the VP. I'm fine
Speaker 4: with that.
Speaker 1: I'm fine, but but you get to see me in doses,
Speaker 1: which is good because it's it's always fun.
Speaker 5: And then you get to go you even less if
Speaker 5: I was the vice president, because you know I was.
Speaker 1: That's probably true world.
Speaker 4: You know, spreading the message of hope and good cheer
Speaker 4: and getting rid of all of the radicals that fill
Speaker 4: our many nations in our nation right.
Speaker 1: Admit, she would be end up being as controversial, if
Speaker 1: not more than Donald Trump if you knew her the
Speaker 1: way I did.
Speaker 5: Let me tell you something, This country's right for a
Speaker 5: little controversy. They're looking for somebody to get.
Speaker 4: Madame Vice President. I am ready to serve my your
Speaker 4: own here. We're going to kick out everybody.
Speaker 6: Doesn't belong here.
Speaker 4: I tell everybody the way it is, every reason, no life.
Speaker 1: Oh Jesus, you're welcome, just for the records. So I'm
Speaker 1: in the middle of doing my show last night, and
Speaker 1: then in a break, my staff talks to me in
Speaker 1: my ear and they go, it's all over the place
Speaker 1: that you're thinking about running for president. And I have
Speaker 1: never been asked about if I have any such desire
Speaker 1: or intention to do so. I do not know where
Speaker 1: this all came from. Do you have any idea in
Speaker 1: terms of the you know where this originated from? Linda,
Speaker 1: I have no idea.
Speaker 5: I think what has really happened. And I say this,
Speaker 5: I don't want to toot my own horn or blow smoke,
Speaker 5: but I think people are excited about the ticket. And
Speaker 5: I think when they heard that I might be your VP,
Speaker 5: they were like, you know what, Sean Hannity for president
Speaker 5: might be good? Because definitely the.
Speaker 1: First the first time the ticket even got discussed, is
Speaker 1: this call today? We never had.
Speaker 4: There's tons of chatter about it online, lots of chatter
Speaker 4: A right.
Speaker 1: So, by the way, how was the poll yesterday that
Speaker 1: came out? We did a poll, didn't.
Speaker 4: We We did do a poll.
Speaker 5: I know you're excited to talk about the poll because
Speaker 5: you won the poll. Everybody knows. I know you don't
Speaker 5: always win. First of all, I think what I learned
Speaker 5: high level is that our audience has an inability to
Speaker 5: discern what is dancing for.
Speaker 1: You attacking the people you're attacking.
Speaker 5: That's my job as the vice president to give it
Speaker 5: like it is so America. You don't know what dancing
Speaker 5: looks like for this white Irishman.
Speaker 1: Okay, him running, So it had to do with me singing.
Speaker 1: The Devil went down to Georgia with Charlie Daniels and
Speaker 1: Linda claimed I was dancing. I'm like, I don't dance.
Speaker 1: I didn't dance in the vague.
Speaker 4: Just was the way that you dance, and I think that's.
Speaker 1: Running is not dancing. I was running around throwing footballs
Speaker 1: out of the crowd during moments when I wasn't singing
Speaker 1: the chorus with Charlie, Like I said.
Speaker 4: You won the pole, you want it far and square.
Speaker 1: I've learned to the final. What was the final outcome?
Speaker 1: You won?
Speaker 4: That's all that matters. You won.
Speaker 1: No, No, what was the final out What was the final
Speaker 1: percentage outcome?
Speaker 4: I think it's like you won like seventy percent uh huh, yeah,
Speaker 4: I know it's it's a proud day. Mister welcome, We're welcome.
Speaker 1: All right. Well, Paul, you very nice to say.
Speaker 3: So.
Speaker 1: I have no intention of running. I don't think I
Speaker 1: could be elected dog catcher, even in the free state
Speaker 1: of Florida. I just don't. I Listen, if you wanted
Speaker 1: to know what kind of president I would be, I
Speaker 1: can tell you I would just follow up with the
Speaker 1: policies that are successful of Donald Trump, and I would
Speaker 1: I would magnify them as much as I possibly could.
Speaker 1: I mean, he actually came forward with a great idea today,
Speaker 1: thinking out of the box only as Trump seems to
Speaker 1: do in the world of politics, that he would eliminate
Speaker 1: capital games when people sell their homes. I love that idea.
Speaker 1: How great that would be for the for the home
Speaker 1: building industry and the real estate industry. I mean, that
Speaker 1: is the lagging indicator in the economy now, is all
Speaker 1: Jerome Powell driven because of high interest rates. Nobody's going
Speaker 1: to give up a thirty year fixed rate mortgage to
Speaker 1: get a seven seven and a half percent thirty year
Speaker 1: fixed rate mortgage because it's thousands of dollars more a month.
Speaker 1: And it's just unfair. It's keeping young people out of
Speaker 1: the housing market. It's forcing older people, you know, to
Speaker 1: stay in homes when they want to retire. It's it's
Speaker 1: terrible and it's unnecessary.
Speaker 3: I think it's a great idea, I really do. And
Speaker 3: in you magnifying his policies, that's a better idea.
Speaker 4: And Paul, when Sean and I run the country, we
Speaker 4: will adhere to these policies and even expand upon them
Speaker 4: for the American people.
Speaker 1: Right, Sean, First of all, I don't think you get
Speaker 1: past the vetice.
Speaker 5: I think you meant to say, yes, Madam Vice President,
Speaker 5: to be I think that that's what you meant to say.
Speaker 1: You just I am not taking this any further or
Speaker 1: else You're going to stephen A. Smith me. And that
Speaker 1: means everywhere I go, I'm going to have to answer
Speaker 1: this question. And Steven A. Smith loved every single solitary
Speaker 1: second of it.
Speaker 4: Should run. Actually, you know what, it could be me,
Speaker 4: you and stephen A. And he could be like, I
Speaker 4: don't know, chief of staff. That would be fun.
Speaker 1: Oh okay, this is not even a team of rivals.
Speaker 1: This is a team of It would be bad, it
Speaker 1: would be lovely.
Speaker 4: And I think that you need.
Speaker 1: To I would find the best job for.
Speaker 4: You, Madame Vice President.
Speaker 1: Yes, I take it.
Speaker 4: Thank you.
Speaker 1: No, I'm not sure that's the right role for you.
Speaker 4: That is my goal.
Speaker 1: American than me. Your goal is for me to run
Speaker 1: for president. Are you out of your mind?
Speaker 2: No?
Speaker 4: My goal is for you to run so I can
Speaker 4: be Madame Vice President. That's my goal. Let's be clear.
Speaker 5: Oh my gosh, the silence is deafening. Let me tell
Speaker 5: you that vote of confidence. You make me feel so
Speaker 5: good today.
Speaker 1: You were taking this way too seriously. All right, The
Speaker 1: FBI police, they're warning all Americans about a surge and
Speaker 1: these phone scams. These fraudsters now are calling demanding that
Speaker 1: your personal information or payments under the threat of arrest,
Speaker 1: and they're using what's called spoof caller ID to look
Speaker 1: like numbers coming from actual government agencies. Authorities advise hanging
Speaker 1: up immediately verifying the caller's identity through other official channels.
Speaker 1: You've got to understand you need to protect your name,
Speaker 1: your finances, your reputation, and we're all being impacted by
Speaker 1: these identity thieves. That's why you need LifeLock dot com.
Speaker 1: They monitor millions of data points a second for any
Speaker 1: risk to your identity and they'll look for, you know,
Speaker 1: threats to for example, people that want to take out
Speaker 1: loans in your name or commit crimes pretending to be you.
Speaker 1: And the best news is if you've become a victim
Speaker 1: of identity theft, you'll have a dedicated US based restoration
Speaker 1: specialist that'll fix it guaranteed. Anyway. Joy, now go to
Speaker 1: LifeLock dot com or call one eight hundred LifeLock. You
Speaker 1: get forty percent off your first year with the promo
Speaker 1: code Hannity one eight hundred LifeLock LifeLock dot com promo
Speaker 1: code Hannity Today, AA.
Speaker 6: Sica winning yet me either, world leaders, union, businesses, social media.
Speaker 6: They all want to work with Trump.
Speaker 1: He said what he was going to do, and then
Speaker 1: he did it.
Speaker 6: The White House is open for business and America is bad,
Speaker 6: bad anities on right now.
Speaker 7: There is irrefutable evidence that detail how President Obama and
Speaker 7: his national security team directed the creation of an intelligence
Speaker 7: community assessment.
Speaker 1: That they knew was false.
Speaker 7: They knew it would promote this contrived narrative that Russia
Speaker 7: interfered in the twenty sixteen election to help President Trump win,
Speaker 7: selling it to the American people as though it were true.
Speaker 1: That's going to wrap things up with today. We have
Speaker 1: such explosive stories Tonight, Hannity nine, Eastern Fox News. Pulsey
Speaker 1: Gabbard's press conference today, more declassified documents, John Solomon, Greg Jarrett,
Speaker 1: Jim Jordan, the band is back together. Also, incredible economic news,
Speaker 1: more trade deals than we ever expected, China, Japan, Indonesia, Vietnam.
Speaker 1: Howard Lutnick will join us. Our Ai Tzar Davis Sacks
Speaker 1: will join us. Also Laura Trump and Well Love the
Speaker 1: latest on the terrible sentencing that took place out in Idaho,
Speaker 1: and much more. DVR nine Eastern Hannity on Fox will
Speaker 1: see you to night. Back here tomorrow with news information
Speaker 1: you'll never get from the state run legacy media mob,
Speaker 1: the peddlers of conspiracy theories, all happening tonight. We'll see
Speaker 1: you tomorrow. Thanks for being with us,