1 00:00:00,760 --> 00:00:03,720 Speaker 1: Hey, guys, ready or not, twenty twenty four is here, 2 00:00:03,880 --> 00:00:06,320 Speaker 1: and we here at breaking points, are already thinking of 3 00:00:06,400 --> 00:00:08,600 Speaker 1: ways we can up our game for this critical election. 4 00:00:08,800 --> 00:00:11,719 Speaker 2: We rely on our premium subs to expand coverage, upgrade 5 00:00:11,760 --> 00:00:15,120 Speaker 2: the studio ad staff give you, guys, the best independent 6 00:00:15,160 --> 00:00:17,360 Speaker 2: coverage that is possible. If you like what we're all about, 7 00:00:17,680 --> 00:00:20,080 Speaker 2: it just means the absolute world to have your support. 8 00:00:20,160 --> 00:00:42,599 Speaker 2: But enough with that, let's get to the show. Good morning, everybody, 9 00:00:42,640 --> 00:00:45,360 Speaker 2: Happy Monday. We have an amazing show for everybody today. 10 00:00:45,360 --> 00:00:46,879 Speaker 2: What do we have, Christal, indeed we do. 11 00:00:47,080 --> 00:00:49,919 Speaker 1: We are making a little bit of breaking points history 12 00:00:50,360 --> 00:00:53,040 Speaker 1: this morning. That focus group that we have been teasing 13 00:00:53,080 --> 00:00:55,360 Speaker 1: now for I guess weeks, that's this point. We have 14 00:00:55,480 --> 00:00:57,960 Speaker 1: some results that we can share with you. The gentleman 15 00:00:58,000 --> 00:01:00,240 Speaker 1: who ran the focus group, James from Jail Partner, is 16 00:01:00,240 --> 00:01:01,960 Speaker 1: going to be here to go through some of the 17 00:01:01,960 --> 00:01:03,680 Speaker 1: top clips. We've got stuff for you though that we're 18 00:01:03,680 --> 00:01:05,720 Speaker 1: going to be unrolling all weeks, so we're very excited 19 00:01:05,720 --> 00:01:08,160 Speaker 1: about that. In addition to that, we have some big 20 00:01:08,200 --> 00:01:10,160 Speaker 1: news stories that we want to cover. There was a 21 00:01:10,240 --> 00:01:12,399 Speaker 1: real big expos in the New York Times about an 22 00:01:12,400 --> 00:01:15,280 Speaker 1: American arms dealer to Ukraine. That is very revealing. This 23 00:01:15,400 --> 00:01:17,959 Speaker 1: is just as the G twenty summit has also wrapped up. 24 00:01:18,280 --> 00:01:20,120 Speaker 1: We have some big news I know you guys are 25 00:01:20,160 --> 00:01:22,679 Speaker 1: going to be excited about. Nancy Pelosi has announced she 26 00:01:22,880 --> 00:01:26,880 Speaker 1: is running for re election again, Sager, So everyone rejoice 27 00:01:26,959 --> 00:01:30,400 Speaker 1: about that. And in terms of JFK news, this is 28 00:01:30,440 --> 00:01:32,679 Speaker 1: an interesting development. One of the Secret Service agents that 29 00:01:32,760 --> 00:01:35,120 Speaker 1: was there in Dallas at the time of his assassination 30 00:01:35,240 --> 00:01:37,560 Speaker 1: has decided he wants to tell his story and it 31 00:01:37,680 --> 00:01:39,880 Speaker 1: does not line up with the official narrative. 32 00:01:39,920 --> 00:01:42,280 Speaker 3: So we'll break those details down for you as well. 33 00:01:42,319 --> 00:01:44,839 Speaker 1: But before we get to any of that, huge, huge, 34 00:01:44,840 --> 00:01:47,520 Speaker 1: thank you the premium subscribers who made this focus group possible. 35 00:01:47,600 --> 00:01:50,120 Speaker 2: Yes, I look, we keep saying it. We finally have 36 00:01:50,200 --> 00:01:51,880 Speaker 2: finished work product. You guys can be able to see 37 00:01:51,880 --> 00:01:54,440 Speaker 2: it already. Our coverage, our focus group has been getting 38 00:01:54,480 --> 00:01:58,560 Speaker 2: mainstream media attention and that's only possible because of all 39 00:01:58,640 --> 00:02:00,559 Speaker 2: of you. That's a big deal for an and show 40 00:02:01,000 --> 00:02:02,600 Speaker 2: like ours, and these things cost a lot of money. 41 00:02:02,640 --> 00:02:04,080 Speaker 2: We want to continue to keep doing them. You know, 42 00:02:04,120 --> 00:02:06,120 Speaker 2: they're well out to the five figures in terms of 43 00:02:06,160 --> 00:02:08,280 Speaker 2: the cost. So any one of you who was signing up, 44 00:02:08,280 --> 00:02:11,480 Speaker 2: you were being tremendously helpful and funding these expansion endeavors. 45 00:02:11,520 --> 00:02:13,880 Speaker 2: So Breakingpoints dot Com, if you are able to it 46 00:02:13,960 --> 00:02:16,560 Speaker 2: means the world to us, and we're producing good work. 47 00:02:16,600 --> 00:02:17,920 Speaker 2: One of the things I'm most proud of in our 48 00:02:17,919 --> 00:02:20,720 Speaker 2: focus group, not only about the attention it's already got, 49 00:02:20,800 --> 00:02:23,200 Speaker 2: you know, even though it's been one day, is that 50 00:02:23,240 --> 00:02:26,800 Speaker 2: we got to things that the regular media companies just 51 00:02:26,880 --> 00:02:29,160 Speaker 2: were not getting to. And I think what we really 52 00:02:29,160 --> 00:02:32,040 Speaker 2: did is we are giving people a very good view 53 00:02:32,160 --> 00:02:34,520 Speaker 2: of like this is what people actually think. Show don't 54 00:02:34,520 --> 00:02:36,800 Speaker 2: tell is the most important thing. Too many people are 55 00:02:36,800 --> 00:02:39,200 Speaker 2: always speaking on behalf of others, and you know, we're 56 00:02:39,240 --> 00:02:41,800 Speaker 2: very proud to elevate just normal voices and be like, listen, 57 00:02:41,800 --> 00:02:43,600 Speaker 2: this is These are the people who support Trump or 58 00:02:43,639 --> 00:02:45,960 Speaker 2: support to Santis, to support for vacer some people who 59 00:02:46,000 --> 00:02:47,720 Speaker 2: are undecided. This is where they get their news. 60 00:02:47,880 --> 00:02:49,280 Speaker 3: We got we got a Doug Burgham supporter. 61 00:02:49,400 --> 00:02:51,720 Speaker 2: Yeah, we got a Doug Burgham supporter, which is hilarious. 62 00:02:51,800 --> 00:02:54,359 Speaker 2: But the point, you know that from watching the whole thing, 63 00:02:54,560 --> 00:02:56,960 Speaker 2: which our amazing crew did such a good jobs, I 64 00:02:57,000 --> 00:02:58,440 Speaker 2: was like I just came away with a way better 65 00:02:58,520 --> 00:03:01,000 Speaker 2: understanding of like how people think of like people who 66 00:03:01,040 --> 00:03:05,840 Speaker 2: are engaging this you know, normal everyday life on Facebook, moms, 67 00:03:05,840 --> 00:03:08,359 Speaker 2: school teachers, people who are retired, and they're like, this 68 00:03:08,400 --> 00:03:11,280 Speaker 2: is what they actually think about politics. So refreshing actually 69 00:03:11,320 --> 00:03:13,840 Speaker 2: to take a break from whatever, you know, pundits and 70 00:03:13,880 --> 00:03:15,040 Speaker 2: how they're talking about. 71 00:03:14,840 --> 00:03:17,800 Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean listen, Like polls have some use that 72 00:03:17,840 --> 00:03:20,200 Speaker 1: can be limited, but to actually hear voters in their 73 00:03:20,240 --> 00:03:22,560 Speaker 1: own words subscribe, who they support, why they support, and 74 00:03:22,680 --> 00:03:24,480 Speaker 1: what they think about the major issues of the day, 75 00:03:24,560 --> 00:03:27,480 Speaker 1: I think, you know, it's it's not scientific, but it's 76 00:03:27,480 --> 00:03:30,400 Speaker 1: incredibly valuable just to give people a sense of how 77 00:03:30,400 --> 00:03:32,720 Speaker 1: we're doing this. So for the main show, we're going 78 00:03:32,760 --> 00:03:34,359 Speaker 1: to be showing you some of the top clips every 79 00:03:34,440 --> 00:03:36,800 Speaker 1: day this week and providing you, you know, with our 80 00:03:36,840 --> 00:03:39,440 Speaker 1: thoughts and reaction to some of the really interesting moments. 81 00:03:39,480 --> 00:03:41,280 Speaker 3: Today we're going to focus on kind of. 82 00:03:41,200 --> 00:03:44,120 Speaker 1: The top line, who is everybody supporting and why and 83 00:03:44,160 --> 00:03:47,080 Speaker 1: some of that that information, and then throughout the week 84 00:03:47,120 --> 00:03:49,800 Speaker 1: we also have some more issue specific clips that we 85 00:03:49,800 --> 00:03:53,000 Speaker 1: can show you as well. From premium subscribers, you are 86 00:03:53,000 --> 00:03:54,880 Speaker 1: going to have access to the whole thing. 87 00:03:55,360 --> 00:03:56,960 Speaker 3: This week, so you'll be able to get. 88 00:03:56,800 --> 00:03:59,000 Speaker 1: Access to all of that first and then later in 89 00:03:59,040 --> 00:03:59,760 Speaker 1: the week we'll have. 90 00:03:59,680 --> 00:04:01,280 Speaker 3: Put it all together for everybody. 91 00:04:01,280 --> 00:04:03,320 Speaker 2: Here you go. Yeah, So, as you said, premium subs, 92 00:04:03,320 --> 00:04:05,120 Speaker 2: you guys are going to get the full thing before 93 00:04:05,120 --> 00:04:07,920 Speaker 2: anybody else. We're going to give you a full, completely 94 00:04:07,960 --> 00:04:10,480 Speaker 2: produced version of which we're working on. We're again, we're 95 00:04:10,480 --> 00:04:11,960 Speaker 2: really really proud of it. With all of that, we 96 00:04:12,040 --> 00:04:14,400 Speaker 2: got James Johnson and Jail Partner standing by. Let's get 97 00:04:14,440 --> 00:04:14,720 Speaker 2: to it. 98 00:04:14,800 --> 00:04:16,920 Speaker 1: As we have been discussing at length at this point, 99 00:04:17,040 --> 00:04:20,160 Speaker 1: we hear Breaking Points, with the help of our premium subscribers, 100 00:04:20,279 --> 00:04:24,000 Speaker 1: commissioned a focus group of New Hampshire Republicans to offer 101 00:04:24,080 --> 00:04:26,960 Speaker 1: their insights, how they're thinking about this primary who they're 102 00:04:27,000 --> 00:04:29,160 Speaker 1: interested in, who they're not interested in, what issues are 103 00:04:29,200 --> 00:04:30,320 Speaker 1: the priorities. 104 00:04:29,800 --> 00:04:30,239 Speaker 3: Et cetera. 105 00:04:30,720 --> 00:04:33,000 Speaker 1: And if you want to help us do this sort 106 00:04:33,040 --> 00:04:35,039 Speaker 1: of work in the future, and if you want to 107 00:04:35,120 --> 00:04:38,440 Speaker 1: get the whole beautifully edited piece of video and all 108 00:04:38,480 --> 00:04:41,760 Speaker 1: the focus group details first in your inbox, make sure 109 00:04:41,760 --> 00:04:45,159 Speaker 1: you subscribe Breakingpoints dot com. Without further ado, though, we 110 00:04:45,200 --> 00:04:48,360 Speaker 1: want to bring in James Johnson of Jail Partners, who 111 00:04:48,480 --> 00:04:50,880 Speaker 1: was the moderator of this focus group, and by the way, 112 00:04:50,960 --> 00:04:53,440 Speaker 1: did a fantastic job getting a lot of very interesting 113 00:04:53,440 --> 00:04:54,560 Speaker 1: information and out of these voters. 114 00:04:54,600 --> 00:04:56,200 Speaker 2: Welcome James, thank you, thanks for having me. 115 00:04:56,279 --> 00:04:58,160 Speaker 1: Yeah, of course, So we want to show some of 116 00:04:58,200 --> 00:04:59,720 Speaker 1: the clips. But before we do what we're sort of 117 00:04:59,760 --> 00:05:03,680 Speaker 1: your top line takeaways. Being there with this group the entire. 118 00:05:03,440 --> 00:05:06,160 Speaker 4: Time, I think us first we're saying who we actually selected. 119 00:05:06,200 --> 00:05:09,640 Speaker 4: So we went for likely New Hampshire primary voters. Almost 120 00:05:09,720 --> 00:05:11,640 Speaker 4: all of them were vegeted Republicans and there was one 121 00:05:11,680 --> 00:05:14,240 Speaker 4: independent because obviously don't forget independence can vote in the 122 00:05:14,279 --> 00:05:19,320 Speaker 4: New Hampshire presidential primary. Who intended to participate in the primary, 123 00:05:19,400 --> 00:05:21,480 Speaker 4: and we got a mix of people, some who made 124 00:05:21,520 --> 00:05:22,800 Speaker 4: up the mind, some who are on the side is 125 00:05:22,839 --> 00:05:24,600 Speaker 4: we really didn't know going into the room who they 126 00:05:24,600 --> 00:05:26,600 Speaker 4: were going to say they were voting for. And as 127 00:05:26,640 --> 00:05:30,880 Speaker 4: we'll see, it is still Trump's game to lose that 128 00:05:30,920 --> 00:05:34,159 Speaker 4: he dominates this focus group, even though there is a 129 00:05:34,200 --> 00:05:36,560 Speaker 4: split view on him. Some are sort of okay with him, 130 00:05:36,600 --> 00:05:38,520 Speaker 4: some love him, some really don't like him. 131 00:05:38,880 --> 00:05:40,080 Speaker 2: It's all about Trump. 132 00:05:40,240 --> 00:05:42,559 Speaker 4: We asked them, you know, what are their most important issues, 133 00:05:42,560 --> 00:05:45,000 Speaker 4: and we had the economy, we had reproductive rights and 134 00:05:45,040 --> 00:05:47,200 Speaker 4: other issues. But really, when we got down to the 135 00:05:47,279 --> 00:05:50,200 Speaker 4: nitty gritty, it was Trump that it was all about. 136 00:05:50,320 --> 00:05:52,360 Speaker 2: One of the defining ones that you guys did was 137 00:05:52,360 --> 00:05:54,840 Speaker 2: where are you getting news from? Which actually revealed a 138 00:05:54,880 --> 00:05:56,640 Speaker 2: lot about all of them. So we have their clip, 139 00:05:56,640 --> 00:05:57,520 Speaker 2: why don't we take a listen. 140 00:06:07,040 --> 00:06:08,560 Speaker 4: I was saying to these guys, we did have a 141 00:06:08,600 --> 00:06:11,720 Speaker 4: fight once in the UK, so you know, you have 142 00:06:11,800 --> 00:06:13,599 Speaker 4: to make sure that you beat the good people of 143 00:06:13,600 --> 00:06:15,640 Speaker 4: Britain by not having a fight. First, name what you 144 00:06:15,680 --> 00:06:16,120 Speaker 4: do for the thing? 145 00:06:16,279 --> 00:06:17,240 Speaker 2: Where you getting news from? 146 00:06:17,720 --> 00:06:21,000 Speaker 5: Okay, James, I work in it and I get my 147 00:06:21,080 --> 00:06:26,440 Speaker 5: news from podcasts or the internet, like a news site 148 00:06:26,520 --> 00:06:28,920 Speaker 5: like a CNN or NBC. 149 00:06:29,120 --> 00:06:31,279 Speaker 2: Any particular podcasts. 150 00:06:32,080 --> 00:06:33,640 Speaker 5: Five thirty eight podcasts. 151 00:06:33,680 --> 00:06:38,039 Speaker 6: Yeah, I am Dana. I'm a full time homemaker and 152 00:06:38,120 --> 00:06:41,160 Speaker 6: I get my news from like a daily email briefing, 153 00:06:41,440 --> 00:06:43,280 Speaker 6: which one the morning brew. 154 00:06:43,720 --> 00:06:48,920 Speaker 7: Hi, my name is Neve. I am a homemaker, homeschooler, 155 00:06:49,520 --> 00:06:54,200 Speaker 7: and I get most of my news shared amongst other 156 00:06:54,320 --> 00:07:01,880 Speaker 7: moms and folks in non mainstream type groups. 157 00:07:02,320 --> 00:07:04,560 Speaker 2: What kind of sort of can give you an example of 158 00:07:04,560 --> 00:07:06,280 Speaker 2: any of those, like. 159 00:07:06,360 --> 00:07:11,480 Speaker 7: Health freedom groups or folks who are more leaning like 160 00:07:12,240 --> 00:07:15,320 Speaker 7: opposing mainstream media. 161 00:07:15,280 --> 00:07:19,560 Speaker 8: Hi, I'm Jennifer. I'm a business analyst, and I get 162 00:07:19,640 --> 00:07:26,960 Speaker 8: my news from mostly the internet, different websites NBC, CNBC, 163 00:07:28,160 --> 00:07:31,360 Speaker 8: Fox News, and whatever. The one that pops up on 164 00:07:31,360 --> 00:07:33,800 Speaker 8: my computer that I don't even ask for it shows 165 00:07:33,840 --> 00:07:36,640 Speaker 8: me the headlines, okay, and also when I check my 166 00:07:36,720 --> 00:07:37,840 Speaker 8: email the headlines there. 167 00:07:37,920 --> 00:07:40,960 Speaker 9: My name is Debbie and I am a homemaker, part 168 00:07:40,960 --> 00:07:44,760 Speaker 9: time teacher, and I get my news from my husband, 169 00:07:46,360 --> 00:07:49,120 Speaker 9: but I do watch Fox News and techer Carlson. 170 00:07:49,840 --> 00:07:50,760 Speaker 4: Great, thanks so much? 171 00:07:51,000 --> 00:07:55,240 Speaker 2: Is that calls on X now right, Jim. 172 00:07:55,320 --> 00:07:58,040 Speaker 10: I'm in advertising sales and I give most of my 173 00:07:58,120 --> 00:08:00,960 Speaker 10: news from either Glenn Beck shot Hannity and the two 174 00:08:00,960 --> 00:08:03,080 Speaker 10: guys at noon, and I heard radio. 175 00:08:03,600 --> 00:08:03,760 Speaker 7: Hi. 176 00:08:03,840 --> 00:08:07,400 Speaker 11: My name is John. I'm a retired service technician and 177 00:08:08,200 --> 00:08:09,840 Speaker 11: I get my news from Newsmax. 178 00:08:10,400 --> 00:08:10,720 Speaker 2: Hello. 179 00:08:10,920 --> 00:08:15,200 Speaker 12: I'm Alexis. I'm an administrator for a state agency, and 180 00:08:15,240 --> 00:08:19,239 Speaker 12: I get my news primarily from the internet, local TV 181 00:08:19,360 --> 00:08:22,640 Speaker 12: stations as well as national ones primarily WMR, as well 182 00:08:22,680 --> 00:08:25,680 Speaker 12: as the local Conquered Monitor and other local newspapers. 183 00:08:28,920 --> 00:08:31,280 Speaker 2: So what do you make of that, James? What did 184 00:08:31,400 --> 00:08:34,040 Speaker 2: where they got their news from? Eventually then inform some 185 00:08:34,120 --> 00:08:37,000 Speaker 2: of their answers because before we preview what they actually 186 00:08:37,000 --> 00:08:38,240 Speaker 2: say about who they're going to vote for. 187 00:08:38,400 --> 00:08:40,760 Speaker 4: Well, I think what's very worth noting there is that 188 00:08:40,760 --> 00:08:44,320 Speaker 4: there's a lot of sort of independent news sources, some 189 00:08:44,400 --> 00:08:47,760 Speaker 4: alternative news sources, and really what sort of fed through 190 00:08:47,800 --> 00:08:50,960 Speaker 4: the entire focus group was a real skepticism about traditional 191 00:08:50,960 --> 00:08:54,240 Speaker 4: news media. Yes, and they were skeptical about stories that heard. 192 00:08:54,520 --> 00:08:57,160 Speaker 4: They talked about how they would go and google stories 193 00:08:57,720 --> 00:08:59,559 Speaker 4: after they'd seen them to check to fact check them 194 00:08:59,559 --> 00:09:01,480 Speaker 4: and see there And it's worth saying that is something 195 00:09:01,480 --> 00:09:03,560 Speaker 4: we see in all of our focus groups. There's a 196 00:09:03,559 --> 00:09:06,120 Speaker 4: big move away from those traditional sources, including in the 197 00:09:06,200 --> 00:09:08,240 Speaker 4: United Kingdom as well as in the US. So I 198 00:09:08,280 --> 00:09:10,000 Speaker 4: think we see that informing a bit of that. And 199 00:09:10,040 --> 00:09:12,600 Speaker 4: you saw the chap there mentioned Newsmax, You saw others 200 00:09:12,640 --> 00:09:14,800 Speaker 4: mention other sources. They are coming at this from a 201 00:09:14,880 --> 00:09:18,800 Speaker 4: very diffuse perspective, not just lying on one classic cable 202 00:09:18,840 --> 00:09:20,240 Speaker 4: news network or one newspaper. 203 00:09:20,400 --> 00:09:20,640 Speaker 6: Right. 204 00:09:20,679 --> 00:09:22,719 Speaker 1: That was what jumped down at me was just how 205 00:09:22,760 --> 00:09:25,480 Speaker 1: many different answers were given. I mean, no one gave 206 00:09:25,720 --> 00:09:28,000 Speaker 1: the same answer, and Fox did not dominate. 207 00:09:28,000 --> 00:09:29,080 Speaker 3: That's what I was going to say. 208 00:09:29,160 --> 00:09:33,040 Speaker 1: If you had asked this question of Republican primary voters 209 00:09:33,120 --> 00:09:35,440 Speaker 1: a decade ago, I think almost all of them would 210 00:09:35,440 --> 00:09:38,680 Speaker 1: have been like Fox News, but the landscape is so 211 00:09:38,760 --> 00:09:40,800 Speaker 1: much more fraction now. Now, I will say, if you're 212 00:09:40,800 --> 00:09:44,480 Speaker 1: like you can kind of very closely expect who's going 213 00:09:44,559 --> 00:09:46,520 Speaker 1: to be where on the political spectrum and what things 214 00:09:46,520 --> 00:09:49,360 Speaker 1: they're going to focus on based on the news preferences 215 00:09:49,360 --> 00:09:50,719 Speaker 1: that they give at the top there, which is part 216 00:09:50,720 --> 00:09:51,160 Speaker 1: of why we. 217 00:09:51,120 --> 00:09:53,560 Speaker 3: Wanted to introduce them to the audience with that clip. 218 00:09:53,720 --> 00:09:56,600 Speaker 1: Now, let's take a listen to another section where you 219 00:09:56,679 --> 00:09:59,400 Speaker 1: ask them who are they supporting and what are they 220 00:09:59,440 --> 00:10:01,160 Speaker 1: thinking about the Let's take a listen to that. 221 00:10:04,559 --> 00:10:07,280 Speaker 4: So write it down the name of the person, the 222 00:10:07,360 --> 00:10:09,959 Speaker 4: name of the candidate who you're currently supporting. 223 00:10:10,200 --> 00:10:13,720 Speaker 9: I would say Trump, And the reason being is because 224 00:10:13,760 --> 00:10:16,600 Speaker 9: I would look back at his presidential days and all 225 00:10:16,640 --> 00:10:20,120 Speaker 9: that was accomplished and what America was like, and then 226 00:10:20,120 --> 00:10:24,160 Speaker 9: I would fast forward to where America is now and 227 00:10:24,200 --> 00:10:25,480 Speaker 9: I wouldn't want to keep going that way. 228 00:10:25,679 --> 00:10:29,239 Speaker 10: Trump, there we go, sorry, And the reason being is 229 00:10:29,280 --> 00:10:32,360 Speaker 10: his past accomplishments we did in you know, four three 230 00:10:32,400 --> 00:10:35,439 Speaker 10: and a half four years, and he does support the 231 00:10:36,960 --> 00:10:39,600 Speaker 10: working class a lot more, I think than the other 232 00:10:39,720 --> 00:10:42,560 Speaker 10: party does right now, and also what he's fighting now 233 00:10:42,720 --> 00:10:47,439 Speaker 10: when he's going through the political firestorm of all these affidavits. 234 00:10:47,960 --> 00:10:50,240 Speaker 10: As he said, I'm fighting for you because if this 235 00:10:50,280 --> 00:10:53,600 Speaker 10: can happen to me, it will happen to you. If 236 00:10:53,640 --> 00:10:55,840 Speaker 10: you say the wrong thing. You're in trouble today. 237 00:10:55,880 --> 00:10:58,880 Speaker 11: Trump definitely because he needs to put his back where 238 00:10:58,920 --> 00:11:03,720 Speaker 11: we were with oil depends, secured borders, great economy, just 239 00:11:03,760 --> 00:11:06,000 Speaker 11: looking off for us. He made give a military or 240 00:11:06,080 --> 00:11:08,400 Speaker 11: raise when they hadn't happened for decades or years, I 241 00:11:08,440 --> 00:11:11,440 Speaker 11: should say, and he made the VA better than what 242 00:11:11,480 --> 00:11:14,680 Speaker 11: it was, and he's just he needs to take over 243 00:11:14,760 --> 00:11:17,240 Speaker 11: where he left off, which is making us where we were, 244 00:11:17,559 --> 00:11:18,880 Speaker 11: especially with the oil independence. 245 00:11:19,120 --> 00:11:21,360 Speaker 12: Hey maybe I can't remember the guy's name from South Dakota. 246 00:11:21,880 --> 00:11:24,360 Speaker 12: I was looking into some of his ideas, and I 247 00:11:25,720 --> 00:11:28,000 Speaker 12: would think that we should still stay with a Republican 248 00:11:28,559 --> 00:11:31,880 Speaker 12: but not necessarily Trump. I'd like to see some a 249 00:11:31,880 --> 00:11:35,400 Speaker 12: little bit more of rational thinking come through. While I 250 00:11:35,600 --> 00:11:38,160 Speaker 12: like how Trump had some ideas that were great and 251 00:11:38,960 --> 00:11:42,320 Speaker 12: his financial abilities were leading us in the right direction, 252 00:11:42,840 --> 00:11:45,560 Speaker 12: some of his changes that he put in while he 253 00:11:45,600 --> 00:11:48,559 Speaker 12: was in tterm directly affected my work and I didn't 254 00:11:48,559 --> 00:11:49,760 Speaker 12: agree with them some of them. 255 00:11:49,920 --> 00:11:51,480 Speaker 2: Doug Burgham, is that who you were thinking of? 256 00:11:52,840 --> 00:11:53,080 Speaker 8: Great? 257 00:11:53,120 --> 00:11:55,960 Speaker 5: Okay, I'm currently undecided, but I would be leaning towards 258 00:11:56,040 --> 00:11:57,000 Speaker 5: Governor DeSantis. 259 00:11:57,200 --> 00:11:59,640 Speaker 2: A main reason we just executive. 260 00:11:59,160 --> 00:12:02,520 Speaker 5: Experience of things. He's accomplished in a very purple state, 261 00:12:03,000 --> 00:12:07,600 Speaker 5: can get things done, had the largest victory in recent 262 00:12:07,679 --> 00:12:09,920 Speaker 5: memory for Florida even though it's a divided state. So 263 00:12:09,960 --> 00:12:11,880 Speaker 5: you know, he can get things done. And I just 264 00:12:11,920 --> 00:12:17,640 Speaker 5: don't think he's quite as divisive or antagonistic as President 265 00:12:17,679 --> 00:12:18,280 Speaker 5: Trump would be. 266 00:12:18,640 --> 00:12:23,520 Speaker 6: I'm considering the vague for my vote. I think he's 267 00:12:23,520 --> 00:12:25,800 Speaker 6: sort of an outsider, and I don't think he has 268 00:12:25,800 --> 00:12:28,560 Speaker 6: any political ties that are going to influence everything I think, 269 00:12:28,840 --> 00:12:31,200 Speaker 6: So I'm not so I'm considering right now. 270 00:12:31,160 --> 00:12:36,760 Speaker 7: Leading to Trump because he isn't a politician. He is 271 00:12:36,800 --> 00:12:42,000 Speaker 7: a businessman. On his list of accomplishments was tremendously good 272 00:12:42,080 --> 00:12:45,320 Speaker 7: for our country. My main hang up is that he 273 00:12:45,520 --> 00:12:50,079 Speaker 7: pushed through the sort of COVID things, the shots and whatnot. 274 00:12:50,280 --> 00:12:53,680 Speaker 8: I honestly don't know yet. I really don't. I agree 275 00:12:53,720 --> 00:12:56,400 Speaker 8: with the warp speed kind of did it for me. 276 00:12:56,720 --> 00:12:59,960 Speaker 8: So I'm not one hundred percent for Trump, but desanded. 277 00:13:00,160 --> 00:13:03,840 Speaker 8: I see some good points, but I'm not really positive yet. 278 00:13:03,960 --> 00:13:06,120 Speaker 8: I haven't really made up my mind yet. Might be naive, 279 00:13:06,160 --> 00:13:09,920 Speaker 8: but I was hoping for somebody out of nowhere to 280 00:13:10,000 --> 00:13:10,320 Speaker 8: come in. 281 00:13:10,480 --> 00:13:12,600 Speaker 4: I want to pick up on why you're sort of 282 00:13:13,160 --> 00:13:14,760 Speaker 4: leaning away from Trump. 283 00:13:15,120 --> 00:13:17,200 Speaker 5: I think we'll have a much better shount of winning 284 00:13:17,240 --> 00:13:19,440 Speaker 5: without Trump at the top of the ticket. I honestly 285 00:13:19,559 --> 00:13:21,839 Speaker 5: think if Trump isn't on top of the ticket, we're 286 00:13:21,840 --> 00:13:23,920 Speaker 5: going to lose all the state races in New Hampshire 287 00:13:24,160 --> 00:13:29,240 Speaker 5: because he's very unliked, very unlikable. I appreciate all the 288 00:13:29,240 --> 00:13:31,120 Speaker 5: things he did, but in office, I think he did 289 00:13:31,200 --> 00:13:33,920 Speaker 5: do a good job, but he's not a likable person. 290 00:13:34,000 --> 00:13:36,480 Speaker 5: He's not a great person, and I think it would 291 00:13:36,520 --> 00:13:39,400 Speaker 5: be a devastating effect on Republicans across the country to 292 00:13:39,440 --> 00:13:40,720 Speaker 5: have him at the top of the ticket. I think 293 00:13:40,760 --> 00:13:43,600 Speaker 5: we would feel that everywhere not worth it. 294 00:13:45,360 --> 00:13:47,920 Speaker 10: Going with the vaccine, I too do not agree with 295 00:13:47,920 --> 00:13:51,839 Speaker 10: the vaccine and got a vaccine vaccine myself. It's a 296 00:13:51,920 --> 00:13:54,680 Speaker 10: free choice to do so. I know Trump did say 297 00:13:55,320 --> 00:13:58,120 Speaker 10: I would not force the vaccine anybody. I do believe 298 00:13:58,160 --> 00:14:01,360 Speaker 10: that Trump was given some bad advice pit Chucky with 299 00:14:01,440 --> 00:14:03,920 Speaker 10: doctor Fosse and I forget the other woman that was there. 300 00:14:04,120 --> 00:14:08,160 Speaker 10: There's a lot of manipulation going on that the media 301 00:14:08,200 --> 00:14:11,000 Speaker 10: will not be truthful about, but that is allow what 302 00:14:11,200 --> 00:14:12,880 Speaker 10: took place. I think you got some bad advice. 303 00:14:12,960 --> 00:14:14,720 Speaker 9: Well, there's many things that I agree with them on. 304 00:14:15,000 --> 00:14:17,880 Speaker 9: I mean, the four years. There are some things, like 305 00:14:18,160 --> 00:14:21,400 Speaker 9: I think a lot of times he speaks without thinking, 306 00:14:21,640 --> 00:14:25,040 Speaker 9: and I think that that's a detriment to himself. But 307 00:14:25,520 --> 00:14:30,920 Speaker 9: I do think that the media warps so much of 308 00:14:30,960 --> 00:14:34,440 Speaker 9: what is truly going on, and I feel like that's 309 00:14:34,440 --> 00:14:39,400 Speaker 9: a huge problem this in many areas, like with many 310 00:14:39,400 --> 00:14:42,640 Speaker 9: of these candidates. I mean, it's hard to know the 311 00:14:42,640 --> 00:14:45,560 Speaker 9: true person underneath the met because it really it depends. 312 00:14:45,600 --> 00:14:47,200 Speaker 9: If you listen to CNN, it tells you one thing, 313 00:14:47,240 --> 00:14:49,120 Speaker 9: if you listen to Fox News, it tells you a 314 00:14:49,120 --> 00:14:52,800 Speaker 9: different thing. How can we make America great again? Because 315 00:14:52,880 --> 00:14:55,960 Speaker 9: it's not great right now. It's not great. And I've 316 00:14:55,960 --> 00:14:58,280 Speaker 9: got six kids and I'm watching them have to grow 317 00:14:58,360 --> 00:15:00,840 Speaker 9: up in this and that worries me about what they're 318 00:15:00,880 --> 00:15:04,040 Speaker 9: going to have to live with if somebody doesn't start 319 00:15:04,040 --> 00:15:05,080 Speaker 9: shaking the boots somewhere. 320 00:15:05,160 --> 00:15:07,480 Speaker 11: He's a businessman and he has a lot of hot 321 00:15:07,520 --> 00:15:09,600 Speaker 11: back on him, and that's why he says some of 322 00:15:09,640 --> 00:15:11,880 Speaker 11: the things that he does because he's just he's a businessman, 323 00:15:11,920 --> 00:15:14,280 Speaker 11: but he does right by the people. He could walk 324 00:15:14,280 --> 00:15:16,440 Speaker 11: away anytime he wants, with all his money, but he's 325 00:15:16,440 --> 00:15:18,640 Speaker 11: still fighting to come back and say, I have to 326 00:15:18,680 --> 00:15:20,600 Speaker 11: finish the job. I have to make as great again. 327 00:15:20,800 --> 00:15:23,400 Speaker 11: When he put the tarifts on China, was bringing jobs 328 00:15:23,440 --> 00:15:26,520 Speaker 11: back and doing the border. So that's why I like 329 00:15:26,600 --> 00:15:28,280 Speaker 11: the guy. And yes, he doesn't say a lot of 330 00:15:28,280 --> 00:15:31,400 Speaker 11: presidential things that he should be saying, but he also 331 00:15:31,400 --> 00:15:33,840 Speaker 11: says a lot of things that people are thinking, but 332 00:15:33,880 --> 00:15:36,360 Speaker 11: they won't come right out and say it. So let's 333 00:15:36,360 --> 00:15:37,120 Speaker 11: call it what it is. 334 00:15:37,280 --> 00:15:39,000 Speaker 4: I've seen you shaking a head a couple of times. 335 00:15:39,080 --> 00:15:42,400 Speaker 5: I'm baffled by these arguments. I mean, he got bad advice. 336 00:15:42,520 --> 00:15:44,440 Speaker 5: You want a president who got bad advice? That's really 337 00:15:44,480 --> 00:15:46,680 Speaker 5: a cop out. But I think mail and ballots are 338 00:15:46,720 --> 00:15:50,640 Speaker 5: here to stay, So they're here. So the Beadia trumping 339 00:15:50,720 --> 00:15:53,640 Speaker 5: up COVID and bringing COVID into the story, you think 340 00:15:53,720 --> 00:15:56,320 Speaker 5: that helps President Biden to have a COVID outbreak on 341 00:15:56,360 --> 00:15:58,720 Speaker 5: his watch. That definitely does not help him. So I 342 00:15:58,720 --> 00:16:03,080 Speaker 5: think could Trump beat him. Maybe we all agree that 343 00:16:03,120 --> 00:16:06,760 Speaker 5: Biden is totally incompetent, I think, and Trump already lost 344 00:16:06,760 --> 00:16:09,280 Speaker 5: to him. Now maybe it was a rigged election, but 345 00:16:09,360 --> 00:16:13,160 Speaker 5: it shouldn't even been close. Right, He's Biden is totally incompetent. 346 00:16:13,200 --> 00:16:16,360 Speaker 5: He shouldn't even win five states. So why don't we 347 00:16:16,600 --> 00:16:18,760 Speaker 5: choose a candidate it doesn't come with all the baggage 348 00:16:19,160 --> 00:16:21,640 Speaker 5: and all the issues and all the media hating him 349 00:16:21,680 --> 00:16:23,720 Speaker 5: and all that. Let's get a fresh voice in there 350 00:16:23,760 --> 00:16:27,000 Speaker 5: that can really whoever is the Republican nominee, should wipe 351 00:16:27,040 --> 00:16:29,040 Speaker 5: the floor with. But it not be in a situation 352 00:16:29,120 --> 00:16:32,840 Speaker 5: where a mail in ballad or media thing to swing. 353 00:16:32,920 --> 00:16:34,760 Speaker 5: It shouldn't even be that close, you know, don't leave 354 00:16:34,760 --> 00:16:35,360 Speaker 5: it to the rest. 355 00:16:35,440 --> 00:16:41,040 Speaker 1: Right, So obviously these things aren't scientific. 356 00:16:41,120 --> 00:16:43,600 Speaker 3: They're just a snapchot. But that being said, I feel like. 357 00:16:43,560 --> 00:16:46,920 Speaker 1: You got a lot of the like, Yeah, that was 358 00:16:47,000 --> 00:16:49,560 Speaker 1: a lot of what you see in some of the 359 00:16:49,600 --> 00:16:52,120 Speaker 1: interpersonal dynamics and some of the things they like about 360 00:16:52,200 --> 00:16:54,680 Speaker 1: dropping some of the question marks. They have also love 361 00:16:54,720 --> 00:16:57,000 Speaker 1: the lady who's the Doug Burghram supporter who doesn't remember 362 00:16:57,040 --> 00:16:59,480 Speaker 1: his name or what state he's throwing. And I genuinely 363 00:16:59,520 --> 00:17:01,480 Speaker 1: mean that. I appreciate she's like, I researched it and 364 00:17:01,560 --> 00:17:02,920 Speaker 1: I linked his policy positions. 365 00:17:03,280 --> 00:17:04,959 Speaker 3: But what did you make of that? 366 00:17:05,000 --> 00:17:07,840 Speaker 1: Because it does seem like, even though there was some 367 00:17:08,080 --> 00:17:10,919 Speaker 1: favorable sentiment towards the Santis and even towards some of 368 00:17:10,920 --> 00:17:14,439 Speaker 1: the other candidates, Trump is really still the central defining 369 00:17:14,520 --> 00:17:15,880 Speaker 1: issue of this whole thing. 370 00:17:16,280 --> 00:17:19,040 Speaker 4: He is and this audience matches really what the New 371 00:17:19,040 --> 00:17:21,520 Speaker 4: Hampshire poles look like around half backing Trump and the 372 00:17:21,520 --> 00:17:23,080 Speaker 4: other sort of diffused across other candidates. 373 00:17:23,119 --> 00:17:25,000 Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right, I fell there are three key. 374 00:17:24,800 --> 00:17:26,879 Speaker 4: Groups in this focus group that are in that New 375 00:17:26,880 --> 00:17:29,240 Speaker 4: Hampshire Electra as a whole. One of the sort of 376 00:17:29,240 --> 00:17:31,520 Speaker 4: Trump true believers. And you saw that with those three 377 00:17:31,520 --> 00:17:33,240 Speaker 4: people at the back there, you know they were he 378 00:17:33,640 --> 00:17:36,359 Speaker 4: had made a values connect with them. He was their guy. 379 00:17:36,480 --> 00:17:38,639 Speaker 4: He smashed it as the president in his view, in 380 00:17:38,680 --> 00:17:41,200 Speaker 4: their view, and they really wanted to see him come back. 381 00:17:41,800 --> 00:17:44,600 Speaker 4: Then we had the sort of Trump agnostics, those people 382 00:17:44,640 --> 00:17:46,879 Speaker 4: in the middle ground. You saw the lady in the 383 00:17:46,880 --> 00:17:48,639 Speaker 4: front row there talking about she liked him, she had 384 00:17:48,640 --> 00:17:52,040 Speaker 4: a few concerns about COVID. They doubt Trump's effectiveness. But 385 00:17:52,119 --> 00:17:54,000 Speaker 4: you can still see them backing hit them, you can 386 00:17:54,040 --> 00:17:56,800 Speaker 4: still see them backing him come a general election. Yeah, 387 00:17:56,840 --> 00:17:58,800 Speaker 4: and then you have that third group really sort of 388 00:17:59,160 --> 00:18:01,879 Speaker 4: exemplified by James on the front row there, who we 389 00:18:02,000 --> 00:18:05,120 Speaker 4: just saw these people who are opposed to Trump. They 390 00:18:05,119 --> 00:18:07,760 Speaker 4: think that he's not only lost his effectiveness, he's lost 391 00:18:07,800 --> 00:18:10,040 Speaker 4: some of this sort of more right to govern. And 392 00:18:10,720 --> 00:18:13,840 Speaker 4: those three groups are absolutely key to sort of who 393 00:18:13,840 --> 00:18:16,000 Speaker 4: can win because Trump and he needs to carry the 394 00:18:16,040 --> 00:18:17,320 Speaker 4: first two of those groups, and he's got. 395 00:18:17,240 --> 00:18:17,720 Speaker 2: It there you go. 396 00:18:17,880 --> 00:18:20,119 Speaker 1: He doesn't even have to carry all of the first 397 00:18:20,119 --> 00:18:23,400 Speaker 1: two of those groups. And so part of what I'd 398 00:18:23,400 --> 00:18:27,160 Speaker 1: love to get more from you on to me, well, yes, 399 00:18:27,200 --> 00:18:29,880 Speaker 1: Trump is the dominant central figure. It did show if 400 00:18:29,880 --> 00:18:32,919 Speaker 1: you did have one candidate that could consolidate the other 401 00:18:33,040 --> 00:18:35,440 Speaker 1: two groups, they maybe would have a path, They maybe 402 00:18:35,480 --> 00:18:37,879 Speaker 1: would have a shot. And there were some questions raised 403 00:18:37,880 --> 00:18:40,080 Speaker 1: there that were, you know, part of the Desantas pitch. 404 00:18:40,119 --> 00:18:41,680 Speaker 1: We're going to talk more about COVID in a minute, 405 00:18:41,680 --> 00:18:43,879 Speaker 1: but I was actually surprised how many people at this 406 00:18:43,960 --> 00:18:46,680 Speaker 1: late date are bringing up COVID and as a core 407 00:18:46,720 --> 00:18:48,400 Speaker 1: critique of Trump. Of like, well, I liked a lot 408 00:18:48,400 --> 00:18:50,080 Speaker 1: of what he did, but what he did in the pandemic, 409 00:18:50,680 --> 00:18:52,760 Speaker 1: I have some questions about that. I'm not sure about that. 410 00:18:52,760 --> 00:18:55,359 Speaker 1: That's something that DeSantis has tried to run on. What 411 00:18:55,440 --> 00:18:58,600 Speaker 1: did they think of some of the other the other candidates. 412 00:18:58,280 --> 00:19:00,880 Speaker 4: Well, Rond de Santis came out of this pretty well. Okay, 413 00:19:00,880 --> 00:19:02,480 Speaker 4: they're not saying they'd vote for him, but when we 414 00:19:02,520 --> 00:19:04,960 Speaker 4: asked them about what their views on him, they were 415 00:19:05,040 --> 00:19:08,439 Speaker 4: uniformly favorable. One of the Trump true believers at the 416 00:19:08,440 --> 00:19:11,040 Speaker 4: back there said why couldn't he run in four years time? 417 00:19:11,560 --> 00:19:15,159 Speaker 4: And others were positive. These Trump attack lines on DeSantis 418 00:19:15,200 --> 00:19:18,119 Speaker 4: haven't landed with Trump supporters. And also you see that 419 00:19:18,160 --> 00:19:19,920 Speaker 4: with Tim Scott as well. There are positive things said 420 00:19:19,920 --> 00:19:22,200 Speaker 4: about him. Nicki Haley was a little bit more divisive, 421 00:19:22,280 --> 00:19:24,679 Speaker 4: Mike Pence a bit more divisive, coming up against that, 422 00:19:24,760 --> 00:19:27,119 Speaker 4: coming up against those pro Trump people, you know, rubbing 423 00:19:27,160 --> 00:19:29,439 Speaker 4: up against them badly a little bit. But you know, 424 00:19:29,520 --> 00:19:32,760 Speaker 4: the Santists, the Tim Scott's, they are liked. The problem 425 00:19:32,920 --> 00:19:35,080 Speaker 4: is is, as you say, there's no one name for 426 00:19:35,119 --> 00:19:37,399 Speaker 4: them to rally around, and as long as that field 427 00:19:37,400 --> 00:19:40,280 Speaker 4: stays diffused, It's exactly what happened in twenty sixteen. Trump 428 00:19:40,320 --> 00:19:42,920 Speaker 4: won in New Hampshire in twenty sixteen because he had 429 00:19:42,920 --> 00:19:45,520 Speaker 4: a split field up against him, and we're headed towards 430 00:19:45,560 --> 00:19:46,080 Speaker 4: the same thing. 431 00:19:46,200 --> 00:19:48,160 Speaker 3: Well, the important is Doug Burgham's race to lose. 432 00:19:49,280 --> 00:19:51,600 Speaker 2: The important thing to also see is that they disagree 433 00:19:51,640 --> 00:19:54,159 Speaker 2: on where they depart from Trump. So like James, the 434 00:19:54,320 --> 00:19:56,320 Speaker 2: IT guy, he's like, well, I think he was divisive. 435 00:19:56,359 --> 00:19:58,280 Speaker 2: I think he's got bad advice. But then the other 436 00:19:58,320 --> 00:20:00,160 Speaker 2: people are like, well, actually I don't like the act 437 00:20:00,200 --> 00:20:02,040 Speaker 2: they did, Operation Warp Speed. You know, it's like they 438 00:20:02,080 --> 00:20:04,840 Speaker 2: have very different views about how exactly that's going to go, 439 00:20:04,840 --> 00:20:07,080 Speaker 2: which is why I don't think one person could unite. 440 00:20:07,119 --> 00:20:09,840 Speaker 2: And let's turn then to COVID, because COVID actually leaped 441 00:20:09,840 --> 00:20:12,160 Speaker 2: out to us. It became really interesting the mainstream media, 442 00:20:12,200 --> 00:20:14,680 Speaker 2: who we shared our focus group with, they actually picked 443 00:20:14,720 --> 00:20:17,560 Speaker 2: on on this immediately. Was a lot of the fears 444 00:20:17,640 --> 00:20:23,159 Speaker 2: around return of COVID restrictions and of impact on the election, 445 00:20:23,320 --> 00:20:25,040 Speaker 2: mail and balloting and all that. Let's take a listen 446 00:20:25,080 --> 00:20:26,560 Speaker 2: to that and we're going to talk about it afterwards. 447 00:20:29,680 --> 00:20:32,520 Speaker 4: Like candidates have said it, I've said, can can Donald 448 00:20:32,520 --> 00:20:33,679 Speaker 4: Trump beat Jay Biden? 449 00:20:33,800 --> 00:20:36,280 Speaker 10: Problem is the fair election? So here you go again, 450 00:20:36,359 --> 00:20:39,320 Speaker 10: we're starting the cranking up with the COVID supposedly with 451 00:20:39,359 --> 00:20:41,439 Speaker 10: the masking, and you know it's going to it's the 452 00:20:41,440 --> 00:20:43,880 Speaker 10: same play that it did four years ago. They're going 453 00:20:43,920 --> 00:20:46,800 Speaker 10: to play the mail in ballots and the chieting's going 454 00:20:46,880 --> 00:20:49,200 Speaker 10: to take place, and you know it's just it's gonna 455 00:20:49,200 --> 00:20:50,240 Speaker 10: be the same scenario again. 456 00:20:50,520 --> 00:20:52,080 Speaker 9: I work in the schools and a couple of the 457 00:20:52,119 --> 00:20:56,040 Speaker 9: teachers were like, you know, already Gove's coming in the masks. 458 00:20:56,080 --> 00:20:58,000 Speaker 9: Some of the schools are already going online, some of 459 00:20:58,000 --> 00:20:59,640 Speaker 9: the things are getting some of the colleges are getting 460 00:20:59,640 --> 00:21:02,639 Speaker 9: shut down, like it's it's like a deja vu. And 461 00:21:02,680 --> 00:21:04,480 Speaker 9: then you think about it, Okay, so then the mail 462 00:21:04,480 --> 00:21:07,320 Speaker 9: in ballot's got to come, Like do I think he 463 00:21:07,359 --> 00:21:07,880 Speaker 9: can beat them? 464 00:21:07,880 --> 00:21:08,960 Speaker 3: Absolutely? If it's fair. 465 00:21:09,359 --> 00:21:11,640 Speaker 4: So you think that that that COVID stuff, you think 466 00:21:11,760 --> 00:21:15,080 Speaker 4: is linked to the elections and who's who's doing that, 467 00:21:15,080 --> 00:21:15,960 Speaker 4: Who's orchestrating that? 468 00:21:17,920 --> 00:21:21,320 Speaker 10: The Democratic Party? It was It was an articles written 469 00:21:21,359 --> 00:21:23,560 Speaker 10: by I figure what the news magazine was, but as 470 00:21:23,560 --> 00:21:25,960 Speaker 10: a as a little news magazine, and they came out 471 00:21:25,960 --> 00:21:28,800 Speaker 10: and basically said it was planned to have the election 472 00:21:29,080 --> 00:21:32,119 Speaker 10: go the way it was and a lot of Republicans 473 00:21:32,200 --> 00:21:34,320 Speaker 10: went along with that plan because they wanted to keep 474 00:21:34,320 --> 00:21:38,520 Speaker 10: the swamp. They want to keep the dirty politics. And 475 00:21:38,560 --> 00:21:41,359 Speaker 10: some of the Republicans are involved with that, and it 476 00:21:41,440 --> 00:21:43,520 Speaker 10: was a planned event and they use COVID as a 477 00:21:44,080 --> 00:21:45,240 Speaker 10: way to push it in. 478 00:21:45,400 --> 00:21:48,480 Speaker 8: With the pandemic. We see it coming again, and there's 479 00:21:48,520 --> 00:21:51,800 Speaker 8: a lot of writing on the wall. I think there's 480 00:21:51,840 --> 00:21:54,600 Speaker 8: a lot of money exchange. There's big farmers behind it all. 481 00:21:55,280 --> 00:21:58,119 Speaker 8: As far as can Trump beat Biden, I think I 482 00:21:58,160 --> 00:22:01,359 Speaker 8: could probably beat Biden at this point. The guy's stumbling around, 483 00:22:01,680 --> 00:22:03,960 Speaker 8: forgets where he is, can't remember his words, doesn't know what 484 00:22:03,960 --> 00:22:07,520 Speaker 8: he's talking about, And so I wonder, like, really, who's 485 00:22:07,560 --> 00:22:09,639 Speaker 8: who's running. We put the name Biden on it, but 486 00:22:09,680 --> 00:22:14,640 Speaker 8: who's really hold those puppet strings and can jump win 487 00:22:14,880 --> 00:22:15,359 Speaker 8: over those? 488 00:22:15,480 --> 00:22:17,120 Speaker 4: Put your hands up if you think the twenty twenty 489 00:22:17,119 --> 00:22:22,280 Speaker 4: election was rigged. I'm repeating what you guys have some 490 00:22:22,320 --> 00:22:25,280 Speaker 4: of you guys have said back to me. Here this 491 00:22:25,440 --> 00:22:28,560 Speaker 4: idea that COVID is coming back up again. Put your 492 00:22:28,560 --> 00:22:31,600 Speaker 4: hands up if you think that's a deliberate plan to 493 00:22:31,960 --> 00:22:34,720 Speaker 4: try and basically stitch the next election up for the Democrats. 494 00:22:34,840 --> 00:22:37,680 Speaker 11: It's all about fear and that's what it is. It's 495 00:22:37,720 --> 00:22:40,879 Speaker 11: all above fear. Scare everybody, stay indoors, wear your masked. 496 00:22:40,920 --> 00:22:42,520 Speaker 11: COVID is coming back. I'm here to help. 497 00:22:42,560 --> 00:22:43,920 Speaker 2: It's fear, it's. 498 00:22:43,720 --> 00:22:45,240 Speaker 8: Control to divide people. 499 00:22:45,640 --> 00:22:46,840 Speaker 4: Well, if you think that's the case, you know, I 500 00:22:46,920 --> 00:22:49,159 Speaker 4: ask the question again. You know, for at least four 501 00:22:49,200 --> 00:22:51,160 Speaker 4: of you nodding there. You know, I don't know about 502 00:22:51,160 --> 00:22:53,120 Speaker 4: the exact semantics, but you're repeating, aback what you said 503 00:22:53,119 --> 00:22:54,800 Speaker 4: to me. You put your hands up if you do 504 00:22:54,920 --> 00:22:58,080 Speaker 4: think that there's at least some connection between COVID coming 505 00:22:58,119 --> 00:23:01,119 Speaker 4: back and the next election being rigged for the Democrats. 506 00:23:05,400 --> 00:23:08,080 Speaker 2: So clearly it's not only about return of COVID restrictions. 507 00:23:08,080 --> 00:23:11,199 Speaker 2: I've seen this too in terms of people, you know, 508 00:23:11,280 --> 00:23:13,400 Speaker 2: like talking about stories of this one college bringing back 509 00:23:13,400 --> 00:23:15,720 Speaker 2: mass mandates, so like, oh, that's going to justify you 510 00:23:15,760 --> 00:23:17,879 Speaker 2: know this, I know Alex Jones and others who have 511 00:23:17,880 --> 00:23:19,680 Speaker 2: been talking about it. So clearly that is going through, 512 00:23:19,760 --> 00:23:21,520 Speaker 2: you know, to a lot of the voters. But then 513 00:23:21,560 --> 00:23:24,719 Speaker 2: you also saw the divide in terms of somebody like James, 514 00:23:24,960 --> 00:23:26,760 Speaker 2: the person in our focus group who didn't raise his 515 00:23:26,800 --> 00:23:28,480 Speaker 2: hand whenever he said the election was stolen. He was 516 00:23:28,520 --> 00:23:30,680 Speaker 2: the only one who departed in the previous clip. He's like, 517 00:23:30,680 --> 00:23:33,160 Speaker 2: why would that be good for President Biden? But I mean, 518 00:23:33,200 --> 00:23:35,280 Speaker 2: the divide there seemed one of the starter ones and 519 00:23:35,280 --> 00:23:36,600 Speaker 2: one of the things that really jumped out that we 520 00:23:36,600 --> 00:23:37,639 Speaker 2: didn't expect to see. 521 00:23:37,760 --> 00:23:40,600 Speaker 4: Absolutely, and it's correlating with some sort of pro Trump 522 00:23:40,800 --> 00:23:43,439 Speaker 4: on the one hand, concerns about twenty twenty election and 523 00:23:43,480 --> 00:23:45,640 Speaker 4: these you know, couple of people in the group who 524 00:23:45,640 --> 00:23:48,159 Speaker 4: were resistant to those kind of things, but that was 525 00:23:48,200 --> 00:23:51,080 Speaker 4: the majority of you in that group that COVID is 526 00:23:51,119 --> 00:23:54,520 Speaker 4: linked to the next election basically going the same way 527 00:23:54,560 --> 00:23:56,560 Speaker 4: in their eyes as the previous one, which they view 528 00:23:56,600 --> 00:24:00,760 Speaker 4: as being rigged for Joe Biden. Now this says to 529 00:24:00,800 --> 00:24:03,520 Speaker 4: me that, you know, if we fast forward to an 530 00:24:03,520 --> 00:24:06,639 Speaker 4: election where Trump and Biden of the candidates, which obviously 531 00:24:06,720 --> 00:24:08,720 Speaker 4: is not guaranteed, but let's assume that is the case, 532 00:24:09,280 --> 00:24:11,800 Speaker 4: and we get a bides and winning that election, that 533 00:24:11,960 --> 00:24:14,280 Speaker 4: is going to cause a lot of rancor and a big, 534 00:24:14,920 --> 00:24:17,480 Speaker 4: big pool of distrust amongst these voters. 535 00:24:17,760 --> 00:24:19,080 Speaker 3: They're already been set up for it. 536 00:24:19,200 --> 00:24:21,119 Speaker 1: I mean, and I've seen these I've just noticed this 537 00:24:21,200 --> 00:24:22,200 Speaker 1: in the past few weeks. 538 00:24:22,240 --> 00:24:23,160 Speaker 3: There are a couple of little stories. 539 00:24:23,160 --> 00:24:26,000 Speaker 1: There's like an elementary school near here that did masks 540 00:24:26,040 --> 00:24:28,680 Speaker 1: for ten days or something. And these stories have been 541 00:24:28,760 --> 00:24:32,000 Speaker 1: blowing up huge in right wing media, and you know, 542 00:24:32,080 --> 00:24:36,080 Speaker 1: it's partly what those media outlets are choosing to coverage cover, 543 00:24:36,200 --> 00:24:39,000 Speaker 1: and it's also partly what these voters are primed to 544 00:24:39,080 --> 00:24:42,160 Speaker 1: really believe. And so they you know, they when they 545 00:24:42,200 --> 00:24:45,080 Speaker 1: see that story, it fits into their mental pattern of, oh, 546 00:24:45,119 --> 00:24:46,760 Speaker 1: this is what happened last time, is what's going to 547 00:24:46,800 --> 00:24:49,479 Speaker 1: happen again? You know, I thought, not only in terms 548 00:24:49,520 --> 00:24:52,359 Speaker 1: of jeez, we saw what happened last time, A majority 549 00:24:52,400 --> 00:24:54,840 Speaker 1: of Republicans thought the election was RAI its catastrophe on 550 00:24:54,920 --> 00:24:56,880 Speaker 1: January sixth, and it was, you know, a genuine sort 551 00:24:56,880 --> 00:25:00,320 Speaker 1: of threat to the core of democracy here. But if 552 00:25:00,359 --> 00:25:03,880 Speaker 1: we have that happen again, obviously that's a scary scenario. 553 00:25:04,080 --> 00:25:06,600 Speaker 1: The other thing that I thought about, though, is doesn't 554 00:25:06,600 --> 00:25:09,520 Speaker 1: this end up being sort of self defeating for Trump? 555 00:25:09,560 --> 00:25:12,240 Speaker 1: If your voters think it's going to be rigged anyway, 556 00:25:12,720 --> 00:25:13,520 Speaker 1: does it make it. 557 00:25:13,440 --> 00:25:15,280 Speaker 3: Harder to motivate them to the polls? 558 00:25:15,560 --> 00:25:17,280 Speaker 1: And we saw a little bit of this in the 559 00:25:17,359 --> 00:25:20,080 Speaker 1: Georgia Senate races that happened, you know, came right on 560 00:25:20,119 --> 00:25:23,720 Speaker 1: the heels of twenty twenty, and you had some influencers 561 00:25:23,720 --> 00:25:25,880 Speaker 1: and I think the President's son, Don Junior going down 562 00:25:25,880 --> 00:25:28,400 Speaker 1: to Georgia and basically saying like it was rigged. 563 00:25:28,119 --> 00:25:28,760 Speaker 3: It was stolen. 564 00:25:29,200 --> 00:25:30,800 Speaker 1: And there was a lot of analysis at the time 565 00:25:30,840 --> 00:25:33,560 Speaker 1: that this really demotivated people, because what's the point of, 566 00:25:33,760 --> 00:25:35,480 Speaker 1: you know, upending your day and doing some of the 567 00:25:35,600 --> 00:25:37,320 Speaker 1: hurdles that it takes to show up at the polls 568 00:25:37,480 --> 00:25:39,600 Speaker 1: if you don't think your vote is going to count anyway. 569 00:25:39,800 --> 00:25:41,720 Speaker 1: So to me, it's sort of a double edged sword 570 00:25:41,760 --> 00:25:44,560 Speaker 1: for them that they already have this idea baked in 571 00:25:45,000 --> 00:25:47,159 Speaker 1: that the election is going to be rigged and their 572 00:25:47,240 --> 00:25:48,199 Speaker 1: votes are going to be stolen. 573 00:25:48,640 --> 00:25:50,960 Speaker 4: Absolutely, and particularly when you think the Republicans do skew 574 00:25:51,000 --> 00:25:53,320 Speaker 4: older and older people tend to use mail in ballots 575 00:25:53,359 --> 00:25:55,879 Speaker 4: more so that is obviously a factor as well. What 576 00:25:55,880 --> 00:25:58,640 Speaker 4: I would say is that local Republican party state parties 577 00:25:59,040 --> 00:26:01,840 Speaker 4: have been changing their message on mail in ballots over 578 00:26:01,840 --> 00:26:04,080 Speaker 4: the last year since the midterms, at least yeah, saying 579 00:26:04,080 --> 00:26:05,720 Speaker 4: you know, we actually sign up, we need to do this, 580 00:26:05,800 --> 00:26:07,480 Speaker 4: We need to play the Democrats at their own game. 581 00:26:07,640 --> 00:26:09,120 Speaker 2: We expect that to have an impact. 582 00:26:09,320 --> 00:26:11,000 Speaker 4: But what these focus groups tell us is they tell 583 00:26:11,080 --> 00:26:13,040 Speaker 4: us not just what people are thinking in terms of their. 584 00:26:13,000 --> 00:26:14,840 Speaker 2: Vote, but whether they might vote. 585 00:26:15,000 --> 00:26:17,480 Speaker 4: And this turnout question is going to be absolutely crucial 586 00:26:17,520 --> 00:26:19,840 Speaker 4: that's twenty twenty four election, because which song they can 587 00:26:19,840 --> 00:26:22,080 Speaker 4: get its people out is critical to the result. And 588 00:26:22,080 --> 00:26:24,439 Speaker 4: we're going to see that with the election integrity argument. 589 00:26:24,560 --> 00:26:26,000 Speaker 4: But we're also going to see it on abortion and 590 00:26:26,000 --> 00:26:31,080 Speaker 4: reproductive rights. Democrats will be hoping to put abortion plev 591 00:26:31,200 --> 00:26:34,040 Speaker 4: sites on the ballot in various states to try and 592 00:26:34,040 --> 00:26:36,680 Speaker 4: boost their turnout overall. So these focus groups also give 593 00:26:36,720 --> 00:26:39,200 Speaker 4: us insight into that what's driving them. Are they actually 594 00:26:39,240 --> 00:26:41,199 Speaker 4: going to turn out, what's their enthusiasm like? 595 00:26:41,720 --> 00:26:45,840 Speaker 1: Yeah, and to turn out more of what these individuals 596 00:26:45,840 --> 00:26:48,760 Speaker 1: thought about some of the other candidates I mentioned before. 597 00:26:49,240 --> 00:26:52,439 Speaker 1: I was surprised how much the pandemic came up in 598 00:26:52,480 --> 00:26:54,879 Speaker 1: the context both of you know, the election being rigged 599 00:26:54,920 --> 00:26:57,320 Speaker 1: again and also in the context of some of the 600 00:26:57,359 --> 00:27:01,159 Speaker 1: critique of Trump. And you know, this is one of 601 00:27:01,200 --> 00:27:03,400 Speaker 1: the things that Ron Desantas had been leaning into. 602 00:27:03,440 --> 00:27:05,200 Speaker 3: I actually haven't been hearing him making. 603 00:27:05,000 --> 00:27:07,880 Speaker 1: This case as much, but this raises for me perhaps 604 00:27:08,480 --> 00:27:11,480 Speaker 1: perhaps he was on to something with that original with 605 00:27:11,560 --> 00:27:14,280 Speaker 1: that original critique and contrast that he was making with 606 00:27:14,320 --> 00:27:20,080 Speaker 1: Donald Trump. You did something really interesting, which was you, 607 00:27:20,080 --> 00:27:22,040 Speaker 1: you know, asked them all to write down what they 608 00:27:22,040 --> 00:27:24,200 Speaker 1: thought about each of the candidates. Let's take a listen 609 00:27:24,200 --> 00:27:25,760 Speaker 1: to some of what they had to say. 610 00:27:28,080 --> 00:27:29,520 Speaker 4: If you don't know who this person is, I think 611 00:27:29,520 --> 00:27:32,560 Speaker 4: you might have been living under a rock. Donald Trump 612 00:27:33,320 --> 00:27:35,760 Speaker 4: a word or phrase to somewhat how you feel. 613 00:27:36,480 --> 00:27:38,399 Speaker 5: I don't mean it rudely, but my word is loser. 614 00:27:38,800 --> 00:27:41,840 Speaker 6: I'm confused. He's not confused. I'm confused about how I feel. 615 00:27:42,359 --> 00:27:45,760 Speaker 8: Competent, competent, but I don't necessarily trust him. 616 00:27:45,800 --> 00:27:50,800 Speaker 11: Competent and wavering, making America great again, unhinged, the. 617 00:27:50,880 --> 00:27:55,360 Speaker 5: Vag Ramaswami refreshing ideas, but not serious. 618 00:27:55,240 --> 00:27:57,680 Speaker 11: Optimistic, suspiciously fake. 619 00:27:58,000 --> 00:28:00,639 Speaker 7: I don't know enough the Trump. 620 00:28:00,800 --> 00:28:02,960 Speaker 11: He's well spoken, but I don't trust them. He took 621 00:28:03,000 --> 00:28:07,240 Speaker 11: money from sorrows and denied it, and so I don't 622 00:28:07,240 --> 00:28:07,760 Speaker 11: trust them. 623 00:28:07,920 --> 00:28:10,560 Speaker 12: He looks like a and he acts like a clear politician, 624 00:28:10,640 --> 00:28:13,280 Speaker 12: but he has no shot at being a president. 625 00:28:13,520 --> 00:28:17,720 Speaker 5: Nicky Hayley, strong and foreign policy consensus builder. 626 00:28:18,240 --> 00:28:20,639 Speaker 7: I'm afraid of completely uninformed. I don't know who she is. 627 00:28:21,000 --> 00:28:21,639 Speaker 7: Kind of naive. 628 00:28:22,000 --> 00:28:23,680 Speaker 3: I have to hear more about her, but. 629 00:28:27,520 --> 00:28:30,840 Speaker 10: She's very liberal, liberal leaning on social issues. 630 00:28:31,320 --> 00:28:31,639 Speaker 11: Rhino. 631 00:28:32,359 --> 00:28:35,800 Speaker 12: She seems confident, but I feel like she's not strong 632 00:28:35,960 --> 00:28:37,600 Speaker 12: enough to be our president. 633 00:28:37,840 --> 00:28:42,000 Speaker 5: Mike Pattins experienced, has a good temperament for the job. 634 00:28:42,480 --> 00:28:43,200 Speaker 6: More of the same. 635 00:28:43,640 --> 00:28:47,920 Speaker 7: Not necessarily a bad person, but not sorry anything to offer. 636 00:28:48,120 --> 00:28:52,680 Speaker 10: Sellout, confident, kind of likes to try to please everybody, 637 00:28:53,640 --> 00:28:55,320 Speaker 10: and that can be an issue sometimes. 638 00:28:55,560 --> 00:28:59,240 Speaker 12: Rhino ultra ultra conservative. 639 00:28:59,640 --> 00:29:04,000 Speaker 4: Next on guys, Tim Scott World or phrase Tim Scott. 640 00:29:04,120 --> 00:29:05,680 Speaker 5: I like him, but when I see him speak, it 641 00:29:05,800 --> 00:29:08,920 Speaker 5: just seems unremarkable, like doesn't doesn't set himself apart. 642 00:29:09,080 --> 00:29:09,400 Speaker 8: Strikes. 643 00:29:09,440 --> 00:29:10,160 Speaker 6: He's honorable. 644 00:29:10,640 --> 00:29:12,680 Speaker 7: I want to say, too new, but I don't. That's 645 00:29:12,720 --> 00:29:14,000 Speaker 7: not quite what I want to say, but I can't 646 00:29:14,000 --> 00:29:15,240 Speaker 7: think of any other words. 647 00:29:15,440 --> 00:29:17,560 Speaker 10: He's more experience, he's well spoken. 648 00:29:17,560 --> 00:29:19,480 Speaker 11: You make a great VP for Trump. 649 00:29:19,600 --> 00:29:22,160 Speaker 12: I think he's too strict on reproductive rights. 650 00:29:22,280 --> 00:29:25,200 Speaker 5: Chris Christy tells it like it is no. 651 00:29:25,200 --> 00:29:29,760 Speaker 7: Way, Yeah, Frank, I think he's a phony, outspoken, more 652 00:29:29,800 --> 00:29:31,120 Speaker 7: liberal Rhino. 653 00:29:31,240 --> 00:29:33,080 Speaker 11: If he didn't have Trump's name to mention, and he 654 00:29:33,120 --> 00:29:35,760 Speaker 11: won't go anywhere. Let's know, if he get Bridgegate. 655 00:29:35,640 --> 00:29:38,360 Speaker 12: Seems like he's too in dated with the Jersey shore. 656 00:29:40,320 --> 00:29:41,400 Speaker 2: Ron de Santis. 657 00:29:42,000 --> 00:29:45,479 Speaker 5: It's a strong record of getting things accomplished. 658 00:29:45,200 --> 00:29:47,360 Speaker 7: Experience, morally solid. 659 00:29:47,680 --> 00:29:49,040 Speaker 8: It's got a lot going for him. 660 00:29:49,240 --> 00:29:50,480 Speaker 3: My wood was experienced. 661 00:29:50,840 --> 00:29:52,080 Speaker 10: Can you wait for more years? 662 00:29:52,760 --> 00:29:55,600 Speaker 11: He's well spoken. I think he's hurt flowing a lot 663 00:29:55,640 --> 00:29:58,400 Speaker 11: of ways too, but he's well spoken. He's a takes 664 00:29:58,440 --> 00:29:59,000 Speaker 11: charge guy. 665 00:29:59,360 --> 00:30:04,320 Speaker 12: He certainly can talk very well. But he's done some 666 00:30:04,360 --> 00:30:08,080 Speaker 12: bad things for Florida that has directly heard, you know, 667 00:30:08,160 --> 00:30:10,920 Speaker 12: the elderly as well as some of the families down there. 668 00:30:14,560 --> 00:30:18,640 Speaker 3: There's so much to dig into there. Let's actually talk 669 00:30:19,120 --> 00:30:19,880 Speaker 3: first about. 670 00:30:19,680 --> 00:30:21,680 Speaker 1: Trump, who, of course, is you know, the elephant in 671 00:30:21,880 --> 00:30:24,320 Speaker 1: literally every room in this entire country. I feel the 672 00:30:24,400 --> 00:30:27,440 Speaker 1: critique of him was lacking in competence, but then there 673 00:30:27,480 --> 00:30:29,800 Speaker 1: was obviously a lot of strong sentiment in favor of 674 00:30:29,880 --> 00:30:30,440 Speaker 1: him as well. 675 00:30:30,880 --> 00:30:33,120 Speaker 4: There was and people who liked him to pick up 676 00:30:33,120 --> 00:30:34,600 Speaker 4: on the fact that, Okay, he might not always be 677 00:30:34,640 --> 00:30:37,680 Speaker 4: the most presidential. He might say things that perhaps he 678 00:30:37,680 --> 00:30:40,200 Speaker 4: shouldn't already, might come down and tweet things or whatever else. 679 00:30:40,920 --> 00:30:43,240 Speaker 4: But that was funny to them. They like that, you know, 680 00:30:43,280 --> 00:30:44,920 Speaker 4: this is not going to be the thing that ruins 681 00:30:44,960 --> 00:30:47,680 Speaker 4: Trump with them. Yeah, to be honest, I thought that 682 00:30:47,680 --> 00:30:49,240 Speaker 4: those three at the back were locked in for Trump. 683 00:30:49,280 --> 00:30:51,440 Speaker 4: They're going to vote for him at the primary. That's 684 00:30:51,560 --> 00:30:53,280 Speaker 4: very hard for the way there's people in the middle 685 00:30:53,280 --> 00:30:54,640 Speaker 4: of the key. 686 00:30:54,640 --> 00:30:57,440 Speaker 2: I think, yeah, absolutely agree. You know, it was interesting 687 00:30:57,480 --> 00:30:59,560 Speaker 2: to see them on Nikki Haley, that one woman she's like, 688 00:30:59,600 --> 00:31:03,800 Speaker 2: I don't even Yeah, yeah, it's worth saying. 689 00:31:03,800 --> 00:31:06,640 Speaker 4: I think that, you know, no candidate here has not 690 00:31:06,680 --> 00:31:08,680 Speaker 4: only had not had a breakthrough moment, but also no 691 00:31:08,720 --> 00:31:11,400 Speaker 4: one's had a New Hampshire moment. No one was sort 692 00:31:11,400 --> 00:31:13,920 Speaker 4: of saying, oh, they've turned up to a lot of events, 693 00:31:14,200 --> 00:31:16,080 Speaker 4: They've done a lot, and you know, that's bad news 694 00:31:16,120 --> 00:31:19,000 Speaker 4: for candidates like Niki Haley and Viveke Ramaswami, who spent 695 00:31:19,000 --> 00:31:20,200 Speaker 4: a lot of time in New Hampshire. 696 00:31:20,200 --> 00:31:21,400 Speaker 2: They weren't. They weren't noticing that. 697 00:31:21,680 --> 00:31:24,000 Speaker 1: I think actually the comments about the Vike were some 698 00:31:24,080 --> 00:31:25,320 Speaker 1: of the most critical. 699 00:31:25,400 --> 00:31:26,760 Speaker 3: You had some people who said. 700 00:31:26,560 --> 00:31:29,680 Speaker 1: You know, I like him, he seems he seems pretty good. 701 00:31:30,320 --> 00:31:31,920 Speaker 1: But then they would flow like maybe he could be 702 00:31:32,000 --> 00:31:35,600 Speaker 1: Trump's vice president. But some of the negative critiques of 703 00:31:35,680 --> 00:31:39,880 Speaker 1: him were also interesting. They found him, they found he 704 00:31:39,920 --> 00:31:43,360 Speaker 1: came across politiciany and also like they didn't trust him. 705 00:31:43,600 --> 00:31:47,360 Speaker 1: There was some skepticism of him that clearly existed in 706 00:31:47,400 --> 00:31:49,680 Speaker 1: this group, even among people that you know that you 707 00:31:49,760 --> 00:31:51,640 Speaker 1: might think had a favorable impression of him. 708 00:31:51,880 --> 00:31:53,960 Speaker 4: Yeah, and it seems that the vake Ramaswami. You know, 709 00:31:54,160 --> 00:31:56,880 Speaker 4: we did a poll after the first debate which lead 710 00:31:56,920 --> 00:32:00,160 Speaker 4: breaking points covered and vike Ramaswami came to top on 711 00:32:00,200 --> 00:32:02,880 Speaker 4: that pole. But he does not seem to have converted 712 00:32:02,880 --> 00:32:05,640 Speaker 4: that debate performance into sort of solid support. We've seen 713 00:32:05,640 --> 00:32:08,040 Speaker 4: that in the polls. He had a boost before the debate, 714 00:32:08,040 --> 00:32:09,719 Speaker 4: but he hasn't really had a boost in the numbers 715 00:32:10,000 --> 00:32:12,880 Speaker 4: since the debate. And it seems like actually his manner 716 00:32:12,920 --> 00:32:14,760 Speaker 4: and his style on that debate, even though people like 717 00:32:14,800 --> 00:32:17,200 Speaker 4: what he was saying, seems to have rubbed off a 718 00:32:17,200 --> 00:32:19,640 Speaker 4: bit negatively on some of these people. Now, big caveat. 719 00:32:19,680 --> 00:32:21,720 Speaker 4: It's only one focus group, you know, there's lots of 720 00:32:21,720 --> 00:32:24,640 Speaker 4: time to go. But certainly this is not someone who 721 00:32:25,120 --> 00:32:27,479 Speaker 4: you know, got a clean sweep and got a lot 722 00:32:27,480 --> 00:32:30,480 Speaker 4: of momentum from that debate. Perhaps somewhat predicting he might. 723 00:32:30,640 --> 00:32:34,640 Speaker 1: There were two people who got less negative comments than 724 00:32:34,680 --> 00:32:37,000 Speaker 1: what I was actually expecting, and that was Mike Pence 725 00:32:37,160 --> 00:32:40,200 Speaker 1: and Chris Christy. Chris Christy, even some of the people 726 00:32:40,240 --> 00:32:43,320 Speaker 1: who were like, you know, sort of Trump curious or 727 00:32:43,360 --> 00:32:46,239 Speaker 1: Trump supporters were described him as like he tells it 728 00:32:46,280 --> 00:32:46,719 Speaker 1: like it is. 729 00:32:46,760 --> 00:32:47,440 Speaker 3: You know, he's frank. 730 00:32:47,480 --> 00:32:49,080 Speaker 1: I mean, there was also he's a rhino, and there 731 00:32:49,120 --> 00:32:51,760 Speaker 1: was that sentiment there as well. But I actually expected 732 00:32:51,800 --> 00:32:53,920 Speaker 1: basically everyone in the group to be like, he's a 733 00:32:54,000 --> 00:32:55,480 Speaker 1: rhino and I don't like him, But there was this 734 00:32:55,560 --> 00:32:57,320 Speaker 1: sense of like, oh, he's brash, he tells it like 735 00:32:57,360 --> 00:32:58,960 Speaker 1: it is. There was more of that in the group 736 00:32:59,000 --> 00:33:01,920 Speaker 1: than I expected. The other one was, as I mentioned 737 00:33:01,920 --> 00:33:05,880 Speaker 1: Mike Pence, where because there's been obviously January sixth year 738 00:33:05,880 --> 00:33:07,840 Speaker 1: of people running around saying wanted to hang him. He 739 00:33:07,920 --> 00:33:10,920 Speaker 1: has now at this point become more outspoken about Trump 740 00:33:10,920 --> 00:33:13,239 Speaker 1: and about Trump's governance and you know, just gave this 741 00:33:13,240 --> 00:33:15,880 Speaker 1: big speech really contrasting his vision with Trump's vision, etc. 742 00:33:16,120 --> 00:33:16,360 Speaker 2: Etc. 743 00:33:17,040 --> 00:33:20,000 Speaker 1: I thought there would be more negative sentiment towards him, 744 00:33:20,160 --> 00:33:21,880 Speaker 1: and again there was some of that. You know, he 745 00:33:21,960 --> 00:33:25,320 Speaker 1: was described as a sellout. The one gentleman who's clearly 746 00:33:25,360 --> 00:33:27,239 Speaker 1: like very strong Trump supporter called a lot of these 747 00:33:27,240 --> 00:33:29,240 Speaker 1: folks rhinos, but Mike Pencil was one of the ones 748 00:33:29,240 --> 00:33:32,040 Speaker 1: who got the rhino label. But you also heard people saying, oh, 749 00:33:32,080 --> 00:33:34,600 Speaker 1: he's experienced, you know, they felt like. 750 00:33:34,520 --> 00:33:35,520 Speaker 3: He was a good person. 751 00:33:35,720 --> 00:33:37,720 Speaker 1: They just disagreed with some of the values in some 752 00:33:37,760 --> 00:33:39,200 Speaker 1: of the direction that he wanted to go in. So 753 00:33:39,240 --> 00:33:41,360 Speaker 1: I was I was actually surprised it wasn't more sort 754 00:33:41,400 --> 00:33:42,960 Speaker 1: of vicious and negative on Mike Pence. 755 00:33:43,120 --> 00:33:45,520 Speaker 4: This is the perennial burden of doing these focus greens 756 00:33:45,840 --> 00:33:50,320 Speaker 4: is saying, never, never overestimate how cludin people are. Yeah, 757 00:33:50,320 --> 00:33:52,440 Speaker 4: because you know, people are not following the contours of 758 00:33:52,480 --> 00:33:53,920 Speaker 4: this like we do. You know, they're not following the 759 00:33:54,000 --> 00:33:55,760 Speaker 4: ups and downs of the race. And to some people, 760 00:33:55,760 --> 00:33:57,800 Speaker 4: they see Mike pens of that debate and they think, oh, 761 00:33:57,800 --> 00:34:00,000 Speaker 4: he came across quite strong. He came across quite principle, 762 00:34:00,400 --> 00:34:02,840 Speaker 4: and they quite like that. It's come off a little 763 00:34:02,840 --> 00:34:04,360 Speaker 4: bit in the numbers now, but in some of the 764 00:34:04,400 --> 00:34:07,160 Speaker 4: early primary polls of this of this cycle, we saw 765 00:34:07,280 --> 00:34:10,279 Speaker 4: quite a large chunk of Trump voters were saying that 766 00:34:10,320 --> 00:34:11,840 Speaker 4: Mike Pence was their second choice. 767 00:34:11,960 --> 00:34:14,600 Speaker 2: And that's still the existence he was a vice president. Yeah, 768 00:34:14,640 --> 00:34:15,240 Speaker 2: it makes sense. 769 00:34:15,360 --> 00:34:18,480 Speaker 1: Yeah, and then the last one for you to weigh 770 00:34:18,480 --> 00:34:21,240 Speaker 1: in on is actually two of them, so Tim Scott 771 00:34:21,280 --> 00:34:25,319 Speaker 1: and Ronda Santis. People didn't have really strong views on 772 00:34:25,400 --> 00:34:27,759 Speaker 1: Tim Scott. There was a sense again of sort of like, yeah, 773 00:34:27,800 --> 00:34:30,480 Speaker 1: he's fine, but maybe needs some experience. He seems honorable, 774 00:34:30,560 --> 00:34:33,400 Speaker 1: but I'm not sure. Ronda Santis actually had a pretty 775 00:34:33,600 --> 00:34:37,040 Speaker 1: positive reception. You know, the one gentleman who is very 776 00:34:37,040 --> 00:34:39,400 Speaker 1: hard Trump and called almost everybody else a rhino, he 777 00:34:39,440 --> 00:34:41,879 Speaker 1: didn't say that about Ronda Santis, even though Trump has 778 00:34:41,920 --> 00:34:45,719 Speaker 1: been obviously aggressively going against Ronda Sanctimonius to beat ball 779 00:34:45,800 --> 00:34:48,160 Speaker 1: Ron whatever the latest nickname of the day is. He 780 00:34:48,239 --> 00:34:50,279 Speaker 1: said that he sees him as well spoken and kind 781 00:34:50,280 --> 00:34:53,880 Speaker 1: of a take charge guy. And so across this group, 782 00:34:54,960 --> 00:34:57,879 Speaker 1: with the exception of the one woman who's the Doug 783 00:34:57,920 --> 00:35:02,200 Speaker 1: Burghram supporter, there seemed to be pretty positive sentiments towards 784 00:35:02,280 --> 00:35:05,120 Speaker 1: him presenting possibly an opera. I mean, if he were 785 00:35:05,160 --> 00:35:07,880 Speaker 1: to consolidate some of that and consolidate the people who 786 00:35:07,960 --> 00:35:10,560 Speaker 1: are like I'm not sure about Trump, consolidate some of 787 00:35:10,560 --> 00:35:12,440 Speaker 1: the people who are definitely anti Trump. 788 00:35:12,400 --> 00:35:13,920 Speaker 3: Then he would have a shot. 789 00:35:14,040 --> 00:35:16,440 Speaker 1: I think, as Sagara was pointing out before the challenge 790 00:35:16,440 --> 00:35:19,919 Speaker 1: in doing that is that people's reasons why they don't 791 00:35:19,920 --> 00:35:22,960 Speaker 1: want Trump again are so different and so various that 792 00:35:23,040 --> 00:35:25,680 Speaker 1: it makes it really hard to have one cohesive message 793 00:35:25,680 --> 00:35:27,640 Speaker 1: that would bring all of those individuals together. 794 00:35:28,160 --> 00:35:30,200 Speaker 4: It does, and I think Ron de Santis and Tim 795 00:35:30,200 --> 00:35:32,440 Speaker 4: Scott will now be thinking, we need to have a moment. 796 00:35:33,000 --> 00:35:34,759 Speaker 4: It's not good enough for Tim Scott to have a 797 00:35:34,880 --> 00:35:36,719 Speaker 4: solid debate, it's not good enough for Ron Santas to 798 00:35:36,719 --> 00:35:39,000 Speaker 4: have a solid debate. They need to start really carving 799 00:35:39,040 --> 00:35:42,440 Speaker 4: them out as the clear opponents and challenges, and they 800 00:35:42,440 --> 00:35:44,520 Speaker 4: need to do that quite quickly now that there is time. 801 00:35:44,840 --> 00:35:46,840 Speaker 4: But look at what happened in twenty sixteen. You know, 802 00:35:46,920 --> 00:35:50,080 Speaker 4: you have Iowa, you have New Hampshire, you have South Carolina, 803 00:35:50,480 --> 00:35:53,000 Speaker 4: and then it's not long until you're into Super Tuesday. Now, 804 00:35:53,040 --> 00:35:56,279 Speaker 4: if there's still a fractured field by then Trump mops up. 805 00:35:56,680 --> 00:35:57,279 Speaker 2: He gets it. 806 00:35:57,560 --> 00:35:59,319 Speaker 4: But I mean, if I was advising, you know, one 807 00:35:59,320 --> 00:36:01,320 Speaker 4: of these candidates, so it was Tim Scott, Rondo Santa's, 808 00:36:01,320 --> 00:36:03,520 Speaker 4: you know, how do you break through? Well, clearly they 809 00:36:03,520 --> 00:36:04,920 Speaker 4: need to have a big sort of presence on the 810 00:36:04,920 --> 00:36:07,480 Speaker 4: debate stage, but it might also be worth thinking for them, 811 00:36:07,680 --> 00:36:09,719 Speaker 4: what the sort of policy issue that they can really 812 00:36:09,719 --> 00:36:11,759 Speaker 4: make a splash with. And one of the things that 813 00:36:11,840 --> 00:36:15,040 Speaker 4: really united this group quite different perhaps and sort of 814 00:36:15,040 --> 00:36:17,840 Speaker 4: what we might expect Trump supporters to be like, is 815 00:36:17,840 --> 00:36:20,280 Speaker 4: that they were very, very keen to see the federal 816 00:36:20,320 --> 00:36:23,759 Speaker 4: government become a lot smaller. They were keen to see 817 00:36:23,760 --> 00:36:25,800 Speaker 4: spending cart they were keen to see the government step 818 00:36:25,840 --> 00:36:29,279 Speaker 4: back from from their lives. Now, if DeSantis or Tim 819 00:36:29,280 --> 00:36:31,880 Speaker 4: Scott could come up with a really punchy economic policy, 820 00:36:32,360 --> 00:36:33,919 Speaker 4: don't quite know what that is. Perhaps there's a flat 821 00:36:34,000 --> 00:36:36,279 Speaker 4: rate tax, perhaps it's something that really appeals to those 822 00:36:36,280 --> 00:36:39,040 Speaker 4: sort of small state Republicans, then you could see them 823 00:36:39,080 --> 00:36:40,000 Speaker 4: start to break through a little. 824 00:36:40,120 --> 00:36:41,839 Speaker 2: It really makes sense in the live for your dire state. 825 00:36:41,880 --> 00:36:43,560 Speaker 2: I'm curious about how it would look like, you know, 826 00:36:43,600 --> 00:36:45,759 Speaker 2: on a national level. I think one of my takeaways 827 00:36:45,840 --> 00:36:48,600 Speaker 2: was with DeSantis is the COVID critique. For some reason, 828 00:36:48,640 --> 00:36:50,760 Speaker 2: he has that critique of Trump from the very beginning, 829 00:36:50,760 --> 00:36:53,799 Speaker 2: criticized warp Speed, criticized Mount Fauci. But not a single 830 00:36:53,800 --> 00:36:55,279 Speaker 2: one of those people was like, yeah, but that's why 831 00:36:55,320 --> 00:36:58,360 Speaker 2: I'm supporting dessantas the one Desanters guy didn't even cite COVID. 832 00:36:58,640 --> 00:37:00,880 Speaker 2: The other people were not. They were like, yeah, I 833 00:37:00,920 --> 00:37:03,440 Speaker 2: kind of agree with the critique, but they're not immediately 834 00:37:03,480 --> 00:37:05,399 Speaker 2: saying his name. And if he hasn't, wont him over 835 00:37:05,440 --> 00:37:08,240 Speaker 2: at this point, I'm like, man, that's kind I'm just curious, 836 00:37:08,280 --> 00:37:11,000 Speaker 2: you know, what could possibly we had those two undecided ladies, 837 00:37:11,120 --> 00:37:13,640 Speaker 2: both of them are very concerned about COVID, but none 838 00:37:13,640 --> 00:37:15,799 Speaker 2: of them they're like, yeah, I'm considering, you know, but 839 00:37:16,040 --> 00:37:18,560 Speaker 2: he still has not been able to win that over. 840 00:37:18,640 --> 00:37:20,759 Speaker 2: So I actually a bit of a red flag, you know, 841 00:37:20,840 --> 00:37:24,200 Speaker 2: he needs consolidate that if to the extent that that's 842 00:37:24,239 --> 00:37:26,600 Speaker 2: a large group in there. But I'm just not sure 843 00:37:26,719 --> 00:37:30,000 Speaker 2: given the amount of the disparate kind of concerns about 844 00:37:30,040 --> 00:37:31,960 Speaker 2: Trump are just so all over the map from right 845 00:37:32,000 --> 00:37:33,640 Speaker 2: to left. I don't know if a single candidate can 846 00:37:33,719 --> 00:37:33,960 Speaker 2: do that. 847 00:37:34,120 --> 00:37:36,759 Speaker 4: Maybe the big moment comes if Trump attends one of 848 00:37:36,760 --> 00:37:39,440 Speaker 4: the debates, right, yeah, somebody can pit themselves as the 849 00:37:39,480 --> 00:37:42,200 Speaker 4: sort of andi Trump candidate, But who also appeals to 850 00:37:42,200 --> 00:37:43,759 Speaker 4: that key group in the middle. And I think, you know, 851 00:37:43,800 --> 00:37:45,560 Speaker 4: to listeners, I think i'd say the key thing to 852 00:37:45,600 --> 00:37:47,480 Speaker 4: take away from this focus group is that group in 853 00:37:47,480 --> 00:37:48,880 Speaker 4: the middle of these Trump agnostics. 854 00:37:48,960 --> 00:37:50,080 Speaker 2: You saw a couple of them there. 855 00:37:50,480 --> 00:37:53,480 Speaker 4: If they can be one round, then it's possible that 856 00:37:53,480 --> 00:37:55,759 Speaker 4: Trump's lead could fray. But look, there's no doubt based 857 00:37:55,760 --> 00:37:57,000 Speaker 4: on this Trump is the clear front. 858 00:37:57,080 --> 00:37:57,680 Speaker 2: Yeah, very true. 859 00:37:58,080 --> 00:37:59,960 Speaker 1: The last thing I'll say, we're going to have, guys, 860 00:38:00,520 --> 00:38:03,000 Speaker 1: some of the more issues specific questions and some of 861 00:38:03,000 --> 00:38:05,160 Speaker 1: the clips from that, you know, on abortion in Ukraine 862 00:38:05,160 --> 00:38:07,040 Speaker 1: and other things later in the weeks that we're going 863 00:38:07,080 --> 00:38:09,280 Speaker 1: to have some of that as well, just as a preview. 864 00:38:10,200 --> 00:38:11,960 Speaker 3: Yeah, we've got a lot more, don't worry. 865 00:38:12,440 --> 00:38:14,640 Speaker 1: But you know, I was curious from your perspective because 866 00:38:14,760 --> 00:38:17,040 Speaker 1: you're saying, you know, they're interested in smaller government, they're 867 00:38:17,080 --> 00:38:19,759 Speaker 1: interested in, you know, the pandemic. They have these things 868 00:38:19,760 --> 00:38:22,120 Speaker 1: that they raise, but when they're actually talking about the 869 00:38:22,120 --> 00:38:24,239 Speaker 1: candidates and how they feel about them and why they're 870 00:38:24,280 --> 00:38:27,839 Speaker 1: supporting them, it's very little that's issue specific. It's much 871 00:38:27,880 --> 00:38:31,080 Speaker 1: more seems to be about personal characteristics. So what was 872 00:38:31,080 --> 00:38:33,840 Speaker 1: your sense in the room of how much these is 873 00:38:33,880 --> 00:38:36,080 Speaker 1: it the vibes, is it the like, you know, the 874 00:38:36,120 --> 00:38:39,439 Speaker 1: personality contest or do you think it comes down more 875 00:38:39,480 --> 00:38:43,239 Speaker 1: to like, here's my top issues, here's how prioritizing them I. 876 00:38:43,160 --> 00:38:45,640 Speaker 4: Think come a general election, that matters a little bit more, 877 00:38:45,680 --> 00:38:47,400 Speaker 4: and I could certainly it was interesting when they were 878 00:38:47,400 --> 00:38:49,600 Speaker 4: talking about things like the economy and abortion, they were 879 00:38:49,600 --> 00:38:53,200 Speaker 4: talking about it not in reference to different Republican candidates 880 00:38:53,280 --> 00:38:54,760 Speaker 4: but against Joe Biden. 881 00:38:54,960 --> 00:38:55,280 Speaker 3: Correct. 882 00:38:55,320 --> 00:38:58,480 Speaker 4: So I do think that matters later, but at this stage, 883 00:38:58,520 --> 00:39:01,000 Speaker 4: I think one of the problems is for anyone trying 884 00:39:01,000 --> 00:39:03,560 Speaker 4: to differentiate on this. We've seen, you know, Nikki Haley, 885 00:39:03,600 --> 00:39:05,759 Speaker 4: for example, take a different position on social security with 886 00:39:05,840 --> 00:39:08,440 Speaker 4: see Mike Pence take a different position on abortion. The 887 00:39:08,480 --> 00:39:11,160 Speaker 4: problem of that sort of approach is that these voters 888 00:39:11,239 --> 00:39:13,719 Speaker 4: sort of assume most Republican candidates are probably on the 889 00:39:13,719 --> 00:39:16,600 Speaker 4: same side on these issues. They sort of instinctively trust 890 00:39:16,600 --> 00:39:18,839 Speaker 4: a lot of them to be so, and that makes 891 00:39:18,880 --> 00:39:21,360 Speaker 4: it hard to differentiate. So I think it is personality. 892 00:39:22,160 --> 00:39:24,760 Speaker 4: US polsters call it brand. You know, it's the brand 893 00:39:24,760 --> 00:39:26,640 Speaker 4: of these candidates. You know, in the same way you 894 00:39:26,680 --> 00:39:29,160 Speaker 4: might go to your favorite you know, chocolate bar provider 895 00:39:29,280 --> 00:39:33,320 Speaker 4: or your favorite you know, telecoms provider. It's the candidate 896 00:39:33,360 --> 00:39:36,040 Speaker 4: and how they come across. Are they competent, are they good? 897 00:39:36,120 --> 00:39:38,600 Speaker 4: Are they reliable? Are they strong? Will they stand up 898 00:39:38,600 --> 00:39:41,880 Speaker 4: for you? And that is, policy matters as a flag 899 00:39:41,920 --> 00:39:44,560 Speaker 4: for that, but it's also so much more about can 900 00:39:44,600 --> 00:39:47,000 Speaker 4: they convince the room, can they persuade them? 901 00:39:47,040 --> 00:39:49,600 Speaker 2: It's personal, characteristic and great point two about how it 902 00:39:49,640 --> 00:39:51,719 Speaker 2: matters also in terms of how they see the other 903 00:39:51,800 --> 00:39:53,719 Speaker 2: candidate and whether they'll get some of what they want, 904 00:39:53,760 --> 00:39:56,440 Speaker 2: you know, Visa VI Joe Biden. So anyway, James, you 905 00:39:56,440 --> 00:39:59,160 Speaker 2: did fantastic job, you really did. Hopefully we'll see you again. 906 00:39:59,560 --> 00:40:02,360 Speaker 2: Great w and we're excited to continue to bring everybody 907 00:40:02,960 --> 00:40:05,120 Speaker 2: all of this work that we've done in conjunction with 908 00:40:05,200 --> 00:40:07,839 Speaker 2: Jail Partners. You guys do amazing work. As we said, 909 00:40:07,880 --> 00:40:10,400 Speaker 2: we've cited previous polls and other things, and glad we 910 00:40:10,400 --> 00:40:10,919 Speaker 2: got to work together. 911 00:40:10,960 --> 00:40:13,439 Speaker 1: I don't know, people remember we showed before these word 912 00:40:13,480 --> 00:40:14,960 Speaker 1: clouds that you guys did of. 913 00:40:14,920 --> 00:40:16,120 Speaker 2: All the cod its. 914 00:40:16,480 --> 00:40:19,000 Speaker 1: I mean, they were really interesting because again it's like 915 00:40:19,239 --> 00:40:21,160 Speaker 1: you can pull on these issues and people all, I 916 00:40:21,160 --> 00:40:23,799 Speaker 1: support this on Ukraine, I support that on abortion, but 917 00:40:23,960 --> 00:40:26,919 Speaker 1: like their gut check of when I hear this Canada's name, 918 00:40:27,000 --> 00:40:29,440 Speaker 1: what's the first thing that comes to mind? That's in 919 00:40:29,440 --> 00:40:32,000 Speaker 1: some ways the most revealing material. So that's why we're 920 00:40:32,040 --> 00:40:33,759 Speaker 1: so excited to work with you guys, and you came through. 921 00:40:33,760 --> 00:40:34,440 Speaker 3: This was phenomenal. 922 00:40:34,440 --> 00:40:36,279 Speaker 2: Thank thank you so much. Gus appreciate it very much, 923 00:40:36,480 --> 00:40:38,239 Speaker 2: and we will continue on with the rest of the show. Now, 924 00:40:38,400 --> 00:40:40,640 Speaker 2: last week we brought you the news that President Zelenski 925 00:40:40,680 --> 00:40:44,040 Speaker 2: had fired the Defense Minister over corruption. We're apparently allowed 926 00:40:44,040 --> 00:40:46,640 Speaker 2: to talk about corruption in Ukraine now, and the New 927 00:40:46,719 --> 00:40:49,239 Speaker 2: York Times, because they've gotten their marching orders now that 928 00:40:49,239 --> 00:40:51,279 Speaker 2: they're allowed to talk about it, are giving us an 929 00:40:51,320 --> 00:40:54,440 Speaker 2: even better insight into what this looks like. It's effectively 930 00:40:54,480 --> 00:40:56,560 Speaker 2: like the plot of the War Dogs movie or of 931 00:40:56,640 --> 00:41:00,520 Speaker 2: Lord of War. Crazy mercenaries who are very unscrewed are 932 00:41:00,560 --> 00:41:03,720 Speaker 2: getting hundreds of millions of dollars from the US government 933 00:41:03,800 --> 00:41:07,479 Speaker 2: on their ability to procure weapons and pump them into 934 00:41:07,480 --> 00:41:09,920 Speaker 2: the Ukraine conflict. Let's put this up there on the screen. 935 00:41:10,239 --> 00:41:12,279 Speaker 2: This is just one view. Remember this is just one 936 00:41:12,840 --> 00:41:15,799 Speaker 2: what twenty something months or so into the conflict. They 937 00:41:15,920 --> 00:41:20,440 Speaker 2: look at Florida based arms contractor. His name is Mark Morales. 938 00:41:20,520 --> 00:41:22,719 Speaker 2: He has regaled people with the stories on his new 939 00:41:22,840 --> 00:41:27,000 Speaker 2: ten million dollar yacht called trigger Happy Crystal that manages 940 00:41:27,120 --> 00:41:33,120 Speaker 2: his company's nine digit portfolio. Said portfolio includes like hundreds 941 00:41:33,120 --> 00:41:36,200 Speaker 2: of millions of dollars that are given to mister Morales. 942 00:41:36,440 --> 00:41:40,759 Speaker 2: They have awarded his company approximately one billion dollars in contracts, 943 00:41:40,800 --> 00:41:44,040 Speaker 2: mostly for ammunition. Record show he has built roughly two 944 00:41:44,200 --> 00:41:49,800 Speaker 2: hundred million dollar side business just selling to the Ukrainians directly. 945 00:41:50,000 --> 00:41:54,399 Speaker 2: He employs multiple Ukrainian officials, some of whom are pictured there, 946 00:41:54,400 --> 00:41:57,879 Speaker 2: one of them literally a former Defense ministry advisor. I mean, 947 00:41:57,880 --> 00:41:59,960 Speaker 2: why would you employ such a person right whenever you're 948 00:42:00,080 --> 00:42:03,040 Speaker 2: trying to sell weapons to the government. But the thing 949 00:42:03,080 --> 00:42:06,880 Speaker 2: I love about mister Morales is that quote. The Justice 950 00:42:06,920 --> 00:42:10,680 Speaker 2: Department indicted him in two thousand and nine on conspiracy 951 00:42:10,760 --> 00:42:13,960 Speaker 2: of money laundering charges after it said he was caught 952 00:42:14,040 --> 00:42:18,239 Speaker 2: on tape discussing methods for paying bribes to foreign officials. 953 00:42:18,480 --> 00:42:22,200 Speaker 2: Quote thissally said, you just gotta be smarter than the government, 954 00:42:22,440 --> 00:42:26,520 Speaker 2: mister Morales said on one recording. Ultimately, FBI agents badly 955 00:42:26,560 --> 00:42:28,799 Speaker 2: botched the case and prosecutors had to drop charges. So 956 00:42:28,840 --> 00:42:31,800 Speaker 2: he's not been convicted. He stands innocent of the charges 957 00:42:32,080 --> 00:42:34,800 Speaker 2: in the eyes of the law. But what they really 958 00:42:34,840 --> 00:42:37,839 Speaker 2: go into with mister Morales, and again we're using him 959 00:42:37,960 --> 00:42:40,040 Speaker 2: just as a stand in for how many there's probably 960 00:42:40,080 --> 00:42:42,960 Speaker 2: dozens of these types of guys who are operating inside 961 00:42:43,000 --> 00:42:46,320 Speaker 2: of Ukraine. Is these guys were instrumental in the Syria 962 00:42:46,320 --> 00:42:47,280 Speaker 2: and Afghan conflict. 963 00:42:47,400 --> 00:42:47,560 Speaker 1: Yep. 964 00:42:47,640 --> 00:42:52,480 Speaker 2: They have deep and shady ties for ammo dealers all 965 00:42:52,480 --> 00:42:54,759 Speaker 2: across the world. They can snap their fingers and they 966 00:42:54,800 --> 00:42:57,280 Speaker 2: can get a plane full of ammunition. And the Pentagon 967 00:42:57,400 --> 00:42:58,919 Speaker 2: was like, Hey, the guy can get the job done, 968 00:42:58,960 --> 00:43:00,840 Speaker 2: So we're just gonna pump money, you know, into his 969 00:43:00,880 --> 00:43:04,080 Speaker 2: pockets and doesn't really matter where it's coming from, or 970 00:43:04,120 --> 00:43:06,480 Speaker 2: what's going on, or where this money is doing or 971 00:43:06,640 --> 00:43:09,520 Speaker 2: who exactly he's paying inside of the country. And it's 972 00:43:09,520 --> 00:43:11,040 Speaker 2: just so obvious. I mean, one of the reasons they 973 00:43:11,080 --> 00:43:13,360 Speaker 2: tried to indict him in two thousand and nine is 974 00:43:13,400 --> 00:43:16,879 Speaker 2: because that directly violates the Foreign and Corrupt Practices Act 975 00:43:17,080 --> 00:43:19,440 Speaker 2: that the United States government has in place, in which 976 00:43:19,560 --> 00:43:23,120 Speaker 2: US businesses are not supposed to be bribing foreign officials 977 00:43:23,239 --> 00:43:25,840 Speaker 2: or engage in any of this corruption to procure business. 978 00:43:26,120 --> 00:43:29,160 Speaker 2: And that specifically would be a violation of business violation 979 00:43:29,239 --> 00:43:32,279 Speaker 2: in terms of that revenue. But when that revenue is 980 00:43:32,320 --> 00:43:35,200 Speaker 2: directly based on the government itself, they're obviously looking the 981 00:43:35,239 --> 00:43:37,040 Speaker 2: other way. So I thought This was just a perfect 982 00:43:37,360 --> 00:43:39,759 Speaker 2: example of you know, now it's twenty something months into 983 00:43:39,760 --> 00:43:42,040 Speaker 2: the conflict, the Biden administration is on the verge of 984 00:43:42,040 --> 00:43:44,720 Speaker 2: sending long range missiles to Ukraine, of which they directly 985 00:43:44,719 --> 00:43:47,200 Speaker 2: had said before it would escalate the conflict. And we 986 00:43:47,280 --> 00:43:49,399 Speaker 2: don't have enough said missiles because if we ever get 987 00:43:49,400 --> 00:43:52,000 Speaker 2: into a conflict, we may need them. Of course I've 988 00:43:52,040 --> 00:43:54,680 Speaker 2: said this before on a long enough timeline, Ukraine always 989 00:43:54,719 --> 00:43:56,680 Speaker 2: get what it wants. But you know, if people like 990 00:43:56,719 --> 00:43:59,040 Speaker 2: mister Morales, who are the go tos between these it's 991 00:43:59,040 --> 00:44:01,440 Speaker 2: not just a direct arms transfers. We take the money, 992 00:44:01,520 --> 00:44:03,360 Speaker 2: we give it to people like him. He gets it 993 00:44:03,400 --> 00:44:05,840 Speaker 2: from god knows where, and then he gives it to Ukraine. 994 00:44:05,880 --> 00:44:08,160 Speaker 2: And he's making a very tidy little profit enough to 995 00:44:08,160 --> 00:44:11,840 Speaker 2: get a ten million dollar yacht in Florida. Must be nice. 996 00:44:11,960 --> 00:44:13,160 Speaker 2: It's nice life. He's got down. 997 00:44:13,160 --> 00:44:15,320 Speaker 1: He's gotten a billion dollars in contracts from the Pentagon. 998 00:44:15,680 --> 00:44:17,279 Speaker 1: I think this story, first of all, some of the 999 00:44:17,320 --> 00:44:20,640 Speaker 1: details here. There are so many Yize details in this, 1000 00:44:20,960 --> 00:44:23,120 Speaker 1: starting with you know, the image of him on his 1001 00:44:23,320 --> 00:44:29,000 Speaker 1: quote unquote trigger happy yacht and partying with these Ukrainian 1002 00:44:29,120 --> 00:44:33,640 Speaker 1: officials and current members of the Ukrainian military that he 1003 00:44:33,760 --> 00:44:36,760 Speaker 1: also employs in order to help him get the meetings 1004 00:44:36,760 --> 00:44:40,799 Speaker 1: with the Ukrainian government that he wants to secure further contracts. 1005 00:44:40,960 --> 00:44:43,799 Speaker 1: So he's not only doing business with the Pentagon. You know, 1006 00:44:43,800 --> 00:44:47,360 Speaker 1: the Pentagon is hiring him to procure and supply certain 1007 00:44:47,640 --> 00:44:50,719 Speaker 1: weapons and in particular ammunition, but he's also getting money 1008 00:44:50,760 --> 00:44:54,239 Speaker 1: directly from the Ukrainian government. He is walking right up 1009 00:44:54,280 --> 00:44:57,280 Speaker 1: to the line of directly bribing foreign officials. 1010 00:44:57,320 --> 00:44:59,560 Speaker 3: I mean, there's just no other way of describing this. 1011 00:45:00,160 --> 00:45:04,160 Speaker 1: One of the people that he employs is a sergeant 1012 00:45:04,320 --> 00:45:07,920 Speaker 1: in the Ukrainian military. He has done a lot too, 1013 00:45:08,239 --> 00:45:10,279 Speaker 1: So he pays this man, and then this man gets 1014 00:45:10,360 --> 00:45:12,800 Speaker 1: him these meetings with foreign government Offirato. 1015 00:45:12,920 --> 00:45:14,239 Speaker 3: So you tell me what that is. 1016 00:45:14,320 --> 00:45:17,800 Speaker 1: Ultimately, I think it's also important, outside of the details 1017 00:45:17,840 --> 00:45:21,760 Speaker 1: of this particular individual, that people really understand the nitty 1018 00:45:21,760 --> 00:45:24,399 Speaker 1: gritty of how this business is done, and that they 1019 00:45:24,440 --> 00:45:29,040 Speaker 1: remember that this man is becoming wildly wealthy off of 1020 00:45:29,120 --> 00:45:33,440 Speaker 1: this horrible, tragic war, and he's not alone. 1021 00:45:33,600 --> 00:45:36,440 Speaker 3: There are a lot of others who are just like him. 1022 00:45:36,920 --> 00:45:40,440 Speaker 1: The article sort of gestures at this massive arms market 1023 00:45:40,560 --> 00:45:43,160 Speaker 1: that has sprung up and the amount of money obviously 1024 00:45:43,200 --> 00:45:46,759 Speaker 1: flowing around all of Eastern Europe, and they say that 1025 00:45:46,840 --> 00:45:51,160 Speaker 1: it could reshape the politics and markets in that whole 1026 00:45:51,200 --> 00:45:54,840 Speaker 1: region for years and years to come, even following after 1027 00:45:54,840 --> 00:45:56,799 Speaker 1: the war, because this is defining sort of a new 1028 00:45:56,840 --> 00:45:59,759 Speaker 1: group of oligarchs who are getting wildly wealthy off of this. 1029 00:46:00,480 --> 00:46:03,600 Speaker 1: So it's always important to remember as these wars are 1030 00:46:03,600 --> 00:46:06,080 Speaker 1: going on, you know, we as the public see it, 1031 00:46:06,160 --> 00:46:07,880 Speaker 1: and we see the tragedy of it, we see the 1032 00:46:08,239 --> 00:46:11,520 Speaker 1: atrocities that are being committed, we see the absolute carnage 1033 00:46:11,560 --> 00:46:14,160 Speaker 1: and horror of it. But it's also important to remember 1034 00:46:14,160 --> 00:46:16,279 Speaker 1: that there are people who have a financial incentive to 1035 00:46:16,360 --> 00:46:20,000 Speaker 1: keep these things going and who are turning huge profits 1036 00:46:20,320 --> 00:46:21,720 Speaker 1: off of this carnage and killing. 1037 00:46:21,840 --> 00:46:24,320 Speaker 2: My personal favorite is that it's really not his connections 1038 00:46:24,320 --> 00:46:26,279 Speaker 2: to the Ukrainian government. Every Tom Dick and Harry and 1039 00:46:26,320 --> 00:46:28,920 Speaker 2: Eastern Europe's got a connection to the corrupt Ukrainian government, 1040 00:46:28,960 --> 00:46:31,440 Speaker 2: he says, quote it is not his ties to the government, 1041 00:46:31,760 --> 00:46:34,600 Speaker 2: that is his ties to the Pentagon, which give him 1042 00:46:34,600 --> 00:46:37,640 Speaker 2: an unfair advantage. Quote. Arms brokers from around the world 1043 00:46:37,719 --> 00:46:40,439 Speaker 2: are competing for limited supply of Soviet style weapons, mostly 1044 00:46:40,480 --> 00:46:43,080 Speaker 2: from Eastern Europe. To sell to Ukraine. With cash pouring 1045 00:46:43,120 --> 00:46:46,080 Speaker 2: in from Washington, Morales can afford to pay more than 1046 00:46:46,080 --> 00:46:50,000 Speaker 2: his competitors do. Several Eastern European arms dealers complained they're 1047 00:46:50,000 --> 00:46:52,279 Speaker 2: mad they're not getting in on the bonanza. He then 1048 00:46:52,360 --> 00:46:54,839 Speaker 2: makes good on his American contracts, then buys even more 1049 00:46:54,840 --> 00:46:57,720 Speaker 2: ammunition with his profits to sell it to Ukraine directly, 1050 00:46:57,920 --> 00:47:00,319 Speaker 2: and in several cases early in the war, Morale US 1051 00:47:00,320 --> 00:47:03,520 Speaker 2: outbid rivals to buy explosive shells, for example, from a 1052 00:47:03,560 --> 00:47:07,880 Speaker 2: Bulgarian arms factory. All of this is again appropriated dollars 1053 00:47:07,920 --> 00:47:11,319 Speaker 2: from the US taxpayer to missed people like him who 1054 00:47:11,360 --> 00:47:15,359 Speaker 2: go out and you know, these shady factories. Nobody knows 1055 00:47:15,400 --> 00:47:17,560 Speaker 2: what's going on in these plays. They probably are most 1056 00:47:17,600 --> 00:47:19,880 Speaker 2: likely they're selling to both sides of the conflict. And 1057 00:47:20,160 --> 00:47:22,000 Speaker 2: this is a perfect example of a guy who's got 1058 00:47:22,080 --> 00:47:25,239 Speaker 2: Washington wired, knows how to gain the subcontracting business and 1059 00:47:25,280 --> 00:47:28,040 Speaker 2: contracting enough of a profit there if we can outbid 1060 00:47:28,160 --> 00:47:30,480 Speaker 2: people in there, and then you know, juice things with 1061 00:47:30,520 --> 00:47:32,799 Speaker 2: the Ukrainian government, so we've got a consistent supply, and 1062 00:47:33,680 --> 00:47:36,799 Speaker 2: longer this conflict goes on, the richer people like him 1063 00:47:36,960 --> 00:47:39,800 Speaker 2: are going to get and what I want to be clear, 1064 00:47:40,000 --> 00:47:43,200 Speaker 2: this isn't even signaling the man out because there are 1065 00:47:43,360 --> 00:47:46,400 Speaker 2: dozens of people like him, and frankly, he's a small 1066 00:47:46,440 --> 00:47:48,680 Speaker 2: fish in all of this. The people who are really 1067 00:47:48,719 --> 00:47:51,280 Speaker 2: cleaning up or like I said that Bulgarian arms factory, 1068 00:47:51,560 --> 00:47:55,720 Speaker 2: our defense contractors who are also those are the people 1069 00:47:55,719 --> 00:47:59,040 Speaker 2: making billions of dollars whenever they are raking that in. 1070 00:47:59,120 --> 00:48:01,960 Speaker 2: He's just like a player in this entire thing. One 1071 00:48:01,960 --> 00:48:04,040 Speaker 2: of the again I shouted out the movie Wardogs. I 1072 00:48:04,080 --> 00:48:06,200 Speaker 2: recommend people go and watch it because that is a 1073 00:48:06,200 --> 00:48:10,320 Speaker 2: great example of our government is not in control nearly 1074 00:48:10,360 --> 00:48:12,080 Speaker 2: as much as people think. They think we're like flying 1075 00:48:12,120 --> 00:48:15,239 Speaker 2: seat thirty sevens over and just dropping the weapons off. No, no, no, 1076 00:48:15,320 --> 00:48:17,400 Speaker 2: you know we the government doesn't do anything anymore. We 1077 00:48:17,440 --> 00:48:20,640 Speaker 2: subcontract out everything NASA to SpaceX and you know the 1078 00:48:20,680 --> 00:48:23,719 Speaker 2: Pentagon here to arms dealers. We just write a check 1079 00:48:23,920 --> 00:48:26,759 Speaker 2: and then we just expect said weapons to show up. 1080 00:48:26,800 --> 00:48:29,640 Speaker 2: And the biggest problem with this is not only quality control, 1081 00:48:29,719 --> 00:48:33,279 Speaker 2: but also who knows who's where are these weapons going. 1082 00:48:33,560 --> 00:48:37,680 Speaker 2: We've already done multiple reports here guys in Azov Nazi battalion, 1083 00:48:38,080 --> 00:48:41,080 Speaker 2: brand new weapons just showing up. We did previously that 1084 00:48:41,120 --> 00:48:44,120 Speaker 2: story about the American mercenary who had told stories about 1085 00:48:44,160 --> 00:48:46,719 Speaker 2: how the just brand new crates of weapons just show up. Yeah, 1086 00:48:46,760 --> 00:48:48,960 Speaker 2: if you're there, grab one. Why not? You know? And 1087 00:48:49,080 --> 00:48:51,200 Speaker 2: who knows? What are they dealing with it? And then 1088 00:48:51,239 --> 00:48:54,520 Speaker 2: also who is stopping people like Morales or any of 1089 00:48:54,560 --> 00:48:57,560 Speaker 2: these people inside Ukraine from taking that crate? Maybe they 1090 00:48:57,560 --> 00:48:59,640 Speaker 2: gave a third to the Ukrainians and they sell two 1091 00:48:59,719 --> 00:49:03,440 Speaker 2: thirds on the black market. That's exactly what happened in Afghanistan. 1092 00:49:03,480 --> 00:49:05,480 Speaker 2: I mean, I've said this before, but the people who 1093 00:49:05,520 --> 00:49:09,319 Speaker 2: really want in Afghanistan bankers in Dubai, And this is 1094 00:49:09,600 --> 00:49:12,600 Speaker 2: a good example. Guys like him made their bones in 1095 00:49:12,640 --> 00:49:15,840 Speaker 2: the Syria and Afghan conflict being able to procure sketchy 1096 00:49:15,880 --> 00:49:18,560 Speaker 2: weapons and deliver it to the conflict zone. So why not, 1097 00:49:18,719 --> 00:49:21,000 Speaker 2: you know? And the amount of money laundering and other 1098 00:49:21,480 --> 00:49:24,239 Speaker 2: chicanery that's going on behind the scenes is just outrageous. 1099 00:49:24,239 --> 00:49:25,359 Speaker 2: When you see something like. 1100 00:49:25,320 --> 00:49:28,440 Speaker 1: This, Your subcontracting point is actually really interesting and important 1101 00:49:28,480 --> 00:49:31,920 Speaker 1: because what happens, whether it's the government using subcontractors or 1102 00:49:31,960 --> 00:49:34,160 Speaker 1: you see this like an auto industry or any other industry, 1103 00:49:34,160 --> 00:49:37,960 Speaker 1: when they use subcontractors, they allow that to act as 1104 00:49:37,960 --> 00:49:40,520 Speaker 1: an excuse to not worry too much about the mushy 1105 00:49:40,600 --> 00:49:44,279 Speaker 1: details about how whatever they need is getting done, and 1106 00:49:44,320 --> 00:49:46,600 Speaker 1: so it makes it much more difficult to have any 1107 00:49:46,600 --> 00:49:49,360 Speaker 1: sort of transparency, accountability, the sort of thing that you 1108 00:49:49,360 --> 00:49:52,120 Speaker 1: would really want inside of a democracy when it comes to. 1109 00:49:52,320 --> 00:49:53,960 Speaker 3: The core issues of war and peace. 1110 00:49:54,400 --> 00:49:57,040 Speaker 1: And by sub contracting, not just in the area of 1111 00:49:57,320 --> 00:50:00,640 Speaker 1: defense spending, but really across all of government, by so contracting, 1112 00:50:00,719 --> 00:50:04,200 Speaker 1: so many key functions out and you know, depleting the 1113 00:50:04,200 --> 00:50:07,719 Speaker 1: ability of our government to actually do anything itself. Yeah, 1114 00:50:07,800 --> 00:50:10,239 Speaker 1: it allows a lot of things to be swept under 1115 00:50:10,280 --> 00:50:12,080 Speaker 1: the rug. It allows people to look in the other 1116 00:50:12,120 --> 00:50:15,760 Speaker 1: direction and empower individuals like this one who was formally 1117 00:50:15,800 --> 00:50:19,680 Speaker 1: indicted for you know, some sketchy circumstances. Again he's guilty, 1118 00:50:19,760 --> 00:50:22,720 Speaker 1: so he's innocent, but you know, raises some question mark. Yeah, anyway, 1119 00:50:23,120 --> 00:50:26,279 Speaker 1: allows our government to work with people like this and 1120 00:50:26,320 --> 00:50:29,960 Speaker 1: not look too closely at exactly what the details are, 1121 00:50:30,000 --> 00:50:31,000 Speaker 1: exactly what's going. 1122 00:50:30,840 --> 00:50:33,279 Speaker 2: On exactly right, and guess what the rest of the 1123 00:50:33,280 --> 00:50:35,319 Speaker 2: world they're waking up. They have a very different view 1124 00:50:35,360 --> 00:50:38,879 Speaker 2: of this conflict. That was especially in the air at 1125 00:50:38,880 --> 00:50:41,760 Speaker 2: the g twenty summit, which just happened in New Delhi, 1126 00:50:41,960 --> 00:50:45,880 Speaker 2: where it stunningly if you don't pay attention to the news, 1127 00:50:46,239 --> 00:50:48,880 Speaker 2: put this up there on the screen. The language that 1128 00:50:48,960 --> 00:50:53,320 Speaker 2: previously had dropped a condemnation of Russian aggression against Ukraine 1129 00:50:53,560 --> 00:50:56,680 Speaker 2: was actually did not appear in the joint communicate that 1130 00:50:56,760 --> 00:50:59,439 Speaker 2: was released by the entire G twenty. They say quote 1131 00:50:59,440 --> 00:51:01,800 Speaker 2: G twenty leaders have failed to condemn the Russian invasion 1132 00:51:01,840 --> 00:51:04,359 Speaker 2: of Ukraine in their joint statement after both China and 1133 00:51:04,440 --> 00:51:07,960 Speaker 2: Russia of course rejected language that blamed Moscow for the conflict, 1134 00:51:07,960 --> 00:51:10,440 Speaker 2: but it really wasn't just them. The New Delhi actually 1135 00:51:10,440 --> 00:51:13,879 Speaker 2: summit declaration only referred to quote the war in Ukraine 1136 00:51:14,040 --> 00:51:17,080 Speaker 2: after a formulation of supporters in Kiev, and then also 1137 00:51:17,239 --> 00:51:19,240 Speaker 2: people who'd have a very different view of the conflict 1138 00:51:19,440 --> 00:51:22,440 Speaker 2: could not come to some sort of consensus about how 1139 00:51:22,480 --> 00:51:25,280 Speaker 2: things were going to refer to the conflict. The previous 1140 00:51:25,360 --> 00:51:28,000 Speaker 2: G twenty actually did refer to quote aggression by the 1141 00:51:28,080 --> 00:51:32,040 Speaker 2: Russian Federation against Ukraine, where Western diplomats and also Chinese 1142 00:51:32,120 --> 00:51:35,040 Speaker 2: officials did not put in the same place the blocks 1143 00:51:35,080 --> 00:51:38,720 Speaker 2: to stop that language from appearing, which shows you clearly 1144 00:51:38,840 --> 00:51:41,319 Speaker 2: things have changed in the geopolitical situation where they have 1145 00:51:41,440 --> 00:51:44,200 Speaker 2: enough juice, not just China and Russia, places like India, 1146 00:51:44,239 --> 00:51:46,719 Speaker 2: Brazil and others that have a very different view of 1147 00:51:46,840 --> 00:51:50,680 Speaker 2: said conflict. They even have the External Minister of Affairs 1148 00:51:50,719 --> 00:51:53,000 Speaker 2: of India, he said, quote it is a fact today 1149 00:51:53,080 --> 00:51:55,799 Speaker 2: it is a very polarizing issue. There are multiple views 1150 00:51:55,800 --> 00:51:58,120 Speaker 2: of this, there are spectrum of views. So I think 1151 00:51:58,239 --> 00:52:00,719 Speaker 2: in all fairness, it was only right to red what 1152 00:52:00,880 --> 00:52:04,480 Speaker 2: was the reality in the meeting rooms. The big takeaway 1153 00:52:04,800 --> 00:52:06,759 Speaker 2: mine from the G twenty sum in Crystal was just 1154 00:52:06,800 --> 00:52:09,960 Speaker 2: how far the US and Europe are moving away from 1155 00:52:09,960 --> 00:52:12,120 Speaker 2: the consensus of the rest of the world because you 1156 00:52:12,239 --> 00:52:16,640 Speaker 2: had big landmark meetings between Mody and MBS, You had 1157 00:52:16,960 --> 00:52:20,080 Speaker 2: meetings with the Chinese and the Russian officials. Lavrov, the 1158 00:52:20,160 --> 00:52:22,879 Speaker 2: Foreign Minister of Russia, actually met with Prime Minister Modi 1159 00:52:23,200 --> 00:52:25,520 Speaker 2: on the sidelines and they it was pumped up by 1160 00:52:25,719 --> 00:52:27,800 Speaker 2: the Indian government because they rely on them, of course 1161 00:52:28,040 --> 00:52:31,640 Speaker 2: for a portion of their oil supply. But also President 1162 00:52:31,719 --> 00:52:35,440 Speaker 2: Lula of Brazil appeared prominently in a photo not only 1163 00:52:35,480 --> 00:52:37,960 Speaker 2: with Prime Minister Modi and with President Biden, but came 1164 00:52:38,000 --> 00:52:40,360 Speaker 2: out directly afterwards and he said, hey, I'm hosting the 1165 00:52:40,360 --> 00:52:42,759 Speaker 2: G twenty next year and putin if you want to come, 1166 00:52:42,920 --> 00:52:44,520 Speaker 2: we're not going to arrest you as a part of 1167 00:52:44,520 --> 00:52:48,439 Speaker 2: the international whatever criminal court tribunal. I mean, these are 1168 00:52:48,480 --> 00:52:51,280 Speaker 2: not things that you do whenever you're afraid of the West, 1169 00:52:51,320 --> 00:52:53,880 Speaker 2: afraid of Europe are in terms of their view on 1170 00:52:53,960 --> 00:52:56,120 Speaker 2: Russia and Ukraine, it's what you do when you have 1171 00:52:56,280 --> 00:53:00,000 Speaker 2: a completely different view. You're looking out for your own interests, 1172 00:53:00,280 --> 00:53:03,560 Speaker 2: and you think that the war in Ukraine, while you 1173 00:53:03,600 --> 00:53:05,759 Speaker 2: think it's important, you think it's unjust. You know what's 1174 00:53:05,760 --> 00:53:08,040 Speaker 2: happening there. You're like, Okay, it's not the primacy of 1175 00:53:08,040 --> 00:53:10,400 Speaker 2: how I'm going to base my entire foreign policy. So 1176 00:53:10,760 --> 00:53:14,520 Speaker 2: Washington's decision to make everything about Ukraine, every single thing 1177 00:53:14,560 --> 00:53:17,480 Speaker 2: that we do, you know, alienating so many of our allies. 1178 00:53:17,760 --> 00:53:19,959 Speaker 2: The G twenty, to me, is a much better view 1179 00:53:20,320 --> 00:53:22,279 Speaker 2: of how this is going as opposed to the G seven, 1180 00:53:22,320 --> 00:53:26,160 Speaker 2: because the G twenty is the actual emerging economies all 1181 00:53:26,200 --> 00:53:28,960 Speaker 2: across Asian And it's also no surprise that President Biden 1182 00:53:29,040 --> 00:53:31,640 Speaker 2: right now is in Hanoi and Vietnam because he needs 1183 00:53:31,640 --> 00:53:33,920 Speaker 2: to shore up what's going on with our Asian alliance, 1184 00:53:33,960 --> 00:53:37,120 Speaker 2: and Vietnam is our number ten trading partner, like reality 1185 00:53:37,239 --> 00:53:39,440 Speaker 2: is beginning to hit us in terms of our obsession 1186 00:53:39,520 --> 00:53:40,240 Speaker 2: with this conflict. 1187 00:53:40,480 --> 00:53:45,040 Speaker 1: It's accelerated the realization of a multipolar world that you know, 1188 00:53:45,080 --> 00:53:47,799 Speaker 1: we were already heading towards, but this has helped to 1189 00:53:47,880 --> 00:53:51,279 Speaker 1: consolidate that new reality. And you can see it when 1190 00:53:51,360 --> 00:53:54,239 Speaker 1: a country like Brazil is like, no, we're not going 1191 00:53:54,280 --> 00:53:55,680 Speaker 1: to go along at all with. 1192 00:53:55,560 --> 00:53:56,799 Speaker 3: What you think, with what you say. 1193 00:53:56,840 --> 00:53:58,400 Speaker 1: We're not going to be ugly er mean about it, 1194 00:53:58,440 --> 00:54:00,040 Speaker 1: but we have a different view of this and I 1195 00:54:00,040 --> 00:54:02,600 Speaker 1: feel very comfortable asserting it and looking out for our 1196 00:54:02,640 --> 00:54:03,880 Speaker 1: own interest in this conflict. 1197 00:54:03,880 --> 00:54:05,000 Speaker 3: Same thing with India. 1198 00:54:05,080 --> 00:54:08,319 Speaker 1: You know, is interesting the news coverage of the G 1199 00:54:08,440 --> 00:54:11,600 Speaker 1: twenty because this is a sort of understandable given that 1200 00:54:11,640 --> 00:54:13,560 Speaker 1: the language last time around was a little bit stronger, 1201 00:54:13,560 --> 00:54:16,160 Speaker 1: and you know, they weren't able to condemn Russian aggression, 1202 00:54:16,160 --> 00:54:17,920 Speaker 1: which you know, I think that they should be able 1203 00:54:17,960 --> 00:54:21,279 Speaker 1: to do, but there was a lot of shock that 1204 00:54:21,280 --> 00:54:23,960 Speaker 1: that was the case. And if anything, I'm actually surprised 1205 00:54:23,960 --> 00:54:26,280 Speaker 1: they were able to issue any sort of joint communicate 1206 00:54:26,400 --> 00:54:28,560 Speaker 1: because of the size of the divisions at this point. 1207 00:54:28,960 --> 00:54:31,080 Speaker 1: And you know, it was a big win for Moodi 1208 00:54:31,120 --> 00:54:33,440 Speaker 1: who's facing reelection to be able to get any sort 1209 00:54:33,600 --> 00:54:37,239 Speaker 1: of joint statement out From the US's side, you had 1210 00:54:37,400 --> 00:54:40,120 Speaker 1: Jake Sullivan, US National Security Advisor calling it a set 1211 00:54:40,160 --> 00:54:43,239 Speaker 1: of consequential paragraphs. They're talking about. Listen, you had to 1212 00:54:43,280 --> 00:54:45,160 Speaker 1: compromise some if you were going to get anything done. 1213 00:54:45,239 --> 00:54:48,280 Speaker 1: Some of their priorities in terms of getting grain exports, 1214 00:54:48,360 --> 00:54:51,640 Speaker 1: restarting the Black Sea that was discussed and you know, 1215 00:54:51,680 --> 00:54:55,400 Speaker 1: commitment to that was realized within this communicay, which is 1216 00:54:55,480 --> 00:54:58,440 Speaker 1: I think really important not just for Ukrainians but for 1217 00:54:58,520 --> 00:55:01,120 Speaker 1: people around the world in terms of food prices. There 1218 00:55:01,160 --> 00:55:04,520 Speaker 1: was another piece here that you know, there was an 1219 00:55:04,560 --> 00:55:08,160 Speaker 1: effort to highlight climate change and to call for reduction 1220 00:55:08,239 --> 00:55:10,680 Speaker 1: fossil fuels, but there was also no deadline there, so 1221 00:55:10,680 --> 00:55:12,600 Speaker 1: it's just sort of like meaningless words on that one. 1222 00:55:12,680 --> 00:55:14,880 Speaker 1: Saudi Arabia obviously not going to go along with that 1223 00:55:14,920 --> 00:55:18,880 Speaker 1: one either. So while there while the some of the 1224 00:55:18,920 --> 00:55:21,319 Speaker 1: things that were not in the communicy. 1225 00:55:20,880 --> 00:55:23,680 Speaker 3: Really underscore the deep divisions at. 1226 00:55:23,520 --> 00:55:26,080 Speaker 1: This point within the G twenty and between the US 1227 00:55:26,080 --> 00:55:28,080 Speaker 1: and Europe and the rest of the world in general. 1228 00:55:28,440 --> 00:55:31,080 Speaker 1: Like I said, I'm actually surprised they were able to 1229 00:55:31,120 --> 00:55:33,240 Speaker 1: put anything out jointly. 1230 00:55:33,320 --> 00:55:35,440 Speaker 2: At this point, another important point from the G twenty 1231 00:55:35,600 --> 00:55:38,360 Speaker 2: Prime Minister Mode making a big show of inviting the 1232 00:55:38,400 --> 00:55:40,960 Speaker 2: African Union directly as a member of the G twenty. 1233 00:55:41,000 --> 00:55:44,000 Speaker 2: That's again, you know, acceleration. The African Union very very 1234 00:55:44,000 --> 00:55:46,840 Speaker 2: different of view of the conflict in Ukraine than anything 1235 00:55:46,920 --> 00:55:48,600 Speaker 2: else going on in the West. They have much deeper 1236 00:55:48,640 --> 00:55:50,640 Speaker 2: ties with China, you know, I just want to emphasize 1237 00:55:50,680 --> 00:55:52,640 Speaker 2: what you said. We're seeing a huge bifurcation with the 1238 00:55:52,640 --> 00:55:54,040 Speaker 2: rest of the world and US. Now, that doesn't mean 1239 00:55:54,040 --> 00:55:55,760 Speaker 2: the rest of the world agrees with each other. India 1240 00:55:55,760 --> 00:55:57,840 Speaker 2: and China avil sorts of rivalry. Actually, there was a 1241 00:55:57,840 --> 00:56:00,920 Speaker 2: lot of questions about shishing Ping and China ahead of 1242 00:56:00,960 --> 00:56:02,920 Speaker 2: this because of a map that the Chinese government put 1243 00:56:02,920 --> 00:56:06,400 Speaker 2: out which jos a border dispute. But overall, I want to, 1244 00:56:06,440 --> 00:56:08,440 Speaker 2: you know, just to underscore what you said, which is 1245 00:56:08,560 --> 00:56:10,640 Speaker 2: I actually thought there was criminal undercoverage what was going 1246 00:56:10,680 --> 00:56:12,839 Speaker 2: on in the G twenty, just because what was going 1247 00:56:12,880 --> 00:56:14,880 Speaker 2: on there and with the bricks. You know, that is 1248 00:56:14,960 --> 00:56:18,600 Speaker 2: clearly going to define a huge portion of geopolitical just 1249 00:56:18,880 --> 00:56:23,920 Speaker 2: of geopolitical not only tension, but division and evolution in 1250 00:56:23,960 --> 00:56:26,600 Speaker 2: the next century. As opposed to the amount of slabbeign 1251 00:56:26,640 --> 00:56:30,120 Speaker 2: coverage that Western based ones like G seven and others get. 1252 00:56:30,320 --> 00:56:32,960 Speaker 2: Our future is in Asia. I mean, like I said, 1253 00:56:33,000 --> 00:56:37,399 Speaker 2: anyone who can read an actual table can see where 1254 00:56:37,440 --> 00:56:39,600 Speaker 2: our major trading partners are, where fifty percent of the 1255 00:56:39,600 --> 00:56:42,960 Speaker 2: world's GDP is. And to see the divisions also between 1256 00:56:42,960 --> 00:56:45,200 Speaker 2: the you know, the Japanese and the South Koreans coming 1257 00:56:45,200 --> 00:56:47,799 Speaker 2: together at their recent Camp David summit. As opposed to 1258 00:56:47,840 --> 00:56:51,040 Speaker 2: how much attention the administration paced in Ukraine, Ukraine, Ukraine, 1259 00:56:51,080 --> 00:56:53,239 Speaker 2: you think it's the most important thing going on in 1260 00:56:53,239 --> 00:56:56,120 Speaker 2: the world. I thought it was a very interesting, you 1261 00:56:56,160 --> 00:56:58,239 Speaker 2: know thing, that this even happened. And to see that 1262 00:56:58,400 --> 00:57:01,279 Speaker 2: again going to Brazil and Putin will be showing up 1263 00:57:01,560 --> 00:57:04,200 Speaker 2: most likely and facing some of the biggest critics on 1264 00:57:04,239 --> 00:57:06,000 Speaker 2: the world stage in a year from now. What a 1265 00:57:06,200 --> 00:57:08,520 Speaker 2: crazy development. I mean, think about that. President Biden well 1266 00:57:08,480 --> 00:57:11,200 Speaker 2: be running for reelection a year from now. I guess 1267 00:57:11,200 --> 00:57:14,320 Speaker 2: if he's around and he's you see Putin face to face, 1268 00:57:14,360 --> 00:57:16,400 Speaker 2: which that's what led to that famous moment. I think 1269 00:57:16,440 --> 00:57:18,600 Speaker 2: it was at the G eight, or maybe it would 1270 00:57:18,600 --> 00:57:20,360 Speaker 2: be in the G twenty when Obama and Putin had 1271 00:57:20,400 --> 00:57:23,600 Speaker 2: the sideline conversation. So you never know how these things 1272 00:57:23,600 --> 00:57:24,840 Speaker 2: are going to go. It's going to be interesting. 1273 00:57:24,960 --> 00:57:30,560 Speaker 1: Yeah, indeed, we got some big domestic news that's going 1274 00:57:30,640 --> 00:57:31,480 Speaker 1: to be excited about. 1275 00:57:31,320 --> 00:57:32,880 Speaker 2: Here, so I have you know. It's just one of 1276 00:57:32,880 --> 00:57:38,720 Speaker 2: those where a major failure for small D democracy. Nancy Pelosi, 1277 00:57:38,760 --> 00:57:42,080 Speaker 2: Representative California San Francisco, has decided she will be running 1278 00:57:42,160 --> 00:57:45,440 Speaker 2: for reelection. The fact that she's running for reelection at 1279 00:57:45,480 --> 00:57:48,560 Speaker 2: all is stunning. She's eighty three years old, but the 1280 00:57:48,600 --> 00:57:51,960 Speaker 2: reasons for why she's running for reelection are very telling 1281 00:57:52,000 --> 00:57:54,640 Speaker 2: in what she's chosen to emphasize. Let's take a listen. 1282 00:57:55,000 --> 00:58:00,640 Speaker 13: Just signed now that in light of the values Fransisco, 1283 00:58:01,320 --> 00:58:05,720 Speaker 13: where she had always been ground to promote, that she 1284 00:58:05,840 --> 00:58:15,040 Speaker 13: may have made decision to seek reelection. I think it's 1285 00:58:15,080 --> 00:58:19,240 Speaker 13: important for me to use my knowledge of the Congress, 1286 00:58:19,280 --> 00:58:23,120 Speaker 13: my knowledge of the city, my concern about the country 1287 00:58:23,480 --> 00:58:26,440 Speaker 13: for the benefit of my constituent. So it was really 1288 00:58:26,440 --> 00:58:29,120 Speaker 13: more respons about responsibility. 1289 00:58:29,360 --> 00:58:32,440 Speaker 2: Did you ever think about not running, Well, you always do. 1290 00:58:32,640 --> 00:58:36,440 Speaker 13: I mean for thirty six years I've running. You always 1291 00:58:36,480 --> 00:58:40,840 Speaker 13: have to measure what the value is of your contribution 1292 00:58:41,760 --> 00:58:44,760 Speaker 13: in something like this, and I never thought I'd stay 1293 00:58:44,800 --> 00:58:45,680 Speaker 13: as long as I did. 1294 00:58:45,840 --> 00:58:47,560 Speaker 2: I never thought I'd stay as long as I did, 1295 00:58:47,560 --> 00:58:50,040 Speaker 2: but I'm staying. Anyways, Let's go to put this up there, 1296 00:58:50,080 --> 00:58:53,520 Speaker 2: and Nancy Pelosi decides that she will be running for 1297 00:58:53,560 --> 00:58:57,080 Speaker 2: reelection in twenty twenty four, dismissing talk of retirement at 1298 00:58:57,120 --> 00:58:59,720 Speaker 2: age eighty three. I mean, this is just someone who 1299 00:58:59,880 --> 00:59:02,840 Speaker 2: is power hungry, and I think their entire identity is 1300 00:59:02,880 --> 00:59:06,680 Speaker 2: wrapped up in their holding office. And at this point, 1301 00:59:06,720 --> 00:59:08,520 Speaker 2: you know, even though she's not the speaker, she's like 1302 00:59:08,560 --> 00:59:10,880 Speaker 2: still the de facto leader of the Democratic Party. She 1303 00:59:10,920 --> 00:59:12,880 Speaker 2: doesn't want to give it up, Crystal. And you know 1304 00:59:13,200 --> 00:59:16,480 Speaker 2: after the coup that she's pulled off by keeping Feinstein 1305 00:59:16,560 --> 00:59:20,800 Speaker 2: in office, rigging the California Democratic primary process so that 1306 00:59:20,840 --> 00:59:23,960 Speaker 2: she'll never face an opponent opponent so that her chosen 1307 00:59:24,040 --> 00:59:26,720 Speaker 2: Adam Schiff will very likely be able to get them 1308 00:59:26,840 --> 00:59:29,520 Speaker 2: or at least contest the nomination. Why should she, I mean, 1309 00:59:29,560 --> 00:59:31,880 Speaker 2: she's one of those who's like, yeah, it doesn't matter. 1310 00:59:31,960 --> 00:59:35,800 Speaker 2: And she's impervious to criticism about the stock trading, She's 1311 00:59:35,840 --> 00:59:39,240 Speaker 2: impervious to criticism about her age. She pulls the feminism 1312 00:59:39,280 --> 00:59:41,200 Speaker 2: card anytime you even try and talk about it as 1313 00:59:41,200 --> 00:59:43,160 Speaker 2: if it's a feminist issue that people are way too 1314 00:59:43,160 --> 00:59:45,280 Speaker 2: old in Congress. I mean, we she just should not 1315 00:59:45,720 --> 00:59:48,200 Speaker 2: dismiss the idea that it's disgraceful that people who are 1316 00:59:48,240 --> 00:59:51,600 Speaker 2: this old continue to just hold onto power and not 1317 00:59:51,760 --> 00:59:54,520 Speaker 2: allow any new generation. And my personal favorite was a 1318 00:59:54,520 --> 00:59:56,960 Speaker 2: clip where she was defending like the state of San Francisco. 1319 00:59:57,080 --> 00:59:59,200 Speaker 2: Someone was like, hey, how's san Francisco done under She's like, 1320 00:59:59,240 --> 01:00:01,720 Speaker 2: you're running for Sanford Goes not doing very well right now. 1321 01:00:01,720 --> 01:00:04,000 Speaker 2: She's like, no, that's an isolated local issue. It's like, well, 1322 01:00:04,040 --> 01:00:05,320 Speaker 2: why are you doing anything about it? 1323 01:00:05,360 --> 01:00:05,520 Speaker 8: Then? 1324 01:00:05,640 --> 01:00:07,840 Speaker 2: Yeah, that's your whole ostensible reason for running. So she 1325 01:00:07,920 --> 01:00:11,040 Speaker 2: mentions Trump, she dismisses talk, and she says, san Francisco 1326 01:00:11,120 --> 01:00:12,200 Speaker 2: is fine. It's ridiculous. 1327 01:00:12,240 --> 01:00:14,880 Speaker 1: I feel like these people feel like they're so core 1328 01:00:14,920 --> 01:00:17,520 Speaker 1: to like that they just, I don't know, they just 1329 01:00:17,560 --> 01:00:20,240 Speaker 1: can't give it up. You know, it's become so central 1330 01:00:20,320 --> 01:00:24,280 Speaker 1: to their own personal identity. They love the power, they 1331 01:00:24,320 --> 01:00:27,360 Speaker 1: love like the spectacle and the yes men and women 1332 01:00:27,440 --> 01:00:31,680 Speaker 1: around them, and they just never let go of their grip, 1333 01:00:31,960 --> 01:00:36,080 Speaker 1: grasping grip on whatever power they have. And you know, 1334 01:00:36,120 --> 01:00:38,720 Speaker 1: this is consequential Obviously it's consequential for people who live 1335 01:00:38,760 --> 01:00:41,440 Speaker 1: in her district. But obviously Nancy Pelosi is much more 1336 01:00:41,480 --> 01:00:44,200 Speaker 1: than just one member of Congress representing one district. She 1337 01:00:44,320 --> 01:00:47,360 Speaker 1: is a national figure, and as long as she remains 1338 01:00:47,400 --> 01:00:51,160 Speaker 1: in Congress, and probably even if she did retire, you 1339 01:00:51,200 --> 01:00:53,840 Speaker 1: can be assured that as much as Sachem Jeffrey's name 1340 01:00:53,960 --> 01:00:55,720 Speaker 1: maybe at the front of the cock is, if you 1341 01:00:55,760 --> 01:00:57,840 Speaker 1: know who was really running the show there. And so 1342 01:00:58,920 --> 01:01:01,720 Speaker 1: I just think it continues point to an extraordinary failure 1343 01:01:01,880 --> 01:01:04,479 Speaker 1: at the core of our democracy that these people feel 1344 01:01:04,520 --> 01:01:06,840 Speaker 1: like they can hang on forever and ever, well into 1345 01:01:06,880 --> 01:01:09,960 Speaker 1: their eighties with Diane Feinstein, my got into her nineties 1346 01:01:10,480 --> 01:01:15,360 Speaker 1: and never face real accountability and never be even pushed 1347 01:01:15,400 --> 01:01:19,160 Speaker 1: aside for a new generation, hopefully that's not just a 1348 01:01:19,200 --> 01:01:21,280 Speaker 1: repeat of the old generation that maybe has some different 1349 01:01:21,320 --> 01:01:24,640 Speaker 1: ideas and perspectives to offer at least open it up 1350 01:01:24,680 --> 01:01:27,320 Speaker 1: to a real democratic process. So I just think it's 1351 01:01:27,360 --> 01:01:32,720 Speaker 1: a sign of more core wrought at how unrepresentative are 1352 01:01:32,760 --> 01:01:34,720 Speaker 1: so called democracy has truly become. 1353 01:01:34,520 --> 01:01:36,280 Speaker 2: One hundred percent. And you know, one of the things 1354 01:01:36,320 --> 01:01:39,000 Speaker 2: that she continues to say is she even used the 1355 01:01:39,040 --> 01:01:42,200 Speaker 2: Trump boogeyman in one interview that she gave. She was like, well, 1356 01:01:42,480 --> 01:01:44,560 Speaker 2: if Trump comes back, like we're going to need somebody 1357 01:01:44,600 --> 01:01:46,000 Speaker 2: to stand up to him. It's like, well, what are 1358 01:01:46,080 --> 01:01:48,160 Speaker 2: you going to do? How has that gone? I mean 1359 01:01:48,400 --> 01:01:49,600 Speaker 2: exactly how did it go for you? 1360 01:01:49,680 --> 01:01:51,680 Speaker 1: What makes you think that you did such an effective 1361 01:01:51,760 --> 01:01:54,560 Speaker 1: job at that The man almost won last time around. 1362 01:01:54,640 --> 01:01:58,400 Speaker 1: It's only because of his own absolute insanity and stupidity 1363 01:01:58,560 --> 01:02:01,959 Speaker 1: that he didn't. He's hide with Biden right now while 1364 01:02:01,960 --> 01:02:06,080 Speaker 1: he's facing freaking ninety one different charges, and so you're 1365 01:02:06,200 --> 01:02:09,760 Speaker 1: really the bulwark against Trump and the fascists. Like, give 1366 01:02:09,760 --> 01:02:13,080 Speaker 1: me a freaking break. Where is any evidence that any 1367 01:02:13,080 --> 01:02:15,040 Speaker 1: of the approach you've taken to this man has been 1368 01:02:15,080 --> 01:02:16,200 Speaker 1: successful whatsoever? 1369 01:02:16,520 --> 01:02:19,680 Speaker 2: And you know, the thing is is that this fake 1370 01:02:20,160 --> 01:02:23,320 Speaker 2: turnover leadership I think is even worse almost than an 1371 01:02:23,360 --> 01:02:26,320 Speaker 2: out retirement as you were talking about with yeah, hakem Jefferies, 1372 01:02:26,360 --> 01:02:28,800 Speaker 2: because I mean, even standing standy Homer is like eighty 1373 01:02:28,840 --> 01:02:29,560 Speaker 2: four years old. 1374 01:02:29,600 --> 01:02:30,520 Speaker 3: He's the same age as her. 1375 01:02:30,720 --> 01:02:33,800 Speaker 2: Yeah, same age. Jim Clyburn, I know, is also getting 1376 01:02:33,840 --> 01:02:39,320 Speaker 2: up there. Everyone is allegedly stepping down from their leadership roles, 1377 01:02:39,320 --> 01:02:41,600 Speaker 2: but they're not retiring. And it's like when you don't 1378 01:02:41,920 --> 01:02:46,000 Speaker 2: retire then clearly like you're still running the show behind 1379 01:02:46,000 --> 01:02:49,240 Speaker 2: the scenes. And to see this running for reelection, to 1380 01:02:49,280 --> 01:02:51,440 Speaker 2: remain the main face of the party. She's still the 1381 01:02:51,560 --> 01:02:54,120 Speaker 2: number one fund raising draw which is insane to me. 1382 01:02:54,240 --> 01:02:57,000 Speaker 2: But it shows you a lot about Democratic downers and 1383 01:02:57,480 --> 01:03:01,280 Speaker 2: to still be like pulling strings behind the scene with Feinstein. 1384 01:03:01,560 --> 01:03:03,920 Speaker 2: You know, we can't emphasize enough just how much of 1385 01:03:03,920 --> 01:03:07,040 Speaker 2: a failure it really is. And also the inability to 1386 01:03:07,080 --> 01:03:10,000 Speaker 2: pass the torch and just let it. You know, who 1387 01:03:10,000 --> 01:03:12,120 Speaker 2: knows how it will play out. They came from the generation, 1388 01:03:12,200 --> 01:03:14,440 Speaker 2: all of these people from when actually there was a 1389 01:03:14,480 --> 01:03:16,960 Speaker 2: huge injection of new blood in the Democratic Party. They're 1390 01:03:17,000 --> 01:03:19,880 Speaker 2: called the Watergate babies. A lot of people were swept 1391 01:03:19,920 --> 01:03:21,960 Speaker 2: into the office with a disgust of the Republican Party 1392 01:03:21,960 --> 01:03:25,720 Speaker 2: and the institutional decline after Watergate. And it's just funny 1393 01:03:25,720 --> 01:03:28,440 Speaker 2: because they've effectively created their own type of situation where 1394 01:03:28,640 --> 01:03:31,200 Speaker 2: their inability to let go of power has led to 1395 01:03:31,280 --> 01:03:34,040 Speaker 2: the same sort of cynicism which propelled them to office 1396 01:03:34,040 --> 01:03:35,680 Speaker 2: in the first place. But they never wanted to learn 1397 01:03:35,720 --> 01:03:37,840 Speaker 2: that lesson. They just keep droning on and on. I 1398 01:03:37,880 --> 01:03:40,120 Speaker 2: was talking with someone recently and I think what they 1399 01:03:40,120 --> 01:03:42,160 Speaker 2: said is like, look, Congress is a great place to 1400 01:03:42,200 --> 01:03:44,840 Speaker 2: be old. You have a mandatory staff, You get free flights, 1401 01:03:44,920 --> 01:03:46,560 Speaker 2: you know, all around the country, no matter where you 1402 01:03:46,560 --> 01:03:48,360 Speaker 2: want to go, everyone opens a door for you. You 1403 01:03:48,480 --> 01:03:50,320 Speaker 2: only work three days a week. You don't have to 1404 01:03:50,360 --> 01:03:53,439 Speaker 2: work that hard. If you don't want to, people call. 1405 01:03:53,720 --> 01:03:56,600 Speaker 2: Everyone has to call you, mammer sir. You'll always get 1406 01:03:56,640 --> 01:03:59,040 Speaker 2: you know, priority boarding on an aircraft. You'll always get 1407 01:03:59,040 --> 01:04:01,640 Speaker 2: a dinner reservation, you get free booze, you get free 1408 01:04:02,160 --> 01:04:05,800 Speaker 2: free dinners. What's not to love. It's effectively a great 1409 01:04:05,920 --> 01:04:09,720 Speaker 2: retirement home, except we all pay for it, and they're 1410 01:04:09,760 --> 01:04:12,200 Speaker 2: supposed to be working for us. Yeah, that's a crazy part. 1411 01:04:12,440 --> 01:04:13,280 Speaker 3: Yeah, I looked it up. 1412 01:04:13,320 --> 01:04:13,680 Speaker 2: You're right. 1413 01:04:13,680 --> 01:04:16,840 Speaker 3: Hoyer's eighty four. Yea, Clyburns eighty three, Pelosis eighty three. 1414 01:04:16,920 --> 01:04:18,440 Speaker 3: This is nuts completely. 1415 01:04:18,560 --> 01:04:20,440 Speaker 2: The President's eighty one. He's a spring chicken. 1416 01:04:20,840 --> 01:04:22,680 Speaker 3: Yeah, that's a great point. 1417 01:04:24,040 --> 01:04:25,760 Speaker 1: This came up a lot in the focus group, and 1418 01:04:25,800 --> 01:04:28,400 Speaker 1: we're going to show you some of this. But they 1419 01:04:28,600 --> 01:04:31,680 Speaker 1: were very concerned about and they brought up McConnell, and 1420 01:04:31,720 --> 01:04:33,840 Speaker 1: they brought up fine set. Of course, they brought up Biden, 1421 01:04:34,160 --> 01:04:36,560 Speaker 1: but they see this also on the you know, this 1422 01:04:36,640 --> 01:04:38,800 Speaker 1: is a group of Republicans in New Hampshire. They saw 1423 01:04:38,840 --> 01:04:40,920 Speaker 1: this also as a really core issue. Now, it was 1424 01:04:40,960 --> 01:04:42,840 Speaker 1: interesting because they differed on how you deal with it. 1425 01:04:43,280 --> 01:04:45,320 Speaker 1: There was some some people were like I definitely want 1426 01:04:45,360 --> 01:04:47,440 Speaker 1: term limits or I definitely want angelamits, and who were like, 1427 01:04:47,520 --> 01:04:49,120 Speaker 1: I don't know about that, and maybe we should have 1428 01:04:49,160 --> 01:04:51,680 Speaker 1: a cognitive ability test. So there was a lot of 1429 01:04:51,720 --> 01:04:54,520 Speaker 1: ideas about Okay, how do we actually deal with this 1430 01:04:54,560 --> 01:04:59,560 Speaker 1: core failure? But I think there is just wide spread 1431 01:04:59,760 --> 01:05:02,760 Speaker 1: this discussed with the way that these people, whether they're 1432 01:05:02,800 --> 01:05:06,400 Speaker 1: Republicans or Democrats, hang on to power long after the 1433 01:05:06,400 --> 01:05:07,520 Speaker 1: public really want in there. 1434 01:05:07,840 --> 01:05:09,000 Speaker 2: Absolutely right, all. 1435 01:05:08,920 --> 01:05:11,880 Speaker 1: Right, we've got some big developments this morning in terms 1436 01:05:11,960 --> 01:05:16,720 Speaker 1: of what happened on that faithful day when JFK was assassinated. 1437 01:05:16,880 --> 01:05:19,680 Speaker 1: Now a little bit of context just for people to remember. 1438 01:05:20,440 --> 01:05:23,280 Speaker 1: Core to the idea put forward by the Warren Commission 1439 01:05:23,680 --> 01:05:26,960 Speaker 1: that led to the conclusion that Lee Harvey Oswald was 1440 01:05:27,040 --> 01:05:31,240 Speaker 1: the lone gunman, was this idea of a pristine or 1441 01:05:31,400 --> 01:05:35,080 Speaker 1: magic bullet which was discovered, which supposedly, did you know 1442 01:05:35,160 --> 01:05:38,920 Speaker 1: all the damage to JFK, but also to the governor 1443 01:05:38,920 --> 01:05:42,480 Speaker 1: that was there with him, and the bullet itself looked impeccable, 1444 01:05:42,520 --> 01:05:44,600 Speaker 1: like it hadn't done anything at all. So this was 1445 01:05:44,640 --> 01:05:46,360 Speaker 1: always one of the points that people were like. 1446 01:05:46,960 --> 01:05:49,200 Speaker 2: I don't know, but to be on the stretcher. 1447 01:05:48,920 --> 01:05:52,320 Speaker 1: Yes, on a stretcher, which becomes incredibly relevant. But to 1448 01:05:52,440 --> 01:05:55,360 Speaker 1: make that whole theory work, they had to have this 1449 01:05:55,440 --> 01:05:57,360 Speaker 1: bullet doing things that no bullet. 1450 01:05:57,000 --> 01:05:59,760 Speaker 3: Has ever done before. Okay, that's the backstory. 1451 01:06:00,120 --> 01:06:02,720 Speaker 1: So now we have one Secret Service agents who was 1452 01:06:02,760 --> 01:06:05,840 Speaker 1: actually charged with protecting Jackie Kennedy. 1453 01:06:06,400 --> 01:06:08,400 Speaker 3: He has decided to tell. 1454 01:06:08,320 --> 01:06:10,920 Speaker 1: His story and he claims, let's put this up on 1455 01:06:10,960 --> 01:06:15,200 Speaker 1: the screen from Vanity Fair. He claims he was actually 1456 01:06:15,480 --> 01:06:19,960 Speaker 1: the person who found that bullet, and he found it 1457 01:06:20,120 --> 01:06:24,560 Speaker 1: in Kennedy's limo, and the placement of where he found 1458 01:06:24,560 --> 01:06:27,560 Speaker 1: it is incredibly important because it would make no sense 1459 01:06:27,640 --> 01:06:30,240 Speaker 1: for that bullet to be in that location if it 1460 01:06:30,280 --> 01:06:33,080 Speaker 1: actually did all those things that the Warrant Commission claimed 1461 01:06:33,120 --> 01:06:37,640 Speaker 1: that it did. Furthermore, part of what allowed them to 1462 01:06:37,800 --> 01:06:42,439 Speaker 1: draw that conclusion was there were two stretchers, right. There 1463 01:06:42,520 --> 01:06:46,040 Speaker 1: was one stretcher that had Governor Connolly, who was injured 1464 01:06:46,080 --> 01:06:48,840 Speaker 1: but not killed in the shooting, and one stretcher that 1465 01:06:48,960 --> 01:06:54,960 Speaker 1: had JFK. This secret Service agent claims that he put 1466 01:06:55,000 --> 01:06:57,320 Speaker 1: the bullet at the hospital because he wanted to make 1467 01:06:57,360 --> 01:06:58,760 Speaker 1: sure that they had it and it was an important 1468 01:06:58,760 --> 01:07:01,760 Speaker 1: piece of evidence. But he himself health is shocked and 1469 01:07:01,800 --> 01:07:05,000 Speaker 1: horrified and suffered clearly with a lot of PTSD, et cetera. 1470 01:07:05,080 --> 01:07:08,040 Speaker 1: But he decides to put this bullet, he says, on 1471 01:07:08,320 --> 01:07:12,320 Speaker 1: Kennedy's stretcher. Now for it to make sense that this 1472 01:07:12,360 --> 01:07:14,440 Speaker 1: bullet did all the things they said it did, it 1473 01:07:14,520 --> 01:07:18,920 Speaker 1: needed to have been instead with Governor Connolly's body. So 1474 01:07:19,200 --> 01:07:21,480 Speaker 1: I know this can sound really like in the weeds, 1475 01:07:21,720 --> 01:07:25,520 Speaker 1: but this one bullet, like the Warren Commission, really hung 1476 01:07:25,640 --> 01:07:31,000 Speaker 1: their entire conclusions on what happened with this one bullet. 1477 01:07:31,200 --> 01:07:33,240 Speaker 1: And so the fact that you now have a secret 1478 01:07:33,320 --> 01:07:36,600 Speaker 1: Service agent who you know, for a variety of reasons, 1479 01:07:36,640 --> 01:07:39,200 Speaker 1: mostly his own trauma, didn't want to speak out before, 1480 01:07:39,320 --> 01:07:41,960 Speaker 1: didn't actually dig into the Warren Commission report, didn't dig 1481 01:07:42,000 --> 01:07:44,800 Speaker 1: in until recently until any of the you know, the 1482 01:07:44,880 --> 01:07:47,640 Speaker 1: other alternative explanations that are out there for what might 1483 01:07:47,640 --> 01:07:50,439 Speaker 1: have actually happened on this day. He has decided here 1484 01:07:50,600 --> 01:07:52,560 Speaker 1: now while he's probably close to the end of his 1485 01:07:52,640 --> 01:07:56,920 Speaker 1: life to come out and tell this story. So he 1486 01:07:57,000 --> 01:07:59,200 Speaker 1: says that he spotted this bullet resting on the top 1487 01:07:59,280 --> 01:08:01,400 Speaker 1: of the back seat, He picked it up, put it 1488 01:08:01,400 --> 01:08:03,919 Speaker 1: in his pocket, brought it into the hospital. Then upon 1489 01:08:04,120 --> 01:08:06,320 Speaker 1: entering trauma room number one at that stage, he was 1490 01:08:06,360 --> 01:08:08,840 Speaker 1: the only non medical person in the room besides Missus Kennedy. 1491 01:08:09,120 --> 01:08:11,680 Speaker 1: He insists he placed the bullet on a white cotton 1492 01:08:11,680 --> 01:08:16,120 Speaker 1: blanket on the President's stretcher. And this vanity, Fairs says, 1493 01:08:16,280 --> 01:08:19,559 Speaker 1: as it turns out, may upend key conclusions of the 1494 01:08:19,560 --> 01:08:22,400 Speaker 1: Warren Commission, the body created by President Lyndon Johnson to 1495 01:08:22,439 --> 01:08:26,519 Speaker 1: investigate the assassination. And part of why, Sagary, you have 1496 01:08:26,600 --> 01:08:29,280 Speaker 1: to have this one bullet doing so many things is 1497 01:08:29,320 --> 01:08:32,080 Speaker 1: because the type of gun that Lee Harvey os while 1498 01:08:32,160 --> 01:08:34,280 Speaker 1: supposedly used like there was no way he could have 1499 01:08:34,439 --> 01:08:39,280 Speaker 1: himself fired sufficient rounds in a short period, is like 1500 01:08:39,320 --> 01:08:41,840 Speaker 1: two seconds that he would have had to fire sufficient rounds, 1501 01:08:42,160 --> 01:08:45,200 Speaker 1: And witnesses on the scene said, many of them said 1502 01:08:45,200 --> 01:08:47,720 Speaker 1: they heard more rounds than what the official conclusion in 1503 01:08:47,760 --> 01:08:49,519 Speaker 1: the report was. So you can see the way they 1504 01:08:49,560 --> 01:08:52,639 Speaker 1: sort of like cobbled things together to try to make 1505 01:08:52,680 --> 01:08:55,680 Speaker 1: this theory work and to rule out the possibility of 1506 01:08:55,760 --> 01:08:56,519 Speaker 1: any other gunman. 1507 01:08:56,600 --> 01:08:59,839 Speaker 2: Yeah, the magic bullet theory was invented by Arlen Spector. 1508 01:09:00,080 --> 01:09:02,439 Speaker 2: It was like the Golden bow tie on the Warren 1509 01:09:02,479 --> 01:09:05,400 Speaker 2: Commission to be able to explain how exactly the amount 1510 01:09:05,400 --> 01:09:08,120 Speaker 2: of bullets that were technically fired possibly or thought to 1511 01:09:08,160 --> 01:09:09,880 Speaker 2: be by Lee Harvey Os while he was able to 1512 01:09:10,200 --> 01:09:11,920 Speaker 2: inflict the damage that it had been. We had the 1513 01:09:11,960 --> 01:09:15,280 Speaker 2: pristine billet which found on the stretcher. The important thing 1514 01:09:15,320 --> 01:09:18,479 Speaker 2: from mister Landis's thing is, I think it's not just trum. 1515 01:09:18,520 --> 01:09:20,320 Speaker 2: I think he was obviously he was afraid. I mean 1516 01:09:20,560 --> 01:09:22,479 Speaker 2: that's really what comes through. If you go through and 1517 01:09:22,520 --> 01:09:25,360 Speaker 2: you read Tom O'Neil's book Chaos, and you have all 1518 01:09:25,400 --> 01:09:28,280 Speaker 2: these people who are involved in Manson. It's clearly the 1519 01:09:28,320 --> 01:09:31,559 Speaker 2: CIA op gone terribly wrong. And many of the cops 1520 01:09:31,560 --> 01:09:34,360 Speaker 2: and others who are involved in that, even decades later, 1521 01:09:34,439 --> 01:09:37,040 Speaker 2: they're terrified to be able to speak to Tom O'Neil 1522 01:09:37,080 --> 01:09:39,280 Speaker 2: whenever he wrote that book. Well, it's the same thing 1523 01:09:39,320 --> 01:09:41,800 Speaker 2: here with many of these secret service agents. And don't forget, 1524 01:09:41,840 --> 01:09:44,479 Speaker 2: I mean these guys were close up. They probably had blood, 1525 01:09:44,520 --> 01:09:46,400 Speaker 2: you know, smeared all over their clothes, and they were 1526 01:09:46,640 --> 01:09:50,160 Speaker 2: witnessed to a horrific murder and then probably put through 1527 01:09:50,200 --> 01:09:54,240 Speaker 2: the ringer and pressure from the FBI and investigative sources. 1528 01:09:54,800 --> 01:09:56,719 Speaker 2: Another thing that he points to is that the scene 1529 01:09:56,800 --> 01:09:59,320 Speaker 2: was not secured at all. It's very important really where 1530 01:09:59,360 --> 01:10:01,799 Speaker 2: he says that he did not He was very concerned 1531 01:10:01,800 --> 01:10:04,320 Speaker 2: about how the scene was not secured properly, about how 1532 01:10:04,400 --> 01:10:08,759 Speaker 2: law enforcement was handling the evidence that was around. And look, 1533 01:10:09,120 --> 01:10:11,720 Speaker 2: what are we to make of what he says, Like 1534 01:10:11,760 --> 01:10:14,639 Speaker 2: you said it cast out on the original magic bullet 1535 01:10:14,640 --> 01:10:18,080 Speaker 2: theory itself, which never made any goddamn sense. But really, 1536 01:10:18,080 --> 01:10:20,000 Speaker 2: what it is is the only doubt we could say 1537 01:10:20,040 --> 01:10:22,559 Speaker 2: as well, people's memories, you know, they age over time. Like, 1538 01:10:22,600 --> 01:10:25,519 Speaker 2: who knows if he's telling the truth or not. I'm 1539 01:10:25,560 --> 01:10:27,760 Speaker 2: inclined to believe him, just because there's never been any 1540 01:10:27,880 --> 01:10:29,800 Speaker 2: like real scrap of evidence for the magic bull of 1541 01:10:29,840 --> 01:10:32,120 Speaker 2: theory in the first place, and because so much of 1542 01:10:32,120 --> 01:10:34,559 Speaker 2: the processing of the scene, of the evidence and all 1543 01:10:34,640 --> 01:10:38,240 Speaker 2: that was so obviously manipulated by the FBI. I recommend 1544 01:10:38,439 --> 01:10:41,040 Speaker 2: Oliver Stones, you know, nearly four hour docu series on 1545 01:10:41,080 --> 01:10:42,840 Speaker 2: this that just came out. I think it came out 1546 01:10:42,920 --> 01:10:44,960 Speaker 2: last year or something like that. It was on showtime. 1547 01:10:45,000 --> 01:10:47,040 Speaker 2: I'm not sure where it's available now. He goes through 1548 01:10:47,080 --> 01:10:49,080 Speaker 2: this in exhaustive detail, like in terms of the chain 1549 01:10:49,120 --> 01:10:52,320 Speaker 2: of custody, the autopsy photos, some of the manipulation that 1550 01:10:52,360 --> 01:10:55,160 Speaker 2: was going on there, the people who were actually at 1551 01:10:55,240 --> 01:10:58,880 Speaker 2: the book depository, whether they saw Lee Harvey Oswald whenever 1552 01:10:58,880 --> 01:11:01,080 Speaker 2: they should have seen Lee Harvey Oswell. I mean, just 1553 01:11:01,080 --> 01:11:03,439 Speaker 2: to me, this is so odd. There's no way that 1554 01:11:03,520 --> 01:11:06,760 Speaker 2: the Warren Commission, us the Warren Commission's narrative of what 1555 01:11:06,880 --> 01:11:08,120 Speaker 2: happened makes any sense. 1556 01:11:08,200 --> 01:11:08,400 Speaker 12: Yeah. 1557 01:11:08,479 --> 01:11:12,479 Speaker 2: Zero. And I find it, you know, important that we're 1558 01:11:12,479 --> 01:11:14,360 Speaker 2: also talking about it on nine to eleven, of course, 1559 01:11:14,880 --> 01:11:17,439 Speaker 2: because it's like it's very important to keep up on 1560 01:11:17,520 --> 01:11:19,519 Speaker 2: all of these things, because you know, a lot of 1561 01:11:19,520 --> 01:11:22,880 Speaker 2: people believe this, at least at the time. But then 1562 01:11:23,040 --> 01:11:26,479 Speaker 2: as the as the time went on increasingly increasingly throughout 1563 01:11:26,520 --> 01:11:28,720 Speaker 2: the seventies and the eighties, there was a feeling with 1564 01:11:28,840 --> 01:11:30,360 Speaker 2: so many of the people who were not only were 1565 01:11:30,400 --> 01:11:32,679 Speaker 2: involved were present on that day, but with the American public, 1566 01:11:32,720 --> 01:11:34,559 Speaker 2: they're like, this just doesn't make any sense. 1567 01:11:34,600 --> 01:11:36,599 Speaker 1: I think the latest pulling was something like sixty percent 1568 01:11:36,640 --> 01:11:40,160 Speaker 1: of the American people now do not buy the Warren Commission 1569 01:11:40,280 --> 01:11:43,639 Speaker 1: official explanation, you know, just to underscore some of what 1570 01:11:43,800 --> 01:11:46,640 Speaker 1: you're saying there, because it becomes really critical. 1571 01:11:46,760 --> 01:11:47,240 Speaker 3: You know, in this. 1572 01:11:47,320 --> 01:11:50,280 Speaker 1: Telling, which stretcher the bullet ended up on. Was it 1573 01:11:50,280 --> 01:11:53,920 Speaker 1: Governor Connolly or was it JFK? And this secret Service 1574 01:11:53,960 --> 01:11:56,800 Speaker 1: agent land as he says that it was, he definitely 1575 01:11:56,800 --> 01:12:00,400 Speaker 1: placed it on JFK stretcher. There was even testimony at 1576 01:12:00,400 --> 01:12:04,200 Speaker 1: the time of how the bullet went from one stretcher 1577 01:12:04,240 --> 01:12:07,679 Speaker 1: to the other stretcher. There's a Parkland Memorial Hospital engineer 1578 01:12:07,800 --> 01:12:13,360 Speaker 1: named Darryl Tomlinson who originally testified that the two stretchers 1579 01:12:13,400 --> 01:12:17,200 Speaker 1: were in very proximate locations and the one that had 1580 01:12:17,280 --> 01:12:20,839 Speaker 1: JFK on it got bumped and he saw a bullet 1581 01:12:21,000 --> 01:12:24,759 Speaker 1: fall off of that stretcher onto the floor. Now, under 1582 01:12:25,560 --> 01:12:30,400 Speaker 1: badgering and bullying basically from Arl Inspector, his testimony became 1583 01:12:30,439 --> 01:12:32,919 Speaker 1: a little different when it came time for the Warren Commission, 1584 01:12:32,960 --> 01:12:35,800 Speaker 1: which shows you again how this was not just a 1585 01:12:35,840 --> 01:12:39,720 Speaker 1: straightforward fact finding mission. Arl Inspector and many of the 1586 01:12:39,800 --> 01:12:43,000 Speaker 1: other people who were on that commission who influenced that commission, 1587 01:12:43,439 --> 01:12:46,840 Speaker 1: they had a certain narrative. They wanted that they tried 1588 01:12:46,840 --> 01:12:49,320 Speaker 1: to get all of the facts to fit. There's also 1589 01:12:49,439 --> 01:12:53,080 Speaker 1: a lot of questions about the autopsy that was performed 1590 01:12:53,120 --> 01:12:56,080 Speaker 1: and some of the pictures that disappeared and were never 1591 01:12:56,120 --> 01:12:59,679 Speaker 1: released and may have shown some evidence of other shrapnel, 1592 01:12:59,680 --> 01:13:02,960 Speaker 1: which again would point to additional rounds, which again would 1593 01:13:03,040 --> 01:13:07,360 Speaker 1: basically rule out the idea that Lee Harvey Oswald was 1594 01:13:07,560 --> 01:13:12,840 Speaker 1: the loan gunman. So somehow those pictures disappeared. Don't know why, 1595 01:13:12,920 --> 01:13:16,120 Speaker 1: but could be very convenient for people who wanted a 1596 01:13:16,280 --> 01:13:19,519 Speaker 1: particular narrative to go forward and to be able to 1597 01:13:19,560 --> 01:13:21,320 Speaker 1: put this in the rear view mirror and not have 1598 01:13:21,360 --> 01:13:23,160 Speaker 1: a lot of people asking a lot of questions. 1599 01:13:23,360 --> 01:13:24,120 Speaker 3: I thought it was interesting. 1600 01:13:24,240 --> 01:13:27,960 Speaker 1: Jefferson Morley, who's JFK researcher and former I think Washington 1601 01:13:27,960 --> 01:13:32,880 Speaker 1: Post journalist and run he's has a substack called JFK Facts. 1602 01:13:32,920 --> 01:13:35,040 Speaker 1: His reaction was, he said, the importance of this story 1603 01:13:35,080 --> 01:13:37,160 Speaker 1: is that the newspaper of record, because this was originally 1604 01:13:37,160 --> 01:13:40,280 Speaker 1: published in The New York Times, now acknowledges the official 1605 01:13:40,320 --> 01:13:43,559 Speaker 1: theory of a quote loan gunman is not very credible. 1606 01:13:43,680 --> 01:13:46,519 Speaker 1: Twice in three months, the paper's ace reporter has broken 1607 01:13:46,680 --> 01:13:48,400 Speaker 1: JFK News, and he goes on to say that he 1608 01:13:48,840 --> 01:13:51,080 Speaker 1: his substacks is going to have Substack is going to 1609 01:13:51,120 --> 01:13:53,439 Speaker 1: have more revelations on the way. But I do think 1610 01:13:53,479 --> 01:13:56,120 Speaker 1: that that the fact that the damn has broken in 1611 01:13:56,160 --> 01:14:00,439 Speaker 1: some ways in terms of mainstream news questioning some of 1612 01:14:00,479 --> 01:14:03,640 Speaker 1: the official narrative that has been pushed for decades and 1613 01:14:03,680 --> 01:14:05,400 Speaker 1: decades at this point, I do think that that is 1614 01:14:05,439 --> 01:14:06,080 Speaker 1: noteworthy as well. 1615 01:14:06,120 --> 01:14:07,760 Speaker 2: One hundred percent got to give all the credit to 1616 01:14:07,760 --> 01:14:10,240 Speaker 2: Oliver Stone. He's the one who reopened this entire thing 1617 01:14:10,280 --> 01:14:13,120 Speaker 2: in nineteen ninety nine with his film. That film had 1618 01:14:13,120 --> 01:14:16,000 Speaker 2: the JFK Assassination Records Act. That didn't end up working 1619 01:14:16,000 --> 01:14:18,240 Speaker 2: out because we still didn't get it, but that really 1620 01:14:18,280 --> 01:14:21,879 Speaker 2: reignited you know, public attention and in terms of interest, 1621 01:14:21,960 --> 01:14:23,680 Speaker 2: and it's been going on now for you know, that 1622 01:14:23,760 --> 01:14:25,880 Speaker 2: was before I was even born. That movie came out, 1623 01:14:25,920 --> 01:14:28,000 Speaker 2: and still people like me were able to watch the 1624 01:14:28,040 --> 01:14:30,200 Speaker 2: movie and then engage with his documentary and more so, 1625 01:14:30,360 --> 01:14:31,640 Speaker 2: I give him all the credit in the world. I 1626 01:14:31,720 --> 01:14:34,679 Speaker 2: really think he's almost singularly responsible for bringing this back 1627 01:14:34,920 --> 01:14:37,559 Speaker 2: in terms of public attention and then paving the way 1628 01:14:37,560 --> 01:14:39,760 Speaker 2: over the last thirty years and opening it so that 1629 01:14:39,800 --> 01:14:42,080 Speaker 2: people like Peter Baker can publish this in the New 1630 01:14:42,160 --> 01:14:43,840 Speaker 2: York Times. Really excellent stuff. 1631 01:14:43,920 --> 01:14:49,120 Speaker 1: Yeah, absolutely, so we'll keep a close eye on that one, Talger, 1632 01:14:49,160 --> 01:14:49,960 Speaker 1: What are you looking at this much? 1633 01:14:50,040 --> 01:14:52,640 Speaker 2: Well, people in the gun world are often derided as 1634 01:14:52,680 --> 01:14:56,000 Speaker 2: paranoid conspiracy theorists. Nobody wants to take your guns. That's 1635 01:14:56,040 --> 01:14:59,200 Speaker 2: mostly the conventional line. It's held up recently until the 1636 01:14:59,240 --> 01:15:02,920 Speaker 2: twenty twenty Democratic primary race, when Beto Rourke proudly declared, quote, 1637 01:15:02,960 --> 01:15:05,800 Speaker 2: damn right, we are coming for your ar fifteen. Actually 1638 01:15:05,800 --> 01:15:08,000 Speaker 2: appreciated when you said that, because it's just obvious and 1639 01:15:08,080 --> 01:15:09,760 Speaker 2: true in the intent of what the end goal for 1640 01:15:09,800 --> 01:15:11,479 Speaker 2: a lot of people who are opposed to gun rights 1641 01:15:11,520 --> 01:15:14,080 Speaker 2: actually want. At least now you can have a real debate. 1642 01:15:14,320 --> 01:15:16,759 Speaker 2: The mask off moment from Beto is now the second 1643 01:15:16,800 --> 01:15:18,840 Speaker 2: in terms of what those opposed to gun rights would 1644 01:15:18,840 --> 01:15:21,600 Speaker 2: do if they had the power. After a stunning episode 1645 01:15:21,600 --> 01:15:24,160 Speaker 2: in the state of New Mexico, the governor of the state, 1646 01:15:24,240 --> 01:15:28,200 Speaker 2: Michelle Luhan Grisham, has unilaterally declared a thirty day ban 1647 01:15:28,360 --> 01:15:31,720 Speaker 2: on carrying guns in public areas or state property in 1648 01:15:31,760 --> 01:15:34,800 Speaker 2: the city of Albuquerque. Through use of a public health 1649 01:15:34,880 --> 01:15:38,599 Speaker 2: emergency declaration. The details of the ban are almost too 1650 01:15:38,680 --> 01:15:41,880 Speaker 2: incredible to believe. The governor decided to put into place 1651 01:15:41,960 --> 01:15:45,599 Speaker 2: this blatantly unconstitutional ban after the death of a five 1652 01:15:45,680 --> 01:15:48,040 Speaker 2: year old girl and believes that the gun ban will 1653 01:15:48,040 --> 01:15:50,800 Speaker 2: provide a quote cooling off period of gun violence for 1654 01:15:50,840 --> 01:15:52,760 Speaker 2: the state so they can figure out the best way 1655 01:15:52,800 --> 01:15:55,760 Speaker 2: to address public safety. What really chills the blood, though, 1656 01:15:55,840 --> 01:15:58,719 Speaker 2: is not how draconian the ban is, but the words 1657 01:15:58,720 --> 01:16:00,960 Speaker 2: that the governor used to in and. 1658 01:16:01,000 --> 01:16:02,200 Speaker 10: All to the Constitution. 1659 01:16:02,400 --> 01:16:08,360 Speaker 11: Isn't it unconstitutional to say you cannot exercise your carrying license. 1660 01:16:08,479 --> 01:16:12,600 Speaker 14: With one exception, and that is if there's an emergency 1661 01:16:13,040 --> 01:16:16,200 Speaker 14: and I've declared an emergency for a temporary amount of time, 1662 01:16:16,720 --> 01:16:22,360 Speaker 14: I can invoke additional powers. No constitutional right, in my view, 1663 01:16:22,680 --> 01:16:26,880 Speaker 14: including my oath, is intended to be absolute. There are 1664 01:16:26,920 --> 01:16:30,480 Speaker 14: restrictions on free speech, there are restrictions on my freedoms 1665 01:16:30,520 --> 01:16:34,840 Speaker 14: in this emergency. This eleven year old and all these 1666 01:16:34,960 --> 01:16:38,120 Speaker 14: parents who have lost all these children, they deserve my 1667 01:16:38,240 --> 01:16:43,040 Speaker 14: attention to have the debate about whether or not in 1668 01:16:43,080 --> 01:16:47,040 Speaker 14: an emergency we can create a safer environment, because what 1669 01:16:47,160 --> 01:16:50,920 Speaker 14: about their constitutional rights? I took an oath to uphold 1670 01:16:50,960 --> 01:16:55,240 Speaker 14: those two and if we ignore this growing problem without 1671 01:16:55,280 --> 01:16:58,760 Speaker 14: being bold, I've said that every other New Mexican your 1672 01:16:59,000 --> 01:17:03,479 Speaker 14: rights are subrogated to theirs, and they are not in 1673 01:17:03,520 --> 01:17:04,000 Speaker 14: my view. 1674 01:17:04,280 --> 01:17:06,960 Speaker 2: Well literally said about crimes. 1675 01:17:07,400 --> 01:17:10,040 Speaker 11: There are laws against the crimes, so how are they're 1676 01:17:10,120 --> 01:17:10,600 Speaker 11: right it? 1677 01:17:10,640 --> 01:17:17,120 Speaker 14: But again, if I'm unsafe, who's standing up for that right? 1678 01:17:18,160 --> 01:17:22,599 Speaker 14: If this climate is so out of control, somebody should 1679 01:17:22,640 --> 01:17:26,320 Speaker 14: do something. I'm doing as much as I know to do. 1680 01:17:26,600 --> 01:17:30,160 Speaker 2: That is the purest distillation of the doctrine of safetyism 1681 01:17:30,240 --> 01:17:32,720 Speaker 2: I've ever heard. The governor declares that her commitment to 1682 01:17:32,760 --> 01:17:35,240 Speaker 2: the Constitution is not absolute, and worse, he uses the 1683 01:17:35,320 --> 01:17:38,439 Speaker 2: justification of all evil. If I feel I'm unsafe, than 1684 01:17:38,520 --> 01:17:41,640 Speaker 2: my rights trump yours. That's the extension of COVID ideology 1685 01:17:41,680 --> 01:17:44,640 Speaker 2: became normalized with lockdowns during the pandemic. No surprise to 1686 01:17:44,680 --> 01:17:47,240 Speaker 2: me that the Governor's then using the public health emergency 1687 01:17:47,240 --> 01:17:49,880 Speaker 2: as justification for the order. And just to be clear, 1688 01:17:50,040 --> 01:17:52,600 Speaker 2: this order does directly violate the US Supreme Court and 1689 01:17:52,640 --> 01:17:55,360 Speaker 2: the US Constitution. In June twenty twenty two, the Court 1690 01:17:55,400 --> 01:17:57,799 Speaker 2: ruled Americans have a right to carry firearms and public 1691 01:17:57,800 --> 01:18:00,519 Speaker 2: for self defense after striking down a New York State 1692 01:18:00,600 --> 01:18:02,519 Speaker 2: law that sought to implement a provision that said you 1693 01:18:02,560 --> 01:18:05,040 Speaker 2: must need proper cause to carry a gun outside your 1694 01:18:05,080 --> 01:18:08,000 Speaker 2: home in the state. The case, colloquially known as Bruin, 1695 01:18:08,280 --> 01:18:11,599 Speaker 2: fundamentally altered any state's ability to infringe upon carry laws 1696 01:18:11,600 --> 01:18:13,960 Speaker 2: in the public and directly set up this challenge now 1697 01:18:14,000 --> 01:18:16,559 Speaker 2: to the New Mexico governor. The iron is, you do 1698 01:18:16,680 --> 01:18:18,880 Speaker 2: not need a pro gun person like me to tell 1699 01:18:18,920 --> 01:18:21,840 Speaker 2: you any of this. Listen here. Anti gun activists David 1700 01:18:21,880 --> 01:18:24,880 Speaker 2: Hogg or Congressman Ted lou both tweeted some version of 1701 01:18:24,880 --> 01:18:28,080 Speaker 2: the following, I support gun safety laws, but this order 1702 01:18:28,200 --> 01:18:31,040 Speaker 2: violates the US Constitution. There is no state in the 1703 01:18:31,120 --> 01:18:33,720 Speaker 2: Union that can suspend the federal Constitution. There is no 1704 01:18:33,840 --> 01:18:36,519 Speaker 2: such thing as a state public health emergency exception to 1705 01:18:36,560 --> 01:18:39,120 Speaker 2: the US Constitution. And I guess the worst person you 1706 01:18:39,160 --> 01:18:41,559 Speaker 2: know just did make a good point, as the meme says, 1707 01:18:41,800 --> 01:18:44,679 Speaker 2: As both Hogg and Lou has said, gun groups already 1708 01:18:44,720 --> 01:18:47,160 Speaker 2: assuming the state of New Mexico, it likely won't even 1709 01:18:47,160 --> 01:18:50,320 Speaker 2: survive much longer. Sheriff's offices are wary about even implementing 1710 01:18:50,400 --> 01:18:52,719 Speaker 2: it because what the governor wants, Even though they could 1711 01:18:52,800 --> 01:18:56,160 Speaker 2: open themselves up now to civil litigation for blatantly violating, 1712 01:18:56,200 --> 01:18:58,600 Speaker 2: as I said, constitutional rights. So at least in this 1713 01:18:58,680 --> 01:19:00,599 Speaker 2: case it doesn't look like it may work. But don't 1714 01:19:00,640 --> 01:19:02,800 Speaker 2: delude yourself. If they could do it, they one hundred 1715 01:19:02,800 --> 01:19:05,240 Speaker 2: percent would, and worse, all of it is a cover 1716 01:19:05,360 --> 01:19:07,280 Speaker 2: for much bigger problems that we are all trying to 1717 01:19:07,320 --> 01:19:10,080 Speaker 2: move past. The government resferred to action by this death 1718 01:19:10,120 --> 01:19:13,320 Speaker 2: of children killed in recent shooting spates, including one road 1719 01:19:13,360 --> 01:19:15,800 Speaker 2: rage incident in a minor league baseball game, or the 1720 01:19:15,800 --> 01:19:17,960 Speaker 2: shooting of a five year old killed and drive by shooting. 1721 01:19:18,479 --> 01:19:20,080 Speaker 2: Let's stake the case of the five year old killed 1722 01:19:20,120 --> 01:19:22,400 Speaker 2: for example. You can see why this band doesn't even 1723 01:19:22,439 --> 01:19:24,639 Speaker 2: make any sense. Of the five people who were charged 1724 01:19:24,680 --> 01:19:26,719 Speaker 2: in the death of the five year old, only one 1725 01:19:26,760 --> 01:19:29,760 Speaker 2: suspect so far is even an adult. That adult is 1726 01:19:29,800 --> 01:19:32,200 Speaker 2: the girlfriend of one of the alleged shooters, who's seventeen 1727 01:19:32,280 --> 01:19:35,000 Speaker 2: years old. The others charge an incident are aged fifteen 1728 01:19:35,040 --> 01:19:37,840 Speaker 2: and sixteen, along with other teenagers. So other than the 1729 01:19:37,840 --> 01:19:40,559 Speaker 2: girlfriend of the person primarily thought responsible for the death 1730 01:19:40,560 --> 01:19:42,760 Speaker 2: of this young child, not one of these people could 1731 01:19:42,760 --> 01:19:45,479 Speaker 2: even legally buy or carry a gun. In fact, if 1732 01:19:45,479 --> 01:19:48,240 Speaker 2: we're talking about handguns, then not a single person, even 1733 01:19:48,320 --> 01:19:51,280 Speaker 2: involved in the shooting, could legally buy or carry one 1734 01:19:51,320 --> 01:19:53,400 Speaker 2: in the state of New Mexico, or in the case 1735 01:19:53,400 --> 01:19:55,599 Speaker 2: of the eleven year old, the shooter is actually still 1736 01:19:55,600 --> 01:19:58,080 Speaker 2: at large. We don't even know anything about them, or 1737 01:19:58,120 --> 01:20:00,120 Speaker 2: if the gun they carried was legal, or how it 1738 01:20:00,200 --> 01:20:03,040 Speaker 2: was obtained. They should be focusing on catching the killer 1739 01:20:03,280 --> 01:20:06,600 Speaker 2: instead of infringing on the rights of actually law abiding citizens. 1740 01:20:06,800 --> 01:20:08,519 Speaker 2: And it just strikes the core of what the gun 1741 01:20:08,560 --> 01:20:11,400 Speaker 2: first people always reach for. They're trying to paper over 1742 01:20:11,640 --> 01:20:14,720 Speaker 2: what is an obvious societal illness that runs so much 1743 01:20:14,760 --> 01:20:17,599 Speaker 2: deeper than guns. Teenagers are doing drive buys and people 1744 01:20:17,640 --> 01:20:20,320 Speaker 2: are killed in children in road rage accidents. That's what 1745 01:20:20,400 --> 01:20:23,400 Speaker 2: happens in a sick culture. And yes, you can say 1746 01:20:23,600 --> 01:20:26,240 Speaker 2: other countries have societal ills and they don't have shootings. 1747 01:20:26,439 --> 01:20:28,960 Speaker 2: You would be right, but don't forget in our country 1748 01:20:29,000 --> 01:20:31,080 Speaker 2: we do have an enshrined right to own and carry 1749 01:20:31,080 --> 01:20:33,599 Speaker 2: a gun if we so choose. In such a country 1750 01:20:33,680 --> 01:20:37,080 Speaker 2: with already hundreds of millions of gun in private ownership, 1751 01:20:37,240 --> 01:20:39,160 Speaker 2: that is just simply how it's going to go. That 1752 01:20:39,280 --> 01:20:41,760 Speaker 2: is not to say that we don't have a responsibility 1753 01:20:41,800 --> 01:20:45,280 Speaker 2: to each other, only we must understand and define the 1754 01:20:45,320 --> 01:20:48,960 Speaker 2: actual challenge we seek to address. In this case, it's 1755 01:20:49,000 --> 01:20:53,559 Speaker 2: clear crime was used to justify then an unconstitutional power grab, 1756 01:20:53,800 --> 01:20:55,600 Speaker 2: and it shows that people who are gun owners to 1757 01:20:56,040 --> 01:20:58,760 Speaker 2: what the real agenda is and always has been. I'm 1758 01:20:58,800 --> 01:21:00,800 Speaker 2: curious what you think of this, Crystal. I know you're 1759 01:21:00,920 --> 01:21:03,519 Speaker 2: supportive of some gun restrictions as well, but what did 1760 01:21:03,560 --> 01:21:05,519 Speaker 2: you make of the governor's order and then kind of 1761 01:21:05,560 --> 01:21:07,479 Speaker 2: what I was talking about in terms of the crime 1762 01:21:07,520 --> 01:21:10,160 Speaker 2: and paper over and we've had this discussion before. 1763 01:21:09,360 --> 01:21:11,760 Speaker 3: Yes, there's a lot of thoughts I have on it. 1764 01:21:11,800 --> 01:21:16,360 Speaker 1: I mean, this is uncustomed, like it's just it goes 1765 01:21:16,439 --> 01:21:18,439 Speaker 1: way too far. But I take it a little bit 1766 01:21:18,439 --> 01:21:21,360 Speaker 1: of a different view because I was heartened to see 1767 01:21:21,640 --> 01:21:25,200 Speaker 1: that you had people who focus a lot on gun 1768 01:21:25,240 --> 01:21:27,080 Speaker 1: control or gun safety or how we want to put it, 1769 01:21:27,200 --> 01:21:30,760 Speaker 1: who were like, no, this is too far, and so, 1770 01:21:31,600 --> 01:21:34,400 Speaker 1: you know, far from drawing the conclusion of like, oh, 1771 01:21:34,439 --> 01:21:37,240 Speaker 1: this is what the gun activists really want, I actually 1772 01:21:37,520 --> 01:21:41,560 Speaker 1: saw the limits of what most of the mainstream proponents 1773 01:21:41,720 --> 01:21:44,280 Speaker 1: of gun control, gun orform how you want to label it, 1774 01:21:44,600 --> 01:21:46,840 Speaker 1: where they actually want to go. So I took the 1775 01:21:46,880 --> 01:21:51,000 Speaker 1: opposite conclusion from that side. The other thing I would 1776 01:21:51,040 --> 01:21:53,840 Speaker 1: question you on is you said that this was, you know, 1777 01:21:54,360 --> 01:21:56,240 Speaker 1: evidence of the cult. 1778 01:21:56,120 --> 01:21:58,240 Speaker 3: Or the view or the ideology of safetyism. 1779 01:21:58,680 --> 01:22:02,240 Speaker 1: Do you see it the same way when it's Republicans 1780 01:22:02,600 --> 01:22:06,000 Speaker 1: using or pushing authoritarian tactics to deal with crime and 1781 01:22:06,080 --> 01:22:10,679 Speaker 1: law and order. Well, well, because because there's more there's 1782 01:22:10,840 --> 01:22:14,760 Speaker 1: more interest in or crime seems to be actually a 1783 01:22:14,800 --> 01:22:17,800 Speaker 1: hotter political issue on the right than it is on 1784 01:22:17,880 --> 01:22:21,120 Speaker 1: the left. So I'm curious if you see that same 1785 01:22:21,200 --> 01:22:24,719 Speaker 1: concern about like safety over everybody's rights being a problem 1786 01:22:24,760 --> 01:22:26,479 Speaker 1: when it comes from the right in their tactics. 1787 01:22:26,520 --> 01:22:28,799 Speaker 2: Well, I think that at the very least, and luckily, 1788 01:22:28,840 --> 01:22:31,320 Speaker 2: we have a well defined civil liberties and Miranda rights 1789 01:22:31,320 --> 01:22:35,000 Speaker 2: that you know, defendants and criminals are actually like subjected to, 1790 01:22:35,080 --> 01:22:37,120 Speaker 2: So it's not like we don't have an adjudicated process. 1791 01:22:37,160 --> 01:22:39,439 Speaker 2: But I mean absolutely, I mean I don't support policies 1792 01:22:39,479 --> 01:22:41,559 Speaker 2: like coop and frisk or anything like that, for example. 1793 01:22:41,600 --> 01:22:42,880 Speaker 2: And I think a lot of people look, and you're 1794 01:22:42,880 --> 01:22:46,800 Speaker 2: not wrong. Many people are one hundred percent hypocrites whenever 1795 01:22:46,840 --> 01:22:49,240 Speaker 2: it comes to this issue. And in fact, like I'm 1796 01:22:49,280 --> 01:22:53,360 Speaker 2: an absolute defender of people's ability to walk the street 1797 01:22:53,360 --> 01:22:56,400 Speaker 2: and not be accosted by police or pretext for any 1798 01:22:56,439 --> 01:22:59,120 Speaker 2: of these ridiculous things for search and seizure that a 1799 01:22:59,120 --> 01:23:01,439 Speaker 2: lot of these cops have. So, I mean we've done 1800 01:23:01,479 --> 01:23:03,200 Speaker 2: plenty of stories on that here. They all hear it 1801 01:23:03,200 --> 01:23:05,559 Speaker 2: from me too, yeah, I mean you probably won't hear 1802 01:23:05,600 --> 01:23:08,080 Speaker 2: it from them. I mean, I just think we want 1803 01:23:08,080 --> 01:23:10,639 Speaker 2: to live in a society where look, if you're law abiding, 1804 01:23:10,680 --> 01:23:12,439 Speaker 2: if you have a gun, or if you're just walking 1805 01:23:12,479 --> 01:23:14,439 Speaker 2: down the street and happened to be black andron in 1806 01:23:14,439 --> 01:23:16,000 Speaker 2: the Bronx or something, you should be able to go 1807 01:23:16,040 --> 01:23:18,799 Speaker 2: about your business. I mean that's just my view personally. 1808 01:23:18,880 --> 01:23:22,559 Speaker 1: Yeah, Because there was a lot of support among not 1809 01:23:22,560 --> 01:23:25,160 Speaker 1: only Republican lawmakers but the president of the United States 1810 01:23:25,160 --> 01:23:28,320 Speaker 1: at the time, a lot of you Republican like just 1811 01:23:28,439 --> 01:23:31,320 Speaker 1: regular rank and file people for like deploying the military 1812 01:23:31,360 --> 01:23:34,160 Speaker 1: when there were riots going on during George Floyd, and 1813 01:23:34,240 --> 01:23:37,640 Speaker 1: I didn't hear that being framed as like safetyism, and 1814 01:23:37,840 --> 01:23:41,679 Speaker 1: there was less concern about the unconstitutional power grab nature 1815 01:23:42,040 --> 01:23:45,320 Speaker 1: of that direction coming for the right. So I actually 1816 01:23:45,400 --> 01:23:49,080 Speaker 1: am more accustomed to seeing authoritarian power grabs with regards 1817 01:23:49,080 --> 01:23:51,320 Speaker 1: to law and order and a sort of like lock 1818 01:23:51,360 --> 01:23:53,519 Speaker 1: them up. We got to crack down on crime above 1819 01:23:53,600 --> 01:23:56,479 Speaker 1: everything else. I'm more accustomed to seeing that from the right. 1820 01:23:56,800 --> 01:24:00,080 Speaker 1: This to me was like the liberal mirror image of 1821 01:24:00,200 --> 01:24:02,240 Speaker 1: some of those tactics that I certainly don't support. 1822 01:24:02,280 --> 01:24:03,479 Speaker 2: Coming I think you're right, and you know, I've actually 1823 01:24:03,479 --> 01:24:05,960 Speaker 2: thought a lot about that. I think that in that context, 1824 01:24:06,040 --> 01:24:07,680 Speaker 2: one of the reasons why people were willing to go 1825 01:24:07,720 --> 01:24:10,559 Speaker 2: along with it was I think myself included was the 1826 01:24:10,600 --> 01:24:13,040 Speaker 2: idea that people's personal property was not being protected. And 1827 01:24:13,040 --> 01:24:14,759 Speaker 2: I think that I still believe that that was true. 1828 01:24:15,000 --> 01:24:16,599 Speaker 2: That said, I mean, I think I can look back 1829 01:24:16,640 --> 01:24:17,920 Speaker 2: on that and be like, yeah, that was It'd be 1830 01:24:18,000 --> 01:24:21,280 Speaker 2: a terrible precedent, specifically in a type of civil of 1831 01:24:21,320 --> 01:24:23,519 Speaker 2: civil unrest, and just to think about, you know, in 1832 01:24:23,600 --> 01:24:27,000 Speaker 2: terms of what we're actually trying to achieve and what 1833 01:24:27,040 --> 01:24:28,680 Speaker 2: we were trying to achieve at that time. And I 1834 01:24:28,680 --> 01:24:30,439 Speaker 2: think this is where the Floyd people got it totally wrong, 1835 01:24:30,479 --> 01:24:32,640 Speaker 2: and it uses a pretext for looting. A lot of 1836 01:24:33,040 --> 01:24:36,040 Speaker 2: cops and others, you know, basically stood by. But at 1837 01:24:36,040 --> 01:24:36,960 Speaker 2: the end of the day, I do think it was 1838 01:24:37,000 --> 01:24:38,920 Speaker 2: a local responsibility and I don't think the FEDS should 1839 01:24:38,920 --> 01:24:40,800 Speaker 2: step in, you know, at that time, So I've thought 1840 01:24:40,840 --> 01:24:42,800 Speaker 2: about that a lot, you know, since then, and specifically 1841 01:24:42,800 --> 01:24:45,599 Speaker 2: also given what happened after January sixth, it was really 1842 01:24:45,640 --> 01:24:48,040 Speaker 2: just a complete vindication of the idea. It's like, look, 1843 01:24:48,040 --> 01:24:49,680 Speaker 2: when you get these people and they're going to take 1844 01:24:49,680 --> 01:24:51,200 Speaker 2: it all the way, yeah, and you just shouldn't get 1845 01:24:51,200 --> 01:24:52,760 Speaker 2: You should never give it to them in the first place. 1846 01:24:52,880 --> 01:24:56,519 Speaker 1: Here's the other thing I'm curious about is, I think 1847 01:24:56,560 --> 01:24:58,639 Speaker 1: for people who live in these areas, and I looked 1848 01:24:58,680 --> 01:25:01,400 Speaker 1: up while you're talking, I looked up the Buquerque crime stats. 1849 01:25:01,760 --> 01:25:05,880 Speaker 1: Homicides are up seventy one percent from twenty seventeen to 1850 01:25:05,920 --> 01:25:09,519 Speaker 1: twenty twenty two. They did actually decline some in twenty 1851 01:25:09,560 --> 01:25:11,679 Speaker 1: twenty two from the height I think was in twenty 1852 01:25:11,720 --> 01:25:17,120 Speaker 1: twenty one. However, seventy one percent increase over that time period, 1853 01:25:17,280 --> 01:25:20,080 Speaker 1: you know, people are still feeling like, yes, they're a danger, 1854 01:25:20,120 --> 01:25:23,720 Speaker 1: their kids aren't safe, et cetera. And I'm curious what 1855 01:25:23,840 --> 01:25:27,200 Speaker 1: the local reaction will be to her order, because we 1856 01:25:27,280 --> 01:25:29,599 Speaker 1: know when people are stressed and fear for their own 1857 01:25:29,640 --> 01:25:33,040 Speaker 1: safety and don't feel secure in their own environment, Unfortunately, 1858 01:25:33,040 --> 01:25:36,080 Speaker 1: too often they are willing to throw their rights or 1859 01:25:36,120 --> 01:25:40,000 Speaker 1: other people's rights aside for that sense of safety and protection. 1860 01:25:40,479 --> 01:25:43,479 Speaker 1: So while there was a lot of sort of national 1861 01:25:43,560 --> 01:25:47,519 Speaker 1: level condemnation, I'm actually curious how people there locally respond 1862 01:25:47,520 --> 01:25:49,439 Speaker 1: to the order and if they have the same reaction 1863 01:25:49,680 --> 01:25:51,439 Speaker 1: or if they have more of a like good at 1864 01:25:51,520 --> 01:25:52,960 Speaker 1: least somebody is doing something kind. 1865 01:25:52,800 --> 01:25:54,679 Speaker 2: Of curious too. But I mean, here's the thing, DC, 1866 01:25:54,840 --> 01:25:55,920 Speaker 2: where you and I are right now, we have the 1867 01:25:55,920 --> 01:25:58,200 Speaker 2: strictest gun laws in the country. Our homicide rate is 1868 01:25:58,200 --> 01:26:00,320 Speaker 2: actually not gone down at all. We have over one 1869 01:26:00,360 --> 01:26:03,519 Speaker 2: hundred percent increase in property crime and in genuine like 1870 01:26:03,600 --> 01:26:06,479 Speaker 2: gun death. So it's like it's not the gun laws. People. 1871 01:26:06,560 --> 01:26:07,840 Speaker 2: You know, you could you literally can. 1872 01:26:08,280 --> 01:26:08,639 Speaker 8: Oh yeah. 1873 01:26:08,640 --> 01:26:10,800 Speaker 1: I mean but DC is like right in the middle, 1874 01:26:11,280 --> 01:26:14,000 Speaker 1: right next to Virginia, and you know, you can't expect 1875 01:26:14,080 --> 01:26:16,479 Speaker 1: just one locality to take to their gun laws to have it. 1876 01:26:16,720 --> 01:26:18,479 Speaker 2: I'm more what I'm saying is you can walk. And 1877 01:26:18,479 --> 01:26:20,800 Speaker 2: they do this all the time. I mean, listen, go 1878 01:26:20,840 --> 01:26:22,719 Speaker 2: look at the DC prison and look at the number 1879 01:26:22,760 --> 01:26:24,960 Speaker 2: one way that they throw people in jail gun charge. 1880 01:26:25,280 --> 01:26:27,400 Speaker 2: It will give you five years for a single bullet 1881 01:26:27,400 --> 01:26:29,280 Speaker 2: that you have wrong, Yeah that's in your pocket. I 1882 01:26:29,320 --> 01:26:31,519 Speaker 2: mean they use it as a pretext all the time. 1883 01:26:31,560 --> 01:26:33,240 Speaker 2: It's not doing anything. You know, if you if you're 1884 01:26:33,240 --> 01:26:36,280 Speaker 2: worried about homicide, people stop people here all the time now, 1885 01:26:36,320 --> 01:26:38,719 Speaker 2: as from what I've heard recently, in search their cars 1886 01:26:38,760 --> 01:26:40,600 Speaker 2: and others look for cuns, and that's one of the 1887 01:26:40,640 --> 01:26:42,599 Speaker 2: number one ways that they try and crack down on crime. 1888 01:26:42,600 --> 01:26:44,720 Speaker 2: We still have a huge homicide rate. Yeah's just one 1889 01:26:44,760 --> 01:26:46,200 Speaker 2: of those where it's like, it's clearly not going to 1890 01:26:46,280 --> 01:26:46,679 Speaker 2: do anything. 1891 01:26:46,880 --> 01:26:48,840 Speaker 1: I don't I wouldn't say it won't do anything. I mean, 1892 01:26:49,080 --> 01:26:51,080 Speaker 1: in this instance, I actually grew. I doobt it will 1893 01:26:51,120 --> 01:26:53,800 Speaker 1: do anything, just because you're talking about in one little city, right, 1894 01:26:53,920 --> 01:26:57,200 Speaker 1: So you're not going to change the overall national culture 1895 01:26:57,400 --> 01:27:00,920 Speaker 1: of gun ownership by changing the rules or regulations in 1896 01:27:00,960 --> 01:27:05,519 Speaker 1: one particular city. I'm curious about what the public reaction 1897 01:27:05,600 --> 01:27:07,880 Speaker 1: will be to it. If there is a positive reaction, 1898 01:27:07,920 --> 01:27:10,679 Speaker 1: at least someone is trying to do something. And then overall, 1899 01:27:10,720 --> 01:27:12,880 Speaker 1: I mean, I don't think you can deny that where 1900 01:27:12,920 --> 01:27:14,960 Speaker 1: we are an outlier is the number of guns that 1901 01:27:15,000 --> 01:27:17,640 Speaker 1: we have in our society and the ease of access 1902 01:27:17,720 --> 01:27:20,360 Speaker 1: and all of that. And I mean, in my mind, 1903 01:27:20,360 --> 01:27:22,240 Speaker 1: there's no doubt that that plays into the level of 1904 01:27:22,320 --> 01:27:25,360 Speaker 1: violence that we have in our society versus other countries. 1905 01:27:26,080 --> 01:27:28,439 Speaker 1: But in terms of disorder, one hundred percent agree with you. 1906 01:27:28,800 --> 01:27:31,960 Speaker 1: Unconstitutional power grab, don't support it, don't think it will 1907 01:27:32,000 --> 01:27:34,920 Speaker 1: probably have much of an impact. Yeah, I don't even 1908 01:27:34,920 --> 01:27:36,760 Speaker 1: think it will have much of an impact because of 1909 01:27:36,760 --> 01:27:39,800 Speaker 1: some of the limitations that you're pointing out. But you know, 1910 01:27:40,000 --> 01:27:42,720 Speaker 1: it does raise for me some other questions about some 1911 01:27:42,760 --> 01:27:44,960 Speaker 1: of the approaches to law and order and tough on 1912 01:27:45,040 --> 01:27:46,599 Speaker 1: crime that seem to get more of a pass. 1913 01:27:46,680 --> 01:27:50,960 Speaker 2: Yeah, Chris, what do you takeing a look at? Well? 1914 01:27:51,120 --> 01:27:55,160 Speaker 1: A recent AI news generation program at a major newspaper 1915 01:27:55,320 --> 01:27:58,400 Speaker 1: was pulled after publishing hilariously. 1916 01:27:57,720 --> 01:28:00,599 Speaker 3: Bizarre high school sports articles. Okay, here are the details. 1917 01:28:00,800 --> 01:28:04,320 Speaker 1: Gannette, which owns USA Today and whole slew of local papers, 1918 01:28:04,439 --> 01:28:07,760 Speaker 1: started using AI to generate local news stories and the 1919 01:28:07,800 --> 01:28:11,360 Speaker 1: results were amazingly bad. Here is a great example quote, 1920 01:28:11,600 --> 01:28:16,679 Speaker 1: Westerville North escapes Westerville Central in thin win in Ohio 1921 01:28:17,040 --> 01:28:18,479 Speaker 1: high school football action. 1922 01:28:19,000 --> 01:28:19,280 Speaker 2: Wow. 1923 01:28:19,479 --> 01:28:21,920 Speaker 1: Totally sounds like a human being wrote that, for sure. 1924 01:28:22,080 --> 01:28:26,880 Speaker 1: Please continue. The article goes on Westerville North edged Westerville 1925 01:28:26,920 --> 01:28:30,040 Speaker 1: Central twenty one to twelve in a close encounter of 1926 01:28:30,120 --> 01:28:33,439 Speaker 1: the athletic kind at Westerville North High on August eighteenth 1927 01:28:33,600 --> 01:28:37,680 Speaker 1: in Ohio football action. The Warriors chalked up this decision 1928 01:28:37,880 --> 01:28:41,320 Speaker 1: in spite of the warhawks spirited fourth quarter performance. In 1929 01:28:41,439 --> 01:28:44,000 Speaker 1: a different story, AI failed to figure out what the 1930 01:28:44,040 --> 01:28:48,160 Speaker 1: school's mascots were, and they published the Worthington Christian winning 1931 01:28:48,160 --> 01:28:52,160 Speaker 1: team mascot defeated the Westerville North losing team mascot two 1932 01:28:52,200 --> 01:28:55,720 Speaker 1: to one in an Ohio boys soccer game on Saturday. Now, 1933 01:28:55,800 --> 01:28:59,519 Speaker 1: Gannette has since suspended this experiment, presumably leaving it to 1934 01:28:59,600 --> 01:29:01,880 Speaker 1: the actual human beings to try to report on future 1935 01:29:01,960 --> 01:29:05,479 Speaker 1: thin winds and close encounters of the athletic kind. This 1936 01:29:05,520 --> 01:29:08,320 Speaker 1: particular situation is of course an embarrassment both for Gannett, 1937 01:29:08,320 --> 01:29:10,360 Speaker 1: which has fired a bunch of their employees over the 1938 01:29:10,360 --> 01:29:12,799 Speaker 1: past couple of years as the news business and especially 1939 01:29:12,880 --> 01:29:15,479 Speaker 1: the local news business has declined and become boor difficult, 1940 01:29:15,800 --> 01:29:19,240 Speaker 1: and it is obviously embarrassing for the entire AI industry, which, 1941 01:29:19,280 --> 01:29:22,360 Speaker 1: far from being ready to revolutionize the workforce or decimate 1942 01:29:22,360 --> 01:29:26,240 Speaker 1: the workforce, can't even credibly publish the most basic information 1943 01:29:26,640 --> 01:29:30,680 Speaker 1: about the most basic events without being utterly absurd, unreliable, 1944 01:29:30,720 --> 01:29:33,240 Speaker 1: and inaccurate. So at least when it comes to the 1945 01:29:33,360 --> 01:29:35,759 Speaker 1: drafting and publishing of news stories. I think the journals 1946 01:29:35,840 --> 01:29:38,559 Speaker 1: for now can rest easy. Chat GPD is in any 1947 01:29:38,560 --> 01:29:40,920 Speaker 1: more prepared to take over the news industry than autonomous 1948 01:29:40,960 --> 01:29:43,559 Speaker 1: driving is prepared to take over taxi and truck driving. 1949 01:29:43,960 --> 01:29:46,439 Speaker 1: So for now, I guess score one for humanity, But 1950 01:29:46,840 --> 01:29:50,040 Speaker 1: the victory is honestly marginal because in another deeper sense, 1951 01:29:50,120 --> 01:29:52,880 Speaker 1: the robots and their masters, they've already won a lot 1952 01:29:52,960 --> 01:29:55,760 Speaker 1: in terms of how news is generated and how it's disseminated, 1953 01:29:55,840 --> 01:29:58,400 Speaker 1: and we barely even notice the attack. What do I 1954 01:29:58,439 --> 01:30:00,919 Speaker 1: mean here, Well, as you know, I'm a big proponent 1955 01:30:00,960 --> 01:30:04,200 Speaker 1: of independent media as an antidote to corporate legacy media. 1956 01:30:04,320 --> 01:30:06,360 Speaker 1: But the further we get into this new era, which 1957 01:30:06,400 --> 01:30:09,639 Speaker 1: is in many ways exciting and continues to hold deep promise, 1958 01:30:09,920 --> 01:30:13,960 Speaker 1: the more I see the limitations of what independent actually means. 1959 01:30:14,360 --> 01:30:17,160 Speaker 1: Because while individual creators can break free from the constraints 1960 01:30:17,200 --> 01:30:21,160 Speaker 1: of giant, corporate, profit driven news conglomerate conglomerates, they're still 1961 01:30:21,160 --> 01:30:24,000 Speaker 1: beholden to the incentives created by the tech giants on 1962 01:30:24,040 --> 01:30:27,800 Speaker 1: which they depend. And probably the most powerful force in 1963 01:30:27,880 --> 01:30:30,720 Speaker 1: independent news generation is YouTube's algorithm. 1964 01:30:31,160 --> 01:30:32,760 Speaker 2: We all live or. 1965 01:30:32,640 --> 01:30:33,280 Speaker 3: Die by it. 1966 01:30:33,280 --> 01:30:37,440 Speaker 1: Its whims, preferences, amplifications, and punishments have created the independent 1967 01:30:37,479 --> 01:30:41,120 Speaker 1: news ecosystem as we know it. Individual creators can try 1968 01:30:41,120 --> 01:30:43,760 Speaker 1: to resist its siren song. We have intentionally tried to 1969 01:30:43,840 --> 01:30:46,559 Speaker 1: algorithm proof and big tech proof our business here at 1970 01:30:46,600 --> 01:30:49,200 Speaker 1: breaking points, but it's like one person trying to stand 1971 01:30:49,280 --> 01:30:52,400 Speaker 1: up to a force of nature. The overall landscape is 1972 01:30:52,479 --> 01:30:55,320 Speaker 1: going to be shaped and built by the big tech 1973 01:30:55,439 --> 01:30:58,920 Speaker 1: AI reward system. And it's not just on the creator side. 1974 01:30:58,960 --> 01:31:02,040 Speaker 1: These robots are also so shaping your brain, messing with 1975 01:31:02,320 --> 01:31:04,799 Speaker 1: your view of the world, driving you towards certain content 1976 01:31:04,840 --> 01:31:07,760 Speaker 1: and away from others. On Facebook, whistleblower revealed how the 1977 01:31:07,760 --> 01:31:11,559 Speaker 1: platform's algorithm rewarded anger emojis at five times the weight 1978 01:31:11,600 --> 01:31:16,639 Speaker 1: of likes, aggressively pushing highly emotional content into user feeds. Facebook, 1979 01:31:16,720 --> 01:31:19,240 Speaker 1: like other platforms, cares more about how long you spend 1980 01:31:19,240 --> 01:31:21,240 Speaker 1: on the platform, being served ads and having your data 1981 01:31:21,240 --> 01:31:24,000 Speaker 1: harvested than how much you're actually enjoying that time, or 1982 01:31:24,000 --> 01:31:26,439 Speaker 1: whether the quality of your experience is good or bad. 1983 01:31:26,800 --> 01:31:29,799 Speaker 1: They also use their user base like guinea pigs, conducting 1984 01:31:29,880 --> 01:31:34,599 Speaker 1: social experiments, attempting explicitly to manipulate user emotions, and even 1985 01:31:34,840 --> 01:31:37,160 Speaker 1: to push them to become closer friends with some in 1986 01:31:37,200 --> 01:31:41,040 Speaker 1: their networks over others creepy stuff that we have little 1987 01:31:41,080 --> 01:31:45,320 Speaker 1: awareness of and even less say. Over, Twitter under Elon Musk, 1988 01:31:45,439 --> 01:31:48,360 Speaker 1: has used the for you page to aggressively push certain 1989 01:31:48,400 --> 01:31:52,000 Speaker 1: content and hide other content. But unlike the other platforms 1990 01:31:52,080 --> 01:31:54,639 Speaker 1: must Twitter has opted to make their biggest content decisions 1991 01:31:54,680 --> 01:31:57,280 Speaker 1: based on the personal whims and preferences of their sovereign 1992 01:31:57,360 --> 01:31:59,760 Speaker 1: Lord Elon, who can bless their punish creators based on 1993 01:31:59,760 --> 01:32:02,679 Speaker 1: his own ego and worldview. In a sense, I actually 1994 01:32:02,720 --> 01:32:06,320 Speaker 1: appreciate the blatant nature of Elon's approach. He strips some 1995 01:32:06,400 --> 01:32:08,759 Speaker 1: of the AI mistique away and just makes it super 1996 01:32:08,800 --> 01:32:11,400 Speaker 1: clear the way that our oligarchs are screwing with us 1997 01:32:11,439 --> 01:32:12,000 Speaker 1: every day. 1998 01:32:12,439 --> 01:32:12,639 Speaker 12: Now. 1999 01:32:12,680 --> 01:32:17,000 Speaker 1: On its surface, our universe of multi platform news looks independent, 2000 01:32:17,360 --> 01:32:20,920 Speaker 1: like individual humans making individual decisions and listen. There is 2001 01:32:20,960 --> 01:32:23,120 Speaker 1: a lot of that going on at the micro level, 2002 01:32:23,160 --> 01:32:25,960 Speaker 1: and a lot of fantastic creators out there. But at 2003 01:32:26,000 --> 01:32:28,559 Speaker 1: the macro level, it is a garden of creators and 2004 01:32:28,640 --> 01:32:33,719 Speaker 1: content cultivated, tilled, and pruned by robots. Human beings unaware 2005 01:32:33,800 --> 01:32:36,479 Speaker 1: how they're being programmed by machines who have in turn 2006 01:32:36,640 --> 01:32:39,200 Speaker 1: been programmed by tech giants to drive their own profits 2007 01:32:39,240 --> 01:32:42,679 Speaker 1: or corporate agendas. So before the chatbots and deep freaks 2008 01:32:42,760 --> 01:32:46,960 Speaker 1: have even really joined the war, humanity has already lost 2009 01:32:47,360 --> 01:32:49,800 Speaker 1: one war that it was being waged in secret under 2010 01:32:49,840 --> 01:32:52,559 Speaker 1: the cloak of the supposedly free market, where they declared 2011 01:32:52,600 --> 01:32:55,040 Speaker 1: victory before we even really caught on to what was 2012 01:32:55,080 --> 01:32:58,640 Speaker 1: happening for this next battle that we're facing now, at 2013 01:32:58,760 --> 01:33:01,240 Speaker 1: least the tech for now it's clunky enough that we 2014 01:33:01,280 --> 01:33:03,800 Speaker 1: can all see what the bosses robots are up to 2015 01:33:04,080 --> 01:33:07,000 Speaker 1: a close encounter of the oligarchic kind. I guess you 2016 01:33:07,000 --> 01:33:09,519 Speaker 1: could say it did really get me thinking. 2017 01:33:09,760 --> 01:33:12,519 Speaker 2: And if you want to hear my reaction to Crystal's monologue, 2018 01:33:12,560 --> 01:33:18,880 Speaker 2: become a premium subscriber today at Breakingpoints dot com. All right, guys, 2019 01:33:18,880 --> 01:33:20,800 Speaker 2: thank you so much for watching. We really appreciate it. 2020 01:33:21,040 --> 01:33:22,840 Speaker 2: Thank you to all the premium members for supporting our 2021 01:33:22,880 --> 01:33:24,960 Speaker 2: focus group. We've got more stuff for you all week 2022 01:33:25,000 --> 01:33:26,639 Speaker 2: that we're going to continue bringing and we will see 2023 01:33:26,640 --> 01:33:27,360 Speaker 2: you all tomorrow