Speaker 1: As I predicted, as I warned you all yesterday, gun
Speaker 1: control has become the central theme of the drive by
Speaker 1: media after the tragedy here the massacre at Virginia TECHT
Speaker 1: by the way, speaking of something that we were just
Speaker 1: talking about, this this guy was sending out clear warning
Speaker 1: signs that he was not right, and nobody would do
Speaker 1: anything about it on the campus. I mean, they sent
Speaker 1: him to counseling. They don't know how that went. Uh,
Speaker 1: it might have been taking antity pressents. We don't know
Speaker 1: what the effect of that was. He was he went
Speaker 1: to some institution for while we don't know how that went.
Speaker 1: We also have just learned that the guy's writings, which
Speaker 1: we did know about, but what we just learned is
Speaker 1: the guy's writings were so scary that there were people
Speaker 1: that refused to go to his class. They refused to
Speaker 1: actually go in the classroom when this guy was there.
Speaker 1: So they're clearly we're all kinds of of warning signs
Speaker 1: about this that we're not heated in a in a
Speaker 1: serious way. And it's said, it's very easy to start
Speaker 1: running around and say, well, band guns, it's a GOP's faults,
Speaker 1: Bush's faults. Get rid of the n r A rather
Speaker 1: than actually deal with what circumstances people had known for
Speaker 1: years prior to this guy committing this random act yesterday.
Speaker 1: And by the way, I think the Democrats heard me,
Speaker 1: Dingy Harry's out there. So no, we can't start talking
Speaker 1: about gun control now, yo, yeah, don't. Let's not rush
Speaker 1: to gun control is the headline of the story on
Speaker 1: Dingji here. There's no question that Democrats are drive by
Speaker 1: media didn't but but the Democrats did. But I want
Speaker 1: to explore something entirely different than banning guns, and that
Speaker 1: would be a ban on political correctness. You people, and
Speaker 1: you know who you are. I'm getting emails from you,
Speaker 1: some of you have called, and you're you're lamenting the
Speaker 1: soft structure of the American child these days, the American
Speaker 1: young person. Why didn't they gang tackle this guy? Why
Speaker 1: why why didn't they just overpower this guy once they
Speaker 1: started firing. And I'll and they all everybody's got their theories.
Speaker 1: And one of the theories, one of those common theories
Speaker 1: that I'm hearing in my email and on the phones here,
Speaker 1: is that we're gonna come on rush. I mean, from
Speaker 1: kindergarten on they're taught conflict resolution, don't defend anybody, don't
Speaker 1: make anybody mad. And and and well what is that
Speaker 1: if not political correctness? And it may be a factor. Uh,
Speaker 1: I don't really know, but let me put it to
Speaker 1: you in the form of a series of questions. What
Speaker 1: might have had a better chance of preventing the carnage
Speaker 1: on the campus of Virginia Tech. A law banning guns
Speaker 1: which they had that was a gun free zone, or
Speaker 1: a law banning political correctness. Now I know what some
Speaker 1: of you saying, but rush, but rush, but rush. It
Speaker 1: was two guns. And by gosh, that's true, folks. Thanks
Speaker 1: for reminding me there were two guns the guy here.
Speaker 1: But let me remind you the killer was a senior.
Speaker 1: He was in that university for four years, and his
Speaker 1: mental state was not a secret. And this university is
Speaker 1: an institution of higher learning. They have lecturers, they have advisors,
Speaker 1: they have teachers, professors, deans, and all these people have degrees,
Speaker 1: postgraduate degrees, doctorate degrees. Before he was in this university
Speaker 1: for four years, he was in a half screwel. And
Speaker 1: before he was in the half screwel, he was in
Speaker 1: the middle school. Not even now we are just beginning
Speaker 1: to learn some of the warning signs, the flares, these
Speaker 1: were not it's not even this guy was sending up
Speaker 1: flares and didn't anybody notice? Was everybody so concerned with
Speaker 1: the trumped up global warming scare they didn't notice a
Speaker 1: real threat? For example? And how about this guy's Korean,
Speaker 1: he's Asian? How many people refused to do anything about
Speaker 1: it or even complained about him because they would be
Speaker 1: tagged as racists And not just because he's Korean, but
Speaker 1: he's a minority. How many people in our school system,
Speaker 1: from you know, k kindergarten on up through the senior
Speaker 1: in high school and all that have been have been
Speaker 1: have been by virtue political correctness. You you don't you
Speaker 1: don't comment on people who are in a minority, no
Speaker 1: matter what they're doing is you're gonna be called bigoted,
Speaker 1: You're gonna be called prejudiced. That worse, you might even
Speaker 1: be called a racist. So I wonder how many of
Speaker 1: the students at this campus live in daily fear of
Speaker 1: global warming because of what is no doubt being taught
Speaker 1: there and every other college campus. Uh, that's a you know,
Speaker 1: a trumped up scare and they don't even notice a
Speaker 1: real threat. Well, it's hard to say that because somebody,
Speaker 1: a lot of people noticed something wrong with this guy,
Speaker 1: whether that equal to threat to them? Well, we know
Speaker 1: that it did with some because they refused to go
Speaker 1: to the class where he submitted all these writings. You
Speaker 1: do not have to be a talk show host. You
Speaker 1: don't have to be a conservative or a Republican or
Speaker 1: a moderate to ask this, how is it that we
Speaker 1: have outlawed standards of behavior? Where is our where is
Speaker 1: our sense of community and civic responsibility? Has all that
Speaker 1: has held our society together? Been swept away by political correctness?
Speaker 1: Well you might have some people come on rethew can't
Speaker 1: think that about it. He was he was just doing
Speaker 1: his own thing, and we didn't want to invade his faith. Uh,
Speaker 1: he's Asian. We we we didn't want any fibl right lawfuit.
Speaker 1: If we tingle him out for aber behavior, where would
Speaker 1: it stop. So this, this is the paralysis caused by
Speaker 1: political correctness. But the fault, my friends, lies in ourselves.
Speaker 1: Not in a gun shop, not in a gun not
Speaker 1: in a not in a not in the hall of Congress,
Speaker 1: House and Senate, not in Washington. Easy to say that
Speaker 1: we need more gun laws, But what's not so easy
Speaker 1: to say is that we need less political correctness and
Speaker 1: we need a lot more return to some sensible values
Speaker 1: that exists. Uh. You know, one of the tenants of
Speaker 1: political correctness. You can't judge anybody. You can't judge him,
Speaker 1: even when you know that there's something wrong with him.
Speaker 1: They can't offend them. You can't offend them. So what
Speaker 1: do you do? You just don't go to class when
Speaker 1: this guy shows up with his wacko writings. Uh, you
Speaker 1: do your best to send him to an institution some drugs.
Speaker 1: But even that you know you can't offend, you don't,
Speaker 1: you don't, you don't judge. Uh, it's you just leave
Speaker 1: people alone. It's none of your business, this sort of thing.
Speaker 1: And uh, this leads to paralysis, which is part of
Speaker 1: It's one of the many things that we had at
Speaker 1: Virginia Tech earlier in the week. I just finished a
Speaker 1: brilliant monalogue on the concept of banning political correctness for
Speaker 1: the good of our kids and the good of our society.
Speaker 1: I want you to listen to this montage here of
Speaker 1: NBC's Meredith Vieria wolf Blitzer. Have a psychotherapist Karen Stark,
Speaker 1: Chris Matthews of Hardball. I still wonder if he's going
Speaker 1: to resign and let a minority take his position at MSNBC.
Speaker 1: Remind me to bring that up because I think it
Speaker 1: running a pole at Russia lymball dot com. Who at
Speaker 1: MSNBC should resign to allow a minority to have a
Speaker 1: primetime show? Uh? In fact, we are going to do that.
Speaker 1: I'll give you the choices here in in just sex.
Speaker 1: So we got Matthews, We've got brand Williams. We've got
Speaker 1: a forensic psychologist Dr. Helen Morrison h and Larry King,
Speaker 1: and they're weighing in on the very thing we've been
Speaker 1: talking about. The profile of this guy, the shooter and
Speaker 1: uh and and and the warning signs were all there.
Speaker 1: Listened to these frustrated questions from the drive by media
Speaker 1: types and the psychotherapists. Is there a profile for someone
Speaker 1: who would do something like this? It seems like the
Speaker 1: classic profile. He's Alona, which fits the profile. What do
Speaker 1: you do when you have a kid who looks like
Speaker 1: the profile who might go on a rampage? The classic
Speaker 1: profile of the loner who exhibited trouble? Isn't that a
Speaker 1: trend that deserves now more resources? We see the typical
Speaker 1: profile of a mass murderer. Is there anyway to spot
Speaker 1: them before? Can we profile this type of person? Love?
Speaker 1: How does this happen? They all end up asking the
Speaker 1: same question, can we end up profile? Can you imagine
Speaker 1: if if this guy was Islamic? Would we be asking
Speaker 1: the question? Now? They want to profile Asian Americans. Now,
Speaker 1: they want to profile people that they think can be
Speaker 1: identified as people are gonna go out and shoot thirty
Speaker 1: two people in one morning, And I'm telling you that
Speaker 1: can't be profile. I don't care what these people say.
Speaker 1: It doesn't happen enough. You can't profile somebody's gonna do
Speaker 1: that just because they're a loner, just because they play
Speaker 1: video game, just because they have a gun. All these
Speaker 1: things may add up. The thing you profile is he
Speaker 1: was a nutcase, and they're all asking is there something
Speaker 1: we can profile? Yes, it was all over. The guy
Speaker 1: was screaming what's the thing? The left says it was
Speaker 1: a desperate cry for help? What Mr Snrdley, what's the question?
Speaker 1: You're interrupting me here in the brilliant riff. Its better
Speaker 1: be a good question. M hm. That's exactly what I'm saying.
Speaker 1: We can't profile them if they kill three thousand. We
Speaker 1: cannot if we can't profile the Islamo fashion, No, no, no,
Speaker 1: we can't. We can't even profile them in those uh
Speaker 1: the Transportation Safety authorities they were you go through the
Speaker 1: metal detectors. There can't profile them in there. No, your
Speaker 1: little grandmother might get wanted, your six year old might
Speaker 1: get wanted. You might have to give up your your
Speaker 1: shaving lotion or shaving creamer. What we can't know, We can't.
Speaker 1: The same people who agree that we shouldn't be profiling
Speaker 1: Islamo fash just not want to profile people like this.
Speaker 1: And there's there was a profile. Nobody paid any attention
Speaker 1: to it in a serious fashion. Nobody paid it to
Speaker 1: I mean, they tried to give him drugs, and they
Speaker 1: sent him to the funny farm and all, but nobody
Speaker 1: didn't think about getting him off campus. Uh See, that's
Speaker 1: why I said, it's so easy to start talking about guns.
Speaker 1: These guys don't know how they're undercutting your own argument.
Speaker 1: What what are they saying? Are they asking? Isn't there
Speaker 1: a way to profile a madman with a gun? Uh?
Speaker 1: These people are so out of it they don't even
Speaker 1: realize how they set themselves up for people like me.
Speaker 1: Where where are these same questions after nine eleven? In fact,
Speaker 1: we've gone just the opposite. They can't profile them at all.
Speaker 1: David and Columbia, Mississippi. Hello, sir, welcome to the Rush
Speaker 1: Limball program, Ali Rush, thanks for taking my call. Greetings
Speaker 1: from Trina Ravage, South Mississippi. Right, Yes, you made a
Speaker 1: point about gun control's impotence, another law not being relevant
Speaker 1: and m Columbine, what three gun laws were violated? Another
Speaker 1: one wouldn't have mattered. You know, this guy had chained
Speaker 1: and lucks. You could have had a five gallon gas
Speaker 1: tank of gasoline and would have done a lot of damage.
Speaker 1: Of course I made that point. Yes, a fertilizer and
Speaker 1: so forth, blew up the mirror building. And but you
Speaker 1: can get this guy filed the serial numbers off the
Speaker 1: gun too. I mean it clearly indicates a criminal intent. Right. Well,
Speaker 1: you know you've made the point about folks not being prepared. Um,
Speaker 1: you know before the nine eleven hijackings, people weren't ready
Speaker 1: for that. After nine eleven, they wouldn't have put up
Speaker 1: if people trying to take over the airplane. Uh, same
Speaker 1: thing about Virginia take today. Somebody would be able to
Speaker 1: do something like that. We did have Columbine, though we
Speaker 1: did have precedent about schools being attacked. Um, your point
Speaker 1: about political craignis is only really semi tongue in cheek.
Speaker 1: For instance, you know one of the guys at the
Speaker 1: one of the victims, was an eagle scout and he
Speaker 1: was trained to be to keep his head. He was
Speaker 1: shot in the leg and ruptured his female artery and
Speaker 1: if he hadn't kept his head, he would have bled
Speaker 1: to death. But he was able to staunish the bleeding
Speaker 1: and tie his leg up with electrical cord while shot.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna have to take a break here. I'm gonna
Speaker 1: hold you through the break. I want you to get
Speaker 1: to what you called about, because I thought I could
Speaker 1: squeeze you in a minute and a half. Back to
Speaker 1: David and Columbia, Mississippi. All right? And where were you
Speaker 1: headed with this the eagle scout? And then my point
Speaker 1: is that people American citizens can be trained to react
Speaker 1: under pressure or in emergencies. Um, this guy was trained
Speaker 1: just as in the voluntary organization. It doesn't require a
Speaker 1: lot of extra work. If you would have you know,
Speaker 1: if if they would just have a portion of emergency
Speaker 1: preparedness in Wait, wait a minute, Wait a minute, are
Speaker 1: you talking You're not talking about emergency service training like paramedics.
Speaker 1: You're you're you're talking about in this case, the students
Speaker 1: who are watching this guy shoot the gun learn what
Speaker 1: to do to stop him. Yeah, keep their heads. Uh.
Speaker 1: I mean obviously you can't train them to be commandos,
Speaker 1: but you can train people to keep their heads and
Speaker 1: think logically, what if somebody had just passed a big
Speaker 1: heavy But you know, we got a we got a
Speaker 1: we we got generation after generation of political correctness that
Speaker 1: we would have to somehow erase from people's minds to
Speaker 1: do this. Um I I look, I understand what you're saying.
Speaker 1: And this seems to be a budding theme out there
Speaker 1: that we need to do something here to to get
Speaker 1: people to toughen up in these circumstances, average citizens who
Speaker 1: are involved in whatever these events happen to be, rather
Speaker 1: than to sit around way to or run away. Uh.
Speaker 1: I want to take you back to Columbine. Remember after
Speaker 1: the Columbine massacre. Uh, there was the Clinton administration mounted
Speaker 1: this huge push for new gun control and it was crushed.
Speaker 1: And do you remember I doubt that many of you
Speaker 1: will remember this. Do you remember what the given reason
Speaker 1: was that the conventional wisdom on why the two Columbine
Speaker 1: shooters did what they did. I will tell you we
Speaker 1: were told that they were teased. Those two boys were
Speaker 1: teased and laughed at and made fun of by their classmates.
Speaker 1: And from now on we should be careful of that
Speaker 1: sort of behavior, because if we start teasing people and
Speaker 1: making fun of them and making them outcasts, then they
Speaker 1: might act on some of the movies they see, or
Speaker 1: the video games they play, or the television shows that
Speaker 1: they watch, and so forth. So let's let's extrapolate that
Speaker 1: and move forward here to Virginia Tech. Uh, how would
Speaker 1: it manifest itself? Well, don't call him, don't don't call
Speaker 1: this choga a newt, a nut, don't don't you know,
Speaker 1: don't don't don't point him out to others. Don't don't say, oh,
Speaker 1: this guy's a wacko. Don't just just he might explode.
Speaker 1: He might, this guy might blow up. Just let's just
Speaker 1: no go to class when he's there. Let's just accept
Speaker 1: the problem is he did explode, and we don't know
Speaker 1: whether he was teased or not. But I mean this
Speaker 1: is this is an outgrowth of political correctness. Uh, don't
Speaker 1: tease him. And of course, what is the real meaning
Speaker 1: of this, the real meaning when you when you came
Speaker 1: up with this conventional wisdom, those boys were being teased.
Speaker 1: They were they were made to feel like outcast. In
Speaker 1: the process of doing that, you you in a way,
Speaker 1: you justify their actions. Well, yeah, what do you expect
Speaker 1: him to do? They put on those long black coats,
Speaker 1: that grabbed their machine guns, they went on this shooting.
Speaker 1: What do you expect them to do? They spent their
Speaker 1: whole youth being laughed at and made fun of. Girls
Speaker 1: wouldn't go out with him on dates. They made fun
Speaker 1: of their acne and pimples and zips and so forth.
Speaker 1: And that's that. That is how this political correctness is
Speaker 1: justified because you then come out and you justify what
Speaker 1: they did because of the actions and behaviors of others,
Speaker 1: regardless whether it's mass murder or is the commission of
Speaker 1: a bank robbery or something like that. And that's where
Speaker 1: political correctness has taken us. And of course the umbrella
Speaker 1: under all this, don't offend anybody, don't insult them, and
Speaker 1: don't don't don't make the mad. Uh they might go
Speaker 1: nuts when they're gonna go nuts anyway at some point. Uh.
Speaker 1: And it's not because of being laughed at or made
Speaker 1: fun of. They've got something wrong with them, which was
Speaker 1: clearly evident. Uh in the in this guy's case, authors
Speaker 1: what checked the timing on this? This um? This hit
Speaker 1: last night about nine o'clock. Authors of a new comprehensive
Speaker 1: analysis of antidepressants for children and teenagers say the benefits
Speaker 1: of treatment trump the small risk of increasing some patient's
Speaker 1: chances of having suice titled Thoughts and Behaviors. The risk
Speaker 1: they found is lower than the one the Food and
Speaker 1: Drug Administration identified in two thousand four, the year the
Speaker 1: agency warned the public about the drugs risk in children.
Speaker 1: So you can sit there and you can say, uh
Speaker 1: that that well, yeah, yeah, it might get suicidal. But
Speaker 1: that's a small risk compared to what might happen. I
Speaker 1: only bringing this up because it's we were told this
Speaker 1: guy was prescribed at any precedents. I don't if he
Speaker 1: took them or not. This is David from parts on
Speaker 1: on in Pennsylvania. Welcome to the E I B Network. Sir,
Speaker 1: Hello Rush, this is a privilege. Thank you sir, I
Speaker 1: think you hit the nail on the head again with
Speaker 1: implying that political correctness is causing paralysis to action. I teach,
Speaker 1: and we've noticed recently that students do not participate in class.
Speaker 1: And this is a bunch of colleges, and we actually
Speaker 1: think that perhaps political correctness has gotten them in a
Speaker 1: situation at any time they open their mouths, they're afraid
Speaker 1: they're going to get dumped on or they're gonna offend somebody.
Speaker 1: Are they gonna make somebody mad? And that's going to
Speaker 1: lead to them getting dumped on. That's right, And I
Speaker 1: think it is a very good idea that you hit
Speaker 1: that nail on the head. I think, thank you very much.
Speaker 1: I appreciate that we in case you missed this about
Speaker 1: an hour and a half ago, I positive theory. And
Speaker 1: rather than band guns, we need to ban political correctness.
Speaker 1: We just need to get rid of it. It leads
Speaker 1: to paralysis, It leads to fear, and it leads to
Speaker 1: people not being who they are. You want to give
Speaker 1: me a couple of examples of it, and this this,
Speaker 1: these are true stories. London Sunday Times headline don't stare
Speaker 1: at Muslims says advice to schools. Pupils and teachers have
Speaker 1: been told by an official body not to stare at
Speaker 1: Muslims for fear of causing offense. The document, intended to
Speaker 1: educate against religious intolerance and sectarian is um, urges to
Speaker 1: cheers to make this quote and make pupils aware of
Speaker 1: the various forms of his Lamophobia, i e. Stairs verbal abuse,
Speaker 1: physical abuse. Osama, said, a spokesman for the Muslim Association
Speaker 1: of Britain, accused officials are going too far. Look, there
Speaker 1: are more, far more serious elements of his lamophobia. People
Speaker 1: people look at all sorts of things that that can
Speaker 1: just be a glance, a glance at the stare at
Speaker 1: two different things. Glances happen naturally with all sorts of
Speaker 1: things catch your eye, whereas a stare is probably gawking
Speaker 1: at something. Personally, I've not encountered much of a problem
Speaker 1: with people staring. I don't know how you would legislate
Speaker 1: for that. That's not going to stop them. I mean,
Speaker 1: good for him for speaking out, but don't stay there there.
Speaker 1: They're they're they're they're not this, They're gonna be stopped.
Speaker 1: I'm just telling you that the pupils and teachers they
Speaker 1: will continue to be told don't stare at Muslims, that
Speaker 1: might incite them. Then try this from this was Tuesday,
Speaker 1: same paper, a different paper. This is the UK Telegraph.
Speaker 1: Don't stare at the apes zoo tells visitors. Most people
Speaker 1: visit the zoos to see the animals, but visitors to
Speaker 1: Antwerp Zoo in Belgium are being told not to look
Speaker 1: at the apes. Now here's why. Visitors are now confronted
Speaker 1: with signs telling them that making prolonged eye contact with
Speaker 1: the apes leaves the apes sad and withdrawn. Zoos staff
Speaker 1: reckons staring can result in the creatures becoming less sociable.
Speaker 1: Multi culturalists usually claim to be respecting people from different cultures,
Speaker 1: while in fact treating them with a decided lack of respect.
Speaker 1: That's the conclusion of James Taranto at the best of
Speaker 1: the web dot com. So two different days, two different
Speaker 1: UK newspapers, don't stare at Muslims and it's that that's
Speaker 1: his homophobia, And don't stare at the apes and the
Speaker 1: zoo because the apes will will become sad and withdrawn. Well,
Speaker 1: I don't know if they're crying out. How do you
Speaker 1: know if they're crying out for attention. I I why, why, Yeah,
Speaker 1: just wink at him. If you want to have eye
Speaker 1: contact with the apes, just wink at him. Uh why
Speaker 1: stop of the apes. Don't wink. Don't stare at the tigers,
Speaker 1: don't stare at the lions. Don't stare at I mean,
Speaker 1: you could go even for don't stare at your own pet.
Speaker 1: Might cause your own pet to become sad, and withdrawing
Speaker 1: might give your own pet an inferiority complex. This is,
Speaker 1: this is. These are the outgrowths of political correctness. I
Speaker 1: know it sounds funny, and it is, but these people
Speaker 1: are dead serious. You know, there is insanity all over
Speaker 1: the place, and some of it is located in positions
Speaker 1: of power and authority. All over Our society is the
Speaker 1: Western democracies. Clyde and Boise, Idaho. Welcome to the E
Speaker 1: I B Network. S. I'm good, Thank you you bet Listen.
Speaker 1: I've been listening to you and I heard you talk
Speaker 1: about all the people that knew about this nut case
Speaker 1: in Virginia and nobody did anything. And I want to
Speaker 1: know if you'd have been one of those people wh
Speaker 1: knew about him exactly directly, what would have what would
Speaker 1: you have done, what could have been done? You're talking
Speaker 1: about the Virginia Tech situation. Well, this is this is
Speaker 1: a this is a question actually for the people in
Speaker 1: um in positions of authority there, and they did, uh
Speaker 1: do certain things. I put him on antidupressants, and they
Speaker 1: did send him. He went to a mental institution in
Speaker 1: two thousand five. But uh, none of that apparently had
Speaker 1: any impact or had any effect. Uh. But I know
Speaker 1: what you're getting at. You're getting at, and it's a
Speaker 1: valid point. There was there really any way to stop
Speaker 1: these things? My my only point in mentioning this is
Speaker 1: that you don't forget the context. Everybody said, we gotta
Speaker 1: ban the guns. We've got to get the guns out
Speaker 1: of it. I'm said, there was all kinds of information
Speaker 1: long before the guy started pulling the trigger that something
Speaker 1: wasn't right with him, and so banning the guns, Manny,
Speaker 1: that's not the solution to this at all. It would
Speaker 1: have had no impact. What's in fact, they already have
Speaker 1: banned guns on that campus. But this guy was able
Speaker 1: to go out and get one because the guy that
Speaker 1: sold him the gun didn't know ainying about him. The
Speaker 1: people at the school knew that something wasn't right about
Speaker 1: this guy. Uh, and I don't. I don't know what
Speaker 1: you do other than take him out of school and
Speaker 1: institutionalize him. His parents felt he was suicidal. That were
Speaker 1: all kinds of warning signs. What is what? What is
Speaker 1: your ultimate point with us? Have I touched? I've heard
Speaker 1: other talk shows to say that people were remissing not
Speaker 1: doing anything. And I've been associated with the courts enough
Speaker 1: to know that we can't arrest a guy because someday
Speaker 1: he's gonna kill somebody. And no, we're not talking about
Speaker 1: a lot we can do about people like that. We're
Speaker 1: not talking about nobody's talking about arresting him people. We're
Speaker 1: doing this a context of either sequestering him or getting
Speaker 1: him some serious help. And and the talk of paralysis
Speaker 1: enters the fray enters the picture when we start introducing
Speaker 1: the notion of political correctness, well, because we don't want
Speaker 1: to be critical because it might hurt his see things
Speaker 1: that might set him off. I understand that. Okay, I
Speaker 1: just want to know if you had a solution that
Speaker 1: I mean, if I'd have been there and knew this guy,
Speaker 1: There's not much I could do either, So I hear
Speaker 1: all the criticism about why did everybody let this go on? Well,
Speaker 1: there's not a whole lot in society that can be done.
Speaker 1: M hmmm, LU and attorneys, and we got the Constitution
Speaker 1: and we can't just jump in and do something in
Speaker 1: voluntarily on these people. Uh. Well, you know what, you're
Speaker 1: inadvertently making the case for what people here are saying,
Speaker 1: because you're gonna have people like the A. C. L
Speaker 1: You'll come along. If the school had tried to do
Speaker 1: anything just to quester the kid until he could have
Speaker 1: been you know, properly analyzed and treated, uh and so forth,
Speaker 1: he might have been able to get some A C.
Speaker 1: L U lawyers. I don't know that's that speculation too.
Speaker 1: But you're you're you're illustrating the problem at the same
Speaker 1: time you're making a point. I mean, I have people
Speaker 1: email me today, well, if we don't get rid of
Speaker 1: the guns, we're just gonna have an okay corral every day.
Speaker 1: We don't have an okay corral in this country, and
Speaker 1: we got all kinds of guns out there, video games
Speaker 1: and everything else. Thanks Clyde