1 00:00:03,480 --> 00:00:07,560 Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg Law Podcast. I'm June Grosso. Every 2 00:00:07,640 --> 00:00:10,440 Speaker 1: day we bring you insight and analysis into the most 3 00:00:10,480 --> 00:00:13,399 Speaker 1: important legal news of the day. You can find more 4 00:00:13,480 --> 00:00:18,000 Speaker 1: episodes of the Bloomberg Law Podcast on Apple podcast, SoundCloud, 5 00:00:18,680 --> 00:00:22,720 Speaker 1: Bloomberg dot com, Slash podcast. Met against Deputy Attorney General 6 00:00:22,840 --> 00:00:27,320 Speaker 1: Rod Rosenstein. Speaking on Fox News, House Freedom Caucus member 7 00:00:27,480 --> 00:00:32,560 Speaker 1: Mark Meadows explained the actions for us, it's all about transparency, 8 00:00:32,640 --> 00:00:35,959 Speaker 1: so of the American people can judge for themselves, and 9 00:00:36,000 --> 00:00:38,559 Speaker 1: so you know, they may be able to ignore Congress, 10 00:00:38,600 --> 00:00:41,360 Speaker 1: but they can't ignore the American people joining us. As 11 00:00:41,400 --> 00:00:44,640 Speaker 1: Jeff Kramer, a former federal prosecutor and managing director at 12 00:00:44,640 --> 00:00:48,239 Speaker 1: the Berkeley Research Group, Jeff a lot of drama, but 13 00:00:48,400 --> 00:00:51,919 Speaker 1: not much evidence of any traction. Paul Ryan says he's 14 00:00:51,920 --> 00:00:55,080 Speaker 1: not supporting it, and Republican Senator Lindsey Graham said it's 15 00:00:55,160 --> 00:00:58,560 Speaker 1: more likely Rosenstein will end up in the NBA playing 16 00:00:58,600 --> 00:01:04,800 Speaker 1: basketball than being impeach So why file articles and impeachment? Yeah, 17 00:01:04,840 --> 00:01:08,080 Speaker 1: that's a good line in the basketball. It's basically for 18 00:01:08,280 --> 00:01:10,440 Speaker 1: it is for drama, and it got a news cycle 19 00:01:10,480 --> 00:01:12,160 Speaker 1: for a day and that was it. You know, it 20 00:01:12,200 --> 00:01:15,560 Speaker 1: allows some people to pop off and express their dissatisfaction 21 00:01:16,160 --> 00:01:19,240 Speaker 1: um with the deputy Attorney general. Um. But it's it 22 00:01:19,280 --> 00:01:21,039 Speaker 1: was absurd to think it was gonna go anywhere. I'm 23 00:01:21,040 --> 00:01:24,920 Speaker 1: sure they thought so as well. So what do you 24 00:01:24,920 --> 00:01:28,679 Speaker 1: think is rosen Stein's future here? Does he does he stay? 25 00:01:28,840 --> 00:01:32,400 Speaker 1: Does he eventually leave? What do you think? You know? 26 00:01:32,920 --> 00:01:36,080 Speaker 1: The rosen fins is a career prosecutor, so he certainly 27 00:01:36,080 --> 00:01:39,319 Speaker 1: has you know, d o j uh running through his blood. 28 00:01:39,440 --> 00:01:41,440 Speaker 1: I don't think he's gonna leave anytime soon, certainly not 29 00:01:41,480 --> 00:01:44,560 Speaker 1: before the Mueller investigation is done. I mean, he he 30 00:01:44,600 --> 00:01:47,080 Speaker 1: knows that if he were to leave, someone could be 31 00:01:47,080 --> 00:01:49,400 Speaker 1: appointed who would then stopped in his track. So I 32 00:01:49,400 --> 00:01:51,520 Speaker 1: think he has a sense of duty that he needs 33 00:01:51,560 --> 00:01:53,120 Speaker 1: to stick it out, and he's gonna be a punching 34 00:01:53,160 --> 00:01:56,000 Speaker 1: bag and he knows that. But he's got to wait, 35 00:01:56,080 --> 00:01:59,280 Speaker 1: I think until the Mueller investigation, not necessarily all the trials, 36 00:01:59,520 --> 00:02:02,440 Speaker 1: but certainly the crux of the investigation has done. You 37 00:02:02,480 --> 00:02:05,480 Speaker 1: just spoke about the Mueller investigation. Let's talk about that 38 00:02:05,480 --> 00:02:07,600 Speaker 1: a little bit. There was a New York Times article 39 00:02:07,720 --> 00:02:12,880 Speaker 1: this morning that talked about how Mueller's investigators are really 40 00:02:12,919 --> 00:02:16,680 Speaker 1: seriously looking at some of the president's tweets tell us 41 00:02:16,720 --> 00:02:20,639 Speaker 1: about how those tweets might play a part in the investigation. Yeah, 42 00:02:20,680 --> 00:02:22,760 Speaker 1: I mean that's been banted around, not by Mueller, but 43 00:02:22,880 --> 00:02:25,919 Speaker 1: just by you know, various individuals that that could prove 44 00:02:26,240 --> 00:02:29,000 Speaker 1: to be fodder. And not surprisingly, Mueller is looking at it. 45 00:02:29,600 --> 00:02:31,840 Speaker 1: It's it gives you a glimpse into what the person 46 00:02:31,919 --> 00:02:33,840 Speaker 1: and you know, if this was an average individual, you 47 00:02:33,919 --> 00:02:35,840 Speaker 1: do the same thing. What is he or she said? 48 00:02:36,360 --> 00:02:38,560 Speaker 1: That could add some color to what they were thinking, 49 00:02:38,840 --> 00:02:41,320 Speaker 1: because that's what obstruction comes down to, is their intent. 50 00:02:42,160 --> 00:02:44,400 Speaker 1: And you look at someone's intent, you look at what 51 00:02:44,440 --> 00:02:49,000 Speaker 1: their actions are. And part of this president's actions are 52 00:02:49,120 --> 00:02:53,320 Speaker 1: his tweets trying to influence, if not the investigation, then 53 00:02:53,440 --> 00:02:56,840 Speaker 1: public perception. But he was certainly trying to influence as 54 00:02:56,840 --> 00:03:00,519 Speaker 1: best he could uh the investigation. You could argue that 55 00:03:00,520 --> 00:03:04,480 Speaker 1: that has obstruction not two problems. One, it's not great evidence, 56 00:03:04,480 --> 00:03:06,280 Speaker 1: but it's it's a part of the mosaic if you 57 00:03:06,320 --> 00:03:09,840 Speaker 1: will too. Which is a bigger problem is even if 58 00:03:09,840 --> 00:03:12,600 Speaker 1: he did commit obstruction, even if you could prove it, 59 00:03:13,320 --> 00:03:15,760 Speaker 1: Mueller has been clear that he's going to abide by 60 00:03:15,880 --> 00:03:19,000 Speaker 1: d o J policy. It's not the law, it's policy 61 00:03:19,400 --> 00:03:22,080 Speaker 1: that a sitting president cannot be indicted. So I think 62 00:03:22,080 --> 00:03:24,519 Speaker 1: it best you're going to get an argument laid out 63 00:03:24,800 --> 00:03:28,360 Speaker 1: in a report to Congress. What about the collusion piece 64 00:03:28,360 --> 00:03:31,200 Speaker 1: of it? Though, yeah, I mean I don't know. The 65 00:03:31,240 --> 00:03:37,240 Speaker 1: president says no collusion over and so far, you know, 66 00:03:37,240 --> 00:03:42,600 Speaker 1: there's no leaks that suggests that that's where Mueller, that 67 00:03:42,680 --> 00:03:47,720 Speaker 1: Mueller's got anything on that true. But this investigation, and 68 00:03:47,760 --> 00:03:50,600 Speaker 1: we've seen it, uh, surprised us in the sense that 69 00:03:51,160 --> 00:03:53,120 Speaker 1: we just wake up and there's an indictment. I mean, 70 00:03:53,880 --> 00:03:57,520 Speaker 1: I dare say that nine percent of the population has 71 00:03:57,560 --> 00:04:00,000 Speaker 1: never heard Bob Muller talk. They don't even know his voice. 72 00:04:00,000 --> 00:04:02,600 Speaker 1: It's like, and that's appropriate because he's just putting his 73 00:04:02,640 --> 00:04:05,240 Speaker 1: head down and doing his work. Is up press release, 74 00:04:05,320 --> 00:04:08,520 Speaker 1: there's no news conferences, et cetera. So he's certainly looking 75 00:04:08,560 --> 00:04:12,120 Speaker 1: at the collusion. That's a hard argument to make. Um. 76 00:04:12,160 --> 00:04:15,320 Speaker 1: We certainly see some individuals in the Trump orbit, and 77 00:04:15,360 --> 00:04:19,080 Speaker 1: some of them have been indicted, who were interacting with 78 00:04:19,279 --> 00:04:22,920 Speaker 1: Russian government officials and perhaps agents of the Russian government, 79 00:04:22,960 --> 00:04:26,440 Speaker 1: and we saw a recent indictment just now. Um. But 80 00:04:26,839 --> 00:04:30,280 Speaker 1: proving that Trump or someone very close to included. And 81 00:04:30,320 --> 00:04:33,160 Speaker 1: you know it's called a conspiracy because collusion itself is 82 00:04:33,520 --> 00:04:37,560 Speaker 1: it's not a crime. Um, it's conspiras a conspiracy to 83 00:04:37,600 --> 00:04:40,520 Speaker 1: take uh anything of aid from a foreign government, that's 84 00:04:40,560 --> 00:04:42,680 Speaker 1: the crime. It's gonna be hard to tag that to 85 00:04:42,880 --> 00:04:45,240 Speaker 1: the White House itself. So now I don't know if 86 00:04:45,279 --> 00:04:49,240 Speaker 1: we'll see Muther even observing at the Maniford trial, but 87 00:04:49,320 --> 00:04:53,400 Speaker 1: that's supposed to start next week. How important is a 88 00:04:53,480 --> 00:04:58,400 Speaker 1: conviction of Manifort to the Special Council's investigation as a whole. 89 00:04:59,560 --> 00:05:02,599 Speaker 1: I think it's are important. It's the first first volley, 90 00:05:02,760 --> 00:05:05,080 Speaker 1: and you want to win that trial because as you 91 00:05:05,160 --> 00:05:07,680 Speaker 1: move forward in the investigation. Part of this that's true 92 00:05:07,680 --> 00:05:10,800 Speaker 1: with any prosecutorial office. When you're bringing people in, is 93 00:05:10,800 --> 00:05:13,160 Speaker 1: you're trying to flip them, you're trying to turn them. Well, 94 00:05:13,200 --> 00:05:15,719 Speaker 1: how you flip them, how you turn them is the fear, 95 00:05:15,920 --> 00:05:19,640 Speaker 1: the specter that if they get indicted and tried, they're 96 00:05:19,680 --> 00:05:23,440 Speaker 1: going to jail. And that specter becomes more prominent if 97 00:05:23,480 --> 00:05:26,440 Speaker 1: you've already cut a scalp, if you were um and 98 00:05:26,480 --> 00:05:28,000 Speaker 1: this one is I don't want to say it's a 99 00:05:28,320 --> 00:05:31,040 Speaker 1: you know, it's it's an easy case because all cases 100 00:05:31,080 --> 00:05:33,240 Speaker 1: are difficult once you get to trial. But it's a 101 00:05:33,240 --> 00:05:38,400 Speaker 1: pretty solid case with documents, money trail, no taxes paid, 102 00:05:38,440 --> 00:05:41,200 Speaker 1: and you've got several witnesses who are going to give 103 00:05:41,240 --> 00:05:44,680 Speaker 1: some color to the trial itself. Certainly, Mr Gates, it's 104 00:05:44,720 --> 00:05:47,000 Speaker 1: not a long trial. You know, this thing may take 105 00:05:47,120 --> 00:05:50,080 Speaker 1: three weeks. I doubt will see Mr manafor trial or 106 00:05:50,120 --> 00:05:52,560 Speaker 1: to actually testify. And I think at the end of 107 00:05:52,560 --> 00:05:55,120 Speaker 1: this trial there'll be a conviction. Uh, and that's an 108 00:05:55,120 --> 00:05:57,960 Speaker 1: important one for the special prosecutor to get. Well, it's 109 00:05:58,000 --> 00:05:59,640 Speaker 1: going to be a little bit of a picture of 110 00:05:59,680 --> 00:06:03,000 Speaker 1: life styles of the rich and famous, five exhibits, including 111 00:06:03,160 --> 00:06:08,719 Speaker 1: including pictures of his palatial houses and expensive clothes. Now 112 00:06:08,920 --> 00:06:12,000 Speaker 1: the judge is trying to lay down all kinds of 113 00:06:12,040 --> 00:06:14,800 Speaker 1: ground rules so that the jury won't be exposed to 114 00:06:14,839 --> 00:06:18,200 Speaker 1: the politics of the case. Is it possible to shield 115 00:06:18,320 --> 00:06:22,040 Speaker 1: jurors from that? You know, it's it's hard. I mean, 116 00:06:22,240 --> 00:06:24,880 Speaker 1: they're not going to be sequestered, so they're gonna go home, 117 00:06:24,920 --> 00:06:28,640 Speaker 1: they're gonna be told not to read anything about uh, 118 00:06:28,880 --> 00:06:31,680 Speaker 1: you know, politics or this trial. Certainly, that basically leaves 119 00:06:31,720 --> 00:06:35,080 Speaker 1: the sports section availbum the potential jurors. You can't turn 120 00:06:35,080 --> 00:06:37,200 Speaker 1: on the TV. That's too risky. But like I say, 121 00:06:37,200 --> 00:06:38,920 Speaker 1: this is not a four months trial, so they just 122 00:06:38,960 --> 00:06:41,400 Speaker 1: need to keep their heads down for for a few weeks. 123 00:06:41,960 --> 00:06:44,440 Speaker 1: You know, the Virginia District is known to pick a 124 00:06:44,520 --> 00:06:47,040 Speaker 1: quick jury. This is gonna be a little trickier because 125 00:06:47,360 --> 00:06:50,200 Speaker 1: given where it's located, either they or someone close to 126 00:06:50,279 --> 00:06:52,920 Speaker 1: them probably works or worked in the past tense for 127 00:06:53,040 --> 00:06:56,160 Speaker 1: the government, and chances are, like everyone else in this country, 128 00:06:56,200 --> 00:07:00,400 Speaker 1: they have pre solid views politically speaking. Uh, maybe a 129 00:07:00,440 --> 00:07:02,320 Speaker 1: little tricky to pick a jury, but once they do, 130 00:07:02,400 --> 00:07:06,479 Speaker 1: in my experience, jurors are pretty good about listening to 131 00:07:06,520 --> 00:07:09,040 Speaker 1: those kind of instructions. The trick here is to make 132 00:07:09,080 --> 00:07:11,400 Speaker 1: sure you get a fair jury and not someone who 133 00:07:11,440 --> 00:07:13,880 Speaker 1: wants to get on this panel just to get their 134 00:07:13,920 --> 00:07:16,760 Speaker 1: fifteen minutes of faith and maybe prove a point. Just 135 00:07:16,880 --> 00:07:20,240 Speaker 1: about thirty seconds here, what do you think man of 136 00:07:20,280 --> 00:07:23,119 Speaker 1: forts defense is going to be just trying to knock 137 00:07:23,160 --> 00:07:26,240 Speaker 1: holes in the prosecution's case. It's a hard defense, it 138 00:07:26,320 --> 00:07:27,840 Speaker 1: really is. And that's what it comes down to. You're 139 00:07:27,840 --> 00:07:30,920 Speaker 1: looking for one juror just to hang this thing up, 140 00:07:30,960 --> 00:07:32,880 Speaker 1: and you know Gates has some baggage on him, as 141 00:07:32,880 --> 00:07:35,800 Speaker 1: any flipper does. But you can't cross examine a document. 142 00:07:35,880 --> 00:07:38,160 Speaker 1: It is what it is. Either paid the taxes or 143 00:07:38,240 --> 00:07:41,480 Speaker 1: he didn't. Either set up the shell companies or he didn't. 144 00:07:42,120 --> 00:07:45,400 Speaker 1: It's a very hard defense, uh, to to muster, and 145 00:07:45,440 --> 00:07:47,560 Speaker 1: you're just gonna throw everything against the wall and maybe 146 00:07:47,560 --> 00:07:50,160 Speaker 1: get lucky. Always great to have you on, Jeff. That's 147 00:07:50,200 --> 00:07:59,560 Speaker 1: Jeff Kramer. He's managed and directed the Berkeley Research. Of course, America, lawyers, 148 00:07:59,640 --> 00:08:02,960 Speaker 1: intern porners, and other professionals are volunteering some of their 149 00:08:02,960 --> 00:08:06,560 Speaker 1: free time to help an organization called Lawyers for Good Government, 150 00:08:06,960 --> 00:08:11,280 Speaker 1: which its founder, executive director and only employee, Tracy fight 151 00:08:11,440 --> 00:08:15,680 Speaker 1: Love says, is a progressive non partis an organization. I 152 00:08:15,720 --> 00:08:18,160 Speaker 1: think the reason we're seeing the wave of activity that 153 00:08:18,200 --> 00:08:21,160 Speaker 1: we're seeing now, and the reasons so many people joined 154 00:08:21,240 --> 00:08:24,000 Speaker 1: Lawyers for Government, and the reasons so many people are 155 00:08:24,040 --> 00:08:27,160 Speaker 1: participating in these other movements is because they believe as 156 00:08:27,200 --> 00:08:30,559 Speaker 1: I do, in the idea of America, in the dream 157 00:08:30,640 --> 00:08:33,480 Speaker 1: of America, and what we can accomplish when we stand 158 00:08:33,559 --> 00:08:36,959 Speaker 1: up for those ideals together joining us as Nick Lieber, 159 00:08:36,960 --> 00:08:40,320 Speaker 1: a reporter for Bloomberg News who has written about this group. Nick, 160 00:08:40,480 --> 00:08:43,480 Speaker 1: It's not unusual for lawyers to do pro bono work, 161 00:08:43,559 --> 00:08:46,679 Speaker 1: but this kind of a setup and network is different 162 00:08:46,800 --> 00:08:52,000 Speaker 1: from the usual pro bono work. Explain how it works. Sure, So, 163 00:08:52,040 --> 00:08:55,719 Speaker 1: they are one point three four million lawyers in the 164 00:08:55,840 --> 00:08:58,840 Speaker 1: US and many of them work for themselves and work 165 00:08:58,880 --> 00:09:01,800 Speaker 1: for small firms that don't have pro bono councils that 166 00:09:02,200 --> 00:09:06,280 Speaker 1: you know, and this group is a way for those 167 00:09:06,360 --> 00:09:09,600 Speaker 1: lawyers who don't have access to pro bono councils to 168 00:09:09,880 --> 00:09:13,600 Speaker 1: volunteer and to find opportunities where they feel like they 169 00:09:13,679 --> 00:09:16,800 Speaker 1: can do some good. So it's a it's a group 170 00:09:16,840 --> 00:09:21,480 Speaker 1: that helps train these lawyers and helps place them in 171 00:09:21,679 --> 00:09:26,920 Speaker 1: volunteer opportunities, and that can be anything from um environmental 172 00:09:27,000 --> 00:09:33,920 Speaker 1: protection to preventing voter suppression to helping immigrants cheek asylums. 173 00:09:35,120 --> 00:09:40,760 Speaker 1: Are there any volunteer lawyers for Trump? Um? There there 174 00:09:40,800 --> 00:09:45,880 Speaker 1: are probably volunteer lawyers for Trump the causes that this 175 00:09:46,000 --> 00:09:52,600 Speaker 1: group Lawyers for Government does UM, I would doubt there 176 00:09:52,640 --> 00:09:59,720 Speaker 1: are too many lawyers within it who support UM many 177 00:10:00,000 --> 00:10:04,920 Speaker 1: of Trump's policies that have to do with immigration or 178 00:10:05,280 --> 00:10:10,640 Speaker 1: environmental protection or voter suppression. Nick I was noticing in 179 00:10:10,640 --> 00:10:13,400 Speaker 1: your article that a lot of the lawyers who are 180 00:10:13,520 --> 00:10:18,880 Speaker 1: volunteering don't have experience in these practice areas, so what 181 00:10:18,920 --> 00:10:23,720 Speaker 1: do they do to train them? So the the organization itself, 182 00:10:23,840 --> 00:10:28,360 Speaker 1: Lawyers for Good Government, will do some training, and the 183 00:10:28,480 --> 00:10:32,760 Speaker 1: organizations in which they volunteer, so say a legal services 184 00:10:32,840 --> 00:10:38,000 Speaker 1: group UM on the border, will will train them as well. 185 00:10:38,679 --> 00:10:41,880 Speaker 1: So there are there are different opportunities to get trained 186 00:10:42,360 --> 00:10:46,400 Speaker 1: depending on what you elect to volunteer and do. And 187 00:10:46,640 --> 00:10:48,880 Speaker 1: you know, and of course it's competitive, there are a 188 00:10:48,880 --> 00:10:53,080 Speaker 1: lot of people who want to volunteer and UM. The 189 00:10:54,040 --> 00:10:59,959 Speaker 1: in the detention centers there is limited space, limited limited 190 00:11:00,080 --> 00:11:04,360 Speaker 1: visiting space where you can meet with clients. UM. So 191 00:11:04,480 --> 00:11:08,480 Speaker 1: you you sort of um have to have to find 192 00:11:08,960 --> 00:11:13,600 Speaker 1: time space training and then be able to do it. 193 00:11:15,320 --> 00:11:17,959 Speaker 1: Make any sense of how much time some of these 194 00:11:18,000 --> 00:11:22,600 Speaker 1: lawyers are spending away from their day jobs, I think 195 00:11:22,600 --> 00:11:25,760 Speaker 1: it's generally about a week if you're if you're on 196 00:11:25,800 --> 00:11:29,400 Speaker 1: the ground in a in a detention center. UM. That's 197 00:11:29,440 --> 00:11:33,000 Speaker 1: generally how it works. But then people are also UM. 198 00:11:33,160 --> 00:11:38,240 Speaker 1: During the first iteration of the of the Muslim band 199 00:11:38,480 --> 00:11:42,720 Speaker 1: the travel ban, people were spending weeks away from their 200 00:11:42,800 --> 00:11:46,600 Speaker 1: offices UM. And I think it depends. I think there 201 00:11:46,960 --> 00:11:52,559 Speaker 1: are also people volunteering UM remotely and helping prepare briefs, 202 00:11:52,880 --> 00:11:56,360 Speaker 1: and that could mean you spend you know, six hours 203 00:11:56,360 --> 00:11:59,360 Speaker 1: at night after after you finished your work at your practice, 204 00:11:59,520 --> 00:12:02,800 Speaker 1: or four hour US at night after you finish your practice. UM. 205 00:12:02,880 --> 00:12:05,199 Speaker 1: I think it. I think it varies, but generally it's 206 00:12:05,200 --> 00:12:09,800 Speaker 1: about a week if you go to to volunteer at 207 00:12:09,840 --> 00:12:13,520 Speaker 1: a legal services group UM and you're and you're in 208 00:12:13,559 --> 00:12:16,840 Speaker 1: a detention center. So I thought you mentioned that they 209 00:12:16,960 --> 00:12:19,920 Speaker 1: volunteered remotely, which I thought was really interesting. But the 210 00:12:20,000 --> 00:12:23,960 Speaker 1: coordination it must take to get all these disparate elements 211 00:12:24,000 --> 00:12:28,080 Speaker 1: together and even to get translators involved. So tell us 212 00:12:28,080 --> 00:12:32,280 Speaker 1: about how she's managing all this. Well, I think I 213 00:12:32,320 --> 00:12:36,800 Speaker 1: think you know right right when she she started the 214 00:12:36,840 --> 00:12:41,160 Speaker 1: group UM, there was an incredible outpouring of people who 215 00:12:41,160 --> 00:12:44,160 Speaker 1: wanted to be involved. And I think what she's been 216 00:12:44,200 --> 00:12:46,599 Speaker 1: spending a lot of time doing is exactly that is 217 00:12:46,640 --> 00:12:50,079 Speaker 1: figuring out. Okay, let's make sure we have an interpreter 218 00:12:50,400 --> 00:12:54,000 Speaker 1: who can be on the ground at Boston Air at Logan. 219 00:12:54,520 --> 00:12:58,320 Speaker 1: Let's make sure we have someone who has spent a 220 00:12:58,400 --> 00:13:03,240 Speaker 1: decade doing immigration law who can go to Texas it's 221 00:13:03,559 --> 00:13:07,760 Speaker 1: figuring out who has certain skills and who can get 222 00:13:08,280 --> 00:13:10,280 Speaker 1: from point A to point B at a certain time. 223 00:13:10,840 --> 00:13:14,720 Speaker 1: And a lot of that is people volunteering their time 224 00:13:15,200 --> 00:13:20,600 Speaker 1: to create spreadsheets that they then used to say, Okay, 225 00:13:20,600 --> 00:13:22,959 Speaker 1: I'm available this, this person is available at this time. 226 00:13:23,040 --> 00:13:24,560 Speaker 1: They have these skills and they can do this, and 227 00:13:24,559 --> 00:13:27,240 Speaker 1: they're willing to come on these dates and then and 228 00:13:27,320 --> 00:13:30,800 Speaker 1: then the sort of magic of them making coordinating all 229 00:13:30,840 --> 00:13:33,480 Speaker 1: that and making it happen. But it's, you know, it's 230 00:13:33,640 --> 00:13:36,560 Speaker 1: it's hard work. Only less in a minute here, Nick, 231 00:13:36,679 --> 00:13:40,559 Speaker 1: But what other professionals besides lawyers and translators do does 232 00:13:40,600 --> 00:13:45,160 Speaker 1: she have? I think that they're also looking for psychiatrists 233 00:13:45,800 --> 00:13:51,560 Speaker 1: who can help do evaluations of parents and children that 234 00:13:51,720 --> 00:13:56,840 Speaker 1: they can use in in their asylum requests. Who can 235 00:13:56,920 --> 00:14:04,920 Speaker 1: talk about the stress and and more hardcore UM realities 236 00:14:05,000 --> 00:14:09,720 Speaker 1: that asylum seekrets have faced and can document that in reports. 237 00:14:10,400 --> 00:14:16,920 Speaker 1: UM interpreters, yes, UM, and people who are willing, I think, 238 00:14:17,000 --> 00:14:21,320 Speaker 1: to give rides to asylum seekers when they're going, say, 239 00:14:21,480 --> 00:14:24,080 Speaker 1: leaving a detention center and then trying to reconnect that 240 00:14:24,320 --> 00:14:27,520 Speaker 1: ended there, Nick, It sounds really comprehensive and as was 241 00:14:27,600 --> 00:14:30,600 Speaker 1: your story. Thanks so much. That's Nick's Lieber, a reporter 242 00:14:30,720 --> 00:14:34,359 Speaker 1: for Bloomberg News. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Law Podcast. 243 00:14:34,720 --> 00:14:38,760 Speaker 1: You can subscribe and listen to the show on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, 244 00:14:38,840 --> 00:14:42,720 Speaker 1: and on bloomberg dot com slash podcast. I'm June Brosso. 245 00:14:43,240 --> 00:14:47,160 Speaker 1: This is Bloomberg. Yeah,