Speaker 1: This is Buck's first thoughts. The news you need to
Speaker 1: get for your day in forty five minutes. Make sure
Speaker 1: you subscribe on the iHeart Act before wherever you get
Speaker 1: your podcasts. It's really hard to overstate these days how
Speaker 1: wacky the woke are getting. Drunk with power after the
Speaker 1: Trump administration ended with a Biden victory, drunk with power culturally,
Speaker 1: in a corporate sense, in an economic sense. And we
Speaker 1: have our work to do, friends, This is about the
Speaker 1: culture which will determine our politics. We can sit around
Speaker 1: and fight about the dead and the deficit all day long,
Speaker 1: but at the end of the day, if the Left
Speaker 1: controls the minds of millions, particularly of the young, which
Speaker 1: is why they want to brainwash kids in school so badly,
Speaker 1: they can get whatever they want politically. It's just a
Speaker 1: question of how long they have to wait for it.
Speaker 1: This is why the progressives are experts at incrementalism, something
Speaker 1: that we have to understand and learn to effectively counter.
Speaker 1: But even with all the craziness going on from the
Speaker 1: Democrats in terms of spending and economic regulation these days,
Speaker 1: there's going to be a surge in the stock market.
Speaker 1: According to my friends at Carnivore trading. I know could
Speaker 1: be a surprise to you, but there are some key
Speaker 1: indicators that carnival Trading is picked up on, and they
Speaker 1: think some of the biggest profits are going to come
Speaker 1: in sectors that a lot of Wall Street experts miss.
Speaker 1: You see Carnivore Trading as an elite squad of strategists
Speaker 1: who influence major Wall Street investors, and when you subscribe
Speaker 1: at Carnivore, you'll receive real time text alerts of explosive
Speaker 1: trades they're making for their elite clients. You can mirror
Speaker 1: their trades with your discount broker or pass. But why
Speaker 1: would you pass when their trades routinely crush the SMP
Speaker 1: five hundred, and they guarantee you'll earn five times your
Speaker 1: monthly subscription or double your money back five x your
Speaker 1: monthly feet just by mirroring their trades. The market looks
Speaker 1: to be on the verge of a massive upswing. Get
Speaker 1: off the sidelines and mirror Carnivores trades right now. You'll
Speaker 1: get two weeks free. Visit get our trades dot com.
Speaker 1: That's right, Get our Trades dot com. Make sure you
Speaker 1: use promo code buck. Just go to this website. Get
Speaker 1: our trades dot Com promo code buck see website for
Speaker 1: guarantee terms and conditions. Pass performance not a guarantee of
Speaker 1: future earnings. Our Wisconsin dairy farmer who has two prosthetic
Speaker 1: legs is suing the Biden administration over what he claims
Speaker 1: is a racist COVID relief plan that disqualifies him because
Speaker 1: he's white. Man's name is Adam Faust. He filed a
Speaker 1: federal suit in Green Bay, Wisconsin last week. And what's
Speaker 1: at the center of this is a Biden COVID nineteen
Speaker 1: stimulus package fund that gives loan forgiveness, but only non
Speaker 1: white farmers are eligible. Okay, let's just let's look at
Speaker 1: this with very clear eyes and let's stick to the facts,
Speaker 1: because it could not be more obvious that this is
Speaker 1: racial discrimination. It is not possible to have equal protection
Speaker 1: under the law when your skin color is used against
Speaker 1: you when it comes to access for federal funds, when
Speaker 1: that is the only disqualifying factor. We are going down
Speaker 1: to the foundations of our legal system here. We are
Speaker 1: going down to the most basic constitutional promises and protections,
Speaker 1: and we have to see it as such. And the
Speaker 1: woke left, the Democrat Party seeks to violate them seeks
Speaker 1: to fundamentally transform American society. And that's what this goes to.
Speaker 1: All Right, he this dairy farmer has a heard of
Speaker 1: one hundred and forty Holstein's on his family farm in Chiltern, Wisconsin.
Speaker 1: And there's a four billion dollar program in the COVID
Speaker 1: nineteen stimulus plan that is supposed to give loan forgiveness
Speaker 1: to farmers. Now, this guy, Faust has had more than
Speaker 1: a share of issues and challenges. I mean, he's disabled.
Speaker 1: So not only is he a guy who's white therefore
Speaker 1: doesn't qualify, but he does actually get some legal benefit
Speaker 1: generally speaking. You know, he'd be covered on the Americans
Speaker 1: with Disability Act. But see, disability is not a discriminatory fact.
Speaker 1: It's not a discriminatory issue of the law because that's
Speaker 1: applicable across all racial and ethnic categories. Right, if you're
Speaker 1: in a wheelchair, doesn't matter what gender or gender identity
Speaker 1: or race you are, you get you know, handicap access
Speaker 1: for example. Right, you have different some different legal provisions
Speaker 1: that come into effect. But that's not enough. The fact
Speaker 1: this guy has two prosthetic legs, one because of an accident,
Speaker 1: one because he lost one leg in an accident, one
Speaker 1: leg to diabetes, so he walks on prosthetic legs. He's
Speaker 1: trying to keep his farm going. He's been through a
Speaker 1: terrible time with COVID, as so many other farmers have,
Speaker 1: and he wants government support. He wants help, and our
Speaker 1: government is saying, sorry, farmer, you're white. Sure you don't
Speaker 1: have legs. Sure you're dealing with disability and have had
Speaker 1: major challenges because of COVID. And there's money set aside
Speaker 1: specifically to help farmers like you, except not like you
Speaker 1: because you're white. This is basic, straightforward, red letter, right
Speaker 1: in your face, racial discrimination. Now they can try what
Speaker 1: they always do, say, oh, it's a holistic and the
Speaker 1: balancing of history. No, no, it's time we draw a
Speaker 1: line on this stuff. It's time we say enough is enough. Now.
Speaker 1: There are woke judges. There are progressive activists sitting on
Speaker 1: the federal bench, a lot of them, especially after the
Speaker 1: Obama administration. And they're going to be more now because
Speaker 1: of Joe Biden and the puppeteers around him would tell
Speaker 1: him what to do. They're going to be a lot
Speaker 1: of these judges and they don't care what the law is.
Speaker 1: They think they're creating a utopian society. They think they're
Speaker 1: creating a better America. But remember that in order to
Speaker 1: get there, they're willing to break some of the most
Speaker 1: fundamental legal and moral protections that we have in our society.
Speaker 1: This is just as clear as it can be. The
Speaker 1: government can't say we're not giving you aid money even
Speaker 1: though you really need it. The guy's disabled and he's
Speaker 1: a farmer, we're not giving you aid money. We're only
Speaker 1: giving it to Asian, Hispanic or black farmers. That is
Speaker 1: the official position of the Biden administration. Now you could say, well,
Speaker 1: this is just one case, but it's not actually, I mean,
Speaker 1: it's federal policy, so it really matters. It involves billions
Speaker 1: of dollars, or it's not a small issue. Four billion
Speaker 1: dollars might not seem like much when they're thrown around
Speaker 1: trillions like they're nothing, but in the normal world, in
Speaker 1: the world where math matters, four billion dollars a lot
Speaker 1: of money. But what you're seeing here is that the
Speaker 1: Left is trying to get is trying to go as
Speaker 1: far as it possibly can. They're drunk with power. They
Speaker 1: want to see what they can get away with conservatism.
Speaker 1: Right now, is in some level of disarray. We don't
Speaker 1: have the effective pushback that we should, and so what
Speaker 1: we're seeing is the weaponization of progressivism and political correctness.
Speaker 1: I mean, they are pushing this further than they ever
Speaker 1: have before. I mean, if you're a white chef now
Speaker 1: who makes burritos in Portland, Oregon, you will get death
Speaker 1: threats and to shut down your business if the woke
Speaker 1: finds out about you because of cultural appropriation that actually happened.
Speaker 1: You can look up Kuks burritos in Portland. I actually
Speaker 1: know you can't. It's gone forever thanks to a woke mob.
Speaker 1: That's right, white guy cannot make a burrito. Not allowed
Speaker 1: according to the left. So just understand that the Biden
Speaker 1: administration policy about the white farmer being denied funds is
Speaker 1: being This is being replicated all throughout our society. Now
Speaker 1: there are all these different ways that whiteness is being
Speaker 1: singled out and legally punished. And yes, you'd say, but
Speaker 1: why are all these white progressives pushing for this? Because
Speaker 1: they view this as creating a coalition of non white
Speaker 1: voters that will propel the progressive left into power. So
Speaker 1: they're willing to sacrifice principles they're willing to sacrifice constitutional
Speaker 1: protection all in the pursuit of total political power. So
Speaker 1: this is a bargain that they're happy to make. It
Speaker 1: doesn't affect them. So much of what happens with progressives is, yeah,
Speaker 1: you know, I don't care about higher taxes. You find out, well,
Speaker 1: that rich you know that Pelosi, that Schumer, that rich
Speaker 1: individual isn't going to pay the higher taxes. Got tax attorneys,
Speaker 1: all kinds of people to take care of that stuff. Um. No,
Speaker 1: the woke left believes that we are in a country
Speaker 1: where there's so much white supremacy that chefs can't white
Speaker 1: chefs can't make pad tie or curry or bibimbop without
Speaker 1: fear of being canceled. This is utter madness, okay. And
Speaker 1: you look at other things that have gotten the left
Speaker 1: upset recently. And you know, I think I mentioned this
Speaker 1: to you. Snow White, the snow white rod. Now the name.
Speaker 1: You might think the name would be the problem. Oh
Speaker 1: why why snow white white supremacy or something? Right? Uh No,
Speaker 1: the name isn't the issue. The problem with snow White
Speaker 1: is that the handsome prince kisses her out of her slumber,
Speaker 1: which is technically non consensual. And so when they reopened
Speaker 1: in Anaheim, California, a Disney ride that had the snow
Speaker 1: White kiss moments shown on a screen, there were riders,
Speaker 1: I believe for the San Francisco Chronicle who said that
Speaker 1: this was this was bad. Effectively, this is perpetuation of
Speaker 1: rape culture. You know. It's it's like the handsome Prince
Speaker 1: roofied snow White and then sexually assaulted her while she
Speaker 1: was passed out. I mean, that's the way the left
Speaker 1: sees things. Now. These people are dranged, But this is
Speaker 1: what happens when you're brainwashed. This is what happens when
Speaker 1: you no longer have any sense of perspective, anything that
Speaker 1: grounds you, that anchors you to objective reality. There's so
Speaker 1: many more of these. There was the decision recently by
Speaker 1: a federal court. This one was amazing. A federal court
Speaker 1: allowed the lawsuit of Kirin Buttacharia to go forward against
Speaker 1: the University of Virginia for expelling him. What happened, Well,
Speaker 1: he was a UVA medical student back in twenty eighteen
Speaker 1: and there was a panel discussion on microaggressions. Mister Buttacharia
Speaker 1: asked the assistant dean who was presenting this complete bullcrap
Speaker 1: about microaggressions, whether they only apply to marginalized groups as
Speaker 1: in blacks and Hispanics, or to other minority groups as well,
Speaker 1: like Indian Americans. And you would think this is totally reasonable, right,
Speaker 1: Mister Bacharia doesn't sound like he's somebody who who has
Speaker 1: white privilege, So he just wants to know what the
Speaker 1: rules are. His actual exchange that came up in the lawsuit. Yeah,
Speaker 1: follow up question, how do you define marginalized and who
Speaker 1: is a marginalized group? Where does that go? I mean,
Speaker 1: it's very non specific. But he said this to the
Speaker 1: dean presenting this, who is a black female, and she
Speaker 1: was very very upset. In fact, she had her colleagues
Speaker 1: reach out to and right after the panel and they
Speaker 1: told Batacharia that his questions were antagonistic and aggressive. In fact,
Speaker 1: they were considered so that question considered so aggressive that
Speaker 1: the University of Virginia Medical School or just the university
Speaker 1: in general, decided that he needed to attend anger counseling.
Speaker 1: That's right. They mandated he attended counseling as a condition
Speaker 1: of his continued enrollment. He refused, They gave him three
Speaker 1: hours notice, held some kind of tribunal and kicked his
Speaker 1: butt out of the school. They even had campus police
Speaker 1: escored him off campus because he wrote on social media
Speaker 1: posts that he was innocent and that this was crazy.
Speaker 1: That was also deemed aggressive and threatening. This is an
Speaker 1: Indian medical school student who asked some questions of a
Speaker 1: black female dean at a very prestigious state school about microaggressions,
Speaker 1: and they responded by saying that he was having a
Speaker 1: clinical mental health crisis and needed to be escorted off
Speaker 1: campus and expelled. Just now, a few weeks ago, a
Speaker 1: federal court said, yeah, you can sue them for that.
Speaker 1: Oh okay, so we haven't completely lost our minds as
Speaker 1: a society yet. You can just go on and on
Speaker 1: and on all these racial categorizations and the racial balancing
Speaker 1: and the identity politics Marxism of the left. It doesn't
Speaker 1: make any sense when you actually look at it. It
Speaker 1: doesn't actually hold together. It's self contradictory. It's absurd, it's wrong,
Speaker 1: it's immoral. But it is also a very good way
Speaker 1: to do a couple of things. It keeps people focused
Speaker 1: on the antagonisms between, you know, between each other, instead
Speaker 1: of at those in charge and the state and Therefore,
Speaker 1: it also allows for people who are the elites to
Speaker 1: get away with a whole lot and to continue to
Speaker 1: be in charge and to underperform, and to who always
Speaker 1: should say, well, here's an excuse. It's all just a misdirection, friends,
Speaker 1: But it undermines our country in very real ways. Do
Speaker 1: we stand up to it or do we let it continue?
Speaker 1: That's the question of the moment right now. The President's
Speaker 1: view is that the major platforms have a responsibility related
Speaker 1: to the health and safety of all Americans to stop
Speaker 1: amplifying untrustworthy content, disinformation and misinformation, especially related to COVID nineteen, vaccinations,
Speaker 1: and elections. And we've seen that over the past several months.
Speaker 1: Broadly speaking, I'm not placing any blame on any individual
Speaker 1: or group. We've seen it from a number of sources.
Speaker 1: He also supports better privacy protections and a robust antitrust program.
Speaker 1: So his view is that there's more that needs to
Speaker 1: be done to ensure that this type of misinformation, disinformation, damaging,
Speaker 1: sometimes life threatening information is not going out to the
Speaker 1: American public. The more that needs to be done. Are
Speaker 1: there any concerns though about First Amendment rights and where
Speaker 1: does the white houst draw Aloe out. Well, look, I
Speaker 1: think we are, of course a believer in First Amendment rights.
Speaker 1: I think what the decisions are that the social media
Speaker 1: platforms need to make is how they address the disinformation,
Speaker 1: misinformation especially related to life threatening issues like COVID nineteen
Speaker 1: and vaccinations that are continue to proliferate on their platforms.
Speaker 1: I mean, they're authoritarian censoring fascists. That's where the Democrats are.
Speaker 1: They like this, They have no problem with this. There's
Speaker 1: there's no principle that they feel is violated by the
Speaker 1: social media companies shutting down speech that they don't like.
Speaker 1: I mean, I'm a perfect example of this. I said
Speaker 1: two months ago, wrote on buck sexton dot com you
Speaker 1: can go check it out, which I hope you're checking
Speaker 1: in on daily to see our news stories we're posting there.
Speaker 1: I said that masking up outside was stupid as a
Speaker 1: policy matter. Mask mandates outdoors are dumb, And now every
Speaker 1: person with her, you know, the CDC guidance actually has said,
Speaker 1: has been pointed out to me that it's really not
Speaker 1: necessary to wear a mask outside even if you're not vaccinated.
Speaker 1: That seems to be getting lost right now, but that
Speaker 1: is part of the guidance as well. At least that's
Speaker 1: what my friend Carol mark Whitz the New York Post
Speaker 1: told me yesterday. I was surprised to hear it from her.
Speaker 1: But it is dumb to wear a mask outside. It
Speaker 1: always hasn't been. But I was censored officially by social media.
Speaker 1: They cut off so a lot of you wouldn't have
Speaker 1: seen my posts for a week or so, and you
Speaker 1: wouldn't have seen things that were being shared by me
Speaker 1: or my team. And yeah, and the White House is
Speaker 1: fine with that. They're fine. Oh, it's just a private company. Yeah.
Speaker 1: We regulate the you know what out of private companies
Speaker 1: in this country for a whole bunch of reasons. We
Speaker 1: regulate who they can fire, how they can fire, what
Speaker 1: they can pay, what they can do, what waste they
Speaker 1: can have. I mean, we we have regulations all over
Speaker 1: the place, but on this, on this, on political neutrality
Speaker 1: or common carrier legislation, no, no, Now, all of a sudden,
Speaker 1: the Democrats are steely eyed capitalists. If there's such frauds,
Speaker 1: it's so obvious what's going on here, But they're terrified
Speaker 1: of what happens if Trump and the MAGA movement gets
Speaker 1: back online in a real way. They've had this period
Speaker 1: of real supremacy on the internet now for months. I
Speaker 1: can't say what I really think about masks. Dumb and
Speaker 1: dumb and useless. Nine ninety five percent of the time,
Speaker 1: I can't say that online or all get in trouble.
Speaker 1: They'll ban me. And you say, oh, well, you know
Speaker 1: too bad. I said, well yeah, but guess what then
Speaker 1: they just amplify the voices of the CNN hacks and
Speaker 1: morons who are out there running propaganda. So we lose.
Speaker 1: So if our conservative voices are getting banned, if conservatives
Speaker 1: can't have platforms, we lose. It's not just like all
Speaker 1: the free market will take care of this. No, maybe
Speaker 1: in fifty years, but in the short run, we're done.
Speaker 1: And this is why the White House, you'll see this.
Speaker 1: The Democrats, they try to be quiet about it, but
Speaker 1: they're terrified the notion of what happens when if the
Speaker 1: Internet becomes a place of free, free exchange of ideas.
Speaker 1: You know, if you had written fourteen fifteen months ago
Speaker 1: that masks were essential based on the rules that were
Speaker 1: told to live under now, you would have been censored
Speaker 1: because Fauci said that wasn't true. That was wrong. That
Speaker 1: was misinformation, isn't it fastening These democra these smug, sanctimonious,
Speaker 1: self righteous Democrats, really think that they know what misinformation is.
Speaker 1: Just remember this, whenever you hear these lectures from these
Speaker 1: idiots like Jensaki, not a single journalist or politician was
Speaker 1: ever kicked off Facebook for trying to negate the results
Speaker 1: of the twenty sixteen election with four years of absurd, reckless,
Speaker 1: obvious Russia collusion lies. So in case you are wondering
Speaker 1: about the ethics of our Internet overlords or their partners
Speaker 1: in the Democrat Party, we know exactly what's gone. We
Speaker 1: see them, we understand this, and I just you know
Speaker 1: the problem I have. I've said this before. Liberal billionaires
Speaker 1: they wanted they want to change society, they want to
Speaker 1: change the world. They'll blow huge amounts of money to
Speaker 1: create their vision of America. Conservative billionaires, what's my ROI? Oh,
Speaker 1: I don't want I don't want to own that media company,
Speaker 1: or I don't want to build that media platform. What's
Speaker 1: my ROI? It's one of the reasons we lose. The
Speaker 1: left cares more. Left wing billionaires. I'm just telling you
Speaker 1: they're more invested in this. You know, right wing conservative
Speaker 1: billionaires just want to make money, be left alone, lib
Speaker 1: billionaires the kind of because that's what you need to
Speaker 1: win this fight, folks. You need deep pockets lib billionaires. Nah,
Speaker 1: they're they're looking to change the world. That's what's happening.
Speaker 1: The biggest enemy of free speech in America today is
Speaker 1: big tech. It's just the truth. They suckered us. They
Speaker 1: swindled the public, at least the public that doesn't agree
Speaker 1: with their politics. Oh, they were just interested in money.
Speaker 1: They were just interested in being the most successful platform
Speaker 1: and being places for free speech. That's a lie. They
Speaker 1: are now the greatest, most powerful purveyors of leftist orthodoxy
Speaker 1: in the world. CNN, the New York Times can't hold
Speaker 1: a candle to what Facebook and Google and Twitter can do,
Speaker 1: not even close. So this fight is essential. And I
Speaker 1: know a lot of you aren't on some of those platforms,
Speaker 1: or you don't engage in social media. Unfortunately your children
Speaker 1: do and their children will and there's a greater impact
Speaker 1: on perception from this than anything else. So look, it's
Speaker 1: it's going to be an uphill fight against big tech,
Speaker 1: that's for sure. And whenever you can, I do want
Speaker 1: you to use just technology in general to your advantage.
Speaker 1: You know, small businesses have had a really tough time
Speaker 1: over COVID's period here, But going forward, I think that
Speaker 1: you're going to see a real renaissance for small business,
Speaker 1: especially as they get local support, as people realize buying
Speaker 1: and supporting buying from and supporting small businesses all across
Speaker 1: the countries is essential. But when you're running a business,
Speaker 1: HR issues can kill you. I mean you've got wrongful
Speaker 1: termination suits, minimum wage requirements, labor regulations, and HR manager
Speaker 1: salaries aren't cheap an average of seventy thousand dollars a year.
Speaker 1: Bambi spelled b Ambee was created specifically for small business.
Speaker 1: You can get a dedicated HR manager, craft HR policy,
Speaker 1: and maintain your compliance all for just ninety nine dollars
Speaker 1: a month. With Bamby, you can change HR from your
Speaker 1: biggest liability to your biggest strength. Go to Bambi dot
Speaker 1: com slash buck right now to schedule your free HR audit.
Speaker 1: That's bambee dot com slash buck bam b b ambee
Speaker 1: dot com slash buck. There must be a reckoning buy
Speaker 1: the tech companies for the role that they play in
Speaker 1: undermining the information ecosystem that is absolutely essential for the
Speaker 1: functioning of any democracy. If you get to a point,
Speaker 1: and we are, if not, they're very close to it
Speaker 1: where you cannot have agreement on facts, on evidence, on truth,
Speaker 1: how does a democracy make decisions? And what we've got
Speaker 1: in the tech world on social media platforms is an
Speaker 1: algorithm driven conspiracy rabbit hole that people are enticed to
Speaker 1: go down and then addicted because it is like watching
Speaker 1: constant car crashes. You cannot turn away. And as someone
Speaker 1: who has been accused of practically everything you can possibly imagine,
Speaker 1: I know how powerful this is. I mean outrageous falsehoods
Speaker 1: which fuel a sense of alienation. Hello, she's back. Every
Speaker 1: time you think you're free of her, she comes back. Now,
Speaker 1: Hillary does have some real firsthand knowledge about technology and
Speaker 1: what I can do for you and how you could, say,
Speaker 1: violate the Espionage Act using technology over a hundred times
Speaker 1: and then not face criminal prosecution. Because James Comey is
Speaker 1: your little errand boy at the FBI making sure that
Speaker 1: he's going to have a nice, cozy relationship with the
Speaker 1: person that he assumes is going to be the next
Speaker 1: president of the United States, and he's a narcissistic, egomaniac.
Speaker 1: So he makes sure that there can't be prosecution of
Speaker 1: Hillary by giving some bizarre, completely unwarranted speech about how
Speaker 1: no reasonable prosecutor would bring charges. So, yeah, Hillary certainly
Speaker 1: knows a thing or two about the misuse of technology.
Speaker 1: But on a broader level, I want to say that
Speaker 1: the Democrats, this is a tactic that they do, that
Speaker 1: they use, and it's they take the exact opposite. Can
Speaker 1: they take the exact opposite approach? They come to the
Speaker 1: polar opposite conclusion of what a reasonable person would under
Speaker 1: the circumstances. Right, So we see tech banning a former president,
Speaker 1: the most recent president of the United States before the
Speaker 1: current administration, has been effectively deep personed on the internet.
Speaker 1: That's a big deal. This matters. This is not a
Speaker 1: little thing. He could run again, He could be president again,
Speaker 1: and if that were to happen, I certainly hope that
Speaker 1: when people like me are saying, gut big tech, go
Speaker 1: after them, regulate that you know what out of them,
Speaker 1: lock it down, get it done. I don't know if
Speaker 1: people saying he fights buck, leave him alone. He's doing
Speaker 1: a great job. I want him to do a great job.
Speaker 1: I wanted him to do a great job, but he
Speaker 1: was in office. It was good. It could have been better,
Speaker 1: and it would have been a little bit better if
Speaker 1: there had been stronger voices around him and getting to
Speaker 1: him to follow through on some of his promises. What
Speaker 1: he didn't know about the problems of big tech when
Speaker 1: he started. But you know, a lot of a lot
Speaker 1: of Goldman Sachs advisors around him, a lot of a
Speaker 1: lot of swamp, a lot of celebrity apprentice and his kids,
Speaker 1: his personnel choices. I don't like it. Don't get mad.
Speaker 1: I mean, I'm telling you the truth because I like you,
Speaker 1: because I respect you, because you're my peers. Okay, that's
Speaker 1: what I do. I haven't sit around, you know, I'm
Speaker 1: pandering all the time. God, it's unbelievable. I'm just trying
Speaker 1: to get to the truth here of what happened and
Speaker 1: what is happening. And it gets it gets very frustrating
Speaker 1: because I understand that people can feel like their country
Speaker 1: is slipping away from them right now. I understand people
Speaker 1: see the future and it feels a little bit bleak.
Speaker 1: But it doesn't get better if I just sit here
Speaker 1: throwing a maga hat on saying everything. It's great, he's
Speaker 1: gonna come he's got a plan, he's coming back. It's
Speaker 1: all gonna No. No, we were in the fight. Now
Speaker 1: we're on defense. So can we can we strategize? We
Speaker 1: are on we're under siege. We're not the ones, you know,
Speaker 1: lobbing the cannonballs into the fort. We're in the fort.
Speaker 1: So what do we do? That's the question of the moment.
Speaker 1: That's how we have to be viewing this and trying
Speaker 1: to come up with the best path forward. Is not
Speaker 1: disloyalty to Trumpy Zoom or the GOP or MAGA. It's
Speaker 1: I want us to win. I want us to win
Speaker 1: hearts and minds, and I want us to win political power,
Speaker 1: and I want us to stop this, stop this utter madness.
Speaker 1: But the exact wrong conclusions I got diverted for a
Speaker 1: moment here, The exact wrong conclusion that the Democrats take, Well,
Speaker 1: it's right in their minds because it goes to their power.
Speaker 1: But it's not that big tech shouldn't be censoring, you see,
Speaker 1: it's that a dozen't censor enough. They don't. They're not
Speaker 1: even allowing us to try to pull it back to
Speaker 1: the center from where it is they're going even further
Speaker 1: in the other direction, pulling even harder toward true authoritarian
Speaker 1: rian online America. That's the way they want this to be.
Speaker 1: Oh you think you make a joke about Nancy Pelosi,
Speaker 1: You say Nancy Pelosi looks drunk. Oh, not allowed to
Speaker 1: do that. Remember when somebody made a video of Nancy
Speaker 1: Pelosi and CNN, some random guy, and CNN went and
Speaker 1: found him and threatened him and docked him. Don't ever
Speaker 1: forget this. I know it may may seem a little tripe,
Speaker 1: but it's so true. You have to laugh at these people.
Speaker 1: That doesn't mean you don't take them seriously, but you
Speaker 1: have to laugh at them too, Make the joke you
Speaker 1: want to make about them, even if someone around you
Speaker 1: might take offense to it. All right, because I mean
Speaker 1: Mark Twain once wrote against the assault of laughter. Nothing
Speaker 1: can stand. It is so true about the woke left.
Speaker 1: That's why they have no sense of humor about anything,
Speaker 1: because at some level they're so insecure about some of
Speaker 1: their most deeply held beliefs. At some level, they're just
Speaker 1: they're they're terrified of having to face the reality of
Speaker 1: what they think is essential is actually untrue. What they
Speaker 1: think is critical, is absurd. So that's a weapon you
Speaker 1: should always keep in your arsenal. Make fun of these absurd,
Speaker 1: absurd libs however you can, whenever you can. But yeah,
Speaker 1: they're saying that they're not censoring enough on Facebook. That
Speaker 1: really is their approach, that's really their belief, and that
Speaker 1: is meant to throw you off balance. How can they
Speaker 1: feel that way when we're saying that there should be
Speaker 1: so much less censorship, Well, because it benefits them obviously,
Speaker 1: Think about the effect that this has had. We don't
Speaker 1: even know what the big tech companies were doing before
Speaker 1: they booted Trump off the internet. You don't think think
Speaker 1: that they were assisting those campaigns and privileging their their
Speaker 1: fundraising efforts, their news sources and information with the with
Speaker 1: changes in the algorithm. Oh sure, we hear all the
Speaker 1: time about Russia disinformation. That's just all crying because even
Speaker 1: with all the built in advantages the Democrats had, they
Speaker 1: still lost to Trump in twenty sixteen. I mean the
Speaker 1: fact that they think that there should be there should
Speaker 1: be this crackdown on what they call COVID misinformation, and
Speaker 1: that there's people should face consequences online. Fauci's a moron.
Speaker 1: Lockdowns didn't work. Mass mandates were utterly pointless based on
Speaker 1: all the data you can show in this country. But
Speaker 1: they still feel righteous and blocking people, banning, suspending people
Speaker 1: who point that out. I was right, and I'm just
Speaker 1: some guy who does a radio show. Faucci was wrong
Speaker 1: time and time again. Do I ever get an apology
Speaker 1: from the Facebook sensors? Do I get a hey, you know,
Speaker 1: we're sorry about all those times that we shut down
Speaker 1: your ability to use our platform. I mean, there is
Speaker 1: some level of agreement here, right. It's kind of like, yeah,
Speaker 1: at a job, you can be an atwell employee, but
Speaker 1: they can't just I mean the guy. If the guy
Speaker 1: comes in and fires you because didn't like the color
Speaker 1: tie you were wearing one day, it's wrongful termination. I mean,
Speaker 1: there's some agreements that are implied by companies operating and
Speaker 1: serving the public and social media. Social media companies have
Speaker 1: turned into the enemy. They're the enemy, and you're saying, well, buck,
Speaker 1: why do I still use them? Um? If I were
Speaker 1: fighting against I want to say, the Taliban, make this
Speaker 1: too real. If I were, you know, fighting against the
Speaker 1: invading barbarian horde, I'm I'm the consul in ancient room.
Speaker 1: I'm fighting against an invading barbarian horde. I'm going to
Speaker 1: take their axes and swords that I capture and arm
Speaker 1: my people with them and use them. So yes, I'm
Speaker 1: going to keep using every social media platform I can
Speaker 1: as long as I can, because I do worry. I
Speaker 1: think eventually they're they're gonna push me off because I
Speaker 1: refused on COVID. And for those of you who supported
Speaker 1: me on this all along, I really appreciate it. I
Speaker 1: refused to bend the need. I would not break on
Speaker 1: this issue. I would not abandon what I truly believed
Speaker 1: and what I knew from the research that I was
Speaker 1: doing all along. So but yeah, I don't. I don't
Speaker 1: think I'm gonna get a sorry in time soon. Oh
Speaker 1: and if you really just just one more bit here
Speaker 1: of if you really need to know how important this
Speaker 1: is to them. The slimiest, I mean, the most unctious, disgusting, disingenuous, dishonest,
Speaker 1: I mean, in some ways, the worst member of the
Speaker 1: United States Congress, really, Adam Shift, slimy Shift, the worst
Speaker 1: kind of lawyer, the worst kind of prosecutors, guyst disgraceful.
Speaker 1: He really wants to make sure that Trump can't get
Speaker 1: back on Facebook play seven its Facebook violating Donald Trump's
Speaker 1: constitutional right to free speech. No, the first time, it
Speaker 1: protects Donald Trump and every American from the government regulating speech.
Speaker 1: It doesn't say that private companies need to use their
Speaker 1: platforms to air patent falsehoods that endanger the country. That insurrection.
Speaker 1: And so no, I think Facebook is trying to have
Speaker 1: a consistent policy. At least it's oversight board is trying
Speaker 1: to make sure that it is consistent and how it
Speaker 1: treats people. The president here is continuing to go out
Speaker 1: and push the big lie about the election, continuing, I think,
Speaker 1: to endanger our democracy by doing that. And so he
Speaker 1: continues to make the case that he would violate the
Speaker 1: policies if they readmitted him, and I think, frankly, pathologically,
Speaker 1: he's incapable of changing. So this is a temporary evan
Speaker 1: it will likely be, if we're fortunate, a permanent van
Speaker 1: because the president is not going to stop the lies
Speaker 1: about the last election or lies about the next one.
Speaker 1: He will incite people if as was necessary to suit
Speaker 1: his narrow personal interests, and that should violate any good
Speaker 1: corporate citizens policies. Yeah, this is about raw power. Democrats
Speaker 1: have no principles, as you know. They just have the
Speaker 1: pursuit of power, and they fold their principles into that
Speaker 1: in whatever way they have to, whenever they have to.
Speaker 1: They don't care about free speech as a concept or
Speaker 1: as a principle at all. And Adam Schiff is a
Speaker 1: disgusting fraud on so many levels. But I hope Republicans
Speaker 1: remember this once we get back into power. It's going
Speaker 1: to be very hard. They're going to people who fight it.
Speaker 1: The big tech companies. They have a lot of money
Speaker 1: to throw around. They have board seats, they have consulting
Speaker 1: deal they have so much money. They'll be able to
Speaker 1: buy a lot of people off. But I don't think
Speaker 1: they'll buy Trump off. I don't think they'll be able
Speaker 1: to buy off Rhonda Santis either. And I just hope
Speaker 1: that we all remember big tech is the enemy of constitutionalism, conservatism,
Speaker 1: free speech, and freedom in general in this country. Now,
Speaker 1: all right, it's like we've imported a portion of communist
Speaker 1: China into this country to run our communications for the
Speaker 1: benefit of the status authoritarian party. I mean, the decision
Speaker 1: is very clear insofar as you know, the board has
Speaker 1: found that the suspension of former President Trump was necessary
Speaker 1: to keep people safe, that the actions of the former
Speaker 1: president encouraged and legitimized violence and constituted what the Board
Speaker 1: has termed a severe violation of the FACEBOOK rules. That
Speaker 1: means every Democrat politician in the country that you can
Speaker 1: think of has also legitimized violence through its support of BLM,
Speaker 1: which has engaged and countless riots in little, many insurrections
Speaker 1: and cities all over the country and has resulted in
Speaker 1: actually murdering people, has resulted in murdering police, which the
Speaker 1: January sixth riot did not. The only person killed by
Speaker 1: the acts of individuals that day was actually Babbitt, killed
Speaker 1: by a Capitol Hill police officer, shot in the neck
Speaker 1: through a locked door. This is the you w want
Speaker 1: to talk about. The big lie here. The big lie
Speaker 1: is that only Trump statements drive some people to riot.
Speaker 1: It's it's only Trump who says things that aren't true
Speaker 1: and then people, you know, break the law. Democrats ran
Speaker 1: around pretending that the president of the United States was
Speaker 1: a white nationalist for four years and and then a
Speaker 1: movement got under way after George Floyd. Really the rebirth
Speaker 1: of a movement that resulted in hundreds of riots, lots
Speaker 1: of people killed, the whole thing. It was awful, awful,
Speaker 1: but that's not there's no violence attached to that. So
Speaker 1: you can't say you think the election was stolen. But
Speaker 1: you can say this is social media land out. You
Speaker 1: can say that cops are racist murderers who get away
Speaker 1: with killing black men all the time and it's part
Speaker 1: of the system, and that's no, and it's just happening constantly.
Speaker 1: That's a lie. But it's spread by BLM. It's spread
Speaker 1: all over by Democrats. You pander and no one does
Speaker 1: anything about it. That's fine. You can say that there's
Speaker 1: no there's no problem with saying cops are racist murderers,
Speaker 1: even though that's resulted in not only riots but also
Speaker 1: some cops being assassinated. I can name some of them
Speaker 1: for you if you want to know their names, Ramos
Speaker 1: and lou Here in New York City, the NYPD, five
Speaker 1: officers from the Dallas Police Department. That was BLM. It
Speaker 1: was under the Obama administration. But those were BLM assassinations
Speaker 1: that occurred. Yeah, you can say, oh, they there's no
Speaker 1: structure of BLM. Oh tell that to all the people
Speaker 1: arching around that are yelling blm slogans. But one group
Speaker 1: is allowed, the other is not. One side's political violence
Speaker 1: is a threat to democracy. The other side, the Democrats side,
Speaker 1: much more frequent, much more common, political violence is an
Speaker 1: expression of legitimate grievances about racial inequity. You know, just
Speaker 1: use all this language to massage what's going on here,
Speaker 1: to make it seem like it's not appalling, because it is.
Speaker 1: This is where we are, this is what we see
Speaker 1: in our society. We have lies, lies, and more lies
Speaker 1: to deal with, and the people in charge, it's not
Speaker 1: even clear anymore they know what the truth is. It's
Speaker 1: certainly clear they don't care. But I'm worried that they've
Speaker 1: started to really believe their nonsense. I think that they've
Speaker 1: started to think that the narratives that they're always pushing
Speaker 1: on the public might actually be true, because they had
Speaker 1: convinced enough easily misled Americans of them in the first place.
Speaker 1: But as I've told you, these social media companies, they
Speaker 1: are the new mainstream media, and they are more powerful
Speaker 1: than the old cable channels and newspapers ever were. They
Speaker 1: are running addiction machines that are changing americans perception about
Speaker 1: the world around them. Every second of every day. I'll
Speaker 1: never forget the first time I had to think about
Speaker 1: preparing for the future. It's when one of my colleagues,
Speaker 1: the CIA, said, you know, you're going to a war
Speaker 1: zone and you need to put your affairs in order.
Speaker 1: And I was in my twenties. I didn't think I
Speaker 1: needed to do that, but I did. You know, these
Speaker 1: are some of the things you just have to do,
Speaker 1: whether you're at that stage where you're having babies, buying
Speaker 1: a home, starting to build wealth for your family, you
Speaker 1: need to secure your family's future. At the top of
Speaker 1: a to do list for you needs to be a
Speaker 1: will or trust and you can do this at trustinwill
Speaker 1: dot com. At trusted will dot com, setting up an
Speaker 1: a state plan is simple, It's convenient and secure. For
Speaker 1: as little as thirty nine dollars. You can nominate guardians
Speaker 1: for your children, determine who gets your stuff, and plan
Speaker 1: for future medical care, all from the comfort of your home.
Speaker 1: Hiring a traditional state attorney can cost thousands, and using
Speaker 1: a one size fits all template is not nearly specialized enough.
Speaker 1: Trust and will documents are designed by state planning experts
Speaker 1: and customize for the state you live in. This is
Speaker 1: what you need to do right now, All right, just
Speaker 1: go to Trust and Will dot com slash buck and
Speaker 1: you'll get ten percent off plus free shipping of your
Speaker 1: customized legal documents. That's Trust and Will dot com slash
Speaker 1: buck and you'll get ten percent off plus free shipping
Speaker 1: of your customized printed out legal documents that you'll have
Speaker 1: in your possession. Don't wait, go right now. This is important.
Speaker 1: Just get this taken care of. It's quick, it's easy.
Speaker 1: The Trust and Will website makes it all so straightforward.
Speaker 1: They've got a quick quiz you'll fill out and it'll
Speaker 1: all be tailored to your needs and Will dot com
Speaker 1: slash buck. I think that we saw last summer that
Speaker 1: there were outbreaks in summer camps and the kids had
Speaker 1: to go home, they had to not attend these summer camps.
Speaker 1: We're trying to make it possible for these kids to
Speaker 1: be able to have as normal of a summer as possible.
Speaker 1: If people are playing tennis and they're they're far away,
Speaker 1: we can reckon, we can say that their masks can
Speaker 1: come off. But if they're crowded on a soccer field,
Speaker 1: they're on top of each other, they're heavily breathing. We
Speaker 1: don't really think that's a good idea right now. These
Speaker 1: are kids who likely will not be vaccinated. Well okay,
Speaker 1: I mean, but doesn't the science say that you're so
Speaker 1: much less likely to pass it outside at this point?
Speaker 1: It doesn't the advantage of kids being able to do
Speaker 1: things more things, doesn't that outweigh the very low risk.
Speaker 1: So you know, I think not all outside is the same.
Speaker 1: So outside playing tennis, outside, swimming, all of those things
Speaker 1: where you're far apart from one another. If you have
Speaker 1: a group of ten year olds crowded trying to get
Speaker 1: over a soccer ball and they're all breathing heavily, I
Speaker 1: think you need to wear a mask because, yes, you
Speaker 1: there's decreased infection risk outside, But if you're all breathing
Speaker 1: heavily on top of a singular soccer ball, that has
Speaker 1: the potential. And we've seen a lot of outbreaks associated
Speaker 1: with youth sports. I mean, this woman is the director
Speaker 1: of the CDC, and she's a moron. I don't know
Speaker 1: what else to tell you. I mean, I don't enjoy
Speaker 1: saying things like that, but it's true. He's an idiot.
Speaker 1: You're gonna have kids running around in ninety degree heat
Speaker 1: in camps playing soccer with a mask on. I mean,
Speaker 1: does she want she want kids to over I just
Speaker 1: want to know how many how many kids need to overheat?
Speaker 1: How many kids need to be at risk of actually
Speaker 1: having some kind of a serious adverse health incident from
Speaker 1: the mask they're wearing a ninety degree weather running outside
Speaker 1: before the lockdown. Libs, let it go, stop being crazy.
Speaker 1: She thinks it's a concession. I play a lot of tennis.
Speaker 1: You're really far from somebody outdoors when you're playing tennis,
Speaker 1: all right, You're usually probably sixty seventy eighty feet away
Speaker 1: from them easily outside. She's like, Wow, in that situation,
Speaker 1: I guess you'll have to wear masks. Is that even
Speaker 1: a question? Well, yes it is, because the CDC is
Speaker 1: so stupid and so incompetent that their initial guys and
Speaker 1: so muddled as well in the guys. But initially it was, yeah,
Speaker 1: all outdoor activities, you want kids to wear masks. Kids
Speaker 1: clear this thing. They are fine, Okay, by the time
Speaker 1: we get into this summer. If someone has chosen not
Speaker 1: to get vaccinated, that's their choice. That's then on them,
Speaker 1: and they deal with the risks inherent in it. This
Speaker 1: is the only way we get back to a normal society.
Speaker 1: By the way, how many months do we have to
Speaker 1: have a free vaccines? Come and get them, Come and
Speaker 1: get them? And you know what, are we promising there's
Speaker 1: perfect safety from COVID? Will never achieve that. But these
Speaker 1: are people that aren't leaders at the CDC. They're they're
Speaker 1: not they're not coming up with brilliant ideas. How many times,
Speaker 1: I really mean this, how many times has Wilenski or
Speaker 1: Fauci said anything that you didn't already know? Never mind
Speaker 1: the things that they've said that were stupid, that you
Speaker 1: knew were made no sense. But how many times he said, Wow,
Speaker 1: I really learned something from from this thing. They're basically like,
Speaker 1: there's a virus, it spreads a lot. You know, there's
Speaker 1: a couple of things that we think maybe kind of help,
Speaker 1: but we don't really know in terms of preventing the spread.
Speaker 1: And yeah, there we go. That's it. There's really nothing
Speaker 1: that they've come up with all along here. You know,
Speaker 1: it's so funny. I want to even get there's a
Speaker 1: kind of a pretty prominent left wing thinker who who
Speaker 1: we had a DM exchange a while ago, and I
Speaker 1: thought about going back and getting This guy's a he's
Speaker 1: a left wing guy. I don't know how many of
Speaker 1: you would know him. Whatever, he's very wealthy too, and
Speaker 1: he's he was so surprised at me because I was
Speaker 1: making fun of the test and trace program and just
Speaker 1: basically saying, test and trace is moronic beyond words, it's
Speaker 1: never gonna work, it's not going to do anything. You
Speaker 1: can never do this on a level where you even
Speaker 1: get valuable data. And he was just incredulous at this idea.
Speaker 1: What do you mean We're gonna know where the transmission
Speaker 1: is happening, We're gonna know the level of transmission. This
Speaker 1: is critical to getting them. And this is somebody who's
Speaker 1: mister he's kind of a tech bro, and he's in
Speaker 1: and I'm looking at it. I looked at this exchange again.
Speaker 1: I was looking for something else in the camp on
Speaker 1: and I just realized, so here's the super rich, data
Speaker 1: driven tech guy and here's me, little old mister buck
Speaker 1: having an exchange about whether this data will even be
Speaker 1: able to be acquired and whether it will be useful.
Speaker 1: And I was one hundred percent right, and he was
Speaker 1: one hundred percent wrong. That was back in June of
Speaker 1: last year was almost exactly a year ago now, and
Speaker 1: there's part of that wants to go in and say, Hey,
Speaker 1: I'm just wondering, do you want to do you want
Speaker 1: to now just concede that when I said that a
Speaker 1: government bureaucracy to try to find everyone you've come into
Speaker 1: contact with who has COVID all across the country, when
Speaker 1: there are hundreds of thousands of cases every single day,
Speaker 1: do you want to do? You want to maybe just
Speaker 1: say that I was able to reason through this instead
Speaker 1: of thinking the experts have some brilliant plan, they just
Speaker 1: wanted There's so many examples. I went back. I was
Speaker 1: looking into some of my messages as so many people
Speaker 1: that were just incredulous. They have this need. They just
Speaker 1: want to believe that there are these super geniuses somewhere
Speaker 1: who know exactly what to do, and if only we
Speaker 1: had all listened to them, everything would be fine, if
Speaker 1: only we had done what Fauci told us. And I'm
Speaker 1: sitting here saying we did what that little stalinist elf
Speaker 1: told us to do and it didn't work. That's what
Speaker 1: actually happened. And people can keep fighting this and they
Speaker 1: keep in didn't work, and they don't want to let
Speaker 1: it go, and they want to keep your kid masked
Speaker 1: up while he's running around, you know, playing football this
Speaker 1: summer and it's it's just madness. Oh and while you're
Speaker 1: dancing too. Here's the mayor of DC. Yes, DC has
Speaker 1: gone full foot loose. Here no dancing at weddings, play one.
Speaker 1: Here's what's getting a lot of attention standing and dancing
Speaker 1: receptions are not allowed. What good is they wedding without dancing, Mayor?
Speaker 1: And why no dancing? Well, I think there's a lot
Speaker 1: of good to a wedding, like people starting off their
Speaker 1: lives together and doing it in a safe way and
Speaker 1: not doing it in a way that puts themselves or
Speaker 1: their guests in danger. And let me be clear. On
Speaker 1: May first, we were proud of our residents and businesses
Speaker 1: who made conditions in DC such that we can start
Speaker 1: opening up these ailities an alternate headline. Maybe now you
Speaker 1: can host a wedding in Washington, DC, a regional meeting.
Speaker 1: You can have your friends and family for a family
Speaker 1: reunion and birthday parties at our hotels and restaurants. And
Speaker 1: just like our restaurant guideline suggests that you have to
Speaker 1: be seated to enjoy the restaurant. You're supposed to be grateful,
Speaker 1: you see, You're supposed to be grateful that you now
Speaker 1: have the legal right to have a wedding in DC,
Speaker 1: and shut up about the fact that you're not allowed
Speaker 1: to dance at your wedding. Be thankful for what they
Speaker 1: give you. That's the attitude. I mean, I just I
Speaker 1: just want to know you have all these people that
Speaker 1: are so weak and cowardly and so easily intimidated by
Speaker 1: the experts that they just believe all this. They go, Yo,
Speaker 1: whatever we had to do, whatever, don't we have to
Speaker 1: do whatever Fauci says, and they just it's remarkable. And
Speaker 1: these people are terrifying. As I've said to you, they're
Speaker 1: like a Milgram experiment. If Faucci told, if Fauci told
Speaker 1: the people you see still walking outside with two masks
Speaker 1: that the way to cure COVID was to just continuously
Speaker 1: electrocute you and put you through excruciating pain. Hey, Fauci says,
Speaker 1: got to cure COVID, they would just sit there and
Speaker 1: press that button and fry you like an egg. You
Speaker 1: know it, and I know it. And that's really unsettling
Speaker 1: about this country. That's unsettling to see so many of
Speaker 1: our fellow Americans who are that weak willed, that incapable
Speaker 1: of thinking for themselves. There's Mayor Bowser again, when asked, Okay, well,
Speaker 1: what if what if everybody at this wedding we're talking
Speaker 1: about what if everyone is vaccinated? Right? Then that's what
Speaker 1: doesn't mean we're all supposed to be Okay, play too,
Speaker 1: may Or just just is there any way that you
Speaker 1: would reconsider with masks on and say a card the
Speaker 1: show is fully vaccinated, that you'd allowed dancing. We're absolutely
Speaker 1: considering opening more activity as our case rates go down
Speaker 1: and our vaccination rates go up, and that's in our
Speaker 1: hotels and that's in our other venues. Yeah, well what
Speaker 1: about loud dancing? Can we got to answer the question
Speaker 1: what about that? Again? Somebody tell us that now they
Speaker 1: won't They will not know interest, no interest in telling
Speaker 1: us that friends, this does not end until we make
Speaker 1: it end. They will continue to do this as much
Speaker 1: as they want, as long as they want. I wonder
Speaker 1: what it's going to take. It won't happen in blue
Speaker 1: areas because we're outnumbered and there's crazy Democrats, so I
Speaker 1: can't lead this charge in a place like New York,
Speaker 1: but you know, and in place like Florida. If I
Speaker 1: were living down there, I'd say, we're just gonna start
Speaker 1: start walking in places without masks on. Okay, they can
Speaker 1: throw me out, fine, but non compliance at some point
Speaker 1: it's just going to be the only way to get
Speaker 1: past this. I'm talking about vaccinated people not walking in
Speaker 1: I'm not wearing a mask anymore. Vaccinator not gonna do it. Nope, No,
Speaker 1: they won't. They won't relent. We're going to have to
Speaker 1: push back. That's where this is. They won't just let
Speaker 1: it go. They're crazy. These people have lost their minds.
Speaker 1: Thanks Fauci for ruining America and saving no one in
Speaker 1: the process.