WEBVTT - Odd Lots:  This is how China builds so much nuclear power

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Hi, it's suckh Bloomberg's Odd Lots podcast recently did a

0:00:04.240 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>great episode about the rise of nuclear power in China

0:00:07.880 --> 0:00:11.440
<v Speaker 1>is the only country deploying nuclear at a large scale

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:14.000
<v Speaker 1>right now, and I thought you would enjoy listening to it.

0:00:15.360 --> 0:00:17.759
<v Speaker 1>So here's the extra episode. We'll be back with a

0:00:17.760 --> 0:00:19.560
<v Speaker 1>new episode of Zero on Thursday.

0:00:23.040 --> 0:00:38.000
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News.

0:00:39.960 --> 0:00:43.640
<v Speaker 3>Hello and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots podcast.

0:00:43.680 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 4>I'm Joe Wisenthal and I'm Tracy all the way.

0:00:46.200 --> 0:00:48.120
<v Speaker 3>Tracy, you know, we've been talking a lot about the

0:00:48.240 --> 0:00:51.600
<v Speaker 3>US energy system for obvious reasons, at least when it

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 3>comes to electricity. I don't know about you. I kind

0:00:53.800 --> 0:00:55.200
<v Speaker 3>of feel like the more we talk about it, the

0:00:55.280 --> 0:00:56.160
<v Speaker 3>less I understanding.

0:00:56.440 --> 0:01:00.640
<v Speaker 4>Yes, yes, absolutely, I think there are a couple problems. So, like,

0:01:00.680 --> 0:01:05.360
<v Speaker 4>even beyond the actual different technologies for generating power, there's

0:01:05.400 --> 0:01:09.800
<v Speaker 4>the patchwork of like how different grids work in different states.

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:15.039
<v Speaker 4>There's the different regulations, the different like interoperability and all

0:01:15.080 --> 0:01:17.760
<v Speaker 4>of that. And then even if we look like beyond

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:20.560
<v Speaker 4>the US, it gets I guess even more different.

0:01:21.000 --> 0:01:23.560
<v Speaker 3>Yes, well, I sort of wonder maybe we can learn

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:26.600
<v Speaker 3>something about the US by a little compared and contrast. Right,

0:01:26.920 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 3>So if we look at the US and we still

0:01:28.880 --> 0:01:32.360
<v Speaker 3>don't totally get how it works, maybe, I don't know,

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:35.480
<v Speaker 3>just to thought, maybe we'll learn something about the US

0:01:35.520 --> 0:01:38.560
<v Speaker 3>by looking at some different system and then we have

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 3>something to compare it to. It might be a waigh

0:01:41.560 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 3>in by looking at the outside world.

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:45.360
<v Speaker 4>I'm a big fan of doing this, by the way,

0:01:45.480 --> 0:01:48.640
<v Speaker 4>just to identify like different choke points in a particular

0:01:48.760 --> 0:01:52.120
<v Speaker 4>domestic process. If you think that the US can't do

0:01:52.200 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 4>something for whatever unidentifiable reason or I don't know, cultural

0:01:57.080 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 4>like holdback, but if you look at a different country

0:02:00.720 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 4>and they're doing it at scale, very very quickly, then

0:02:04.680 --> 0:02:06.880
<v Speaker 4>I think you can learn a lot about yourself.

0:02:07.160 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 3>Well, that's exactly right. And so one of the things

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:12.160
<v Speaker 3>again that comes up from time to time here in

0:02:12.200 --> 0:02:15.600
<v Speaker 3>our conversations is nuclear and this is just one example

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 3>of a source of power that may or may not

0:02:18.120 --> 0:02:21.120
<v Speaker 3>be important in our future. But according to and I'm

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:24.600
<v Speaker 3>looking at a story from the Economist, over the past decade,

0:02:24.840 --> 0:02:28.560
<v Speaker 3>China has added thirty seven nuclear reactors according to the

0:02:28.600 --> 0:02:32.480
<v Speaker 3>International Atomic Energy Agency. I don't know, maybe we've added

0:02:32.520 --> 0:02:34.640
<v Speaker 3>like two. I forget how many there are at that

0:02:34.720 --> 0:02:38.919
<v Speaker 3>Georgia plant. A couple more, maybe restarted. But you know,

0:02:39.160 --> 0:02:41.280
<v Speaker 3>we talk all the time about nuclear and how hard

0:02:41.320 --> 0:02:43.359
<v Speaker 3>it is and how hard the financing is and the

0:02:43.440 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 3>labor force and the learning laws, and we forgot to

0:02:46.520 --> 0:02:49.399
<v Speaker 3>you know, we forgot how to build them for various reasons.

0:02:49.840 --> 0:02:51.960
<v Speaker 3>But that's not and it's so expensive. There's all these

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:54.840
<v Speaker 3>cost overruns every time. But apparently that is not the

0:02:54.840 --> 0:02:57.040
<v Speaker 3>case everywhere, and that there are other parts of the world,

0:02:57.080 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 3>particularly China, where they just keep building at scale, and

0:03:01.240 --> 0:03:03.600
<v Speaker 3>maybe we could learn a little bit of how they

0:03:03.600 --> 0:03:05.359
<v Speaker 3>do that and how they finance it and how they

0:03:05.560 --> 0:03:07.079
<v Speaker 3>avoid forgetting how to build them.

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:09.960
<v Speaker 4>I think this is so interesting, this particular approach that

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 4>compare and contrast, and it is absolutely true. I think

0:03:12.880 --> 0:03:16.720
<v Speaker 4>the US has the most nuclear reactors out there, like

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:18.919
<v Speaker 4>almost one hundred or something like that, but it took

0:03:18.960 --> 0:03:21.359
<v Speaker 4>us decades and decades to build them, and as you

0:03:21.480 --> 0:03:25.919
<v Speaker 4>rightly point out, we haven't built many new ones that recently. Meanwhile,

0:03:26.000 --> 0:03:29.160
<v Speaker 4>China is adding more and more, and they make it

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:31.480
<v Speaker 4>look easy. I mean, I guess they are just like

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:34.320
<v Speaker 4>giant things to boil water, but you know, China really

0:03:34.320 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 4>makes it look easy. So what can we learn from China.

0:03:36.680 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 3>We really do have the perfect guests. By the way,

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 3>we've had this guest on in the past. We talked

0:03:41.040 --> 0:03:43.640
<v Speaker 3>to him about something completely different. Yes.

0:03:44.240 --> 0:03:47.080
<v Speaker 4>This was during the depths of the COVID crisis, Yes,

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:50.120
<v Speaker 4>and we were talking to this person. He was based

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 4>out in Shanghai and we were talking basically about how

0:03:52.240 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 4>they were getting food into apartment buildings and staying alive

0:03:56.120 --> 0:03:56.920
<v Speaker 4>during that time.

0:03:57.200 --> 0:04:00.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so that was an interesting sort of logis story

0:04:00.600 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 3>and it's own right. If you're under complete lockdown and

0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 3>a Shanghai apartment building, how do you actually get food?

0:04:05.480 --> 0:04:10.040
<v Speaker 3>And anyway, I'm thrilled because now we're recording this December seventeenth,

0:04:10.080 --> 0:04:13.520
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty four, we are talking to him in completely

0:04:13.920 --> 0:04:14.560
<v Speaker 3>different times.

0:04:14.600 --> 0:04:16.040
<v Speaker 4>He's been freed from lockdown.

0:04:16.120 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 3>He is now here in studio with us. So we

0:04:18.640 --> 0:04:22.080
<v Speaker 3>are going to be speaking with David Fishman, senior manager

0:04:22.120 --> 0:04:25.479
<v Speaker 3>at the Lantau Group. He's based in China typically where

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:29.920
<v Speaker 3>he mostly focuses on the Chinese energy system. So literally

0:04:30.320 --> 0:04:33.040
<v Speaker 3>the perfect guest and a repeat guest. So David, thank

0:04:33.080 --> 0:04:35.440
<v Speaker 3>you for coming on. Ad lads, welcome to New York City,

0:04:35.440 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back.

0:04:36.440 --> 0:04:37.240
<v Speaker 5>Thank you for having me.

0:04:37.480 --> 0:04:39.800
<v Speaker 3>What do you do the only other time we talked

0:04:39.800 --> 0:04:41.760
<v Speaker 3>to you, the only thing we knew about you is

0:04:41.800 --> 0:04:44.039
<v Speaker 3>that you were figuring out how to get food into

0:04:44.040 --> 0:04:46.719
<v Speaker 3>your apartment. What do you do now when that's no

0:04:46.800 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 3>longer the pressing issue?

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 5>Yeah? Sure. So I work at a company called the

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 5>Lantau Group. We are an economic consultancy. We're doing power

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:59.280
<v Speaker 5>and gas consulting across apac and so I'm focused on China.

0:04:59.320 --> 0:05:02.560
<v Speaker 5>I'm in the China. We're doing the business of electricity.

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:05.640
<v Speaker 5>So for me, that means either somebody who wants to

0:05:05.680 --> 0:05:10.039
<v Speaker 5>build an electricity generation asset, wants to sell one, wants

0:05:10.040 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 5>to sell a portfolio of assets, wants to invest in one,

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 5>maybe through a fund or as some other type of

0:05:15.440 --> 0:05:18.880
<v Speaker 5>investment product. And then on the what we'd call our downstream,

0:05:19.000 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 5>who uses the electricity right, your major multinationals, your factories,

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:26.119
<v Speaker 5>anybody who uses electricity as an input to produce things.

0:05:26.440 --> 0:05:29.480
<v Speaker 5>So we're working in the business of electricity, trying to

0:05:29.480 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 5>make buying and selling electricity more economic for everybody involved.

0:05:34.200 --> 0:05:36.719
<v Speaker 4>Well, I'm just going to dive into the nuclear aspect

0:05:36.839 --> 0:05:39.520
<v Speaker 4>of this. Then, you know, Joe gave us some contours

0:05:39.600 --> 0:05:43.520
<v Speaker 4>around how much China is currently building. When did China

0:05:43.920 --> 0:05:47.359
<v Speaker 4>decide that it was interested in nuclear and what was

0:05:47.400 --> 0:05:50.040
<v Speaker 4>the sort of like thought process the strategy about how

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:53.720
<v Speaker 4>nuclear would fit into everything else, including the coal power

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:55.799
<v Speaker 4>that China is famous for using.

0:05:56.560 --> 0:05:59.679
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean the history of the Chinese civil nuclear

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 5>power industry goes back to stems back to the eighties.

0:06:02.880 --> 0:06:06.120
<v Speaker 5>So looking at you know, the mid to late eighties

0:06:06.400 --> 0:06:09.400
<v Speaker 5>is when China was signing agreements to bring in its

0:06:09.440 --> 0:06:12.920
<v Speaker 5>first nuclear reactor technology. At the time, it was there

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:15.480
<v Speaker 5>are two different paths that were pursuing. They signed an

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:18.680
<v Speaker 5>agreement with Framatome, a French company, to bring over one reactor,

0:06:19.080 --> 0:06:21.680
<v Speaker 5>and they developed a domestic reactor with at the time

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:25.680
<v Speaker 5>the Soviet Union to have a domestic technology tree as well.

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 5>So in the eighties, China was actually experiencing some pretty

0:06:29.480 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 5>rapid economic growth, especially in the late eighties, and looking

0:06:33.080 --> 0:06:36.719
<v Speaker 5>to expand its power supply rapidly and at the time

0:06:36.760 --> 0:06:39.200
<v Speaker 5>it was quite tight, and so nuclear was seen as

0:06:39.200 --> 0:06:42.360
<v Speaker 5>a potential way to expand the power supply and get

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 5>into a power generation for what was at the time

0:06:45.400 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 5>something very new for China.

0:06:47.240 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 3>What did you so I mentioned literally from just reading

0:06:49.920 --> 0:06:53.040
<v Speaker 3>the first paragraph of a paywalled economist story that number

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:55.160
<v Speaker 3>of about thirty seven new nuclears. I saw that one too,

0:06:55.920 --> 0:06:58.360
<v Speaker 3>just like I just google how many new clear reactors

0:06:58.360 --> 0:07:00.520
<v Speaker 3>are big built in China? Scrolled down where I find

0:07:00.560 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 3>something in the Google search. This is how the research

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:06.479
<v Speaker 3>is done, folks. Well, why don't you, in your words,

0:07:07.000 --> 0:07:10.200
<v Speaker 3>give us a sense of the size and scale of

0:07:10.480 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 3>Chinese civil nuclear generation and where it's going, and then

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 3>sort of like the role it generally plays in.

0:07:18.040 --> 0:07:22.040
<v Speaker 5>The overall portfolio there, yeah, surescribe it. Yeah, sure so.

0:07:22.040 --> 0:07:25.400
<v Speaker 5>So nuclear in China has the interesting status of being

0:07:25.440 --> 0:07:28.840
<v Speaker 5>both relatively large and still somehow small. Large in the

0:07:28.880 --> 0:07:31.040
<v Speaker 5>sense that it's one of the largest operating fleets in

0:07:31.080 --> 0:07:33.400
<v Speaker 5>the world. Right, You've got you know, fifty almost sixty

0:07:33.440 --> 0:07:38.800
<v Speaker 5>reactors operating, We're talking about nearly sixty gigawatts of generation capacity.

0:07:39.040 --> 0:07:42.120
<v Speaker 5>But then in the context of China's entire generation fleet, right,

0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:45.800
<v Speaker 5>they've got well over a thousand gigawatts of coal and

0:07:45.840 --> 0:07:48.400
<v Speaker 5>then many more thousands of gigawatts of wind and solar.

0:07:48.840 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 5>So it's both large in the context of the world,

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:54.320
<v Speaker 5>but also small. And that's the case for a lot

0:07:54.320 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 5>of things in China. The thing that can be large

0:07:56.000 --> 0:07:57.280
<v Speaker 5>in China canoso And what's.

0:07:57.160 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 3>The ambition for you know, looking out you know, in

0:07:59.840 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 3>a five year plan. I don't know how whether they

0:08:01.840 --> 0:08:05.720
<v Speaker 3>do that for energy? Two? Where is nuclear potentially? How

0:08:05.800 --> 0:08:08.520
<v Speaker 3>much could nuclear be a thing? What's the size and

0:08:08.560 --> 0:08:09.440
<v Speaker 3>scale of the ambition?

0:08:09.880 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, sure so long term? I mean it depends on

0:08:12.640 --> 0:08:16.480
<v Speaker 5>how your energy planners and your economic planners and vision

0:08:16.680 --> 0:08:19.080
<v Speaker 5>the long term makeup of the grid. What type of

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:21.840
<v Speaker 5>power are we using in twenty fifty Is it going

0:08:21.880 --> 0:08:23.680
<v Speaker 5>to be a little bit or a medium amount or

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:26.160
<v Speaker 5>a lot of nuclear? So it's scenarios, right, and China

0:08:26.160 --> 0:08:29.160
<v Speaker 5>has scenarios too, for a high end a low end.

0:08:29.280 --> 0:08:33.360
<v Speaker 5>So the recent scenarios that I've seen, Originally it was

0:08:33.440 --> 0:08:36.959
<v Speaker 5>saying no less than three hundred gigawatts two hundred and

0:08:36.960 --> 0:08:39.199
<v Speaker 5>fifty three hundred gigawats, so two hundred and fifty or

0:08:39.200 --> 0:08:42.600
<v Speaker 5>three hundred reactors, right, two hundred and fifty units. So

0:08:42.800 --> 0:08:44.920
<v Speaker 5>the United States has just about one hundred right now.

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 5>So if they got to that scenario, it would be

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:49.080
<v Speaker 5>about two and a half times what the US has

0:08:49.200 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 5>right now.

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 4>So what's the process by which a new nuclear reactor

0:08:54.040 --> 0:08:56.640
<v Speaker 4>gets built in China, and how much does it differ

0:08:56.920 --> 0:08:58.840
<v Speaker 4>from what goes on in the US.

0:08:59.360 --> 0:09:02.880
<v Speaker 5>Sure, well, the steps of the process are actually very similar.

0:09:03.440 --> 0:09:06.280
<v Speaker 5>These are international best practices for how you build these

0:09:06.360 --> 0:09:09.200
<v Speaker 5>types of infrastructure. So you have to choose a site.

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 5>You're going through a siting process and environmental impact report.

0:09:12.559 --> 0:09:15.200
<v Speaker 5>Maybe you've got to make sure the local sea life

0:09:15.240 --> 0:09:18.760
<v Speaker 5>is not going to be affected by warm water being discharged,

0:09:18.800 --> 0:09:22.840
<v Speaker 5>there's no endangered species nearby, all those different aspects. So

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:25.160
<v Speaker 5>you choose your site. That takes a few years. You

0:09:25.240 --> 0:09:28.240
<v Speaker 5>have consultation period, there's a period for the public to

0:09:28.400 --> 0:09:32.440
<v Speaker 5>maybe express their dissatisfaction. This happens in China too. And

0:09:32.600 --> 0:09:35.960
<v Speaker 5>when the site is finally selected, then you start pre construction.

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:39.679
<v Speaker 5>You can level the site, you can connect communications utilities,

0:09:39.760 --> 0:09:41.959
<v Speaker 5>you can do all your pre groundwork, and then we're

0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:45.679
<v Speaker 5>waiting for a really key milestone called FCD. That's first

0:09:45.760 --> 0:09:49.360
<v Speaker 5>concrete need and that's when the first barrel of safety

0:09:49.400 --> 0:09:52.680
<v Speaker 5>related concrete is poured at the site. And so that

0:09:52.720 --> 0:09:55.680
<v Speaker 5>would be the beginning of your construction of your containment building.

0:09:56.000 --> 0:09:59.640
<v Speaker 5>And so from FCD to your full construction period, you

0:09:59.640 --> 0:10:03.560
<v Speaker 5>do construction, you do installation, you have commissioning. Maybe you

0:10:03.760 --> 0:10:06.679
<v Speaker 5>encounter some issues during commissioning, you do trouble shooting right,

0:10:06.720 --> 0:10:09.680
<v Speaker 5>and eventually you fully connect. You connect it, you load

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:12.440
<v Speaker 5>your fuel, you have your first criticality the first time

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:14.800
<v Speaker 5>that you know, fission starts in the reactor. Then you

0:10:14.840 --> 0:10:17.120
<v Speaker 5>connect it to the grid and then you get up

0:10:17.120 --> 0:10:18.720
<v Speaker 5>to one hundred percent power and you got a nuclear

0:10:18.760 --> 0:10:20.880
<v Speaker 5>power plant. If you do it quick, we'll you're looking

0:10:20.920 --> 0:10:22.839
<v Speaker 5>at ten to twelve years. If you do it not

0:10:22.880 --> 0:10:24.760
<v Speaker 5>so quick, you're looking at a lot more than that.

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:27.520
<v Speaker 3>So it takes a long time in China too, So

0:10:27.679 --> 0:10:29.720
<v Speaker 3>you know, we look at you as construction build. I

0:10:29.760 --> 0:10:33.040
<v Speaker 3>was like, oh can't we It's a log process anywhere

0:10:33.040 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 3>you look. I want to ask about the financing. So

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:38.520
<v Speaker 3>if there's a new who's paying for this? And also

0:10:39.040 --> 0:10:41.120
<v Speaker 3>how are they selling this energy? Because one thing I

0:10:41.160 --> 0:10:45.160
<v Speaker 3>get the impression of is that setting aside the cost

0:10:45.200 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 3>of building a new nuclear reactor, which is an expensive,

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:52.880
<v Speaker 3>time consuming process. The electricity market structure also seems to

0:10:53.000 --> 0:10:55.280
<v Speaker 3>matter a lot because you need a certain amount of

0:10:55.400 --> 0:10:58.280
<v Speaker 3>guaranteed off take, You need a certain amount of price

0:10:58.320 --> 0:11:01.880
<v Speaker 3>stability if the price robs to zero for a long time,

0:11:01.960 --> 0:11:04.920
<v Speaker 3>because there's it's very sunny and windy in that area,

0:11:05.559 --> 0:11:08.760
<v Speaker 3>and suddenly you're that's screwing with the economics of it.

0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:12.480
<v Speaker 3>And so market structure and financing are both important. Talk

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:15.000
<v Speaker 3>to us about how that works in China versus two.

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:18.480
<v Speaker 5>Right. Sure, So the builders, right, the companies that are

0:11:18.480 --> 0:11:22.360
<v Speaker 5>constructing and eventually owning the assets are all state owned enterprises. Okay,

0:11:22.400 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 5>So you've got these great big sos. Their job is

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:27.319
<v Speaker 5>to own and operate nuclear power plants. And so when

0:11:27.320 --> 0:11:29.840
<v Speaker 5>they go out to secure financing, of course they're securing

0:11:29.920 --> 0:11:32.600
<v Speaker 5>financing from state owned banks as well. They're going to

0:11:32.600 --> 0:11:36.160
<v Speaker 5>be getting very preferential loan treatment, right, very low percentage

0:11:36.200 --> 0:11:38.480
<v Speaker 5>rates maybe two percent, one and a half percent, things

0:11:38.559 --> 0:11:42.240
<v Speaker 5>like that. For a huge infrastructure like that, we're talking billions.

0:11:41.760 --> 0:11:43.440
<v Speaker 3>Of cultural rate, not the spread.

0:11:44.120 --> 0:11:48.079
<v Speaker 5>Okay, keep going, so very very low rates because again

0:11:48.360 --> 0:11:50.520
<v Speaker 5>they have a mandate to build. This is state banks,

0:11:50.559 --> 0:11:53.840
<v Speaker 5>state infrastructure, and state builders. They need to build these things.

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:57.520
<v Speaker 5>And then when they're going out to sell power right now,

0:11:57.520 --> 0:12:01.240
<v Speaker 5>they're given a guaranteed on grid rate. So the grid

0:12:01.280 --> 0:12:04.400
<v Speaker 5>company and the power regulators say, when you complete your

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:06.600
<v Speaker 5>plant and you start selling power, we will make sure

0:12:06.640 --> 0:12:09.080
<v Speaker 5>you receive this much for every kilo lot hour of

0:12:09.080 --> 0:12:11.840
<v Speaker 5>power that you send into the grid. Long term, they

0:12:11.920 --> 0:12:14.240
<v Speaker 5>want to marketize it. They want to have that exposed

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:17.079
<v Speaker 5>to the vagaries of the markets the same way that

0:12:17.080 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 5>you would see maybe in the United States or Western Europe,

0:12:20.160 --> 0:12:22.920
<v Speaker 5>and that will be an adjustment for China's nuclear industry.

0:12:23.320 --> 0:12:26.040
<v Speaker 5>Historically they have only operated on this kind of fixed

0:12:26.040 --> 0:12:26.720
<v Speaker 5>feed and rate.

0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:30.560
<v Speaker 4>So, I mean, that's a pretty big comparative advantage if

0:12:30.600 --> 0:12:34.960
<v Speaker 4>you're getting subsidized financing from a state owned enterprise or

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:38.280
<v Speaker 4>something like that. Plus at the moment you have that

0:12:38.400 --> 0:12:41.000
<v Speaker 4>guaranteed off take, even though they might want to move

0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:44.000
<v Speaker 4>to a market based system before. It also strikes me

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:47.000
<v Speaker 4>that there are a few other potential comparative advantages, like

0:12:47.360 --> 0:12:52.200
<v Speaker 4>lots of ready labor, lots of manufacturing capacity presumably that's

0:12:52.240 --> 0:12:54.480
<v Speaker 4>able to make the stuff you need for these things.

0:12:54.840 --> 0:12:59.040
<v Speaker 4>Walk us through all the different advantages that China has

0:12:59.120 --> 0:12:59.960
<v Speaker 4>in this process.

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:02.760
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, sure, so if you maybe you've seen before or not,

0:13:02.840 --> 0:13:05.040
<v Speaker 5>if you look at one of those like stacked bar charts,

0:13:05.040 --> 0:13:07.920
<v Speaker 5>that it compares all the cost components of you know,

0:13:08.000 --> 0:13:10.400
<v Speaker 5>building one of these things in China versus Europe versus

0:13:10.440 --> 0:13:12.839
<v Speaker 5>the United States. It's not like you'd point to any

0:13:12.880 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 5>single component of the stacked bar and say, ah, that's it.

0:13:15.840 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 5>That's the key. That's why they're so cheap. Every single

0:13:18.520 --> 0:13:21.400
<v Speaker 5>component is cheaper. Right, You've got your cost of capital

0:13:21.480 --> 0:13:25.840
<v Speaker 5>is lower, You've got your construction timeline is so tightly managed.

0:13:25.480 --> 0:13:27.719
<v Speaker 4>Right, and so you're saving on interest costsactly.

0:13:28.040 --> 0:13:29.680
<v Speaker 5>And the sooner you can connect to the grid and

0:13:29.679 --> 0:13:32.959
<v Speaker 5>start selling power, that's when you start making your money back. Right.

0:13:33.040 --> 0:13:36.040
<v Speaker 5>So every day that you go over your construction schedule

0:13:36.040 --> 0:13:37.960
<v Speaker 5>as a hunt, we say in the US about a

0:13:38.000 --> 0:13:41.520
<v Speaker 5>million dollars of missed power sales and then also about

0:13:41.520 --> 0:13:43.920
<v Speaker 5>a million dollars of interest payments. So here you got

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:47.240
<v Speaker 5>this two million dollars spread every day over your construction

0:13:47.360 --> 0:13:50.520
<v Speaker 5>schedule that was originally planned. Like that's just mind boggling.

0:13:50.840 --> 0:13:54.320
<v Speaker 5>Then we look at the production capacity, right, China's incredible

0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:58.719
<v Speaker 5>industrial production capacity. We're talking about these heavy forged components.

0:13:58.800 --> 0:14:01.000
<v Speaker 5>Maybe only a couple of companies in the whole world

0:14:01.040 --> 0:14:04.760
<v Speaker 5>can make things like the reactor pressure vessel, the steam generators,

0:14:05.160 --> 0:14:09.079
<v Speaker 5>the pressure risers, the primary piping, the reactor cool and pump,

0:14:09.120 --> 0:14:11.160
<v Speaker 5>all these things. And there's like three companies in the

0:14:11.160 --> 0:14:13.640
<v Speaker 5>world that can make these, and now at this point,

0:14:13.679 --> 0:14:15.920
<v Speaker 5>several of them are in China. And when they need

0:14:15.960 --> 0:14:18.040
<v Speaker 5>to prototype, when they need to iterate, when they need

0:14:18.080 --> 0:14:21.280
<v Speaker 5>to troubleshoot something, it's all in one industrial cluster. It's

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:25.360
<v Speaker 5>all a company and its subsidiaries or its sister partner companies, right,

0:14:25.560 --> 0:14:28.080
<v Speaker 5>and so they can quickly trouble through things really quickly.

0:14:28.280 --> 0:14:31.160
<v Speaker 5>So that's going to be your industrial production component very strong.

0:14:31.440 --> 0:14:35.680
<v Speaker 5>You've got you know, people work longer hours, they'll work

0:14:35.720 --> 0:14:39.000
<v Speaker 5>through weekends, they'll work through holidays. China is really really

0:14:39.320 --> 0:14:42.920
<v Speaker 5>competent at building very large construction, very large infrastructure.

0:14:43.000 --> 0:14:43.160
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:14:43.440 --> 0:14:45.360
<v Speaker 5>It could be a dam, or a bridge, or a

0:14:45.480 --> 0:14:48.480
<v Speaker 5>highway or a high speed railway, or a nuclear reactor.

0:14:48.520 --> 0:14:51.640
<v Speaker 5>When it comes to the construction know how of being

0:14:51.680 --> 0:14:54.440
<v Speaker 5>able to do it on time and like an oiled machine,

0:14:54.680 --> 0:14:57.200
<v Speaker 5>they're winning there too. And then we talk about the

0:14:57.240 --> 0:15:00.560
<v Speaker 5>actual way they're building the nuclear power plant. Something really

0:15:00.600 --> 0:15:04.240
<v Speaker 5>interesting here. This was actually pioneered by Westinghouse out of

0:15:04.280 --> 0:15:08.840
<v Speaker 5>the United States, something called modularized construction, where on site

0:15:09.040 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 5>or off site, you're prefabricating large portions of the reactor,

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 5>portions of the containment building, and so you can work

0:15:16.440 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 5>on individual components at the same time, bring it to site,

0:15:20.320 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 5>and then you get the largest crane in the world

0:15:22.600 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 5>that lifts this massive, massive, pre assembled component into place.

0:15:26.800 --> 0:15:28.560
<v Speaker 5>When you're able to work like that, you can cut

0:15:28.600 --> 0:15:32.840
<v Speaker 5>down the construction schedule even more Interestingly, Westinghouse pioneered that

0:15:33.160 --> 0:15:35.840
<v Speaker 5>that they haven't been really successful in implementing it in

0:15:35.880 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 5>their recent builds. China, on the other hand, learned from

0:15:39.080 --> 0:15:43.040
<v Speaker 5>Westinghouse and has been very successful with this modulized construction approach.

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:46.120
<v Speaker 3>Can you talk more about that, because it's very intuitive, right,

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:48.240
<v Speaker 3>the idea that the more you can build at the

0:15:48.360 --> 0:15:51.000
<v Speaker 3>factory and the less you have to build on site

0:15:51.480 --> 0:15:54.040
<v Speaker 3>makes it easy and a lot of the so far,

0:15:54.080 --> 0:15:57.320
<v Speaker 3>it seems like mostly hype about small modular reactors in

0:15:57.360 --> 0:15:59.360
<v Speaker 3>the US is sort of on this idea, like why

0:15:59.440 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 3>don't start a project from scratch? Why is it apparently hard?

0:16:04.160 --> 0:16:07.760
<v Speaker 3>Even though in theory that seems very obvious, because I

0:16:07.760 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 3>don't know if there actually are any modular reactors in

0:16:10.600 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 3>the US despite the sort of intuitive appeal.

0:16:13.680 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 5>So I think I gotta clarify here, there's modularized construction

0:16:17.440 --> 0:16:21.320
<v Speaker 5>and there's small modular reactors. Okay, so SMRs are small

0:16:21.360 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 5>modular reactors. They refer to a situation where the entire

0:16:24.520 --> 0:16:26.400
<v Speaker 5>reactor is encased in a single unit.

0:16:26.520 --> 0:16:28.560
<v Speaker 3>Oh okay, got it. Yeah, but it's still this idea

0:16:28.600 --> 0:16:31.840
<v Speaker 3>that the lot of the fabrication process happens not at

0:16:31.840 --> 0:16:35.560
<v Speaker 3>the site itself. Again, something that feels highly intuitive and

0:16:35.640 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 3>apparently easier so than time.

0:16:37.840 --> 0:16:41.720
<v Speaker 5>Well so my understanding from the Westinghouse design approach when

0:16:41.720 --> 0:16:43.960
<v Speaker 5>they used this for the first time in designing the

0:16:44.000 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 5>AP one thousand technology that we're built here in Vocal

0:16:47.160 --> 0:16:50.560
<v Speaker 5>in the United States, is one of the major barriers. Well,

0:16:50.560 --> 0:16:53.040
<v Speaker 5>there's terveral. There's always going to be regulatory barriers, right,

0:16:53.080 --> 0:16:55.360
<v Speaker 5>it's a new way of doing things. Anytime it's a

0:16:55.400 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 5>new way of doing things, the regulator is going to

0:16:57.520 --> 0:16:59.560
<v Speaker 5>want you to jump through a million hoops to try

0:16:59.600 --> 0:17:02.680
<v Speaker 5>to clarify and justify that what you're doing is defensible

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:05.679
<v Speaker 5>and safe. So you've got that one, of course, But

0:17:05.760 --> 0:17:10.200
<v Speaker 5>then the actual logistics of lifting these massive, massive, we're

0:17:10.240 --> 0:17:15.040
<v Speaker 5>talking thousands of tons of prefabed components. They actually had

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:18.680
<v Speaker 5>to design and then especially contract the world's largest heavy

0:17:18.720 --> 0:17:21.960
<v Speaker 5>lift crane. Westinghouse did just to be able to lift

0:17:22.000 --> 0:17:24.480
<v Speaker 5>the first one. They worked with an American company to

0:17:24.480 --> 0:17:28.600
<v Speaker 5>design to custom design this giant fixed base ring crane

0:17:28.680 --> 0:17:31.560
<v Speaker 5>that requires other cranes to build it. Then you have

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:34.760
<v Speaker 5>this giant giant crane that's in place and it swings around.

0:17:34.760 --> 0:17:37.480
<v Speaker 5>It usually works for two different units to build two

0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:40.919
<v Speaker 5>reactors at the same site. Interestingly, they weren't able to

0:17:41.040 --> 0:17:43.760
<v Speaker 5>use this giant giant crane in China because of a

0:17:43.960 --> 0:17:48.360
<v Speaker 5>design miscommunication. The first AP one thousands that Westinghouse tried

0:17:48.400 --> 0:17:51.320
<v Speaker 5>to build in China, they didn't leave space on the

0:17:51.359 --> 0:17:54.399
<v Speaker 5>site to put the giant crane, so in the end

0:17:54.480 --> 0:17:57.720
<v Speaker 5>they had to use a very very large roller crane instead,

0:17:57.760 --> 0:17:59.800
<v Speaker 5>which just about did the job, but it forced them

0:17:59.800 --> 0:18:02.040
<v Speaker 5>to change the way they built it. China has learned

0:18:02.080 --> 0:18:04.120
<v Speaker 5>from that though, So the newest you know, QUA long

0:18:04.119 --> 0:18:07.639
<v Speaker 5>one reactors that China builds, they use a giant ring crane.

0:18:07.680 --> 0:18:10.119
<v Speaker 5>I believe they use a zoom lion to the Chinese

0:18:10.160 --> 0:18:12.480
<v Speaker 5>brand has designed one of these, built one of these

0:18:12.680 --> 0:18:15.400
<v Speaker 5>massive ultra heavy lift cranes as well, and so now

0:18:15.440 --> 0:18:28.920
<v Speaker 5>that's you know, they're reaping those benefits.

0:18:33.000 --> 0:18:36.640
<v Speaker 4>I have a slightly random question, which is building nuclear

0:18:36.680 --> 0:18:40.480
<v Speaker 4>reactors how customized. Do the components that go into these

0:18:40.640 --> 0:18:43.879
<v Speaker 4>actually have to be like how much does the design

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:46.000
<v Speaker 4>actually vary site to site?

0:18:46.920 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 5>Well, if they are the same series of reactors, right,

0:18:50.640 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 5>you could say the AP one thousand, right, that's a

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 5>base unit. Now the ones that are built in vocal

0:18:55.440 --> 0:18:57.960
<v Speaker 5>and the ones that were being built at Summer in

0:18:58.000 --> 0:19:00.760
<v Speaker 5>South Carolina before that was canceled, those are probably a

0:19:00.800 --> 0:19:03.679
<v Speaker 5>little bit different, right, but you know, largely part of

0:19:03.680 --> 0:19:05.680
<v Speaker 5>the same series. The ones that were built in China

0:19:05.680 --> 0:19:07.520
<v Speaker 5>were built on that same platform, but they would have

0:19:07.520 --> 0:19:09.959
<v Speaker 5>been modified a little bit for the Chinese context. They

0:19:10.000 --> 0:19:13.439
<v Speaker 5>called them Chinese AP one thousand CAP one thousands, But

0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:16.760
<v Speaker 5>you could say they're substantially the same reactor with with

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:20.399
<v Speaker 5>small modifications. When we start talking about different series, though,

0:19:20.480 --> 0:19:23.200
<v Speaker 5>if we say like the French design versus the US

0:19:23.320 --> 0:19:26.959
<v Speaker 5>design versus what's being sold now in Korea or something

0:19:27.040 --> 0:19:31.399
<v Speaker 5>like that, you'll see more similarities to their predecessors that

0:19:31.440 --> 0:19:35.440
<v Speaker 5>they came up through different generations of technology. So like Korea,

0:19:35.520 --> 0:19:38.800
<v Speaker 5>you'd see similarities to the old g Hatachi reactors because

0:19:38.840 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 5>that's where they got their technology originally. Then you'd see

0:19:41.800 --> 0:19:44.520
<v Speaker 5>to say a modern EP one thousand, these are different

0:19:44.520 --> 0:19:46.560
<v Speaker 5>tech trees from different competitors.

0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:50.520
<v Speaker 3>So if I'm a guy on Twitter listening to this,

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:52.320
<v Speaker 3>and I am a guy on Twitter, except I'm talking

0:19:52.400 --> 0:19:54.199
<v Speaker 3>in this, but I'm just a guy on Twitter, and

0:19:54.240 --> 0:19:57.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm hearing you talk about Okay, they get preferential lending

0:19:58.000 --> 0:20:01.919
<v Speaker 3>from the state owned bank. The company me is state owned.

0:20:02.520 --> 0:20:05.399
<v Speaker 3>Probably the crane company is state owned. There's probably a

0:20:05.440 --> 0:20:08.080
<v Speaker 3>few other state owned businesses. And I think, yeah, okay,

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:11.119
<v Speaker 3>you know, they're really good at building reactors fast, but

0:20:11.200 --> 0:20:15.240
<v Speaker 3>there must be some sort of accumulated debts and inefficiencies

0:20:15.280 --> 0:20:19.040
<v Speaker 3>that come with all of these all of these entities

0:20:19.320 --> 0:20:22.359
<v Speaker 3>that have something other than a profit motive. And you know,

0:20:22.480 --> 0:20:26.359
<v Speaker 3>probably you know, I don't know that my intuition or

0:20:26.359 --> 0:20:28.720
<v Speaker 3>my response to you, or my my dunk on you

0:20:28.880 --> 0:20:31.480
<v Speaker 3>is that there's going to be all these accumulated losses

0:20:31.640 --> 0:20:34.960
<v Speaker 3>that ripple through the systems on account of the fact

0:20:35.000 --> 0:20:38.479
<v Speaker 3>that it's SOOE working with see after SOE, do we

0:20:38.600 --> 0:20:44.040
<v Speaker 3>have any sense of how economic these projects actually are?

0:20:44.200 --> 0:20:46.280
<v Speaker 3>Because if these were private companies, you say, oh, they're

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:48.360
<v Speaker 3>either making money, or if these were sort of strictly

0:20:48.600 --> 0:20:51.160
<v Speaker 3>for profit listed companies, you say, well, they're making money.

0:20:51.160 --> 0:20:54.160
<v Speaker 3>They're not making money whatever, How do we think about

0:20:54.160 --> 0:20:58.320
<v Speaker 3>the actual economics of whether this is good investment? Because

0:20:58.359 --> 0:21:01.400
<v Speaker 3>it's cool. Yeah, you know, China building dozens of reactors.

0:21:01.560 --> 0:21:03.520
<v Speaker 3>How do we know these are good economic investments?

0:21:04.359 --> 0:21:07.080
<v Speaker 5>Well, unless I can crack open you know, China National

0:21:07.119 --> 0:21:09.560
<v Speaker 5>Nuclear Corporations books like, I can't tell you for sure

0:21:09.560 --> 0:21:10.680
<v Speaker 5>if these are good investments.

0:21:10.760 --> 0:21:10.920
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:21:11.440 --> 0:21:14.479
<v Speaker 5>But when they build them at that pace, when you

0:21:14.520 --> 0:21:16.240
<v Speaker 5>look at it from the outside and you say, all

0:21:16.240 --> 0:21:18.840
<v Speaker 5>the conditions are in place to have surely built this

0:21:18.960 --> 0:21:21.280
<v Speaker 5>according to the budget you set for yourself. Right, you

0:21:21.320 --> 0:21:23.040
<v Speaker 5>declared that you would build it with a certain budget

0:21:23.040 --> 0:21:25.760
<v Speaker 5>and a certain time. Ye talk about the budget, right,

0:21:25.920 --> 0:21:28.480
<v Speaker 5>So you're looking at you know, your construction period of

0:21:28.520 --> 0:21:31.280
<v Speaker 5>five years, your pre construction, and your commissioning. You add

0:21:31.320 --> 0:21:33.959
<v Speaker 5>another five years or so. Right. But then once they

0:21:34.000 --> 0:21:35.720
<v Speaker 5>build it, they're saying, you know, we can build a

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:38.960
<v Speaker 5>single gigawatt unit reactor for five billion dollars four and

0:21:39.000 --> 0:21:41.680
<v Speaker 5>a half billion, five billion. You look at numbers out

0:21:41.720 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 5>of the US and they're saying, we're going to build

0:21:43.680 --> 0:21:46.480
<v Speaker 5>what vocal cost was two units for twenty eight billion

0:21:46.520 --> 0:21:48.719
<v Speaker 5>dollars or something like that. You do a little bit

0:21:48.720 --> 0:21:51.879
<v Speaker 5>of Napkin math, and you say that reactor can't possibly

0:21:51.960 --> 0:21:54.399
<v Speaker 5>make back how much money it costs to build and

0:21:54.440 --> 0:21:57.240
<v Speaker 5>it's operating lifetime or maybe it will just about get

0:21:57.240 --> 0:22:00.520
<v Speaker 5>there after forty years. And that's assuming that the plant

0:22:00.600 --> 0:22:03.399
<v Speaker 5>operates in the spot markets really really well and sells

0:22:03.440 --> 0:22:06.840
<v Speaker 5>power so efficiently and never gets curtailed and never has

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:10.320
<v Speaker 5>issues like that. Meanwhile, your Napkin math in China is saying, well,

0:22:10.359 --> 0:22:12.320
<v Speaker 5>they're going to sell power at this rate for the

0:22:12.359 --> 0:22:15.520
<v Speaker 5>next forty, maybe sixty years, maybe they'll do double life extension,

0:22:15.520 --> 0:22:18.720
<v Speaker 5>maybe eighty years. And you know, so many killo odd

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:21.720
<v Speaker 5>hours of power times so much per kill a lot hour. Yeah,

0:22:21.760 --> 0:22:24.920
<v Speaker 5>it looks like these things should be reasonably profitable. And

0:22:25.040 --> 0:22:28.800
<v Speaker 5>keep in mind the profit motive of Chinese soees is different, right,

0:22:28.840 --> 0:22:31.280
<v Speaker 5>They're expected to try to be profitable so they have

0:22:31.400 --> 0:22:34.400
<v Speaker 5>cash flow to do things and you know, be functional.

0:22:34.640 --> 0:22:37.440
<v Speaker 5>But if they have to take a hit, sometimes they will.

0:22:38.080 --> 0:22:40.880
<v Speaker 5>They can be the lubricant in the system that causes

0:22:40.880 --> 0:22:43.639
<v Speaker 5>the inefficiencies to be okay, because you've got you know,

0:22:43.720 --> 0:22:46.720
<v Speaker 5>a major SOE that was okay, losing half a billion

0:22:46.760 --> 0:22:49.520
<v Speaker 5>dollars last year. They'll make it back later. It's okay.

0:22:49.560 --> 0:22:51.960
<v Speaker 5>The system didn't fall apart. They were the lubricant.

0:22:52.720 --> 0:22:55.879
<v Speaker 4>So one way we could potentially judge the success of

0:22:56.080 --> 0:22:58.560
<v Speaker 4>Chinese nuclear reactors is you could look at whether or

0:22:58.600 --> 0:23:03.360
<v Speaker 4>not they are significant changing the energy mix. And there

0:23:03.440 --> 0:23:06.280
<v Speaker 4>was a story out this week saying that China's domestic

0:23:06.359 --> 0:23:09.640
<v Speaker 4>coal production had reached an all time high, and granted

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:14.320
<v Speaker 4>that's production that's not necessarily coal use, but I don't know,

0:23:14.400 --> 0:23:17.480
<v Speaker 4>it doesn't seem like there's been a big impact just yet.

0:23:17.520 --> 0:23:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Why is that?

0:23:19.040 --> 0:23:21.640
<v Speaker 5>And yeah, and that's right. I saw that yesterday too.

0:23:21.880 --> 0:23:24.840
<v Speaker 5>I'm bummed about that because I'm on record saying back

0:23:25.119 --> 0:23:28.480
<v Speaker 5>in December twenty twenty three that I thought twenty twenty

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:31.320
<v Speaker 5>four would be the peak year, and I thought structurally

0:23:31.359 --> 0:23:33.120
<v Speaker 5>we were in place to be able to peak coal

0:23:33.119 --> 0:23:36.000
<v Speaker 5>consumption in twenty twenty four, and I think we're going

0:23:36.080 --> 0:23:39.760
<v Speaker 5>to end up up one one point five percent year

0:23:39.800 --> 0:23:41.320
<v Speaker 5>on year something like that, which for China is a

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:43.520
<v Speaker 5>huge amount of coal because it consumes so much coal.

0:23:43.680 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 5>But it's really close, which of course means if we're

0:23:46.400 --> 0:23:48.240
<v Speaker 5>up year on year and last year was the highest

0:23:48.280 --> 0:23:50.800
<v Speaker 5>year ever, then this year is the highest test year ever.

0:23:51.320 --> 0:23:53.280
<v Speaker 5>And so what are we looking at, though, We're looking

0:23:53.359 --> 0:23:56.440
<v Speaker 5>at a power sector that is still growing consumption every

0:23:56.520 --> 0:23:59.080
<v Speaker 5>year by seven percent year on year, six or seven

0:23:59.080 --> 0:24:01.439
<v Speaker 5>percent year on year, compared to the US, where a

0:24:01.480 --> 0:24:03.520
<v Speaker 5>good year is maybe like one percent or half a

0:24:03.560 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 5>percent year on year, and you talk about data center

0:24:06.640 --> 0:24:09.400
<v Speaker 5>demand growth is going to maybe rise that and everybody's

0:24:09.440 --> 0:24:11.200
<v Speaker 5>freaking out, how are we going to meet this new

0:24:11.200 --> 0:24:15.040
<v Speaker 5>consumption need? China has been growing like that seven percent

0:24:15.080 --> 0:24:17.160
<v Speaker 5>eight percent in the past. It was even higher for

0:24:17.280 --> 0:24:21.320
<v Speaker 5>decades now. So it to be able to peak coal consumption,

0:24:21.920 --> 0:24:24.359
<v Speaker 5>we have to get to a single year where all

0:24:24.560 --> 0:24:29.080
<v Speaker 5>of the incremental consumption growth is met by incremental generation

0:24:29.280 --> 0:24:32.000
<v Speaker 5>from clean assets, right from wind and water and solar

0:24:32.040 --> 0:24:34.040
<v Speaker 5>and nuclear. If we can't manage to do that in

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:36.440
<v Speaker 5>one year where all the incremental growth is covered by

0:24:36.440 --> 0:24:39.840
<v Speaker 5>new incremental clean generation, thermal generation has to go up.

0:24:40.119 --> 0:24:42.720
<v Speaker 5>And so that's still where we're at. We're real close.

0:24:42.800 --> 0:24:45.000
<v Speaker 5>If it only grew by one point five percent this year,

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:48.600
<v Speaker 5>that means that seven percent of China's entire consumption mix

0:24:48.680 --> 0:24:51.679
<v Speaker 5>was almost totally covered by growth year on year of

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:54.080
<v Speaker 5>wind and water and solar and nuclear, but it wasn't

0:24:54.119 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 5>quite there, and so that's where we stand at twenty

0:24:56.320 --> 0:24:59.320
<v Speaker 5>twenty four. I'm going to be made a liar of

0:24:59.320 --> 0:25:01.320
<v Speaker 5>that statement at the end of last year where I

0:25:01.320 --> 0:25:02.840
<v Speaker 5>thought coal consumption would peak this.

0:25:02.840 --> 0:25:05.840
<v Speaker 3>Year since you mentioned it. Data centers is obviously a

0:25:05.880 --> 0:25:07.760
<v Speaker 3>huge part of the story of the return of load

0:25:07.800 --> 0:25:10.560
<v Speaker 3>growth in the US. I mean, there's obviously just the

0:25:10.680 --> 0:25:14.080
<v Speaker 3>general modernization and country getting wealthier. But tell us about

0:25:14.119 --> 0:25:16.080
<v Speaker 3>the data center's story in China as you see it

0:25:16.080 --> 0:25:17.320
<v Speaker 3>and it's impact on the grid.

0:25:17.920 --> 0:25:20.920
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it's it's of course going to be another growth driver.

0:25:21.560 --> 0:25:23.879
<v Speaker 5>The major difference here is that when China says, oh,

0:25:23.880 --> 0:25:26.200
<v Speaker 5>we've got data centers coming in, so instead of six

0:25:26.280 --> 0:25:28.280
<v Speaker 5>point five percent growth, it's going to be seven point

0:25:28.320 --> 0:25:31.120
<v Speaker 5>five percent growth. Right, It's just what's a percentage point

0:25:31.119 --> 0:25:34.000
<v Speaker 5>among friends, right, Whereas the United States going from half

0:25:34.000 --> 0:25:36.240
<v Speaker 5>a percentage point to one point five or two percent

0:25:36.400 --> 0:25:38.639
<v Speaker 5>is very different from how we've had to grow in

0:25:38.680 --> 0:25:42.960
<v Speaker 5>the past. So China's i think, approaching this with much

0:25:43.000 --> 0:25:47.000
<v Speaker 5>more sanguinity, maybe that they're just saying, yeah, it's going

0:25:47.080 --> 0:25:49.159
<v Speaker 5>to be a driver of growth. Let's put them in

0:25:49.240 --> 0:25:50.960
<v Speaker 5>some of our parts of the country that have low

0:25:51.000 --> 0:25:53.840
<v Speaker 5>load and great renewable resources. We're going to put them

0:25:53.840 --> 0:25:55.880
<v Speaker 5>Inner Mongolia is what we're going to put them. We're

0:25:55.880 --> 0:25:58.280
<v Speaker 5>going to put growth demand centers in Inner Mongolia. They

0:25:58.320 --> 0:26:00.159
<v Speaker 5>don't need to be close to the Chinese.

0:26:01.560 --> 0:26:02.600
<v Speaker 3>Is Inner Mongolia.

0:26:02.720 --> 0:26:05.720
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it's it's sparsely populated, it's got a lot of

0:26:05.720 --> 0:26:08.520
<v Speaker 5>great energy resources. The wind blows and the sunshines all

0:26:08.560 --> 0:26:11.480
<v Speaker 5>day long, and there's no load out there. So it

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:13.879
<v Speaker 5>wouldn't have made so much sense maybe to cite you know,

0:26:14.040 --> 0:26:17.879
<v Speaker 5>your heavy energy intensive industrial manufacturing so far from the

0:26:17.880 --> 0:26:20.280
<v Speaker 5>demand center, so far from the coasts where you could

0:26:20.280 --> 0:26:22.360
<v Speaker 5>get it to logistics. Oh, they put some stuff out there,

0:26:22.359 --> 0:26:25.680
<v Speaker 5>but it wasn't so intuitive to put energy intensive industry

0:26:25.680 --> 0:26:27.959
<v Speaker 5>out there. But data centers, Oh that's great, right. They

0:26:27.960 --> 0:26:30.439
<v Speaker 5>don't need to be close to markets per se. You

0:26:30.520 --> 0:26:33.639
<v Speaker 5>just need to get be them close to the affordable energy.

0:26:33.920 --> 0:26:36.560
<v Speaker 5>So it's looking like inn Moongolia or places like that

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:39.359
<v Speaker 5>will be a great match for China's data center growth.

0:26:39.680 --> 0:26:41.560
<v Speaker 4>So one of the things that's been happening in the

0:26:41.680 --> 0:26:44.560
<v Speaker 4>US speaking of data centers is a lot of the

0:26:44.560 --> 0:26:48.080
<v Speaker 4>big tech companies have been signing off take agreements with

0:26:48.280 --> 0:26:52.240
<v Speaker 4>energy producers and they've been pushing them towards more renewable energy.

0:26:52.480 --> 0:26:55.119
<v Speaker 4>So they say, we want clean energy to power these things,

0:26:55.160 --> 0:26:57.000
<v Speaker 4>and you make it for us and we'll take it.

0:26:57.520 --> 0:27:00.560
<v Speaker 4>Do you see a similar dynamic taking place in China

0:27:00.720 --> 0:27:04.320
<v Speaker 4>or do people not care as much about the ultimate

0:27:04.440 --> 0:27:06.840
<v Speaker 4>cleanliness of their energy for data centers.

0:27:07.640 --> 0:27:11.439
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that's a major driver of how the power sector

0:27:11.480 --> 0:27:14.640
<v Speaker 5>offers power. Right, your customers demand a certain type of power,

0:27:14.680 --> 0:27:17.119
<v Speaker 5>you should be able to meet their needs. Right now,

0:27:17.280 --> 0:27:20.000
<v Speaker 5>in China, you'd split, or in anywhere anywhere in the world,

0:27:20.040 --> 0:27:23.399
<v Speaker 5>not just in China, you'd split green power consumption on

0:27:23.480 --> 0:27:28.440
<v Speaker 5>the end user end into voluntary and mandatory. So mandatory

0:27:28.480 --> 0:27:30.400
<v Speaker 5>says the government says you have to consume a certain

0:27:30.400 --> 0:27:32.399
<v Speaker 5>amount of electricity that is green. We call it a

0:27:32.400 --> 0:27:35.879
<v Speaker 5>renewable portfolio standard or an RPS. Right, there's rps and

0:27:36.000 --> 0:27:37.760
<v Speaker 5>US states, not all of them, but some of them,

0:27:37.760 --> 0:27:40.639
<v Speaker 5>And there's RPS in China. So from that perspective, you

0:27:40.680 --> 0:27:43.359
<v Speaker 5>could say the government mandates that you consume a certain

0:27:43.400 --> 0:27:47.000
<v Speaker 5>amount of renewable energy to meet the quota. Now. Right now,

0:27:47.040 --> 0:27:50.040
<v Speaker 5>that applies to utilities in China, but it doesn't yet

0:27:50.080 --> 0:27:53.560
<v Speaker 5>apply to end users. Your aluminum smelter doesn't have that

0:27:53.640 --> 0:27:56.880
<v Speaker 5>man yet, but that's the next stage of RPS that's

0:27:56.920 --> 0:27:59.320
<v Speaker 5>being added right now. Data centers I think need to

0:27:59.359 --> 0:28:02.000
<v Speaker 5>be it's quite high. I think it's eighty percent renewable.

0:28:02.040 --> 0:28:04.280
<v Speaker 5>To build a new data center in China, you're going

0:28:04.320 --> 0:28:07.000
<v Speaker 5>to need to have aluminum and steel and all these

0:28:07.040 --> 0:28:10.640
<v Speaker 5>heavy energy intensive industries need to consume renewable. So that's

0:28:10.640 --> 0:28:13.719
<v Speaker 5>your mandatory consumption. That's OURPS driven and then you've got

0:28:13.720 --> 0:28:17.520
<v Speaker 5>your voluntary consumption. So voluntary consumption, you know, corporate social

0:28:17.560 --> 0:28:21.680
<v Speaker 5>responsibility initiatives ESG right companies say we want to go green.

0:28:21.760 --> 0:28:23.959
<v Speaker 5>We want to put it in our CSR report that

0:28:24.000 --> 0:28:27.239
<v Speaker 5>we consumed x amount of renewables last year. We did

0:28:27.240 --> 0:28:30.159
<v Speaker 5>this on a voluntary basis. We joined ARE one hundred,

0:28:30.280 --> 0:28:33.160
<v Speaker 5>we joined the Science Based Targets initiative, and we want

0:28:33.160 --> 0:28:35.880
<v Speaker 5>to claim that we are green. Yeah, that's your consumer

0:28:35.960 --> 0:28:39.640
<v Speaker 5>tech brands, that's your luxury fashion and increasing. A lot

0:28:39.640 --> 0:28:43.760
<v Speaker 5>of European brands are very aggressive on their renewable energy consumption,

0:28:43.920 --> 0:28:47.479
<v Speaker 5>including in China. So if you're producing in China and

0:28:47.680 --> 0:28:49.440
<v Speaker 5>selling to the world, you want to be able to

0:28:49.480 --> 0:28:52.440
<v Speaker 5>say our production in China was also green. So that's

0:28:52.560 --> 0:28:56.040
<v Speaker 5>voluntary consumption of green power. But you demand your power

0:28:56.040 --> 0:28:58.800
<v Speaker 5>retail or to provide you with green electricity and they'll

0:28:58.800 --> 0:28:59.959
<v Speaker 5>give you a quote for green electrics.

0:29:16.320 --> 0:29:19.520
<v Speaker 3>We started on the nuclear side, we talked coal, but

0:29:19.560 --> 0:29:21.480
<v Speaker 3>then we're all, you know, there's all these charts that

0:29:21.520 --> 0:29:24.520
<v Speaker 3>are you know, great about all this solar being installed?

0:29:25.080 --> 0:29:28.080
<v Speaker 3>Is the economics of that roughly the same in the

0:29:28.160 --> 0:29:31.840
<v Speaker 3>sense that it's probably an sooe getting money from an

0:29:31.960 --> 0:29:36.520
<v Speaker 3>so E bank, And talk to us about who's funding

0:29:36.520 --> 0:29:38.320
<v Speaker 3>that and where does it make sense? Like why in

0:29:38.440 --> 0:29:41.880
<v Speaker 3>some places is solar going to be solar wind part

0:29:41.920 --> 0:29:43.520
<v Speaker 3>of the answer versus say nuclear.

0:29:44.200 --> 0:29:46.600
<v Speaker 5>Right, So when it comes to wind and solar, these

0:29:46.600 --> 0:29:49.160
<v Speaker 5>are being built differently from nuclear, right, They're not nearly

0:29:49.200 --> 0:29:52.200
<v Speaker 5>as capital intensive. Also, they can be smaller, they can

0:29:52.240 --> 0:29:55.040
<v Speaker 5>be more distributed. And so when you look at Chinese

0:29:55.080 --> 0:29:57.680
<v Speaker 5>wind and solar, of course you still see sooees playing

0:29:57.680 --> 0:30:00.520
<v Speaker 5>a big role, but there are as well ipp independent

0:30:00.600 --> 0:30:03.360
<v Speaker 5>power producers or just non soees right, as well as

0:30:03.400 --> 0:30:06.400
<v Speaker 5>foreign players. So you as a you know, a foreign

0:30:06.400 --> 0:30:09.560
<v Speaker 5>investor who you know, like black Rock, can come into

0:30:09.760 --> 0:30:12.640
<v Speaker 5>China and build a power plant if they want to,

0:30:12.720 --> 0:30:15.080
<v Speaker 5>a wind or a solar farm, no problem. And so

0:30:15.280 --> 0:30:18.040
<v Speaker 5>anyone can participate in that space if they do their

0:30:18.040 --> 0:30:21.640
<v Speaker 5>financial analysis and they see the way to attractive project economics.

0:30:22.080 --> 0:30:25.000
<v Speaker 5>So for if Chinese builders they borrow from Chinese banks,

0:30:25.320 --> 0:30:28.800
<v Speaker 5>as will Chinese independent borrowers, then international players they might

0:30:28.840 --> 0:30:30.959
<v Speaker 5>borrow from international banks, they might try to borrow from

0:30:31.040 --> 0:30:33.280
<v Speaker 5>Chinese banks. They can do that as well. They will

0:30:33.320 --> 0:30:36.479
<v Speaker 5>get you know, market competitive rates. This is a different

0:30:36.600 --> 0:30:39.480
<v Speaker 5>kind of building compared to nuclear where it's instead of

0:30:39.520 --> 0:30:42.720
<v Speaker 5>it's like a national strategic priority to build a rooftop

0:30:42.720 --> 0:30:45.640
<v Speaker 5>sole or facility. Now that's much more of a commercial

0:30:45.680 --> 0:30:49.520
<v Speaker 5>market operation. However, there are some projects in China that

0:30:49.560 --> 0:30:54.120
<v Speaker 5>are national strategic priority. We talk about those huge desert bases,

0:30:54.200 --> 0:30:57.240
<v Speaker 5>you know, hundreds of megawats gigawatts, hundreds of gigawats in

0:30:57.280 --> 0:30:59.520
<v Speaker 5>the middle of the Gobi desert, coal plants, plus a

0:30:59.520 --> 0:31:01.720
<v Speaker 5>wind far and plus a solar firem plus a huge

0:31:01.760 --> 0:31:04.719
<v Speaker 5>battery array, all financed by a giant Chinese built by

0:31:04.720 --> 0:31:07.480
<v Speaker 5>a Chinese soe. That's the kind of stuff that that

0:31:07.680 --> 0:31:09.840
<v Speaker 5>kind of looks more like a nuclear power plant in

0:31:09.920 --> 0:31:12.440
<v Speaker 5>the way that they finance and process that. But you know,

0:31:12.640 --> 0:31:15.680
<v Speaker 5>rooftop solar facility in Eastern China. Now that's very much

0:31:15.720 --> 0:31:18.040
<v Speaker 5>just a commercial play. If it makes money, if it

0:31:18.080 --> 0:31:19.080
<v Speaker 5>makes sense, they'll build it.

0:31:19.600 --> 0:31:23.320
<v Speaker 4>So when we talk about China's energy landscape or its

0:31:23.480 --> 0:31:26.320
<v Speaker 4>energy mix, I mean a lot of what we're talking about,

0:31:26.320 --> 0:31:29.720
<v Speaker 4>we're pulling in numbers from the Chinese government, right, like

0:31:29.840 --> 0:31:34.640
<v Speaker 4>domestic production numbers, domestic usage numbers. And whenever you do that,

0:31:34.720 --> 0:31:39.080
<v Speaker 4>there's always a certain element of uncertainty or a question

0:31:39.200 --> 0:31:41.880
<v Speaker 4>mark over them. And there are some people who even

0:31:41.920 --> 0:31:44.960
<v Speaker 4>if you were to say that China's coal production was

0:31:45.160 --> 0:31:48.800
<v Speaker 4>finally falling, which it isn't, as you know, people wouldn't

0:31:48.840 --> 0:31:51.040
<v Speaker 4>necessarily believe it. They'd be like, oh, well, China wants

0:31:51.040 --> 0:31:53.800
<v Speaker 4>you to think that. So I guess my question is

0:31:53.800 --> 0:31:57.480
<v Speaker 4>like how much should we believe some of these stats?

0:31:57.920 --> 0:32:00.200
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and this is going to be always very subject

0:32:00.280 --> 0:32:02.040
<v Speaker 5>about how much you want to believe or how much

0:32:02.080 --> 0:32:06.240
<v Speaker 5>you think is worthwhile believing. My take that I usually

0:32:06.240 --> 0:32:08.080
<v Speaker 5>go to is like, look at the top levels. You've

0:32:08.120 --> 0:32:10.760
<v Speaker 5>got your National Bureau of Statistics, You've got these you know,

0:32:11.040 --> 0:32:14.800
<v Speaker 5>national level entities who's their job mandate is to report

0:32:14.840 --> 0:32:18.200
<v Speaker 5>statistics as faithfully and as honestly as they can. All right, fine,

0:32:18.240 --> 0:32:20.120
<v Speaker 5>you know what, that's their job mandate. I have no

0:32:20.240 --> 0:32:23.040
<v Speaker 5>latitude to say I think they're doing their job dishonestly

0:32:23.200 --> 0:32:26.240
<v Speaker 5>or something like that. But I do believe there are

0:32:26.640 --> 0:32:30.560
<v Speaker 5>many kind of perverse incentives throughout the structure of the

0:32:30.640 --> 0:32:35.520
<v Speaker 5>reporting economy in China that would create opportunity for misreporting information.

0:32:35.920 --> 0:32:39.800
<v Speaker 5>When you tie you know, the county governor's promotion or

0:32:39.920 --> 0:32:42.960
<v Speaker 5>lack thereof, to his ability to grow GDP in that

0:32:43.040 --> 0:32:46.120
<v Speaker 5>province or in that county, you're creating the incentive for

0:32:46.200 --> 0:32:50.240
<v Speaker 5>him to cook the data. When you're creating economic recovery,

0:32:50.280 --> 0:32:52.520
<v Speaker 5>and you announced to and this happened. This is a

0:32:52.520 --> 0:32:55.960
<v Speaker 5>real story. When you announce to a certain city in

0:32:56.000 --> 0:32:58.400
<v Speaker 5>twenty twenty two that you're going to be evaluating how

0:32:58.480 --> 0:33:02.640
<v Speaker 5>quickly they've recovered from COVID conditions by seeing how quickly

0:33:02.680 --> 0:33:05.960
<v Speaker 5>their factories get back up to regular production. And you

0:33:06.040 --> 0:33:08.400
<v Speaker 5>know that they're measuring that by seeing how much electricity

0:33:08.400 --> 0:33:10.040
<v Speaker 5>they consume. Well, all of a sudden, you have.

0:33:10.280 --> 0:33:12.080
<v Speaker 4>And everyone starts plugging stuff in.

0:33:12.440 --> 0:33:15.040
<v Speaker 5>Right, So if you can say that people are trying

0:33:15.040 --> 0:33:17.040
<v Speaker 5>to do their jobs honestly, and then you also have

0:33:17.120 --> 0:33:21.280
<v Speaker 5>people that have been given perpose incentives to misreport did.

0:33:21.320 --> 0:33:22.800
<v Speaker 5>I think that's where a lot of the uncertainty.

0:33:23.120 --> 0:33:26.840
<v Speaker 3>I mean, this is the core problem of central plan.

0:33:26.880 --> 0:33:29.680
<v Speaker 3>I mean, this is it in a nutshell. And obviously

0:33:30.280 --> 0:33:34.000
<v Speaker 3>the most egregious examples of this were, you know, during

0:33:34.000 --> 0:33:37.480
<v Speaker 3>the Great Leap Forward and all of the ways that

0:33:37.160 --> 0:33:41.120
<v Speaker 3>either they you know, the steel production that was melting

0:33:41.160 --> 0:33:44.840
<v Speaker 3>down literally anything of steel and destroying the economy. In

0:33:44.920 --> 0:33:48.000
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty four, what are some of the techniques used

0:33:48.040 --> 0:33:52.120
<v Speaker 3>to avoid sort of egregious juking of the stats so that, yeah,

0:33:52.160 --> 0:33:55.680
<v Speaker 3>someone's promotion who is tied to electricity consumption can't be

0:33:55.720 --> 0:33:57.200
<v Speaker 3>sort of egregiously abused like that.

0:33:57.760 --> 0:34:01.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, well, I mean famously or perhaps infamous. So I

0:34:01.000 --> 0:34:02.560
<v Speaker 5>think it ended up it came out of like a

0:34:02.600 --> 0:34:06.600
<v Speaker 5>WikiLeaks something that the former premier Leka Chang said he

0:34:06.640 --> 0:34:08.360
<v Speaker 5>didn't look at GDP data.

0:34:08.120 --> 0:34:10.799
<v Speaker 3>From certain produces and that's the terminal.

0:34:11.680 --> 0:34:13.680
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, the le Kasyang index, And he said, I prefer

0:34:13.719 --> 0:34:15.880
<v Speaker 5>to look at I think it was a rail cargo

0:34:16.120 --> 0:34:19.200
<v Speaker 5>and electricity consumption, and there were the third item too, right,

0:34:19.440 --> 0:34:21.960
<v Speaker 5>he said that these items, you know, the people in

0:34:22.080 --> 0:34:25.360
<v Speaker 5>charge of reporting them, there's you know, my assumption is

0:34:25.360 --> 0:34:28.600
<v Speaker 5>that his logic was there's less incentives to misreport these,

0:34:28.840 --> 0:34:30.439
<v Speaker 5>so that these are the ones I want to look at,

0:34:30.640 --> 0:34:32.279
<v Speaker 5>and you can maybe come up with your own version

0:34:32.320 --> 0:34:34.879
<v Speaker 5>of the modern day Li Ku Chang index. I think

0:34:34.920 --> 0:34:37.839
<v Speaker 5>electricity consumption is still fine, but maybe there's some other

0:34:37.920 --> 0:34:40.920
<v Speaker 5>numbers that you say, look, this is all very centralized reporting.

0:34:41.200 --> 0:34:44.160
<v Speaker 5>The reason I like electricity because it's all state grid, right,

0:34:44.239 --> 0:34:47.080
<v Speaker 5>those numbers almost all come from state grid, and State

0:34:47.120 --> 0:34:50.120
<v Speaker 5>grid is just a single unified entity. You're not gathering

0:34:50.200 --> 0:34:53.920
<v Speaker 5>data points from many different companies. Maybe other stuff like

0:34:53.960 --> 0:34:57.200
<v Speaker 5>we talk about cargo right again China Railways. Yeah, you

0:34:57.239 --> 0:34:59.520
<v Speaker 5>have one centralized company that would be able to report

0:34:59.520 --> 0:35:01.640
<v Speaker 5>that information. So if you want to modern you know,

0:35:01.719 --> 0:35:04.399
<v Speaker 5>fashion your modern Lika Chanan decks, maybe try those types

0:35:04.440 --> 0:35:04.960
<v Speaker 5>of indsease.

0:35:06.120 --> 0:35:10.640
<v Speaker 3>So one other element obviously of the Chinese energy demand.

0:35:10.680 --> 0:35:13.840
<v Speaker 3>We've talked a lot about the grid obviously and the

0:35:13.880 --> 0:35:16.320
<v Speaker 3>power of the grid. Then there is the whole world

0:35:16.440 --> 0:35:20.360
<v Speaker 3>of automobiles, which up until very recently was totally separate

0:35:20.400 --> 0:35:24.320
<v Speaker 3>part of the energy system, but now it's around the world,

0:35:24.520 --> 0:35:27.560
<v Speaker 3>but in particular China, and we talk about Chinese evs

0:35:27.600 --> 0:35:30.399
<v Speaker 3>all the time being plugged into the grid. How much

0:35:30.480 --> 0:35:35.120
<v Speaker 3>do we see the electrification of the Chinese automobile fleet, Like, A,

0:35:35.280 --> 0:35:38.719
<v Speaker 3>how electrified is it right now? And b is it

0:35:38.840 --> 0:35:41.880
<v Speaker 3>moving the dial on oil consumption? Because this is a

0:35:41.880 --> 0:35:44.080
<v Speaker 3>pretty big question in the West, right like at some

0:35:44.239 --> 0:35:47.400
<v Speaker 3>point will EV's become big enough where meaningfully starts to

0:35:47.440 --> 0:35:50.760
<v Speaker 3>reduce our oil demand? And even in countries like Norway,

0:35:50.840 --> 0:35:53.600
<v Speaker 3>I think like it's still barely moving the dial despite

0:35:53.640 --> 0:35:56.160
<v Speaker 3>mass of electrification. What are we seeing in China right

0:35:56.200 --> 0:35:56.800
<v Speaker 3>now on that front?

0:35:57.120 --> 0:36:01.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean in the major cities you say, Shenjen, Shanghai, Beijing,

0:36:01.080 --> 0:36:06.080
<v Speaker 5>places like this, the EV penetration rate is noticeably high,

0:36:06.360 --> 0:36:09.040
<v Speaker 5>and you'll see that they're easily identifiable. They have green

0:36:09.080 --> 0:36:11.480
<v Speaker 5>license plates instead of the regular blue license flight, so

0:36:11.480 --> 0:36:13.000
<v Speaker 5>you can just kind of look at them on the street.

0:36:13.080 --> 0:36:15.520
<v Speaker 5>It's very expensive to get a license plate in Shanghai.

0:36:15.600 --> 0:36:18.480
<v Speaker 5>Just the license plate itself is expensive. But EV's for

0:36:18.520 --> 0:36:21.480
<v Speaker 5>a long time were free, like the license plate was free,

0:36:21.880 --> 0:36:24.839
<v Speaker 5>so that was a great perk for them to pursue those.

0:36:25.120 --> 0:36:27.480
<v Speaker 5>And yeah, there I think it was. New vehicle sales

0:36:27.480 --> 0:36:30.520
<v Speaker 5>in Shanghai, for example, was fifty percent electric vehicles in

0:36:30.560 --> 0:36:34.680
<v Speaker 5>the last reporting session, and it's really noticeable when you

0:36:34.760 --> 0:36:37.880
<v Speaker 5>stand on a street corner in Shanghai, and I guess

0:36:37.960 --> 0:36:40.200
<v Speaker 5>it's noticeable by the lack of the noise.

0:36:41.280 --> 0:36:43.279
<v Speaker 3>I heard that everyone goes to Shanghai and says it's

0:36:43.280 --> 0:36:44.520
<v Speaker 3>really quiet. That's you know.

0:36:44.560 --> 0:36:46.279
<v Speaker 5>Look, I'm back in New York right now for the

0:36:46.320 --> 0:36:47.680
<v Speaker 5>first time in a year, and I stand on a

0:36:47.680 --> 0:36:51.000
<v Speaker 5>street corner. It's so loud, and I hadn't really noted

0:36:51.160 --> 0:36:53.239
<v Speaker 5>the lack of the noise because I'm just used to

0:36:53.280 --> 0:36:55.400
<v Speaker 5>it now, and it's it's I hear the roar of

0:36:55.520 --> 0:36:57.680
<v Speaker 5>petroleum based engines all around me.

0:36:58.040 --> 0:36:58.279
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:36:58.320 --> 0:37:02.360
<v Speaker 5>So eve's in the large cities. Penetration rates noticeably high.

0:37:02.520 --> 0:37:05.400
<v Speaker 5>In the smaller cities still fairly high. When you go

0:37:05.520 --> 0:37:08.040
<v Speaker 5>out to the more rural areas, it's going to drop off.

0:37:08.080 --> 0:37:10.960
<v Speaker 5>Of course, there's more skepticism about the completeness of the

0:37:11.040 --> 0:37:16.440
<v Speaker 5>charging network, just maybe some more uncertainty about the technology itself.

0:37:16.560 --> 0:37:19.719
<v Speaker 5>You'll hear people in the countrysides and all batteries are dangerous.

0:37:19.840 --> 0:37:21.640
<v Speaker 5>I heard that I saw a video once of an

0:37:21.640 --> 0:37:25.400
<v Speaker 5>evy on fire. Things like that. Similar you know comments

0:37:25.400 --> 0:37:28.920
<v Speaker 5>in the United States too. But the long term, the

0:37:28.960 --> 0:37:31.959
<v Speaker 5>EV penetration rate will will only continue to rise.

0:37:32.239 --> 0:37:35.920
<v Speaker 3>It's national oil consumption, I believe.

0:37:35.920 --> 0:37:38.760
<v Speaker 5>So I think I saw. Now I'm not an oil specialist,

0:37:38.840 --> 0:37:41.200
<v Speaker 5>but I think I've seen and I've read recently that

0:37:41.200 --> 0:37:45.359
<v Speaker 5>that Chinese oil imports should have peeped right, that they

0:37:45.400 --> 0:37:48.359
<v Speaker 5>should have be ready to draw down if you know,

0:37:48.400 --> 0:37:50.560
<v Speaker 5>if I'm lying here, may God smite me down. But

0:37:50.920 --> 0:37:52.799
<v Speaker 5>I think that that was the case, and that we

0:37:52.800 --> 0:37:56.200
<v Speaker 5>see a structural decline in petroleum because of the adoption

0:37:56.440 --> 0:37:57.160
<v Speaker 5>of evs.

0:37:57.600 --> 0:38:00.440
<v Speaker 4>So, speaking of EV's, there is a lot of Chinese

0:38:00.520 --> 0:38:03.920
<v Speaker 4>made clean tech that is here in the US, including

0:38:04.040 --> 0:38:07.080
<v Speaker 4>solar panels as well. And this has been one of

0:38:07.120 --> 0:38:10.040
<v Speaker 4>the frictions of the past few years, which is, you know,

0:38:10.200 --> 0:38:13.960
<v Speaker 4>the US says it wants cleaner energy, and Chinese solar

0:38:14.040 --> 0:38:17.560
<v Speaker 4>panels and evs are probably the cheapest forms of that

0:38:17.719 --> 0:38:21.240
<v Speaker 4>technology around, and yet there's a lot of I guess,

0:38:21.280 --> 0:38:24.520
<v Speaker 4>reluctance to import tons of those into the US, and

0:38:24.560 --> 0:38:28.279
<v Speaker 4>certainly with Trump coming in, it seems like tariffs are

0:38:28.280 --> 0:38:30.520
<v Speaker 4>on their way. How do you see all of that

0:38:30.840 --> 0:38:32.520
<v Speaker 4>shaking out into the new year.

0:38:33.520 --> 0:38:33.759
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:38:33.800 --> 0:38:38.319
<v Speaker 5>Look, in the United States, you're gonna decarbonize or you're

0:38:38.360 --> 0:38:43.360
<v Speaker 5>gonna buy green tech. At exactly the rate that is economic. Yeah,

0:38:43.400 --> 0:38:48.439
<v Speaker 5>and so if you have access to very affordable green tech,

0:38:48.480 --> 0:38:50.000
<v Speaker 5>you'll do it at a faster rate. If you have

0:38:50.040 --> 0:38:52.440
<v Speaker 5>access to more expensive green tech, you'll do it more slowly.

0:38:52.960 --> 0:38:56.000
<v Speaker 5>And so I have to assume that if those teriffs

0:38:56.000 --> 0:38:59.920
<v Speaker 5>go in place, unless alternative producers are able to offer

0:39:00.280 --> 0:39:02.600
<v Speaker 5>similar quality goods at similar prices, then you're going to

0:39:02.640 --> 0:39:06.719
<v Speaker 5>slow down your green transition. That's maybe a simple but

0:39:06.800 --> 0:39:10.240
<v Speaker 5>obvious kind of answer there. On the Chinese side, of course,

0:39:10.320 --> 0:39:13.759
<v Speaker 5>there will be some pain for exporters, anyone exposed to

0:39:14.160 --> 0:39:17.160
<v Speaker 5>the United States market. Some solar panels, maybe some evs,

0:39:17.160 --> 0:39:20.480
<v Speaker 5>some batteries I think are pretty significant if those are targeted. Yeah,

0:39:20.520 --> 0:39:23.239
<v Speaker 5>you'd expect to see some pain on the Chinese side there.

0:39:23.239 --> 0:39:27.960
<v Speaker 5>It's already an extremely extremely competitive environment in China. Most

0:39:28.000 --> 0:39:31.360
<v Speaker 5>of these producers are in very thin profit margins, hanging

0:39:31.360 --> 0:39:33.480
<v Speaker 5>on by a threat. It's good for consumers, it's not

0:39:33.560 --> 0:39:36.759
<v Speaker 5>good for if you're holding those stocks. So this would

0:39:36.760 --> 0:39:40.240
<v Speaker 5>only just be another bit of pain for them, denial

0:39:40.360 --> 0:39:42.120
<v Speaker 5>of a potential revenue channel.

0:39:42.320 --> 0:39:46.359
<v Speaker 3>Since you mentioned EV charging stations, we have this sort

0:39:46.400 --> 0:39:48.919
<v Speaker 3>of weird patchwork here, and there's a lot of I'm

0:39:49.000 --> 0:39:53.040
<v Speaker 3>a little ambiguity about the US government under Biden has

0:39:53.239 --> 0:39:56.000
<v Speaker 3>earmarked a lot of money to build EV charging stations.

0:39:56.040 --> 0:39:59.560
<v Speaker 3>It's a little unclear how much actually got built publicly.

0:40:00.120 --> 0:40:02.120
<v Speaker 3>There seems to be a view that it hasn't been

0:40:02.160 --> 0:40:06.120
<v Speaker 3>particularly successful on the public side. What is the structure

0:40:06.320 --> 0:40:09.000
<v Speaker 3>of the buildout for charging stations in China? Is it

0:40:09.000 --> 0:40:10.799
<v Speaker 3>publicly owned? Is it what's the deal?

0:40:11.320 --> 0:40:13.399
<v Speaker 5>It's all of the above, I guess. So you've got

0:40:13.440 --> 0:40:16.239
<v Speaker 5>you know, China State Grid or China Southern Grid. The

0:40:16.400 --> 0:40:19.799
<v Speaker 5>grid companies they build charging infrastructure. Some of the EV

0:40:19.920 --> 0:40:23.759
<v Speaker 5>makers themselves build their own charging infrastructure, maybe like like

0:40:23.760 --> 0:40:26.480
<v Speaker 5>a Tesla supercharger, right. Some of them also build their

0:40:26.480 --> 0:40:29.240
<v Speaker 5>own battery swap stations. I think Neo is quite famous

0:40:29.239 --> 0:40:31.759
<v Speaker 5>for having battery swap stations. You can go pretty much

0:40:31.760 --> 0:40:34.560
<v Speaker 5>any highway rest stop in China and you can find

0:40:34.560 --> 0:40:36.200
<v Speaker 5>a Neo battery swap station.

0:40:36.320 --> 0:40:37.920
<v Speaker 3>So then there's no time you just swap it in

0:40:37.960 --> 0:40:38.239
<v Speaker 3>and out.

0:40:38.360 --> 0:40:40.720
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I'm there's a line to wait for the battery

0:40:40.760 --> 0:40:43.160
<v Speaker 5>swap station if another Neo pulls ahead of you. But

0:40:43.280 --> 0:40:47.440
<v Speaker 5>besides that, I mean, I think the major thrust, at

0:40:47.520 --> 0:40:49.600
<v Speaker 5>least the ones that I've seen recently in the Southern

0:40:49.600 --> 0:40:52.600
<v Speaker 5>Grid region have been by the grid company itself, right, So,

0:40:52.960 --> 0:40:55.919
<v Speaker 5>China Southern Grid. I remember reading last year they said, ah,

0:40:55.960 --> 0:40:58.480
<v Speaker 5>you know, we're planning to build one hundred thousand chargers

0:40:58.520 --> 0:41:01.320
<v Speaker 5>this year, where you know, three min we're seventeen thousand

0:41:01.360 --> 0:41:04.320
<v Speaker 5>chargers in so far. We're on track to finish our

0:41:04.680 --> 0:41:07.040
<v Speaker 5>goal by the end of the year. And you do

0:41:07.200 --> 0:41:09.560
<v Speaker 5>see it when you go to regions that have been

0:41:09.600 --> 0:41:12.560
<v Speaker 5>targeted for those buildouts. Right. You can go to fairly

0:41:12.760 --> 0:41:16.320
<v Speaker 5>rural areas in say Gwandong Province down in the south,

0:41:16.440 --> 0:41:19.400
<v Speaker 5>and you'll find EV chargers installed there by China Southern

0:41:19.440 --> 0:41:21.319
<v Speaker 5>Grid and a village where I don't think there are

0:41:21.440 --> 0:41:24.279
<v Speaker 5>necessarily any evs, but hey, they got the infrastructure there

0:41:24.280 --> 0:41:25.840
<v Speaker 5>because they said we're going to build one hundred k,

0:41:25.960 --> 0:41:27.080
<v Speaker 5>and so they built a hundred K.

0:41:27.680 --> 0:41:31.239
<v Speaker 3>David Fisherman so great to chat with you again, especially

0:41:31.360 --> 0:41:34.440
<v Speaker 3>in person, and I'm so good you have other things

0:41:34.480 --> 0:41:36.960
<v Speaker 3>to worry about besides figuring out how to get food

0:41:37.000 --> 0:41:39.440
<v Speaker 3>in your apartment. Really appreciate you coming back on ovloins.

0:41:39.640 --> 0:41:52.600
<v Speaker 5>Thanks a lot for having you guys.

0:41:53.800 --> 0:41:56.760
<v Speaker 3>That was really helpful. Tracy, I learned all the things

0:41:56.760 --> 0:41:58.480
<v Speaker 3>more or less that I wanted to know about how

0:41:58.480 --> 0:41:59.960
<v Speaker 3>they're built so much nuclear.

0:41:59.760 --> 0:42:04.279
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, what's that reaction? Well, it does. It leaves me

0:42:04.360 --> 0:42:08.080
<v Speaker 4>wondering how like replicable it is in other countries, right,

0:42:08.160 --> 0:42:11.000
<v Speaker 4>because obviously in places like the US, we don't really

0:42:11.040 --> 0:42:14.600
<v Speaker 4>have subsidized finance on the scale that China does. We

0:42:14.680 --> 0:42:18.879
<v Speaker 4>don't have a lot of cheap and skilled labor at

0:42:18.920 --> 0:42:21.319
<v Speaker 4>the same time, and we don't have some of the

0:42:22.080 --> 0:42:27.719
<v Speaker 4>let's put it this way, like regulatory hastiness maybe in

0:42:27.840 --> 0:42:30.799
<v Speaker 4>approving these sites and these things. I don't know, like,

0:42:30.920 --> 0:42:32.440
<v Speaker 4>how replicable do you think it is?

0:42:32.600 --> 0:42:36.919
<v Speaker 3>No, this is the exact question, because you know there's

0:42:36.960 --> 0:42:41.120
<v Speaker 3>some subsidy the loan Program's office exists, but we don't not,

0:42:41.239 --> 0:42:44.560
<v Speaker 3>say the same gigantic state owned banks. Yeah, and then

0:42:44.680 --> 0:42:48.560
<v Speaker 3>even if you solve the financing problem, and even if

0:42:48.560 --> 0:42:51.719
<v Speaker 3>you solve the market off take problem, which is going

0:42:51.760 --> 0:42:54.200
<v Speaker 3>to be very different, right because we have market grids

0:42:54.200 --> 0:42:56.279
<v Speaker 3>in a lot of parts of the country, and so

0:42:56.360 --> 0:42:59.120
<v Speaker 3>it's hard to sort of make that forty year commitment

0:42:59.160 --> 0:43:02.319
<v Speaker 3>that you will get this price. Then there's all the

0:43:02.440 --> 0:43:05.680
<v Speaker 3>logistics like oh, you needed this gigantic crane that's the

0:43:05.680 --> 0:43:07.160
<v Speaker 3>biggest crane in the history of.

0:43:07.120 --> 0:43:08.759
<v Speaker 4>Now you need a big crane to make the big

0:43:08.800 --> 0:43:09.200
<v Speaker 4>crane you.

0:43:09.239 --> 0:43:11.080
<v Speaker 3>Need to make. So this gets to I mean, this

0:43:11.160 --> 0:43:13.760
<v Speaker 3>is a point that jigger Shaw makes all the time,

0:43:14.320 --> 0:43:17.880
<v Speaker 3>but this idea that we're never gonna really do this economically,

0:43:18.360 --> 0:43:22.240
<v Speaker 3>and David just mentioned the sort of daunting economics of Vogel.

0:43:22.440 --> 0:43:25.080
<v Speaker 3>We're never gonna do this economically unless we do it

0:43:25.120 --> 0:43:27.680
<v Speaker 3>over and over and over and over again. And it

0:43:27.719 --> 0:43:30.279
<v Speaker 3>feels like the components of what it would actually take

0:43:30.320 --> 0:43:32.840
<v Speaker 3>to do it over and over and over again is

0:43:32.920 --> 0:43:39.160
<v Speaker 3>this massive centralized commitment to doing lots of different parts.

0:43:40.280 --> 0:43:42.319
<v Speaker 3>And you know, it sounds like the regulatory side or

0:43:42.320 --> 0:43:44.440
<v Speaker 3>the permitting thing that seems about the same. And the

0:43:44.480 --> 0:43:46.960
<v Speaker 3>fact that the public can complain about endangered fish and

0:43:47.000 --> 0:43:50.320
<v Speaker 3>all that that's sort of similar. So people complain about

0:43:50.400 --> 0:43:53.720
<v Speaker 3>annoying local nimbi's. That doesn't really sound that much different.

0:43:53.760 --> 0:43:55.400
<v Speaker 3>It sounds like everything else that's different.

0:43:55.719 --> 0:43:59.839
<v Speaker 4>I suspect the nimbiism is slightly different too. But point

0:43:59.840 --> 0:44:02.120
<v Speaker 4>to taken, and I do wonder, like, how do you

0:44:02.200 --> 0:44:07.040
<v Speaker 4>even go about beginning to redevelop that nuclear muscle memory

0:44:07.360 --> 0:44:10.240
<v Speaker 4>in the States. It seems really really hard, Like, Okay,

0:44:10.239 --> 0:44:14.360
<v Speaker 4>we can reactivate some nuclear reactors like we're planning to,

0:44:15.000 --> 0:44:17.800
<v Speaker 4>but starting like new ones from scratch. It just seems

0:44:17.800 --> 0:44:19.719
<v Speaker 4>like there's such a limited pool of people who are

0:44:19.800 --> 0:44:22.120
<v Speaker 4>capable of doing that and then putting in place, as

0:44:22.160 --> 0:44:24.800
<v Speaker 4>you rightly pointed out, all the off take agreements and

0:44:24.880 --> 0:44:28.040
<v Speaker 4>the network and everything needed to kind of make those

0:44:28.080 --> 0:44:31.600
<v Speaker 4>things financially viable. It seems hard.

0:44:31.680 --> 0:44:34.520
<v Speaker 3>By the way, I'm glad you asked that question about

0:44:34.560 --> 0:44:37.239
<v Speaker 3>coal consumption that because that was really helpful, because it's

0:44:37.280 --> 0:44:41.000
<v Speaker 3>one thing to say, well, another record year for coal consumption,

0:44:41.480 --> 0:44:43.680
<v Speaker 3>but I guess the waight I think about it, at

0:44:43.760 --> 0:44:45.120
<v Speaker 3>least in the short term, we don't know.

0:44:45.000 --> 0:44:47.400
<v Speaker 4>When it's not coal consumption, it's production.

0:44:47.320 --> 0:44:50.359
<v Speaker 3>Just to be cold production. Yeah, but it's really going

0:44:50.440 --> 0:44:53.239
<v Speaker 3>to be about like if coal is in fact as

0:44:53.280 --> 0:44:55.600
<v Speaker 3>a part of the you know, if it's only growing

0:44:55.640 --> 0:45:00.320
<v Speaker 3>one percent, but electricity demand is growing six to seven percent,

0:45:00.520 --> 0:45:03.920
<v Speaker 3>that is a good sign, right, even if it's not

0:45:04.239 --> 0:45:05.600
<v Speaker 3>bending the curve down yet.

0:45:05.719 --> 0:45:10.480
<v Speaker 4>Mm hm. Anyway, it's funny I will always associate Beijing

0:45:10.680 --> 0:45:13.560
<v Speaker 4>with lots and lots of burning coal in the winter.

0:45:13.840 --> 0:45:16.719
<v Speaker 3>By the way, I had heard that about how apparently

0:45:16.800 --> 0:45:19.360
<v Speaker 3>the big cities now are really quiet, which is pretty cool.

0:45:19.400 --> 0:45:21.920
<v Speaker 3>And once self driving cars are everywhere, there will be

0:45:21.920 --> 0:45:25.360
<v Speaker 3>no honking either, And so we can look forward to

0:45:25.360 --> 0:45:29.880
<v Speaker 3>a future. Maybe one day we're very peaceful, peaceful, quiet

0:45:29.880 --> 0:45:31.000
<v Speaker 3>big cities.

0:45:30.640 --> 0:45:33.000
<v Speaker 4>All right, something to hope for. Shall we leave it there?

0:45:33.080 --> 0:45:33.839
<v Speaker 3>Let's leave it there.

0:45:34.080 --> 0:45:36.960
<v Speaker 4>This has been another episode of the Outhoughts podcast. I'm

0:45:37.000 --> 0:45:40.040
<v Speaker 4>Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at Tracy Alloway.

0:45:40.080 --> 0:45:42.840
<v Speaker 3>And I'm Jill Wisenthal. You can follow me at the Stalwart.

0:45:43.000 --> 0:45:46.800
<v Speaker 3>Follow our guest David Fishman, he's at Pretentious What. Follow

0:45:46.840 --> 0:45:50.240
<v Speaker 3>our producers Carmen Rodriguez at Carman armand dash Ol Bennett

0:45:50.239 --> 0:45:53.359
<v Speaker 3>at Dashbot and Kilbrooks at Kilbrooks. Thank you to our

0:45:53.400 --> 0:45:56.760
<v Speaker 3>producer Moses Adam. From our Oddlots content. Go to Bloomberg

0:45:56.800 --> 0:45:59.160
<v Speaker 3>dot com slash oud lots, where we have transcripts, a

0:45:59.239 --> 0:46:02.120
<v Speaker 3>blog and a newsletter and you can chat about all

0:46:02.160 --> 0:46:05.680
<v Speaker 3>of these topics, including energy and China, where we have

0:46:05.719 --> 0:46:09.759
<v Speaker 3>two separate rooms in our discord Discord dot gg slash.

0:46:09.480 --> 0:46:11.680
<v Speaker 4>Out lots and if you enjoy all thoughts, if you

0:46:11.800 --> 0:46:14.960
<v Speaker 4>like it, when we talk about nuclear power plants in China.

0:46:15.040 --> 0:46:17.680
<v Speaker 4>Then please leave us a positive review on your favorite

0:46:17.680 --> 0:46:21.279
<v Speaker 4>podcast platform. And remember, if you are a Bloomberg subscriber,

0:46:21.360 --> 0:46:24.440
<v Speaker 4>you can listen to all of our episodes absolutely ad free.

0:46:24.760 --> 0:46:27.360
<v Speaker 4>All you need to do is connect your Bloomberg account

0:46:27.440 --> 0:46:29.960
<v Speaker 4>with Apple Podcasts. In order to do that, just find

0:46:29.960 --> 0:46:33.439
<v Speaker 4>the Bloomberg channel on Apple Podcasts and follow the instructions there.

0:46:33.760 --> 0:46:34.640
<v Speaker 4>Thanks for listening.

0:47:00.480 --> 0:47:00.719
<v Speaker 5>Eight