WEBVTT - Surveillance: Market Reality Check With Emanuel (Podcast)

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene Julie.

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>We bring you insight from the best in economics, financial investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course, on the Bloomberg Julian

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Emanuel joins us now of bt I G, the chief

0:00:29.720 --> 0:00:32.680
<v Speaker 1>equity and derisist strategist. Julian, let's just start with the

0:00:32.680 --> 0:00:35.760
<v Speaker 1>week we've just had and just pause for a moment. Monday,

0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:40.280
<v Speaker 1>positive vaccine news, this cyclical rotation that everyone was looking for.

0:00:40.400 --> 0:00:42.479
<v Speaker 1>We all want to live in the back half of one.

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:45.040
<v Speaker 1>It sounds so good that we're confronted with the reality

0:00:45.640 --> 0:00:47.639
<v Speaker 1>of the next few days. Can you walk me through

0:00:47.640 --> 0:00:50.160
<v Speaker 1>how you're navigating it. I've asked every single guest we've

0:00:50.159 --> 0:00:53.160
<v Speaker 1>had in this spot that question every single day. What's

0:00:53.159 --> 0:00:57.920
<v Speaker 1>your response. It's incredibly challenging, no doubt, And you know,

0:00:57.960 --> 0:01:01.000
<v Speaker 1>I think, to an outside observer or someone who landed

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:05.880
<v Speaker 1>from Mars, the idea that you could have profoundly great

0:01:05.959 --> 0:01:09.200
<v Speaker 1>news on Monday and have the top in the market

0:01:09.440 --> 0:01:11.760
<v Speaker 1>that looks to us like you know, it could be

0:01:11.800 --> 0:01:16.039
<v Speaker 1>the high for the year. UM is very counterintuitive, but

0:01:16.160 --> 0:01:20.080
<v Speaker 1>again that's the world of the financial world. But the

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:23.399
<v Speaker 1>reality is is that is that you have to get

0:01:23.480 --> 0:01:28.039
<v Speaker 1>through this transition period from you know, the hope of

0:01:28.120 --> 0:01:32.240
<v Speaker 1>the vaccine whenever that is with the reality of the

0:01:32.280 --> 0:01:36.199
<v Speaker 1>fact that you know, honestly the virus is really raking

0:01:36.280 --> 0:01:39.880
<v Speaker 1>out of control and that's the challenge UM and the

0:01:39.920 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 1>markets are just trying to digest it, and for now

0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:45.600
<v Speaker 1>it's it's really a standoff, which is not a bad

0:01:45.680 --> 0:01:48.840
<v Speaker 1>result to be perfectly frank, given the way the cases

0:01:48.880 --> 0:01:51.160
<v Speaker 1>are spiking. I mean, I look at this, Julian and

0:01:51.240 --> 0:01:53.400
<v Speaker 1>I think of the great Luisia Mata, who would talk

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:58.000
<v Speaker 1>about distribution. We've been distributing within this noise or September

0:01:58.000 --> 0:02:02.279
<v Speaker 1>in October, what's wrong going going flat for a while,

0:02:03.240 --> 0:02:05.960
<v Speaker 1>And nothing's wrong with it actually, and from our point

0:02:06.000 --> 0:02:10.240
<v Speaker 1>of view, you know, Bullmark gets correct in various ways.

0:02:10.440 --> 0:02:13.639
<v Speaker 1>You can have they correct in time, they correct in price,

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:17.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, literally if you look at it, the NASDAC

0:02:17.320 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 1>topped on September two, although the other industries made new

0:02:21.520 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 1>all time highs on Monday. This consolidation process has gone

0:02:25.600 --> 0:02:27.880
<v Speaker 1>on for a couple of months, and from our point

0:02:27.919 --> 0:02:32.240
<v Speaker 1>of view again sideways really given the news would not

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:34.640
<v Speaker 1>be a bad thing at all, because we do think

0:02:34.680 --> 0:02:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the setup for one is quite positive. Okay, Julian cause

0:02:38.919 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 1>a short term, long term quite positive. What does that

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:44.600
<v Speaker 1>mean as an investor more cash now looking for an

0:02:44.720 --> 0:02:48.920
<v Speaker 1>entry point? I know, I think what it means is

0:02:48.960 --> 0:02:51.680
<v Speaker 1>that if you first of all, we do believe in

0:02:51.680 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 1>the cyclical rotation, so we think you should be reducing

0:02:55.960 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 1>some of your exposure to high multiple, high growth, you know,

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 1>technology centric, the work from home names, because honestly, when

0:03:04.320 --> 0:03:08.400
<v Speaker 1>you get to a point where the vaccine becomes closer

0:03:08.440 --> 0:03:13.079
<v Speaker 1>to reality, that will cause an acceleration in the cyclical theme.

0:03:13.520 --> 0:03:18.079
<v Speaker 1>Rotate into financials. We think healthcare is an exceptionally interesting

0:03:18.120 --> 0:03:22.320
<v Speaker 1>proposition here, having been battered because of politics at trading

0:03:22.360 --> 0:03:26.720
<v Speaker 1>at an extreme discount um if you've got gains, we

0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:31.760
<v Speaker 1>think optionality is is very inexpensive downside protection but in

0:03:31.840 --> 0:03:35.880
<v Speaker 1>general patients is what's required. Well, let's talk about the

0:03:35.880 --> 0:03:38.400
<v Speaker 1>optionality Judy, and I just wonder if a different strategy

0:03:38.520 --> 0:03:40.200
<v Speaker 1>is the best approach here. It seems to me we've

0:03:40.240 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 1>had a series of head fakes over the last six

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:45.200
<v Speaker 1>to nine months. What you needed going into Monday was

0:03:45.240 --> 0:03:48.560
<v Speaker 1>the optionality on a cyclical move and then cash out

0:03:48.560 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Speaker 1>of it and go back to tech again. And it

0:03:50.440 --> 0:03:52.800
<v Speaker 1>seems to me that that's worked repeatedly, not just over

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:54.360
<v Speaker 1>the last six to nine months, but over the last

0:03:54.360 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 1>several years. Every time we've had the rotation head fake,

0:03:57.560 --> 0:03:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the people that have really benefited from that were the

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:01.520
<v Speaker 1>people that had to position going gone into the head

0:04:01.560 --> 0:04:03.680
<v Speaker 1>fight and I used everyone asked to fight out of it.

0:04:03.680 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 1>I caught up with Mike Collins a page Jim yesterday.

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 1>He was doing exactly that in credit. He had a

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:10.120
<v Speaker 1>stick could expose you got into this week used to

0:04:10.120 --> 0:04:12.240
<v Speaker 1>write to sell it down, Judy and wants that not

0:04:12.320 --> 0:04:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the better approach because again from our point of view,

0:04:16.960 --> 0:04:21.839
<v Speaker 1>the psychology factually began to change at the you know,

0:04:21.880 --> 0:04:25.839
<v Speaker 1>the really the the parabolic high in the NASDAC on

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:29.040
<v Speaker 1>September two, And we think that the market is giving

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:32.520
<v Speaker 1>you information when you look back to Monday with the

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:36.800
<v Speaker 1>NASDAK being the only major UH index that didn't make

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:39.679
<v Speaker 1>a new all time high, and when you look toward

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:43.159
<v Speaker 1>next year, the hope of a Washington that's going to

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:47.080
<v Speaker 1>be centrist, that's likely going to get stimulus over the line,

0:04:47.200 --> 0:04:50.719
<v Speaker 1>even if it unfortunately does have to wait till a

0:04:50.760 --> 0:04:54.560
<v Speaker 1>new session of Congress that might engage in infrastructure spending

0:04:54.920 --> 0:04:58.400
<v Speaker 1>and really taking down the temperature of Washington. All of

0:04:58.440 --> 0:05:01.159
<v Speaker 1>these things are going to backstop confidence, and we think

0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:04.600
<v Speaker 1>you get this cyclical recovery that not not only is

0:05:04.640 --> 0:05:08.080
<v Speaker 1>in the US, but as we've seen, the monetary authorities

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:11.240
<v Speaker 1>in Europe for one, are going to be as aggressive,

0:05:11.320 --> 0:05:13.520
<v Speaker 1>if not more than the US, And so you get

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the cyclical theme playing out in markets like Europe and Japan.

0:05:17.520 --> 0:05:20.240
<v Speaker 1>It's just a change of psychology. And we've seen a

0:05:20.279 --> 0:05:23.240
<v Speaker 1>massive momentum shift in the last week that we don't

0:05:23.240 --> 0:05:26.560
<v Speaker 1>think investors should be ignoring. Julian, how do you price

0:05:26.640 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 1>in economic scarring? And it stems from what we're experiencing

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 1>right now with the pandemic. So so that is really

0:05:33.120 --> 0:05:36.360
<v Speaker 1>the challenge of the concept. And I think part of

0:05:36.400 --> 0:05:39.760
<v Speaker 1>what that means is that and and this is typical

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:43.640
<v Speaker 1>coming out of recessions into recoveries, but it may be

0:05:43.680 --> 0:05:46.520
<v Speaker 1>more exaggerated this time, is that you get a degree

0:05:46.520 --> 0:05:49.640
<v Speaker 1>of multiple compression. Because if you get to a point

0:05:49.760 --> 0:05:54.360
<v Speaker 1>where the next three to six months you have permanent

0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:58.720
<v Speaker 1>business closures, and increase in in permanent job losses. That

0:05:58.800 --> 0:06:02.479
<v Speaker 1>means your long run potential shifts in and the the

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:04.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, the long run what used to be called

0:06:04.440 --> 0:06:08.720
<v Speaker 1>NEHRU shifts higher um and and that's a different mindset

0:06:09.000 --> 0:06:12.320
<v Speaker 1>given the fact that there's an expectation that that people

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:15.480
<v Speaker 1>think unemployment will eventually go back to three and a

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:17.880
<v Speaker 1>half or four percent, and that's not going to be

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:21.560
<v Speaker 1>the reality if we get economic scarring. Julian's thom has

0:06:21.560 --> 0:06:24.239
<v Speaker 1>been far too quiet for the past compliments for my liking,

0:06:24.240 --> 0:06:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Can we wind him up just a little bit and

0:06:25.560 --> 0:06:27.680
<v Speaker 1>can you give me your of you on Judy shout

0:06:27.760 --> 0:06:32.640
<v Speaker 1>to potentially being confirmed to the Federal Reserve. Well, John,

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it really just points to the fact that, uh,

0:06:36.560 --> 0:06:39.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, Washington has been a bit too political and

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:43.279
<v Speaker 1>a bit too backward looking these last several months, We

0:06:44.000 --> 0:06:47.240
<v Speaker 1>like j Powell, have been adamant in the need for

0:06:47.320 --> 0:06:52.680
<v Speaker 1>more stimulus, simply because I think backward looking into the

0:06:52.760 --> 0:06:55.720
<v Speaker 1>nineteenth century? Is there where your head? And Julian, well,

0:06:55.760 --> 0:06:59.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, Williams Jennings Bryan didn't want to uh parish

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:02.840
<v Speaker 1>on the cross of gold, but you know, frankly, the

0:07:02.839 --> 0:07:06.040
<v Speaker 1>gold windows shut with Richard Nixon, and and you know

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:09.480
<v Speaker 1>to look forward, and we need to get stimulus, and

0:07:09.520 --> 0:07:14.800
<v Speaker 1>we need to talk about the issues that not John,

0:07:14.840 --> 0:07:17.320
<v Speaker 1>I could tell that Julian's dresser behind him there with

0:07:17.400 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 1>a b T. I g just sign on it. He's

0:07:19.480 --> 0:07:23.680
<v Speaker 1>got a stack of Kruger Rans in that thing. It's

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:27.760
<v Speaker 1>great to get any money about that. I thank you said,

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:35.880
<v Speaker 1>he's one of our most acute voices on conservative more

0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:39.280
<v Speaker 1>long term investment, and he has been right right right

0:07:39.680 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 1>in this bullmarket. James Bevan, can you maintain your optimism

0:07:43.920 --> 0:07:48.600
<v Speaker 1>with the change pandemic? I certainly, Canton what I think

0:07:48.640 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 1>about fiscal policy. The big question is you have correctly articulated,

0:07:52.960 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 1>is whether or not we would see more spending to

0:07:55.280 --> 0:07:58.960
<v Speaker 1>get aside to the other side of the current economic downturn.

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:02.600
<v Speaker 1>And I believe interestingly, the government will now be prepared

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:06.480
<v Speaker 1>to spend more, precisely because the vaccine gives them confidence

0:08:06.640 --> 0:08:08.320
<v Speaker 1>that there really will be an end of the COVID

0:08:08.400 --> 0:08:11.840
<v Speaker 1>nineteen crisis in due course. That to me suggests that

0:08:11.880 --> 0:08:15.400
<v Speaker 1>we will see genuine economic recovery. We will see corporate

0:08:15.400 --> 0:08:19.000
<v Speaker 1>earnings growth, we will see investors had a more because

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 1>if I am correct, that the Central Bank will continue

0:08:22.480 --> 0:08:25.320
<v Speaker 1>to buy bonds, yields will stay low, well below the

0:08:25.400 --> 0:08:28.640
<v Speaker 1>race of inflation. That's great for the mathematics for equities,

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:31.880
<v Speaker 1>it's excellent for company balance sheets and quick clearly, it's

0:08:31.960 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 1>very supportive consumers that in due course will want to

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:37.600
<v Speaker 1>be able to spend a lot more money. James, Well,

0:08:37.640 --> 0:08:40.520
<v Speaker 1>you describe is working here in the United Kingdom, that

0:08:40.559 --> 0:08:43.640
<v Speaker 1>beautiful choreography between the Treasury at the Bank of England.

0:08:43.679 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Can you say the same thing about the US right now? Well,

0:08:47.160 --> 0:08:49.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, very interestingly, I think there was a broader

0:08:49.280 --> 0:08:52.320
<v Speaker 1>expectation that had there been a Blue sweep, we would

0:08:52.320 --> 0:08:56.040
<v Speaker 1>have seen Mr Biden asking and getting perhaps to two

0:08:56.040 --> 0:09:00.280
<v Speaker 1>and a half trillion dollars to spend on new fiscal sures.

0:09:00.400 --> 0:09:05.400
<v Speaker 1>And I d equally anticipate that the Biden presidency, coupled

0:09:05.480 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 1>with a Republican Senate, would have been far more tricky

0:09:09.320 --> 0:09:11.640
<v Speaker 1>in terms of what could be spent, and perhaps no

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:14.679
<v Speaker 1>more than half a trillion dollars. However, now that we

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:17.640
<v Speaker 1>have clarity that there is a vaccine and therefore and

0:09:17.679 --> 0:09:19.760
<v Speaker 1>then I think that Mr Biden will get an extra

0:09:19.840 --> 0:09:24.400
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars and that will make all the difference a trillion, James,

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:29.240
<v Speaker 1>what gives you the confidence? Well, I would say two things, John.

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:31.880
<v Speaker 1>I would say, first off, there is I think a

0:09:31.920 --> 0:09:36.080
<v Speaker 1>broad cross party acceptance in the States that the States

0:09:36.240 --> 0:09:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the government has to do more to end the challenge.

0:09:39.880 --> 0:09:42.600
<v Speaker 1>And I don't believe that the Republicans will wish to

0:09:42.800 --> 0:09:45.840
<v Speaker 1>kill the US economy because it will play very badly

0:09:46.040 --> 0:09:49.439
<v Speaker 1>for their future chances of election. I think the second

0:09:49.520 --> 0:09:52.679
<v Speaker 1>issue is that there is a subtle change in the

0:09:52.840 --> 0:09:57.640
<v Speaker 1>conversations that Jerome Piles having by federal Reserve policy. He's

0:09:57.679 --> 0:10:00.679
<v Speaker 1>made it clear that he supports a grace your quality

0:10:00.920 --> 0:10:03.679
<v Speaker 1>with the new US economy, and he's been very targeted

0:10:03.760 --> 0:10:06.760
<v Speaker 1>in terms of his support of the bond markets. This

0:10:06.800 --> 0:10:10.199
<v Speaker 1>is quantity of easing that is focused, that is challenging

0:10:10.440 --> 0:10:14.000
<v Speaker 1>that absolutely, I think is going to be providing the

0:10:14.040 --> 0:10:17.840
<v Speaker 1>base plate for continued low yields and therefore low cost

0:10:17.880 --> 0:10:22.200
<v Speaker 1>fiscal expansion. How much do your market calls hinge on

0:10:22.280 --> 0:10:25.160
<v Speaker 1>this expectation of fiscal support. I believe you're calling for

0:10:25.200 --> 0:10:28.959
<v Speaker 1>the SMP to reach thirty eight hundred by mid two

0:10:29.360 --> 0:10:32.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty one and four thousand by the end of the year. Yeah,

0:10:32.920 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm not overly dependent on fiscal support to get there

0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:39.240
<v Speaker 1>because the sorts of companies that I think that we

0:10:39.240 --> 0:10:43.240
<v Speaker 1>should be investing in our high quality companies. I mean,

0:10:43.320 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 1>you were talking prior to the break about the prospects

0:10:46.520 --> 0:10:49.560
<v Speaker 1>for Disney. Disney for me is a world class company,

0:10:49.600 --> 0:10:52.240
<v Speaker 1>and I would take the recent share price weakness there's

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:56.120
<v Speaker 1>an excellent entry opportunity for the long haul. Equally, if

0:10:56.160 --> 0:10:58.480
<v Speaker 1>I were to think about some of the great companies

0:10:58.520 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 1>in medical medical technology, I'm still a fan of Metronic

0:11:02.920 --> 0:11:05.880
<v Speaker 1>and Striker because these are companies that I think rise

0:11:05.960 --> 0:11:10.959
<v Speaker 1>from the ashes of share price markt. Dan's just positive, James,

0:11:10.960 --> 0:11:13.679
<v Speaker 1>this is an incredibly important inside folks. We haven't discussed

0:11:13.679 --> 0:11:15.960
<v Speaker 1>this ms A ten or fifteen days because of election

0:11:17.280 --> 0:11:21.199
<v Speaker 1>and the healthcare play. Everybody's simple by Johnson and Johnson,

0:11:21.200 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 1>and there's like three other names down, Components, etcetera. Take

0:11:24.360 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 1>us beneath that tell us about not the specifics of

0:11:27.600 --> 0:11:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Metronic or Striker, but the thematic play of those stacks.

0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:38.559
<v Speaker 1>Given Abiden administration, the first key issue is that as

0:11:38.640 --> 0:11:42.960
<v Speaker 1>people get older, so medical CAB becomes more complex. Were

0:11:43.120 --> 0:11:47.880
<v Speaker 1>into issues like parts replacement for hits, operations, were into

0:11:48.040 --> 0:11:52.319
<v Speaker 1>dialysis that the people who have challenges with their kidneys.

0:11:52.360 --> 0:11:54.920
<v Speaker 1>These are all issues where we will see an increasing

0:11:54.960 --> 0:11:57.600
<v Speaker 1>spend in the years ahead. In the wake of the

0:11:57.640 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 1>COVID nineteen crisis, it's called elect active operations, those where

0:12:01.800 --> 0:12:04.760
<v Speaker 1>people can choose if and when they have Such operations

0:12:04.960 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 1>were essentially shelved, and inevitably there was a big hit

0:12:09.280 --> 0:12:12.800
<v Speaker 1>short term earnings of people providing parts and facilities that

0:12:12.840 --> 0:12:15.760
<v Speaker 1>could be described as elective. If I am correct, the

0:12:15.840 --> 0:12:21.160
<v Speaker 1>vaccine leads the gradual reopening of elective surgery and medicinal state.

0:12:21.520 --> 0:12:24.920
<v Speaker 1>So I think will benefits Actually, James, will there be

0:12:24.960 --> 0:12:27.680
<v Speaker 1>a roll up of the industry. There's been roll ups

0:12:27.679 --> 0:12:29.760
<v Speaker 1>in other industries. What are we waiting for in the

0:12:29.840 --> 0:12:34.960
<v Speaker 1>health cares? In the health space, I certainly think there

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:38.920
<v Speaker 1>will be mergers and acquisitions activity because cash is cheap.

0:12:39.000 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm very very interesting. People talk about the extraordinary performance

0:12:42.559 --> 0:12:47.000
<v Speaker 1>of Alphabet, for example, and the Fangs. Actually in recent years,

0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Domino's Pizza that came to the market at the same

0:12:50.160 --> 0:12:54.640
<v Speaker 1>time in two thousand and four has thoroughly outperformed Alphabet,

0:12:54.720 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 1>and the reason it has done so is it has

0:12:56.440 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 1>a spent cash and issue debt to buy back its

0:12:59.240 --> 0:13:02.400
<v Speaker 1>own share, so it has magnified as earning. The market

0:13:02.559 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 1>has been pleased. If Alphabet had played the same game

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:08.840
<v Speaker 1>and get its parent sheet, it would really be reporting

0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:11.920
<v Speaker 1>earning twice at the current level. And I think this

0:13:12.000 --> 0:13:15.160
<v Speaker 1>issue of using cheap debt to fund them and a

0:13:15.400 --> 0:13:19.920
<v Speaker 1>to fund financial engineering is getting a continuous as long

0:13:19.960 --> 0:13:23.840
<v Speaker 1>as we have ample credit and lou cost debt. Jens

0:13:23.840 --> 0:13:26.199
<v Speaker 1>are gonna jump in quickly because you sound so constructive.

0:13:26.240 --> 0:13:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Just a final question for me on where you're playing

0:13:28.640 --> 0:13:32.040
<v Speaker 1>things right now. You sound optimistic, yet you're not playing

0:13:32.040 --> 0:13:34.079
<v Speaker 1>it through the European banks. Earlier this week when the

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:37.600
<v Speaker 1>optimism return, where did people go the European banks? Why

0:13:37.640 --> 0:13:40.720
<v Speaker 1>aren't you doing the same thing. I think that European

0:13:40.720 --> 0:13:44.559
<v Speaker 1>banks remain an accident waiting to happen. Negative interest rates

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:47.720
<v Speaker 1>mean that we have higher savings rates rather than more spending.

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 1>It's extraordinarily difficult for a bank to make money and

0:13:50.320 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 1>a climates negative interest rates, and I see no expectation

0:13:53.480 --> 0:13:55.559
<v Speaker 1>of the European Central Bank will come to the rescue.

0:13:57.000 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 1>James Bevan of c c l A just laying it

0:13:59.720 --> 0:14:01.640
<v Speaker 1>into the European banks at the end that James thank

0:14:01.679 --> 0:14:07.319
<v Speaker 1>you got to catch up new and virol on Twitter.

0:14:07.400 --> 0:14:10.200
<v Speaker 1>John W. Hopium the other day. Peter Hotez of Baylor

0:14:10.280 --> 0:14:13.640
<v Speaker 1>College of Medicine is the push of get back against Hopium.

0:14:13.640 --> 0:14:15.920
<v Speaker 1>He's in the reality of finding a vaccine. We'll look

0:14:15.960 --> 0:14:18.240
<v Speaker 1>at that in a minute. Peter Hotez, Can we have

0:14:18.280 --> 0:14:24.160
<v Speaker 1>any vaccine for anybody in America within the vicinity of January? Yeah?

0:14:24.240 --> 0:14:27.200
<v Speaker 1>I think so. Uh, we certainly won't have all seniors

0:14:27.280 --> 0:14:30.560
<v Speaker 1>vaccinated by January. You know what's gonna happen now is,

0:14:30.640 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 1>first of all, the face to be trial has to

0:14:32.840 --> 0:14:36.400
<v Speaker 1>be completed for that VISOR vaccine or other vaccines. Following

0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:40.760
<v Speaker 1>the VISOR one will get the full spectrum of safety

0:14:40.880 --> 0:14:44.880
<v Speaker 1>data and also the level of protection. Right now, we

0:14:44.960 --> 0:14:48.320
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen whether the vaccine protects against serious and infection

0:14:48.440 --> 0:14:50.640
<v Speaker 1>or not. I hope that's the case. And also we

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:53.520
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen the protection level in different groups, so we

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:55.600
<v Speaker 1>don't even know if it protects seniors yet, so we'll

0:14:55.600 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 1>have to All that information will come out towards the

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:01.960
<v Speaker 1>end of the year. The likely refriser will likely request

0:15:02.000 --> 0:15:05.080
<v Speaker 1>in emergency use authorization with the f d A. The

0:15:05.120 --> 0:15:07.440
<v Speaker 1>FDA will take a couple of weeks to review it

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:10.760
<v Speaker 1>and and UH certify that everything looks good, and then

0:15:10.920 --> 0:15:14.760
<v Speaker 1>starting in January, if everything looks good, they could start

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 1>potentially releasing vaccine. Friser says they'll have fifty million doses

0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:21.120
<v Speaker 1>by the end of the year. But remember in the

0:15:21.240 --> 0:15:23.320
<v Speaker 1>US it's only half of that's for the US, that's

0:15:23.360 --> 0:15:26.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty five million doses, and you require two doses of

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:30.200
<v Speaker 1>the vaccine, So in theory, you could start vaccinating around

0:15:30.240 --> 0:15:35.200
<v Speaker 1>twelve million Americans starting around Peter you Hotez and Botazi

0:15:35.480 --> 0:15:37.800
<v Speaker 1>what eight months ago, a year ago was talking up

0:15:37.840 --> 0:15:40.520
<v Speaker 1>low cost vaccines that don't need to be frozen to

0:15:40.600 --> 0:15:44.560
<v Speaker 1>negative ninety four degrees fahreneit we use fahrenheit John in America.

0:15:44.640 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Dr Hotez. Where are we on a low

0:15:47.840 --> 0:15:52.360
<v Speaker 1>cost vaccine? Well, thanks for asking. So we're hopefully we'll

0:15:52.400 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 1>announce for starting clinical trials UH in in India and

0:15:55.960 --> 0:15:59.600
<v Speaker 1>five sites and then we can move pretty quickly on

0:15:59.720 --> 0:16:03.520
<v Speaker 1>that UH And then right now biologically BIOE and Hyderabad

0:16:03.520 --> 0:16:07.800
<v Speaker 1>as producing one billion doses, so that's extraordinary. We've never

0:16:07.840 --> 0:16:10.920
<v Speaker 1>made a billion of anything before, so we're very excited.

0:16:10.960 --> 0:16:14.600
<v Speaker 1>This is a simple technology that's been around for almost

0:16:14.600 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 1>forty years. It uses the same technology used to make

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the recombinant hepatitis B vaccine made locally in many countries,

0:16:21.400 --> 0:16:24.760
<v Speaker 1>and hopefully it could be made for around a dollar

0:16:24.840 --> 0:16:27.800
<v Speaker 1>a dose or less. So so we're very excited about it.

0:16:27.800 --> 0:16:30.800
<v Speaker 1>It's looking really good and and hopefully that can fill

0:16:30.960 --> 0:16:32.720
<v Speaker 1>up the areas where it's going to be hard to

0:16:32.760 --> 0:16:35.480
<v Speaker 1>get that VISOR vaccine out because it does require that

0:16:35.520 --> 0:16:40.080
<v Speaker 1>deep deep freeze, which limits our ability to use that

0:16:40.240 --> 0:16:42.320
<v Speaker 1>to vaccinate around the world, and also some of the

0:16:42.360 --> 0:16:45.200
<v Speaker 1>production issues. So we're going to see is a pretty

0:16:45.480 --> 0:16:49.320
<v Speaker 1>complex ecosystem of at least half a dozen different vaccines

0:16:49.640 --> 0:16:51.640
<v Speaker 1>used all around the world. And there definitely is a

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:54.000
<v Speaker 1>lot more hope as some of these vaccines are shown

0:16:54.000 --> 0:16:56.240
<v Speaker 1>to be effective, and yet we are seeing the pandemic

0:16:56.280 --> 0:16:59.280
<v Speaker 1>worsen dramatically in some places in the United States, and

0:16:59.360 --> 0:17:02.600
<v Speaker 1>timing really matters. What is the time frame for you,

0:17:02.680 --> 0:17:05.080
<v Speaker 1>if it's not January for all seniors in the US,

0:17:05.400 --> 0:17:07.800
<v Speaker 1>as alex Azar says, what's the time frame for us

0:17:07.800 --> 0:17:10.000
<v Speaker 1>to get a critical mass of people in the United

0:17:10.000 --> 0:17:14.560
<v Speaker 1>States vaccinated? I hope by Q two will have will

0:17:14.600 --> 0:17:17.679
<v Speaker 1>really move in that direction. So by certainly by the

0:17:17.720 --> 0:17:21.160
<v Speaker 1>summer will be in much better shape than we are now. UH.

0:17:21.160 --> 0:17:23.640
<v Speaker 1>And and it assumes that there's no bumps in the road,

0:17:23.680 --> 0:17:25.520
<v Speaker 1>but of course there are always bumps in the road,

0:17:25.600 --> 0:17:28.480
<v Speaker 1>and and there's another there are other vaccines coming behind it.

0:17:28.560 --> 0:17:31.119
<v Speaker 1>So by the middle of next year, we're going to

0:17:31.200 --> 0:17:33.160
<v Speaker 1>be in a much better position. And that's why I've

0:17:33.200 --> 0:17:36.320
<v Speaker 1>been telling people UH to do everything you can to

0:17:36.400 --> 0:17:40.639
<v Speaker 1>be careful now for the next few months, because things

0:17:40.680 --> 0:17:43.680
<v Speaker 1>are going to get better. We're not asking UH for

0:17:44.320 --> 0:17:48.919
<v Speaker 1>UH for social distancing and mass and perpetuity will eventually

0:17:49.000 --> 0:17:51.960
<v Speaker 1>get to a better place, but just hang on and

0:17:52.080 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 1>don't do things that are reckless. To be careful and

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:57.119
<v Speaker 1>look after your loved ones for the next few months.

0:17:58.800 --> 0:18:01.240
<v Speaker 1>Many people shan't have you. Many people also who watch

0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:04.000
<v Speaker 1>and listen to this program followed a panel yesterday with

0:18:04.080 --> 0:18:06.680
<v Speaker 1>ECP President Christine the Guard, the Chairman of the Federal

0:18:06.720 --> 0:18:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Reserve J. Pale, and also the Governor of the Bank

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:10.560
<v Speaker 1>of England, Mr Bailey, And at the end of that

0:18:10.680 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 1>panel they were asked what they think are the biggest

0:18:12.720 --> 0:18:16.040
<v Speaker 1>risks right now. President the Guard brought up the mink

0:18:16.119 --> 0:18:19.920
<v Speaker 1>mutation in Denmark. Can you walk us through what you've

0:18:20.000 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 1>learned from that in the past week or so, doctor,

0:18:22.640 --> 0:18:26.920
<v Speaker 1>and how concerned we should be or shouldn't for that matter. Well,

0:18:27.000 --> 0:18:30.720
<v Speaker 1>remember our RNA viruses. This is an RNA virus, the

0:18:30.920 --> 0:18:35.720
<v Speaker 1>mutate and so far those mutate we've not seen any

0:18:35.760 --> 0:18:41.400
<v Speaker 1>evidence of those mutations are affecting transmissibility or severity of illness,

0:18:42.320 --> 0:18:46.080
<v Speaker 1>or the ability for those vaccines to cross protect. So

0:18:46.800 --> 0:18:50.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is a fast moving train. Things could change,

0:18:50.040 --> 0:18:52.480
<v Speaker 1>and things I'm saying today may look very different three

0:18:52.520 --> 0:18:55.480
<v Speaker 1>or four months for now, But right now, I would

0:18:55.480 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 1>say that the mutations that these virus undergoes on a

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 1>regular basis are not my top flight concern. I'm more

0:19:02.840 --> 0:19:05.679
<v Speaker 1>concerned that we can get some vaccine out to the

0:19:05.760 --> 0:19:08.200
<v Speaker 1>population because you know, in the US, we haven't really

0:19:08.240 --> 0:19:11.800
<v Speaker 1>had a national control program, so there's a complete reliance

0:19:11.840 --> 0:19:17.600
<v Speaker 1>on biotechnology solutions. Uh, let's get the US population vaccinated.

0:19:17.640 --> 0:19:21.159
<v Speaker 1>We have the virologists working on constantly looking at the

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 1>evolution of the virus. Hopefully those vaccines will still be effective.

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, one of the things that we're working on

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:29.919
<v Speaker 1>have been trying to get funding on for more than

0:19:29.960 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 1>a decade, but the world has not been interested is

0:19:32.880 --> 0:19:36.600
<v Speaker 1>creating a universal coronavirus vaccine. So you know, just like

0:19:36.640 --> 0:19:39.680
<v Speaker 1>there's work towards a universal flu vaccine. We've seen now

0:19:39.720 --> 0:19:42.639
<v Speaker 1>stars one in two thousand three, We've seen mayors in

0:19:42.680 --> 0:19:46.080
<v Speaker 1>two thousand twelve. Now we're seeing COVID nineteen. But guess

0:19:46.160 --> 0:19:48.440
<v Speaker 1>what we're gonna see COVID twenty five. We're gonna see

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:51.400
<v Speaker 1>COVID twenty eight. We're gonna see COVID thirty four. This

0:19:51.480 --> 0:19:54.040
<v Speaker 1>is a new normal. So if we don't have to

0:19:54.880 --> 0:19:57.679
<v Speaker 1>uh rush like a little kids soccer game towards the

0:19:57.720 --> 0:20:01.359
<v Speaker 1>ball every time a new coronaviru our submerges, that would

0:20:01.359 --> 0:20:04.360
<v Speaker 1>be great to develop a universal coronavirus vaccine. And we're

0:20:04.400 --> 0:20:08.800
<v Speaker 1>putting a lot of energy now into that goal. So

0:20:08.920 --> 0:20:10.720
<v Speaker 1>bring word to the end that Delta. I appreciate your

0:20:10.760 --> 0:20:12.399
<v Speaker 1>time this morning. Thank you to pay to how it

0:20:12.440 --> 0:20:19.720
<v Speaker 1>says that of Bayla College of Medicine, we go Washington

0:20:19.800 --> 0:20:22.040
<v Speaker 1>policy on d But we can't do that with Henry

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 1>had a trade. She's not up a speed on bitcoin,

0:20:24.359 --> 0:20:27.399
<v Speaker 1>but she is with Veta Partners on the path forward.

0:20:27.880 --> 0:20:31.159
<v Speaker 1>You know, I look Henrietta where we are now. Everybody

0:20:31.200 --> 0:20:34.600
<v Speaker 1>wants to hear from their president of supporters is not supporters,

0:20:34.680 --> 0:20:39.960
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. Is there any optimism of policy towards this

0:20:40.119 --> 0:20:45.800
<v Speaker 1>pandemic and towards a government shutdown December twelve? I see

0:20:46.080 --> 0:20:50.000
<v Speaker 1>very small pockets of optimism. Unfortunately, we have to keep

0:20:50.040 --> 0:20:53.240
<v Speaker 1>talking about elections, namely the two Senate races in Georgia

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:56.760
<v Speaker 1>that could be a driver for conversations around a very

0:20:56.840 --> 0:20:59.840
<v Speaker 1>small package of stimulus in the lame duck session. And

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:02.399
<v Speaker 1>you just pointed out the continuing Resolution to fund the

0:21:02.400 --> 0:21:04.960
<v Speaker 1>government needs to pass by December eleventh, and the two

0:21:04.960 --> 0:21:06.679
<v Speaker 1>senators in Georgia are going to need to show that

0:21:06.680 --> 0:21:09.760
<v Speaker 1>they're making some sort of progress on the coronavirus, especially

0:21:09.800 --> 0:21:12.959
<v Speaker 1>as everybody heads home or tries to engage with their

0:21:13.000 --> 0:21:16.400
<v Speaker 1>family members and Thanksgiving and the cases continue to skyrocket.

0:21:16.720 --> 0:21:19.879
<v Speaker 1>I wonder. And I've heard directly from some folks in

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:23.600
<v Speaker 1>the various senators offices in Georgia that they'd like to

0:21:23.640 --> 0:21:27.840
<v Speaker 1>take some votes on particularly extending the PPP program and

0:21:27.880 --> 0:21:31.159
<v Speaker 1>potentially providing airline aid, given that Atlanta obviously is a

0:21:31.240 --> 0:21:33.800
<v Speaker 1>huge airline. Okay, so they gotta win. They got to

0:21:33.840 --> 0:21:36.960
<v Speaker 1>win the vote in Hartsfield. I get it. What are

0:21:36.960 --> 0:21:40.320
<v Speaker 1>we going to do about which is clearly the negotiated

0:21:40.359 --> 0:21:43.840
<v Speaker 1>stumbling block, which is the big cities, the big towns

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 1>across this nation. Nothing until the first quarter of next year.

0:21:48.200 --> 0:21:50.879
<v Speaker 1>I don't see a state local aid package happening. I

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:54.439
<v Speaker 1>don't see aid to mass transit or public rail or

0:21:54.440 --> 0:21:57.920
<v Speaker 1>anything like that. Um, I think that's the first quarter event.

0:21:57.960 --> 0:22:00.679
<v Speaker 1>I think it needs to be done before mark. We

0:22:00.720 --> 0:22:03.399
<v Speaker 1>saw the two thousand nine Recovery Act get passed. I

0:22:03.400 --> 0:22:06.720
<v Speaker 1>think it was February. That's exactly the kind of momentum

0:22:06.800 --> 0:22:10.000
<v Speaker 1>that President Biden will need to bring to the table

0:22:10.240 --> 0:22:12.240
<v Speaker 1>in order to get sixty votes out of the Senate

0:22:12.280 --> 0:22:15.120
<v Speaker 1>in the first quarter next year. But no big aid

0:22:15.160 --> 0:22:18.520
<v Speaker 1>package is passing before the next Congress is sworn in.

0:22:18.840 --> 0:22:21.399
<v Speaker 1>So that's the side in the domestic sphere. When we

0:22:21.440 --> 0:22:24.840
<v Speaker 1>talk about the fiscal backdrop for the United States. Let's

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:28.560
<v Speaker 1>talk international. Let's talk China coming out and congratulating Joe

0:22:28.600 --> 0:22:31.399
<v Speaker 1>Biden for being the next president of the United States.

0:22:31.400 --> 0:22:35.760
<v Speaker 1>They had actually restrained themselves from doing so. How coincidental

0:22:35.880 --> 0:22:38.920
<v Speaker 1>is it that this comes right after President Trump announces

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:42.679
<v Speaker 1>some further restrictions on investments in Chinese entities. Not at

0:22:42.720 --> 0:22:45.359
<v Speaker 1>all I mean, you guys nailed it in your last segment.

0:22:45.400 --> 0:22:50.639
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's remotely coincidental that the acknowledgement of

0:22:50.680 --> 0:22:54.080
<v Speaker 1>President like Biden having won the election came and coincided

0:22:54.440 --> 0:22:57.159
<v Speaker 1>almost exactly in the same process. You know, twelve and

0:22:57.200 --> 0:22:59.600
<v Speaker 1>or twenty four hours later, from every phase in the

0:22:59.680 --> 0:23:03.280
<v Speaker 1>US China trade war, whether it was tariffs or announcements

0:23:03.280 --> 0:23:06.800
<v Speaker 1>around quawe or export control restrictions, every time the President

0:23:06.840 --> 0:23:09.439
<v Speaker 1>did anything, there about twelve hours later we get a

0:23:09.440 --> 0:23:12.480
<v Speaker 1>response from China. And that's exactly what we got last night. UM.

0:23:12.520 --> 0:23:15.119
<v Speaker 1>I think the most important cabinet official to watch in

0:23:16.359 --> 0:23:19.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, people are concentrating on Treasury and Commerce and State,

0:23:20.000 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 1>and I respect that, I get it. I think the

0:23:22.080 --> 0:23:23.880
<v Speaker 1>most exciting is who's going to be the ut next

0:23:23.960 --> 0:23:27.480
<v Speaker 1>US trade representative. UM, that person is going to inherit.

0:23:27.560 --> 0:23:29.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, over three hundred billion dollars worth the tariffs

0:23:29.880 --> 0:23:32.480
<v Speaker 1>on China, and that's gonna be as soon as we

0:23:32.560 --> 0:23:35.040
<v Speaker 1>get past the stimulus conversation. I think probably the only

0:23:35.119 --> 0:23:38.359
<v Speaker 1>jofiic in DC, aside from regulatory changes that we have

0:23:38.440 --> 0:23:40.040
<v Speaker 1>for the next three and a half years. That's where

0:23:40.040 --> 0:23:42.400
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to go. How does Joe Biden respond to this,

0:23:42.560 --> 0:23:45.840
<v Speaker 1>because frankly, there's bipartisan agreement on taking a harder line

0:23:45.880 --> 0:23:48.600
<v Speaker 1>with China. Does he embrace this or does he push

0:23:48.680 --> 0:23:50.679
<v Speaker 1>back and try to indicate that he's going to take

0:23:50.680 --> 0:23:54.320
<v Speaker 1>a similarly hard line as President Trump. There was a

0:23:54.359 --> 0:23:56.280
<v Speaker 1>line that I heard from the Chief of Staff in

0:23:56.320 --> 0:23:58.320
<v Speaker 1>the Ways of Means Committee on the Trade Subcommittee a

0:23:58.320 --> 0:24:01.199
<v Speaker 1>couple of months back, and effectively she said, you know,

0:24:01.320 --> 0:24:04.840
<v Speaker 1>when we see the President imposing tariffs on China, we think, well, great,

0:24:04.920 --> 0:24:07.960
<v Speaker 1>he's doing the hard work for us. Now when President

0:24:08.000 --> 0:24:11.159
<v Speaker 1>Biden comes in, he is in a position to offer

0:24:11.240 --> 0:24:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the carrots and not necessarily need to impose more sticks.

0:24:14.280 --> 0:24:17.399
<v Speaker 1>So as China and the US engage and start to

0:24:17.400 --> 0:24:20.320
<v Speaker 1>talk about real fundamental forms, not you know, buying more

0:24:20.320 --> 0:24:24.600
<v Speaker 1>soybeans or more pork bellies, but actually instituting um um

0:24:25.040 --> 0:24:29.160
<v Speaker 1>intellectual property theft changes um and forced tech transfer, they

0:24:29.160 --> 0:24:32.560
<v Speaker 1>can walk down the tariffs eventually. We've heard from the

0:24:32.600 --> 0:24:36.639
<v Speaker 1>Biden transition team repeatedly now that they're going to first

0:24:36.640 --> 0:24:39.399
<v Speaker 1>focus on domestic priorities, so stimulus all day in the

0:24:39.400 --> 0:24:41.960
<v Speaker 1>first quarter. But as we get beyond that and we

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:44.800
<v Speaker 1>start to you know, re engage with China or the EU,

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:48.480
<v Speaker 1>or Japan or the UK and hash out these trade agreements.

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:51.800
<v Speaker 1>There needs to be a substantive discussion that I think

0:24:51.800 --> 0:24:54.399
<v Speaker 1>will dominate the next three years. Henrietta, thank you so

0:24:54.480 --> 0:24:56.680
<v Speaker 1>much to Tray as a policy briefing. She's with the

0:24:56.760 --> 0:25:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Data Partners. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast.

0:25:00.960 --> 0:25:05.879
<v Speaker 1>Subscribe and listen to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or

0:25:06.040 --> 0:25:10.359
<v Speaker 1>whichever podcast platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at Tom

0:25:10.480 --> 0:25:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Keene before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide.

0:25:14.800 --> 0:25:15.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm Bloomberg Radio