WEBVTT - Populism is Resentment of Elites, Schneider Says

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Jai Ley. We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg Joining

0:00:32.960 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 1>us in New York. I'm really pleased to say is

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:38.400
<v Speaker 1>cal Windberg, High Frequency Economics, chief economist and managing director,

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:40.760
<v Speaker 1>and he joins us right now. Good morning to you, Carl.

0:00:41.000 --> 0:00:42.919
<v Speaker 1>Pleasure to be here, Thanks for having me on. It's

0:00:42.960 --> 0:00:45.239
<v Speaker 1>the trade war on hold and for how long will

0:00:45.280 --> 0:00:47.240
<v Speaker 1>it be on hold? It is on hold, it will

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:49.479
<v Speaker 1>be on hold until it's not on hold. There's no

0:00:49.520 --> 0:00:52.440
<v Speaker 1>reason to suspect that it's going to go either well

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:56.640
<v Speaker 1>or badly. The scorecard is this. I think China is

0:00:56.680 --> 0:00:59.560
<v Speaker 1>having its way with the United States in this conversation,

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:03.400
<v Speaker 1>and this was a backdown by the United States. It

0:01:03.440 --> 0:01:06.840
<v Speaker 1>avoids a conflict, the tariff war that would have been

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:09.480
<v Speaker 1>to everybody's disadvantage, and it gives people a time to

0:01:09.520 --> 0:01:11.480
<v Speaker 1>cool off. So I'm all in favor of it, and

0:01:11.520 --> 0:01:13.880
<v Speaker 1>I hope it less and I hope that China and

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:16.319
<v Speaker 1>the United States can learn to work together rather than

0:01:16.520 --> 0:01:18.840
<v Speaker 1>knock each other's heads. Well, we can discuss how long

0:01:18.920 --> 0:01:22.319
<v Speaker 1>last thing it might be. Finalists explore the vague commitments

0:01:22.360 --> 0:01:27.680
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese pledging to to rebalance the disparity between Chinese

0:01:27.680 --> 0:01:31.440
<v Speaker 1>and the United States trade surplus. Um, how firm is

0:01:31.480 --> 0:01:34.160
<v Speaker 1>that commitment to rebalance that? And what are you expecting

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:38.720
<v Speaker 1>to see? Car We've send commitments to boost imports of energy, agriculture.

0:01:38.959 --> 0:01:41.479
<v Speaker 1>Are they good things? Yeah, well, they'd be good things

0:01:41.520 --> 0:01:43.840
<v Speaker 1>if they would happen. I don't know exactly how you

0:01:44.080 --> 0:01:46.759
<v Speaker 1>make them happen. I remember John Maynard. I remember reading

0:01:46.760 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 1>about John Maynard Keynes talking to bertel Lean about why

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Germany doesn't export more? You know, why doesn't Germany export

0:01:53.600 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 1>were And his idea was that Germany had to impoverage

0:01:56.240 --> 0:01:58.840
<v Speaker 1>its workers to make all of its stuff cheaper. Um.

0:01:58.920 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 1>I think at the end of the day, you know,

0:02:00.400 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the United States has to produce more stuff that China wants.

0:02:03.320 --> 0:02:06.720
<v Speaker 1>We have stuff that China wants on the technology side,

0:02:06.440 --> 0:02:08.480
<v Speaker 1>and we're not selling it to them, and that would

0:02:08.520 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 1>be one way to reduce all of this. And that's

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:12.679
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese point. And as I said, I think the

0:02:12.760 --> 0:02:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Chinese are really having their way in this conversation. What

0:02:15.080 --> 0:02:17.600
<v Speaker 1>I talk about to what extent the Chinese, the commitments

0:02:17.600 --> 0:02:20.400
<v Speaker 1>of the weekend, how much of that is just an organic,

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:23.280
<v Speaker 1>natural consequence of more growth in China that they will

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:26.600
<v Speaker 1>need more foreign agricultural goods, they will need more foreign

0:02:26.680 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 1>energy sources as well. Undoubtedly that's going to growth, is

0:02:30.240 --> 0:02:33.400
<v Speaker 1>going to help move this conversation forward. They've agreed to

0:02:33.400 --> 0:02:36.080
<v Speaker 1>buy things like energy. All right, we make energy, we

0:02:36.120 --> 0:02:38.760
<v Speaker 1>export energy now in the United States, that's new. We

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:41.799
<v Speaker 1>have a comparative advantage and if you will over China,

0:02:42.160 --> 0:02:44.240
<v Speaker 1>and so therefore we're going to sell some more of it.

0:02:44.280 --> 0:02:46.920
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's kind of a natural evolution. I

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:49.240
<v Speaker 1>really do believe that a lot of the substance of

0:02:49.280 --> 0:02:51.840
<v Speaker 1>what we've seen this weekend is really just a face

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:54.560
<v Speaker 1>saving way for both sides to down from the cliff

0:02:55.280 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 1>any real commitment to do anything. It just gives everybody

0:02:58.040 --> 0:03:00.120
<v Speaker 1>a way to say, okay, just kidding ha ha, to

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:03.359
<v Speaker 1>move on with the conversation. I strongly agree. And then

0:03:03.400 --> 0:03:08.440
<v Speaker 1>within the face saving Dr Weinberg is the timeline and

0:03:08.480 --> 0:03:13.240
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese have every advantage, don't they don't They just wait, well,

0:03:13.240 --> 0:03:15.920
<v Speaker 1>they're growing at in a bad year at just under

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:18.120
<v Speaker 1>seven percent, and the United States and the good year

0:03:18.200 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 1>is growing at two and a half percent. So you

0:03:20.400 --> 0:03:22.160
<v Speaker 1>do the math on that, and you start off with

0:03:22.680 --> 0:03:25.400
<v Speaker 1>China slightly larger than the U. S economy in terms

0:03:25.400 --> 0:03:28.240
<v Speaker 1>of converting looking at its economy in terms of the

0:03:28.240 --> 0:03:30.440
<v Speaker 1>purchasing power of the money rather than the exchange right

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:32.239
<v Speaker 1>the way the World Bank looks at it. So they're

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:34.720
<v Speaker 1>already the largest economy on Earth, and they're just going

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 1>to pull farther and farther ahead with their silk root.

0:03:38.280 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Their exports are going to grow faster and faster than

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the United States. They have already become the largest economy

0:03:44.080 --> 0:03:46.720
<v Speaker 1>on Earth, and they're on track to become the dominant economy.

0:03:46.720 --> 0:03:48.840
<v Speaker 1>But it was going to pay the the trade hawks.

0:03:48.840 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 1>What they really wanted was not just to rebounance the

0:03:50.960 --> 0:03:52.840
<v Speaker 1>trade surplus. It was to go after made and shine,

0:03:54.080 --> 0:03:57.440
<v Speaker 1>to go after the protected industries that they want to

0:03:57.480 --> 0:04:01.000
<v Speaker 1>dominate on a worldwide basis. Have we seen a big

0:04:01.040 --> 0:04:06.160
<v Speaker 1>loss for Navarro, Wilbur Ross, and Mr Your good question,

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Greg Villier posits in his Morning Note that Mr Leightheiser

0:04:10.200 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 1>and Mr Navarro may resign. Yeah, I actually saw the

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 1>same thing in his morning you did, and yeah, you

0:04:15.640 --> 0:04:19.120
<v Speaker 1>were read in and that's very read in. Um, cow

0:04:19.680 --> 0:04:22.240
<v Speaker 1>cow To what extent is it a loss for them

0:04:22.279 --> 0:04:24.719
<v Speaker 1>over the weekend? And also I should add to what

0:04:24.839 --> 0:04:28.080
<v Speaker 1>extent is this actually about a foreign policy goal that

0:04:28.120 --> 0:04:31.040
<v Speaker 1>could come about next month when the United States sits

0:04:31.040 --> 0:04:34.040
<v Speaker 1>down with North Korea? Yeah? So, um, there's a lot

0:04:34.080 --> 0:04:36.560
<v Speaker 1>of questions in the question that you raised, right, I

0:04:36.560 --> 0:04:40.560
<v Speaker 1>mean Navarro, Uh, In my view, all right, his point

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:43.720
<v Speaker 1>of view has always been wrong. So to have him

0:04:43.760 --> 0:04:46.640
<v Speaker 1>excluded from the administration because what he's doing is not

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:48.360
<v Speaker 1>working on what he wants to do is not going

0:04:48.400 --> 0:04:50.920
<v Speaker 1>to work, all right, that's a logical extension. It's an

0:04:50.920 --> 0:04:53.800
<v Speaker 1>evolutionary sort of thing. It's not a revolutionary sort of thing.

0:04:54.200 --> 0:04:56.440
<v Speaker 1>But I think that his Mercanti listen approach to U

0:04:56.520 --> 0:04:58.640
<v Speaker 1>S trade is just is just off as far as

0:04:58.720 --> 0:05:01.240
<v Speaker 1>North Korea is concerned. I think the Chinese have a

0:05:01.320 --> 0:05:04.000
<v Speaker 1>very clear upper hand here. The Chinese are saying to

0:05:04.040 --> 0:05:06.719
<v Speaker 1>the North Koreans, you know, we'll give you what you want,

0:05:07.040 --> 0:05:08.719
<v Speaker 1>do what we want you to do, which is to

0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:12.080
<v Speaker 1>make friends with South Korea, and then to annex yourself

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:14.920
<v Speaker 1>to what we're doing, and that moves South Korea out

0:05:14.960 --> 0:05:17.520
<v Speaker 1>of the US fold. Carl, I want to rip up

0:05:17.560 --> 0:05:19.479
<v Speaker 1>the script, and I know we can do this with

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:22.680
<v Speaker 1>you because you're prodigious in your your history and ability.

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:25.239
<v Speaker 1>We have a merger this morning which is pretty cut

0:05:25.240 --> 0:05:29.320
<v Speaker 1>and dry, and it's all these alphabets ge to my

0:05:29.440 --> 0:05:33.000
<v Speaker 1>web co for what is it, John eleven billion dollars

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:36.479
<v Speaker 1>something like that after tax benefits ten billion dollars. But

0:05:36.600 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 1>this barely describes the G Transportation flat out. Its back

0:05:41.320 --> 0:05:43.240
<v Speaker 1>is going to be taken out where g E owns

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:48.919
<v Speaker 1>fifte of the Westinghouse break Company of eighteen sixty nine

0:05:49.600 --> 0:05:53.279
<v Speaker 1>in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Outside of Pittsburgh as well. And the

0:05:53.440 --> 0:05:59.640
<v Speaker 1>fact is these are multi national companies. There are perfect

0:05:59.839 --> 0:06:06.560
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing example of a true multinational vision, which I would

0:06:06.560 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 1>suggest the President looks at as a discreet, uh domestic

0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:15.960
<v Speaker 1>company outside Pittsburgh. They're not just another break company outside Pittsburgh,

0:06:15.960 --> 0:06:19.040
<v Speaker 1>are they. They're truly multinational. Yeah. I think what you're

0:06:19.080 --> 0:06:22.440
<v Speaker 1>hitting on, Tom is the education that this administration is getting,

0:06:22.760 --> 0:06:25.840
<v Speaker 1>which is that trade is not a domestic issue, all right,

0:06:25.920 --> 0:06:29.440
<v Speaker 1>but most American business is multinational. I mean even my

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:33.800
<v Speaker 1>little business does two thirds of its revenues come from overseas.

0:06:34.120 --> 0:06:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Production chains are linked. You know, you go after NAFTA,

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:40.200
<v Speaker 1>for example, as the current administration has, and suddenly they

0:06:40.200 --> 0:06:43.760
<v Speaker 1>allotmobile manufacturers, a core industry in the United States, are saying, WHOA,

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:46.560
<v Speaker 1>this affects us. We have to to rope it back

0:06:46.600 --> 0:06:49.000
<v Speaker 1>in so that our core businesses aren't affected and the

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:51.760
<v Speaker 1>whole economy isn't affected. So I think there's an educational

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:54.440
<v Speaker 1>process going on within the administration, which is why the

0:06:54.520 --> 0:06:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Navarros maybe stepping to this being pushed to the side,

0:06:57.680 --> 0:07:00.400
<v Speaker 1>and bigger, more adults are coming into the and John,

0:07:00.440 --> 0:07:03.200
<v Speaker 1>what's so important about this is I'm going to assume

0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 1>within transportation and trains and breaks it's wildly competitive, there's

0:07:10.920 --> 0:07:14.000
<v Speaker 1>got to be like five but from bidding on the

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:17.760
<v Speaker 1>next train, away from the specifics of one particular industry,

0:07:17.880 --> 0:07:20.160
<v Speaker 1>this was always about whether you want to maintain the

0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 1>status quote, not maintain free trade because we don't have

0:07:22.760 --> 0:07:25.760
<v Speaker 1>free trade. Was about whether you maintain the status quo.

0:07:25.840 --> 0:07:29.800
<v Speaker 1>And multinationals in the United States quite clearly benefit from

0:07:29.840 --> 0:07:32.360
<v Speaker 1>the status quot and the view in the C suite

0:07:32.440 --> 0:07:34.360
<v Speaker 1>is don't take the risk with the status quote to

0:07:34.400 --> 0:07:37.680
<v Speaker 1>open up Chinese markets aggressively. They will over time. We

0:07:37.720 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 1>can wait. We make enough money as it is. This

0:07:40.120 --> 0:07:43.600
<v Speaker 1>administration took a very different stance. This administration looked at

0:07:43.600 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese, a very protectionist regime that has leached on

0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:49.960
<v Speaker 1>global trade for over a decade now and more, and said,

0:07:49.960 --> 0:07:52.960
<v Speaker 1>we need to do something aggressively. Now, Carl, as you

0:07:52.960 --> 0:07:54.960
<v Speaker 1>sit there is a business owner that benefits from the

0:07:55.000 --> 0:07:58.160
<v Speaker 1>status quo. Are you basically saying that you're not happy

0:07:58.200 --> 0:08:01.440
<v Speaker 1>with this administration taking the risk aggressively opening up Chinese

0:08:01.480 --> 0:08:04.679
<v Speaker 1>markets when the downside is the status quot could become

0:08:04.920 --> 0:08:08.160
<v Speaker 1>something much much worse. Yeah, well, I think that uh

0:08:08.840 --> 0:08:11.360
<v Speaker 1>ripping up the script, as Tom likes to say, without

0:08:11.360 --> 0:08:13.360
<v Speaker 1>having a new script in its place, is a risky

0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:16.280
<v Speaker 1>business right, And Tom can get away with it because

0:08:16.280 --> 0:08:20.360
<v Speaker 1>he's Tom. But the US economic policy can't get away

0:08:20.360 --> 0:08:23.160
<v Speaker 1>with it because there are many more complicated moving parts.

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:26.280
<v Speaker 1>And to my mind, the fault in this area of

0:08:26.320 --> 0:08:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the Trump administration has been that they've been willing to

0:08:29.720 --> 0:08:32.360
<v Speaker 1>take things off the table and to break things up,

0:08:32.400 --> 0:08:35.600
<v Speaker 1>to remove elements from pieces from the puzzle without having

0:08:35.640 --> 0:08:38.200
<v Speaker 1>replacement pieces ready to go. And that's been true of

0:08:38.200 --> 0:08:40.679
<v Speaker 1>the China policy. It's been true of NAFTA, where we're

0:08:40.679 --> 0:08:43.000
<v Speaker 1>now seeing them reel that back in as well. All right,

0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:45.520
<v Speaker 1>it was true of Transpacific Partnership where suddenly we want

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:47.280
<v Speaker 1>to get back in and again it's it's true of

0:08:47.360 --> 0:08:50.080
<v Speaker 1>so many things, because you can't leave a vacuum, because

0:08:50.080 --> 0:08:53.120
<v Speaker 1>if you leave a void, someone like China will step

0:08:53.160 --> 0:08:56.040
<v Speaker 1>into it and fill it for you. Fantastic to have

0:08:56.080 --> 0:08:58.480
<v Speaker 1>you with this this this morning, and really appreciate your time.

0:08:58.559 --> 0:09:16.080
<v Speaker 1>High Frequency Economics Chief Economists and Managing Directory. The book

0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:21.559
<v Speaker 1>is standoff How America became ungovernable, governable. But what matters

0:09:21.679 --> 0:09:25.200
<v Speaker 1>is the author is Bill Schneider. He has definitively put

0:09:25.280 --> 0:09:29.880
<v Speaker 1>history first in our review of America are politics and

0:09:29.880 --> 0:09:32.320
<v Speaker 1>of course the chaos that we're in right now. I

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:34.520
<v Speaker 1>love the blurb at the beginning. In a little more

0:09:34.520 --> 0:09:39.520
<v Speaker 1>than fifty years, America policies have gone from Camelot to

0:09:39.640 --> 0:09:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Game of Thrones. I guess that really says it all,

0:09:42.280 --> 0:09:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Bill Schneider. Game of Thrones, which character is President Trump playing?

0:09:46.120 --> 0:09:48.080
<v Speaker 1>I haven't seen the game of you're the only one

0:09:48.080 --> 0:09:50.480
<v Speaker 1>who has it, but the but the answer is the

0:09:50.559 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 1>chaos that's out there. We've seen before. How do you

0:09:54.360 --> 0:09:58.360
<v Speaker 1>get beyond whether someone's a Republican, Democrat, whatever, How do

0:09:58.440 --> 0:10:02.160
<v Speaker 1>we get beyond where we are out to something bordering

0:10:02.200 --> 0:10:06.720
<v Speaker 1>on civility and stability? Normally, the answer is a crisis.

0:10:07.040 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 1>We're a system that's very difficult to govern. We were

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:12.280
<v Speaker 1>designed not to be easy to govern. When there's a crisis,

0:10:12.320 --> 0:10:15.760
<v Speaker 1>everything comes into place. You know. For one year after

0:10:15.840 --> 0:10:19.320
<v Speaker 1>nine eleven, Democrats supported President Bush and the country. It

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:22.319
<v Speaker 1>looked like a consensus was being built because there was

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:24.600
<v Speaker 1>a crisis in the world and in the United States.

0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:27.400
<v Speaker 1>It didn't last very long because a year after nine eleven,

0:10:27.640 --> 0:10:31.120
<v Speaker 1>President Bush started the rollout for the Iraq War and

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:35.439
<v Speaker 1>all the old division surfaced once again. I look at

0:10:35.480 --> 0:10:37.520
<v Speaker 1>where we are and helped John Farrell here, the young

0:10:37.559 --> 0:10:41.359
<v Speaker 1>man from the United Kingdom, and that there's this populism

0:10:41.400 --> 0:10:43.920
<v Speaker 1>mood that's out there. We see it everywhere. What is

0:10:43.960 --> 0:10:48.680
<v Speaker 1>the flavor of populism that is the standoff of American politics.

0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:52.960
<v Speaker 1>The flavor of populism is resentment of elites, that's very deep,

0:10:53.000 --> 0:10:55.960
<v Speaker 1>resentments of big word here is and resentment. Yeah, there's

0:10:55.960 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of resentment. Uh. And in the United States.

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:04.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, the constituency that Trump mobilized are basically people

0:11:04.520 --> 0:11:08.800
<v Speaker 1>who feel disrespected. They went into a rage over President Obama.

0:11:09.320 --> 0:11:12.360
<v Speaker 1>They called it the Ray the reign of political correctness,

0:11:12.400 --> 0:11:16.400
<v Speaker 1>because political correctness is the belief in diversity and inclusion,

0:11:16.720 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of these working class white men think

0:11:19.600 --> 0:11:22.839
<v Speaker 1>inclusion does not include them. That's a really interesting point.

0:11:23.120 --> 0:11:25.880
<v Speaker 1>And so your point, Bill. We've had full presidents two

0:11:25.920 --> 0:11:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Democrats to Republicans that have promised to unite and to

0:11:30.080 --> 0:11:34.040
<v Speaker 1>heal and totally not only failed. Why it's so different

0:11:34.080 --> 0:11:36.680
<v Speaker 1>this time around. We have a president who is governing

0:11:36.720 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 1>by dividing. Uh. President Trump is doing something no other

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:44.280
<v Speaker 1>president has done. He ran as a divider by mobilizing

0:11:44.320 --> 0:11:48.360
<v Speaker 1>this angry constituency that feels disrespected. Remember Hillary Clinton called

0:11:48.400 --> 0:11:53.200
<v Speaker 1>them a basket of deplorables. Well, they erupted then in

0:11:53.280 --> 0:11:55.600
<v Speaker 1>that campaign. Uh. And they feel as if no one

0:11:55.640 --> 0:11:58.719
<v Speaker 1>is paying attention to them. The economy that affects them

0:11:58.800 --> 0:12:02.720
<v Speaker 1>is fail ing. Uh. And these people have no place

0:12:02.720 --> 0:12:06.280
<v Speaker 1>in a world of political correctness. Can't he deliver for them?

0:12:06.400 --> 0:12:09.360
<v Speaker 1>We don't know yet. Uh. He the economy is moving

0:12:09.400 --> 0:12:12.200
<v Speaker 1>along nicely, and if that happens and it helps them

0:12:12.480 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 1>get ahead. Uh, then they'll be very appreciative. But the

0:12:15.679 --> 0:12:18.280
<v Speaker 1>fact is there's very little evidence that the economic growth

0:12:18.280 --> 0:12:21.080
<v Speaker 1>that the country is now enjoying is helping people much

0:12:21.120 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 1>at the bottom. Where were you were you on the

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 1>CNN set in Yes, the Republican I sat there, remember

0:12:28.200 --> 0:12:30.680
<v Speaker 1>sitting on the coach. The only major network that covered

0:12:30.720 --> 0:12:33.120
<v Speaker 1>it was Dan Rather on CBLS. And there was this

0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:37.400
<v Speaker 1>revolution in absolutely stunning. Is that what we're faced here

0:12:37.440 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 1>in November? We could be that would be they're talking

0:12:40.000 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 1>about a blue wave instead of a red wave. That

0:12:42.440 --> 0:12:45.480
<v Speaker 1>was the first time in forty years in that the

0:12:45.520 --> 0:12:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Republicans took over the House of Representatives over Congress. It

0:12:48.600 --> 0:12:51.920
<v Speaker 1>was a revolution. Did anybody see it coming? My recollection

0:12:52.040 --> 0:12:55.040
<v Speaker 1>is pretty much no, no, not really. And we know

0:12:55.120 --> 0:12:58.840
<v Speaker 1>what happened that year. Historically what happened is gun owners

0:12:59.440 --> 0:13:01.559
<v Speaker 1>and there were it just right came out in huge,

0:13:01.760 --> 0:13:06.160
<v Speaker 1>unprecedented numbers, nine million new mid The Blue crew come

0:13:06.160 --> 0:13:08.640
<v Speaker 1>out this time around. That's what we don't know. It

0:13:08.640 --> 0:13:12.400
<v Speaker 1>would include Bill Snyder. You know what's going to happen here? Well,

0:13:12.440 --> 0:13:15.280
<v Speaker 1>you know there's an old rule never make predictions, especially

0:13:15.320 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 1>about the future. Well, the down right. That was Yogie Barrett.

0:13:21.679 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 1>I megan right down in the wedding register. How long

0:13:25.880 --> 0:13:29.880
<v Speaker 1>has that taken you? Twenty three minutes to bring up

0:13:29.920 --> 0:13:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the roll away John a question from Bill Snyder. Police,

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:35.320
<v Speaker 1>they'll just to complete this conversation. The risk for many

0:13:35.360 --> 0:13:39.640
<v Speaker 1>people listening in our audience, investments, business leaders, is that

0:13:39.679 --> 0:13:43.160
<v Speaker 1>if the president can't address the problems that the minorities

0:13:43.160 --> 0:13:46.559
<v Speaker 1>that you've brought up that believe they haven't been listened

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:50.000
<v Speaker 1>to over the last several decades, if he can't address

0:13:50.040 --> 0:13:53.200
<v Speaker 1>those problems, that this country swings aggressively to the left.

0:13:54.440 --> 0:13:56.520
<v Speaker 1>How big is that risk? Well, I think there is

0:13:56.559 --> 0:13:59.440
<v Speaker 1>a risk that will happen. It very much depends on

0:13:59.440 --> 0:14:02.840
<v Speaker 1>whom the Democrats. Who who catches fire among Democrats? Will

0:14:02.880 --> 0:14:06.800
<v Speaker 1>it be a strong progressive candidate like Elizabeth Warren? They

0:14:06.800 --> 0:14:09.360
<v Speaker 1>could be Joe Biden. He would be the logical next person.

0:14:09.600 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 1>The problem is he's well into his seventies and he's

0:14:12.520 --> 0:14:14.960
<v Speaker 1>part of the past. We don't know. That's what primaries

0:14:14.960 --> 0:14:17.480
<v Speaker 1>are all about, and they're inherently unpredictable, but some of

0:14:17.520 --> 0:14:20.320
<v Speaker 1>them will always catch fire. The old rule is Democrats

0:14:20.320 --> 0:14:23.080
<v Speaker 1>fall in love and Republicans fall in line. That didn't

0:14:23.120 --> 0:14:26.080
<v Speaker 1>happen in twenty Republicans fell in love with Donald Trump

0:14:26.240 --> 0:14:29.480
<v Speaker 1>and Democrats fell in line behind Hillary Clinton. So even

0:14:29.520 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 1>those rules aren't necessarily the case. Bill Snyder, thank you

0:14:32.600 --> 0:14:35.640
<v Speaker 1>so much in congratulations. The book is standoff, How America

0:14:36.240 --> 0:14:40.720
<v Speaker 1>became ungovernable, with a fabulous tapestry history to drive forward

0:14:41.040 --> 0:14:43.400
<v Speaker 1>to the mid term elections and then to two thousand

0:14:43.720 --> 0:14:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Tory of course, Bill Schneider at George Mason and for

0:14:47.200 --> 0:15:05.080
<v Speaker 1>years associated and inventing our political coverage and CNN soaring prices,

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:09.440
<v Speaker 1>widespread hunger, rampant crime, failing health system, and a large

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:14.680
<v Speaker 1>scale exodus of its citizens. And yet President Nicolas Maduro

0:15:15.000 --> 0:15:18.720
<v Speaker 1>has won a second term as the president of Venezuela.

0:15:19.000 --> 0:15:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Here to tell us more about it is Patricia La

0:15:21.600 --> 0:15:26.400
<v Speaker 1>our Venezuela Bureau chief, joining us now on the phone. Patricia,

0:15:26.440 --> 0:15:29.040
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much for being with us. Uh Do

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:33.680
<v Speaker 1>people in Venezuela regard the results of the election as

0:15:34.080 --> 0:15:38.760
<v Speaker 1>uh legal? Um? Well, be hard for me to speak

0:15:38.760 --> 0:15:41.240
<v Speaker 1>on behalf of Venezuela, but we did visit a lot

0:15:41.280 --> 0:15:44.000
<v Speaker 1>of voting centers yesterday, and many of them were in

0:15:44.040 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the western side of Calacas, which is the more popular areas,

0:15:47.320 --> 0:15:50.880
<v Speaker 1>and they were practically empty, many of them. I was

0:15:50.960 --> 0:15:53.400
<v Speaker 1>the only person even there apart from the people that

0:15:53.400 --> 0:15:56.360
<v Speaker 1>were working at the voting center. So clearly you have

0:15:56.440 --> 0:16:02.120
<v Speaker 1>a very disillusioned and uninterested electorate who UM already fighting

0:16:02.120 --> 0:16:05.920
<v Speaker 1>a daily plight to do about just anything, finding food,

0:16:06.200 --> 0:16:08.640
<v Speaker 1>being able to afford food once you can find it.

0:16:09.200 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Public services are completely collapsed, as running water has become

0:16:12.800 --> 0:16:15.920
<v Speaker 1>a luxury. In Kalaas and most of Venezuela, you have

0:16:16.000 --> 0:16:20.120
<v Speaker 1>power out of just happening for hours. Public transportation is

0:16:20.720 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 1>becoming more and more difficult, a spare parts are hard

0:16:24.160 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 1>to find, an important to the country. So of course

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:31.360
<v Speaker 1>a large large percentage of Venezuelans were completely uninterested in

0:16:31.560 --> 0:16:35.240
<v Speaker 1>yesterday's event. So before we get into smooth the economic

0:16:35.240 --> 0:16:39.800
<v Speaker 1>implications of the continued reign of Maduro, I'm wondering almost

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:45.280
<v Speaker 1>of the population did vote? Who are his supporters? So, um,

0:16:45.400 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 1>those are the numbers according to the national like the

0:16:49.080 --> 0:16:53.520
<v Speaker 1>UM authority, but well, you know, it's hard to know.

0:16:53.720 --> 0:16:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Some people do cust out on them UM. But of

0:16:56.400 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 1>course they do have UM a large government shame that

0:17:00.560 --> 0:17:06.400
<v Speaker 1>encourages people to vote by offering um bonuses or certain prices.

0:17:06.440 --> 0:17:09.679
<v Speaker 1>That there were hundreds of thousands of points outside of

0:17:09.720 --> 0:17:14.360
<v Speaker 1>electoral UH centers yesterday that if you prove that you voted, UM,

0:17:14.440 --> 0:17:17.400
<v Speaker 1>they'll give you, you know, a certain price. They don't

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:19.679
<v Speaker 1>tell you what it is outwardly, right, but you assume

0:17:19.720 --> 0:17:23.320
<v Speaker 1>that it's just a deposit into your accounts. At some

0:17:23.480 --> 0:17:26.520
<v Speaker 1>of the centers, I even saw people handing out bread

0:17:26.560 --> 0:17:30.200
<v Speaker 1>and water to voters. Um. So yeah, there's this, there's

0:17:30.200 --> 0:17:33.399
<v Speaker 1>a machine that's encouraging people to come out and vote. Okay,

0:17:33.600 --> 0:17:35.880
<v Speaker 1>so let's talk about the implications because I am looking

0:17:35.880 --> 0:17:38.800
<v Speaker 1>at PASA bands that is, the state owned oil company

0:17:38.840 --> 0:17:43.840
<v Speaker 1>that are falling, and the ie that the International Energy

0:17:44.400 --> 0:17:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Agency has been coming out and saying they expect Venezuela

0:17:48.160 --> 0:17:54.560
<v Speaker 1>oil output to decline to an innex basically a negligible amount.

0:17:55.080 --> 0:17:57.040
<v Speaker 1>What's the prospects? Why are you? Why are things so

0:17:57.080 --> 0:17:59.720
<v Speaker 1>bleak and getting bleaker for Venezuela at this point? Yeah?

0:17:59.760 --> 0:18:02.399
<v Speaker 1>So oil production is already at a thirty or forty

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:05.880
<v Speaker 1>year low. Um, you have many of the oil workers

0:18:05.920 --> 0:18:09.200
<v Speaker 1>just walking out, not only because they're so poorly paid,

0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:14.159
<v Speaker 1>but because they're too hungry and weak to operate heavy machinery. Um,

0:18:14.240 --> 0:18:17.960
<v Speaker 1>you have conical philips uh on a global assault. I

0:18:17.960 --> 0:18:21.280
<v Speaker 1>guess Thataday sat trying to take some of his two

0:18:21.320 --> 0:18:25.159
<v Speaker 1>billion arbitration award that it was granted last month. And you,

0:18:25.440 --> 0:18:28.480
<v Speaker 1>on top of all of that, you have the Venezuela

0:18:28.560 --> 0:18:31.160
<v Speaker 1>under active review for oil sanctions on behalf of the US,

0:18:31.240 --> 0:18:34.160
<v Speaker 1>which would be sort of the deadly blow to an

0:18:34.160 --> 0:18:37.320
<v Speaker 1>economy that's already in crisis. So the outlook is for

0:18:37.359 --> 0:18:39.639
<v Speaker 1>everything to just continue to words them from now on.

0:18:41.119 --> 0:18:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Does the president recognize that your description, and indeed the

0:18:45.840 --> 0:18:50.119
<v Speaker 1>description of most media outlets about what the majority of

0:18:50.240 --> 0:18:53.120
<v Speaker 1>people in Venezuela deal with on a daily basis, does

0:18:53.160 --> 0:18:56.560
<v Speaker 1>he recognize that that is true? No, he does not.

0:18:56.680 --> 0:18:59.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he has ever even uttered the word

0:18:59.359 --> 0:19:03.159
<v Speaker 1>hyper influ asan or anything of the stort um everything

0:19:03.520 --> 0:19:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Um that he does sort of agree or admit he

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:14.200
<v Speaker 1>characterizes it as the war waged from the US against Venezuela. Um,

0:19:14.240 --> 0:19:17.840
<v Speaker 1>he blames everything as a Venezuela being under economic attack

0:19:17.960 --> 0:19:20.840
<v Speaker 1>from other nations across the globe. Okay, but if he

0:19:21.280 --> 0:19:24.440
<v Speaker 1>just sort of move a little further on that, if

0:19:24.520 --> 0:19:27.399
<v Speaker 1>you're under it, let's say, let's say that is, let's

0:19:27.440 --> 0:19:32.119
<v Speaker 1>just take that as his version. Does he admit or

0:19:32.240 --> 0:19:35.240
<v Speaker 1>recognize that there are people who are going hungry, that

0:19:35.320 --> 0:19:39.320
<v Speaker 1>there is no running water, that electricity is intermittent, and

0:19:39.560 --> 0:19:43.040
<v Speaker 1>that no one can afford to buy food? No, I

0:19:43.040 --> 0:19:48.080
<v Speaker 1>mean he'll admitted to a certain extent, but nothing even closed.

0:19:48.119 --> 0:19:51.360
<v Speaker 1>He he will mention some of these, um issues are

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:53.359
<v Speaker 1>in press conferences and things like that. And the funny

0:19:53.359 --> 0:19:56.320
<v Speaker 1>thing is that he kept repeating that, you know, after

0:19:56.359 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 1>he was elected, Um, he was going to solve you know,

0:19:59.320 --> 0:20:03.119
<v Speaker 1>a majority these issues. What we're wondering is how have

0:20:03.359 --> 0:20:07.639
<v Speaker 1>those options alluded him so far as to how we

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:12.680
<v Speaker 1>can continue? The economy is expected to contract nine percent. Uh,

0:20:12.760 --> 0:20:16.600
<v Speaker 1>this dear inflation is said to hit percent. The currency

0:20:16.600 --> 0:20:20.280
<v Speaker 1>has lost more than his value. Right, Um, there are

0:20:20.280 --> 0:20:22.359
<v Speaker 1>a lot of things that he needs to get on

0:20:22.400 --> 0:20:25.399
<v Speaker 1>the right path. Patricia Lah, thank you so much for

0:20:25.440 --> 0:20:28.159
<v Speaker 1>being with us. Good luck to you, and UH it

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:30.680
<v Speaker 1>sounds pretty hopeless. I'm hoping that there is something else,

0:20:31.160 --> 0:20:34.680
<v Speaker 1>uh that will perhaps help mitigate the situation and perhaps

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:39.360
<v Speaker 1>cause a change to the at least policies of the leadership.

0:20:39.359 --> 0:20:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Patricia la Venezuela Bureau chief talking to us about those

0:20:42.760 --> 0:21:00.199
<v Speaker 1>Venezuelan elections and chairs of Tesla. They are up right

0:21:00.240 --> 0:21:03.360
<v Speaker 1>now a little bit more than three percent. This comes

0:21:03.440 --> 0:21:08.120
<v Speaker 1>after Elon Muska, the founder and the chief executive of Tesla,

0:21:08.200 --> 0:21:14.120
<v Speaker 1>announces details about two variants of the model of three. Indeed,

0:21:14.160 --> 0:21:18.160
<v Speaker 1>one of those variants is estimated to cost about seventy

0:21:18.200 --> 0:21:22.719
<v Speaker 1>eight thousand dollars. That's twice the price of a base

0:21:23.000 --> 0:21:27.959
<v Speaker 1>Model three. And it reminds me of an old National

0:21:28.000 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Airlines commercial entitled is this any way to run an airline?

0:21:32.920 --> 0:21:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Is this any way to run a car company? Here

0:21:35.400 --> 0:21:38.639
<v Speaker 1>to help us answer that question, Kevin Tynan, Bloomberg Intelligence

0:21:38.840 --> 0:21:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Senior analyst for Everything's Automotive Kevin always a pleasure. Um.

0:21:44.640 --> 0:21:47.440
<v Speaker 1>I know I'm dating myself by talking about National Airlines,

0:21:47.480 --> 0:21:49.480
<v Speaker 1>but we all know what happened to National Airlines, So

0:21:49.560 --> 0:21:54.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious, is this any way to run an automobile company?

0:21:54.160 --> 0:21:58.199
<v Speaker 1>By having the chief executive tweet out, I mean, I

0:21:58.240 --> 0:22:00.320
<v Speaker 1>get you know, it gets you tons of free public listening.

0:22:00.359 --> 0:22:02.280
<v Speaker 1>You never have to do an ad in your life,

0:22:02.920 --> 0:22:04.960
<v Speaker 1>But is this the way to run a company that's

0:22:04.960 --> 0:22:09.960
<v Speaker 1>trying to produce mass automobiles? Well? I look I guess

0:22:10.000 --> 0:22:13.120
<v Speaker 1>that goes all the way up to the President communicates

0:22:13.200 --> 0:22:16.720
<v Speaker 1>via tweet now too, So, um, I think Elon Musk

0:22:16.800 --> 0:22:22.440
<v Speaker 1>is that sort of new generation of CEO tweeting out plans, uh,

0:22:22.600 --> 0:22:25.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, calling analyst bone heads on the call, so

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:30.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, until until the shareholders react, he'll he'll continue

0:22:30.160 --> 0:22:32.600
<v Speaker 1>to push the envelope in that way. I'm sure. So

0:22:32.640 --> 0:22:37.320
<v Speaker 1>what is your thought about this announcement and the new

0:22:37.640 --> 0:22:41.919
<v Speaker 1>loaded versions of the Tesla Model three. Aren't they just

0:22:42.000 --> 0:22:46.280
<v Speaker 1>having challenges getting the regular model three out there? Well?

0:22:46.320 --> 0:22:48.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I'm not sure they want to get the

0:22:48.400 --> 0:22:51.600
<v Speaker 1>regular model three out there when you look at you know,

0:22:51.640 --> 0:22:55.919
<v Speaker 1>the quarterly reports and and you know, running at at

0:22:55.920 --> 0:22:59.000
<v Speaker 1>an operating loss, and you know, the idea is is

0:22:59.160 --> 0:23:02.679
<v Speaker 1>to still be up market until you know they can

0:23:02.720 --> 0:23:05.000
<v Speaker 1>get production. I'm not sure you're ever going to see

0:23:05.000 --> 0:23:08.679
<v Speaker 1>the thirty five thousand dollar vehicle. Um. You know, so

0:23:08.720 --> 0:23:12.320
<v Speaker 1>in that in that way, this makes sense to be selling,

0:23:12.880 --> 0:23:15.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, the premium vehicles. I think two things happen though.

0:23:15.920 --> 0:23:20.679
<v Speaker 1>One is at seventy eight thousand dollars before autopilot even

0:23:21.280 --> 0:23:23.399
<v Speaker 1>um that that's not even included in that seventy eight

0:23:23.440 --> 0:23:26.119
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollar price egg, but at seventy eight thousand dollars,

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:28.800
<v Speaker 1>you worry about cannibalization of the Model S, which is

0:23:28.880 --> 0:23:31.159
<v Speaker 1>priced a little bit higher. But you know, if you

0:23:31.200 --> 0:23:34.399
<v Speaker 1>look at revenue per unit over the past couple of quarters,

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:37.600
<v Speaker 1>it's in that eighty you know, eighty to ninety dollar range,

0:23:37.600 --> 0:23:40.800
<v Speaker 1>So you're pushing up against models. The other thing is

0:23:40.840 --> 0:23:44.359
<v Speaker 1>how many of those five hundred thousand deposits we hear

0:23:44.359 --> 0:23:46.760
<v Speaker 1>about all the time. We're people expecting to be able

0:23:46.800 --> 0:23:49.520
<v Speaker 1>to actually get a thirty five thousand dollar vehicle, which

0:23:50.040 --> 0:23:53.840
<v Speaker 1>probably won't be at least until some point of if ever.

0:23:54.640 --> 0:23:59.120
<v Speaker 1>And doesn't this also bring into question the competition models

0:23:59.200 --> 0:24:06.720
<v Speaker 1>from bm W as well as lower price models from Toyota, Nissan, etcetera. Right, Yeah,

0:24:06.720 --> 0:24:10.240
<v Speaker 1>And and I still believe that those manufacturers are only

0:24:10.280 --> 0:24:14.879
<v Speaker 1>halfheartedly involved in the battery electric vehicle market. Um. You know,

0:24:14.880 --> 0:24:18.160
<v Speaker 1>there's announcements and you see this long lead time till

0:24:18.200 --> 0:24:20.760
<v Speaker 1>those get to market, and I think that's just simply

0:24:20.800 --> 0:24:24.800
<v Speaker 1>because the business economics of the drive train uh drivetrain

0:24:24.880 --> 0:24:29.000
<v Speaker 1>technology just don't make sense yet. And basically Tesla proves

0:24:29.040 --> 0:24:32.119
<v Speaker 1>that with every quarterly report. Right, And I think you

0:24:32.200 --> 0:24:36.560
<v Speaker 1>saw General Motors with Chevrolet Bolt, and we were constantly

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:39.680
<v Speaker 1>hearing how Tesla out sells Bold, and I keep arguing, well,

0:24:39.680 --> 0:24:42.880
<v Speaker 1>they're not trying to sell Chevrolet Bolt. It was an

0:24:42.880 --> 0:24:46.359
<v Speaker 1>experiment of finance experience to see what the economics of

0:24:46.400 --> 0:24:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the technology look like. Knowing it's not profit is profitable

0:24:50.280 --> 0:24:52.800
<v Speaker 1>is why you don't see Chevally Bolt be marketed or

0:24:52.800 --> 0:24:55.879
<v Speaker 1>aggressively sold, because you're losing money on everyone. You you

0:24:56.560 --> 0:24:59.399
<v Speaker 1>that that you do put in customers hands. So the

0:24:59.440 --> 0:25:01.600
<v Speaker 1>idea is is that we can do this. We have

0:25:01.680 --> 0:25:03.840
<v Speaker 1>the technology, it's up on the shelf. If this ever

0:25:04.000 --> 0:25:06.320
<v Speaker 1>looks like it's profitable, we'll put it in a good

0:25:06.359 --> 0:25:08.919
<v Speaker 1>looking vehicle or a compact crossover, which is the best

0:25:08.960 --> 0:25:11.399
<v Speaker 1>selling segment in the US, and we'll sell them like

0:25:11.480 --> 0:25:13.679
<v Speaker 1>we want to sell them. Well, I just also want

0:25:13.720 --> 0:25:16.919
<v Speaker 1>to mention getting this a news item from Greg Jared

0:25:16.920 --> 0:25:19.040
<v Speaker 1>and the Bloomberg news Room that at least one person

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:22.119
<v Speaker 1>is dead after a Tesla Model S was found in

0:25:22.160 --> 0:25:27.280
<v Speaker 1>a pond on a property in Alameda County on Sunday night.

0:25:27.320 --> 0:25:31.600
<v Speaker 1>This according to the California Highway Patrol. UH this in

0:25:31.920 --> 0:25:36.680
<v Speaker 1>you know Castro, in your Castro Valley um our Tesla

0:25:36.800 --> 0:25:40.640
<v Speaker 1>automobiles getting a pass in terms of what they can

0:25:40.800 --> 0:25:45.920
<v Speaker 1>do versus other electrified or what you might call hybrid

0:25:45.920 --> 0:25:50.480
<v Speaker 1>technology cars can do well. I think, Um, I I

0:25:50.800 --> 0:25:54.760
<v Speaker 1>don't know that that's totally Testla's fault. I think autopilot

0:25:54.760 --> 0:25:57.399
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know if this incident was the autopilot

0:25:57.480 --> 0:25:59.639
<v Speaker 1>was involved. I'm just you know, going over some of

0:25:59.680 --> 0:26:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the ens recently, UM, you know, I think there's certainly

0:26:03.280 --> 0:26:06.479
<v Speaker 1>misinterpretation of what that system can do. And I think

0:26:06.520 --> 0:26:10.240
<v Speaker 1>when you look at even the um most recent crash

0:26:10.280 --> 0:26:12.439
<v Speaker 1>where or the one before the one you just mentioned,

0:26:12.440 --> 0:26:15.360
<v Speaker 1>where it hits a parked fire truck and you're wondering,

0:26:16.040 --> 0:26:19.399
<v Speaker 1>why why does it not see a stopped object and

0:26:19.400 --> 0:26:24.160
<v Speaker 1>and you know stop driving towards it. UM, it just

0:26:24.240 --> 0:26:26.679
<v Speaker 1>tells me that people don't understand autopilot in the way

0:26:26.720 --> 0:26:29.159
<v Speaker 1>it's supposed to work. And you just don't see that

0:26:29.280 --> 0:26:33.480
<v Speaker 1>from from Cadillac and super Cruise. I think for some reason,

0:26:33.520 --> 0:26:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the consumer understands, UH that those are driver aids and

0:26:38.160 --> 0:26:42.119
<v Speaker 1>not expected to be the full control of the vehicle

0:26:42.200 --> 0:26:44.760
<v Speaker 1>given over to the to the driver or to the

0:26:44.840 --> 0:26:47.800
<v Speaker 1>vehicle from the driver. UM. You know, and perhaps that's

0:26:47.880 --> 0:26:50.240
<v Speaker 1>way back in the day when you had Elon Musk's

0:26:50.280 --> 0:26:53.119
<v Speaker 1>wife of the time, you know, dancing in the driver's

0:26:53.160 --> 0:26:55.560
<v Speaker 1>seat with no hands on the wheel. Why that misconception

0:26:55.680 --> 0:26:57.600
<v Speaker 1>is out there, but it certainly seems to be real.

0:26:58.640 --> 0:27:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Is there a misconception of what the consumer wants when

0:27:01.760 --> 0:27:06.399
<v Speaker 1>you have Ford getting rid of pretty much their entire

0:27:06.520 --> 0:27:11.440
<v Speaker 1>sedan lineup going to SUVs and pickups except for the Mustang,

0:27:11.520 --> 0:27:17.280
<v Speaker 1>I believe, uh, where Tesla doesn't have an suv really

0:27:17.640 --> 0:27:20.879
<v Speaker 1>or a pick up right and I and I think

0:27:21.160 --> 0:27:24.560
<v Speaker 1>in in Ford's defense there and I think this is

0:27:24.600 --> 0:27:27.760
<v Speaker 1>industry wide. What you're seeing is certainly the death of

0:27:27.800 --> 0:27:31.680
<v Speaker 1>the coupe in the sedan UM, but also a sort

0:27:31.720 --> 0:27:33.600
<v Speaker 1>of a change in the shape. So we're still going

0:27:33.640 --> 0:27:37.119
<v Speaker 1>to have small vehicles, We're gonna have fuel efficient vehicles. Uh,

0:27:37.160 --> 0:27:40.240
<v Speaker 1>they're just gonna be shaped differently. So rather than what

0:27:40.320 --> 0:27:45.040
<v Speaker 1>we know in for tourists UM or Ford focus, that

0:27:45.119 --> 0:27:47.600
<v Speaker 1>just gets lifted up a little bit, looks a little

0:27:47.600 --> 0:27:50.520
<v Speaker 1>bit more like a like a compact crossover where you

0:27:50.520 --> 0:27:52.960
<v Speaker 1>have the higher ride height that people like a little

0:27:52.960 --> 0:27:57.280
<v Speaker 1>bit more utility and usable space. Um, you know, and

0:27:57.320 --> 0:27:59.399
<v Speaker 1>maybe use a car name or maybe you don't, but

0:27:59.440 --> 0:28:03.720
<v Speaker 1>it's essentially filling that gap of utility that people need.

0:28:03.800 --> 0:28:06.879
<v Speaker 1>It's just not shaped with what we know conventionally to

0:28:06.920 --> 0:28:09.439
<v Speaker 1>be a car. What's what else should we know about

0:28:09.520 --> 0:28:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Tesla that we don't focus on? Is it battery technology?

0:28:12.920 --> 0:28:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Is it the drive range? Is it you know, weather conditions,

0:28:17.280 --> 0:28:21.240
<v Speaker 1>when it gets cold. We note that the range on

0:28:21.280 --> 0:28:25.560
<v Speaker 1>an electric vehicle can change dramatically, you know. I think

0:28:25.600 --> 0:28:29.400
<v Speaker 1>that the product itself, for the most part, other than

0:28:29.440 --> 0:28:32.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, those issues with autopilot dry, I think the

0:28:32.119 --> 0:28:36.440
<v Speaker 1>consumer is is educated and aware or at least comfortable

0:28:36.520 --> 0:28:39.040
<v Speaker 1>with what the vehicles can do. Um. I think the

0:28:39.040 --> 0:28:43.280
<v Speaker 1>biggest misconception is that you know and and in our space,

0:28:43.320 --> 0:28:45.480
<v Speaker 1>it winds up being more about the financials when you

0:28:45.560 --> 0:28:47.440
<v Speaker 1>when you dive into the numbers of the company, and

0:28:47.440 --> 0:28:51.200
<v Speaker 1>that's everything from the volume numbers down to the gross

0:28:51.240 --> 0:28:54.720
<v Speaker 1>margin numbers that everybody talks about, and then the profitability

0:28:54.760 --> 0:28:59.000
<v Speaker 1>of the company going forward. I think this is a

0:28:59.120 --> 0:29:04.080
<v Speaker 1>firm that's really valued like it's of of global volume automaker,

0:29:04.360 --> 0:29:07.800
<v Speaker 1>and it's really not or it's not yet at least

0:29:08.440 --> 0:29:11.120
<v Speaker 1>um you know, in terms of market capped comparing it

0:29:11.200 --> 0:29:14.760
<v Speaker 1>to Ford and in terms of uh, you know, volume,

0:29:14.840 --> 0:29:18.280
<v Speaker 1>comparing it to whoever BMW or General Motors, and it's

0:29:18.320 --> 0:29:21.600
<v Speaker 1>just not in that ballpark yet, um, you know, and

0:29:21.640 --> 0:29:24.280
<v Speaker 1>it's going to take some doing and get there. I

0:29:24.360 --> 0:29:27.080
<v Speaker 1>was just looking at gross margins. Somebody up their target

0:29:27.080 --> 0:29:30.680
<v Speaker 1>price because they are expecting better than what was forecast

0:29:30.680 --> 0:29:33.680
<v Speaker 1>gross margins on Model three and and that's entirely possible.

0:29:33.720 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 1>But at the end of the day, I keep saying,

0:29:35.200 --> 0:29:38.719
<v Speaker 1>this is an automaker, and you know, gross margins are

0:29:38.720 --> 0:29:40.840
<v Speaker 1>going to be somewhere in that twenty percent range. And

0:29:41.040 --> 0:29:45.640
<v Speaker 1>and I don't see Tesla doing anything production wise, manufacturing

0:29:45.680 --> 0:29:51.280
<v Speaker 1>wise that gets them to that when companies like Toyota, BMW,

0:29:51.800 --> 0:29:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Volkswagen are a Thanks very much, Kevin Tynan, Bloomberg Intelligence

0:29:57.800 --> 0:30:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Senior analysts for all Things Automotive. Thanks for listening to

0:30:07.800 --> 0:30:12.360
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen to interviews on

0:30:12.400 --> 0:30:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast platform you prefer. I'm

0:30:18.280 --> 0:30:21.600
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Tom Keene before the podcast. You can

0:30:21.640 --> 0:30:24.840
<v Speaker 1>always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio