WEBVTT - How Does the 'Streisand Effect' Make Cover-ups Go Viral?

0:00:01.920 --> 0:00:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to brain Stuff, a production of iHeart Radio. Hey

0:00:06.680 --> 0:00:11.160
<v Speaker 1>brain Stuff, Lauren Vogelbaum here. The rich and powerful bullies

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:15.680
<v Speaker 1>of the world, governments, corporations, celebrities, et cetera have lots

0:00:15.680 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>of creative ways to control the public's access to information intimidation, bands, bribery,

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:25.720
<v Speaker 1>or straight up censorship, especially when that information makes them

0:00:25.720 --> 0:00:29.320
<v Speaker 1>look bad. But every once in a while, and especially

0:00:29.400 --> 0:00:35.680
<v Speaker 1>clumsy control effort backfires spectacularly. Take the case of Barbra Streisand,

0:00:35.760 --> 0:00:38.960
<v Speaker 1>the award winning actress, singer, and owner of a sprawling

0:00:39.000 --> 0:00:42.800
<v Speaker 1>mega mansion near the wealthy coastal enclave of Malibu, California.

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:46.599
<v Speaker 1>Back in two thousand three, Streisand sued a photographer by

0:00:46.600 --> 0:00:49.559
<v Speaker 1>the name of Kenneth Edelman because he refused to lead

0:00:49.600 --> 0:00:52.559
<v Speaker 1>a photo of her Malibu mansion from an online project

0:00:52.640 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 1>that tracked erosion on the California coastline. Edelman wasn't a

0:00:56.800 --> 0:00:59.200
<v Speaker 1>paparazzo trying to snag a shot of Babs in her

0:00:59.240 --> 0:01:03.520
<v Speaker 1>bathing suit. He was documenting an important environmental issue. But

0:01:03.720 --> 0:01:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Streisand obviously felt that her privacy had been violated, or

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:10.840
<v Speaker 1>perhaps wanted to nip future violations in the bud so

0:01:11.000 --> 0:01:15.160
<v Speaker 1>she took Adelman to court for fifty million dollars in damages. Yep,

0:01:15.280 --> 0:01:19.600
<v Speaker 1>that's for one photo. The irony was that before Streisand

0:01:19.640 --> 0:01:22.319
<v Speaker 1>took Adelman to court, the online image of her house

0:01:22.360 --> 0:01:26.080
<v Speaker 1>had been downloaded a grand total of six times, including

0:01:26.120 --> 0:01:29.440
<v Speaker 1>twice by her own lawyers. But after the media caught

0:01:29.440 --> 0:01:32.240
<v Speaker 1>wind of the lawsuit, the image was downloaded four hundred

0:01:32.319 --> 0:01:35.640
<v Speaker 1>and twenty thousand times in just a month and publicized

0:01:35.640 --> 0:01:38.280
<v Speaker 1>around the world. For an added kick in the teeth

0:01:38.319 --> 0:01:42.560
<v Speaker 1>that judge dismissed the case. Streisand wasn't the first to

0:01:42.720 --> 0:01:46.120
<v Speaker 1>get burned by her own attempt to repress information, but

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:49.520
<v Speaker 1>her name became indelibly attached to the phenomenon when Tector

0:01:49.600 --> 0:01:54.000
<v Speaker 1>blogger Mike Masnick jokingly labeled the backfire the Streisand Effect.

0:01:55.240 --> 0:01:58.400
<v Speaker 1>But we spoke with Sue Curry Jansen, professor emeritus of

0:01:58.440 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Media and Communications at Inburg College, who co authored a

0:02:02.560 --> 0:02:06.280
<v Speaker 1>paper about the curious dynamics of the Streisand Effect. She

0:02:06.400 --> 0:02:09.079
<v Speaker 1>said nobody had paid much attention to the whole thing

0:02:09.160 --> 0:02:12.120
<v Speaker 1>until the lawsuit, which I'm sure Streisand wishes she had

0:02:12.160 --> 0:02:16.400
<v Speaker 1>never undertaken. The Streisand effect is a product of public

0:02:16.400 --> 0:02:19.600
<v Speaker 1>outrage and blowback over a perceived attempt by someone with

0:02:19.639 --> 0:02:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the power to repress free speech to do so. As

0:02:23.080 --> 0:02:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Streisand's lawsuit shows, sometimes a supposedly dangerous piece of information

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:30.920
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't likely draw much attention if left uncensored, but the

0:02:31.000 --> 0:02:34.440
<v Speaker 1>very act of trying to repress it creates public curiosity

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:37.920
<v Speaker 1>and even outrage, which ends up shining a far brighter

0:02:38.000 --> 0:02:42.160
<v Speaker 1>light on the information in the process. It's also been

0:02:42.160 --> 0:02:45.119
<v Speaker 1>shown that banning books or blocking access to certain websites

0:02:45.280 --> 0:02:49.519
<v Speaker 1>only serves to increase public demand for that information. One

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:52.720
<v Speaker 1>study from eighteen found that China's attempts to block access

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:56.239
<v Speaker 1>to sites like Twitter and Facebook prompted millions of otherwise

0:02:56.280 --> 0:02:59.960
<v Speaker 1>a political citizens to download VPN software to evade the

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:05.200
<v Speaker 1>sensors and access those sites. In the paper, Jansen and

0:03:05.240 --> 0:03:08.200
<v Speaker 1>her co author highlight some truly shining examples of the

0:03:08.200 --> 0:03:12.639
<v Speaker 1>Streisand effect at work, from global corporations to grade school cafeterias.

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:17.200
<v Speaker 1>For example, the fast food giant McDonald's made a huge

0:03:17.240 --> 0:03:20.240
<v Speaker 1>mistake in the nineteen nineties when it sued two volunteers

0:03:20.240 --> 0:03:23.919
<v Speaker 1>with the activist organization London Greenpeace for a street pamphlet

0:03:23.919 --> 0:03:27.640
<v Speaker 1>that they wrote called What's Wrong with McDonald's. The trial,

0:03:27.720 --> 0:03:31.480
<v Speaker 1>which the British press dubbed McLibel, became the longest running

0:03:31.560 --> 0:03:35.200
<v Speaker 1>civil trial in British history and handed critics of McDonald's

0:03:35.240 --> 0:03:39.480
<v Speaker 1>a media bull horn for publicizing the chain's exploitative advertising,

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:44.240
<v Speaker 1>low pay and unhealthy food. And just like streisand McDonald's,

0:03:44.320 --> 0:03:48.200
<v Speaker 1>ended up losing the lawsuit. In two thousand three, Fox

0:03:48.240 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 1>News sued Al Franken, then a comedian and actor not

0:03:51.560 --> 0:03:55.280
<v Speaker 1>yet a senator, for copyright infringement over his anti conservative

0:03:55.280 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 1>book called Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them

0:03:58.440 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 1>A Fair and Balanced Look at the Right. Fox News

0:04:01.920 --> 0:04:04.720
<v Speaker 1>alleged that the phrase fair and balanced was its own

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 1>intellectual property, but a judge disagreed. Not only did Fox

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 1>News lose the case, but the free publicity shot Franken's

0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:15.920
<v Speaker 1>book to the top of the best seller list in Scotland.

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:18.800
<v Speaker 1>In a nine year old schoolgirl by the name of

0:04:18.800 --> 0:04:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Martha Payne began taking pictures of her school cafeteria lunches

0:04:22.640 --> 0:04:26.040
<v Speaker 1>and writing about them on her personal blog. When chef

0:04:26.040 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 1>and TV personality Jamie Oliver tweeted about Pain's blog, the

0:04:29.680 --> 0:04:33.000
<v Speaker 1>site received three million hits in just two months, the

0:04:33.040 --> 0:04:35.839
<v Speaker 1>local town council, fearing that the grade schooler was making

0:04:35.880 --> 0:04:38.800
<v Speaker 1>them look bad, banned her from taking photos at school.

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Of course, Pain blogged about the band too, which then

0:04:42.760 --> 0:04:46.880
<v Speaker 1>made international news. The town council wound up publicly apologizing

0:04:47.000 --> 0:04:51.680
<v Speaker 1>and they removed the band. Then, in twenty nineteen, Republican

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Senator Devin Nunez filed a lawsuit against Twitter, alleging that

0:04:55.880 --> 0:04:59.440
<v Speaker 1>he was defamed on the platform by Republican political strategist

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Liz May and by the anonymous owners of the Twitter

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:08.240
<v Speaker 1>accounts Devon Ninez's Cow and Devon Ninez's Mom. Before the lawsuit,

0:05:08.440 --> 0:05:11.960
<v Speaker 1>devon Ninez's Cow had only one thousand, two hundred and

0:05:12.040 --> 0:05:15.159
<v Speaker 1>nine followers. After the lawsuit was filed, it's shot up

0:05:15.200 --> 0:05:18.480
<v Speaker 1>to fifty four thousand. A year later, the account has

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:21.479
<v Speaker 1>over seven hundred and twenty two thousand followers and has

0:05:21.520 --> 0:05:25.800
<v Speaker 1>inspired several more copycat accounts. The lawsuit is still ongoing,

0:05:27.279 --> 0:05:32.400
<v Speaker 1>but Jansen says that unfortunately, most censorship efforts are successful.

0:05:33.040 --> 0:05:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Quote that's the way power works. For example, the non

0:05:36.680 --> 0:05:39.320
<v Speaker 1>disclosure agreements that employees have to sign to work at

0:05:39.360 --> 0:05:42.520
<v Speaker 1>many corporations, you can know something really bad is going on,

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:45.360
<v Speaker 1>but you can't tell anyone. Not only will you be fired,

0:05:45.440 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 1>but you'll be sued. Even if a powerful person or

0:05:49.279 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 1>entity is caught trying to silence a critic or hide

0:05:51.960 --> 0:05:55.599
<v Speaker 1>a dirty secret, there's a whole crisis management playbook to

0:05:55.760 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 1>diffuse public outcry, sometimes called outrage management. In the paper,

0:06:02.360 --> 0:06:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Jansen and her co author list five techniques at sensors

0:06:05.440 --> 0:06:09.640
<v Speaker 1>used to discredit and silence critics, covering up the action,

0:06:10.040 --> 0:06:15.839
<v Speaker 1>devaluing the target, reinterpreting events by lying, minimizing consequences, blaming others,

0:06:15.880 --> 0:06:19.240
<v Speaker 1>and using favorable framing, using official channels to give an

0:06:19.240 --> 0:06:25.320
<v Speaker 1>appearance of justice, and intimidating or rewarding people involved. Jansen

0:06:25.360 --> 0:06:28.520
<v Speaker 1>said there are pr people who are very good at

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:31.320
<v Speaker 1>doing this kind of thing. They set up listening sessions

0:06:31.320 --> 0:06:34.120
<v Speaker 1>with people who are objecting to something, then single out

0:06:34.279 --> 0:06:36.480
<v Speaker 1>one or two people and put them on a committee.

0:06:37.000 --> 0:06:39.839
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes they even overtly bribe people with some kind of

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:42.840
<v Speaker 1>honorific and then proceed with whatever they intended to do

0:06:43.040 --> 0:06:47.040
<v Speaker 1>in the first place. The streisand effect can be an

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:50.080
<v Speaker 1>effective check on censorship and the more general misuse of

0:06:50.120 --> 0:06:53.039
<v Speaker 1>power to bully critics into silence, but only if the

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:55.320
<v Speaker 1>act is dragged into the light by a free and

0:06:55.480 --> 0:06:59.520
<v Speaker 1>unfettered press. None of the examples we cited above, including

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Stresa End, would have happened if not for journalists picking

0:07:02.640 --> 0:07:06.640
<v Speaker 1>up the stories and bringing them to the public's attention. Unfortunately,

0:07:06.880 --> 0:07:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the effectiveness of the media as a check on this

0:07:09.120 --> 0:07:11.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of misuse and abuse of power has taken a

0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:16.280
<v Speaker 1>hit during this are fake News era. If politicians and

0:07:16.320 --> 0:07:19.360
<v Speaker 1>other people in power can dismiss news stories that make

0:07:19.400 --> 0:07:22.240
<v Speaker 1>them look bad as being biased or false, then the

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:26.480
<v Speaker 1>power of the streisand effect dries up. Jansen said, that's

0:07:26.480 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 1>a real issue. The whole sense of what is the

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:37.679
<v Speaker 1>truth has been undermined quite deliberately. Today's episode was written

0:07:37.720 --> 0:07:40.280
<v Speaker 1>by Dave Ruse and produced by Tyler Clang. For more

0:07:40.280 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 1>on listen lots of other topics, visit how Stuff works

0:07:42.400 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Brain Stuff is a production of by Heart Radio.

0:07:45.200 --> 0:07:47.240
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts from my heart Radio, visit the I

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to

0:07:49.960 --> 0:07:50.760
<v Speaker 1>your favorite shows.