WEBVTT - Will Trump Bring the River to Washington?

0:00:15.604 --> 0:00:28.844
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin, Welcome back to Risky Business, A show about making

0:00:28.884 --> 0:00:31.444
<v Speaker 1>better decisions. I'm Maria Kanakova.

0:00:31.124 --> 0:00:36.884
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Nate Silver. Today the election's over. What am

0:00:36.924 --> 0:00:38.284
<v Speaker 2>I doing today?

0:00:39.844 --> 0:00:42.844
<v Speaker 1>Today? Nate is having an existential crisis over the fact

0:00:42.884 --> 0:00:45.684
<v Speaker 1>that the election is over and he no longer knows.

0:00:45.564 --> 0:00:50.444
<v Speaker 2>Who I was so thrilled I gave a talk in Orlando, Florida.

0:00:51.324 --> 0:00:54.124
<v Speaker 2>It was kind of like the official, official last election

0:00:54.204 --> 0:00:57.204
<v Speaker 2>obligation I had, and the talks done at one thirty

0:00:57.244 --> 0:01:01.364
<v Speaker 2>and I dovetailed like the big Mexican strip ball restaurant

0:01:01.404 --> 0:01:03.444
<v Speaker 2>and get like the world's largest plate in he doesn't

0:01:03.444 --> 0:01:05.404
<v Speaker 2>have margarita, and I'm like, fucking yeah, I do. This

0:01:05.484 --> 0:01:09.044
<v Speaker 2>election's over, but the implications for our country are not over.

0:01:09.524 --> 0:01:13.124
<v Speaker 2>Talking a little bit about Donald Trump's cabinet picks, the

0:01:13.164 --> 0:01:16.324
<v Speaker 2>influence of the community I call the river people like

0:01:16.364 --> 0:01:20.484
<v Speaker 2>Elon Musk, and looking a little bit ahead dangerously toward

0:01:21.004 --> 0:01:23.164
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty six and the midterm map.

0:01:23.284 --> 0:01:25.764
<v Speaker 1>And after that will ship gears a little bit and

0:01:25.964 --> 0:01:29.924
<v Speaker 1>talk about the NAPT the North American Poker Tour where

0:01:30.044 --> 0:01:33.884
<v Speaker 1>I played last week and had some good results, including

0:01:33.964 --> 0:01:37.924
<v Speaker 1>a fourteenth place finish in the main event. So we'll

0:01:37.964 --> 0:01:40.524
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit about that, about the strategy, the

0:01:40.604 --> 0:01:43.924
<v Speaker 1>thinking behind it, and our poker plans for the future.

0:01:53.804 --> 0:01:56.964
<v Speaker 1>Since we last spoke, Nate Trump has started making some

0:01:57.044 --> 0:02:00.564
<v Speaker 1>of his initial appointments, and so we're starting to see

0:02:00.564 --> 0:02:03.684
<v Speaker 1>the kind of initial trends outlines of what Trump two

0:02:03.684 --> 0:02:06.004
<v Speaker 1>point zero, what the administration is going to look like.

0:02:06.324 --> 0:02:10.804
<v Speaker 1>Some of those appointments seem to be more riverian than

0:02:11.044 --> 0:02:14.204
<v Speaker 1>villagey in nature. Let's talk a little bit about that.

0:02:14.284 --> 0:02:17.764
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about river versus village and what the Trump

0:02:17.804 --> 0:02:21.604
<v Speaker 1>administration seems like it's going to be as of now.

0:02:21.924 --> 0:02:24.964
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So the river is my name for this kind

0:02:24.964 --> 0:02:28.364
<v Speaker 2>of psychographic region of the world of people who take

0:02:28.404 --> 0:02:31.964
<v Speaker 2>calculator risks for a living. So Silicon Valley and Wall

0:02:32.004 --> 0:02:35.764
<v Speaker 2>Street in Las Vegas, both the casino and at least

0:02:35.804 --> 0:02:38.764
<v Speaker 2>a skilled game players, poker players, sports betters and the like,

0:02:39.924 --> 0:02:45.084
<v Speaker 2>and the river had gotten much more anti village. The

0:02:45.204 --> 0:02:48.204
<v Speaker 2>village is the name for like the establishment the world

0:02:48.204 --> 0:02:50.804
<v Speaker 2>that Kamala Harras comes from, so Harvard and the New

0:02:50.884 --> 0:02:54.084
<v Speaker 2>York Times, and a government with Democrat is in charge,

0:02:54.204 --> 0:02:57.964
<v Speaker 2>very risk averse establishment. The expert class and that class

0:02:58.004 --> 0:03:02.444
<v Speaker 2>had like a bad week last week. I think, you know,

0:03:02.524 --> 0:03:07.164
<v Speaker 2>will Elon be formerly part of the cabinet, I don't know.

0:03:07.244 --> 0:03:09.244
<v Speaker 2>I guess you can bet at polymarket and the Ohs

0:03:09.244 --> 0:03:13.044
<v Speaker 2>are in favor. I'm not sure that Elon necessarily wants

0:03:13.044 --> 0:03:14.764
<v Speaker 2>to have a cabinet seat. I'm not sure that he

0:03:14.844 --> 0:03:16.244
<v Speaker 2>needs to have a cabinet seat to have a lot

0:03:16.284 --> 0:03:19.644
<v Speaker 2>of influence over the over the trajectory of the administration.

0:03:20.884 --> 0:03:24.124
<v Speaker 2>You know, typically Republicans are also more willing than Democrats

0:03:24.164 --> 0:03:30.564
<v Speaker 2>to appoint business people to cabinet seats. So for Treasury Secretary,

0:03:30.604 --> 0:03:34.844
<v Speaker 2>for example, Scott Bessen, a hedge fund executive, is under consideration.

0:03:35.604 --> 0:03:37.724
<v Speaker 2>Trump has, however, also made a lot of very kind

0:03:37.724 --> 0:03:44.964
<v Speaker 2>of normal appointments. Elis Stefanak, for example, who is a

0:03:45.404 --> 0:03:49.324
<v Speaker 2>used to be kind of moderate Republican member of Congress.

0:03:49.484 --> 0:03:52.124
<v Speaker 2>Is uh is going to be the UN ambassador or

0:03:52.164 --> 0:03:54.564
<v Speaker 2>some of the Republicans win the House by enough seats

0:03:54.564 --> 0:03:55.924
<v Speaker 2>that they can keep the House if they lose a

0:03:55.924 --> 0:03:57.404
<v Speaker 2>couple of seats, which is actually like a little bit

0:03:57.404 --> 0:04:00.364
<v Speaker 2>of a risk. Marco Rubio is set to be Secretary

0:04:00.364 --> 0:04:04.164
<v Speaker 2>of State. Lee Zelden, a former New York Long Island representative,

0:04:05.004 --> 0:04:11.324
<v Speaker 2>relatively moderate, relatively is under considered for EPA administrator. So

0:04:11.804 --> 0:04:16.244
<v Speaker 2>and there are some more MAGA epics. H Stephen Miller,

0:04:16.404 --> 0:04:19.564
<v Speaker 2>who has very conservative views on race and immigration, is

0:04:19.604 --> 0:04:24.524
<v Speaker 2>the Deputy chief of Staff for policy. But you know,

0:04:24.564 --> 0:04:33.244
<v Speaker 2>Trump is how to put this, Trump's cabinet nominations, I

0:04:33.284 --> 0:04:36.964
<v Speaker 2>would say, on balance so far with Rubio, for example,

0:04:37.124 --> 0:04:43.884
<v Speaker 2>are maybe not quite what the village would most have feared.

0:04:44.204 --> 0:04:46.524
<v Speaker 2>I don't think. I mean, I'm sure there will be

0:04:47.164 --> 0:04:49.564
<v Speaker 2>one or two or three or four that they really dislike.

0:04:49.684 --> 0:04:53.404
<v Speaker 2>Steven Miller is certainly one of those. For example. We'll

0:04:53.404 --> 0:04:56.604
<v Speaker 2>see about Attorney General is a very important one, for instance.

0:04:58.484 --> 0:05:01.604
<v Speaker 2>But you know, maybe that reflects a little bit of

0:05:01.644 --> 0:05:06.924
<v Speaker 2>the a little bit of the the River's influence, just maybe.

0:05:06.964 --> 0:05:08.684
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you know, I would say the rivers should

0:05:08.724 --> 0:05:13.204
<v Speaker 2>in principle be in favor of more rational governance. That's

0:05:13.244 --> 0:05:16.764
<v Speaker 2>kind of pro business and pro growth. Doesn't do stupid things, right,

0:05:18.444 --> 0:05:20.564
<v Speaker 2>you know. Now in practice they get very red pilled,

0:05:20.604 --> 0:05:22.644
<v Speaker 2>and so you don't have the most intelligent version of

0:05:22.644 --> 0:05:26.964
<v Speaker 2>the arguments coming from like Elon Musk for example. But

0:05:27.044 --> 0:05:30.244
<v Speaker 2>you know, like if I were, let me put it

0:05:30.284 --> 0:05:36.004
<v Speaker 2>like this, if Trump called me, and then I'd say, well,

0:05:36.044 --> 0:05:38.044
<v Speaker 2>you want to be popular, don't do a bunch of

0:05:38.044 --> 0:05:39.884
<v Speaker 2>fucking tariffs. It might be popular in the service, but

0:05:39.924 --> 0:05:43.244
<v Speaker 2>it'll make the economy worse. Don't deport a bunch of immigrants.

0:05:43.244 --> 0:05:46.444
<v Speaker 2>We can have a more organized conversation about that, right,

0:05:46.524 --> 0:05:49.564
<v Speaker 2>And then maybe the other stuff. Okay, whatever you're Trump,

0:05:49.564 --> 0:05:51.444
<v Speaker 2>it's not and you're not gonna do what I want anyway, Right,

0:05:52.524 --> 0:05:55.564
<v Speaker 2>But you know, can they get Trump to moderate on

0:05:55.644 --> 0:05:58.524
<v Speaker 2>these issues? Then? I don't know. That remains to be seen.

0:05:58.804 --> 0:06:00.764
<v Speaker 2>And the answer when it comes to Trump and moderation,

0:06:00.844 --> 0:06:03.044
<v Speaker 2>on the one hand, is never been on anything. On

0:06:03.084 --> 0:06:05.804
<v Speaker 2>the other hand, it's not always clear where Trump's passions

0:06:05.924 --> 0:06:10.844
<v Speaker 2>lie and what he really cares about beyond himself. You know,

0:06:10.884 --> 0:06:13.204
<v Speaker 2>there was some poling that found that one reason that

0:06:14.324 --> 0:06:16.804
<v Speaker 2>Harris's message on abortion didn't resonate as much as they

0:06:16.804 --> 0:06:20.004
<v Speaker 2>were hoping for is because voters just didn't really believe

0:06:20.044 --> 0:06:24.844
<v Speaker 2>that Trump was passionate about the abortion stuff. Right, So

0:06:24.884 --> 0:06:27.244
<v Speaker 2>where will he be guided, I think is an open question.

0:06:27.804 --> 0:06:30.324
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I actually had a really interesting conversation right before

0:06:30.364 --> 0:06:33.204
<v Speaker 1>the election with a poker player who will remain nameless,

0:06:33.964 --> 0:06:37.684
<v Speaker 1>who was not going to be voting and was kind

0:06:37.724 --> 0:06:41.164
<v Speaker 1>of saying that, you know, oh, obviously, you know, I'm

0:06:41.284 --> 0:06:43.884
<v Speaker 1>pro choice, but I don't think I don't think that

0:06:43.924 --> 0:06:46.204
<v Speaker 1>Trump is going to do anything bad for abortion. That's

0:06:46.244 --> 0:06:48.604
<v Speaker 1>not an issue that's going to sway me one way

0:06:48.684 --> 0:06:51.084
<v Speaker 1>or the other because Trump is just leaving it up

0:06:51.124 --> 0:06:53.524
<v Speaker 1>to the States. So just like parroting back kind of

0:06:53.284 --> 0:06:57.204
<v Speaker 1>that message. And this was a very smart person, and

0:06:57.684 --> 0:07:01.044
<v Speaker 1>it just it made me realize that that, yes, that

0:07:01.164 --> 0:07:05.124
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people don't really you know, it's one

0:07:05.164 --> 0:07:07.484
<v Speaker 1>of these like I don't think it will actually happen

0:07:07.764 --> 0:07:11.084
<v Speaker 1>types of things, and I'd like i'd like to believe

0:07:11.124 --> 0:07:14.244
<v Speaker 1>that it won't. And I think that that's psychologically kind

0:07:14.244 --> 0:07:18.404
<v Speaker 1>of that kind of hopeful or wilful ignorance or trying

0:07:18.444 --> 0:07:21.364
<v Speaker 1>to say like, I don't think that's gonna happen. Oh,

0:07:21.484 --> 0:07:23.804
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's not really that bad. I think that

0:07:23.804 --> 0:07:26.284
<v Speaker 1>that is actually a very major thing. But I do

0:07:26.404 --> 0:07:29.644
<v Speaker 1>actually wonder you know, we're talking about the river versus

0:07:29.644 --> 0:07:33.284
<v Speaker 1>the village. Trump is very much of the village, right.

0:07:33.364 --> 0:07:36.804
<v Speaker 1>He is very establishment, you know, old New York family

0:07:37.764 --> 0:07:41.284
<v Speaker 1>money like he and the only time he the times

0:07:41.284 --> 0:07:43.884
<v Speaker 1>he's tried to foray into the river. Like the casino business.

0:07:43.884 --> 0:07:47.564
<v Speaker 1>He's bankrupted it, right. He has proven himself to not

0:07:47.684 --> 0:07:52.644
<v Speaker 1>be very adept when he does Riverian things. So I

0:07:52.684 --> 0:07:54.884
<v Speaker 1>think that I think that we do need to realize that.

0:07:54.924 --> 0:07:57.964
<v Speaker 1>I think he is the village as well. Elon Musk,

0:07:58.004 --> 0:08:01.324
<v Speaker 1>of course, does represent the river, and I don't think

0:08:01.724 --> 0:08:05.204
<v Speaker 1>so far we have seen signs that with or without

0:08:05.204 --> 0:08:08.364
<v Speaker 1>an appointment. It seems like, at least for now, he's

0:08:08.404 --> 0:08:11.124
<v Speaker 1>still on the inn with Trump, you know, putting him

0:08:11.164 --> 0:08:15.684
<v Speaker 1>on the call with Zelenski talking about foreign policy when

0:08:16.364 --> 0:08:19.004
<v Speaker 1>that seems too you know, why in the world would

0:08:19.044 --> 0:08:21.404
<v Speaker 1>he be doing that. I think that that's a really

0:08:21.444 --> 0:08:25.204
<v Speaker 1>interesting trend, and we do see I think this confluence

0:08:25.404 --> 0:08:29.604
<v Speaker 1>of you know, Silicon Valley technocrats, etc. Big money coming

0:08:29.724 --> 0:08:34.324
<v Speaker 1>to Washington in an informal advisory way. That to me,

0:08:34.524 --> 0:08:36.444
<v Speaker 1>and I don't want to you know, I'm not trying

0:08:36.484 --> 0:08:39.484
<v Speaker 1>to draw too many parallels that might not hold, but

0:08:40.604 --> 0:08:44.244
<v Speaker 1>to me, it's actually kind of evocative of what happened

0:08:44.324 --> 0:08:47.164
<v Speaker 1>when Putin came to power initially, where you had a

0:08:47.204 --> 0:08:50.044
<v Speaker 1>lot of oligarchs and a lot of you know, big money,

0:08:50.044 --> 0:08:52.324
<v Speaker 1>a lot of big business people backing him and thinking

0:08:52.564 --> 0:08:53.924
<v Speaker 1>you know this is going to be good for us,

0:08:53.964 --> 0:08:55.404
<v Speaker 1>this is going to be good for our bottom line,

0:08:55.404 --> 0:08:57.404
<v Speaker 1>and we're going to be able to control him. And

0:08:57.484 --> 0:09:00.324
<v Speaker 1>obviously what happened was a lot of them are now

0:09:00.404 --> 0:09:04.244
<v Speaker 1>dead or in jail or in exile because Putin was

0:09:04.284 --> 0:09:07.924
<v Speaker 1>absolutely not controllable and ended up turning on basically all

0:09:07.964 --> 0:09:10.084
<v Speaker 1>of the people who brought him into power. So I

0:09:10.084 --> 0:09:15.084
<v Speaker 1>think that that's an interesting semi parallel and I'm very

0:09:15.084 --> 0:09:19.164
<v Speaker 1>curious to see whether Elon Musk and others like him

0:09:19.164 --> 0:09:22.724
<v Speaker 1>are going to be able to maintain their influence in

0:09:22.844 --> 0:09:25.644
<v Speaker 1>Washington or whether we're going to see something like that

0:09:25.724 --> 0:09:28.244
<v Speaker 1>as well, because we know that Trump has no problems

0:09:28.524 --> 0:09:30.844
<v Speaker 1>turning on people who were allies of his right. He's

0:09:30.884 --> 0:09:32.924
<v Speaker 1>done that. He did that in Trump one point zero

0:09:33.724 --> 0:09:36.164
<v Speaker 1>and Trump two point oho is probably going to be

0:09:36.204 --> 0:09:38.084
<v Speaker 1>more brazen, although as you say, who knows.

0:09:39.524 --> 0:09:41.364
<v Speaker 2>I mean, so in the book, I don't put Trump

0:09:41.364 --> 0:09:44.404
<v Speaker 2>in either the village or the river. I you know,

0:09:44.484 --> 0:09:46.724
<v Speaker 2>I think he wishes he could have been in the village.

0:09:46.764 --> 0:09:50.004
<v Speaker 2>I think he isn't. And at some level, if you

0:09:50.164 --> 0:09:51.404
<v Speaker 2>if you're not wanted, then you're.

0:09:51.284 --> 0:09:53.564
<v Speaker 1>Not fairpoint fair point.

0:09:54.324 --> 0:09:55.364
<v Speaker 2>I mean, look, I don't.

0:09:57.364 --> 0:09:57.804
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:09:57.884 --> 0:10:01.724
<v Speaker 2>I can't like, I can't get into like the Trump

0:10:01.804 --> 0:10:06.524
<v Speaker 2>putin comparisons, he won a fair election by quite a bit.

0:10:08.484 --> 0:10:10.684
<v Speaker 2>He won a fair election a decent amount in part

0:10:10.764 --> 0:10:13.844
<v Speaker 2>by like winning over lots of votes from lots of

0:10:13.884 --> 0:10:17.324
<v Speaker 2>like Hispanic and Asian people, from younger voters, and has

0:10:17.324 --> 0:10:20.364
<v Speaker 2>a more like diverse coalition, And like, I don't know,

0:10:20.444 --> 0:10:23.564
<v Speaker 2>I you know, I don't know. I uh. And we've

0:10:23.564 --> 0:10:26.404
<v Speaker 2>talked about this a little bit last week, but like, okay,

0:10:26.484 --> 0:10:31.204
<v Speaker 2>let me ask you, Maria. Yeah, does the fact that

0:10:31.244 --> 0:10:34.804
<v Speaker 2>Trump won by this convincing march and have you update

0:10:34.844 --> 0:10:37.244
<v Speaker 2>your views on Trump at all?

0:10:37.844 --> 0:10:41.044
<v Speaker 1>It does not have me update my views on Trump himself.

0:10:41.204 --> 0:10:44.444
<v Speaker 1>I still think that Trump is someone who only cares

0:10:44.884 --> 0:10:50.604
<v Speaker 1>about number one. It does make me realize that kind

0:10:50.604 --> 0:10:57.484
<v Speaker 1>of the discontent is goes much deeper than I realized.

0:10:57.564 --> 0:11:02.244
<v Speaker 1>And I do think that The other thing here is

0:11:02.324 --> 0:11:04.764
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about the incumbency effect on the show in

0:11:04.804 --> 0:11:08.244
<v Speaker 1>the past, and it does seem kind of worldwide right

0:11:08.284 --> 0:11:10.284
<v Speaker 1>now that it's kind of Reber saying that, you know,

0:11:10.324 --> 0:11:12.844
<v Speaker 1>with inflation, with all of these things, incumbent parties are

0:11:12.844 --> 0:11:16.164
<v Speaker 1>actually not doing that well. That instead we do see

0:11:16.284 --> 0:11:19.364
<v Speaker 1>people wanting change, and so I would not be at

0:11:19.364 --> 0:11:22.204
<v Speaker 1>all surprised. You know, let's let's talk a little bit.

0:11:22.524 --> 0:11:25.084
<v Speaker 1>You know, you kind of hinted that we'll talk about

0:11:25.124 --> 0:11:27.404
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty six, twenty twenty eight. I wouldn't be at

0:11:27.404 --> 0:11:30.084
<v Speaker 1>all surprised if the Democratic parties make more gains in

0:11:30.084 --> 0:11:34.084
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty six, because you know, when you're the establishment,

0:11:34.604 --> 0:11:37.364
<v Speaker 1>it's much more difficult to kind of play the victimhood

0:11:37.404 --> 0:11:41.404
<v Speaker 1>card and say, oh, you know, it's the establishment versus us.

0:11:41.724 --> 0:11:45.284
<v Speaker 1>Now we are the establishment, So I think that we

0:11:45.444 --> 0:11:48.044
<v Speaker 1>might start seeing kind of things go the other way,

0:11:48.124 --> 0:11:51.124
<v Speaker 1>because I think that some of the vote wasn't necessarily

0:11:51.204 --> 0:11:53.244
<v Speaker 1>a vote for Trump so much as a vote for

0:11:53.764 --> 0:11:56.364
<v Speaker 1>I'm not happy, I'm not doing well. These people in power,

0:11:56.724 --> 0:11:59.364
<v Speaker 1>you know, seem to be responsible, so like, let's put

0:11:59.364 --> 0:12:00.964
<v Speaker 1>someone else in power and hope for the best.

0:12:01.524 --> 0:12:04.724
<v Speaker 2>You're right, Like, relatively speaking, Harris actually lost less vote

0:12:04.724 --> 0:12:07.444
<v Speaker 2>share than a lot of incoment parties around the world.

0:12:07.444 --> 0:12:10.244
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think the US is somewhat exceptional in

0:12:10.244 --> 0:12:14.564
<v Speaker 2>certain ways, but also I mean, yeah, in starting on

0:12:14.684 --> 0:12:20.364
<v Speaker 2>January twentieth, all these headwinds that Democrats face become a tailwind.

0:12:21.804 --> 0:12:26.364
<v Speaker 2>Democrats almost flipped the House. Looks like they'll be something

0:12:26.444 --> 0:12:28.804
<v Speaker 2>like three or four seats short. So you are going

0:12:28.884 --> 0:12:35.164
<v Speaker 2>to have like a effectively freedom caucus led majority, which

0:12:35.204 --> 0:12:37.524
<v Speaker 2>will not always disagree, will not always agree with what

0:12:37.604 --> 0:12:40.684
<v Speaker 2>you might formally have called the up establishment majority. All

0:12:40.684 --> 0:12:42.604
<v Speaker 2>of it is pretty maga now for the most part.

0:12:44.084 --> 0:12:48.964
<v Speaker 2>And Democrats held their losses to four Senate seats, which

0:12:49.004 --> 0:12:51.244
<v Speaker 2>sounds like I'm spinning. But here's the thing. So you

0:12:51.244 --> 0:12:55.004
<v Speaker 2>have forty seven seats now, and you're gonna have Trump

0:12:55.884 --> 0:12:58.604
<v Speaker 2>gable to appoint the cabinet nominees he wants within reason.

0:13:00.444 --> 0:13:04.244
<v Speaker 2>Candemocrats get back to fifty Senate seats by twenty twenty eight,

0:13:04.884 --> 0:13:08.004
<v Speaker 2>in which case we have a President Shapiro or President

0:13:08.044 --> 0:13:11.844
<v Speaker 2>Gretchen Whitmer or ever else. Gavin Newsom, I think probably

0:13:11.884 --> 0:13:14.084
<v Speaker 2>thinks he's gonna get it that I think that time.

0:13:15.724 --> 0:13:19.884
<v Speaker 2>So for Gavin Newsom, I'm just kidding. Uh, you know,

0:13:19.924 --> 0:13:22.564
<v Speaker 2>can they have a democratic Senate? And the answer is yes.

0:13:22.604 --> 0:13:25.524
<v Speaker 2>It's not that hopeless for Democrats because they need three

0:13:25.564 --> 0:13:27.324
<v Speaker 2>pickups if they win the presidency. They can win with

0:13:27.324 --> 0:13:31.524
<v Speaker 2>fifty to fifty. There are two races in North Carolina

0:13:31.604 --> 0:13:34.244
<v Speaker 2>between now and twenty twenty eight. There is one race

0:13:34.284 --> 0:13:36.604
<v Speaker 2>in Wisconsin that's gup held, and there's one in Maine

0:13:36.604 --> 0:13:39.484
<v Speaker 2>where Susan Collins keeps holding on every year, but now

0:13:39.524 --> 0:13:41.724
<v Speaker 2>her luck might run out, right, So Democrats need to

0:13:41.764 --> 0:13:45.364
<v Speaker 2>win three of those four without losing any of their own.

0:13:45.444 --> 0:13:48.004
<v Speaker 2>There are some other longer shot bets. Ohio, where Shared

0:13:48.044 --> 0:13:51.964
<v Speaker 2>Brown lost has a special election because of Jade Vance

0:13:51.964 --> 0:13:55.204
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty six, and that's a race Democrats will

0:13:55.204 --> 0:13:58.044
<v Speaker 2>surely contest. If he ran again in a more blue environment,

0:13:58.804 --> 0:14:02.404
<v Speaker 2>he might be in a toss up race there. But yeah,

0:14:02.404 --> 0:14:06.764
<v Speaker 2>look we're kind of going back to like, look, all

0:14:07.124 --> 0:14:09.604
<v Speaker 2>the risks, the existential risks to democracy, I think think

0:14:09.644 --> 0:14:15.244
<v Speaker 2>are are less now because you had a clear verdict.

0:14:15.284 --> 0:14:17.964
<v Speaker 2>You didn't have a disputed verdict, Harris, Thank goodness didn't

0:14:17.964 --> 0:14:20.324
<v Speaker 2>dispute the verdict. I'm sure Trump would have if the

0:14:20.364 --> 0:14:24.804
<v Speaker 2>same result had been only in their foot. You know, look,

0:14:24.844 --> 0:14:26.564
<v Speaker 2>you'll have commentary to say, well, what he doesn't want

0:14:26.564 --> 0:14:29.084
<v Speaker 2>to give up the presidency in twenty twenty eight. I've

0:14:29.084 --> 0:14:35.044
<v Speaker 2>never seen any type of like warrant for that theory. Necessarily, No,

0:14:35.204 --> 0:14:36.604
<v Speaker 2>I hope, I hope you're right.

0:14:36.644 --> 0:14:38.404
<v Speaker 1>I hope you're right, and I do think that the

0:14:38.804 --> 0:14:42.204
<v Speaker 1>I do think that it is good that we that

0:14:42.204 --> 0:14:44.564
<v Speaker 1>that this was not disputed. I think that that's one

0:14:44.604 --> 0:14:48.684
<v Speaker 1>of the very few silver linings of this election. And

0:14:48.764 --> 0:14:51.284
<v Speaker 1>I do and I do really hope that kind of

0:14:51.484 --> 0:14:55.164
<v Speaker 1>democracy holds holds enough that we have another free and

0:14:55.204 --> 0:14:58.484
<v Speaker 1>fair election four years down the line. And until we

0:14:58.524 --> 0:15:00.484
<v Speaker 1>see signs that that's not the case, I'm just going to,

0:15:00.844 --> 0:15:04.164
<v Speaker 1>you know, assume that that's going to happen and that

0:15:04.324 --> 0:15:07.564
<v Speaker 1>you know, our our democratic transition will work. Do you

0:15:07.804 --> 0:15:12.004
<v Speaker 1>have any any parting thoughts anything you think we should

0:15:12.004 --> 0:15:15.724
<v Speaker 1>be looking at, paying attention to kind of heading forward

0:15:16.364 --> 0:15:20.204
<v Speaker 1>or just let's revisit when it becomes a little bit

0:15:20.204 --> 0:15:22.164
<v Speaker 1>more clear. I am like one of the things that

0:15:22.204 --> 0:15:25.484
<v Speaker 1>I'm very curious about is to see kind of how

0:15:25.524 --> 0:15:31.044
<v Speaker 1>much the Muskian influence will will remain in the Trump administration,

0:15:31.284 --> 0:15:33.804
<v Speaker 1>or if he'll turn on him sooner rather than later.

0:15:34.044 --> 0:15:36.844
<v Speaker 1>It's something that I'm just like quite curious about.

0:15:37.164 --> 0:15:39.164
<v Speaker 2>You know. Look just for like the pure economic stuff

0:15:39.164 --> 0:15:42.004
<v Speaker 2>between the tariffs and between what I expect will be

0:15:42.044 --> 0:15:44.364
<v Speaker 2>a lot of cronyism in the White House. I don't

0:15:44.364 --> 0:15:49.404
<v Speaker 2>necessarily expect a marvel of economic efficiency exactly. So for me,

0:15:49.444 --> 0:15:50.844
<v Speaker 2>and again that's kind of again more of like an

0:15:50.844 --> 0:15:53.164
<v Speaker 2>advanced argument. Tariffs are one of those things that seem

0:15:53.204 --> 0:15:55.684
<v Speaker 2>appealing on the surface, but the economics are really bad

0:15:55.724 --> 0:15:59.204
<v Speaker 2>if you're an econ wonk. So yeah, I worry about that.

0:15:59.244 --> 0:16:00.924
<v Speaker 2>And you know, I think Democrats a new way to

0:16:00.964 --> 0:16:05.564
<v Speaker 2>like have attack lines on cronyism, which can which can

0:16:05.604 --> 0:16:08.244
<v Speaker 2>dovetail well with populism of different kinds. I mean, I

0:16:08.244 --> 0:16:09.604
<v Speaker 2>think they don't know which way to go. I think

0:16:09.604 --> 0:16:14.804
<v Speaker 2>they're kind of like shocked at how much certain parts

0:16:14.804 --> 0:16:17.084
<v Speaker 2>and it's again it's minority of Silicon Valley. It's probably

0:16:17.684 --> 0:16:20.764
<v Speaker 2>a quarter or thirty percent or something. But I think

0:16:20.764 --> 0:16:23.244
<v Speaker 2>they were not ready for how much money there would

0:16:23.284 --> 0:16:26.884
<v Speaker 2>suddenly be from the crypto space and from the AI

0:16:26.964 --> 0:16:29.844
<v Speaker 2>space and from things like that mostly working against them,

0:16:29.844 --> 0:16:31.244
<v Speaker 2>and what it was going to be like to have

0:16:32.724 --> 0:16:34.844
<v Speaker 2>these people who of course, of course Democrats went to

0:16:34.844 --> 0:16:37.204
<v Speaker 2>discredit Elon Musk, and Elon Musk acted like a total

0:16:37.244 --> 0:16:39.964
<v Speaker 2>fucking goofball at various points of the campaign and retweets

0:16:39.964 --> 0:16:42.244
<v Speaker 2>a lot of unreliable information, but at the same time

0:16:42.484 --> 0:16:44.364
<v Speaker 2>he is a different type of person who can vouch

0:16:44.724 --> 0:16:47.844
<v Speaker 2>for Trump and give him some credibility, as are these

0:16:47.884 --> 0:16:53.124
<v Speaker 2>podcasters and the various like podcasts rows of different kind,

0:16:53.364 --> 0:16:55.884
<v Speaker 2>you know, as as his increasing number of minority supporters

0:16:55.964 --> 0:16:58.564
<v Speaker 2>racial minority or ethnic minority, and so like, there are

0:16:58.564 --> 0:17:01.724
<v Speaker 2>people that can like that can now vouch for Trump

0:17:01.764 --> 0:17:04.004
<v Speaker 2>and kind of like and all the Democrats are kind

0:17:04.004 --> 0:17:08.284
<v Speaker 2>of like uncool dorks pretty much, and like how can

0:17:08.284 --> 0:17:11.044
<v Speaker 2>they they have alebrities? I mean, joy Read the MSNBC

0:17:11.124 --> 0:17:14.604
<v Speaker 2>host was like, you know, Beyonce endorsed and blah blah.

0:17:14.604 --> 0:17:16.164
<v Speaker 2>It's like, come on, like you can't. Like it's not

0:17:16.204 --> 0:17:21.364
<v Speaker 2>like actually how you win elections, you know. But look,

0:17:21.404 --> 0:17:25.884
<v Speaker 2>look Democrats, the sooner Democrats. I think this is controversial.

0:17:28.164 --> 0:17:31.684
<v Speaker 2>Trump is likely to hang himself hang himself to be

0:17:31.764 --> 0:17:36.044
<v Speaker 2>unpopular again in the normal ways that incumbents are unpopular

0:17:36.124 --> 0:17:42.364
<v Speaker 2>in their second term, meaning spending too much money even

0:17:42.364 --> 0:17:44.524
<v Speaker 2>though GUP is supposed for definit production, they're not. They

0:17:44.524 --> 0:17:46.764
<v Speaker 2>probably have another big tax cut that we're not paying for,

0:17:46.964 --> 0:17:51.924
<v Speaker 2>and engaging in unpopular foreign policy conduct and personal scandals

0:17:51.924 --> 0:17:54.044
<v Speaker 2>and just general fatigue and bad decision making that you

0:17:54.124 --> 0:17:56.284
<v Speaker 2>make when when you're seventy eight. I mean, Trump is

0:17:56.324 --> 0:17:58.124
<v Speaker 2>a few months older than Biden was at the start

0:17:58.164 --> 0:18:01.644
<v Speaker 2>of his first term, and so you know, I don't

0:18:02.124 --> 0:18:06.444
<v Speaker 2>I don't know that the rhetoric of like existential crisis,

0:18:06.484 --> 0:18:08.724
<v Speaker 2>like I don't think it was helpful to Harris and

0:18:08.764 --> 0:18:12.284
<v Speaker 2>I don't know that helpful to Democrats now. And it's

0:18:12.324 --> 0:18:13.924
<v Speaker 2>made a little easier when you actually have a clear

0:18:14.044 --> 0:18:15.764
<v Speaker 2>verdict on an election night where Trump will win the

0:18:16.244 --> 0:18:19.444
<v Speaker 2>popular vote. And so you know, looking forward to and

0:18:19.484 --> 0:18:22.124
<v Speaker 2>by the way, I think the Democrats have taken this

0:18:22.244 --> 0:18:28.724
<v Speaker 2>loss about as constructively as you possibly can. I have

0:18:28.924 --> 0:18:33.324
<v Speaker 2>not seen a lot of liberal tiers necessarily right, you know,

0:18:33.404 --> 0:18:35.884
<v Speaker 2>in general, Democrats recognize that we have to move to

0:18:36.084 --> 0:18:39.724
<v Speaker 2>the center, which is hard for parties to recognize. And

0:18:39.764 --> 0:18:42.804
<v Speaker 2>that seems like that seems good. So you know, look

0:18:42.844 --> 0:18:47.204
<v Speaker 2>as far as like having steering the country back toward

0:18:47.364 --> 0:18:49.764
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. Maybe I'm neglecting the damage Trump could

0:18:49.844 --> 0:18:51.404
<v Speaker 2>do in four years.

0:18:52.684 --> 0:18:54.884
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, I think there is a lot of

0:18:54.964 --> 0:18:58.084
<v Speaker 1>damage that people don't really talk about that he that

0:18:58.164 --> 0:19:01.524
<v Speaker 1>he could do in four years. You know, some one

0:19:01.524 --> 0:19:05.484
<v Speaker 1>of the things we haven't talked about is science, and

0:19:05.844 --> 0:19:08.084
<v Speaker 1>we know what happened during Trump one point zero with

0:19:08.124 --> 0:19:12.604
<v Speaker 1>science funding, with age funding, research funding, and the types

0:19:12.644 --> 0:19:16.004
<v Speaker 1>of research that suddenly could not get any funding, you know,

0:19:16.284 --> 0:19:19.564
<v Speaker 1>fetal cells, stem cell research, like a lot of things

0:19:19.644 --> 0:19:23.444
<v Speaker 1>that are crucially important, and people are afraid that that's

0:19:23.484 --> 0:19:29.244
<v Speaker 1>going to happen again. RFK, you know, being potentially very

0:19:29.284 --> 0:19:32.524
<v Speaker 1>influential in the administration. I think that there are some

0:19:32.564 --> 0:19:35.364
<v Speaker 1>effects like that that we're not even thinking about, you know,

0:19:35.644 --> 0:19:38.524
<v Speaker 1>or like religion, you know, bringing religion into classrooms, what

0:19:38.684 --> 0:19:41.964
<v Speaker 1>happens with federal judge appointments. So right now, we just

0:19:42.044 --> 0:19:47.244
<v Speaker 1>had the Louisiana requirement to put ten commandments in every

0:19:47.244 --> 0:19:50.004
<v Speaker 1>classroom that was actually struck down. We're going to see

0:19:50.004 --> 0:19:52.444
<v Speaker 1>an appeals process there, right all of those appointments that

0:19:52.484 --> 0:19:56.244
<v Speaker 1>Trump is going to be making, changing the judicial system.

0:19:56.844 --> 0:19:58.644
<v Speaker 1>We'll see what happens to the Supreme Court. You know,

0:19:58.684 --> 0:20:02.084
<v Speaker 1>what are there retires, who retires or dies? You know,

0:20:02.604 --> 0:20:06.084
<v Speaker 1>I hope no one dies, and how Trumpian the Supreme

0:20:06.084 --> 0:20:09.244
<v Speaker 1>Court becomes. Because there's a difference between conservative and Trumpian, right,

0:20:09.404 --> 0:20:12.764
<v Speaker 1>There's a big difference between you know, your regular conservative

0:20:13.084 --> 0:20:16.404
<v Speaker 1>judge and a Trump judge appointee. So I think that

0:20:16.444 --> 0:20:19.004
<v Speaker 1>there are lots of effects like that that we haven't

0:20:19.004 --> 0:20:23.084
<v Speaker 1>talked about yet that Trump could very much put in place.

0:20:23.124 --> 0:20:26.404
<v Speaker 1>In four years. I think we will potentially see things

0:20:26.444 --> 0:20:29.404
<v Speaker 1>that are going to be incredibly harmful.

0:20:30.684 --> 0:20:34.364
<v Speaker 2>There's some good stuff. No one good thing is I

0:20:34.364 --> 0:20:37.644
<v Speaker 2>think we'll probably end up getting a ban on gain

0:20:37.684 --> 0:20:39.884
<v Speaker 2>a function research which may have been responsible for the

0:20:39.924 --> 0:20:43.524
<v Speaker 2>COVID pandemic and I think is from an expected value standpoint,

0:20:43.524 --> 0:20:44.884
<v Speaker 2>has negative expected values.

0:20:44.964 --> 0:20:46.404
<v Speaker 1>So that's good.

0:20:48.564 --> 0:20:51.244
<v Speaker 2>You know, I could probably point out a few other thing.

0:20:51.244 --> 0:20:53.124
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to necessarily give people a laundry list

0:20:53.164 --> 0:20:55.524
<v Speaker 2>of every single position that that Nates hold, but yeah,

0:20:55.644 --> 0:20:58.164
<v Speaker 2>that Nate holds. But yet, Look, one reason why I

0:20:58.164 --> 0:21:03.244
<v Speaker 2>find myself being a bit less worried about Trump than

0:21:03.284 --> 0:21:05.484
<v Speaker 2>I might have been with that larger victory is that

0:21:05.524 --> 0:21:08.004
<v Speaker 2>it does create more of a mandate for more mainstream

0:21:08.684 --> 0:21:12.284
<v Speaker 2>cabinet members to come in, right, you know, Secretary of

0:21:12.284 --> 0:21:15.084
<v Speaker 2>say it's a good job. But the fact that that

0:21:15.204 --> 0:21:18.364
<v Speaker 2>Marco Ribio one of the more I mean he ran

0:21:18.364 --> 0:21:20.084
<v Speaker 2>a band president campaign Tway sixteen, but one of the

0:21:20.084 --> 0:21:25.404
<v Speaker 2>more normal electable GOP senators and maybe the most important role.

0:21:25.524 --> 0:21:28.244
<v Speaker 2>I mean that that seems valuable.

0:21:28.284 --> 0:21:31.524
<v Speaker 1>Well, right, here's hoping. And you know, and I do

0:21:31.604 --> 0:21:35.324
<v Speaker 1>think that if we see I hope that we see politics.

0:21:36.084 --> 0:21:38.564
<v Speaker 1>You know, I would love to see politics moving more

0:21:38.604 --> 0:21:41.244
<v Speaker 1>to the center. I would love to see, you know,

0:21:41.324 --> 0:21:43.684
<v Speaker 1>third parties become stronger. There are lots of things I

0:21:43.684 --> 0:21:46.364
<v Speaker 1>would love to see. And if any of those end

0:21:46.444 --> 0:21:49.484
<v Speaker 1>up being you know, downstream effects from this, that would

0:21:49.484 --> 0:21:50.124
<v Speaker 1>be wonderful.

0:21:52.204 --> 0:21:56.284
<v Speaker 2>Mariet, we can now guiltlessly talk about poker. So you

0:21:56.324 --> 0:22:01.644
<v Speaker 2>want to do that, Let's do it after this break.

0:22:16.084 --> 0:22:21.924
<v Speaker 1>Okay, let's now guiltlessly talk about poker. NIDE. So we

0:22:22.204 --> 0:22:27.204
<v Speaker 1>are now finished with the North American Poker Tour, the

0:22:27.324 --> 0:22:31.924
<v Speaker 1>NAPT which is the Poker Stars flagship event in North America.

0:22:32.404 --> 0:22:35.524
<v Speaker 1>So there were the main event had almost nine hundred players,

0:22:36.444 --> 0:22:40.924
<v Speaker 1>and I was lucky enough to be four of those players.

0:22:42.684 --> 0:22:47.244
<v Speaker 2>Four of those So despite Norman Chad's scolding, you're still

0:22:47.324 --> 0:22:48.284
<v Speaker 2>rebuying into these things.

0:22:48.684 --> 0:22:53.444
<v Speaker 1>I am still rebuying despite the scolding that I received. Yes,

0:22:53.684 --> 0:22:58.644
<v Speaker 1>so I the first Okay, so I played. So day

0:22:58.644 --> 0:23:01.644
<v Speaker 1>one of the main event was November fifth, so that

0:23:01.844 --> 0:23:04.004
<v Speaker 1>was kind of a big day in the country, and

0:23:04.084 --> 0:23:06.364
<v Speaker 1>I was doing quite well. You know, everything was fine.

0:23:06.404 --> 0:23:08.684
<v Speaker 1>I had plenty of chips. I never had a lot

0:23:08.684 --> 0:23:10.924
<v Speaker 1>of chips, but I was never you know, I was

0:23:11.004 --> 0:23:14.164
<v Speaker 1>kind of hanging in there. And then as the as

0:23:14.164 --> 0:23:16.924
<v Speaker 1>it got late, you know, second to last level of

0:23:16.964 --> 0:23:20.844
<v Speaker 1>the night, when it became quite clear that this was

0:23:20.884 --> 0:23:23.964
<v Speaker 1>not going to end well for Kamala Harris, that Trump

0:23:24.004 --> 0:23:26.004
<v Speaker 1>was probably going to win. I think I texted you

0:23:26.084 --> 0:23:29.244
<v Speaker 1>a few times about my existential dread. You did not

0:23:29.364 --> 0:23:34.244
<v Speaker 1>engage with them with those two Marie texts, and I

0:23:34.324 --> 0:23:37.404
<v Speaker 1>quite frankly punted, you know, I made uh, you know,

0:23:37.444 --> 0:23:40.284
<v Speaker 1>I made a decision that it wasn't a horrible punt.

0:23:40.924 --> 0:23:44.244
<v Speaker 1>What do you think about this name? I had about

0:23:44.964 --> 0:23:49.564
<v Speaker 1>thirty five big blinds. I was in the small blind.

0:23:49.604 --> 0:23:52.724
<v Speaker 1>It had folded to me. I had ace ten offsuit.

0:23:53.444 --> 0:23:55.164
<v Speaker 1>So for people who don't play poker, that's a very

0:23:55.164 --> 0:23:56.844
<v Speaker 1>good hand. And you know in the small blind when

0:23:56.884 --> 0:24:01.644
<v Speaker 1>it's folded to you, I raised, the big blind re raised,

0:24:02.644 --> 0:24:04.204
<v Speaker 1>and I shoved with my.

0:24:04.204 --> 0:24:06.324
<v Speaker 2>Ace ton how many big BLUs you have?

0:24:06.644 --> 0:24:07.484
<v Speaker 1>About thirty five?

0:24:08.804 --> 0:24:12.964
<v Speaker 2>So the small blind, big blind?

0:24:13.564 --> 0:24:16.644
<v Speaker 1>So I raised to like three big blinds. Big blind

0:24:16.684 --> 0:24:19.564
<v Speaker 1>re raises to let's say, you know, nine big blinds,

0:24:19.564 --> 0:24:20.084
<v Speaker 1>and I shove.

0:24:20.964 --> 0:24:24.764
<v Speaker 2>I think it's probably pretty close to gto. Yeah, I

0:24:24.804 --> 0:24:26.764
<v Speaker 2>think that it's I.

0:24:26.764 --> 0:24:29.444
<v Speaker 1>Mean, you're not supposed to fold, right, You're definitely not

0:24:29.484 --> 0:24:32.044
<v Speaker 1>supposed to fold. Because so for people who don't play poker.

0:24:32.044 --> 0:24:35.604
<v Speaker 1>By the way, blind versus blind confrontations are very interesting

0:24:35.724 --> 0:24:39.324
<v Speaker 1>because you know, people think that you're taking advantage, right,

0:24:39.364 --> 0:24:42.164
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of psychological play there. But but but

0:24:42.244 --> 0:24:44.804
<v Speaker 1>I busted. That was my first bullet, and then my

0:24:44.884 --> 0:24:50.164
<v Speaker 1>second two bullets that was November sixth. Those were not puns,

0:24:50.164 --> 0:24:52.324
<v Speaker 1>but I just you know, sometimes you have those poker

0:24:52.404 --> 0:24:54.364
<v Speaker 1>days when you can't win a hand, right. I never

0:24:54.404 --> 0:24:57.164
<v Speaker 1>got above starting stack, like, I could never get anything going.

0:24:57.844 --> 0:25:00.964
<v Speaker 1>So I ended up not being able to do much

0:25:01.044 --> 0:25:04.404
<v Speaker 1>over there. And so then I bought in for the

0:25:04.644 --> 0:25:08.604
<v Speaker 1>fourth time, my fourth bullet on the start of day two,

0:25:08.604 --> 0:25:10.564
<v Speaker 1>which was the last that you can buy in. So

0:25:10.604 --> 0:25:13.164
<v Speaker 1>I started the day with twenty big blinds for people

0:25:13.164 --> 0:25:16.124
<v Speaker 1>who don't play poker, that's playable, but not you know,

0:25:16.124 --> 0:25:18.844
<v Speaker 1>not a huge stack by any stretch of the imagination,

0:25:19.884 --> 0:25:23.204
<v Speaker 1>and far below average. I think average at that point

0:25:23.364 --> 0:25:25.724
<v Speaker 1>was like over fifty big blinds, close to sixty. Because

0:25:25.724 --> 0:25:27.564
<v Speaker 1>this is a you know, it's a main event. So

0:25:28.124 --> 0:25:30.164
<v Speaker 1>on day two we have ninety minute levels, like this

0:25:30.244 --> 0:25:35.284
<v Speaker 1>is a deep stacked tournament. And yeah, so I ended

0:25:35.364 --> 0:25:38.964
<v Speaker 1>up starting day two with twenty big blinds and had

0:25:39.004 --> 0:25:43.524
<v Speaker 1>a good day too, but didn't bag a lot. Started

0:25:43.604 --> 0:25:46.324
<v Speaker 1>day three, made day three right, made day three with

0:25:46.724 --> 0:25:50.724
<v Speaker 1>thirty big blinds, and ended up making the final two

0:25:50.804 --> 0:25:56.924
<v Speaker 1>tables of the tournament on day four and ended up

0:25:57.084 --> 0:26:00.884
<v Speaker 1>so first place was almost eight hundred thousand dollars. I

0:26:01.044 --> 0:26:05.404
<v Speaker 1>was out in fourteenth, so I got around forty thousand dollars,

0:26:05.484 --> 0:26:06.164
<v Speaker 1>and it was sad.

0:26:07.324 --> 0:26:11.284
<v Speaker 2>It is so perverse that, like you almost went just

0:26:11.324 --> 0:26:13.604
<v Speaker 2>shitloads of money, and then it's kind of crazy.

0:26:14.124 --> 0:26:18.644
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, it is kind of crazy. And so so

0:26:18.764 --> 0:26:21.524
<v Speaker 1>for day four, you know, I was on the televised

0:26:21.524 --> 0:26:24.644
<v Speaker 1>table the whole time, which is actually quite interesting because

0:26:24.884 --> 0:26:30.444
<v Speaker 1>you know the dynamical No, I don't I don't love

0:26:30.524 --> 0:26:33.644
<v Speaker 1>giving away all of that information. I would prefer people

0:26:33.724 --> 0:26:36.684
<v Speaker 1>not know how I play, to be perfectly honest, But

0:26:37.524 --> 0:26:40.524
<v Speaker 1>I've gotten you know, I understand that as an ambassador

0:26:40.604 --> 0:26:44.204
<v Speaker 1>for poker, it's important to do that, and I tried

0:26:44.284 --> 0:26:47.204
<v Speaker 1>just not to think about it. There was one hand

0:26:47.284 --> 0:26:51.004
<v Speaker 1>where I actually ended up making a correct fold on

0:26:51.044 --> 0:26:54.804
<v Speaker 1>the turn with top pair I had. This was also

0:26:54.884 --> 0:26:58.204
<v Speaker 1>a blind versus blind situation, so I had limped in

0:26:58.284 --> 0:27:03.364
<v Speaker 1>with ACE nine and the big blind checked. The flop

0:27:03.644 --> 0:27:08.324
<v Speaker 1>was ACE five three. I bet one blind, got raised

0:27:08.804 --> 0:27:12.284
<v Speaker 1>called the turn was a five. I checked and ended

0:27:12.364 --> 0:27:16.484
<v Speaker 1>up folding to a big turn bet. And I later

0:27:16.564 --> 0:27:19.284
<v Speaker 1>heard people talking about it, you know, once we were

0:27:19.324 --> 0:27:23.884
<v Speaker 1>on break and the stream had caught up, saying, you know,

0:27:23.924 --> 0:27:26.604
<v Speaker 1>oh my god, like I can't believe she folded, like

0:27:26.684 --> 0:27:29.084
<v Speaker 1>she should have called and paid you off there talking

0:27:29.084 --> 0:27:31.484
<v Speaker 1>to the person I was playing against, brock Wilson, who's

0:27:31.484 --> 0:27:33.804
<v Speaker 1>a great player. He had five three right, so he

0:27:33.844 --> 0:27:36.604
<v Speaker 1>had turned a full house and so I was drawing

0:27:36.884 --> 0:27:40.364
<v Speaker 1>pretty much done and so it was a very good

0:27:40.404 --> 0:27:42.484
<v Speaker 1>fault fold. But one of the reasons they thought I

0:27:42.484 --> 0:27:45.324
<v Speaker 1>would have called was because it was on a TV stream, right,

0:27:45.404 --> 0:27:47.804
<v Speaker 1>and you don't want to look dumb folding top hair

0:27:48.324 --> 0:27:51.284
<v Speaker 1>in a spot like that where you're almost always good.

0:27:51.684 --> 0:27:54.244
<v Speaker 1>And I said, you know, I just don't care, right,

0:27:54.324 --> 0:27:56.204
<v Speaker 1>like I don't actually give a fuck of people.

0:27:57.044 --> 0:28:00.084
<v Speaker 2>Usually when you feel when you feel that past because

0:28:00.084 --> 0:28:03.164
<v Speaker 2>folding was hard, right, when you feel that temptation to

0:28:03.284 --> 0:28:05.804
<v Speaker 2>make a tight fold that I'm trying to train myself

0:28:05.844 --> 0:28:08.044
<v Speaker 2>to like just flick the cards in right, not get

0:28:08.084 --> 0:28:08.684
<v Speaker 2>too attached.

0:28:08.924 --> 0:28:14.524
<v Speaker 1>So let's also talk about let's talk about a hand

0:28:14.644 --> 0:28:17.804
<v Speaker 1>that and we'll stop talking strategy after this, I promise.

0:28:18.124 --> 0:28:21.124
<v Speaker 1>But you know, whenever I review performances like this, right,

0:28:21.404 --> 0:28:24.124
<v Speaker 1>it's such a big it's such a big difference to

0:28:24.124 --> 0:28:27.044
<v Speaker 1>come in fourteenth and first, right, I made forty thousand,

0:28:27.324 --> 0:28:30.564
<v Speaker 1>I could have made eight hundred thousand, right, Like, that's

0:28:30.764 --> 0:28:34.244
<v Speaker 1>that's huge, and every single place at that point is

0:28:34.284 --> 0:28:37.484
<v Speaker 1>worth a lot of money, and so you go through

0:28:37.524 --> 0:28:40.324
<v Speaker 1>all of your decisions. My bust out hand don't regret

0:28:40.364 --> 0:28:42.284
<v Speaker 1>at all. You know, I had nine big blinds under

0:28:42.324 --> 0:28:46.684
<v Speaker 1>the gun and shoved jack, tapsuited right. That was perfectly fine,

0:28:47.204 --> 0:28:49.604
<v Speaker 1>ended up running into queen's and did not suck out

0:28:49.764 --> 0:28:52.564
<v Speaker 1>the poker term for hitting when you should not you

0:28:52.564 --> 0:28:55.884
<v Speaker 1>should not hit. So that was totally fine. But I

0:28:55.924 --> 0:28:59.564
<v Speaker 1>do regret a hand that got me short where I

0:28:59.724 --> 0:29:03.524
<v Speaker 1>raised Ace King, one of the best starting hands from

0:29:03.604 --> 0:29:06.964
<v Speaker 1>under the gun and got called by the big blind

0:29:07.564 --> 0:29:11.124
<v Speaker 1>and the flop I don't actually remember the exact flop,

0:29:11.124 --> 0:29:12.884
<v Speaker 1>but I think it was like something like eight four duce,

0:29:14.164 --> 0:29:18.284
<v Speaker 1>and I ended up checking back as opposed to betting,

0:29:18.724 --> 0:29:21.924
<v Speaker 1>and I think that there's you know, it's Ace King

0:29:22.244 --> 0:29:26.524
<v Speaker 1>off suit. Okay, Yeah, So I checked instead of betting

0:29:27.204 --> 0:29:28.644
<v Speaker 1>when it was checked to me. And then the turn

0:29:28.724 --> 0:29:33.004
<v Speaker 1>was a queen and it's a big blind bet and

0:29:33.244 --> 0:29:35.604
<v Speaker 1>bet bigger than I would have bet the turn. But

0:29:35.764 --> 0:29:37.684
<v Speaker 1>he ended up betting and I called, and then the

0:29:37.764 --> 0:29:40.284
<v Speaker 1>river was a blank and he checked and I checked

0:29:40.284 --> 0:29:43.724
<v Speaker 1>back and he ended up winning with a four. And

0:29:43.924 --> 0:29:45.924
<v Speaker 1>I really regret how I played this hand. I actually

0:29:45.924 --> 0:29:48.604
<v Speaker 1>think I messed it up multiple times. And that's the

0:29:48.644 --> 0:29:51.284
<v Speaker 1>hand that kind of I think that had I played

0:29:51.284 --> 0:29:53.404
<v Speaker 1>it differently, and even if I'd busted, even if he

0:29:53.444 --> 0:29:55.764
<v Speaker 1>had hero called me with his four, I think I

0:29:55.764 --> 0:29:57.564
<v Speaker 1>would have felt much better about it than I did

0:29:57.604 --> 0:30:00.924
<v Speaker 1>in retrospect from having played it more passively. So I

0:30:00.964 --> 0:30:04.404
<v Speaker 1>think that this is the show of the show, right

0:30:04.484 --> 0:30:08.404
<v Speaker 1>Passive passive play is not is not is a decision,

0:30:08.644 --> 0:30:10.964
<v Speaker 1>and it's not alw is the right decision even when

0:30:11.004 --> 0:30:15.844
<v Speaker 1>you're have ic M considerations, which is independent chip model,

0:30:16.164 --> 0:30:17.244
<v Speaker 1>pay jumps, et cetera.

0:30:17.684 --> 0:30:19.204
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because the reason you're called because you can just

0:30:19.204 --> 0:30:23.084
<v Speaker 2>fold the turn if he's betting into a queen. I mean,

0:30:23.124 --> 0:30:25.124
<v Speaker 2>I can mean different things, but but you don't have

0:30:25.164 --> 0:30:26.884
<v Speaker 2>a pair. It's supposed to be a good card for

0:30:26.924 --> 0:30:29.444
<v Speaker 2>your range, right, So if he's betting, if you are calling,

0:30:29.524 --> 0:30:32.524
<v Speaker 2>then it's because I think you're calling almost your whole range, right,

0:30:33.684 --> 0:30:37.124
<v Speaker 2>And so it's calling with the intent of betting pretty

0:30:37.164 --> 0:30:43.284
<v Speaker 2>big on the river exactly, maybe maybe raising certain rivers

0:30:43.404 --> 0:30:47.564
<v Speaker 2>against a small bet with your representatives queen. And so yeah,

0:30:47.604 --> 0:30:50.844
<v Speaker 2>I look, I think you mentioned earlier how like, oh,

0:30:50.884 --> 0:30:53.684
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't quite seem like a punt, right, And I'm

0:30:53.724 --> 0:30:54.924
<v Speaker 2>not sure if this this is like a hand where

0:30:54.924 --> 0:30:58.124
<v Speaker 2>it's more in the passive category. But like sometimes the

0:30:58.124 --> 0:31:02.324
<v Speaker 2>things that involve like multi street planning are the things

0:31:02.324 --> 0:31:05.724
<v Speaker 2>that tend to go away when when you're tired, when

0:31:05.764 --> 0:31:08.284
<v Speaker 2>you're fatigued, or been playing too much for whatever else. Right,

0:31:08.324 --> 0:31:10.804
<v Speaker 2>And so it's so you know, the twenty percent of

0:31:10.804 --> 0:31:13.644
<v Speaker 2>the time you're supposed to reaschhove Ace ten off student

0:31:13.644 --> 0:31:15.484
<v Speaker 2>at thirty five bigs, maybe you're doing that eight centimes

0:31:15.524 --> 0:31:17.524
<v Speaker 2>because you have to just thinkings out of your hand, then, right,

0:31:17.604 --> 0:31:20.364
<v Speaker 2>you don't have to like have this complex plan and

0:31:20.404 --> 0:31:21.764
<v Speaker 2>so and so that can be a sign of.

0:31:21.724 --> 0:31:26.644
<v Speaker 1>Fatigue, I think, and we'll be back right after this.

0:31:43.084 --> 0:31:46.204
<v Speaker 2>You seem to have had I guess since the World Series,

0:31:46.284 --> 0:31:49.004
<v Speaker 2>like a really good run of yeah poker. What do

0:31:49.004 --> 0:31:51.324
<v Speaker 2>you attribute that to? Just variants? Are you doing things differently?

0:31:52.084 --> 0:31:52.284
<v Speaker 2>You know?

0:31:52.364 --> 0:31:54.484
<v Speaker 1>I think I think a lot of it is variants.

0:31:54.964 --> 0:31:58.404
<v Speaker 2>As always talked about what it's always the boring answers.

0:31:58.484 --> 0:32:00.324
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, I mean I think a lot of it

0:32:00.364 --> 0:32:04.364
<v Speaker 1>is variants in the sense that you know, I, I've

0:32:04.764 --> 0:32:07.524
<v Speaker 1>you know, been studying and trying to play well the

0:32:07.564 --> 0:32:10.604
<v Speaker 1>whole year unfortunately, you know, the World Series. I just

0:32:11.044 --> 0:32:15.564
<v Speaker 1>as we know, around like absolute shit and really below expectation.

0:32:16.804 --> 0:32:20.884
<v Speaker 1>Some of it is probably just more intensive study because

0:32:20.924 --> 0:32:23.724
<v Speaker 1>I was really upset after the World Series, and that's

0:32:23.764 --> 0:32:28.124
<v Speaker 1>a good motivation. Upset not because like oh I'm so sad,

0:32:28.204 --> 0:32:30.204
<v Speaker 1>you know, poor me, but upset because I was like,

0:32:30.244 --> 0:32:32.924
<v Speaker 1>you know, am I I realize I'm not running well,

0:32:32.924 --> 0:32:35.564
<v Speaker 1>but I really want to up my game, like I

0:32:35.644 --> 0:32:38.044
<v Speaker 1>need to be competitive. Otherwise, what am I even doing

0:32:38.124 --> 0:32:41.604
<v Speaker 1>spending my time playing poker? Right? What am I doing

0:32:41.684 --> 0:32:44.244
<v Speaker 1>just spending money on this? I don't I don't like

0:32:44.324 --> 0:32:48.284
<v Speaker 1>that feeling, And so that's I think do never underestimate

0:32:48.364 --> 0:32:51.404
<v Speaker 1>that as a motivation when you're trying to do better.

0:32:51.484 --> 0:32:53.004
<v Speaker 2>What kind of things have you been studying?

0:32:54.604 --> 0:32:58.604
<v Speaker 1>I have just tried to So Number one, I've really

0:32:58.644 --> 0:33:01.684
<v Speaker 1>really tried to study this seems very boring, my preflop

0:33:01.724 --> 0:33:03.804
<v Speaker 1>game to make sure that I really did not have

0:33:03.884 --> 0:33:07.044
<v Speaker 1>many preflop leaks, because that's just so basic. But that's

0:33:07.044 --> 0:33:10.204
<v Speaker 1>something that I think is often understand studied because it's

0:33:10.284 --> 0:33:14.724
<v Speaker 1>not just it's not just kind of opening ranges from

0:33:14.724 --> 0:33:17.164
<v Speaker 1>all positions, but it's you know, how do you respond

0:33:17.244 --> 0:33:19.284
<v Speaker 1>to three bets, how do you respond to four bets?

0:33:19.444 --> 0:33:21.084
<v Speaker 1>How do you play different parts of your range in

0:33:21.084 --> 0:33:23.044
<v Speaker 1>all of these situations? And so I've tried to go

0:33:23.124 --> 0:33:26.244
<v Speaker 1>deeper on that to make sure that I'm plugging as

0:33:26.284 --> 0:33:29.564
<v Speaker 1>many leaks as I can kind of at the beginning

0:33:29.604 --> 0:33:31.364
<v Speaker 1>of my game, because that sets you up to play

0:33:31.364 --> 0:33:33.884
<v Speaker 1>well afterwards, right Like, if you have a major leak

0:33:34.004 --> 0:33:37.804
<v Speaker 1>or even a small leak at the beginning, then the

0:33:37.964 --> 0:33:41.924
<v Speaker 1>entire game tree changes if you're making those early mistakes.

0:33:42.124 --> 0:33:44.364
<v Speaker 1>So that's something that I've really worked on.

0:33:44.724 --> 0:33:48.444
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, if you really want to see the importance of

0:33:48.524 --> 0:33:54.804
<v Speaker 2>pre flop play some deep staked cash for limits that

0:33:54.844 --> 0:33:58.564
<v Speaker 2>you care about enough to get some actual feedback, right, Yeah,

0:33:58.604 --> 0:34:00.004
<v Speaker 2>you know, because I think a lot of cash game

0:34:00.004 --> 0:34:01.804
<v Speaker 2>players are like I've been playing more cash lately, like

0:34:02.084 --> 0:34:05.204
<v Speaker 2>or of the mindset that like, oh, I can make

0:34:05.244 --> 0:34:08.244
<v Speaker 2>it up with my superior post flop play and the

0:34:08.284 --> 0:34:09.884
<v Speaker 2>fact it said if your range is just two weak,

0:34:09.964 --> 0:34:12.644
<v Speaker 2>then you just can't. You have too many bluffs and

0:34:12.684 --> 0:34:15.844
<v Speaker 2>not the right bluffs. Right. You are constantly on the

0:34:15.844 --> 0:34:20.124
<v Speaker 2>defensive about not wanting to bloat pots, right, So we're

0:34:20.164 --> 0:34:22.204
<v Speaker 2>trying to get that more correct. And obviously in some

0:34:22.244 --> 0:34:25.804
<v Speaker 2>cash game settings you're kind of node locking to not

0:34:25.884 --> 0:34:30.884
<v Speaker 2>people people not playing optimally, right, and you're trying to

0:34:30.884 --> 0:34:32.604
<v Speaker 2>be conscious of your image and not being too much

0:34:32.604 --> 0:34:35.964
<v Speaker 2>of a knit. But like, yeah, you were really drill

0:34:36.164 --> 0:34:38.684
<v Speaker 2>pre flop supportance into your head if you if you're

0:34:38.684 --> 0:34:41.204
<v Speaker 2>playing huge four or five figure.

0:34:40.924 --> 0:34:45.444
<v Speaker 1>Pots, absolutely, absolutely, And early stage tournaments for people who

0:34:45.444 --> 0:34:48.124
<v Speaker 1>don't play poker or who want to learn are very

0:34:48.164 --> 0:34:51.124
<v Speaker 1>similar to cash games because you do start out quite

0:34:51.124 --> 0:34:53.204
<v Speaker 1>deep stacked, right, Sometimes you have two hundred big lines,

0:34:53.204 --> 0:34:56.684
<v Speaker 1>three hundred big lines, and so that's when your mistakes

0:34:56.724 --> 0:35:00.324
<v Speaker 1>are very costly, especially pre flop mistakes, and so many

0:35:00.324 --> 0:35:03.044
<v Speaker 1>people just you know, want to see a flop, right,

0:35:03.484 --> 0:35:06.644
<v Speaker 1>and so they'll they'll put themselves in situations where they're

0:35:06.684 --> 0:35:09.884
<v Speaker 1>not they're not calling correctly, they're not raising correc they're

0:35:10.204 --> 0:35:12.964
<v Speaker 1>just not playing correctly. And even though this is something

0:35:13.004 --> 0:35:16.684
<v Speaker 1>that I know, you can always refine your pre flop play,

0:35:17.404 --> 0:35:19.884
<v Speaker 1>and this is just something that I decided that I

0:35:19.924 --> 0:35:23.044
<v Speaker 1>was going to focus on more because there was a

0:35:23.044 --> 0:35:24.644
<v Speaker 1>time when I was like, Okay, like I got pre

0:35:24.724 --> 0:35:26.964
<v Speaker 1>flopped down. Now I'm going to like work on three

0:35:27.004 --> 0:35:29.124
<v Speaker 1>bet pods and I'm going to work on you know,

0:35:29.204 --> 0:35:31.204
<v Speaker 1>for I'm going to work on like blind versus blind

0:35:31.244 --> 0:35:34.404
<v Speaker 1>in the specific situation. And at some point I realized,

0:35:34.404 --> 0:35:36.804
<v Speaker 1>you know what, now it's time for me to go

0:35:36.924 --> 0:35:39.924
<v Speaker 1>back to the basics but in a more advanced way

0:35:40.244 --> 0:35:42.244
<v Speaker 1>and to really make sure that I have that solid

0:35:42.404 --> 0:35:44.524
<v Speaker 1>And I think that that's just good advice in general

0:35:44.924 --> 0:35:47.804
<v Speaker 1>for life. Right, even if you have a strategy for something,

0:35:47.844 --> 0:35:52.524
<v Speaker 1>as you as you get more advanced, as you start

0:35:52.884 --> 0:35:56.164
<v Speaker 1>kind of being more sophisticated, you might want to revisit

0:35:56.204 --> 0:35:58.204
<v Speaker 1>some of the fundamentals and basics to see if you

0:35:58.204 --> 0:36:01.164
<v Speaker 1>need to update right toe to see what's happening. Because

0:36:01.204 --> 0:36:05.484
<v Speaker 1>the world also changes. Poker changes, poker strategy changes, people's

0:36:05.524 --> 0:36:08.884
<v Speaker 1>game evolves, and so you do constantly have to update things,

0:36:08.924 --> 0:36:10.884
<v Speaker 1>even when you don't think you need to update them,

0:36:11.124 --> 0:36:13.364
<v Speaker 1>Even if you think, oh, like my you know, preflop,

0:36:13.404 --> 0:36:15.124
<v Speaker 1>what else is there to learn? Right? I know what

0:36:15.204 --> 0:36:18.764
<v Speaker 1>my ranges are. No ranges change, right, And styles change

0:36:18.764 --> 0:36:21.124
<v Speaker 1>and things change. And I think that just with everything,

0:36:21.164 --> 0:36:23.884
<v Speaker 1>it's really important to keep revisiting to make sure that

0:36:23.924 --> 0:36:27.324
<v Speaker 1>your process stays optimal, because if you don't update your process,

0:36:27.324 --> 0:36:30.164
<v Speaker 1>it's going to grow stale as everything else changes around you.

0:36:31.004 --> 0:36:36.404
<v Speaker 1>But you know, let's end on a positive poker note,

0:36:36.604 --> 0:36:38.844
<v Speaker 1>and I'm going to choose to take my fourteenth place

0:36:38.884 --> 0:36:41.964
<v Speaker 1>finish as a positive focus on the good. You know,

0:36:42.044 --> 0:36:46.044
<v Speaker 1>I outlasted almost nine hundred players and I almost made it.

0:36:46.404 --> 0:36:49.564
<v Speaker 1>Next time, Nate, I'm going to make it to that

0:36:49.684 --> 0:36:51.604
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred thousand dollars score.

0:36:53.404 --> 0:36:56.604
<v Speaker 2>Uh next time, Maria, if I know it, because next

0:36:56.604 --> 0:36:58.644
<v Speaker 2>time we'll be playing together, hopefully, But all right.

0:36:58.524 --> 0:37:10.564
<v Speaker 1>We can shop, we can chop. Let's do it. Let

0:37:10.644 --> 0:37:12.884
<v Speaker 1>us know what you think of the show. Reach out

0:37:12.884 --> 0:37:18.524
<v Speaker 1>to us at Risky Business at pushkin dot FM. Risky

0:37:18.524 --> 0:37:21.244
<v Speaker 1>Business is hosted by me Maria Kondikova.

0:37:20.804 --> 0:37:22.124
<v Speaker 2>And by me Nate Silver.

0:37:22.484 --> 0:37:25.964
<v Speaker 1>The show is a co production of Pushkin Industries and iHeartMedia.

0:37:26.484 --> 0:37:30.044
<v Speaker 1>This episode was produced by Isabelle Carter. Our associate producer

0:37:30.124 --> 0:37:33.684
<v Speaker 1>is Gabriel Hunter Chang. Our executive producer is Jacob Goldstein.

0:37:34.204 --> 0:37:36.324
<v Speaker 2>If you like the show, please rate and review us

0:37:36.364 --> 0:37:38.444
<v Speaker 2>so other people can find us too. And if you

0:37:38.484 --> 0:37:40.844
<v Speaker 2>want to listen to an ad free version, sign up

0:37:40.844 --> 0:37:43.444
<v Speaker 2>for Pushkin Plus. For six, ten and nine a month,

0:37:43.484 --> 0:37:46.324
<v Speaker 2>you get access to ad free listening. Thanks for tuning in.