WEBVTT - How Auto-Tune Works

0:00:01.000 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff you Should Know from House Stuff Works

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:13.160
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh

0:00:13.280 --> 0:00:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Clark to Charles W. Chuck Bryant. Yep, there's Jerry and

0:00:18.280 --> 0:00:24.200
<v Speaker 1>this is Stuff you Should Know. That was great, Thanks man.

0:00:24.440 --> 0:00:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Do I sound like Share? Have you sound like T

0:00:27.080 --> 0:00:31.360
<v Speaker 1>paying T Josh T Josh or Snoop Dogg? Does he

0:00:31.440 --> 0:00:34.520
<v Speaker 1>do the auto to? He factors into this big time

0:00:34.600 --> 0:00:37.279
<v Speaker 1>later on? Oh well, I don't even know about that,

0:00:37.320 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 1>so I've got some of my lead. This is kind

0:00:42.440 --> 0:00:44.479
<v Speaker 1>of fun. I don't know how much we're gonna do

0:00:44.520 --> 0:00:49.840
<v Speaker 1>that because people are probably like, stop it right now. Oh, Chuck,

0:00:49.920 --> 0:00:54.880
<v Speaker 1>I think we should do it a lot. Are you done? Yeah?

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm done. Um, we could have just auto tuned this

0:00:59.800 --> 0:01:03.120
<v Speaker 1>whole thing. Yeah, you know, maybe we should. Maybe we

0:01:03.160 --> 0:01:05.560
<v Speaker 1>should maybe from this moment, Flore, we should just started

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:09.520
<v Speaker 1>tune the rest of the episode starting now. Let's sabotage

0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:15.280
<v Speaker 1>our careers. Uh, you've got an intro for this, fancy intro.

0:01:15.680 --> 0:01:18.520
<v Speaker 1>I think we just did it, buddy. Okay, well, let's

0:01:18.520 --> 0:01:20.559
<v Speaker 1>get in the way back machine then, my friend, Okay,

0:01:20.640 --> 0:01:22.039
<v Speaker 1>we don't have to go back that far because I

0:01:22.040 --> 0:01:23.679
<v Speaker 1>know where we're going, it's gonna be a short trip.

0:01:24.240 --> 0:01:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Let's go back to Oh Summer Boom. I'm you and

0:01:36.760 --> 0:01:39.199
<v Speaker 1>Iron the club. We're hanging out, we're drinking the rum

0:01:39.200 --> 0:01:42.040
<v Speaker 1>and coke. You can find us in the club and

0:01:42.280 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 1>uh we're we're dancing, We're getting down and grooving too.

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Uh to share his latest jam, Believe Believe. It's a

0:01:49.800 --> 0:01:53.480
<v Speaker 1>hot jam, a hot, hot, hot jam that's released in

0:01:53.520 --> 0:01:56.040
<v Speaker 1>the summer. It's summertime. As you can tell, it's hot

0:01:56.040 --> 0:01:58.520
<v Speaker 1>in the club. Cheat, and I've got on my my

0:01:58.520 --> 0:02:00.960
<v Speaker 1>my short pants. I'm us like I'm out for a

0:02:01.080 --> 0:02:07.320
<v Speaker 1>night at the Rocks. I'm wearing a shirt. So I noticed, Actually,

0:02:07.640 --> 0:02:09.959
<v Speaker 1>how did you not? Well? Yeah, the third nipple really

0:02:09.960 --> 0:02:15.400
<v Speaker 1>stands out. So we're in the club where jamming and

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 1>share song is on, and uh, something happens at about

0:02:19.040 --> 0:02:21.560
<v Speaker 1>thirty five seconds into the song, and you and I

0:02:21.600 --> 0:02:25.079
<v Speaker 1>are just like, whoa daddy? Did you just hear that?

0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:27.919
<v Speaker 1>It changes everything. It changed the whole tone of the club,

0:02:28.000 --> 0:02:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Like the club was like okay, and now it's banging

0:02:31.320 --> 0:02:37.760
<v Speaker 1>yek Yeah, because of a little something called auto tune. Uh,

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 1>what sounded like a little electronic glitch was very purposeful

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:46.200
<v Speaker 1>and it was the first time the auto tune had

0:02:46.240 --> 0:02:50.160
<v Speaker 1>been used in this way. So what Josh is auto

0:02:50.200 --> 0:02:55.120
<v Speaker 1>tune was quite a set up? Uh, can we do

0:02:55.160 --> 0:02:57.960
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the episode in the club? Yeah? Why not? Okay,

0:02:58.080 --> 0:03:02.560
<v Speaker 1>just keep those rumbings cokes coming. Okay, that's cool. Um,

0:03:02.639 --> 0:03:06.120
<v Speaker 1>So let me let me stop you for a second. Right,

0:03:06.520 --> 0:03:08.720
<v Speaker 1>because the way you described it, you made it sound

0:03:08.760 --> 0:03:12.520
<v Speaker 1>like everybody was like, oh, Share just used auto tune. No, no,

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:17.840
<v Speaker 1>everybody said what was that? That was awesome? Although some

0:03:17.880 --> 0:03:20.240
<v Speaker 1>people were like, what was that? Don't ever do that again,

0:03:20.880 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 1>but most people were like, wow, Shared just released her

0:03:24.040 --> 0:03:25.919
<v Speaker 1>biggest hit of her entire career, and it was a

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:29.320
<v Speaker 1>pretty long career. She just came back like that just

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 1>established her comeback was this track, and it actually became

0:03:32.800 --> 0:03:36.080
<v Speaker 1>one of the greatest best selling singles of all time. Yeah,

0:03:36.080 --> 0:03:38.520
<v Speaker 1>and I think, I mean, it would have been a

0:03:38.600 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 1>probably a big song anyway, but I think most definitely

0:03:42.280 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 1>auto tune kicked it into the stratasy, gave it just

0:03:45.080 --> 0:03:48.760
<v Speaker 1>the extra something. It became part of the talking but

0:03:48.760 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 1>everyone was talking about it. So everybody went to her

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:54.840
<v Speaker 1>producer and said, dude, how did you do that? We

0:03:54.880 --> 0:03:58.360
<v Speaker 1>want to know how to do that, and he was like, vocoder. Yeah,

0:03:58.360 --> 0:04:01.600
<v Speaker 1>he lied, He lied, He lied big time. He lied

0:04:01.680 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 1>in person to other producers, he lied in interviews, he lied, lied,

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:10.040
<v Speaker 1>lied about how he made that track because he wanted

0:04:10.080 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 1>to keep it to himself because it was so huge,

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:16.159
<v Speaker 1>and it became so huge, Chuck that at first Auto

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Tune was called the Share Effect. Even the company that

0:04:19.480 --> 0:04:23.400
<v Speaker 1>produced Auto Tune and Terry's, which we'll talk about in

0:04:23.400 --> 0:04:27.240
<v Speaker 1>a minute, called it in their instructional book, the Share Effect.

0:04:27.279 --> 0:04:29.599
<v Speaker 1>They probably still do, don't they. They don't mention it

0:04:29.640 --> 0:04:34.200
<v Speaker 1>any longer. Yeah, um. But the so it was, it

0:04:34.279 --> 0:04:36.480
<v Speaker 1>was a huge deal, and this guy lied and kept

0:04:36.480 --> 0:04:39.920
<v Speaker 1>it under wraps, and for many years it was very mysterious. Yeah.

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Let's actually, if you live under a rock, let's go

0:04:42.320 --> 0:04:45.680
<v Speaker 1>ahead and play that clip of the very first thirty

0:04:45.760 --> 0:04:48.839
<v Speaker 1>five seconds into that song where Share says I can't

0:04:48.880 --> 0:05:00.960
<v Speaker 1>break through. Yeah, right there, boom right there. Music changed

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 1>from that point forward. So what what this guy, what

0:05:05.160 --> 0:05:10.120
<v Speaker 1>her producer was saying was vocoder. Vocoder is something that's

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:11.800
<v Speaker 1>been around for a very long time. If you've ever

0:05:11.839 --> 0:05:15.120
<v Speaker 1>listened to any Pete Frampton, Peter Frampton and he things,

0:05:15.880 --> 0:05:19.240
<v Speaker 1>do you feel like we do that whole long guitar

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:23.159
<v Speaker 1>solo or whatever. He's breathing into a tube connected to

0:05:23.240 --> 0:05:27.760
<v Speaker 1>his guitar, which is electrifying his voice. Vocoder had been

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:31.200
<v Speaker 1>around for a very long time, but there's different ways

0:05:31.240 --> 0:05:34.600
<v Speaker 1>of doing it. That That was definitely the tube effect

0:05:34.960 --> 0:05:37.920
<v Speaker 1>through the guitar, but you can also just use it to,

0:05:38.160 --> 0:05:41.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, make your voice robotic like Beck to turn

0:05:41.839 --> 0:05:46.839
<v Speaker 1>tables in a microphone or Mr Roboto with sticks, But

0:05:47.080 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 1>all different ways to use it. This thing, this sounded different,

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:53.160
<v Speaker 1>the share effect. It was a little different, sure, And

0:05:53.240 --> 0:05:57.920
<v Speaker 1>I wonder how this guy talked his way out of Yeah.

0:05:58.000 --> 0:06:00.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean like if if if a producer like, okay,

0:06:00.480 --> 0:06:03.080
<v Speaker 1>well show me how you did it on vocoder, if

0:06:03.080 --> 0:06:05.360
<v Speaker 1>he was like over here and then just like ran

0:06:05.400 --> 0:06:06.960
<v Speaker 1>out of the room, I don't. I don't think he

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:08.920
<v Speaker 1>talked out of it. I think he was just another

0:06:09.080 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 1>line music producer and he was just like okay, well busted, okay.

0:06:13.120 --> 0:06:18.440
<v Speaker 1>So um, Apparently along the way people figured out here

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:24.320
<v Speaker 1>there what this guy did believe and they started using

0:06:24.320 --> 0:06:27.880
<v Speaker 1>it themselves, but very very sparsely. All right, So, Josh,

0:06:28.240 --> 0:06:32.440
<v Speaker 1>what is auto tune? All right? I'll answer your question

0:06:32.680 --> 0:06:35.599
<v Speaker 1>because I'm gonna keep asking it, all right. So auto

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:41.680
<v Speaker 1>tune is a plug in originally released for the audio

0:06:42.120 --> 0:06:47.520
<v Speaker 1>editing software pro tools. Yeah, it's a software piece that

0:06:47.560 --> 0:06:51.360
<v Speaker 1>allows you and the original UM intent and how it's

0:06:51.360 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 1>still mostly used is to pitch correct UM singer's voice.

0:06:57.240 --> 0:06:59.560
<v Speaker 1>So when you, when you or I go into the

0:06:59.600 --> 0:07:02.320
<v Speaker 1>studio to record those albums that will never release, but

0:07:02.400 --> 0:07:05.720
<v Speaker 1>we just record for fun. Um we hit flat notes

0:07:05.760 --> 0:07:08.039
<v Speaker 1>here there. Oh not me. I have perfect pitch. I

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 1>hit flat notes here there, perfect um, and everybody does.

0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:16.320
<v Speaker 1>It's a normal thing. Sure for most of eternity. UM

0:07:16.560 --> 0:07:21.880
<v Speaker 1>music producers would say, blue Eyes chairman, I need another take.

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:23.760
<v Speaker 1>That was a great take, but you had a couple

0:07:23.800 --> 0:07:26.280
<v Speaker 1>of flat notes. Give me another take just like that one.

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:29.320
<v Speaker 1>And Frank would finish his scotch, put out a cigarette

0:07:29.840 --> 0:07:36.720
<v Speaker 1>and say you get one more shine hood. What was

0:07:36.760 --> 0:07:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the Joe? Oh you didn't even see spinal tap, did you? Yeah,

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 1>you finally saw it, finally, Okay, But I don't remember

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:44.840
<v Speaker 1>any Frank Sinatra t Yeah there was. When Bruno Kirby

0:07:44.880 --> 0:07:49.560
<v Speaker 1>is the Limo Drivers, He's talks about Sammy Davis's book,

0:07:49.680 --> 0:07:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Yes I can, and he says what they should have

0:07:51.680 --> 0:07:53.840
<v Speaker 1>called it is. Yes, I can as long as Frank

0:07:53.880 --> 0:07:55.880
<v Speaker 1>says it's okay, because Frank called the shots. For all

0:07:55.920 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 1>those guys, I do remember that. Um So, Frank would

0:08:00.160 --> 0:08:03.000
<v Speaker 1>one more take, and this could be like take twelve

0:08:03.240 --> 0:08:07.120
<v Speaker 1>or fifteen or twenty, depending on like how how much

0:08:08.720 --> 0:08:10.960
<v Speaker 1>how much the person was feeling at The singer was

0:08:11.000 --> 0:08:13.120
<v Speaker 1>feeling it at the time and would be happy to

0:08:13.160 --> 0:08:15.800
<v Speaker 1>hang around the studio whatever was keeping the singer there

0:08:15.880 --> 0:08:19.080
<v Speaker 1>at the studio. As long as that was around the singer,

0:08:19.240 --> 0:08:22.080
<v Speaker 1>the singer was happy to give it one more try,

0:08:22.120 --> 0:08:26.080
<v Speaker 1>one more try, right, drugs maybe, um or if they

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:29.000
<v Speaker 1>had like a really good candy bowl, who knows, I

0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:32.559
<v Speaker 1>gotta stay for the skittles. Um So. The editor then

0:08:32.800 --> 0:08:35.040
<v Speaker 1>or the music producer would then take all of these

0:08:35.080 --> 0:08:38.760
<v Speaker 1>different tracks and would go through and I can't imagine

0:08:38.760 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 1>how awful this would be. Take the best part of

0:08:42.200 --> 0:08:44.760
<v Speaker 1>this track and edit it together with the best part

0:08:44.760 --> 0:08:48.160
<v Speaker 1>of that track, and like we're talking like pre digital air,

0:08:48.280 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 1>so like they're spicing together tape from what I understand,

0:08:52.360 --> 0:08:56.199
<v Speaker 1>right to get the best possible complete take piece together

0:08:56.280 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 1>from many different takes. Right, So Okay, that's that's what

0:08:59.840 --> 0:09:03.960
<v Speaker 1>they did. All of a sudden, there's this new software

0:09:04.559 --> 0:09:08.760
<v Speaker 1>that just runs through a take and says, oh, well,

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:11.800
<v Speaker 1>I see what note or what key the singers singing in,

0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:15.200
<v Speaker 1>But this this particular notes just a little out, so

0:09:15.360 --> 0:09:18.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to nudge it into the key that the

0:09:18.440 --> 0:09:21.040
<v Speaker 1>singer was going for. And now, all of a sudden,

0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:25.880
<v Speaker 1>one take is all it takes. Yeah. I mean what

0:09:25.920 --> 0:09:28.200
<v Speaker 1>it did was it cut down on studio time, which

0:09:28.200 --> 0:09:31.080
<v Speaker 1>is super expensive, which was very appealing because now you

0:09:31.080 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 1>could churn out songs that are more rapid rate and

0:09:34.960 --> 0:09:38.120
<v Speaker 1>a cheaper rate. And uh, it was it was a

0:09:38.120 --> 0:09:41.280
<v Speaker 1>little sort of a secret tool that they didn't intend

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:43.480
<v Speaker 1>to like get out to the public. I don't think

0:09:43.480 --> 0:09:46.240
<v Speaker 1>they wanted everyone to know this stuff. No, it was

0:09:46.280 --> 0:09:49.760
<v Speaker 1>meant for professionals. Yeah, And basically it was just it

0:09:49.880 --> 0:09:56.079
<v Speaker 1>was the musical audio equivalent of cosmetics. Yeah. Doctor. It

0:09:56.120 --> 0:10:00.880
<v Speaker 1>was invented by Dr Harold Andy Hilda Brand, and he

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:04.960
<v Speaker 1>likened it to make up and the New Yorker likened

0:10:05.000 --> 0:10:07.520
<v Speaker 1>it to um, like getting rid of a red eye

0:10:07.520 --> 0:10:11.440
<v Speaker 1>and a photograph. It was just you use it just

0:10:11.600 --> 0:10:13.440
<v Speaker 1>enough so that you can't tell it's there, but it

0:10:13.480 --> 0:10:19.280
<v Speaker 1>makes for a more pleasant um overall composition. Right, what

0:10:19.440 --> 0:10:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Share had done, or what shares producers had done, is

0:10:22.200 --> 0:10:25.640
<v Speaker 1>take this thing and used it to the nth degree. Yes,

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:28.400
<v Speaker 1>supposedly it was just a joke, and Share was like,

0:10:28.480 --> 0:10:31.280
<v Speaker 1>I love that, but that's like I don't know if

0:10:31.280 --> 0:10:33.160
<v Speaker 1>that's an urban legend, ear if that's fact. Well, from

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:36.360
<v Speaker 1>what I read that her producer, she was she wanted like, um,

0:10:36.400 --> 0:10:39.840
<v Speaker 1>she had heard like some telephone effect that she was

0:10:39.880 --> 0:10:43.200
<v Speaker 1>interested in using, like she wanted something and I guess

0:10:43.240 --> 0:10:47.120
<v Speaker 1>the producer had stumbled upon that and UM played it

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 1>for but it was like you're not gonna like this,

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:52.320
<v Speaker 1>but listen to this weirdness and she was like that

0:10:52.600 --> 0:10:55.720
<v Speaker 1>I want that. Nice, that's what I read. Well, I

0:10:55.720 --> 0:10:58.280
<v Speaker 1>think that it's due to her giving it the green light.

0:10:58.320 --> 0:11:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Then that was truly like uh, foresight, like a masterful

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:06.160
<v Speaker 1>move by Share. You know, well, Share has a lot

0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:08.840
<v Speaker 1>of ForSight. You know, they say, don't don't doubt Share

0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 1>and Share has a lot of foresight. Never bet against Share. Yeah, Um,

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:15.800
<v Speaker 1>so when you did make that decision, it changed, like

0:11:15.840 --> 0:11:18.560
<v Speaker 1>you said, it changed everything. And well, well, I I

0:11:18.880 --> 0:11:20.920
<v Speaker 1>we can't talk enough about this, but we're going to

0:11:21.040 --> 0:11:22.719
<v Speaker 1>take a break and then come back and talk more

0:11:22.760 --> 0:11:42.720
<v Speaker 1>about it right after this, all right, josh, Uh. What

0:11:42.840 --> 0:11:46.840
<v Speaker 1>I found most interesting about this while researching what UM

0:11:47.120 --> 0:11:51.520
<v Speaker 1>was what Andy Hildebrand did before he did this. He

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 1>was a musician. He was played flute professionally since he

0:11:55.960 --> 0:11:59.680
<v Speaker 1>was a young teenager. Even went to University of Illinois

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:04.560
<v Speaker 1>go Fighting a Line I on a music scholarship. Yet

0:12:04.640 --> 0:12:09.000
<v Speaker 1>he chose to work for Exxon Mobile for seventeen years

0:12:09.400 --> 0:12:16.400
<v Speaker 1>looking for oil. Yeah, the two weren't too terribly far apart, right, well,

0:12:16.440 --> 0:12:19.520
<v Speaker 1>as we will find out. So he's a professional floutist,

0:12:20.200 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 1>classically trained flout is a good one from what I understand,

0:12:22.840 --> 0:12:26.760
<v Speaker 1>flouting his flute, yes, um. And he went to college

0:12:26.760 --> 0:12:30.720
<v Speaker 1>to get an electrical engineering degree, I think. And basically

0:12:30.720 --> 0:12:32.840
<v Speaker 1>when when he went to work for the oil companies,

0:12:32.880 --> 0:12:37.000
<v Speaker 1>it was an oil exploration and he figured out a

0:12:37.000 --> 0:12:42.240
<v Speaker 1>programmer he designed to software UM that when you set

0:12:42.240 --> 0:12:48.080
<v Speaker 1>off an explosive charge underground, it measured the pitch of

0:12:48.200 --> 0:12:51.640
<v Speaker 1>stuff of the sound waves that that were created. Right,

0:12:52.000 --> 0:12:54.840
<v Speaker 1>So as they traveled through rock, different types of rock,

0:12:56.000 --> 0:12:59.719
<v Speaker 1>just the pitch basically, and this software like analyzed the

0:12:59.720 --> 0:13:03.400
<v Speaker 1>pitch that was coming through and could create a subsurface

0:13:03.520 --> 0:13:07.200
<v Speaker 1>map of the rock below, and oil companies have long

0:13:07.240 --> 0:13:09.600
<v Speaker 1>known that this type of rock is associated with oil,

0:13:09.720 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 1>and this type of rock is not maybe a'll financial

0:13:12.360 --> 0:13:14.400
<v Speaker 1>guess and this type of rock. So with this guy

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:20.720
<v Speaker 1>creating an audio visual map of the subsurface area, oil

0:13:20.760 --> 0:13:23.520
<v Speaker 1>companies no longer had to just drill and drill and

0:13:23.720 --> 0:13:26.920
<v Speaker 1>hope that they found um oil. He would say, this

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:29.880
<v Speaker 1>is a pretty pretty great place to drill because this

0:13:29.960 --> 0:13:33.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of rock is there. That's right. It's called auto correlation.

0:13:33.559 --> 0:13:37.120
<v Speaker 1>And it saved Exxon a lot of money and he

0:13:37.360 --> 0:13:39.599
<v Speaker 1>somehow made a lot of money. I thought it was

0:13:39.640 --> 0:13:41.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna be one of those things where like XN was

0:13:41.960 --> 0:13:44.679
<v Speaker 1>just like thanks, you work for us, you wint here's

0:13:44.720 --> 0:13:49.319
<v Speaker 1>yours a year. But apparently he UM earned enough money

0:13:49.320 --> 0:13:51.640
<v Speaker 1>to retire by the age of forty thanks to this

0:13:52.320 --> 0:13:56.760
<v Speaker 1>innovation and UM in the early he got out of

0:13:56.760 --> 0:14:00.040
<v Speaker 1>the oil business and found it like it's just a

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:04.760
<v Speaker 1>popularity content. Yeah. Uh. He founded UH in Terrorists Audio

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Technologies and UH kind of near Silicon Valley in Scott's Valley, California.

0:14:09.880 --> 0:14:12.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think still they only have about ten employees.

0:14:12.080 --> 0:14:15.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a pretty small operation. It's all centered

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:18.319
<v Speaker 1>around him and his ideas, and he is the main

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:20.880
<v Speaker 1>inventor um. One of the first things he invented was

0:14:21.200 --> 0:14:24.560
<v Speaker 1>something called Infinity, which is a program that where you

0:14:24.560 --> 0:14:28.960
<v Speaker 1>could loop samples um over and over and over, like seamlessly.

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Apparently that was a necessary thing. I didn't know that.

0:14:32.080 --> 0:14:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, think about it. We're talking like early nineties.

0:14:35.680 --> 0:14:39.560
<v Speaker 1>That was like the oh eight acid house revolution. Yeah,

0:14:39.600 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 1>but I just didn't realize. I guess he made it easier,

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:45.520
<v Speaker 1>probably is my guess. Yes, I think he enabled it.

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 1>He enabled technos the impression I have, Oh yeah, interesting

0:14:51.240 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 1>looping samples together seamlessly. Well, but you could already do that.

0:14:55.040 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 1>What I'm saying is is he clearly found a way

0:14:56.800 --> 0:15:01.040
<v Speaker 1>to do it better and more efficiently. He didn't invent looping, No,

0:15:01.320 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 1>he made it better, Yeah, exactly. Another thing he did

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:10.720
<v Speaker 1>was invented the microphone modeler. Modeling is a big thing

0:15:10.760 --> 0:15:14.600
<v Speaker 1>in music. You can get um guitar amplifiers that model,

0:15:15.360 --> 0:15:19.440
<v Speaker 1>uh basically means imitate other amps. I have a modeling

0:15:19.440 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 1>amp which I don't use anymore because it's uh not

0:15:22.200 --> 0:15:25.600
<v Speaker 1>very good, but it models. There's like twelve different classic

0:15:25.600 --> 0:15:30.720
<v Speaker 1>amps models supposedly, but he inventled the modeling microphone, which

0:15:30.760 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 1>means you could mimic like classic microphones or like a

0:15:33.520 --> 0:15:37.440
<v Speaker 1>harmonica mike and vintage mics like the Elvis Presley that

0:15:37.480 --> 0:15:41.200
<v Speaker 1>cool looking mike. Sure that was on there? Oh? Is

0:15:41.200 --> 0:15:44.840
<v Speaker 1>that the silver kind of rounded rectangular one. Noel's got

0:15:44.840 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 1>one on his desk. Yeah, yeah, that's associated with Elvis Presley. Well,

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:51.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean just the music of that time. But I

0:15:51.120 --> 0:15:53.480
<v Speaker 1>always picture Elvish. Yeah, you know what I mean, I

0:15:53.520 --> 0:15:55.720
<v Speaker 1>can see that. Yeah, have you ever seen his grandson,

0:15:55.800 --> 0:15:59.520
<v Speaker 1>by the way, quick sidebar? No, his name is quick sidebar,

0:16:00.320 --> 0:16:04.520
<v Speaker 1>quick sidebar Pressley. It's weird name, but you know, Lisa

0:16:04.600 --> 0:16:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Marie was his mom, So yeah, um, that was very funny.

0:16:09.800 --> 0:16:13.720
<v Speaker 1>By the way, he uh, just look him up. I

0:16:13.760 --> 0:16:16.360
<v Speaker 1>think what's his name. I can't remember his name. His

0:16:16.480 --> 0:16:21.560
<v Speaker 1>last name is the father's name for Lisa Marie's first husband,

0:16:21.600 --> 0:16:24.400
<v Speaker 1>is who she had him with. Uh yeah, just look

0:16:24.400 --> 0:16:29.400
<v Speaker 1>at Elvis Presley's grandson. It is creepy. Dude looks exactly

0:16:29.440 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 1>like Elvis at that age, like scary, scary, eerily similar

0:16:35.160 --> 0:16:38.720
<v Speaker 1>that I don't know, doesne that I do know? If

0:16:38.720 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 1>he sings, he probably use his auto tune probably because

0:16:42.600 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 1>of singers. Apparently his auto tune its hem even higher

0:16:45.800 --> 0:16:50.640
<v Speaker 1>than that. Really, how about that? Admit it? You know? Yeah,

0:16:50.720 --> 0:16:55.400
<v Speaker 1>there's the thing about auto tune where, um, you deny

0:16:55.560 --> 0:16:58.080
<v Speaker 1>that you use it even though you're totally aware that

0:16:58.160 --> 0:17:02.840
<v Speaker 1>everyone uses it. Um. I read an article where apparently

0:17:03.360 --> 0:17:08.320
<v Speaker 1>this one producer said that he's worked with two artists

0:17:08.359 --> 0:17:11.240
<v Speaker 1>that have haven't used it everyone else has, and it

0:17:11.320 --> 0:17:14.359
<v Speaker 1>was Nico Case and Nellie for Tato. And then apparently

0:17:14.640 --> 0:17:17.080
<v Speaker 1>later after that, Nelly for Tato released a single that

0:17:17.160 --> 0:17:21.320
<v Speaker 1>had tons of auto tune on it. She may be

0:17:21.480 --> 0:17:25.080
<v Speaker 1>the only artist in the world who hasn't used auto tune,

0:17:25.200 --> 0:17:30.280
<v Speaker 1>either subtly or um to the nth degree. Well, that's

0:17:30.280 --> 0:17:33.440
<v Speaker 1>certainly not true. I think there are plenty of indie artists.

0:17:33.440 --> 0:17:36.160
<v Speaker 1>But if you're talking, you should read this Verge article.

0:17:36.160 --> 0:17:39.680
<v Speaker 1>It basically lays it out like, no, everyone uses this

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:44.240
<v Speaker 1>even if so. Apparently producers don't even necessarily tell the

0:17:44.320 --> 0:17:47.159
<v Speaker 1>band that it's being used right then, because there's a

0:17:47.200 --> 0:17:51.680
<v Speaker 1>live function, so that the monitors or the headphones that um,

0:17:51.800 --> 0:17:55.879
<v Speaker 1>the band is hearing is being run through auto tune,

0:17:55.920 --> 0:17:59.360
<v Speaker 1>so what they're hearing is already corrected, so they think

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:02.159
<v Speaker 1>they just did a perfect take. Yeah, I'm just wary

0:18:02.240 --> 0:18:06.000
<v Speaker 1>of anytime someone says out of twenty million singers, one

0:18:06.040 --> 0:18:09.679
<v Speaker 1>person doesn't that's just very dubious claim. I don't know,

0:18:09.720 --> 0:18:13.320
<v Speaker 1>we're talking music industry here, especially when a lot of

0:18:13.320 --> 0:18:16.720
<v Speaker 1>people are making their own music in their own homes. Well,

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:18.879
<v Speaker 1>that's another thing. They're not a part of the pop machine.

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:23.160
<v Speaker 1>They don't have stats on that, you know. Yeah, I'm

0:18:23.200 --> 0:18:25.200
<v Speaker 1>just I'm just saying that's that sounds like a load

0:18:25.200 --> 0:18:27.879
<v Speaker 1>of garbage to me. I'm sure more than one person

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:33.840
<v Speaker 1>doesn't just one. Um. So auto tune came about, apparently

0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:38.960
<v Speaker 1>this is the tail because of a dinner that Hilda

0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:41.119
<v Speaker 1>Brand was at. He was having lunch with a sales

0:18:41.160 --> 0:18:44.160
<v Speaker 1>rep and the wife said something funny like, hey, Andy,

0:18:44.200 --> 0:18:46.679
<v Speaker 1>can you once you invent something to make me sing

0:18:46.720 --> 0:18:53.080
<v Speaker 1>in tune? And he went, no, great idea that we

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:56.720
<v Speaker 1>should have auto tuned, that maybe we could maybe maybe

0:18:56.720 --> 0:19:00.240
<v Speaker 1>it was maybe it just happened. Uh. And so he said,

0:19:00.280 --> 0:19:03.760
<v Speaker 1>you know what, Uh, if I can tell Jed Clampitt

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:06.400
<v Speaker 1>where the oil is, then I can make you sing

0:19:06.600 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 1>in tune. And he did, and he did. He created

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:14.919
<v Speaker 1>auto tune and um we've kind of mentioned how it works. Basically,

0:19:15.560 --> 0:19:20.119
<v Speaker 1>it takes a it takes that take of a singer's song.

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 1>It takes the vocals of the song, and you select

0:19:25.040 --> 0:19:28.560
<v Speaker 1>what key you're singing in, and then auto tune goes

0:19:28.600 --> 0:19:31.760
<v Speaker 1>through and makes this map of this of that audio

0:19:31.960 --> 0:19:34.640
<v Speaker 1>of the vocal track, and it goes through and says

0:19:34.640 --> 0:19:37.720
<v Speaker 1>that this one's a little flat, this one's a little low,

0:19:37.880 --> 0:19:41.880
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, um and it just nudges these things into

0:19:42.240 --> 0:19:45.000
<v Speaker 1>tune into into the key that it's supposed to be in.

0:19:45.440 --> 0:19:49.000
<v Speaker 1>So all all of the notes that the singer hits

0:19:49.040 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 1>and that take are within the correct key, meaning that

0:19:52.600 --> 0:19:55.560
<v Speaker 1>they all sound great. It's a perfect take, right well, yeah,

0:19:55.600 --> 0:19:57.520
<v Speaker 1>and the the key there is it's in the original

0:19:57.560 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 1>tone and inflection of the artist, so you can't tell

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:03.600
<v Speaker 1>it's happening. No. And there's actually if you look, if

0:20:03.640 --> 0:20:08.680
<v Speaker 1>you look at the um uh Auto Tune product demo videos,

0:20:09.440 --> 0:20:14.040
<v Speaker 1>it's amazing. So there's a there's an um an automatic

0:20:14.160 --> 0:20:17.240
<v Speaker 1>version where like it just you select the key and

0:20:17.320 --> 0:20:19.119
<v Speaker 1>like auto tune do its thing, and it does a

0:20:19.119 --> 0:20:21.760
<v Speaker 1>pretty great job. One of the one of the ways

0:20:21.800 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 1>that it does this is um it adds like millisecond

0:20:26.240 --> 0:20:30.880
<v Speaker 1>pauses in between notes. There's little spaces between notes, which

0:20:30.920 --> 0:20:35.840
<v Speaker 1>gives it a natural feel. Um. There's other selections that

0:20:35.920 --> 0:20:39.200
<v Speaker 1>you can make, like throat length. You can select grow

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:42.560
<v Speaker 1>how long the singer's throat is uh, and you can

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:45.880
<v Speaker 1>do that note by note um, so you can make

0:20:45.920 --> 0:20:48.360
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing even more natural. Until basically, what you've

0:20:48.400 --> 0:20:54.760
<v Speaker 1>done is taught auto tune how to simulate a particular

0:20:54.840 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 1>singers singing style and voice so that when it when

0:20:59.720 --> 0:21:03.119
<v Speaker 1>a us that no, it doesn't within the same exact

0:21:03.240 --> 0:21:05.159
<v Speaker 1>range that the singer would have done had they hit

0:21:05.240 --> 0:21:09.280
<v Speaker 1>it correctly. It's pretty amazing and advanced stuff totally. What

0:21:09.880 --> 0:21:12.439
<v Speaker 1>when when normal people think of auto tune, like you

0:21:12.520 --> 0:21:15.719
<v Speaker 1>and me who are not in the music biz um,

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:20.000
<v Speaker 1>we we think of this thing that's called the zero function. Yes,

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:21.600
<v Speaker 1>and you know what, let's take a break and we

0:21:21.600 --> 0:21:24.080
<v Speaker 1>will explain what the zero function is right after this.

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Stop all right, the suspense is kidling me. You're gonna

0:21:44.640 --> 0:21:51.480
<v Speaker 1>kid let's kid alright. Zero function. That was essentially what

0:21:51.760 --> 0:21:56.760
<v Speaker 1>the share effect was, Okay, right, yes, go ahead no

0:21:56.760 --> 0:21:58.280
<v Speaker 1>no, no no go ahead, no, no go ahead. You just

0:21:58.320 --> 0:21:59.680
<v Speaker 1>sat up in your chair like you were about to

0:21:59.760 --> 0:22:02.359
<v Speaker 1>arm kind I've been Do you go ahead? Do you

0:22:02.400 --> 0:22:05.480
<v Speaker 1>talk about it? Well, what auto tune does in the

0:22:05.600 --> 0:22:09.800
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the zero function is it gets rid

0:22:09.840 --> 0:22:14.560
<v Speaker 1>of all of that space and when shares voice changes,

0:22:15.080 --> 0:22:18.719
<v Speaker 1>it's immediate. Yeah, all of those notes go right up

0:22:18.720 --> 0:22:22.520
<v Speaker 1>against each other, and it creates this robotic sounding voice. Yeah,

0:22:22.560 --> 0:22:25.560
<v Speaker 1>there's no like rise, it's there's it's not like a

0:22:27.080 --> 0:22:30.439
<v Speaker 1>what's the word I'm looking for? It's uh. It's not

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:33.800
<v Speaker 1>like a normal vibrato that you would get because in

0:22:33.800 --> 0:22:37.719
<v Speaker 1>the normal vibrato there's there's pauses, there's space in between

0:22:37.720 --> 0:22:41.240
<v Speaker 1>the notes. With this, it's note note all pressed up

0:22:41.240 --> 0:22:44.720
<v Speaker 1>against each other, compressed way, and that zero function, um

0:22:45.280 --> 0:22:49.159
<v Speaker 1>is what what It takes any spaces out between the

0:22:49.200 --> 0:22:51.640
<v Speaker 1>notes and creates that robot sound. Yeah, because I think

0:22:51.680 --> 0:22:54.720
<v Speaker 1>auto tune has has a range of numbers to make

0:22:54.720 --> 0:22:56.719
<v Speaker 1>it flow more seamlessly. And when they took it all

0:22:56.720 --> 0:22:58.800
<v Speaker 1>the way down to zero, which means there's nothing there,

0:22:59.119 --> 0:23:00.639
<v Speaker 1>it created that weird I act that they were like,

0:23:01.119 --> 0:23:04.560
<v Speaker 1>share your listen to this, it's weird. Yeah, and she's like,

0:23:04.600 --> 0:23:08.600
<v Speaker 1>I like weird. It's great, baby, I hear number one

0:23:08.680 --> 0:23:16.720
<v Speaker 1>hit in my future. No, you gotta wrot. It's great, baby, No,

0:23:16.960 --> 0:23:22.640
<v Speaker 1>that was that was Jack from Will and Grace. Oh

0:23:22.760 --> 0:23:24.399
<v Speaker 1>do you remember when he thought he was talking to

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:29.040
<v Speaker 1>a share impersonator. Oh yeah, yeah, yeah yeah, And he's like, no,

0:23:29.600 --> 0:23:34.280
<v Speaker 1>if I could turn back to turn. He was teaching

0:23:34.280 --> 0:23:36.960
<v Speaker 1>her how to say it, sing it correctly. I thoroughly

0:23:37.000 --> 0:23:42.879
<v Speaker 1>enjoyed Will and Grace. It was great. Agreed, All right,

0:23:42.880 --> 0:23:45.800
<v Speaker 1>where are we? Well? You were talking about the share effect, right,

0:23:46.440 --> 0:23:48.359
<v Speaker 1>and that's what it was called again and Tari has

0:23:48.400 --> 0:23:51.240
<v Speaker 1>called this zero function the share effect for many years

0:23:51.960 --> 0:23:55.200
<v Speaker 1>and um and over time, remember her producer just kept

0:23:55.280 --> 0:23:59.280
<v Speaker 1>lying and lying and lying. Over time, other producers independently

0:23:59.320 --> 0:24:01.280
<v Speaker 1>figured out why he had done that. He had used

0:24:01.280 --> 0:24:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the zero function, which is a really obscure tool on

0:24:07.920 --> 0:24:13.640
<v Speaker 1>a software suite that not everybody knew about. Right, So

0:24:13.800 --> 0:24:16.680
<v Speaker 1>it took some some brainpower and some experimentation, but little

0:24:16.680 --> 0:24:19.720
<v Speaker 1>by little some producers figured it out. This one producer

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:22.960
<v Speaker 1>um did a remix of a j Lo song and

0:24:23.080 --> 0:24:25.439
<v Speaker 1>used it, and he I think was the second person

0:24:25.520 --> 0:24:30.320
<v Speaker 1>to use it, um publicly and uh for a brief time,

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:33.240
<v Speaker 1>it became known as the Jal effect. Of course, anybody

0:24:33.240 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 1>who used this without fessing up to it. At first

0:24:36.119 --> 0:24:38.800
<v Speaker 1>in the early two thousands, it was called the whatever effect.

0:24:39.440 --> 0:24:43.200
<v Speaker 1>And there's this producer rapper down in Florida named T Paine,

0:24:44.359 --> 0:24:48.440
<v Speaker 1>and T Paine heard this JL effect. He went on

0:24:48.600 --> 0:24:51.960
<v Speaker 1>a mission to figure out what this was, and he

0:24:52.080 --> 0:24:55.280
<v Speaker 1>finally apparently took him years to figure it out. He

0:24:55.400 --> 0:24:58.040
<v Speaker 1>finally figured out that it was the zero effect on

0:24:58.640 --> 0:25:02.760
<v Speaker 1>this pro tools plug in UM and he started using

0:25:02.760 --> 0:25:06.199
<v Speaker 1>it and just went crazy with it. Like up to

0:25:06.240 --> 0:25:08.439
<v Speaker 1>this point it was used to like tweak or it

0:25:08.480 --> 0:25:11.800
<v Speaker 1>would maybe make UM a track of just a little

0:25:11.880 --> 0:25:15.240
<v Speaker 1>weird over here, something like that. He used it as

0:25:15.320 --> 0:25:17.800
<v Speaker 1>often as he possibly could. Yeah. He basically said the

0:25:17.880 --> 0:25:20.720
<v Speaker 1>zero function and tee pain are one and the same. Yeah,

0:25:20.720 --> 0:25:24.080
<v Speaker 1>And it became known as the tea pain effect. Really

0:25:25.200 --> 0:25:27.920
<v Speaker 1>because when people asked him how he did it, guess

0:25:27.920 --> 0:25:32.440
<v Speaker 1>what he said folder did he really? Yes, Yes he did.

0:25:32.480 --> 0:25:35.560
<v Speaker 1>And for years he managed to make a mint because

0:25:35.600 --> 0:25:38.240
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing was in hip hop or in pop.

0:25:38.520 --> 0:25:41.960
<v Speaker 1>If you wanted this tea pain effect, te pain needed

0:25:41.960 --> 0:25:44.560
<v Speaker 1>to console at least if not produce your record. That

0:25:44.680 --> 0:25:47.720
<v Speaker 1>was like ten years after the Share effect. People not

0:25:47.800 --> 0:25:50.359
<v Speaker 1>know that I I he managed to pull it off

0:25:50.359 --> 0:25:52.360
<v Speaker 1>for years and years and years. Good for tea Pain

0:25:52.520 --> 0:25:55.000
<v Speaker 1>is what I say? Yes, you know, yeah, I mean

0:25:55.359 --> 0:25:58.760
<v Speaker 1>he apparently was like, um, I guess on a plane ride.

0:25:59.119 --> 0:26:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Usher was the same plane and asked to speak to him,

0:26:02.560 --> 0:26:04.560
<v Speaker 1>and she was like, I've got to get something off

0:26:04.600 --> 0:26:08.840
<v Speaker 1>my chest. You really screwed up music like big time

0:26:09.440 --> 0:26:11.600
<v Speaker 1>well S. Pain was like, I've made a bunch of

0:26:11.640 --> 0:26:14.320
<v Speaker 1>money doing this and people seem to like it, so

0:26:14.400 --> 0:26:17.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna stop. Hildebrand has been vilified by many,

0:26:17.440 --> 0:26:19.440
<v Speaker 1>and he said, you know what, I just make the car.

0:26:19.560 --> 0:26:22.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't drive it down the wrong side of the road. Yeah.

0:26:22.080 --> 0:26:26.000
<v Speaker 1>It's a great quote because a lot of people hate

0:26:26.040 --> 0:26:28.159
<v Speaker 1>auto tune and things. That's the worst thing that happened

0:26:28.160 --> 0:26:31.160
<v Speaker 1>to music. A lot of people like it and say,

0:26:31.160 --> 0:26:32.600
<v Speaker 1>when you use it for what it's supposed to be

0:26:32.680 --> 0:26:35.240
<v Speaker 1>used for, it can really help out. Because you know,

0:26:35.280 --> 0:26:38.040
<v Speaker 1>it's not like everyone uses it all the time. I'm

0:26:38.080 --> 0:26:40.560
<v Speaker 1>sure some people need it way more than others. Well,

0:26:40.600 --> 0:26:43.439
<v Speaker 1>even if you're using it as a like cosmetic touch,

0:26:43.600 --> 0:26:46.280
<v Speaker 1>like kill the brand originally designed it for a lot

0:26:46.320 --> 0:26:48.440
<v Speaker 1>of people say no, we shouldn't even be doing that,

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:51.399
<v Speaker 1>because if you go back and listen to things like

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Bob Dylan or The Beach Boards or um, just a

0:26:55.520 --> 0:26:58.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of these original artists that didn't use these kind

0:26:58.119 --> 0:27:01.280
<v Speaker 1>of effects on their voice. Um, when they sang and

0:27:01.320 --> 0:27:04.600
<v Speaker 1>their recordings made it through the studio, there were still

0:27:04.680 --> 0:27:08.240
<v Speaker 1>flat notes here there, but it was their music, it

0:27:08.359 --> 0:27:11.360
<v Speaker 1>was their voice, it was their vocals in these tracks,

0:27:11.720 --> 0:27:14.119
<v Speaker 1>and everyone came to know and love them. But now,

0:27:14.400 --> 0:27:18.320
<v Speaker 1>because everything is auto tuned perfectly, even the stuff that

0:27:18.359 --> 0:27:21.040
<v Speaker 1>you don't you can't hear it's auto tune because they're

0:27:21.040 --> 0:27:23.240
<v Speaker 1>not using zero function, but just the fact that it's

0:27:23.240 --> 0:27:26.240
<v Speaker 1>been running through the auto tune, this stuff sounds really

0:27:26.400 --> 0:27:28.800
<v Speaker 1>rough by comparison. So a lot of people are like

0:27:29.160 --> 0:27:32.920
<v Speaker 1>auto tune has ruined music. It ruined music that people

0:27:33.000 --> 0:27:37.800
<v Speaker 1>love for decades because now by comparison it seems rough. Well.

0:27:37.800 --> 0:27:41.119
<v Speaker 1>But it also, like a good ear can tell if

0:27:41.160 --> 0:27:44.640
<v Speaker 1>something's auto tune, it has this weird tin equality that, um,

0:27:44.680 --> 0:27:47.600
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't sound natural. So I think it they will

0:27:47.640 --> 0:27:52.560
<v Speaker 1>be blowback and a and a reversion back to older methods. Okay,

0:27:52.680 --> 0:27:54.680
<v Speaker 1>I bet you. Jack White has an auto tune that's

0:27:54.720 --> 0:27:58.679
<v Speaker 1>the most purest of pure guys. No, he uses all

0:27:58.680 --> 0:28:00.919
<v Speaker 1>sorts of weird vocal effects on his stuff. No, but

0:28:01.000 --> 0:28:04.280
<v Speaker 1>as far as like I bet he has ask him,

0:28:06.080 --> 0:28:09.960
<v Speaker 1>he wouldn't admit it. Apparently that's part for the course. Um,

0:28:09.960 --> 0:28:14.080
<v Speaker 1>so te Pain. If we can get back to the

0:28:14.119 --> 0:28:18.639
<v Speaker 1>history of this drink, so te Pain. Right, he's huge,

0:28:18.880 --> 0:28:21.959
<v Speaker 1>like he's just everything he drops is just blowing up

0:28:22.000 --> 0:28:25.080
<v Speaker 1>all over the place. He's getting invited to consult and

0:28:25.160 --> 0:28:31.840
<v Speaker 1>produce on uh Kanye's album, which ultimately had every track

0:28:31.920 --> 0:28:33.680
<v Speaker 1>had auto tune on it by the time Tea Pain

0:28:33.760 --> 0:28:37.159
<v Speaker 1>got done with that, right. Um, have you heard his

0:28:37.240 --> 0:28:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Queen Bohemian raapsody live? No? Is it good? Oh? No,

0:28:42.320 --> 0:28:45.840
<v Speaker 1>oh no, it's there's a video that someone spliced of

0:28:46.000 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 1>him and he and Freddie Mercury. It's one of the

0:28:48.880 --> 0:28:51.320
<v Speaker 1>worst things I've ever heard on the stage. I've got

0:28:51.320 --> 0:28:56.320
<v Speaker 1>to check it out. It's terrible. Okay, Um, I gotta

0:28:56.360 --> 0:28:59.880
<v Speaker 1>see that. It's good. So um the tea Pain effect. Yeah,

0:29:00.000 --> 0:29:01.880
<v Speaker 1>and if you wanted this effect, you had to have

0:29:01.960 --> 0:29:05.840
<v Speaker 1>t pain. Well Snoop Dogg says that's enough of that finally,

0:29:06.280 --> 0:29:11.440
<v Speaker 1>and he releases something called Sensual Seduction, and it's one

0:29:11.440 --> 0:29:14.440
<v Speaker 1>of the better rap videos you've ever seen. It's pretty good.

0:29:14.800 --> 0:29:16.560
<v Speaker 1>There's a star wipe in it, so you know I

0:29:16.640 --> 0:29:21.200
<v Speaker 1>love it. Um. So Snoop releases this using the te

0:29:21.360 --> 0:29:24.479
<v Speaker 1>Pain effect to great degree, but he didn't consult with

0:29:24.560 --> 0:29:27.280
<v Speaker 1>T Pain. T Paint had nothing to do with this record.

0:29:27.520 --> 0:29:30.560
<v Speaker 1>So Snoop kind of opened the floodgates saying, if you

0:29:30.560 --> 0:29:33.200
<v Speaker 1>guys want to use this, go use it. But what's

0:29:33.240 --> 0:29:36.920
<v Speaker 1>interesting if you watch that video when Snoop is doing

0:29:36.920 --> 0:29:40.200
<v Speaker 1>like the the t pain effect of the auto tune stuff,

0:29:40.600 --> 0:29:43.200
<v Speaker 1>he's actually got a tube going to a synthesizer to

0:29:43.240 --> 0:29:46.120
<v Speaker 1>make it look like he's using a vocoder. Interesting that

0:29:46.200 --> 0:29:50.320
<v Speaker 1>weird like in his video. But anyway, he sure that

0:29:50.360 --> 0:29:54.120
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a marijuana smoking divide. It may have been, it

0:29:54.200 --> 0:29:56.360
<v Speaker 1>may have been the other thing about it, um, but

0:29:56.800 --> 0:29:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Snoop changed everything in in that he took tea Pain

0:30:00.040 --> 0:30:02.520
<v Speaker 1>now to the equation and really open the floodgates for

0:30:02.600 --> 0:30:07.160
<v Speaker 1>anybody and everybody to use this stuff. Simultaneously, jay Z

0:30:07.320 --> 0:30:10.320
<v Speaker 1>was trying to close those floodgates and push all of

0:30:10.320 --> 0:30:13.360
<v Speaker 1>it back in. Yeah, I think jay Z um uh

0:30:13.760 --> 0:30:15.920
<v Speaker 1>it clearly jumped the shark. At a certain point. You

0:30:15.920 --> 0:30:20.200
<v Speaker 1>know when major ad brands are making ads using the

0:30:20.280 --> 0:30:23.560
<v Speaker 1>latest and greatest. That it's years late, first of all,

0:30:24.000 --> 0:30:26.520
<v Speaker 1>and that means that has definitely jumped the shark. And

0:30:26.520 --> 0:30:30.480
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand nine, uh Windy's had a Frosty Posse

0:30:30.680 --> 0:30:33.960
<v Speaker 1>commercial where a gang of office workers built it out

0:30:34.000 --> 0:30:38.160
<v Speaker 1>auto tuned rhymes while searching for Frosty's. I don't remember

0:30:38.160 --> 0:30:39.680
<v Speaker 1>that add do you? I know? But I went and

0:30:39.720 --> 0:30:42.120
<v Speaker 1>watched it. Of course. How is it pretty great? It's

0:30:42.160 --> 0:30:45.240
<v Speaker 1>what you think it is pretty great. It's awesome. Okay, no,

0:30:45.440 --> 0:30:49.560
<v Speaker 1>it's terrible. And jay Z apparently saw this and was enraged,

0:30:49.640 --> 0:30:51.560
<v Speaker 1>and so he wrote a song called d O a

0:30:51.760 --> 0:30:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Death of auto Tune. I know we're facing a recession,

0:30:55.400 --> 0:30:58.640
<v Speaker 1>but the music y'all making gonna make it the great depression.

0:30:58.720 --> 0:31:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Get back to wrap ut painting too much, that's calling

0:31:02.280 --> 0:31:08.080
<v Speaker 1>that's calling someone out ye hard. Yeah, but other auto tune,

0:31:08.360 --> 0:31:11.480
<v Speaker 1>um auto tune. The news was a big YouTube pit.

0:31:11.640 --> 0:31:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, man, that um the bed intruder song. Yeah,

0:31:15.600 --> 0:31:17.800
<v Speaker 1>let's um. Let's play a clip from that From two

0:31:17.880 --> 0:31:21.520
<v Speaker 1>thousand and ten. It was a local news footage from Huntsville, Alabama,

0:31:21.640 --> 0:31:26.800
<v Speaker 1>of Antoine Dodson delivering human being. Yeah, about a neighborhood

0:31:26.800 --> 0:31:30.080
<v Speaker 1>intruder and someone auto tune that the Gregory Brothers did.

0:31:30.200 --> 0:31:36.120
<v Speaker 1>That's right, let's hear that real quick start. You are

0:31:36.200 --> 0:31:41.120
<v Speaker 1>really go for the man got away, leaving behind the evidence.

0:31:41.280 --> 0:31:46.080
<v Speaker 1>I was okay by some sold don't sold, don't so

0:31:46.440 --> 0:31:50.120
<v Speaker 1>don't song be climbing a windows? He snatching up people

0:31:50.280 --> 0:31:57.960
<v Speaker 1>up trying to write? Have you listened recently? Now? It's

0:31:58.040 --> 0:32:02.280
<v Speaker 1>pretty great? Yeah? Yeah, but again that was in two

0:32:02.280 --> 0:32:03.959
<v Speaker 1>thousand ten, and I think that even kind of had

0:32:03.960 --> 0:32:07.120
<v Speaker 1>a pretty short shelf life. Unless they're still doing it,

0:32:07.160 --> 0:32:09.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, Well, what do you say, The Gregory Brothers,

0:32:09.480 --> 0:32:12.320
<v Speaker 1>the Brooklyn Soul band. Yeah, they started out doing auto

0:32:12.320 --> 0:32:14.840
<v Speaker 1>tune the news and they would take the news and

0:32:14.880 --> 0:32:16.560
<v Speaker 1>just auto tune it and turn it and like just

0:32:16.600 --> 0:32:19.520
<v Speaker 1>produce it overproduce it um. And they did that with

0:32:19.600 --> 0:32:21.960
<v Speaker 1>the Bed and Shooter song, and that actually became the

0:32:22.080 --> 0:32:25.520
<v Speaker 1>number one video on YouTube of all of two thousand ten.

0:32:26.080 --> 0:32:28.960
<v Speaker 1>I look the original the original video has a hundred

0:32:28.960 --> 0:32:32.760
<v Speaker 1>and twenty eight million views right now. Yeah, yeah, it's

0:32:32.760 --> 0:32:37.320
<v Speaker 1>pretty impressive stuff. At at the same point, like now,

0:32:37.640 --> 0:32:41.400
<v Speaker 1>auto tune has become a parody of itself. It's it's

0:32:41.440 --> 0:32:45.000
<v Speaker 1>being used in ads, here's this progression. Something starts out,

0:32:45.400 --> 0:32:49.800
<v Speaker 1>someone uses it artistically, someone comes along and overuses it,

0:32:50.240 --> 0:32:53.440
<v Speaker 1>then everybody starts to overuse it. Then Wendy's makes a

0:32:53.480 --> 0:32:57.440
<v Speaker 1>commercial using it. Newsweek finally gets around to writing an

0:32:57.520 --> 0:33:01.280
<v Speaker 1>article about it, and then years after we record a

0:33:01.320 --> 0:33:04.280
<v Speaker 1>podcast on it, and then the thing finally dies. Yeah,

0:33:04.320 --> 0:33:06.800
<v Speaker 1>and then fifteen or twenty years after that it becomes

0:33:06.840 --> 0:33:11.240
<v Speaker 1>hip again. Yes, you know, that's the progression. So the

0:33:11.280 --> 0:33:13.440
<v Speaker 1>point that we're at though, now, Chuck, it's not so

0:33:13.480 --> 0:33:15.440
<v Speaker 1>cut and dry, man. It's not as cut and dry

0:33:15.480 --> 0:33:18.120
<v Speaker 1>as jay Z would like to have you think. Because

0:33:18.120 --> 0:33:20.520
<v Speaker 1>he came out with this death of auto tune track

0:33:20.560 --> 0:33:23.800
<v Speaker 1>in like two thousand nine. Auto tune is still around

0:33:24.520 --> 0:33:28.080
<v Speaker 1>very much. And now it's getting the point where if

0:33:28.120 --> 0:33:31.520
<v Speaker 1>like um the Verge and I can't remember the other

0:33:31.800 --> 0:33:34.640
<v Speaker 1>article I read, they're both on this podcast page. If

0:33:34.640 --> 0:33:37.600
<v Speaker 1>they're to be believed, they're credible sources, and they certainly

0:33:37.600 --> 0:33:40.720
<v Speaker 1>seemed like it from these articles. There's a there's this

0:33:41.280 --> 0:33:46.440
<v Speaker 1>growing question of um, is auto tune here to stay?

0:33:47.600 --> 0:33:50.560
<v Speaker 1>People are starting to compare it to the initial reaction

0:33:50.600 --> 0:33:53.720
<v Speaker 1>that people had to the electric guitar. It was a

0:33:53.760 --> 0:33:56.480
<v Speaker 1>lot different from the original guitar, and people it took

0:33:56.480 --> 0:33:58.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of getting used to, or like when Bob

0:33:58.200 --> 0:34:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Dylan went electric, a lot of people didn't like that,

0:34:02.040 --> 0:34:04.440
<v Speaker 1>but then look at what happened now with the electric guitar.

0:34:04.480 --> 0:34:06.960
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people tried different stuff with it and

0:34:07.320 --> 0:34:10.640
<v Speaker 1>it became a standard. Some people are wondering if auto

0:34:10.640 --> 0:34:13.279
<v Speaker 1>tune is going to fulfill the same destiny. I think

0:34:13.320 --> 0:34:16.120
<v Speaker 1>most people are hoping that it does not. Yeah, well,

0:34:16.160 --> 0:34:19.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean sweetening vocals is nothing new, Like reverb is

0:34:19.520 --> 0:34:22.680
<v Speaker 1>a tried and true thing for years and embraced. H

0:34:22.840 --> 0:34:25.000
<v Speaker 1>does that sweetened vocals? I thought that was always used

0:34:25.040 --> 0:34:27.560
<v Speaker 1>to like make it weird. Now it's it's sort of

0:34:27.600 --> 0:34:29.640
<v Speaker 1>like it gives it an echo, a like you're singing

0:34:29.640 --> 0:34:32.280
<v Speaker 1>in a big empty church hall or something. But it

0:34:32.320 --> 0:34:36.359
<v Speaker 1>makes it sweetens it. It doesn't like correct anything, but

0:34:36.440 --> 0:34:38.400
<v Speaker 1>when I say sweetens it, it just makes it sound

0:34:38.480 --> 0:34:42.520
<v Speaker 1>a little better. Reverbs a great tool, right. The point

0:34:42.640 --> 0:34:46.960
<v Speaker 1>is as artificial. Yeah, it's not natural. Yeah, they it's

0:34:47.280 --> 0:34:49.640
<v Speaker 1>they tried to replicate like singing in a big empty

0:34:49.719 --> 0:34:53.799
<v Speaker 1>echo e hallway, uh, with an effect and it worked, right.

0:34:53.840 --> 0:34:56.680
<v Speaker 1>And another argument in favor of auto tune that I've

0:34:56.719 --> 0:35:01.440
<v Speaker 1>seen is simply taking a human voice and recording it

0:35:01.480 --> 0:35:04.719
<v Speaker 1>automatically makes it artificial, like if they're not there in

0:35:04.760 --> 0:35:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the room with you singing to you at that moment.

0:35:08.040 --> 0:35:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Anything else is artificial, So what's the problem. So just

0:35:13.239 --> 0:35:15.319
<v Speaker 1>to let people know, I put out to text during

0:35:15.400 --> 0:35:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the episode to musician friends Jack White, No. I texted

0:35:19.680 --> 0:35:24.719
<v Speaker 1>Lucy Wayne Wright our buddy Jerry from our TV show.

0:35:24.800 --> 0:35:29.640
<v Speaker 1>She's not answered, which means she's used auto tune. Kidding

0:35:30.000 --> 0:35:32.800
<v Speaker 1>and our buddy Joey c Are from the Henry Clay People,

0:35:33.120 --> 0:35:36.600
<v Speaker 1>formerly of Henry Clay People, now with fakers, And he said,

0:35:36.680 --> 0:35:39.120
<v Speaker 1>I think there were a few harmonized us and as

0:35:39.800 --> 0:35:42.000
<v Speaker 1>on one of our old records where we did some

0:35:42.040 --> 0:35:47.239
<v Speaker 1>pitch correcting, but that's it, I think, maybe so definitely

0:35:49.080 --> 0:35:51.080
<v Speaker 1>he's probably be mad that I said that. Thank you

0:35:51.160 --> 0:35:54.840
<v Speaker 1>for being forth right, Joey. Yeah, good guy. Are you

0:35:54.840 --> 0:35:57.960
<v Speaker 1>got anything else about autit Yeah? Just a really quick um.

0:35:58.000 --> 0:36:01.000
<v Speaker 1>This is from a great website. Tin artists that are

0:36:01.040 --> 0:36:05.560
<v Speaker 1>essentially computer programs. They just have the most auto tuned people.

0:36:06.080 --> 0:36:10.120
<v Speaker 1>They have t Pain, Kesha, Chris Brown, Maroon Five, Black

0:36:10.120 --> 0:36:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Eyed Peas, Deaft Punk, Paris Hilton, who I forgot actually

0:36:14.000 --> 0:36:17.239
<v Speaker 1>had a song the cast of Glee Katy Perry, and

0:36:17.360 --> 0:36:19.920
<v Speaker 1>number one was owl City who. I don't even know

0:36:19.960 --> 0:36:22.960
<v Speaker 1>what that is. There's a huge outcry apparently among Glee

0:36:23.000 --> 0:36:25.600
<v Speaker 1>fans for Glee to stop using so much auto tune.

0:36:26.160 --> 0:36:28.240
<v Speaker 1>I think the deal is. They're like, well, these are actors,

0:36:28.960 --> 0:36:32.640
<v Speaker 1>like yeah, And there's another there's a big scandal with

0:36:32.800 --> 0:36:37.680
<v Speaker 1>u K's got talent or something weird like that, um

0:36:37.880 --> 0:36:40.120
<v Speaker 1>where they were using a lot of auto tune for

0:36:40.200 --> 0:36:46.360
<v Speaker 1>the auditions. It was like comeme on. Well anyway, man,

0:36:47.440 --> 0:36:50.319
<v Speaker 1>that's not a very surprising list. So this has been

0:36:50.360 --> 0:36:53.200
<v Speaker 1>grumpy old men. I don't feel like we've been grumpy yet.

0:36:53.239 --> 0:36:59.000
<v Speaker 1>We haven't like, condemned it out right. No, Nico Casey,

0:36:59.040 --> 0:37:01.360
<v Speaker 1>she condemns it out right. Yeah, Emily, I have an

0:37:01.400 --> 0:37:05.640
<v Speaker 1>agreement about Nico case but we could both marry her, okay,

0:37:05.960 --> 0:37:09.560
<v Speaker 1>if she was ever available to us. She's right behind you.

0:37:09.719 --> 0:37:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god. Uh so we have a very well

0:37:14.560 --> 0:37:16.640
<v Speaker 1>done finish up your a deal. Sorry, I just jumped

0:37:16.640 --> 0:37:20.080
<v Speaker 1>the gonka. Thank you, Ah, you don't have anything else

0:37:20.120 --> 0:37:23.800
<v Speaker 1>about No, I was just teasing. We have a special

0:37:23.800 --> 0:37:28.200
<v Speaker 1>listener mail with guests. Well, hold on let me finish first. Okay, okay, Well,

0:37:28.280 --> 0:37:31.640
<v Speaker 1>since Chuck doesn't have anything, it's the end. And if

0:37:31.640 --> 0:37:33.359
<v Speaker 1>you want to know more about auto tune, you can

0:37:33.400 --> 0:37:35.520
<v Speaker 1>type those words into the search bar at how stuff

0:37:35.520 --> 0:37:38.640
<v Speaker 1>works dot com. And this article, I have to say,

0:37:38.680 --> 0:37:42.040
<v Speaker 1>by the way, was the most definitive article about auto

0:37:42.080 --> 0:37:44.799
<v Speaker 1>tune on the internet. How about that. It's a good one.

0:37:45.480 --> 0:37:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Uh So you can go look that up. And since

0:37:48.000 --> 0:37:51.160
<v Speaker 1>I said definitive, it's time for listener mail, and it's

0:37:51.160 --> 0:37:54.399
<v Speaker 1>a special one. Like Chuck said, that's right. Today we

0:37:54.680 --> 0:37:59.200
<v Speaker 1>um got a joint listener mail to ourselves into Holly

0:37:59.239 --> 0:38:01.680
<v Speaker 1>and Tracy from stuff you missed in history class. Yep,

0:38:01.760 --> 0:38:03.600
<v Speaker 1>So we're gonna bring them in right, Yeah, we're gonna

0:38:03.680 --> 0:38:06.520
<v Speaker 1>read the email and we're going to talk about its implications.

0:38:07.080 --> 0:38:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's start now. So, without further ado, we actually have

0:38:13.840 --> 0:38:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Holly and Tracy of stuff you missed in history class

0:38:17.239 --> 0:38:22.719
<v Speaker 1>with us. Hi and Tracy, we have actually not with us,

0:38:22.760 --> 0:38:26.160
<v Speaker 1>she's with us in spirit and voice from Boston. I

0:38:26.239 --> 0:38:29.040
<v Speaker 1>know it's pretty it's pretty interesting when it comes in

0:38:29.080 --> 0:38:31.920
<v Speaker 1>through your headphones, but the other person somewhere else, it's

0:38:32.000 --> 0:38:34.279
<v Speaker 1>kind of awesome. And this is how you guys do

0:38:34.280 --> 0:38:38.800
<v Speaker 1>the show now, right? Yes, we also have like an

0:38:38.880 --> 0:38:41.680
<v Speaker 1>online you know, we have a Google hangout where we

0:38:41.760 --> 0:38:44.120
<v Speaker 1>both are so we can see each other as well.

0:38:45.560 --> 0:38:48.279
<v Speaker 1>We should have done that Tracy in here with her

0:38:48.320 --> 0:38:52.200
<v Speaker 1>little video image or like um hologram of or they'd

0:38:52.200 --> 0:38:54.400
<v Speaker 1>be pretty cool too. That's true, all right. So I

0:38:54.440 --> 0:38:55.920
<v Speaker 1>think the first thing I should do. You have a

0:38:55.920 --> 0:38:58.400
<v Speaker 1>picture of me like our old boss. Oh well, I

0:38:58.440 --> 0:39:00.120
<v Speaker 1>do have a picture of you. I have the all

0:39:00.160 --> 0:39:04.040
<v Speaker 1>its side that he gave out. So, um, I think

0:39:04.040 --> 0:39:05.359
<v Speaker 1>the first thing we should do is just read. I'll

0:39:05.400 --> 0:39:08.200
<v Speaker 1>read the email here and then we will discuss like adults.

0:39:08.320 --> 0:39:11.480
<v Speaker 1>How about that? Uh So, like I said, already set

0:39:11.480 --> 0:39:13.239
<v Speaker 1>it up that we both got an email from a

0:39:13.239 --> 0:39:16.719
<v Speaker 1>listener and she says the following, and this is from

0:39:16.840 --> 0:39:21.319
<v Speaker 1>Amanda Lions. Hey, guys and gals. She didn't say that,

0:39:21.360 --> 0:39:26.680
<v Speaker 1>of course, I just did. Well, you should read it, okay, Josh, Chuckers,

0:39:26.719 --> 0:39:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Holly and Tracy, and of course a hello to Jerry

0:39:29.160 --> 0:39:32.440
<v Speaker 1>and Nol. Yeah. I'm a social worker from Portland, Oregon

0:39:32.480 --> 0:39:35.520
<v Speaker 1>with a passion for human equity and respect. One of

0:39:35.520 --> 0:39:38.279
<v Speaker 1>the original members of the s Y s K Army

0:39:38.560 --> 0:39:42.160
<v Speaker 1>and a more recent listener to missed in History. I

0:39:42.280 --> 0:39:45.239
<v Speaker 1>binged for about five months before I got all caught up.

0:39:45.320 --> 0:39:48.480
<v Speaker 1>So how about that. I'm concerned about something I've heard

0:39:48.480 --> 0:39:50.000
<v Speaker 1>a few times on the History podcast, and I was

0:39:50.000 --> 0:39:52.440
<v Speaker 1>wondering if you guys would be willing to get together

0:39:53.080 --> 0:39:56.440
<v Speaker 1>we are and look into something to fulfill my curiosity.

0:39:56.600 --> 0:39:59.640
<v Speaker 1>When Josh and Chuck received corrections, they thank people for

0:39:59.719 --> 0:40:03.360
<v Speaker 1>being nice and frequently ask people not to be jerks

0:40:03.400 --> 0:40:06.480
<v Speaker 1>when correcting them. When Holly and Tracy talk about corrections

0:40:06.520 --> 0:40:10.400
<v Speaker 1>they receive, they ask people to be nice and have

0:40:10.560 --> 0:40:14.759
<v Speaker 1>referred to corrections on several occasions as hate mail. My

0:40:14.800 --> 0:40:17.759
<v Speaker 1>concern is that listeners may be more disrespectful Holly and

0:40:17.760 --> 0:40:20.319
<v Speaker 1>Tracy because they are women, and even if listeners are

0:40:20.400 --> 0:40:22.000
<v Speaker 1>rude to Josh and Chuck, they may rein it in

0:40:22.360 --> 0:40:25.360
<v Speaker 1>when making corrections because there are men. Could be completely

0:40:25.400 --> 0:40:27.200
<v Speaker 1>off base. But if I'm right, I feel like the

0:40:27.239 --> 0:40:30.760
<v Speaker 1>discrepancy should be addressed on the podcast to raise awareness

0:40:31.040 --> 0:40:33.839
<v Speaker 1>about how people treat men and women differently, and even

0:40:33.880 --> 0:40:37.080
<v Speaker 1>to address people's tendency to feel protected by the anonymity

0:40:37.080 --> 0:40:38.759
<v Speaker 1>of the Internet and say things online they wouldn't say

0:40:38.800 --> 0:40:42.879
<v Speaker 1>to someone's face and Uh so, Manda, we did talk

0:40:42.920 --> 0:40:44.879
<v Speaker 1>about it via email, and now we're going to talk

0:40:44.920 --> 0:40:48.520
<v Speaker 1>about it like regular human folks. And Tracy really has

0:40:48.600 --> 0:40:51.759
<v Speaker 1>the wealth of information because of her job and what

0:40:52.320 --> 0:40:55.359
<v Speaker 1>you know she's been responsible for in the past. Oh yeah,

0:40:55.560 --> 0:40:59.800
<v Speaker 1>that sounds serious. Yeah. I was part of the management

0:41:00.080 --> 0:41:02.600
<v Speaker 1>with a website for several years before I started actually

0:41:02.600 --> 0:41:05.959
<v Speaker 1>being on a podcast, and for a chunk of that time,

0:41:06.080 --> 0:41:09.160
<v Speaker 1>most of the podcasters reported to me. So even though

0:41:09.200 --> 0:41:12.279
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't managing the podcast program, I was sort of

0:41:12.360 --> 0:41:15.680
<v Speaker 1>keeping tabs on the iTunes reviews for everybody. And there

0:41:15.760 --> 0:41:19.120
<v Speaker 1>was a definite, definite trend in that the podcast that

0:41:19.160 --> 0:41:25.000
<v Speaker 1>had women on them got disproportionately more vicious comments about

0:41:25.040 --> 0:41:30.000
<v Speaker 1>what their voices sounded like versus the podcast with men

0:41:30.120 --> 0:41:33.560
<v Speaker 1>on them, which got less of that. So this is

0:41:33.600 --> 0:41:36.480
<v Speaker 1>news to me. Misogyny on the internet. I had not

0:41:36.800 --> 0:41:40.320
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't aware that that was the thing that was

0:41:40.360 --> 0:41:46.520
<v Speaker 1>a beautiful blind spot of all time. No, I can imagine,

0:41:46.640 --> 0:41:49.120
<v Speaker 1>And I know Tracy, you've like pointed some of these

0:41:49.120 --> 0:41:52.480
<v Speaker 1>out before. Um, for us, it's it's like, yeah, we'll

0:41:52.480 --> 0:41:56.520
<v Speaker 1>get hate mail every once in a while. Um, but

0:41:56.600 --> 0:41:59.600
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of easy to dismiss because even if it

0:41:59.680 --> 0:42:02.280
<v Speaker 1>is to erect it at us, it's not necessarily directed

0:42:02.280 --> 0:42:05.480
<v Speaker 1>at our gender or whatever it's or even if it

0:42:05.560 --> 0:42:09.320
<v Speaker 1>is personal, it's it's dumb. It's just it's just dumb stuff.

0:42:09.600 --> 0:42:12.200
<v Speaker 1>It's easy to not take personally, even when it's meant

0:42:12.280 --> 0:42:16.200
<v Speaker 1>to be personal. But um, that's me speaking. Is like

0:42:16.280 --> 0:42:19.400
<v Speaker 1>a white male age eighteen to forty nine, you know,

0:42:20.080 --> 0:42:23.040
<v Speaker 1>so I can imagine that like when someone attacks you

0:42:23.400 --> 0:42:26.719
<v Speaker 1>just just based on your gender, or even worse, if

0:42:26.719 --> 0:42:29.200
<v Speaker 1>they're coming after you and they don't even realize that

0:42:29.239 --> 0:42:32.800
<v Speaker 1>they're being driven by this, um, this disdain for your gender,

0:42:33.560 --> 0:42:35.319
<v Speaker 1>that has to make it a lot harder to just

0:42:35.320 --> 0:42:41.200
<v Speaker 1>just dismiss. Yeah, well, yeah, how you can go. I

0:42:41.280 --> 0:42:43.760
<v Speaker 1>was gonna say, for me, I mean I am lucky

0:42:43.840 --> 0:42:46.360
<v Speaker 1>and that I really give very few damns about what

0:42:46.400 --> 0:42:48.680
<v Speaker 1>most people think, like unless you're sitting in my lap

0:42:48.800 --> 0:42:51.319
<v Speaker 1>or paying my paycheck, Like it's great if you like me,

0:42:51.360 --> 0:42:53.319
<v Speaker 1>but if you don't, that's cool too. Like everybody do

0:42:53.400 --> 0:42:56.920
<v Speaker 1>your thing. But eventually, like the landslide builds up and

0:42:56.960 --> 0:43:02.920
<v Speaker 1>it's not it's not so much that I'm heartbroken or traumatized,

0:43:02.960 --> 0:43:05.040
<v Speaker 1>but it just wears you down after a while where

0:43:05.040 --> 0:43:07.000
<v Speaker 1>you're like, why am I doing this just to get

0:43:07.000 --> 0:43:11.920
<v Speaker 1>more of this crap? Yeah? Well, and we definitely have,

0:43:12.239 --> 0:43:15.920
<v Speaker 1>like we have been called slurs based on our gender before,

0:43:15.920 --> 0:43:21.160
<v Speaker 1>We have been called the C word over the pipe une. Yeah. Well,

0:43:21.200 --> 0:43:23.839
<v Speaker 1>and then the I told you about that when we

0:43:23.840 --> 0:43:26.799
<v Speaker 1>were discussing the email in our email conversation, I told

0:43:26.800 --> 0:43:28.480
<v Speaker 1>you about the person who wrote to us and said

0:43:28.520 --> 0:43:30.399
<v Speaker 1>they didn't understand how I could be in the same

0:43:30.480 --> 0:43:32.960
<v Speaker 1>room with Holly without strangling her. Like, that's the kind

0:43:33.000 --> 0:43:34.640
<v Speaker 1>of stuff that people will write to us and be

0:43:34.719 --> 0:43:37.440
<v Speaker 1>really awful, But we do get a whole lot of

0:43:37.480 --> 0:43:40.520
<v Speaker 1>them that I don't think people are consciously being misogynistic,

0:43:40.560 --> 0:43:42.920
<v Speaker 1>but they're talking to us and about us in a

0:43:43.000 --> 0:43:45.320
<v Speaker 1>very gendered way. So people tell us that we sound

0:43:45.320 --> 0:43:48.680
<v Speaker 1>shrill or that we sound bossy, and those aren't words

0:43:48.719 --> 0:43:51.000
<v Speaker 1>that people would use to describe men most of the time.

0:43:52.080 --> 0:43:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Most of their um and all of the articles that

0:43:58.719 --> 0:44:02.600
<v Speaker 1>had come out lately of out, especially vocal fry and

0:44:02.719 --> 0:44:05.640
<v Speaker 1>other things that people criticize about women's voices that they

0:44:05.680 --> 0:44:09.160
<v Speaker 1>don't generally criticize about men's voices. Every single time I

0:44:09.239 --> 0:44:11.160
<v Speaker 1>read it, and I'm like, I could have written that

0:44:11.239 --> 0:44:14.480
<v Speaker 1>about my job and my experience being a woman talking

0:44:14.520 --> 0:44:18.600
<v Speaker 1>on the internet. So which one, Um, which one hits

0:44:18.640 --> 0:44:22.600
<v Speaker 1>home the most? Like one that's a just a direct

0:44:22.680 --> 0:44:25.239
<v Speaker 1>personal attack are the ones that or the person is

0:44:25.280 --> 0:44:33.000
<v Speaker 1>just being unconsciously misogynistic, which to me would seem more entrenched. Yeah,

0:44:33.040 --> 0:44:35.000
<v Speaker 1>to me, the second one is worse. And it's especially

0:44:35.040 --> 0:44:38.680
<v Speaker 1>worse because a lot of the implicitly gendered criticism that

0:44:38.719 --> 0:44:43.560
<v Speaker 1>we get is also from women. The hardest part, Yeah,

0:44:43.719 --> 0:44:46.239
<v Speaker 1>that's the hardest part for me to deal with. Yeah,

0:44:46.320 --> 0:44:49.800
<v Speaker 1>when they're real specific, for example, like the person who

0:44:50.440 --> 0:44:54.160
<v Speaker 1>wants me to be strangled. Um, at the end of

0:44:54.200 --> 0:44:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the day, I'm like, he's working through his own stuff,

0:44:56.480 --> 0:44:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Like I have really have very little to do with this.

0:44:58.600 --> 0:45:00.480
<v Speaker 1>So I may have been the trigger the you know,

0:45:00.719 --> 0:45:03.520
<v Speaker 1>cause this little outrage bomb, but really it has very

0:45:03.520 --> 0:45:06.160
<v Speaker 1>little to do with me that I think almost of

0:45:06.200 --> 0:45:08.759
<v Speaker 1>the time that is the case. These are people who

0:45:08.960 --> 0:45:12.280
<v Speaker 1>have their own gripes in life and are probably angry,

0:45:12.360 --> 0:45:15.560
<v Speaker 1>unhappy people. Yes, But then, as Tracy said, when you

0:45:15.600 --> 0:45:17.799
<v Speaker 1>get those ones that are like they they're not even

0:45:17.840 --> 0:45:23.799
<v Speaker 1>conscious of how it's playing out, you realize how much

0:45:23.880 --> 0:45:28.920
<v Speaker 1>it is a bigger, sort of systemic social problem because

0:45:29.080 --> 0:45:32.080
<v Speaker 1>most of those people are not evil, they don't intend

0:45:32.160 --> 0:45:36.719
<v Speaker 1>to be misogynistic. They're not conscious that they're separating the

0:45:36.719 --> 0:45:42.520
<v Speaker 1>two genders and judging them differently on different criteria. So yeah,

0:45:42.520 --> 0:45:44.680
<v Speaker 1>those are, as Tracy said, a little more disturbing because

0:45:44.680 --> 0:45:46.800
<v Speaker 1>you realize that it's kind of like the silent creep

0:45:46.880 --> 0:45:50.319
<v Speaker 1>that underlays everything. Well, we do get a lot of

0:45:50.360 --> 0:45:52.640
<v Speaker 1>emails that are great from people who are great, and

0:45:52.680 --> 0:45:54.919
<v Speaker 1>the majority of the email that we get is great,

0:45:54.960 --> 0:45:56.399
<v Speaker 1>so we like, I don't want to make it sound

0:45:56.480 --> 0:45:59.319
<v Speaker 1>like every person who writes to us is awful. Um,

0:45:59.360 --> 0:46:01.360
<v Speaker 1>And we talked about corrections on the episode a lot

0:46:01.400 --> 0:46:03.640
<v Speaker 1>of times from people who write it in and everything

0:46:03.800 --> 0:46:05.960
<v Speaker 1>is fine and everything is very respectful. So to me,

0:46:06.280 --> 0:46:09.320
<v Speaker 1>a correction is you said this person died in nineteen

0:46:09.360 --> 0:46:13.320
<v Speaker 1>and eighteen, but really it was nineteen seven. That's a correction,

0:46:13.360 --> 0:46:15.279
<v Speaker 1>and that's fine. But then we'll also get ones that

0:46:15.320 --> 0:46:17.400
<v Speaker 1>are like, I can't believe you didn't even bother to

0:46:17.480 --> 0:46:20.080
<v Speaker 1>look this up. You completely butchered it. I don't know

0:46:20.120 --> 0:46:22.439
<v Speaker 1>why you don't even put more thought into what you're doing,

0:46:22.480 --> 0:46:24.960
<v Speaker 1>because it's really important that you represent yourselves as well,

0:46:25.000 --> 0:46:27.960
<v Speaker 1>And that's when I'm like, that's hate mail. Yeah, we

0:46:28.040 --> 0:46:29.840
<v Speaker 1>get those. Yeah, we get a lot of those, but

0:46:29.960 --> 0:46:33.400
<v Speaker 1>I never feel like those are like, uh, have anything

0:46:33.400 --> 0:46:36.600
<v Speaker 1>to do with my gender? Yeah, in those cases absolutely,

0:46:36.719 --> 0:46:38.799
<v Speaker 1>I mean we get the same exact emails where it's

0:46:38.840 --> 0:46:41.600
<v Speaker 1>just like you, you guys are total idiots, like how

0:46:41.640 --> 0:46:43.719
<v Speaker 1>how could you drop the ball this badly? And it's

0:46:43.719 --> 0:46:47.360
<v Speaker 1>like we basically said exactly what you're saying, We just

0:46:47.400 --> 0:46:51.120
<v Speaker 1>said it slightly differently. It definitely doesn't warrant this kind

0:46:51.160 --> 0:46:56.600
<v Speaker 1>of reaction, you know, Um yeah, I I why do

0:46:56.640 --> 0:47:01.160
<v Speaker 1>you think there is a gender or bias or a gender?

0:47:03.200 --> 0:47:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Why is it worse for you guys being women? Do

0:47:05.480 --> 0:47:09.480
<v Speaker 1>you think not just in common history of the world,

0:47:09.719 --> 0:47:11.680
<v Speaker 1>but I know, like how how long do you have?

0:47:12.560 --> 0:47:15.000
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, like even even beyond comments like why

0:47:15.080 --> 0:47:19.000
<v Speaker 1>is the internet so geared towards hating women? I mean,

0:47:19.000 --> 0:47:20.759
<v Speaker 1>what's what's the deal with that? Do you guys? Is

0:47:20.800 --> 0:47:24.520
<v Speaker 1>there is there a general understanding or idea behind it

0:47:25.200 --> 0:47:28.160
<v Speaker 1>lonely angry men? Is my guess? Well? I think it's

0:47:28.320 --> 0:47:32.200
<v Speaker 1>it's super complex, right, There's no one simple answer. Like

0:47:32.320 --> 0:47:34.480
<v Speaker 1>some of it is that we have reached an age

0:47:34.480 --> 0:47:41.640
<v Speaker 1>where the disparity in terms of UH gender equality has

0:47:41.719 --> 0:47:44.520
<v Speaker 1>shrunk at the same time that a lot of people

0:47:44.560 --> 0:47:48.440
<v Speaker 1>have this outlet readily available to them. So there's progress

0:47:48.480 --> 0:47:50.480
<v Speaker 1>being made, but there are also the people who are

0:47:50.480 --> 0:47:53.279
<v Speaker 1>still kicking and screaming as they get dragged into a

0:47:53.320 --> 0:47:57.120
<v Speaker 1>future they're not comfortable with. But then there's also just

0:47:57.160 --> 0:47:58.879
<v Speaker 1>the thing that again I don't think people are even

0:47:58.920 --> 0:48:01.880
<v Speaker 1>conscious of it where it is new for many people,

0:48:01.960 --> 0:48:05.759
<v Speaker 1>and even people that are younger and have maybe grown

0:48:05.800 --> 0:48:09.240
<v Speaker 1>up in a more kind of old school traditional environment,

0:48:09.400 --> 0:48:13.520
<v Speaker 1>be at household or community, where they're not even conscious

0:48:13.719 --> 0:48:16.840
<v Speaker 1>of why they're more upset at women. There's just something

0:48:16.880 --> 0:48:21.719
<v Speaker 1>about women, you know, sharing knowledge or being assertive or

0:48:21.719 --> 0:48:24.480
<v Speaker 1>being confident that just rankles them. And they don't even

0:48:24.520 --> 0:48:27.000
<v Speaker 1>register that it's because it's a woman. They just know

0:48:27.040 --> 0:48:29.560
<v Speaker 1>there's something about that person I hate and it's something

0:48:29.560 --> 0:48:32.960
<v Speaker 1>they're just not used to and they haven't kind of

0:48:33.000 --> 0:48:38.480
<v Speaker 1>made the the mental accustomization to. Oh. Sometimes people that

0:48:38.520 --> 0:48:41.480
<v Speaker 1>aren't dudes have stuff to say as well. Do you

0:48:41.480 --> 0:48:46.200
<v Speaker 1>think the same experiences extrapolatable under race as well as gender,

0:48:46.200 --> 0:48:49.080
<v Speaker 1>and well, I mean I know it is, but I

0:48:49.080 --> 0:48:52.000
<v Speaker 1>mean is it almost like a step for step do

0:48:52.080 --> 0:48:58.520
<v Speaker 1>you think I think it's probably pretty similar models. Yeah, well,

0:48:58.600 --> 0:49:01.360
<v Speaker 1>speaking like as the ass a white person in a

0:49:01.480 --> 0:49:03.560
<v Speaker 1>room of white people who are on the phone right now.

0:49:03.640 --> 0:49:07.280
<v Speaker 1>The worst days I have ever had managing our Facebook page,

0:49:07.719 --> 0:49:10.680
<v Speaker 1>our days when we talk about something that has to

0:49:10.719 --> 0:49:15.440
<v Speaker 1>do with systemic racism and we'll we'll get a flood

0:49:15.480 --> 0:49:20.280
<v Speaker 1>of similarly implicitly racist comments from people who really don't

0:49:20.280 --> 0:49:22.479
<v Speaker 1>know that the view that they just put out there

0:49:23.160 --> 0:49:26.319
<v Speaker 1>is racist. Like, that's sort of the same thing. Like

0:49:26.360 --> 0:49:28.319
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people do things that are misogynists, not

0:49:28.360 --> 0:49:31.480
<v Speaker 1>really consciously being misogynist. That just it comes out and

0:49:31.480 --> 0:49:33.879
<v Speaker 1>they're not consciously aware of it, and it's we see

0:49:33.880 --> 0:49:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the same thing on our Facebook posts in subjects that

0:49:37.560 --> 0:49:41.120
<v Speaker 1>are related to race really pretty often. So at the

0:49:41.200 --> 0:49:43.040
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, when you guys get a bunch

0:49:43.080 --> 0:49:46.640
<v Speaker 1>of these, say, on just a particularly bad day, what

0:49:47.719 --> 0:49:49.640
<v Speaker 1>what do you do? I mean, do you battle this?

0:49:49.719 --> 0:49:51.439
<v Speaker 1>Do you just brush it off and be like, these

0:49:51.440 --> 0:49:53.640
<v Speaker 1>guys are idiots and whether they like it or not,

0:49:53.680 --> 0:49:56.480
<v Speaker 1>they are going to be dragged into the future against

0:49:56.560 --> 0:49:59.080
<v Speaker 1>their will. Uh, you know, what do you do a

0:49:59.080 --> 0:50:02.360
<v Speaker 1>combination of both? Or do you look at your status

0:50:02.360 --> 0:50:08.520
<v Speaker 1>is a perennial top twenty podcast and say, clearly, who

0:50:08.520 --> 0:50:10.759
<v Speaker 1>cares what they say? Because we're really good at what

0:50:10.800 --> 0:50:14.880
<v Speaker 1>we do, because we're very successful. I do a combination

0:50:14.880 --> 0:50:17.840
<v Speaker 1>of things. I have kind of a library of links

0:50:17.880 --> 0:50:20.880
<v Speaker 1>about vocal fry and whatever. Anyone writes directly to us

0:50:20.920 --> 0:50:24.240
<v Speaker 1>to complain about vocal fry, I kind of send them, hey,

0:50:24.239 --> 0:50:28.160
<v Speaker 1>why don't you listen to this? Uh this American Life

0:50:28.160 --> 0:50:32.440
<v Speaker 1>segment all about vocal fry in which Ira Glass has

0:50:32.520 --> 0:50:35.560
<v Speaker 1>vocal fry the entire segment, but nobody complains at him

0:50:35.600 --> 0:50:40.040
<v Speaker 1>about it. Um. So I like I specifically will address that.

0:50:40.080 --> 0:50:42.319
<v Speaker 1>I will specifically address things that people say on our

0:50:42.320 --> 0:50:46.439
<v Speaker 1>Facebook page in public, because I feel like our role

0:50:46.560 --> 0:50:50.600
<v Speaker 1>as a podcast about history does not include allowing people

0:50:50.680 --> 0:50:53.920
<v Speaker 1>free rein to be racist in public and have that

0:50:54.000 --> 0:50:56.960
<v Speaker 1>not be challenge. Um. But when it comes to the

0:50:57.680 --> 0:50:59.560
<v Speaker 1>like the email that Holly and I got that was

0:50:59.800 --> 0:51:02.160
<v Speaker 1>that was so bad pretty recently, that was the person

0:51:02.200 --> 0:51:09.440
<v Speaker 1>who was basically advocating me murdering Holly. Um, I was

0:51:09.520 --> 0:51:11.960
<v Speaker 1>actually traveling. I went down to the hotel bar and

0:51:11.960 --> 0:51:15.720
<v Speaker 1>how to drink there? You got a book and tried

0:51:15.760 --> 0:51:17.680
<v Speaker 1>to chill Yeah, I tried and chill out about it,

0:51:19.360 --> 0:51:25.319
<v Speaker 1>booze everything. Well, um, thank you both for addressing this.

0:51:26.160 --> 0:51:28.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry we didn't solve this problem here in this this.

0:51:30.680 --> 0:51:32.799
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for having us on the show. Of course. Um,

0:51:32.840 --> 0:51:34.560
<v Speaker 1>if anyone out there and stuff you should know Land

0:51:34.600 --> 0:51:36.600
<v Speaker 1>has not checked out stuff you missed in history class,

0:51:37.080 --> 0:51:40.759
<v Speaker 1>you definitely should because it is super awesome and as

0:51:40.800 --> 0:51:43.279
<v Speaker 1>are both of you. And I don't want to strangle you,

0:51:43.360 --> 0:51:51.080
<v Speaker 1>but I want to hug your necks. Nope, you've got

0:51:51.080 --> 0:51:56.520
<v Speaker 1>to have it. And now she don't move no more. Nope.

0:51:56.560 --> 0:51:59.120
<v Speaker 1>But thanks for coming in. And uh, we should do

0:51:59.160 --> 0:52:01.480
<v Speaker 1>this more often, you know, we should. We should have

0:52:01.520 --> 0:52:03.000
<v Speaker 1>a whole show where we just get together and do

0:52:03.080 --> 0:52:05.560
<v Speaker 1>roundtable stuff. We can have yappy pow wow party time.

0:52:06.280 --> 0:52:09.960
<v Speaker 1>That would be fun. Yeah. Well, if you have something

0:52:10.000 --> 0:52:12.120
<v Speaker 1>to say about all this, and we're sure you will,

0:52:12.200 --> 0:52:14.319
<v Speaker 1>we want to hear from you. You can tweet to

0:52:14.440 --> 0:52:17.320
<v Speaker 1>us at s Y s K podcast. You can tweet

0:52:17.360 --> 0:52:20.440
<v Speaker 1>the stuff you missed in history class at at missed

0:52:20.440 --> 0:52:23.359
<v Speaker 1>in History. You can join us on Facebook dot com

0:52:23.400 --> 0:52:25.920
<v Speaker 1>slash stuff you should know. You can join stuff you

0:52:25.960 --> 0:52:29.960
<v Speaker 1>missed in History class at missed in History, Facebook dot com,

0:52:30.040 --> 0:52:32.920
<v Speaker 1>slash miss in History make it easy? What about email?

0:52:32.920 --> 0:52:34.960
<v Speaker 1>How do they get in touch of your history? Podcast

0:52:35.000 --> 0:52:36.799
<v Speaker 1>at how stuff works dot com And you can hit

0:52:36.880 --> 0:52:39.000
<v Speaker 1>us up at stuff podcast at how stuff works dot

0:52:39.000 --> 0:52:40.960
<v Speaker 1>com and at all as always joined us at our

0:52:41.040 --> 0:52:43.640
<v Speaker 1>home on the Web, Stuff you Should Know dot com

0:52:43.719 --> 0:52:52.040
<v Speaker 1>and missed in History dot com. For more on this

0:52:52.200 --> 0:52:54.720
<v Speaker 1>and thousands of other topics, does it how stuff works

0:52:54.719 --> 0:53:02.400
<v Speaker 1>dot com