WEBVTT - Which Messaging App is Truly Secure?

0:00:01.720 --> 0:00:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Also media.

0:00:08.680 --> 0:00:11.800
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back to it could happen here. I am Robert Evans,

0:00:11.880 --> 0:00:16.160
<v Speaker 2>and this is a podcast about things falling apart. Sometimes

0:00:16.160 --> 0:00:19.040
<v Speaker 2>it's about how to make things not fall apart, and

0:00:19.120 --> 0:00:22.360
<v Speaker 2>other times it's more about enduring it. Today is more

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:24.639
<v Speaker 2>on the endurance side of things. And we're talking about

0:00:24.640 --> 0:00:27.440
<v Speaker 2>a subject that we get a lot of requests about here.

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:30.240
<v Speaker 2>We've discussed this a year or so ago with one

0:00:30.240 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 2>of our guests, a great Carl Pasarta. We're talking about

0:00:33.159 --> 0:00:36.839
<v Speaker 2>like security culture, and particularly the aspect of security culture

0:00:36.840 --> 0:00:40.360
<v Speaker 2>that involves digital devices and how to communicate with your friends'

0:00:40.360 --> 0:00:45.920
<v Speaker 2>affinity groups, whomever via your phone essentially or your computer.

0:00:46.400 --> 0:00:49.080
<v Speaker 2>This is a thing where there's a huge amount of

0:00:49.120 --> 0:00:52.599
<v Speaker 2>disinformation as to which apps are safe. What does it

0:00:52.640 --> 0:00:55.960
<v Speaker 2>actually mean to say that an app is encrypted? How

0:00:56.000 --> 0:00:58.840
<v Speaker 2>far does encryption get you? What sort of like cultural

0:00:58.880 --> 0:01:03.920
<v Speaker 2>things come alongside the actual, like physical reality of the

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:06.160
<v Speaker 2>security of the device in order to kind of make

0:01:06.319 --> 0:01:09.560
<v Speaker 2>a comprehensive security profile. We're gonna be talking about all

0:01:09.560 --> 0:01:11.560
<v Speaker 2>that today and hopefully giving you some good advice on

0:01:11.560 --> 0:01:14.240
<v Speaker 2>what you can trust. Because I am the furthest thing

0:01:14.280 --> 0:01:17.360
<v Speaker 2>in the world from a technical expert. We have two

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:21.959
<v Speaker 2>actual experts with us today. Carolyn Senders and Cooper Quinton

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:25.800
<v Speaker 2>have both recently published a paper alongside several other authors

0:01:26.560 --> 0:01:31.360
<v Speaker 2>Leila Wagner, Tim Bernard, Ami Meta, and Justin Hendricks called

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 2>what Is Secure? An Analysis of Popular Messaging Apps, and

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:38.720
<v Speaker 2>it's it's basically going over what is the actual level

0:01:38.760 --> 0:01:42.120
<v Speaker 2>of security with a number of things like Telegram, you know,

0:01:42.200 --> 0:01:47.880
<v Speaker 2>Telegram's private messaging system, Facebook Messenger, Apple Message, or I Message.

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 2>I guess it's called and obviously signal and kind of

0:01:51.240 --> 0:01:54.080
<v Speaker 2>as a spoiler, signal is your best bet, but that

0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:56.600
<v Speaker 2>also isn't where you should end, right I think we

0:01:56.640 --> 0:01:58.760
<v Speaker 2>want to also talk about kind of like why and

0:01:59.160 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 2>to what extent that's the case. But anyway, I'm going

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:04.520
<v Speaker 2>to turn things over to Carolyn and Cooper now because

0:02:04.520 --> 0:02:07.840
<v Speaker 2>I have talked enough about this. Hey guys, welcome to

0:02:07.880 --> 0:02:08.200
<v Speaker 2>the show.

0:02:09.680 --> 0:02:11.760
<v Speaker 3>Hey, Robert, thanks so much for having us on.

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:15.119
<v Speaker 4>Yeah ah, yeah, thank you so much, A big fan

0:02:15.360 --> 0:02:18.840
<v Speaker 4>of the podcast, so always lovely, really lovely to be here.

0:02:19.320 --> 0:02:20.359
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, thank you so much.

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:23.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's really lovely to have you both again. Listeners,

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:26.600
<v Speaker 2>if you want to take a look at this their paper,

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 2>if you just google what is secure and analysis of

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 2>popular messaging apps. You'll find the Tech Policy Press has

0:02:32.240 --> 0:02:34.760
<v Speaker 2>a summary of it that's pretty quick. The full paper

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 2>is eighty six pages or so. I also recommend reading that,

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:40.240
<v Speaker 2>but if you wanted to give this the summary a

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:43.200
<v Speaker 2>skin before you continue, that might help. But I kind

0:02:43.200 --> 0:02:45.760
<v Speaker 2>of wanted to start by asking you, guys, what is

0:02:45.840 --> 0:02:49.600
<v Speaker 2>it that makes Signal a good option for people? Right?

0:02:49.600 --> 0:02:52.040
<v Speaker 2>Because I think most folks you describe it as sort

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:55.240
<v Speaker 2>of security folklore, right, the stuff that you hear about

0:02:55.280 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 2>security from your friends, and if you're not a technical person,

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:00.680
<v Speaker 2>you kind of just like trust what the folks around

0:03:00.720 --> 0:03:02.200
<v Speaker 2>you were saying. And that was sort of how I

0:03:02.240 --> 0:03:05.040
<v Speaker 2>got into Signal. Right, I'm not a technical person, but

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:07.240
<v Speaker 2>people I knew and trusted who were were like, this

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:08.080
<v Speaker 2>is your best option?

0:03:08.760 --> 0:03:09.639
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, thank you so much.

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 4>That's such a good question, and I think Cooper and

0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:15.480
<v Speaker 4>I probably have similar but also like very different answers

0:03:15.560 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 4>to it.

0:03:16.360 --> 0:03:18.320
<v Speaker 5>Cooper, I can go first if you want.

0:03:18.960 --> 0:03:20.560
<v Speaker 4>One of the things I love about Signal is it's

0:03:20.560 --> 0:03:24.200
<v Speaker 4>just really easy to use. It's in and encrypted, it's

0:03:24.200 --> 0:03:26.640
<v Speaker 4>a messaging app. There's not a lot of stuff on it,

0:03:26.680 --> 0:03:29.360
<v Speaker 4>but you can do a lot with it, so you

0:03:29.360 --> 0:03:32.720
<v Speaker 4>can do video calls, you can send actually pretty large

0:03:32.720 --> 0:03:33.799
<v Speaker 4>files like PDFs.

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 5>You can have drag and drop stuff.

0:03:36.080 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 4>It's like such a low threshold for use for users

0:03:40.040 --> 0:03:42.160
<v Speaker 4>because it is a messaging app, but it does so

0:03:42.200 --> 0:03:45.280
<v Speaker 4>many different kinds of things. But then related to that,

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 4>it's also actually quite minimal. So the paper which everyone

0:03:48.960 --> 0:03:52.120
<v Speaker 4>should read and we'll probably get into this later. Different

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:58.800
<v Speaker 4>apps like Telegram or Facebook's Messenger app, for example, have have.

0:03:58.840 --> 0:04:00.840
<v Speaker 5>This thing we've been calling feature bloat.

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:04.160
<v Speaker 4>They are messaging services that actually feel a bit more

0:04:04.240 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 4>like social networks if you look at the amount of

0:04:06.520 --> 0:04:08.840
<v Speaker 4>stuff that's on there, and by stuff, I don't just

0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 4>mean like stickers, I mean if you look at there's

0:04:11.920 --> 0:04:15.080
<v Speaker 4>all these sort of specific and strange settings you can

0:04:15.160 --> 0:04:17.920
<v Speaker 4>use to have all different kinds of messages and all

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:21.120
<v Speaker 4>different kinds of privacy settings, and all privacy settings are

0:04:21.160 --> 0:04:25.640
<v Speaker 4>really really great. Because Telegram and Facebook Messenger are not

0:04:25.960 --> 0:04:28.840
<v Speaker 4>encrypted by default, actually some of those settings can make

0:04:28.880 --> 0:04:31.279
<v Speaker 4>you feel more secure when you're not so. Kind of

0:04:31.279 --> 0:04:33.159
<v Speaker 4>the beauty of Signal is that out of the box,

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:37.279
<v Speaker 4>it's incredibly secure. It's an inn encrypted They're not holding

0:04:37.279 --> 0:04:40.360
<v Speaker 4>any data about you. I believe the only only day

0:04:40.400 --> 0:04:42.920
<v Speaker 4>they hold is like when you've like when a phone

0:04:43.000 --> 0:04:46.120
<v Speaker 4>number or a profile has downloaded signal, like when you've

0:04:46.279 --> 0:04:50.600
<v Speaker 4>when you've signed up. But again it's it's incredibly easy

0:04:50.640 --> 0:04:54.159
<v Speaker 4>to use. And another thing is, you know, if this

0:04:54.240 --> 0:04:56.039
<v Speaker 4>was a few years ago, we've been looking at wire

0:04:56.120 --> 0:04:56.679
<v Speaker 4>for example.

0:04:56.680 --> 0:04:58.440
<v Speaker 5>One of the nice things about Signal.

0:04:58.200 --> 0:05:00.800
<v Speaker 4>And this might be controversial to some, is that it

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:03.640
<v Speaker 4>does follow modern design patterns and standards. So if you're

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:07.240
<v Speaker 4>using an iOS or Android version, like there are buttons

0:05:07.279 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 4>in places where you expect them to be. Signal is

0:05:09.880 --> 0:05:15.040
<v Speaker 4>not perfectly designed, but it is quite usable. Yeah, So

0:05:15.080 --> 0:05:17.240
<v Speaker 4>for me, that's kind of what I think makes it

0:05:17.279 --> 0:05:18.400
<v Speaker 4>makes it really wonderful.

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:21.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's definitely as much as I love it, and

0:05:21.880 --> 0:05:24.880
<v Speaker 2>it's my like standard messaging app I do every now

0:05:24.920 --> 0:05:26.559
<v Speaker 2>and then run into the thing where like my friends

0:05:26.560 --> 0:05:28.640
<v Speaker 2>will call me through Signal, which is great if you

0:05:28.640 --> 0:05:31.160
<v Speaker 2>need a call to be secure, but it's not nearly

0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:33.280
<v Speaker 2>as good, Like it drops a lot more often than

0:05:33.320 --> 0:05:35.720
<v Speaker 2>a regular phone call, and I'm like, we're just trying

0:05:35.760 --> 0:05:37.680
<v Speaker 2>to meet at the movie theater. It's okay if the

0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 2>nsay noes right, Like I've.

0:05:40.640 --> 0:05:42.800
<v Speaker 4>Definitely had that with friends where I'm like, I'm like yeah,

0:05:42.800 --> 0:05:46.640
<v Speaker 4>I'm like, we're just calling to talk about like your dog.

0:05:47.120 --> 0:05:48.320
<v Speaker 5>It's probably fine.

0:05:48.560 --> 0:05:50.839
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the FBI can have this stuff.

0:05:51.160 --> 0:05:54.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, please send, please send, please send dog picks through

0:05:55.279 --> 0:05:56.479
<v Speaker 4>all all messaging apps.

0:05:57.760 --> 0:06:00.839
<v Speaker 3>You know. But on that note, it's uh, right, writing

0:06:01.080 --> 0:06:05.480
<v Speaker 3>usable software that is also secure is really hard, right,

0:06:05.520 --> 0:06:09.560
<v Speaker 3>And like as a like as cryptographer, I'm not a cryptographer,

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:13.479
<v Speaker 3>but like as somebody cryptographer adjacent, we got that wrong

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:17.480
<v Speaker 3>for a long time, right, Like before Signal the problem,

0:06:17.680 --> 0:06:20.359
<v Speaker 3>you know, there were the the the sort of most

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:24.919
<v Speaker 3>used encryption methods were probably uh PGP email, which is

0:06:24.920 --> 0:06:28.159
<v Speaker 3>a method for encrypting email, and off the record chats,

0:06:28.240 --> 0:06:31.760
<v Speaker 3>and both of those none of those ever got to

0:06:31.920 --> 0:06:35.320
<v Speaker 3>the sort of level of user base that Signal and

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 3>and certainly not WhatsApp have, right, And and that's largely

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 3>because they were pretty much unusable, like PGP, almost entirely

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:49.360
<v Speaker 3>unusable even by cryptography professionals, right, even by computer security

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:54.080
<v Speaker 3>professionals like ourselves. OTR chat total pain in the butt, right,

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:58.679
<v Speaker 3>like just just a real nightmare to use. So, like Signal,

0:06:58.880 --> 0:07:01.239
<v Speaker 3>there are still some rough edges, and we talked about

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:04.280
<v Speaker 3>some of those in our paper. But overall, I think

0:07:04.320 --> 0:07:06.560
<v Speaker 3>that the big the big innovation they've had is just

0:07:07.200 --> 0:07:10.000
<v Speaker 3>remembering that what people want to do on a chat

0:07:10.040 --> 0:07:12.840
<v Speaker 3>app is not encrypt things. What people want to do

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:14.800
<v Speaker 3>on a chat app is they want to they want

0:07:14.800 --> 0:07:18.040
<v Speaker 3>to chat right. And and the second that that that

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:20.320
<v Speaker 3>the security sort of gets in the way of that,

0:07:20.880 --> 0:07:23.000
<v Speaker 3>people will stop using it and go find something that's

0:07:23.040 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 3>more usable. And it seems like that's been Signals sort

0:07:26.040 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 3>of guiding star and it's and they've you know, doing

0:07:30.360 --> 0:07:33.040
<v Speaker 3>the doing the most secure thing that you can will

0:07:33.120 --> 0:07:38.720
<v Speaker 3>still being fun and usable to actually just chat on right.

0:07:38.800 --> 0:07:40.960
<v Speaker 3>And I think that that has served them quite well.

0:07:41.800 --> 0:07:45.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think there's it's it's so important. One of

0:07:45.880 --> 0:07:47.960
<v Speaker 2>I think one of the things that that contributes to

0:07:48.040 --> 0:07:52.400
<v Speaker 2>good overall security is setting yourself up for success, which

0:07:52.440 --> 0:07:54.960
<v Speaker 2>means setting yourself up for a system that can function

0:07:55.040 --> 0:07:56.920
<v Speaker 2>well if you're lazy, which is one of the nice

0:07:56.960 --> 0:07:58.800
<v Speaker 2>things that you know, with Signal, you don't have to

0:07:58.840 --> 0:08:01.120
<v Speaker 2>worry about like opting in and out and like selecting

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:03.840
<v Speaker 2>a bunch of stuff. It's pretty safe, especially for a

0:08:03.840 --> 0:08:07.040
<v Speaker 2>normal person's uses right out of the box, which is

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 2>huge and kind of in the same line, as that

0:08:10.160 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 2>is the fact that because Signal doesn't store metadata, you're

0:08:13.200 --> 0:08:16.760
<v Speaker 2>not relying upon them being like committed you know, anti

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:20.440
<v Speaker 2>state actors or whatever like, because they don't have access

0:08:20.480 --> 0:08:22.840
<v Speaker 2>to the thing that for example, Facebook will hand over

0:08:22.920 --> 0:08:25.560
<v Speaker 2>to the cops if the cops just like breathe in

0:08:25.600 --> 0:08:26.160
<v Speaker 2>their direction.

0:08:28.040 --> 0:08:30.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's that's exactly right, And that's that is that

0:08:30.760 --> 0:08:32.760
<v Speaker 3>is the other really cool thing about Signal. You know, we,

0:08:33.400 --> 0:08:36.560
<v Speaker 3>as Carolyn said, the only data that Signal gives over

0:08:36.640 --> 0:08:40.480
<v Speaker 3>in response to uh A subpoena is the time that

0:08:41.040 --> 0:08:43.319
<v Speaker 3>the phone number signed up for Signal account and the

0:08:43.400 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 3>last time it connected to the Signal server. And the

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 3>reason we know that is because Signal publishes transparency reports

0:08:50.080 --> 0:08:53.199
<v Speaker 3>with the full text and full response of any subpoena

0:08:53.240 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 3>that they get, so like we can actually just see

0:08:56.760 --> 0:08:59.280
<v Speaker 3>in the responses that all they've given over is these

0:08:59.320 --> 0:09:01.920
<v Speaker 3>two pieces of information, because that's all they have, and

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:05.319
<v Speaker 3>they've done some pretty clever things to make that be the.

0:09:05.280 --> 0:09:08.840
<v Speaker 4>Case, right, And that's actually so different than how other

0:09:08.960 --> 0:09:13.160
<v Speaker 4>companies are I think reporting on either subpoenas or any

0:09:13.200 --> 0:09:13.640
<v Speaker 4>kind of.

0:09:15.280 --> 0:09:17.040
<v Speaker 5>Weight that law enforcement puts on them.

0:09:17.400 --> 0:09:20.160
<v Speaker 4>So for our report, I don't remember how much it's

0:09:20.200 --> 0:09:23.120
<v Speaker 4>it's mentioned in the report actually, but we did go

0:09:23.240 --> 0:09:28.440
<v Speaker 4>through and look at Apple Meta and I think Google

0:09:28.520 --> 0:09:31.040
<v Speaker 4>like in their own transparency reports to try to get

0:09:31.040 --> 0:09:34.000
<v Speaker 4>a sense of how how that would stack up in

0:09:34.040 --> 0:09:38.120
<v Speaker 4>comparison to Signals. I think in some cases it's saying

0:09:38.280 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 4>like they received some kind of like notification, but like no,

0:09:43.880 --> 0:09:47.840
<v Speaker 4>nothing really clear or specific on like what they received

0:09:47.880 --> 0:09:50.640
<v Speaker 4>from law enforcement or government, but rather just that they

0:09:50.720 --> 0:09:52.640
<v Speaker 4>received one. And so that's also the really great thing

0:09:52.679 --> 0:09:55.600
<v Speaker 4>about Signal is you are getting all of this information

0:09:56.000 --> 0:10:00.400
<v Speaker 4>that you're not getting from other companies or PLATF forms.

0:10:01.040 --> 0:10:04.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, I wanted to kind of in the

0:10:04.480 --> 0:10:07.280
<v Speaker 2>same subject and going back to we kind of opened

0:10:07.280 --> 0:10:11.320
<v Speaker 2>this introducing the concept that y'all introduced me to. I

0:10:11.320 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 2>guess I was aware of this, but not the terminology

0:10:13.520 --> 0:10:16.080
<v Speaker 2>security folklore, and I wanted to chat a little bit

0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:18.040
<v Speaker 2>about kind of the most recent example of this something

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:20.560
<v Speaker 2>a lot of folks have probably been wondering about since

0:10:20.559 --> 0:10:23.200
<v Speaker 2>we started talking about Signal, which is that roughly a

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:27.320
<v Speaker 2>week before y'all and I sat down to talk about this,

0:10:28.320 --> 0:10:32.280
<v Speaker 2>a kind of viral info meme started coming through that

0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:36.200
<v Speaker 2>was like Signal has a zero day exploit, which is

0:10:36.559 --> 0:10:40.320
<v Speaker 2>basically a hole that a hacker found in an Apple program.

0:10:40.520 --> 0:10:43.880
<v Speaker 2>That is that can't expose you. You have to turn off

0:10:45.160 --> 0:10:47.720
<v Speaker 2>link previews, right, which is that when you when someone

0:10:47.760 --> 0:10:50.040
<v Speaker 2>sends you like a link to an article in Signal,

0:10:50.240 --> 0:10:53.800
<v Speaker 2>you get a little preview not dissimilar to how it is.

0:10:54.360 --> 0:10:56.720
<v Speaker 2>And I think to be fair, just based on my

0:10:56.880 --> 0:10:59.559
<v Speaker 2>very limited knowledge, that is, when I think about, like,

0:10:59.600 --> 0:11:01.840
<v Speaker 2>what are potential holes in Signal, I don't think it's

0:11:01.880 --> 0:11:05.680
<v Speaker 2>unreasonable to be concerned about that specific feature. But that

0:11:05.920 --> 0:11:09.040
<v Speaker 2>warning was not what it kind of seemed to be basically,

0:11:09.120 --> 0:11:10.679
<v Speaker 2>or not as accurate as I think a lot of

0:11:10.720 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 2>people took it as being.

0:11:11.800 --> 0:11:12.080
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:11:12.160 --> 0:11:13.840
<v Speaker 2>I'll let I'll tell I'll turn it over to you, guys.

0:11:13.840 --> 0:11:15.280
<v Speaker 2>I think that's the next thing I want to talk about.

0:11:15.600 --> 0:11:18.480
<v Speaker 4>I'll turn it over to Cooper, who had you had

0:11:18.679 --> 0:11:21.600
<v Speaker 4>a Uh, you have a lot of feels about that.

0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 3>I have so many feelings about this. I was working

0:11:25.679 --> 0:11:26.680
<v Speaker 3>on this all weekend.

0:11:26.800 --> 0:11:30.520
<v Speaker 6>So this yeah, so this copy pasta I'm calling this

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 6>like this signal copy pasta yeah, which is a term

0:11:33.880 --> 0:11:37.960
<v Speaker 6>from you know, four Chan and other horrible internet places,

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:39.640
<v Speaker 6>but some.

0:11:40.120 --> 0:11:42.440
<v Speaker 5>Media audience is probably Internet enough.

0:11:43.240 --> 0:11:45.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm gonna guess a good half of the people

0:11:45.640 --> 0:11:47.880
<v Speaker 2>listening at least got that message.

0:11:47.920 --> 0:11:52.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah yeah. And it's it's like, first of all, this

0:11:52.240 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 3>is not if you if you had a zero day

0:11:55.760 --> 0:11:57.560
<v Speaker 3>in Signal, which is it, which is an exploit for

0:11:57.600 --> 0:12:00.360
<v Speaker 3>Signal that has been unpatched but has not been patched

0:12:00.360 --> 0:12:02.560
<v Speaker 3>by the vendor so you can actively exploit it. There

0:12:02.600 --> 0:12:06.360
<v Speaker 3>are no people in the world who would choose to

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:12.760
<v Speaker 3>quietly leak this over you know, over vague signal texts.

0:12:13.000 --> 0:12:15.960
<v Speaker 3>There are two types of people. One uh, you know,

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:19.559
<v Speaker 3>people like us that would bring this to Signal immediately

0:12:19.600 --> 0:12:22.320
<v Speaker 3>and get them to patch it to protect the you know,

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:25.079
<v Speaker 3>millions of high risk users that you signal, or to

0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 3>the type of people that would go sell this exploit

0:12:27.960 --> 0:12:30.440
<v Speaker 3>to some horrible company that would use it, you know,

0:12:30.520 --> 0:12:32.920
<v Speaker 3>sell it to to Saudi Arabia or something and use

0:12:32.960 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 3>it to kill activists. Right, Like there is and there's

0:12:35.840 --> 0:12:39.160
<v Speaker 3>no in between. There's nobody that is going to quietly

0:12:39.240 --> 0:12:43.840
<v Speaker 3>leak this for you know, just for fun with vague details. Right. So,

0:12:43.840 --> 0:12:46.640
<v Speaker 3>so this this message set up red flags immediately, and

0:12:47.480 --> 0:12:51.280
<v Speaker 3>like it's because I really do not like lying previews,

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 3>And in our paper we discussed some of the issues

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:56.800
<v Speaker 3>that we have with link previews. You know, we think

0:12:56.840 --> 0:13:00.360
<v Speaker 3>that they can they can leak some information about your

0:13:00.840 --> 0:13:04.319
<v Speaker 3>chats to the owner of the website. Right. We think

0:13:04.360 --> 0:13:06.680
<v Speaker 3>it's a kind of a large attack service. It's not

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:07.719
<v Speaker 3>super necessary.

0:13:08.120 --> 0:13:11.640
<v Speaker 4>Would you mind explaining to actually the audience to like

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:15.840
<v Speaker 4>a little bit about what what we found when looking

0:13:15.880 --> 0:13:16.880
<v Speaker 4>at link previews.

0:13:17.520 --> 0:13:20.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. So, the way that link previews work is when

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:23.719
<v Speaker 3>you the way that they work on Signal and on

0:13:23.760 --> 0:13:27.480
<v Speaker 3>WhatsApp is that when you send a link to somebody,

0:13:28.120 --> 0:13:32.400
<v Speaker 3>the Signal app or WhatsApp goes and like fetches the

0:13:32.440 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 3>web page that that you know for that link, Right,

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:37.000
<v Speaker 3>It goes and downloads, you know, downloads the content of

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:41.079
<v Speaker 3>that link and gets a There are some there's some

0:13:41.120 --> 0:13:45.080
<v Speaker 3>special HTML tags that describe, you know, sort of what

0:13:45.120 --> 0:13:47.200
<v Speaker 3>the page is about, what the title of the page is,

0:13:47.240 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 3>and like an image for the page. And it gets

0:13:49.480 --> 0:13:51.280
<v Speaker 3>those tags and it puts them all together in this

0:13:51.280 --> 0:13:53.839
<v Speaker 3>little package and then sends that all as part of

0:13:53.920 --> 0:13:57.120
<v Speaker 3>the signal message. So when you put a link in Signal,

0:13:57.160 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 3>your phone actually goes out and gets that web page,

0:13:59.120 --> 0:14:04.360
<v Speaker 3>and it gets that web page with a what's called

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:07.040
<v Speaker 3>the user agent, which is like a piece of text

0:14:07.080 --> 0:14:11.079
<v Speaker 3>that's attached to the request that uniquely that that identifies

0:14:11.120 --> 0:14:15.280
<v Speaker 3>it as being a request from Signal and from like

0:14:15.320 --> 0:14:18.680
<v Speaker 3>from signal and from your IP address. Right, So when

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:20.880
<v Speaker 3>you put a link in, the owner of that website,

0:14:20.880 --> 0:14:23.200
<v Speaker 3>whoever has the logs for that website can know that

0:14:24.280 --> 0:14:27.240
<v Speaker 3>somebody at your IP address is using signal and sending

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 3>this link over signal. What we're what our concern is

0:14:31.440 --> 0:14:32.360
<v Speaker 3>is that if that.

0:14:32.280 --> 0:14:37.960
<v Speaker 7>Link is unique, then anybody else who visits that link

0:14:38.400 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 7>can be inferred to be somebody that you are talking

0:14:42.600 --> 0:14:43.280
<v Speaker 7>with over.

0:14:43.200 --> 0:14:47.720
<v Speaker 3>Signal, right, And so like this can be this can

0:14:47.760 --> 0:14:51.920
<v Speaker 3>be a good an interesting a source of intelligence for

0:14:53.040 --> 0:14:56.680
<v Speaker 3>website owners, especially for big websites that can easily generate

0:14:56.760 --> 0:14:59.800
<v Speaker 3>unique links with like tracking parameters at the end of

0:14:59.800 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 3>the right, Like when you share a Instagram post and

0:15:04.560 --> 0:15:06.560
<v Speaker 3>like at the end it's like question mark I G

0:15:06.920 --> 0:15:09.320
<v Speaker 3>S H I D equals you know, a long string

0:15:09.360 --> 0:15:12.200
<v Speaker 3>of numbers and letters, right, or a Twitter post where

0:15:12.320 --> 0:15:15.160
<v Speaker 3>you know T equals a long string of letters and numbers. Right.

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:17.880
<v Speaker 3>That makes a unique link, and then anybody who visits

0:15:17.920 --> 0:15:20.880
<v Speaker 3>that same link can be determined to be somebody that

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:27.400
<v Speaker 3>you're speaking with over Signal, so and also WhatsApp and so.

0:15:27.400 --> 0:15:33.080
<v Speaker 8>So for that reason, we we we think that Signal

0:15:33.160 --> 0:15:36.640
<v Speaker 8>and WhatsApp should turn link previews off by by default

0:15:37.520 --> 0:15:40.800
<v Speaker 8>because we think that that's an unncessary information. Link Signal

0:15:40.840 --> 0:15:45.560
<v Speaker 8>and WhatsApps pushed back on that is that link previews

0:15:45.640 --> 0:15:51.040
<v Speaker 8>are a core feature that people demand and if they

0:15:51.200 --> 0:15:53.440
<v Speaker 8>if they were to turn off link previews by default,

0:15:53.960 --> 0:15:56.800
<v Speaker 8>they're worried that people would leave the platform for less

0:15:56.800 --> 0:15:59.360
<v Speaker 8>secure platforms like Telegram.

0:16:00.480 --> 0:16:00.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:16:00.640 --> 0:16:02.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I don't want to tell them their business,

0:16:02.600 --> 0:16:05.920
<v Speaker 2>because I'm sure they have data on this, but I've

0:16:06.000 --> 0:16:10.920
<v Speaker 2>never thought about link previews as being a thing that

0:16:11.000 --> 0:16:11.800
<v Speaker 2>I needed.

0:16:12.920 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 4>It's like, yeah, I think it's I think it's one

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:18.560
<v Speaker 4>of those things. And you know, we haven't necessarily done

0:16:18.840 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 4>like extensive general design research in this right, Like we

0:16:24.200 --> 0:16:27.600
<v Speaker 4>haven't surveyed like three thousand people in the US. We

0:16:27.640 --> 0:16:31.080
<v Speaker 4>haven't had like a Pew Research survey across countries and

0:16:31.200 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 4>be like, what are your thoughts on link previews?

0:16:33.760 --> 0:16:34.920
<v Speaker 5>But I would.

0:16:34.600 --> 0:16:38.400
<v Speaker 4>Probably argue because it is it is included in so

0:16:38.560 --> 0:16:40.200
<v Speaker 4>much of modern messaging.

0:16:39.800 --> 0:16:43.000
<v Speaker 5>Apps that we now assume it's like a core feature.

0:16:43.840 --> 0:16:45.880
<v Speaker 4>One thing I will give Signal that I think is

0:16:45.920 --> 0:16:48.760
<v Speaker 4>amazing that other apps don't do, and this is true

0:16:48.800 --> 0:16:52.800
<v Speaker 4>of WhatsApp is pretty much every feature except for encryption,

0:16:52.920 --> 0:16:55.920
<v Speaker 4>you can there's something you can toggle or turn off. Right,

0:16:56.000 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 4>So like link preview already was available for people to

0:17:00.440 --> 0:17:05.080
<v Speaker 4>turn off on Signal, WhatsApp does not allow that, and

0:17:05.840 --> 0:17:09.920
<v Speaker 4>it seems like they're making no moves to allow that

0:17:09.960 --> 0:17:12.680
<v Speaker 4>future to be optional to turn on or off.

0:17:13.000 --> 0:17:13.880
<v Speaker 5>But that is I will say.

0:17:13.880 --> 0:17:15.639
<v Speaker 4>One of the things that's really lovely about Signal that

0:17:16.080 --> 0:17:20.680
<v Speaker 4>is so different from modern design and modern like big

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:23.480
<v Speaker 4>tech platforms and just platforms in general, is that those

0:17:23.640 --> 0:17:26.720
<v Speaker 4>a lot of features are optional, whereas you know, WhatsApp

0:17:26.720 --> 0:17:29.399
<v Speaker 4>in metas sort of stance on design is that a

0:17:29.400 --> 0:17:31.920
<v Speaker 4>lot of things are not optional, that those are things

0:17:32.000 --> 0:17:35.439
<v Speaker 4>users would want. Why would we make foundational elements like

0:17:35.480 --> 0:17:40.359
<v Speaker 4>link previews optional? And you're just like starting like gesturing wildly,

0:17:40.480 --> 0:17:42.560
<v Speaker 4>but like you know, it's like, well, you don't know

0:17:42.560 --> 0:17:44.720
<v Speaker 4>what people want, and I mean, what's the harm in

0:17:44.760 --> 0:17:46.320
<v Speaker 4>turning off some of some of these things?

0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:46.560
<v Speaker 3>Right?

0:17:47.200 --> 0:17:50.320
<v Speaker 4>You know, like maybe maybe people don't want to receive gifts.

0:17:50.400 --> 0:17:52.320
<v Speaker 4>I don't know, maybe they don't want to receive stickers.

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:55.040
<v Speaker 4>Why don't you like let them have that option. What's

0:17:55.040 --> 0:17:56.000
<v Speaker 4>the harm that could happen?

0:17:56.200 --> 0:17:56.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:17:56.720 --> 0:17:58.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I couldn't agree more.

0:17:58.560 --> 0:18:01.119
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Two things I want to say that one is

0:18:01.240 --> 0:18:03.760
<v Speaker 3>one is that and first we should acknowledge that this

0:18:03.920 --> 0:18:05.840
<v Speaker 3>it turns out that there was no zero day, there

0:18:05.880 --> 0:18:10.040
<v Speaker 3>was no vulnerability. Yeah, this was absolutely just something that

0:18:10.040 --> 0:18:13.960
<v Speaker 3>that spread virally out of nowhere. I'd be really interested

0:18:13.960 --> 0:18:16.600
<v Speaker 3>to find out what the origin of this copy of

0:18:16.640 --> 0:18:19.119
<v Speaker 3>past I was, but I haven't. I haven't been able to.

0:18:19.200 --> 0:18:20.639
<v Speaker 3>But it's I'm.

0:18:20.520 --> 0:18:21.840
<v Speaker 5>Curious about that as as well.

0:18:21.880 --> 0:18:23.560
<v Speaker 4>Because I was in another group threw that was like,

0:18:23.600 --> 0:18:25.960
<v Speaker 4>we really need outside auditors to look at these.

0:18:25.800 --> 0:18:27.840
<v Speaker 5>And I was like, we have a whole report that

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:29.919
<v Speaker 5>we wrote that didn't look at this.

0:18:30.920 --> 0:18:34.840
<v Speaker 2>Speaking of outside auditors, I gotta pause you guys just

0:18:34.840 --> 0:18:37.760
<v Speaker 2>a second, because it is time for an ad break,

0:18:38.400 --> 0:18:42.600
<v Speaker 2>So please spend your money and then come back to

0:18:42.680 --> 0:18:59.080
<v Speaker 2>learn more. Ah and we're back. Okay, sorry about that, Cooper, Carolyn,

0:18:59.640 --> 0:19:02.000
<v Speaker 2>you make continue as you were.

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:04.480
<v Speaker 3>The other thing I was, I was going to say

0:19:05.080 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 3>that the idea that anybody would leave WhatsApp because they

0:19:09.560 --> 0:19:13.800
<v Speaker 3>stopped having link previews is completely preposterous to me. Like

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:21.600
<v Speaker 3>Clownish has over two billion users. They are the you know,

0:19:21.720 --> 0:19:26.240
<v Speaker 3>in a position to set the standard for what people

0:19:26.280 --> 0:19:31.440
<v Speaker 3>expect from a messaging app, and so like they could

0:19:31.520 --> 0:19:35.840
<v Speaker 3>do things like turn on disappearing messages by default and

0:19:35.920 --> 0:19:38.320
<v Speaker 3>change that culture. They could do things like turn off

0:19:38.320 --> 0:19:41.440
<v Speaker 3>link previews by default and change that culture. Like, they

0:19:41.440 --> 0:19:44.159
<v Speaker 3>could do these things, and you know they would you know,

0:19:45.280 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 3>they would not lose enough users to even notice or

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:51.159
<v Speaker 3>care about.

0:19:51.320 --> 0:19:51.439
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:19:51.520 --> 0:19:53.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, they are the only people in the position in

0:19:53.800 --> 0:19:57.080
<v Speaker 3>the world, in the position to decide what the culture

0:19:57.119 --> 0:19:59.159
<v Speaker 3>should be, and this is what they've decided the culture

0:19:59.200 --> 0:19:59.600
<v Speaker 3>should be.

0:20:00.240 --> 0:20:00.680
<v Speaker 5>Totally.

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:03.040
<v Speaker 4>I hate to break it to you, but if WhatsApp

0:20:03.320 --> 0:20:05.879
<v Speaker 4>just got rid of link previews, I'm just throwing my

0:20:05.960 --> 0:20:09.040
<v Speaker 4>whole phone into the garbage garbage can, getting rid of it.

0:20:09.040 --> 0:20:11.159
<v Speaker 2>Just tossing it back to a landline.

0:20:11.560 --> 0:20:12.080
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I'm just.

0:20:12.000 --> 0:20:14.240
<v Speaker 4>Gonna eat it into a river. I feel like I

0:20:14.280 --> 0:20:17.360
<v Speaker 4>don't need this anymore. Actually, I'm going back to carryer pigeons.

0:20:17.400 --> 0:20:18.919
<v Speaker 5>That's how far back I'm going to go.

0:20:19.280 --> 0:20:21.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean that that does kind of lead into the

0:20:21.280 --> 0:20:23.480
<v Speaker 2>next thing I wanted to talk about, which is sort

0:20:23.520 --> 0:20:28.760
<v Speaker 2>of the other wing from security folklore, which is security nihilism.

0:20:29.400 --> 0:20:32.160
<v Speaker 2>And yeah, this is kind of you introduce this when

0:20:32.200 --> 0:20:35.400
<v Speaker 2>talking about sort of if you do try to engage

0:20:35.480 --> 0:20:37.760
<v Speaker 2>somewhat with the technology, or if you wind up just

0:20:37.800 --> 0:20:39.760
<v Speaker 2>kind of in the position I think most lay people are,

0:20:39.840 --> 0:20:42.240
<v Speaker 2>where you know, maybe you have some friends who know more,

0:20:42.440 --> 0:20:44.200
<v Speaker 2>or maybe you have some friends who think they know more,

0:20:44.240 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 2>and you get all these conflicting things about like this

0:20:46.920 --> 0:20:49.159
<v Speaker 2>is safe, No, it's not. You can't trust signal. The

0:20:49.160 --> 0:20:51.280
<v Speaker 2>FEDS could be running signal all this kind of stuff,

0:20:51.880 --> 0:20:54.560
<v Speaker 2>And to be fair, the FEDS have run security based

0:20:54.600 --> 0:20:57.159
<v Speaker 2>services before. It's not like I don't believe that's happening

0:20:57.160 --> 0:20:59.920
<v Speaker 2>with signal, but it's not like I understand where parent

0:21:00.480 --> 0:21:04.239
<v Speaker 2>like that can can enter into people's calculus, especially if

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 2>you're not technically knowledgeable, and that can lead to this

0:21:08.640 --> 0:21:11.959
<v Speaker 2>sort of state of security nihilism where you're just like,

0:21:12.400 --> 0:21:14.720
<v Speaker 2>you can't communicate it all online. There's no way to

0:21:14.760 --> 0:21:18.199
<v Speaker 2>do it securely, and obviously there's no perfect right you

0:21:18.240 --> 0:21:20.040
<v Speaker 2>never have it, but you don't have one hundred percent

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:24.760
<v Speaker 2>with like talking in person to somebody. Right there are

0:21:24.760 --> 0:21:28.280
<v Speaker 2>individuals in prison right now who you know somebody they

0:21:28.359 --> 0:21:31.240
<v Speaker 2>loved and trusted rat it on them. There's no one

0:21:31.280 --> 0:21:35.399
<v Speaker 2>hundred percents in this world. But that doesn't mean nihilism

0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:38.280
<v Speaker 2>is the right response to like trying to figure out

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:41.920
<v Speaker 2>how to set up your communications standards with people right.

0:21:42.320 --> 0:21:44.680
<v Speaker 4>Totally, I mean, I think the approach we take in

0:21:44.920 --> 0:21:48.399
<v Speaker 4>because throughout this report we were also teaching workshops to

0:21:49.040 --> 0:21:53.120
<v Speaker 4>reproductive justice activists across the US and states where abortion

0:21:53.240 --> 0:21:56.680
<v Speaker 4>is banned. I'm from Louisiana, I live half the year there,

0:21:57.040 --> 0:22:01.600
<v Speaker 4>the abortion is banned there, and we were also working

0:22:01.600 --> 0:22:04.000
<v Speaker 4>with journalists in India. So a big big thing for

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:07.520
<v Speaker 4>us was also teaching threat modeling and different kinds of

0:22:07.680 --> 0:22:11.359
<v Speaker 4>what Matt Mitchell, a security trainer and expert, calls digital hygiene,

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:14.840
<v Speaker 4>and so a lot of this was recognizing that there

0:22:14.960 --> 0:22:18.000
<v Speaker 4>was certain practices we were picking up on, particularly with

0:22:18.119 --> 0:22:19.639
<v Speaker 4>folks we were working with. So like a lot of

0:22:19.720 --> 0:22:23.399
<v Speaker 4>reproductive justice activists we were working with are new to security,

0:22:23.440 --> 0:22:25.720
<v Speaker 4>they're new to technology, they don't have a background in tech,

0:22:25.840 --> 0:22:29.880
<v Speaker 4>and generally, you know, the American South, the American Deep

0:22:29.920 --> 0:22:33.520
<v Speaker 4>South is super overlooked in terms of tech policy, in

0:22:33.640 --> 0:22:37.200
<v Speaker 4>terms of just I think a general focus when people

0:22:37.280 --> 0:22:40.280
<v Speaker 4>are talking about tech or tech literacy or tech activism,

0:22:40.960 --> 0:22:44.160
<v Speaker 4>and that is like leaving really massive gaps and knowledge

0:22:44.240 --> 0:22:47.760
<v Speaker 4>for people. And so you know, when we were working

0:22:47.800 --> 0:22:50.720
<v Speaker 4>on this security folkal or and security nihilism, we're both

0:22:50.840 --> 0:22:51.840
<v Speaker 4>actually very.

0:22:51.920 --> 0:22:53.639
<v Speaker 5>Almost like I won't say, like a pendulum, but they

0:22:53.640 --> 0:22:56.199
<v Speaker 5>were very connected. And so some of that was.

0:22:56.200 --> 0:22:58.520
<v Speaker 4>People hearing things like oh, I should put my phone

0:22:58.960 --> 0:23:02.120
<v Speaker 4>in a microwave when I'm having a very sensitive conversation, right,

0:23:02.160 --> 0:23:04.480
<v Speaker 4>And so that's where some of that security folklore is

0:23:04.520 --> 0:23:08.399
<v Speaker 4>coming in. It is something that is technically safe, but

0:23:08.480 --> 0:23:10.920
<v Speaker 4>it's like not the thing you necessarily, like totally need

0:23:10.960 --> 0:23:13.760
<v Speaker 4>to do in that moment. And with security nihilism, what

0:23:13.840 --> 0:23:15.359
<v Speaker 4>it kind of came down to, and this is stuff

0:23:15.359 --> 0:23:20.000
<v Speaker 4>we've seen with other groups and other circumstances. A great

0:23:20.040 --> 0:23:23.520
<v Speaker 4>example are are you know Palestinian activists and journalists. Let's say,

0:23:23.560 --> 0:23:26.680
<v Speaker 4>who are you know facing the threat of all different

0:23:26.760 --> 0:23:30.080
<v Speaker 4>kinds of governmental censorship and surveillance of sort of saying like,

0:23:30.080 --> 0:23:32.560
<v Speaker 4>when there's this large threat sort of hanging on us,

0:23:33.040 --> 0:23:36.439
<v Speaker 4>and there's also physical surveillance. And this is true for

0:23:36.480 --> 0:23:39.120
<v Speaker 4>a lot of journalists in other countries like India as well.

0:23:39.240 --> 0:23:44.280
<v Speaker 4>For example, you know, like should everything go through signal

0:23:44.359 --> 0:23:45.280
<v Speaker 4>or does it really matter?

0:23:45.400 --> 0:23:46.400
<v Speaker 5>Like does it really matter?

0:23:46.480 --> 0:23:49.080
<v Speaker 4>And this is also something again we saw with some

0:23:49.080 --> 0:23:51.479
<v Speaker 4>some reproductive justice activists as well, where it's like if

0:23:51.520 --> 0:23:53.480
<v Speaker 4>everything is being monitored, what's safe?

0:23:53.680 --> 0:23:57.080
<v Speaker 5>Like can I send stuff? Like can I even use Google?

0:23:57.480 --> 0:24:01.480
<v Speaker 4>And part of this was, you know, by teaching privacy

0:24:01.480 --> 0:24:04.680
<v Speaker 4>and security workshops, by teaching things like threat modeling, which

0:24:04.720 --> 0:24:06.720
<v Speaker 4>is a framework for just assessing what.

0:24:06.800 --> 0:24:08.200
<v Speaker 5>Are what are threats?

0:24:08.560 --> 0:24:11.040
<v Speaker 4>Like are what are all the potential threats you could

0:24:11.040 --> 0:24:13.359
<v Speaker 4>face and kind of mapping them from like the most

0:24:13.400 --> 0:24:16.159
<v Speaker 4>minor to like the most major, and what you can

0:24:16.200 --> 0:24:18.320
<v Speaker 4>do about that. That's a way to try to combat

0:24:18.440 --> 0:24:20.840
<v Speaker 4>security nihilism. But I think an approach Cooper and I

0:24:20.880 --> 0:24:23.119
<v Speaker 4>are also really fond of is thinking of this like

0:24:23.160 --> 0:24:26.040
<v Speaker 4>safer sex. There's all different kinds of things you can

0:24:26.080 --> 0:24:29.679
<v Speaker 4>do that our mitigations are actually incredibly helpful, and we

0:24:29.760 --> 0:24:32.240
<v Speaker 4>can't look at it as a binary of safe or

0:24:32.400 --> 0:24:35.600
<v Speaker 4>not safe. It's actually like much more of a gradient.

0:24:37.240 --> 0:24:40.080
<v Speaker 4>But you know, the focal are and the nihilism, I

0:24:40.080 --> 0:24:42.520
<v Speaker 4>think come from a very similar place, which is we're

0:24:42.560 --> 0:24:45.960
<v Speaker 4>asking people like society is kind of asking or demanding

0:24:46.000 --> 0:24:49.880
<v Speaker 4>that people be experts and something that's really hard. I

0:24:49.920 --> 0:24:52.480
<v Speaker 4>am like a fairly technical person, and even there are

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:54.639
<v Speaker 4>some things that I find hard to serve wrap my

0:24:54.680 --> 0:24:57.320
<v Speaker 4>head around. And I've been working in privacy and security

0:24:57.359 --> 0:25:00.719
<v Speaker 4>for like quite a while, and I think think, you know,

0:25:01.920 --> 0:25:03.879
<v Speaker 4>it's also really hard when you think about these apps

0:25:03.880 --> 0:25:06.280
<v Speaker 4>as like a brand new person. So, like, one of

0:25:06.280 --> 0:25:07.840
<v Speaker 4>the things that popped up a lot in our research

0:25:07.960 --> 0:25:10.080
<v Speaker 4>is like why should we trust signal? And that's actually

0:25:10.160 --> 0:25:13.000
<v Speaker 4>a great question, Like what about Signal in its interface

0:25:13.040 --> 0:25:14.120
<v Speaker 4>and its design.

0:25:14.760 --> 0:25:17.320
<v Speaker 5>Would cause you to trust it? Like some people were

0:25:17.359 --> 0:25:19.359
<v Speaker 5>like it's a nonprofit. That's great, but I don't know

0:25:19.359 --> 0:25:21.640
<v Speaker 5>what that means. I'm like, that's actually a fantastic question,

0:25:21.720 --> 0:25:23.040
<v Speaker 5>Like what does that mean? Right?

0:25:23.080 --> 0:25:26.040
<v Speaker 4>Like why should you trust this? You've heard through the

0:25:26.040 --> 0:25:28.479
<v Speaker 4>grapevine that you should. And I think these are kind

0:25:28.520 --> 0:25:30.240
<v Speaker 4>of all the things that people are dealing with because

0:25:30.240 --> 0:25:32.000
<v Speaker 4>if you sort of take a step back and just

0:25:32.040 --> 0:25:34.920
<v Speaker 4>look at software or any different kinds of software generally,

0:25:35.359 --> 0:25:37.600
<v Speaker 4>why should you trust that it's safe and secure when

0:25:37.640 --> 0:25:40.480
<v Speaker 4>there have been so many different kinds of leaks or

0:25:40.520 --> 0:25:46.040
<v Speaker 4>breaches or things breaking, right, Yeah, Like, so these are

0:25:46.359 --> 0:25:48.600
<v Speaker 4>I think really really closely tied. But I think a

0:25:48.640 --> 0:25:52.080
<v Speaker 4>big thing for us is trying to combat that security nihilism.

0:25:52.200 --> 0:25:54.719
<v Speaker 4>Like when whenever we can like, there is things you

0:25:54.760 --> 0:25:57.480
<v Speaker 4>can do. I don't want to say like no matter

0:25:57.480 --> 0:25:59.560
<v Speaker 4>how great the threat, but I believe like, no matter

0:25:59.600 --> 0:26:01.760
<v Speaker 4>how great threat, there is stuff, there is stuff you

0:26:01.800 --> 0:26:02.120
<v Speaker 4>can do.

0:26:02.760 --> 0:26:04.679
<v Speaker 3>No matter how great the threat is, there's stuff that

0:26:04.720 --> 0:26:07.920
<v Speaker 3>you can do to make it more difficult and more

0:26:07.920 --> 0:26:10.679
<v Speaker 3>expensive for that person to attack you. Right, Like we

0:26:10.760 --> 0:26:13.480
<v Speaker 3>all lock the doors to our house, or you know,

0:26:13.560 --> 0:26:16.639
<v Speaker 3>for the most part, or you know, we all we

0:26:16.720 --> 0:26:20.320
<v Speaker 3>all do things to to protect ourselves like that that

0:26:20.400 --> 0:26:22.680
<v Speaker 3>aren't fool proof, right. Somebody can always break a window

0:26:22.720 --> 0:26:24.680
<v Speaker 3>to get into your house, right. Somebody can find other

0:26:24.680 --> 0:26:27.040
<v Speaker 3>ways to get into your house. But locking the door

0:26:27.240 --> 0:26:30.000
<v Speaker 3>makes it so that somebody has to do the noisy

0:26:30.040 --> 0:26:33.600
<v Speaker 3>thing of breaking a window. Right. It makes it so that,

0:26:33.640 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 3>you know, somebody has to spend more time and effort

0:26:35.920 --> 0:26:40.000
<v Speaker 3>and more risk of getting caught in getting into your house. Right.

0:26:40.040 --> 0:26:42.760
<v Speaker 3>And that's and that's like we layer. When you layer

0:26:42.880 --> 0:26:47.160
<v Speaker 3>these protections, right, the idea, you know is that you're

0:26:47.280 --> 0:26:51.200
<v Speaker 3>you're you're making it harder, You're making there be more

0:26:51.240 --> 0:26:54.200
<v Speaker 3>friction right to piercing your security.

0:26:54.760 --> 0:26:57.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that's that's a really good point, and

0:26:57.320 --> 0:26:59.720
<v Speaker 2>that the concept of friction, you know, this is something

0:26:59.760 --> 0:27:02.639
<v Speaker 2>I've talked about. Not that these are exactly the same things,

0:27:02.640 --> 0:27:05.360
<v Speaker 2>but in the although there's not not wildly different when

0:27:05.359 --> 0:27:09.360
<v Speaker 2>it comes to like how insurgents win insurgencies, right, it's

0:27:09.800 --> 0:27:13.439
<v Speaker 2>not by carrying out these sort of like great battlefield

0:27:13.560 --> 0:27:17.760
<v Speaker 2>victories that sweep the enemy from the field. It's by friction, right,

0:27:18.040 --> 0:27:22.199
<v Speaker 2>which wears down both the culture and the kind of

0:27:22.280 --> 0:27:27.080
<v Speaker 2>readiness of the opponent until they simply bounce, which is

0:27:27.160 --> 0:27:29.679
<v Speaker 2>a pretty durable and effective strategy. You can keep it up.

0:27:29.720 --> 0:27:35.679
<v Speaker 2>It's this matter of like there's no like sweeping sudden

0:27:35.800 --> 0:27:39.719
<v Speaker 2>like ninety minute three act win here. It's more a

0:27:39.720 --> 0:27:43.239
<v Speaker 2>matter of the more difficult, the more expensive you make it,

0:27:43.480 --> 0:27:46.240
<v Speaker 2>the more you hold on to and the more all

0:27:46.280 --> 0:27:48.160
<v Speaker 2>of us hold on to. Right. That's the other benefit

0:27:48.240 --> 0:27:50.200
<v Speaker 2>is like, even if you're not even if you are

0:27:50.400 --> 0:27:53.000
<v Speaker 2>the most law abiding person in the world like myself,

0:27:54.600 --> 0:27:58.160
<v Speaker 2>having these security measures in place means that you're kind

0:27:58.160 --> 0:28:02.480
<v Speaker 2>of contributing to the overall immune system of a of

0:28:02.520 --> 0:28:05.399
<v Speaker 2>a kind of community of people who don't want the

0:28:05.520 --> 0:28:06.720
<v Speaker 2>NSA listening to their ship.

0:28:08.600 --> 0:28:12.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly, exactly. And the friction thing is is also

0:28:12.760 --> 0:28:16.800
<v Speaker 3>exactly what Signal does, right, Like by the threat model

0:28:16.840 --> 0:28:21.080
<v Speaker 3>for Signal is stopping the NSA or other global adversaries

0:28:21.119 --> 0:28:25.560
<v Speaker 3>from listening to all communications as they travel over the internet, right,

0:28:25.680 --> 0:28:28.360
<v Speaker 3>And that's when you can when you can do that,

0:28:28.720 --> 0:28:30.840
<v Speaker 3>like when you can when you can listen to everybody's

0:28:30.880 --> 0:28:33.800
<v Speaker 3>conversations as they travel over the Internet, it's really cheap

0:28:33.840 --> 0:28:37.080
<v Speaker 3>to spy on anybody. Right when you're encrypting that communication,

0:28:38.160 --> 0:28:41.239
<v Speaker 3>then the NSA or whatever other global adversary has to

0:28:41.280 --> 0:28:45.120
<v Speaker 3>go actually hack your phone, right, they have to. They

0:28:45.120 --> 0:28:48.920
<v Speaker 3>have to target you specifically, they have to burn resources

0:28:49.000 --> 0:28:53.920
<v Speaker 3>and you know, burn weapons, right, zero days to get

0:28:53.960 --> 0:28:56.080
<v Speaker 3>access to your phone. And that's a lot more costly,

0:28:56.560 --> 0:28:59.240
<v Speaker 3>it's a lot more noisy, it's a much higher risk

0:28:59.280 --> 0:29:02.280
<v Speaker 3>of them getting caught. So it's introduced to huge friction,

0:29:02.920 --> 0:29:08.560
<v Speaker 3>uh in that in that area.

0:29:08.720 --> 0:29:10.200
<v Speaker 5>Go ahead, okay, go ahead, go.

0:29:10.160 --> 0:29:13.040
<v Speaker 3>Ahead, I say, and I think you're asymmetic. The sort

0:29:13.080 --> 0:29:16.000
<v Speaker 3>of comparison to asymmetric warfare is exactly spot on, because

0:29:16.040 --> 0:29:17.840
<v Speaker 3>none of us are ever going to have the money

0:29:17.840 --> 0:29:20.160
<v Speaker 3>that that the NSA or Masade has. None of us

0:29:20.160 --> 0:29:23.760
<v Speaker 3>are ever going to have the the total technical acumen

0:29:23.840 --> 0:29:26.560
<v Speaker 3>that the NSA or MASAD has, right, but like those

0:29:27.200 --> 0:29:28.920
<v Speaker 3>that you know, so we have to kind of fight

0:29:29.000 --> 0:29:32.080
<v Speaker 3>a you know, in terms of caryption, in terms of encryption,

0:29:32.160 --> 0:29:35.320
<v Speaker 3>a guerrilla war, right, and we have to make things

0:29:35.840 --> 0:29:38.840
<v Speaker 3>so expensive and so annoying for them that it's not.

0:29:38.760 --> 0:29:41.800
<v Speaker 5>Worth it totally. And just to sort of building that.

0:29:41.840 --> 0:29:44.000
<v Speaker 4>One of the things I love about Signal is while

0:29:44.040 --> 0:29:48.680
<v Speaker 4>they're creating friction for our adversaries, it's actually so frictionless

0:29:48.720 --> 0:29:51.440
<v Speaker 4>to use as a user. And I think that's one

0:29:51.480 --> 0:29:54.800
<v Speaker 4>of the things I find just continually impressive about that.

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:58.160
<v Speaker 4>I don't want this to turn into like the like.

0:29:58.160 --> 0:30:01.200
<v Speaker 5>We're all himbos for signal. Looks we probably are.

0:30:01.720 --> 0:30:03.760
<v Speaker 4>But because like that's one of the things as a

0:30:03.800 --> 0:30:06.200
<v Speaker 4>researcher like Kuber and IOMs have to be like, we're

0:30:06.280 --> 0:30:08.640
<v Speaker 4>not paid by a signal at all, Like, but this

0:30:08.840 --> 0:30:10.640
<v Speaker 4>is in fact, like one of the best things you

0:30:10.680 --> 0:30:12.480
<v Speaker 4>can use. But again, one of the things I think

0:30:12.520 --> 0:30:16.000
<v Speaker 4>is amazing is that it is so easy to use

0:30:17.080 --> 0:30:21.440
<v Speaker 4>and it really is designed for and I'm using the

0:30:21.520 --> 0:30:25.960
<v Speaker 4>term usability as as a design term, meaning that it

0:30:26.000 --> 0:30:29.920
<v Speaker 4>is they're thinking about a common user, including those with

0:30:29.960 --> 0:30:33.480
<v Speaker 4>like lower digital literacy or those that are have never

0:30:33.680 --> 0:30:37.160
<v Speaker 4>used any kind of any kind of security tool, and

0:30:37.240 --> 0:30:40.800
<v Speaker 4>so they're hitting a specific threshold of usability for things

0:30:40.840 --> 0:30:44.120
<v Speaker 4>to be understandable. And again, that's incredibly hard to do well,

0:30:44.280 --> 0:30:46.280
<v Speaker 4>and they are they are doing it quite well. Like

0:30:46.320 --> 0:30:48.760
<v Speaker 4>it's very I would argue, it's very easy and sort

0:30:48.760 --> 0:30:52.080
<v Speaker 4>of seamless for people to make a jump from WhatsApp

0:30:52.240 --> 0:30:55.240
<v Speaker 4>or if you're on like Google or Android using like

0:30:55.280 --> 0:30:59.400
<v Speaker 4>Google Messages, sorry Google, if you're on Android or an iPhone,

0:30:59.600 --> 0:31:03.200
<v Speaker 4>from Like Messages to Google Messages to signal like it

0:31:03.240 --> 0:31:05.400
<v Speaker 4>doesn't It might look slightly different. I might feel a

0:31:05.400 --> 0:31:07.080
<v Speaker 4>lot more blue, I might feel a lot more black,

0:31:07.120 --> 0:31:10.040
<v Speaker 4>depending on how yours is constructed. But for the most part,

0:31:10.480 --> 0:31:12.160
<v Speaker 4>a lot of the features are kind of where you

0:31:12.200 --> 0:31:15.760
<v Speaker 4>expect them to be, and it's not at all difficult

0:31:15.760 --> 0:31:17.960
<v Speaker 4>to get it up and running, which is not something

0:31:18.120 --> 0:31:19.200
<v Speaker 4>against Cooper said earlier.

0:31:19.200 --> 0:31:21.640
<v Speaker 5>We could say about things like PGP.

0:31:22.320 --> 0:31:25.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I wanted to kind of move on to talking

0:31:25.240 --> 0:31:28.040
<v Speaker 2>about other apps and their security or lack of it,

0:31:28.080 --> 0:31:31.040
<v Speaker 2>and I think we should start probably by talking about Telegram,

0:31:31.120 --> 0:31:33.920
<v Speaker 2>because that's probably close to top of the list of

0:31:33.960 --> 0:31:38.800
<v Speaker 2>things people use for secure communications that is not nearly

0:31:38.840 --> 0:31:43.160
<v Speaker 2>as secure as they think. So, yeah, I wanted to

0:31:43.200 --> 0:31:45.840
<v Speaker 2>kind of chat with you about like why that is,

0:31:45.920 --> 0:31:48.120
<v Speaker 2>and I specifically I wanted to talk one of the

0:31:48.160 --> 0:31:52.400
<v Speaker 2>things that is frustrating about Telegram is they kind of

0:31:52.480 --> 0:31:54.560
<v Speaker 2>have they have like a secret chat or private chat,

0:31:54.600 --> 0:31:57.480
<v Speaker 2>like they have a couple of different options that don't

0:31:57.920 --> 0:32:01.760
<v Speaker 2>necessarily mean what they sound like they mean to most people.

0:32:01.840 --> 0:32:04.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so that's actually one thing our report found. So

0:32:04.920 --> 0:32:07.520
<v Speaker 4>private chat and secret chat are in fact.

0:32:07.560 --> 0:32:08.200
<v Speaker 5>The same thing.

0:32:09.240 --> 0:32:12.560
<v Speaker 4>They're just called slightly different things in the app, which

0:32:12.640 --> 0:32:15.120
<v Speaker 4>for for again, for those listening.

0:32:14.760 --> 0:32:17.400
<v Speaker 5>That are don't have the background in design, that's bad design.

0:32:17.480 --> 0:32:21.920
<v Speaker 4>That's actually not that's not professional, that's a that is

0:32:22.040 --> 0:32:25.680
<v Speaker 4>a mistake. There's no reason for a feature to have

0:32:25.760 --> 0:32:29.720
<v Speaker 4>like two different names inside of inside of your software.

0:32:30.760 --> 0:32:33.560
<v Speaker 4>And so I don't know if that's an oversight on

0:32:33.600 --> 0:32:38.080
<v Speaker 4>their part. I'm assuming so, but like those two things

0:32:38.200 --> 0:32:40.880
<v Speaker 4>correlate to the same feature, and so they should actually

0:32:40.880 --> 0:32:43.719
<v Speaker 4>be called the same thing. But then even further that

0:32:43.760 --> 0:32:46.720
<v Speaker 4>being said, what does private mean to a user?

0:32:46.800 --> 0:32:47.960
<v Speaker 5>What does secret mean?

0:32:49.440 --> 0:32:53.680
<v Speaker 4>You know, Facebook Messenger they call their encrypted message secure

0:32:53.880 --> 0:32:55.040
<v Speaker 4>or no, they also call it secret.

0:32:55.080 --> 0:32:57.720
<v Speaker 5>Sorry, they also call it secret. But does that mean security?

0:32:57.720 --> 0:32:58.720
<v Speaker 5>Does that mean encrypted?

0:32:58.880 --> 0:33:02.640
<v Speaker 4>And so that's like one of the one of the

0:33:02.640 --> 0:33:05.880
<v Speaker 4>weird things where it's like, you know, I think by

0:33:06.000 --> 0:33:10.280
<v Speaker 4>using a very sort of like normalize or culturally almost

0:33:10.320 --> 0:33:13.840
<v Speaker 4>like emotional name like private, it makes something seem like

0:33:14.120 --> 0:33:17.600
<v Speaker 4>it's actually quite safe, when in fact it's not. And

0:33:17.640 --> 0:33:20.760
<v Speaker 4>there's a variety of reasons as why, like Telegram is

0:33:20.800 --> 0:33:24.680
<v Speaker 4>not not a very secure app that I will let Cooper.

0:33:24.440 --> 0:33:25.040
<v Speaker 5>Talk about more.

0:33:25.520 --> 0:33:28.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I would never advise anybody to have a chat

0:33:29.080 --> 0:33:33.320
<v Speaker 3>over Telegram if they are concerned about the privacy of that. Yeah,

0:33:33.360 --> 0:33:38.040
<v Speaker 3>So we were talking about friction and the fact that

0:33:38.760 --> 0:33:42.600
<v Speaker 3>and encrypted chats are not the default in Telegram creates

0:33:42.600 --> 0:33:47.720
<v Speaker 3>a friction for users to have an actually secure chat.

0:33:47.800 --> 0:33:49.920
<v Speaker 3>Right you have to go remember to turn it.

0:33:49.880 --> 0:33:53.040
<v Speaker 4>On, and you can only turn it on turn it

0:33:53.080 --> 0:33:57.680
<v Speaker 4>on individually per message. It's not like an overall feature

0:33:57.880 --> 0:34:01.200
<v Speaker 4>on Telegram or Facebook Messenger. You have to go select

0:34:01.200 --> 0:34:06.200
<v Speaker 4>a specific like the specific conversation per conversation, which is

0:34:06.880 --> 0:34:09.399
<v Speaker 4>and another thing ourper gets into is how also those

0:34:09.520 --> 0:34:12.640
<v Speaker 4>chats don't look very different. They look almost identical to

0:34:13.239 --> 0:34:17.239
<v Speaker 4>a normal chat. So for for low vision users or

0:34:17.280 --> 0:34:21.160
<v Speaker 4>anyone with any kind of like disability, especially a vision

0:34:21.239 --> 0:34:25.960
<v Speaker 4>related disability, it's almost impossible to it's like nearly impossible

0:34:25.960 --> 0:34:29.759
<v Speaker 4>to recognize which chat you're using if you're looking at.

0:34:29.640 --> 0:34:30.360
<v Speaker 5>The chat logs.

0:34:31.080 --> 0:34:34.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, outside of that, like if people, you know, in

0:34:34.760 --> 0:34:37.080
<v Speaker 2>terms of like things, that may not be options right now,

0:34:37.120 --> 0:34:40.840
<v Speaker 2>I think basically everyone listening signal is a perfectly viable option.

0:34:40.880 --> 0:34:43.920
<v Speaker 2>But it's not impossible that, for example, you might wind

0:34:44.000 --> 0:34:46.640
<v Speaker 2>up in a country where, even if there's not a

0:34:46.680 --> 0:34:49.880
<v Speaker 2>specific law against it, there is a precedent established that

0:34:49.920 --> 0:34:52.279
<v Speaker 2>if you have signal on your phone, you know, it

0:34:52.719 --> 0:34:55.600
<v Speaker 2>can be at least used as a justification for charges

0:34:55.640 --> 0:34:58.200
<v Speaker 2>that you are planning to use. Like you know, with Atlanta,

0:34:58.280 --> 0:35:01.440
<v Speaker 2>people are getting charges because they had a lawyer's name

0:35:01.480 --> 0:35:04.440
<v Speaker 2>written on their arm right, and and so the state saying, well,

0:35:04.480 --> 0:35:07.440
<v Speaker 2>that's evidence that we're planning to commit a crime. You know,

0:35:07.640 --> 0:35:09.880
<v Speaker 2>that doesn't mean that convictions will go through in that

0:35:09.960 --> 0:35:11.480
<v Speaker 2>kind of thing, but it may be a reason why

0:35:11.560 --> 0:35:15.000
<v Speaker 2>signal might not be an option, or say, you know,

0:35:15.080 --> 0:35:17.520
<v Speaker 2>something comes out about it that makes it seem less secure.

0:35:18.000 --> 0:35:22.360
<v Speaker 2>What are other good or or acceptable options? And I

0:35:22.400 --> 0:35:24.720
<v Speaker 2>know when we're talking about this, these are often options

0:35:24.719 --> 0:35:27.319
<v Speaker 2>that require more input and work from the user in

0:35:27.440 --> 0:35:30.120
<v Speaker 2>order to maximize their potential security. But I do think

0:35:30.160 --> 0:35:31.600
<v Speaker 2>it's good to like let people kind of know what

0:35:31.640 --> 0:35:32.439
<v Speaker 2>else is out there.

0:35:32.840 --> 0:35:36.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so when signal isn't an option, WhatsApp is actually

0:35:37.040 --> 0:35:41.439
<v Speaker 3>not a bad option. So WhatsApp it is owned by Meta,

0:35:41.640 --> 0:35:44.400
<v Speaker 3>which is a you know which is which is you

0:35:44.440 --> 0:35:48.880
<v Speaker 3>know not which is not ideal? But WhatsApp actually uses

0:35:48.960 --> 0:35:53.399
<v Speaker 3>the same encryption protocol as signal. Uh so, like under

0:35:53.400 --> 0:35:55.000
<v Speaker 3>the hood, the way that the you know, the way

0:35:55.040 --> 0:35:57.000
<v Speaker 3>that the math works to hide your messages from the

0:35:57.120 --> 0:36:02.400
<v Speaker 3>NSA is exactly the same, right, and they've implemented it well.

0:36:02.440 --> 0:36:05.759
<v Speaker 3>You know, there are a few more steps that, you know,

0:36:05.800 --> 0:36:07.960
<v Speaker 3>a few more precautions that you need to take with WhatsApp,

0:36:08.040 --> 0:36:11.120
<v Speaker 3>like making sure that your chats aren't backed up being

0:36:11.120 --> 0:36:16.399
<v Speaker 3>the main one. But WhatsApp is certainly good enough, right

0:36:16.440 --> 0:36:20.760
<v Speaker 3>if you're if you're you know, chat networks aren't using signal,

0:36:20.840 --> 0:36:23.000
<v Speaker 3>if you're in a country where you can't use signal, right,

0:36:23.120 --> 0:36:27.680
<v Speaker 3>Like WhatsApp has two billion users, I'm you know, it's

0:36:27.719 --> 0:36:30.040
<v Speaker 3>it's you can use WhatsApp almost anywhere in the world.

0:36:30.080 --> 0:36:32.319
<v Speaker 3>It's and it's ubiquitous enough that it's not going to

0:36:32.440 --> 0:36:35.120
<v Speaker 3>mark you as you know, somebody with something to hide, right,

0:36:35.680 --> 0:36:37.680
<v Speaker 3>And like, and I don't want to I don't want

0:36:37.719 --> 0:36:42.000
<v Speaker 3>to discount what's app. Right, getting two billion people to

0:36:42.520 --> 0:36:46.840
<v Speaker 3>have end to end encrypted messaging by default overnight basically

0:36:47.360 --> 0:36:52.080
<v Speaker 3>was a major cupe. Like that that was world changing, right,

0:36:52.320 --> 0:36:57.280
<v Speaker 3>and like they they really do deserve applause for that obviously,

0:36:57.520 --> 0:36:59.720
<v Speaker 3>you know, I think partly because of their scale, partly

0:36:59.719 --> 0:37:02.520
<v Speaker 3>because they're own b meta, right, they haven't taken all

0:37:02.560 --> 0:37:06.880
<v Speaker 3>of these same steps, Like they do have more metadata

0:37:07.320 --> 0:37:11.239
<v Speaker 3>on their servers than Signal does. Right. But if that's

0:37:11.239 --> 0:37:13.080
<v Speaker 3>your option, that is a fine option.

0:37:13.880 --> 0:37:17.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that's really good to know, particularly since

0:37:18.040 --> 0:37:21.960
<v Speaker 2>options are always more secure than not having any kind

0:37:21.960 --> 0:37:24.280
<v Speaker 2>of a backup plan totally.

0:37:24.719 --> 0:37:28.000
<v Speaker 4>And if people are like even slightly nervous about WhatsApp,

0:37:28.200 --> 0:37:31.480
<v Speaker 4>of great things, they do have disappearing messages. The downside

0:37:31.560 --> 0:37:35.000
<v Speaker 4>is like the fastest disappearing message is only twenty four hours.

0:37:35.000 --> 0:37:39.040
<v Speaker 4>But that's something that again you still have, and that's

0:37:39.280 --> 0:37:41.520
<v Speaker 4>like that is that is an amazing feature.

0:37:42.280 --> 0:37:45.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and that kind of gets into also what kind

0:37:45.680 --> 0:37:48.960
<v Speaker 2>of stuff you can do in order to maximize the

0:37:49.040 --> 0:37:52.200
<v Speaker 2>value of features like that. Like, for example, if you're

0:37:52.480 --> 0:37:55.560
<v Speaker 2>coming back into the country or a country and your

0:37:55.600 --> 0:37:59.920
<v Speaker 2>phone gets confiscated by customs or whatever because security so

0:38:00.160 --> 0:38:02.600
<v Speaker 2>uses have some sort of eye on you for whatever reason.

0:38:03.000 --> 0:38:07.880
<v Speaker 2>If you've got you know, thumbprint log in or face

0:38:07.920 --> 0:38:09.920
<v Speaker 2>log in, they're going to get into that phone right

0:38:10.320 --> 0:38:12.799
<v Speaker 2>in your twenty four hour delete thing may not have

0:38:12.840 --> 0:38:15.799
<v Speaker 2>gotten taken care of everything. If you've got like a

0:38:15.840 --> 0:38:20.640
<v Speaker 2>complicated eight digit password and no biometrics enabled, maybe depending

0:38:20.680 --> 0:38:23.040
<v Speaker 2>on where you are and whatnot, that'll keep your phone

0:38:23.080 --> 0:38:25.680
<v Speaker 2>locked long enough for those messages to get deleted, right, Like,

0:38:25.719 --> 0:38:28.680
<v Speaker 2>it's all about kind of maximizing the chances that something.

0:38:28.400 --> 0:38:32.680
<v Speaker 3>Like that helps. Yeah, exactly. We definitely recommend that people

0:38:32.719 --> 0:38:35.920
<v Speaker 3>turn on disappearing messages. I think that that's just a

0:38:35.960 --> 0:38:40.600
<v Speaker 3>good sensible default to have. Also definitely recommend that if

0:38:40.640 --> 0:38:43.480
<v Speaker 3>you're going to be in a situation where you think

0:38:43.480 --> 0:38:45.400
<v Speaker 3>you're going to be, you know, there's a higher likelihood

0:38:45.400 --> 0:38:47.960
<v Speaker 3>if you interacting with law enforcement, if you're crossing a border,

0:38:48.000 --> 0:38:50.759
<v Speaker 3>if you're going to a protest turn off the biometric

0:38:50.960 --> 0:38:54.600
<v Speaker 3>unlock on your phone. Certainly, especially in the US, there's

0:38:54.719 --> 0:38:57.319
<v Speaker 3>the case law isn't settled, but there's a lot of

0:38:57.360 --> 0:39:01.279
<v Speaker 3>state courts that have decided that police can force you

0:39:01.320 --> 0:39:03.560
<v Speaker 3>to unlock your phone with your biometrics and that that's

0:39:03.600 --> 0:39:06.759
<v Speaker 3>totally fine. So this, you know, in the in the

0:39:06.840 --> 0:39:09.120
<v Speaker 3>US context, is a good idea in any context. I

0:39:09.120 --> 0:39:11.040
<v Speaker 3>think it's a good idea if you're at heightened risk

0:39:11.120 --> 0:39:12.680
<v Speaker 3>to turn off totally.

0:39:14.080 --> 0:39:15.560
<v Speaker 4>I mean, one thing we're also a big fan of

0:39:15.719 --> 0:39:18.000
<v Speaker 4>is figuring out too like and this is again where

0:39:18.000 --> 0:39:20.759
<v Speaker 4>threat modeling is so key, is like, is this a

0:39:20.760 --> 0:39:23.759
<v Speaker 4>circumstance where you need your phone or another thing that

0:39:24.400 --> 0:39:26.040
<v Speaker 4>you know you can always do if you are nervous

0:39:26.080 --> 0:39:29.800
<v Speaker 4>about traveling across the border, is you can delete signal

0:39:29.840 --> 0:39:33.240
<v Speaker 4>and reinstall it and everything is gone. You can delete

0:39:33.239 --> 0:39:36.560
<v Speaker 4>WhatsApp temporarily while you're crossing a border so it's not

0:39:37.200 --> 0:39:40.600
<v Speaker 4>on your phone. You know, there are things like that

0:39:40.640 --> 0:39:43.720
<v Speaker 4>you can do if you feel comfortable wiping your phone,

0:39:43.760 --> 0:39:47.680
<v Speaker 4>that's something also you can do. You know, these are

0:39:47.680 --> 0:39:50.560
<v Speaker 4>all again these are these are these are different things,

0:39:50.600 --> 0:39:52.240
<v Speaker 4>and I think this is one of the things our

0:39:52.360 --> 0:39:55.279
<v Speaker 4>report I don't remember how too much we get into

0:39:55.280 --> 0:39:57.080
<v Speaker 4>a bit something that at least we've been thinking about.

0:39:57.080 --> 0:40:00.040
<v Speaker 4>Cooper and I run a little lab called Complication, and

0:40:01.400 --> 0:40:04.440
<v Speaker 4>one of the things we've been thinking about there is

0:40:04.520 --> 0:40:07.240
<v Speaker 4>just also how do we instill sort of like better,

0:40:07.440 --> 0:40:10.680
<v Speaker 4>better holistic practices where we understand that a phone is

0:40:10.760 --> 0:40:15.320
<v Speaker 4>just one component of our safety and so like secure messaging,

0:40:15.360 --> 0:40:17.920
<v Speaker 4>encrypted messaging is one component of that safe safety. So

0:40:18.000 --> 0:40:20.279
<v Speaker 4>like what are other things we can do?

0:40:20.760 --> 0:40:21.840
<v Speaker 5>And some of that can.

0:40:21.640 --> 0:40:24.680
<v Speaker 4>Be you know, wiping your phone if traveling, if that

0:40:24.719 --> 0:40:26.560
<v Speaker 4>makes sense for you, or if that's a thing that

0:40:26.640 --> 0:40:30.760
<v Speaker 4>makes you feel safer, or removing certain apps and then

0:40:31.160 --> 0:40:33.560
<v Speaker 4>you know, reinstalling them, reinstalling them later.

0:40:34.280 --> 0:40:37.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, and it and it really is holistic. Right,

0:40:37.160 --> 0:40:39.640
<v Speaker 3>Like a thing that a thing that people need to

0:40:39.680 --> 0:40:43.000
<v Speaker 3>keep in mind is that, you know, disappearing messages can't

0:40:43.040 --> 0:40:50.760
<v Speaker 3>stop an untrustworthy uh conversation partner, right Like if if

0:40:50.880 --> 0:40:53.800
<v Speaker 3>my conversation partner is untrustworthy, they can take screenshots of

0:40:53.840 --> 0:40:57.160
<v Speaker 3>the messages, right, they can you know, go they can

0:40:57.200 --> 0:41:01.080
<v Speaker 3>go snitch to law enforcement about what I've hold them. Right,

0:41:02.480 --> 0:41:06.200
<v Speaker 3>Encrypted messaging, discipree messages, These are not panaspeas. Right, you

0:41:06.280 --> 0:41:09.640
<v Speaker 3>still have to you still have to keep all of

0:41:09.680 --> 0:41:17.160
<v Speaker 3>your other aspects of security as well, right, So don't

0:41:17.320 --> 0:41:19.680
<v Speaker 3>entirely rely on these technologies to save you, right, you

0:41:19.719 --> 0:41:21.680
<v Speaker 3>have to also trust the people you're working with and

0:41:22.040 --> 0:41:23.440
<v Speaker 3>build these layers of security.

0:41:23.480 --> 0:41:26.000
<v Speaker 4>Yet it's true, I mean, Cooper, you could leak all

0:41:26.000 --> 0:41:29.000
<v Speaker 4>of my secrets right now on this podcast and them.

0:41:28.920 --> 0:41:30.120
<v Speaker 5>That too, what a gentleman.

0:41:30.719 --> 0:41:33.600
<v Speaker 2>And that is that is the other thing, right where

0:41:34.640 --> 0:41:37.879
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to like what is secure, one thing

0:41:37.920 --> 0:41:40.520
<v Speaker 2>to remember is that signal for all the good things

0:41:40.560 --> 0:41:43.120
<v Speaker 2>about it, Nothing, nothing at all about that app stops

0:41:43.520 --> 0:41:45.719
<v Speaker 2>the recipient of a message from you from taking a

0:41:45.760 --> 0:41:49.520
<v Speaker 2>screen grab or just handing their phone over to their

0:41:49.520 --> 0:41:54.160
<v Speaker 2>friendly local federal agent, right, which is always you know,

0:41:54.960 --> 0:41:56.560
<v Speaker 2>we don't want to be I'm not trying to be

0:41:56.640 --> 0:41:58.960
<v Speaker 2>a security nihilist here. I think you know, there's no

0:41:59.120 --> 0:42:04.880
<v Speaker 2>replacing communication over phones in many situations. But if you are,

0:42:04.960 --> 0:42:11.040
<v Speaker 2>for example, going to be transferring a bunch of Plan

0:42:11.160 --> 0:42:15.279
<v Speaker 2>B pills in an area where that is prosecutable, that

0:42:15.320 --> 0:42:17.799
<v Speaker 2>probably shouldn't go on your phone in that language. Right,

0:42:17.880 --> 0:42:20.600
<v Speaker 2>Perhaps you know you could come up with a clever

0:42:20.719 --> 0:42:26.400
<v Speaker 2>codeword or whatever. But don't you know it is security

0:42:26.480 --> 0:42:28.640
<v Speaker 2>is like you said, holistic. You know you should not

0:42:28.800 --> 0:42:31.560
<v Speaker 2>be looking at it as just like, well the app

0:42:31.640 --> 0:42:32.120
<v Speaker 2>is secure.

0:42:32.160 --> 0:42:32.879
<v Speaker 3>So that's enough.

0:42:33.760 --> 0:42:35.400
<v Speaker 4>I mean, one thing I also want people sort of

0:42:35.400 --> 0:42:37.360
<v Speaker 4>think about too, because that's a really great point Robert,

0:42:37.520 --> 0:42:39.799
<v Speaker 4>is like, we do all different kinds of things every

0:42:39.840 --> 0:42:43.320
<v Speaker 4>day in our lives that could, you know, in dangerous.

0:42:43.360 --> 0:42:45.600
<v Speaker 4>Like I think a lot of the work I do

0:42:45.719 --> 0:42:47.360
<v Speaker 4>is I work a lot with people facing all different

0:42:47.400 --> 0:42:50.520
<v Speaker 4>kinds of online harassment. So like falling in love, for example,

0:42:50.600 --> 0:42:52.640
<v Speaker 4>is a dangerous thing to do. You could have your

0:42:52.680 --> 0:42:56.799
<v Speaker 4>heart broken or that person could hurt you. Learning how

0:42:56.800 --> 0:43:01.640
<v Speaker 4>to trust people, you know, crossing the street, deciding to

0:43:01.760 --> 0:43:04.440
<v Speaker 4>jaywalk right, all different things we do sort of.

0:43:04.360 --> 0:43:06.520
<v Speaker 5>Every day actually can expose us to harm.

0:43:06.560 --> 0:43:08.400
<v Speaker 4>And so one thing I think for people listening to

0:43:08.440 --> 0:43:11.040
<v Speaker 4>keep in mind is that's the same one we have conversations.

0:43:11.120 --> 0:43:14.200
<v Speaker 4>And I think a way to avoid nihilism is just

0:43:14.239 --> 0:43:17.120
<v Speaker 4>to remember that that every day we are sort of

0:43:17.120 --> 0:43:19.920
<v Speaker 4>going out there and actually being incredibly brave just by

0:43:19.960 --> 0:43:23.480
<v Speaker 4>living our everyday lives, by deciding to be in community

0:43:23.520 --> 0:43:28.200
<v Speaker 4>and have friendships and have relationships, and in my case,

0:43:28.200 --> 0:43:31.680
<v Speaker 4>I love jaywalking, and no one around me does, and

0:43:32.040 --> 0:43:35.920
<v Speaker 4>that's why that's my choice. And I have not yet

0:43:36.239 --> 0:43:38.080
<v Speaker 4>gotten hit by a car jaywalking.

0:43:38.880 --> 0:43:42.080
<v Speaker 2>I think it's good to look at this the same way.

0:43:42.120 --> 0:43:46.719
<v Speaker 2>There's a concept that the military has sort of developed

0:43:46.719 --> 0:43:49.279
<v Speaker 2>when talking about how not to die when you're in

0:43:49.320 --> 0:43:52.359
<v Speaker 2>a gunfight or something. It's called the survivability onion, right,

0:43:52.640 --> 0:43:55.000
<v Speaker 2>And I think it's extremely useful both if you're talking

0:43:55.040 --> 0:43:56.759
<v Speaker 2>about like, well, I'm going to a protest and there

0:43:56.800 --> 0:43:58.919
<v Speaker 2>will be violence there, you know, should I wear armor,

0:43:58.920 --> 0:44:01.880
<v Speaker 2>et cetera. But it's also just really it's really useful

0:44:01.880 --> 0:44:05.160
<v Speaker 2>with any kind of security, and and the onion, it's

0:44:05.200 --> 0:44:08.040
<v Speaker 2>it's envision, doesn't on you because like the largest outside

0:44:08.120 --> 0:44:10.920
<v Speaker 2>chunk of it is don't be seen, don't be acquired,

0:44:10.960 --> 0:44:13.120
<v Speaker 2>which means somebody actually getting you in their head sights.

0:44:13.640 --> 0:44:17.960
<v Speaker 2>Don't be a hit, which means being behind cover or something.

0:44:18.200 --> 0:44:20.640
<v Speaker 2>And then the very internal part of it is like,

0:44:20.719 --> 0:44:22.800
<v Speaker 2>have some sort of armor in case you are shot.

0:44:23.160 --> 0:44:24.040
<v Speaker 3>But if you if the.

0:44:24.080 --> 0:44:27.640
<v Speaker 2>Armor is useful, the majority of the onion has already failed.

0:44:27.760 --> 0:44:27.920
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:44:28.320 --> 0:44:32.480
<v Speaker 2>If encryption is useful, that is not a dissimilar sort

0:44:32.520 --> 0:44:35.040
<v Speaker 2>of situation. Right, So there's a there's a degree of

0:44:35.840 --> 0:44:41.000
<v Speaker 2>canniness is super helpful and thinking about like what is

0:44:41.320 --> 0:44:44.799
<v Speaker 2>what is visible about me? If I'm doing something, I

0:44:44.880 --> 0:44:47.480
<v Speaker 2>know that I have to be extra concerned about the

0:44:47.520 --> 0:44:51.920
<v Speaker 2>state seeing what is visible about me from the outside,

0:44:52.200 --> 0:44:53.399
<v Speaker 2>you know, tobly, I mean.

0:44:53.360 --> 0:44:55.040
<v Speaker 4>I think that's an amazing thing to think about. Like

0:44:55.480 --> 0:44:57.920
<v Speaker 4>where where are you sending a text message? Are you

0:44:58.000 --> 0:45:00.879
<v Speaker 4>in a place in which like someone can lean over,

0:45:00.960 --> 0:45:04.680
<v Speaker 4>Like I'm the nosiest motherfucker, and all the time I'm

0:45:04.760 --> 0:45:07.400
<v Speaker 4>constantly like like looking around being like what's that person

0:45:07.440 --> 0:45:10.240
<v Speaker 4>watching on an airplane? Or like if someone is sitting

0:45:10.239 --> 0:45:12.960
<v Speaker 4>next to me scrolling, So like you wouldn't want to

0:45:12.960 --> 0:45:15.360
<v Speaker 4>like send a sensitive text message like next to me,

0:45:15.400 --> 0:45:18.520
<v Speaker 4>because I'd be like, that's that's interesting fodder.

0:45:18.600 --> 0:45:23.200
<v Speaker 5>That's kind of a show Texas to Cooper later, you know.

0:45:23.239 --> 0:45:24.919
<v Speaker 4>And so I think it's important to think about that,

0:45:25.200 --> 0:45:28.200
<v Speaker 4>Like who's around you? Is this is like how are

0:45:28.280 --> 0:45:31.400
<v Speaker 4>you describing something? Do you know the person you're messaging?

0:45:31.440 --> 0:45:33.560
<v Speaker 4>If you're in a group message, you know everybody there?

0:45:33.600 --> 0:45:35.759
<v Speaker 4>Like do you trust all of them?

0:45:36.760 --> 0:45:37.000
<v Speaker 5>You know?

0:45:37.040 --> 0:45:39.200
<v Speaker 4>And if you're ever nervous there are this is I

0:45:39.200 --> 0:45:42.279
<v Speaker 4>guess the upside also to in person conversations. You can have,

0:45:43.200 --> 0:45:45.440
<v Speaker 4>you know, a phone call or an in person conversation

0:45:45.560 --> 0:45:48.640
<v Speaker 4>with someone. Right if you're really not sure or you

0:45:48.680 --> 0:45:51.839
<v Speaker 4>don't feel comfortable even sending something over signal, that might

0:45:51.840 --> 0:45:53.000
<v Speaker 4>be the time to be like, hey, do you want

0:45:53.000 --> 0:45:55.000
<v Speaker 4>to meet up and get a coffee and then you know,

0:45:56.719 --> 0:46:01.160
<v Speaker 4>try to find a discreet place to have have a conversation.

0:46:02.000 --> 0:46:07.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I do want to roll to ads real quick.

0:46:07.719 --> 0:46:09.799
<v Speaker 2>One second, and I think Cooper had something to say,

0:46:09.840 --> 0:46:25.880
<v Speaker 2>and we'll we'll continue, but first products ah, we're back Cooper.

0:46:26.200 --> 0:46:28.440
<v Speaker 2>You look like you had something to add.

0:46:28.200 --> 0:46:31.080
<v Speaker 3>On that, nothing particularly serious, just that. I think that

0:46:31.080 --> 0:46:32.920
<v Speaker 3>that's I think that that's really good advice for the

0:46:32.920 --> 0:46:36.080
<v Speaker 3>military and absolutely justifies the nine hundred billion dollars.

0:46:39.040 --> 0:46:42.799
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm glad they put together a fucking graphic. I

0:46:42.840 --> 0:46:45.879
<v Speaker 2>wonder how many billions of dollars that did best I could.

0:46:45.920 --> 0:46:49.360
<v Speaker 4>I could make a graphic for hundreds of millions of dollars.

0:46:49.600 --> 0:46:52.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, if anybody, if anybody wants to fund us for

0:46:52.239 --> 0:46:54.319
<v Speaker 3>hundreds of millions, we will will do it less now

0:46:54.640 --> 0:46:56.239
<v Speaker 3>a year, hundreds of millions.

0:46:56.320 --> 0:46:59.000
<v Speaker 4>We have so many good T shirt ideas and sticker

0:46:59.080 --> 0:47:03.239
<v Speaker 4>ideas y'all like so many good ones, so many unhinged

0:47:03.239 --> 0:47:04.880
<v Speaker 4>ones that the world needs to see.

0:47:05.280 --> 0:47:08.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean I do. I guess just because of

0:47:08.800 --> 0:47:10.920
<v Speaker 2>the amount of time I've spent thinking about this stuff

0:47:11.200 --> 0:47:14.080
<v Speaker 2>from my old job. There are a couple of concepts

0:47:14.200 --> 0:47:18.920
<v Speaker 2>from military planning I think about in this context, and

0:47:18.960 --> 0:47:21.520
<v Speaker 2>one of them that I also think is relevant to

0:47:21.520 --> 0:47:23.800
<v Speaker 2>what we're talking about with friction is the concept of

0:47:23.840 --> 0:47:26.480
<v Speaker 2>an ode loop, right, which is how do you win

0:47:27.360 --> 0:47:30.480
<v Speaker 2>and combat against an opponent, And it's by disrupting this

0:47:30.520 --> 0:47:32.200
<v Speaker 2>thing called the ode loop. And the ODO loop is

0:47:32.239 --> 0:47:37.719
<v Speaker 2>how an adversary carries out actions in a conflict like this, right,

0:47:38.120 --> 0:47:42.360
<v Speaker 2>and the steps you have to go for observe, orient, decide,

0:47:42.400 --> 0:47:44.799
<v Speaker 2>and act. And if you can disrupt any stage of that,

0:47:45.120 --> 0:47:48.280
<v Speaker 2>you can stop them from taking actions, right, which stops

0:47:48.320 --> 0:47:52.480
<v Speaker 2>them from being able to harm you. And the good

0:47:52.600 --> 0:47:56.960
<v Speaker 2>security is going to impact all three of those things, right,

0:47:57.000 --> 0:47:58.719
<v Speaker 2>It's going to stop them from being able to see

0:47:58.760 --> 0:48:02.200
<v Speaker 2>you sometimes if they can see you stuff like you know,

0:48:02.560 --> 0:48:04.840
<v Speaker 2>you were just talking, we were just talking earlier about

0:48:05.600 --> 0:48:07.760
<v Speaker 2>link previews, right, and how that can kind of expose

0:48:07.880 --> 0:48:11.319
<v Speaker 2>maybe who you're in communication with potentially, well, that could

0:48:11.320 --> 0:48:13.719
<v Speaker 2>allow the state to orient themselves to you and to

0:48:13.840 --> 0:48:17.879
<v Speaker 2>your friends, right, And obviously stuff like locking down your

0:48:17.880 --> 0:48:21.800
<v Speaker 2>devices not having unnecessarily info online can stop them bring

0:48:22.080 --> 0:48:24.320
<v Speaker 2>being able to decide, you know, what you're doing and

0:48:24.640 --> 0:48:27.480
<v Speaker 2>how they should respond to that. And I think that's

0:48:27.520 --> 0:48:30.480
<v Speaker 2>also good if you're thinking, if you're not just somebody

0:48:30.480 --> 0:48:32.839
<v Speaker 2>who is concerned about your security like most people are,

0:48:32.880 --> 0:48:35.720
<v Speaker 2>because it's good to have some security. If you're actually

0:48:36.400 --> 0:48:40.120
<v Speaker 2>dealing with the state or a corporation as an adversary

0:48:40.200 --> 0:48:43.400
<v Speaker 2>in some way, it can be useful to think about

0:48:43.520 --> 0:48:45.440
<v Speaker 2>your security culture in those terms.

0:48:46.560 --> 0:48:50.279
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Absolutely, I think that's absolutely right. It's it's and

0:48:50.320 --> 0:48:52.040
<v Speaker 3>I think that it's you know, it points to you

0:48:52.160 --> 0:48:56.719
<v Speaker 3>like we should, we should understand what the you know,

0:48:57.080 --> 0:49:00.480
<v Speaker 3>mode of thinking of our adversaries is, right, like we

0:49:00.640 --> 0:49:04.359
<v Speaker 3>you know, we should if your adversary is the NSA, right,

0:49:04.360 --> 0:49:08.160
<v Speaker 3>which is like probably actually not most people in the US,

0:49:08.200 --> 0:49:10.960
<v Speaker 3>Like for most US activists, the NSA is not actually

0:49:11.040 --> 0:49:14.279
<v Speaker 3>your biggest adversary, right, Like your biggest adversary is going

0:49:14.360 --> 0:49:17.000
<v Speaker 3>to be local police, right, your biggest adversary is going

0:49:17.080 --> 0:49:20.080
<v Speaker 3>to be you know, the the you know, somebody like

0:49:20.120 --> 0:49:22.480
<v Speaker 3>your abusive partner, right, and you need to. And this

0:49:22.520 --> 0:49:27.440
<v Speaker 3>is why threat modeling is important, because you need to

0:49:27.440 --> 0:49:29.919
<v Speaker 3>to really to really think about, you know, think through

0:49:30.040 --> 0:49:32.279
<v Speaker 3>like you know, well, okay, wait, am I actually worried

0:49:32.280 --> 0:49:34.279
<v Speaker 3>about protecting myself from the NSA? Or am I more

0:49:34.320 --> 0:49:38.120
<v Speaker 3>worried about uh uh, you know the the racist police

0:49:38.120 --> 0:49:41.000
<v Speaker 3>officer that drives down my street every day? Right? And yeah,

0:49:41.040 --> 0:49:43.440
<v Speaker 3>probably it's the latter. And so you can you can

0:49:43.480 --> 0:49:47.279
<v Speaker 3>take a lot more useful actions, right uh. And and

0:49:47.360 --> 0:49:51.239
<v Speaker 3>you know you can you can you know, break that

0:49:51.360 --> 0:49:55.600
<v Speaker 3>oda loop for him once you know actually what it is. Right, Yeah,

0:49:55.680 --> 0:49:58.000
<v Speaker 3>if you're defending yourself against the NSA, you're gonna leave

0:49:58.000 --> 0:50:01.879
<v Speaker 3>yourself wide open to the actual threat. Yeah.

0:50:01.880 --> 0:50:05.200
<v Speaker 2>It's totally I think a great example. And I don't

0:50:05.239 --> 0:50:07.680
<v Speaker 2>mean to be like quote unquote sub tweeting somebody here,

0:50:07.719 --> 0:50:10.640
<v Speaker 2>but I've known a couple of folks like this. It's like,

0:50:10.640 --> 0:50:12.920
<v Speaker 2>if you have if you're super paranoid, you're not putting

0:50:12.920 --> 0:50:16.000
<v Speaker 2>anything online, You're only talking with your close friends, you

0:50:16.120 --> 0:50:18.799
<v Speaker 2>use a dumb phone, you have burners, but you also

0:50:18.880 --> 0:50:20.560
<v Speaker 2>drive around with a shitload of weed in your car

0:50:20.600 --> 0:50:22.839
<v Speaker 2>in a state where that's illegal. It's like, well, like

0:50:23.080 --> 0:50:27.239
<v Speaker 2>your threat modeling is not great in that situation, right,

0:50:27.360 --> 0:50:29.080
<v Speaker 2>or like I do all that, but I carry in

0:50:29.120 --> 0:50:32.319
<v Speaker 2>a legal handgun with me wherever I go. It's like, well,

0:50:32.400 --> 0:50:34.880
<v Speaker 2>it may be more of a threat than your phone.

0:50:35.120 --> 0:50:36.840
<v Speaker 4>My partner the other day was like, what if I

0:50:36.840 --> 0:50:38.120
<v Speaker 4>got a dumb phone? I was like, what if I

0:50:38.160 --> 0:50:41.759
<v Speaker 4>divorced you? Like like what if?

0:50:43.239 --> 0:50:44.120
<v Speaker 5>They were like what do you mean?

0:50:44.160 --> 0:50:45.640
<v Speaker 4>And I was like, well, I'm going to be the

0:50:45.640 --> 0:50:48.840
<v Speaker 4>one using all the maps for both of us, yeah,

0:50:48.880 --> 0:50:52.120
<v Speaker 4>and having to google all the dumb shit you want

0:50:52.120 --> 0:50:55.000
<v Speaker 4>at Google. That doesn't make I'm now your weakest link,

0:50:55.040 --> 0:50:57.399
<v Speaker 4>like go fuck yourself. But also I was like, I'm

0:50:57.440 --> 0:51:02.560
<v Speaker 4>absolutely not going to be your your your Google maps bitch,

0:51:02.640 --> 0:51:06.239
<v Speaker 4>Like I'm not not doing that. But but I mean

0:51:06.280 --> 0:51:08.560
<v Speaker 4>I think also, you know, to both of y'all's points

0:51:08.560 --> 0:51:10.560
<v Speaker 4>to get serious again for a second. I mean, you know,

0:51:10.600 --> 0:51:15.040
<v Speaker 4>like my threat model, for example, might be similar or

0:51:15.040 --> 0:51:18.680
<v Speaker 4>slightly different, maybe slightly less serious than than Cooper's. But

0:51:18.840 --> 0:51:21.520
<v Speaker 4>you know, like some of the like the the the

0:51:21.600 --> 0:51:23.560
<v Speaker 4>journalists in India we were working with, have quite a

0:51:23.640 --> 0:51:26.840
<v Speaker 4>high threat model, right, Like, yeah, the Indian police force

0:51:27.200 --> 0:51:30.920
<v Speaker 4>are very much like the NSA. They're very talented they

0:51:30.960 --> 0:51:33.200
<v Speaker 4>have a lot of money and tech at their disposal,

0:51:33.560 --> 0:51:36.840
<v Speaker 4>and that might be different for some of the activists

0:51:36.880 --> 0:51:39.480
<v Speaker 4>we're working with, let's say in like Louisiana or Texas, right,

0:51:40.719 --> 0:51:44.160
<v Speaker 4>but the differences is, like we're still talking about I

0:51:44.160 --> 0:51:48.920
<v Speaker 4>would argue two brutal police forces that just have different

0:51:49.000 --> 0:51:51.839
<v Speaker 4>means of disposal at their hands. So like the Louisiana

0:51:52.080 --> 0:51:55.880
<v Speaker 4>police are our groups you should totally be worried about.

0:51:56.120 --> 0:51:58.880
<v Speaker 4>They might not be able to hack your phone, but

0:51:59.400 --> 0:52:00.600
<v Speaker 4>maybe eventually they could.

0:52:00.960 --> 0:52:03.000
<v Speaker 5>But there are other there are obviously other things that

0:52:03.040 --> 0:52:03.719
<v Speaker 5>were about them.

0:52:03.760 --> 0:52:07.000
<v Speaker 4>But you know, in the context of like some of

0:52:07.040 --> 0:52:09.800
<v Speaker 4>the folks who are working with in the South, like

0:52:09.840 --> 0:52:13.160
<v Speaker 4>reproductive justice activists, some of the things are probably much

0:52:13.200 --> 0:52:17.160
<v Speaker 4>more serious in terms of your threat model would be

0:52:17.200 --> 0:52:20.680
<v Speaker 4>like a nurse for someone who let's say is miscarring

0:52:20.960 --> 0:52:23.359
<v Speaker 4>or has sought an abortion. And this is something Kate

0:52:23.360 --> 0:52:26.719
<v Speaker 4>Bertosh from the Digital Defense Fund, a friend of of

0:52:26.880 --> 0:52:29.720
<v Speaker 4>you know ours, has talked about where like the people

0:52:29.800 --> 0:52:31.799
<v Speaker 4>that are supposed to take care of you might be

0:52:31.840 --> 0:52:35.359
<v Speaker 4>the ones that are actually your your biggest threat, right,

0:52:35.640 --> 0:52:37.960
<v Speaker 4>the ones that have heard you say something or you've

0:52:37.960 --> 0:52:41.200
<v Speaker 4>can fight it in for example, and that is kind

0:52:41.239 --> 0:52:42.640
<v Speaker 4>of a horrifying thing to think about.

0:52:42.680 --> 0:52:44.399
<v Speaker 5>But that is, that is a thing you.

0:52:44.400 --> 0:52:47.479
<v Speaker 4>Have to threat model, right, is is can I trust

0:52:47.520 --> 0:52:49.640
<v Speaker 4>this person? How am I describing?

0:52:49.760 --> 0:52:50.760
<v Speaker 5>You know? What's happening?

0:52:51.400 --> 0:52:51.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:52:52.200 --> 0:52:56.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, absolutely, Well, did y'all have anything else you wanted

0:52:56.280 --> 0:52:59.080
<v Speaker 2>to make sure to get into in this conversation? There's

0:52:59.080 --> 0:53:01.360
<v Speaker 2>so much more in your in the great paper you

0:53:01.719 --> 0:53:05.200
<v Speaker 2>helped co author, What is Secure and Analysis of Popular

0:53:05.239 --> 0:53:08.600
<v Speaker 2>Messaging Apps on the Tech Policy Press. But yeah, is

0:53:08.600 --> 0:53:10.560
<v Speaker 2>there anything else y'all wanted to really make sure you

0:53:10.640 --> 0:53:11.640
<v Speaker 2>hit before we roll out?

0:53:12.160 --> 0:53:14.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah? Please don't use telegram for a variety of reasons,

0:53:14.440 --> 0:53:17.560
<v Speaker 4>but also like it's very unclear how they respond to

0:53:17.600 --> 0:53:20.200
<v Speaker 4>any law enforcement or government. They don't say anything, and

0:53:20.200 --> 0:53:22.520
<v Speaker 4>it's kind of impossible to reach anyone that works there.

0:53:23.160 --> 0:53:27.000
<v Speaker 4>Please don't use Facebook Messenger other than maybe sending memes.

0:53:28.520 --> 0:53:31.160
<v Speaker 4>There's a lot of really gross surveillance capitalism inside a

0:53:31.200 --> 0:53:35.160
<v Speaker 4>Facebook messenger that the paper gets into. But effectively, Meta

0:53:35.239 --> 0:53:38.720
<v Speaker 4>is building this weird, sprawling infrastructure inside a Facebook Messenger

0:53:38.719 --> 0:53:40.640
<v Speaker 4>and try to link Facebook and Instagram.

0:53:41.080 --> 0:53:43.239
<v Speaker 5>And one of the things we noticed is.

0:53:43.200 --> 0:53:45.919
<v Speaker 4>That, like if you've blocked someone on Instagram or mute

0:53:45.920 --> 0:53:48.799
<v Speaker 4>to them, but you haven't blocked remuted them on Facebook,

0:53:49.160 --> 0:53:51.680
<v Speaker 4>that your stories, like all those stories are still coming

0:53:51.719 --> 0:53:55.560
<v Speaker 4>across in messengers, so you can still see content from

0:53:55.600 --> 0:53:59.480
<v Speaker 4>someone because it's linking both of those both of those profiles.

0:54:00.239 --> 0:54:02.719
<v Speaker 4>So you know, you could see how partaking like an

0:54:02.760 --> 0:54:05.720
<v Speaker 4>online harassment lens like why that's why that's really bad,

0:54:06.320 --> 0:54:11.440
<v Speaker 4>that's really harmful and could be potentially you know, upsetting

0:54:11.480 --> 0:54:13.000
<v Speaker 4>and triggering for folks.

0:54:14.640 --> 0:54:18.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'll add that. I think my the major thing

0:54:18.080 --> 0:54:21.320
<v Speaker 3>I want people to to think about is that encryption

0:54:21.440 --> 0:54:24.239
<v Speaker 3>really does work, and it works really well. And we

0:54:24.280 --> 0:54:26.759
<v Speaker 3>can see that because a lot of countries right now

0:54:27.120 --> 0:54:30.160
<v Speaker 3>are trying to pass laws that either weaken or byan

0:54:30.320 --> 0:54:34.160
<v Speaker 3>encryption right and in fact, the UK uh did passed,

0:54:34.480 --> 0:54:37.399
<v Speaker 3>did just pass such a law, the online Safety built

0:54:37.400 --> 0:54:40.680
<v Speaker 3>in the UK. And so it's really important that we

0:54:41.480 --> 0:54:43.799
<v Speaker 3>that we you know, push back against these laws and

0:54:43.840 --> 0:54:48.160
<v Speaker 3>fight back against these laws and and whatever we can, right.

0:54:48.200 --> 0:54:49.720
<v Speaker 3>And I'm not I'm not coming at.

0:54:49.560 --> 0:54:53.799
<v Speaker 9>This as somebody who's a big believer in the you know,

0:54:53.880 --> 0:54:57.040
<v Speaker 9>in in incrementalism and in working with governments, but I

0:54:57.120 --> 0:54:59.640
<v Speaker 9>think that I still think that it's really important to

0:55:00.480 --> 0:55:00.839
<v Speaker 9>you know.

0:55:01.719 --> 0:55:04.040
<v Speaker 3>Educate folks and push back against these laws and try

0:55:04.040 --> 0:55:08.040
<v Speaker 3>to not let these pasts because these will be really

0:55:08.080 --> 0:55:10.200
<v Speaker 3>bad for all of us totally.

0:55:10.400 --> 0:55:12.680
<v Speaker 4>And not to defend the Online Safet Bill, because I

0:55:12.680 --> 0:55:14.719
<v Speaker 4>would never do that. I'll go to my grave not

0:55:15.280 --> 0:55:19.000
<v Speaker 4>speaking highly of it, only speaking critically at least, like

0:55:19.080 --> 0:55:24.280
<v Speaker 4>the pushback from encryption experts and encryption supporters like Merrit Whitaker,

0:55:24.719 --> 0:55:28.919
<v Speaker 4>president of Signal, did lead to lawmakers in the UK,

0:55:29.080 --> 0:55:33.200
<v Speaker 4>for example, admitting that there's no sort of feasible safe

0:55:33.239 --> 0:55:35.359
<v Speaker 4>way to build a back door, right, And that is

0:55:35.440 --> 0:55:39.719
<v Speaker 4>I think also a win because of so much pushback,

0:55:39.800 --> 0:55:42.839
<v Speaker 4>because of so much research, because of so much criticism

0:55:42.920 --> 0:55:46.160
<v Speaker 4>that security and privacy folks gave people that are pro

0:55:46.280 --> 0:55:49.920
<v Speaker 4>encryption like that, we you know, we were able to

0:55:50.000 --> 0:55:53.279
<v Speaker 4>walk back that part. And I do think that's a

0:55:53.320 --> 0:55:58.439
<v Speaker 4>big deal, even if there are other issues with that bill,

0:55:58.440 --> 0:56:01.480
<v Speaker 4>because I think it also sends a sick pun intended

0:56:01.800 --> 0:56:07.040
<v Speaker 4>to other governments as well, and I think that that's

0:56:07.040 --> 0:56:09.319
<v Speaker 4>incredibly important. But yeah, I would also say just just

0:56:09.400 --> 0:56:10.479
<v Speaker 4>use Signal whenever you can.

0:56:13.000 --> 0:56:17.399
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, yeah, well all right, folks, that is going

0:56:17.480 --> 0:56:22.120
<v Speaker 2>to be it for us here at it could happen here. Yeah,

0:56:22.160 --> 0:56:25.000
<v Speaker 2>thank you all for listening, and thank you Cooper and

0:56:25.200 --> 0:56:26.680
<v Speaker 2>Carolyn for coming on.

0:56:27.880 --> 0:56:29.440
<v Speaker 3>Thank you for having us, yeah.

0:56:29.280 --> 0:56:30.200
<v Speaker 5>And thank you for having us.

0:56:30.400 --> 0:56:34.239
<v Speaker 4>You can find us on social media for now, I

0:56:34.239 --> 0:56:35.759
<v Speaker 4>guess until it all.

0:56:35.600 --> 0:56:36.320
<v Speaker 5>Lights on fire.

0:56:36.520 --> 0:56:38.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, whichever one you want to trust.

0:56:40.080 --> 0:56:44.400
<v Speaker 3>I'm Cooper Cue on most social media's Blue Sky Mastered

0:56:44.440 --> 0:56:45.480
<v Speaker 3>on Shitter.

0:56:46.520 --> 0:56:49.799
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I'm Caroline Cinders. My first name, last name. Our

0:56:49.880 --> 0:56:54.800
<v Speaker 4>lab is Convocation Research and Design Record Labs on Twitter

0:56:54.840 --> 0:56:55.360
<v Speaker 4>at the moment.

0:56:55.680 --> 0:56:57.879
<v Speaker 5>Hopefully we'll get be getting on Blue Sky very soon.

0:56:58.920 --> 0:57:01.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah, probably get back on there more.

0:57:01.600 --> 0:57:01.799
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:57:01.880 --> 0:57:06.879
<v Speaker 2>Twitter has gotten remarkably worse, which you know, we had

0:57:06.880 --> 0:57:11.440
<v Speaker 2>a back in the day on the old something Awful forums.

0:57:11.480 --> 0:57:14.320
<v Speaker 2>There was a thread in one of the debate forums

0:57:14.360 --> 0:57:17.919
<v Speaker 2>about this very right wing site called Free Republic, which

0:57:17.960 --> 0:57:20.440
<v Speaker 2>is like one of the earliest reservoirs of what became

0:57:20.960 --> 0:57:24.320
<v Speaker 2>trump Ism, and the tagline for the thread just kind

0:57:24.360 --> 0:57:26.920
<v Speaker 2>of watching these people, was there is always more and

0:57:26.960 --> 0:57:30.440
<v Speaker 2>it is always worse, And boy, goddamn, if that hasn't

0:57:30.480 --> 0:57:34.720
<v Speaker 2>been a continually accurate statement about the whole of social media.

0:57:34.800 --> 0:57:37.640
<v Speaker 4>Right now, isn't a time amazing to watch someone just

0:57:37.720 --> 0:57:39.600
<v Speaker 4>light forty billion dollars on fire.

0:57:39.800 --> 0:57:43.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, just like yeah, totally there to it. Yeah, it's

0:57:43.720 --> 0:57:47.160
<v Speaker 2>like the nihilist and me being like, wow, Comrade Musk

0:57:47.200 --> 0:57:50.040
<v Speaker 2>really really taking some hits to capitalism here.

0:57:54.600 --> 0:57:56.960
<v Speaker 1>It could Happen here as a production of cool Zone Media.

0:57:57.200 --> 0:57:59.880
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts from cool Zone Media, visit our website

0:58:00.000 --> 0:58:02.120
<v Speaker 1>fo zonemedia dot com or check us out on the

0:58:02.160 --> 0:58:05.680
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to podcasts.

0:58:06.120 --> 0:58:08.280
<v Speaker 1>You can find sources for It Could Happen Here, updated

0:58:08.320 --> 0:58:12.360
<v Speaker 1>monthly at coolzonemedia dot com slash sources. Thanks for listening,