WEBVTT - From the Vault: Tomato, Tomato, Part 1

0:00:05.720 --> 0:00:08.239
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind. This is

0:00:08.320 --> 0:00:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick. In today's Vault episode

0:00:12.240 --> 0:00:14.200
<v Speaker 1>is the first part of the two part series we

0:00:14.240 --> 0:00:16.800
<v Speaker 1>did about the humble tomato. Why why did I say

0:00:16.880 --> 0:00:21.759
<v Speaker 1>humble tomatoes, not humble the beautiful, glorious, majestic tomato. Yes,

0:00:22.079 --> 0:00:25.360
<v Speaker 1>this is a part one of our episode Tomato tomato,

0:00:26.280 --> 0:00:29.000
<v Speaker 1>or maybe it was tomato tomato or tomato tomato or

0:00:29.040 --> 0:00:33.240
<v Speaker 1>tomato tomato. I'm not sure. Did you say tomato tomato?

0:00:33.479 --> 0:00:39.519
<v Speaker 1>Was that tomato tomato? Um? I love you tomato. Yeah.

0:00:41.400 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, these were fun. These were some some nice

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:49.199
<v Speaker 1>food based botanical explorations, and I believe we got to

0:00:49.240 --> 0:00:52.640
<v Speaker 1>gush a lot about just how good a tomato can be. Hey,

0:00:52.640 --> 0:00:58.400
<v Speaker 1>and they're in season again. Welcome to Stuff to Blow

0:00:58.440 --> 0:01:07.839
<v Speaker 1>your Mind, production of My Heart Radio. Hey you, welcome

0:01:07.880 --> 0:01:10.040
<v Speaker 1>to Stuff to Blow your Mind. My name is Robert

0:01:10.120 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick. And Robert, I was going

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:16.039
<v Speaker 1>to start off today by saying that, of course it's

0:01:16.080 --> 0:01:18.680
<v Speaker 1>the most wonderful time of the year, but I think

0:01:18.680 --> 0:01:21.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually already on record saying October is the most

0:01:21.640 --> 0:01:24.200
<v Speaker 1>wonderful time of the year, and of course October is

0:01:24.240 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 1>because that's you know, monster madness, but monster season aside,

0:01:28.000 --> 0:01:31.600
<v Speaker 1>I think tomato season is the second most wonderful time

0:01:31.640 --> 0:01:34.120
<v Speaker 1>of the year, and we're right in it now. Tomato

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:37.839
<v Speaker 1>season is pretty wonderful. Um, We're we're big tomato fans

0:01:37.880 --> 0:01:41.399
<v Speaker 1>here in the house. Given the confines of imposed by

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:44.760
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic, we're actually growing more tomatoes at the house

0:01:44.800 --> 0:01:48.320
<v Speaker 1>than ever before. Um, and yeah, it's been fabulous. We're

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:52.280
<v Speaker 1>big fans of pensanella, which is a I think a

0:01:52.360 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 1>tuscan chopped salad or originally but it's like soaked or

0:01:56.360 --> 0:02:00.040
<v Speaker 1>soaked stale or toasted bread we throw in basil and

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:03.000
<v Speaker 1>then of course the tomatoes. Uh. Similarly, we really love

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:07.120
<v Speaker 1>a good caprice salad because, yeah, a great tomato just

0:02:07.680 --> 0:02:10.480
<v Speaker 1>elevates anything. In my opinion. You know, you can do

0:02:10.520 --> 0:02:12.480
<v Speaker 1>a great tomato. All you need is just a little

0:02:12.480 --> 0:02:14.440
<v Speaker 1>salt and pepper, maybe a drizzle of olive oil, and

0:02:14.440 --> 0:02:17.480
<v Speaker 1>you're good to go. A great tomato is I think

0:02:17.480 --> 0:02:19.440
<v Speaker 1>in the same class where people think of like a

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:23.240
<v Speaker 1>great steak. It is just like a complete food in

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:26.520
<v Speaker 1>itself that is so good it you know, it kind

0:02:26.520 --> 0:02:29.239
<v Speaker 1>of makes people moan when they eat it. And I

0:02:29.639 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 1>definitely grew up thinking that I did not like tomatoes.

0:02:32.800 --> 0:02:34.919
<v Speaker 1>I thought I hated tomatoes. I'd always pick them off

0:02:34.960 --> 0:02:37.360
<v Speaker 1>of a sandwich if if they were on there. But

0:02:37.440 --> 0:02:39.720
<v Speaker 1>I realized later in life the issue was just that

0:02:39.760 --> 0:02:43.240
<v Speaker 1>I hated bad tomatoes. And almost every tomato you get

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:45.280
<v Speaker 1>in a you know, in a subway or what. I

0:02:45.280 --> 0:02:46.960
<v Speaker 1>don't mean to single them out, but you know, any

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:49.320
<v Speaker 1>sandwich shop, whatever, it's almost never going to be a

0:02:49.360 --> 0:02:52.440
<v Speaker 1>good one. It's going to be kind of a white, mealy, tough,

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 1>flavorless thing that doesn't have all of the beautiful aromatic

0:02:56.320 --> 0:03:00.880
<v Speaker 1>tomato ee compounds, that doesn't have that perfect juicy text.

0:03:00.919 --> 0:03:04.880
<v Speaker 1>You're a ripe, home grown or or you know, farmer's

0:03:04.880 --> 0:03:08.680
<v Speaker 1>market summer tomato that has never been refrigerated, never had

0:03:08.720 --> 0:03:11.240
<v Speaker 1>to be shipped on a big truck, any of that stuff.

0:03:11.560 --> 0:03:13.919
<v Speaker 1>It is a thing of beauty. And if you've never

0:03:14.000 --> 0:03:16.600
<v Speaker 1>experienced a tomato that way, you don't know what you're

0:03:16.639 --> 0:03:19.519
<v Speaker 1>missing yet. Yeah, absolutely, you just you're not going to

0:03:19.600 --> 0:03:22.920
<v Speaker 1>get the same thing with a grocery store tomato generally,

0:03:22.960 --> 0:03:25.600
<v Speaker 1>unless you know they are actually serve as selling like

0:03:25.680 --> 0:03:28.799
<v Speaker 1>local air limb tomatoes. I'm a big fan of box

0:03:28.919 --> 0:03:31.679
<v Speaker 1>meal kits. I'm a subscriber to one of them right now.

0:03:31.760 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 1>But you're just not gonna You're not gonna get a

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:37.360
<v Speaker 1>wonderful tomato through the mail like that it's got it's

0:03:37.360 --> 0:03:38.840
<v Speaker 1>gotta come from your own garden. It's got to come

0:03:38.840 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 1>from a local um garden. It and when you get

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:44.680
<v Speaker 1>to dig into it, it is like nothing else. It's

0:03:44.720 --> 0:03:50.520
<v Speaker 1>just miles above uh the sort of mundane canned tomato

0:03:50.680 --> 0:03:54.800
<v Speaker 1>grocery store tomato experience. Yeah, and I think one reason is,

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:59.400
<v Speaker 1>uh just the sheer mechanics of like shipping products. Right

0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 1>if you ever had a really good ripe summer tomato,

0:04:02.320 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 1>as soon as you handle it, you know, like this

0:04:04.320 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 1>would not survive the like the rough process of getting

0:04:08.400 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 1>from a farm to the grocery store to my house.

0:04:11.120 --> 0:04:14.400
<v Speaker 1>It's a delicate baby bird. It's the thing that that

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:17.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's it's barely going to survive the trip

0:04:17.839 --> 0:04:21.200
<v Speaker 1>from the vine to your kitchen counter. Oh yeah, and

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:25.320
<v Speaker 1>again speaking is a very amateur tomato grower here. But

0:04:25.360 --> 0:04:27.799
<v Speaker 1>the ones we bring in from the backyard, like they

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:29.720
<v Speaker 1>we have to like knock the bugs off of them,

0:04:29.760 --> 0:04:32.479
<v Speaker 1>they're already oozing a little bit. Yeah, this is a

0:04:32.560 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 1>very delicate balance between the plate and the compost heap.

0:04:37.760 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 1>You've got to get there just the right time. But

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:42.479
<v Speaker 1>on the other hand, I'm also actually I'm a pretty

0:04:42.480 --> 0:04:45.720
<v Speaker 1>big fan of canned tomatoes for cooked applications. If if

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:48.279
<v Speaker 1>it's a tomato, you know, if you're making tomato sauce

0:04:48.400 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 1>or something like that, a decent can of of whole

0:04:51.720 --> 0:04:54.839
<v Speaker 1>peeled tomatoes that you puree yourself or mash to whatever

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:57.279
<v Speaker 1>consistency you want, where it's just fine. I mean, you

0:04:57.320 --> 0:04:59.440
<v Speaker 1>know that they're picked when they're ideal, and you know

0:04:59.480 --> 0:05:01.880
<v Speaker 1>they go ahead and canum. It's much better than trying

0:05:01.880 --> 0:05:05.000
<v Speaker 1>to make a say a tomato sauce from tomatoes that

0:05:05.000 --> 0:05:09.240
<v Speaker 1>are fresh in the off season. Yeah. Yeah, It ultimately depends,

0:05:09.279 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 1>like what is the role of the tomato in the dish?

0:05:11.200 --> 0:05:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Is Is this a starring vehicle for a fresh tomato.

0:05:14.600 --> 0:05:17.480
<v Speaker 1>If so, nothing but a really good fresh tomato is

0:05:17.520 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 1>going to work. But if it's something where the tomato

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:23.839
<v Speaker 1>is more of a supporting player, then perhaps one of

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 1>these other things will work. And then, of course all

0:05:26.240 --> 0:05:29.240
<v Speaker 1>there's not just one tomato. Obviously, there's so many different types.

0:05:29.880 --> 0:05:32.720
<v Speaker 1>For my own purposes, I find that when it's not

0:05:32.800 --> 0:05:36.680
<v Speaker 1>tomato season, those little like grape tomatoes are pretty good

0:05:36.720 --> 0:05:38.840
<v Speaker 1>if you have to get some of the store. Absolutely,

0:05:39.040 --> 0:05:42.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm a hundred percent in agreement, cherry tomatoes, grape tomatoes

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:44.800
<v Speaker 1>are the much better option if you need fresh tomatoes

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 1>in the off season. So listeners, as you can probably tell,

0:05:48.320 --> 0:05:51.240
<v Speaker 1>we're going to be talking about tomatoes not for one episode,

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:54.800
<v Speaker 1>but for two whole episodes. And if you're thinking, well,

0:05:55.040 --> 0:05:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the tomato is just so mundane, it's so every day.

0:05:57.680 --> 0:06:00.200
<v Speaker 1>This is gonna be a you know, two episodes of

0:06:00.200 --> 0:06:04.240
<v Speaker 1>of backyard um like hoakery here that I can just

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:07.320
<v Speaker 1>skip on stuff to blow your mind. Nothing could be

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 1>further from the truth, because there is so much weirdness

0:06:11.120 --> 0:06:15.560
<v Speaker 1>in these episodes. There's quackery, there's myth making, they're tall tails,

0:06:15.880 --> 0:06:19.200
<v Speaker 1>and there's all space colonizations, yes, space colonization. It's going

0:06:19.240 --> 0:06:23.240
<v Speaker 1>to cover really like a broad area of stuff to

0:06:23.200 --> 0:06:25.919
<v Speaker 1>blow your mind content, even though at the center of

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:29.920
<v Speaker 1>it is this fruit that has become just such a

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:33.159
<v Speaker 1>staple of most of our diets in one form or another.

0:06:34.160 --> 0:06:36.240
<v Speaker 1>So maybe we should start off just by looking at

0:06:36.240 --> 0:06:40.480
<v Speaker 1>the tomato plant as an organism, What what is this organism?

0:06:40.480 --> 0:06:44.280
<v Speaker 1>And how did we end up with the modern cultivated tomato. Yeah,

0:06:44.279 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 1>this is a great, great place to start, because this

0:06:46.920 --> 0:06:49.920
<v Speaker 1>is another one of those stories where if you don't

0:06:49.920 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 1>think about it too close, if you don't research it yourself,

0:06:52.000 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 1>you just might think, oh, well, tomatoes have always been everywhere,

0:06:56.360 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 1>they have always been a part of our diet because

0:06:58.440 --> 0:07:02.119
<v Speaker 1>they're just so ubiquitous now. But this is not the case. Okay,

0:07:02.160 --> 0:07:04.880
<v Speaker 1>So first of all, you've probably just heard to say

0:07:04.880 --> 0:07:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the word fruit. This is one of those facts I

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:09.640
<v Speaker 1>think most people know at this point. You probably learned

0:07:09.680 --> 0:07:13.040
<v Speaker 1>this before. But in biological terms, a tomato is a

0:07:13.080 --> 0:07:15.680
<v Speaker 1>fruit rather than a vegetable. And part of this comes

0:07:15.720 --> 0:07:17.720
<v Speaker 1>down to the different ways that we use the term

0:07:17.800 --> 0:07:21.200
<v Speaker 1>fruits and vegetables in a sort of culinary or nutritional

0:07:21.240 --> 0:07:24.840
<v Speaker 1>sense versus in a botanical sense. Um Like we in

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:28.240
<v Speaker 1>a culinary or nutritional sense, we intuitively sort things into

0:07:28.280 --> 0:07:32.040
<v Speaker 1>categories of fruits and vegetables, I think largely based on

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 1>sugar content and whether they're primarily used in sweet or

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 1>savory preparations. So plants that are savory or vegetables plants

0:07:40.520 --> 0:07:44.080
<v Speaker 1>that are sweet or fruits. However, even this is somewhat

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:48.040
<v Speaker 1>arbitrary as a cultural convention, because there are ways in

0:07:48.080 --> 0:07:51.880
<v Speaker 1>which these these types of groupings can vary widely from

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 1>culture to culture. One example is avocados. Are avocados a

0:07:56.280 --> 0:07:59.120
<v Speaker 1>sweet food or a savory food? I think for me

0:07:59.280 --> 0:08:02.600
<v Speaker 1>and for most of Americans, the answer overwhelmingly would be

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 1>its savory food. They go in guacamole, you pair them

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:07.480
<v Speaker 1>with lime and salt, you put them on toast, you

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 1>put them in a burrito. But for millions of people

0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:14.240
<v Speaker 1>in like South America and Asia, avocados are primarily a

0:08:14.360 --> 0:08:17.760
<v Speaker 1>sweet food, used more often in dessert dishes, which seems

0:08:17.840 --> 0:08:19.960
<v Speaker 1>very strange to us. But I don't know. If you

0:08:19.960 --> 0:08:22.960
<v Speaker 1>think of it as kind of basically just a buttery substance,

0:08:23.040 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 1>it starts to click in place. Yeah, yeah, I agree.

0:08:26.720 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 1>I always grew up thinking of it certainly something you

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:31.800
<v Speaker 1>add a little salt and pepper two again some olive

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 1>oil two, and you have a great dish. But we're

0:08:34.960 --> 0:08:38.160
<v Speaker 1>big fans of going to local like bubble tea places,

0:08:38.800 --> 0:08:41.280
<v Speaker 1>uh in Asian dessert places, and you will find like

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:44.959
<v Speaker 1>avocado smoothies as as a you know, a standard item

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:47.240
<v Speaker 1>you encounter on menus and I've tried it before and

0:08:47.440 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 1>it's delicious, But yeah, you wouldn't you wouldn't necessarily think

0:08:50.320 --> 0:08:54.360
<v Speaker 1>about it from a Western perspective of being the dessert item, right.

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:57.840
<v Speaker 1>But either way, these culinary distinctions often just don't have

0:08:57.880 --> 0:09:01.520
<v Speaker 1>a biological basis. In fact, other alinary vegetables things we

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:08.440
<v Speaker 1>think of as vegetables in a cooking sense, are biologically fruits. Cucumbers, chili, peppers, eggplants,

0:09:08.480 --> 0:09:11.840
<v Speaker 1>all fruits. But to go even better, the tomato is

0:09:11.880 --> 0:09:16.480
<v Speaker 1>not only fruit, it is technically a berry and one

0:09:16.480 --> 0:09:18.960
<v Speaker 1>thing that I think you could probably even into it

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:21.480
<v Speaker 1>just looking at say, you know, if you're growing a

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:24.760
<v Speaker 1>variety of heirloom tomato in your backyard and you see

0:09:24.760 --> 0:09:28.480
<v Speaker 1>this monstrous fruit hanging off of a vine that you

0:09:28.520 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 1>have to prop up on a steak or a cage

0:09:31.080 --> 0:09:33.560
<v Speaker 1>or otherwise, this gigantic fruit is just going to make

0:09:33.600 --> 0:09:36.280
<v Speaker 1>it drooped down on the ground. Uh, And it's the

0:09:36.520 --> 0:09:39.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, it looks like a thing that should not

0:09:39.320 --> 0:09:42.320
<v Speaker 1>be in a way. Um, so you might be able

0:09:42.360 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 1>to into it that tomatoes have not always been this way,

0:09:45.760 --> 0:09:48.520
<v Speaker 1>like many of the modern fruits and vegetables we eat.

0:09:48.559 --> 0:09:53.160
<v Speaker 1>It had to be adapted from a naturally occurring fruit

0:09:53.240 --> 0:09:56.640
<v Speaker 1>or vegetable that did not necessarily grow as large in

0:09:56.640 --> 0:10:01.800
<v Speaker 1>the edible part um. And it appears that modern cultivated tomatoes,

0:10:01.880 --> 0:10:06.920
<v Speaker 1>which have the scientific name Solanum lycopersicum, are descended from

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 1>a wild berry that grew in northwestern South America, maybe

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 1>around the area of Peru or a little farther north.

0:10:15.200 --> 0:10:20.040
<v Speaker 1>And the research tracing these biological origins has been summarized

0:10:20.040 --> 0:10:22.480
<v Speaker 1>in a few sources. I looked at, for example, in

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:26.880
<v Speaker 1>the Oxford Companion to Food, which was edited by Alan Davidson.

0:10:27.480 --> 0:10:30.400
<v Speaker 1>They looked at studies by, for example, Sophie co in

0:10:30.520 --> 0:10:34.720
<v Speaker 1>N and other researchers over the years that found that

0:10:34.800 --> 0:10:39.480
<v Speaker 1>the wild ancestor of the tomato was very likely. They

0:10:39.520 --> 0:10:45.040
<v Speaker 1>identify a couple of species, one Lycopersicon seraciform, and then

0:10:45.080 --> 0:10:50.319
<v Speaker 1>another one so Lantum pimpanellifolium, which is today known as

0:10:50.360 --> 0:10:53.840
<v Speaker 1>the current tomato. Not current as in timely, but current

0:10:53.880 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 1>as in like the fruit a current. And it's called

0:10:56.520 --> 0:10:59.440
<v Speaker 1>this because in a way, these these wild tomatoes, the

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Slanum pimpanella folium, sort of resemble currents they're these tiny

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:08.480
<v Speaker 1>little berries, almost kind of current or blueberry sized. Yeah,

0:11:08.760 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 1>some of the examples I was reading was that if

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:14.600
<v Speaker 1>you went back to pre Columbian Peru, you would encounter,

0:11:14.800 --> 0:11:16.360
<v Speaker 1>if you knew where to look, you would find these

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:21.440
<v Speaker 1>wild growing, essentially yellow berries that were the predecessor, the

0:11:21.480 --> 0:11:24.840
<v Speaker 1>likely predecessor to the modern tomato. Yes, now, exactly how

0:11:24.880 --> 0:11:28.400
<v Speaker 1>it went from that wild berry to the cultivated varieties

0:11:28.440 --> 0:11:32.640
<v Speaker 1>that people eat that that's still um, we know some things,

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 1>but it's still a somewhat open question that there have

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 1>been some genomic studies that I'll talk about in just

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:40.920
<v Speaker 1>a minute, but we know that such a thing as

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:45.840
<v Speaker 1>the cultivated tomato existed by the time the Spanish arrived

0:11:45.880 --> 0:11:49.360
<v Speaker 1>in meso America. By that time, the az Tech people

0:11:49.360 --> 0:11:53.400
<v Speaker 1>are the no waddle speaking people were eating tomatoes that

0:11:53.520 --> 0:11:56.280
<v Speaker 1>they grew as crops, and they were eating them in dishes,

0:11:56.320 --> 0:12:00.559
<v Speaker 1>often prepared in conjunction with chili peppers. But of course

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:03.199
<v Speaker 1>we we know that this wild ancestor of the tomato,

0:12:03.240 --> 0:12:06.840
<v Speaker 1>this berry grew in northwest South America. It was, you know,

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 1>this wild fine and so there's still a question of

0:12:10.520 --> 0:12:14.960
<v Speaker 1>how exactly that wild fruit made its way up north

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:17.480
<v Speaker 1>to Meso America in order to be cultivated as a

0:12:17.520 --> 0:12:21.280
<v Speaker 1>food crop by the Aztecs. Yeah, there's already even at

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:24.960
<v Speaker 1>this early stage in the history of the global tomato.

0:12:25.040 --> 0:12:28.640
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of a botanical game of telephone, right. Uh.

0:12:28.760 --> 0:12:30.480
<v Speaker 1>So I was trying to look up what is some

0:12:30.520 --> 0:12:33.480
<v Speaker 1>of the most recent scientific work on this, and there

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:36.840
<v Speaker 1>was a new study about the domestication history of the

0:12:36.880 --> 0:12:39.520
<v Speaker 1>tomato that was published just this year, published in the

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 1>journal Molecular Biology and Evolution by Razafard at All. And

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:49.320
<v Speaker 1>so what they present is a little complicated. I'm going

0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 1>to try to do the simplest version I can. So

0:12:52.360 --> 0:12:56.360
<v Speaker 1>the authors say that before their research, our best guess

0:12:56.400 --> 0:12:58.880
<v Speaker 1>about the domestication history of the tomato went like this.

0:12:58.920 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 1>So you had this wild berry in South America. It's

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:04.560
<v Speaker 1>growing up in the Andes, up in the northwest corner

0:13:04.640 --> 0:13:09.520
<v Speaker 1>of South America. And this is Solanum pimpanella folium here again,

0:13:09.559 --> 0:13:11.520
<v Speaker 1>this is the one we mentioned earlier. The fruits are

0:13:11.520 --> 0:13:14.280
<v Speaker 1>going to be about the size of a blueberry. Then

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:18.920
<v Speaker 1>in this older understanding, this was transformed into the semi

0:13:18.960 --> 0:13:26.040
<v Speaker 1>domesticated plant Solanum lycopersicum saraciform or SLC. But if you

0:13:26.080 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 1>see SLC and tomato literature, don't confuse that with Salt

0:13:29.120 --> 0:13:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Lake City. It means this species and this would have

0:13:32.080 --> 0:13:35.439
<v Speaker 1>happened within South America. These fruits would have been about

0:13:35.440 --> 0:13:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the size of a cherry, so kind of similar to

0:13:37.720 --> 0:13:40.280
<v Speaker 1>cherry tomatoes or grape tomatoes that you could buy at

0:13:40.280 --> 0:13:43.439
<v Speaker 1>the store today. Obviously somewhat different, but similar somewhat in

0:13:43.440 --> 0:13:48.160
<v Speaker 1>in look, in size. And then finally, this middle species,

0:13:48.200 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 1>the s l C, was transformed into the larger, fully

0:13:51.480 --> 0:13:56.679
<v Speaker 1>domesticated clandum Lycopersicum variant Lycopersicum, and this was the Aztec

0:13:56.720 --> 0:13:59.480
<v Speaker 1>food crop that was developed into the tomatoes that the

0:13:59.520 --> 0:14:02.680
<v Speaker 1>people eat all around the world today and uh strange

0:14:02.720 --> 0:14:05.080
<v Speaker 1>fact lyco persicum. I think Robert you might have a

0:14:05.120 --> 0:14:11.240
<v Speaker 1>note about this later, but it means literally wolf peach. Yes, um, yeah, yeah,

0:14:11.280 --> 0:14:14.360
<v Speaker 1>that it's This is interesting because this was some sort

0:14:14.360 --> 0:14:18.800
<v Speaker 1>of a fruit that was described by Galen who lived

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 1>two dred c, which obviously as well before tomatoes actually

0:14:25.240 --> 0:14:30.240
<v Speaker 1>came to uh To, uh To to Europe, so obviously

0:14:30.240 --> 0:14:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Galen was not describing a tomato. But this just this

0:14:33.240 --> 0:14:37.160
<v Speaker 1>description ends up getting wound up in the classification of

0:14:37.320 --> 0:14:41.200
<v Speaker 1>tomatoes in the West later on. Yeah, but so anyway,

0:14:41.240 --> 0:14:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the authors of this study from used population genomic methods

0:14:45.600 --> 0:14:48.680
<v Speaker 1>to try to reconstruct a genomic map of the modern

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:53.760
<v Speaker 1>tomatoes domestication history, and they conclude quote A. Results suggests

0:14:53.800 --> 0:14:58.400
<v Speaker 1>that the origin of SLC may predate domestication, and that

0:14:58.440 --> 0:15:02.240
<v Speaker 1>many traits considered typical cole of cultivated tomatoes arose in

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:07.080
<v Speaker 1>South American SLC, but we're lost or diminished once these

0:15:07.120 --> 0:15:11.560
<v Speaker 1>partially domesticated forms spread northward. These traits were then likely

0:15:11.840 --> 0:15:15.840
<v Speaker 1>re selected in a convergent fashion in the common cultivated

0:15:15.880 --> 0:15:18.760
<v Speaker 1>tomato prior to its expansion around the world. So a

0:15:18.760 --> 0:15:22.960
<v Speaker 1>little complicated. Basically, they're saying that the semi domesticated breed

0:15:23.000 --> 0:15:24.960
<v Speaker 1>of tomato that may have been used as a as

0:15:25.120 --> 0:15:28.240
<v Speaker 1>not not a cultivated crop but a semi domesticated food

0:15:28.280 --> 0:15:31.920
<v Speaker 1>by some people in South America, it had some traits

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:35.800
<v Speaker 1>that arose naturally, and then those traits were re selected

0:15:35.840 --> 0:15:41.160
<v Speaker 1>and emphasized by growers in Mesoamerica before the tomato finally

0:15:41.200 --> 0:15:44.920
<v Speaker 1>spread all over the world. Interesting, now we've already touched

0:15:44.920 --> 0:15:47.080
<v Speaker 1>on the fact that the tomato isn't the only case

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:49.520
<v Speaker 1>of this there. There's a whole thing about what you

0:15:49.680 --> 0:15:53.320
<v Speaker 1>call breeds of plants and how and how to know

0:15:53.680 --> 0:15:56.600
<v Speaker 1>whether you're talking about the same fruit or plant. When

0:15:56.640 --> 0:16:00.920
<v Speaker 1>you're using different names throughout history, it can become very confusing. Um.

0:16:00.920 --> 0:16:04.320
<v Speaker 1>But just about the history of the word tomato itself.

0:16:04.360 --> 0:16:08.680
<v Speaker 1>The English word tomato, of course comes via the Spanish tomate,

0:16:09.000 --> 0:16:13.080
<v Speaker 1>which was adapted from the original no Wattle word tomadel.

0:16:13.520 --> 0:16:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Now I've seen a lot of sources claimed that to

0:16:16.080 --> 0:16:19.680
<v Speaker 1>model was simply the Noattle word for the fruit for

0:16:19.760 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 1>the tomato, but the entry and the Oxford companion actually

0:16:22.920 --> 0:16:24.840
<v Speaker 1>goes a little deeper. And this is kind of interesting

0:16:25.000 --> 0:16:29.120
<v Speaker 1>again about linguistic confusion. So apparently in the now Wattle language,

0:16:29.240 --> 0:16:33.720
<v Speaker 1>tom model simply meant plump fruit. So to indicate the

0:16:33.800 --> 0:16:37.800
<v Speaker 1>ancestor of our tomato you had to add the prefix z.

0:16:38.520 --> 0:16:41.200
<v Speaker 1>So the word was z to model that was the

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:44.640
<v Speaker 1>ancestor of the tomato we have today, and this distinguished

0:16:44.680 --> 0:16:49.160
<v Speaker 1>it from the husked ancestor to modern tomatios, which the

0:16:49.280 --> 0:16:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Aztecs called meal to model, and then the Spanish ended

0:16:52.800 --> 0:16:57.000
<v Speaker 1>up using the word tomate for both tomatio in Spanish

0:16:57.040 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 1>that just means little tomato, though they are not actually

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:03.040
<v Speaker 1>large and small versions of the same fruit. They're totally

0:17:03.040 --> 0:17:06.480
<v Speaker 1>different species. Yeah, but that but they are related. These

0:17:06.480 --> 0:17:08.440
<v Speaker 1>are all in the night shade family, and we'll get

0:17:08.440 --> 0:17:11.639
<v Speaker 1>into to that, um into that in a bit. But

0:17:11.800 --> 0:17:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the authors of the Oxford Companion point out this led

0:17:14.480 --> 0:17:17.959
<v Speaker 1>to a bunch of confusion for Spanish chroniclers, who just

0:17:18.040 --> 0:17:22.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't always seem to understand which fruit was being talked about. Uh.

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:25.439
<v Speaker 1>THEO and I have mentioned this before, but they also

0:17:25.680 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 1>point out that in as Tech cuisine, tomatoes were consistently

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:32.399
<v Speaker 1>linked with chili peppers, and I gotta say it's a

0:17:32.440 --> 0:17:35.600
<v Speaker 1>good combination. Tomatoes and chili peppers are are two fruits

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:38.879
<v Speaker 1>that go well together. Absolutely, But here, once we have

0:17:39.359 --> 0:17:43.919
<v Speaker 1>contact between the hemispheres, this opens up the doors of

0:17:43.920 --> 0:17:46.760
<v Speaker 1>of of spread of this plant all over the world,

0:17:46.840 --> 0:17:49.760
<v Speaker 1>and eventually it does spread. Now I have to say

0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 1>that the way that the tomato spreads uh through and

0:17:53.640 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 1>around the world is it both is it was it

0:17:56.680 --> 0:17:59.480
<v Speaker 1>once alarming, like it's really it's really a success story.

0:17:59.800 --> 0:18:02.280
<v Speaker 1>But it's also not one of these situations where you

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:05.320
<v Speaker 1>can say, oh, well, this individual brought the tomato to

0:18:05.440 --> 0:18:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Europe and then it was an enormous success. And here

0:18:08.560 --> 0:18:11.480
<v Speaker 1>we are like, it's not that simple and uh and

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:14.800
<v Speaker 1>and we we certainly encourage people are interested in this

0:18:15.040 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 1>to seek out some of the books we're going to

0:18:16.600 --> 0:18:18.639
<v Speaker 1>mention here in a bit because they'll get into a

0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:21.400
<v Speaker 1>lot more detail about this. It is, um, I guess

0:18:21.400 --> 0:18:23.600
<v Speaker 1>you would say it is. There's a lot of touch

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:28.040
<v Speaker 1>and go uh, false starts. Um. And as we'll discuss

0:18:28.080 --> 0:18:30.280
<v Speaker 1>a little bit too, there's some myth making involved in

0:18:30.320 --> 0:18:34.440
<v Speaker 1>some some legend regarding just how the tomato takes off

0:18:34.520 --> 0:18:36.920
<v Speaker 1>and what is standing in its way. I would also

0:18:36.960 --> 0:18:40.680
<v Speaker 1>say that the tomato has a somewhat complicated and murky Uh.

0:18:40.720 --> 0:18:42.399
<v Speaker 1>If it were a text, we would call it the

0:18:42.440 --> 0:18:47.520
<v Speaker 1>reception history. Yeah. Absolutely, So we're gonna take a quick break,

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:49.560
<v Speaker 1>but when we come back, we are going to dive

0:18:49.640 --> 0:18:54.040
<v Speaker 1>into some of the issues of its spread through Europe

0:18:54.080 --> 0:19:02.399
<v Speaker 1>and then paradoxically, like back into North America. All right,

0:19:02.440 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 1>we're back. So. Uh. We may have talked in the past,

0:19:05.640 --> 0:19:08.200
<v Speaker 1>you and I about doing a tomato episode, uh, doing

0:19:08.240 --> 0:19:10.359
<v Speaker 1>something about the tomatoes. Tomatoes have definitely come up on

0:19:10.400 --> 0:19:15.000
<v Speaker 1>the show before, but my wife this summer had had

0:19:15.040 --> 0:19:18.480
<v Speaker 1>specifically mentioned she said, you guys should do Tomato episode.

0:19:18.720 --> 0:19:20.640
<v Speaker 1>You should do it. You should, you should really dive

0:19:20.640 --> 0:19:24.280
<v Speaker 1>in there. And I think something that helped encourage this

0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:26.919
<v Speaker 1>is that we encountered a sign at a botanical garden

0:19:27.200 --> 0:19:29.719
<v Speaker 1>that was describing tomatoes and it mentioned that in the

0:19:29.720 --> 0:19:32.680
<v Speaker 1>past people thought they were poisonous. So I have to

0:19:32.720 --> 0:19:34.480
<v Speaker 1>admit that that was like, that was a real key

0:19:34.480 --> 0:19:37.680
<v Speaker 1>area of interest for me going into this episode, getting

0:19:37.680 --> 0:19:42.040
<v Speaker 1>into you know, just just discussing whether people ever actually

0:19:42.080 --> 0:19:45.240
<v Speaker 1>considered the tomato to be poisonous and what does that mean,

0:19:45.480 --> 0:19:48.359
<v Speaker 1>because it just seems ridiculous on the face of it, right,

0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:50.959
<v Speaker 1>but the tomato has conquered the planet. We know the

0:19:50.960 --> 0:19:53.960
<v Speaker 1>tomato is not poisonous, and the idea of people being

0:19:53.960 --> 0:19:57.160
<v Speaker 1>afraid to eat it because they think it is poisonous, Uh,

0:19:57.480 --> 0:20:00.600
<v Speaker 1>it just seems completely looney. Well, in this money, because

0:20:00.640 --> 0:20:02.880
<v Speaker 1>even once you investigate it, I would say that this

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:08.320
<v Speaker 1>irony remains, because the irony remains because we are going

0:20:08.359 --> 0:20:11.520
<v Speaker 1>to encounter people who are saying the tomato is poisonous,

0:20:11.560 --> 0:20:14.960
<v Speaker 1>but they're not saying it at a time when nobody

0:20:15.000 --> 0:20:18.240
<v Speaker 1>was eating tomatoes because everybody thought they were poisonous. They'd

0:20:18.280 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 1>be like, well, some people eat them but they're poisonous. Right, Yeah,

0:20:21.840 --> 0:20:25.639
<v Speaker 1>you didn't have like single voices with a global reach

0:20:25.880 --> 0:20:28.359
<v Speaker 1>saying we do not eat tomatoes or no one should

0:20:28.359 --> 0:20:31.800
<v Speaker 1>eat tomatoes, because you have a lot of um, you know,

0:20:32.000 --> 0:20:34.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of division based on like who's talking about it,

0:20:34.640 --> 0:20:37.399
<v Speaker 1>what country they're in, what you know, what levels of

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:40.400
<v Speaker 1>society they're at, etcetera. And then on top of additional

0:20:40.560 --> 0:20:44.160
<v Speaker 1>legends that pop up. But but this basic idea that

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:48.760
<v Speaker 1>people specifically, you'll see like Europeans or Americans used to

0:20:48.760 --> 0:20:52.159
<v Speaker 1>be afraid to eat tomatoes because they thought they were poisonous.

0:20:52.280 --> 0:20:54.919
<v Speaker 1>You see this everywhere. You see this again at botanical gardens,

0:20:54.960 --> 0:20:58.280
<v Speaker 1>you see this popping up in news stories about the

0:20:58.320 --> 0:21:00.480
<v Speaker 1>tomato and it is often just and it is just

0:21:00.520 --> 0:21:04.439
<v Speaker 1>a straight up fact. Uh. But again, when I started

0:21:04.480 --> 0:21:07.479
<v Speaker 1>looking into it, I became increasingly less sure because on

0:21:07.480 --> 0:21:09.240
<v Speaker 1>one hand, yeah, it sounds too good to be true,

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:12.440
<v Speaker 1>and then you do encounter these um these are these

0:21:12.480 --> 0:21:15.560
<v Speaker 1>these wrinkles in the description that really um drive home

0:21:15.600 --> 0:21:18.800
<v Speaker 1>that Okay, not everybody thought this at the same time.

0:21:19.440 --> 0:21:21.439
<v Speaker 1>So again we're not going to cover the entire history

0:21:21.560 --> 0:21:26.720
<v Speaker 1>of the tomatoes um influx into Europe. And then it's

0:21:26.840 --> 0:21:31.560
<v Speaker 1>um it's acceptance by European societies. But the first known

0:21:31.680 --> 0:21:37.480
<v Speaker 1>European reference to tomatoes comes in four from Italian herbalist

0:21:38.000 --> 0:21:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Pito Andre Matthioli, and he wrote of the mala aria

0:21:44.200 --> 0:21:48.919
<v Speaker 1>the golden apples we described as ripening from green to yellow.

0:21:49.280 --> 0:21:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Now he classified the tomato with the man drake, which

0:21:52.680 --> 0:21:56.080
<v Speaker 1>was of course part of this big nightshade family. And

0:21:56.119 --> 0:21:58.920
<v Speaker 1>this is, of course this is accurate. I mean they

0:21:58.920 --> 0:22:01.359
<v Speaker 1>are in this family. We consider the tomato to be

0:22:01.760 --> 0:22:05.560
<v Speaker 1>a nightshade, along with things like the eggplant um But

0:22:05.680 --> 0:22:08.280
<v Speaker 1>this is often held up is one aspect of the

0:22:08.359 --> 0:22:14.159
<v Speaker 1>poisonous reputation that tomatoes gathered in European society, with botanists

0:22:14.200 --> 0:22:16.600
<v Speaker 1>signifying that they were a part of this family that

0:22:16.720 --> 0:22:21.159
<v Speaker 1>contained things um uh like deadly nightshade or like like

0:22:21.240 --> 0:22:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the man drake root, which of course has all these

0:22:23.840 --> 0:22:28.439
<v Speaker 1>connotations with various medicinal and sort of magical practices. But

0:22:28.480 --> 0:22:30.680
<v Speaker 1>at the same time at the only discussed how tomatoes

0:22:30.760 --> 0:22:33.240
<v Speaker 1>were cooked and eaten at the time much in the

0:22:33.320 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 1>same way as eggplants, which were another imported food. Only

0:22:36.920 --> 0:22:41.119
<v Speaker 1>this this eggplants came from Asia um and and they

0:22:41.119 --> 0:22:44.199
<v Speaker 1>were again part of the night shade family, and this

0:22:44.280 --> 0:22:46.080
<v Speaker 1>has to be This seems to be a major sticking

0:22:46.080 --> 0:22:51.120
<v Speaker 1>point for a large portion of of the tomatoes European

0:22:51.160 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 1>tradition UH, with it and the related egg plant not

0:22:54.920 --> 0:22:58.119
<v Speaker 1>traveling all that well into New European cuisines, or not

0:22:58.160 --> 0:23:01.359
<v Speaker 1>all of them anyway, because of their or association with

0:23:01.440 --> 0:23:04.600
<v Speaker 1>man drakes and poisons as well as I would imagine

0:23:04.600 --> 0:23:07.800
<v Speaker 1>just sort of a general hesitation to take up new

0:23:07.840 --> 0:23:13.120
<v Speaker 1>plants into a into a pre existing culinary tradition. One

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:15.600
<v Speaker 1>one really interesting example of this um I was reading

0:23:15.640 --> 0:23:21.159
<v Speaker 1>about UH regards the seventeenth century German garden. Uh I

0:23:21.240 --> 0:23:24.640
<v Speaker 1>was reading when the tomato was purely ornamental considering New

0:23:24.680 --> 0:23:28.280
<v Speaker 1>World foods in seventeenth century Berlin. And this was by

0:23:28.400 --> 0:23:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Millie Taylor Pulaski, published in Transatlantic Trade and Global Cultural

0:23:33.480 --> 0:23:37.199
<v Speaker 1>Transfer since fourteen nine two. This was published in twenty nineteen,

0:23:38.080 --> 0:23:42.280
<v Speaker 1>so the author mentions that tomatoes were purely ornamental summer

0:23:42.280 --> 0:23:45.720
<v Speaker 1>plants in most Berlin gardens in sixteen fifty six, and

0:23:45.800 --> 0:23:49.040
<v Speaker 1>this was due in large part to a German naturalist

0:23:49.080 --> 0:23:54.200
<v Speaker 1>by the name of Johann uh citismund El schotz Um

0:23:54.240 --> 0:23:56.879
<v Speaker 1>who highlighted its connections, first of all, to the vile

0:23:56.920 --> 0:24:02.439
<v Speaker 1>eggplant which UH, which was also present in the gardens

0:24:02.480 --> 0:24:05.560
<v Speaker 1>of Berlin, but not consumed, just growns so you could

0:24:05.560 --> 0:24:08.840
<v Speaker 1>look at it. But Taylor at Polinsky also points out

0:24:09.000 --> 0:24:12.840
<v Speaker 1>that el Schultz didn't argue that either of these plants

0:24:12.920 --> 0:24:17.800
<v Speaker 1>was poisonous, only that they were unhealthy U. And he

0:24:17.840 --> 0:24:21.480
<v Speaker 1>also seems to mention with some disdain that Italians eat

0:24:21.520 --> 0:24:24.760
<v Speaker 1>them and Spaniards did too at the time. So um,

0:24:24.920 --> 0:24:27.440
<v Speaker 1>the idea is that there was likely um a large

0:24:27.480 --> 0:24:30.840
<v Speaker 1>amount of anti Catholic sentiment here as well, Like this

0:24:30.920 --> 0:24:32.840
<v Speaker 1>is this is a plant. Yes you can eat it,

0:24:32.920 --> 0:24:36.920
<v Speaker 1>the Italians eat it, the Catholics eat it, but Protestant

0:24:37.160 --> 0:24:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Germans should not eat it because it's bad for you. Yeah.

0:24:40.160 --> 0:24:41.720
<v Speaker 1>That seems to go along with some of the things

0:24:41.760 --> 0:24:44.159
<v Speaker 1>I was reading. And this is interesting to because we

0:24:44.200 --> 0:24:46.560
<v Speaker 1>see a similar trend actually if you look at potatoes,

0:24:46.760 --> 0:24:50.040
<v Speaker 1>which are also part of the large night shade family. Again,

0:24:50.080 --> 0:24:53.359
<v Speaker 1>where a new food is destined just destined for widespread

0:24:53.400 --> 0:24:58.920
<v Speaker 1>popularity and ultimately is going to have a life sustaining success. Um.

0:24:59.359 --> 0:25:02.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, with the particularly it ends up being embraced

0:25:02.440 --> 0:25:07.000
<v Speaker 1>by um lower levels of the socio economic um uh

0:25:07.160 --> 0:25:10.680
<v Speaker 1>ladder first and those communities that take up the potato

0:25:10.840 --> 0:25:15.960
<v Speaker 1>benefit from them like nutritionally uh and and dietarially um.

0:25:16.040 --> 0:25:18.160
<v Speaker 1>And then of course ultimately it it just takes over.

0:25:18.200 --> 0:25:21.359
<v Speaker 1>But initially something like the potato as well, is grown

0:25:21.359 --> 0:25:25.960
<v Speaker 1>only for decoration before it is ultimately embraced by everybody

0:25:26.000 --> 0:25:29.840
<v Speaker 1>for decoration. Potato for decoration. Yeah, I mean, you know,

0:25:29.880 --> 0:25:32.160
<v Speaker 1>I could I guess I could see it. I see

0:25:32.160 --> 0:25:34.200
<v Speaker 1>it less with the two with with the potato, but

0:25:34.240 --> 0:25:37.440
<v Speaker 1>certainly to tomato is a bright plant. It is pleasing

0:25:37.440 --> 0:25:40.240
<v Speaker 1>to look at. But it's impossible for for me to

0:25:40.320 --> 0:25:42.880
<v Speaker 1>really imagine like a garden, walking into a garden where

0:25:42.920 --> 0:25:46.040
<v Speaker 1>you have ripe tomatoes and eggplants and you're just gonna

0:25:46.040 --> 0:25:48.320
<v Speaker 1>stand back and say, oh, look at that. Isn't that

0:25:48.480 --> 0:25:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Isn't that beautiful? Isn't that nice? No, you need to

0:25:52.320 --> 0:25:55.800
<v Speaker 1>harvest that stuff and make a ratatui. Yeah. Now. One

0:25:55.840 --> 0:25:58.960
<v Speaker 1>of the really wonderful text that we're both looking at

0:25:59.040 --> 0:26:02.639
<v Speaker 1>for for this a pair of episodes, UH is a

0:26:02.640 --> 0:26:07.560
<v Speaker 1>book by Andrew F. Smith titled The Tomato in America, which, again,

0:26:07.640 --> 0:26:12.000
<v Speaker 1>if you if you're tantalized by our discussions in these episodes,

0:26:12.000 --> 0:26:14.320
<v Speaker 1>and you want more about the tomato, this is the

0:26:14.320 --> 0:26:18.119
<v Speaker 1>book for you. Highly recommended. But Smith points out that

0:26:18.240 --> 0:26:22.679
<v Speaker 1>some Renaissance herbalist when they were considering the the tomato,

0:26:22.760 --> 0:26:25.359
<v Speaker 1>they looked at these other sources, one of which is

0:26:25.760 --> 0:26:28.040
<v Speaker 1>galen and the idea of the wolf peach. And that's

0:26:28.119 --> 0:26:30.959
<v Speaker 1>again when we have the scientific name that we have

0:26:31.200 --> 0:26:35.960
<v Speaker 1>for the tomato. But also there were descriptions of of

0:26:35.960 --> 0:26:41.120
<v Speaker 1>of Glossium by Pedanius Dioscorides who lived forty through nineties,

0:26:41.880 --> 0:26:44.399
<v Speaker 1>and this was a Syrian herb that was so named

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:48.200
<v Speaker 1>because it was recommended as a treatment for eye ailments. Um.

0:26:48.280 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 1>So that was another sort of pre existing classification that

0:26:51.600 --> 0:26:55.199
<v Speaker 1>helped inform how we thought about tomatoes, or certainly how

0:26:55.600 --> 0:26:58.560
<v Speaker 1>naturalists and botanists thought about them at the time. But

0:26:59.400 --> 0:27:03.960
<v Speaker 1>neither of these uh is the tomato, just to be clear,

0:27:04.600 --> 0:27:06.960
<v Speaker 1>But they do tie into some of the they frequently

0:27:07.000 --> 0:27:10.680
<v Speaker 1>mentioned associations that were made at the time with tomatoes.

0:27:11.240 --> 0:27:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Now to get into some of the myth making a

0:27:13.520 --> 0:27:17.639
<v Speaker 1>little bit, here's another frequently mentioned tail that I imagine

0:27:17.640 --> 0:27:19.320
<v Speaker 1>a number of you have heard, and this is how

0:27:19.359 --> 0:27:21.600
<v Speaker 1>it goes, um. This is the story. I'm not saying

0:27:21.640 --> 0:27:23.760
<v Speaker 1>this is this correct. We'll get into that in a second.

0:27:23.760 --> 0:27:27.119
<v Speaker 1>But the story goes that when the tomato originally found

0:27:27.160 --> 0:27:31.719
<v Speaker 1>its way onto European plates, you had aristocrats who were like, oh,

0:27:31.800 --> 0:27:33.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna try out this. This sounds great, and they

0:27:33.400 --> 0:27:36.680
<v Speaker 1>started eating these tomatoes. But then they started becoming very sick,

0:27:37.240 --> 0:27:39.719
<v Speaker 1>and they end up pronouncing the fruit to be poisonous.

0:27:39.920 --> 0:27:41.800
<v Speaker 1>But it would turn out that the acid in the

0:27:41.840 --> 0:27:44.800
<v Speaker 1>tomatoes was leaching lead out of the plates they were

0:27:44.840 --> 0:27:49.240
<v Speaker 1>served on, which incidentally made poorer members of society um

0:27:49.520 --> 0:27:51.800
<v Speaker 1>less susceptible to the poison because they would be eating

0:27:51.800 --> 0:27:55.240
<v Speaker 1>off of the wooden plates or earthenware plates. Now, whether

0:27:55.359 --> 0:27:59.120
<v Speaker 1>or not this claim is true, it is actually true,

0:27:59.119 --> 0:28:03.040
<v Speaker 1>of course, that that acidic fruits and vegetables, when cooked

0:28:03.200 --> 0:28:06.639
<v Speaker 1>in or eaten on certain types of pots or pans

0:28:06.720 --> 0:28:09.800
<v Speaker 1>or plates, can actually react with the material. One example

0:28:09.880 --> 0:28:14.080
<v Speaker 1>is if you cook overly acidic foods, including tomato based foods,

0:28:14.080 --> 0:28:18.840
<v Speaker 1>and for example, aluminum cookware. Sometimes this isn't great, Like

0:28:18.880 --> 0:28:21.639
<v Speaker 1>they can react with each other. The food can pick

0:28:21.720 --> 0:28:24.960
<v Speaker 1>up a kind of nasty metallic taste from the aluminum.

0:28:25.000 --> 0:28:28.399
<v Speaker 1>The acid can sort of damage the surface of the aluminum.

0:28:28.680 --> 0:28:31.960
<v Speaker 1>So so there are reactions like that that can't happen, right,

0:28:32.000 --> 0:28:34.920
<v Speaker 1>And we have discussed lead making its way into food

0:28:34.960 --> 0:28:37.440
<v Speaker 1>and lead poisoning in at least a couple of episodes

0:28:37.440 --> 0:28:40.360
<v Speaker 1>in the past. I know we did Cupids leaden Arrow,

0:28:40.520 --> 0:28:42.720
<v Speaker 1>which discussed lead quite a bit, and then we also

0:28:42.840 --> 0:28:45.360
<v Speaker 1>did one of one of our three or four Dangerous

0:28:45.360 --> 0:28:48.719
<v Speaker 1>Foods episodes touched on lead poisoning. But anyway, this idea

0:28:48.800 --> 0:28:52.000
<v Speaker 1>of tomatoes sucking the lead out of your your your

0:28:52.000 --> 0:28:55.120
<v Speaker 1>plate where uh. This ended up being circulated in the

0:28:55.160 --> 0:28:58.680
<v Speaker 1>United States as well, um, with commentators highlighting the lead issue,

0:28:59.040 --> 0:29:01.720
<v Speaker 1>and they were also conser turns over the general effect

0:29:01.880 --> 0:29:05.120
<v Speaker 1>of the acidity of the tomato on the stomach, with

0:29:05.200 --> 0:29:07.040
<v Speaker 1>some saying oh, well, the you know, the the acidity

0:29:07.040 --> 0:29:09.240
<v Speaker 1>and the tomatoes dangerous to the stomach, others saying no, no,

0:29:09.320 --> 0:29:12.560
<v Speaker 1>it's really beneficial. Another thing I've read, Actually, I don't

0:29:12.560 --> 0:29:14.880
<v Speaker 1>know if this overlaps with the lead issue or not,

0:29:14.960 --> 0:29:19.200
<v Speaker 1>but the specific substance I saw mentioned was pewter plates.

0:29:19.440 --> 0:29:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Was that like that they would discolor When you put

0:29:22.240 --> 0:29:26.040
<v Speaker 1>tomatoes on a pewter plate, it would allegedly discolor the plate,

0:29:26.160 --> 0:29:30.600
<v Speaker 1>and this led to concerns. Yeah, now, Andrew F. Smith

0:29:30.720 --> 0:29:33.320
<v Speaker 1>does right that the acid content of tomatoes was a

0:29:33.320 --> 0:29:35.600
<v Speaker 1>topic of concern in Europe and the United States for

0:29:35.640 --> 0:29:39.200
<v Speaker 1>a while. The Paris Society for Horticulture published a paper

0:29:39.200 --> 0:29:42.840
<v Speaker 1>warning about the possibility of leaching with metal plates uh,

0:29:43.080 --> 0:29:46.960
<v Speaker 1>including copper, recommending that you should use wooden and earthenware

0:29:47.000 --> 0:29:50.440
<v Speaker 1>plates instead. But but I looked into this a bit more,

0:29:50.760 --> 0:29:54.479
<v Speaker 1>reading from a book titled Death by petticoat American History

0:29:54.520 --> 0:29:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Myths Debunked by Mary Miley Theobald, and the author points

0:29:58.600 --> 0:30:03.000
<v Speaker 1>out that in Brittish barber surgeon published a botanical book

0:30:03.040 --> 0:30:06.520
<v Speaker 1>that claimed tomatoes were actually poisonous, while also noting that

0:30:06.560 --> 0:30:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the French and Italians did eat them. So I guess

0:30:10.520 --> 0:30:12.960
<v Speaker 1>it was like, these are dangerous to humans unless you're

0:30:13.000 --> 0:30:16.239
<v Speaker 1>French or Italians. Somehow, I don't know. Apparently this uh

0:30:16.320 --> 0:30:19.680
<v Speaker 1>that this was this was no expert um, this particular

0:30:19.880 --> 0:30:21.720
<v Speaker 1>barber surgeon. I guess it would be like the modern

0:30:21.760 --> 0:30:26.880
<v Speaker 1>equivalent of say a a like a YouTube based dietary expert.

0:30:27.080 --> 0:30:30.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm not positive, but I think that's referring to somebody

0:30:30.800 --> 0:30:33.560
<v Speaker 1>who's cited in another paper by Andrew F. Smith. Not

0:30:33.640 --> 0:30:35.280
<v Speaker 1>that book we're looking at, but a paper I'm going

0:30:35.320 --> 0:30:38.560
<v Speaker 1>to sit in a bit. I think that is John Girard,

0:30:38.720 --> 0:30:42.080
<v Speaker 1>a barber surgeon and the superintendent of the gardens of

0:30:42.080 --> 0:30:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the College of Physicians in Holborn. And Smith says of

0:30:46.800 --> 0:30:49.840
<v Speaker 1>of of this barber surgeon guy, that in addition to

0:30:50.000 --> 0:30:53.760
<v Speaker 1>repeating the claims of others that the tomatoes poisonous, he

0:30:53.840 --> 0:30:57.960
<v Speaker 1>also made strange comments such as quote the temperature of

0:30:58.000 --> 0:31:02.840
<v Speaker 1>the tomato was in the highest degree of coldness, which

0:31:02.840 --> 0:31:07.480
<v Speaker 1>he said was left quote to every man's censure. What

0:31:07.600 --> 0:31:10.440
<v Speaker 1>does that mean. I don't know. Well, I know about

0:31:10.440 --> 0:31:13.400
<v Speaker 1>the censure. It just seems like, okay, yes, disdain in

0:31:13.440 --> 0:31:19.080
<v Speaker 1>the tomato alright, Well, at any rate, Um theobald of

0:31:19.440 --> 0:31:22.000
<v Speaker 1>contends that quote this book set the state for the

0:31:22.040 --> 0:31:24.800
<v Speaker 1>negative view of tomatoes among the English that lasted more

0:31:24.800 --> 0:31:28.000
<v Speaker 1>than a century. However, by the end of the seventeen hundreds,

0:31:28.000 --> 0:31:31.880
<v Speaker 1>tomatoes had overcome this bad press. Yeah. That seems in

0:31:31.920 --> 0:31:33.880
<v Speaker 1>line with a lot of what I was reading as well,

0:31:33.880 --> 0:31:37.640
<v Speaker 1>that it's not that everybody thought that tomatoes were poisonous,

0:31:37.680 --> 0:31:41.600
<v Speaker 1>but that there were some prominent writers that had made

0:31:41.760 --> 0:31:44.800
<v Speaker 1>or repeated these allegations that the tomato was in some

0:31:44.840 --> 0:31:49.280
<v Speaker 1>way potentially poisonous or unhealthy, and that these misimpressions trickled

0:31:49.320 --> 0:31:52.400
<v Speaker 1>down to some people in society but not everybody. So

0:31:52.440 --> 0:31:54.800
<v Speaker 1>some people were reading tomatoes, other people were saying, no,

0:31:54.920 --> 0:31:58.560
<v Speaker 1>that's dangerous, don't do that, And over time the non

0:31:58.680 --> 0:32:03.320
<v Speaker 1>dangerous faction grew in numbers. Yeah, I think, you know,

0:32:03.360 --> 0:32:06.280
<v Speaker 1>it's easy to look back at history and assume that

0:32:06.320 --> 0:32:08.920
<v Speaker 1>there would be sort of weirdly to think there would

0:32:08.920 --> 0:32:11.320
<v Speaker 1>be some sort of consensus at the time about whether

0:32:11.480 --> 0:32:15.040
<v Speaker 1>you know wrong or correct about particular foods. But obviously

0:32:15.080 --> 0:32:17.320
<v Speaker 1>we just look around the world today and we see

0:32:17.320 --> 0:32:21.360
<v Speaker 1>how um are our understanding of the nutritional values of

0:32:21.440 --> 0:32:24.680
<v Speaker 1>various foods shifts with our understanding, and also just sort

0:32:24.680 --> 0:32:27.840
<v Speaker 1>of the popular idea of what we should be eating,

0:32:27.920 --> 0:32:30.320
<v Speaker 1>what is good, what is tasty, what is stylish, and

0:32:30.360 --> 0:32:34.040
<v Speaker 1>even what is healthy shifts as well. Yeah, you're exactly right,

0:32:34.080 --> 0:32:36.320
<v Speaker 1>and and there is a grain of truth here, at

0:32:36.400 --> 0:32:40.480
<v Speaker 1>least in the fact that that plants in the soul

0:32:40.560 --> 0:32:44.720
<v Speaker 1>and a c family, including you know, say potatoes, for instance,

0:32:44.760 --> 0:32:48.840
<v Speaker 1>to do sometimes in some parts of the plant have

0:32:49.760 --> 0:32:53.240
<v Speaker 1>do accumulate toxins that can be dangerous. For example, if

0:32:53.240 --> 0:32:57.000
<v Speaker 1>you consume the leaves or something, or even um, we've

0:32:57.000 --> 0:33:00.280
<v Speaker 1>talked before about there there are ways that talk sins

0:33:00.280 --> 0:33:03.600
<v Speaker 1>can accumulate in potatoes if they say, left out for

0:33:03.640 --> 0:33:06.720
<v Speaker 1>a long time, if you have a really old potato,

0:33:06.840 --> 0:33:08.840
<v Speaker 1>it can get a lot of soulanine in it, which

0:33:08.920 --> 0:33:11.880
<v Speaker 1>can lead to potato poisoning. Yeah, it turns green on

0:33:11.960 --> 0:33:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the sunlit countertop, that sort of thing. Um. Yes. Smith

0:33:15.720 --> 0:33:17.520
<v Speaker 1>points out that well, first of all, as far as

0:33:17.640 --> 0:33:21.240
<v Speaker 1>um acidity goes, it's gonna very quite a bit across

0:33:21.280 --> 0:33:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the varieties of tomato. But then in terms of um

0:33:25.080 --> 0:33:29.440
<v Speaker 1>potentially dangerous alkaloids, those are going to be mostly in

0:33:29.480 --> 0:33:32.239
<v Speaker 1>the leaves and stem. That's where the highest concentrations are

0:33:32.240 --> 0:33:34.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be in a tomato plant. And there have

0:33:34.600 --> 0:33:39.720
<v Speaker 1>been cases where, say, a child consumed a key made

0:33:39.800 --> 0:33:44.320
<v Speaker 1>from those leaves, and it has resulted in severe reactions.

0:33:44.360 --> 0:33:47.600
<v Speaker 1>But as you can guess from the like billions of

0:33:47.680 --> 0:33:50.640
<v Speaker 1>pounds or whatever of catchup and other tomato products that

0:33:50.680 --> 0:33:53.280
<v Speaker 1>people eat around the world every day, the tomato itself

0:33:53.360 --> 0:33:58.240
<v Speaker 1>is overwhelmingly safety. There's just yeah, there's nothing to this, right,

0:33:58.360 --> 0:34:00.520
<v Speaker 1>and and certainly any of these case is we we're

0:34:00.560 --> 0:34:04.800
<v Speaker 1>discussing a place or a people or a community that

0:34:05.400 --> 0:34:07.560
<v Speaker 1>was afraid of the tomato, or did not eat the tomato,

0:34:07.680 --> 0:34:10.719
<v Speaker 1>or only grew it ornamentally, there was an all likelihood

0:34:11.080 --> 0:34:14.320
<v Speaker 1>um people or a place not too far away where

0:34:14.360 --> 0:34:16.000
<v Speaker 1>it was just a part of the It had already

0:34:16.040 --> 0:34:18.919
<v Speaker 1>become part of the culinary tradition. So yeah, you would

0:34:18.960 --> 0:34:23.440
<v Speaker 1>have English people or Germans that were not eating the tomato.

0:34:23.560 --> 0:34:26.520
<v Speaker 1>But meanwhile, in Italy and Spain and France and Portugal

0:34:26.920 --> 0:34:29.680
<v Speaker 1>they were already all in. I mean, it was already

0:34:29.719 --> 0:34:34.239
<v Speaker 1>a food crop when Europeans first encountered it. Yeah. Absolutely.

0:34:34.680 --> 0:34:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Now there's a really interesting paper I mentioned a minute

0:34:37.000 --> 0:34:39.920
<v Speaker 1>ago by also by Andrew F. Smith, from from the

0:34:39.960 --> 0:34:44.080
<v Speaker 1>nineteen nineties that was about the history of how perceptions

0:34:44.080 --> 0:34:46.920
<v Speaker 1>of the tomato changed in the United States during the

0:34:46.920 --> 0:34:50.200
<v Speaker 1>first half of the nineteenth century, and there are some

0:34:50.200 --> 0:34:54.040
<v Speaker 1>some interesting reasons involved in that transition that the Smith

0:34:54.080 --> 0:34:56.120
<v Speaker 1>gets into. I think we're probably gonna explore that paper

0:34:56.160 --> 0:34:58.759
<v Speaker 1>in the second episode here, but it's got a lot

0:34:58.760 --> 0:35:01.319
<v Speaker 1>of fun quackery in it, so so pulled on for

0:35:01.360 --> 0:35:05.000
<v Speaker 1>that one. I'd say one of the stumbling blocks to

0:35:05.800 --> 0:35:09.839
<v Speaker 1>understanding The idea of the tomato as being is being

0:35:09.840 --> 0:35:14.800
<v Speaker 1>received as poisonous or beneficial is that sometimes the best

0:35:14.920 --> 0:35:20.120
<v Speaker 1>seeming examples, the best stories about about this are actually

0:35:20.200 --> 0:35:23.720
<v Speaker 1>just legends, so you know, are completely apocryphal, Uh, such

0:35:23.760 --> 0:35:26.000
<v Speaker 1>as the this famous story that I imagined a lot

0:35:26.040 --> 0:35:29.040
<v Speaker 1>of people have heard, uh, the apocryphal legend of Robert

0:35:29.239 --> 0:35:33.279
<v Speaker 1>Gibbon Johnson. Uh. So they're multiple versions of this, and

0:35:33.320 --> 0:35:36.840
<v Speaker 1>they concern a real life individual named Robert Gibbon Johnson

0:35:36.880 --> 0:35:39.640
<v Speaker 1>who have seventeen seventy one through eighteen fifty, and he

0:35:39.680 --> 0:35:43.920
<v Speaker 1>was a notable farmer and horticulturist in Salem, New Jersey.

0:35:44.840 --> 0:35:48.440
<v Speaker 1>He was an actual tomato grower uh, and is sometimes

0:35:48.480 --> 0:35:51.239
<v Speaker 1>credited with having introduced the crop into the area in

0:35:51.280 --> 0:35:54.840
<v Speaker 1>eighteen twenty, and certainly they become a major crop around

0:35:54.840 --> 0:35:58.560
<v Speaker 1>that time in southern New Jersey. But this is was

0:35:58.560 --> 0:36:00.400
<v Speaker 1>discussing a second like this doesn't seem to be the

0:36:00.480 --> 0:36:03.120
<v Speaker 1>case either. He didn't didn't actually introduce the crop. But

0:36:03.200 --> 0:36:07.000
<v Speaker 1>in this particular story, um, the idea is that he

0:36:07.120 --> 0:36:10.160
<v Speaker 1>said he was defending the tomato and he announced I

0:36:10.239 --> 0:36:13.640
<v Speaker 1>will publicly eat a basket of tomatoes on the old

0:36:13.680 --> 0:36:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Salem County courthouse steps uh, that this is the twenty

0:36:18.440 --> 0:36:20.759
<v Speaker 1>in order to demonstrate that they are not poisonous. And

0:36:20.760 --> 0:36:23.120
<v Speaker 1>then and then the town's folk burned him as a witch.

0:36:24.200 --> 0:36:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Wrong Salem. But but you know, the idea is that

0:36:27.640 --> 0:36:29.239
<v Speaker 1>people were like, oh, he's gonna eat a basket and

0:36:29.280 --> 0:36:32.200
<v Speaker 1>tomatoes and die publicly. I've got to see that. So

0:36:32.320 --> 0:36:36.120
<v Speaker 1>people gather to watch the spectacle. They come from far

0:36:36.200 --> 0:36:38.839
<v Speaker 1>and wide, and then he eats the tomatoes and does

0:36:38.880 --> 0:36:41.200
<v Speaker 1>not die. That's the story, and it makes for a

0:36:41.239 --> 0:36:44.719
<v Speaker 1>great story. But everyone seems to agree that this is

0:36:44.800 --> 0:36:48.359
<v Speaker 1>just not true as uh. And Andrew F. Smith actually

0:36:48.400 --> 0:36:50.760
<v Speaker 1>gets into this in the first few pages of the book,

0:36:51.280 --> 0:36:54.319
<v Speaker 1>um pointing out that there's some pretty good records from

0:36:54.320 --> 0:36:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the time in Salem, and Johnson being a prominent citizen,

0:36:58.200 --> 0:37:01.360
<v Speaker 1>was mentioned quite a bit for his their activities and exploits,

0:37:01.560 --> 0:37:03.560
<v Speaker 1>like he was also in the military and so forth,

0:37:03.560 --> 0:37:05.680
<v Speaker 1>like he was a major deal at the time. But

0:37:05.760 --> 0:37:09.720
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing about him introducing the tomato. There's nothing about

0:37:09.840 --> 0:37:13.759
<v Speaker 1>him um uh, you know, eating tomatoes and as a

0:37:13.800 --> 0:37:16.319
<v Speaker 1>matter of public spectacle to to to prove that they're

0:37:16.320 --> 0:37:19.040
<v Speaker 1>not poisonous. And it just seems like that would be

0:37:19.120 --> 0:37:22.240
<v Speaker 1>written up if he had done that, Like the papers

0:37:22.320 --> 0:37:24.960
<v Speaker 1>were not shy about writing about about this guy at

0:37:24.960 --> 0:37:27.279
<v Speaker 1>the time. Anyway. Smith goes on to note that as

0:37:27.320 --> 0:37:30.680
<v Speaker 1>far as the idea of him introducing the tomato, this

0:37:30.760 --> 0:37:33.640
<v Speaker 1>is just one of some five hundred different myths about

0:37:33.680 --> 0:37:37.160
<v Speaker 1>tomato introduction in America, and that they often end end

0:37:37.239 --> 0:37:40.600
<v Speaker 1>up involving the great Man trope, in which someone such

0:37:40.640 --> 0:37:44.680
<v Speaker 1>as Thomas Jefferson, He's another individual that sometimes is erroneously

0:37:44.880 --> 0:37:48.440
<v Speaker 1>cited as being the introducer of tomatoes is responsible. But

0:37:48.520 --> 0:37:52.640
<v Speaker 1>in reality we don't know who is responsible, you know,

0:37:52.680 --> 0:37:57.080
<v Speaker 1>specifically for introducing the tomato. There is no actual American

0:37:57.160 --> 0:38:00.960
<v Speaker 1>King Tomato to credit. I do love the idea, though,

0:38:01.040 --> 0:38:03.600
<v Speaker 1>that if this story were true, I mean, so, imagine

0:38:03.640 --> 0:38:05.440
<v Speaker 1>this guy sits out in front of the courthouse and

0:38:05.480 --> 0:38:08.920
<v Speaker 1>eats a bushel basket of tomatoes. Like I don't think

0:38:09.000 --> 0:38:11.480
<v Speaker 1>that would kill him because they're not poisonous, but surely

0:38:11.520 --> 0:38:16.759
<v Speaker 1>that would give him just like horrible diarrhea. What you

0:38:17.120 --> 0:38:23.239
<v Speaker 1>eat a basket of tomatoes with nothing else? Yeah? Maybe so,

0:38:23.360 --> 0:38:26.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Supposedly, this whole incident has even been

0:38:27.000 --> 0:38:32.839
<v Speaker 1>um recreated in various past documentaries. But I didn't get

0:38:32.840 --> 0:38:34.319
<v Speaker 1>a chance to look them up and see how they

0:38:34.360 --> 0:38:37.080
<v Speaker 1>presented it if because there are different versions of it.

0:38:37.120 --> 0:38:40.319
<v Speaker 1>So maybe in some versions it's just like one tomato, uh,

0:38:40.360 --> 0:38:42.359
<v Speaker 1>and in others it's a whole bushel. I don't know.

0:38:42.680 --> 0:38:45.400
<v Speaker 1>So I've got another story like this about the supposed

0:38:45.440 --> 0:38:49.960
<v Speaker 1>reputation of tomatoes as poisonous, and this is the rumor

0:38:50.239 --> 0:38:55.080
<v Speaker 1>about the George Washington assassination attempt. Okay, so one version

0:38:55.080 --> 0:38:58.560
<v Speaker 1>of the story, as collected in the Snopes article on

0:38:58.640 --> 0:39:02.760
<v Speaker 1>this rumor quote. I remember one of my junior high

0:39:02.800 --> 0:39:07.240
<v Speaker 1>history teachers reading us a suicide note by George Washington's cook.

0:39:07.840 --> 0:39:09.759
<v Speaker 1>The author of the note said that he could not

0:39:09.840 --> 0:39:14.200
<v Speaker 1>forgive Washington's treason against the British and had therefore decided

0:39:14.239 --> 0:39:18.000
<v Speaker 1>to poison him then kill himself. The poison he used

0:39:18.040 --> 0:39:23.799
<v Speaker 1>on Washington was a tomato. That's great story, right, yeah, yeah, yeah,

0:39:23.840 --> 0:39:27.200
<v Speaker 1>it's it's comedic, It generates laughter, and it ties into

0:39:27.239 --> 0:39:31.000
<v Speaker 1>this this ridiculous idea that people once thought that the

0:39:31.000 --> 0:39:34.080
<v Speaker 1>tomato was harmful and and exaggerated to the point where

0:39:34.120 --> 0:39:38.520
<v Speaker 1>it could be used as a lethal weapon. Yeah. Unfortunately,

0:39:38.640 --> 0:39:40.560
<v Speaker 1>as great of a story as this is, this one

0:39:40.719 --> 0:39:43.920
<v Speaker 1>is fiction in a literal sense. It comes from a story,

0:39:44.320 --> 0:39:47.640
<v Speaker 1>a short story called the Murder of George Washington by

0:39:47.760 --> 0:39:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Richard im Gordon, which was published in Ellery Queen's Mystery

0:39:52.120 --> 0:39:55.960
<v Speaker 1>magazine in April nineteen fifty nine. I think the author

0:39:56.200 --> 0:39:59.000
<v Speaker 1>is this guy, Richard Gordon, who was also a surgeon

0:39:59.320 --> 0:40:04.280
<v Speaker 1>and an an enthusiologist, who who wrote historical fiction underpen names.

0:40:04.640 --> 0:40:08.239
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, in the story, uh this, this cook wants

0:40:08.280 --> 0:40:11.759
<v Speaker 1>to kill Washington because he's a British loyalist, and so

0:40:12.040 --> 0:40:15.720
<v Speaker 1>he waits until Washington is quote afflicted with a cold

0:40:15.800 --> 0:40:20.360
<v Speaker 1>in his head which has seriously impaired his sense of taste. Okay,

0:40:20.600 --> 0:40:23.239
<v Speaker 1>so perfect opportunity, right, He's not going to be able

0:40:23.280 --> 0:40:26.320
<v Speaker 1>to taste the poison that the cook adds to his stew,

0:40:26.840 --> 0:40:30.040
<v Speaker 1>which comes in the form of quote, the scarlet flesh

0:40:30.040 --> 0:40:33.040
<v Speaker 1>of a fruit of a variety of the deadly nightshade.

0:40:34.400 --> 0:40:37.239
<v Speaker 1>And then, after serving what he assumes to be the

0:40:37.280 --> 0:40:40.440
<v Speaker 1>deadly poison, the cook writes a ps to his suicide

0:40:40.480 --> 0:40:44.040
<v Speaker 1>note quote, as a cook, I have a prejudice against

0:40:44.080 --> 0:40:47.560
<v Speaker 1>dying by poison. I am too corpulent to hang. But

0:40:47.680 --> 0:40:50.440
<v Speaker 1>by reason of my calling, I am expert with a

0:40:50.480 --> 0:40:53.759
<v Speaker 1>carving knife. So it is alleged that he takes his

0:40:53.800 --> 0:40:56.320
<v Speaker 1>own life somehow with the aid of a carving knife.

0:40:56.800 --> 0:40:59.040
<v Speaker 1>And then, of course, I think the reader is just

0:40:59.120 --> 0:41:01.760
<v Speaker 1>left to assume that this guy's scheme does not work

0:41:01.840 --> 0:41:05.520
<v Speaker 1>because the poison does not work, because it is a tomato.

0:41:05.680 --> 0:41:10.160
<v Speaker 1>That's great, but no basis in history whatsoever. It sounds

0:41:10.160 --> 0:41:12.200
<v Speaker 1>like the author was merely having fun with some of

0:41:12.200 --> 0:41:14.680
<v Speaker 1>these very these very topics that we've been discussing here.

0:41:15.000 --> 0:41:16.600
<v Speaker 1>All right, on that note, we're going to take one

0:41:16.600 --> 0:41:19.320
<v Speaker 1>more break, but when we come back, we will discuss

0:41:19.680 --> 0:41:26.680
<v Speaker 1>the killer tomato worm. Thank alright, we're back now, Robert.

0:41:26.719 --> 0:41:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Before we went to the break, did you say something

0:41:28.640 --> 0:41:34.000
<v Speaker 1>about a killer tomato worm? Yes, killer tomato worms, which

0:41:34.000 --> 0:41:38.640
<v Speaker 1>is another interesting area that combines like actual um actual

0:41:38.920 --> 0:41:43.680
<v Speaker 1>in this case, entomological fact with a fair amount of

0:41:44.360 --> 0:41:48.520
<v Speaker 1>myth making here. Uh and and just uh, you know, superstition.

0:41:48.560 --> 0:41:51.319
<v Speaker 1>I guess. So it is a fact of life that

0:41:51.360 --> 0:41:54.560
<v Speaker 1>if you're going to raise some crops, uh, you're going

0:41:54.560 --> 0:41:57.200
<v Speaker 1>to have to deal with other organisms that also want

0:41:57.280 --> 0:42:01.000
<v Speaker 1>to eat said crops. And uh, again, we've been growing

0:42:01.000 --> 0:42:03.600
<v Speaker 1>some tomatoes in our own backyard here. So so we've

0:42:03.719 --> 0:42:06.560
<v Speaker 1>gotten used to this. As again we're growing tomatoes. We

0:42:06.600 --> 0:42:11.120
<v Speaker 1>also have some volunteer summertime pumpkins from our compost. We

0:42:11.160 --> 0:42:12.719
<v Speaker 1>didn't know what they were gonna be. It turns out

0:42:12.920 --> 0:42:18.840
<v Speaker 1>they're useless pumpkins, but they're still fun. Are pumpkins useless? Well,

0:42:19.040 --> 0:42:22.560
<v Speaker 1>most of these are those little ornamental pumpkins, uh, you

0:42:22.600 --> 0:42:25.720
<v Speaker 1>know the kind uh that you you buy around um

0:42:26.040 --> 0:42:28.799
<v Speaker 1>Halloween and you set out for decoration and you put

0:42:28.880 --> 0:42:31.919
<v Speaker 1>on the basket on the down dining room table. Um.

0:42:32.120 --> 0:42:34.440
<v Speaker 1>That's what's been growing in our backyard. But can you

0:42:34.640 --> 0:42:38.040
<v Speaker 1>can can you imagine a future culture that looks back

0:42:38.120 --> 0:42:41.040
<v Speaker 1>on us with the same disdain that we had for

0:42:41.080 --> 0:42:45.240
<v Speaker 1>people who would have grown tomatoes and eggplants only as decorations,

0:42:45.360 --> 0:42:48.879
<v Speaker 1>and they think that about us about pumpkins. It's true,

0:42:48.880 --> 0:42:50.640
<v Speaker 1>I may be completely off on this. I could be

0:42:50.680 --> 0:42:54.160
<v Speaker 1>wasting these um like. It does remind me of a

0:42:54.200 --> 0:42:57.440
<v Speaker 1>time when I was helping deliver for a c. S

0:42:57.480 --> 0:43:01.520
<v Speaker 1>A here in in our area. And you know, so

0:43:01.560 --> 0:43:03.879
<v Speaker 1>I would we would volunteer and we would would get

0:43:03.920 --> 0:43:07.360
<v Speaker 1>like a free basket of vegetables in return for our service,

0:43:07.680 --> 0:43:10.960
<v Speaker 1>but we would deliver baskets of fresh vegetables to various households,

0:43:11.480 --> 0:43:13.200
<v Speaker 1>and there's a lot of good stuff in there. There's

0:43:13.200 --> 0:43:15.239
<v Speaker 1>stuff like sun chokes that I don't think I've ever

0:43:15.280 --> 0:43:18.560
<v Speaker 1>had before. Um. But then we would also have a

0:43:18.560 --> 0:43:20.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of squash, and one of them I particularly remember.

0:43:20.560 --> 0:43:24.879
<v Speaker 1>They were acorn squash, which can be quite delicious. And

0:43:24.960 --> 0:43:28.400
<v Speaker 1>I delivered one week to this household, and then the

0:43:28.440 --> 0:43:32.319
<v Speaker 1>next week when I came back, there were the acorn squash, uh,

0:43:32.520 --> 0:43:35.040
<v Speaker 1>not served up inside in a dish, but on the

0:43:35.080 --> 0:43:38.320
<v Speaker 1>porch as decorations. And I was thinking, oh my god,

0:43:38.360 --> 0:43:40.440
<v Speaker 1>those are so delicious and you're just gonna use them

0:43:40.440 --> 0:43:44.640
<v Speaker 1>as porch decorations. Did they carve a jackal interface into

0:43:44.719 --> 0:43:46.440
<v Speaker 1>them at least? No, No, just they just set them

0:43:46.440 --> 0:43:50.279
<v Speaker 1>out there. But it's possible I'm doing the same thing

0:43:50.320 --> 0:43:53.319
<v Speaker 1>with my summertime pumpkins. UM. So I do I do

0:43:53.400 --> 0:43:56.680
<v Speaker 1>not know, um, But at any rate, growing all this

0:43:56.680 --> 0:44:00.480
<v Speaker 1>stuff in the backyard, um, other organisms are interested. Various

0:44:00.560 --> 0:44:02.839
<v Speaker 1>bugs make a go at it. The squirrels, I think,

0:44:02.840 --> 0:44:05.160
<v Speaker 1>get a little bit bored and we'll eat like part

0:44:05.280 --> 0:44:07.920
<v Speaker 1>of something here and there. And we've also even had

0:44:07.920 --> 0:44:10.359
<v Speaker 1>a rabbit shown up, show up which has been a

0:44:10.400 --> 0:44:12.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of fun because you get anytime you get to

0:44:12.080 --> 0:44:14.600
<v Speaker 1>watch a rabbit in your own yard. Uh, that's kind

0:44:14.640 --> 0:44:16.839
<v Speaker 1>of magical, at least for me. Yeah, they'll they'll gnaw

0:44:16.920 --> 0:44:19.080
<v Speaker 1>on your fruits, but they bring bunny magic with them

0:44:19.080 --> 0:44:23.399
<v Speaker 1>in return. They're they're fun to watch, they're cute. Um.

0:44:23.440 --> 0:44:25.879
<v Speaker 1>But but then there's there's a different pest we're gonna

0:44:25.880 --> 0:44:29.560
<v Speaker 1>be talking about here and um, and it's it's quite interesting.

0:44:29.600 --> 0:44:33.840
<v Speaker 1>According to Smith, there's no beating the large green tomato worm,

0:44:34.280 --> 0:44:37.320
<v Speaker 1>an alarming pest that is three to four inches long

0:44:37.480 --> 0:44:39.440
<v Speaker 1>or can grow the three to four inches long. And

0:44:39.480 --> 0:44:42.960
<v Speaker 1>it has this weird horn sticking out of its back,

0:44:43.160 --> 0:44:46.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of out of the final portion of its body.

0:44:46.920 --> 0:44:48.759
<v Speaker 1>And uh, I've included a picture here for you to

0:44:48.800 --> 0:44:51.920
<v Speaker 1>look at, Joe. It's it's really quite impressive, right. It

0:44:52.040 --> 0:44:56.439
<v Speaker 1>is generally not spiky. It just has one giant buttthorn. Yeah,

0:44:56.480 --> 0:45:00.680
<v Speaker 1>that has kind of a crimson or scarlet color to it,

0:45:01.320 --> 0:45:06.040
<v Speaker 1>as if it has already like stabbed a muppet or something. Anyway,

0:45:06.080 --> 0:45:08.880
<v Speaker 1>it is, so it's pretty impressive. It's closely related to

0:45:08.880 --> 0:45:11.439
<v Speaker 1>the tobacco worms, So if you've seen one or the other,

0:45:11.719 --> 0:45:13.560
<v Speaker 1>you may have an idea where I'm talking about here.

0:45:14.400 --> 0:45:17.799
<v Speaker 1>Smith points out that Ralph Waldo Emerson even bemoaned these

0:45:17.880 --> 0:45:22.720
<v Speaker 1>quote young entomologies that we're eating up his tomato plants.

0:45:23.080 --> 0:45:27.480
<v Speaker 1>So this particular, these particular worms, they are the larval

0:45:27.600 --> 0:45:31.239
<v Speaker 1>stage of the five spotted hawk moth, and it is

0:45:31.280 --> 0:45:34.799
<v Speaker 1>in fact a different species from the tobacco hornworm. But

0:45:34.920 --> 0:45:38.040
<v Speaker 1>they're closely related. And the confusing thing is that both

0:45:38.400 --> 0:45:42.040
<v Speaker 1>organisms feed on a variety of species that include both

0:45:42.080 --> 0:45:45.880
<v Speaker 1>tomato and tobacco leaves. Oh interesting, but they got what

0:45:45.960 --> 0:45:49.200
<v Speaker 1>different kind of specialties? Uh? Yeah? Or just one is

0:45:49.239 --> 0:45:51.319
<v Speaker 1>in one is more associated with tomatoes and one is

0:45:51.320 --> 0:45:55.160
<v Speaker 1>more associated with tobacco. But they'll, you know, either one

0:45:55.200 --> 0:45:58.799
<v Speaker 1>will eat the leaves of both plants. Now, will will

0:45:59.120 --> 0:46:03.120
<v Speaker 1>strip your nerve screamingly raw? Yes? Apparently so, or at

0:46:03.160 --> 0:46:04.880
<v Speaker 1>least that seems to have been the panic around them

0:46:04.920 --> 0:46:09.000
<v Speaker 1>back in the uh certainly the mid nineteenth century. Apparently

0:46:09.000 --> 0:46:12.560
<v Speaker 1>in eighteen forty five New York Farmers Club report described

0:46:12.600 --> 0:46:19.000
<v Speaker 1>them as quote positively shocking to weak nerves. Well, I

0:46:19.040 --> 0:46:20.920
<v Speaker 1>think there are a lot of weak nerves back then.

0:46:22.400 --> 0:46:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Smith has a bit more on this. You just have

0:46:24.680 --> 0:46:27.840
<v Speaker 1>to read in in the book. But but he includes

0:46:27.920 --> 0:46:30.759
<v Speaker 1>these quotations where people were talking about how like the

0:46:30.760 --> 0:46:34.880
<v Speaker 1>worm just ruins tomatoes for them forever, Like they're just

0:46:34.920 --> 0:46:36.839
<v Speaker 1>like they're just too gross. I'm not even going into

0:46:36.880 --> 0:46:39.680
<v Speaker 1>my tomato garden ever again. Oh I see you like

0:46:39.760 --> 0:46:42.319
<v Speaker 1>you see the worm once, it like turns you off

0:46:42.360 --> 0:46:45.799
<v Speaker 1>of the entire fruit. Right. But on top of that,

0:46:46.200 --> 0:46:49.480
<v Speaker 1>some even considered it to be poisonous as well, including

0:46:49.520 --> 0:46:53.440
<v Speaker 1>such claims that the bite could cause instant death, or

0:46:53.480 --> 0:46:56.240
<v Speaker 1>that the spittle, the mere spittle from one of these

0:46:56.320 --> 0:47:00.600
<v Speaker 1>creatures could kill a small child dead. Um, so it's

0:47:00.640 --> 0:47:02.560
<v Speaker 1>it's like, it's not only is is it like a

0:47:02.560 --> 0:47:06.840
<v Speaker 1>foul creature to behold? Buddy? It befouls the entire tomato

0:47:06.960 --> 0:47:10.080
<v Speaker 1>garden and makes it a dangerous place in which to venture.

0:47:10.440 --> 0:47:14.760
<v Speaker 1>So is there any truth to this? Where's this coming from? Uh?

0:47:14.800 --> 0:47:17.600
<v Speaker 1>The thing is apparently not. The idea ran rampant through

0:47:17.680 --> 0:47:20.960
<v Speaker 1>the late nineteenth century until you had an Illinois based

0:47:21.000 --> 0:47:24.719
<v Speaker 1>intomologist by the name of Benjamin Walsh who pointed out

0:47:24.840 --> 0:47:27.000
<v Speaker 1>and apparently this made the papers and all saying like, look,

0:47:27.040 --> 0:47:29.799
<v Speaker 1>this is hard, this is harmless to humans. This is

0:47:29.840 --> 0:47:33.040
<v Speaker 1>not going to kill you. This is. It's a past. Yes,

0:47:33.400 --> 0:47:35.600
<v Speaker 1>it's maybe a little big, it's a little maybe alarming

0:47:35.640 --> 0:47:38.600
<v Speaker 1>to look at, but it's not going to poison you. Uh. Though,

0:47:38.600 --> 0:47:41.879
<v Speaker 1>as Smith points out, you still you had publications uh

0:47:42.000 --> 0:47:47.200
<v Speaker 1>in um Illinois based papers pointing out Walsh's um uh

0:47:47.520 --> 0:47:50.400
<v Speaker 1>facts here. But then you had other columns where people

0:47:50.400 --> 0:47:52.680
<v Speaker 1>were saying, oh, there was a girl that was killed

0:47:52.680 --> 0:47:55.239
<v Speaker 1>by one of these tomato worms. So it took a

0:47:55.239 --> 0:47:57.680
<v Speaker 1>while for this idea to really go away. Yeah, my

0:47:57.800 --> 0:48:03.640
<v Speaker 1>roommates cousin's friend died from tomato hornworm. Yeah, now I've

0:48:03.640 --> 0:48:06.560
<v Speaker 1>got another poison tomato rabbit hole to run down here,

0:48:06.719 --> 0:48:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Because I was trying to think, okay, well, what if

0:48:09.080 --> 0:48:12.680
<v Speaker 1>you do want to poison somebody with a tomato allah

0:48:12.760 --> 0:48:16.440
<v Speaker 1>the you know, the early European misunderstandings, or or the

0:48:16.480 --> 0:48:19.719
<v Speaker 1>fictional account of George Washington's cook. I do have a

0:48:19.760 --> 0:48:24.080
<v Speaker 1>possible candidate for you. It's not confirmed how lethal this

0:48:24.160 --> 0:48:27.960
<v Speaker 1>tomato would be, but it's at least suspected with good reason,

0:48:28.480 --> 0:48:33.880
<v Speaker 1>and that candidate is the tomaco now. Weirdly, whereas the

0:48:33.920 --> 0:48:39.000
<v Speaker 1>George Washington story takes a historically factual misunderstanding as the

0:48:39.040 --> 0:48:44.040
<v Speaker 1>inspiration for fiction. This story takes a modern fiction as

0:48:44.080 --> 0:48:47.560
<v Speaker 1>the inspiration for a fact. So there's an episode of

0:48:47.600 --> 0:48:52.760
<v Speaker 1>The Simpsons that aired in called Ei Ei Annoyed Grunt

0:48:52.960 --> 0:48:56.279
<v Speaker 1>as an e I E I dough uh. And in

0:48:56.440 --> 0:49:00.360
<v Speaker 1>this episode, Homer I guess he's trying his hand at arming,

0:49:00.840 --> 0:49:04.600
<v Speaker 1>and he attempts to farm tomatoes and tobacco plants, but

0:49:04.800 --> 0:49:08.600
<v Speaker 1>he fertilizes his crops with plutonium from the nuclear power plant,

0:49:09.239 --> 0:49:11.800
<v Speaker 1>and this produces a hybrid plant that is basically a

0:49:11.880 --> 0:49:17.120
<v Speaker 1>tomato stuffed with tobacco, which tastes bad but is highly addictive.

0:49:17.160 --> 0:49:20.840
<v Speaker 1>I think Bart says it's so refreshingly addictive, and he

0:49:20.960 --> 0:49:24.680
<v Speaker 1>sells it as tomacco and everybody gets addicted to it.

0:49:24.760 --> 0:49:26.960
<v Speaker 1>And then I think there's some calamity where where all

0:49:27.040 --> 0:49:30.680
<v Speaker 1>his crops are destroyed. Okay, I'd forgotten about this episode,

0:49:30.719 --> 0:49:32.680
<v Speaker 1>but now that you summarize it, I do remember it.

0:49:33.239 --> 0:49:37.000
<v Speaker 1>But apparently reality caught up because I was reading a

0:49:37.080 --> 0:49:40.640
<v Speaker 1>report in Wired from November of two thousand three by

0:49:40.719 --> 0:49:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Kristen Philip Cooski, and it was about a man named

0:49:44.880 --> 0:49:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Rob Bauer of Lake Oswego, Oregon. Now Bauer I believe

0:49:49.680 --> 0:49:53.799
<v Speaker 1>he worked in wastewater management, and he had some scientific training, uh,

0:49:53.920 --> 0:49:59.360
<v Speaker 1>and he remembered reading about a similar procedure when he

0:49:59.560 --> 0:50:02.320
<v Speaker 1>had been in college, when I think when he was

0:50:02.360 --> 0:50:05.880
<v Speaker 1>in graduate school, and he decided to try to create

0:50:06.320 --> 0:50:10.239
<v Speaker 1>such a plant in reality, which he did by grafting

0:50:10.320 --> 0:50:14.320
<v Speaker 1>together a tomato plant and a tobacco plant. Apparently he

0:50:14.440 --> 0:50:19.279
<v Speaker 1>initially experimented with with grafting in in one direction, which

0:50:19.400 --> 0:50:22.160
<v Speaker 1>was putting a tobacco plant on a tomato root, but

0:50:22.239 --> 0:50:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the graft didn't take and when he removed the wrapping

0:50:24.880 --> 0:50:27.000
<v Speaker 1>that held them together, the plant kind of fell apart

0:50:27.080 --> 0:50:30.680
<v Speaker 1>and died. But the inverst grafting procedure did work. He

0:50:30.760 --> 0:50:34.720
<v Speaker 1>put a tomato plant on a tobacco root, and Bauer

0:50:34.880 --> 0:50:39.239
<v Speaker 1>claims that this process was successful and the tomato plant

0:50:39.280 --> 0:50:43.160
<v Speaker 1>with the tobacco roots actually bore fruit, though nobody ate

0:50:43.239 --> 0:50:46.240
<v Speaker 1>the fruit because he suspected it was at least possible

0:50:46.680 --> 0:50:49.480
<v Speaker 1>that one of these tomatoes could contain a lethal amount

0:50:49.520 --> 0:50:53.800
<v Speaker 1>of nicotine. Oh wow, Well, on one hand, it's alarming,

0:50:54.200 --> 0:50:55.719
<v Speaker 1>but on the other hand it's I guess it's not

0:50:55.760 --> 0:50:59.200
<v Speaker 1>completely surprising because tobacco is a part of this large

0:50:59.320 --> 0:51:02.319
<v Speaker 1>night shade fan point. Yeah, exactly, and that's probably why, yeah,

0:51:02.400 --> 0:51:05.759
<v Speaker 1>why the grafting worked out. Uh. So, to be clear,

0:51:06.120 --> 0:51:08.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't I couldn't find any evidence that it was

0:51:08.040 --> 0:51:11.200
<v Speaker 1>ever confirmed that the tomato itself would have been poisonous

0:51:11.239 --> 0:51:13.400
<v Speaker 1>with the lethal amount of nicotine. But it seems like

0:51:13.520 --> 0:51:16.200
<v Speaker 1>a reasonable thing to worry about, at least good reason

0:51:16.360 --> 0:51:20.080
<v Speaker 1>enough not to eat the tomato. Uh And Bower, speaking

0:51:20.160 --> 0:51:23.040
<v Speaker 1>to Wire, had said, quote, I've got this one plant

0:51:23.120 --> 0:51:26.840
<v Speaker 1>growing and it's blooming again. I accidentally left the tomacco

0:51:27.040 --> 0:51:29.719
<v Speaker 1>on the kitchen table, and my wife yelled at me,

0:51:30.040 --> 0:51:32.359
<v Speaker 1>get that thing out of the kitchen, you knuckle head,

0:51:32.719 --> 0:51:37.680
<v Speaker 1>because it looks like a regular tomato. Yeah, don't leave

0:51:37.760 --> 0:51:41.640
<v Speaker 1>your secret poison tomatoes just laying around. But but as

0:51:41.680 --> 0:51:44.360
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned earlier, Bauer was apparently not the first person

0:51:44.440 --> 0:51:47.120
<v Speaker 1>to try this plant hybridization. He he mentioned that he

0:51:47.200 --> 0:51:50.280
<v Speaker 1>had actually read about this when he was in college,

0:51:50.640 --> 0:51:52.960
<v Speaker 1>I think, in an article that was published in Scientific

0:51:53.000 --> 0:51:56.600
<v Speaker 1>American in nineteen fifty nine that described a similar procedure

0:51:57.000 --> 0:52:01.600
<v Speaker 1>to what end. I'm not exactly sure. I don't know

0:52:01.719 --> 0:52:04.520
<v Speaker 1>what what you really gain by creating a tomato that

0:52:04.680 --> 0:52:07.600
<v Speaker 1>possibly has nicotine in it, I mean, and that's probably

0:52:07.680 --> 0:52:10.440
<v Speaker 1>ultimately the reason you don't see a tremendous amount of

0:52:10.480 --> 0:52:12.080
<v Speaker 1>effort going to this, right, I mean, like, what is

0:52:12.120 --> 0:52:15.120
<v Speaker 1>the payoff? What's the incentive? Perhaps there's some I just

0:52:15.200 --> 0:52:17.839
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I couldn't find anything else about that. But hey,

0:52:17.920 --> 0:52:20.120
<v Speaker 1>if you know of a good reason to create a

0:52:20.280 --> 0:52:23.719
<v Speaker 1>tomato tobacco hybrid right in, let us know. All right,

0:52:23.760 --> 0:52:26.440
<v Speaker 1>well we've reached the point we're gonna have to stop

0:52:26.920 --> 0:52:29.840
<v Speaker 1>and uh and come back in another episode to continue

0:52:29.920 --> 0:52:33.799
<v Speaker 1>our exploration of the tomato. But but real quick, Joe, Uh,

0:52:34.000 --> 0:52:36.560
<v Speaker 1>fresh tomatoes are in your kitchen. What's what's one of

0:52:36.640 --> 0:52:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the first dishes you think you'll you would try to make?

0:52:39.680 --> 0:52:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Like what something is popular right now in your household

0:52:41.880 --> 0:52:44.879
<v Speaker 1>with tomatoes? Oh? Answer to that is extremely easy. Um

0:52:45.400 --> 0:52:48.439
<v Speaker 1>toast with a little bit of mayonnaise with tomato on top,

0:52:48.640 --> 0:52:52.720
<v Speaker 1>salt and pepper, I mean, unbeatable, Like just tomato sandwich

0:52:52.800 --> 0:52:55.920
<v Speaker 1>with mayonnaise is the most delicious thing if it's a

0:52:55.960 --> 0:52:58.720
<v Speaker 1>good ripe summer tomato. Also just a good ripe summer

0:52:58.760 --> 0:53:02.279
<v Speaker 1>tomatoes sliced with like olive oil, salt and pepper, maybe

0:53:02.320 --> 0:53:04.920
<v Speaker 1>a bit of torn basil leaves. I mean, keep it simple,

0:53:05.160 --> 0:53:08.360
<v Speaker 1>a good ripe summer tomato is it's like a steak.

0:53:08.600 --> 0:53:12.200
<v Speaker 1>It's a dish unto itself. Yeah, that sounds great. I mean,

0:53:12.200 --> 0:53:13.759
<v Speaker 1>it reminds me that one of the things we like

0:53:13.880 --> 0:53:16.319
<v Speaker 1>to do here at our house is make a sort

0:53:16.360 --> 0:53:19.600
<v Speaker 1>of b LT. We don't we don't eat bacon anymore,

0:53:19.680 --> 0:53:23.160
<v Speaker 1>but we will will use um like store bought soysage

0:53:23.600 --> 0:53:26.000
<v Speaker 1>like you get from like Morning Star or t J's

0:53:26.239 --> 0:53:28.200
<v Speaker 1>put that on there instead of bacon, and with a

0:53:28.280 --> 0:53:31.760
<v Speaker 1>really good tomato. It's fabulous. I've actually been wondering about

0:53:32.040 --> 0:53:35.120
<v Speaker 1>trying to create a vegetarian version of a b LT

0:53:35.640 --> 0:53:37.400
<v Speaker 1>and some of the ideas that came across for the

0:53:37.440 --> 0:53:40.960
<v Speaker 1>bacon substitute, where like um uh sort of dried out

0:53:41.080 --> 0:53:45.080
<v Speaker 1>charred strips of eggplant or smoked strips of eggplant, but

0:53:45.160 --> 0:53:47.600
<v Speaker 1>then also just the idea of using like smoked tempe.

0:53:48.160 --> 0:53:51.000
<v Speaker 1>That sounds good. It sounds good. All right, we're gonna

0:53:51.120 --> 0:53:54.120
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna close out then, but obviously we want you

0:53:54.239 --> 0:53:56.920
<v Speaker 1>to come back for the next episode on Tomatoes, and

0:53:57.239 --> 0:54:00.480
<v Speaker 1>in the meantime you can certainly right in and give

0:54:00.520 --> 0:54:04.960
<v Speaker 1>some feedback on the journey thus far, share some insight

0:54:05.080 --> 0:54:09.200
<v Speaker 1>based on your own experience with tomato growing with tomato consumption.

0:54:09.840 --> 0:54:11.920
<v Speaker 1>We'd love to hear from you. If you want to

0:54:11.960 --> 0:54:13.839
<v Speaker 1>check out other episodes of Stuff to Blow Your Mind?

0:54:14.040 --> 0:54:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Do you know where to find us? Absolutely anywhere you

0:54:16.400 --> 0:54:19.160
<v Speaker 1>get your podcasts and wherever that happens to be. Make

0:54:19.200 --> 0:54:22.960
<v Speaker 1>sure you rate, review and subscribe huge thanks as always

0:54:23.000 --> 0:54:26.200
<v Speaker 1>to our excellent audio producer Seth Nicholas Johnson. If you

0:54:26.200 --> 0:54:28.120
<v Speaker 1>would like to get in touch with us with feedback

0:54:28.200 --> 0:54:30.520
<v Speaker 1>on this episode or any other, to suggest a topic

0:54:30.600 --> 0:54:33.120
<v Speaker 1>for the future, just to say hello, you can email

0:54:33.200 --> 0:54:36.279
<v Speaker 1>us at contact at stuff to blow your Mind dot com.

0:54:44.080 --> 0:54:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of I Heart Radio.

0:54:46.920 --> 0:54:49.240
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts for my heart Radio, visit the iHeart

0:54:49.280 --> 0:54:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you're listening to your

0:54:52.040 --> 0:55:08.560
<v Speaker 1>favorite shows pasco I thought, I thought A five