WEBVTT - Goldman to Cut About 3,200 Jobs This Week

0:00:01.840 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Tim Stanevik. We're here every day bringing you the latest

0:00:06.840 --> 0:00:11.000
<v Speaker 1>news from the world's of business and finance, clus technology, politics, economics,

0:00:11.039 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>all harnessing the power of Business Week reporters and editors,

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>not to mention our journalists and analyst in more than

0:00:17.040 --> 0:00:19.960
<v Speaker 1>one and twenty countries. You can download Bloomberg Business Week

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:22.880
<v Speaker 1>on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot com. You can also

0:00:22.880 --> 0:00:25.000
<v Speaker 1>listen to our radio show at two pm Eastern Time

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio or stream us live on YouTube and

0:00:28.240 --> 0:00:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com. Well, it is the most read story

0:00:31.840 --> 0:00:34.040
<v Speaker 1>on the Bloomberg terminal over the last eight hours. It's

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:37.040
<v Speaker 1>a Bloomberg exclusive. Goldman Sachs embarking on one of its

0:00:37.120 --> 0:00:39.760
<v Speaker 1>biggest rounds of job cuts ever, as it locks in

0:00:39.800 --> 0:00:42.839
<v Speaker 1>on a plan to eliminate about thirty two hundred positions

0:00:42.920 --> 0:00:46.120
<v Speaker 1>just this week, the bank's leadership going deeper than rivals

0:00:46.159 --> 0:00:49.040
<v Speaker 1>to shed jobs. It's expected to start the process midweek.

0:00:49.240 --> 0:00:52.080
<v Speaker 1>The total number will not exceed thirty two d according

0:00:52.080 --> 0:00:55.160
<v Speaker 1>to people with knowledge of the matter. With us now,

0:00:55.360 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 1>we've got Bloomberg News Finance Team leader Sally Bakewell, she's

0:00:58.760 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 1>in the Bloomberg Interactive broke his studio with us. Sally,

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:04.440
<v Speaker 1>good to have you with us this afternoon. What does

0:01:04.480 --> 0:01:07.360
<v Speaker 1>our investing audience need to understand about these job cuts

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:09.399
<v Speaker 1>that are going to happen at Goldman Sachs. I think

0:01:09.400 --> 0:01:11.679
<v Speaker 1>there are two things. So. First of all, Goldman has

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:14.600
<v Speaker 1>not been immune to these forces that are impacting all

0:01:14.720 --> 0:01:17.399
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street banks. They're all trying to contain this slump

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:21.320
<v Speaker 1>in profit and revenue um owing to tightening monetary conditions,

0:01:21.360 --> 0:01:24.640
<v Speaker 1>which is slowing down deal activity UM. And you know

0:01:24.680 --> 0:01:27.840
<v Speaker 1>it's really causing some key Wall Street profit engines to

0:01:27.880 --> 0:01:30.840
<v Speaker 1>splutter um. And we've seen other banks let go of

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:34.399
<v Speaker 1>staff Morgan Stanley, Credit, sweez Barcleys, They've all either fired

0:01:34.440 --> 0:01:37.640
<v Speaker 1>staff or announced that they plan to do so. But

0:01:37.800 --> 0:01:40.280
<v Speaker 1>with Goldman, they have some more specific things here, and

0:01:40.280 --> 0:01:43.560
<v Speaker 1>indeed they have gone deeper than their rivals in this pullback,

0:01:43.600 --> 0:01:47.040
<v Speaker 1>at least for now. UM. They're contending with some other things.

0:01:47.040 --> 0:01:50.720
<v Speaker 1>For example, they made this very costly expansion into consumer

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:54.240
<v Speaker 1>bank banking, which left that unit with deep losses. This

0:01:54.360 --> 0:01:57.760
<v Speaker 1>is the Marcus unit, Alan Sacks exactly UM. And ultimately

0:01:57.760 --> 0:02:01.560
<v Speaker 1>in October that unit was apped into a new business

0:02:01.560 --> 0:02:06.320
<v Speaker 1>which they have called platform Solutions, and UM Shreda reported

0:02:06.520 --> 0:02:11.120
<v Speaker 1>this unit is poised to report that it's it's recorded

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 1>more than two billion in pretext losses. So Goldman is

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:16.720
<v Speaker 1>facing forces in the market that all Wall Street banks

0:02:16.720 --> 0:02:19.320
<v Speaker 1>are forcing facing, but it's contending with a few other things.

0:02:19.360 --> 0:02:22.880
<v Speaker 1>And it also had um surging head count since twenty eighteen,

0:02:23.760 --> 0:02:27.400
<v Speaker 1>and no doubt these cuts have kind of walked back

0:02:27.480 --> 0:02:30.320
<v Speaker 1>some of some of that. Well, that's that's what I

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:32.120
<v Speaker 1>was about to ask about, how much of this is

0:02:32.200 --> 0:02:34.760
<v Speaker 1>really something that we should be worried about as kind

0:02:34.800 --> 0:02:36.240
<v Speaker 1>of a canary in the coal mine for some sort

0:02:36.280 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 1>of broader macroeconomic outlook when they have that kind of

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:41.639
<v Speaker 1>bloated head count to begin with, I think we're looking

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 1>at a number here of head counts down thirty four

0:02:44.240 --> 0:02:48.120
<v Speaker 1>percent of the end of eighteen, about four fifty people

0:02:48.320 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 1>as of September. So that's that's a lot of people,

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:56.240
<v Speaker 1>it is. And those years included the pandemic, of course,

0:02:56.320 --> 0:03:00.359
<v Speaker 1>where banks tried not to UM let go of any

0:03:00.400 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 1>staff during that incredibly difficult time, and so we started

0:03:04.320 --> 0:03:07.239
<v Speaker 1>to see that when that period ended, UM and those

0:03:07.320 --> 0:03:10.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of moratoriums ended that they have started to let

0:03:10.160 --> 0:03:13.720
<v Speaker 1>go of people. Um. When we speak to the banks,

0:03:14.080 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 1>the message we often get is that this is more

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 1>normal trimming around the edges, and it's kind of a

0:03:19.600 --> 0:03:23.000
<v Speaker 1>return to those annual culls um that they used to

0:03:23.080 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 1>do of underperformers. But I think with Goldman Sacks owing

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:29.840
<v Speaker 1>to these more idiosyncratic things, UM, it's a little bit

0:03:30.040 --> 0:03:31.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's why they have had to go a

0:03:31.720 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 1>little bit further than some of their rivals. Yeah. So,

0:03:34.320 --> 0:03:37.680
<v Speaker 1>so talk about the consumer banking element of this because

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 1>and you know you mentioned this story that's exclusit by Shrinadarajan.

0:03:41.400 --> 0:03:43.640
<v Speaker 1>We've talked to him at length about it in the past,

0:03:43.760 --> 0:03:48.160
<v Speaker 1>but we can't look past the weakness there. And I

0:03:48.200 --> 0:03:50.400
<v Speaker 1>mean what some analysts would say is, I don't want

0:03:50.400 --> 0:03:52.480
<v Speaker 1>to call it a mistake, but it certainly didn't work

0:03:52.480 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 1>out the way that Goldman Sachs wanted it to. That's right, UM.

0:03:56.000 --> 0:03:58.360
<v Speaker 1>And Solomon, you know, he's said that they have been

0:03:58.520 --> 0:04:02.480
<v Speaker 1>dialing back their ambitions for the consumer banking UM unit

0:04:03.000 --> 0:04:06.400
<v Speaker 1>and signaled that they're reviewing other business lines to manage

0:04:06.440 --> 0:04:11.120
<v Speaker 1>headcount and limit costs. UM. How much we can pinpoint

0:04:11.680 --> 0:04:15.840
<v Speaker 1>UM that episode UM as a result as resulting in

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:19.880
<v Speaker 1>these cuts is a bit unclear, and maybe it's stepping

0:04:19.920 --> 0:04:22.280
<v Speaker 1>too far to to do so. And you know, the

0:04:22.320 --> 0:04:26.119
<v Speaker 1>bank still continues plans to continue hiring UM. A Street

0:04:26.160 --> 0:04:30.640
<v Speaker 1>reports it it will hire, including for the regular analyst

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 1>class later this year. UM. But I think, yeah, Goldman's

0:04:35.000 --> 0:04:39.320
<v Speaker 1>consumer banking for a UM, just the difficulty UM, the

0:04:39.800 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 1>in getting something like that, something so ambitious and huge

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:47.320
<v Speaker 1>up and running UM and the kind of regulatory perspective

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:49.880
<v Speaker 1>for doing that, the need to the sort of things

0:04:49.960 --> 0:04:52.720
<v Speaker 1>that come with consumer banking that it needed to have

0:04:52.839 --> 0:04:56.080
<v Speaker 1>in place were just perhaps a bridge too far. And

0:04:56.160 --> 0:04:58.120
<v Speaker 1>what about at the very top when we're talking about

0:04:58.200 --> 0:05:00.760
<v Speaker 1>David Solomon, James Warman. The is kind of folks, what

0:05:00.960 --> 0:05:05.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of consequences or are there any hits that they take, oh,

0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:08.080
<v Speaker 1>hits that they take from this? No doubt they're getting

0:05:08.120 --> 0:05:10.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of questions, and no doubt a lot of

0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:16.520
<v Speaker 1>senior leadership are pretty unhappy. Because of course, UM Investment,

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:20.240
<v Speaker 1>the investment bankers are not expecting to get particularly good

0:05:20.480 --> 0:05:25.159
<v Speaker 1>bonuses this year, and those compensation discussions will happen about

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:27.600
<v Speaker 1>a week from now and again, that is something that

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:31.480
<v Speaker 1>is the same across Wall Street. Um. But the consumer

0:05:31.600 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 1>banking issue fed into and bled into a lot of um,

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:38.480
<v Speaker 1>the other sort of business lines at banks, and they've

0:05:38.560 --> 0:05:39.920
<v Speaker 1>ended up kind of having to take a bit of

0:05:39.960 --> 0:05:42.880
<v Speaker 1>a hit for it. UM. So I'm sure questions are

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:45.120
<v Speaker 1>pretty rife right now. All right, Sally bag Well, we

0:05:45.200 --> 0:05:46.800
<v Speaker 1>love it when you join us. Thank you so much

0:05:47.000 --> 0:05:50.760
<v Speaker 1>for taking the time. Check out Sharinadar Rajin's story Goldman

0:05:50.800 --> 0:05:54.719
<v Speaker 1>to cut about thirty jobs this week after a cost review. Again,

0:05:54.760 --> 0:05:57.480
<v Speaker 1>it's a Bloomberg exclusive. It's among the most read on

0:05:57.760 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg terminal. These sees Bloomberg Business Week with Carol

0:06:02.440 --> 0:06:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Messer and Tim Stanovic on Bloomberg Radio. Well, the forthcoming

0:06:06.960 --> 0:06:09.560
<v Speaker 1>issue of Bloomberg Business Week, it's the year Ahead issue.

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 1>It's on news stands later this week. But right now

0:06:11.839 --> 0:06:13.640
<v Speaker 1>you can read one of my favorite features that the

0:06:13.720 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 1>magazine does each year. It's on the Bloomberg terminal and

0:06:15.920 --> 0:06:19.000
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash business Week. The features based

0:06:19.080 --> 0:06:21.640
<v Speaker 1>on tapping into the excellent team of analysts that we

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:25.159
<v Speaker 1>have over at Bloomberg Intelligence. That team tracking some two

0:06:25.320 --> 0:06:29.240
<v Speaker 1>thousand companies and sectors that range from communications to commodities

0:06:29.279 --> 0:06:32.480
<v Speaker 1>to finance and food. Now, of those, b I has

0:06:32.560 --> 0:06:35.799
<v Speaker 1>identified fifty that weren't a closer look this year based

0:06:35.880 --> 0:06:39.240
<v Speaker 1>on a list of focus ideas. The companies they run

0:06:39.320 --> 0:06:42.800
<v Speaker 1>the gamut Adidas to vinci eBay to Portscha and more.

0:06:42.880 --> 0:06:45.120
<v Speaker 1>It's also today's big take. We've got with us Bloomberg

0:06:45.160 --> 0:06:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Business Week Editor Joel Webber and Business Week Solutions and

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Strategy Senior editor Rebecca Penty. Joel with us in the

0:06:50.839 --> 0:06:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Interactive Broker's studio, Rebecca joining us on the phone

0:06:53.960 --> 0:06:56.240
<v Speaker 1>from the UK. Joel, I want to start with you

0:06:56.360 --> 0:06:58.840
<v Speaker 1>and just get an understanding from from you how this

0:06:58.960 --> 0:07:02.159
<v Speaker 1>list comes together because a sub Bloomberg intelligence they follow

0:07:02.320 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 1>a couple of thousand companies. Yeah, it's uh, it's a

0:07:05.160 --> 0:07:07.360
<v Speaker 1>it's a feat what they do on in an given day.

0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:10.160
<v Speaker 1>And one of the things that we've long done with

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:14.440
<v Speaker 1>them is this project which culminates, uh it's it's actually

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:17.320
<v Speaker 1>like months in the making and then culminates with the

0:07:17.400 --> 0:07:21.040
<v Speaker 1>publication of the list UM today. We've also gone on

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:24.280
<v Speaker 1>and done quarterly installments UM that we now do. So

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 1>this is uh fifty companies to watch for the year,

0:07:27.280 --> 0:07:29.880
<v Speaker 1>but you'll hear us come back and ahead of every quarter,

0:07:29.960 --> 0:07:34.200
<v Speaker 1>will will tell you U companies to watch this quarter. Um.

0:07:34.520 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 1>But the fifty is the real deal. And what what basically, um,

0:07:40.280 --> 0:07:43.760
<v Speaker 1>the team of of analysts at Bloomberg Intelligence Intelligence does

0:07:44.160 --> 0:07:46.720
<v Speaker 1>is take that two thousand plus companies and push it

0:07:46.800 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 1>through Excel sheets and it spits out, uh, just a

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:53.320
<v Speaker 1>couple of dozen companies that we really want to kind

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 1>of talk about. And we can't tell you these are

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:59.280
<v Speaker 1>bison cells that we're not gonna do anything. Um, that

0:07:59.400 --> 0:08:03.880
<v Speaker 1>foolish that much conviction. But we can look at hindsight

0:08:04.000 --> 0:08:05.840
<v Speaker 1>is as a measure of that. Yeah, exactly, that's what

0:08:05.960 --> 0:08:08.800
<v Speaker 1>hindsights for, right. Um, we we look we call this

0:08:08.920 --> 0:08:12.600
<v Speaker 1>watch because some of them we expect will outperform and

0:08:12.800 --> 0:08:16.240
<v Speaker 1>others might lack. And so it's a great little mix

0:08:16.840 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 1>of companies that we just think are going to have

0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:24.160
<v Speaker 1>interesting years. Um. Rebecca was one of the Business Week

0:08:24.280 --> 0:08:26.520
<v Speaker 1>editors who worked closely with the I to come up

0:08:26.560 --> 0:08:29.240
<v Speaker 1>with that list and refine it and turn it into

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:32.520
<v Speaker 1>the magic that it is. Rebecca, I'm curious, what was

0:08:32.640 --> 0:08:35.640
<v Speaker 1>the company that m was your was the one that

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:38.560
<v Speaker 1>you liked the most on the list? Well, I think

0:08:38.880 --> 0:08:42.199
<v Speaker 1>Disney and Um, it was interesting. You know, b I

0:08:42.320 --> 0:08:46.520
<v Speaker 1>has these focus ideas and they you know, basically they're

0:08:46.679 --> 0:08:49.959
<v Speaker 1>they're high conviction ideas of companies where they think the

0:08:50.040 --> 0:08:53.079
<v Speaker 1>market is not recognizing something about the company and so

0:08:53.240 --> 0:08:56.719
<v Speaker 1>either the market's undervaluing overvaluing. And Disney was one of

0:08:56.760 --> 0:08:59.800
<v Speaker 1>them that was really beat up during the pandemic and

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 1>and you know, continues to be beat up once recession

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:07.280
<v Speaker 1>risks started looming because of all their theme parks. And

0:09:07.360 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the thing that was so interesting for me is that

0:09:09.520 --> 0:09:12.920
<v Speaker 1>b I had this conviction that, you know, Disney is

0:09:13.000 --> 0:09:16.240
<v Speaker 1>really poised for a rebound um due to you know,

0:09:16.360 --> 0:09:21.640
<v Speaker 1>restructuring and accelerating streaming strategy. And we'd already landed on

0:09:21.720 --> 0:09:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Disney as a company, and then the announcement of Bob

0:09:24.679 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Biker's return as CEO and and so that just reinforced

0:09:29.080 --> 0:09:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the view from b I that this is a company

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:34.719
<v Speaker 1>to watch. And I think, you know, the bi's view

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:36.439
<v Speaker 1>that it could be a tale of two halves for

0:09:36.800 --> 0:09:39.839
<v Speaker 1>for Disney, where you know, the second half is the

0:09:39.920 --> 0:09:42.280
<v Speaker 1>stronger of the two. Okay, well, if you're gonna talk

0:09:42.280 --> 0:09:45.480
<v Speaker 1>about Disney, we should talk about Netflix. Um, because Netflix

0:09:45.480 --> 0:09:48.800
<v Speaker 1>also on the list. Why why did Netflix make it? Uh?

0:09:48.920 --> 0:09:52.840
<v Speaker 1>In that same conversation, since obviously it's been the dominant

0:09:53.240 --> 0:09:57.120
<v Speaker 1>streaming video provider. Yeah, that's true, And I think this

0:09:57.280 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 1>is an interesting one where um B I Z going

0:10:00.360 --> 0:10:05.079
<v Speaker 1>in on net Netflix is ads supported pricing tier. For

0:10:05.160 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 1>the longest time, it's been a company that's dependent on

0:10:09.080 --> 0:10:14.040
<v Speaker 1>um subscriptions but not advertising, and so Ba's view is

0:10:14.120 --> 0:10:18.839
<v Speaker 1>that the market isn't fully recognizing the additional revenue and

0:10:19.000 --> 0:10:22.960
<v Speaker 1>sales growth that could come from that advertising, which which

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:26.880
<v Speaker 1>they see as supporting higher average revenue per user and

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:32.839
<v Speaker 1>offsetting cannabalization of subscription revenue from customers downgrading to cheaper plans. Okay,

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:36.120
<v Speaker 1>so worth mentioning that to US companies perhaps you've heard

0:10:36.160 --> 0:10:41.480
<v Speaker 1>of them? Right. The other thing I love about this project, though, Rebecca,

0:10:41.800 --> 0:10:44.719
<v Speaker 1>is how global it is. Right, So, in addition to

0:10:44.880 --> 0:10:49.240
<v Speaker 1>some marquee American names, tell us about ones that people

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:52.480
<v Speaker 1>outside of the US might not even heard of. Yeah, well,

0:10:52.520 --> 0:10:54.680
<v Speaker 1>this one was an interesting one for me. I think,

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:57.079
<v Speaker 1>you know, we often hear about China being, you know,

0:10:57.160 --> 0:11:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the world's manufacturing center, but we don't often know the

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:03.600
<v Speaker 1>names of the companies that make the stuff that we use,

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 1>and one of the ones featured here is t s

0:11:07.200 --> 0:11:11.599
<v Speaker 1>m C. It is the world's largest semiconductor foundry. And

0:11:12.360 --> 0:11:15.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, with with the recession looming, with with um

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:20.240
<v Speaker 1>the economy taking a beating, worldwide, chip making is slowing down.

0:11:20.679 --> 0:11:24.839
<v Speaker 1>But blub intelligence view is that t s MC is

0:11:24.920 --> 0:11:29.040
<v Speaker 1>placed to better weather the cyclical market downturn than it's

0:11:29.120 --> 0:11:32.400
<v Speaker 1>piers because of its dominant industry position. Yeah, I mean

0:11:32.520 --> 0:11:36.800
<v Speaker 1>it is a juggernaut, right yeah, joel Um, what about

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:39.199
<v Speaker 1>your favorite on this list? Okay, well, I'll stick with

0:11:40.200 --> 0:11:44.200
<v Speaker 1>tech Um and I'm gonna I'm gonna say sons Um,

0:11:44.559 --> 0:11:48.199
<v Speaker 1>the little speaker company that could. Yeah, it's truly, as

0:11:48.480 --> 0:11:50.480
<v Speaker 1>we say in the blurb, it is a David versus

0:11:50.559 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Goliath moment. There's a patent case. It's been wrestling with

0:11:54.240 --> 0:11:57.719
<v Speaker 1>Google for a really long time. As we write b

0:11:57.840 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 1>I is optimistic. Optimistic sons succeed in the dispute, which

0:12:01.400 --> 0:12:04.679
<v Speaker 1>goes to a jury trial in May. Uh. This has

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:08.400
<v Speaker 1>been a long time coming. Uh, this showdown has been

0:12:08.840 --> 0:12:12.360
<v Speaker 1>it's years in the making. Um so nos UH has

0:12:12.520 --> 0:12:15.160
<v Speaker 1>has has had its share of some challenges. If your

0:12:15.160 --> 0:12:18.000
<v Speaker 1>son's user, like I am, there's some software decisions that

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:21.200
<v Speaker 1>will make you pull your hair out, like that Apple

0:12:21.200 --> 0:12:23.760
<v Speaker 1>bit of which app because there's multiple apps actually in

0:12:23.880 --> 0:12:25.959
<v Speaker 1>order to use different devices that don't talk to each

0:12:25.960 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 1>other always. You know, is there more to talk about here? Yes?

0:12:29.120 --> 0:12:31.920
<v Speaker 1>There is? But so I like this so nos one, Um,

0:12:32.200 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 1>but you know that's another American company. We've done tech

0:12:35.679 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. Now, Rebecca, what's another international company that

0:12:40.000 --> 0:12:44.040
<v Speaker 1>that jumped out to you? Okay, I'm just looking down

0:12:44.080 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 1>the list I've got, which was Porch. Let's talk about

0:12:48.160 --> 0:12:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Porsche exactly, which I thought. So this company went public

0:12:52.559 --> 0:12:55.679
<v Speaker 1>this year. VW spent out, which is just also just

0:12:55.760 --> 0:12:58.199
<v Speaker 1>an incredible I p O. But now they actually have to, like,

0:12:58.520 --> 0:13:02.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, make some evs and autos I think are

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:06.280
<v Speaker 1>just a really interesting kind of your head story. We're

0:13:06.320 --> 0:13:09.559
<v Speaker 1>seeing obviously the pressure on Tesla, and we're gonna have

0:13:09.800 --> 0:13:13.319
<v Speaker 1>more automakers sort of show up and an attempt to

0:13:13.400 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 1>hit velocity like Tesla has proven. Um, what what what

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 1>a successful company can look like? And now they have

0:13:19.480 --> 0:13:22.400
<v Speaker 1>to like wade through some challenges. Yeah, it's a fantastic list.

0:13:22.800 --> 0:13:25.439
<v Speaker 1>Go ahead, go ahead, reaty seconds. If I could just

0:13:25.559 --> 0:13:27.839
<v Speaker 1>throw one quick one back in there. We talked a

0:13:27.880 --> 0:13:30.760
<v Speaker 1>lot about companies that are poised to do well on

0:13:30.880 --> 0:13:33.600
<v Speaker 1>the e V game. One of them that is maybe

0:13:33.679 --> 0:13:38.200
<v Speaker 1>poised to fair worse off is Allison Transmission UM, another

0:13:38.440 --> 0:13:42.319
<v Speaker 1>US company. Uh, it's a truck transmission supplier. And what

0:13:42.480 --> 0:13:44.559
<v Speaker 1>you may have heard about EVS is that you know,

0:13:45.000 --> 0:13:48.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not just regular cars, it's also trucks. So there's

0:13:48.600 --> 0:13:51.040
<v Speaker 1>heightened competition in that truck space, which is going to

0:13:51.120 --> 0:13:54.160
<v Speaker 1>be at some pressure to Alison Transmission. Well, I think

0:13:54.160 --> 0:13:56.319
<v Speaker 1>we only talked about ten percent of the companies that

0:13:56.400 --> 0:13:58.280
<v Speaker 1>are on this list. Check it out. It's at Bloomberg

0:13:58.320 --> 0:14:01.400
<v Speaker 1>dot com Slash business Week. It's also available on the

0:14:01.480 --> 0:14:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg terminal. Big thank you to Rebecca Pentty. She's Solutions

0:14:04.880 --> 0:14:08.679
<v Speaker 1>and Strategy Senior editor for Bloomberg Business Week, joining us

0:14:08.679 --> 0:14:11.040
<v Speaker 1>on the phone from the UK this evening for her.

0:14:11.320 --> 0:14:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Also to Joel Webber, the editor of Bloomberg Business Week.

0:14:14.160 --> 0:14:16.160
<v Speaker 1>He's with us right now in the Bloomberg Interactive at

0:14:16.200 --> 0:14:18.839
<v Speaker 1>Broker's studio. Check out Joel on Twitter at Joel Weber Show.

0:14:18.880 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Rebecca's there are penty on Twitter. You're listening to Bloomberg

0:14:22.800 --> 0:14:27.880
<v Speaker 1>business Week. This is Bloomberg. You're listening to Bloomberg Business

0:14:27.960 --> 0:14:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Week with Carol Messier and Tim Stenevic on Bloomberg Radio.

0:14:32.080 --> 0:14:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Brazil's capital of Brazilia recovering today from an insurrection by

0:14:35.280 --> 0:14:39.000
<v Speaker 1>thousands of supporters of ex president Jayra Bilsonaro, who stormed

0:14:39.040 --> 0:14:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the country top government institutions, leaving a trail of destruction

0:14:42.480 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 1>and testing the leadership of Louise and Nascio Lula da

0:14:45.760 --> 0:14:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Silva just a week after he took office. Rioters ransacked Congress,

0:14:50.080 --> 0:14:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the presidential palace and the top court in Brazilia on Sunday,

0:14:53.480 --> 0:14:56.720
<v Speaker 1>hoping to trigger a military intervention. It took hours for

0:14:56.800 --> 0:14:59.600
<v Speaker 1>security forces to regain control of the main government buildings.

0:14:59.680 --> 0:15:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Hundred were arrested throughout the night, thousands that of bolson

0:15:02.960 --> 0:15:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Our supporters remained in the area. For more. We turned

0:15:06.280 --> 0:15:09.800
<v Speaker 1>out to Julia Lachi, Brazil country chief for Bloomberg News.

0:15:10.120 --> 0:15:13.560
<v Speaker 1>She joined us on the phone from South Holo, Brazil. Julia,

0:15:13.560 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 1>good to have you with us this afternoon. Just want

0:15:16.440 --> 0:15:18.560
<v Speaker 1>to get from you the latest on on what we

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:23.920
<v Speaker 1>understand about this, uh, these insurrectionists yesterday. Hi, thanks for

0:15:24.000 --> 0:15:28.360
<v Speaker 1>having me. So Brasita is in really recovery. Mode Um

0:15:28.680 --> 0:15:35.720
<v Speaker 1>police are gathering evidence and really um booking thousands of

0:15:35.880 --> 0:15:40.280
<v Speaker 1>protesters who came back to a militant like they have

0:15:40.400 --> 0:15:43.280
<v Speaker 1>been camping in front of a military facility about eight

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:46.320
<v Speaker 1>kilometers from where the protests took place, UM, and they

0:15:46.440 --> 0:15:49.120
<v Speaker 1>walked back there. Thousands of them walked back there after

0:15:49.200 --> 0:15:53.560
<v Speaker 1>the protests, and today they were removed and taken to

0:15:53.800 --> 0:15:57.680
<v Speaker 1>police for questioning and booking. And really it's a it's

0:15:58.280 --> 0:16:00.680
<v Speaker 1>a swath of evidence that police East and the and

0:16:00.800 --> 0:16:04.640
<v Speaker 1>the ministries now have to go through. Lula meanwhile, is

0:16:04.800 --> 0:16:08.520
<v Speaker 1>reasserting his power. He met with the chiefs of Congress,

0:16:08.640 --> 0:16:11.640
<v Speaker 1>the chiefs of the Supreme Court UM today really putting

0:16:11.760 --> 0:16:20.080
<v Speaker 1>up united front against these protests and Luters really and

0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Julia this is coming of course, as Billsonarow is I

0:16:23.680 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 1>believe hospitalized as well. Can he gives a little more

0:16:26.600 --> 0:16:30.040
<v Speaker 1>contact with us, right? Yeah? Here in the States, Yeah,

0:16:30.120 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 1>that is right. UM. Bolsonado flu to Florida right before

0:16:33.720 --> 0:16:36.359
<v Speaker 1>at the end of December, right before Blula was inaugurated,

0:16:36.440 --> 0:16:41.440
<v Speaker 1>which was last Sunday, UM, and he has been really

0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:44.040
<v Speaker 1>just taking pictures with supporters. There's been videos of him

0:16:44.080 --> 0:16:48.720
<v Speaker 1>in supermarkets at KFC. UM so really just on vacation

0:16:48.800 --> 0:16:53.560
<v Speaker 1>in Florida, and today we heard that he has been hospitalized,

0:16:54.040 --> 0:16:57.680
<v Speaker 1>which has been confirmed by his wife. And really Billsonado

0:16:57.720 --> 0:17:00.960
<v Speaker 1>has been hospitalized many times since he was stabbed UM

0:17:01.160 --> 0:17:05.600
<v Speaker 1>in eighteen on the campaign trail. It's usually UM abdominal

0:17:05.720 --> 0:17:09.600
<v Speaker 1>problems that he has. SILVER were monitoring that situation and

0:17:09.720 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 1>what does that mean in terms of his response. Has

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:14.639
<v Speaker 1>he responded to the protests that he's seen or has

0:17:14.640 --> 0:17:18.320
<v Speaker 1>he been kind of out of commission here? He has,

0:17:18.480 --> 0:17:22.159
<v Speaker 1>although he has been mostly silent since losing the election

0:17:22.200 --> 0:17:26.560
<v Speaker 1>on October both UM skipping public events and on social media,

0:17:26.680 --> 0:17:29.280
<v Speaker 1>which is where he always had a huge presence with

0:17:29.480 --> 0:17:33.159
<v Speaker 1>him and his family. He did tweet last night UM

0:17:33.440 --> 0:17:37.800
<v Speaker 1>saying these kinds of riots, these sort of demonstrations are

0:17:37.920 --> 0:17:43.120
<v Speaker 1>not within the rules of the democracy, and very quickly

0:17:43.359 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 1>trying to distance himself from protests because there were immediately

0:17:47.920 --> 0:17:52.280
<v Speaker 1>allegations UM that he was UM you know, he helped

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:57.200
<v Speaker 1>stoke protesters and and was behind the E section. So

0:17:57.320 --> 0:18:01.800
<v Speaker 1>he was very quick to deny that. UM. So we

0:18:01.880 --> 0:18:04.760
<v Speaker 1>shall see what happens next with that. UM. The Justice

0:18:04.840 --> 0:18:08.240
<v Speaker 1>ministers said that for at the moment he cannot be

0:18:08.800 --> 0:18:13.399
<v Speaker 1>um legally responsible for what happened yesterday, but he did

0:18:13.520 --> 0:18:19.240
<v Speaker 1>say politically unequivocally responsible for some of what happened yesterday.

0:18:19.520 --> 0:18:21.320
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of people when they first saw

0:18:21.400 --> 0:18:24.159
<v Speaker 1>images of this, they thought of January six here in

0:18:24.240 --> 0:18:28.200
<v Speaker 1>the United States, And you know, some similarities between between

0:18:28.240 --> 0:18:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the two Julia UM. A different part of the conversation though,

0:18:32.119 --> 0:18:34.879
<v Speaker 1>has to do with the demands of these insurrectionists. What

0:18:35.040 --> 0:18:37.840
<v Speaker 1>was the commonality that tied them together, sort of apart

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:40.239
<v Speaker 1>from the idea that that Bilsonaro was the one who

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:44.080
<v Speaker 1>won the election. Yeah, I think that's the main threat

0:18:44.119 --> 0:18:46.760
<v Speaker 1>they wanted to UM. You know, they refused to accept

0:18:46.800 --> 0:18:49.480
<v Speaker 1>the result of the election, and they were asking for

0:18:49.560 --> 0:18:52.280
<v Speaker 1>the military to intervene and keep you know, and take

0:18:52.359 --> 0:18:56.159
<v Speaker 1>Lula out of office. UM. And and that was when

0:18:56.200 --> 0:18:58.840
<v Speaker 1>you're right. The images were very similar to what we

0:18:58.920 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 1>saw in the Capitol two years ago, almost to the date. UM.

0:19:03.480 --> 0:19:09.280
<v Speaker 1>One difference that UM we saw was police initially did

0:19:09.400 --> 0:19:14.440
<v Speaker 1>not really resist the protesters, unlike in the US. So

0:19:14.680 --> 0:19:19.080
<v Speaker 1>they ran rampant for about two hours before reinforcements arrived

0:19:19.119 --> 0:19:21.680
<v Speaker 1>and really started taking people out of the buildings. But

0:19:22.040 --> 0:19:24.840
<v Speaker 1>by then, you know, the damage to work of art

0:19:24.920 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 1>and really to the building structure was just countless. Another

0:19:28.320 --> 0:19:30.399
<v Speaker 1>difference that that I noticed was the fact that so

0:19:30.520 --> 0:19:36.840
<v Speaker 1>many protesters insurrectionists were actually arrested immediately. This is not

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:40.119
<v Speaker 1>something that happened here in the US. What do we

0:19:40.160 --> 0:19:42.240
<v Speaker 1>know about the people who have been arrested and the

0:19:42.320 --> 0:19:45.359
<v Speaker 1>consequences that they could face if they do if they

0:19:45.400 --> 0:19:49.359
<v Speaker 1>if they are indeed found guilty. Yeah, that's right. A

0:19:49.440 --> 0:19:53.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of people were arrested kind of on the act um.

0:19:53.520 --> 0:19:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I think a couple of hundred. The numbers varied depending

0:19:56.560 --> 0:20:00.720
<v Speaker 1>on on the the government agency that is commenting on it.

0:20:01.840 --> 0:20:04.359
<v Speaker 1>But you know, it was all over social media. People

0:20:04.400 --> 0:20:08.800
<v Speaker 1>were posting selfies and videos while they weren't booting the buildings.

0:20:09.440 --> 0:20:12.639
<v Speaker 1>So it is a trove of evidence that police now

0:20:12.760 --> 0:20:15.680
<v Speaker 1>has to go through and just keep um, you know,

0:20:15.800 --> 0:20:18.040
<v Speaker 1>finding these people and arresting them. Although a lot of

0:20:18.160 --> 0:20:21.480
<v Speaker 1>videos have been erased, even social media accounts have been wiped,

0:20:21.960 --> 0:20:25.360
<v Speaker 1>but the Supreme Court last night ordered um that these

0:20:25.880 --> 0:20:29.439
<v Speaker 1>the evidence be preserved and really started going after these

0:20:29.480 --> 0:20:31.159
<v Speaker 1>people and not just the people who were there, but

0:20:31.280 --> 0:20:35.920
<v Speaker 1>people who financed the act. That's been a very key

0:20:36.080 --> 0:20:41.080
<v Speaker 1>point um from all authorities commenting about the aftermath of

0:20:41.160 --> 0:20:43.240
<v Speaker 1>this is that they really want to go after the

0:20:43.320 --> 0:20:46.720
<v Speaker 1>people who bust thousands of Boston NATO supporters over the

0:20:46.760 --> 0:20:49.760
<v Speaker 1>past two days. Too busy there for these protests. So

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Julie talked to us a little bit about the market

0:20:51.359 --> 0:20:56.080
<v Speaker 1>reaction here. Demian sasaur Our, Bloomberg Intelligence Chief Emerging Market strategist,

0:20:56.560 --> 0:20:59.000
<v Speaker 1>um kind of said the look, these are emerging markets.

0:20:59.040 --> 0:21:01.359
<v Speaker 1>A lot of the stupolue whole risk is actually priced in.

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Bloomer Economics on the other hand, saying like there could

0:21:03.920 --> 0:21:05.400
<v Speaker 1>still be a lot of pain. It could shave off

0:21:05.560 --> 0:21:08.920
<v Speaker 1>seven tenths of one percent when it comes to economic

0:21:09.000 --> 0:21:12.240
<v Speaker 1>activity in the month of January. Is that something the

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:17.119
<v Speaker 1>markets are responding to. So when markets opened, it was

0:21:17.640 --> 0:21:21.280
<v Speaker 1>really looking like a horrible day, especially considering it was

0:21:21.400 --> 0:21:25.119
<v Speaker 1>such a risk one day abroad, So both stocks and

0:21:25.200 --> 0:21:29.440
<v Speaker 1>the currency were underperforming massively. As the day we're on

0:21:30.119 --> 0:21:33.040
<v Speaker 1>things that improved. Both the mood here improved and the

0:21:33.200 --> 0:21:36.879
<v Speaker 1>risk on sentiment that we were seeing abroad kind of

0:21:36.960 --> 0:21:38.960
<v Speaker 1>fade at a little bit. So in the end it

0:21:39.160 --> 0:21:41.440
<v Speaker 1>wasn't as bad as it could have been. But you know,

0:21:41.560 --> 0:21:45.679
<v Speaker 1>Brazilian assets have been under performing since Lola Um won

0:21:45.800 --> 0:21:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the election, really because investors have begun to worry that

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 1>his comments on how much he's going to spend and

0:21:55.200 --> 0:21:59.639
<v Speaker 1>comments from cabinet members that he just appointed about revoking,

0:22:00.040 --> 0:22:03.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, the labor reform and the pension reform, both

0:22:03.520 --> 0:22:07.160
<v Speaker 1>of which investors really see a key keeping government accounts

0:22:07.160 --> 0:22:10.600
<v Speaker 1>and check are really weighing on us. It's so it's

0:22:10.600 --> 0:22:13.280
<v Speaker 1>a bit longer than just today, Julia, what are you

0:22:13.320 --> 0:22:16.720
<v Speaker 1>watching for now? What's the smart question that our investing

0:22:16.720 --> 0:22:20.480
<v Speaker 1>audience needed needs to be asking as Brazilia continues to

0:22:20.520 --> 0:22:24.520
<v Speaker 1>recover from US. I think there are a few things. UM.

0:22:24.680 --> 0:22:27.399
<v Speaker 1>One is will that will this happen again? Right? Um,

0:22:27.480 --> 0:22:30.800
<v Speaker 1>authorities say this will never happen again, but there are

0:22:30.840 --> 0:22:35.800
<v Speaker 1>still thousands of people in Brazilia. UM, so it really

0:22:35.920 --> 0:22:38.720
<v Speaker 1>needs to We really need to be on the watch

0:22:38.800 --> 0:22:42.920
<v Speaker 1>for a resurgence of violence and then whatever comes out

0:22:43.160 --> 0:22:48.000
<v Speaker 1>of these Supreme Court requests and inquiries. There are several

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:51.280
<v Speaker 1>arrest warrants that have already been issued. We don't have

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:56.280
<v Speaker 1>names yet, but it really could shake things up in

0:22:56.440 --> 0:22:59.680
<v Speaker 1>politics and in the system, depending on what they find

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:03.440
<v Speaker 1>in terms of who financed and who stoked protesters. So

0:23:03.640 --> 0:23:05.480
<v Speaker 1>I think those are the main things that we're watching for,

0:23:06.200 --> 0:23:10.280
<v Speaker 1>all right. Julia late Chi, Brazil country chief for Bloomberg News,

0:23:10.840 --> 0:23:14.440
<v Speaker 1>joining us this afternoon on the phone from sal Pallo, Brazil.

0:23:15.160 --> 0:23:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Just to update our audience. If you're just now joining us.

0:23:18.600 --> 0:23:22.160
<v Speaker 1>We were speaking to Julia about Brazilia, the capital of Brazil,

0:23:22.440 --> 0:23:26.840
<v Speaker 1>reeling after anti Lula rioters stormed Congress over the weekend.

0:23:26.880 --> 0:23:28.680
<v Speaker 1>A big thank you to Julia for taking a time

0:23:28.720 --> 0:23:31.120
<v Speaker 1>and joining us to bring us the latest from there.

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:39.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm roam a journal but you let me drive. Oh no, no, no, no,

0:23:39.600 --> 0:23:43.000
<v Speaker 1>who's going to drive home? Honey? Please? I'll do the

0:23:43.160 --> 0:23:52.879
<v Speaker 1>ride gravels. I want to drive. It's the question. This

0:23:53.359 --> 0:23:57.600
<v Speaker 1>is the drive to the globe to music well down

0:23:58.040 --> 0:24:01.879
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio. It is the drive to the close.

0:24:02.160 --> 0:24:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Tim Stanebec and Creedy Gupta in for Carol Master this afternoon.

0:24:05.840 --> 0:24:08.440
<v Speaker 1>We're just about seventeen minutes away from the close of

0:24:08.520 --> 0:24:12.640
<v Speaker 1>equity trading here on this January three, and we're seeing

0:24:13.040 --> 0:24:15.359
<v Speaker 1>markets roll over quite a bit. The SP five hundred

0:24:15.440 --> 0:24:17.560
<v Speaker 1>since high as hired by as much as one point

0:24:17.640 --> 0:24:20.560
<v Speaker 1>four two percent earlier. Now it's just up just for

0:24:20.600 --> 0:24:23.520
<v Speaker 1>actionately less than one tenth of one percent. Really eager

0:24:23.560 --> 0:24:25.040
<v Speaker 1>to hear what our next guest has to think of,

0:24:25.119 --> 0:24:27.639
<v Speaker 1>not just today's trade, but of the outlook for the year.

0:24:27.720 --> 0:24:30.280
<v Speaker 1>We've got Gina Bolvan with us, president of Bolven Wealth

0:24:30.359 --> 0:24:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Management Group. She joins us this afternoon on the phone

0:24:33.040 --> 0:24:36.119
<v Speaker 1>from Boston. Gina, how are you hi? How are you?

0:24:36.320 --> 0:24:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for having me and Happy New Year. Happy

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:41.280
<v Speaker 1>New Year to you too, Thanks so much for joining us. Well,

0:24:41.680 --> 0:24:44.200
<v Speaker 1>let's talk a little bit about the trade moving forward,

0:24:44.280 --> 0:24:47.200
<v Speaker 1>because if the theme of last week and the year

0:24:47.560 --> 0:24:52.080
<v Speaker 1>has been and it continues, uh, how high will inflation go?

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Is it? Has it indeed peaked? And how high will

0:24:54.720 --> 0:24:56.560
<v Speaker 1>the federal funds rate have to go in order to

0:24:56.800 --> 0:24:59.399
<v Speaker 1>tamp down inflation? What's top of mind for you at

0:24:59.440 --> 0:25:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Boven Well Management Grow? Oh well, you know, yes, last

0:25:03.920 --> 0:25:06.600
<v Speaker 1>week was such a good week for the market. Um.

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:09.160
<v Speaker 1>You know what kicked it off as a job's report

0:25:09.240 --> 0:25:11.639
<v Speaker 1>and there was something for everyone there and it was

0:25:11.800 --> 0:25:14.920
<v Speaker 1>it was surprising to the upside um when we still

0:25:15.000 --> 0:25:19.200
<v Speaker 1>have that boken record of oh of um, bad news

0:25:19.359 --> 0:25:22.440
<v Speaker 1>is good news, good news is bad news. A slower

0:25:22.560 --> 0:25:26.399
<v Speaker 1>wage growth which helps bring inflation down was good for

0:25:26.520 --> 0:25:31.160
<v Speaker 1>investors because it gave investors hope finally that the stead

0:25:31.240 --> 0:25:34.200
<v Speaker 1>may may not have to raise rates as much and

0:25:34.320 --> 0:25:37.320
<v Speaker 1>as long, and maybe they might even have to cut

0:25:37.440 --> 0:25:40.760
<v Speaker 1>rate and there's a glimmer of hope of a soft landing.

0:25:41.359 --> 0:25:43.920
<v Speaker 1>So that's what happened last week. And we also saw

0:25:44.000 --> 0:25:47.480
<v Speaker 1>the I s M survey um was surprising with the

0:25:47.600 --> 0:25:51.359
<v Speaker 1>service industry contracted for the first time in two and

0:25:51.400 --> 0:25:54.240
<v Speaker 1>a half years. So we're starting to see that the

0:25:54.400 --> 0:25:58.359
<v Speaker 1>interest rate plakes are making their way into the economy

0:25:58.840 --> 0:26:00.840
<v Speaker 1>and most of the work the state had to do

0:26:01.000 --> 0:26:05.239
<v Speaker 1>to slow the economy maybe behind us. Well, Gina. One

0:26:05.320 --> 0:26:08.120
<v Speaker 1>of the historical trends that has really kind of thrown

0:26:08.160 --> 0:26:10.400
<v Speaker 1>me for a loop here is that after midterm elections,

0:26:10.680 --> 0:26:13.560
<v Speaker 1>people tend to buy in for Lago remarket for a

0:26:13.600 --> 0:26:15.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of the bulls waiting on the sidelines. I think

0:26:15.720 --> 0:26:18.720
<v Speaker 1>they were waiting for some sort of gridlock in Washington

0:26:19.400 --> 0:26:21.800
<v Speaker 1>to come to fruition before hopping back into the market,

0:26:21.920 --> 0:26:24.600
<v Speaker 1>and we haven't really seen that with the same conviction

0:26:24.680 --> 0:26:29.040
<v Speaker 1>we've seen it in the past years. Any idea why, well,

0:26:29.320 --> 0:26:31.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that one of the reasons is because we've

0:26:31.760 --> 0:26:35.120
<v Speaker 1>had seven interest rate hikes and we've had forty year

0:26:35.760 --> 0:26:40.159
<v Speaker 1>inflation high high, so UM, but I do think that

0:26:40.280 --> 0:26:41.760
<v Speaker 1>we are going to see it. When you know, when

0:26:41.800 --> 0:26:44.720
<v Speaker 1>you look at history, UM, that is one of the

0:26:44.840 --> 0:26:48.960
<v Speaker 1>trends that we see is that UM after the mid terms,

0:26:49.080 --> 0:26:51.880
<v Speaker 1>no matter who wins, there has an average game gain

0:26:51.960 --> 0:26:54.920
<v Speaker 1>of about fourteen percent in the market. So that is

0:26:55.040 --> 0:26:58.080
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons why we think the market this

0:26:58.280 --> 0:27:01.800
<v Speaker 1>year will be up double digits, twelve to fifteen percent.

0:27:01.880 --> 0:27:03.760
<v Speaker 1>But it's just going to take all year to get there.

0:27:03.920 --> 0:27:06.320
<v Speaker 1>What's more important to you technicals like that, the sort

0:27:06.359 --> 0:27:09.280
<v Speaker 1>of farmer's almanac statistics that you you know, look back

0:27:09.359 --> 0:27:12.960
<v Speaker 1>on over the last what years or so, or what

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:17.520
<v Speaker 1>you're actually seeing. When it comes to fundamentals, well, I

0:27:17.640 --> 0:27:20.480
<v Speaker 1>think you can. You can't ignore either, right, I mean,

0:27:21.080 --> 0:27:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the only thing we have to go by is history.

0:27:24.640 --> 0:27:27.240
<v Speaker 1>But UM in history is very strong. But when you

0:27:27.320 --> 0:27:31.800
<v Speaker 1>look at fundamentals, that's strong as well. We've seen this

0:27:32.040 --> 0:27:37.520
<v Speaker 1>is the most UM expected recession we've ever seen or

0:27:37.800 --> 0:27:41.280
<v Speaker 1>talked about. And because of that, you know, it just

0:27:41.600 --> 0:27:44.800
<v Speaker 1>may not be as bad as everyone thinks. Because we're

0:27:45.080 --> 0:27:47.960
<v Speaker 1>why though, because we're preparing for it, because we're so

0:27:48.200 --> 0:27:50.480
<v Speaker 1>prepared for it, like one of the like when you

0:27:50.520 --> 0:27:54.919
<v Speaker 1>look at the financial services sector, when you look at banks, um,

0:27:55.040 --> 0:27:57.960
<v Speaker 1>they've they've been preparing for a recession. Think of all

0:27:58.000 --> 0:28:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the stress tests they've had to think of what happened

0:28:01.720 --> 0:28:04.760
<v Speaker 1>in the Great Recession of two thousand and nine. So

0:28:05.119 --> 0:28:09.760
<v Speaker 1>the banks are very much prepared for recession. And you know,

0:28:10.000 --> 0:28:13.760
<v Speaker 1>everybody's been talking about this recession that's going to happen.

0:28:14.200 --> 0:28:18.240
<v Speaker 1>So consumers and businesses, I would say, you're somewhat compared,

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:20.680
<v Speaker 1>and they may they are prepared, and they may be

0:28:20.920 --> 0:28:25.359
<v Speaker 1>more resilient than you think. Well more resilient, But I

0:28:25.400 --> 0:28:29.040
<v Speaker 1>wonder what that then means for perhaps some of the consumptions,

0:28:29.080 --> 0:28:34.440
<v Speaker 1>some spending patterns not necessarily intoe. But when that's I

0:28:34.480 --> 0:28:36.320
<v Speaker 1>feel like what the markets are now pricing in it's

0:28:36.359 --> 0:28:40.880
<v Speaker 1>no longer this year kind of story. Well, I think, um,

0:28:41.800 --> 0:28:44.479
<v Speaker 1>when we talked about what's being priced into the market,

0:28:44.600 --> 0:28:47.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that's what happened Friday is you know, the

0:28:47.800 --> 0:28:52.640
<v Speaker 1>worst case scenario has already been faced in So if

0:28:52.720 --> 0:28:55.960
<v Speaker 1>we get any type of good news, you know, like

0:28:56.160 --> 0:28:59.640
<v Speaker 1>earning season is starting taking off Friday with the big banks,

0:28:59.720 --> 0:29:02.360
<v Speaker 1>If we get any type of good news. The market

0:29:02.440 --> 0:29:04.600
<v Speaker 1>takes it in once with it. Yeah, look at what

0:29:04.680 --> 0:29:06.600
<v Speaker 1>we saw on Friday, I think that is a perfect

0:29:06.680 --> 0:29:09.280
<v Speaker 1>way to describe it. With that kind of perfect jobs

0:29:09.320 --> 0:29:11.880
<v Speaker 1>report that many people saw as being a goldilocks report.

0:29:11.920 --> 0:29:13.800
<v Speaker 1>We saw the rally, it's given up a little bit

0:29:13.840 --> 0:29:15.520
<v Speaker 1>of steam today is the S and P five hundred

0:29:15.600 --> 0:29:19.040
<v Speaker 1>just continues to move lower, down about eight one hundreds

0:29:19.040 --> 0:29:21.480
<v Speaker 1>of one per cent. So, Gina, does that mean that

0:29:21.760 --> 0:29:25.840
<v Speaker 1>you think markets have bottomed at least in this cycle? Well,

0:29:26.000 --> 0:29:29.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it's really hard to um call a bottom.

0:29:29.600 --> 0:29:31.960
<v Speaker 1>You don't. You don't always know where the bottom is

0:29:32.360 --> 0:29:36.040
<v Speaker 1>until it's over, until it's in hindsight. But I think

0:29:36.120 --> 0:29:38.800
<v Speaker 1>we have more of an upside than a downside at

0:29:38.840 --> 0:29:43.080
<v Speaker 1>these levels, more downside on these levels. You know, it's

0:29:43.120 --> 0:29:45.160
<v Speaker 1>interesting to me that a lot of people are expecting

0:29:45.200 --> 0:29:48.320
<v Speaker 1>this turnaround story to happen at the halfway point, the

0:29:48.400 --> 0:29:49.880
<v Speaker 1>back half of the years, when you're going to see

0:29:49.880 --> 0:29:54.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot more green on the screen. Gina, why not earlier? Well,

0:29:54.280 --> 0:29:57.000
<v Speaker 1>I think we need to get a signal from the Fed. Right,

0:29:57.160 --> 0:30:01.240
<v Speaker 1>the Fed still very hawkish, um and I think that's

0:30:01.320 --> 0:30:03.880
<v Speaker 1>part of their campaign. It's not what they're doing it,

0:30:04.000 --> 0:30:08.080
<v Speaker 1>talks of what they say, and so you you know,

0:30:08.280 --> 0:30:10.920
<v Speaker 1>the FED is on one side, the markets on the

0:30:11.040 --> 0:30:14.640
<v Speaker 1>other side, and we need to see a little bit

0:30:14.760 --> 0:30:18.480
<v Speaker 1>of the FED coming to the middle to meet the

0:30:18.600 --> 0:30:23.880
<v Speaker 1>market or acknowledging because they really haven't yet, and they

0:30:24.000 --> 0:30:28.400
<v Speaker 1>need to acknowledge that inflation is coming down and they

0:30:28.440 --> 0:30:31.040
<v Speaker 1>are closer to the end of the right hyps. And

0:30:31.400 --> 0:30:33.120
<v Speaker 1>we don't hear a lot of that from FED speakers,

0:30:33.240 --> 0:30:36.640
<v Speaker 1>including the that's right, and they're all in Unison, all

0:30:36.720 --> 0:30:40.280
<v Speaker 1>in Unison, and they're all talking the same talk, walking

0:30:40.360 --> 0:30:45.480
<v Speaker 1>the same walk, and um, you know that's why we

0:30:45.600 --> 0:30:47.800
<v Speaker 1>think it's going to take longer. Hey, Gina, just in

0:30:47.800 --> 0:30:50.520
<v Speaker 1>the last twenty seconds that we have with you, give

0:30:50.600 --> 0:30:53.480
<v Speaker 1>us a couple of areas that you're investing in. Just

0:30:53.520 --> 0:30:57.040
<v Speaker 1>got twenty seconds left. We like financials. We like financials

0:30:57.200 --> 0:31:01.400
<v Speaker 1>because of you know, good good it ends and um,

0:31:02.480 --> 0:31:05.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, if there's no recession, they'll do well because

0:31:05.160 --> 0:31:08.200
<v Speaker 1>of economic activity. If there is a recession, as I mentioned,

0:31:08.280 --> 0:31:11.480
<v Speaker 1>they have in really good shape. They have valuations and

0:31:11.600 --> 0:31:13.960
<v Speaker 1>we like healthy if the dividends and they have a

0:31:14.040 --> 0:31:18.200
<v Speaker 1>good tip demographic. Kale wind all right, Gina Bolvin, President

0:31:18.320 --> 0:31:24.200
<v Speaker 1>of boldn Wealth Management Group, liking for three healthcare and financials.

0:31:24.280 --> 0:31:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Gina joining us this afternoon from Boston. Follow her on

0:31:26.640 --> 0:31:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at Gina Bolvin. You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week

0:31:30.440 --> 0:31:39.320
<v Speaker 1>and this is Bloomberg Radio. Thanks for listening to Bloomberg

0:31:39.360 --> 0:31:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Business Week. Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg

0:31:43.120 --> 0:31:45.400
<v Speaker 1>dot com. You can also listen to our radio show

0:31:45.480 --> 0:31:48.760
<v Speaker 1>at two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio or stream us

0:31:48.840 --> 0:31:50.920
<v Speaker 1>live on YouTube and Bloomberg dot com