WEBVTT - The Uber Story (So Far)

0:00:04.320 --> 0:00:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Get in text with technology with tex stuff, Chrome host

0:00:07.680 --> 0:00:15.520
<v Speaker 1>ft dot Com. EI there, and welcome to tex Stuff.

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:18.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm Jonathan Strickland, and today we're going to look at

0:00:19.120 --> 0:00:23.360
<v Speaker 1>the Uber story, story about the company Uber, not an

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Uber large embank story, although I guess it's that too.

0:00:27.600 --> 0:00:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Now this is gonna be part one. I've already recorded

0:00:30.440 --> 0:00:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Part two, Peek behind the Curtain brought Scott Benjamin in

0:00:33.560 --> 0:00:36.800
<v Speaker 1>for a little discussion about Uber and Uh. It ended

0:00:36.880 --> 0:00:38.440
<v Speaker 1>up being so long that it had to be its

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:41.280
<v Speaker 1>own episode. I was originally just gonna kind of tag

0:00:41.280 --> 0:00:43.680
<v Speaker 1>it onto the end of this one, but you can

0:00:43.720 --> 0:00:47.360
<v Speaker 1>listen to the next episode to hear Scott's ideas about

0:00:47.479 --> 0:00:50.239
<v Speaker 1>Uber and autonomous cars and a fleet of vehicles that

0:00:50.320 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 1>take you places without any human drivers. But for this episode,

0:00:53.920 --> 0:00:56.640
<v Speaker 1>I really wanted to look at the story of Uber itself,

0:00:56.720 --> 0:00:59.720
<v Speaker 1>not its future, but it's past and up to the present.

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:03.040
<v Speaker 1>So to look at how Uber came about, you have

0:01:03.120 --> 0:01:06.480
<v Speaker 1>to go back to two thousand eight. That's when a

0:01:06.480 --> 0:01:11.360
<v Speaker 1>pair of entrepreneurs named Garrett Camp and Travis Kalinnik began

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:13.240
<v Speaker 1>to talk about a way to make it easier to

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:18.240
<v Speaker 1>get a taxi in San Francisco, world's turn upon such

0:01:18.360 --> 0:01:22.440
<v Speaker 1>thoughts bloom So. Camp was a co founder of the

0:01:22.520 --> 0:01:27.360
<v Speaker 1>web discovery platform stumble Upon. So, in case you've never

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:30.559
<v Speaker 1>used it, stumble Upon is a web discovery tool. Let's

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:34.120
<v Speaker 1>users share web pages, you can rate them, and it

0:01:34.200 --> 0:01:36.720
<v Speaker 1>also a lots lets you discover other web pages and

0:01:36.760 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 1>photos and videos and other web related content that your

0:01:39.560 --> 0:01:42.800
<v Speaker 1>friends liked. It's sort of a curation engine, so the

0:01:42.840 --> 0:01:47.080
<v Speaker 1>idea is that it helps you discover stuff related to

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:49.360
<v Speaker 1>your interests. So it's kind of like a search engine,

0:01:49.400 --> 0:01:51.720
<v Speaker 1>but it's always on the lookout for things that you

0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:56.400
<v Speaker 1>might find interesting, so kind of a baby step towards

0:01:56.440 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the semantic web, but it's largely dependent upon other people

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 1>tagging that information. In May two thousand seven, eBay bought

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:11.000
<v Speaker 1>stumble Upon for seventy five million dollars. So in two

0:02:11.040 --> 0:02:14.280
<v Speaker 1>thousand and eight, there's Camp sitting around thinking about what

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:17.239
<v Speaker 1>he's going to tackle next. He's still CEEO of stumble Upon,

0:02:17.960 --> 0:02:21.520
<v Speaker 1>but you know, he's also flush with cash, and by

0:02:21.520 --> 0:02:23.600
<v Speaker 1>the way, he would go on to buy stumble Upon

0:02:23.720 --> 0:02:26.280
<v Speaker 1>back from eBay in two thousand nine along with a

0:02:26.320 --> 0:02:30.160
<v Speaker 1>few other investors. Meanwhile, you've got Travis Kalenik, who had

0:02:30.240 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 1>dropped out of the computer science program at u c

0:02:33.520 --> 0:02:37.679
<v Speaker 1>l A to found a company called Scour Incorporated. That's

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:42.160
<v Speaker 1>s c O you are, and that was a multimedia

0:02:42.280 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 1>search engine. He also created scour Exchange, which was appeer

0:02:46.440 --> 0:02:51.200
<v Speaker 1>to peer file sharing service. Uh, peer to peer file sharing.

0:02:51.200 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure you guys remember, But this is a method

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:59.320
<v Speaker 1>of transferring large data files quickly by creating a network

0:02:59.480 --> 0:03:03.639
<v Speaker 1>of peers, all of whom are either hosting part of

0:03:03.800 --> 0:03:07.240
<v Speaker 1>or an entire file large file, and they make that

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:10.400
<v Speaker 1>available to other peers in the network to download, so

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:13.680
<v Speaker 1>it speeds up the downloading process. And this is not

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:18.480
<v Speaker 1>necessarily a means to get illegal content like works that

0:03:18.520 --> 0:03:21.240
<v Speaker 1>are protected under copyright and in other words, it's not

0:03:21.360 --> 0:03:24.600
<v Speaker 1>necessarily a way to pirate stuff. But it has been

0:03:24.720 --> 0:03:27.320
<v Speaker 1>used to pirate things, and so a lot of people

0:03:27.360 --> 0:03:30.840
<v Speaker 1>equate peer to peer networks with illegal activity. That's just

0:03:30.960 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 1>not true. It's just a means of distribution. It's kind

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:37.640
<v Speaker 1>of like saying a road would be illegal because someone

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:40.760
<v Speaker 1>was driving something illegal in a car, or that the

0:03:40.800 --> 0:03:45.280
<v Speaker 1>car itself is illegal. That's ridiculous. Obviously. However, it has

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:50.640
<v Speaker 1>meant that certain industry organizations like the m P A

0:03:50.640 --> 0:03:53.760
<v Speaker 1>A and the r I Double A have come down

0:03:54.080 --> 0:03:57.920
<v Speaker 1>on these companies and threatened them with enormous lawsuits for

0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 1>allowing such things to happen. Uh. The d m c

0:04:01.400 --> 0:04:05.200
<v Speaker 1>A says that it gives you know, safe harbor to

0:04:05.600 --> 0:04:09.600
<v Speaker 1>two companies that host these services as long as those

0:04:09.600 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 1>companies take pains to remove or prevent piracy from happening uh,

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:18.080
<v Speaker 1>and then they're they're protected. But the r I Double

0:04:18.120 --> 0:04:19.720
<v Speaker 1>A and the m P A and a couple of

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:24.000
<v Speaker 1>other organizations all filed lawsuits against scour and so the

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:29.719
<v Speaker 1>company declared bankruptcy in September in anticipation of those lawsuits

0:04:29.760 --> 0:04:33.479
<v Speaker 1>coming at them and kind of dissolved. Kalin Nick would

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:36.120
<v Speaker 1>then go on to start other companies. The next one

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:39.320
<v Speaker 1>was called red Swoosh, which was another peer to peer

0:04:39.360 --> 0:04:43.440
<v Speaker 1>file exchange service, which was eventually acquired by a Kami

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Technologies or Akamai Technologies in two thousand seven for nineteen

0:04:48.680 --> 0:04:51.839
<v Speaker 1>million dollars. So both call Nick and Camp we're doing

0:04:51.839 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 1>pretty well for themselves. When they met up to talk

0:04:54.440 --> 0:04:57.040
<v Speaker 1>about a way to leverage the Internet and mobile devices

0:04:57.080 --> 0:04:59.840
<v Speaker 1>to make it easier to hail a cab to get

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:03.279
<v Speaker 1>a taxi in San Francisco, and actually in the very

0:05:03.360 --> 0:05:07.040
<v Speaker 1>beginning it was a bit more elitist than that, according

0:05:07.080 --> 0:05:10.840
<v Speaker 1>to some reports. Anyway, The story is that Camp and

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:14.600
<v Speaker 1>call Nick were in Paris for the low Web conference

0:05:15.279 --> 0:05:17.599
<v Speaker 1>and the two began to moll over what a pain

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:19.680
<v Speaker 1>in the patook as it is to hail a cab

0:05:19.720 --> 0:05:23.000
<v Speaker 1>in San Francisco, particularly when you're loaded down with luggage.

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:27.400
<v Speaker 1>So they started talking about collaborating on a particularly private venture.

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:30.560
<v Speaker 1>They began to wonder if it would make sense for

0:05:30.640 --> 0:05:33.760
<v Speaker 1>them to go in together and purchase a Mercedes S

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:37.960
<v Speaker 1>class vehicle and hire a personal driver and get a

0:05:38.000 --> 0:05:41.200
<v Speaker 1>parking spot in a garage that would be geographically equa

0:05:41.240 --> 0:05:44.840
<v Speaker 1>distant to their individual houses. In other words, at first,

0:05:44.839 --> 0:05:47.440
<v Speaker 1>they were just talking about sharing a personal driver and

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:50.760
<v Speaker 1>a car, so kind of like an uber just for

0:05:50.880 --> 0:05:55.240
<v Speaker 1>the two of them. But this conversation evolved into the

0:05:55.320 --> 0:05:58.240
<v Speaker 1>idea for a mobile app that would allow you to

0:05:58.279 --> 0:06:00.480
<v Speaker 1>put in a request for a dry her and a

0:06:00.600 --> 0:06:04.039
<v Speaker 1>service of drivers capable of responding to such a call.

0:06:04.720 --> 0:06:07.160
<v Speaker 1>So Camp would go on to work on that idea

0:06:07.200 --> 0:06:09.919
<v Speaker 1>in his spare time, and he actually produced a prototype

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:12.960
<v Speaker 1>app in March two thousand nine, at the time, he

0:06:13.000 --> 0:06:17.080
<v Speaker 1>was calling it uber Cab. Now Camp actually hired Kallinik

0:06:17.279 --> 0:06:21.000
<v Speaker 1>to become the full time custodian of uber Cab. So

0:06:21.160 --> 0:06:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Camp was still being busy as the CEO of stumble Upon,

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 1>and it was Kalenik's job to take this initial prototype

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:30.240
<v Speaker 1>app and develop it until it could launch as a

0:06:30.279 --> 0:06:33.640
<v Speaker 1>real service, with the aim of launching it in San Francisco.

0:06:34.920 --> 0:06:37.520
<v Speaker 1>In January two tho the service was ready for a

0:06:37.560 --> 0:06:39.960
<v Speaker 1>test run and it was about as alpha as you

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 1>can get. There were only three cars and they started

0:06:44.200 --> 0:06:47.159
<v Speaker 1>in the city of New York City, so three cars

0:06:47.200 --> 0:06:51.160
<v Speaker 1>in New York City is a tiny test run of service.

0:06:51.880 --> 0:06:55.760
<v Speaker 1>In March two thousand ten, Uber would hire Ryan Graves

0:06:55.760 --> 0:06:58.000
<v Speaker 1>to become the general manager of the company. And this

0:06:58.040 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 1>is a pretty funny story all on its own. Kalinnik

0:07:01.080 --> 0:07:04.120
<v Speaker 1>actually posted on Twitter that he was looking for a

0:07:04.200 --> 0:07:07.359
<v Speaker 1>business developer and he said that there would be big

0:07:07.400 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 1>equity in a pre launch product. So Ryan Graves responded

0:07:11.640 --> 0:07:13.880
<v Speaker 1>to the tweet and send a Twitter message of his

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 1>own that said they should email him, and they and

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:19.960
<v Speaker 1>he gave his email address over Twitter, and I guess

0:07:20.000 --> 0:07:24.000
<v Speaker 1>things worked out because they hired him. Now. Ryan Graves

0:07:24.000 --> 0:07:27.320
<v Speaker 1>had been working at General Electric and had described his

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:32.520
<v Speaker 1>position there as being quote unquote unglamorous and not really

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 1>any room for him to to advance in his job,

0:07:36.320 --> 0:07:38.680
<v Speaker 1>at least not that he could see. He had also

0:07:38.760 --> 0:07:41.520
<v Speaker 1>served as an intern for four Square and apparently it

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:45.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of just wheedled his way into their depending depending

0:07:45.480 --> 0:07:48.800
<v Speaker 1>upon whose account you believe, and he would eventually become

0:07:48.920 --> 0:07:52.720
<v Speaker 1>the CEO of Uber for a short while before Kalinnik

0:07:52.840 --> 0:07:55.160
<v Speaker 1>took over that position and Graves would become involved in

0:07:55.160 --> 0:07:58.040
<v Speaker 1>the global development of the company, so his focus began

0:07:58.160 --> 0:08:03.239
<v Speaker 1>to be um really directed at getting Uber into various

0:08:03.240 --> 0:08:08.280
<v Speaker 1>cities around the globe. But a very successful hire, and

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:11.680
<v Speaker 1>it's funny that it happened over Twitter. In July two

0:08:11.720 --> 0:08:14.680
<v Speaker 1>thousand ten, Uber would hit the streets of San Francisco.

0:08:15.360 --> 0:08:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Uber Cab was being called an on demand car service

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:21.160
<v Speaker 1>via the iPhone. There was no Android app at this point,

0:08:21.840 --> 0:08:24.240
<v Speaker 1>and at this stage the service already used the phone

0:08:24.280 --> 0:08:27.040
<v Speaker 1>to determine your location and to send a driver to you,

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 1>or you can use the map within the app service

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:33.560
<v Speaker 1>itself to indicate an exact pickup location that your driver

0:08:33.640 --> 0:08:36.760
<v Speaker 1>would go to. Now, drivers in the area would be

0:08:36.800 --> 0:08:41.120
<v Speaker 1>alerted to your request, so when a driver accepts your request,

0:08:41.600 --> 0:08:43.800
<v Speaker 1>that request goes off the list, so that way you

0:08:43.840 --> 0:08:47.679
<v Speaker 1>don't get multiple drivers all responding to the same request.

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:50.599
<v Speaker 1>The driver who accepted it then heads your way to

0:08:50.679 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 1>pick you up and take you to your destination, and

0:08:53.280 --> 0:08:55.440
<v Speaker 1>you can rate the driver, and the driver can also

0:08:55.640 --> 0:08:58.360
<v Speaker 1>rate you too. You can give a review and the

0:08:58.440 --> 0:09:01.600
<v Speaker 1>driver can review you, so users who have low ratings

0:09:01.679 --> 0:09:04.440
<v Speaker 1>might find that they aren't getting rides as easily as

0:09:04.520 --> 0:09:07.760
<v Speaker 1>other people. In other words, it pays to be nice

0:09:07.800 --> 0:09:11.240
<v Speaker 1>to your driver, or at least not to be obnoxious

0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:16.679
<v Speaker 1>and disruptive. In October, Uber Cab received a one point

0:09:16.760 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 1>to five million dollars in an investment round, and that's

0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:24.360
<v Speaker 1>also when the company would drop the cab from its

0:09:24.440 --> 0:09:27.959
<v Speaker 1>name and just become Uber. But the company also got

0:09:28.000 --> 0:09:31.599
<v Speaker 1>a cease and desist order from the Public Utilities Commission

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 1>of California, and the reason was because the organization accused

0:09:36.240 --> 0:09:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Uber of acting as a cab company without the proper

0:09:39.320 --> 0:09:43.720
<v Speaker 1>licensing to do so. In other words, Uber was performing

0:09:43.880 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 1>a service that was identical to that of taxi cabs,

0:09:47.080 --> 0:09:50.439
<v Speaker 1>but not having to obey the same rules that taxicabs

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:53.720
<v Speaker 1>did so for the time being, Uber had to be

0:09:53.760 --> 0:09:57.480
<v Speaker 1>put out of commission in San Francisco uh In November

0:09:57.520 --> 0:10:02.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty Uber becomes available for Android device, and in February eleven,

0:10:02.760 --> 0:10:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the company would receive eleven million dollars from another round

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:09.320
<v Speaker 1>of investments. A few months later, in May, Uber would

0:10:09.360 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 1>go live in New York City. In September eleven, Uber

0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:16.679
<v Speaker 1>landed itself in some hot water with journalists. It was

0:10:16.720 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 1>revealed that Uber has a sort of overview of the

0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:22.400
<v Speaker 1>entire system within a region, and some people were calling

0:10:22.400 --> 0:10:26.000
<v Speaker 1>it the God view. It shows the names and locations

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:29.720
<v Speaker 1>of all the Uber users in that area. So remember

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Uber is using the location data of your phone and

0:10:33.679 --> 0:10:37.000
<v Speaker 1>then broadcasts set to Uber so that drivers can find you.

0:10:37.520 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 1>But that also means that the system knows where you

0:10:40.400 --> 0:10:44.000
<v Speaker 1>are when you are using the Uber app, So if

0:10:44.040 --> 0:10:46.160
<v Speaker 1>you were able to access this view, you can see

0:10:46.160 --> 0:10:50.280
<v Speaker 1>where all the Uber users are in that area. It

0:10:50.360 --> 0:10:52.079
<v Speaker 1>was meant to be an internal tool, but they did

0:10:52.120 --> 0:10:54.680
<v Speaker 1>start showing it off in a party at Chicago, and

0:10:54.720 --> 0:10:59.160
<v Speaker 1>that really started off some trouble. Also, one Uber executive

0:10:59.160 --> 0:11:02.240
<v Speaker 1>apparently sent a message to a journalist who requested an

0:11:02.280 --> 0:11:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Uber ride so because the Uber executive executive could see

0:11:06.000 --> 0:11:08.520
<v Speaker 1>where the journalist was and how the journalist was active,

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:11.960
<v Speaker 1>the executive sent a message saying, hey, won't you write

0:11:11.960 --> 0:11:15.079
<v Speaker 1>a story about Uber. Essentially, they were using the god

0:11:15.160 --> 0:11:18.160
<v Speaker 1>view to keep tabs on the journalist and that kind

0:11:18.160 --> 0:11:23.400
<v Speaker 1>of backfired. UH. That seemed to be a violation of privacy,

0:11:23.480 --> 0:11:25.560
<v Speaker 1>and since then Uber has said that it has placed

0:11:25.679 --> 0:11:29.640
<v Speaker 1>strict limits on who can view that particular data. So

0:11:29.679 --> 0:11:32.079
<v Speaker 1>this is not something that people can easily see now,

0:11:32.120 --> 0:11:36.040
<v Speaker 1>at least according to Uber. And Uber got another shot

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:40.680
<v Speaker 1>of investments in December eleven. They raised thirty seven million

0:11:40.720 --> 0:11:45.960
<v Speaker 1>dollars and also launched service in Seattle, Boston, Chicago, Washington,

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:49.720
<v Speaker 1>d C. And Paris. So they launched service in the

0:11:49.760 --> 0:11:54.560
<v Speaker 1>city where the idea for Uber was first born. In

0:11:54.640 --> 0:11:59.680
<v Speaker 1>April of twelve, Uber launched Uber x and that's what

0:11:59.720 --> 0:12:03.000
<v Speaker 1>allows people to become Uber drivers using their own personal

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:05.480
<v Speaker 1>vehicles at a lower rate than what you'd find with

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 1>a taxi or with other Uber services whey're using black

0:12:08.679 --> 0:12:13.240
<v Speaker 1>cars or SUVs or other upscale vehicles. The company also

0:12:13.320 --> 0:12:15.760
<v Speaker 1>launched a feature in which you could use Uber to

0:12:15.880 --> 0:12:20.280
<v Speaker 1>hail an official taxicab in markets like Chicago. So in

0:12:20.400 --> 0:12:23.280
<v Speaker 1>some markets you can use Uber to get a regular

0:12:23.360 --> 0:12:27.280
<v Speaker 1>cab uh and uh instead of an Uber driver, and

0:12:27.320 --> 0:12:29.360
<v Speaker 1>in some markets that actually makes sense. I'll talk more

0:12:29.360 --> 0:12:33.640
<v Speaker 1>about that in a second. In November twelve, Uber caught

0:12:33.720 --> 0:12:36.640
<v Speaker 1>some flack for its surge pricing, which had been an

0:12:36.640 --> 0:12:40.400
<v Speaker 1>issue already. Surge pricing was really Uber's way and still

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:45.080
<v Speaker 1>is Uber's way of managing the balance between supply and demand.

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:49.360
<v Speaker 1>So if demand is really high, surge pricing kicks in

0:12:49.520 --> 0:12:52.760
<v Speaker 1>and the price for Uber services goes up as well,

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 1>at least until the supply ends up coming closer to

0:12:56.480 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the demand. In other words, if the demand is really high,

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:03.040
<v Speaker 1>surge pricing goes up. Other Uber drivers might end up

0:13:03.200 --> 0:13:06.200
<v Speaker 1>entering that area in order to take advantage of that

0:13:06.280 --> 0:13:10.160
<v Speaker 1>surge pricing, because Uber drivers make more if the prices

0:13:10.160 --> 0:13:14.559
<v Speaker 1>are higher. But as supply ends up meeting the same

0:13:14.640 --> 0:13:18.440
<v Speaker 1>as demand, then the prices come down. It's very much

0:13:18.480 --> 0:13:23.679
<v Speaker 1>reactive to that. Well. During emergency situations, the demand can

0:13:23.679 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 1>be very high and supply can be very low, and

0:13:25.960 --> 0:13:31.360
<v Speaker 1>that can end up creating a difficult and sometimes um

0:13:31.480 --> 0:13:37.400
<v Speaker 1>well certainly discriminatory pricing in the wake of pretty awful situations,

0:13:38.520 --> 0:13:41.040
<v Speaker 1>one of those being when Hurricane Sandy hit New York.

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:45.640
<v Speaker 1>It was a very severe weather pattern that moved through

0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:49.120
<v Speaker 1>and hit New York much harder than anyone had anticipated,

0:13:49.679 --> 0:13:53.320
<v Speaker 1>and as a result, surge prices went way up in

0:13:53.400 --> 0:13:57.840
<v Speaker 1>New York after Sandy was moving through. Now Uber responded

0:13:57.920 --> 0:14:00.800
<v Speaker 1>by waiving the surge pricing for aids in the wake

0:14:00.880 --> 0:14:04.520
<v Speaker 1>of Sandy, and they also let drivers take home the

0:14:04.760 --> 0:14:09.040
<v Speaker 1>entire fair. Now Uber usually takes a commission off affairs.

0:14:09.600 --> 0:14:12.079
<v Speaker 1>Typically in the early days it was something like twenty percent,

0:14:12.280 --> 0:14:15.280
<v Speaker 1>meaning the driver would have eight percent of what they

0:14:15.280 --> 0:14:17.320
<v Speaker 1>made that day and the other twenty percent would go

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:19.840
<v Speaker 1>to Uber. That has actually changed over time, and I'll

0:14:19.880 --> 0:14:22.480
<v Speaker 1>get to that in a little bit. Around that same time,

0:14:22.520 --> 0:14:27.160
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand twelve, late Uber was fined twenty thousand

0:14:27.160 --> 0:14:31.760
<v Speaker 1>dollars by the California Public Utilities Commission CPUC, in other words,

0:14:31.960 --> 0:14:36.600
<v Speaker 1>for operating an unlicensed taxi and limousine dispatch service. Those

0:14:36.640 --> 0:14:39.560
<v Speaker 1>fines would never be collected upon because Uber and the

0:14:39.560 --> 0:14:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Commission would strike a deal in early allowing Uber to

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:48.880
<v Speaker 1>operate in California in return for following certain regulations. In

0:14:48.880 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 1>the summer of the rival service, Lift was starting to

0:14:52.320 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 1>get in some serious attraction. They were really starting to

0:14:54.840 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 1>take off. Lift had been around since twenty twelve, and

0:14:58.240 --> 0:15:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Uber had also had to face a battle on many

0:15:01.200 --> 0:15:04.000
<v Speaker 1>fronts as various cities and regions began to react to

0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:08.920
<v Speaker 1>its business model and you know, protest moving into those markets.

0:15:09.560 --> 0:15:12.160
<v Speaker 1>The company at that time was valued at three point

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:18.680
<v Speaker 1>seven billion with a B dollars. In September, California would

0:15:18.680 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 1>become the first state to regulate what is called ride

0:15:22.080 --> 0:15:25.760
<v Speaker 1>sharing services. Here's where I take a moment to say,

0:15:25.840 --> 0:15:29.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't like the idea of calling these ride sharing services.

0:15:29.280 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 1>I think of ride sharing services as a means to

0:15:32.120 --> 0:15:36.320
<v Speaker 1>allow people to car pool. In other words, so if

0:15:36.360 --> 0:15:39.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to a concert maybe and I say, hey,

0:15:39.920 --> 0:15:42.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to this concert. I've got a card seats

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 1>about twenties, so come along and bring your jukebox money,

0:15:45.200 --> 0:15:47.520
<v Speaker 1>people can put in an app saying hey, I'm also

0:15:47.520 --> 0:15:49.120
<v Speaker 1>going to that concert. Can you pick me up? And

0:15:49.120 --> 0:15:50.720
<v Speaker 1>if it's on my way, I can do that. I

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:53.840
<v Speaker 1>think of that as ride sharing. You are literally sharing

0:15:53.880 --> 0:15:57.720
<v Speaker 1>a ride, whereas with uber x you are using your

0:15:57.720 --> 0:16:00.200
<v Speaker 1>own personal vehicle. If you're an uber x dry, where

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:03.760
<v Speaker 1>you're using your own car to drive people around. That's

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:06.480
<v Speaker 1>not really ride sharing. It's still kind of more like

0:16:06.840 --> 0:16:10.000
<v Speaker 1>hailing a cab. It's just in this case it's not

0:16:10.040 --> 0:16:14.200
<v Speaker 1>a cab. It's someone's personal car. But it's not ride sharing.

0:16:14.240 --> 0:16:17.080
<v Speaker 1>I would argue, in fact, I think this whole share

0:16:17.080 --> 0:16:20.680
<v Speaker 1>based economy is a misnomer. But that's an episode for

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:24.400
<v Speaker 1>another time. At any rate, California passes rules in two

0:16:24.400 --> 0:16:29.080
<v Speaker 1>thousand thirteen in September that require Uber drivers and other

0:16:29.240 --> 0:16:32.200
<v Speaker 1>drivers drivers of other services that are similar to Uber

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:36.080
<v Speaker 1>to undergo a criminal background check, They have to pass

0:16:36.120 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 1>a training program, they have to obtain a permit from

0:16:38.840 --> 0:16:42.880
<v Speaker 1>the CPUC before driving for any of those companies, and

0:16:42.920 --> 0:16:47.040
<v Speaker 1>the companies themselves have to offer insurance coverage of the vehicles,

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:50.040
<v Speaker 1>and that put Uber closer to the level of taxi service.

0:16:50.480 --> 0:16:54.400
<v Speaker 1>And in addition, the CPUC demands one third of one

0:16:54.520 --> 0:16:59.400
<v Speaker 1>percent of the total revenues as fees. UH the various

0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:02.960
<v Speaker 1>cars are his companies saw this as a victory, the

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:08.840
<v Speaker 1>ability to have a legitimate claim to operating in those

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:13.040
<v Speaker 1>environments now. The following month, Uber made a deal with

0:17:13.080 --> 0:17:17.639
<v Speaker 1>a few auto manufacturers like Toyota and GM, and also

0:17:17.720 --> 0:17:21.320
<v Speaker 1>with auto financing companies to make it easier for prospective

0:17:21.440 --> 0:17:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Uber drivers to get favorable financing rates on vehicles when

0:17:25.040 --> 0:17:28.080
<v Speaker 1>purchasing a car. So this was a strategic move on

0:17:28.240 --> 0:17:31.919
<v Speaker 1>Uber's part to attract more drivers to work with the

0:17:31.960 --> 0:17:36.600
<v Speaker 1>service because they were seeing escalating demand in various markets

0:17:36.800 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 1>and that meant that surge pricing was hitting all the

0:17:39.359 --> 0:17:42.000
<v Speaker 1>time because there weren't enough drivers to meet that demand,

0:17:42.600 --> 0:17:45.159
<v Speaker 1>and that meant that the people who were asking for

0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:50.159
<v Speaker 1>rides were getting these crazy surge prices tacked on, and

0:17:50.200 --> 0:17:51.960
<v Speaker 1>they didn't like that. They didn't want to take the

0:17:52.240 --> 0:17:55.439
<v Speaker 1>they didn't want to use the service because why use

0:17:55.480 --> 0:17:57.800
<v Speaker 1>a service that's so much more expensive than just taking

0:17:57.840 --> 0:18:01.240
<v Speaker 1>a cab. So there was a real incentive on Uber's

0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:04.080
<v Speaker 1>part to get more drivers into these markets in order

0:18:04.119 --> 0:18:07.800
<v Speaker 1>to meet the demand that was already there. So they

0:18:07.920 --> 0:18:12.240
<v Speaker 1>ended up making these partnerships, and Klinik said that a

0:18:12.359 --> 0:18:15.359
<v Speaker 1>fully utilized vehicle on Uber would grows more than a

0:18:15.440 --> 0:18:20.080
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand dollars per year. Later estimations had at a

0:18:20.119 --> 0:18:22.440
<v Speaker 1>lower rate, but at this time he said about a

0:18:22.520 --> 0:18:24.800
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand dollars per year if it was quote unquote

0:18:24.840 --> 0:18:28.320
<v Speaker 1>fully utilized. What that means I don't know, I imagine

0:18:28.359 --> 0:18:32.560
<v Speaker 1>at least forty hours a week. But using that information

0:18:33.040 --> 0:18:37.720
<v Speaker 1>and coming from Kalinnick himself, UH, the car financing companies

0:18:37.760 --> 0:18:41.800
<v Speaker 1>in the car manufacturers were able to leverage and or

0:18:42.359 --> 0:18:46.000
<v Speaker 1>able to look at better deals for prospective Uber drivers.

0:18:46.040 --> 0:18:47.760
<v Speaker 1>So if you wanted to drive for Uber and you

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:50.920
<v Speaker 1>went forward trying to purchase a car this way, you

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:54.520
<v Speaker 1>would actually get really favorable rates. And klin Nick estimated

0:18:54.600 --> 0:18:57.440
<v Speaker 1>that the preferential rates would actually result in a hundred

0:18:57.440 --> 0:19:01.159
<v Speaker 1>to two hundred dollars in savings on car ements per month.

0:19:02.119 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 1>So having less to pay was a big incentive if

0:19:06.560 --> 0:19:09.280
<v Speaker 1>you were already thinking about driving, and keeping in mind

0:19:09.320 --> 0:19:11.800
<v Speaker 1>that these Uber x drivers are using their own vehicles,

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:15.360
<v Speaker 1>they have to purchase those vehicles and maintain those vehicles,

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:20.160
<v Speaker 1>so this was a necessary incentive. In March two thousand fourteen,

0:19:20.840 --> 0:19:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Uber announced an insurance plan that would cover drivers when

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 1>there are no passengers in the car, and this would

0:19:27.040 --> 0:19:30.000
<v Speaker 1>be an extension of personal coverage that drivers were already

0:19:30.000 --> 0:19:32.400
<v Speaker 1>required to have in order to be an Uber x driver,

0:19:33.160 --> 0:19:35.160
<v Speaker 1>So this was to kind of add a little more

0:19:35.200 --> 0:19:37.480
<v Speaker 1>protection to those drivers. This this was in the wake

0:19:37.560 --> 0:19:42.080
<v Speaker 1>of some pretty tragic circumstances where an Uber driver struck

0:19:42.160 --> 0:19:48.400
<v Speaker 1>and killed a pedestrian. Very tragic story, but Uber had

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:52.119
<v Speaker 1>maintained that the the incident when it happened, the Uber

0:19:52.200 --> 0:19:55.200
<v Speaker 1>driver was not carrying a fair nor was the Uber

0:19:55.280 --> 0:19:59.000
<v Speaker 1>driver responding to a fair request at that exact moment.

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:03.959
<v Speaker 1>In May two thousand fourteen, Travis Kalinnik spoke at the

0:20:04.119 --> 0:20:08.679
<v Speaker 1>CODE Conference and revealed Uber's long term plan is to

0:20:08.720 --> 0:20:12.080
<v Speaker 1>switch to autonomous vehicles, which we mean they would replace

0:20:12.160 --> 0:20:15.880
<v Speaker 1>human drivers, the cars would drive themselves. He talked about

0:20:15.880 --> 0:20:18.880
<v Speaker 1>the future in which car ownership would be increasingly rare,

0:20:18.960 --> 0:20:22.879
<v Speaker 1>particularly for dense urban environments, and in those places, instead

0:20:22.920 --> 0:20:24.880
<v Speaker 1>of owning a car, you just call for a car

0:20:24.960 --> 0:20:27.639
<v Speaker 1>whenever you needed one, and it would arrive within thirty

0:20:27.680 --> 0:20:29.600
<v Speaker 1>seconds and then take you to where you're you needed

0:20:29.640 --> 0:20:32.520
<v Speaker 1>to be efficiently and safely, and you wouldn't need a

0:20:32.600 --> 0:20:36.560
<v Speaker 1>space for your own car, because why would you ever

0:20:36.600 --> 0:20:38.840
<v Speaker 1>own one. You you could have that space set aside

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:43.280
<v Speaker 1>for something else, And cars usually sit idle like nine

0:20:43.280 --> 0:20:46.399
<v Speaker 1>percent of the time. You aren't in your car that

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:49.920
<v Speaker 1>frequently in the grand scheme of things, So why would

0:20:49.920 --> 0:20:53.120
<v Speaker 1>you pay for something that you only use ten percent?

0:20:53.200 --> 0:20:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Of the time you own it and you have to

0:20:55.560 --> 0:20:58.000
<v Speaker 1>pay for the place to keep it, especially if you're

0:20:58.000 --> 0:20:59.560
<v Speaker 1>in a living in a place like New York City,

0:20:59.640 --> 0:21:02.919
<v Speaker 1>where the payment for a car parking spot might be

0:21:03.000 --> 0:21:05.879
<v Speaker 1>the same as an apartment in other parts of the world.

0:21:06.720 --> 0:21:12.240
<v Speaker 1>So it's a pretty powerful argument. Uh. It also suggests

0:21:12.240 --> 0:21:15.840
<v Speaker 1>that Uber is not terribly concerned with what their drivers

0:21:15.840 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 1>think of the the company in the long term, but

0:21:18.840 --> 0:21:22.119
<v Speaker 1>the public image of Uber has been something of a

0:21:22.200 --> 0:21:29.880
<v Speaker 1>problem area for its entire existence. Anyway, This only makes sense, obviously,

0:21:30.000 --> 0:21:33.360
<v Speaker 1>if the amount you would spend on car rides through

0:21:33.400 --> 0:21:35.680
<v Speaker 1>the service would be less than what you would spend

0:21:35.720 --> 0:21:39.679
<v Speaker 1>on the ownership and maintenance of a vehicle. So I

0:21:39.720 --> 0:21:41.720
<v Speaker 1>guess in the very long run, if you were to

0:21:41.800 --> 0:21:45.359
<v Speaker 1>keep a car for a very very long time, then

0:21:45.480 --> 0:21:48.000
<v Speaker 1>you could argue that the personal car ownership makes more

0:21:48.040 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 1>sense because you are getting the most out of that vehicle,

0:21:51.160 --> 0:21:54.760
<v Speaker 1>and that's less common today than it was twenty years ago.

0:21:55.240 --> 0:21:57.240
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know that you can make that argument

0:21:57.240 --> 0:21:59.920
<v Speaker 1>as effectively today at any rate. Klan Nick says the

0:22:00.400 --> 0:22:02.239
<v Speaker 1>real reality of such a day is quite a long

0:22:02.280 --> 0:22:06.840
<v Speaker 1>ways off, but it is inevitable we will get there.

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:10.600
<v Speaker 1>And this address that he gave at the CODE conference

0:22:10.640 --> 0:22:12.960
<v Speaker 1>came not long after Uber had released a report that

0:22:13.000 --> 0:22:16.760
<v Speaker 1>claimed Uber drivers would make much more money than cab

0:22:16.840 --> 0:22:19.800
<v Speaker 1>drivers would now. According to that report, a cab driver's

0:22:19.800 --> 0:22:22.680
<v Speaker 1>salary was around the thirty thousand dollar per year mark,

0:22:22.760 --> 0:22:24.960
<v Speaker 1>and Uber said the median wage for a New York

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:27.800
<v Speaker 1>based Uber x driver who works at least forty hours

0:22:27.840 --> 0:22:31.920
<v Speaker 1>per week is ninety thousand, seven d sixty six dollars

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:35.840
<v Speaker 1>per year. In San Francisco it was seventy four thousand

0:22:37.200 --> 0:22:40.439
<v Speaker 1>dollars per years. So obviously the amount you make was

0:22:41.080 --> 0:22:45.119
<v Speaker 1>relied heavily upon where you actually work, and that doesn't

0:22:45.520 --> 0:22:48.840
<v Speaker 1>factor into account the expenses the driver would incur in

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:53.800
<v Speaker 1>owning and operating and maintaining that vehicle. So those those

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 1>figures don't indicate like how much did the car cost,

0:22:56.960 --> 0:22:59.280
<v Speaker 1>how much did it cost to fuel the vehicle or

0:22:59.359 --> 0:23:01.520
<v Speaker 1>park the vehic goal when you weren't using it, or

0:23:01.960 --> 0:23:04.199
<v Speaker 1>just take it in for tuneups. None of that is

0:23:04.240 --> 0:23:07.840
<v Speaker 1>factored into that that revenue, so keep that in mind too.

0:23:08.680 --> 0:23:11.720
<v Speaker 1>In June two thousand fourteen, Uber announced another round of funding.

0:23:11.760 --> 0:23:14.400
<v Speaker 1>In that time, it was truly huge, as in one

0:23:14.440 --> 0:23:18.960
<v Speaker 1>point to billion dollars, and at that point the company

0:23:19.080 --> 0:23:23.720
<v Speaker 1>was valued at seventeen billion dollars, so definitely on a

0:23:23.800 --> 0:23:28.320
<v Speaker 1>stress spurc rise and we're not done yet. In August

0:23:28.320 --> 0:23:32.800
<v Speaker 1>two thousand fourteen, that's when we had the the publication

0:23:33.040 --> 0:23:36.720
<v Speaker 1>of all the stories of the great Uber versus Left war.

0:23:37.800 --> 0:23:41.359
<v Speaker 1>So during August we started seeing lots of reports of

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:46.480
<v Speaker 1>one side accusing the other shenanigans. Most of the accusations

0:23:46.520 --> 0:23:51.320
<v Speaker 1>were from Left against Uber and had the added up

0:23:51.640 --> 0:23:56.639
<v Speaker 1>of internal memos to support the allegations. Left executives accused

0:23:56.720 --> 0:24:01.919
<v Speaker 1>Uber of running a campaign designed to sabotage lifts operations.

0:24:01.920 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 1>So the accusation said that Uber drivers had been using

0:24:04.880 --> 0:24:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Lift to call for rides and then to cancel them,

0:24:08.160 --> 0:24:11.160
<v Speaker 1>which would tie up drivers and make them frustrated as

0:24:11.160 --> 0:24:14.600
<v Speaker 1>they failed to get fares. At the same time, Uber

0:24:14.840 --> 0:24:18.800
<v Speaker 1>was accused of beginning a campaign to lure lift drivers

0:24:18.840 --> 0:24:22.639
<v Speaker 1>away from Lift to work for Uber instead. Now Uber

0:24:22.680 --> 0:24:26.800
<v Speaker 1>claims that lift drivers were also calling and canceling rides,

0:24:26.840 --> 0:24:30.159
<v Speaker 1>and in greater numbers than the other way around, And

0:24:30.200 --> 0:24:33.560
<v Speaker 1>the fight got really super ugly. And it's not exactly

0:24:33.640 --> 0:24:38.000
<v Speaker 1>done yet, but boy, that was some nasty press that

0:24:38.040 --> 0:24:42.080
<v Speaker 1>came out at during that time. Also in August, Uber

0:24:42.200 --> 0:24:46.360
<v Speaker 1>hired David Pluff and I'm probably butchering his last name,

0:24:46.400 --> 0:24:49.680
<v Speaker 1>but as a lobbyist to help push for favorable changes

0:24:49.720 --> 0:24:52.679
<v Speaker 1>in regulations and laws that could give Uber a place

0:24:52.720 --> 0:24:56.520
<v Speaker 1>in the market. He had formerly been a campaign manager

0:24:56.560 --> 0:24:59.639
<v Speaker 1>for President Obama, so it was very well versed in

0:24:59.680 --> 0:25:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the world of politics. In November two thousand fourteen, Emil Michaels,

0:25:04.800 --> 0:25:07.399
<v Speaker 1>who was a senior vice president still is at Uber,

0:25:07.720 --> 0:25:11.520
<v Speaker 1>suggested digging up dirt on journalists who published stories that

0:25:11.560 --> 0:25:14.359
<v Speaker 1>are critical of Uber. In other words, he seemed to

0:25:14.400 --> 0:25:19.000
<v Speaker 1>suggest using blackmail to silence critics, and kalin Nick would

0:25:19.040 --> 0:25:22.919
<v Speaker 1>eventually apologize for Michael's remarks, but he wasn't fired or

0:25:22.960 --> 0:25:25.160
<v Speaker 1>demoted as a result of them, which made a lot

0:25:25.160 --> 0:25:29.480
<v Speaker 1>of people really angry. By the end of two thousand fourteen,

0:25:29.600 --> 0:25:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Uber was valued at forty billion dollars, so twice as

0:25:35.000 --> 0:25:38.359
<v Speaker 1>much from the previous year. Uber is also banned in

0:25:38.520 --> 0:25:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Spain and Thailand, the reason given that the service is

0:25:42.200 --> 0:25:46.280
<v Speaker 1>unfair to other businesses, the taxi business in other words,

0:25:46.320 --> 0:25:50.080
<v Speaker 1>and Holland would ban Uber Pop, which is the UH

0:25:50.200 --> 0:25:55.159
<v Speaker 1>the European version of Uber X, but Holland would continue

0:25:55.200 --> 0:25:59.320
<v Speaker 1>to allow other versions of Uber to operate within the country. Portland,

0:25:59.359 --> 0:26:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Oregon sued to shut down Uber when it launched there,

0:26:03.200 --> 0:26:06.920
<v Speaker 1>because of course it did. In December fourteen, and Uber

0:26:07.040 --> 0:26:11.280
<v Speaker 1>driver was charged with kidnapping and raping and Uber customer,

0:26:11.400 --> 0:26:17.200
<v Speaker 1>which absolutely horrifying story. And this isn't the only instance

0:26:17.240 --> 0:26:20.680
<v Speaker 1>of an Uber employee being accused of something so heinous

0:26:20.880 --> 0:26:24.840
<v Speaker 1>as as rape. It's unfortunately happened a few times. At

0:26:24.920 --> 0:26:27.600
<v Speaker 1>least the charges have been levied a few times. UM.

0:26:27.600 --> 0:26:31.440
<v Speaker 1>A Florida driver was charged with assaulting a female passenger.

0:26:31.760 --> 0:26:34.320
<v Speaker 1>There were a couple of instances in Chicago, one in

0:26:34.359 --> 0:26:36.800
<v Speaker 1>which an uber x driver was accused of sexually assaulting

0:26:36.840 --> 0:26:40.399
<v Speaker 1>a female passenger, and a different Uber x driver in

0:26:40.480 --> 0:26:46.879
<v Speaker 1>Chicago was charged with sexual assault UM in January for

0:26:46.960 --> 0:26:51.720
<v Speaker 1>attacking a male passenger. Also in January, a criminal trial

0:26:51.760 --> 0:26:54.200
<v Speaker 1>began for an Uber driver in India who was accused

0:26:54.240 --> 0:26:58.639
<v Speaker 1>of rape, and in February, a Boston driver was charged

0:26:58.680 --> 0:27:03.320
<v Speaker 1>with indecent assault and battery. So partially as a response

0:27:03.359 --> 0:27:06.479
<v Speaker 1>to the driver assaults on passengers, Uber institute a measure

0:27:06.520 --> 0:27:10.440
<v Speaker 1>that was found originally in the Indian version of its

0:27:10.440 --> 0:27:13.760
<v Speaker 1>app uh this was a panic button that they they

0:27:14.359 --> 0:27:18.240
<v Speaker 1>enacted in Chicago. That panic button alerts police if the

0:27:18.240 --> 0:27:22.520
<v Speaker 1>writer feels threatened while inside the vehicle. They also announced

0:27:22.520 --> 0:27:26.960
<v Speaker 1>that they were going to institute much more um strict

0:27:27.359 --> 0:27:32.280
<v Speaker 1>criminal background checks before hiring on any drivers. So this

0:27:32.359 --> 0:27:37.639
<v Speaker 1>has been an incredibly negative story, obviously for obvious reasons.

0:27:37.720 --> 0:27:40.840
<v Speaker 1>You never want to have a company that's a service

0:27:40.920 --> 0:27:46.240
<v Speaker 1>oriented company putting customers at risk, clearly, and Uber has

0:27:46.280 --> 0:27:49.800
<v Speaker 1>been you know, responsive to it. But there have been

0:27:49.800 --> 0:27:51.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of critics who said that the company has

0:27:51.840 --> 0:27:54.120
<v Speaker 1>not done enough, nor has it done it quickly enough,

0:27:54.200 --> 0:27:58.720
<v Speaker 1>nor has it been responsible because this should never have

0:27:58.760 --> 0:28:02.720
<v Speaker 1>happened in the first place. So again Uber's public image

0:28:03.000 --> 0:28:07.880
<v Speaker 1>is taking a beating. Wouldn't be the last time. In February,

0:28:08.280 --> 0:28:10.679
<v Speaker 1>Uber revealed that a hacker had gained access to its

0:28:10.800 --> 0:28:17.320
<v Speaker 1>database in sometime, but it was waiting until reveal this

0:28:17.359 --> 0:28:20.240
<v Speaker 1>information really as part of the investigation that the company

0:28:20.280 --> 0:28:23.600
<v Speaker 1>needed to be quiet. The database contained the names and

0:28:23.720 --> 0:28:27.760
<v Speaker 1>driver's licensed numbers of around fifty thousand Uber drivers, so

0:28:28.200 --> 0:28:31.200
<v Speaker 1>potentially the hacker got access to all of that information.

0:28:31.720 --> 0:28:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Of course, they don't really know, or at least They

0:28:34.080 --> 0:28:37.400
<v Speaker 1>haven't released all the info that the hacker did access,

0:28:37.520 --> 0:28:42.240
<v Speaker 1>but it's potentially that much. In April, researchers at the

0:28:42.280 --> 0:28:45.040
<v Speaker 1>University of Cambridge and the University of Namur, which is

0:28:45.080 --> 0:28:49.520
<v Speaker 1>in Belgium, I believe, combined, they combed through mountains of

0:28:49.600 --> 0:28:53.040
<v Speaker 1>data fromteen to compare the cost of trips taken in

0:28:53.040 --> 0:28:56.240
<v Speaker 1>New York City on uber X and compare that to

0:28:56.400 --> 0:29:01.760
<v Speaker 1>trips in traditional yellow cabs. They wanted to see do

0:29:01.840 --> 0:29:04.760
<v Speaker 1>you actually save money by taking uber X and guess

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:09.720
<v Speaker 1>what you don't? Necessarily, They found that taxis were actually,

0:29:09.840 --> 0:29:13.560
<v Speaker 1>on average a dollar and forty cents cheaper than uber

0:29:13.760 --> 0:29:17.280
<v Speaker 1>X trips as long as the overall price was thirty

0:29:17.280 --> 0:29:20.680
<v Speaker 1>five dollars or less, meaning that it was a relatively

0:29:21.200 --> 0:29:24.400
<v Speaker 1>short cab trip. They found that on longer trips, where

0:29:24.440 --> 0:29:27.920
<v Speaker 1>the full price would be thirty five or more, or

0:29:28.000 --> 0:29:30.800
<v Speaker 1>rather more than thirty five dollars, the uber cars became

0:29:30.840 --> 0:29:34.200
<v Speaker 1>more competitive. Uh, it's just on the short trips cabs

0:29:34.200 --> 0:29:37.080
<v Speaker 1>were on the whole cheaper. Then again, you don't tip

0:29:37.280 --> 0:29:40.560
<v Speaker 1>uber drivers, but it is customary to tip cab drivers,

0:29:40.800 --> 0:29:42.880
<v Speaker 1>so it could be that once you factor in the tip,

0:29:43.800 --> 0:29:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the difference in prices is negligible. Uh. In fact, a

0:29:48.080 --> 0:29:51.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of the the scenarios I saw ended up having

0:29:51.560 --> 0:29:55.000
<v Speaker 1>the overall price of a cab trip being maybe fifty

0:29:55.080 --> 0:29:57.640
<v Speaker 1>cents more than an Uber trip, So it's it may

0:29:57.680 --> 0:30:00.640
<v Speaker 1>be that it doesn't really make a grand and difference

0:30:00.640 --> 0:30:04.200
<v Speaker 1>in the in in the big picture. Now, that discovery

0:30:04.920 --> 0:30:07.640
<v Speaker 1>actually led to the development of another app called Open

0:30:07.760 --> 0:30:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Street Cab, which lets you compare the estimated rates of

0:30:10.760 --> 0:30:13.880
<v Speaker 1>any particular trip between a cab and Uber X. And

0:30:13.920 --> 0:30:15.960
<v Speaker 1>the goal would be to build an app that automatically

0:30:15.960 --> 0:30:18.760
<v Speaker 1>recommends which service you use on any given trip. So,

0:30:18.800 --> 0:30:21.400
<v Speaker 1>in other words, you would open up this app, tell

0:30:21.520 --> 0:30:23.760
<v Speaker 1>you tell the app where you wanted to be picked up,

0:30:23.800 --> 0:30:26.720
<v Speaker 1>where you were going, and then it would estimate how

0:30:26.800 --> 0:30:29.520
<v Speaker 1>much you would spend on either service, keeping in mind

0:30:29.640 --> 0:30:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Uber's algorithmic searge pricing. Obviously, during a high surge price,

0:30:36.160 --> 0:30:37.960
<v Speaker 1>it would be much cheaper to take a cab because

0:30:38.040 --> 0:30:42.520
<v Speaker 1>cabs don't have surge prices. In June two thousand fifteen,

0:30:42.520 --> 0:30:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Parisian taxi drivers began to protest and they were violent

0:30:47.120 --> 0:30:50.160
<v Speaker 1>about it. I mean, there was some violent protesting in

0:30:50.200 --> 0:30:52.680
<v Speaker 1>the streets of Paris, and it was all about Uber

0:30:52.680 --> 0:30:56.360
<v Speaker 1>pop again that equipal, that European equivalent of Uber X.

0:30:57.160 --> 0:31:00.040
<v Speaker 1>Part of this reason what was that the taxi drivers

0:31:00.040 --> 0:31:03.560
<v Speaker 1>in Paris work in a highly regulated business and the

0:31:03.680 --> 0:31:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Uber drivers aren't subjected to the same restrictions that the

0:31:06.880 --> 0:31:09.680
<v Speaker 1>taxi drivers are, which creates what the taxi drivers see

0:31:09.800 --> 0:31:14.760
<v Speaker 1>as an unfair market. I've seen some common some folks

0:31:14.800 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 1>common on this saying that the problem is that taxis

0:31:18.040 --> 0:31:22.200
<v Speaker 1>are an outdated form of business. They are based upon

0:31:22.280 --> 0:31:27.680
<v Speaker 1>regulations that no longer really are applicable. And the real

0:31:27.760 --> 0:31:30.760
<v Speaker 1>issue here is that you're looking at an outmoded form

0:31:30.800 --> 0:31:35.240
<v Speaker 1>of business and comparing it to the new emerging business

0:31:35.760 --> 0:31:38.480
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to the new emerging business needs to adhere

0:31:38.480 --> 0:31:40.800
<v Speaker 1>to the rules of the old business. But whatever your

0:31:40.840 --> 0:31:45.120
<v Speaker 1>perspective is, there was clearly a disagreement here. And in

0:31:45.240 --> 0:31:48.760
<v Speaker 1>July two thousand fifteen, Steve Jerviston, who is a member

0:31:48.760 --> 0:31:52.440
<v Speaker 1>of the board for the company Tesla, said that kla

0:31:52.520 --> 0:31:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Nick had made a pretty bold statement and had said

0:31:54.840 --> 0:31:58.560
<v Speaker 1>that if Tesla could build a fully functional electric autonomous

0:31:58.560 --> 0:32:04.160
<v Speaker 1>car by twenty Uber would purchase half a million of them.

0:32:04.160 --> 0:32:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Now that would be every single vehicle Tesla would make

0:32:08.160 --> 0:32:11.120
<v Speaker 1>in that year. Because that's about how many cars Tesla

0:32:11.160 --> 0:32:14.400
<v Speaker 1>makes New Year's half a million. So essentially, call Nick

0:32:14.440 --> 0:32:17.600
<v Speaker 1>was saying, if you can make an electric autonomous vehicle

0:32:17.920 --> 0:32:21.680
<v Speaker 1>in I will buy every single one of them. Now,

0:32:21.680 --> 0:32:24.960
<v Speaker 1>that would be incredibly transformative. It would impact taxi drivers

0:32:25.040 --> 0:32:29.200
<v Speaker 1>and Uber drivers alike because according to one study, if

0:32:29.240 --> 0:32:34.000
<v Speaker 1>you had nine thousand electric autonomous vehicles, you could replace

0:32:34.720 --> 0:32:38.600
<v Speaker 1>all of the yellow cabs in New York City. That's

0:32:38.600 --> 0:32:43.440
<v Speaker 1>about thirteen thousand, five hundred medallions. Medallions are the essentially

0:32:43.440 --> 0:32:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the authorization to operate a vehicle as a cab. Now

0:32:47.000 --> 0:32:52.120
<v Speaker 1>that's in Manhattan really mostly Lower Manhattan. But those nine

0:32:52.160 --> 0:32:56.240
<v Speaker 1>thousand vehicles would replace thirteen thousand, five hundred vehicles, so

0:32:56.280 --> 0:33:00.160
<v Speaker 1>you would remove more than four thousand vehicles from the road,

0:33:00.320 --> 0:33:04.760
<v Speaker 1>from the streets of Manhattan. So traffic would decrease because

0:33:04.760 --> 0:33:08.080
<v Speaker 1>of that. Uh, the arguably you would have a much

0:33:08.120 --> 0:33:11.520
<v Speaker 1>safer environment because electric autonomous vehicles would be able to

0:33:11.560 --> 0:33:16.040
<v Speaker 1>respond much more quickly than human operated vehicles. There are

0:33:16.040 --> 0:33:20.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of benefits to this. So let's say that

0:33:20.400 --> 0:33:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Uber bought five hundred thousand electric autonomous vehicles. Imagine how

0:33:24.960 --> 0:33:28.560
<v Speaker 1>many different regions they could impact. With that, if nine

0:33:28.600 --> 0:33:32.120
<v Speaker 1>thousand would be enough to affect Manhattan, keep in mind

0:33:32.600 --> 0:33:37.400
<v Speaker 1>the yellow cabs of Manhattan carry about four five thousand

0:33:37.520 --> 0:33:42.400
<v Speaker 1>fairs in an average day. Just imagine transforming all the

0:33:42.440 --> 0:33:45.880
<v Speaker 1>different markets out there with five hundred thousand of these cars.

0:33:45.920 --> 0:33:49.400
<v Speaker 1>You could make a huge impact across the entire United States,

0:33:50.200 --> 0:33:54.400
<v Speaker 1>assuming of course, that it was legal to operate autonomous

0:33:54.520 --> 0:33:58.360
<v Speaker 1>vehicles as taxis in those states. It would also mean

0:33:58.440 --> 0:34:01.400
<v Speaker 1>that Uber would be making a more money for the

0:34:01.440 --> 0:34:04.000
<v Speaker 1>company itself because it would be taking It would take

0:34:04.040 --> 0:34:07.880
<v Speaker 1>a hundred percent of the fairs as opposed to twenty.

0:34:09.960 --> 0:34:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Now here's some other points about cabs versus Uber in

0:34:13.520 --> 0:34:16.440
<v Speaker 1>New York City. Slayton had a piece about Uber and

0:34:16.480 --> 0:34:19.799
<v Speaker 1>New York and talked about how it didn't matter that

0:34:19.840 --> 0:34:21.920
<v Speaker 1>there are more Uber drivers in New York City than

0:34:21.920 --> 0:34:24.560
<v Speaker 1>there are cab drivers. That was one of those stories

0:34:24.600 --> 0:34:29.040
<v Speaker 1>that was capturing a lot of attention because you know,

0:34:29.120 --> 0:34:32.200
<v Speaker 1>people were using that as an argument to say, this

0:34:32.480 --> 0:34:37.120
<v Speaker 1>new disruptive business is threatening this older business that has

0:34:37.160 --> 0:34:42.320
<v Speaker 1>been established and regulated over the past several decades. Slate

0:34:42.360 --> 0:34:46.319
<v Speaker 1>pointed out that this there was a huge disparity in

0:34:46.520 --> 0:34:50.799
<v Speaker 1>the number of trips between yellow cabs and Uber. So

0:34:50.840 --> 0:34:52.719
<v Speaker 1>even though there are more Uber drivers in New York

0:34:52.760 --> 0:34:56.560
<v Speaker 1>City than there are cab drivers, the cab drivers are

0:34:56.600 --> 0:35:01.480
<v Speaker 1>taking way more of the fares again, thousand on average

0:35:01.480 --> 0:35:06.040
<v Speaker 1>per day. Uber is closer to thirty four thousand. They

0:35:06.120 --> 0:35:09.880
<v Speaker 1>also say, well, you know that there's this argument about

0:35:09.960 --> 0:35:12.359
<v Speaker 1>how you can make a really good salaries an Uber

0:35:12.440 --> 0:35:14.120
<v Speaker 1>driver in New York. All you have to do is

0:35:14.160 --> 0:35:17.080
<v Speaker 1>work forty or more hours a week. It turns out

0:35:17.120 --> 0:35:20.080
<v Speaker 1>that nearly all the drivers in New York who are

0:35:20.120 --> 0:35:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Uber drivers are driving significantly fewer hours than that of

0:35:24.920 --> 0:35:28.120
<v Speaker 1>New York's Uber drivers work between one and fifteen hours

0:35:28.120 --> 0:35:31.840
<v Speaker 1>per week, and another thirty five percent are driving between

0:35:31.960 --> 0:35:35.439
<v Speaker 1>sixteen and thirty four hours. So the vast majority are

0:35:35.560 --> 0:35:38.200
<v Speaker 1>driving fewer than forty hours per week. They're not making

0:35:38.200 --> 0:35:42.960
<v Speaker 1>that ninety thousand dollars that was quoted earlier. Um. In

0:35:43.280 --> 0:35:46.200
<v Speaker 1>other words, most of them are working as Uber drivers

0:35:46.200 --> 0:35:49.120
<v Speaker 1>as a part time job, not a full time gig.

0:35:49.840 --> 0:35:52.120
<v Speaker 1>And of course there's some other issues. Ubers come under

0:35:52.120 --> 0:35:54.920
<v Speaker 1>fire from multiple fronts. Uh they are the commissions and

0:35:55.000 --> 0:35:58.720
<v Speaker 1>unions that represent existing businesses that oppose Uber for various reasons,

0:35:59.040 --> 0:36:01.800
<v Speaker 1>from charges of fair competition to pointing out that Uber

0:36:01.840 --> 0:36:04.640
<v Speaker 1>needs to fall under the same rules as other services

0:36:04.640 --> 0:36:07.120
<v Speaker 1>that are in that space. There are also problems that

0:36:07.200 --> 0:36:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Uber has experienced with instances of drivers engaged in criminal

0:36:10.360 --> 0:36:13.600
<v Speaker 1>and violent behavior. I mean, obviously that is a huge issue,

0:36:14.360 --> 0:36:17.400
<v Speaker 1>and they're the criticisms about how Uber isn't responding to

0:36:17.520 --> 0:36:21.799
<v Speaker 1>calls to increase accessibility for people who suffer from disabilities.

0:36:22.239 --> 0:36:26.160
<v Speaker 1>So folks who have like you know, like people who

0:36:26.200 --> 0:36:29.960
<v Speaker 1>are bound to wheelchairs, they're having a harder time finding

0:36:30.480 --> 0:36:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Uber drivers that have vehicles equipped to handle that. So ideally,

0:36:34.440 --> 0:36:37.840
<v Speaker 1>in the future, Uber would have it built into the

0:36:37.880 --> 0:36:40.640
<v Speaker 1>app so that you could request this from the very

0:36:40.680 --> 0:36:45.759
<v Speaker 1>beginning and still have very fast response times. Obviously that's

0:36:45.760 --> 0:36:47.480
<v Speaker 1>going to take a lot of time, especially when you're

0:36:47.600 --> 0:36:50.560
<v Speaker 1>factor in Uber x, which require you know, has people

0:36:50.600 --> 0:36:53.799
<v Speaker 1>driving their own personal vehicles. Uh, there's an incentive for

0:36:53.880 --> 0:36:56.800
<v Speaker 1>them to have a vehicle that could accommodate someone who's

0:36:56.800 --> 0:37:00.560
<v Speaker 1>in a wheelchair, but that's not inexpensive and it's not

0:37:00.600 --> 0:37:04.120
<v Speaker 1>necessarily practical for all people who want to drive Uber X.

0:37:04.680 --> 0:37:07.600
<v Speaker 1>So that's a real problem. I mean that accessibility is

0:37:07.640 --> 0:37:09.600
<v Speaker 1>a very big issue that needs to be answered. I mean,

0:37:09.600 --> 0:37:13.799
<v Speaker 1>obviously you would not want to switch to Uber UH

0:37:14.400 --> 0:37:17.800
<v Speaker 1>and and have that be your only means of mass

0:37:17.840 --> 0:37:22.080
<v Speaker 1>transit for a given region if they weren't also accessible

0:37:22.120 --> 0:37:25.960
<v Speaker 1>for all people. There's also an ongoing public image problem

0:37:25.960 --> 0:37:28.279
<v Speaker 1>of how much the fair, how much of the fair

0:37:28.360 --> 0:37:31.440
<v Speaker 1>the company takes versus how much goes to drivers. UH.

0:37:31.480 --> 0:37:33.640
<v Speaker 1>It was a big deal when Uber moved from twenty

0:37:33.719 --> 0:37:36.520
<v Speaker 1>percent to twenty percent in San Francisco. They used San

0:37:36.560 --> 0:37:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Francisco as kind of a testing grounds for that, and

0:37:38.360 --> 0:37:42.040
<v Speaker 1>that was that was huge. Then in May, Uber announced

0:37:42.040 --> 0:37:45.840
<v Speaker 1>it would experiment with a tiered approach as a commission

0:37:45.920 --> 0:37:48.040
<v Speaker 1>for fairs. So in other words, it would be a

0:37:48.120 --> 0:37:51.120
<v Speaker 1>thirty percent take for the first twenty rides in a week,

0:37:51.239 --> 0:37:53.640
<v Speaker 1>the company would take thirty percent of the fairs and

0:37:53.680 --> 0:37:56.600
<v Speaker 1>the driver would take home the other seventy they're paid

0:37:56.840 --> 0:38:01.480
<v Speaker 1>weekly by the way. Then after the twenty rides it

0:38:01.520 --> 0:38:05.600
<v Speaker 1>would dip down to commission for the next twenty rides,

0:38:05.760 --> 0:38:09.879
<v Speaker 1>so from to forty the company would take of the fair.

0:38:10.080 --> 0:38:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Then after that it would drop to for all rides

0:38:13.640 --> 0:38:15.960
<v Speaker 1>until the end of the week. And keep in mind

0:38:16.000 --> 0:38:18.800
<v Speaker 1>that standard used to be for Uber x drivers across

0:38:18.800 --> 0:38:21.319
<v Speaker 1>the board, whether it was the first trip or the

0:38:21.520 --> 0:38:26.040
<v Speaker 1>forty one trip. Then there's the surge pricing. This is

0:38:26.080 --> 0:38:28.879
<v Speaker 1>one of those things that definitely has received a lot

0:38:28.920 --> 0:38:33.480
<v Speaker 1>of press, particularly in instances where people have been charged

0:38:33.640 --> 0:38:38.160
<v Speaker 1>huge amounts of money because the surge pricing was enormous,

0:38:38.160 --> 0:38:41.640
<v Speaker 1>like twenty times what the normal rate would be. So

0:38:41.719 --> 0:38:44.920
<v Speaker 1>search pricing kicks in during times of high demand. The

0:38:45.000 --> 0:38:48.680
<v Speaker 1>higher prices encourage are are supposed to encourage more Uber

0:38:48.760 --> 0:38:52.000
<v Speaker 1>drivers to hit the streets, so that way the supply

0:38:52.560 --> 0:38:54.719
<v Speaker 1>begins to catch up with the demand. As long as

0:38:54.760 --> 0:38:58.040
<v Speaker 1>the supply is meeting the demand, surge pricing isn't an issue.

0:38:58.480 --> 0:39:00.799
<v Speaker 1>It's when you have a lot of people asking for

0:39:00.920 --> 0:39:03.080
<v Speaker 1>rides in a particular part of town and there aren't

0:39:03.160 --> 0:39:07.320
<v Speaker 1>enough drivers. That's when search pricing kicks in. Uh. But

0:39:07.440 --> 0:39:11.799
<v Speaker 1>a Washington Post article written by Nicholas Dia Couplus postulates

0:39:11.800 --> 0:39:14.880
<v Speaker 1>that search pricing really all it does is to redistribute

0:39:15.080 --> 0:39:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the concentration of drivers in an area. It doesn't really

0:39:18.640 --> 0:39:22.759
<v Speaker 1>create an incentive for more drivers to go active. Uh. Now,

0:39:22.800 --> 0:39:26.480
<v Speaker 1>it does decrease demand because youwer people are willing to

0:39:26.480 --> 0:39:28.600
<v Speaker 1>pay a high price for cars. So if you if

0:39:28.640 --> 0:39:32.560
<v Speaker 1>you realize that there's a multiplayer put on there. And

0:39:32.600 --> 0:39:34.960
<v Speaker 1>by the way, the app does tell you there have

0:39:34.960 --> 0:39:37.400
<v Speaker 1>been many times where I've looked at the the searge

0:39:37.480 --> 0:39:40.600
<v Speaker 1>pricing the four point five times the regular price, and no,

0:39:40.719 --> 0:39:43.040
<v Speaker 1>it's not worth that to me. You can actually tell

0:39:43.040 --> 0:39:46.520
<v Speaker 1>in the app, Hey, alert me when search prices come

0:39:46.560 --> 0:39:48.640
<v Speaker 1>to an end, when it's back to its normal amount.

0:39:49.800 --> 0:39:53.240
<v Speaker 1>But that's that shows that search pricing can decrease demand,

0:39:53.440 --> 0:39:56.799
<v Speaker 1>so that can space out how many people need to

0:39:56.920 --> 0:39:59.240
<v Speaker 1>use or want to use the service in a given

0:39:59.239 --> 0:40:02.600
<v Speaker 1>area in a given time, and as that demand decreases,

0:40:02.640 --> 0:40:05.520
<v Speaker 1>the search pricing decreases as well. So you can actually

0:40:05.560 --> 0:40:08.280
<v Speaker 1>see this price fluctuate quite a bit within a pretty

0:40:08.280 --> 0:40:11.960
<v Speaker 1>crowded area. Search prices place a multiplayer on the base

0:40:12.040 --> 0:40:14.879
<v Speaker 1>cost of a trip, and that might so a trip

0:40:14.920 --> 0:40:17.759
<v Speaker 1>that might cost ten dollars on an average day could

0:40:17.840 --> 0:40:20.880
<v Speaker 1>end up being fifty dollars or more in a heavy

0:40:20.960 --> 0:40:24.680
<v Speaker 1>demand uh time frame. And there are a lot of

0:40:24.719 --> 0:40:27.400
<v Speaker 1>horror stories out there about people who didn't realize that

0:40:27.440 --> 0:40:29.680
<v Speaker 1>they were arranging a ride at peak demand, and we're

0:40:29.760 --> 0:40:33.560
<v Speaker 1>charged enormous amounts for that. Right again, if you pay attention,

0:40:34.000 --> 0:40:37.239
<v Speaker 1>you can pretty much tell what's gonna happen, but it

0:40:37.320 --> 0:40:39.920
<v Speaker 1>does require you to pay attention. Usually you can just

0:40:39.920 --> 0:40:42.040
<v Speaker 1>wait a few minutes and the pricing will adjust. But

0:40:42.160 --> 0:40:45.520
<v Speaker 1>that volatility does mean there's not a big incentive for

0:40:45.600 --> 0:40:48.200
<v Speaker 1>more drivers to hit the roads. This is why we

0:40:48.280 --> 0:40:51.360
<v Speaker 1>usually see it as a means of redistributing the the

0:40:51.400 --> 0:40:55.440
<v Speaker 1>concentration of drivers in an area, rather than increasing an

0:40:55.440 --> 0:40:58.640
<v Speaker 1>influx of new drivers. Like if you are an Uber

0:40:58.840 --> 0:41:01.800
<v Speaker 1>X driver and you see a message that surge pricing

0:41:01.880 --> 0:41:05.840
<v Speaker 1>is in effect, and you think I could make some money.

0:41:06.160 --> 0:41:08.960
<v Speaker 1>By the time you get to your car started up,

0:41:09.160 --> 0:41:11.200
<v Speaker 1>hit the road and go to pick up your first fair,

0:41:11.600 --> 0:41:14.440
<v Speaker 1>that surge pricing may be over because it's so volable,

0:41:14.480 --> 0:41:17.120
<v Speaker 1>it changes so quickly, so it can't really be an

0:41:17.160 --> 0:41:20.560
<v Speaker 1>incentive to get more people on the streets. Well, guys,

0:41:20.560 --> 0:41:23.200
<v Speaker 1>that kind of wraps up the Uber story so far.

0:41:23.600 --> 0:41:26.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean there's a lot more to cover, including this

0:41:27.200 --> 0:41:31.080
<v Speaker 1>idea of a fleet of robo cars taking you wherever

0:41:31.120 --> 0:41:33.160
<v Speaker 1>you want to go. But in order to cover that,

0:41:33.320 --> 0:41:36.319
<v Speaker 1>I asked Scott Benjamin to join me. So in our

0:41:36.320 --> 0:41:39.320
<v Speaker 1>next episode you'll hear Scott and I talk about this

0:41:39.840 --> 0:41:44.040
<v Speaker 1>idea and the pros and cons and what Scott thinks

0:41:44.080 --> 0:41:47.200
<v Speaker 1>about a world in which we may not have human

0:41:47.360 --> 0:41:52.520
<v Speaker 1>operated vehicles anymore. It's so much fun to break that

0:41:52.600 --> 0:41:55.360
<v Speaker 1>news to them. Anyway, you need to tune in for

0:41:55.520 --> 0:41:57.799
<v Speaker 1>the next episode to hear that. In the meantime, if

0:41:57.800 --> 0:41:59.960
<v Speaker 1>you have any suggestions for future topics that I can

0:42:00.120 --> 0:42:02.560
<v Speaker 1>tackle here on tex Stuff, you should write me. My

0:42:02.680 --> 0:42:06.080
<v Speaker 1>email address is tech Stuff at all stuffworks dot Com,

0:42:06.160 --> 0:42:09.520
<v Speaker 1>or dropped me a message on Twitter or Facebook the

0:42:09.640 --> 0:42:12.719
<v Speaker 1>handle words tech stuff hs W, and I'll talk to

0:42:12.800 --> 0:42:21.920
<v Speaker 1>you again really soon for more on this embattens and

0:42:22.000 --> 0:42:33.120
<v Speaker 1>other topics because it has stop works dot com