WEBVTT - Grading The Ringer's 22 Ways To Fix The NBA

0:00:06.330 --> 0:00:10.890
<v Speaker 1>Good morning, sweet world, and welcome to the No Dunks Podcast,

0:00:10.930 --> 0:00:16.800
<v Speaker 1>presented by FanDuel, Saturday, September 5th, 2026. I'm J.E. Skeets,

0:00:17.050 --> 0:00:22.480
<v Speaker 1>here in the yard, hoping, praying my mic is working

0:00:22.520 --> 0:00:25.560
<v Speaker 1>a little bit better than the last time I tried this.

0:00:26.380 --> 0:00:28.980
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to have to lean here on the stream

0:00:29.020 --> 0:00:33.280
<v Speaker 1>team to let me know whether I'm coming in crystal clear.

0:00:33.380 --> 0:00:37.780
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what happened. with the Bulmer Kauai Emergency Podcast.

0:00:38.300 --> 0:00:42.280
<v Speaker 1>I had this mic selected and then it sounded like

0:00:42.340 --> 0:00:44.320
<v Speaker 1>I was in an aquarium or something. So let me

0:00:44.360 --> 0:00:46.760
<v Speaker 1>know if you can hear me and you can see

0:00:46.820 --> 0:00:48.659
<v Speaker 1>me and all that good stuff. If you can feel me,

0:00:48.720 --> 0:00:52.660
<v Speaker 1>all right. Everybody says I sound good. Hello. Little bonus

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:57.150
<v Speaker 1>surprise episode here. Trying something different. Always trying to get

0:00:57.200 --> 0:01:02.170
<v Speaker 1>creative here. I'm gonna share my thoughts and ultimately grade

0:01:02.250 --> 0:01:05.730
<v Speaker 1>some of the ringers ideas on how to fix the

0:01:05.830 --> 0:01:08.560
<v Speaker 1>NBA they had a very fun column up recently that

0:01:08.600 --> 0:01:13.120
<v Speaker 1>I thought we could tackle they asked 22 different employees

0:01:13.180 --> 0:01:15.520
<v Speaker 1>I guess one simple question if you can make one

0:01:15.620 --> 0:01:18.190
<v Speaker 1>change to the NBA what would it be and some

0:01:18.200 --> 0:01:22.350
<v Speaker 1>of the proposals were practical others got a little radical

0:01:22.370 --> 0:01:25.429
<v Speaker 1>a little silly but it's pretty fun so the plan

0:01:25.510 --> 0:01:29.660
<v Speaker 1>here for this podcast go through each one talk it

0:01:29.780 --> 0:01:33.080
<v Speaker 1>out And then decide whether we hate it or love it.

0:01:33.209 --> 0:01:36.410
<v Speaker 1>Maybe grade it on a scale of 1 to 5.

0:01:36.410 --> 0:01:39.610
<v Speaker 1>Something like that. Shouts to our guy Kenny Beecham for

0:01:39.650 --> 0:01:42.820
<v Speaker 1>basically inspiring this idea. I know Kenny does a lot

0:01:42.840 --> 0:01:45.180
<v Speaker 1>of content like this on his own YouTube channel where

0:01:45.220 --> 0:01:51.480
<v Speaker 1>he reacts to columns such as trade ideas or rankings.

0:01:52.160 --> 0:01:55.580
<v Speaker 1>I always enjoy those ones. But Kenny's a pro. I'm

0:01:55.600 --> 0:01:58.010
<v Speaker 1>just a man. I'm just a man with a little

0:01:58.110 --> 0:02:00.510
<v Speaker 1>time on my hand here on the weekend. It's too

0:02:00.530 --> 0:02:02.410
<v Speaker 1>damn hot to do anything here in Atlanta. I don't

0:02:02.430 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 1>know where you are. If you are outside right now

0:02:05.460 --> 0:02:08.760
<v Speaker 1>in Atlanta, you have to be in a pool. That's it.

0:02:10.000 --> 0:02:13.359
<v Speaker 1>And I think I'm doing pool hangs on Monday, the

0:02:13.440 --> 0:02:18.460
<v Speaker 1>actual holiday here in North America. So I'm inside. I'm

0:02:18.500 --> 0:02:21.370
<v Speaker 1>doing some NBA sicko shit here. And if you do

0:02:21.430 --> 0:02:25.230
<v Speaker 1>enjoy and end up liking this content, hit the like button. Subscribe,

0:02:25.370 --> 0:02:29.460
<v Speaker 1>comment away as the stream team already is. Five-star ratings

0:02:29.580 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 1>and reviews for everybody listening to the pod. So let's

0:02:35.340 --> 0:02:39.690
<v Speaker 1>share a screen and let's get right into the column. Again,

0:02:40.310 --> 0:02:43.550
<v Speaker 1>I've linked to this in the show notes. This is

0:02:43.630 --> 0:02:50.120
<v Speaker 1>on the ringer. 22 Increasingly Unhinged Ways to Fix the NBA.

0:02:51.730 --> 0:02:54.669
<v Speaker 1>And they say here right off the jump, they start

0:02:55.030 --> 0:02:58.709
<v Speaker 1>a little more practical, a little more reasonable and get

0:02:58.750 --> 0:03:01.400
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more unhinged as it goes on. And

0:03:01.410 --> 0:03:04.260
<v Speaker 1>we'll just tackle them in order here. And I'm not

0:03:04.280 --> 0:03:06.540
<v Speaker 1>going to read this whole column. You can go do that,

0:03:06.639 --> 0:03:10.440
<v Speaker 1>but obviously we'll highlight the idea, some of the thoughts

0:03:10.540 --> 0:03:13.440
<v Speaker 1>from the writer in particular, and then again, we'll grade it.

0:03:13.520 --> 0:03:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Maybe at the end, if I can keep track well enough,

0:03:16.480 --> 0:03:20.519
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you my top five favorite ideas. from this

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 1>ringer article on how to fix the nba that's what

0:03:22.500 --> 0:03:25.639
<v Speaker 1>we're doing here and who knows maybe you guys have

0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:29.340
<v Speaker 1>22 other ideas how to fix the nba and that

0:03:29.380 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 1>can be a whole other uh podcast down the line

0:03:32.320 --> 0:03:34.730
<v Speaker 1>here you know it's the summer we're still uh we're

0:03:34.750 --> 0:03:36.690
<v Speaker 1>still scraping the bottom of the barrel here for some

0:03:36.750 --> 0:03:38.710
<v Speaker 1>content here but this should be fun okay so part

0:03:38.770 --> 0:03:41.170
<v Speaker 1>one they say it right here uh wait these are

0:03:41.210 --> 0:03:42.990
<v Speaker 1>actually good ideas and i think what they mean is

0:03:43.030 --> 0:03:47.330
<v Speaker 1>like you know these are maybe possible first one Rob Mahoney,

0:03:47.670 --> 0:03:49.990
<v Speaker 1>our guy, Rob Mahoney. We got to get him back

0:03:50.030 --> 0:03:52.610
<v Speaker 1>on the podcast. Let's do that. Let's have him on

0:03:53.430 --> 0:03:55.650
<v Speaker 1>for some like preseason fun. I love Rob Mahoney. I

0:03:55.650 --> 0:03:58.580
<v Speaker 1>think he's one of the best podcasters in the game. Okay,

0:03:58.620 --> 0:04:03.790
<v Speaker 1>his idea, get rid of pick protections. He's tired of it.

0:04:05.020 --> 0:04:08.140
<v Speaker 1>You know, he's trying to keep track of who has

0:04:08.240 --> 0:04:10.380
<v Speaker 1>it and the more favorable and then it goes here.

0:04:10.420 --> 0:04:12.340
<v Speaker 1>But if it's in this range, it goes to this team.

0:04:12.380 --> 0:04:14.260
<v Speaker 1>And it's like, you know, and then it fails to convey.

0:04:14.300 --> 0:04:15.920
<v Speaker 1>And then, oh my God, it's second round picks. And

0:04:15.940 --> 0:04:20.670
<v Speaker 1>it's like, It's frustrating. Like it's gotten out of hand. And,

0:04:21.250 --> 0:04:22.950
<v Speaker 1>you know, as someone who does this for a living,

0:04:23.510 --> 0:04:26.610
<v Speaker 1>I go to those real GM pages. I look at

0:04:26.670 --> 0:04:29.469
<v Speaker 1>some of the picks and I give up after like

0:04:29.470 --> 0:04:31.830
<v Speaker 1>30 seconds. I don't know. I'm like, I don't know

0:04:31.870 --> 0:04:35.529
<v Speaker 1>who has this. Where is it going? So I really

0:04:35.589 --> 0:04:41.240
<v Speaker 1>like this idea. Get rid of pick protections. The idea

0:04:41.300 --> 0:04:44.140
<v Speaker 1>is you either trade the pick or you don't, as

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:47.580
<v Speaker 1>Rob says. You take the risk of trading said pick

0:04:47.920 --> 0:04:51.890
<v Speaker 1>or you don't. Let's just keep it very simple. I

0:04:51.930 --> 0:04:55.770
<v Speaker 1>like it. I'm on board. Again, I'm maybe in the

0:04:55.830 --> 0:04:59.030
<v Speaker 1>weeds when it comes to this stuff, but my eyes

0:04:59.089 --> 0:05:01.270
<v Speaker 1>just gloss over when I try and make sense of

0:05:01.310 --> 0:05:05.300
<v Speaker 1>some of these. TK just did a short recently, if

0:05:05.339 --> 0:05:10.110
<v Speaker 1>you saw, on a real... I can't remember which particular

0:05:10.190 --> 0:05:12.390
<v Speaker 1>one it was. It doesn't really matter. But it was

0:05:12.430 --> 0:05:17.529
<v Speaker 1>like war and peace. Trying to like read through of

0:05:17.890 --> 0:05:20.420
<v Speaker 1>all the protections and where it goes. And if this happens,

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:23.070
<v Speaker 1>then this happens and all this. He wasn't making it up.

0:05:23.100 --> 0:05:24.920
<v Speaker 1>He didn't write it. It wasn't AI or something like that.

0:05:24.940 --> 0:05:29.140
<v Speaker 1>It's like a real crazy protected pick that's like owned

0:05:29.180 --> 0:05:31.120
<v Speaker 1>in some weird way by like eight different teams. So

0:05:32.020 --> 0:05:34.700
<v Speaker 1>I like this one. High on this one. I will say,

0:05:34.800 --> 0:05:39.260
<v Speaker 1>you know what? Starting off with five stars. I like it.

0:05:39.980 --> 0:05:42.159
<v Speaker 1>I like it. I mean, I like what's the counter

0:05:42.380 --> 0:05:46.039
<v Speaker 1>to like keeping it. I guess it may be facilitates

0:05:46.080 --> 0:05:49.220
<v Speaker 1>more trades because it's not so binary. It's like you

0:05:49.300 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 1>either trade the bigger you don't. So, you know, you can,

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:53.920
<v Speaker 1>you can cover your ass as a franchise a bit,

0:05:53.980 --> 0:05:56.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, or, or you can get unlucky as we

0:05:56.240 --> 0:05:58.780
<v Speaker 1>saw with the Pacers and the zoo bots trade and

0:05:58.820 --> 0:06:01.339
<v Speaker 1>the pick protection sort of backfired on them. And the

0:06:01.380 --> 0:06:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Clippers luckily got it. My God, now they're out of

0:06:03.540 --> 0:06:07.570
<v Speaker 1>picks for a decade. So maybe that's why you want

0:06:07.589 --> 0:06:11.830
<v Speaker 1>to keep them, but I don't care that much. You

0:06:11.850 --> 0:06:14.550
<v Speaker 1>trade the pick or you don't. The stakes are high

0:06:14.589 --> 0:06:18.690
<v Speaker 1>that way. I like it. So five stars. Second idea,

0:06:18.890 --> 0:06:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Michael Pena. Abolish the salary cap aprons. Okay, so he

0:06:26.839 --> 0:06:30.960
<v Speaker 1>goes through. Okay, look, simply put, have we gone too

0:06:31.060 --> 0:06:34.240
<v Speaker 1>far here and we are now punishing teams that have

0:06:34.260 --> 0:06:38.219
<v Speaker 1>done a great job in drafting, creating squads that maybe

0:06:38.260 --> 0:06:40.920
<v Speaker 1>even win championships like the Nuggets, the Celtics, the Thunder,

0:06:40.980 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 1>and then they have to turn around and be like, well,

0:06:44.080 --> 0:06:48.280
<v Speaker 1>our payroll is obviously insane now, and we can't keep

0:06:48.300 --> 0:06:50.760
<v Speaker 1>the championship window open, and we just got to move on.

0:06:51.400 --> 0:06:53.659
<v Speaker 1>And so we got to start selling off pieces, thus

0:06:53.740 --> 0:06:57.620
<v Speaker 1>making it very difficult to create and maintain any sort

0:06:57.640 --> 0:07:03.810
<v Speaker 1>of dynasty. Now, Silver loves this, it feels like. he

0:07:03.950 --> 0:07:06.549
<v Speaker 1>can't stop talking about, oh, we got a different winner,

0:07:06.630 --> 0:07:11.650
<v Speaker 1>eight consecutive seasons. Like, he seems anti-dynasty, where a lot

0:07:11.670 --> 0:07:13.970
<v Speaker 1>of other people are like, hold on, dynasties are badass.

0:07:14.690 --> 0:07:17.020
<v Speaker 1>Because either it's your team, and you're like, hey, we're

0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:19.380
<v Speaker 1>trying to build one of the best teams of all time, or,

0:07:19.960 --> 0:07:22.780
<v Speaker 1>more likely, you hate said dynasty, you want to see

0:07:22.820 --> 0:07:26.260
<v Speaker 1>the dynasty fall. Who's going to be the team that

0:07:26.320 --> 0:07:29.040
<v Speaker 1>knocks them off? And you root against them. And it

0:07:29.060 --> 0:07:31.120
<v Speaker 1>feels like, you know, there's a lot of interest in

0:07:31.850 --> 0:07:34.970
<v Speaker 1>Be it the Warriors to some extent or the Heedles

0:07:35.030 --> 0:07:38.970
<v Speaker 1>before that and obviously Jordan's Bulls and go on and on.

0:07:39.150 --> 0:07:41.050
<v Speaker 1>We've had a lot of them. Or we used to.

0:07:41.230 --> 0:07:43.710
<v Speaker 1>Now we don't. So maybe you're, I don't know where

0:07:43.750 --> 0:07:47.970
<v Speaker 1>you fall, whether you're pro-dynasty or not. I sort of...

0:07:49.470 --> 0:07:51.070
<v Speaker 1>I sort of, I don't know. I don't think I

0:07:51.110 --> 0:07:53.910
<v Speaker 1>really ultimately care, but I guess it's really fun when

0:07:53.930 --> 0:07:56.930
<v Speaker 1>there's like these super, super good teams that you want

0:07:56.970 --> 0:07:59.990
<v Speaker 1>to see either continue to dominate or, like I said,

0:08:00.030 --> 0:08:03.040
<v Speaker 1>get knocked off. But again, the idea here from Pina

0:08:03.240 --> 0:08:06.340
<v Speaker 1>is a big reason why we don't have dynasties where

0:08:06.360 --> 0:08:08.820
<v Speaker 1>it's become more difficult is because of these salary cap aprons.

0:08:08.900 --> 0:08:11.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think ultimately we're going to like, these are

0:08:11.100 --> 0:08:14.560
<v Speaker 1>going to change. I do think we'll get there when

0:08:14.580 --> 0:08:19.120
<v Speaker 1>they get to the next CBA structuring and all that.

0:08:20.060 --> 0:08:21.980
<v Speaker 1>But I don't have this one as a five. I

0:08:22.020 --> 0:08:24.240
<v Speaker 1>think I'm more in the middle somewhere. I'll even put

0:08:24.260 --> 0:08:29.140
<v Speaker 1>it at a two. Because I just ultimately, I don't

0:08:29.160 --> 0:08:33.500
<v Speaker 1>know if I care enough. Yes, these teams are hurt. Look,

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:37.959
<v Speaker 1>there's probably a middle ground of something of when it

0:08:38.000 --> 0:08:44.040
<v Speaker 1>comes to you drafting said player, you get to almost

0:08:44.140 --> 0:08:46.480
<v Speaker 1>star them in a way or somehow as a workaround.

0:08:47.820 --> 0:08:50.160
<v Speaker 1>to your actual huge payroll and stuff like that. And

0:08:50.179 --> 0:08:51.560
<v Speaker 1>I know a lot of people have talked about this.

0:08:51.580 --> 0:08:53.340
<v Speaker 1>You can really get into the weeds with this stuff.

0:08:53.780 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, that makes sense. Cause like, why are we

0:08:55.520 --> 0:08:58.500
<v Speaker 1>punishing franchises for doing a great job of drafting and

0:08:58.559 --> 0:09:01.040
<v Speaker 1>building up these players? And then, you know, they get

0:09:01.080 --> 0:09:02.420
<v Speaker 1>to a point where you're like, okay, well now we

0:09:02.440 --> 0:09:05.819
<v Speaker 1>can't have two, three max guys. So bye. But again,

0:09:05.840 --> 0:09:07.560
<v Speaker 1>I think the league and silver loves that. They want

0:09:07.580 --> 0:09:10.620
<v Speaker 1>to like spread the wealth around. And it's like, okay,

0:09:10.640 --> 0:09:12.079
<v Speaker 1>I don't want you to have three max guys. I

0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:14.760
<v Speaker 1>want you to have maybe one or two. And then

0:09:14.780 --> 0:09:16.710
<v Speaker 1>I want another franchise to get said max guy. So

0:09:17.630 --> 0:09:19.430
<v Speaker 1>I'll go two. I'll grade this one a two on

0:09:19.470 --> 0:09:23.790
<v Speaker 1>abolishing the salary cap aprons and play along as you

0:09:23.809 --> 0:09:25.370
<v Speaker 1>guys are here in the stream team. All right, next

0:09:25.450 --> 0:09:33.239
<v Speaker 1>one here. Daniel Chen says, lose the conferences. Meh, why?

0:09:33.740 --> 0:09:36.600
<v Speaker 1>I got no problem with the conferences. I don't care

0:09:36.640 --> 0:09:39.620
<v Speaker 1>at all. Now, so I'm one star on this one

0:09:40.580 --> 0:09:42.700
<v Speaker 1>in terms of like, I don't see, what is this, fix?

0:09:43.590 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 1>I know we have another one later about schedules. And

0:09:48.010 --> 0:09:51.380
<v Speaker 1>you can make it more fair where every team plays

0:09:51.480 --> 0:09:55.120
<v Speaker 1>another team in the league twice. We could shorten the season.

0:09:55.160 --> 0:09:56.290
<v Speaker 1>Do all that. We'll get to that when we get

0:09:56.330 --> 0:09:58.620
<v Speaker 1>to it. As for this one, you know, I know

0:09:58.640 --> 0:10:02.820
<v Speaker 1>we're going to expand to 32 teams. And if they

0:10:03.080 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 1>are in Seattle and Vegas where everybody thinks they'll be,

0:10:05.980 --> 0:10:08.970
<v Speaker 1>those are Western Conference teams. So there's going to be

0:10:09.450 --> 0:10:12.910
<v Speaker 1>one of those Western Conference teams to balance things out

0:10:12.950 --> 0:10:15.329
<v Speaker 1>if we keep conferences, which I think we are. One

0:10:15.350 --> 0:10:18.390
<v Speaker 1>of those teams will move to the East. And, you know,

0:10:18.410 --> 0:10:20.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the teams are listed here. As to

0:10:20.480 --> 0:10:23.079
<v Speaker 1>who that could be, the Grizzlies, the Pelicans, the Timberwolves,

0:10:23.120 --> 0:10:25.479
<v Speaker 1>I think are the team that are going to be

0:10:25.500 --> 0:10:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the ones that come to the Eastern Conference, which is exciting.

0:10:29.300 --> 0:10:32.180
<v Speaker 1>I've said before, and I really should make it short

0:10:32.220 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 1>about it, is like Silver has such a boner for

0:10:35.340 --> 0:10:38.720
<v Speaker 1>tournaments that we should just have a tournament to decide

0:10:38.820 --> 0:10:40.370
<v Speaker 1>who gets to be the team that goes to the

0:10:40.400 --> 0:10:44.730
<v Speaker 1>Eastern Conference. It'd be awesome. Put all these teams in. Like,

0:10:45.190 --> 0:10:48.570
<v Speaker 1>I know, we even just picked the four most realistic teams. Okay,

0:10:48.590 --> 0:10:52.189
<v Speaker 1>we got Grizzlies, Pelicans, Wolves. I know, who else would

0:10:52.210 --> 0:10:56.460
<v Speaker 1>be sort of Eastern there? I don't know, Thunder, whatever.

0:10:57.059 --> 0:10:59.700
<v Speaker 1>Make it four teams and then let them battle it out.

0:11:01.020 --> 0:11:04.599
<v Speaker 1>You win, you go East. Now, more and more people

0:11:04.620 --> 0:11:06.450
<v Speaker 1>are like, do you really want to go East? East

0:11:06.530 --> 0:11:09.210
<v Speaker 1>is sort of getting stacked here now. Though the Thunder

0:11:09.230 --> 0:11:10.569
<v Speaker 1>and Spurs, of course, are in the West and that's

0:11:10.590 --> 0:11:13.430
<v Speaker 1>very difficult, but I would do that. Just make another tournament, Silver.

0:11:14.210 --> 0:11:18.570
<v Speaker 1>Play your way to the East. But as for this, conferences, meh.

0:11:20.130 --> 0:11:21.950
<v Speaker 1>I'm pro conferences. I want the All-Star game to go

0:11:21.970 --> 0:11:26.010
<v Speaker 1>back to conferences. Just straight up East-West, baby. So I'm

0:11:26.090 --> 0:11:31.230
<v Speaker 1>one star. Sorry, Daniel. Next one. Make the four worst

0:11:31.309 --> 0:11:37.810
<v Speaker 1>teams play for the number one pick. Isaiah Blakely. He

0:11:37.870 --> 0:11:40.910
<v Speaker 1>says the NBA's lottery system is boring and these new

0:11:40.950 --> 0:11:45.550
<v Speaker 1>wrinkles haven't made it more interesting. I guess he's sort

0:11:45.570 --> 0:11:48.990
<v Speaker 1>of projecting there as we get into the new draft reform,

0:11:49.010 --> 0:11:50.929
<v Speaker 1>which is actually going to kick in here when it

0:11:50.970 --> 0:11:53.809
<v Speaker 1>comes to the relegation zone. You don't want to be

0:11:53.830 --> 0:11:57.840
<v Speaker 1>the worst of the worst. So instead, Isaiah's thought here

0:11:57.920 --> 0:12:01.580
<v Speaker 1>is just let the four worst teams duke it out

0:12:01.620 --> 0:12:04.000
<v Speaker 1>at the end. I think he even says, at the

0:12:04.080 --> 0:12:07.900
<v Speaker 1>same time the play-in tournament is going on, we do

0:12:07.970 --> 0:12:12.309
<v Speaker 1>this little mini-tournament. And again, Silver loves tournaments. So geez,

0:12:12.410 --> 0:12:14.449
<v Speaker 1>this could be something that happens in the future. I

0:12:14.470 --> 0:12:18.170
<v Speaker 1>don't mind it. I don't mind it. You know, there's

0:12:18.210 --> 0:12:22.030
<v Speaker 1>some complications here. I think measures that need to be

0:12:22.050 --> 0:12:25.500
<v Speaker 1>in place, as Isaiah says, where teams couldn't get like

0:12:25.540 --> 0:12:30.360
<v Speaker 1>real slick with it and like shut down talented players

0:12:30.940 --> 0:12:33.100
<v Speaker 1>during the regular season only to bring them back for

0:12:33.140 --> 0:12:36.210
<v Speaker 1>this little mini tournament. So I don't know. How you

0:12:36.230 --> 0:12:39.050
<v Speaker 1>get to that, maybe guys have had to have played

0:12:39.090 --> 0:12:41.770
<v Speaker 1>so many games or something, I don't know. But, you know,

0:12:41.790 --> 0:12:43.790
<v Speaker 1>the idea of them playing for the top prize is

0:12:43.830 --> 0:12:46.270
<v Speaker 1>sort of fun. And taking it out of the hands

0:12:46.490 --> 0:12:52.880
<v Speaker 1>of just random ping pong balls. You know, I don't

0:12:52.900 --> 0:12:57.140
<v Speaker 1>mind it. I think I'm a... I think I'm a three.

0:12:57.840 --> 0:13:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Somewhere in the middle with this one. I do want

0:13:02.100 --> 0:13:06.640
<v Speaker 1>to see how this goes, the new draft reform, but... Yeah,

0:13:06.700 --> 0:13:10.500
<v Speaker 1>bad teams battling each other to see who gets the pick. Now,

0:13:10.740 --> 0:13:13.559
<v Speaker 1>the counter always to this is, why will the players

0:13:13.880 --> 0:13:18.390
<v Speaker 1>on said bad teams actually want to compete to win

0:13:19.090 --> 0:13:23.110
<v Speaker 1>the number one pick, which in theory could take their spot,

0:13:23.210 --> 0:13:26.770
<v Speaker 1>their minutes, their opportunity? It's like, okay, yeah. So I

0:13:26.790 --> 0:13:30.970
<v Speaker 1>think Isaiah says, you know, add money to it. That's

0:13:31.010 --> 0:13:33.329
<v Speaker 1>the answer for everything. Just throw some more money at it.

0:13:34.340 --> 0:13:37.640
<v Speaker 1>So then, hey, you guys get some more cash. But ultimately,

0:13:37.679 --> 0:13:41.340
<v Speaker 1>maybe your minutes will be gone if you guys win.

0:13:41.420 --> 0:13:43.470
<v Speaker 1>So that's what I get. I'm somewhere in the middle there.

0:13:43.490 --> 0:13:49.090
<v Speaker 1>I'll go three. All right, number five. Ban intentional fouls

0:13:49.350 --> 0:13:53.150
<v Speaker 1>and hack a shack. This is Anthony. You know, pretty

0:13:53.190 --> 0:13:58.470
<v Speaker 1>self-explanatory here. You know, the hack a shack is one thing.

0:13:58.490 --> 0:14:02.060
<v Speaker 1>That one, to me, like it is sort of insane. Still,

0:14:02.679 --> 0:14:05.790
<v Speaker 1>you're a pro. NBA player and you can't hit free

0:14:05.809 --> 0:14:10.750
<v Speaker 1>throws enough where it's like not even makes any sense

0:14:10.790 --> 0:14:13.030
<v Speaker 1>for the opposition to follow you. Like it, like people

0:14:13.080 --> 0:14:14.640
<v Speaker 1>have crunched the numbers, right? It's like, you don't have

0:14:14.679 --> 0:14:18.579
<v Speaker 1>to be an 85% free throw shooter to suddenly make

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:20.940
<v Speaker 1>that a disadvantage to the team doing the hack and check.

0:14:20.980 --> 0:14:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Like it's pretty damn low, the percentage. And it's still

0:14:23.740 --> 0:14:26.940
<v Speaker 1>mind boggling that the Mitchell Robinsons and I guess what

0:14:27.020 --> 0:14:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Ben Simmons is back in the mix. Like those guys

0:14:29.600 --> 0:14:31.540
<v Speaker 1>just can't hit at like basically a 50% clip. It's crazy.

0:14:33.370 --> 0:14:36.930
<v Speaker 1>So put that aside. The intentional fouls, I think what

0:14:36.980 --> 0:14:39.820
<v Speaker 1>Anthony's getting at here is the end of game situations, right?

0:14:39.880 --> 0:14:43.300
<v Speaker 1>Where it just turns into a free throw contest. And

0:14:43.320 --> 0:14:48.540
<v Speaker 1>it feels like it just zaps all energy from a game.

0:14:48.860 --> 0:14:51.910
<v Speaker 1>And we've talked about this for years on No Dunks.

0:14:52.470 --> 0:14:56.790
<v Speaker 1>I think it's part the free throw, you know, intentional

0:14:56.830 --> 0:14:58.830
<v Speaker 1>fouling and all that to try and get back in

0:14:58.850 --> 0:15:03.530
<v Speaker 1>the game if you're trailing. In addition to... the insane

0:15:03.580 --> 0:15:06.540
<v Speaker 1>amount of timeouts. Like, I was sort of shocked nobody

0:15:06.640 --> 0:15:10.200
<v Speaker 1>in this list, from what I can remember, suggested, like,

0:15:10.280 --> 0:15:14.980
<v Speaker 1>just cut back on timeouts. Aggressively cut back on timeouts. Like,

0:15:15.600 --> 0:15:18.940
<v Speaker 1>I swear to God, I think you should have two timeouts,

0:15:19.180 --> 0:15:24.140
<v Speaker 1>that's it, per half. Done. And you can only even

0:15:24.300 --> 0:15:26.160
<v Speaker 1>use one, let's say, in the final two minutes. So,

0:15:26.480 --> 0:15:28.840
<v Speaker 1>you got one other one, and then one in the

0:15:28.880 --> 0:15:32.480
<v Speaker 1>final two minutes. That's what I would do. Are you

0:15:32.560 --> 0:15:37.260
<v Speaker 1>kidding me? Am I hearing a leaf blower? My guys

0:15:37.300 --> 0:15:39.410
<v Speaker 1>aren't even here this weekend. The hell's going on? I

0:15:39.500 --> 0:15:43.990
<v Speaker 1>guess then some other neighbor's got it. Without fail, you

0:15:44.010 --> 0:15:46.250
<v Speaker 1>do a podcast and a leaf blower is going to

0:15:46.290 --> 0:15:54.050
<v Speaker 1>show up. It's insane. So yeah, I'm on the intentional fouling.

0:15:54.090 --> 0:15:55.790
<v Speaker 1>I'm high, but on the hack-a-shock, I care less. So

0:15:55.810 --> 0:15:58.250
<v Speaker 1>I'm somewhere in the middle ultimately on this idea for

0:15:58.290 --> 0:16:00.190
<v Speaker 1>fixing the NBA. I'll go right in the middle. I'll

0:16:00.230 --> 0:16:08.250
<v Speaker 1>go three. But fixing the end of game situations? Yes, yes, yes, please.

0:16:09.480 --> 0:16:12.700
<v Speaker 1>It's batshit crazy that what should be the best part

0:16:12.720 --> 0:16:15.260
<v Speaker 1>of an NBA game is usually the worst. So I

0:16:15.320 --> 0:16:18.200
<v Speaker 1>am all for fixing that. Be it getting rid of

0:16:18.280 --> 0:16:22.020
<v Speaker 1>intentionally fouling. Be it, like I said, the timeout situation.

0:16:22.080 --> 0:16:25.600
<v Speaker 1>All that. Which sort of spins into number six here

0:16:25.680 --> 0:16:33.730
<v Speaker 1>from Kirk Goldsberry. Shorten the games, the season, and the load. And,

0:16:33.750 --> 0:16:37.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, this has been talked about ad nauseum, obviously

0:16:37.340 --> 0:16:41.860
<v Speaker 1>shortening the schedule. It's too long, which, you know, everybody

0:16:41.920 --> 0:16:46.040
<v Speaker 1>says creates more injuries and superstars are out. And it's just, oh, yeah,

0:16:46.100 --> 0:16:49.820
<v Speaker 1>the data, the data, the data, the data. They say

0:16:49.840 --> 0:16:52.380
<v Speaker 1>is like they're just playing too much and they rest

0:16:52.400 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 1>too little. And because of that, we get all these injuries.

0:16:55.320 --> 0:16:58.900
<v Speaker 1>And Kirk has been on this for a very long time. Very,

0:16:58.940 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 1>very long time, especially as he says here with the

0:17:00.720 --> 0:17:03.180
<v Speaker 1>combination of the volume and the pace. And the way

0:17:03.240 --> 0:17:07.880
<v Speaker 1>this sport is now played with these athletes, that just

0:17:07.880 --> 0:17:11.030
<v Speaker 1>82 games is too much in sort of the, at

0:17:11.070 --> 0:17:13.430
<v Speaker 1>least the calendar it's crunched into. And then on top

0:17:13.470 --> 0:17:15.550
<v Speaker 1>of that, the playoffs, I mean, you get up to,

0:17:16.330 --> 0:17:18.150
<v Speaker 1>you get up to a hundred plus games for teams

0:17:18.170 --> 0:17:21.650
<v Speaker 1>that are going to the finals, which also I do

0:17:21.730 --> 0:17:24.070
<v Speaker 1>think pairs with this idea of maybe this is why

0:17:24.090 --> 0:17:26.070
<v Speaker 1>we're not seeing these dynasties as much too. Yeah, we

0:17:26.090 --> 0:17:28.210
<v Speaker 1>can get into the salary caps and the limitations of

0:17:28.270 --> 0:17:30.449
<v Speaker 1>like maintaining a good team because you got to pay

0:17:30.490 --> 0:17:32.520
<v Speaker 1>your guys, but Maybe this is a part of it

0:17:32.580 --> 0:17:34.619
<v Speaker 1>as well, that because of the way the sport is

0:17:34.640 --> 0:17:38.200
<v Speaker 1>played and the grind these guys go through, to do that,

0:17:38.560 --> 0:17:43.119
<v Speaker 1>to basically play 200 games over a two-year stretch is

0:17:43.359 --> 0:17:46.780
<v Speaker 1>just a lot. A lot. And maybe teams and players

0:17:46.820 --> 0:17:48.780
<v Speaker 1>are gassed out because of such. So I think that

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:50.440
<v Speaker 1>does go into play. But anyway, back to this. Back

0:17:50.460 --> 0:17:56.210
<v Speaker 1>to Kirk. I do like this one. I mean, again,

0:17:56.230 --> 0:17:58.450
<v Speaker 1>I hate when we always say this, but it feels

0:17:58.470 --> 0:18:01.150
<v Speaker 1>like it's never going to happen just because of money, money, money.

0:18:02.410 --> 0:18:04.530
<v Speaker 1>But I would love the idea of shortening the season

0:18:04.590 --> 0:18:08.980
<v Speaker 1>to make the games more important. I love shortening games.

0:18:09.240 --> 0:18:11.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm a huge FIBA guy when it comes to the

0:18:11.420 --> 0:18:15.399
<v Speaker 1>40-minute game. But again, I'm watching way more basketball than

0:18:15.420 --> 0:18:18.260
<v Speaker 1>the average person. So I think that's like, you know,

0:18:18.280 --> 0:18:20.100
<v Speaker 1>I have a biased opinion on that. And it's like,

0:18:20.180 --> 0:18:22.800
<v Speaker 1>oh yeah, I could get more games in the shorter

0:18:22.840 --> 0:18:27.930
<v Speaker 1>they are. I do love the 40-minute game. But also FIBA,

0:18:28.270 --> 0:18:29.870
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm tricked into it because when I watch

0:18:29.910 --> 0:18:33.560
<v Speaker 1>FIBA games... the pace of it is faster. It's just,

0:18:33.600 --> 0:18:36.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's not commercialized as much. So, you know,

0:18:36.520 --> 0:18:40.580
<v Speaker 1>I just went to a college football game on Thursday

0:18:40.619 --> 0:18:44.139
<v Speaker 1>night here in Atlanta to watch Colorado and Georgia Tech.

0:18:45.920 --> 0:18:48.330
<v Speaker 1>And I, I mean, I've been to lots of football games,

0:18:48.400 --> 0:18:50.190
<v Speaker 1>but I didn't realize first off it was on ESPN.

0:18:50.910 --> 0:18:52.790
<v Speaker 1>And I naively like told Nora, I was like, oh yeah,

0:18:52.810 --> 0:18:54.550
<v Speaker 1>game starts at eight. I'll be back. I think I'll

0:18:54.570 --> 0:18:56.629
<v Speaker 1>be back by, back home by 11. I don't live

0:18:56.670 --> 0:19:01.899
<v Speaker 1>that far, super far from the stadium. This game, This

0:19:01.940 --> 0:19:03.840
<v Speaker 1>game was still going at midnight. I didn't get home

0:19:03.859 --> 0:19:07.840
<v Speaker 1>until 1 in the morning. And part of it is

0:19:08.380 --> 0:19:11.500
<v Speaker 1>the longer commercials because of the televised product and all that.

0:19:11.900 --> 0:19:14.119
<v Speaker 1>And then, oh my God, there was a million timeouts

0:19:14.160 --> 0:19:18.330
<v Speaker 1>at the end. It just took forever. So I'm always

0:19:18.420 --> 0:19:21.270
<v Speaker 1>pro make these sports a little tighter, a little quicker.

0:19:21.430 --> 0:19:23.870
<v Speaker 1>I was a big fan of the World Cup when

0:19:23.890 --> 0:19:27.530
<v Speaker 1>you know what the actual time it's going to take

0:19:27.570 --> 0:19:31.359
<v Speaker 1>to watch the damn thing. So I like it. I

0:19:31.380 --> 0:19:33.960
<v Speaker 1>don't think any of this will ever happen, unfortunately, but

0:19:34.859 --> 0:19:39.520
<v Speaker 1>shortening games and shortening the season is a no-brainer. No-brainer,

0:19:39.540 --> 0:19:42.699
<v Speaker 1>especially if it does help with fewer injuries. That would

0:19:42.700 --> 0:19:45.940
<v Speaker 1>be awesome. But because of the whole television rights and

0:19:45.940 --> 0:19:48.300
<v Speaker 1>that's where the money is all made now, like we're

0:19:48.320 --> 0:19:49.679
<v Speaker 1>just not going to get there i'm high on this

0:19:49.700 --> 0:19:51.879
<v Speaker 1>though you know four give me a four out of

0:19:51.900 --> 0:19:56.720
<v Speaker 1>five on on fixing it number seven i guess this

0:19:56.740 --> 0:19:59.250
<v Speaker 1>is our last one of like yeah the realistic ones

0:19:59.869 --> 0:20:04.389
<v Speaker 1>so to speak bring back the preps to pros era

0:20:04.510 --> 0:20:10.050
<v Speaker 1>from danny chow um This one I don't care enough about.

0:20:10.070 --> 0:20:13.730
<v Speaker 1>I guess the concept here, though, is with the NIL

0:20:14.390 --> 0:20:17.919
<v Speaker 1>era and the money going into college and staying in

0:20:17.960 --> 0:20:20.720
<v Speaker 1>college can be attractive now for these guys and all that.

0:20:20.820 --> 0:20:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Because now they're like, I mean, look, college sports is

0:20:23.820 --> 0:20:26.420
<v Speaker 1>just turning into a professional league. It basically is already there.

0:20:28.090 --> 0:20:32.150
<v Speaker 1>That why not just let high school players jump right

0:20:32.190 --> 0:20:35.050
<v Speaker 1>to the NBA again like we used to? Where it

0:20:35.109 --> 0:20:39.470
<v Speaker 1>worked for some and it was complete disaster for other guys. Uh, and,

0:20:39.630 --> 0:20:42.640
<v Speaker 1>and like, uh, Danny or yeah, Danny says here, it was,

0:20:43.040 --> 0:20:45.659
<v Speaker 1>you know, there were some cautionary tales with guys who

0:20:45.680 --> 0:20:47.720
<v Speaker 1>were like making the jump and probably a lot of

0:20:47.760 --> 0:20:50.540
<v Speaker 1>it was financial reasons and it blew up in their

0:20:50.560 --> 0:20:52.379
<v Speaker 1>face and we never heard from them again. And maybe

0:20:52.400 --> 0:20:53.980
<v Speaker 1>they would have been better off going to college and

0:20:54.020 --> 0:20:56.679
<v Speaker 1>doing that route and all that. Of course, like who knows? Um,

0:20:56.859 --> 0:20:59.220
<v Speaker 1>so I don't care that much about this one. Sure.

0:20:59.240 --> 0:21:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Like I wouldn't be like, Oh no, no, you must

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:05.739
<v Speaker 1>go to college and pretend to get an education for

0:21:05.840 --> 0:21:09.940
<v Speaker 1>one year. And you'll also be paid. Like, I don't, sure.

0:21:09.960 --> 0:21:12.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, do that or don't. So I'm low on

0:21:12.540 --> 0:21:15.379
<v Speaker 1>this one. It doesn't really change much to me. This,

0:21:15.780 --> 0:21:18.399
<v Speaker 1>how the pipeline would go, whether they go to college

0:21:18.460 --> 0:21:19.699
<v Speaker 1>or forced to go to college for the one year

0:21:19.720 --> 0:21:21.820
<v Speaker 1>or not. So, I mean, especially when we get into

0:21:21.840 --> 0:21:24.700
<v Speaker 1>the international aspect too, it's like, what are the rules

0:21:24.740 --> 0:21:28.370
<v Speaker 1>are different for where you're coming from in the world.

0:21:28.420 --> 0:21:31.030
<v Speaker 1>So I'm fine getting rid of it. Having high school

0:21:31.070 --> 0:21:32.970
<v Speaker 1>players come if they want and they're that talented and

0:21:32.990 --> 0:21:34.470
<v Speaker 1>they want to go right to the pro, sure. But

0:21:34.930 --> 0:21:37.550
<v Speaker 1>this one, I don't care that much about. So I

0:21:37.570 --> 0:21:42.390
<v Speaker 1>will go to part two of the column here. Again,

0:21:42.410 --> 0:21:46.210
<v Speaker 1>it's in the show notes. It's fun. This one's titled,

0:21:46.230 --> 0:21:47.909
<v Speaker 1>You Want to Get Nuts? Let's Get Nuts. So they

0:21:47.930 --> 0:21:52.290
<v Speaker 1>get a little sillier here, maybe. Isaac has a fix

0:21:52.330 --> 0:22:00.700
<v Speaker 1>number eight. Get rid of instant replay entirely. Preach! Five stars.

0:22:01.380 --> 0:22:04.580
<v Speaker 1>I almost have nothing else to add. I'm over this shit.

0:22:05.280 --> 0:22:07.980
<v Speaker 1>They got it wrong. Who cares? There'll be another game.

0:22:08.040 --> 0:22:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Guess what? We got a lot of games. There'll definitely

0:22:11.180 --> 0:22:13.940
<v Speaker 1>be another play. Don't worry. We'll have a timeout before

0:22:13.960 --> 0:22:16.890
<v Speaker 1>we get to said play. It'll take a while. Yeah.

0:22:17.970 --> 0:22:22.669
<v Speaker 1>It's just like it ruins the television experience. Ruins when

0:22:22.690 --> 0:22:26.450
<v Speaker 1>you're in the building, for that matter. It is supposed

0:22:26.470 --> 0:22:29.540
<v Speaker 1>to be entertaining. Yes, we want it to be fair,

0:22:30.940 --> 0:22:33.619
<v Speaker 1>but it also needs to be entertaining. And when things

0:22:33.700 --> 0:22:39.199
<v Speaker 1>just come to a crawl in these games, it's brutal.

0:22:40.369 --> 0:22:45.990
<v Speaker 1>So I'd rather live, like I've proposed on controversial calls

0:22:46.050 --> 0:22:49.010
<v Speaker 1>or who's it out on or all that, man, just

0:22:49.050 --> 0:22:51.970
<v Speaker 1>shoot for it like we do at the gym. I

0:22:51.990 --> 0:22:56.250
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Nobody knows. Shoot for it. Like just, like

0:22:56.270 --> 0:22:58.770
<v Speaker 1>at least that's like a little drama, right? Well, somebody

0:22:58.810 --> 0:23:01.410
<v Speaker 1>at least taking a big shot to keep possession or not,

0:23:01.440 --> 0:23:03.240
<v Speaker 1>especially as we get to the end. But it's just,

0:23:03.500 --> 0:23:06.479
<v Speaker 1>we've just gone too far. These can be, they can

0:23:06.530 --> 0:23:12.330
<v Speaker 1>take minutes, several minutes to look at all this stuff

0:23:12.410 --> 0:23:15.210
<v Speaker 1>and break it down. And it's just boring. It's just

0:23:15.310 --> 0:23:17.129
<v Speaker 1>boring as shit. And a lot of the times it

0:23:17.230 --> 0:23:20.350
<v Speaker 1>doesn't even matter. And oh my God, like, especially like

0:23:20.450 --> 0:23:23.690
<v Speaker 1>first half, like, oh, let's twirl the finger. Let's all

0:23:23.730 --> 0:23:26.770
<v Speaker 1>green lights on. Let's go to Joe Borgia and Sakaka. Like,

0:23:27.350 --> 0:23:32.100
<v Speaker 1>Who cares? I get it. Playoff games, end of games, yeah.

0:23:32.600 --> 0:23:36.280
<v Speaker 1>So maybe we just literally keep it to that. But

0:23:37.680 --> 0:23:40.900
<v Speaker 1>I'm on board with this. I'm five stars. I wouldn't

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:45.980
<v Speaker 1>miss it at all. I saw my Raptors team get

0:23:46.060 --> 0:23:50.740
<v Speaker 1>screwed constantly. It felt like, again, a biased fan. There

0:23:50.770 --> 0:23:52.990
<v Speaker 1>was that one season, though, where it legit kept happening.

0:23:53.010 --> 0:23:58.060
<v Speaker 1>We kept getting back-breaking calls, no-calls calls. Sort of screwed.

0:23:59.080 --> 0:24:00.840
<v Speaker 1>I feel like this was a long time ago. This

0:24:00.859 --> 0:24:05.240
<v Speaker 1>feels like Bargnani days, if I remember correctly. Anyway, whatever.

0:24:07.420 --> 0:24:08.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's not like we were good enough. We

0:24:08.540 --> 0:24:10.800
<v Speaker 1>were winning the title anyway, so it still, it sucks.

0:24:10.880 --> 0:24:14.609
<v Speaker 1>But like, okay, you know, hopefully it all evens out

0:24:14.650 --> 0:24:16.710
<v Speaker 1>in the end. And I sort of, that's how I

0:24:16.750 --> 0:24:20.609
<v Speaker 1>believe it does with all this stuff. Like these refs

0:24:20.770 --> 0:24:23.770
<v Speaker 1>are human. They're going to make mistakes. So what? They're

0:24:23.790 --> 0:24:25.489
<v Speaker 1>going to make mistakes against you and for you, man.

0:24:27.619 --> 0:24:29.680
<v Speaker 1>So get rid of it. All right, next one, number nine.

0:24:29.780 --> 0:24:41.540
<v Speaker 1>Finally bring one-on-one to All-Star weekend. Regina is suggesting this. Okay, yeah.

0:24:43.680 --> 0:24:46.149
<v Speaker 1>I guess I don't have much of a take on

0:24:46.190 --> 0:24:49.610
<v Speaker 1>this one. Sure, would I be on board to see

0:24:49.670 --> 0:24:53.370
<v Speaker 1>if it worked? I'm skeptical. I'm skeptical it would work because...

0:24:54.600 --> 0:24:58.180
<v Speaker 1>I'm skeptical we would get the participants that we would

0:24:58.200 --> 0:25:00.510
<v Speaker 1>all hope for and want to see in this thing.

0:25:02.450 --> 0:25:04.310
<v Speaker 1>You know, just like when it comes to the dunk contest.

0:25:04.350 --> 0:25:07.169
<v Speaker 1>That's the thing. The contests are fine. It's getting the

0:25:07.310 --> 0:25:12.909
<v Speaker 1>guys in the damn thing. That's the issue. But, you know,

0:25:12.930 --> 0:25:16.990
<v Speaker 1>Regina points out the Unrivaled has done this, their one-on-one tournament.

0:25:17.450 --> 0:25:20.730
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, Trace McGrady's OBL Hoops. I know I get

0:25:20.869 --> 0:25:25.679
<v Speaker 1>fed a lot of that in my Instagram algorithm. I

0:25:25.720 --> 0:25:29.270
<v Speaker 1>think it's very digestible as an Instagram clip. I don't

0:25:29.310 --> 0:25:34.370
<v Speaker 1>know about an actual full event that's live there. But look,

0:25:34.470 --> 0:25:37.050
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't not be watching. So sure, give it a go.

0:25:37.070 --> 0:25:39.290
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it fixes anything. I don't think it

0:25:39.369 --> 0:25:45.490
<v Speaker 1>changes anything. If guys compete, it'd be fantastic. Jalen Brown

0:25:45.510 --> 0:25:49.850
<v Speaker 1>has said he would be down. But man, I don't know.

0:25:49.869 --> 0:25:54.270
<v Speaker 1>I feel like it takes one guy getting crossed up

0:25:56.690 --> 0:25:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Internet never lets them hear the end of it. And

0:25:58.660 --> 0:26:00.719
<v Speaker 1>then it's like the next person the next year. Like,

0:26:00.760 --> 0:26:07.860
<v Speaker 1>why would I do that? Why would I care? So two, three. Again,

0:26:07.880 --> 0:26:10.790
<v Speaker 1>I'm not fixing anything. Let's just be. Why not? With

0:26:10.830 --> 0:26:13.450
<v Speaker 1>All-Star Weekend, why not? Yes. If we have the guys

0:26:13.490 --> 0:26:15.130
<v Speaker 1>that will say they're going to do it and they're

0:26:15.150 --> 0:26:19.190
<v Speaker 1>like obviously star players, because I think that's sort of

0:26:19.270 --> 0:26:23.840
<v Speaker 1>important with this, then sure. But this ain't changing the

0:26:23.859 --> 0:26:29.180
<v Speaker 1>world here. Number 10, introduce the NBA red zone rim, Colby.

0:26:30.900 --> 0:26:35.670
<v Speaker 1>Suggesting like they have with football and the NFL red zone,

0:26:36.550 --> 0:26:38.290
<v Speaker 1>have a version of that. Now, this is funny to

0:26:38.330 --> 0:26:41.659
<v Speaker 1>me for a couple of reasons. And Colby does mention it,

0:26:41.690 --> 0:26:46.300
<v Speaker 1>but like NBA TV did this or tried to do

0:26:46.340 --> 0:26:50.689
<v Speaker 1>this with crunch time. Jared Greenberg. Should I hit it?

0:26:51.700 --> 0:26:53.980
<v Speaker 1>Should I find the clip? Should we hear some Jared Greenberg?

0:26:54.280 --> 0:27:11.659
<v Speaker 1>think i still have it in here yeah why not

0:27:12.359 --> 0:27:16.070
<v Speaker 1>that slaps absolutely slaps crunch time that was a thing

0:27:16.770 --> 0:27:21.660
<v Speaker 1>that was basically nba red zone um So they gave

0:27:21.720 --> 0:27:23.720
<v Speaker 1>it a go, you know, did it do well? I

0:27:23.720 --> 0:27:25.639
<v Speaker 1>don't know what the numbers were. I think it's, I

0:27:26.140 --> 0:27:31.180
<v Speaker 1>think it's done. Um, also 20, not 20 years ago,

0:27:31.180 --> 0:27:35.200
<v Speaker 1>15 years ago. Yeah. You know, nearly 20 years ago. Um,

0:27:36.040 --> 0:27:40.340
<v Speaker 1>we did this in Canada. Court surfing was this, if,

0:27:40.520 --> 0:27:43.240
<v Speaker 1>if you're a Canadian and you're old, uh, and you're

0:27:43.260 --> 0:27:47.020
<v Speaker 1>in the stream team right now, you'll remember that court

0:27:47.040 --> 0:27:51.180
<v Speaker 1>surfing was this concept. Now, uh, Tim and Sid used

0:27:51.200 --> 0:27:54.540
<v Speaker 1>to do it. Did Cabby have a go at it

0:27:54.600 --> 0:27:59.440
<v Speaker 1>too back in the day? Maybe Tass and I ultimately

0:27:59.859 --> 0:28:02.690
<v Speaker 1>did it for like a season, maybe season and a half,

0:28:02.750 --> 0:28:05.350
<v Speaker 1>something like that. But it was, it was like us

0:28:05.410 --> 0:28:07.850
<v Speaker 1>in studio, but we weren't on like camera all that much.

0:28:07.930 --> 0:28:11.510
<v Speaker 1>It was just more like flipping between games. Oh, we

0:28:11.530 --> 0:28:13.050
<v Speaker 1>got a close one over here. Like it was always

0:28:13.090 --> 0:28:14.270
<v Speaker 1>on a night where there's a lot of, you know,

0:28:14.310 --> 0:28:17.139
<v Speaker 1>close game here. Okay. They're in commercial break. Let's go

0:28:17.160 --> 0:28:19.470
<v Speaker 1>over here. Like it was fun and people loved it

0:28:19.550 --> 0:28:23.510
<v Speaker 1>up there in Canada. Little different when it was much

0:28:23.550 --> 0:28:26.230
<v Speaker 1>more difficult, especially for Canadians at least, to get games,

0:28:26.310 --> 0:28:28.150
<v Speaker 1>watch any game they wanted. So it was a fun

0:28:28.170 --> 0:28:30.429
<v Speaker 1>way to stay up on the league. If you were

0:28:30.450 --> 0:28:34.250
<v Speaker 1>an NBA sicko who at the time, it was like hockey, hockey, hockey,

0:28:34.290 --> 0:28:36.630
<v Speaker 1>all that. So it was a fun little niche thing there.

0:28:37.670 --> 0:28:40.190
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I mean, look, it can work. It is

0:28:40.280 --> 0:28:42.220
<v Speaker 1>weird that they don't have it, that the NBA doesn't

0:28:42.260 --> 0:28:46.880
<v Speaker 1>have it. But again, we sort of, Like it's, you know,

0:28:46.980 --> 0:28:49.500
<v Speaker 1>we're not fixing the NBA. Like we've tried this or

0:28:49.540 --> 0:28:53.030
<v Speaker 1>we've had iterations of this. So, you know, this is

0:28:53.250 --> 0:28:55.930
<v Speaker 1>really thinking outside the box. But I will say if

0:28:55.970 --> 0:29:00.110
<v Speaker 1>this actually happens, I want to host it. Okay. I'm

0:29:00.130 --> 0:29:02.890
<v Speaker 1>putting my name down right now. Get at me. Problem is,

0:29:02.910 --> 0:29:04.820
<v Speaker 1>do we even have NBA TV anymore? I mean, I

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:06.820
<v Speaker 1>know it's still there, but like what's going on with that?

0:29:07.460 --> 0:29:10.260
<v Speaker 1>Because of Turner Sports getting out of the NBA game.

0:29:11.000 --> 0:29:14.650
<v Speaker 1>But I'm in. I'm in. I'll do this if this

0:29:14.710 --> 0:29:19.180
<v Speaker 1>is a real show on an NBA network. So anyway,

0:29:19.800 --> 0:29:25.880
<v Speaker 1>two stars. Number 11, give owners a 10-year limit. Howard Beck, ownership.

0:29:26.820 --> 0:29:28.940
<v Speaker 1>It's often said might be the most important factor in

0:29:28.980 --> 0:29:32.350
<v Speaker 1>team success. Yet owners have less accountability than anyone else.

0:29:32.370 --> 0:29:35.670
<v Speaker 1>All right, and then it goes through. You know, bad coach,

0:29:35.750 --> 0:29:37.850
<v Speaker 1>bad GM, you get fired. Bad player, you get traded.

0:29:37.870 --> 0:29:41.620
<v Speaker 1>You get waived. Bad owners, they're eternal. Howard Beck writes.

0:29:42.460 --> 0:29:45.820
<v Speaker 1>So he wants to change it. His proposal is 10-year

0:29:45.960 --> 0:29:53.060
<v Speaker 1>contract upon purchase of the franchise. And then he goes through, like, basically,

0:29:53.740 --> 0:29:56.180
<v Speaker 1>you know, when you get to year nine of owning

0:29:56.220 --> 0:29:59.660
<v Speaker 1>said team, you got to reapply to run this, this

0:29:59.700 --> 0:30:02.770
<v Speaker 1>franchise still. And it's like, yeah, maybe the board of

0:30:02.810 --> 0:30:06.390
<v Speaker 1>governors and silver and all that potentially on a vote,

0:30:06.550 --> 0:30:10.530
<v Speaker 1>but it actually, there is a fan vote. There is

0:30:10.570 --> 0:30:15.210
<v Speaker 1>a local level initiative. And this would be fascinating to

0:30:15.270 --> 0:30:18.600
<v Speaker 1>see how many fan bases at the end of said

0:30:18.600 --> 0:30:21.540
<v Speaker 1>10 year run would be like, yep, we love this, this, this, uh,

0:30:21.580 --> 0:30:24.020
<v Speaker 1>this person in charge, run it back, give them another

0:30:24.020 --> 0:30:27.700
<v Speaker 1>10 years. It'd be just funny to see. Um, So

0:30:27.720 --> 0:30:29.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't, you know, this is intriguing to me. I

0:30:29.720 --> 0:30:34.680
<v Speaker 1>hadn't really thought about this. So I'm like, I'm a

0:30:34.740 --> 0:30:40.670
<v Speaker 1>two or a three, probably three. But it's a funny

0:30:40.710 --> 0:30:43.670
<v Speaker 1>concept of firing bad owners, or at least you have

0:30:43.710 --> 0:30:48.270
<v Speaker 1>a smaller window. And Howard like wraps up his point saying,

0:30:49.150 --> 0:30:52.230
<v Speaker 1>the truth is that every owner eventually sells. So you

0:30:52.250 --> 0:30:55.420
<v Speaker 1>know what that makes them? They're just renters. Because they don't,

0:30:55.740 --> 0:31:00.590
<v Speaker 1>they don't, own the team as he has in quotes there.

0:31:00.650 --> 0:31:06.970
<v Speaker 1>They're just borrowing them for a little bit. So yeah, yeah,

0:31:07.070 --> 0:31:10.350
<v Speaker 1>let's do that. Let's also do this with politicians at

0:31:10.390 --> 0:31:15.010
<v Speaker 1>basically every level. On board with that. So let's keep

0:31:15.050 --> 0:31:17.610
<v Speaker 1>it going with this. So I'm a three. Not bad there, Howard.

0:31:17.810 --> 0:31:20.790
<v Speaker 1>All right, number 12 and number 13, I'm pairing together

0:31:20.890 --> 0:31:25.860
<v Speaker 1>because they're one in the same. Jomi and Raheem, excuse me.

0:31:27.490 --> 0:31:30.810
<v Speaker 1>about jerseys so number 12 is bring back home and

0:31:30.850 --> 0:31:36.980
<v Speaker 1>away jerseys okay so simple enough just get like get

0:31:37.040 --> 0:31:41.820
<v Speaker 1>back to simplicity um or you're wearing white at home

0:31:42.280 --> 0:31:45.000
<v Speaker 1>for the most part lakers obviously with the gold and

0:31:45.040 --> 0:31:50.600
<v Speaker 1>all that and then the 13th fix is fix the

0:31:50.700 --> 0:31:55.690
<v Speaker 1>nba's aesthetic problem so this is just Like the idea

0:31:55.790 --> 0:32:00.150
<v Speaker 1>of there are too many damn jerseys. Brand identities for

0:32:00.190 --> 0:32:05.830
<v Speaker 1>these squads are completely ruined because of it. And get

0:32:05.870 --> 0:32:11.790
<v Speaker 1>back to basics. Either limited amount of jerseys, obviously the colorways,

0:32:15.130 --> 0:32:17.290
<v Speaker 1>stuff of that nature. Simple as that. A lot of

0:32:17.310 --> 0:32:19.910
<v Speaker 1>people do agree with this, that it's probably gone too

0:32:19.950 --> 0:32:24.380
<v Speaker 1>far where they are just changing jerseys all year. The time.

0:32:25.420 --> 0:32:30.850
<v Speaker 1>All the time. Even as Raheem points out, even when

0:32:30.870 --> 0:32:33.350
<v Speaker 1>they get a good jersey, let's say, like a great

0:32:33.430 --> 0:32:37.270
<v Speaker 1>City Edition jersey, it's gone a year later. And they're

0:32:37.290 --> 0:32:39.130
<v Speaker 1>just doing this because they want to sell more jerseys.

0:32:40.110 --> 0:32:42.510
<v Speaker 1>Because they want the diehards. They're going to buy it again.

0:32:42.530 --> 0:32:45.110
<v Speaker 1>They're going to buy a new version. And then, yeah,

0:32:45.150 --> 0:32:47.490
<v Speaker 1>maybe you hit on one that really connects with people

0:32:47.550 --> 0:32:51.460
<v Speaker 1>and then that explodes and you're counting the money. But

0:32:51.500 --> 0:32:53.420
<v Speaker 1>it is funny, like the Raptors won their first NBA

0:32:53.460 --> 0:32:59.300
<v Speaker 1>title in an alternate jersey that we basically never saw again. Giannis, crazy,

0:32:59.360 --> 0:33:05.050
<v Speaker 1>weird alternate jersey, gone the season after that. And, you know,

0:33:05.090 --> 0:33:09.670
<v Speaker 1>it's funny to think, as Raheem says, imagine Jordan's Bulls

0:33:10.810 --> 0:33:16.050
<v Speaker 1>winning six championships over, you know, the eight-year span. And

0:33:16.090 --> 0:33:19.400
<v Speaker 1>it was like a different jersey. Every time it would

0:33:19.420 --> 0:33:22.090
<v Speaker 1>be funny to think now like they did have different

0:33:22.120 --> 0:33:24.250
<v Speaker 1>versions and all that and they tweaked here and there.

0:33:24.290 --> 0:33:27.570
<v Speaker 1>But like it was basically red and black, white and red.

0:33:27.610 --> 0:33:30.030
<v Speaker 1>Those are the combos. So, you know, pare it down.

0:33:30.830 --> 0:33:33.730
<v Speaker 1>You got your colors. Yes, you can do New Jersey's,

0:33:33.790 --> 0:33:35.730
<v Speaker 1>but it's got to be like every five years and

0:33:35.750 --> 0:33:42.080
<v Speaker 1>just like really focus on the brand identity and building that. I,

0:33:42.500 --> 0:33:45.650
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm not against this. I do think we've

0:33:45.690 --> 0:33:51.370
<v Speaker 1>gone a little nuts with so many jerseys. And I

0:33:51.410 --> 0:33:56.440
<v Speaker 1>think now, aren't they bringing back particular City Edition jerseys

0:33:56.480 --> 0:33:58.760
<v Speaker 1>this year? So I guess ones that sort of connected

0:33:58.800 --> 0:34:01.800
<v Speaker 1>with people, they're going to bring them back. So Phoenix

0:34:01.820 --> 0:34:03.540
<v Speaker 1>will have the Valley ones, and then this team will

0:34:03.560 --> 0:34:06.300
<v Speaker 1>have that one. It's like, okay, yeah, good. Cool to

0:34:06.320 --> 0:34:09.260
<v Speaker 1>see that jersey again, but it's like good luck keeping track.

0:34:10.620 --> 0:34:15.140
<v Speaker 1>So I like it. I'm a three or four on that. And,

0:34:15.380 --> 0:34:17.270
<v Speaker 1>you know, unfortunately, that's another one that's probably never going

0:34:17.290 --> 0:34:19.370
<v Speaker 1>to happen. Because they're like, yeah, make something new. Nobody

0:34:19.390 --> 0:34:21.790
<v Speaker 1>cares how crappy it looks. Enough people will buy it.

0:34:23.110 --> 0:34:26.350
<v Speaker 1>And we get the buzz of everybody tweeting about it

0:34:26.370 --> 0:34:28.510
<v Speaker 1>and sharing it on Instagram. So we're in the zeitgeist

0:34:28.550 --> 0:34:33.920
<v Speaker 1>there for a second. Good or bad. But, yeah, come on, man.

0:34:33.940 --> 0:34:35.319
<v Speaker 1>Let's go back to basic a little bit with these.

0:34:35.600 --> 0:34:41.420
<v Speaker 1>All right, number 14. Stop trying to profit from gimmicks.

0:34:41.500 --> 0:34:44.140
<v Speaker 1>So she really swerved on this. She zagged, as she said.

0:34:45.210 --> 0:34:49.210
<v Speaker 1>And it was almost like, fix the NBA. No, we've

0:34:49.230 --> 0:34:51.489
<v Speaker 1>been trying to fix the NBA too much almost. Like

0:34:51.510 --> 0:34:54.089
<v Speaker 1>there's too many tweaks and this and that. So this one,

0:34:54.110 --> 0:34:55.830
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a, you know, this will not be

0:34:55.989 --> 0:34:58.589
<v Speaker 1>one of my favorites because it's like, again, she's coming

0:34:58.630 --> 0:35:03.450
<v Speaker 1>at it a little different. So, you know, I almost

0:35:03.660 --> 0:35:05.219
<v Speaker 1>don't even want to grade this one because she was like,

0:35:05.520 --> 0:35:10.359
<v Speaker 1>I'll take a little different angle with this. So one

0:35:10.380 --> 0:35:16.930
<v Speaker 1>or two here, but yeah, She approached it obviously not

0:35:16.950 --> 0:35:21.350
<v Speaker 1>as silly as maybe everybody else, but how things have

0:35:21.390 --> 0:35:24.750
<v Speaker 1>gotten out of control with the ownerships. The NBA has

0:35:24.790 --> 0:35:30.590
<v Speaker 1>some structural issues, as she says. Yes. Part three, final

0:35:30.630 --> 0:35:34.549
<v Speaker 1>part of this. It's titled, And We've Lost Control of

0:35:34.590 --> 0:35:41.650
<v Speaker 1>the Exercise. So the wildest suggestions from all. Ben, number 15.

0:35:41.650 --> 0:35:45.629
<v Speaker 1>All trades are secret trades. I'm going to quote Ben here.

0:35:45.750 --> 0:35:48.190
<v Speaker 1>NBA trades have gotten really boring. Trade deadline day used

0:35:48.210 --> 0:35:49.530
<v Speaker 1>to be one of the biggest events of the year

0:35:49.590 --> 0:35:52.520
<v Speaker 1>when meaningful players could be moved to meaningful teams. And now,

0:35:52.880 --> 0:35:55.340
<v Speaker 1>teams use the deadline to avoid the aprons or to

0:35:55.380 --> 0:36:01.400
<v Speaker 1>fully embrace tanking their shitty season. True, true. The trades

0:36:01.440 --> 0:36:05.140
<v Speaker 1>are not what they used to be. So, Ben's idea

0:36:05.180 --> 0:36:09.970
<v Speaker 1>here to fix the NBA is to Basically go pro

0:36:10.010 --> 0:36:13.660
<v Speaker 1>wrestling style and double down on secrecy. So we got

0:36:13.680 --> 0:36:16.960
<v Speaker 1>to get Shams to stop tweeting about trades that happen.

0:36:17.500 --> 0:36:19.440
<v Speaker 1>The idea is the trade happens, but we don't know

0:36:19.500 --> 0:36:23.380
<v Speaker 1>about it until, oh my God, those teams play or

0:36:23.400 --> 0:36:26.799
<v Speaker 1>the next game. And like you show up or you're

0:36:26.820 --> 0:36:30.560
<v Speaker 1>just flipped onto the TV to watch whatever. I don't know,

0:36:30.980 --> 0:36:34.570
<v Speaker 1>the Sixers. And suddenly LeBron's not there. He's been traded

0:36:34.610 --> 0:36:37.489
<v Speaker 1>again or something like that. Again, these are going to

0:36:37.510 --> 0:36:40.169
<v Speaker 1>get out there. These are going to get out there.

0:36:41.210 --> 0:36:47.509
<v Speaker 1>So it won't happen. It's wild, but be pretty hilarious.

0:36:48.110 --> 0:36:50.830
<v Speaker 1>Like people would go nuts. Like the crowds themselves as

0:36:50.870 --> 0:36:55.290
<v Speaker 1>Ben writes, like now you're in the arena and that's

0:36:55.350 --> 0:36:57.759
<v Speaker 1>when you find out. You don't find out from a tweet.

0:36:57.950 --> 0:37:01.280
<v Speaker 1>You don't find out from a podcast. You just find

0:37:01.360 --> 0:37:04.339
<v Speaker 1>out in the moment and they could really lean into

0:37:04.360 --> 0:37:07.580
<v Speaker 1>the pro wrestling angle. It's like, oh my God, that's

0:37:07.620 --> 0:37:13.890
<v Speaker 1>LeBron's music. Pretty out there. I like the creativity, though.

0:37:14.370 --> 0:37:17.230
<v Speaker 1>You know I love the wrestling. I think there's an

0:37:17.270 --> 0:37:19.350
<v Speaker 1>event here in Atlanta soon. Is there a main event here?

0:37:19.930 --> 0:37:23.510
<v Speaker 1>I'll go three. I'll go three on that one. Number 16, Keith.

0:37:23.530 --> 0:37:29.950
<v Speaker 1>I love Keith. Every team gets to roster one retired player. Okay?

0:37:30.510 --> 0:37:34.380
<v Speaker 1>So it's as simple as that. It's a two-way spot

0:37:34.530 --> 0:37:37.879
<v Speaker 1>that every team gets to give to somebody that's, like,

0:37:38.200 --> 0:37:43.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, retired. Air quotes. Jamal Crawford, Vince Carter, White Chocolate,

0:37:44.380 --> 0:37:48.710
<v Speaker 1>maybe even Jordan himself, says Keith. Could those guys, at

0:37:48.750 --> 0:37:51.670
<v Speaker 1>the age they're at, still jump in, give you 10,

0:37:51.670 --> 0:37:55.630
<v Speaker 1>12 points? Bet some of them could. He goes on

0:37:55.650 --> 0:37:59.560
<v Speaker 1>to say, imagine Jeff Teague after torching the Nets for

0:37:59.560 --> 0:38:03.080
<v Speaker 1>30 points on 29 shots. Imagine his podcast, the content

0:38:03.120 --> 0:38:07.239
<v Speaker 1>that he would be able to generate. Pretty funny. I

0:38:07.280 --> 0:38:09.540
<v Speaker 1>like it. Even whether they don't play or not, it

0:38:09.560 --> 0:38:12.460
<v Speaker 1>would just be fun as hell to debate who they're

0:38:12.480 --> 0:38:15.520
<v Speaker 1>going to pick, what the team, what retired guy, who

0:38:15.580 --> 0:38:18.819
<v Speaker 1>still could contribute. Then we would have some weird moment

0:38:18.840 --> 0:38:21.520
<v Speaker 1>where there'd be enough injuries and suddenly Joe Johnson's got

0:38:21.540 --> 0:38:23.320
<v Speaker 1>to play. And you're like, oh, he's still got it.

0:38:23.620 --> 0:38:28.239
<v Speaker 1>Joe's still got it. Just leaning into the nostalgia. Love it.

0:38:28.510 --> 0:38:33.890
<v Speaker 1>Five stars. No harm in this. Let these guys get

0:38:33.969 --> 0:38:39.880
<v Speaker 1>one more... Chance at glory, too. I'm in. Number 17,

0:38:39.880 --> 0:38:42.920
<v Speaker 1>teams pick their own three-point lines. I've seen this one

0:38:42.980 --> 0:38:46.469
<v Speaker 1>on Reddit before. This one always makes the rounds every

0:38:46.510 --> 0:38:50.960
<v Speaker 1>couple years. For those that don't or haven't seen it,

0:38:52.230 --> 0:38:57.130
<v Speaker 1>Katie Baker wrote this. It's basically the NBA equivalent of

0:38:57.870 --> 0:39:03.840
<v Speaker 1>MLB ballpark. Different dimensions, different Down the line, it's 330 here,

0:39:03.920 --> 0:39:07.120
<v Speaker 1>and it's 360 in a wall here, the Green Monster

0:39:07.180 --> 0:39:10.560
<v Speaker 1>in Boston and all that. Oh, there's weird hills out there.

0:39:11.840 --> 0:39:15.630
<v Speaker 1>All the stuff and the unique vibes of each MLB park,

0:39:15.810 --> 0:39:19.290
<v Speaker 1>we take into the NBA, and we do it with

0:39:19.350 --> 0:39:25.589
<v Speaker 1>a three-point line where you can make it deeper. You

0:39:25.670 --> 0:39:30.660
<v Speaker 1>could have it zigzag in, I guess. It's sort of fun. concept.

0:39:30.719 --> 0:39:35.600
<v Speaker 1>How many actual things could you do with it? Could

0:39:35.620 --> 0:39:40.629
<v Speaker 1>you make a four-point shot pocket? Maybe that's the thing.

0:39:40.650 --> 0:39:44.190
<v Speaker 1>Maybe we open it up to even different types of

0:39:44.210 --> 0:39:48.370
<v Speaker 1>shots or stuff like that. But anyway, her idea, just

0:39:49.090 --> 0:39:53.000
<v Speaker 1>let each... nba team pick how they want to make

0:39:53.080 --> 0:39:57.980
<v Speaker 1>their three-point line and like so you know the warriors

0:39:58.000 --> 0:40:01.359
<v Speaker 1>with steph curry you would think they're like oh we'll

0:40:01.380 --> 0:40:03.380
<v Speaker 1>make it we'll make our line deeper because he can

0:40:03.400 --> 0:40:05.049
<v Speaker 1>hit these shots but you're not going to be able

0:40:05.090 --> 0:40:08.010
<v Speaker 1>to uh you know instead of damian lillard or something

0:40:08.030 --> 0:40:15.480
<v Speaker 1>like that um so Yeah, very weird, very different. There

0:40:15.500 --> 0:40:19.319
<v Speaker 1>would be a lot of analytics breaking down, oh, this

0:40:19.360 --> 0:40:22.299
<v Speaker 1>team should be doing this, oh, they should eliminate the

0:40:22.380 --> 0:40:25.560
<v Speaker 1>corner three, so we'll just completely get it out of

0:40:25.580 --> 0:40:29.569
<v Speaker 1>the left side, stuff like that. Pretty funny. Now, she

0:40:29.610 --> 0:40:32.770
<v Speaker 1>does say this would cause a lot of statistical chaos

0:40:32.830 --> 0:40:35.430
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to three-point percentages, and we'd have to

0:40:35.469 --> 0:40:38.790
<v Speaker 1>really get in the weeds. Yeah, he's shooting 39% from three,

0:40:38.830 --> 0:40:42.040
<v Speaker 1>but have you seen him... when he's playing those teams

0:40:42.080 --> 0:40:45.200
<v Speaker 1>that have no corner, then it like caters to like 25,

0:40:45.200 --> 0:40:50.189
<v Speaker 1>you know, be stuff like that. But, uh, this is silly, funny.

0:40:50.210 --> 0:40:54.630
<v Speaker 1>I like it. I go four stars. I won't go

0:40:54.710 --> 0:40:57.680
<v Speaker 1>full five. Um, but I would love just to see

0:40:57.700 --> 0:41:00.879
<v Speaker 1>what teams would do and how they would, uh, like

0:41:01.120 --> 0:41:05.620
<v Speaker 1>paint their three point line to help their chances. Like,

0:41:05.640 --> 0:41:07.799
<v Speaker 1>could you, like, could you just get, could there be

0:41:07.820 --> 0:41:10.939
<v Speaker 1>a team that'd be like, we don't want any, Like, nah,

0:41:11.060 --> 0:41:14.279
<v Speaker 1>we just don't want to shoot no threes in this game. And, like,

0:41:14.420 --> 0:41:16.140
<v Speaker 1>do you have to, like, commit to it to a year?

0:41:16.239 --> 0:41:18.939
<v Speaker 1>Can you change it game to game? Can you change

0:41:19.000 --> 0:41:21.969
<v Speaker 1>it weekly, monthly? I would think it would have to

0:41:22.010 --> 0:41:24.950
<v Speaker 1>be for a season, but... I like it. Four stars.

0:41:24.969 --> 0:41:29.989
<v Speaker 1>All right, a couple more. Start awarding extra points for

0:41:30.070 --> 0:41:37.779
<v Speaker 1>cool shots. Craig Gaines. Basically... We're turning this into like,

0:41:37.800 --> 0:41:39.899
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, almost like figure skating where we'd have

0:41:39.940 --> 0:41:46.150
<v Speaker 1>like a panel that would add more points on difficulty

0:41:46.310 --> 0:41:51.070
<v Speaker 1>or uniqueness or whatever of a said shot. So obviously

0:41:51.110 --> 0:41:52.750
<v Speaker 1>dunks come to mind and I know there's a little

0:41:52.770 --> 0:41:55.090
<v Speaker 1>bit more on dunks in a second, but off balance shots,

0:41:55.110 --> 0:41:57.570
<v Speaker 1>you can be like, Ooh, another point for that. Dream shake,

0:41:57.630 --> 0:42:02.739
<v Speaker 1>sky hooks, uh, layups off of a great no look passes.

0:42:02.800 --> 0:42:04.520
<v Speaker 1>So like Jokic and the nuggets are going to get

0:42:04.540 --> 0:42:08.630
<v Speaker 1>away more points. You know, you could say alley-oops off

0:42:08.650 --> 0:42:13.590
<v Speaker 1>the glass, stuff like that. So Craig says three-person panel

0:42:14.130 --> 0:42:18.330
<v Speaker 1>circulates around the league like the refs do. So now

0:42:18.370 --> 0:42:19.770
<v Speaker 1>we get the refs' names, and then we're going to

0:42:19.790 --> 0:42:22.750
<v Speaker 1>get like the judges' names, the panel's names. Ooh, who's

0:42:22.790 --> 0:42:25.609
<v Speaker 1>judging this game tonight? Like people will be like looking

0:42:25.650 --> 0:42:29.190
<v Speaker 1>at it. Oh, they love a behind-the-back pass. That'll get

0:42:29.230 --> 0:42:33.620
<v Speaker 1>our points up. It'd be confusing. Because we would have

0:42:33.780 --> 0:42:35.719
<v Speaker 1>just points like coming out of nowhere. It would feel

0:42:35.760 --> 0:42:37.779
<v Speaker 1>like it's like, hold on. They've scored that amount of points,

0:42:37.820 --> 0:42:41.160
<v Speaker 1>but then like another 12 points because of creativity and

0:42:41.380 --> 0:42:45.890
<v Speaker 1>weird shots and cool shots. So tough to follow. Funny.

0:42:46.630 --> 0:42:48.690
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, Craig just wants to turn this into like

0:42:49.010 --> 0:42:55.410
<v Speaker 1>sort of Globetrotter type things. So I'll go three. I'll

0:42:55.430 --> 0:42:57.380
<v Speaker 1>go three. Yeah, somewhere in the middle on that one.

0:42:57.380 --> 0:43:05.469
<v Speaker 1>19 though, Tyler Parker. Make dunks worth three points. So

0:43:05.489 --> 0:43:07.969
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of piggybacking off of Craig's here, really, but like,

0:43:08.489 --> 0:43:10.570
<v Speaker 1>you know, zeroing in on just dunks. We do it

0:43:10.610 --> 0:43:12.300
<v Speaker 1>for three-point shots. Why don't we do it for dunks?

0:43:12.320 --> 0:43:14.020
<v Speaker 1>This is something that has been kicked around for a

0:43:14.040 --> 0:43:20.080
<v Speaker 1>while now, too. You know, like in the NBA, it

0:43:20.140 --> 0:43:23.960
<v Speaker 1>is more difficult to dunk than it is to hit

0:43:24.000 --> 0:43:27.360
<v Speaker 1>a three-point shot. In an empty gym, when you're 6'8,

0:43:27.440 --> 0:43:29.569
<v Speaker 1>it's obviously a lot more easier just to dunk than

0:43:29.610 --> 0:43:33.290
<v Speaker 1>hit a you know, 25 foot shot, but yeah, with defense. Yes.

0:43:33.770 --> 0:43:36.230
<v Speaker 1>I would think that is fair to say. So why

0:43:36.270 --> 0:43:40.650
<v Speaker 1>don't we reward it and, uh, and just give it to, uh,

0:43:40.810 --> 0:43:49.680
<v Speaker 1>make it three points as well. Yeah. Fun, you know, uh, just,

0:43:49.840 --> 0:43:51.580
<v Speaker 1>it'd be like, it'd be one of these rules where

0:43:51.600 --> 0:43:54.600
<v Speaker 1>you're like, how does this change how these coaches play

0:43:54.620 --> 0:43:57.319
<v Speaker 1>or how they tackle the offense? Like, does it at all?

0:43:57.380 --> 0:44:01.350
<v Speaker 1>Can you even at all? Does it like your roster

0:44:01.370 --> 0:44:03.370
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to your roster? I mean, you're just

0:44:03.410 --> 0:44:08.250
<v Speaker 1>trying to throw alley-oops left and right. I don't hate it.

0:44:08.570 --> 0:44:11.830
<v Speaker 1>I don't hate it. I think I saw an article

0:44:11.850 --> 0:44:17.400
<v Speaker 1>that the NBL, so the Australian League, are really exploring

0:44:17.420 --> 0:44:22.319
<v Speaker 1>the possibility of this and putting it into play. So

0:44:22.360 --> 0:44:25.300
<v Speaker 1>this is definitely a let the Aussies try it. Maybe

0:44:25.540 --> 0:44:27.839
<v Speaker 1>try it in the G League. Because I think this

0:44:27.860 --> 0:44:30.899
<v Speaker 1>is going to have ramifications. So what spirals out of this?

0:44:32.340 --> 0:44:34.840
<v Speaker 1>But give it a go. I'm on board. Give it

0:44:34.880 --> 0:44:38.040
<v Speaker 1>a go. I mean, does it change at all the

0:44:38.100 --> 0:44:41.410
<v Speaker 1>concept of there's too many three-pointers? Which a lot of

0:44:41.430 --> 0:44:44.210
<v Speaker 1>people think. And the game's getting a little too vanilla.

0:44:44.290 --> 0:44:47.170
<v Speaker 1>And a little too, you know, everybody's doing it. It's

0:44:47.190 --> 0:44:49.770
<v Speaker 1>a little copycat league. And just everybody becomes the same.

0:44:51.660 --> 0:44:54.440
<v Speaker 1>But Tyler says, too, the idea of three points for

0:44:54.460 --> 0:44:56.969
<v Speaker 1>a dunk. You know, Stromal Swift might still be playing.

0:44:57.030 --> 0:45:01.030
<v Speaker 1>Tyrus Thomas might still be playing. Guys like that. This

0:45:01.070 --> 0:45:03.290
<v Speaker 1>would be weird for our show named No Dunks, though.

0:45:04.610 --> 0:45:07.650
<v Speaker 1>Suddenly then dunks are like, already dunks are cool, but

0:45:07.710 --> 0:45:10.630
<v Speaker 1>now they're becoming even more important. We might have to

0:45:10.690 --> 0:45:13.200
<v Speaker 1>change our name. Whole brand identity. We need a City

0:45:13.239 --> 0:45:17.490
<v Speaker 1>Edition name change. Okay, I like it, though. I like it.

0:45:19.730 --> 0:45:21.630
<v Speaker 1>Did I grade it? I give it a three. Give

0:45:21.650 --> 0:45:26.250
<v Speaker 1>it a three. Maybe even a four. Number 20, Jack

0:45:27.330 --> 0:45:31.469
<v Speaker 1>McCluskey says, and he's piggybacking off of Tyler here, make

0:45:31.630 --> 0:45:37.530
<v Speaker 1>buzzer-beating dunks worth even more. Okay, so a great buzzer-beating

0:45:37.590 --> 0:45:43.370
<v Speaker 1>shot is obviously high drama, but if it's a buzzer-beating dunk,

0:45:44.610 --> 0:45:45.830
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how many points you get. What are

0:45:45.850 --> 0:45:48.090
<v Speaker 1>we talking here? He says more, so he wants four

0:45:48.110 --> 0:45:51.569
<v Speaker 1>or five points. Okay. Okay, sure. I'm low on this one, though.

0:45:53.250 --> 0:45:57.290
<v Speaker 1>It's like, first off, how many buzzer-beating dunks have we

0:45:57.590 --> 0:46:01.450
<v Speaker 1>even ever had in the history of the NBA? Now,

0:46:01.930 --> 0:46:04.180
<v Speaker 1>I guess you could say, yeah, but they're not incentivized

0:46:04.219 --> 0:46:06.460
<v Speaker 1>skeets to do it. Why would they try it? So

0:46:06.520 --> 0:46:08.620
<v Speaker 1>you give them five points, suddenly Anthony Edwards is going

0:46:08.640 --> 0:46:13.500
<v Speaker 1>to try and yam on everybody. Okay, maybe. I'm thinking

0:46:13.580 --> 0:46:15.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of defense is going to back up at

0:46:15.239 --> 0:46:19.109
<v Speaker 1>that point, but I'm going two. Two on this one, Jack.

0:46:20.730 --> 0:46:24.390
<v Speaker 1>Two more crazy ideas to fix the NBA from the ringer.

0:46:24.450 --> 0:46:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Number 21 is add a 16th spot on NBA benches

0:46:27.960 --> 0:46:32.299
<v Speaker 1>and give it to a fan. Austin says this is

0:46:32.340 --> 0:46:36.420
<v Speaker 1>a layup. NBA teams got to add a 16th spot

0:46:37.260 --> 0:46:40.020
<v Speaker 1>on the bench and on the roster to one fan.

0:46:40.520 --> 0:46:44.370
<v Speaker 1>And he has a bunch of rules, though, to said fan.

0:46:44.890 --> 0:46:48.450
<v Speaker 1>They can't have played basketball after high school. They must

0:46:48.510 --> 0:46:51.450
<v Speaker 1>be a diehard fan of the team. Very important, he says.

0:46:51.950 --> 0:46:58.359
<v Speaker 1>No one over 6'3. 75-inch rule. So you've got to

0:46:58.420 --> 0:47:02.660
<v Speaker 1>be quote-unquote normal-sized. And the fan must have a seat

0:47:02.700 --> 0:47:05.360
<v Speaker 1>on the bench and a uniform for every game in

0:47:05.400 --> 0:47:07.440
<v Speaker 1>which they're a fan for the team. So if the

0:47:07.500 --> 0:47:10.660
<v Speaker 1>fan no-shows, the team can move on and pick somebody else.

0:47:12.980 --> 0:47:15.940
<v Speaker 1>And he says that fan doesn't have to play in

0:47:15.960 --> 0:47:19.220
<v Speaker 1>the game. They're just sitting there. Just part of the team.

0:47:21.280 --> 0:47:23.100
<v Speaker 1>I mean, a coach could put them in when your

0:47:23.120 --> 0:47:25.279
<v Speaker 1>team's up 40 or something like that. Maybe you try

0:47:25.300 --> 0:47:28.750
<v Speaker 1>and get a shot up or something like that. I

0:47:28.770 --> 0:47:33.250
<v Speaker 1>think the thinking is, you know, great marketing here. Who

0:47:33.290 --> 0:47:36.719
<v Speaker 1>the fan is, how they decide on it. I worry

0:47:36.739 --> 0:47:40.919
<v Speaker 1>with this one, though, they would just lean into, like,

0:47:41.060 --> 0:47:45.219
<v Speaker 1>content creators. Like teams would. Like it wouldn't actually go

0:47:45.280 --> 0:47:48.969
<v Speaker 1>to Joe Blow. It'd be like, oh, there's millions of

0:47:49.010 --> 0:47:51.299
<v Speaker 1>views here and stuff like that. I would hope I'm wrong,

0:47:51.360 --> 0:47:55.900
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, that's where it would go, wouldn't it? Wouldn't it?

0:47:56.180 --> 0:48:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Wouldn't Jesser, is that his name? Wouldn't he just be

0:48:00.719 --> 0:48:05.020
<v Speaker 1>sitting there, probably on his phone, racking, oh yeah, I

0:48:05.060 --> 0:48:06.819
<v Speaker 1>show speed's going to be, oh yeah, see, that's where

0:48:06.860 --> 0:48:11.850
<v Speaker 1>we're going to go here. I love the concept, but

0:48:11.870 --> 0:48:13.870
<v Speaker 1>you just know they're going to ruin it. They'll ruin

0:48:13.910 --> 0:48:17.770
<v Speaker 1>it immediately with who they pick. So for that reason,

0:48:17.830 --> 0:48:22.590
<v Speaker 1>I'm a two. Final one, number 22. Make everything in

0:48:22.640 --> 0:48:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the NBA eight inches shorter, says Brian Phillips. Just absolutely everything. Well,

0:48:31.500 --> 0:48:35.600
<v Speaker 1>we're dropping the rim, of course, by eight inches. So

0:48:35.820 --> 0:48:43.890
<v Speaker 1>it's nine foot four now. All right. And I didn't

0:48:43.910 --> 0:48:45.509
<v Speaker 1>really realize this. I guess I sort of skimmed this

0:48:45.550 --> 0:48:46.969
<v Speaker 1>one over because it was the last one. I guess

0:48:47.030 --> 0:48:54.910
<v Speaker 1>players too. Players are also limited. And Brian's like, there's

0:48:54.950 --> 0:49:00.510
<v Speaker 1>way more people in the world that are normal sized.

0:49:00.590 --> 0:49:04.810
<v Speaker 1>I'm using that. That are like six foot three than

0:49:04.850 --> 0:49:07.489
<v Speaker 1>there are obviously six foot eight or seven feet tall.

0:49:08.450 --> 0:49:13.100
<v Speaker 1>So because of the sport, we are just limiting so

0:49:13.160 --> 0:49:18.870
<v Speaker 1>many people that maybe stick with playing basketball or don't

0:49:18.930 --> 0:49:21.040
<v Speaker 1>because of their height. So just open it up and

0:49:21.080 --> 0:49:24.880
<v Speaker 1>all that. Open up the talent pool is the best

0:49:24.920 --> 0:49:28.030
<v Speaker 1>way to put it. All right. Now, I like crazy

0:49:28.070 --> 0:49:31.790
<v Speaker 1>tall people doing crazy cool things. Get the shorties out

0:49:31.810 --> 0:49:33.609
<v Speaker 1>of here. That's what makes the shorties that do make

0:49:33.650 --> 0:49:41.170
<v Speaker 1>it even more special. So, sorry, Brian. No. I'm a one,

0:49:41.310 --> 0:49:45.730
<v Speaker 1>I'm a one on this one. Keep basketball tall says

0:49:45.770 --> 0:49:49.410
<v Speaker 1>the guy who's five, 10 and a half. Uh, okay.

0:49:49.430 --> 0:49:55.140
<v Speaker 1>That's it. That's it. Those are the 22 ways from

0:49:55.180 --> 0:49:59.299
<v Speaker 1>the ringer staff to, to fix the NBA. Um, some

0:49:59.340 --> 0:50:01.719
<v Speaker 1>good ones in there. I think, uh, if I were

0:50:01.739 --> 0:50:08.469
<v Speaker 1>to pick my five favorite ones in no particular order, um,

0:50:09.120 --> 0:50:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Get rid of pick protections. I'm on board with that,

0:50:11.660 --> 0:50:16.470
<v Speaker 1>Rob Mahoney. You got my vote. Kirks, shorten the season.

0:50:17.950 --> 0:50:21.130
<v Speaker 1>Shorten the games. Shorten the load that we put on

0:50:21.170 --> 0:50:23.910
<v Speaker 1>these players. I am pro. I don't think we have

0:50:23.930 --> 0:50:27.569
<v Speaker 1>to go overboard because I still like watching basketball, so

0:50:27.610 --> 0:50:29.239
<v Speaker 1>it's not like I want 10 games a season or

0:50:29.280 --> 0:50:31.320
<v Speaker 1>anything like that. We don't need to go college football style.

0:50:32.739 --> 0:50:37.180
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, 40-minute games. 60 game seasons and then the

0:50:37.200 --> 0:50:40.419
<v Speaker 1>play up. Yeah. Ooh, that'd be nice. Uh, love that. Okay.

0:50:40.460 --> 0:50:44.500
<v Speaker 1>Get rid of instant replay. Hell yeah. If I was

0:50:44.520 --> 0:50:48.450
<v Speaker 1>actual commissioner would be one of my first things, or

0:50:48.510 --> 0:50:53.890
<v Speaker 1>at least limiting timeouts and replays. We're going back, baby.

0:50:54.350 --> 0:50:58.299
<v Speaker 1>We've gone too far. Get back to human error. It's

0:50:58.320 --> 0:51:04.020
<v Speaker 1>actually more entertaining. Um, so yes. Uh, fourth one I

0:51:04.080 --> 0:51:08.719
<v Speaker 1>liked from the article, uh, Um, I liked, uh, whose

0:51:08.760 --> 0:51:13.170
<v Speaker 1>was it? Was it Keith? Uh, every team gets, uh,

0:51:13.250 --> 0:51:16.230
<v Speaker 1>to roster one retired player. I liked that for some reason.

0:51:17.070 --> 0:51:18.930
<v Speaker 1>I just love the idea because those guys could do

0:51:19.010 --> 0:51:22.069
<v Speaker 1>media too. And that's sort of like, I think the,

0:51:22.230 --> 0:51:27.230
<v Speaker 1>the fan on the bench is maybe too extreme, but

0:51:27.270 --> 0:51:29.390
<v Speaker 1>a guy that actually played and was in the league

0:51:29.430 --> 0:51:33.029
<v Speaker 1>and maybe can still even hang. Um, That one's more

0:51:33.070 --> 0:51:34.330
<v Speaker 1>intriguing to me, so I like that one. And the

0:51:34.350 --> 0:51:37.380
<v Speaker 1>final one, picking the three-point lines. I just want to

0:51:37.410 --> 0:51:39.020
<v Speaker 1>see it. I want to see what they would come

0:51:39.100 --> 0:51:45.340
<v Speaker 1>up with. Are we adding little hills on a court, too?

0:51:47.100 --> 0:51:49.739
<v Speaker 1>Maybe even going further. Teams could be like, no, we

0:51:49.760 --> 0:51:52.660
<v Speaker 1>want double rim. Oh, everyone's like, oh, nobody likes shooting

0:51:52.700 --> 0:51:56.489
<v Speaker 1>on double rims. They're like, yeah, no mesh. Fuck. Hate

0:51:56.510 --> 0:52:01.200
<v Speaker 1>playing there. So I like it. Let each, uh, get some,

0:52:01.360 --> 0:52:03.790
<v Speaker 1>some uniqueness to each NBA court. They basically all look

0:52:03.810 --> 0:52:05.790
<v Speaker 1>the same now. These, uh, these stadiums. So let's, uh,

0:52:05.870 --> 0:52:08.670
<v Speaker 1>let's have some fun with the, with the floors and

0:52:08.690 --> 0:52:11.410
<v Speaker 1>the backboards and the rims and stuff like that. And

0:52:11.450 --> 0:52:13.830
<v Speaker 1>obviously the three point line, that was Katie's. I think, uh,

0:52:14.330 --> 0:52:15.610
<v Speaker 1>teams picked their own three point line. So those are

0:52:15.630 --> 0:52:20.410
<v Speaker 1>my five favorites. Let's hear yours. Let's hear some other ones. Uh,

0:52:20.510 --> 0:52:22.450
<v Speaker 1>drop them right now here in the stream team, drop

0:52:22.469 --> 0:52:24.500
<v Speaker 1>them in the comments. You can drop them on Spotify

0:52:24.520 --> 0:52:27.750
<v Speaker 1>as well. We have the comment section there. Uh, It's

0:52:27.770 --> 0:52:30.029
<v Speaker 1>a holiday here, as I said, in North America on Monday.

0:52:30.070 --> 0:52:35.140
<v Speaker 1>So no show on Monday. We did record on Friday, though,

0:52:35.900 --> 0:52:40.980
<v Speaker 1>Pirates of the Caribbean on Stranger Tides. That's what we're

0:52:41.040 --> 0:52:45.020
<v Speaker 1>up to. Number four in the series. So go check

0:52:45.040 --> 0:52:52.670
<v Speaker 1>that out. Spoiler. People did not like it. I was

0:52:52.690 --> 0:52:54.910
<v Speaker 1>trying to say, is it that much worse than the

0:52:54.950 --> 0:52:59.430
<v Speaker 1>other ones? And they were like, yeah, it was. I'm like, okay.

0:52:59.790 --> 0:53:02.710
<v Speaker 1>But it does have Penelope Cruz in it. Guys, guys.

0:53:03.530 --> 0:53:05.250
<v Speaker 1>So anyway, we had a lot of fun and we've

0:53:05.270 --> 0:53:10.640
<v Speaker 1>had a blast recapping every film of the Pirates of

0:53:10.680 --> 0:53:14.459
<v Speaker 1>the Caribbean franchise. One to go. Four down, one to go.

0:53:14.500 --> 0:53:18.359
<v Speaker 1>And that's next Friday. And then we've wrapped up that

0:53:18.420 --> 0:53:24.739
<v Speaker 1>very short series. In comparison to Jurassic Park, which was

0:53:24.760 --> 0:53:27.540
<v Speaker 1>way longer, and Fast and Furious, which was even longer

0:53:27.580 --> 0:53:32.940
<v Speaker 1>than that. So, um, had a fun. Go check those out. And, uh, yeah,

0:53:33.020 --> 0:53:35.640
<v Speaker 1>next one is, uh, Dead Men Tell No Tales, which

0:53:35.660 --> 0:53:37.560
<v Speaker 1>is apparently the worst of the bunch. So, can't wait

0:53:37.580 --> 0:53:40.560
<v Speaker 1>to shit all over that. We do plan on recording

0:53:40.580 --> 0:53:44.380
<v Speaker 1>an NBA podcast on Wednesday, I think is the next

0:53:44.660 --> 0:53:50.560
<v Speaker 1>live No Dunks. Some news, Ben Simmons, Alman Thompson, some

0:53:50.600 --> 0:53:51.920
<v Speaker 1>other things. We'll probably hit the beach. So if you

0:53:51.940 --> 0:53:57.800
<v Speaker 1>have questions, nodunksinc, that's inc at gmail.com. Get your questions

0:53:57.880 --> 0:54:02.640
<v Speaker 1>in for the next beach step-in. Again, Wednesday, we should

0:54:02.660 --> 0:54:06.240
<v Speaker 1>be back in the Classic Factory live at 10 a.m. Eastern.

0:54:06.760 --> 0:54:08.660
<v Speaker 1>So we'll call it there. Thanks again for joining me.

0:54:08.860 --> 0:54:12.540
<v Speaker 1>If you enjoyed this, I guess for us, somewhat unique content,

0:54:13.070 --> 0:54:15.960
<v Speaker 1>let us know. Maybe we'll do more. There's a lot

0:54:16.000 --> 0:54:17.560
<v Speaker 1>of fun articles out there on the internet. I feel

0:54:17.580 --> 0:54:19.200
<v Speaker 1>like I read more about the NBA than anyone in

0:54:19.219 --> 0:54:23.259
<v Speaker 1>the world. I'm up there. I'm top 1%. It's like

0:54:23.300 --> 0:54:25.219
<v Speaker 1>when you get your Spotify wrapped at the end and

0:54:25.239 --> 0:54:31.580
<v Speaker 1>they're like, oh, you listen to the Flipmode Squad. You're

0:54:31.600 --> 0:54:35.180
<v Speaker 1>in the top 0.01% of listeners. Like, oh, wow, still.

0:54:36.239 --> 0:54:39.779
<v Speaker 1>I'm like that with NBA articles. So If you like this, again,

0:54:39.800 --> 0:54:41.180
<v Speaker 1>let me know. If you hate it, also let me know.

0:54:41.260 --> 0:54:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Then we just won't do it again. But everybody have

0:54:43.700 --> 0:54:45.879
<v Speaker 1>a great weekend. Have a great holiday. And again, we'll

0:54:45.940 --> 0:54:49.900
<v Speaker 1>see you next week for some new NBA content. Until then,

0:54:49.940 --> 0:54:52.590
<v Speaker 1>Clipper Bros. You heard it here first. Have a great time.

0:54:52.780 --> 0:54:55.950
<v Speaker 1>Turn up. Love you guys. Awesome. All right. Everybody be

0:54:55.989 --> 0:54:57.509
<v Speaker 1>safe and embrace the day, people.