WEBVTT - Hyper-Real Religion: Pastafarianism and Beyond

0:00:03.080 --> 0:00:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind from house stop

0:00:05.920 --> 0:00:15.760
<v Speaker 1>ward dot com. Hey, you're welcome to stuff to blow

0:00:15.760 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 1>your mind. My name is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick,

0:00:18.760 --> 0:00:22.160
<v Speaker 1>and I want to share with you a modern legend.

0:00:22.760 --> 0:00:24.639
<v Speaker 1>Probably heard this one before it. It's one of the

0:00:24.640 --> 0:00:28.280
<v Speaker 1>most persistent rumors of the modern age, the L Ron

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Hubbard Robert A. Heinland bar bet. You know this one, Robert, Yes, Now,

0:00:33.400 --> 0:00:35.720
<v Speaker 1>I looked into it, and I couldn't find any convincing

0:00:35.760 --> 0:00:38.559
<v Speaker 1>evidence that this bet ever actually took place, so it's

0:00:38.600 --> 0:00:41.240
<v Speaker 1>probably just more of a legend than than a real

0:00:41.320 --> 0:00:45.440
<v Speaker 1>historical account. But the legend I always heard goes something

0:00:45.520 --> 0:00:48.320
<v Speaker 1>like this, You've got L. Ron Hubbard and Robert A.

0:00:48.400 --> 0:00:52.239
<v Speaker 1>Heinland to science fiction authors of the twentieth century, and

0:00:52.280 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 1>they're sitting in a bar. They don't walk into a bar,

0:00:55.280 --> 0:00:57.000
<v Speaker 1>I guess. I suppose they have to walk into the

0:00:57.000 --> 0:01:00.080
<v Speaker 1>bar first, if they don't take hoverboards or maybe a

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:03.600
<v Speaker 1>power armor stamp into the bar. But anyway, they're in

0:01:03.640 --> 0:01:06.360
<v Speaker 1>the bar. They're down in some bruskis and this is

0:01:06.360 --> 0:01:08.840
<v Speaker 1>probably some time I would guess in the late nineteen forties,

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:11.520
<v Speaker 1>and they are discussing the best way to make a

0:01:11.520 --> 0:01:15.000
<v Speaker 1>ton of money, because let's face it, writing science fiction

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:17.960
<v Speaker 1>doesn't always pay amazingly right, and at this point in

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:20.920
<v Speaker 1>both of them in his career, they are sci fi writers. Yeah,

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:24.040
<v Speaker 1>very much so. Uh so Hubbard has an opinion. L

0:01:24.160 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Ron Hubbard says, you know, the best strategy is really

0:01:26.959 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 1>to take advantage of the common people's desire for transcendence

0:01:30.600 --> 0:01:34.760
<v Speaker 1>and salvation. So he says, quote religion, that's where the

0:01:34.800 --> 0:01:38.640
<v Speaker 1>real money is. And Hubbard boasts that he could invent

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 1>a religion and make millions. Of course, Hinland balks at this.

0:01:43.000 --> 0:01:45.720
<v Speaker 1>That sounds kind of extravagant. So they make a bet

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 1>can he do it? Can he not do it? And

0:01:49.200 --> 0:01:51.160
<v Speaker 1>by the end of the century there are at least

0:01:51.200 --> 0:01:54.600
<v Speaker 1>tens of thousands of Scientologists in the world. The Church

0:01:54.600 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 1>of Scientology claims millions of adherents those numbers. Who knows

0:02:00.400 --> 0:02:02.000
<v Speaker 1>what the real numbers are, but it seems like at

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 1>least tens of thousands. And Scientology is the sci fi

0:02:05.480 --> 0:02:08.760
<v Speaker 1>religion founded on the teachings of l. Ron Hubbard. Yeah,

0:02:08.800 --> 0:02:12.240
<v Speaker 1>and it has official religious status in numerous countries. So

0:02:13.280 --> 0:02:16.680
<v Speaker 1>even though this bat probably did not take place, like

0:02:16.680 --> 0:02:18.520
<v Speaker 1>it's one of those things where, yes, it could have

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:21.639
<v Speaker 1>if you really crunch it, but there's an absolutely no documentation. Yeah,

0:02:21.680 --> 0:02:23.840
<v Speaker 1>there's no good evidence for it. And and in fact,

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:26.960
<v Speaker 1>we we we probably really should emphasize that because apparently

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:30.400
<v Speaker 1>in the past there have been some legal actions against

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:33.120
<v Speaker 1>people who promulgate this as if it were true. So

0:02:33.280 --> 0:02:36.760
<v Speaker 1>probably not true. But why is the rumors so persistent?

0:02:36.880 --> 0:02:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Everybody's heard this, right, I bet you sitting at home,

0:02:39.960 --> 0:02:43.399
<v Speaker 1>or sitting standing running wherever you are listening, I bet

0:02:43.440 --> 0:02:46.680
<v Speaker 1>you've heard some version of this before, right, So you

0:02:46.680 --> 0:02:50.280
<v Speaker 1>could chalk it up to people's just general distaste for scientology.

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:52.800
<v Speaker 1>There there's a lot of antipathy out there, right, there's

0:02:52.880 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 1>no sortage of scientology criticism, uh and and lampoon ing

0:02:57.560 --> 0:02:59.960
<v Speaker 1>on the internet these days. Right, But you could also

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 1>say that this kind of story sticks in the mind

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and merits repeating simply because of the sheer audacity of it.

0:03:07.800 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 1>It offends our most basic sensibilities about what religion is

0:03:12.880 --> 0:03:16.760
<v Speaker 1>and is supposed to be creating a religion out of

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:19.680
<v Speaker 1>thin air, just on a whim, coming up with a

0:03:19.720 --> 0:03:27.119
<v Speaker 1>new religion. Something about it seems fiercely wrong, just nakedly perverse. Well, yeah,

0:03:27.160 --> 0:03:29.960
<v Speaker 1>I think I think so. I think yeah. On one hand,

0:03:30.720 --> 0:03:33.640
<v Speaker 1>it does seem like sheer audacity that somebody would just

0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:37.480
<v Speaker 1>create it wholesale. Though, of course, as we'll discuss to

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:40.640
<v Speaker 1>a large extent, nobody creates a religion wholesale. You're building

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:42.640
<v Speaker 1>it out of existing parts. It's all kind of like

0:03:42.680 --> 0:03:46.800
<v Speaker 1>that first Iron Man suit that that that start builds

0:03:46.800 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 1>in the first Iron Man film. He just builds it

0:03:48.400 --> 0:03:50.600
<v Speaker 1>out of all the stuff that's laying around, and then

0:03:50.600 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 1>he uses that to his advantage. And that's I think

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:54.960
<v Speaker 1>I would argue that that's what you see in most

0:03:55.000 --> 0:03:58.320
<v Speaker 1>of these cases, though the particular suit of religious armor

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:01.240
<v Speaker 1>changes depending on the qual day of the ingredients. Yeah.

0:04:01.280 --> 0:04:03.800
<v Speaker 1>And I would say this relates back to something we

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:06.520
<v Speaker 1>talked about in our Techno Religion for the Masses episodes,

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 1>which is that I personally think that a lot of

0:04:09.440 --> 0:04:13.720
<v Speaker 1>the power we attribute to religion lies in our chronological

0:04:13.760 --> 0:04:17.280
<v Speaker 1>alienation from its origins and from its contents. I mean,

0:04:17.320 --> 0:04:19.120
<v Speaker 1>it comes down to sort of like, what does someone

0:04:19.240 --> 0:04:21.520
<v Speaker 1>want from a religion? What does one want from a

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:24.359
<v Speaker 1>a god? They want something greater than themselves, something that

0:04:24.360 --> 0:04:27.320
<v Speaker 1>stands outside of themselves. What better way than to have

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:32.000
<v Speaker 1>something that stands outside of not only your lifespan, but

0:04:32.120 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 1>even your generation, outside of your your your era, even

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 1>you know it's calling to you from a distant place

0:04:39.640 --> 0:04:42.800
<v Speaker 1>slash time. Some of the power comes from the mystery

0:04:42.880 --> 0:04:45.920
<v Speaker 1>of its separation. That's sort of what holiness is. It's

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:49.200
<v Speaker 1>way less impressive if it seems to spring from the

0:04:49.279 --> 0:04:52.960
<v Speaker 1>very ground we walk on from day to day. And

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:57.919
<v Speaker 1>and yet all religions start somewhere. No religion can have

0:04:58.040 --> 0:05:02.200
<v Speaker 1>always been ancient, uh, because every religion that exists today,

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:05.120
<v Speaker 1>even the one you believe in, you would you would

0:05:05.160 --> 0:05:07.680
<v Speaker 1>have to admit, has an origin. It started at some

0:05:07.760 --> 0:05:11.040
<v Speaker 1>point people started believing in this thing. Uh. Though most

0:05:11.080 --> 0:05:15.200
<v Speaker 1>are probably not the result of a single moment of creativity,

0:05:15.200 --> 0:05:18.240
<v Speaker 1>whether inspired by gambling in Bruskys and whatnot. I mean,

0:05:18.240 --> 0:05:22.120
<v Speaker 1>they're probably from gradual evolutions of beliefs, right, Yeah, new

0:05:22.160 --> 0:05:25.440
<v Speaker 1>ideas that suddenly get picked up by, in many cases

0:05:25.560 --> 0:05:29.159
<v Speaker 1>a charismatic individual who is bringing this to people or

0:05:29.440 --> 0:05:32.640
<v Speaker 1>you know it ties into uh two shifts and changes

0:05:33.400 --> 0:05:36.960
<v Speaker 1>in the structure of society and uh and then in

0:05:37.040 --> 0:05:38.840
<v Speaker 1>our sort of in and then when you layer over

0:05:38.880 --> 0:05:42.279
<v Speaker 1>the mythic uh materials as well. You're gonna throw in

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:45.760
<v Speaker 1>some miracles. You're gonna throw in some some fantastic occurrences,

0:05:45.800 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 1>golden books falling out of the sky or emerging from

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the ground. Right, Yeah, But this is what we want

0:05:51.080 --> 0:05:53.760
<v Speaker 1>to talk about today, right, So it's the beginnings of

0:05:53.800 --> 0:05:58.039
<v Speaker 1>religious movements, and especially on those that draw from sources

0:05:58.279 --> 0:06:01.240
<v Speaker 1>other than direct spirit whole revelation. So you might have

0:06:01.279 --> 0:06:04.159
<v Speaker 1>a movement that starts with somebody thinks they've received a

0:06:04.160 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 1>message from God or from other worldly powers, from a

0:06:07.560 --> 0:06:11.200
<v Speaker 1>supernatural agent, and then they deliver that message and found

0:06:11.200 --> 0:06:13.719
<v Speaker 1>a new religion. You've got those, But we want to

0:06:13.720 --> 0:06:18.240
<v Speaker 1>talk about what happens when something that everybody recognizes as

0:06:18.240 --> 0:06:22.479
<v Speaker 1>a fiction or an in joke or a prank or

0:06:22.560 --> 0:06:26.599
<v Speaker 1>a fan club takes on the mantle of religion and

0:06:26.720 --> 0:06:30.960
<v Speaker 1>genuine sanctity. Yeah, when does it become an actual religion?

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:32.800
<v Speaker 1>And I know that some of you might be thinking, well,

0:06:32.800 --> 0:06:34.800
<v Speaker 1>what does any of this have to do with science

0:06:34.839 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 1>and the flag of science that is up there over

0:06:37.760 --> 0:06:41.360
<v Speaker 1>stuff to bow your mind? Well a lot actually, because

0:06:41.680 --> 0:06:44.279
<v Speaker 1>because most of what we're gonna talk about is occurring,

0:06:44.360 --> 0:06:48.160
<v Speaker 1>if not right now, than at least in the scientific age.

0:06:48.680 --> 0:06:52.360
<v Speaker 1>And I believe that that that the the age of science,

0:06:52.400 --> 0:06:54.520
<v Speaker 1>this age of a reason, has a lot to do

0:06:54.680 --> 0:06:58.640
<v Speaker 1>with the emergence of hyper real religions. Absolutely, and I

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:01.159
<v Speaker 1>think we would be remiss if we did not begin

0:07:01.279 --> 0:07:05.360
<v Speaker 1>this discussion with one of the most popular jokes turned

0:07:05.440 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 1>religions of our modern age, and that is postafarianism. Yes,

0:07:10.760 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 1>and and I do want to just throw in real

0:07:12.160 --> 0:07:16.320
<v Speaker 1>quick this is, of course, the the word postafarianism is

0:07:16.320 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 1>is a play on Rastafarianism, and I do I do

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 1>want to just point out that we are aware that

0:07:24.440 --> 0:07:29.160
<v Speaker 1>adherents of the Rastafari faith uh often do not like

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:32.520
<v Speaker 1>the term Rastafarianism. So it's kind of like there's a

0:07:32.520 --> 0:07:39.600
<v Speaker 1>little bit of an insult to Rastafari adherents built into postafarianism.

0:07:39.720 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Well maybe maybe for that, for that reason, we could

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:45.280
<v Speaker 1>avoid it and just say flying spaghetti monsterism. Well we

0:07:45.440 --> 0:07:47.000
<v Speaker 1>I think we can refer to either just what I

0:07:47.040 --> 0:07:50.360
<v Speaker 1>just thought it was important to acknowledge that, yes, uh uh,

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:54.600
<v Speaker 1>there's I don't think it was intentional, but they're Postafarianism

0:07:54.640 --> 0:07:58.400
<v Speaker 1>could be deemed offensive by some out there, certainly, and

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:01.120
<v Speaker 1>if you're already lost. We need to back up, because

0:08:01.200 --> 0:08:02.920
<v Speaker 1>in order for this to make sense, we've got to

0:08:02.920 --> 0:08:05.720
<v Speaker 1>start with a brief bit of historical context, especially for

0:08:05.760 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 1>those of you who live outside the United States and

0:08:09.240 --> 0:08:13.880
<v Speaker 1>aren't familiar with the school creationism controversy that's gone on

0:08:13.960 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, I'd say mostly in the last

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:19.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty years or so many twenty years. So in the

0:08:19.640 --> 0:08:24.240
<v Speaker 1>United States, we have a constitutional doctrine of separation of

0:08:24.320 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 1>church and State, and this is traditionally interpreted to say

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:30.920
<v Speaker 1>that private citizens can believe whatever they want. You have,

0:08:31.000 --> 0:08:34.000
<v Speaker 1>whatever religious beliefs you want, an agents of the government

0:08:34.040 --> 0:08:37.200
<v Speaker 1>can't interfere with that, but also agents of the government

0:08:37.280 --> 0:08:41.920
<v Speaker 1>can't use their civil authority to punish or promote particular

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:45.080
<v Speaker 1>religious ideas. Right. And for the most part, that works

0:08:45.080 --> 0:08:48.120
<v Speaker 1>pretty well, except where there's this crossover where on one

0:08:48.200 --> 0:08:51.040
<v Speaker 1>side the science book is saying, uh, there's this thing

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:54.480
<v Speaker 1>called evolution. There were these things called dinosaurs. This is

0:08:54.520 --> 0:08:59.360
<v Speaker 1>the basic timeline as a science understands it versus more

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:04.800
<v Speaker 1>fundamentalist and literal interpretations of biblical tradition. Right. And this

0:09:05.000 --> 0:09:07.640
<v Speaker 1>is the most common example in the United States of

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:12.600
<v Speaker 1>a conflict between between separate between the sort of individual

0:09:12.679 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 1>beliefs of people who work for the government, and the

0:09:16.040 --> 0:09:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the idea that civil servants of the government shouldn't be

0:09:18.840 --> 0:09:21.920
<v Speaker 1>using their power to inflict their religious beliefs on other people.

0:09:22.400 --> 0:09:25.319
<v Speaker 1>Uh So, a large percent of Americans are what we

0:09:25.360 --> 0:09:29.480
<v Speaker 1>would call Young Earth creationists. And what does that mean. Well,

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:33.960
<v Speaker 1>a Gallop poll released in June found that forty two

0:09:33.960 --> 0:09:37.880
<v Speaker 1>percent of Americans said they agreed with the following statement

0:09:38.120 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 1>quote God created human beings pretty much in their present

0:09:42.240 --> 0:09:45.800
<v Speaker 1>form at one time within the last ten thousand years

0:09:45.880 --> 0:09:49.960
<v Speaker 1>or so, which is of course complete nonsense, right, And

0:09:50.000 --> 0:09:52.360
<v Speaker 1>if you're listening to this podcast, I'm just gonna go

0:09:52.480 --> 0:09:55.400
<v Speaker 1>and assume you do not believe this. Yeah, as you

0:09:55.400 --> 0:09:58.600
<v Speaker 1>could guess, this entails a rejection of biological evolution and

0:09:58.600 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 1>common descent usually, uh, pretty much all of geology, radiometric dating,

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:08.040
<v Speaker 1>all mainstream scientific thinking about fossils and paleontology, probably a

0:10:08.080 --> 0:10:11.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of astronomy and astrophysics too, for example, the creation

0:10:11.760 --> 0:10:14.440
<v Speaker 1>of the Solar System and the formation of galaxies, and

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:17.240
<v Speaker 1>probably plenty of other things. You could just generally say

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:21.439
<v Speaker 1>that Young Earth creationism is a belief that encounters generalized

0:10:21.600 --> 0:10:25.640
<v Speaker 1>difficulty when held alongside a scientific picture of our world. Yeah,

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:29.719
<v Speaker 1>it's the the rejection of the best modern scientific understanding

0:10:29.760 --> 0:10:32.560
<v Speaker 1>of how the world works, and the acceptance of and

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 1>the reliance upon a sort of modern untangling of ancient

0:10:38.840 --> 0:10:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Babylonian right. So, but the problem is plenty of civil

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:45.760
<v Speaker 1>servants in the United States, especially people who might be

0:10:46.040 --> 0:10:50.840
<v Speaker 1>teachers in public schools or approving curriculum or textbook selection

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:55.640
<v Speaker 1>for public schools, hold these beliefs themselves, and they sometimes

0:10:55.640 --> 0:10:58.280
<v Speaker 1>try to promote these beliefs and their consequences in what

0:10:58.360 --> 0:11:03.440
<v Speaker 1>are supposed to be secular, religiously neutral classes for all students.

0:11:03.920 --> 0:11:06.440
<v Speaker 1>And this can take a lot of forms. At one extreme,

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:09.000
<v Speaker 1>it might have biology classes teaching about the Garden of

0:11:09.160 --> 0:11:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Eden and Noah's Ark as an alternative evolutionary theory. At

0:11:13.000 --> 0:11:16.120
<v Speaker 1>the other end, it might be less overt than that,

0:11:16.160 --> 0:11:20.360
<v Speaker 1>and it might just insist on biology classes including materials

0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:24.080
<v Speaker 1>prepared by creationists that sort of cast vague, unfounded doubts

0:11:24.120 --> 0:11:28.200
<v Speaker 1>on modern biology, or that uh teach children scientifically false

0:11:28.320 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 1>arguments against evolution, like you know, things you've heard before,

0:11:31.840 --> 0:11:34.640
<v Speaker 1>like there are no transitional fossils and stuff like that.

0:11:35.160 --> 0:11:38.720
<v Speaker 1>And obviously this has led to lots of social conflict,

0:11:38.720 --> 0:11:41.840
<v Speaker 1>big public debates, and lots of court cases. One example

0:11:41.880 --> 0:11:44.079
<v Speaker 1>of such a court case occurs very close to home

0:11:44.120 --> 0:11:46.720
<v Speaker 1>for us here in Cobb County, Georgia, which is includes

0:11:46.840 --> 0:11:51.040
<v Speaker 1>northern suburbs of Atlanta. And on March twenty, two thousand two,

0:11:51.360 --> 0:11:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the public school officials in Cobb County approved a measure

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:57.559
<v Speaker 1>requiring biology textbooks to wear a sticker on the inside

0:11:57.559 --> 0:12:01.560
<v Speaker 1>cover that has the following statement. It's says evolution is

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:05.360
<v Speaker 1>a theory, not a fact, regarding the origin of living

0:12:05.559 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 1>living things. Uh. And in two thousand five, this was

0:12:08.760 --> 0:12:13.040
<v Speaker 1>ruled unconstitutional by US District Judge Clarence Cooper, who said,

0:12:13.040 --> 0:12:16.520
<v Speaker 1>of this ruling quote, by denigrating evolution, the school board

0:12:16.520 --> 0:12:19.880
<v Speaker 1>appears to be endorsing the well known prevailing alternative theory

0:12:20.200 --> 0:12:24.040
<v Speaker 1>creationism or variations thereof, even though the sticker does not

0:12:24.120 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 1>specifically reference the alternative theories. And this gets us back

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:31.800
<v Speaker 1>to the monster in question, the spaghetti monster. Where where

0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:36.480
<v Speaker 1>did this come from? Well? This originates with a protest, Yeah,

0:12:36.480 --> 0:12:40.240
<v Speaker 1>a protest against the inclusion of statements like the stickers

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 1>like this in science textbooks. Like the basic idea here

0:12:43.679 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 1>is hey, if this nonsense is going to be presented

0:12:47.800 --> 0:12:52.439
<v Speaker 1>as an alternative to our science. How about this nonsense?

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:55.959
<v Speaker 1>How about I just blatantly make something up, just completely

0:12:55.960 --> 0:12:58.280
<v Speaker 1>off the top of my head, just the craziest thing

0:12:58.320 --> 0:13:01.480
<v Speaker 1>you can imagine. Let's put that in there as well. Yeah,

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:04.000
<v Speaker 1>and this of course takes this to Kansas. Yeah, to

0:13:04.120 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 1>two thousand five, when the Kansas State Board of Education

0:13:07.440 --> 0:13:10.440
<v Speaker 1>had decided to allow intelligent design the sort of a

0:13:10.480 --> 0:13:13.920
<v Speaker 1>moniker of creationism, you might call it, like a marketing

0:13:14.040 --> 0:13:17.200
<v Speaker 1>term to make it seem more scientific, like to add

0:13:17.240 --> 0:13:23.360
<v Speaker 1>a lexicon of scientific vocabulary to h to creationism. And

0:13:23.400 --> 0:13:25.599
<v Speaker 1>they said that they wanted to introduce this into the

0:13:25.679 --> 0:13:28.480
<v Speaker 1>curriculum as an as an alternative to evolution, you know,

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:33.160
<v Speaker 1>teach both theories. So uh. Then twenty five year old

0:13:33.200 --> 0:13:37.560
<v Speaker 1>physics graduate Bobby Henderson wrote what is known as the

0:13:37.600 --> 0:13:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Open Letter to the Kansas School Board, published online in

0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:45.160
<v Speaker 1>two thousand five, to present his vision for religious inclusivity

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:47.240
<v Speaker 1>in the science classroom. Robert, would you like to read

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:50.520
<v Speaker 1>a select quote from the letter? I shall quote. I

0:13:50.520 --> 0:13:53.720
<v Speaker 1>am writing you with much concern, after having read of

0:13:53.840 --> 0:13:57.160
<v Speaker 1>your hearing to decide whether the alternative theory of intelligent

0:13:57.200 --> 0:13:59.800
<v Speaker 1>design should be taught along with the theory of evolution.

0:14:00.200 --> 0:14:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Let us remember that there are multiple theories of intelligent design.

0:14:03.840 --> 0:14:06.560
<v Speaker 1>I and many others around the world are of the

0:14:06.600 --> 0:14:09.800
<v Speaker 1>strong belief that the universe was created by a flying

0:14:10.040 --> 0:14:13.920
<v Speaker 1>spaghetti monster. Right. So throughout this letter, Henderson goes on

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 1>to critique and satirize the intelligent design arguments by showing

0:14:19.200 --> 0:14:22.560
<v Speaker 1>how the claims of flying spaghetti monsterism, though they might

0:14:22.600 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 1>appear to conflict with scientists around the world, don't actually

0:14:26.520 --> 0:14:29.320
<v Speaker 1>because the flying spaghetti monster reaches out with his newly

0:14:29.320 --> 0:14:32.640
<v Speaker 1>appendages to tweak the results of experiments so that we

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:35.880
<v Speaker 1>will be tricked into believing in an evolutionary model of

0:14:35.920 --> 0:14:38.800
<v Speaker 1>the old Earth. Uh. And he goes on also to

0:14:38.920 --> 0:14:42.680
<v Speaker 1>insist that when flying spaghetti monsterism is taught in science classrooms,

0:14:42.720 --> 0:14:46.560
<v Speaker 1>the teacher must wear full pirate regalia. Quote. The concise

0:14:46.600 --> 0:14:52.000
<v Speaker 1>explanation for this is that he becomes angry if we don't. Yeah. So,

0:14:52.320 --> 0:14:56.120
<v Speaker 1>and of course this leads to um wonderful depictions of

0:14:56.120 --> 0:14:59.440
<v Speaker 1>the flying spaghetti monster, yeah, which we've all seen before, right.

0:14:59.520 --> 0:15:02.320
<v Speaker 1>The meme very much. It started as a bit of satire,

0:15:03.000 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 1>a joke on this religious social movement that the author

0:15:07.920 --> 0:15:10.520
<v Speaker 1>of this letter opposed, but it really took on a

0:15:10.560 --> 0:15:12.560
<v Speaker 1>life of its own. It became a meme, it became

0:15:12.600 --> 0:15:15.080
<v Speaker 1>picked up on the internet. So there's artwork. Like you said,

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:20.520
<v Speaker 1>there's uh, it's a whole living library of self referential

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:24.920
<v Speaker 1>humor based around this original idea of a flying spaghetti monster,

0:15:25.400 --> 0:15:30.720
<v Speaker 1>including actually becoming some form of church. Yeah. I mean

0:15:31.320 --> 0:15:34.600
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting to look at the evolution of the joke.

0:15:35.480 --> 0:15:38.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm often just taken by the visual depiction

0:15:38.400 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 1>because I feel like those really pick up a lot

0:15:40.120 --> 0:15:43.880
<v Speaker 1>of steam. And the spaghetti monster itself is funny looking.

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:47.000
<v Speaker 1>It kind of looks like testicles, so it's it's it's

0:15:47.040 --> 0:15:49.840
<v Speaker 1>inherently goofy. It has meatballs, by the way, it's a

0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:52.320
<v Speaker 1>it's a large pile of spaghetti flying through the sky

0:15:52.400 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 1>with eyes and meatballs generally too, and and and yeah,

0:15:55.920 --> 0:15:57.640
<v Speaker 1>to your point, like a lot of it's kind of

0:15:57.720 --> 0:16:01.920
<v Speaker 1>a community, a symbol, myth those as well, Like everyone,

0:16:02.320 --> 0:16:04.400
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of little bits and pieces are thrown in

0:16:04.600 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of willy nilly to create this overall faith. And

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:10.760
<v Speaker 1>it's one of those the theology is not all top down,

0:16:11.160 --> 0:16:14.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of bottom up theology. Yeah, and it's it's one

0:16:14.560 --> 0:16:16.280
<v Speaker 1>of those jokes that I think over the years, like

0:16:16.280 --> 0:16:18.000
<v Speaker 1>when I first heard it, I was kind of like,

0:16:18.040 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't get the joke, and then I got the joke.

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:22.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, Okay, I get it. But then the joke,

0:16:22.760 --> 0:16:25.400
<v Speaker 1>it's the joke just keeps going. People keep telling it

0:16:25.640 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 1>to the point where it's not really that funny anymore.

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:31.840
<v Speaker 1>But you know, it's kind of like having that that

0:16:31.880 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 1>friend in high school who loves Monty Python so much

0:16:34.880 --> 0:16:37.880
<v Speaker 1>that they won't they just fit a reference or half

0:16:37.880 --> 0:16:40.520
<v Speaker 1>a skit into every conversation. Like that's kind of how

0:16:40.520 --> 0:16:44.560
<v Speaker 1>I feel about Pastafari. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, I know

0:16:44.640 --> 0:16:47.080
<v Speaker 1>exactly what you mean. And also I would say that

0:16:47.160 --> 0:16:52.520
<v Speaker 1>in some cases it evolved from a specific satire of

0:16:52.520 --> 0:16:56.640
<v Speaker 1>of teaching of Young Earth creationism in public schools to

0:16:56.800 --> 0:17:00.920
<v Speaker 1>become a more general critique of of religion across the board,

0:17:00.960 --> 0:17:05.520
<v Speaker 1>which I think is not necessarily what the author originally intended, right,

0:17:05.600 --> 0:17:08.280
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, that's definitely becomes kind of a you know,

0:17:08.280 --> 0:17:13.760
<v Speaker 1>an atheistic protest religion, um, and it serves a useful

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:19.760
<v Speaker 1>purpose there, I think, you know it. It's it continually argues, hey, um,

0:17:20.040 --> 0:17:22.119
<v Speaker 1>why do we believe that in the things we believed in.

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:25.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, why is this valuable? And this isn't um

0:17:25.680 --> 0:17:28.600
<v Speaker 1>and you know, as a joke goes it is it

0:17:29.000 --> 0:17:32.000
<v Speaker 1>has proven to be effective, you know, in the way

0:17:32.000 --> 0:17:35.840
<v Speaker 1>that jokes can often tear down the most formidable walls

0:17:36.240 --> 0:17:39.760
<v Speaker 1>in our society but also piss people off royally. Now,

0:17:39.800 --> 0:17:41.679
<v Speaker 1>I can take the other side for a second and

0:17:41.680 --> 0:17:44.320
<v Speaker 1>say that I can understand why some religious people would

0:17:44.840 --> 0:17:49.200
<v Speaker 1>be less than impressed with this joke as it exists today, because,

0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:51.720
<v Speaker 1>let's be fair, in a lot of cases, it does

0:17:51.760 --> 0:17:55.119
<v Speaker 1>seem to represent a just sort of generalized critique, and

0:17:55.160 --> 0:17:59.600
<v Speaker 1>critique might be a generous word of of religion without

0:17:59.760 --> 0:18:03.600
<v Speaker 1>much attempt to understand people's religions or doctrines and the

0:18:03.720 --> 0:18:06.960
<v Speaker 1>values they provide to the people that that hold them. Yeah,

0:18:07.000 --> 0:18:08.560
<v Speaker 1>it is you can just look at as a kind

0:18:08.560 --> 0:18:14.040
<v Speaker 1>of shallow, outsider mockery. Yeah, and I and I definitely,

0:18:14.320 --> 0:18:16.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, I can definitely relate to some of those

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 1>feelings about it, you know, over the years, because at

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:21.520
<v Speaker 1>times I have felt like, not only is it a

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:23.880
<v Speaker 1>joke that I maybe don't don't get or I don't

0:18:23.880 --> 0:18:26.000
<v Speaker 1>find as funny, but yeah, I could also see where

0:18:26.040 --> 0:18:28.480
<v Speaker 1>it's a little a little offensive, you know, because you're

0:18:28.640 --> 0:18:31.600
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of like you're taking just three minutes to

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:36.639
<v Speaker 1>throw up a spaghetti monster image to rebuke a person's

0:18:36.840 --> 0:18:39.880
<v Speaker 1>lifetime of faith, you know, to to rebuke their their

0:18:39.960 --> 0:18:43.520
<v Speaker 1>their cultural heritage in many cases. But as we said,

0:18:44.440 --> 0:18:47.440
<v Speaker 1>this is becoming a new heritage of its own. And

0:18:47.560 --> 0:18:50.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm curious to see what the Church of the

0:18:50.400 --> 0:18:54.119
<v Speaker 1>Flying Spaghetti Monster looks like in twenty years. Yeah. I

0:18:54.160 --> 0:18:58.000
<v Speaker 1>think for the most part, for most people, it's it's

0:18:58.000 --> 0:19:01.159
<v Speaker 1>remains at that bumper sticker level involvement, you know, it

0:19:01.280 --> 0:19:03.000
<v Speaker 1>is just something you throw up on social media or

0:19:03.000 --> 0:19:04.679
<v Speaker 1>stick on the back of your car. Other people have

0:19:04.760 --> 0:19:07.720
<v Speaker 1>taken it to two greater extremes, going in and trying

0:19:07.720 --> 0:19:10.359
<v Speaker 1>to get their official um, you know state I D

0:19:10.840 --> 0:19:12.840
<v Speaker 1>with a colander on their head, which is of course

0:19:12.880 --> 0:19:16.040
<v Speaker 1>one of the other articles of faith for the adherents,

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:20.960
<v Speaker 1>and UH and other folks have pushed for official religious status,

0:19:21.960 --> 0:19:24.840
<v Speaker 1>which is is really taking it to the next level,

0:19:24.920 --> 0:19:28.520
<v Speaker 1>saying not only is our joke religion jokey, but it

0:19:28.720 --> 0:19:31.960
<v Speaker 1>is actually a religion, or it is as real religion

0:19:31.960 --> 0:19:34.800
<v Speaker 1>as your religion. And we want the government to recognize

0:19:34.800 --> 0:19:36.960
<v Speaker 1>that fact. And I think there are some governments that

0:19:37.000 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 1>have recognized it, right, Yeah, at least the Netherlands and

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:45.080
<v Speaker 1>New Zealand to to some degree. That the Netherlands where

0:19:45.200 --> 0:19:47.760
<v Speaker 1>that was where we saw the most recent headlines about it,

0:19:47.800 --> 0:19:50.439
<v Speaker 1>and apparently they had to they had to prove that

0:19:50.520 --> 0:19:52.679
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't just a fad, that it was an actual

0:19:52.760 --> 0:19:54.919
<v Speaker 1>thing that people believed in and that they had like

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:57.679
<v Speaker 1>a marriage ritual, uh, that sort of thing, so that

0:19:57.720 --> 0:19:59.439
<v Speaker 1>it was it's the kind of thing that people are

0:19:59.480 --> 0:20:02.960
<v Speaker 1>invested in enough that it is, you know, potentially a

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:05.679
<v Speaker 1>part of your life. Yeah, and this leads us to

0:20:05.840 --> 0:20:09.639
<v Speaker 1>the realization that a religion need not be ancient in

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:13.720
<v Speaker 1>order to be followed. So I I stand by what

0:20:13.800 --> 0:20:16.760
<v Speaker 1>I said earlier about a lot of the aesthetic power

0:20:16.880 --> 0:20:19.439
<v Speaker 1>of religion does seem to come from its antiquity and

0:20:19.480 --> 0:20:23.760
<v Speaker 1>its chronological alienation sort of alien holiness of the distant past.

0:20:24.640 --> 0:20:27.080
<v Speaker 1>But this doesn't mean you can't create religions in the

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:29.600
<v Speaker 1>modern day that gain a following. Yeah. I mean we've

0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:34.560
<v Speaker 1>already mentioned Rastafari, which is an Abrahamic religion, uh, you know,

0:20:34.640 --> 0:20:37.040
<v Speaker 1>certainly with a lot of elements that are based in

0:20:37.160 --> 0:20:42.119
<v Speaker 1>deep history, but it also venerated uh then Emperor of

0:20:42.200 --> 0:20:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Ethiopia highly Stilassi, you know. And it's it's it's certainly

0:20:47.080 --> 0:20:49.399
<v Speaker 1>a religion I would love to look at in greater

0:20:49.480 --> 0:20:51.879
<v Speaker 1>depth at some point in the future. But yeah, you

0:20:51.920 --> 0:20:54.840
<v Speaker 1>have a situation where it's it's in the past, it's

0:20:54.920 --> 0:20:57.439
<v Speaker 1>it's taking place in the present. And I mean to

0:20:57.560 --> 0:21:02.280
<v Speaker 1>have your Messiah of and and die within the lifespan

0:21:02.560 --> 0:21:04.879
<v Speaker 1>of the faith, uh and to see that sort of

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:08.760
<v Speaker 1>happen in in recent history, it's fascinating. Well, how about

0:21:08.920 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 1>how about Joseph Smith and the Latter day Saints. Oh yeah,

0:21:11.600 --> 0:21:14.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean there's another good one. Um, it's the origins

0:21:14.359 --> 0:21:18.240
<v Speaker 1>date back around eighteen thirty. This is a millennialist religion

0:21:18.640 --> 0:21:22.959
<v Speaker 1>that preach the impending second Coming, continuing revelations and uh

0:21:23.560 --> 0:21:26.400
<v Speaker 1>uh an identity and values that I guess you'd say

0:21:26.400 --> 0:21:29.199
<v Speaker 1>we're more grounded in the temporary setting. So you know,

0:21:29.240 --> 0:21:33.880
<v Speaker 1>it's America. It's there's a modern cosmology, very American religion. Yeah,

0:21:34.000 --> 0:21:35.919
<v Speaker 1>very much. So. If if you don't realize that this

0:21:36.000 --> 0:21:38.200
<v Speaker 1>is the name, the official name of the Mormons, the

0:21:38.280 --> 0:21:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Church of Jesus Christ, of Latter day Saints and it too,

0:21:40.720 --> 0:21:47.440
<v Speaker 1>of course, sprang up around a single charismatic individual, and uh,

0:21:47.640 --> 0:21:50.600
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's actually a very interesting religion to look

0:21:50.600 --> 0:21:54.000
<v Speaker 1>at in terms of science as well, um, in the

0:21:54.040 --> 0:21:56.520
<v Speaker 1>in since it's since it is more of a more

0:21:56.560 --> 0:21:59.639
<v Speaker 1>closely tied to our scientific age, you do find elements

0:21:59.760 --> 0:22:03.880
<v Speaker 1>of it that are that that conflict less with modern

0:22:04.520 --> 0:22:07.880
<v Speaker 1>scientific cosmology, such as the the idea that there are

0:22:07.960 --> 0:22:10.760
<v Speaker 1>other planets and that there is a potential for life

0:22:10.760 --> 0:22:14.080
<v Speaker 1>on other worlds. Oh yeah, though even without the introduction

0:22:14.240 --> 0:22:16.760
<v Speaker 1>of new holy texts such as the Book of Mormon,

0:22:17.600 --> 0:22:20.280
<v Speaker 1>you could point out that lots of modern Christians have

0:22:20.440 --> 0:22:25.000
<v Speaker 1>adapted their beliefs to include modern science. Oh certainly. I mean,

0:22:25.640 --> 0:22:29.000
<v Speaker 1>when we look at the numbers from from that Gallup poll,

0:22:29.200 --> 0:22:32.040
<v Speaker 1>only forty two percent of Americans adhered to a literal

0:22:32.119 --> 0:22:36.040
<v Speaker 1>understanding of the Bible, and so that's obviously not even

0:22:36.080 --> 0:22:39.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe that's like half of Christians or something in America. Yeah, yeah,

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:43.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you can certainly still be a Christian according

0:22:43.440 --> 0:22:44.919
<v Speaker 1>to me anyway. I mean, this is going to very

0:22:44.960 --> 0:22:49.000
<v Speaker 1>depending on who's who's serving you your Christianity, but um, yeah,

0:22:49.040 --> 0:22:51.159
<v Speaker 1>you can still be a Christian and not believe that

0:22:51.200 --> 0:22:53.240
<v Speaker 1>there was a literal garden of eaton. You can still

0:22:53.240 --> 0:22:56.720
<v Speaker 1>look at something like Noah's ark uh and and really

0:22:56.800 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 1>and and view it as mythology without and view it

0:23:00.840 --> 0:23:04.560
<v Speaker 1>as mythology, not in the as a dismissal, but understanding

0:23:04.600 --> 0:23:07.200
<v Speaker 1>the power of myth and the necessity of myth uh

0:23:07.359 --> 0:23:09.920
<v Speaker 1>in our culture right. Well, or you might not even

0:23:09.960 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 1>put it in those terms. You might just say like, well,

0:23:12.080 --> 0:23:14.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's a story that's part of our received tradition,

0:23:14.680 --> 0:23:17.159
<v Speaker 1>and I accept it as a story. But I but

0:23:17.240 --> 0:23:21.040
<v Speaker 1>also I wouldn't deny what the evidence in the lab says.

0:23:21.119 --> 0:23:23.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that would be foolish. So so one is

0:23:23.359 --> 0:23:26.159
<v Speaker 1>science and one is my religion, and you know you

0:23:26.160 --> 0:23:28.720
<v Speaker 1>don't have to smash them together in a particle collider

0:23:28.720 --> 0:23:31.160
<v Speaker 1>of my brain. Yeah, I mean you can. You can.

0:23:31.240 --> 0:23:33.120
<v Speaker 1>You can look at it as literature. You can look

0:23:33.160 --> 0:23:35.880
<v Speaker 1>at it his mythology if you want. You can look

0:23:36.000 --> 0:23:39.040
<v Speaker 1>at it as some sort of a literal historical document.

0:23:39.200 --> 0:23:42.800
<v Speaker 1>But to do so is to throw out our modern

0:23:42.880 --> 0:23:45.360
<v Speaker 1>understanding of the world. Yeah, so how about the other

0:23:45.560 --> 0:23:50.000
<v Speaker 1>uh recently created religion that we opened with talking about scientology,

0:23:50.040 --> 0:23:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Like we said, the bar Bet story probably isn't true,

0:23:52.640 --> 0:23:57.080
<v Speaker 1>but scientology certainly is a religion explicitly created in the

0:23:57.119 --> 0:24:03.000
<v Speaker 1>twentieth century. That's right. Nine Um contemporary individual focused movement

0:24:03.040 --> 0:24:07.800
<v Speaker 1>elements of science fiction, New age philosophy, and the psychoanalysis,

0:24:07.840 --> 0:24:12.720
<v Speaker 1>though it also has historically been anti psychiatry. Um. And

0:24:13.000 --> 0:24:16.119
<v Speaker 1>I think it's sort of almost uh positions itself as

0:24:16.160 --> 0:24:19.280
<v Speaker 1>an alternative to psychiatry. Yes, yeah, I think very much so,

0:24:19.840 --> 0:24:23.000
<v Speaker 1>um and one of them. We're not gonna go in

0:24:23.040 --> 0:24:26.840
<v Speaker 1>deep into all the mysteries of scientology here, but it

0:24:26.960 --> 0:24:29.800
<v Speaker 1>essentially says that we're all alien souls called Betan's that

0:24:29.840 --> 0:24:32.679
<v Speaker 1>bounce around from life to life. One attempts to free

0:24:32.680 --> 0:24:35.480
<v Speaker 1>oneself from this cycle and train their true self. So

0:24:35.480 --> 0:24:38.760
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of like space Buddhism, which you know, I

0:24:38.840 --> 0:24:40.919
<v Speaker 1>with without getting into the other details, I could get

0:24:40.960 --> 0:24:42.920
<v Speaker 1>behind the idea of some space Buddhism. I could see

0:24:42.960 --> 0:24:45.600
<v Speaker 1>the appeal in the abstract at least, though, as you note,

0:24:45.600 --> 0:24:49.240
<v Speaker 1>it is a pretty divisive religion. Everybody's got an opinion

0:24:49.320 --> 0:24:52.480
<v Speaker 1>on it. Yeah, it's hard to find and I'm I'm

0:24:52.480 --> 0:24:54.040
<v Speaker 1>one of those people that I would love to see

0:24:54.080 --> 0:24:57.640
<v Speaker 1>more just like objective down the middle coverage of scientology.

0:24:57.720 --> 0:25:00.600
<v Speaker 1>But for the most part it's either U. I mean, certainly,

0:25:00.640 --> 0:25:03.320
<v Speaker 1>just researching online you're gonna find one voice or the

0:25:03.320 --> 0:25:07.560
<v Speaker 1>other in very drastically different positions on the matter. Now,

0:25:07.600 --> 0:25:10.159
<v Speaker 1>any of the religions that we've mentioned so far, you

0:25:10.200 --> 0:25:13.800
<v Speaker 1>can definitely go at them and point out at least

0:25:13.840 --> 0:25:17.080
<v Speaker 1>little bits and pieces that don't match up with our

0:25:17.119 --> 0:25:19.920
<v Speaker 1>scientific understanding of reality. You can say, hey, bees didn't

0:25:19.960 --> 0:25:23.000
<v Speaker 1>have four legs, as we've mentioned in previous episodes. Sure

0:25:23.040 --> 0:25:26.159
<v Speaker 1>there were no New World horses prior to h to

0:25:26.359 --> 0:25:31.399
<v Speaker 1>the colonial presence UH in North America. You told how

0:25:31.480 --> 0:25:37.000
<v Speaker 1>is that relevant? Um? Some criticize, you know, the Book

0:25:37.000 --> 0:25:41.080
<v Speaker 1>of Mormon and point to UH passages about horses and

0:25:41.080 --> 0:25:42.760
<v Speaker 1>and use this as a, you know, a sort of

0:25:42.880 --> 0:25:45.200
<v Speaker 1>rallying point for Oh, you're totally full of it because

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:48.120
<v Speaker 1>this thing doesn't match up with with real life. Likewise,

0:25:48.119 --> 0:25:50.320
<v Speaker 1>you can say, oh, there's no demonic space, aliens, there

0:25:50.359 --> 0:25:53.360
<v Speaker 1>no there was no z new etcetera. But as we're

0:25:53.359 --> 0:25:56.720
<v Speaker 1>about to discuss, there are religions or hyper religions as

0:25:56.760 --> 0:26:01.159
<v Speaker 1>they're they're sometimes called, in which there is definite fiction

0:26:01.240 --> 0:26:04.199
<v Speaker 1>going on, like the whole Bedrock for the faith is

0:26:04.280 --> 0:26:08.159
<v Speaker 1>fiction where not everybody agrees this fiction nobody and the

0:26:08.240 --> 0:26:10.480
<v Speaker 1>people on the inside. Yeah, So it's not a situation

0:26:10.520 --> 0:26:13.080
<v Speaker 1>where someone is having to say, well, you know, this

0:26:13.160 --> 0:26:16.600
<v Speaker 1>one little detail about horses or bees or what have you.

0:26:16.680 --> 0:26:18.879
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't match up because X Y and is either saying, oh, no,

0:26:19.200 --> 0:26:22.560
<v Speaker 1>I fully agree with you. This is all fiction. But

0:26:22.640 --> 0:26:25.760
<v Speaker 1>the thing that comes out of that fiction is real. Right,

0:26:25.800 --> 0:26:29.880
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about religions that draw inspiration from fictional narratives

0:26:29.960 --> 0:26:33.560
<v Speaker 1>that don't claim to adhere to reality at all. And

0:26:33.840 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 1>here we're going to get into a little bit of

0:26:36.080 --> 0:26:39.240
<v Speaker 1>the work of a sort of cultural critic and sociologist

0:26:39.320 --> 0:26:43.560
<v Speaker 1>named Adam Possum I And Possum's got a he's got

0:26:43.560 --> 0:26:46.840
<v Speaker 1>a book that came out in two thousand five called

0:26:46.960 --> 0:26:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Religion and Popular Culture a hyper Real Testament like that title, uh,

0:26:53.040 --> 0:26:57.720
<v Speaker 1>And in this book he builds on some postmodern social theory. Now,

0:26:57.840 --> 0:26:59.440
<v Speaker 1>don't worry, we're not going to get too into the

0:26:59.480 --> 0:27:03.760
<v Speaker 1>weeds of social theory and post modern criticism. But basically

0:27:03.800 --> 0:27:07.400
<v Speaker 1>here's how it goes. It says the twentieth century represents

0:27:07.400 --> 0:27:14.840
<v Speaker 1>a turn from traditional cultural structures to individualized consumer experiences

0:27:14.960 --> 0:27:19.000
<v Speaker 1>driven by capitalism. So just think about that for a second. Oh,

0:27:19.040 --> 0:27:23.119
<v Speaker 1>and he says, of course this extends to religion. And

0:27:23.160 --> 0:27:24.880
<v Speaker 1>so if you think about that, it's sort of saying

0:27:24.880 --> 0:27:29.080
<v Speaker 1>that instead of having a structure like a community accountable

0:27:29.160 --> 0:27:32.000
<v Speaker 1>to one another that gathers to pray and worship in

0:27:32.040 --> 0:27:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the received antique tradition, people consume their religion individually in

0:27:38.560 --> 0:27:42.639
<v Speaker 1>the same way they do their shopping and their media experiences.

0:27:42.680 --> 0:27:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Religion becomes a co modified, consume arized thing that you

0:27:47.920 --> 0:27:50.600
<v Speaker 1>you can pick off the shelf and take home with you.

0:27:51.119 --> 0:27:53.320
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not sure I totally agree, but I think

0:27:53.359 --> 0:27:55.879
<v Speaker 1>there is at least a grain of truth to this. Uh.

0:27:56.040 --> 0:27:59.719
<v Speaker 1>Simply by looking at the esthetics of religion in America today,

0:28:00.160 --> 0:28:02.280
<v Speaker 1>you could point to, for example, I think the rise

0:28:02.320 --> 0:28:06.119
<v Speaker 1>of televangelism, TV ministry networks. You can change the channel

0:28:06.960 --> 0:28:10.520
<v Speaker 1>at home religious participation on your own time with a

0:28:10.600 --> 0:28:14.120
<v Speaker 1>TV program. You could also look at mega churches, which

0:28:14.160 --> 0:28:17.240
<v Speaker 1>I think are a really interesting cultural phenomenon. I have

0:28:17.480 --> 0:28:21.240
<v Speaker 1>huge congregations, and what's the point of the huge congregation. Well,

0:28:21.280 --> 0:28:23.520
<v Speaker 1>if you wanted to look at it from this critical

0:28:23.520 --> 0:28:26.320
<v Speaker 1>point of view, you could say, really, a huge congregation

0:28:26.400 --> 0:28:29.200
<v Speaker 1>like that provides each individual church go or a kind

0:28:29.200 --> 0:28:32.840
<v Speaker 1>of Walmart level of anonymity. You don't have to have

0:28:32.920 --> 0:28:36.600
<v Speaker 1>a personal relationship. You just go and sort of consume

0:28:37.080 --> 0:28:40.080
<v Speaker 1>as another face in the crowd, as on your own time,

0:28:40.120 --> 0:28:43.760
<v Speaker 1>on your own terms. Now, of course that also can

0:28:43.840 --> 0:28:45.880
<v Speaker 1>be The very thing about a mega church that would

0:28:45.880 --> 0:28:47.520
<v Speaker 1>turn someone away is that they want to go into

0:28:47.520 --> 0:28:49.560
<v Speaker 1>a church. They want to be recognized, right, they want

0:28:49.560 --> 0:28:50.920
<v Speaker 1>to be an individual, they want a part of a

0:28:50.920 --> 0:28:54.160
<v Speaker 1>community exactly. But then also you could look at their

0:28:54.400 --> 0:28:58.120
<v Speaker 1>attention grabbing multimedia experiences like let's you know, let's watch

0:28:58.520 --> 0:29:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Pastor Trent rock out with the Rays Band on the JumboTron,

0:29:02.480 --> 0:29:04.880
<v Speaker 1>which there there's certainly plenty of that. And sometimes they've

0:29:04.920 --> 0:29:08.560
<v Speaker 1>even got truly built in shopping experiences. You've got coffee shops,

0:29:08.560 --> 0:29:11.479
<v Speaker 1>bookstores and the church and stuff like that. And so

0:29:11.520 --> 0:29:13.160
<v Speaker 1>this is the work that I think possum I is

0:29:13.200 --> 0:29:15.840
<v Speaker 1>building on. And so possum I, when he gets to

0:29:15.880 --> 0:29:19.280
<v Speaker 1>the concept of hyper real religion, he makes a comparison

0:29:19.320 --> 0:29:25.280
<v Speaker 1>between trends in fantasy literature and trends in religion. And

0:29:25.320 --> 0:29:27.800
<v Speaker 1>so he starts out by looking at fantasy fiction and

0:29:27.800 --> 0:29:31.200
<v Speaker 1>he says he says essentially that fantasy fiction has this

0:29:31.320 --> 0:29:35.960
<v Speaker 1>traditional library of tropes, styles, and contents from which it

0:29:36.040 --> 0:29:39.760
<v Speaker 1>usually draws like sword and sorcery fiction. He possum I

0:29:39.840 --> 0:29:43.360
<v Speaker 1>claims that this is based mostly on chivalric or medieval

0:29:43.520 --> 0:29:46.280
<v Speaker 1>romance like the R three and cycle, you know, King

0:29:46.360 --> 0:29:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Arthur and those kind of stories, that they form the

0:29:49.840 --> 0:29:53.040
<v Speaker 1>library of things which the modern fantasy author can now

0:29:53.080 --> 0:29:55.400
<v Speaker 1>reach in and grab and put together in his or

0:29:55.440 --> 0:29:59.200
<v Speaker 1>her own way. And so among the standard library of

0:29:59.240 --> 0:30:06.000
<v Speaker 1>tropes or things, magic, creatures, thieves, warriors, druids, wizards, orcs, elves,

0:30:06.720 --> 0:30:10.960
<v Speaker 1>what else, oh, gelatinous cubes. Yeah, all the standard dungeon

0:30:11.000 --> 0:30:15.360
<v Speaker 1>and dragons, characters, creatures and tropes for sure. But then

0:30:15.440 --> 0:30:18.719
<v Speaker 1>possum My points to an interesting development in the history

0:30:18.720 --> 0:30:21.560
<v Speaker 1>of fantasy, which he singles out as the two thousand

0:30:21.560 --> 0:30:24.520
<v Speaker 1>two video game Kingdom Hearts. Now, I've never played this

0:30:24.680 --> 0:30:28.000
<v Speaker 1>of you know, but I'm familiar with the with the series,

0:30:28.080 --> 0:30:31.640
<v Speaker 1>especially it's it's crossovers with like Disney material. Yeah, I

0:30:31.640 --> 0:30:34.200
<v Speaker 1>did not expect Kingdom Hearts to show up in the material,

0:30:34.320 --> 0:30:36.200
<v Speaker 1>but this is exactly what he points out. I think

0:30:36.200 --> 0:30:38.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a really interesting point. He says, so okay. Kingdom

0:30:38.680 --> 0:30:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Hearts is a video game following a very traditional fantasy plot.

0:30:42.240 --> 0:30:46.120
<v Speaker 1>In some ways, it has a traditional fantasy plot structure.

0:30:46.240 --> 0:30:48.800
<v Speaker 1>There's a quest, there's a main character who has a

0:30:49.360 --> 0:30:52.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of symbolic sword and uh, and the main character

0:30:52.640 --> 0:30:56.400
<v Speaker 1>is seeking reunification with friends who are lost. It all

0:30:56.440 --> 0:31:00.880
<v Speaker 1>sounds like this could be Tolkien or something. But instead

0:31:00.920 --> 0:31:05.040
<v Speaker 1>of having all of just the regular dungeons and dragons, chivalry,

0:31:05.600 --> 0:31:07.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, the knights and the elves and the orcs

0:31:07.840 --> 0:31:11.160
<v Speaker 1>and all that, it's got characters from Disney movies. Like

0:31:11.240 --> 0:31:14.000
<v Speaker 1>you say, so, it's got characters from Aladdin and Peter

0:31:14.120 --> 0:31:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Pan and hundred and one Dalmatians and Alice in Wonderland.

0:31:18.680 --> 0:31:22.160
<v Speaker 1>And so he's looking at this as saying, huh. So,

0:31:22.200 --> 0:31:25.320
<v Speaker 1>when you put yourself in the fantasy mindset, you kind

0:31:25.320 --> 0:31:29.280
<v Speaker 1>of have to uh accept as real all of the

0:31:29.320 --> 0:31:32.840
<v Speaker 1>tropes that are being pulled from the the antique library

0:31:33.000 --> 0:31:37.520
<v Speaker 1>of medieval and fantasy tropes like wizards and stuff like that.

0:31:37.520 --> 0:31:40.200
<v Speaker 1>That's the real material that you work with within the

0:31:40.240 --> 0:31:43.080
<v Speaker 1>fantasy realm. But this is bringing in all this stuff

0:31:43.120 --> 0:31:47.560
<v Speaker 1>where people are explicitly familiar with the origins Disney movies

0:31:47.640 --> 0:31:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Disney movies they saw when they were a kid, and

0:31:49.800 --> 0:31:53.880
<v Speaker 1>now they're part of the Fantasy library. Yeah. This is

0:31:53.880 --> 0:31:55.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this just makes me think about walking around

0:31:55.600 --> 0:31:58.160
<v Speaker 1>the office here, how stuff works. Uh, you go by

0:31:58.200 --> 0:32:01.720
<v Speaker 1>each desk and everyone as at least it seems like

0:32:02.080 --> 0:32:07.480
<v Speaker 1>one figuring, right, one action figure, some sort of pop

0:32:07.520 --> 0:32:11.600
<v Speaker 1>culture comic bookie character that is serving as kind of

0:32:11.800 --> 0:32:15.040
<v Speaker 1>uh kind of an avatar, kind of an icon, kind

0:32:15.080 --> 0:32:18.520
<v Speaker 1>of uh kind of a holy artifact, a little god,

0:32:18.640 --> 0:32:20.920
<v Speaker 1>a little shrine at your desk. Yeah, exactly. I mean,

0:32:20.960 --> 0:32:24.200
<v Speaker 1>like like I think about in my own situation, like

0:32:24.320 --> 0:32:28.160
<v Speaker 1>I carry a Ganesha in my pocket, Ganesha being of

0:32:28.160 --> 0:32:31.040
<v Speaker 1>course that the Hindu, a little elephant deity, the remover

0:32:31.120 --> 0:32:34.040
<v Speaker 1>of obstacles, um and and so you know, I carry

0:32:34.600 --> 0:32:37.680
<v Speaker 1>him around as a kind of a good good luck token.

0:32:38.040 --> 0:32:40.040
<v Speaker 1>But on my desk here at work, I also have

0:32:40.160 --> 0:32:45.360
<v Speaker 1>a Gammera and a tom Servo, which very fine idols. Yeah,

0:32:45.400 --> 0:32:48.720
<v Speaker 1>and they kind of what they kind of embody certain

0:32:49.040 --> 0:32:51.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe not completely thought out ideas, but they

0:32:51.680 --> 0:32:55.760
<v Speaker 1>embody certain nostalgic powers and thematic powers that I kind

0:32:55.760 --> 0:32:58.280
<v Speaker 1>of draw in a draw on as I work. Gammera

0:32:58.400 --> 0:33:00.760
<v Speaker 1>has stuff we can all get behind he of all children.

0:33:00.760 --> 0:33:03.440
<v Speaker 1>It's right. He's a friend of children, and he breathes

0:33:03.520 --> 0:33:06.960
<v Speaker 1>fire and flies, so he's you know, he's he's a

0:33:07.000 --> 0:33:09.680
<v Speaker 1>he's a powerful force to to to to turn to.

0:33:09.960 --> 0:33:12.640
<v Speaker 1>So anytime there's a bat in your vicinity that begins

0:33:12.680 --> 0:33:15.320
<v Speaker 1>to emit rays you know that you have gammera on

0:33:15.360 --> 0:33:18.080
<v Speaker 1>your side. Exactly. Yeah, but you know to what extent

0:33:18.160 --> 0:33:21.080
<v Speaker 1>are all these little little creatures and little toy I mean,

0:33:21.120 --> 0:33:23.280
<v Speaker 1>they are all kind of religious icons. They're kind of

0:33:23.320 --> 0:33:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the gods of the New Age, right, Yeah, And so

0:33:26.280 --> 0:33:29.560
<v Speaker 1>we should note about possum I before we continue that.

0:33:30.320 --> 0:33:34.920
<v Speaker 1>In the academic community postmodern religious and cultural criticism, there's

0:33:34.960 --> 0:33:37.760
<v Speaker 1>been you know, a ton of ink spill debating the

0:33:37.800 --> 0:33:41.760
<v Speaker 1>merits of possum eze definitions and analysis. We're not going

0:33:41.800 --> 0:33:43.360
<v Speaker 1>to get into all that. We're we're not going to

0:33:43.440 --> 0:33:46.200
<v Speaker 1>get into these debates. We can just focus on that

0:33:46.440 --> 0:33:50.400
<v Speaker 1>the example itself, basically the all it is subjective analysis.

0:33:50.480 --> 0:33:53.520
<v Speaker 1>So if there's nothing definite about any of it, yeah,

0:33:53.640 --> 0:33:55.680
<v Speaker 1>but it's but it does it does make a lot

0:33:55.680 --> 0:33:57.360
<v Speaker 1>of sense in this one we're discussing it here. But

0:33:57.720 --> 0:34:02.080
<v Speaker 1>essentially the idea is creating religios inspired by source material

0:34:02.240 --> 0:34:06.600
<v Speaker 1>that the religion's own adherents except to be fiction. Well,

0:34:06.680 --> 0:34:08.440
<v Speaker 1>let's run through some examples of this, because I mean,

0:34:08.440 --> 0:34:10.279
<v Speaker 1>I know it's if you're not familiar with this, your

0:34:10.320 --> 0:34:12.160
<v Speaker 1>your brain is probably going in circles here, like how

0:34:12.160 --> 0:34:14.120
<v Speaker 1>do you base a religion? It's one thing to say, oh,

0:34:14.120 --> 0:34:16.279
<v Speaker 1>I get some inspiration from a gammera, but how would

0:34:16.280 --> 0:34:18.520
<v Speaker 1>you actually have a Gambra based faith? Well, do you

0:34:18.560 --> 0:34:20.879
<v Speaker 1>mind if I talk about the Jedi? First? Talk about

0:34:20.920 --> 0:34:24.319
<v Speaker 1>the Jedi? Okay, so how about Jedi is M. Have

0:34:24.400 --> 0:34:27.200
<v Speaker 1>you have you folks heard of this Jedi is M

0:34:27.520 --> 0:34:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Jeddism or Jeddi is M. Jedism always makes me think

0:34:30.560 --> 0:34:32.920
<v Speaker 1>of Jed from Beverly Hill, Billways. It's the religion of

0:34:33.000 --> 0:34:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Jed clamp At. Yes, because he came across the Black Gold,

0:34:37.320 --> 0:34:39.880
<v Speaker 1>so he must be inspired. Yes he would God let

0:34:39.960 --> 0:34:43.239
<v Speaker 1>him there. But anyway, that no, jedi Ism is a

0:34:43.440 --> 0:34:46.719
<v Speaker 1>Star Wars inspired religion that takes after the Jedi, the

0:34:46.800 --> 0:34:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Jedi knights of the Star Wars universe. Who are the heroes?

0:34:49.480 --> 0:34:51.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I probably don't need to explain the Star

0:34:51.719 --> 0:34:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Wars context. You I assume you've seen it, if not,

0:34:54.680 --> 0:34:59.080
<v Speaker 1>suffice to say, they're, you know, a quasimistical religious order

0:34:59.160 --> 0:35:02.440
<v Speaker 1>of good guy is facing off against an evil empire.

0:35:03.400 --> 0:35:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Well evil in quotation, I don't know how evil they

0:35:06.040 --> 0:35:08.520
<v Speaker 1>actually were. But but oh so you've got a bone

0:35:08.520 --> 0:35:10.759
<v Speaker 1>to pick there, Well, it's it's not really worth picking

0:35:10.760 --> 0:35:14.400
<v Speaker 1>at this point, never mind. Okay, So anyway, in my

0:35:14.440 --> 0:35:18.560
<v Speaker 1>best judgment, Jedi pretty clearly began as a joke. It

0:35:18.680 --> 0:35:22.720
<v Speaker 1>just explicitly a joke. Uh. First example the two thousand

0:35:22.840 --> 0:35:25.359
<v Speaker 1>one Senceus phenomenon. So around the time of the year

0:35:25.360 --> 0:35:30.120
<v Speaker 1>two thousand one, there was a widespread international email campaign

0:35:30.360 --> 0:35:35.200
<v Speaker 1>urging people to list Jedi as their religion on official

0:35:35.320 --> 0:35:39.880
<v Speaker 1>census forms. And it worked. It worked. According to the BBC,

0:35:40.120 --> 0:35:44.600
<v Speaker 1>In the two thousand one UK census, three hundred ninety thousand,

0:35:44.680 --> 0:35:47.880
<v Speaker 1>one d twenty seven people, which amounted to about zero

0:35:47.920 --> 0:35:51.200
<v Speaker 1>point seven percent of the population at the time, listed

0:35:51.239 --> 0:35:55.640
<v Speaker 1>their religion as some variation on Jedi on that census

0:35:55.920 --> 0:36:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Jedi or Jedi Night something like. That same year, according

0:36:00.480 --> 0:36:03.920
<v Speaker 1>to the Sydney Morning Herald, seventy thousand, five hundred and

0:36:04.040 --> 0:36:07.400
<v Speaker 1>nine Australians are about zero point three seven percent of

0:36:07.440 --> 0:36:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Australians registered as Jedi on on the two thousand one census.

0:36:12.160 --> 0:36:14.480
<v Speaker 1>So at the time, I think everybody assumed this was

0:36:14.520 --> 0:36:18.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of like flying spaghetti monsterism. It's a joke carried

0:36:18.160 --> 0:36:22.439
<v Speaker 1>out by atheists and secularists, maybe trying to point out

0:36:22.520 --> 0:36:26.120
<v Speaker 1>something about the arbitrary nous of people's religious beliefs. Maybe

0:36:26.160 --> 0:36:27.839
<v Speaker 1>they thought they were making a point. Maybe they didn't

0:36:27.880 --> 0:36:29.640
<v Speaker 1>even think they were making a point. Maybe they just

0:36:29.760 --> 0:36:33.480
<v Speaker 1>thought it was funny to say I'm a Jedi instead

0:36:33.520 --> 0:36:36.239
<v Speaker 1>of to say no religion or none or something. Yeah,

0:36:36.280 --> 0:36:38.120
<v Speaker 1>and it's probably the kind of thing where in many

0:36:38.120 --> 0:36:40.560
<v Speaker 1>of these cases, not a tremendous A tremendous now I thought,

0:36:40.600 --> 0:36:42.239
<v Speaker 1>is not going into this. It's it's just kind of

0:36:42.239 --> 0:36:45.560
<v Speaker 1>a gut reaction. But the roots may run a little

0:36:45.600 --> 0:36:47.879
<v Speaker 1>deeper than they're conscious off. Yeah. So that was two

0:36:47.880 --> 0:36:51.920
<v Speaker 1>thousand one. But if you look at the website now

0:36:52.600 --> 0:36:55.440
<v Speaker 1>of the Temple of the Jedi Order, and if you

0:36:55.520 --> 0:36:59.160
<v Speaker 1>listen to their spokespeople, it starts to seem less and

0:36:59.239 --> 0:37:02.360
<v Speaker 1>less like a joke, okay, or even a statement in

0:37:02.440 --> 0:37:05.200
<v Speaker 1>order to make a point. If you look at them now,

0:37:05.320 --> 0:37:10.640
<v Speaker 1>the Jedi have beliefs, they have doctrines. They have credle statements,

0:37:11.239 --> 0:37:15.120
<v Speaker 1>and it sounds to me perhaps unsettlingly sincere, I don't

0:37:15.160 --> 0:37:17.520
<v Speaker 1>mean unsettling as in I'm mocking them. I just mean

0:37:18.280 --> 0:37:21.680
<v Speaker 1>it's surprising. So I want to read a couple of

0:37:21.719 --> 0:37:24.920
<v Speaker 1>little things from the Temple of the Jedi Order. These

0:37:24.960 --> 0:37:28.280
<v Speaker 1>are These are statements they have. One is the Jedi Code,

0:37:28.320 --> 0:37:30.040
<v Speaker 1>and there are two versions of it. I want to

0:37:30.040 --> 0:37:35.560
<v Speaker 1>read the simplified version. The Jedi Code reads emotion yet peace,

0:37:36.520 --> 0:37:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Ignorance yet, knowledge, passion yet serenity, chaos yet, harmony, death

0:37:45.120 --> 0:37:52.600
<v Speaker 1>yet the force that sounds pleasingly my mystic and deep. Yeah. Okay,

0:37:52.680 --> 0:37:55.080
<v Speaker 1>there's also a Jedi creed, believe it or not, so

0:37:55.200 --> 0:37:58.480
<v Speaker 1>that this is their creed. I am a Jedi, an

0:37:58.520 --> 0:38:01.680
<v Speaker 1>instrument of peace. Where there is hatred, I shall bring

0:38:01.760 --> 0:38:05.560
<v Speaker 1>love where there is injury, pardon where there is doubt,

0:38:06.000 --> 0:38:10.959
<v Speaker 1>faith where there is despair, Hope where there is darkness, light,

0:38:11.400 --> 0:38:14.880
<v Speaker 1>and where there is sadness joy. I am a Jedi.

0:38:15.480 --> 0:38:18.200
<v Speaker 1>I shall never seek so much to be consoled as

0:38:18.239 --> 0:38:23.040
<v Speaker 1>to console, to be understood, as to understand, to be loved,

0:38:23.160 --> 0:38:26.720
<v Speaker 1>as to love, For it is in giving that we receive.

0:38:27.040 --> 0:38:30.040
<v Speaker 1>It is in pardoning that we're pardoned, and it is

0:38:30.080 --> 0:38:33.400
<v Speaker 1>in dying that we're born to eternal life. The forces

0:38:33.480 --> 0:38:36.560
<v Speaker 1>with me always for I am a Jedi. Okay, so

0:38:36.600 --> 0:38:40.280
<v Speaker 1>this makes me instantly wonder are we are we witnessing

0:38:40.360 --> 0:38:43.919
<v Speaker 1>here the evolution of a faith or the evolution of

0:38:43.960 --> 0:38:46.120
<v Speaker 1>the joke? Are we are we kind of in like

0:38:46.160 --> 0:38:50.239
<v Speaker 1>the Andy Kaufman uh period of the joke where we're

0:38:50.320 --> 0:38:53.040
<v Speaker 1>just forced to feel kind of confused and maybe a

0:38:53.040 --> 0:38:57.760
<v Speaker 1>little uncomfortable about where we stand, uh in bit versus reality?

0:38:58.120 --> 0:39:00.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, because I so first of all, that

0:39:01.000 --> 0:39:02.960
<v Speaker 1>creed I read there, they said they claimed that is

0:39:03.000 --> 0:39:06.320
<v Speaker 1>actually adapted from a traditional prayer of St. Francis of

0:39:06.360 --> 0:39:11.000
<v Speaker 1>assisi um. So that's sort of interesting that they're adapting

0:39:11.080 --> 0:39:15.320
<v Speaker 1>traditional religious materials. But I also listened to an interview

0:39:15.840 --> 0:39:19.800
<v Speaker 1>with the spokesperson from the organization, the Temple of the Jedi,

0:39:20.600 --> 0:39:22.719
<v Speaker 1>and you know what, he seemed to me like a

0:39:22.840 --> 0:39:25.760
<v Speaker 1>level headed guy who was not playing a prank. In fact,

0:39:25.800 --> 0:39:27.880
<v Speaker 1>he the weirdest thing was he didn't even seem like

0:39:27.920 --> 0:39:31.799
<v Speaker 1>all that obsessive of a Star Wars fan. Um. And

0:39:31.840 --> 0:39:34.040
<v Speaker 1>he so he explained that all the Jedi believe in

0:39:34.040 --> 0:39:37.640
<v Speaker 1>the Force, but the Jedi need not believe in like

0:39:37.680 --> 0:39:41.040
<v Speaker 1>a literal physical reality of the Force as an energy

0:39:41.080 --> 0:39:43.759
<v Speaker 1>field that surrounds us and binds us, though apparently you

0:39:43.800 --> 0:39:47.319
<v Speaker 1>can believe in that instead. He made it sound like

0:39:47.360 --> 0:39:50.319
<v Speaker 1>the Force can be defined however you like. He can

0:39:50.360 --> 0:39:53.440
<v Speaker 1>be a physical reality, it can be a metaphor for

0:39:53.520 --> 0:39:55.960
<v Speaker 1>the interconnectedness of the universe, or it can be something

0:39:56.040 --> 0:39:59.160
<v Speaker 1>else entirely pretty much whatever you want. He seemed very

0:39:59.239 --> 0:40:04.120
<v Speaker 1>earnest and serious about Jedism being taken seriously as a religion, or,

0:40:04.160 --> 0:40:07.160
<v Speaker 1>if not a religion, as a sort of philosophy, accorded

0:40:07.200 --> 0:40:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the same cultural respect as a religion. Well it's interesting,

0:40:11.280 --> 0:40:15.040
<v Speaker 1>right because you're, I mean, what is what is Star

0:40:15.080 --> 0:40:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Wars but sort of a rehashing and reassemblage of various

0:40:19.800 --> 0:40:23.560
<v Speaker 1>uh mythic tropes, right, yeah, And he pointed to exactly

0:40:23.600 --> 0:40:26.240
<v Speaker 1>this thing. He said, Star Wars doesn't exist in a vacuum.

0:40:26.280 --> 0:40:30.759
<v Speaker 1>You know, it draws on traditional philosophies and religions, and

0:40:30.840 --> 0:40:34.560
<v Speaker 1>so we're essentially using Star Wars as as a metaphorical

0:40:34.560 --> 0:40:37.160
<v Speaker 1>way to go back to these ancient traditions. So it's

0:40:37.239 --> 0:40:39.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of like, Hey, I really love Star Wars, Why

0:40:40.000 --> 0:40:42.000
<v Speaker 1>do I love Star Wars? And then if the answer

0:40:42.080 --> 0:40:43.960
<v Speaker 1>as well, some of these belief systems are kind of

0:40:44.000 --> 0:40:47.400
<v Speaker 1>appealing to me if you then explore the roots of

0:40:47.440 --> 0:40:49.520
<v Speaker 1>those things and began to find meaning in the roots

0:40:49.520 --> 0:40:54.120
<v Speaker 1>of those things without abandoning that initial science fiction lens

0:40:54.360 --> 0:40:57.279
<v Speaker 1>by continuing to have that be a part of your

0:40:57.760 --> 0:41:00.719
<v Speaker 1>your I'm hesitant to say world view, but let's see

0:41:01.000 --> 0:41:06.160
<v Speaker 1>your your spiritual construction. Then you you have yourself a

0:41:06.280 --> 0:41:09.440
<v Speaker 1>hyper real religion. Yeah, but the Star Wars universe is

0:41:09.480 --> 0:41:12.440
<v Speaker 1>not the only one that has created movements like this.

0:41:12.600 --> 0:41:14.799
<v Speaker 1>I think there are others that I would say chart

0:41:14.880 --> 0:41:18.360
<v Speaker 1>a similar path. It looks to me, and like I

0:41:18.520 --> 0:41:21.280
<v Speaker 1>have to admit, as with all these I'm an outsider,

0:41:21.320 --> 0:41:24.240
<v Speaker 1>so you know, I can't speak as a Jedi or something,

0:41:24.280 --> 0:41:27.879
<v Speaker 1>and I don't want to diminish people's experiences in that

0:41:27.960 --> 0:41:30.319
<v Speaker 1>faith or in any other faith. But what I'll say

0:41:30.360 --> 0:41:32.960
<v Speaker 1>is it looks to me like it definitely started as

0:41:33.000 --> 0:41:37.080
<v Speaker 1>a joke, and it it and it took on a seriousness.

0:41:37.080 --> 0:41:39.520
<v Speaker 1>And and there are others like that, like, well, that's

0:41:39.520 --> 0:41:42.360
<v Speaker 1>just like your opinion, man, right, how about the dude,

0:41:42.840 --> 0:41:46.240
<v Speaker 1>that's right? Dudaism is another big one. Um, I assume

0:41:46.320 --> 0:41:48.600
<v Speaker 1>we also have some Big Lebowski fans, I should hope.

0:41:48.640 --> 0:41:51.880
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, The Big Lebowski, The Cohen Brothers. Uh, just

0:41:51.960 --> 0:41:54.160
<v Speaker 1>wonderful film and it didn't really do well when it

0:41:54.239 --> 0:41:56.320
<v Speaker 1>came out, but it's one of those that has continued

0:41:56.360 --> 0:41:59.919
<v Speaker 1>to just gain a cult following conventions and even it's

0:42:00.040 --> 0:42:03.600
<v Speaker 1>own hyper real religion in the form of Dudaism. So

0:42:04.760 --> 0:42:08.360
<v Speaker 1>it's basically all boils down to the dude abides right. Um,

0:42:08.400 --> 0:42:12.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a dude centric philosophy and lifestyle, more or less

0:42:12.040 --> 0:42:16.839
<v Speaker 1>a modern pop culture take on Daoism dallasm. I've heard

0:42:16.840 --> 0:42:19.160
<v Speaker 1>it described also as having a lot of similarities to

0:42:19.239 --> 0:42:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Zen Buddhism. Yeah. Indeed, it's you know, it's a little

0:42:22.320 --> 0:42:26.439
<v Speaker 1>it's chill, it's uh, it's peaceful, it's uh, it's it's

0:42:26.480 --> 0:42:31.759
<v Speaker 1>it's all of the positive aspects of the dude, um,

0:42:32.160 --> 0:42:35.000
<v Speaker 1>without some of his more you know, reckless or laziness. Well,

0:42:35.000 --> 0:42:36.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, one of the funny things is that the

0:42:37.080 --> 0:42:39.720
<v Speaker 1>thing about the dude is that he's chill, but throughout

0:42:39.800 --> 0:42:41.919
<v Speaker 1>much of the movie, the dude is not chill. Yeah,

0:42:41.920 --> 0:42:45.799
<v Speaker 1>the the dude gets a little irritated and uh, and

0:42:45.800 --> 0:42:49.640
<v Speaker 1>and and is even criticized by the stranger for his

0:42:49.640 --> 0:42:53.719
<v Speaker 1>his vulgar language. So it's it's it's one of the

0:42:53.760 --> 0:42:56.120
<v Speaker 1>This is another great example though, where you when you

0:42:56.120 --> 0:42:59.759
<v Speaker 1>look at Dudaism, you see the people who follow it

0:42:59.880 --> 0:43:02.640
<v Speaker 1>or least like to talk about it. It all does

0:43:02.680 --> 0:43:05.200
<v Speaker 1>begin in that kind of bumper sticker area, like it's

0:43:05.200 --> 0:43:07.680
<v Speaker 1>fun to say, hey, what's your religion? Oh, it's Dudaism,

0:43:07.719 --> 0:43:10.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, because I really love this movie. But you

0:43:10.920 --> 0:43:14.440
<v Speaker 1>see the same thing, right, You see individuals who seem

0:43:14.480 --> 0:43:16.759
<v Speaker 1>to follow the roots of it or sort of ask

0:43:16.840 --> 0:43:20.920
<v Speaker 1>themself questions, Well, if Dudaism were a real faith, if

0:43:20.960 --> 0:43:24.800
<v Speaker 1>it were a real philosophy, what would what would his

0:43:24.840 --> 0:43:27.160
<v Speaker 1>tendants be? What would be what? What would I need

0:43:27.200 --> 0:43:29.680
<v Speaker 1>to understand? And then they sort of follow it backwards

0:43:29.719 --> 0:43:34.319
<v Speaker 1>into um, you know, more historical modes of belief. Yeah,

0:43:34.360 --> 0:43:36.680
<v Speaker 1>and I think this would encounter the same kind of

0:43:37.400 --> 0:43:40.520
<v Speaker 1>criticisms from outsiders that all these others would. People would

0:43:40.520 --> 0:43:42.560
<v Speaker 1>be like, wait a second, hold on, what do you

0:43:42.560 --> 0:43:46.000
<v Speaker 1>mean do you really believe in Dudaism? Is that really

0:43:46.040 --> 0:43:48.319
<v Speaker 1>your religion? Well, it's kind of It kind of makes

0:43:48.320 --> 0:43:51.000
<v Speaker 1>me think of you remember win App Yeah, and the

0:43:51.800 --> 0:43:54.720
<v Speaker 1>like MP three player that we all had our skins.

0:43:54.880 --> 0:43:56.879
<v Speaker 1>That's the thing. You had different skins, right, We all

0:43:56.880 --> 0:43:59.480
<v Speaker 1>had the same program, but we use different skins that

0:43:59.560 --> 0:44:02.160
<v Speaker 1>appeal of us personally. Since you have like a tool

0:44:02.520 --> 0:44:05.200
<v Speaker 1>skin on Winnamp, I think I had some sort of

0:44:05.200 --> 0:44:08.400
<v Speaker 1>like horrible blood splattery one or something like that. It was.

0:44:08.640 --> 0:44:11.840
<v Speaker 1>It was nice and dark and moody. But but I

0:44:12.160 --> 0:44:14.880
<v Speaker 1>can't help but feel like we encounter something something similar

0:44:14.920 --> 0:44:18.040
<v Speaker 1>with these hyper real religions that we're discussing, where the

0:44:18.120 --> 0:44:23.800
<v Speaker 1>actual mode of beliefs, the actual mechanics are either something

0:44:23.840 --> 0:44:26.920
<v Speaker 1>old or something cobbled together from other beliefs. But if

0:44:26.920 --> 0:44:30.440
<v Speaker 1>that skin that brings us in, that skin is unique

0:44:30.560 --> 0:44:32.520
<v Speaker 1>and appeals to us. I got another one. I was

0:44:32.600 --> 0:44:37.359
<v Speaker 1>trying to tell Rachel last night about Jeddism, my wife Rachel,

0:44:37.400 --> 0:44:41.040
<v Speaker 1>about Jedis to convert her or to Jedism. No, no, no,

0:44:41.120 --> 0:44:43.440
<v Speaker 1>just to explain it. And she was like, oh, I

0:44:43.480 --> 0:44:45.880
<v Speaker 1>bet there is this for Lord of the Rings and

0:44:45.880 --> 0:44:47.799
<v Speaker 1>and what do you know that there are there are

0:44:47.800 --> 0:44:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Tolkien inspired religious ideas, which is very interesting to me

0:44:51.719 --> 0:44:55.799
<v Speaker 1>because I would say that in some ways Tolkien is

0:44:55.920 --> 0:45:01.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of adapting Christianity to a fantasy setting. Yeah, or

0:45:01.040 --> 0:45:04.040
<v Speaker 1>at least some ideas of Christianity. It's not like an

0:45:04.040 --> 0:45:08.799
<v Speaker 1>explicit one to one metaphor, but a lot of his messages,

0:45:08.920 --> 0:45:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I think in Lord of the Rings are Christian ones. Yeah,

0:45:11.719 --> 0:45:18.359
<v Speaker 1>it's these sort of sort of vague tolken f neopagan religions.

0:45:18.440 --> 0:45:21.640
<v Speaker 1>They're they're interesting because you have the book itself. They're

0:45:21.640 --> 0:45:24.080
<v Speaker 1>they're often these arguments, you know, people saying, oh, this

0:45:24.160 --> 0:45:26.840
<v Speaker 1>is a pagan work and and it's they're the pagan

0:45:26.880 --> 0:45:29.160
<v Speaker 1>elements or what's important here? Others saying no, it's inherently

0:45:29.160 --> 0:45:31.399
<v Speaker 1>a Christian work. Other people saying it's it's a it's

0:45:31.400 --> 0:45:34.600
<v Speaker 1>a synthesis of the two um And maybe all of

0:45:34.640 --> 0:45:38.200
<v Speaker 1>these arguments there are ultimately kind of silly, but you

0:45:38.760 --> 0:45:41.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's a very popular work, and especially out

0:45:41.719 --> 0:45:44.080
<v Speaker 1>of the you know, the nineteen seventies where you saw

0:45:44.400 --> 0:45:46.520
<v Speaker 1>people are really into Token. There's a lot of good.

0:45:46.560 --> 0:45:49.240
<v Speaker 1>There's still a lot of you know, culture cultural energy

0:45:49.320 --> 0:45:52.400
<v Speaker 1>going on. It's and led Zeppelin albums and all Zeppelin albums.

0:45:52.440 --> 0:45:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Then it it has a lot of power to it.

0:45:55.120 --> 0:45:57.640
<v Speaker 1>It has a lot of um, it has a lot

0:45:57.680 --> 0:46:01.239
<v Speaker 1>of depth to it. You can just go completely crazy, uh,

0:46:01.360 --> 0:46:03.400
<v Speaker 1>filling in all the details in your mind about the

0:46:03.920 --> 0:46:07.759
<v Speaker 1>world of Tolkien. We maybe don't advise that. No, well,

0:46:07.880 --> 0:46:09.920
<v Speaker 1>you go for it if you want. Um. I mean,

0:46:10.120 --> 0:46:12.520
<v Speaker 1>that's one thing I always enjoy about the various sci

0:46:12.560 --> 0:46:15.440
<v Speaker 1>fi and fantasy properties that that really engage me is

0:46:15.480 --> 0:46:18.279
<v Speaker 1>if there's a really rich mythos, they're either one that

0:46:18.360 --> 0:46:22.680
<v Speaker 1>is explicitly um laid out for you or one where

0:46:22.680 --> 0:46:24.680
<v Speaker 1>they are all these holes that you can't help but

0:46:24.760 --> 0:46:27.080
<v Speaker 1>fill in the details yourself. You know, we were talking

0:46:27.120 --> 0:46:30.040
<v Speaker 1>about this concept of hyper real religions and uh, and

0:46:30.640 --> 0:46:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Christian Seger our other host brought Satanism to mind, that's right. Um.

0:46:36.440 --> 0:46:40.200
<v Speaker 1>And if anyone remembers the Satanic Panic episode that Christian

0:46:40.239 --> 0:46:43.200
<v Speaker 1>and I did, I guess about a year ago. Now, Ums,

0:46:43.280 --> 0:46:47.560
<v Speaker 1>we discussed in that Satanism like never really existed, certainly

0:46:47.600 --> 0:46:50.680
<v Speaker 1>not in the way that that it was presented in

0:46:50.800 --> 0:46:53.160
<v Speaker 1>during the Satanic Panic, Right. I mean, I would say

0:46:53.200 --> 0:46:56.280
<v Speaker 1>that what you have as Satanism, people who would actually

0:46:56.280 --> 0:47:00.600
<v Speaker 1>claim this religion is almost explicitly an atheistic religion, right. Yeah,

0:47:00.680 --> 0:47:03.759
<v Speaker 1>And generally when we talk about Satanism, we're talking about

0:47:03.880 --> 0:47:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Lavay and Satanism, which was comes from the Church of Satan,

0:47:07.560 --> 0:47:11.040
<v Speaker 1>found in nineteen sixty six by Anton LaVey. Was you know,

0:47:11.120 --> 0:47:17.239
<v Speaker 1>ultimately it's an atheistic, individualist philosophy. It's UH with more

0:47:17.280 --> 0:47:20.520
<v Speaker 1>than a dash of of drama, symbolism, fun. It's about

0:47:20.560 --> 0:47:23.960
<v Speaker 1>messing with the squares and and putting on a you know,

0:47:24.000 --> 0:47:26.319
<v Speaker 1>a fun show. Well, in some ways I think it

0:47:26.360 --> 0:47:28.920
<v Speaker 1>has a lot in common with the Flying Spaghetti Monster

0:47:29.040 --> 0:47:32.680
<v Speaker 1>is um and that it's it's maybe more than this,

0:47:32.760 --> 0:47:34.680
<v Speaker 1>but in in some ways you can think of it

0:47:34.760 --> 0:47:38.399
<v Speaker 1>as a massive prank. Yes, very much so, UM And

0:47:38.840 --> 0:47:41.719
<v Speaker 1>And I think Leave, I think was was pretty straightforward

0:47:41.760 --> 0:47:43.080
<v Speaker 1>about that. I mean, this is a guy that came

0:47:43.120 --> 0:47:46.080
<v Speaker 1>from sort of Carney roots. It's a very Carney faith

0:47:46.200 --> 0:47:48.120
<v Speaker 1>and and I love it. You can't help it but

0:47:48.239 --> 0:47:51.600
<v Speaker 1>get involved with the trappings of it, especially as the

0:47:51.680 --> 0:47:53.759
<v Speaker 1>years rolled by and it becomes a part of uh,

0:47:54.080 --> 0:47:57.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, an entire segment of of music, right, and

0:47:58.000 --> 0:47:59.879
<v Speaker 1>you get into all this death metal that has very

0:48:00.120 --> 0:48:02.799
<v Speaker 1>degrees of satanic elements. All right, but I think it's

0:48:02.840 --> 0:48:05.520
<v Speaker 1>time to turn to psychology to try to see what

0:48:05.560 --> 0:48:08.480
<v Speaker 1>we can figure out about what people are actually trying

0:48:08.520 --> 0:48:11.440
<v Speaker 1>to get out of these religious beliefs. It seems fairly

0:48:11.440 --> 0:48:15.120
<v Speaker 1>clear what people get out of traditional religious beliefs where

0:48:15.239 --> 0:48:18.480
<v Speaker 1>there is at the core of them the assumption of

0:48:18.520 --> 0:48:23.880
<v Speaker 1>a real revelation about the metaphysical nature of reality. Um,

0:48:23.880 --> 0:48:25.839
<v Speaker 1>maybe not in all of them, but in lots of them.

0:48:26.000 --> 0:48:28.480
<v Speaker 1>But in these religious beliefs that are in some way

0:48:28.560 --> 0:48:32.400
<v Speaker 1>based on what everybody agrees is fiction, what what is

0:48:32.440 --> 0:48:36.319
<v Speaker 1>the goal of the seeker of the adherent? Well, one

0:48:36.360 --> 0:48:41.040
<v Speaker 1>take on this comes from Carol mq Sax Invented Religions, Imagination,

0:48:41.080 --> 0:48:44.799
<v Speaker 1>Fiction and Faith, and she posits that invented religions, such

0:48:44.840 --> 0:48:48.080
<v Speaker 1>as the ones we're discussing here, they demonstrate that what

0:48:48.320 --> 0:48:52.319
<v Speaker 1>meaning hungry humans really want is a powerful narrative, particularly

0:48:52.320 --> 0:48:56.200
<v Speaker 1>one in which unseen agents affect causality in our world

0:48:56.280 --> 0:48:59.239
<v Speaker 1>and in our lives. Okay, so maybe saying that even

0:48:59.280 --> 0:49:03.160
<v Speaker 1>if we don't agree that the narratives refer to a

0:49:03.200 --> 0:49:07.560
<v Speaker 1>thing that's literally true, just participation in the narrative is enough. Yeah,

0:49:07.600 --> 0:49:10.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like the fictional realm becomes the place where

0:49:10.600 --> 0:49:15.000
<v Speaker 1>it is okay to dream, whereas to to dream in

0:49:15.040 --> 0:49:18.319
<v Speaker 1>the more real world of of sort of, you know,

0:49:18.360 --> 0:49:22.080
<v Speaker 1>religious history that is Uh, that's that is sometimes seen

0:49:22.120 --> 0:49:24.640
<v Speaker 1>as a bit weird in some circles. Well, that relates

0:49:24.680 --> 0:49:26.840
<v Speaker 1>to something that we that I know, we read a

0:49:26.840 --> 0:49:31.040
<v Speaker 1>little bit about about why fantasy is popular these days.

0:49:31.400 --> 0:49:34.960
<v Speaker 1>It actually reminds me of of some thoughts, some observations

0:49:34.960 --> 0:49:37.799
<v Speaker 1>that are Scott Baker made our Scott Baker himself being

0:49:37.880 --> 0:49:42.719
<v Speaker 1>a successful and in my opinion, highly talented UM fantasy

0:49:42.719 --> 0:49:47.120
<v Speaker 1>writer himself background in philosophy, and also he works a

0:49:47.120 --> 0:49:51.520
<v Speaker 1>fair amount of neuroscience into his into his creations. But um.

0:49:51.800 --> 0:49:55.920
<v Speaker 1>In his paper that published on science fiction and Fantasy

0:49:55.920 --> 0:49:59.239
<v Speaker 1>World Whine Fantasy and Why now Um, he says that

0:49:59.280 --> 0:50:02.279
<v Speaker 1>fantasy is quote the primary literary response to what is

0:50:02.320 --> 0:50:05.360
<v Speaker 1>often called the contemporary crisis of meaning. So the idea

0:50:05.400 --> 0:50:06.600
<v Speaker 1>here is that we live in an age of reason

0:50:06.640 --> 0:50:10.120
<v Speaker 1>and science. We have all sorts of myth erasing answers

0:50:10.600 --> 0:50:13.080
<v Speaker 1>for how the world works, so so long as we

0:50:13.160 --> 0:50:16.959
<v Speaker 1>don't require teleological answers. So this get in other words,

0:50:16.960 --> 0:50:19.200
<v Speaker 1>this gets down to, you know, we have all these

0:50:19.239 --> 0:50:23.600
<v Speaker 1>answers about how, say, the solar system works, how life works,

0:50:24.080 --> 0:50:26.240
<v Speaker 1>but we don't have the wise, right, that's the stuff

0:50:26.280 --> 0:50:30.400
<v Speaker 1>that that is beyond science. Yeah, he almost says science

0:50:30.520 --> 0:50:34.160
<v Speaker 1>is essentially created too reliable of a tool for finding

0:50:34.200 --> 0:50:37.400
<v Speaker 1>correct answers about reality, and so reliable in fact, that

0:50:37.480 --> 0:50:41.120
<v Speaker 1>it has left us with nihilism. Uh. Now, we we

0:50:41.360 --> 0:50:44.239
<v Speaker 1>don't necessarily need to agree with that perspective to say that.

0:50:44.480 --> 0:50:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Certainly a lot of people probably feel this way that

0:50:47.280 --> 0:50:52.080
<v Speaker 1>if science is the only socially legitimate way of of

0:50:52.160 --> 0:50:56.520
<v Speaker 1>asserting that something is definitely true, where do you get

0:50:56.560 --> 0:50:59.880
<v Speaker 1>your meaning of life from? Yeah? If science is not

0:51:00.000 --> 0:51:02.000
<v Speaker 1>going to give that to you, and it can lead

0:51:02.040 --> 0:51:05.320
<v Speaker 1>to a sense of kind of despair, of hopelessness, of emptiness.

0:51:05.360 --> 0:51:07.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, what is life really all about? I mean,

0:51:07.160 --> 0:51:10.840
<v Speaker 1>who cares if I can finally understand the mysteries of

0:51:10.920 --> 0:51:14.200
<v Speaker 1>the quantum physics? If if what it reveals is that

0:51:14.520 --> 0:51:16.760
<v Speaker 1>there's no way to answer the question of the meaning

0:51:16.760 --> 0:51:20.919
<v Speaker 1>of life. Yeah, so you end up turning to fantasy. Um,

0:51:21.120 --> 0:51:23.000
<v Speaker 1>and to a certain a certain extent science fiction, but

0:51:23.080 --> 0:51:25.040
<v Speaker 1>largely we're talking about fantasy. You're trying to turn to

0:51:25.120 --> 0:51:29.719
<v Speaker 1>these fantastic stories, uh, in which you can find if

0:51:29.760 --> 0:51:32.080
<v Speaker 1>not find that meaning for yourself, then you at least

0:51:32.080 --> 0:51:35.080
<v Speaker 1>embody characters who find that meaning and world and live

0:51:35.080 --> 0:51:39.359
<v Speaker 1>in a world where life and in the individual has significance. Now,

0:51:39.480 --> 0:51:42.640
<v Speaker 1>I I personally probably wouldn't agree with Baker that this

0:51:42.760 --> 0:51:46.160
<v Speaker 1>is what this is what is entailed by the scientific

0:51:46.200 --> 0:51:48.399
<v Speaker 1>view of the world. But I can certainly see how

0:51:48.440 --> 0:51:51.400
<v Speaker 1>if you do go to that conclusion, fantasy could provide

0:51:51.400 --> 0:51:54.000
<v Speaker 1>a very powerful escape from it. Right. And you know,

0:51:54.120 --> 0:51:56.960
<v Speaker 1>I do have to say our Scott Baker's own work,

0:51:57.120 --> 0:52:01.200
<v Speaker 1>his UM Second Apocalypse series, he he crowns these case

0:52:01.239 --> 0:52:04.200
<v Speaker 1>it's definitely dark fantasy, but he grounds these many of

0:52:04.200 --> 0:52:10.840
<v Speaker 1>these characters, uh, in this this very believable philosophical place

0:52:10.920 --> 0:52:13.520
<v Speaker 1>that is at times like you, at times you're loot,

0:52:13.560 --> 0:52:15.799
<v Speaker 1>you lose yourself in the story, in the narrative, in

0:52:15.800 --> 0:52:18.719
<v Speaker 1>the world. But other times he forces the reader to

0:52:18.719 --> 0:52:22.279
<v Speaker 1>to really ask some troubling questions about about who we

0:52:22.360 --> 0:52:26.200
<v Speaker 1>are and how we work as individuals. Um. So, yeah,

0:52:26.200 --> 0:52:29.400
<v Speaker 1>I would say that his critique of fantasy genre UM

0:52:29.560 --> 0:52:32.200
<v Speaker 1>does not apply to everything within that realm, and it

0:52:32.200 --> 0:52:35.680
<v Speaker 1>certainly doesn't apply to all readers. It does comes back

0:52:35.719 --> 0:52:38.120
<v Speaker 1>comes back to the question, right, what do modern religious

0:52:38.200 --> 0:52:42.080
<v Speaker 1>individuals want? So he would say maybe meaning right, he

0:52:42.080 --> 0:52:44.040
<v Speaker 1>would say, meaning he would tie it into this idea.

0:52:44.120 --> 0:52:47.080
<v Speaker 1>He he coined the term the semantic apocalypse. Uh, this

0:52:47.239 --> 0:52:49.359
<v Speaker 1>idea that we are either at the point where we're

0:52:49.400 --> 0:52:53.279
<v Speaker 1>approaching this point where we just we're just completely stupefied

0:52:53.320 --> 0:52:55.960
<v Speaker 1>by the lack of meaning in our lives and in

0:52:56.000 --> 0:52:58.359
<v Speaker 1>the world. But then again, I mean, I'm sure there

0:52:58.400 --> 0:53:01.439
<v Speaker 1>have been some scientific study is that look into what

0:53:01.600 --> 0:53:06.040
<v Speaker 1>it is that people want out of religions in general? Uh?

0:53:06.080 --> 0:53:09.359
<v Speaker 1>There have, yeah, and one in particular. And again, this

0:53:09.440 --> 0:53:12.720
<v Speaker 1>is when we're talking about papers and studies about religion.

0:53:13.080 --> 0:53:16.480
<v Speaker 1>This is all ultimately, you know, subjective analysis. Uh, So

0:53:16.560 --> 0:53:18.560
<v Speaker 1>feel free to disagree and our igue with us and

0:53:18.680 --> 0:53:21.839
<v Speaker 1>uh but in this case, Uh. According to Ohio State

0:53:21.920 --> 0:53:25.200
<v Speaker 1>University professor Stephen rice Offer, author of the two thousand

0:53:25.280 --> 0:53:29.839
<v Speaker 1>sixteen book, uh, The Sixteen Strivings for God, he says

0:53:29.880 --> 0:53:40.959
<v Speaker 1>people have sixteen basic desires like these the interesting, Yeah, acceptance, curiosity, eating, family, honor, idealism, independence, order,

0:53:41.080 --> 0:53:46.680
<v Speaker 1>physical activity, power, romance, saving, social contact, status, tranquility, and

0:53:46.760 --> 0:53:49.840
<v Speaker 1>vengeance and any pretty good lists. I was trying to

0:53:49.840 --> 0:53:52.319
<v Speaker 1>think of things other than that. Yeah, though I think

0:53:52.400 --> 0:53:54.759
<v Speaker 1>he covered all the basics there, and you can't help

0:53:54.840 --> 0:53:56.919
<v Speaker 1>but look at that list and sort of check things

0:53:56.920 --> 0:53:58.439
<v Speaker 1>off in your head as you look at your own

0:53:58.680 --> 0:54:02.080
<v Speaker 1>either your own religious leaves, your spiritualism, or your the

0:54:02.120 --> 0:54:05.359
<v Speaker 1>fantasy that you're into. Um. But he developed this Rice

0:54:05.440 --> 0:54:09.360
<v Speaker 1>motivation profile that measures how much people value each of

0:54:09.400 --> 0:54:12.960
<v Speaker 1>these sixteen goals, and he administered it to a hundred

0:54:12.960 --> 0:54:16.080
<v Speaker 1>thousand plus people, and he found that the appeal of

0:54:16.120 --> 0:54:19.440
<v Speaker 1>any given religion relates to how it responds to one

0:54:19.640 --> 0:54:23.040
<v Speaker 1>or more of those desires. Uh, and it competes with

0:54:23.120 --> 0:54:27.600
<v Speaker 1>secular society to meet those desires. So, so think about it,

0:54:27.680 --> 0:54:30.680
<v Speaker 1>in what ways can both traditional religions and hyper real

0:54:30.719 --> 0:54:34.640
<v Speaker 1>religions meet in any of these desires such as uh, Well,

0:54:34.760 --> 0:54:37.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean stuff like curiosity. I can definitely see the

0:54:37.840 --> 0:54:40.200
<v Speaker 1>appeal of that, because one of the things that always

0:54:40.280 --> 0:54:42.920
<v Speaker 1>drew me into actual religions and continues to draw me

0:54:42.920 --> 0:54:46.520
<v Speaker 1>into actual religions is the mystery and the creativity, the

0:54:46.520 --> 0:54:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the interplay and narratives of these gods and heroes. Right,

0:54:50.000 --> 0:54:53.080
<v Speaker 1>It's what brings me into uh to you know, reading

0:54:53.120 --> 0:54:55.799
<v Speaker 1>a Hinduism, and brings me into reading a uh, you

0:54:55.800 --> 0:54:59.319
<v Speaker 1>know about ancient Egypt. It brings me into reading you know,

0:54:59.760 --> 0:55:02.560
<v Speaker 1>they his fantasy novels as well. Well, I mean in

0:55:02.600 --> 0:55:06.040
<v Speaker 1>some cases, I think this might grow out of a

0:55:06.080 --> 0:55:09.759
<v Speaker 1>slight disconnect between the things we need, you know, these

0:55:09.760 --> 0:55:13.000
<v Speaker 1>things we strive for and desire, versus what we really

0:55:13.040 --> 0:55:16.840
<v Speaker 1>know is appropriate in modern society, given that we've started

0:55:16.880 --> 0:55:19.920
<v Speaker 1>to think out ethical issues in a secular way. I

0:55:19.920 --> 0:55:22.400
<v Speaker 1>don't know if you can say that there's really a good,

0:55:22.920 --> 0:55:27.160
<v Speaker 1>widely agreed upon, secular justification for things like a desire

0:55:27.280 --> 0:55:31.480
<v Speaker 1>for honor. And yet the ancient structures of fantasy, or

0:55:31.520 --> 0:55:34.600
<v Speaker 1>of traditional religions or something like that might all include

0:55:34.640 --> 0:55:37.760
<v Speaker 1>concepts of honor that can sort of legitimate this desire

0:55:37.840 --> 0:55:40.880
<v Speaker 1>that we have biologically, even if we can't think of

0:55:40.880 --> 0:55:44.120
<v Speaker 1>a good reason to seek honor. Yeah, it makes more

0:55:44.480 --> 0:55:47.600
<v Speaker 1>something like honor often makes more sense in a simplified

0:55:47.760 --> 0:55:51.320
<v Speaker 1>and highly symbolic world than it does and you know

0:55:51.360 --> 0:55:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the minutia of real life. Yeah, um, you know. Likewise,

0:55:54.680 --> 0:55:57.880
<v Speaker 1>something like vengeance, which made the list, Like vengeance is

0:55:57.920 --> 0:56:00.719
<v Speaker 1>something that in your own life, like vengeance is kind

0:56:00.719 --> 0:56:04.000
<v Speaker 1>of ikey um, Well, yeah, it's the thing we all desire,

0:56:04.080 --> 0:56:06.600
<v Speaker 1>but most of us would probably agree we sort of

0:56:06.640 --> 0:56:09.080
<v Speaker 1>know better than to try to get it right. But

0:56:09.280 --> 0:56:11.520
<v Speaker 1>like a religious faith, you know, you have some sort

0:56:11.520 --> 0:56:16.319
<v Speaker 1>of hell doctrine. There an outsource of engeance. I'd say,

0:56:16.360 --> 0:56:19.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't have to get revenge something bad might happen

0:56:19.640 --> 0:56:24.080
<v Speaker 1>to you outside of my control. Yeah, and and and likewise,

0:56:24.400 --> 0:56:28.920
<v Speaker 1>we continually turn to fictional models of what vengeance might

0:56:28.960 --> 0:56:32.080
<v Speaker 1>consist of. I mean, revenge tails have always been popular

0:56:32.080 --> 0:56:35.000
<v Speaker 1>and will continue to be popular. And again, they often

0:56:35.280 --> 0:56:40.799
<v Speaker 1>fall back on a simplified and highly symbolic world. You know,

0:56:40.920 --> 0:56:46.120
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if studies on religious experience would indicate that

0:56:46.120 --> 0:56:49.919
<v Speaker 1>that hyper reality could become or is becoming, the new

0:56:50.000 --> 0:56:53.799
<v Speaker 1>norm for religious experiences. Yeah. It often reminds me of

0:56:53.840 --> 0:56:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the line in Big Trouble, Little China from the Sorcerer

0:56:56.960 --> 0:57:01.320
<v Speaker 1>egg Shin, who talks about Chinese UH modes of belief

0:57:01.320 --> 0:57:03.680
<v Speaker 1>in saying that it's like a salad bar that you choose, uh,

0:57:04.400 --> 0:57:06.560
<v Speaker 1>you take what you like and you leave the rest uh.

0:57:07.000 --> 0:57:10.319
<v Speaker 1>In this case, the character was referring to Confusism and

0:57:10.400 --> 0:57:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Daoism and and uh and and uh and and also

0:57:14.200 --> 0:57:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Buddhism as well. But the I find that increasingly in

0:57:17.760 --> 0:57:19.960
<v Speaker 1>my own life that I do that that I kind

0:57:19.960 --> 0:57:22.600
<v Speaker 1>of take what I want from these various models, including

0:57:22.640 --> 0:57:28.120
<v Speaker 1>some fictional models. And and incorporated into my sort of religious,

0:57:28.120 --> 0:57:33.080
<v Speaker 1>spiritual worldview. There's actually a two thousand fifteen study from

0:57:33.120 --> 0:57:37.440
<v Speaker 1>the University of Evansville published in American Sociological Review, and

0:57:37.480 --> 0:57:40.160
<v Speaker 1>it took a pretty thorough look at the way Americans

0:57:40.200 --> 0:57:44.960
<v Speaker 1>process religion and science. So the authors crunched data from

0:57:45.040 --> 0:57:48.400
<v Speaker 1>three waves of the General Social Survey and found that

0:57:48.600 --> 0:57:52.040
<v Speaker 1>US adults hold one of three perspectives based on their

0:57:52.040 --> 0:57:54.640
<v Speaker 1>knowledge and attitudes about science and religion. Now, the first

0:57:54.680 --> 0:57:57.480
<v Speaker 1>two are long established, but the third isn't. Is, according

0:57:57.480 --> 0:58:01.360
<v Speaker 1>to the author's entirely new. So there's modern perspective, a

0:58:01.400 --> 0:58:05.640
<v Speaker 1>worldview that favors science over religion, and that scot okay

0:58:05.760 --> 0:58:09.000
<v Speaker 1>science trump's religion. That's that's that version. Then there's a

0:58:09.040 --> 0:58:14.560
<v Speaker 1>traditional perspective, a worldview that favors religion over science, which

0:58:15.320 --> 0:58:18.840
<v Speaker 1>you know to interpret that that that score as you will.

0:58:19.320 --> 0:58:21.840
<v Speaker 1>But then the third one is the post secular perspective,

0:58:21.880 --> 0:58:25.200
<v Speaker 1>a worldview that values both science and religion, but quote

0:58:25.400 --> 0:58:28.439
<v Speaker 1>rejects science in favor of religion when it comes to

0:58:28.440 --> 0:58:33.800
<v Speaker 1>topics such as creation and evolution, and that scored. So

0:58:34.760 --> 0:58:38.320
<v Speaker 1>that is kind of the salad bar situation in action

0:58:38.360 --> 0:58:44.200
<v Speaker 1>there right where the individual is willing to favor science

0:58:44.320 --> 0:58:47.040
<v Speaker 1>and religion, in fact, favor science over religion, except for

0:58:47.040 --> 0:58:53.200
<v Speaker 1>those places where it becomes um teleologically difficult, where if

0:58:53.200 --> 0:58:57.960
<v Speaker 1>not overt issues of meaning come into play, then at

0:58:58.040 --> 0:59:02.160
<v Speaker 1>least implied um meaning, you know, implied issues of meaning.

0:59:02.240 --> 0:59:04.760
<v Speaker 1>So you know, it's like like, ultimately, I think there

0:59:04.760 --> 0:59:06.840
<v Speaker 1>can be a strong case to be made that what

0:59:06.920 --> 0:59:10.840
<v Speaker 1>does it matter if if life evolved or of the

0:59:11.120 --> 0:59:15.800
<v Speaker 1>hand of God shaped it. But if your interpretation sees

0:59:16.080 --> 0:59:20.680
<v Speaker 1>one vision version as problematic or threatening to the overall

0:59:21.280 --> 0:59:24.160
<v Speaker 1>religious structure in your head, then you then in this

0:59:24.200 --> 0:59:27.600
<v Speaker 1>case you're gonna favor that religious construct over the science.

0:59:29.080 --> 0:59:32.120
<v Speaker 1>And a separate question I think would be just what

0:59:32.200 --> 0:59:34.919
<v Speaker 1>are the triggers that cause people to view these things

0:59:34.960 --> 0:59:38.000
<v Speaker 1>as in conflict anyway? Like, some people obviously hold both

0:59:38.080 --> 0:59:41.280
<v Speaker 1>views in their heads without trouble, and some people perceive

0:59:41.360 --> 0:59:44.760
<v Speaker 1>a conflict. Um I'm not sure what makes the difference,

0:59:44.760 --> 0:59:48.440
<v Speaker 1>but it seems significant. Yeah, so yeah, So what we're

0:59:48.480 --> 0:59:51.080
<v Speaker 1>talking about here that the post secular perspective. It's not

0:59:51.120 --> 0:59:53.840
<v Speaker 1>a mere midpoint between the traditional and the modern, but

0:59:53.920 --> 0:59:56.080
<v Speaker 1>rather a unique way of looking at reality through the

0:59:56.080 --> 0:59:59.480
<v Speaker 1>combined lenses of science, and religion, So you can think

0:59:59.520 --> 1:00:01.479
<v Speaker 1>of it as a it's kind of a hybrid view.

1:00:01.920 --> 1:00:04.720
<v Speaker 1>And I think that the hyper real religions that we're

1:00:04.760 --> 1:00:06.720
<v Speaker 1>looking at our kind of represent a high red view

1:00:06.760 --> 1:00:11.640
<v Speaker 1>of a different, slightly different form where instead of rejecting

1:00:12.440 --> 1:00:17.520
<v Speaker 1>the science that that that threatens, meaning, we're going to

1:00:17.640 --> 1:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>just we're going to outsource the religion into a sort

1:00:20.760 --> 1:00:23.240
<v Speaker 1>of a safe bucket, into the bucket of fiction, and

1:00:23.240 --> 1:00:25.840
<v Speaker 1>then build from there. I think that's an interesting way

1:00:25.880 --> 1:00:27.440
<v Speaker 1>of looking at it. Like we said, I mean a

1:00:27.480 --> 1:00:30.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of these people who have these beliefs, I get

1:00:30.680 --> 1:00:39.000
<v Speaker 1>the sense are basically uh non basically materialist humanists, Like

1:00:39.040 --> 1:00:42.360
<v Speaker 1>they typically have humanist values. They could just subscribe to

1:00:42.400 --> 1:00:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the humanist manifesto, and they typically don't believe in uh

1:00:47.800 --> 1:00:51.440
<v Speaker 1>spirits or something anything other than the natural world. That

1:00:51.720 --> 1:00:53.440
<v Speaker 1>certainly isn't the case for all of them, but that

1:00:53.480 --> 1:00:56.720
<v Speaker 1>seems to be a dominant way of thinking. But like,

1:00:56.720 --> 1:00:58.880
<v Speaker 1>like as we know from Buddhism and stuff like that,

1:00:58.920 --> 1:01:01.320
<v Speaker 1>you need not be a supernaturalist in order to be

1:01:01.360 --> 1:01:03.960
<v Speaker 1>a religious person, right, yeah, And there are ways of

1:01:04.040 --> 1:01:08.000
<v Speaker 1>engaging I mean, just for Buddhism on its on its own,

1:01:08.040 --> 1:01:11.360
<v Speaker 1>you can take a very sort of abstract philosophical approach

1:01:11.400 --> 1:01:15.960
<v Speaker 1>to Buddhism where you don't literally believe in life to

1:01:16.040 --> 1:01:19.400
<v Speaker 1>life reincarnation, or you can take what you can take

1:01:19.440 --> 1:01:22.280
<v Speaker 1>one that is very traditional and ultimately you know it's

1:01:22.280 --> 1:01:26.080
<v Speaker 1>it's all about being fearful and responding from a place

1:01:26.080 --> 1:01:29.120
<v Speaker 1>of fear in terms of what your your next incarnation

1:01:29.120 --> 1:01:32.240
<v Speaker 1>will consist of. I had another idea based in psychology,

1:01:32.280 --> 1:01:34.360
<v Speaker 1>about what might explain some of this. I mean, I

1:01:34.400 --> 1:01:36.439
<v Speaker 1>certainly wouldn't want to say that all of it could

1:01:37.280 --> 1:01:39.720
<v Speaker 1>is explained by this, but it could explain some of

1:01:39.760 --> 1:01:43.520
<v Speaker 1>the transition from joke religions into real religions. And it

1:01:43.560 --> 1:01:46.960
<v Speaker 1>would be based in the idea of sunk costs, choice

1:01:46.960 --> 1:01:52.000
<v Speaker 1>supportive bias, and post purchase rationalization. So let's say you

1:01:52.040 --> 1:01:54.920
<v Speaker 1>spend a lot of money on a new lawnmower. Okay,

1:01:55.040 --> 1:01:58.080
<v Speaker 1>I can't imagine it happening in my case, but yeah,

1:01:58.120 --> 1:02:00.800
<v Speaker 1>you've mowed the lawn a few times, and you start

1:02:00.800 --> 1:02:03.120
<v Speaker 1>to worry that maybe you didn't spend your money all

1:02:03.160 --> 1:02:07.400
<v Speaker 1>that well, So you start to engage in an internal conversation,

1:02:07.520 --> 1:02:10.520
<v Speaker 1>which is a form of choice supportive bias, a bias

1:02:10.600 --> 1:02:15.480
<v Speaker 1>towards validating the choice you already made. That's called post

1:02:15.600 --> 1:02:18.919
<v Speaker 1>purchase rationalization. You start coming up with the reasons why

1:02:19.000 --> 1:02:21.040
<v Speaker 1>you know this really was a good way to spend

1:02:21.040 --> 1:02:23.640
<v Speaker 1>my money. I think I did the right thing by

1:02:23.640 --> 1:02:26.720
<v Speaker 1>spending the money on this lawnmower, because it could sort

1:02:26.760 --> 1:02:29.880
<v Speaker 1>of lead to some unpleasant cognitive dissonance. If you don't

1:02:30.000 --> 1:02:32.320
<v Speaker 1>come to that conclusion, you can think, man, I really

1:02:32.320 --> 1:02:35.400
<v Speaker 1>screwed up. I shouldn't have gone down this road. So

1:02:35.400 --> 1:02:37.280
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of kind of gets into the area if

1:02:37.320 --> 1:02:41.120
<v Speaker 1>I read Done three times or more times than that,

1:02:41.200 --> 1:02:43.680
<v Speaker 1>even maybe it wasn't just a good book. Maybe it

1:02:43.720 --> 1:02:45.440
<v Speaker 1>wasn't just a great book, but maybe it was a

1:02:45.480 --> 1:02:48.520
<v Speaker 1>book that was so meaningful that it is that it

1:02:48.560 --> 1:02:52.439
<v Speaker 1>achieves kind of a spiritual level exactly, or in another way,

1:02:52.760 --> 1:02:55.520
<v Speaker 1>it could be true that Let's say if you spent

1:02:55.640 --> 1:02:58.439
<v Speaker 1>a lot of time and effort just carrying out a joke,

1:02:58.720 --> 1:03:01.680
<v Speaker 1>just on a prank religion. Let's say you start spending

1:03:01.680 --> 1:03:05.000
<v Speaker 1>time on Judaism because you love the Big Lebowski and

1:03:05.040 --> 1:03:07.240
<v Speaker 1>because it's funny. It's funny to pretend that there's a

1:03:07.320 --> 1:03:11.280
<v Speaker 1>dude religion. But after realizing how much sunk costs you've

1:03:11.320 --> 1:03:13.600
<v Speaker 1>incurred in your own time and energy over a long

1:03:13.640 --> 1:03:17.720
<v Speaker 1>period of time. You start seeking ways to rationalize the

1:03:17.800 --> 1:03:22.040
<v Speaker 1>purchase of of these beliefs by saying, huh, you know,

1:03:22.200 --> 1:03:27.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe if I've spent three hundred hours on Dudaism, was

1:03:27.120 --> 1:03:29.320
<v Speaker 1>it really just a joke. Maybe it wasn't just a

1:03:29.960 --> 1:03:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Maybe there's really some meaning in this. And and that's

1:03:33.320 --> 1:03:35.560
<v Speaker 1>not even to say that the meaning you find is

1:03:35.600 --> 1:03:38.200
<v Speaker 1>invalid if that's your method of coming to that meaning,

1:03:38.680 --> 1:03:44.000
<v Speaker 1>I would say that that conclusions reached through choice supportive

1:03:44.000 --> 1:03:48.320
<v Speaker 1>bias aren't necessarily untrue conclusions. I think in many cases,

1:03:48.360 --> 1:03:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the time and financial investment involved here, it just forces

1:03:51.080 --> 1:03:53.560
<v Speaker 1>you to double down on something that you were already

1:03:53.640 --> 1:03:57.240
<v Speaker 1>inclined to support or inclined to buy into. You know,

1:03:57.800 --> 1:03:59.880
<v Speaker 1>It's it's like I already thought this was a great idea,

1:04:00.400 --> 1:04:04.160
<v Speaker 1>but now that I've I've potentially wasted this much time

1:04:04.200 --> 1:04:07.160
<v Speaker 1>on it, it's definitely a great idea. One other thing

1:04:07.200 --> 1:04:09.280
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to note, I was interested to see what

1:04:09.360 --> 1:04:12.840
<v Speaker 1>you thought of this is that these religions, the hyper

1:04:12.880 --> 1:04:17.120
<v Speaker 1>real religions, especially like Jedi is Um and Judaism, seem

1:04:17.200 --> 1:04:22.960
<v Speaker 1>to be very much creatures of the Internet. In fact,

1:04:23.080 --> 1:04:25.640
<v Speaker 1>even I mentioned that I listened to an interview with

1:04:25.720 --> 1:04:28.600
<v Speaker 1>the spokesperson of the Jedi Temple. The guy who I

1:04:28.640 --> 1:04:32.439
<v Speaker 1>listened to explicitly pointed to the introduction of Internet fan

1:04:32.560 --> 1:04:35.960
<v Speaker 1>communities and forums in the nineteen nineties as the thing

1:04:36.040 --> 1:04:39.320
<v Speaker 1>that made the Jedi religion possible. And so that makes

1:04:39.320 --> 1:04:42.240
<v Speaker 1>me wonder how the Internet has changed what's possible in

1:04:42.360 --> 1:04:46.040
<v Speaker 1>terms of social movements and the birth of religions. Well, yeah,

1:04:46.120 --> 1:04:48.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the Internet has made it possible to to

1:04:48.960 --> 1:04:52.560
<v Speaker 1>find those communities of people that share your belief. You

1:04:52.640 --> 1:04:54.960
<v Speaker 1>might be the only person in your small town that

1:04:55.080 --> 1:04:57.480
<v Speaker 1>loves Star Wars as much as you do, but the

1:04:57.520 --> 1:05:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Internet allows you to find all those other individuals who

1:05:00.240 --> 1:05:03.600
<v Speaker 1>are as invested, and you find the community in your

1:05:03.640 --> 1:05:06.960
<v Speaker 1>fandom that that one could you know, that would pre

1:05:07.160 --> 1:05:11.240
<v Speaker 1>one could previously find, perhaps only in something like a religion.

1:05:11.280 --> 1:05:14.800
<v Speaker 1>You're finding that religious community in your fandom. But then again,

1:05:14.840 --> 1:05:16.680
<v Speaker 1>I come back to the question. I mean, I have

1:05:16.800 --> 1:05:19.760
<v Speaker 1>to wonder what the evolution of this looks like over

1:05:19.840 --> 1:05:22.360
<v Speaker 1>a long time. Could you ever reach the point where

1:05:22.840 --> 1:05:26.200
<v Speaker 1>there are jedi Ists who believe in the truth of

1:05:26.280 --> 1:05:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Jedi is m so firmly that they would actually come

1:05:30.040 --> 1:05:32.640
<v Speaker 1>to the position of the creationists we talked about at

1:05:32.680 --> 1:05:35.160
<v Speaker 1>the beginning, where they would want their views taught as

1:05:35.200 --> 1:05:39.000
<v Speaker 1>an alternative to modern science in schools, where they would say,

1:05:39.080 --> 1:05:41.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, I I don't just say that this is

1:05:41.360 --> 1:05:44.080
<v Speaker 1>a useful framework for my life. That kind of makes

1:05:44.080 --> 1:05:47.160
<v Speaker 1>sense to me. I say this is how reality is,

1:05:47.320 --> 1:05:52.000
<v Speaker 1>and I've got the exclusive truth. I mean, I it's

1:05:52.040 --> 1:05:54.360
<v Speaker 1>hard to imagine with the jedi Ists of today, who,

1:05:54.400 --> 1:05:56.080
<v Speaker 1>like we said, seemed to be just sort of like

1:05:56.160 --> 1:06:00.520
<v Speaker 1>a taking from the salad bar of interesting ideas. But

1:06:01.160 --> 1:06:03.480
<v Speaker 1>who knows what would be possible in the future. Yeah, well,

1:06:03.520 --> 1:06:05.000
<v Speaker 1>it seems to me it would be less of a

1:06:05.040 --> 1:06:10.720
<v Speaker 1>conflict between between science and this kind of story telling mythology,

1:06:10.760 --> 1:06:13.600
<v Speaker 1>but it wouldld be more of a conflict between mythology,

1:06:13.680 --> 1:06:17.040
<v Speaker 1>So would be more in line with the Jedi is saying, Hey,

1:06:17.120 --> 1:06:21.000
<v Speaker 1>if you're going to teach the children about Greek mythology, uh,

1:06:21.000 --> 1:06:23.760
<v Speaker 1>then and if you're going to teach them about you know,

1:06:23.800 --> 1:06:26.480
<v Speaker 1>about Hinduism or some of these other um, you know,

1:06:26.560 --> 1:06:28.480
<v Speaker 1>modes of sort of mythological belief, and you have to

1:06:28.520 --> 1:06:31.640
<v Speaker 1>teach them about our mode as well. Because yeah, because

1:06:31.640 --> 1:06:34.240
<v Speaker 1>our mode has all of those old ideas, but it's

1:06:34.280 --> 1:06:39.000
<v Speaker 1>been kind of purified through the lens of modern culture. Well,

1:06:39.080 --> 1:06:41.840
<v Speaker 1>I will say I do believe Obi wan Kenobi is

1:06:41.960 --> 1:06:45.840
<v Speaker 1>much wiser than most of the Greek gods. He's he's

1:06:45.840 --> 1:06:49.280
<v Speaker 1>a very wise individual. It's hard not to I don't

1:06:49.280 --> 1:06:51.440
<v Speaker 1>know if some of his choices in the prequels may

1:06:51.480 --> 1:06:57.600
<v Speaker 1>have been I'm not even talking about that. That's heretical. Yes, blasphemy. Robert,

1:06:57.680 --> 1:07:01.560
<v Speaker 1>what's your own personal choice for hyper real religion? Well,

1:07:01.600 --> 1:07:03.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, um, like if if you had to go

1:07:03.960 --> 1:07:07.240
<v Speaker 1>with one, I could see myself as a follower of

1:07:07.840 --> 1:07:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Anambor Kellis the aspect emperor of the three season our

1:07:11.080 --> 1:07:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Scott Baker's Second Apocalypse saga. Um, okay, I don't know

1:07:14.720 --> 1:07:17.280
<v Speaker 1>anything about that. It's pretty it's pretty rich and deep

1:07:17.360 --> 1:07:20.200
<v Speaker 1>and uh, that is one where there are segments in

1:07:20.240 --> 1:07:22.880
<v Speaker 1>those books where I've I can't they come back to me.

1:07:22.920 --> 1:07:25.240
<v Speaker 1>I think about little motifs that he rolls out, and

1:07:26.360 --> 1:07:28.880
<v Speaker 1>like some of it is as meaningful as any you know,

1:07:28.960 --> 1:07:34.080
<v Speaker 1>actual religion, actual mythology in my life. Likewise the done universe. Hey,

1:07:34.160 --> 1:07:36.439
<v Speaker 1>I am right with you there. In fact, I think

1:07:36.560 --> 1:07:41.120
<v Speaker 1>some of the some of the liturgical formulas of the

1:07:41.200 --> 1:07:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Done universe are absolutely useful in the real world, and

1:07:44.560 --> 1:07:46.640
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to buy into the reality of Done

1:07:46.640 --> 1:07:50.600
<v Speaker 1>at all. I'd say try the Litany against Fear sometime. Yeah,

1:07:50.640 --> 1:07:53.880
<v Speaker 1>if you are feeling fear, say these words, I must

1:07:53.920 --> 1:07:57.360
<v Speaker 1>not fear. Fear is the mind killer. Fear is the

1:07:57.400 --> 1:08:01.480
<v Speaker 1>little death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear.

1:08:01.880 --> 1:08:04.160
<v Speaker 1>I will permit it to pass over me and through me.

1:08:04.600 --> 1:08:06.640
<v Speaker 1>And when it has gone past, I will turn the

1:08:06.640 --> 1:08:09.720
<v Speaker 1>inner eye to see the path. And where the fear

1:08:09.760 --> 1:08:13.479
<v Speaker 1>has gone, there will be nothing. Only I will remain. Yeah,

1:08:13.520 --> 1:08:15.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean I have. I have seriously taken some some

1:08:16.040 --> 1:08:19.640
<v Speaker 1>strength and comfort from from from those words and in

1:08:19.680 --> 1:08:21.360
<v Speaker 1>the past. Yeah, I mean, they sort of take on

1:08:21.400 --> 1:08:24.519
<v Speaker 1>the nature of a proverb where it's not necessarily it's

1:08:24.560 --> 1:08:28.200
<v Speaker 1>not the authority of the text that gives it its power.

1:08:28.360 --> 1:08:31.800
<v Speaker 1>It's self evidently powerful. It's a it's a piece of

1:08:31.920 --> 1:08:34.280
<v Speaker 1>literature that you you don't even need to know where

1:08:34.320 --> 1:08:37.679
<v Speaker 1>it came from in order for it to be effective. Yeah, exactly.

1:08:38.000 --> 1:08:40.719
<v Speaker 1>So how about you, what what hyper real religion would

1:08:40.720 --> 1:08:42.960
<v Speaker 1>you turn to jail? Well, besides that, you know, I

1:08:43.280 --> 1:08:46.240
<v Speaker 1>do love the Litany against Fear, but my own personal

1:08:46.320 --> 1:08:49.280
<v Speaker 1>choice for years was, you know, Facebook used to ask

1:08:49.320 --> 1:08:51.720
<v Speaker 1>you what your religion is, and I was like, well,

1:08:51.760 --> 1:08:54.040
<v Speaker 1>that's none of your business, Facebook. So I'm gonna say

1:08:54.080 --> 1:08:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Falsa Doom, right, the Temple of Set from the James

1:08:58.160 --> 1:09:00.200
<v Speaker 1>from James Earl Jones and the Schwartz and I er

1:09:00.320 --> 1:09:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Cone in the Barbarian movie. I'm to understand Fulsa Doom

1:09:03.160 --> 1:09:05.920
<v Speaker 1>is kind of different in other media, right, Yeah, but

1:09:06.439 --> 1:09:10.400
<v Speaker 1>my opinion is that he gained perfection in that film. Yeah,

1:09:10.439 --> 1:09:13.840
<v Speaker 1>I James Earl Jones, He's the perfect Fulsa Doom. He's

1:09:13.880 --> 1:09:16.880
<v Speaker 1>a great villain, but he's a very profound and literary

1:09:16.960 --> 1:09:20.200
<v Speaker 1>villain and very charismatic. What is steel compared to the

1:09:20.240 --> 1:09:23.160
<v Speaker 1>hand that wields it? He has the whole message that

1:09:23.280 --> 1:09:26.759
<v Speaker 1>flesh is stronger than steel because steel is just a tool.

1:09:26.920 --> 1:09:30.479
<v Speaker 1>The flesh is the will. And I can get behind that.

1:09:30.560 --> 1:09:32.559
<v Speaker 1>I see what he's getting at. Yeah. And plus the

1:09:32.560 --> 1:09:36.759
<v Speaker 1>parties looked pretty cool. Yeah yeah, cannibal stew, giant snakes

1:09:36.800 --> 1:09:40.680
<v Speaker 1>and uh, lots of lounging around. Yeah. Well, one more thing,

1:09:40.720 --> 1:09:43.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I have to admit that there's there's ever

1:09:43.439 --> 1:09:46.400
<v Speaker 1>so slight a temptation to some jedi is m. I'm

1:09:46.439 --> 1:09:48.519
<v Speaker 1>not saying I would ever be a jedi Ist, but

1:09:49.000 --> 1:09:50.800
<v Speaker 1>I can get a little misty when I think about

1:09:50.840 --> 1:09:53.920
<v Speaker 1>the fact that luminous beings are we not this crude matter?

1:09:55.800 --> 1:09:58.720
<v Speaker 1>All right? Well, there you have it, hyper real religions

1:09:58.800 --> 1:10:01.479
<v Speaker 1>kind of a you know, an exa emanation of of

1:10:01.520 --> 1:10:05.559
<v Speaker 1>where we are in terms of modern religious faith and

1:10:05.560 --> 1:10:08.280
<v Speaker 1>and fandom, where we've come from, and perhaps a new

1:10:08.320 --> 1:10:10.599
<v Speaker 1>way to sort of look at these these old religions

1:10:10.600 --> 1:10:12.559
<v Speaker 1>as well. Of course, we want to hear from everyone

1:10:12.560 --> 1:10:15.679
<v Speaker 1>else out there. Do any of you guys and gals

1:10:15.800 --> 1:10:19.280
<v Speaker 1>follow a hyper real religion? Do we have any uh

1:10:19.880 --> 1:10:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Unutologists in the audience that want to speak up about

1:10:23.520 --> 1:10:26.360
<v Speaker 1>about Altman, about Church of the SubGenius. Yeah, Church of

1:10:26.439 --> 1:10:28.439
<v Speaker 1>the SubGenius. They're a number of big ones that we

1:10:28.439 --> 1:10:29.920
<v Speaker 1>didn't We didn't even have time to get to in

1:10:29.920 --> 1:10:32.679
<v Speaker 1>this podcast. So we would love to hear from any

1:10:32.680 --> 1:10:35.840
<v Speaker 1>and all of you about that, And sincerely, if you

1:10:35.880 --> 1:10:38.080
<v Speaker 1>want to let us know what you truly love about

1:10:38.120 --> 1:10:40.840
<v Speaker 1>this religion and why you consider it a real faith,

1:10:41.320 --> 1:10:43.559
<v Speaker 1>please share? Yeah, yeah, do so, we will. We will

1:10:43.800 --> 1:10:45.680
<v Speaker 1>keep an open mind and encourage everyone else keep an

1:10:45.720 --> 1:10:48.200
<v Speaker 1>open mind about it as well. Um In the meantime,

1:10:48.360 --> 1:10:50.160
<v Speaker 1>check us out of Stuff to Blow your Mind dot com.

1:10:50.240 --> 1:10:52.839
<v Speaker 1>That's where you will find all the podcasts, the videos,

1:10:53.000 --> 1:10:55.200
<v Speaker 1>blog post links out to our social media accounts we

1:10:55.280 --> 1:10:57.599
<v Speaker 1>are we are blow the Mind on Facebook and Twitter,

1:10:57.720 --> 1:11:00.400
<v Speaker 1>we are stuff to Blow your Mind on tumble and

1:11:00.439 --> 1:11:01.760
<v Speaker 1>if you want to get in touch with us with

1:11:01.840 --> 1:11:04.360
<v Speaker 1>the feedback to this episode or any other recent episode,

1:11:04.400 --> 1:11:06.280
<v Speaker 1>you can email us it blow the Mind at how

1:11:06.320 --> 1:11:18.719
<v Speaker 1>stuff works dot com. For more on this and thousands

1:11:18.760 --> 1:11:43.920
<v Speaker 1>of other topics, is it how stuff works dot com