WEBVTT - #545 Packers Unscripted: Starting with a showdown

0:00:00.840 --> 0:00:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Hi, everybody. Welcome to another edition of Packers Unscripted social

0:00:14.840 --> 0:00:18.160
<v Speaker 1>distancing Style from Packers dot Com. I am Mike Spofford

0:00:18.239 --> 0:00:22.120
<v Speaker 1>joint as always by the one and only Wes Hodkowits.

0:00:22.160 --> 0:00:26.520
<v Speaker 1>We are coming to you from twelve Lombardi Avenue West.

0:00:26.920 --> 0:00:31.159
<v Speaker 1>The first game of the Packers season is just a

0:00:31.200 --> 0:00:33.760
<v Speaker 1>few days away, and I want to start today's show

0:00:33.880 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 1>by tossing a phrase out at you because it's a

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:40.520
<v Speaker 1>phrase we've heard a few different times through the off

0:00:40.560 --> 0:00:44.159
<v Speaker 1>season and again this week from Aaron Rodgers that he

0:00:44.200 --> 0:00:47.800
<v Speaker 1>thinks this Packers team, despite thirteen and three a year ago,

0:00:48.120 --> 0:00:50.720
<v Speaker 1>one game away from the Super Bowl, he believes this

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Packers team is flying under the radar a little bit

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:55.920
<v Speaker 1>as far as the national pundits are concerned. Do you

0:00:56.080 --> 0:00:58.800
<v Speaker 1>think that is the case. Well, it's funny that he

0:00:58.920 --> 0:01:02.760
<v Speaker 1>feels this way, Mike, because the Packers did win thirteen

0:01:02.760 --> 0:01:06.240
<v Speaker 1>games last year, they did make the NFC Championship game,

0:01:06.920 --> 0:01:10.360
<v Speaker 1>and they are flying underneath the radar of the National

0:01:10.400 --> 0:01:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Football League once again. The thing I love about this

0:01:14.800 --> 0:01:20.200
<v Speaker 1>analytics era of this um, you know, this proliferation of

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:25.360
<v Speaker 1>just you know, analysis everywhere, video guy that and analytics

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:30.680
<v Speaker 1>here talking head. There is that when you need talking points,

0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:34.240
<v Speaker 1>you typically will grab onto things that you don't understand,

0:01:34.240 --> 0:01:35.560
<v Speaker 1>and I think there are a lot of things that

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:38.760
<v Speaker 1>people couldn't comprehend. If you didn't watch this team every

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 1>single week last year, why were they as successful as

0:01:41.920 --> 0:01:44.480
<v Speaker 1>they were? How were they able to overcome some of

0:01:44.520 --> 0:01:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the typical Well, they weren't a top ten offense or

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:49.800
<v Speaker 1>a top ten defense, or they still made plays and

0:01:49.800 --> 0:01:52.960
<v Speaker 1>they still found ways to win. If you can't fit

0:01:53.040 --> 0:01:58.040
<v Speaker 1>all of that into a nice, tight, tiny, concise, understandable bubble,

0:01:58.320 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 1>well then everybody just disregards it. And for that reason,

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:05.320
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of people are again counting against

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:08.679
<v Speaker 1>this team going into two thousand and twenty, and I

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:11.480
<v Speaker 1>think that's unfortunate, Mike, because if you look at the

0:02:11.480 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 1>way the Packers are built in a lot of ways,

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:16.639
<v Speaker 1>there are a much better team on paper than they

0:02:16.639 --> 0:02:19.840
<v Speaker 1>were a year ago at this time. Don't get me wrong.

0:02:19.880 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Losing Brian Bulaga, that's a big loss, especially with the

0:02:22.800 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 1>questions at right tackle going into Sunday's game. They had to,

0:02:26.720 --> 0:02:28.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, shed a few parts to gain a few

0:02:29.520 --> 0:02:32.840
<v Speaker 1>and now you have the running game is more established,

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:35.519
<v Speaker 1>you have Aaron Rodgers looking more comfortable. You have Davonte

0:02:35.560 --> 0:02:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Adams being the type of receiver that I think also

0:02:38.960 --> 0:02:41.800
<v Speaker 1>is really flying underneath the radar of the NFL. I

0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:44.360
<v Speaker 1>think it's finally starting to feel some of that that

0:02:44.480 --> 0:02:48.480
<v Speaker 1>real appreciation for his game. The Smith's Adrian Ames. The

0:02:48.520 --> 0:02:51.240
<v Speaker 1>list goes on and on. Mike, the Greenbay Packers are

0:02:51.240 --> 0:02:53.680
<v Speaker 1>a better team than they were last year at this time,

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 1>and if they can find the progress that they want

0:02:56.320 --> 0:02:58.640
<v Speaker 1>from those second and third year players, there's a reason

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:01.880
<v Speaker 1>to believe this team is once again Super Bowl contender. Yeah,

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:04.960
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting to me that you brought up analytics because

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:10.880
<v Speaker 1>to me, there's To me, there's been a big analytical

0:03:11.000 --> 0:03:14.639
<v Speaker 1>narrative surrounding this Packers team, and not just the Packers,

0:03:14.680 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 1>but I think the Seahawks are another team that falls

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:20.960
<v Speaker 1>into this category because those were the two teams last

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:24.119
<v Speaker 1>year that won the most close games, the most one

0:03:24.200 --> 0:03:27.400
<v Speaker 1>score games, you know, eight points are less, and all

0:03:27.440 --> 0:03:30.880
<v Speaker 1>the analytics say you can't have that type of record

0:03:30.919 --> 0:03:33.880
<v Speaker 1>in close games again. And while there is certainly a

0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:37.640
<v Speaker 1>law of averages to a funny game with a funny

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:40.280
<v Speaker 1>shaped ball that can bounce weird ways, I get that,

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:44.120
<v Speaker 1>but There's also something to be said in this league

0:03:44.160 --> 0:03:47.200
<v Speaker 1>for being the better team in the clutch moments when

0:03:47.200 --> 0:03:50.680
<v Speaker 1>it really matters, and I think that's what the Packers

0:03:50.720 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 1>were in twenty nineteen. You look at three of their

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:59.320
<v Speaker 1>wins in December Washington, Chicago, Detroit, the Packers were better

0:03:59.360 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 1>than all three of those teams. They did not play

0:04:02.320 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 1>very well in either in any of those three games,

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:08.560
<v Speaker 1>but in the fourth quarter when it mattered, when they

0:04:08.640 --> 0:04:11.000
<v Speaker 1>had to find a way to win the game, they did,

0:04:11.080 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 1>and they were the better team when it counted, And

0:04:12.920 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that sort of became the identity of the

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:19.599
<v Speaker 1>two thousand nineteen Packers. So I think if you're talking

0:04:19.640 --> 0:04:22.240
<v Speaker 1>about regression to the means, so to speak, with some

0:04:22.320 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 1>of these analytics, the one thing that could certainly catch

0:04:24.640 --> 0:04:27.440
<v Speaker 1>up to the Packers is the health issue. Because Green

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Bay was extremely healthy last year. Did you know, other

0:04:30.440 --> 0:04:35.120
<v Speaker 1>than losing Davante Adams for four games to the turf

0:04:35.200 --> 0:04:38.600
<v Speaker 1>toe injury at mid season, there wasn't any other, you know,

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:42.320
<v Speaker 1>really high level significant injury that the Packers had to

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:44.560
<v Speaker 1>deal with in twenty nineteen, and they took advantage of

0:04:44.600 --> 0:04:47.640
<v Speaker 1>that certainly. But when you know, and as I said,

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:49.919
<v Speaker 1>The Seahawks are kind of another team now. The Packers

0:04:49.920 --> 0:04:51.760
<v Speaker 1>and Seahawks bet in the playoffs, and obviously it was

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:53.960
<v Speaker 1>a very close game of five point difference came down

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:55.600
<v Speaker 1>to the way or so something had to give there.

0:04:56.080 --> 0:04:59.479
<v Speaker 1>But the Seahawks are another team that a lot of

0:04:59.480 --> 0:05:02.479
<v Speaker 1>the nash Old pundits are kind of discounting them a

0:05:02.480 --> 0:05:04.719
<v Speaker 1>little bit because of all the close games they won

0:05:05.240 --> 0:05:08.480
<v Speaker 1>last year, and I just I don't think that's necessarily

0:05:08.520 --> 0:05:11.640
<v Speaker 1>the right reason to to count somebody out. Now. The

0:05:11.640 --> 0:05:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Seahawks certainly are are in a tough division that NFC

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:16.520
<v Speaker 1>West is going to be really really fun and entertaining

0:05:16.520 --> 0:05:19.600
<v Speaker 1>to watch, certainly, But when it comes to the Packers

0:05:19.600 --> 0:05:22.240
<v Speaker 1>flying under the radar, I do think they are. I

0:05:22.320 --> 0:05:27.160
<v Speaker 1>just don't necessarily agree with the reasons that are being

0:05:27.400 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 1>put out there for why they are well. And the

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:32.280
<v Speaker 1>thing I think would have been really interesting if, as

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 1>if everyone would have been as hot on the Packers

0:05:36.120 --> 0:05:41.080
<v Speaker 1>last August as they were the Cleveland Browns. The pundits,

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:43.400
<v Speaker 1>this is another thing they love to do. These these

0:05:43.440 --> 0:05:45.560
<v Speaker 1>analysts love to do they want They like picking out

0:05:45.600 --> 0:05:48.000
<v Speaker 1>their attractive dark horse, and they do it to the

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:51.159
<v Speaker 1>point that they beat that dark horse to death, and

0:05:51.320 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 1>you you end up getting these stories where you know,

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the Cleveland Browns don't end up being the team everybody

0:05:56.640 --> 0:05:59.120
<v Speaker 1>expects them to be, and now everybody's disappointed in them.

0:05:59.120 --> 0:06:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Everybody thinks that they're needs to be this type of

0:06:00.960 --> 0:06:03.520
<v Speaker 1>change over. The Browns were still a team that was

0:06:03.600 --> 0:06:05.560
<v Speaker 1>up and coming, but they weren't by any means, a

0:06:05.600 --> 0:06:07.560
<v Speaker 1>finished product. I think you're seeing it now with the

0:06:07.560 --> 0:06:10.679
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay Buccaneers, and they may have a fantastic season,

0:06:10.720 --> 0:06:14.039
<v Speaker 1>but they're competing against a really difficult New Orleans Saints

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:16.880
<v Speaker 1>team in that same division, and they're having to really

0:06:16.920 --> 0:06:20.280
<v Speaker 1>rebuild an entire offense now around Tom Brady. There are

0:06:20.400 --> 0:06:23.320
<v Speaker 1>question marks there, but yet nobody wants to talk about that.

0:06:23.360 --> 0:06:25.080
<v Speaker 1>They just want to talk about the fact that Tom

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Terrific's there. The Buccaneers are fantastic and they're gonna have

0:06:28.480 --> 0:06:31.600
<v Speaker 1>a phenomenal season. It doesn't work like that. The Green

0:06:31.600 --> 0:06:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Bay Packers last year were a testament to the people

0:06:34.440 --> 0:06:36.640
<v Speaker 1>that do all the analysis early on and they do

0:06:36.680 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 1>their rankings and they try to figure out who the

0:06:38.440 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 1>division champions are gonna be and who's gonna make the playoffs.

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:42.839
<v Speaker 1>You can't play that game in the National Football League

0:06:42.839 --> 0:06:45.200
<v Speaker 1>because there is so much turnover. All you have to

0:06:45.240 --> 0:06:47.839
<v Speaker 1>do is look at the playoffs scenarios from the last

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:50.320
<v Speaker 1>ten years. There's always gonna be a Packers team. There's

0:06:50.320 --> 0:06:52.479
<v Speaker 1>always gonna be a Titans team that kind of comes

0:06:52.480 --> 0:06:55.240
<v Speaker 1>out of relative obscurity relative to where they were the

0:06:55.320 --> 0:07:00.159
<v Speaker 1>last season and really surprise people enjoy that ride, be

0:07:00.240 --> 0:07:03.800
<v Speaker 1>able to appreciate that ride, and then realistically, yeah, you

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:05.800
<v Speaker 1>want to have all these discussions about where did the

0:07:05.839 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 1>stats bear out? You can have them until you're blue

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:09.040
<v Speaker 1>in the face. But the fact of the matter is

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:12.560
<v Speaker 1>there's one metric that the NFL uses to determine who

0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:15.840
<v Speaker 1>gets to go to the playoffs. It's wins. It's division titles.

0:07:16.280 --> 0:07:17.920
<v Speaker 1>The Packers did that and they won a game in

0:07:17.920 --> 0:07:20.120
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs and they got to the NFC Championship game.

0:07:20.840 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Another they want to try to make that next step. Yeah,

0:07:24.000 --> 0:07:26.600
<v Speaker 1>another point to throw out there as well, because this

0:07:26.680 --> 0:07:29.240
<v Speaker 1>is a long season and we're certainly hoping that we're

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:31.680
<v Speaker 1>going to have a full long season once again here

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:35.720
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL. Thanksgiving last year, nobody thought the Tennessee

0:07:35.720 --> 0:07:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Titans would be one of the last four teams standing

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:41.440
<v Speaker 1>right go back to at Thanksgiving, did anybody think the

0:07:41.440 --> 0:07:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay Packers were gonna be one of the last

0:07:43.320 --> 0:07:46.560
<v Speaker 1>four teams standing? So even with all this talk through

0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:50.040
<v Speaker 1>August and early September about where teams are, it comes

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:52.360
<v Speaker 1>down to where are you in November and December and

0:07:52.400 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 1>heading in January? And we are so far away from

0:07:56.400 --> 0:07:58.840
<v Speaker 1>getting to that point. So, yes, it's fun to talk

0:07:58.840 --> 0:08:00.560
<v Speaker 1>about who's gonna win the divis Asi and who's going

0:08:00.600 --> 0:08:02.880
<v Speaker 1>to make the playoffs, who were the super Bowl contenders,

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:07.040
<v Speaker 1>But quite quite frankly, it's it's a it's a discussion

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:09.960
<v Speaker 1>that that you can't even really get serious about until

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:12.440
<v Speaker 1>you get about ten eleven games into this thing. Well,

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:14.720
<v Speaker 1>and what I love about Matt Lafore's perspective to Mike

0:08:14.840 --> 0:08:16.679
<v Speaker 1>is that even if the Packers were getting the proper

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:18.760
<v Speaker 1>credit for being a thirteen and three team, for being

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:21.720
<v Speaker 1>amongst those final four, he wouldn't want to hear about

0:08:21.720 --> 0:08:23.680
<v Speaker 1>two thousand nineteen because if you look at many of

0:08:23.720 --> 0:08:26.280
<v Speaker 1>those same examples of teams that made it to championship games,

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 1>heck that even made it to Super Bowls, that is

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:31.400
<v Speaker 1>not an indicator we're gonna be able to just replicate

0:08:31.440 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 1>that the next season they're onto two thousand and twenty,

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:37.560
<v Speaker 1>And for the hope and sake of my own sanity,

0:08:38.040 --> 0:08:40.720
<v Speaker 1>I hope the onlookers are too. If the Packers perform

0:08:40.800 --> 0:08:43.520
<v Speaker 1>well on Sunday, it's not because it's a fluke. It's

0:08:43.559 --> 0:08:46.440
<v Speaker 1>not because it's some statistical anomaly. It's because they were

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:49.199
<v Speaker 1>the better football team and so far underneath mapa floor

0:08:49.760 --> 0:08:52.480
<v Speaker 1>in eighteen games or whatever it is underneath him at

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:55.000
<v Speaker 1>this point, more often than not, the Packers have been

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:59.240
<v Speaker 1>the more prepared and better producing football team on the field. Well,

0:08:59.320 --> 0:09:01.920
<v Speaker 1>that is a big Week one matchup coming up here

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:04.840
<v Speaker 1>with the Packers traveling to Minneapolis to take on the Vikings,

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 1>a big NFC North battle. I want to get to

0:09:07.000 --> 0:09:10.480
<v Speaker 1>some keys to victory here. But a little sponsor Business West,

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:15.079
<v Speaker 1>our first sponsor business on Packers unscripted of gear up

0:09:15.120 --> 0:09:18.559
<v Speaker 1>four game day folks, open a Packers checking account from

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Associated Bank and score a fifty dollar Packers Pro Shop

0:09:22.200 --> 0:09:26.440
<v Speaker 1>gift card. Learn more at Associated bank dot com. Backslash

0:09:26.600 --> 0:09:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Packers Okay Week one noon Central time kickoff at us

0:09:31.360 --> 0:09:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Bank Stadium. It's the Packers and the Vikings. A little

0:09:33.760 --> 0:09:37.239
<v Speaker 1>bit of news that we found out yesterday. The Vikings

0:09:37.400 --> 0:09:39.280
<v Speaker 1>and we had talked on our last show about all

0:09:39.320 --> 0:09:42.240
<v Speaker 1>the changes that are going on with some of their

0:09:42.280 --> 0:09:45.800
<v Speaker 1>personnel on defense, they will be without pro Bowl pass

0:09:45.880 --> 0:09:48.680
<v Speaker 1>rusher Daniel Hunter, fourteen and a half sacks each of

0:09:48.720 --> 0:09:50.679
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of years. This is the guy who

0:09:50.720 --> 0:09:53.600
<v Speaker 1>has five and a half career sacks against the Green

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Bay Packers. He was placed on injury preserve by the Vikings.

0:09:56.920 --> 0:09:59.680
<v Speaker 1>He's going to be out at least three weeks. Had

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:02.120
<v Speaker 1>been dealing with an injury throughout training camp, and the

0:10:02.200 --> 0:10:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Vikings have just decided he will not be ready to

0:10:05.000 --> 0:10:07.920
<v Speaker 1>play in the early going here in and with the

0:10:07.920 --> 0:10:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Packers having obviously their own injury question at right tackle

0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:15.040
<v Speaker 1>on on one of the edges. Um, you know, something

0:10:15.040 --> 0:10:18.120
<v Speaker 1>to watch here to see just what matchup ends up

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:21.280
<v Speaker 1>actually taking place on the field Sunday afternoon. You know

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 1>it's funny too, Mike. It makes a lot, I mean

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:25.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of reasons why them trading for Unique made

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:27.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of a lot of sense for them. But boy,

0:10:27.920 --> 0:10:30.200
<v Speaker 1>that's another one. Now. The fact that Hunter dealing with

0:10:30.200 --> 0:10:32.120
<v Speaker 1>what he was dealing with probably shed some light on

0:10:32.200 --> 0:10:34.480
<v Speaker 1>why they were so proactive and trying to go out

0:10:34.559 --> 0:10:38.760
<v Speaker 1>in adding another pass rusher during training camp. It was funny.

0:10:38.960 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Matt Arvin, our wonderful producer, can bring

0:10:42.240 --> 0:10:45.560
<v Speaker 1>up the video on top of us. But the reaction

0:10:45.760 --> 0:10:48.560
<v Speaker 1>that Aaron Rodgers had when Bill Hubert, because it literally

0:10:48.600 --> 0:10:52.839
<v Speaker 1>happened seconds before Rogers spoke to the media on Wednesday.

0:10:53.440 --> 0:10:56.040
<v Speaker 1>So Bill, who was the first reporter to to ask

0:10:56.080 --> 0:10:58.559
<v Speaker 1>a question in the zoom session, used his opportunity to

0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:01.640
<v Speaker 1>ask Rogers about that, and there is this pause in

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:06.000
<v Speaker 1>thousand yard gaze, uh in Aaron Rodgers expression the moment

0:11:06.040 --> 0:11:08.600
<v Speaker 1>that Bill mentioned that he was going on injured reserve.

0:11:08.679 --> 0:11:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Not that Rogers is necessarily happy about it, but it's

0:11:10.920 --> 0:11:15.120
<v Speaker 1>shocking the people. I think that in Minnesota earlier in

0:11:15.160 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the day, they were maybe the day before, they were

0:11:16.920 --> 0:11:20.520
<v Speaker 1>talking to Hunter about Eric Kendricks and if Eric Kendricks

0:11:20.559 --> 0:11:23.280
<v Speaker 1>would be playing in this game, and him mentioning, you know, yeah,

0:11:23.360 --> 0:11:26.640
<v Speaker 1>that's a guy you can't replace. Nobody thought that Danil

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Hunter was just going to be completely not only you know,

0:11:29.160 --> 0:11:31.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, questionable for this game, that's fine, but like

0:11:31.559 --> 0:11:34.840
<v Speaker 1>just completely out of the equation for the Vikings. It's

0:11:34.880 --> 0:11:37.160
<v Speaker 1>that stuff that happens when there's no preseason, when there's

0:11:37.160 --> 0:11:39.120
<v Speaker 1>no eyes on anybody, and you really kind of had

0:11:39.160 --> 0:11:41.319
<v Speaker 1>this cloak of darkness that I keep talking about throughout

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:44.600
<v Speaker 1>the league. He's not in there, So that changes thing.

0:11:44.720 --> 0:11:49.320
<v Speaker 1>The different secondary, the different cornerbacks for the Vikings change things,

0:11:49.320 --> 0:11:51.280
<v Speaker 1>and it's going to lead to some more questions than

0:11:51.360 --> 0:11:53.800
<v Speaker 1>we've grown accustomed to with this Mike Zimmer defense going

0:11:53.800 --> 0:11:56.440
<v Speaker 1>into this game. Yeah, I think when we if we

0:11:56.520 --> 0:12:00.120
<v Speaker 1>look at keys to victory here for the Packers, if

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:04.000
<v Speaker 1>you start on the offensive side of the ball, even

0:12:04.040 --> 0:12:07.080
<v Speaker 1>without Hunter, this is still a heck of a Vikings defense.

0:12:07.120 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 1>And there are questions about these young rookie cornerbacks stepping

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:13.600
<v Speaker 1>into significant roles and all that, but you're gonna have

0:12:13.840 --> 0:12:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Unique and Ghakway on one side as a pass rusher.

0:12:16.480 --> 0:12:18.720
<v Speaker 1>You've still got Eric Kendricks and Anthony Barr in the

0:12:18.720 --> 0:12:21.120
<v Speaker 1>middle of that defense. And then the back middle, so

0:12:21.200 --> 0:12:24.640
<v Speaker 1>to speak, is Anthony Harrison Harrison Smith, and you know

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Harrison Smith will line up anywhere and everywhere I think

0:12:28.000 --> 0:12:30.360
<v Speaker 1>offensively for the Packers. And this is what we saw,

0:12:31.240 --> 0:12:33.720
<v Speaker 1>I would say, in the second half of that Week

0:12:33.800 --> 0:12:37.200
<v Speaker 1>sixteen game last year. The Packers control the line of

0:12:37.240 --> 0:12:40.440
<v Speaker 1>scrimmage in that game because they were avoiding the negative plays.

0:12:40.480 --> 0:12:42.760
<v Speaker 1>As Matt Lafleur likes to say, you can't get behind

0:12:42.800 --> 0:12:45.959
<v Speaker 1>the sticks against a defense like this. You stay in

0:12:46.040 --> 0:12:49.120
<v Speaker 1>manageable down and distances. You avoid the penalties, you avoid

0:12:49.160 --> 0:12:51.880
<v Speaker 1>the sacks, the tackles for loss against the run, you

0:12:51.880 --> 0:12:55.840
<v Speaker 1>avoid those negative plays. And this Packers offense with Aaron

0:12:55.920 --> 0:12:58.839
<v Speaker 1>Rodgers can really do its thing. And I think offensively,

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:01.360
<v Speaker 1>whether you want to do it trying to pound the

0:13:01.360 --> 0:13:03.720
<v Speaker 1>ball and play action or do the short passing game

0:13:03.800 --> 0:13:06.240
<v Speaker 1>test those rookie corners, I'm not sure how the Package

0:13:06.280 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 1>are going to go about it. But if they avoid

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:11.880
<v Speaker 1>those negative plays and the penalties that that put them

0:13:11.880 --> 0:13:15.400
<v Speaker 1>in rough down and distant situations, I like their chances

0:13:15.440 --> 0:13:17.960
<v Speaker 1>offensively to to have a have a good day. Yeah,

0:13:18.000 --> 0:13:19.720
<v Speaker 1>when we're gonna talk about Delvin Cook here in the

0:13:19.720 --> 0:13:22.679
<v Speaker 1>second when we talk about defensive keys to victory. But

0:13:22.960 --> 0:13:25.480
<v Speaker 1>one thing that was underrated in that first series last

0:13:25.559 --> 0:13:28.240
<v Speaker 1>year was the fact that when Cook was in that game,

0:13:28.640 --> 0:13:31.439
<v Speaker 1>it was different. Right. What did the Green Bay Packers

0:13:31.480 --> 0:13:34.840
<v Speaker 1>benefit from in those two games? Aaron Jones. Jones came

0:13:34.960 --> 0:13:38.560
<v Speaker 1>up big. He was dynamic, he was successful. The Packers

0:13:38.559 --> 0:13:40.800
<v Speaker 1>were able to get their running game going. I think

0:13:40.840 --> 0:13:42.760
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna be a big key in this game, and honestly,

0:13:42.800 --> 0:13:44.760
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be a big key for the season, allowing

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:46.880
<v Speaker 1>that running game to set up what they want to

0:13:46.920 --> 0:13:49.960
<v Speaker 1>do with their past, with their misdirection, with making defensive

0:13:49.960 --> 0:13:52.640
<v Speaker 1>coordinators scratch their heads a little bit. We didn't talk

0:13:52.679 --> 0:13:54.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot about Aaron Jones this camp because a lot

0:13:54.920 --> 0:13:59.080
<v Speaker 1>of the eyes were on Hey J Dillon's thighs uh

0:13:59.120 --> 0:14:02.360
<v Speaker 1>and and also, you know Jamal Williams getting so much

0:14:02.440 --> 0:14:05.320
<v Speaker 1>due credit as well for Aaron Rodgers. But I said

0:14:05.320 --> 0:14:06.880
<v Speaker 1>this a couple of weeks ago, Mike. It was a

0:14:06.960 --> 0:14:09.319
<v Speaker 1>very small snippet that I put in an insider inbox.

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:13.120
<v Speaker 1>But I thought Aaron Jones had a really quietly successful camp.

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:16.079
<v Speaker 1>I thought he looked sharp. I thought he looked decisive.

0:14:16.200 --> 0:14:18.440
<v Speaker 1>I thought like the wide zone scheme was starting to

0:14:18.520 --> 0:14:21.440
<v Speaker 1>fit him a little bit better. And here's the other

0:14:21.480 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 1>option too. They wanted to expand the repertoire of these receivers,

0:14:25.560 --> 0:14:28.000
<v Speaker 1>of these running backs with the receiving aspect of the game.

0:14:28.200 --> 0:14:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Jamal Williams took that to heart. Aaron Jones already has

0:14:30.960 --> 0:14:32.720
<v Speaker 1>definitely been taking that to heart. That was an area

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:36.720
<v Speaker 1>he emphasized last year going into the season. There were

0:14:36.760 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 1>we can talk about the receivers and MVS had a

0:14:39.080 --> 0:14:42.680
<v Speaker 1>great offseason, had a great camp. Uh, certainly Davante Adams

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 1>one of the best in the league at the receiver position.

0:14:45.000 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 1>But the Packers have put a lot of horses, a

0:14:47.440 --> 0:14:50.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of firepower behind their running game, and this would

0:14:50.160 --> 0:14:51.680
<v Speaker 1>be like the kind of game I think that that

0:14:51.720 --> 0:14:54.720
<v Speaker 1>could really shine for them. Yeah. Well, shifting to the

0:14:54.760 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 1>defensive side, you already said it, Dalvin Cook. I think

0:14:58.320 --> 0:15:00.920
<v Speaker 1>he's the whole key to this game and for Vikings

0:15:00.960 --> 0:15:05.280
<v Speaker 1>offense versus Packers defense, because you look at obviously he

0:15:05.400 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 1>wasn't in there in Week sixteen, the game that decided

0:15:07.920 --> 0:15:10.960
<v Speaker 1>the NFC North last December. You look at the way

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:13.200
<v Speaker 1>the Packers end of the season in San Francisco, with

0:15:13.240 --> 0:15:16.240
<v Speaker 1>all the struggles trying to stop the run. The Vikings

0:15:16.240 --> 0:15:19.640
<v Speaker 1>have cooked back. You know that, Mike Zimmer, Gary Kubiak,

0:15:19.760 --> 0:15:21.440
<v Speaker 1>they want to run the ball. They are going to

0:15:21.480 --> 0:15:26.240
<v Speaker 1>test that Packers run defense something fierce. I think on Sunday.

0:15:26.400 --> 0:15:28.600
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not saying you have to hold Dalvin Cook

0:15:28.680 --> 0:15:31.200
<v Speaker 1>to you know, thirteen carries for forty yards or some

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:34.520
<v Speaker 1>like herculean effort. But you can't let Dalvin Cook be

0:15:34.560 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the guy who's dictating the pace of every possession for

0:15:38.160 --> 0:15:41.360
<v Speaker 1>the Minnesota Vikings and therefore dictating the pace of the

0:15:41.480 --> 0:15:44.600
<v Speaker 1>entire game. The Packers have to contain him in some

0:15:44.680 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 1>form or fashion. And that's not to say it will

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:49.200
<v Speaker 1>be easy if it gets turned over to, you know,

0:15:49.320 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 1>dealing with Adam Theeland and Kyle Rudolph and will see

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:55.720
<v Speaker 1>what Justin Jefferson, the rookie wide receiver provides for Kirk Cousins.

0:15:55.720 --> 0:15:58.560
<v Speaker 1>But it all starts with Dalvin Cook for the Minnesota Vikings.

0:15:58.560 --> 0:16:01.000
<v Speaker 1>In my opinion, yeah, and all Mary your your key

0:16:01.040 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 1>to victory With what I wanted to say, and it's

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:05.520
<v Speaker 1>a it's something I've been really hitting home all week long.

0:16:05.600 --> 0:16:08.680
<v Speaker 1>To me, it's two aspects to the same question. It's

0:16:08.720 --> 0:16:11.080
<v Speaker 1>containing Delvin Cook and insider in box. I said that

0:16:11.080 --> 0:16:12.880
<v Speaker 1>would be underneath the hundred yards. I think would be

0:16:12.920 --> 0:16:15.120
<v Speaker 1>a really good day, or at least make him work

0:16:15.160 --> 0:16:19.000
<v Speaker 1>for those carries cares. Obviously, Madison is a guy too

0:16:19.000 --> 0:16:20.600
<v Speaker 1>that you need to be cognizant of. They have good

0:16:20.680 --> 0:16:23.880
<v Speaker 1>running backs. It's not just Cook, but he's going to

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:25.560
<v Speaker 1>be the guy that the Vikings are gonna want to

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:28.480
<v Speaker 1>shove down Green Bays throat because he had success last

0:16:28.560 --> 0:16:30.840
<v Speaker 1>year in that week to matchup a hundred fifty yards

0:16:30.880 --> 0:16:33.240
<v Speaker 1>or whatever it came to. He was dynamic, and when

0:16:33.280 --> 0:16:36.120
<v Speaker 1>they didn't have him, when Madison was dealing with his stuff,

0:16:36.680 --> 0:16:39.000
<v Speaker 1>their running game was different. And why was it when

0:16:39.000 --> 0:16:42.200
<v Speaker 1>what was the byproduct of that? Kirk Cousins was different.

0:16:42.240 --> 0:16:45.720
<v Speaker 1>This passing game was different. So my two pronged answer

0:16:45.720 --> 0:16:49.360
<v Speaker 1>to this is containing Cook but then pressuring Kirk Cousins.

0:16:49.720 --> 0:16:53.440
<v Speaker 1>So Darius Smith had arguably his best game in that

0:16:53.480 --> 0:16:56.600
<v Speaker 1>matchup against the Vikings. I know Mike Smith would disagree

0:16:56.600 --> 0:16:58.840
<v Speaker 1>with me on that because he really liked those nineteen

0:16:58.880 --> 0:17:03.440
<v Speaker 1>pressures or whatever uh Smith had against Oakland or the

0:17:03.480 --> 0:17:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Panthers or whoever that was last season. But that being said,

0:17:07.280 --> 0:17:10.800
<v Speaker 1>you could see what Sadarius Smith was taking out of

0:17:10.840 --> 0:17:14.359
<v Speaker 1>those Vikings offensive linemen last year, three and a half sacks.

0:17:14.720 --> 0:17:18.320
<v Speaker 1>They were demoralized, they were beaten, they were mentally exhausted

0:17:18.320 --> 0:17:20.360
<v Speaker 1>by the end of that game. And because of that,

0:17:20.640 --> 0:17:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Kirk Cousins had a really long afternoon. If you contain cook,

0:17:24.920 --> 0:17:27.879
<v Speaker 1>if you allow them to not get off the ground

0:17:27.880 --> 0:17:32.200
<v Speaker 1>with that running game, then the game changes for Kirk Cousins.

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:34.359
<v Speaker 1>When he's able to manage it, when he's able to

0:17:34.400 --> 0:17:36.680
<v Speaker 1>work the sidelines, when he's able to get his guys

0:17:36.720 --> 0:17:40.040
<v Speaker 1>going underneath off the play action, that's when things get

0:17:40.080 --> 0:17:44.800
<v Speaker 1>really difficult against Minnesota's offense. That's where it starts from me. Alright, Well,

0:17:44.800 --> 0:17:46.760
<v Speaker 1>one other thing before we go here West, Let's just

0:17:46.800 --> 0:17:49.720
<v Speaker 1>take a quick look around at some other key games

0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:53.080
<v Speaker 1>to keep an eye on Week one in the NFL. Obviously,

0:17:53.119 --> 0:17:56.080
<v Speaker 1>as we are taping this, the kickoff opener Thursday night

0:17:56.200 --> 0:17:59.760
<v Speaker 1>between the Chiefs and the Texans has not taken place yet,

0:17:59.800 --> 0:18:03.280
<v Speaker 1>but by the time um Sunday rolls around, we will

0:18:03.280 --> 0:18:06.200
<v Speaker 1>know if the Kansas City Chiefs have started their title

0:18:06.240 --> 0:18:08.680
<v Speaker 1>defense with a victory. But it's a big week in

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 1>the NFC North Minnesota and Green Bay obviously, but Chicago

0:18:12.080 --> 0:18:15.000
<v Speaker 1>also traveling to Detroit, so all the NFC North teams

0:18:15.240 --> 0:18:17.400
<v Speaker 1>are playing against each other. I think, you know all

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:20.080
<v Speaker 1>the talk in Chicago about who's gonna play quarterback, and

0:18:20.119 --> 0:18:23.600
<v Speaker 1>they're going with Trubisky right now, and and Folds is

0:18:23.800 --> 0:18:26.960
<v Speaker 1>the backup and we'll see how long um that actually

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:29.560
<v Speaker 1>is the case. But a lot of other really interesting

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:31.800
<v Speaker 1>games in the NFC. I'll throw these out there and

0:18:31.880 --> 0:18:34.200
<v Speaker 1>let you talk about which ones interest you the most.

0:18:34.640 --> 0:18:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Seattle is at Atlanta, an interesting cross divisional matchup there,

0:18:38.960 --> 0:18:42.680
<v Speaker 1>big one in the NFC West, San Francisco hosting Arizona.

0:18:43.000 --> 0:18:46.720
<v Speaker 1>I think Arizona very tough division obviously in the NFC West,

0:18:46.760 --> 0:18:49.919
<v Speaker 1>but I think Arizona with Kyler Murray the way Lamar

0:18:50.000 --> 0:18:52.679
<v Speaker 1>Jackson kind of took the league by storm in year two.

0:18:53.000 --> 0:18:55.440
<v Speaker 1>You never know, maybe Kyler Murray is that type of guy.

0:18:55.440 --> 0:19:00.600
<v Speaker 1>In Dallas is at the Rams, Mike McCarthy's first game

0:19:00.680 --> 0:19:03.400
<v Speaker 1>as head coach of the Dallas Cowboys on the road

0:19:03.440 --> 0:19:06.320
<v Speaker 1>out in l A. And then of course New Orleans

0:19:06.720 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 1>at Tampa Bay. Big matchup in the NFC South, Drew

0:19:09.560 --> 0:19:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Brees versus Tom Brady making his debut for the Tampa

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:16.399
<v Speaker 1>Bay Buccaneer. There's so many good matchups, Mike. I mean,

0:19:16.440 --> 0:19:19.120
<v Speaker 1>whoever was putting these schedules together, I mean the week one,

0:19:19.200 --> 0:19:21.679
<v Speaker 1>they it was power packed with how they approached this.

0:19:22.040 --> 0:19:23.919
<v Speaker 1>Somebody even pointed out inside or inbox, I mean this

0:19:23.960 --> 0:19:26.399
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be an incredible matchup between the Saints and

0:19:26.400 --> 0:19:28.679
<v Speaker 1>Buccaneers for so many reasons, but also the fact that

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:31.360
<v Speaker 1>the two starting quarterbacks are like a combined forty five

0:19:31.440 --> 0:19:33.960
<v Speaker 1>years or eighty five years old. Excuse me, uh that

0:19:34.040 --> 0:19:37.040
<v Speaker 1>there's just there's so much experience on that field. I

0:19:37.080 --> 0:19:40.000
<v Speaker 1>would it's not the most attractive matchup. But I do

0:19:40.040 --> 0:19:42.359
<v Speaker 1>want to actually touch on that Cardinals game quick because

0:19:42.560 --> 0:19:45.800
<v Speaker 1>DeAndre Hopkins goes and gets his extension after they acquired him,

0:19:46.040 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Larry Fitzgerald, back Christian Kirk, the way that they have

0:19:49.600 --> 0:19:52.119
<v Speaker 1>built that offense now not only for Kyler Murray, but

0:19:52.160 --> 0:19:54.280
<v Speaker 1>then also you know, when you when you look at

0:19:54.280 --> 0:19:57.120
<v Speaker 1>the way that they're structured and what they're trying to achieve,

0:19:57.280 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 1>their uh, they just they can be a really dynamic

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:02.280
<v Speaker 1>team and they still have you know, you look at

0:20:02.280 --> 0:20:05.720
<v Speaker 1>their defense and Chandler Jones and the pieces are there.

0:20:05.760 --> 0:20:07.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying it's a complete puzzle yet, but I

0:20:07.840 --> 0:20:09.760
<v Speaker 1>think the Cardinals are going to give a lot of

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:13.320
<v Speaker 1>people in that division problems this year in San Francisco

0:20:13.359 --> 0:20:15.840
<v Speaker 1>forty Niners. Man, that's a good test for their defense

0:20:15.960 --> 0:20:18.560
<v Speaker 1>right out of the gate. Again, there's a lot of

0:20:18.560 --> 0:20:21.399
<v Speaker 1>compelling matchups. But that's one that secretly, if you're like

0:20:21.480 --> 0:20:23.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of picking like a quiet one that you're sort

0:20:23.480 --> 0:20:25.840
<v Speaker 1>of looking at, seeing what kind of litmus test that

0:20:25.920 --> 0:20:27.280
<v Speaker 1>is for both of those teams out of the gate,

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:29.320
<v Speaker 1>is something I might be paying attention to. Yeah, and

0:20:29.320 --> 0:20:32.000
<v Speaker 1>everybody's gonna be wondering what the forty niners that whole

0:20:32.040 --> 0:20:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl hangover effect. You know, when you're the team

0:20:35.119 --> 0:20:36.720
<v Speaker 1>that goes to the Super Bowl and you lose, and

0:20:36.760 --> 0:20:38.560
<v Speaker 1>certainly it was a really tough loss. They had the

0:20:38.640 --> 0:20:41.119
<v Speaker 1>lead in the fourth quarter and they let it get away.

0:20:41.160 --> 0:20:43.800
<v Speaker 1>And we've seen over the years teams that have gone

0:20:43.840 --> 0:20:45.600
<v Speaker 1>to the Super Bowl and gotten beat. There are a

0:20:45.640 --> 0:20:48.439
<v Speaker 1>lot of times that team not only doesn't live up

0:20:48.480 --> 0:20:50.080
<v Speaker 1>to it the next year, but they don't even make

0:20:50.080 --> 0:20:53.200
<v Speaker 1>the postseason because the other teams in their division take

0:20:53.320 --> 0:20:57.480
<v Speaker 1>steps forward. San Francisco forty seven years ago. Yeah exactly,

0:20:57.480 --> 0:21:00.199
<v Speaker 1>I mean that that's you know, so I do think, uh,

0:21:00.200 --> 0:21:03.399
<v Speaker 1>there there's some great matchups here. You don't always like

0:21:03.520 --> 0:21:06.280
<v Speaker 1>to see all these great division games right away because

0:21:06.359 --> 0:21:08.200
<v Speaker 1>you know you only have six of them and whatnot,

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:10.560
<v Speaker 1>but you know what, it sure makes for a makes

0:21:10.600 --> 0:21:13.840
<v Speaker 1>for a compelling week one here as we get kicked off. Yeah,

0:21:13.840 --> 0:21:15.520
<v Speaker 1>and you know we were talking about the teams that

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:17.880
<v Speaker 1>have been kind of seen his offseason Darling's the Detroit

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Lions are one of them. So I mean, this is

0:21:20.040 --> 0:21:21.919
<v Speaker 1>a team at the Chicago Bears that they have some

0:21:22.000 --> 0:21:26.200
<v Speaker 1>legitimate questions on both sides of the ball. Defensively obviously

0:21:26.240 --> 0:21:27.879
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more sure handed there. But if the

0:21:27.920 --> 0:21:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Lions can come out and make a statement like that

0:21:29.880 --> 0:21:33.240
<v Speaker 1>week one, I think myself in particular, that'd be a

0:21:33.280 --> 0:21:35.080
<v Speaker 1>huge wake up call for me. Is you know people

0:21:35.080 --> 0:21:37.560
<v Speaker 1>have been boarding that hype train in the last few months. Yeah, well,

0:21:37.560 --> 0:21:40.480
<v Speaker 1>they're getting their quarterback back, Matthew Stafford. You know when

0:21:40.480 --> 0:21:43.840
<v Speaker 1>he he left the Lions with an injury last season

0:21:43.880 --> 0:21:46.399
<v Speaker 1>and then they were not the same, not anything close

0:21:46.440 --> 0:21:48.560
<v Speaker 1>to the same. And he'd been playing at a pretty

0:21:48.640 --> 0:21:51.480
<v Speaker 1>darn good high level when he did get hurt. And

0:21:51.520 --> 0:21:54.520
<v Speaker 1>the Packers just can't quit. Adrian Peterson, he just always

0:21:54.520 --> 0:21:56.760
<v Speaker 1>finds a way to work his way back onto the schedule,

0:21:56.760 --> 0:21:59.280
<v Speaker 1>always always going to face him. You know, it's it

0:21:59.320 --> 0:22:01.199
<v Speaker 1>will be will be ten years from now we'll be

0:22:01.280 --> 0:22:04.159
<v Speaker 1>talking about the Packers facing Adrian Peterson again. I was

0:22:04.160 --> 0:22:06.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna say the year is two thousand and thirty. Adrian

0:22:06.520 --> 0:22:08.639
<v Speaker 1>Peterson is forty five years old, and he's still you know,

0:22:08.720 --> 0:22:11.200
<v Speaker 1>picking up some reps for the Chicago Bears and putting

0:22:11.240 --> 0:22:14.080
<v Speaker 1>up seventy yards. Yeah, who knows. All right, well, it

0:22:14.119 --> 0:22:16.800
<v Speaker 1>should be a fun week one in the NFL. We

0:22:16.840 --> 0:22:19.920
<v Speaker 1>are glad it is finally here, and certainly thank you

0:22:20.200 --> 0:22:23.320
<v Speaker 1>for tuning into our show. We will be back next

0:22:23.359 --> 0:22:26.840
<v Speaker 1>week for WES. I am Mike. Take care, We will

0:22:27.040 --> 0:22:27.800
<v Speaker 1>see you next time.