WEBVTT - Who Really Made the Real ‘Daffy’s Elixir’ and What Was Really In It?

0:00:02.240 --> 0:00:06.559
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Criminalia, a production of Shondaland Audio in partnership

0:00:06.600 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>with iHeartRadio.

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:17.600
<v Speaker 2>Daffy's Elixir was one of the most popular patent medicines

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:20.640
<v Speaker 2>in Britain during the eighteenth century, and it was produced

0:00:20.640 --> 0:00:23.920
<v Speaker 2>for nearly three hundred years, which is amazing considering these

0:00:23.960 --> 0:00:26.520
<v Speaker 2>types of products were usually often just a flash in

0:00:26.520 --> 0:00:29.960
<v Speaker 2>a pan. But what makes Daffies different than others we've

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:34.040
<v Speaker 2>talked about this season, other than perhaps its longevity, is

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 2>that its ingredients list was not a secret initially maybe,

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:40.960
<v Speaker 2>but it didn't stay that way for very long, and

0:00:41.000 --> 0:00:45.599
<v Speaker 2>the manufacturers plural seemed to be okay with that. And

0:00:45.680 --> 0:00:49.040
<v Speaker 2>then there's the question of ownership. Who thought of it

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:53.160
<v Speaker 2>and whose recipe was the original? As the story goes,

0:00:53.280 --> 0:00:57.160
<v Speaker 2>it was probably created by clergyman Thomas Daffy of red Myle,

0:00:57.280 --> 0:01:01.480
<v Speaker 2>Leicestershire in sixteen forty seven. They named it Elixer Salutes

0:01:01.760 --> 0:01:05.759
<v Speaker 2>or Elixir of Health, and things took off from there,

0:01:05.880 --> 0:01:09.240
<v Speaker 2>not only with dozens of different formulas, but also published

0:01:09.280 --> 0:01:11.559
<v Speaker 2>recipes to help you make some in your own home.

0:01:12.080 --> 0:01:15.840
<v Speaker 2>That's unheard of. Welcome to Criminalia. I'm a Rage Marky.

0:01:16.319 --> 0:01:19.880
<v Speaker 1>And I'm Holly Fried. It was a novel idea to

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:24.760
<v Speaker 1>publish ingredients and recipes for patent medicines in newspapers and pamphlets.

0:01:25.360 --> 0:01:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Most products didn't even put that information on the label,

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:32.200
<v Speaker 1>but in the nineteenth century, recipes began to be widely

0:01:32.200 --> 0:01:36.640
<v Speaker 1>distributed in places like household management books, and that included

0:01:36.800 --> 0:01:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Elixer salutes. But these recipes did not always have an

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:45.640
<v Speaker 1>associated name or source. So who should claim themselves as

0:01:45.640 --> 0:01:49.880
<v Speaker 1>the sole manufacturer of the genuine elixir of health? Well,

0:01:50.080 --> 0:01:53.400
<v Speaker 1>that's complicated, and we're going to talk about why. During

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 1>this time of patent medicine popularity, there were, of course rivals,

0:01:57.600 --> 0:02:01.800
<v Speaker 1>there were counterfeitters, and each reclaimed to consumers that the

0:02:01.880 --> 0:02:06.960
<v Speaker 1>other was of quote spurious imitation. Ownership of a recipe

0:02:06.960 --> 0:02:11.200
<v Speaker 1>could be claimed by its inventor or by anyone any relative,

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:14.680
<v Speaker 1>an employee, or a business partner in the manufacturing company.

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Basically legit or not. Anyone who had access to the

0:02:18.919 --> 0:02:21.720
<v Speaker 1>recipe could say that they owned it, and there wasn't

0:02:21.840 --> 0:02:24.800
<v Speaker 1>actually much to be done to correct those falsehoods once

0:02:24.840 --> 0:02:29.200
<v Speaker 1>they happened, which makes the historical record on Elixer salutis

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:30.920
<v Speaker 1>a bit of an adventure.

0:02:32.160 --> 0:02:36.040
<v Speaker 2>Manufactured and sold for roughly three hundred years. The elixir

0:02:36.160 --> 0:02:40.480
<v Speaker 2>became popularly known as Daffy's Elixir and was one of

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:43.320
<v Speaker 2>the longest surviving and one of the most successful of

0:02:43.400 --> 0:02:47.679
<v Speaker 2>all patent medicines. So let's start at the beginning. When

0:02:47.720 --> 0:02:51.480
<v Speaker 2>Thomas Daffy died in sixteen eighty, his recipe stayed in

0:02:51.560 --> 0:02:55.119
<v Speaker 2>the Daffy family, but not for long. It was such

0:02:55.200 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 2>a popular product that herbalists and chemists had begun making

0:02:58.919 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 2>their own versions for them their apothecary shelves, even though

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:06.200
<v Speaker 2>their ingredients often bore little to no resemblance to the

0:03:06.240 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 2>Thomas Daffy original. It's believed only three people knew the

0:03:10.760 --> 0:03:14.480
<v Speaker 2>original recipe after Daffy's death, his daughter Catherine, and two

0:03:14.560 --> 0:03:18.400
<v Speaker 2>other family members, Anthony and Daniel Daffy. Daniel was his son,

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:22.720
<v Speaker 2>and Anthony was very likely a nephew, probably not a son.

0:03:23.400 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 2>Records dating back three hundred years can be a little

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:31.560
<v Speaker 2>bit fuzzy sometimes, Both, though, were apothecaries in Nottingham.

0:03:30.800 --> 0:03:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Way back in the historical timeline when the product was

0:03:33.800 --> 0:03:38.000
<v Speaker 1>first introduced. Daffy's Elixir was listed in the Oxford English

0:03:38.080 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Dictionary as a remedy for toothaches, in particular for teething babies,

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:46.720
<v Speaker 1>and its origin was listed as seventeenth century English clergyman

0:03:47.160 --> 0:03:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Thomas Daffy, and maybe he intended it to be for

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 1>toothaches or not. That's actually hard to know because its

0:03:54.800 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 1>usage changes over time, as we're going to talk about.

0:03:58.280 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 1>By sixteen eighty though, around the same time of Thomas's death,

0:04:02.080 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Thomas Daffy's name was replaced with Anthony Daffy in the OED.

0:04:07.880 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Close to the turn of the eighteenth century, Anthony moved

0:04:10.920 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 1>to London and began to advertise Elixer Salutis as Daffy's

0:04:15.640 --> 0:04:19.599
<v Speaker 1>Elixir Salutis. He began to market it beyond word of

0:04:19.640 --> 0:04:23.800
<v Speaker 1>mouth by distributing pamphlets listing the patent medicine as a

0:04:23.920 --> 0:04:28.359
<v Speaker 1>laxative rather than a remedy for toothaches. It was nicknamed

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:33.800
<v Speaker 1>quote the famous purging cordial. Anthony's advertising brought it out

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:37.919
<v Speaker 1>of the shadows and into the national and eventually international market,

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:41.200
<v Speaker 1>and people began using it for all sorts of things.

0:04:42.320 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 2>When Anthony died, the secret recipe became an open secret.

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:49.120
<v Speaker 2>It wasn't very secret before his death, though, to the

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:50.600
<v Speaker 2>chagrin of the Daffi family.

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Quote.

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:54.760
<v Speaker 2>Despite all the efforts of Anthony Daffy and his family

0:04:54.800 --> 0:04:58.279
<v Speaker 2>to keep it to themselves, it still got out. Before

0:04:58.360 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 2>seventeen hundred, there are published records of more than one

0:05:01.520 --> 0:05:04.960
<v Speaker 2>version of the Elixir, but then over the next two

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:09.320
<v Speaker 2>hundred years, many versions were published in dozens of household

0:05:09.360 --> 0:05:12.799
<v Speaker 2>medicine books, pharmacopeias, and books of household management.

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:18.200
<v Speaker 1>After Anthony's death, it's believed that his widow, Eleanor, continued

0:05:18.240 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 1>to market the product until their daughter, also named Catherine,

0:05:22.240 --> 0:05:27.240
<v Speaker 1>took over the business in seventeen oh seven. Probably this

0:05:27.279 --> 0:05:29.760
<v Speaker 1>is a turn in the elixir journey that is a

0:05:29.760 --> 0:05:32.839
<v Speaker 1>little bit ill defined, but we do know that in

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:36.960
<v Speaker 1>the early seventeen hundreds, the Elixir began being advertised widely

0:05:37.400 --> 0:05:41.520
<v Speaker 1>in not only local pamphlets, but also in emerging national

0:05:41.560 --> 0:05:43.080
<v Speaker 1>newspapers and journals.

0:05:43.920 --> 0:05:48.000
<v Speaker 2>Anthony and Eleanor's daughter Katherine is considered responsible for placing

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:50.839
<v Speaker 2>an ad, well sort of an ad you'll see what

0:05:50.880 --> 0:05:54.400
<v Speaker 2>we mean in the Postboy in seventeen oh seven, or

0:05:55.080 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 2>maybe very early seventeen oh eight, telling the origin story

0:05:59.279 --> 0:06:02.479
<v Speaker 2>of the tonic, which will paraphrase, and it went a

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:06.800
<v Speaker 2>bit like this that during the inventor Thomas Daffy's lifetime.

0:06:06.960 --> 0:06:09.840
<v Speaker 2>The elixir had been sold by his son Daniel in

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:14.840
<v Speaker 2>apothecary at Nottingham. The ad claimed his kin, Anthony Daffy,

0:06:15.000 --> 0:06:19.039
<v Speaker 2>also knew the secret ingredients and preparation. It's also said

0:06:19.080 --> 0:06:23.160
<v Speaker 2>that at the time Anthony's widow, Eleanor, disputed Thomas Daffy's

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:27.400
<v Speaker 2>daughter's right to name herself proprietus of the elixir, though

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:30.520
<v Speaker 2>we don't know why she felt that way, or why

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:34.640
<v Speaker 2>it would even be written in marketing materials, but there

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:35.000
<v Speaker 2>it is.

0:06:36.200 --> 0:06:39.479
<v Speaker 1>The new and rapidly growing medium of newspapers offered a

0:06:39.520 --> 0:06:43.120
<v Speaker 1>way to expand the reach of your advertising. Patent medicines,

0:06:43.200 --> 0:06:47.960
<v Speaker 1>or otherwise beyond anything that was previously available, you could

0:06:48.000 --> 0:06:53.360
<v Speaker 1>reach national and international consumers at least potentially. One advertisement,

0:06:53.400 --> 0:06:56.360
<v Speaker 1>placed in an addition of the Manchester Mercury in seventeen

0:06:56.440 --> 0:07:00.920
<v Speaker 1>fifty seven, begins describing the product as a cure quote

0:07:01.080 --> 0:07:04.400
<v Speaker 1>the original elixir so much approved of in both town

0:07:04.440 --> 0:07:07.839
<v Speaker 1>and country, which has performed such number of great cures

0:07:07.880 --> 0:07:13.200
<v Speaker 1>when all other medicines have failed, recommended by several eminent physicians.

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:16.200
<v Speaker 2>We're going to take a break for a word from

0:07:16.200 --> 0:07:19.440
<v Speaker 2>our sponsors. When we're back. We'll talk about how many

0:07:19.520 --> 0:07:24.000
<v Speaker 2>manufacturers really produced Daffy's Elixir and how many claimed they

0:07:24.000 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 2>were the.

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Original Welcome back to Criminalia. Let's talk Diceyan Company, and

0:07:42.000 --> 0:07:45.280
<v Speaker 1>how while they were definitely not the original makers of

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:48.440
<v Speaker 1>the elixir, they became its number one source.

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:52.960
<v Speaker 2>By the seventeen twenties, there were at least half a

0:07:53.000 --> 0:07:57.840
<v Speaker 2>dozen different Daffi's Elixir manufacturers competing to be the number

0:07:57.920 --> 0:08:05.040
<v Speaker 2>one seller, names like Ray Rock, Barclay, Bradshaw, Jackson, Swinton, Smith, Staples.

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:08.720
<v Speaker 2>Throughout the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, all of these

0:08:08.800 --> 0:08:11.880
<v Speaker 2>names came and went as producers of the elixir, but

0:08:12.200 --> 0:08:16.160
<v Speaker 2>one company dominated the others, William and klud Dicey and

0:08:16.240 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 2>Company of Bow Churchyard in London. By seventeen seventy five

0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:24.360
<v Speaker 2>ish they claimed they had the soul rights of manufacture

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:28.040
<v Speaker 2>of what was now being called true Daffy's Elixir, though

0:08:28.320 --> 0:08:32.960
<v Speaker 2>there's no official record of anyone having soul rights. There

0:08:33.000 --> 0:08:36.640
<v Speaker 2>is though record that the Daffy family knew there were

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:40.600
<v Speaker 2>fake versions out there. An advertisement as early as seventeen

0:08:40.679 --> 0:08:44.839
<v Speaker 2>hundred featured the warning quote reader, beware of counterfeiters, for

0:08:45.040 --> 0:08:47.960
<v Speaker 2>they swarm.

0:08:47.360 --> 0:08:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about this dominating producer, Dicey in Company, from

0:08:52.040 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 1>at least the early nineteenth century until the mid twentieth century,

0:08:55.480 --> 0:08:59.160
<v Speaker 1>when it disappears from the market. Most of Daffy's elixir

0:08:59.280 --> 0:09:03.360
<v Speaker 1>sold is thought to have been manufactured by Dices. The

0:09:03.440 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 1>company saturated the market so well that what had always

0:09:06.800 --> 0:09:13.040
<v Speaker 1>been nicknamed Daffi's was now popularly known as Dicey's, Daffy's, Dicey's, Daffy's.

0:09:13.200 --> 0:09:16.320
<v Speaker 1>The Daffies that became Diceys seems to have first appeared

0:09:16.360 --> 0:09:19.959
<v Speaker 1>during the seventeen twenties, so that's about twenty to thirty

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:25.439
<v Speaker 1>years after all of those allegedly secret recipes were first produced. DICE's,

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 1>as we mentioned, was just one of many producing the product,

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 1>and people were okay with this. It was generally accepted

0:09:33.160 --> 0:09:35.719
<v Speaker 1>that there was more than one version of their go

0:09:35.800 --> 0:09:39.320
<v Speaker 1>to patent medicine. For an analogy, think of it the

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:42.040
<v Speaker 1>way we have different brands of say aspirin on the

0:09:42.080 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 1>market today.

0:09:44.520 --> 0:09:47.680
<v Speaker 2>But by the turn of the nineteenth century, two names

0:09:47.880 --> 0:09:50.520
<v Speaker 2>show up repeatedly when it comes to the elixir and

0:09:50.559 --> 0:09:56.240
<v Speaker 2>its preparation, Dicey Yes and also a brand named Swinton.

0:09:57.240 --> 0:10:01.080
<v Speaker 2>Consumers may not have noticed a difference, but there actually

0:10:01.160 --> 0:10:04.640
<v Speaker 2>was one. Dicey's version was based in senna leaves, while

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:08.120
<v Speaker 2>Swinton's elixir base was jolip root, and we'll talk about

0:10:08.120 --> 0:10:12.240
<v Speaker 2>how both are part of an early ingredients list. But

0:10:12.400 --> 0:10:16.360
<v Speaker 2>Swinton's Daffy's elixir had one thing in its favor. It

0:10:16.440 --> 0:10:19.760
<v Speaker 2>had a direct link to the Daffy family. And here's how.

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:24.920
<v Speaker 2>A man named Peter Swinton married Mary Acton around seventeen

0:10:25.000 --> 0:10:29.320
<v Speaker 2>sixty three, and Mary was the niece of Anthony Daffy.

0:10:29.360 --> 0:10:32.560
<v Speaker 2>This Anthony Daffy was the grandson of the Anthony who

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 2>was Thomas Daffy's nephew. It's somewhat confusing because we have

0:10:37.160 --> 0:10:39.600
<v Speaker 2>a lot of similar names, but hang in there with us.

0:10:39.600 --> 0:10:43.439
<v Speaker 2>We'll try to figure it all out. According to records,

0:10:43.679 --> 0:10:46.400
<v Speaker 2>Mary seems to have been the maker of the elixir

0:10:46.400 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 2>for the Swinton brand until her death in seventeen eighty,

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:54.240
<v Speaker 2>after which Peter claimed proprietorship of the product. Peter died

0:10:54.280 --> 0:10:56.439
<v Speaker 2>a few years after his wife and left the rights

0:10:56.480 --> 0:10:59.960
<v Speaker 2>to the elixir to his son, who was another Anthony,

0:11:00.400 --> 0:11:05.160
<v Speaker 2>Anthony Daffy Swinton. This Anthony continued to produce and sell

0:11:05.280 --> 0:11:10.800
<v Speaker 2>Swinton's original Daffy's Elixir until roughly eighteen fourteen, and after

0:11:10.840 --> 0:11:13.960
<v Speaker 2>which writes to produce the product appeared to have gone

0:11:13.960 --> 0:11:15.520
<v Speaker 2>to Smith and Company.

0:11:16.880 --> 0:11:21.319
<v Speaker 1>Manufacturing later turned over to Messrs W. Sutton in Company

0:11:21.360 --> 0:11:24.719
<v Speaker 1>of Enfield, Middlesex, who continued to market it throughout the

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:28.880
<v Speaker 1>later nineteenth century. It remained in production in a similar

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:31.600
<v Speaker 1>form as in previous years, and we'll get into how

0:11:31.640 --> 0:11:35.400
<v Speaker 1>its ingredients and preparations varied by manufacturer in just a bit.

0:11:36.200 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Eventually it made its way to the American market, most

0:11:39.480 --> 0:11:44.199
<v Speaker 1>likely through Diceian Company. Prior to the American Revolutionary War,

0:11:44.400 --> 0:11:48.200
<v Speaker 1>the elixir was exported from Britain to colonial America, but

0:11:48.320 --> 0:11:52.160
<v Speaker 1>after eighteen hundred it was manufactured. It appears in Pennsylvania

0:11:52.320 --> 0:11:57.080
<v Speaker 1>by the Diattville Glassworks. Thomas W. Diot, owner of said

0:11:57.120 --> 0:12:00.320
<v Speaker 1>glass works in the eighteen thirties, was well known for

0:12:00.440 --> 0:12:03.920
<v Speaker 1>tempering the bottles for patent medicines that he sold around

0:12:03.920 --> 0:12:04.520
<v Speaker 1>the country.

0:12:05.600 --> 0:12:07.440
<v Speaker 2>We are going to take a break for a word

0:12:07.480 --> 0:12:10.600
<v Speaker 2>from our sponsors now, and when we return, we'll talk

0:12:10.640 --> 0:12:14.360
<v Speaker 2>about the ingredients used to make this elixir and how

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:17.640
<v Speaker 2>some differed from what was considered the original.

0:12:29.200 --> 0:12:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to Criminalia. Let's talk about ingredients like senna

0:12:33.800 --> 0:12:37.120
<v Speaker 1>and jalap and how manufacturers of the elixir over the

0:12:37.200 --> 0:12:39.679
<v Speaker 1>years changed its health claims.

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:43.760
<v Speaker 2>As we mentioned earlier in the episode, the top two

0:12:43.840 --> 0:12:48.240
<v Speaker 2>producers of this elixir were the Dicey and the Swinton brands.

0:12:49.160 --> 0:12:53.560
<v Speaker 2>Most published recipes that actually had attribution were associated with

0:12:53.600 --> 0:12:57.800
<v Speaker 2>these two specific manufacturer names as well, But one common

0:12:57.880 --> 0:13:01.679
<v Speaker 2>observation of the recipes from the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries

0:13:02.280 --> 0:13:05.680
<v Speaker 2>was that Daffy's Elixir was very similar to a product

0:13:05.760 --> 0:13:09.000
<v Speaker 2>called tincture of Senna, which was sold by apothecaries and

0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:13.360
<v Speaker 2>druggists during that time. Sena tincture was an herbal remedy

0:13:13.559 --> 0:13:18.360
<v Speaker 2>used to relieve constipation and contained generally the leaves of

0:13:18.400 --> 0:13:23.000
<v Speaker 2>Senna alexandrina in an alcohol base. Its use went way

0:13:23.040 --> 0:13:25.680
<v Speaker 2>back before the time of a patent medicine's craze, but

0:13:25.760 --> 0:13:28.640
<v Speaker 2>it was available around the time many of these wannabe

0:13:28.720 --> 0:13:33.199
<v Speaker 2>Daffy's Elixir manufacturers were busy being wannabes. They could have

0:13:33.280 --> 0:13:36.559
<v Speaker 2>easily read about it, for instance, in Nicholas Culpeper's English

0:13:36.600 --> 0:13:40.680
<v Speaker 2>Physician and Complete Herbal which was written in seventeen eighty nine.

0:13:42.080 --> 0:13:45.960
<v Speaker 1>An early recipe for what was called true Daffy, dating

0:13:45.960 --> 0:13:50.240
<v Speaker 1>to seventeen hundred lists the following ingredients. This was only

0:13:50.320 --> 0:13:55.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty years, mind you, after Thomas Daffy died. Quote aniseed, brandy,

0:13:55.679 --> 0:14:05.440
<v Speaker 1>coconeel ella, campaign, fennel seed, jalla, manna, parsley seed, raisin, rhubarb, saffron, senna,

0:14:05.480 --> 0:14:10.080
<v Speaker 1>and Spanish liquorice. Modern analysis suggests, though they were mostly

0:14:10.080 --> 0:14:13.680
<v Speaker 1>made from alcohol, many forms of the elixir could function

0:14:13.880 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 1>as a laxative of note. Other older recipes included guwackened

0:14:19.200 --> 0:14:23.440
<v Speaker 1>wood chips, caraway seeds, and on occasion, coriander seeds.

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:31.760
<v Speaker 2>So laxative that seems plausible toothaches debatable. Let's break down

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:36.440
<v Speaker 2>these ingredients a bit. Using an alcoholic distillation as an

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:40.160
<v Speaker 2>ingredient would have helped to preserve the elixir. Aniseed is

0:14:40.200 --> 0:14:43.720
<v Speaker 2>a folk remedy often used for indigestion, so that's on

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:47.480
<v Speaker 2>brand for a purgative. Jollip, mana, and senna all have

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:53.400
<v Speaker 2>laxative qualities. Raisins would have added sweetness, but also fiber. Rhubarb,

0:14:53.720 --> 0:14:56.480
<v Speaker 2>like raisins, would also have been a good source of fiber.

0:14:56.800 --> 0:15:00.240
<v Speaker 2>Those other ingredients, some of them may or may not

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 2>have anti inflammatory benefits. Coconeil does not have laxative properties,

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:08.120
<v Speaker 2>but it's long been used to give things a really

0:15:08.240 --> 0:15:12.760
<v Speaker 2>deep red color. Add those alternative ingredients we mentioned too,

0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:18.760
<v Speaker 2>Guiacum wood chips were historically used to treat syphilis, not constipation,

0:15:19.560 --> 0:15:23.880
<v Speaker 2>and caraway and coriander may have helped with digestive conditions

0:15:24.040 --> 0:15:24.920
<v Speaker 2>like heartburn.

0:15:26.400 --> 0:15:29.840
<v Speaker 1>In later years, the ingredients list differed depending on which

0:15:29.920 --> 0:15:34.560
<v Speaker 1>manufacturer you got your tonic from, but most often contained

0:15:34.560 --> 0:15:37.560
<v Speaker 1>a similar list to that one from seventeen hundred. It

0:15:37.600 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 1>was really amazingly consistent. The whole thing doesn't sound very tasty. Well.

0:15:43.160 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 1>It was said to be an acquired taste. Any alcohol

0:15:46.720 --> 0:15:49.160
<v Speaker 1>could be used, but the alcohols of choice for a

0:15:49.280 --> 0:15:53.880
<v Speaker 1>true elixir salutis were gin or brandy. In fact, in

0:15:53.960 --> 0:15:57.320
<v Speaker 1>the eighteen hundreds, when the product was at peak popularity,

0:15:57.840 --> 0:16:00.560
<v Speaker 1>gin was so popular as an ingredient that the name

0:16:00.640 --> 0:16:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Daffies became British slang for Jim.

0:16:04.160 --> 0:16:09.160
<v Speaker 2>Antique. Bottle Collector's ABC magazine published in twenty nineteen that

0:16:09.240 --> 0:16:13.880
<v Speaker 2>they had discovered, at least so far nearly thirty recipes

0:16:13.920 --> 0:16:18.960
<v Speaker 2>for Daffy's elixir across the seventeenth, eighteenth, and nineteenth centuries,

0:16:19.040 --> 0:16:24.360
<v Speaker 2>including one that was handwritten, and unlike most other proprietary medicines,

0:16:24.400 --> 0:16:28.200
<v Speaker 2>you could if you wanted to just make them at home.

0:16:28.520 --> 0:16:32.840
<v Speaker 2>There were multiple recipes available to make small batches. The

0:16:32.960 --> 0:16:37.120
<v Speaker 2>Lady's Friend and Family Physical Library, published in seventeen eighty eight,

0:16:37.200 --> 0:16:40.480
<v Speaker 2>notes that quote this is an agreeable purge if there

0:16:40.560 --> 0:16:42.920
<v Speaker 2>is such a thing, and nothing more can be useful

0:16:42.920 --> 0:16:46.400
<v Speaker 2>than to keep it ready made for family use. Modern

0:16:46.480 --> 0:16:50.440
<v Speaker 2>Domestic Cookery and Useful Receipt Book from eighteen twenty nine

0:16:50.640 --> 0:16:55.040
<v Speaker 2>printed another version from William Augustus Henderson called quote the

0:16:55.160 --> 0:16:59.360
<v Speaker 2>true Daffy's elixir, and this was considered by many to

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:02.720
<v Speaker 2>be the true do it yourself recipe.

0:17:03.840 --> 0:17:07.960
<v Speaker 1>So what's in that homebrew? Henderson's was as follows, quote

0:17:08.119 --> 0:17:12.280
<v Speaker 1>take five ounces of aniseeds, three ounces of fennel seeds,

0:17:12.840 --> 0:17:17.200
<v Speaker 1>four ounces of parsley seeds, six ounces of Spanish liquorice,

0:17:17.520 --> 0:17:21.760
<v Speaker 1>five ounces of senna, one ounce of rhubarb, three ounces

0:17:21.800 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 1>of ella campaign root, seven ounces of kiln, twenty one

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:31.000
<v Speaker 1>DRAMs of saffron, six ounces of manna, two pounds of raisins,

0:17:31.160 --> 0:17:33.560
<v Speaker 1>a quarter of an ounce of cocaine, eel and two

0:17:33.600 --> 0:17:37.439
<v Speaker 1>gallons of brandy stone the raisins, slice the mots and

0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:41.399
<v Speaker 1>bruise the jallab, then mix the hole together, and after

0:17:41.560 --> 0:17:45.600
<v Speaker 1>letting them stand close covered for fifteen days, strain out

0:17:45.640 --> 0:17:49.400
<v Speaker 1>the elixir. If you look closely at it, that ingredient

0:17:49.440 --> 0:17:53.639
<v Speaker 1>list isn't too different from what manufacturers were producing, and

0:17:53.800 --> 0:17:56.920
<v Speaker 1>other make it yourself versions that we found contained spirit

0:17:57.000 --> 0:18:02.080
<v Speaker 1>of malt, sac or white wine, and liquorice shred. When

0:18:02.080 --> 0:18:04.520
<v Speaker 1>it came to method, of course, it varied a bit

0:18:04.560 --> 0:18:07.240
<v Speaker 1>among the home recipes as well.

0:18:07.400 --> 0:18:10.960
<v Speaker 2>Analysis of those recipes dating from as early as the

0:18:11.040 --> 0:18:16.000
<v Speaker 2>sixteen eighties, which is shortly after Thomas Daffy's death, through

0:18:16.440 --> 0:18:20.480
<v Speaker 2>eighteen fifty shows there are some ingredients that often overlap,

0:18:20.760 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 2>but there are three primary ingredients in common. And no,

0:18:25.280 --> 0:18:27.840
<v Speaker 2>it's not the fennel, the raisins and the rhubarb. It's

0:18:27.880 --> 0:18:32.520
<v Speaker 2>the senna, the jallab and the copious amounts of alcohol.

0:18:33.440 --> 0:18:37.600
<v Speaker 2>All of the Daffy's Elixir recipes have a high alcohol content,

0:18:37.800 --> 0:18:41.320
<v Speaker 2>ranging from around twenty five percent to more than fifty

0:18:41.320 --> 0:18:45.720
<v Speaker 2>percent by volume. Among the twenty seven recipes uncovered by

0:18:45.800 --> 0:18:50.760
<v Speaker 2>Antique Bottle Collector, twenty six are different versions, although some

0:18:50.800 --> 0:18:54.400
<v Speaker 2>of those recipes have identical ingredient lists with just differing

0:18:54.680 --> 0:18:59.919
<v Speaker 2>proportions and maybe slightly differing method and also sure transcre

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:02.959
<v Speaker 2>ryption errors and other mistakes could have been made when

0:19:03.040 --> 0:19:07.359
<v Speaker 2>recipes were transferred between people and over generations. That's certainly

0:19:07.440 --> 0:19:10.240
<v Speaker 2>a really common problem with documents in general, as they're

0:19:10.280 --> 0:19:11.440
<v Speaker 2>shared and they evolve.

0:19:12.840 --> 0:19:16.159
<v Speaker 1>We can't talk about a patent medicine without talking about

0:19:16.240 --> 0:19:20.160
<v Speaker 1>its dubious medical claims. And as there were many variations

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:24.960
<v Speaker 1>of Daffy's elixir, there were also many claims it was

0:19:25.000 --> 0:19:29.360
<v Speaker 1>originally designed for toothaches, as we said, or maybe stomach ailments,

0:19:29.359 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 1>depending on what you read, but it doesn't matter. Daffy's

0:19:33.000 --> 0:19:36.280
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a single source remedy for long. By the early

0:19:36.359 --> 0:19:39.840
<v Speaker 1>nineteenth century, it was advertised as an elixir intended to

0:19:39.960 --> 0:19:43.400
<v Speaker 1>help the following ailments. And you should brace yourself because

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:46.320
<v Speaker 1>this is going to take a minute. Quote the stone

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:51.040
<v Speaker 1>in babes and children convulsion fits, consumption and bad digestives,

0:19:51.520 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 1>agus piles, surfeits, fits of the mother, and vapors from

0:19:55.520 --> 0:20:00.439
<v Speaker 1>the spleen, green sickness, children's distempers, whether the worms, rickets,

0:20:00.480 --> 0:20:04.720
<v Speaker 1>stones convulsions, gripes, king's evil, joint evil, or any other

0:20:04.800 --> 0:20:10.160
<v Speaker 1>disorder proceeding from wind or crudities, doubt and rheumatism, stone

0:20:10.280 --> 0:20:13.920
<v Speaker 1>or gravel in the kidneys, colic and griping of the bowels.

0:20:14.520 --> 0:20:18.240
<v Speaker 1>The this stick, both as cure and preventative, provided always

0:20:18.520 --> 0:20:21.440
<v Speaker 1>that the patient be moderate in drinking, have a care

0:20:21.520 --> 0:20:25.119
<v Speaker 1>to prevent taking cold, and keep to good diet. Dropsy

0:20:25.280 --> 0:20:29.200
<v Speaker 1>and scurvy. The frequent use of the medicine to treat colic,

0:20:29.280 --> 0:20:33.760
<v Speaker 1>gripes or fret in horses was deplored in early veterinary manuals.

0:20:34.040 --> 0:20:36.919
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, that's right. There were at least two recipes

0:20:36.960 --> 0:20:39.560
<v Speaker 1>found that were intended for veterinary use.

0:20:40.440 --> 0:20:44.639
<v Speaker 2>That is a long list, and as that long list shows,

0:20:44.920 --> 0:20:49.639
<v Speaker 2>in the end, it became, characteristically as most other quack medicines,

0:20:50.080 --> 0:20:53.760
<v Speaker 2>a product promoted as a cure all and a general

0:20:53.800 --> 0:20:57.359
<v Speaker 2>pick me up. Popular as it was while it was

0:20:57.400 --> 0:21:02.240
<v Speaker 2>claimed it could cure everything. This elixir probably couldn't cure anything.

0:21:02.840 --> 0:21:05.119
<v Speaker 2>But what it could do was get you drunk.

0:21:06.080 --> 0:21:07.920
<v Speaker 1>And on that note, would you like a little sip

0:21:07.960 --> 0:21:09.439
<v Speaker 1>of curious what ails you? Well?

0:21:09.520 --> 0:21:12.320
<v Speaker 2>Yes I would.

0:21:16.240 --> 0:21:19.359
<v Speaker 1>Okay, this one gave me such a delicious inspiration and

0:21:19.440 --> 0:21:21.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm very glad and happy to report that it turned

0:21:21.720 --> 0:21:26.959
<v Speaker 1>out really well. So once we mentioned there's an ingredient,

0:21:27.000 --> 0:21:29.520
<v Speaker 1>we mentioned that's not any of the primaries that I

0:21:29.760 --> 0:21:33.000
<v Speaker 1>literally did the meerkat set up and went, let's put

0:21:33.000 --> 0:21:36.159
<v Speaker 1>that in a drink, and that is saffron.

0:21:35.920 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 2>Oh, one of the alternatives.

0:21:37.600 --> 0:21:40.919
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yes, And once that came up, I knew exactly

0:21:40.960 --> 0:21:44.159
<v Speaker 1>what I wanted to do. And because gin was so

0:21:44.320 --> 0:21:47.000
<v Speaker 1>prominent in it and it was very alcohol forward, I

0:21:47.080 --> 0:21:49.280
<v Speaker 1>was like, we need to do a spirit forward drink

0:21:49.600 --> 0:21:52.480
<v Speaker 1>that features gin and saffron, And I thought, ooh, we

0:21:52.520 --> 0:21:55.320
<v Speaker 1>could mess with a gimlet and make something new. First

0:21:55.320 --> 0:21:57.480
<v Speaker 1>of all, you got to do a little infusion before

0:21:57.480 --> 0:21:59.480
<v Speaker 1>you're ready to make your drink. This is a prep

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:02.760
<v Speaker 1>the day before situation. As an aside, I thought when

0:22:02.760 --> 0:22:06.880
<v Speaker 1>I was a kid that saffron was like for millionaires,

0:22:06.960 --> 0:22:10.919
<v Speaker 1>because every time my mom would make saffron bread, she

0:22:10.960 --> 0:22:14.000
<v Speaker 1>would make sure we knew how expensive that saffron had

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:15.600
<v Speaker 1>been and we better appreciate it.

0:22:15.680 --> 0:22:16.840
<v Speaker 2>I felt the same way.

0:22:18.240 --> 0:22:22.240
<v Speaker 1>It is pricey compared to some other ingredients or herbs

0:22:22.359 --> 0:22:24.720
<v Speaker 1>or any kind of mix in you might use. But

0:22:25.440 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 1>it's also a nice case where a little goes quite

0:22:27.560 --> 0:22:29.919
<v Speaker 1>a long way. So for this, you need a pinch

0:22:29.920 --> 0:22:32.200
<v Speaker 1>of saffron, like I would say, less than a third

0:22:32.240 --> 0:22:35.199
<v Speaker 1>of a teaspoon. I get mine, and it comes in

0:22:35.320 --> 0:22:38.800
<v Speaker 1>like pre set little mini envelopes, and so I just

0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:41.199
<v Speaker 1>use it as in the envelope. It averages out to

0:22:41.240 --> 0:22:43.760
<v Speaker 1>like maybe a third of a teaspoon. Maybe you're being

0:22:43.880 --> 0:22:47.000
<v Speaker 1>very generous. You're gonna put that into an airtight container

0:22:47.400 --> 0:22:50.199
<v Speaker 1>with six ounces of gin, so you're gonna make a

0:22:50.200 --> 0:22:53.359
<v Speaker 1>lot more gin than you actually need. But if you,

0:22:53.720 --> 0:22:56.879
<v Speaker 1>as we've said before, if you shrink your amounts a

0:22:56.920 --> 0:22:59.639
<v Speaker 1>lot smaller, you start to mess with the proportions and

0:22:59.680 --> 0:23:01.520
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't quite work as well. So put those in

0:23:01.560 --> 0:23:03.960
<v Speaker 1>your eartight container. Give it a good shake. You'll notice

0:23:04.040 --> 0:23:06.960
<v Speaker 1>right away it starts to turn yellow. Leave it overnight

0:23:07.600 --> 0:23:09.840
<v Speaker 1>if you don't want to wait overnight six to eight hours.

0:23:09.880 --> 0:23:12.720
<v Speaker 1>You can shake it more if you want optional, but

0:23:12.760 --> 0:23:15.240
<v Speaker 1>it's fun to do. Then when you're done, you're still

0:23:15.240 --> 0:23:17.919
<v Speaker 1>gonna have those kind of little spindly threadlike pieces of

0:23:17.960 --> 0:23:21.480
<v Speaker 1>saffron that you'll strain out, and the gin will be

0:23:21.520 --> 0:23:24.879
<v Speaker 1>a beautiful golden yellow color. And it is time to

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:27.680
<v Speaker 1>get ready to make your drink. So into your shaking tin,

0:23:28.359 --> 0:23:31.560
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna put two ounces of this saffron infused gin,

0:23:32.480 --> 0:23:36.000
<v Speaker 1>three quarters of an ounce of lime juice, three quarters

0:23:36.000 --> 0:23:38.439
<v Speaker 1>of an ounce of simple or vanilla syrup, and then

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:41.119
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna add another ingredient that came up, which is

0:23:41.600 --> 0:23:45.680
<v Speaker 1>a half ounce of cognac. Shakey, shaky, shake with ice.

0:23:46.440 --> 0:23:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Strain it into a pre chilled cocktail glass. You will

0:23:50.080 --> 0:23:53.920
<v Speaker 1>not have ice in that glass. And then note how

0:23:53.960 --> 0:23:58.440
<v Speaker 1>absolutely beautiful it turns out and how absolutely beautiful it tastes.

0:23:59.040 --> 0:24:02.280
<v Speaker 1>I am obsessed with drink now. I gotta have saffron

0:24:02.280 --> 0:24:05.760
<v Speaker 1>all the time. I'm calling this one open secret since

0:24:06.160 --> 0:24:10.359
<v Speaker 1>Daffy's recipe was gonna open secret. I love this. I

0:24:10.880 --> 0:24:13.000
<v Speaker 1>love a spirit forward drink once in a while, and

0:24:13.040 --> 0:24:16.639
<v Speaker 1>this one was like exceptional. And what's really cool is

0:24:16.640 --> 0:24:18.879
<v Speaker 1>that there's a ton of gin in it, which a

0:24:18.920 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of people don't like. And I really think people

0:24:22.000 --> 0:24:24.560
<v Speaker 1>that don't like gin might like this drink. So I

0:24:24.680 --> 0:24:29.120
<v Speaker 1>tested it on people that don't like gin and they

0:24:29.320 --> 0:24:29.680
<v Speaker 1>liked it.

0:24:29.800 --> 0:24:30.679
<v Speaker 2>That's in its favor.

0:24:31.119 --> 0:24:34.520
<v Speaker 1>The mocktail is you're gonna use the same proportions for everything,

0:24:35.040 --> 0:24:38.400
<v Speaker 1>But instead of that two ounces of gin, you're gonna

0:24:38.480 --> 0:24:42.160
<v Speaker 1>use flat tonic to do your saffron and fusion. Make

0:24:42.200 --> 0:24:44.480
<v Speaker 1>sure it is very flat before you seal your thing

0:24:44.520 --> 0:24:47.120
<v Speaker 1>and shake it because you don't want any surprise explosions.

0:24:47.119 --> 0:24:51.080
<v Speaker 1>It's never fun. And then in lieu of kognac, you'll

0:24:51.119 --> 0:24:52.840
<v Speaker 1>only use half an ounce. But again this is a

0:24:52.840 --> 0:24:55.760
<v Speaker 1>proportion game. You're gonna use four ounces of white grape

0:24:55.840 --> 0:24:58.920
<v Speaker 1>juice and you're gonna soak it with a tea bag

0:24:58.960 --> 0:25:01.600
<v Speaker 1>of black tea. If you want to heat up your

0:25:01.600 --> 0:25:04.200
<v Speaker 1>white grape juice, that is totally fine. You really only

0:25:04.240 --> 0:25:06.600
<v Speaker 1>need to steep it for like ten minutes. You can

0:25:06.640 --> 0:25:09.040
<v Speaker 1>also cold steep it and give it more like forty

0:25:09.040 --> 0:25:11.439
<v Speaker 1>five minutes or an hour. That also works fine. But

0:25:11.520 --> 0:25:13.840
<v Speaker 1>you basically just want to give that white grape juice

0:25:13.880 --> 0:25:16.400
<v Speaker 1>a fuller body and a bigger flavor than it has

0:25:16.440 --> 0:25:19.040
<v Speaker 1>on its own, because that is going to help balance

0:25:19.040 --> 0:25:21.479
<v Speaker 1>out all those other ingredients. And that is you make

0:25:21.520 --> 0:25:23.919
<v Speaker 1>it exactly the same. So it's a two ounces of

0:25:23.960 --> 0:25:27.520
<v Speaker 1>your saffron infused fluid, whether that be gin or flattonic,

0:25:27.800 --> 0:25:29.879
<v Speaker 1>three quarters of an ounce of lime juice, three quarters

0:25:29.880 --> 0:25:32.359
<v Speaker 1>of an ounce with simpler vanilla syrup and then just

0:25:32.400 --> 0:25:36.680
<v Speaker 1>a half ounce of cognac or your tea infused white

0:25:36.680 --> 0:25:38.359
<v Speaker 1>grape juice. Delicious.

0:25:38.480 --> 0:25:41.040
<v Speaker 2>That sounds both of them sound delicious, both versions.

0:25:41.720 --> 0:25:44.680
<v Speaker 1>You want it so cold and it's so good. Now

0:25:44.720 --> 0:25:47.840
<v Speaker 1>I just have to be constantly infusing gin with saffron

0:25:48.760 --> 0:25:50.800
<v Speaker 1>and then you'll feel fancy if you grew up like

0:25:50.800 --> 0:25:53.159
<v Speaker 1>me getting yelled at about how expensive saffron is.

0:25:53.720 --> 0:25:55.440
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I think that might be our age group.

0:25:56.600 --> 0:25:59.760
<v Speaker 1>That is the open secret. It is a lot of alcohol.

0:25:59.840 --> 0:26:02.280
<v Speaker 1>So it is one that we want you to be

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:05.680
<v Speaker 1>very careful with. Drink responsibly always. We will be right

0:26:05.720 --> 0:26:09.440
<v Speaker 1>back here next week with another tale of snake oil

0:26:09.800 --> 0:26:18.560
<v Speaker 1>and another drink to go with it. Criminalia is a

0:26:18.600 --> 0:26:22.600
<v Speaker 1>production of Shondaland Audio in partnership with iHeartRadio. For more

0:26:22.640 --> 0:26:27.680
<v Speaker 1>podcasts from Shondaland Audio, please visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:26:27.800 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.