Speaker 1: You're in the freedom hunt. This is the Buck Sexton
Speaker 1: Show podcast. Get more from Buck by following him on
Speaker 1: social media at buck Sexton on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.
Speaker 1: Welcome friends to the Buck Sexton Show. I trust you
Speaker 1: had a lovely, RESTful, thankful Thanksgiving and you've already seen
Speaker 1: what I told you would happened, which is this was
Speaker 1: never going to be about give up your freedom, give
Speaker 1: up your liberty just for this one day. No. In fact,
Speaker 1: the arguments that they made about how you should cancel Thanksgiving,
Speaker 1: about how you're not allowed to enjoy this holiday, those
Speaker 1: arguments were inevitably going to extend past the holiday, which
Speaker 1: raises a very important question. Why can they never tell
Speaker 1: us the truth about what the real goals are? Why
Speaker 1: is it that those who are devoted, i would say
Speaker 1: ideologically almost spiritually now devoted to the most extreme lockdowns possible.
Speaker 1: Why is it that they won't tell us what they
Speaker 1: really plan on doing that we have to sit here
Speaker 1: and continuously get told do this, and then we do it,
Speaker 1: and then it's oh, but there's one more thing, or
Speaker 1: we changed our mind, or let's do something else. Now.
Speaker 1: Is it because the data is shifting? Or is it
Speaker 1: because they can't be honest with you, and they can't
Speaker 1: be honest with themselves. They can't tell you what they
Speaker 1: really plan to do, and they can't let you know
Speaker 1: that they've made so many mistakes in the past. Already,
Speaker 1: here we are going into this period, going into the holidays,
Speaker 1: and we were told that we weren't allowed to enjoy Thanksgiving.
Speaker 1: We were told that we had to assume that we
Speaker 1: were putting people in jeopardy if we spend time with
Speaker 1: loved ones over Thanksgiving. And the way they set it up,
Speaker 1: it was, well, it's just this one thing, wait two weeks,
Speaker 1: except in this case it was wait a couple of days.
Speaker 1: Don't see anyone on Thanksgiving? Okay, well, now are we
Speaker 1: allowed to see people for Christmas? No, of course not.
Speaker 1: Are you allowed to celebrate Christmas, New Year's, Hanukkah, whatever
Speaker 1: your holiday season means for you. Are you told that
Speaker 1: now you're cleared to spend time with relatives, to be
Speaker 1: around with the people. No. No, the lockdowners are expanding
Speaker 1: the argument they made about one holiday into all of
Speaker 1: the holidays to come. This is what they do. Fifteen
Speaker 1: days to slow the spread became two months, became six months,
Speaker 1: and so on. You've seen it happen. You know this,
Speaker 1: and that's why I think finally enough people have seen this,
Speaker 1: they understand the way that this is going to continue
Speaker 1: to unfold, that they say, I'm just not going to
Speaker 1: play the game anymore. I'm not going to obey. This
Speaker 1: is unacceptable to me. And they've received a very important
Speaker 1: assistance here in that. You know how I've been saying
Speaker 1: what these mandates are is unconstitutional. I've been telling you
Speaker 1: this for months, that the Constitution still counts that just
Speaker 1: because there are a bunch of Democrat politicians, not all Democrats,
Speaker 1: some Republicans too, but just because there are Democrat politicians
Speaker 1: who think they've got a really good reason, it's really important,
Speaker 1: their ideas, their goals really matter so much here. So
Speaker 1: the Constitution no longer counts. That's not how it works,
Speaker 1: that's not how our system was built. That ignores the
Speaker 1: principles and the separation of powers that gives our government
Speaker 1: the authority that it has in the first place. There
Speaker 1: are areas which we cannot allow the encroachment of the
Speaker 1: authorities under any circumstances, and certainly not under extended ad
Speaker 1: hoc as they see fit. Circumstances. This was the first
Speaker 1: legal challenge that we've had that went all the way
Speaker 1: up to the Supreme Court, and it showed that yes,
Speaker 1: in fact, the restrictions on religious services were capricious, arbitrary, unconstitutional.
Speaker 1: This was the Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn in New
Speaker 1: York versus Governor Cuomo. And by five four it went
Speaker 1: in favor of the diocese and and other complainants you had.
Speaker 1: In this instance, you had two synagogues, an Orthodox Jewish organization,
Speaker 1: two individuals, and the Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn, and
Speaker 1: they claimed that Governor Cuomo in New York violated their
Speaker 1: constitutional protections for the free exercise of religion. And this
Speaker 1: was a five four decision that in a sane world
Speaker 1: would have been nine. Oh. Here's what's at the heart
Speaker 1: of this now. That they didn't say that there could
Speaker 1: never be restrictions on religious freedom right that that's actually
Speaker 1: not the It wasn't as sweeping in order as that.
Speaker 1: What they did say is you can't have vape stores
Speaker 1: and acupuncturists and you know, pet therapists open and not
Speaker 1: allow people to go to church or give them different treatment.
Speaker 1: And that's what you were seeing Democrats were giving disparate
Speaker 1: treatment to religious services because ultimately, the religion of the state,
Speaker 1: the religion of the authoritarian left more important than actual
Speaker 1: connection to and celebration of one's relationship with God. That's
Speaker 1: what was going on here. Who do you think joined
Speaker 1: the three Libs on the Supreme Court to make this one?
Speaker 1: Thank Heavens we have Amy Coney Barrett on the court.
Speaker 1: The only move for Trump not only was it a
Speaker 1: good move, the only move was to get that done
Speaker 1: before the election. Could you imagine if he had waited,
Speaker 1: what would the point of that have been. Of course,
Speaker 1: John Roberts, who is yet another enduring legacy of failure
Speaker 1: and bad decision making of the Bush administration. Let's just
Speaker 1: be honest about that. John Roberts knows better. But he
Speaker 1: wants to be considered the reasonable conservative on the court.
Speaker 1: He wants to be the guy that The New York
Speaker 1: Times doesn't totally trash. He doesn't want people saying mean
Speaker 1: things about him at the cocktail parties. Right, that's what's
Speaker 1: going on here. John Roberts joined the Three Lives and saying, yeah,
Speaker 1: no government can do whatever it wants through your religious
Speaker 1: freedom and services. That constitution doesn't really count here. Sorry,
Speaker 1: there's this virus out there that kills one in a
Speaker 1: thousand people who get it. So and if that, uh so,
Speaker 1: we're we're not allowed to have any constitutional religious freedom anymore.
Speaker 1: We're gonna shut down your church. And they were they
Speaker 1: weren't even trying to make this intelligent. One thing that
Speaker 1: came up in this case is that you had the
Speaker 1: same restrictions on say, Saint Patrick's Cathedral here in New
Speaker 1: York City only allowed you know, either it's ten or
Speaker 1: twenty five, depending on whether it's a red zone or
Speaker 1: an organ zone. And these zones were shifting. Think about this,
Speaker 1: you know, think about the the pressure and the strain
Speaker 1: that they put on these institutions by not only putting
Speaker 1: caps on attendance, but putting caps that change, that are
Speaker 1: variable at any at any moment in time. So you
Speaker 1: had a small, let's say, a small more like a
Speaker 1: chapel open to the public, had the same restrictions at
Speaker 1: Saint Patrick's Cathedral. How does that make sense? How would
Speaker 1: a massive church that can fit thousands, why would that
Speaker 1: have the same attendance restrictions as a tiny chapel that
Speaker 1: has a small space much less air circulation, much less
Speaker 1: ability to social distance, and all this stuff. Well, of
Speaker 1: course it doesn't make sense, and anybody with a moment's
Speaker 1: thought would figure that out. Anybody could understand right away
Speaker 1: that this is absurd. But now you see they've gotten
Speaker 1: you to agree to so much. They've forced so much
Speaker 1: absurd COVID policy down our throats, jammed it into our faces.
Speaker 1: They've done this so many times that at this point
Speaker 1: they feel like they can do whatever they want to do,
Speaker 1: whatever restriction, however arbitrary and silly it may be. It's
Speaker 1: about COVID, so we are supposed to listen. We're not
Speaker 1: allowed to question, we're not allowed to take a different
Speaker 1: approach or else. You saw people over the weekend operating
Speaker 1: their businesses in violation of COVID shutdown mandates. Whether they're
Speaker 1: talking about a bar or a restaurant or a gym.
Speaker 1: People are saying, not going to do this anymore, and
Speaker 1: some were arrested. Now you're seeing the problem with Okay,
Speaker 1: we'll just go along the state. I mean, they're just
Speaker 1: trying to keep us safe. They're not really gonna hurt
Speaker 1: us if we don't do what they say. No, when
Speaker 1: the state makes a declaration, and I mean that by
Speaker 1: big s and little s. State when you're state government
Speaker 1: or where in the overall state, the authority, the government
Speaker 1: tells you you have to do something if it's wrong,
Speaker 1: if it's a violation of your freedoms, it's not enough
Speaker 1: to say, well, I don't think that they'll come for me.
Speaker 1: I don't think they'll enforce this one against me. It's
Speaker 1: wrong in principle, it's wrong in practice, and it's time
Speaker 1: for people to say no more, no more lockdown tyranny.
Speaker 1: The numbers are not on their sides. Look at all
Speaker 1: this stuff you're seeing with masks. Oh, they're telling you
Speaker 1: that you have to wear more masks now that ever before. Meanwhile,
Speaker 1: places that have had mandates for months months, no better off,
Speaker 1: And they can't even try to make a case. No
Speaker 1: better off than places that haven't had mandates. If these
Speaker 1: things work the way that we're led to believe, Notice
Speaker 1: they never give you numbers or percentages. They just say, oh, no,
Speaker 1: they work if they worked in a way that was clear.
Speaker 1: And keep in mind that doctor Fauci, at the beginning
Speaker 1: of the year and all of modern pandemic science had said, no,
Speaker 1: you're not you don't have to wear these things. They
Speaker 1: change their mind on that, and now it's, oh, you're
Speaker 1: an imbecile if you question it. Meanwhile, look at the
Speaker 1: places that have mask mandates and have almost one hundred
Speaker 1: percent compliance. I mean, I'm in New York City, cases arising,
Speaker 1: cases arising. No one goes indoors without a mask on.
Speaker 1: You don't see it anywhere, and people outdoors are wearing
Speaker 1: them too, and there's no signs to back up outdoor
Speaker 1: mask mandates. Are we so much better off? We have
Speaker 1: cases spiking in all of these democrat mask mandate areas,
Speaker 1: So what are we to believe it would be twice
Speaker 1: as high, fifty percent Higher's what's really the net benefit
Speaker 1: of this? The effect of this, I notice how it's
Speaker 1: wear a mask and we're also going to lock you down.
Speaker 1: They keep doing all of these things that if any
Speaker 1: one of them actually worked, they wouldn't need to do
Speaker 1: all of the other things. But they claim there's some
Speaker 1: general benefit. We can't prove it. We don't know how
Speaker 1: good it is, but we're we're going to insist that
Speaker 1: you do what we say. Social distance, mask up between bites,
Speaker 1: stay away from your relatives, assume I saw doctor Burke
Speaker 1: say this, assume that you've been infected. If you saw
Speaker 1: anybody over Thanksgiving get tested this week, well, I could
Speaker 1: get tested this week, but I could also get infected today,
Speaker 1: and then would that even show up in a test
Speaker 1: that I took this morning. It's it's also it's all
Speaker 1: so flimsy. It's fear and control and pack and the
Speaker 1: exploitation thereof by people in charge. That's what's happening here.
Speaker 1: Enough is enough. They have been lying to you. The
Speaker 1: people in charge are wrong and they don't have the
Speaker 1: authority to do what they've been doing. Now we've taken
Speaker 1: an all the way up to the Supreme Court and
Speaker 1: they're not allowed to just say ten people in church,
Speaker 1: but anybody who wants to go vape, go to the
Speaker 1: vape store, have fun. You know, not allowed to kneel
Speaker 1: before God, but go buy yourself a weed whacker at
Speaker 1: home depot. That's absolutely essential. That's the government that we've
Speaker 1: had during this pandemic in this year, and I'm pleased
Speaker 1: to see that at least the Archdiocese of Brooklyn said
Speaker 1: this is unacceptable and they took action. More people need
Speaker 1: to take action. We need to bury, we need to
Speaker 1: drown these authoritarians in lawsuits or else. We will never
Speaker 1: get our freedoms back because it's not just about COVID now,
Speaker 1: it's about them being able to make you do things
Speaker 1: for which they cannot even prove a benefit because they
Speaker 1: say it's good for you. You're in the freedom Hut.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast from more buck
Speaker 1: Head to Bucksexton dot com and remember to subscribe to
Speaker 1: the podcast. Verse has had a statewide mask mandate since July,
Speaker 1: yet your numbers, as we talked about, have gone up
Speaker 1: exponentially in recent weeks. So what's happening? Is it not working?
Speaker 1: Are people not doing it? Are you not enforcing it? Yeah,
Speaker 1: we've had one on the inside since even well before that.
Speaker 1: We were one of the first states in America to
Speaker 1: have the indoor mask requirement, and that is overwhelmingly adhered
Speaker 1: to outdoors. Folks largely are doing the right thing. I
Speaker 1: don't think that's where the transmission is coming from. Although
Speaker 1: we've reduced outdoor gathering limits effective tomorrow. I think most
Speaker 1: of this brett is on the inside. And I do
Speaker 1: think it's folks letting their hair down and their fatigue.
Speaker 1: Who the heck could blame them. New Jersey instid the unthinkable.
Speaker 1: In the spring, we crushed a curve that was overwhelming.
Speaker 1: I have every confidence we could do it again. But
Speaker 1: I would just beg folks, particularly in the holiday season,
Speaker 1: particularly before we get to a vaccine, don't let your
Speaker 1: hair down, keep your guard up, and remember, in particular
Speaker 1: intergenerational spread from an asymptomatic, healthy young person to grandma grandpa.
Speaker 1: That is our biggest fear. That's the government New Jersey.
Speaker 1: And I'm sure you'd have the same double speak and
Speaker 1: nonsense if you ask Avinusom in California, if you asked
Speaker 1: Gretchen Whitmer in Michigan, if you asked any number of
Speaker 1: state governors across the country. Polis in Colorado. He just
Speaker 1: got COVID. I think his wife got it too, which
Speaker 1: is so strange because he's a big mask advocate. I'm
Speaker 1: sure he was masking up all the time. Remember when
Speaker 1: Trump got it, it was his fault. He's a bad person.
Speaker 1: He doesn't mask up enough. But when Democrat governors get it,
Speaker 1: who are in mask mandates on everyone else? And who
Speaker 1: are big believers in the glories of wearing a mask? Right?
Speaker 1: The wonderful symbolism of wearing a mask. It's not their fault.
Speaker 1: It's just a thing that happened. Oh okay, well, notice
Speaker 1: the government of New Jersey here dances around the point,
Speaker 1: dances around the answers to the question because we ask him,
Speaker 1: hold on, hold on a second. Why is it? Why
Speaker 1: is it that you had a mask mandate since the
Speaker 1: middle of the summer. And we were all told when
Speaker 1: the cases were low during the mask mandates, see look
Speaker 1: what a great job you're doing New York and New Jersey.
Speaker 1: See you, guys, a little pat on the head for
Speaker 1: all of us, all the people, the citizens, the folks
Speaker 1: who live here, the residents, were told, good job, you
Speaker 1: did what we said. So you're not dying where you're
Speaker 1: not killing grandma. And we keep doing what they say
Speaker 1: and doing what they say. You know, bang these mandates
Speaker 1: and now boom, huge spike going to the end of
Speaker 1: November in cases and you have I mean, here, I'm
Speaker 1: looking at the numbers. As I talked to you. April sixteenth,
Speaker 1: you had one of the absolute high points of cases
Speaker 1: in New Jersey. You had about four thousand, about four
Speaker 1: thousand cases. It was like forty two eighty seven. Now
Speaker 1: here we are mask mandates since the summer, and we're
Speaker 1: at forty two seventy five as of late November, forty
Speaker 1: four seventy three as of November twenty sixth, so the
Speaker 1: peak of the pandemic in the spring. We're at that
Speaker 1: same number of cases in New Jersey now. And we've
Speaker 1: had a mask mandate, and we've had we have social distancing,
Speaker 1: we have all these things. They never allow for the
Speaker 1: possibility that these policies, these mandates don't work. What do
Speaker 1: they do. It's exactly what I told you they would do.
Speaker 1: It's your fault. It's not enough. You're not doing enough.
Speaker 1: You see, you're the problem. Oh okay, isn't that convenient
Speaker 1: for people that have been trampling on constitutional rights? Isn't it?
Speaker 1: Isn't it convenient for all of us to see that
Speaker 1: what's really happening here is they can't explain why what
Speaker 1: they've insisted we do does not work. So what they're
Speaker 1: telling us is we're not doing it the way we're
Speaker 1: supposed to. But somehow we were when the cases were
Speaker 1: really low. All you have to do is think, and
Speaker 1: you see how flimsy this is. Just think for yourself.
Speaker 1: Look at the data, the obvious data, look at cases,
Speaker 1: look at timelines, look at mandates. Their policies do not
Speaker 1: make a difference, doesn't matter, doesn't work. People are still
Speaker 1: living their lives enough, there's still enough human contact, there's
Speaker 1: still enough ability to spread the virus. Even with distancing
Speaker 1: and mandates and masks, it's still spreads. But they still
Speaker 1: want to take away your freedoms even though it doesn't work.
Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Get
Speaker 1: the latest news and information from Buck by heading to
Speaker 1: Bucksexton dot com. We won the election easily. There's no
Speaker 1: way Joe Biden got eighty million votes. I just said,
Speaker 1: there's no way. Joe Biden beat Barack Obama in the
Speaker 1: black communities of various cities, and then he did very
Speaker 1: badly compared to Obama in other cities throughout the United States.
Speaker 1: There's no way it happens. This election was a fraud.
Speaker 1: It was a rigged election. President not backing off a bit.
Speaker 1: He's in this fight until the end. And people are
Speaker 1: looking at this now and seeing as we analyze the data,
Speaker 1: as we have a little bit more time to digest
Speaker 1: this meal of an election that has been offered up
Speaker 1: to all of us. The smells funky, a lot of
Speaker 1: stuff a little too chewy. Something's wrong here. There's a problem.
Speaker 1: Joe Biden got eighty million votes. I can't tell you
Speaker 1: how much. This is a shock to those of us
Speaker 1: who believe that our fellow Americans have the basic ability
Speaker 1: of discernment to recognize that Joe Biden is a loser.
Speaker 1: And yet Joe Biden got more votes than any president
Speaker 1: in history, more votes than anyone ever. That's right for
Speaker 1: Joe Biden. This guy is a deeply unimpressive Democrat machine politician,
Speaker 1: never done anything worthwhile for anyone in his life in
Speaker 1: public office. But here he is actually maybe the crime
Speaker 1: bill that he passed that he now runs away from
Speaker 1: because Democrats have gone back to coddling criminals and acting
Speaker 1: like locking people up when they do very bad things
Speaker 1: makes us an evil country. But Joe Biden getting eighty
Speaker 1: million votes, Okay, let's let's spend a little time on this.
Speaker 1: There was a piece over the weekend in The Federalist
Speaker 1: by JB. Shirk and I haven't heard of mister J. B.
Speaker 1: Shirk before President Trump retweeted this, and this was this
Speaker 1: was really brilliant. I mean it just lays it out
Speaker 1: for you. These are facts, instead of spending our time
Speaker 1: today just talking about the same allegations without giving more
Speaker 1: data to back it up. We'll do some of that, right.
Speaker 1: We need to keep track of what's being said about
Speaker 1: this election. But here are some things that we know
Speaker 1: for a fact are true at this point. And this
Speaker 1: all comes from the Federalist dot com. This JB. Shirkpiece
Speaker 1: which the President shared. It's gone megaviral over the weekend,
Speaker 1: and we started with one of them. Eighty number one,
Speaker 1: eighty million votes. Here's what he writes. Holy moly, a
Speaker 1: lot of Americans turned out for a wash politician who's
Speaker 1: been in office for nearly fifty years. Consider this, No
Speaker 1: incoming president nearly a century and a half has gained
Speaker 1: votes in a reelection campaign and still lost. President Trump
Speaker 1: gained more than ten million vote since his two and
Speaker 1: sixteen victory, but Biden's appeal was so substantial that it
Speaker 1: overcame President's record support among minority voters. Biden also shattered
Speaker 1: Barack Obama's popular vote totals, really calling into question whether
Speaker 1: it was not perhaps Biden who pulled Obama across the
Speaker 1: finish line in two In twenty twelve, proving how sharp
Speaker 1: his political instincts are, the former VP managed to gather
Speaker 1: a record number of votes while consistently trailing President Trump
Speaker 1: in measures of voter enthusiasm. Biden was so savvy that
Speaker 1: he motivated voters unenthusiastic about his campaign to vote for
Speaker 1: him in record numbers. These are facts. Everything that I've
Speaker 1: just told you here, everything voting here from mister Shirk
Speaker 1: in the Federalist, these are just facts. Joe. I didn't
Speaker 1: think about that for a second. Joe Biden got over
Speaker 1: eighty million votes. Really, really, he did badly in a
Speaker 1: lot of places where he was supposed to do well,
Speaker 1: But in a few places he was able to blow
Speaker 1: all previous Democrats completely out of the water, and obviously
Speaker 1: all Republicans. That is interesting. And remember who we're talking
Speaker 1: about here, Barack Obama. And I was obviously in opposition
Speaker 1: to the Obama administration on a policy level, strenuously in
Speaker 1: opposition to him. But I understood what the appeal was.
Speaker 1: I know what Democrats were seeing and thinking when they
Speaker 1: thought they had this almost messianic figure in Barack Obama
Speaker 1: running for president of the United States. Does any person
Speaker 1: with a basic grip on reality. Does anyone think that
Speaker 1: Joe Biden is a messianic figure? I mean, I don't
Speaker 1: think any Democrats believe that, never mind Republicans. No. Okay,
Speaker 1: and yet eighty million votes for Biden huh, very interesting.
Speaker 1: Voter enthusiasm for Biden very low. Democrats were able to
Speaker 1: get those machines turned on so to speak, well maybe
Speaker 1: not just so to speak, and get those votes counted, okay,
Speaker 1: Number two in this piece winning despite losing most bell
Speaker 1: Weather counties, Biden is set to become the first president
Speaker 1: in sixty years to lose the states of Ohio and
Speaker 1: Florida on his way to election. For a century, these
Speaker 1: states have consistently predicted the national outcome, and they've been
Speaker 1: considered roughly representative of the American melting pot as a whole.
Speaker 1: Despite national polling giving Biden a lead in both the states,
Speaker 1: he lost Ohio by eight points and Florida by more
Speaker 1: than three. For Biden to lose these keybell weathers by
Speaker 1: notable margins and in the national election is newsworthy. Not
Speaker 1: since the mafia allegedly aided John Kennedy and winning Illinois
Speaker 1: over Richard Nixon in nineteen sixty has an American president
Speaker 1: pulled off this neat trick. Even more unbelievably, Biden is
Speaker 1: on his way to winning the White House after having
Speaker 1: lost almost every historic Bellweather county across the country. Wall
Speaker 1: Street Journal in the Epoch Times independently analyzed the results
Speaker 1: of nineteen counties around the United States that have nearly
Speaker 1: perfect presidential voting records over the last forty years. President
Speaker 1: Trump won every single Bellweather county except Klallum County in Washington,
Speaker 1: whereas the former VP picked up Klallum by about three points,
Speaker 1: Trump's margin of victory in the other eighteen counties average
Speaker 1: over sixteen points. In a larger list of fifty eight
Speaker 1: Bellwather counties that have correctly picked up president since two thousand,
Speaker 1: Trump won fifty one of them by an average of
Speaker 1: fifteen points, while the other seven went to buy and
Speaker 1: buy around four points. So the Bellweather Counties, Ohio, Florida
Speaker 1: to end quote there and the Bellweather Counties and Ohio
Speaker 1: and Florida go to Trump, and somehow Biden still wins.
Speaker 1: So what has been and this is Biden. Now we're
Speaker 1: looking at results. This is not poll based. This is
Speaker 1: results based. When you look at counties that have in
Speaker 1: the aggregate told you if you won those counties, you
Speaker 1: became the president for the last forty years. Joe Biden
Speaker 1: was able to break that trend. Really, Joe Biden was
Speaker 1: able to break that trend. That's amazing. Joe Biden must
Speaker 1: be the greatest politician in the history of the Republic.
Speaker 1: I mean, how could he pull this off? How was
Speaker 1: he able to do this? He's so amazing. I guess
Speaker 1: we just don't see it, or there's something else going
Speaker 1: on here, or maybe just maybe there was foul play
Speaker 1: in this election. There was fraud. Friends. The issue isn't
Speaker 1: whether there was fraud. The issue is how much fraud.
Speaker 1: Was the fraud enough and was enough of it provable
Speaker 1: that that's all that it took to change the election?
Speaker 1: Is that? That's what we're left with at this point.
Speaker 1: Not Oh, but it was a perfect election. Everything was cleaning,
Speaker 1: everything was great. Nobody really believes, nobody knows anything believes
Speaker 1: that Number three. In this excellent piece on the Federalist
Speaker 1: dot Com, Biden trailed Clinton except in a few select cities.
Speaker 1: Patrick Basham, a polster with an accurate track record, highlighted
Speaker 1: two observations made by fellow colleagues that Biden underperformed Hillary
Speaker 1: Clinton in every major metro area around the country except
Speaker 1: for Milwaukee, Detroit, Atlanta, and Philadelphia. Huh interesting, isn't that fascinating?
Speaker 1: I think that that's something that you'd have to How
Speaker 1: do you explain that? How do you explain that? Now
Speaker 1: there isn't adendum here and adendem here that a national
Speaker 1: review you have Dan McLaughlin saying that, no, it wasn't
Speaker 1: only four major swing city, swing state cities where that
Speaker 1: changed here that there was. It was more than that.
Speaker 1: But when you look at the a lot of these cities,
Speaker 1: Biden still performed incredibly well, incredibly well. And we're talking
Speaker 1: about Joe Biden here, number four, Biden one, despite Democrat
Speaker 1: losses everywhere else. This is one of the one of
Speaker 1: the biggest challenges for me to get past and believe,
Speaker 1: oh yeah, this was fine, this makes sense. Here we go.
Speaker 1: Quote Randy de Soto noted in The Western Journal that
Speaker 1: Donald Trump was pretty much the only incumbent president in
Speaker 1: US history to lose his reelection while his own party
Speaker 1: gained seats in the House of Representatives. That's a Biden miracle.
Speaker 1: In twenty twenty The Cook Political Report and The New
Speaker 1: York Times rated twenty seven House seats as toss ups
Speaker 1: going into election day. Right now, Republicans appear to have
Speaker 1: won all twenty seven. Democrats failed to flip a single
Speaker 1: state House chamber, while Republicans flipped both the House and
Speaker 1: the Senate in New Hampshire and expanded their dominance of
Speaker 1: state legislatures across the country. Okay, so does somebody want
Speaker 1: to come up with what is the rationale here? How
Speaker 1: could that happen? You're in a presidential election year, but
Speaker 1: you have all these down ballot races, and this has
Speaker 1: been overshadowed by the Trump Biden ongoing battle. But Republicans
Speaker 1: did really well. They had a difficult Senate map to defend,
Speaker 1: and we know George is not yet done. But it
Speaker 1: looks likely they will. I shouldn't. I don't want to jinxip.
Speaker 1: It looks likely they will maintain Senate control. They picked
Speaker 1: up House seats, they did very well in state legislatures.
Speaker 1: But Trump lost and not and didn't lose by a
Speaker 1: little bit. I mean, when you add up both the
Speaker 1: electoral college tally as well as the popular vote, of
Speaker 1: the popular vote doesn't really matter as we know. But
Speaker 1: if you look at just the vote counts in the aggregate,
Speaker 1: if you believe what happened in this election, Trump lost
Speaker 1: by a lot, right, I mean, this is not a
Speaker 1: close This is not really a close election if you
Speaker 1: think that what happened in all these states is what happened.
Speaker 1: If you look at this, if he doesn't flip back
Speaker 1: Arizona or Georgia or Michigan or Pennsylvania, not a particularly
Speaker 1: close election, really, I mean close enough by He did
Speaker 1: win Florida and Ohio, but that's a substantial victory. Do
Speaker 1: you believe that Joe Biden could really pull that off? Again,
Speaker 1: this is not proof, but this is context for everything
Speaker 1: else that we're talking about. And these are real numbers.
Speaker 1: This is not conjecture or supposition. And then the final
Speaker 1: one here in this spiece, Biden overcame Trump's commanding primary vote.
Speaker 1: Here you go quote. In the past, primary vote totals
Speaker 1: have been remarkably accurate in predicting general election winners. Political
Speaker 1: analyst David Chapman highlighted three historical facts. First, no incumbent
Speaker 1: who has received seventy five percent of the total primary
Speaker 1: vote has lost reelection. Second, President Trump received ninety four
Speaker 1: percent of the primary vote, the fourth highest of all time,
Speaker 1: higher than Dwight Eisenhower, Nixon, Clinton, or Obama. Trump is
Speaker 1: only one of Ivan Cummins since nineteen twelve to receive
Speaker 1: more than ninety percent of the primary vote, and Trump
Speaker 1: set a record for most primary votes by an incumbent
Speaker 1: when more than eighteen million people turned out for him
Speaker 1: in twenty twenty. For Biden to prevail in the general
Speaker 1: election despite Trump's historic support in the primaries, turns a
Speaker 1: century's worth of prior election data on its head. Joe
Speaker 1: Biden achieved the impossible. It's interesting that many more journalists
Speaker 1: aren't pointing that out. Joe Biden achieved the impossible. That's
Speaker 1: really the line here, And people who say, oh, but
Speaker 1: look at Trump in twenty sixteen, No Trump was It
Speaker 1: was claimed by the media that he had no chance.
Speaker 1: It was claimed by the establishment that he could never win,
Speaker 1: and then he did, and then they lied about it
Speaker 1: with Russia collusion all the rest. This is different. We're
Speaker 1: seeing here is now Biden's win, if that's what it
Speaker 1: ends up being. Biden's win is premised on breaking and
Speaker 1: eradicating all of the previous metrics and political narratives that
Speaker 1: have been built up for presidential elections for decades. The
Speaker 1: trends that would predict the winner didn't matter. That's asking
Speaker 1: a lot. It's not impossible, but it's asking a lot,
Speaker 1: especially given what we are seeing in terms of the
Speaker 1: way these states have some very suspicious activities going on
Speaker 1: with these ballot counts. You're in the Freedom Hunt. This
Speaker 1: is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Get more from Buck
Speaker 1: by following him on social media at buck Sexton on Facebook, Twitter,
Speaker 1: and Instagram. The media doesn't even want to cover it.
Speaker 1: I mean, you're doing something. You're actually very brave because
Speaker 1: you're doing something. The media doesn't want to talk about it.
Speaker 1: They know how fraudulent this is. It's no different than Hunter.
Speaker 1: It's no different than Hunter. They don't want to talk
Speaker 1: about Hunter. So they totally closed it off big tech
Speaker 1: and the media other than the New York Post, as
Speaker 1: you remember, which took a lot of heat. It was terminated.
Speaker 1: It was terminated from I guess Twitter, maybe Facebook, But
Speaker 1: it's a it's a situation the likes of which we
Speaker 1: don't have freedom of the press in this country. We
Speaker 1: have suppression by the press. They suppress you know, you
Speaker 1: can't have a scandal if nobody reports about it. This
Speaker 1: is the greatest fraud in the history of our country
Speaker 1: from an electoral standpoint, and I guess you could build
Speaker 1: it up bigger than electrical. What's bigger from a electoral standpoint,
Speaker 1: What's bigger than this? This is the essence of our country.
Speaker 1: This is the whole ball game, and they cheated. Trump
Speaker 1: is saying they cheated. He's not backing down one bit,
Speaker 1: and he's got his legal team out there bringing these
Speaker 1: different challenges. And here's what is definitely true. I mean
Speaker 1: meaning that we know it's true already. Democrats bench rules,
Speaker 1: broke rules, really but changed rules to suit their own
Speaker 1: electoral advantage and used COVID. I mean, this election was
Speaker 1: only possible to happen in this way because of the
Speaker 1: narrative around COVID nineteen. It's safe for people to vote
Speaker 1: and do that even in this era of COVID. But
Speaker 1: Democrats had convinced everybody, you know, they used COVID in
Speaker 1: so many ways to defeat this present Without COVID nineteen,
Speaker 1: Donald Trump wins reelection, no question. And they all knew that.
Speaker 1: And Pelosi knew that. The Democrats, Schumer They all know this,
Speaker 1: which is why they were spending those insane conspiracy theories
Speaker 1: over the summer that Trump was defunding the Post Office.
Speaker 1: There was no need for them to be mail in
Speaker 1: balloting because of COVID, but they said that that's what
Speaker 1: had to happen, and so indifferent. In some key states
Speaker 1: like Pennsylvania, they changed the rules to suit Democrat needs.
Speaker 1: Were they allowed to do that? Was that fair? Was
Speaker 1: that legal? Was it constitutional? Those are the questions that
Speaker 1: if we had an honest press they'd be asking. But
Speaker 1: they're not. They're already just writing stories about the Biden
Speaker 1: transition team and cabinet measuring the drapes on their new
Speaker 1: offices in the White House. You're in the freedom Hunt.
Speaker 1: This is the buck Sexton Show podcast from more buck
Speaker 1: Head to Bucksexton dot com and remember to subscribe to
Speaker 1: the podcast which cases specifically will reach the Supreme Court,
Speaker 1: and went, well, the problem is it's hard to get
Speaker 1: into the Supreme Court. I've got the best Supreme Court advocates,
Speaker 1: lawyers that want to argue the case if it gets there,
Speaker 1: but they said, it's very hard to get a case
Speaker 1: up there. Can you imagine Donald Trump, president of the
Speaker 1: United States files a case, and I probably can't get
Speaker 1: a case even with and we have tremendous proof. We
Speaker 1: have hundreds and hundreds of affidavits, sworn affidavis, and it's
Speaker 1: very hard to get a case to the Supreme Court.
Speaker 1: That's what everybody's fighting for. I thought that Mike Kelly, Congressman.
Speaker 1: I thought they had a great case and it get
Speaker 1: thrown out the other day. Now they'll appeal it, I hope,
Speaker 1: to the Supreme Court. They have a great case because
Speaker 1: the legislature didn't make the decision on this stuff, and
Speaker 1: they have a great case, but you have to appeal it.
Speaker 1: The big thing is can you get it. That's a
Speaker 1: big part of it. The President's writing so far is
Speaker 1: it's not a sure thing the Supreme Court will take
Speaker 1: up any individual, any specific challenge, right. But the President
Speaker 1: is also is also right that you know this, this
Speaker 1: needs to be figured out, that we have to find
Speaker 1: a way forward here where we can get answers about this,
Speaker 1: and it's going to require taking it to the court.
Speaker 1: But there are no guarantees right now. In Pennsylvania, the
Speaker 1: appeals court judge there has already ruled against the Trump team.
Speaker 1: The Trump legal team and saying that they're not going
Speaker 1: to throw out all these ballots because there were rule
Speaker 1: changes made the election before the election. That's a very
Speaker 1: short version of a much more complicated legal argument, and
Speaker 1: so now they're trying to appeal it to the Supreme Corps.
Speaker 1: That's where it is now. For this, we should all ask,
Speaker 1: we should all understand, Well, hold on a minute, can
Speaker 1: we even trust Look at what just happened as I've
Speaker 1: been talking to you, Look at what happened with the
Speaker 1: lockdown issue and religious freedom. He can't trust John Roberts, Okay,
Speaker 1: can't trust him. Guy will always find it somehow. Whatever
Speaker 1: the Lib legal and media establishment thinks is the moderate path,
Speaker 1: which is not the same thing as actually being a moderate.
Speaker 1: That's what he will do. So you can't trust all right.
Speaker 1: That's four. Where does that fifth vote come in? Could
Speaker 1: be Kavanaugh, could be Gorsch, who knows Gorcitch on the
Speaker 1: case about religious freedom was pretty good. He actually said
Speaker 1: it's time pastime to make plain that while the pandemic
Speaker 1: poses many grave challenges, there's no world in which the
Speaker 1: Constitution tolerates color coded executive edicts that reopen liquor stores
Speaker 1: and bike shops, but shutter churches, synagogues, and mosques. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that that even had to go to the Supreme Court,
Speaker 1: that we needed the Supreme Court to weigh in on.
Speaker 1: That tells you just how much jeopardy religious freedom is
Speaker 1: really in this country and how many violations of religious
Speaker 1: freedom have been ongoing now, right. But I'll take I'll
Speaker 1: take a win. I wish we wasn't a win that
Speaker 1: we need it, but I'll take it. But even if
Speaker 1: we get to the Supreme Court, understand, my friends, there
Speaker 1: are no guarantees. What do you think the mentality will
Speaker 1: be of the Supreme Court about possibly changing the results
Speaker 1: of one of these swing states. Remember, even if they
Speaker 1: just get Biden below to seventy, then it switches into
Speaker 1: the House of Representatives. There's this constitutional process, and all
Speaker 1: of a sudden, we have a very different, very different
Speaker 1: election that Trump could in fact win. We have twenty
Speaker 1: six twenty six of the states would would be Republican
Speaker 1: based on based on their congressional delegation. So yeah, do
Speaker 1: you think the Supreme Court is going to be willing
Speaker 1: to do that? Do you think the Supreme Court will
Speaker 1: have the backbone to say, yeah, we're going to throw
Speaker 1: out six hundred thousand votes in Pennsylvania. They were illegally casts.
Speaker 1: You weren't allowed to do this the way they did it.
Speaker 1: They weren't allowed to change the election so that they
Speaker 1: could count them afterwards, or you know, whatever, whatever the
Speaker 1: specifics of it may be. What do you think the
Speaker 1: streets would be in this country? Then? I'm not advocating
Speaker 1: against the Supreme Court making that call. I hope they do.
Speaker 1: I'm just trying to take you into the mindset of
Speaker 1: the different judges here and why the Democrats still remain
Speaker 1: very confident that really, no matter what, they'll end up
Speaker 1: getting their way, the mayhem on the streets would be
Speaker 1: like nothing we've ever seen. What if in their minds,
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court took another election, they think that they
Speaker 1: stole the two thousand election for Bush, even though no
Speaker 1: Bush won that election, every analysis of it, every vote
Speaker 1: count Bush won Florida, that was reality. Okay, But they
Speaker 1: still have a narrative, and as you know, that's what
Speaker 1: really matters among the lives among the Democrats. They have
Speaker 1: a narrative that the only reason that Bush one in
Speaker 1: two thousand was because of the Supreme Court. What do
Speaker 1: you think they would do now when they're going around
Speaker 1: saying that Trump is a fascist if the Supreme Court
Speaker 1: allowed him to get four more years, just let's all
Speaker 1: be very clear about what the ramifications for the country
Speaker 1: would be. I still think that what matters is who won,
Speaker 1: and that they're and that you can't allow cheating, and
Speaker 1: that this is the center of our whole system, right,
Speaker 1: I believe that. But I'm just saying, these are pressures
Speaker 1: that are put on the system that may prevent an
Speaker 1: honest and fair response even from the Supreme Court on
Speaker 1: exactly on exactly what happened here. Here's um I mean,
Speaker 1: there's plenty of examples of this. If here's a guy
Speaker 1: on MSNBC, this is what they're still saying about the
Speaker 1: president for bringing legal challenges. They compare him to and
Speaker 1: his base, They compare Trump supporters to Nazis. They really
Speaker 1: say this play too. And I think, because we've seen
Speaker 1: how close that if there is this drive along what
Speaker 1: is now the Republican Party against the Trump Party to
Speaker 1: make sure can happen again, to make sure that our
Speaker 1: people are in position to do what it wasn't done
Speaker 1: this one, we've got a problem because I can see
Speaker 1: in twenty twenty two, a number of these Republicans being
Speaker 1: removed from their jobs and replaced by people who are
Speaker 1: willing to do whatever it takes to keep their candidate
Speaker 1: in power or to put them in power. And once
Speaker 1: that you have the state legislators asserting that power, I
Speaker 1: then worry about the courts because there are people even
Speaker 1: on the Supreme Court who believe the state legislation of
Speaker 1: power is almost total. And so I think I'm they're
Speaker 1: using a very blood metaphor your joke. If you remember
Speaker 1: or if you know how the German Luftwaffa use the
Speaker 1: Spanish Civil War as a testing ground for their theories,
Speaker 1: I think you may be seen some of the more
Speaker 1: extreme supporters of someone like Donald Trump saying we've learned
Speaker 1: from twenty twenty. We know what to do next time. Yeah,
Speaker 1: the Nazi Air Force. That's right, we got to bring
Speaker 1: Nazis in. You can't talk about Trump and a supporters
Speaker 1: without finding a way to make your make your World
Speaker 1: War two analogy. And of course Trump is the Third Reich.
Speaker 1: These people are insane, they really are, but they don't stop. No,
Speaker 1: we're trying to use the legal process. We are trying
Speaker 1: to use the avenues open to us to find out
Speaker 1: what really happened here, because we've already established it's a
Speaker 1: heck of a thing that Joe Biden won this election.
Speaker 1: It's for anybody who understands how these elections tend to
Speaker 1: work and how it all plays out, it's a pretty
Speaker 1: big shock, a pretty big shock. But here we are here,
Speaker 1: we are being told that, oh, no, nothing to see here,
Speaker 1: It's fine. Joe Biden was just so inspiring. You know this,
Speaker 1: this doddering old fool Oh we're a mask and I'm
Speaker 1: sitting here now, I just sort of saying things I've
Speaker 1: been saying for a long time. Here. I am no
Speaker 1: no joke, no joke, that that guy got over eighty
Speaker 1: million votes and blew away all of these different expectations,
Speaker 1: all of these different metrics that have been used to
Speaker 1: correctly after the fact predict who the president would be.
Speaker 1: Right once you see these numbers, you know, oh, whoever
Speaker 1: won that won the election didn't count anymore. There's something
Speaker 1: going on here, friends, we all know it, and there
Speaker 1: are enormously powerful and influential forces doing everything that they
Speaker 1: can to make sure that we don't get the answers
Speaker 1: to all of this think about what it would mean.
Speaker 1: I mean, I'm not gonna sugarcoat this. If we can prove,
Speaker 1: and I mean really prove beyond the shadow of a doubt,
Speaker 1: that there was a Democrat plot to steal this election
Speaker 1: from Donald Trump, which given the rhetoric they used and
Speaker 1: their belief that he he stole the twenty sixteen election
Speaker 1: with Russian help and Russia collusion, that he's a fascist,
Speaker 1: that he's a threat to our democracy. They say that
Speaker 1: all the time. I mean, that's common, that's the standard
Speaker 1: way Democrats describe this president, even that that's the review
Speaker 1: of him. Why would it be so unbelievable that they
Speaker 1: would take extreme, even illegal actions that go to the
Speaker 1: very core of our republic, that kick right at the
Speaker 1: load bearing walls of our system. Why would it be
Speaker 1: unbelievable they would do that. No, I would say, if
Speaker 1: I believed that a sitting president was really a fascist
Speaker 1: who was trying to destroy the whole system and was
Speaker 1: going to purge his enemies and you know, real fascism stuff, yeah,
Speaker 1: I think a little vote cheating would probably be the
Speaker 1: necessary remedy, if not a lot more. But Democrats assure
Speaker 1: you that would never happen. That would never happen. Be quiet, peasant,
Speaker 1: Do as you're told, wear your mask, don't ask questions
Speaker 1: about this election. That's what they tell us, and I
Speaker 1: say no.