1 00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:02,400 Speaker 1: Let's get to our guests. Julia along is with as 2 00:00:02,480 --> 00:00:07,440 Speaker 1: Julia's executive director and global market strategist at JP Morgan 3 00:00:07,560 --> 00:00:10,639 Speaker 1: Private Bank. She joins us from our studios in Hong Kong. Juliet, 4 00:00:10,680 --> 00:00:14,080 Speaker 1: it's always a pleasure to benefit from your perspective. You're 5 00:00:14,200 --> 00:00:16,600 Speaker 1: so smart on these markets, and I want to begin 6 00:00:16,920 --> 00:00:21,040 Speaker 1: with what's going on with US interest rates? FED policy. 7 00:00:21,920 --> 00:00:25,000 Speaker 1: We saw a move lower today across the treasury curve 8 00:00:25,000 --> 00:00:27,960 Speaker 1: and I'm wondering how much of that is tied to 9 00:00:28,160 --> 00:00:31,520 Speaker 1: the expectation that we've hit peak inflation and that it's 10 00:00:31,560 --> 00:00:37,520 Speaker 1: going to begin decelerating at a pretty healthy clip. Thanks 11 00:00:37,520 --> 00:00:41,080 Speaker 1: for having me on the show, um So, I think that, um, 12 00:00:41,120 --> 00:00:45,080 Speaker 1: we are starting to see a more balanced picture between 13 00:00:45,360 --> 00:00:48,479 Speaker 1: growth and inflation emerging in many parts of the world. 14 00:00:48,680 --> 00:00:52,440 Speaker 1: We see that leading to some of more devish tone 15 00:00:52,479 --> 00:00:54,560 Speaker 1: from the e C, b UH and and Bank of 16 00:00:54,640 --> 00:00:57,640 Speaker 1: Canada and before that the the r b A as well. 17 00:00:58,360 --> 00:01:00,320 Speaker 1: Um So, I think that that is the back drop 18 00:01:00,760 --> 00:01:04,080 Speaker 1: that may have led to some hope for a more 19 00:01:04,120 --> 00:01:07,520 Speaker 1: balanced toe from the Fed as well. We do think that, um, 20 00:01:07,520 --> 00:01:10,440 Speaker 1: that is warranted, but we feel that, um, you know, 21 00:01:10,560 --> 00:01:14,319 Speaker 1: the inflation picture really it's still inflation is still really 22 00:01:14,400 --> 00:01:16,720 Speaker 1: too hot at the moment um. So for us to 23 00:01:16,800 --> 00:01:20,080 Speaker 1: get to a point where there is a really an 24 00:01:20,120 --> 00:01:22,560 Speaker 1: easy signal from the FAT, I think we're still a 25 00:01:22,680 --> 00:01:25,160 Speaker 1: very long way off, so we will be very wary 26 00:01:25,200 --> 00:01:28,760 Speaker 1: of I think, chasing this UH, this hope for a 27 00:01:28,760 --> 00:01:32,440 Speaker 1: tone in the market for too much. So going forward 28 00:01:32,480 --> 00:01:35,160 Speaker 1: seventy five basis point in November seems to be pretty 29 00:01:35,200 --> 00:01:38,039 Speaker 1: much a lock for the Fed. But if any pivot 30 00:01:38,160 --> 00:01:40,600 Speaker 1: still some time off, what might we see a few 31 00:01:40,600 --> 00:01:45,160 Speaker 1: more supersized hikes. We definitely think that, UM, Like you 32 00:01:45,240 --> 00:01:48,280 Speaker 1: need to bear in mind the backdrop for markets right 33 00:01:48,280 --> 00:01:51,240 Speaker 1: now it's still an inflation trading regime UH, and inflation 34 00:01:51,320 --> 00:01:55,280 Speaker 1: is too high, and labor markets it's too tight, employment 35 00:01:55,320 --> 00:01:59,040 Speaker 1: rated three point five percent MUNTI decade low. And for 36 00:01:59,120 --> 00:02:01,360 Speaker 1: us to get to a point going where that's consistent 37 00:02:01,440 --> 00:02:04,800 Speaker 1: with the FAT long term inflation target UM, it's going 38 00:02:04,840 --> 00:02:07,960 Speaker 1: to take us a decent twelve month or even longer. 39 00:02:08,160 --> 00:02:10,720 Speaker 1: So I do think that the near term risk is 40 00:02:10,760 --> 00:02:13,920 Speaker 1: for UH inflation to be a little harder than the 41 00:02:13,919 --> 00:02:16,960 Speaker 1: market expects. And the FAT having made me to raise 42 00:02:17,600 --> 00:02:19,880 Speaker 1: beyond four point five to four point seven five range, 43 00:02:19,960 --> 00:02:23,680 Speaker 1: and but more importantly, staying there until we see a 44 00:02:23,720 --> 00:02:27,920 Speaker 1: substantial improvement in the inflation trajector. Yeah, Bloomberg Economics, I 45 00:02:27,960 --> 00:02:30,720 Speaker 1: think is looking for a terminal rated five percent. I 46 00:02:30,760 --> 00:02:33,920 Speaker 1: think a lot of that is already been discounted by 47 00:02:33,960 --> 00:02:36,240 Speaker 1: the market. And I'm wondering now whether or not that 48 00:02:36,320 --> 00:02:40,280 Speaker 1: means that the dollar will remain strong for for a 49 00:02:40,360 --> 00:02:43,840 Speaker 1: period of time. Is that the way you see it? Um? Yeah, 50 00:02:44,040 --> 00:02:47,320 Speaker 1: I think that, um, you know, five percent is is high. 51 00:02:47,360 --> 00:02:50,160 Speaker 1: We don't know if that's high enough. Um. And I 52 00:02:50,160 --> 00:02:52,440 Speaker 1: think that the other leg to that, it's just how 53 00:02:52,480 --> 00:02:56,240 Speaker 1: how long the fat stays restricted with monetary policy. Uh. 54 00:02:56,320 --> 00:02:58,520 Speaker 1: And bring that to the dollar, it does mean that 55 00:02:58,560 --> 00:03:01,679 Speaker 1: if you combine the growth and interest rate backdrop of 56 00:03:01,760 --> 00:03:05,079 Speaker 1: the dollar visa VI other currencies b h G, ten 57 00:03:05,240 --> 00:03:07,760 Speaker 1: or emerging market, it's very hard to paint a picture 58 00:03:07,800 --> 00:03:10,720 Speaker 1: of an immediate dollar reversal. And actually, if you think 59 00:03:10,760 --> 00:03:15,480 Speaker 1: about dollar versus global growth backdrop is actually printing we 60 00:03:15,600 --> 00:03:19,480 Speaker 1: think a pretty fair so historically we only have such 61 00:03:19,520 --> 00:03:23,320 Speaker 1: a modest overshoot of dollar valuation. It's historically you don't 62 00:03:23,360 --> 00:03:25,520 Speaker 1: see an immediate reversal in the year after, So we 63 00:03:25,600 --> 00:03:28,560 Speaker 1: think that most likely dollars stay strong. UM for next 64 00:03:28,639 --> 00:03:32,200 Speaker 1: year China, the People's Congress is over j and Pings 65 00:03:32,240 --> 00:03:34,400 Speaker 1: got the third term as we expected, but of course 66 00:03:34,440 --> 00:03:38,400 Speaker 1: there's no real economic reformists in a in a circle, 67 00:03:38,400 --> 00:03:42,880 Speaker 1: which did somewhat spook markets. Has your investing thesis around 68 00:03:42,960 --> 00:03:48,080 Speaker 1: China changed after the People's Congress? UM? Well, to be honest, 69 00:03:48,160 --> 00:03:51,240 Speaker 1: not so much, because UM, I think the Party Congress 70 00:03:51,280 --> 00:03:53,960 Speaker 1: really reaffirmed some of the longer term goals that have 71 00:03:54,440 --> 00:03:57,800 Speaker 1: gradually crystallized over the last couple of years. UM. They 72 00:03:57,800 --> 00:04:00,880 Speaker 1: will invest very heavily innovation to try to close the 73 00:04:00,880 --> 00:04:05,320 Speaker 1: technological gap as much as possible, UH, transform the economy 74 00:04:05,360 --> 00:04:09,360 Speaker 1: in terms of energy sources towards greener sources of energy UH, 75 00:04:09,400 --> 00:04:14,720 Speaker 1: and beyond those two most pressing UH agenda UM, try 76 00:04:14,760 --> 00:04:20,080 Speaker 1: to redistribute income towards the poor families and income inland provinces, 77 00:04:20,120 --> 00:04:22,240 Speaker 1: so in terms of regional development. So all of these 78 00:04:22,279 --> 00:04:24,960 Speaker 1: are fairly long term goals that I think we've we've 79 00:04:24,960 --> 00:04:27,600 Speaker 1: we've been quite grown quite familiar with over the last 80 00:04:27,600 --> 00:04:32,240 Speaker 1: couple of years. I think, UM, you know, relative to markets, 81 00:04:32,720 --> 00:04:35,919 Speaker 1: where where we are with versus in terms of thinking 82 00:04:35,960 --> 00:04:38,679 Speaker 1: for next year, is that, UM, we don't really expect 83 00:04:39,080 --> 00:04:41,680 Speaker 1: because of its long term goals, we don't expect a 84 00:04:41,680 --> 00:04:44,880 Speaker 1: lot of policy easing. We don't expect you turn around 85 00:04:44,880 --> 00:04:49,960 Speaker 1: the housing market, and probably I think, UM, that's still entertained, 86 00:04:50,000 --> 00:04:52,960 Speaker 1: I think by by fair chunk of market participants. So 87 00:04:53,000 --> 00:04:55,120 Speaker 1: I think that that maybe a gap, you know, in 88 00:04:55,200 --> 00:04:57,640 Speaker 1: terms of differences of where we are versus the market 89 00:04:57,760 --> 00:05:00,120 Speaker 1: right now. So how are you waiting a move by 90 00:05:00,200 --> 00:05:04,039 Speaker 1: the Biden administration to halt some of the technological progress 91 00:05:04,040 --> 00:05:08,760 Speaker 1: in China by withholding certain technology where semiconductors are concerned. 92 00:05:08,800 --> 00:05:11,240 Speaker 1: And Brian and I were talking before the program, and 93 00:05:11,279 --> 00:05:13,560 Speaker 1: he was pointing out that maybe there's a risk of 94 00:05:13,839 --> 00:05:18,280 Speaker 1: certain pharmaceutical or biotech technology being withheld as well. I mean, 95 00:05:18,760 --> 00:05:21,039 Speaker 1: do moves like this on the part of the US 96 00:05:21,400 --> 00:05:24,680 Speaker 1: really have the potential to hold back economic activity in 97 00:05:24,760 --> 00:05:29,000 Speaker 1: China to a great degree? UM. I think it certainly 98 00:05:30,040 --> 00:05:33,960 Speaker 1: makes the policy trade off tougher. Three in a sense 99 00:05:34,000 --> 00:05:38,560 Speaker 1: that UM obviously resources and policy resources a finite, so 100 00:05:38,640 --> 00:05:41,599 Speaker 1: you have to kind of prioritize UM. And I think 101 00:05:41,640 --> 00:05:45,160 Speaker 1: that the Party Congress affirmed to us that the priorities 102 00:05:45,200 --> 00:05:49,560 Speaker 1: really are with regards to innovation, great green transition and 103 00:05:49,600 --> 00:05:52,880 Speaker 1: with regard to innovation, so these priorities are very clear, uh, 104 00:05:52,960 --> 00:05:55,880 Speaker 1: and that leaves I think less resources and policy room 105 00:05:55,960 --> 00:05:58,919 Speaker 1: with regard to um you know, uh things like the 106 00:05:58,920 --> 00:06:02,160 Speaker 1: housing market. So I think, um, you know what's happening 107 00:06:02,240 --> 00:06:06,360 Speaker 1: with with the technological um uh competition. Really, I think 108 00:06:06,440 --> 00:06:11,560 Speaker 1: it's another um move that probably of firms or highlights 109 00:06:12,040 --> 00:06:16,080 Speaker 1: just how priorities have are shifting in China UM. So 110 00:06:16,120 --> 00:06:18,960 Speaker 1: I think that it does make the policy trade off 111 00:06:19,080 --> 00:06:22,000 Speaker 1: much tougher for the economy and probably for financial markets 112 00:06:22,040 --> 00:06:24,320 Speaker 1: as well. I want to talk a little about Japan 113 00:06:24,440 --> 00:06:26,960 Speaker 1: before we let you go. It is, of course a 114 00:06:26,960 --> 00:06:29,080 Speaker 1: big decision day for the Bank of Japan today, but 115 00:06:29,120 --> 00:06:31,840 Speaker 1: we've got the hottest Tokyo CPI that we've seen since 116 00:06:33,400 --> 00:06:36,240 Speaker 1: nearly half a billion US dollars in stimulus coming down 117 00:06:36,320 --> 00:06:39,360 Speaker 1: the pipe from the government as well. Is a policy 118 00:06:39,440 --> 00:06:42,520 Speaker 1: shift inevitable at some point from the bo J When 119 00:06:42,520 --> 00:06:46,000 Speaker 1: do you think we're going to see it? M I 120 00:06:46,080 --> 00:06:48,200 Speaker 1: don't think it's inevitable actually, I mean, if you look 121 00:06:48,240 --> 00:06:51,680 Speaker 1: at the underlying economy of Japan, UM, it's not really 122 00:06:51,680 --> 00:06:53,760 Speaker 1: in the same place as the US. In fact, no 123 00:06:53,920 --> 00:06:56,719 Speaker 1: other economies in the same place. Japanese GDP is not 124 00:06:56,839 --> 00:07:00,640 Speaker 1: back to pre COVID level yet, So I think that, um, 125 00:07:00,680 --> 00:07:05,200 Speaker 1: the effectiveness of tightening monetary policy when enderlying economic environment 126 00:07:05,279 --> 00:07:08,560 Speaker 1: does not warranted. I think it's it's it's kind of questionable, 127 00:07:08,680 --> 00:07:11,440 Speaker 1: So we don't really think, um, they're from an economic 128 00:07:11,480 --> 00:07:14,880 Speaker 1: fundamental perspective in a position to to tighten policy. What 129 00:07:14,960 --> 00:07:17,480 Speaker 1: about the yen and how weak it's been. I mean, 130 00:07:17,520 --> 00:07:22,240 Speaker 1: we've seen intervention maybe on at least two separate occasions, 131 00:07:22,240 --> 00:07:24,240 Speaker 1: and I'm wondering whether here in the near term, at 132 00:07:24,240 --> 00:07:27,080 Speaker 1: any rate, that we have seen UH an end to 133 00:07:27,400 --> 00:07:32,280 Speaker 1: two yend weakness. So UH, the way we look at UH, 134 00:07:32,360 --> 00:07:34,800 Speaker 1: you know, fair value for the yend UH is really 135 00:07:34,880 --> 00:07:38,600 Speaker 1: coming from the interest rate differential UH model of framework. 136 00:07:38,840 --> 00:07:41,679 Speaker 1: And on that framework, one fifty is actually quite fair 137 00:07:41,760 --> 00:07:44,840 Speaker 1: given where interest rate differentials are between the US and Japan. 138 00:07:44,920 --> 00:07:47,680 Speaker 1: And if we, of course see further upsiders to US yolds, 139 00:07:47,680 --> 00:07:51,000 Speaker 1: then um, that differential gets larger. So there is very 140 00:07:51,040 --> 00:07:53,080 Speaker 1: little standing the way at the moment, I think for 141 00:07:53,160 --> 00:07:57,120 Speaker 1: further yend depreciation. All right, Julia Wang will have to 142 00:07:57,160 --> 00:07:58,840 Speaker 1: leave it there. Thanks so much for joining us on 143 00:07:58,880 --> 00:08:02,560 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Day Breakage. Julia Wang as executive director and Global 144 00:08:02,560 --> 00:08:05,200 Speaker 1: market Strategist at JP Morgan, a private bank,