WEBVTT - It's a Numbers Game: The Numbers Behind the GOP’s 2026 Midterm Comeback Strategy

0:00:01.520 --> 0:00:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to It's the Numbers Game with Ryan Gridowski.

0:00:04.559 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>I want to start by saying two things. One, give

0:00:07.760 --> 0:00:12.640
<v Speaker 1>a moment of a moment to honor the great memory

0:00:12.680 --> 0:00:17.960
<v Speaker 1>of Spirit Airline. And the thousands of Instagram reels that

0:00:18.079 --> 0:00:22.279
<v Speaker 1>filled my page of people throwing luggage out the window

0:00:22.640 --> 0:00:26.360
<v Speaker 1>or you know, getting into fistfights. They were really great entertainment. Also,

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:29.040
<v Speaker 1>I've talked a lot of this podcasts of personal victories.

0:00:30.000 --> 0:00:35.000
<v Speaker 1>I made a meal the other day that was phenomenal.

0:00:35.120 --> 0:00:36.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to talk about it during the Ask Me

0:00:36.720 --> 0:00:38.519
<v Speaker 1>Anything segment because I know most people are heard for

0:00:38.600 --> 0:00:42.519
<v Speaker 1>politics and not for any of my big bag of bs.

0:00:42.680 --> 0:00:45.479
<v Speaker 1>But this was phenomenal, and some people do like my

0:00:45.880 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Italian recipes, my Italian food. I'm going to give you

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:50.640
<v Speaker 1>guys that at the end of the episode. Okay, let's

0:00:50.680 --> 0:00:55.200
<v Speaker 1>get into the numbers of how Republicans can win the

0:00:55.240 --> 0:00:58.800
<v Speaker 1>majority in the House of Representatives in November. I know

0:00:59.200 --> 0:01:02.640
<v Speaker 1>everyone's already assumed it's a bygone conclusion. It's too far fetched.

0:01:02.680 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 1>We can't win. It's going to be a twenty eighteen blowout.

0:01:05.560 --> 0:01:08.400
<v Speaker 1>I've been breaking down the numbers and they're not as

0:01:08.520 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 1>bad as people think. There are, there are a lot

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:12.720
<v Speaker 1>of ifs, there's a lot that could change, and a

0:01:12.760 --> 0:01:14.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of things do change from now until election day.

0:01:14.959 --> 0:01:17.920
<v Speaker 1>But it's not as big a reach as even I

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:21.600
<v Speaker 1>thought it was. So let's first get into the redistricting fight,

0:01:21.640 --> 0:01:24.800
<v Speaker 1>because a lot is centered on the redistricting fight of

0:01:24.840 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 1>what's going on with these new congressional districts. Since the

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court ruled against race based redistricting, and remember the

0:01:31.200 --> 0:01:35.600
<v Speaker 1>DOJ said they're going to enforce lawsuits against race based redistricting,

0:01:35.880 --> 0:01:38.880
<v Speaker 1>there's been a lot of movements, mostly in the Southern states,

0:01:38.959 --> 0:01:42.920
<v Speaker 1>ahead of the November election. Now there's a big problem

0:01:43.040 --> 0:01:44.840
<v Speaker 1>in the sense that there's time. And this is what

0:01:44.920 --> 0:01:48.760
<v Speaker 1>I heard in DC circles was that the liberal justices

0:01:48.960 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 1>were taking such a long time to deliberate to give

0:01:52.320 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 1>their opinions on the case because they wanted to hold

0:01:56.120 --> 0:01:58.880
<v Speaker 1>it up as long as possible to give Republican states

0:01:58.880 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 1>as little time as pots to redistrict ahead of the midterms.

0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:05.280
<v Speaker 1>And this is, by the way, I'm not like breaking news.

0:02:05.320 --> 0:02:09.040
<v Speaker 1>This was told wildly throughout Washington, d C. Now, the

0:02:09.120 --> 0:02:13.600
<v Speaker 1>crazy thing is going into this. Almost all the Southern

0:02:13.639 --> 0:02:17.560
<v Speaker 1>states have governors who cannot run for reelection right. Governors

0:02:17.560 --> 0:02:21.720
<v Speaker 1>in Alabama, Georgia, Florida, Tennessee, South Carolina, they're all set

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 1>to retire this year, so part of them are looking

0:02:25.680 --> 0:02:29.960
<v Speaker 1>at this as I'm going to build my legacy that

0:02:30.080 --> 0:02:32.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm for my idea of fairness. I'm going to get

0:02:32.800 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 1>a nice up in the New York Times when I die,

0:02:35.360 --> 0:02:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the obituary from established media are going to say I

0:02:38.160 --> 0:02:42.360
<v Speaker 1>stood up for black majority districts, or they're saying my

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:46.040
<v Speaker 1>legacy will be the I delivered Republicans more congressional districts.

0:02:46.080 --> 0:02:49.080
<v Speaker 1>It's a very unusual thing because there's not as much

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:52.639
<v Speaker 1>political pressure that can be applied to a governor who

0:02:52.680 --> 0:02:55.680
<v Speaker 1>is retiring as the one who needs to run for

0:02:55.760 --> 0:02:59.080
<v Speaker 1>reelection in the future. And we're seeing this in this redistricting,

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:02.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, escape what's going on right now. First of all,

0:03:02.880 --> 0:03:04.480
<v Speaker 1>let's look with the states that are not redistioncing that

0:03:04.560 --> 0:03:07.960
<v Speaker 1>said off the top, I'm not redistricting Georgia being number one,

0:03:08.000 --> 0:03:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Georgia could redistrict one to two seats in Republicans favor

0:03:12.440 --> 0:03:15.959
<v Speaker 1>predominantly one the one in South Georgia for sure, and

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Brian Kemp has said no obviously Brian Kemp. Anyone who

0:03:19.400 --> 0:03:21.480
<v Speaker 1>follows and who knows Brian Kemp is not a big

0:03:21.520 --> 0:03:23.360
<v Speaker 1>fan of Donald Trump. Stalin Trump's not a big fan

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 1>of Brian Kemp. Trump tried to primary Camp. Kemp obviously

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:29.920
<v Speaker 1>came out as a big victor, but there is no

0:03:30.040 --> 0:03:31.560
<v Speaker 1>love lost between the two of them. But he has

0:03:31.560 --> 0:03:34.240
<v Speaker 1>said flat out I'm not redistricting, so take those seats.

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:36.680
<v Speaker 1>That seats are two seats off the table. Others state

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:39.920
<v Speaker 1>that's not redistrict is South Carolina. South Carolina, they have

0:03:40.160 --> 0:03:44.160
<v Speaker 1>one predominantly black district which is which is where Jim

0:03:44.280 --> 0:03:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Clyburn is the representative. Now, for those who are know,

0:03:46.760 --> 0:03:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Jim Clyburn was the head of was in Democratic leadership

0:03:49.800 --> 0:03:52.840
<v Speaker 1>for a long time. Whenever like Nancy Pelosis to take

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:56.680
<v Speaker 1>those pictures with like house Democratic leadership, he was the older,

0:03:56.960 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 1>bald black gentleman next to Nancy Pelosi all the time.

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 1>He is a powerhouse in South Carolina. He is the

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Democratic Party of South Carolina and he most famously is

0:04:08.760 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 1>the reason that Joe Biden won the nomination in twenty twenty.

0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 1>He was that he changed the trajectory of Biden's losing

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:21.280
<v Speaker 1>campaign because of his endorsement, Biden won South Carolina, then

0:04:21.320 --> 0:04:23.760
<v Speaker 1>he won more southern states. The black vote came for him,

0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:26.200
<v Speaker 1>and that's after he got obliterated in Iowa and New

0:04:26.200 --> 0:04:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Hampshire and Nevada, and people were like, well, it's kind

0:04:28.720 --> 0:04:33.359
<v Speaker 1>of over for Joe. Clyburn has immense political power, and

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:36.080
<v Speaker 1>even in the Democratic Party, even with Nancy Pelosi retiring

0:04:36.080 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 1>and all the rest of them kind of leaving, he

0:04:37.880 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 1>still wields a lot of power and a lot of

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:42.800
<v Speaker 1>power for the state. And I think maybe a calculation

0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:45.599
<v Speaker 1>could be that they want him there in Congress in

0:04:45.640 --> 0:04:47.640
<v Speaker 1>case they need money for the state and the Democrats

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 1>of the House or whatnot. Anyway, so Henry McMasters, according

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:53.680
<v Speaker 1>to the Post Courier, says he is not redistracting, and

0:04:53.720 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 1>I kind of believe that that's where they, like, let's

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 1>talk about the places that are redistriing, pending some lawsuits.

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:02.920
<v Speaker 1>First of Tennessee, I'm actually surprised Tennessee only has one

0:05:03.320 --> 0:05:06.279
<v Speaker 1>Democrat district, one black majority district. It is the district

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:08.880
<v Speaker 1>in Memphis. If you look at a map of Tennessee, right,

0:05:09.120 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 1>it all looks red, ruby, red. There's one little, tiny

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:17.440
<v Speaker 1>little spot that is where there's the democratic district. It's

0:05:17.520 --> 0:05:19.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of even hard to redistrict because it's really in

0:05:19.760 --> 0:05:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the corner and it's so democratic. But the governor, Governor

0:05:24.120 --> 0:05:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Lee has said that he is going to push forward

0:05:26.920 --> 0:05:29.320
<v Speaker 1>arm redistricting, and not only it's going to be redistricting,

0:05:29.320 --> 0:05:33.680
<v Speaker 1>they're going to overturn a fifty year law that allows

0:05:33.760 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 1>them to do mid decade redistricting. It was illegal in

0:05:37.360 --> 0:05:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee like it's illegal in New Jersey and many other places.

0:05:40.360 --> 0:05:45.080
<v Speaker 1>So they're going to overturn this law and once again

0:05:45.160 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 1>do that. They're going to take the Memphis district and

0:05:47.680 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 1>split it into three that will give Republicans a new

0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:55.360
<v Speaker 1>seat out of Tennessee. The congressman who's been there for sometimes,

0:05:55.400 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Steve Cohen, he represents Tennessee. He has basically said that

0:06:00.200 --> 0:06:01.840
<v Speaker 1>this is gonna end up in litigation. They're going to

0:06:01.880 --> 0:06:05.839
<v Speaker 1>fight this in litigation. But whether or not they win

0:06:05.960 --> 0:06:08.560
<v Speaker 1>this in twenty twenty six, they're losing the seat in

0:06:08.600 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty eight. He has acknowledged that this seat is gone.

0:06:11.000 --> 0:06:13.479
<v Speaker 1>It will be a Republican seat come twenty twenty eight,

0:06:14.000 --> 0:06:17.720
<v Speaker 1>and Tennessee's gonna get another seat, probably by twenty thirty two,

0:06:17.760 --> 0:06:20.600
<v Speaker 1>it's very likely to So Tennessee. All these people moving

0:06:20.640 --> 0:06:23.279
<v Speaker 1>to it, they're very quickly adding seats, and they can.

0:06:23.600 --> 0:06:26.360
<v Speaker 1>East Tennessee is so Republican that if they push keep

0:06:26.360 --> 0:06:30.400
<v Speaker 1>putting East Tennessee further central, they'll have enough for Publican

0:06:30.480 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 1>votes to make sure that they can continue to make

0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 1>the all those seats Republican. So Tennessee is the one

0:06:34.960 --> 0:06:39.480
<v Speaker 1>for Republicans, going one seat for Republican. Next over is Alabama. Okay,

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:43.560
<v Speaker 1>this state is a mess. It is a mess. It

0:06:43.640 --> 0:06:46.600
<v Speaker 1>is you have no I've been hearing from stories from

0:06:46.600 --> 0:06:51.440
<v Speaker 1>people constantly. So initially Governor k Ivy, she's allegedly, well,

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:53.200
<v Speaker 1>she's not allegedly a very old woman, but she's an

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:55.520
<v Speaker 1>older lady and older, a woman of a certain age

0:06:56.360 --> 0:06:59.840
<v Speaker 1>who allegedly likes the drink in the middle of the day.

0:07:00.520 --> 0:07:03.000
<v Speaker 1>And she did not want any redistricting. She was saying

0:07:03.080 --> 0:07:06.000
<v Speaker 1>flat out, I'm not redistricting, I'm not doing anything. And

0:07:06.080 --> 0:07:09.360
<v Speaker 1>the leader of the state Senate in Alabama was a

0:07:09.520 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 1>longtime Democrat who recently fairly recently became a Republican, so

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:18.200
<v Speaker 1>he's not even gung ho about it either, And she

0:07:18.240 --> 0:07:21.000
<v Speaker 1>said I'm not redistricting period. Well, she blinked. She said,

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:23.800
<v Speaker 1>now we're going to redistrict. A big question is to

0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:28.480
<v Speaker 1>do they do redistrict one seat or two, because they're

0:07:28.560 --> 0:07:30.640
<v Speaker 1>saying what I'm hearing is is that she wants to

0:07:30.680 --> 0:07:34.000
<v Speaker 1>go back to the old map, the map from before

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 1>the lawsuit, which is one democratic seat. However, it's a

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:42.840
<v Speaker 1>democratic seat that basically captures almost the entire large portion

0:07:42.880 --> 0:07:45.920
<v Speaker 1>of the black vote in Alabama. Well, you can't do

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:49.360
<v Speaker 1>that because we're against race based redistricting. So how do

0:07:49.440 --> 0:07:51.840
<v Speaker 1>you have she say, Now, they could make a democratic

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 1>seat if they made like Birmingham and the surrounding areas,

0:07:54.840 --> 0:07:57.200
<v Speaker 1>And in that case, it's a democratic seat, but it's

0:07:57.200 --> 0:08:00.320
<v Speaker 1>not that democratic. It's really a swing seat. They can

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:02.560
<v Speaker 1>make that a Republican seat, but a swing Republican seat

0:08:02.560 --> 0:08:04.920
<v Speaker 1>as well. There's other things to do besides make it

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:08.040
<v Speaker 1>a full blown Republican seat. But if we can't do

0:08:08.360 --> 0:08:13.360
<v Speaker 1>race based redistricting, I don't know how she does the

0:08:13.440 --> 0:08:15.880
<v Speaker 1>old map that she says she's going to do. There's

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:20.120
<v Speaker 1>this really big push on the part of Republicans in

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Alabama to protect Democrat Terry Sewell's district. Terry Sewell is

0:08:24.120 --> 0:08:26.760
<v Speaker 1>not a moderate Democrat in any sense. She votes as

0:08:27.000 --> 0:08:29.640
<v Speaker 1>left as Bernie Sanders does. I mean, it's one for

0:08:29.720 --> 0:08:31.840
<v Speaker 1>the other. It's, you know, instead of a Jewish guy

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:34.680
<v Speaker 1>from Vermont, it's a black woman from Alabama. They vote

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:38.760
<v Speaker 1>exactly the same. The need to protect her or the

0:08:38.800 --> 0:08:41.800
<v Speaker 1>fight to protect her is what's going on in Alabama

0:08:41.960 --> 0:08:45.679
<v Speaker 1>right now. We'll see how that kind of plays out.

0:08:45.960 --> 0:08:49.680
<v Speaker 1>The person who's pushing hardest for this seven zero map.

0:08:49.720 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 1>We're all republic there's all Republican seats is Senator Tommy Tupperville.

0:08:53.840 --> 0:08:56.280
<v Speaker 1>He is very likely going to be the next governor.

0:08:56.320 --> 0:09:01.880
<v Speaker 1>He's essentially the nominee now and and it's Alabama, so

0:09:01.920 --> 0:09:05.240
<v Speaker 1>he'll he'll be He's very very very likely going to

0:09:05.240 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 1>be the next governor. He wants a seven o map.

0:09:07.800 --> 0:09:10.320
<v Speaker 1>He wants this very badly. He's been lobbing for it,

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:14.520
<v Speaker 1>he's been fighting for it. We'll see if he gets

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:16.600
<v Speaker 1>his way or if k Ivy gets her way. It's

0:09:16.679 --> 0:09:20.640
<v Speaker 1>very much but even though they're both people of a

0:09:20.679 --> 0:09:23.480
<v Speaker 1>certain age, it's very much a generational fight in the

0:09:23.880 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 1>in the mindset of who they are as Republicans versus

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:28.800
<v Speaker 1>in the ages of who they are as Republicans, but

0:09:28.880 --> 0:09:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Tuberville has been a one man machine wrecking ball. And

0:09:32.600 --> 0:09:34.840
<v Speaker 1>if they get the seven zero map where it's all

0:09:34.880 --> 0:09:39.120
<v Speaker 1>seven districts, a big credit goes to Tommy Tupperville more than

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:42.079
<v Speaker 1>basically any It was Marshall Blackburn was very for the

0:09:42.120 --> 0:09:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee See, but Blackburn and Tuberville have been the two

0:09:45.080 --> 0:09:50.080
<v Speaker 1>senators really fighting for redistricting their state's map. Over in Mississippi,

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Governor Tate Reeves he is not of a reale or

0:09:52.679 --> 0:09:56.040
<v Speaker 1>retirement this year, but Governor Tate Reeves has said off

0:09:56.040 --> 0:09:58.079
<v Speaker 1>the bat they are redistricting that seat, so that will

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:00.400
<v Speaker 1>be Benny Thomas's seat, will be a republic can see,

0:10:00.480 --> 0:10:04.360
<v Speaker 1>that will be an extra Republican seat for Republicans or

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:07.680
<v Speaker 1>extra seat for Republicans out of Mississippi, and that leaves

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:13.800
<v Speaker 1>us with Louisiana. The Louisiana has two Democratic seats, one

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:16.560
<v Speaker 1>based out of predominantly New Orleans and one out of

0:10:16.600 --> 0:10:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Baton Rouge. So let me tell you guys a little story.

0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:21.840
<v Speaker 1>This is not that long ago. It was like six

0:10:21.920 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 1>or seven years ago when the lawsuit came out where

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:27.880
<v Speaker 1>they had to draw a second Democratic seat. I there's

0:10:27.920 --> 0:10:30.560
<v Speaker 1>a man in Louisiana. He was a congressman. His name

0:10:30.760 --> 0:10:35.960
<v Speaker 1>is Garrett Graves. I don't know who's cereal this man

0:10:36.040 --> 0:10:39.480
<v Speaker 1>peed in, but for whatever reason, he is the most

0:10:39.520 --> 0:10:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Hayden man in Louisiana. He's a Republican and they purposely

0:10:44.559 --> 0:10:47.960
<v Speaker 1>drew his house into this new Democratic district. They did

0:10:48.000 --> 0:10:51.200
<v Speaker 1>not want him having a seat in Congress. They were like,

0:10:51.240 --> 0:10:54.200
<v Speaker 1>we're getting rid of this guy, and that's that. Well,

0:10:54.240 --> 0:10:58.560
<v Speaker 1>now they're talking about redistricting. They're having a conversation about giving,

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, either either all Republican seats or one Democratic seat.

0:11:02.720 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 1>They what I'm hearing this is alleged. Allegedly they do

0:11:06.559 --> 0:11:09.200
<v Speaker 1>not want to give all Republican seats because they don't

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 1>even want the possibility of Garrett Graves running for his

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:17.480
<v Speaker 1>old seat to get What did this man do that

0:11:17.679 --> 0:11:22.719
<v Speaker 1>everyone can't stand him. It's it's quite bizarre. So if

0:11:22.760 --> 0:11:25.920
<v Speaker 1>they did the old map, which basically breaks up the

0:11:25.960 --> 0:11:29.199
<v Speaker 1>Baton Rouge district into several different different districts, it opens

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:34.040
<v Speaker 1>up a seat in central to northern Louisiana. The population

0:11:34.120 --> 0:11:38.440
<v Speaker 1>center where population is growing, however, is in southeast Louisiana.

0:11:38.480 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 1>It's the way Saint Tammany Parish and Orleans Parish and

0:11:40.800 --> 0:11:45.959
<v Speaker 1>Jefferson Parish. They are they want they're going to break

0:11:46.040 --> 0:11:48.800
<v Speaker 1>up the New Orleans District, which is much harder to

0:11:48.800 --> 0:11:51.199
<v Speaker 1>break up really because it's much more it's much more democratic.

0:11:51.440 --> 0:11:54.559
<v Speaker 1>They're going to break up the New Orleans District and

0:11:54.640 --> 0:11:58.480
<v Speaker 1>make another Republican district, more in the south, more in

0:11:58.600 --> 0:12:03.240
<v Speaker 1>the east, away from Garret Graves's house. That's what I'm hearing.

0:12:03.280 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 1>That's how desperately they want to prevent this man from

0:12:07.760 --> 0:12:11.080
<v Speaker 1>being able to run for office again once again. Don't

0:12:11.120 --> 0:12:13.760
<v Speaker 1>know who we pissed off, but he pissed somebody up

0:12:14.000 --> 0:12:16.320
<v Speaker 1>royally that this is like an eight year long feud.

0:12:16.600 --> 0:12:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Louisiana can get messy. It really can. Having lived there

0:12:20.280 --> 0:12:23.960
<v Speaker 1>now for a bit, Uh, it's he can get really messy.

0:12:24.240 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 1>It would be hilarious though. If I end up in

0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:29.000
<v Speaker 1>a seat that's like a vacant Republican seat, I will

0:12:29.000 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 1>get calls immediately saying, hey, just do it for fun

0:12:31.080 --> 0:12:32.800
<v Speaker 1>run for office. I will not do it, but it

0:12:32.880 --> 0:12:35.719
<v Speaker 1>will be funny. Okay. So if you add all those

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:39.960
<v Speaker 1>hes together that, depending on what Alabama does, that creates

0:12:40.160 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 1>four or five new Republican districts. Now, there is also

0:12:45.080 --> 0:12:47.960
<v Speaker 1>the two core cases that we're looking at that will

0:12:48.000 --> 0:12:50.679
<v Speaker 1>also decide this, the first being in Virginia and the

0:12:50.720 --> 0:12:54.120
<v Speaker 1>second being in Florida. Let's srob with Florida first. In Florida,

0:12:54.240 --> 0:12:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Ronda Santa's redistricted his map, creating four new Republican majority districts,

0:13:00.240 --> 0:13:03.680
<v Speaker 1>districts that Trump won anyway by a good margin. While

0:13:03.760 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 1>all those maps are in the middle of a new

0:13:05.960 --> 0:13:09.240
<v Speaker 1>lawsuit by Mark Elias. He's a Democratic lawyer. He's a

0:13:09.280 --> 0:13:14.079
<v Speaker 1>pretty awful person. Constantly tries to make bluestates, redistrict Republicans

0:13:14.120 --> 0:13:17.600
<v Speaker 1>out of existence. Says he fights for democracy, but he

0:13:17.960 --> 0:13:21.280
<v Speaker 1>works really hard and making sure voters, depending on how

0:13:21.280 --> 0:13:24.640
<v Speaker 1>they vote, don't get any say, and who their congressman is,

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:26.760
<v Speaker 1>make sure they're all democratic seats. He tried to get

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 1>rid of the stadn Island seat put into Manhattan. He's

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 1>awful anyway, He is suing the He is suing Florida,

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:36.760
<v Speaker 1>and because the claim that he is saying is if

0:13:36.840 --> 0:13:40.440
<v Speaker 1>flies in the face of Florida's Fair District's Amendment, which

0:13:40.520 --> 0:13:43.520
<v Speaker 1>was passed in twenty ten. The amendment says it's in

0:13:43.559 --> 0:13:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the Florida constitution maps cannot be drawn to favor an

0:13:47.760 --> 0:13:54.280
<v Speaker 1>incumbent or a political party. DeSantis are saying that that

0:13:54.440 --> 0:13:57.880
<v Speaker 1>they're not but there because they're compact maps. We'll see

0:13:57.880 --> 0:13:59.760
<v Speaker 1>how that goes. I mean, it seems like markle Lies

0:13:59.800 --> 0:14:01.520
<v Speaker 1>has a case to be made. We'll see how the

0:14:01.559 --> 0:14:03.360
<v Speaker 1>court does it. It is going to I think a

0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Republican judge at first. I could see it's working its

0:14:06.400 --> 0:14:08.320
<v Speaker 1>way up to the Florida Supreme Court, which is very

0:14:08.360 --> 0:14:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Republican as well. But that will be an interesting question

0:14:11.840 --> 0:14:14.520
<v Speaker 1>of whether Mark Elias wins and if if he loses,

0:14:14.600 --> 0:14:17.720
<v Speaker 1>those are foremost he's going to Republicans. The more interesting

0:14:17.800 --> 0:14:21.760
<v Speaker 1>case is the one in Virginia over their referendum. Okay,

0:14:22.600 --> 0:14:26.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to read court documents to you. Per court documents,

0:14:26.400 --> 0:14:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Virginia Democrats advanced the proposal during the twenty twenty four

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:34.240
<v Speaker 1>special session of the general election. However, there are strict

0:14:34.320 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 1>rules as to what kind of legislation can be considered

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:41.320
<v Speaker 1>during these types of sessions. Democratocrats reportedly violated those rules.

0:14:41.400 --> 0:14:44.680
<v Speaker 1>As results, any action has taking place. It taking place

0:14:44.680 --> 0:14:48.560
<v Speaker 1>to advance the plan would be deemed illegal. That is

0:14:48.600 --> 0:14:50.720
<v Speaker 1>what the court case is saying. The court case is

0:14:50.720 --> 0:14:55.760
<v Speaker 1>saying there are certain time restrictions on how this referendum

0:14:55.840 --> 0:14:59.240
<v Speaker 1>could have gone forward. In Virginia. Democrats broke the law

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 1>when they put far Or this ballot initiative that passed

0:15:02.120 --> 0:15:05.520
<v Speaker 1>by three points. So so far it's made its way

0:15:05.560 --> 0:15:10.000
<v Speaker 1>to the Virginia Supreme Court. The Virginia Supreme Court has

0:15:10.160 --> 0:15:14.800
<v Speaker 1>not certified this election results despite it being a week

0:15:14.960 --> 0:15:19.200
<v Speaker 1>now and as of Friday, they were supposed to decide

0:15:19.200 --> 0:15:20.760
<v Speaker 1>by Priory, they had not decided yet. As of the

0:15:20.760 --> 0:15:23.560
<v Speaker 1>according's podcast, they have not decided. And according to Dan

0:15:23.640 --> 0:15:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Turntime from The Huddle, he's been on this podcast before,

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:29.680
<v Speaker 1>loved Dan Turntime, He's a longtime democratic strategist. He said

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:34.680
<v Speaker 1>that there is growing anxiety among Democrats Virginia Democrats and

0:15:34.840 --> 0:15:40.720
<v Speaker 1>fights kind of happening behind the scenes because Spamberger initially

0:15:40.760 --> 0:15:43.800
<v Speaker 1>told the legislator, we can't do this, it is not legal,

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 1>and she was kind of strong armed into this position.

0:15:48.120 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 1>And her approval rating. I've done multiple episodes. Her prooting

0:15:52.240 --> 0:15:56.119
<v Speaker 1>is tanking because of this. Her provoting is falling apart

0:15:56.280 --> 0:15:59.360
<v Speaker 1>because of this. So he says he gives it less

0:15:59.400 --> 0:16:02.760
<v Speaker 1>than a fifth DP percent chance that they certify this election.

0:16:03.400 --> 0:16:06.760
<v Speaker 1>If that happens, used blowback to Spamburger, usable like to

0:16:06.800 --> 0:16:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Democrats who spend sixty five million dollars sixty six million

0:16:09.960 --> 0:16:13.840
<v Speaker 1>dollars on this redistrict effort that went nowhere, and the

0:16:13.840 --> 0:16:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Octagerian Speaker of the House, who's completely delusional at this point.

0:16:18.240 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 1>But if that happens, that would give Republicans a chance

0:16:21.760 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 1>at another four seats, So fourig in Virginia, four in Florida,

0:16:26.120 --> 0:16:30.120
<v Speaker 1>and four to five in the Deep South. Thirteen seats total.

0:16:31.480 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 1>That's a lot of ifs. I want to reminder that's

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:36.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of if if if so. Nothing is set

0:16:36.280 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 1>in stone, but those are the initial things that we

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:42.360
<v Speaker 1>need to track and look forward to in order to

0:16:42.440 --> 0:16:45.080
<v Speaker 1>see what what the map actually looks like. Do Republicans

0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:48.600
<v Speaker 1>really have this chance? If all three of those things happen,

0:16:49.280 --> 0:16:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Republicans will start out with about two hundred and ten

0:16:52.520 --> 0:16:55.240
<v Speaker 1>seats in Congress, two hundred and nine, two hundred and ten,

0:16:55.240 --> 0:16:57.160
<v Speaker 1>two hundred eight. It'sing like that, depending on what you

0:16:57.240 --> 0:16:59.080
<v Speaker 1>say is a tossup seat. It's a little nuanced, but

0:16:59.440 --> 0:17:01.360
<v Speaker 1>between two undred eight to two hundred and ten seats,

0:17:01.560 --> 0:17:04.960
<v Speaker 1>they only need another ten at most to win the majority.

0:17:05.520 --> 0:17:07.440
<v Speaker 1>How do they do that? How do they win the majority?

0:17:07.480 --> 0:17:11.359
<v Speaker 1>We'll get back into that coming up next. As I

0:17:11.400 --> 0:17:14.919
<v Speaker 1>said before, if Republicans manage the reditioning wins in the

0:17:14.960 --> 0:17:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Deep South in the lawsuit in Virginia and the lawsuit

0:17:17.800 --> 0:17:20.840
<v Speaker 1>in Florida, they start off this map with about two

0:17:21.000 --> 0:17:23.359
<v Speaker 1>hundred and nine to two hundred and ten House seats,

0:17:23.400 --> 0:17:27.360
<v Speaker 1>They need two hundred and eighteen to win the majority, right,

0:17:27.480 --> 0:17:29.600
<v Speaker 1>eight to ten more depending on what you call a

0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:33.040
<v Speaker 1>swing district. How do they do that? Where are those

0:17:33.119 --> 0:17:35.159
<v Speaker 1>eight seats? Right? That's where we want to look at.

0:17:35.160 --> 0:17:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Where is the eight seats to create the majority? All right,

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:41.159
<v Speaker 1>let's first go into the seats that they're going to

0:17:41.240 --> 0:17:43.240
<v Speaker 1>defend in the House represented Where are they going to

0:17:43.320 --> 0:17:47.320
<v Speaker 1>gun to take out seats, especially that Kamala Harris won

0:17:47.400 --> 0:17:51.280
<v Speaker 1>but or Republican represents them in Congress? The first being

0:17:51.600 --> 0:17:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Mike Lawler seat in New York seventeen. That's the Rockland

0:17:55.080 --> 0:17:57.600
<v Speaker 1>County seat. His seat will be very dependent on how

0:17:57.640 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 1>the Orthodox Jewish vote. The other seat is saving his

0:18:00.600 --> 0:18:03.200
<v Speaker 1>first congressional district, that's Bucks County and a little bit

0:18:03.320 --> 0:18:07.200
<v Speaker 1>north of Bucks a little bit of the Philadelphia suburb Areia.

0:18:07.760 --> 0:18:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Fitzpatrick is the most liberal member of the Congress by

0:18:11.359 --> 0:18:16.080
<v Speaker 1>a long shot, but he is a fundraising machine and

0:18:16.119 --> 0:18:18.440
<v Speaker 1>he's very popular in his seat. I actually don't even

0:18:18.440 --> 0:18:20.160
<v Speaker 1>have his seat as a toss. I think his seat

0:18:20.200 --> 0:18:23.439
<v Speaker 1>is actually probably lean Republican, despite Kamala Harris having won it.

0:18:24.480 --> 0:18:27.800
<v Speaker 1>That's the two that are the peak, you know, Preak

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:31.439
<v Speaker 1>targets for the for the Democrats that Republicans need to defend.

0:18:31.720 --> 0:18:34.240
<v Speaker 1>And they both have kind of special conditions. Lawler Very

0:18:34.680 --> 0:18:37.880
<v Speaker 1>has a very orthodox Jewish sheet. Fitzpatrick, he's a very

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:41.119
<v Speaker 1>liberal Republican, but in a seat that he has a

0:18:41.160 --> 0:18:43.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of money and he's personally very popular. He only

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:45.880
<v Speaker 1>votes with Republicans like fifty five percent of the time,

0:18:45.920 --> 0:18:48.440
<v Speaker 1>so he's considered an independent. So there's seats in the northeast.

0:18:48.440 --> 0:18:52.360
<v Speaker 1>There's Scott Perry. He represents Harrisburg in Pennsylvania ten. It's Harrisburg,

0:18:52.440 --> 0:18:55.520
<v Speaker 1>it's surrounding areas. Perry is a very conservative congressman in

0:18:55.560 --> 0:18:57.600
<v Speaker 1>a district that's moving to the left very quickly as

0:18:57.680 --> 0:19:00.320
<v Speaker 1>more people from Maryland and New Jersey and Philadelphia move

0:19:00.359 --> 0:19:03.040
<v Speaker 1>to that area of the state. Then there's two other districts,

0:19:03.080 --> 0:19:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Pennsylvania eight Rob Brushman, and then there's Pennsylvania seven, Ryan McKenzie.

0:19:07.880 --> 0:19:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Those are the two northeast Pennsylvania seats. They're both freshmen.

0:19:10.720 --> 0:19:13.560
<v Speaker 1>It will be a tough battle to fight. And right

0:19:13.640 --> 0:19:17.120
<v Speaker 1>over the river is Tom Kean over in New Jersey seven.

0:19:17.160 --> 0:19:19.800
<v Speaker 1>So those is like, that's the biggest compact of swing

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:22.720
<v Speaker 1>areas that all touch each other, those two in Pennsylvania

0:19:22.800 --> 0:19:24.640
<v Speaker 1>and the one in New Jersey, and then a little

0:19:24.640 --> 0:19:28.159
<v Speaker 1>further away is Pennsylvania ten. Republicans would have to defend

0:19:28.160 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 1>those seats. But that's five right there. Those are five

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:33.879
<v Speaker 1>seats right there that Republicans would need to defend. And

0:19:33.920 --> 0:19:35.960
<v Speaker 1>if you can they defend them, if they can win them,

0:19:36.240 --> 0:19:38.920
<v Speaker 1>that takes the pressure immediately off the rest of the map.

0:19:39.400 --> 0:19:42.399
<v Speaker 1>Now in the southeast, almost all the seats are safe

0:19:42.400 --> 0:19:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Republican except for Chuck Edwards from North Carolina. You're like,

0:19:47.320 --> 0:19:53.240
<v Speaker 1>who is Chuck Edwards. Chuck Edwards represents the Mountains of Appalachia.

0:19:53.280 --> 0:19:56.119
<v Speaker 1>He is He took over from Madison Cawthorne when Madison

0:19:56.160 --> 0:20:00.359
<v Speaker 1>Cawthorne had all his scandals. Well, Chuck Edwards now running

0:20:00.359 --> 0:20:03.000
<v Speaker 1>for reelection, His first reelection has tons of scandals. He

0:20:03.119 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 1>allegedly is under ethical investigation for allegedly having an affair

0:20:07.840 --> 0:20:11.960
<v Speaker 1>with a staffer and, according to Axios, made multiple female

0:20:11.960 --> 0:20:15.600
<v Speaker 1>staffers very uncomfortable giving them handwritten notes. One of the

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:19.000
<v Speaker 1>letters said that the staffer wrote a had quote written

0:20:19.000 --> 0:20:26.160
<v Speaker 1>a complex chapter to his heart. That is just so stupid. Anyway,

0:20:26.400 --> 0:20:29.200
<v Speaker 1>he like, you know, this is such a weird congress

0:20:29.200 --> 0:20:32.840
<v Speaker 1>where you have everyone from Corey Mills to Eric Slowell.

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Everyone's no one keep it in their pants, keep it

0:20:35.040 --> 0:20:37.240
<v Speaker 1>in your pants, and run for reelection. All right. He

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:39.560
<v Speaker 1>is going to have issues because of his personal stuff

0:20:39.600 --> 0:20:43.200
<v Speaker 1>going on, but otherwise it is a pretty likely Republican seat.

0:20:43.400 --> 0:20:45.720
<v Speaker 1>He's going to be controversial. Whoever thought that the man

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:49.280
<v Speaker 1>following Madison Catherine would be more controversial. But he's more

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:53.840
<v Speaker 1>controversial if the Virginia lawsuit. By the way, also with

0:20:53.880 --> 0:20:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the Republicans win that Jen Kiggins and Pennsylvania, it's sort

0:20:56.520 --> 0:20:59.400
<v Speaker 1>in Virginia. Second, that's the Virginia Beach district that will

0:20:59.440 --> 0:21:02.600
<v Speaker 1>also be very competitive. Okay, but that's how you That's

0:21:02.640 --> 0:21:06.640
<v Speaker 1>the entire southeast over in the Midwest, there are five seats,

0:21:06.680 --> 0:21:09.320
<v Speaker 1>two in Michigan, one in Wisconsin and two in Iowa.

0:21:09.640 --> 0:21:11.680
<v Speaker 1>You have over in Michigan you have the vacant seat

0:21:11.720 --> 0:21:14.440
<v Speaker 1>that John James is leaving outside of Detroit and Tom

0:21:14.480 --> 0:21:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Barrett seat that's kind of more central Michigan. That's Michigan. Seven.

0:21:17.720 --> 0:21:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Over in Wisconsin you have Western Wisconsin. Wisconsin's third district.

0:21:22.119 --> 0:21:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Derek Van Orden represents that district. He's in a lot

0:21:25.040 --> 0:21:28.400
<v Speaker 1>of trouble. And in Iowa, there's really three swing seats

0:21:28.440 --> 0:21:30.800
<v Speaker 1>in Iowa, but there's two that are really in a

0:21:30.840 --> 0:21:34.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of trouble. There is the pro amnesty Republican Zach

0:21:34.560 --> 0:21:38.919
<v Speaker 1>Nunn his seat in southwest Iowa. And then there's Marionette

0:21:39.040 --> 0:21:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Miller Meeks. Mmm, she's in southeast Iowa. Let me tell

0:21:43.600 --> 0:21:47.359
<v Speaker 1>you she doesn't get talked about a lot, Marionette Miller Meeks,

0:21:48.119 --> 0:21:51.280
<v Speaker 1>but she is the face of persistence, this lady. She

0:21:51.480 --> 0:21:55.159
<v Speaker 1>ran three times for the seat, lost all three times,

0:21:55.200 --> 0:21:57.199
<v Speaker 1>then ran for state Senate, won the state Senate seat.

0:21:57.400 --> 0:22:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Then she runs again a fourth time after using three times,

0:22:00.960 --> 0:22:04.720
<v Speaker 1>and she wins by six votes out of four hundred

0:22:04.920 --> 0:22:08.600
<v Speaker 1>thousand casts. She wins comfortably the second time, and then

0:22:08.640 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 1>the third time she wins by eight hundred votes out

0:22:11.760 --> 0:22:15.600
<v Speaker 1>of four hundred and fifteen thousand casts. She pulls out

0:22:15.760 --> 0:22:19.000
<v Speaker 1>sweekers like no one's business. Can she do it again?

0:22:19.119 --> 0:22:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Who's to say. We'll find out very quickly, but yeah,

0:22:22.840 --> 0:22:29.639
<v Speaker 1>she triple ms Marionette Miller meeks Is. She's able to

0:22:29.640 --> 0:22:31.920
<v Speaker 1>pull by Vi sweevers by in a district that Trump

0:22:32.000 --> 0:22:34.119
<v Speaker 1>won overwhelmingly. So it's not like a uge. It's not

0:22:34.160 --> 0:22:37.119
<v Speaker 1>Susan Collins. This is not a big accomplishment. She should

0:22:37.160 --> 0:22:39.960
<v Speaker 1>be able to win there by good margins, and she can,

0:22:40.240 --> 0:22:43.000
<v Speaker 1>but she does win, so it's very strange. Okay. The

0:22:43.040 --> 0:22:45.960
<v Speaker 1>other seat that Republicans Democrats are targeting is the Omaha

0:22:46.000 --> 0:22:50.119
<v Speaker 1>seat Nebraska that is vacated by Dom Bacon. That seat

0:22:50.320 --> 0:22:53.400
<v Speaker 1>is most likely going to Democrats. It's very unlikely they're

0:22:53.400 --> 0:22:57.240
<v Speaker 1>going to Republicans will hold that seat. It's a vacant seat. Okay.

0:22:57.480 --> 0:23:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Over in the Mountain States and the south West is

0:23:00.440 --> 0:23:03.360
<v Speaker 1>just a handful of seats. Last left to defend Gabe Evans.

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:06.560
<v Speaker 1>He represents Koloras eighth, that's the suburbs of Denver. You

0:23:06.600 --> 0:23:11.720
<v Speaker 1>have Juan Siscamani. He represents this like southeast Arizona, and

0:23:11.760 --> 0:23:14.520
<v Speaker 1>you have a suburban a seat district one which is

0:23:14.560 --> 0:23:18.680
<v Speaker 1>a vacant representing the Phoenix suburbs. That's really it. That's

0:23:18.720 --> 0:23:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the entire landscape. If you want, if Democrats had a

0:23:21.560 --> 0:23:23.200
<v Speaker 1>really good year, they could stretch. They can go out

0:23:23.200 --> 0:23:26.199
<v Speaker 1>for Iowa's first district, they could go after Monica de

0:23:26.280 --> 0:23:30.800
<v Speaker 1>la Cruz's district, in Texas's fifteenth district. There's a few

0:23:30.840 --> 0:23:34.120
<v Speaker 1>other ones that they could reach for. But that's basically it.

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:39.200
<v Speaker 1>That's basically where Republicans are on super defense this time

0:23:39.280 --> 0:23:42.080
<v Speaker 1>in districts that they can lose. Now, where can they

0:23:42.119 --> 0:23:45.040
<v Speaker 1>go on offense? Can Republicans pick up any Democrats seats?

0:23:45.040 --> 0:23:47.680
<v Speaker 1>The answer is yes. There are two seats in South

0:23:47.720 --> 0:23:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Texas Henry quear seat. He is the most conservative Democrat

0:23:51.600 --> 0:23:54.840
<v Speaker 1>in Congress by a long shot. I think he actually

0:23:54.880 --> 0:23:58.359
<v Speaker 1>votes a majority of time with Trump, or he did. Anyway,

0:23:58.720 --> 0:24:02.080
<v Speaker 1>he was under multiple investigations and I believe he was

0:24:02.119 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 1>indicted and for whatever reason, Trump pardoned him. This is

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:09.520
<v Speaker 1>a Democrat, by the way, who did not then switch parties.

0:24:09.560 --> 0:24:12.800
<v Speaker 1>He's running for reelection. It is very strange. I don't

0:24:12.840 --> 0:24:15.800
<v Speaker 1>know why the pardon ever happened, but anyway, Henry Quayer's seat.

0:24:15.880 --> 0:24:18.680
<v Speaker 1>And then right next door or to a district and

0:24:18.720 --> 0:24:22.280
<v Speaker 1>a half next door is Vincente Gonzales. That's Texas thirty

0:24:22.280 --> 0:24:25.880
<v Speaker 1>fourth district. He's also up in a Trump back district.

0:24:26.200 --> 0:24:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Over in Ohio, Marcy Captors, she's been in Congress longer

0:24:30.200 --> 0:24:33.199
<v Speaker 1>than I've been alive. She's running again. Her district was

0:24:33.359 --> 0:24:36.119
<v Speaker 1>changed and is much more Republican. That is a prime

0:24:36.320 --> 0:24:40.080
<v Speaker 1>pickup seat opportunity in Ohio. In Washington State, you have

0:24:40.200 --> 0:24:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Maria Perez's seat. That's the seat that Joe Kent ran

0:24:42.720 --> 0:24:45.879
<v Speaker 1>for and loss. It was represented previously by Republicans. Trump

0:24:45.960 --> 0:24:48.840
<v Speaker 1>won it. It's a tough it's a reach, but it's possible.

0:24:49.160 --> 0:24:51.600
<v Speaker 1>And then the other two districts that Republicans can really

0:24:51.640 --> 0:24:54.560
<v Speaker 1>reach for is over in Long Island in New York's

0:24:54.600 --> 0:24:57.199
<v Speaker 1>third congressional district, the old George Santos seat. This is

0:24:57.200 --> 0:25:00.480
<v Speaker 1>the seat that Trump won by four points a Republicans. MICHAELA.

0:25:00.520 --> 0:25:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Petrie's running. He's very he ran last time. He came

0:25:03.600 --> 0:25:06.560
<v Speaker 1>very close to beating defeating Tom Swase, the longtime incumbent.

0:25:07.720 --> 0:25:10.400
<v Speaker 1>They have a chance. It's a Trump seat by a

0:25:10.480 --> 0:25:12.960
<v Speaker 1>decent margin. This wasn't a seat that Trump barely won.

0:25:13.040 --> 0:25:15.600
<v Speaker 1>So there and there's a big Jewish population as well,

0:25:15.600 --> 0:25:18.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a big Asian population, so we'll see how the

0:25:18.160 --> 0:25:21.480
<v Speaker 1>dynamics changed there. But that's definitely a prime pickup opportunity.

0:25:21.680 --> 0:25:24.360
<v Speaker 1>And then the last one is Main's second congressional that's

0:25:24.440 --> 0:25:27.480
<v Speaker 1>northern Maine. It is a Trump ten seat. Trump won

0:25:27.520 --> 0:25:31.240
<v Speaker 1>it by ten points last time. The former governor, PAULA. Page,

0:25:31.280 --> 0:25:33.159
<v Speaker 1>he is a wild man. You could I could do

0:25:33.160 --> 0:25:36.360
<v Speaker 1>a whole episode on Polo Page. A wide, very interesting

0:25:36.440 --> 0:25:39.040
<v Speaker 1>human being, but a wild man. He has never lost

0:25:39.040 --> 0:25:41.880
<v Speaker 1>that district anytime he's ever run statewide. So he's running

0:25:41.880 --> 0:25:44.520
<v Speaker 1>as a Republican. I think that's probably the biggest opportunity

0:25:44.520 --> 0:25:46.760
<v Speaker 1>of Republicans have to pick up a seat anyway. That's

0:25:46.800 --> 0:25:50.479
<v Speaker 1>the gamut, That's the entire map for you, right, so

0:25:50.840 --> 0:25:55.000
<v Speaker 1>think about think about it. First of all, how few people,

0:25:55.320 --> 0:25:59.000
<v Speaker 1>relatively a few people in this country will decide the

0:25:59.040 --> 0:26:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Speaker of the House or presenta's race and who is

0:26:01.760 --> 0:26:06.240
<v Speaker 1>the majority in Congress. It's probably less than ten million

0:26:06.280 --> 0:26:10.800
<v Speaker 1>people live in a will vote for, will vote in

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:14.719
<v Speaker 1>favor of the congressman who will be who will make

0:26:14.800 --> 0:26:17.240
<v Speaker 1>up the majority? Maybe twenty million. Maybe we see twenty

0:26:17.240 --> 0:26:19.639
<v Speaker 1>million at most, right, because you think everyone who lives there,

0:26:19.720 --> 0:26:22.560
<v Speaker 1>not everyone who votes. Everyone who votes in these places

0:26:22.840 --> 0:26:25.919
<v Speaker 1>is probably ten million people will live there. Maybe twenty million.

0:26:26.359 --> 0:26:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Not many, not many in a country of three hundred

0:26:28.720 --> 0:26:34.000
<v Speaker 1>fifty million people. Really, we are a democracy that of

0:26:34.480 --> 0:26:36.480
<v Speaker 1>if you're in the right zip code, you make a

0:26:36.520 --> 0:26:41.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of big decisions. But that's pretty wild anyway. Those

0:26:41.160 --> 0:26:46.520
<v Speaker 1>are the districts. That's the math. If Virginia, the Virginia

0:26:46.600 --> 0:26:49.520
<v Speaker 1>lawsuit goes for Republican's way, if Florida goes Republican's way,

0:26:49.560 --> 0:26:51.440
<v Speaker 1>and if the South three districts were at two hundred

0:26:51.480 --> 0:26:55.879
<v Speaker 1>and nine seats, about there's fifteen seats to defend. There

0:26:55.960 --> 0:26:58.720
<v Speaker 1>are maybe like seventeen seats will be generous, seventeen seats

0:26:58.720 --> 0:27:00.720
<v Speaker 1>to defend, and there's so seven seats to go on

0:27:00.760 --> 0:27:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the offense. And that, ladies and gentlemen, is the House.

0:27:05.960 --> 0:27:10.680
<v Speaker 1>It's not impossible to Republicans to get a majority. They

0:27:10.720 --> 0:27:14.920
<v Speaker 1>need to win about nine to ten out of twenty

0:27:15.000 --> 0:27:19.960
<v Speaker 1>two twenty three seats total twenty four seats. I mean,

0:27:20.119 --> 0:27:22.240
<v Speaker 1>we're all playing with like, is this really a swing seat?

0:27:22.280 --> 0:27:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Is this not really a swing seats. So I'm that's

0:27:23.840 --> 0:27:26.159
<v Speaker 1>why my numbers are changing a little bit. But about

0:27:26.200 --> 0:27:29.640
<v Speaker 1>ten seats to win out of twenty two twenty two,

0:27:29.680 --> 0:27:34.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty three, that's less than half. It actually shocked me

0:27:34.080 --> 0:27:36.760
<v Speaker 1>when I did this map because the conclusion that bygun

0:27:36.840 --> 0:27:39.479
<v Speaker 1>conclusion is not only is this impossible, but it is

0:27:39.480 --> 0:27:42.880
<v Speaker 1>going to be a twenty eighteen style wave. I don't

0:27:42.920 --> 0:27:45.000
<v Speaker 1>think we're there. I don't think we're there. I just

0:27:45.040 --> 0:27:47.320
<v Speaker 1>don't think the the maps have changed so much where

0:27:48.119 --> 0:27:50.680
<v Speaker 1>we would either have to see a Hillary Clinton style

0:27:50.800 --> 0:27:53.000
<v Speaker 1>or version of the Latina vote where we're losing Latinos

0:27:53.000 --> 0:27:56.600
<v Speaker 1>by fifty points. Kind of don't see that, and we

0:27:56.640 --> 0:28:01.119
<v Speaker 1>would have to see a map where there's just not

0:28:01.160 --> 0:28:03.560
<v Speaker 1>as many swing seats. That's the that's the point. There's

0:28:03.640 --> 0:28:06.040
<v Speaker 1>not that many swing seats left. We are in a

0:28:06.080 --> 0:28:09.240
<v Speaker 1>country where people basically live in a seat that's gonna

0:28:09.280 --> 0:28:10.919
<v Speaker 1>go one way or the other almost every time, with

0:28:11.400 --> 0:28:16.520
<v Speaker 1>very very very few exceptions. Okay, next up, Ask Me Anything.

0:28:17.560 --> 0:28:19.399
<v Speaker 1>Now it's time for the Ask Me Anything segment. If

0:28:19.400 --> 0:28:21.560
<v Speaker 1>you want to part of the Ask Me Anything segment

0:28:21.640 --> 0:28:24.680
<v Speaker 1>only Ryan at Numbers Game podcast dot com. That's Ryan

0:28:24.880 --> 0:28:28.040
<v Speaker 1>at Numbers or a numbers gamepodcast dot com. Top of

0:28:28.080 --> 0:28:30.000
<v Speaker 1>the show, I told you about a personal victory. I

0:28:30.000 --> 0:28:32.439
<v Speaker 1>had a meal that I made because it was like

0:28:32.560 --> 0:28:36.199
<v Speaker 1>it was restaurant quality, like it was really good. I

0:28:36.400 --> 0:28:39.440
<v Speaker 1>made a pasta with broccoli sauce and a lemon chicken

0:28:39.520 --> 0:28:41.840
<v Speaker 1>that was legitimately ten out of ten. I'm not even

0:28:41.880 --> 0:28:44.520
<v Speaker 1>just bred like my guess is, jaws were on the floor.

0:28:44.560 --> 0:28:45.920
<v Speaker 1>That's how good it is. I want to tell you

0:28:46.000 --> 0:28:49.120
<v Speaker 1>about how to make it because it because the recipes

0:28:49.160 --> 0:28:50.800
<v Speaker 1>that I get, Like I when I give you a recipe,

0:28:50.840 --> 0:28:53.240
<v Speaker 1>I get so much positive feedback, and I want people

0:28:53.280 --> 0:28:55.120
<v Speaker 1>to eat good. I mean, life is too short to

0:28:55.200 --> 0:28:57.200
<v Speaker 1>have a bad meal. This is how you make it.

0:28:57.200 --> 0:29:01.760
<v Speaker 1>It's very simple. Basically, you take broccoli and olive oil.

0:29:01.760 --> 0:29:03.440
<v Speaker 1>You coat the whole bottom of a pan of pot

0:29:03.440 --> 0:29:06.400
<v Speaker 1>and olive oil. Throw broccoli in, Throw garlic. Don't even

0:29:06.440 --> 0:29:09.200
<v Speaker 1>cut the garlic nothing, don't drop the whole entire two

0:29:09.280 --> 0:29:13.280
<v Speaker 1>cloves of garlic. Put some salt, whatever spices you want,

0:29:13.320 --> 0:29:15.040
<v Speaker 1>a little, a little paprika, a little you know, a

0:29:15.040 --> 0:29:18.920
<v Speaker 1>little spice. Cup of water and you steam it and

0:29:18.960 --> 0:29:20.760
<v Speaker 1>you let it steam and you'll cook through the steaming.

0:29:21.040 --> 0:29:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Then you take cheese like parmesan and some Romano's cheese,

0:29:24.920 --> 0:29:27.240
<v Speaker 1>and you whip them together with an egg. So many

0:29:27.320 --> 0:29:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Italian recipes do not call for a dairy that you

0:29:29.800 --> 0:29:32.080
<v Speaker 1>think call for dairy, it's actually just cheese and eggs.

0:29:32.360 --> 0:29:35.160
<v Speaker 1>You whip them together with an egg. Once the broccoli

0:29:35.280 --> 0:29:38.600
<v Speaker 1>is cooked, you take the mash or whatebout's call it.

0:29:38.640 --> 0:29:41.520
<v Speaker 1>The I think that mashes the food. And you mash

0:29:41.560 --> 0:29:44.320
<v Speaker 1>the broccoli, and you mash the garlic, You throw the

0:29:44.400 --> 0:29:47.440
<v Speaker 1>cheese in, you mix them together. All this time, you've

0:29:47.520 --> 0:29:50.000
<v Speaker 1>boiled a pot of water with pasta in it. You

0:29:50.240 --> 0:29:52.600
<v Speaker 1>spoon the pasta into the into the pot with the

0:29:52.640 --> 0:29:55.880
<v Speaker 1>broccoli in it, and then you apply a cup or

0:29:55.960 --> 0:30:00.440
<v Speaker 1>not a cup, a spoonful, a ladleful of winter from

0:30:00.480 --> 0:30:03.680
<v Speaker 1>the pasta into the pot with a broccoli in it.

0:30:03.840 --> 0:30:06.160
<v Speaker 1>You whip them all together. You coat it with more

0:30:06.200 --> 0:30:09.520
<v Speaker 1>olive oil, a little more cheese, and that's basically it.

0:30:09.600 --> 0:30:12.360
<v Speaker 1>You mix it together. It's not it's amazing, it's incredible.

0:30:12.400 --> 0:30:15.480
<v Speaker 1>It's so good. It's pretty healthy for you. You have you know,

0:30:15.560 --> 0:30:18.960
<v Speaker 1>vitamins and fiber from the broccoli. It's not super heavy.

0:30:19.280 --> 0:30:22.640
<v Speaker 1>It's so delicious. And the chicken wait, this was incredible, guys.

0:30:22.920 --> 0:30:26.200
<v Speaker 1>So cut the chicken in half, you tenderize it, you

0:30:26.280 --> 0:30:27.959
<v Speaker 1>beat it with like a mallet or something like that.

0:30:28.000 --> 0:30:29.440
<v Speaker 1>You can use a wine bottle if you got nothing

0:30:29.440 --> 0:30:31.640
<v Speaker 1>else nothing I mean, if you got a wine bottle,

0:30:31.720 --> 0:30:34.440
<v Speaker 1>use a wine bottle. Who knows life's better with some wine.

0:30:34.600 --> 0:30:36.640
<v Speaker 1>You take, You throw two cups of butter in it.

0:30:36.720 --> 0:30:40.120
<v Speaker 1>You bread the chicken lightly with either like flour or

0:30:40.120 --> 0:30:42.560
<v Speaker 1>what I do, which is breadcrumbs, no egg on top,

0:30:42.640 --> 0:30:45.120
<v Speaker 1>but nothing. You just bread it as well sweat. You

0:30:45.120 --> 0:30:48.320
<v Speaker 1>throw it in with the melted butter. Cook them, and

0:30:48.360 --> 0:30:51.000
<v Speaker 1>then you take like Alfredo sauce with lemon in it.

0:30:51.040 --> 0:30:53.080
<v Speaker 1>You can make your own with heavy whipping cream, but

0:30:53.600 --> 0:30:56.240
<v Speaker 1>who's got time for that? You got just buy buy

0:30:56.280 --> 0:30:58.719
<v Speaker 1>Alfredo sauce with lemon in it. You coat that in

0:30:58.760 --> 0:31:00.840
<v Speaker 1>and you put in a cut or not a cup

0:31:00.960 --> 0:31:06.080
<v Speaker 1>half a cup of dry white wine. Together creates the

0:31:06.120 --> 0:31:10.360
<v Speaker 1>most incredible marinate. You just flip them over, cook them,

0:31:10.720 --> 0:31:13.400
<v Speaker 1>take them out, sprinkle the sauce that you made on top,

0:31:13.480 --> 0:31:16.080
<v Speaker 1>the juice you made on top, put a little cilantro.

0:31:16.200 --> 0:31:19.400
<v Speaker 1>That's it. That's all, guys. It was incredibly so good.

0:31:19.760 --> 0:31:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Not my Grandma's recipe, not the grandma's meat ball recipe,

0:31:22.880 --> 0:31:25.280
<v Speaker 1>but it was excellent, and some of you appreciate the

0:31:25.280 --> 0:31:26.920
<v Speaker 1>food recipes, so I'm going to keep giving them as

0:31:26.960 --> 0:31:29.520
<v Speaker 1>long as you appreciate them. Now it's time to go

0:31:29.680 --> 0:31:32.800
<v Speaker 1>back to the politics. Let's talk about questions from asking

0:31:32.800 --> 0:31:36.320
<v Speaker 1>me anything. First one comes from Brian. Brian writes, imagine

0:31:36.360 --> 0:31:39.640
<v Speaker 1>a world which of Bill Clinton opposed both the NAFTA

0:31:39.760 --> 0:31:43.200
<v Speaker 1>North American Free Trade Agreement and granting China permanent normal

0:31:43.280 --> 0:31:47.120
<v Speaker 1>trade relations, effectively blocking their entry into the WTO. In

0:31:47.160 --> 0:31:51.120
<v Speaker 1>this scenario, what does Americas electorate look like today? Do

0:31:51.320 --> 0:31:55.200
<v Speaker 1>soccer moms and Nascar dads can't even evolve as political

0:31:55.360 --> 0:31:58.880
<v Speaker 1>arc types? Does change narratives that propelled Obama to the

0:31:58.880 --> 0:32:02.560
<v Speaker 1>White House still resonate? Does a Hillary Clinton campaign succeed

0:32:02.600 --> 0:32:08.000
<v Speaker 1>without that specific policy baggage of her husband? Finally, would

0:32:08.160 --> 0:32:11.600
<v Speaker 1>that political inversion between parties that Alton benefit Trump have

0:32:11.640 --> 0:32:15.800
<v Speaker 1>ever taken place? Happy thirty ninth birthday, What an interesting question.

0:32:16.280 --> 0:32:21.120
<v Speaker 1>It's a lot to chew on. Obviously, we don't enter WTO,

0:32:21.240 --> 0:32:25.360
<v Speaker 1>we don't enter NAFTA, we don't have We will still

0:32:25.400 --> 0:32:28.520
<v Speaker 1>lose some manufacturing jobs as we did before those two things,

0:32:28.560 --> 0:32:34.520
<v Speaker 1>but we wouldn't see the huge plumb drop in manufacturing

0:32:34.560 --> 0:32:37.680
<v Speaker 1>jobs that we saw during really the Bush administration because

0:32:37.720 --> 0:32:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Bush made China a permanent member of the WTO likely.

0:32:43.120 --> 0:32:45.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I can't speak to every one of those scenarios.

0:32:46.080 --> 0:32:48.720
<v Speaker 1>I will say the one scenario that I would speak to,

0:32:48.760 --> 0:32:51.680
<v Speaker 1>because remember Obama's change was really about Iraq and the

0:32:51.680 --> 0:32:55.680
<v Speaker 1>financial crisis, not so much about the trade agreements. That

0:32:55.720 --> 0:33:00.240
<v Speaker 1>was all kind of in the background. Hillary and Trump

0:33:01.480 --> 0:33:04.480
<v Speaker 1>in that scenario, I would think Hillary would actually be

0:33:04.560 --> 0:33:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Trump if we had if miss if Trump did not

0:33:07.480 --> 0:33:12.840
<v Speaker 1>have the substantial loss of manufactory and the two decades

0:33:12.920 --> 0:33:14.720
<v Speaker 1>of the opioid crisis or a decade and a half

0:33:14.760 --> 0:33:17.480
<v Speaker 1>the opiad crisis, that fill that void for a lot

0:33:17.480 --> 0:33:20.680
<v Speaker 1>of people. I don't know if he wins, I don't

0:33:20.680 --> 0:33:23.320
<v Speaker 1>think he went Pennsylvania, Michigan, in Wisconsin. Those jobs would

0:33:23.320 --> 0:33:25.760
<v Speaker 1>still be there, those people would still be blue collar workers.

0:33:26.320 --> 0:33:29.600
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, I think I've fed a lot when Trump.

0:33:29.640 --> 0:33:32.880
<v Speaker 1>I remember this so well. In twenty sixteen, Trump went

0:33:33.440 --> 0:33:36.440
<v Speaker 1>to I have a speech in Michigan saying that he

0:33:37.080 --> 0:33:39.920
<v Speaker 1>would tell the executives of the Ford Motor industry that

0:33:40.000 --> 0:33:42.920
<v Speaker 1>if they moved their cars to China or Japan. He

0:33:43.000 --> 0:33:44.400
<v Speaker 1>was going to put it on Mexico. He was going

0:33:44.480 --> 0:33:47.160
<v Speaker 1>to put a tariff so strong on their business it

0:33:47.200 --> 0:33:52.160
<v Speaker 1>would bankrupt them. And it was electricity in Michigan. So yeah,

0:33:52.240 --> 0:33:56.120
<v Speaker 1>would would that? Would that? Yeah? I don't Without that,

0:33:56.240 --> 0:33:58.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if he would win. I really don't.

0:33:58.120 --> 0:34:01.560
<v Speaker 1>I think. Here's the thing, and I wrote this in

0:34:01.560 --> 0:34:03.360
<v Speaker 1>my book. It's called They're not Listening. I actually have

0:34:03.360 --> 0:34:04.800
<v Speaker 1>a copyright next to me. You don't have to buy

0:34:04.840 --> 0:34:07.000
<v Speaker 1>it because it's out for years. I don't make any

0:34:07.040 --> 0:34:08.720
<v Speaker 1>money off of it. I mean you can. It's interesting.

0:34:08.760 --> 0:34:10.920
<v Speaker 1>You could listen to an audio tipe. I don't read it.

0:34:10.920 --> 0:34:17.320
<v Speaker 1>You don't hear my nasally voice. The thing about Trump

0:34:17.840 --> 0:34:21.359
<v Speaker 1>is the elite who hated him were the ones who

0:34:21.440 --> 0:34:24.440
<v Speaker 1>created him. The elite who can't stand him were the

0:34:24.480 --> 0:34:28.200
<v Speaker 1>media that gave him free advertising. And it was the

0:34:28.239 --> 0:34:31.520
<v Speaker 1>political class like Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama and George W.

0:34:31.600 --> 0:34:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Bush who hurt the livelihoods of the American people to

0:34:37.120 --> 0:34:40.880
<v Speaker 1>such a degree that they would vote for a reality

0:34:40.920 --> 0:34:45.080
<v Speaker 1>show star somebody who Now it seems like, of course,

0:34:45.120 --> 0:34:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump, but eleven years ago absolutely not Yeah, they

0:34:50.360 --> 0:34:52.759
<v Speaker 1>created him. So if they didn't create him, if they

0:34:52.800 --> 0:34:56.360
<v Speaker 1>didn't do those things, the open borders, the endless wars, Iraq,

0:34:57.040 --> 0:35:02.120
<v Speaker 1>open borders, mass immigration, NAFTA, China, WTO. Without those things,

0:35:02.120 --> 0:35:05.040
<v Speaker 1>you don't get Donald Trump. You just don't. That's my opinion. Okay,

0:35:05.280 --> 0:35:08.319
<v Speaker 1>next question is I think the first. This question goes

0:35:08.320 --> 0:35:11.000
<v Speaker 1>from Michael by the way, he said, I really enjoy

0:35:11.040 --> 0:35:13.800
<v Speaker 1>your podcast with Ann Coulter. I frequently hear that political

0:35:13.880 --> 0:35:16.600
<v Speaker 1>violence is mostly right wing phenomenon. But I find this

0:35:16.719 --> 0:35:18.800
<v Speaker 1>hard to believe, especially given the size and scope of

0:35:18.840 --> 0:35:21.719
<v Speaker 1>the BLM and antifil rally since twenty twenty. How are

0:35:21.760 --> 0:35:24.840
<v Speaker 1>they deriving these numbers? Do all instances of violence count

0:35:24.880 --> 0:35:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the same? No, they do not. That's such a good question.

0:35:28.160 --> 0:35:30.200
<v Speaker 1>I was on Laura Ingram show about this one time.

0:35:30.600 --> 0:35:35.000
<v Speaker 1>So the way that the SPLC, which is the predominant group,

0:35:35.040 --> 0:35:36.880
<v Speaker 1>I know KATO had their own numbers, but KATO is

0:35:36.880 --> 0:35:39.400
<v Speaker 1>such a joke of an organization. SPLC is the one

0:35:39.400 --> 0:35:44.839
<v Speaker 1>that everyone kind of reaches to for the official numbers

0:35:44.239 --> 0:35:48.600
<v Speaker 1>on crime with political violence. The way that they do

0:35:48.640 --> 0:35:51.600
<v Speaker 1>it is if you are associated with anything that they

0:35:51.680 --> 0:35:56.320
<v Speaker 1>deem as right wing and you commit a crime at all.

0:35:57.120 --> 0:36:00.000
<v Speaker 1>It is there for right wing political violence. So, for instance,

0:36:00.360 --> 0:36:03.279
<v Speaker 1>I remember this very specifically. It was a case of

0:36:03.320 --> 0:36:06.880
<v Speaker 1>a man from New Hampshire who was in a Nazi

0:36:07.840 --> 0:36:11.359
<v Speaker 1>prison gang when he was in prison, gets out of

0:36:11.400 --> 0:36:15.440
<v Speaker 1>prison and kills his stepbrother for calling the police on

0:36:15.520 --> 0:36:18.000
<v Speaker 1>him for a different crime work. I think he shot

0:36:18.000 --> 0:36:20.120
<v Speaker 1>a gun out of his car into a neighborhood like

0:36:20.160 --> 0:36:22.160
<v Speaker 1>a stray bullet, didn't kill anybody, didn't urt anybody, but

0:36:22.160 --> 0:36:24.280
<v Speaker 1>the brother called the police and then he killed a brother.

0:36:24.800 --> 0:36:28.879
<v Speaker 1>There is no politics in that conversation at all. He

0:36:29.000 --> 0:36:31.680
<v Speaker 1>was doing it for any political reason, but the fact

0:36:31.719 --> 0:36:35.520
<v Speaker 1>that he belonged to a Nazi prison gang, and that

0:36:35.640 --> 0:36:38.359
<v Speaker 1>is deemed as a right wing political organization. According to

0:36:38.280 --> 0:36:43.480
<v Speaker 1>the SPLC, he committed a right wing targeted attack. No

0:36:43.520 --> 0:36:46.200
<v Speaker 1>one from the BLM riots who committed a crime, or

0:36:46.280 --> 0:36:48.920
<v Speaker 1>virtually no one who committed a crime, was ever counted

0:36:48.960 --> 0:36:54.600
<v Speaker 1>as political violence. David Dorn, the former policeman seventy seven

0:36:54.680 --> 0:36:59.799
<v Speaker 1>year old black policeman was murdered by BLM rioters was

0:37:00.280 --> 0:37:04.919
<v Speaker 1>counted as BLM insided violence or left wing violence at all.

0:37:05.360 --> 0:37:07.560
<v Speaker 1>They were like, Nope, doesn't count, doesn't count at all,

0:37:08.800 --> 0:37:11.920
<v Speaker 1>if you went to a BLM rally and then broke

0:37:11.960 --> 0:37:17.000
<v Speaker 1>a window, burned a building, beat somebody, murdered somebody. No,

0:37:17.120 --> 0:37:18.880
<v Speaker 1>it does not count as left wing violence. If you

0:37:18.960 --> 0:37:22.680
<v Speaker 1>belong to a gang in prison and that gang is white,

0:37:23.200 --> 0:37:25.160
<v Speaker 1>and you commit another crime out of prison, as many

0:37:25.520 --> 0:37:28.760
<v Speaker 1>former prisoners do, that is considered right wing political violence.

0:37:28.800 --> 0:37:32.400
<v Speaker 1>That's how they calculated it as utter and total nonsense.

0:37:32.640 --> 0:37:36.320
<v Speaker 1>That's why these organizations should not be trusted. These non profits,

0:37:36.400 --> 0:37:38.479
<v Speaker 1>they also don't count. By the way, they don't count

0:37:38.680 --> 0:37:43.279
<v Speaker 1>non homicidal crime. I remember twenty sixteen, I was in

0:37:43.280 --> 0:37:46.640
<v Speaker 1>my late twenties. If I remember in Chicago and the

0:37:46.680 --> 0:37:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Trump supporters were going to Chicago to see Trump speak

0:37:49.440 --> 0:37:52.920
<v Speaker 1>and they were attacked. I remember where that woman was, like,

0:37:52.960 --> 0:37:55.839
<v Speaker 1>I think it was in California. They threw eggs at her.

0:37:55.920 --> 0:37:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Those are acts of political violence that they are not homicidal,

0:37:59.040 --> 0:38:02.120
<v Speaker 1>but they are not counted as left wing political violence.

0:38:02.160 --> 0:38:03.719
<v Speaker 1>So also, by the way, you know who's not count

0:38:03.719 --> 0:38:09.560
<v Speaker 1>as left wing political violence. Luigi yep, Luigi Mangione is

0:38:09.600 --> 0:38:11.560
<v Speaker 1>not considered left wing political violence because he doesn't have

0:38:11.600 --> 0:38:16.200
<v Speaker 1>a quote ideology. Okay, you also wrote, by the way,

0:38:16.280 --> 0:38:19.040
<v Speaker 1>you email the NFL draft pick. I know nothing about sports,

0:38:19.040 --> 0:38:21.000
<v Speaker 1>so I can't even read that question because I'm going

0:38:21.080 --> 0:38:24.840
<v Speaker 1>to sound like a moron. Last question comes from Trevor.

0:38:24.880 --> 0:38:26.799
<v Speaker 1>He writes, I hope you had a great birthday. I did,

0:38:26.800 --> 0:38:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. Trevor, He says, do you think it'd be

0:38:28.680 --> 0:38:32.120
<v Speaker 1>a great good idea to amend the Constitution so that

0:38:32.160 --> 0:38:34.920
<v Speaker 1>any effort to increase or expand immigration must be passed

0:38:34.960 --> 0:38:38.480
<v Speaker 1>by a majority of voters in a nationwide ballot referendum.

0:38:38.960 --> 0:38:41.480
<v Speaker 1>I understand that the founding fathers weren't huge fans of

0:38:41.480 --> 0:38:44.400
<v Speaker 1>direct democracy, but I think that who lives here and

0:38:44.440 --> 0:38:47.160
<v Speaker 1>who votes here is too important that Americans should get

0:38:47.200 --> 0:38:51.560
<v Speaker 1>a say. Also, the form more population in the US

0:38:51.560 --> 0:38:53.000
<v Speaker 1>is now, it's May fifteen to sixty percent of the

0:38:53.000 --> 0:38:55.920
<v Speaker 1>total population. Do you think that we should set caps

0:38:55.960 --> 0:38:58.600
<v Speaker 1>on what the percentage of the US population forum born

0:38:58.960 --> 0:39:01.839
<v Speaker 1>should be? If he yes, which the percentage be? Those

0:39:01.880 --> 0:39:05.680
<v Speaker 1>are very smart questions. Let's start with the referendum first. No,

0:39:05.760 --> 0:39:08.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think of that showing for a referendum, because

0:39:08.760 --> 0:39:14.640
<v Speaker 1>there are just times when there is you know, unforeseen

0:39:14.719 --> 0:39:19.560
<v Speaker 1>instances where immigration flows up. Let's say Canada is invaded.

0:39:19.600 --> 0:39:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm just making up a making a random thing. But

0:39:23.160 --> 0:39:25.439
<v Speaker 1>we have to take in refugees from Canada and mass

0:39:25.440 --> 0:39:29.799
<v Speaker 1>immigration is expanded, or we have a situation where there

0:39:29.880 --> 0:39:33.200
<v Speaker 1>is something we need a group of people. We can't

0:39:33.239 --> 0:39:36.680
<v Speaker 1>wait for a national referendum. National referendums in a nation

0:39:36.840 --> 0:39:38.799
<v Speaker 1>like ours, I don't think really work. It's too big,

0:39:38.840 --> 0:39:42.560
<v Speaker 1>it's too diverse. They work sometimes in places like Leechenstein

0:39:42.640 --> 0:39:46.319
<v Speaker 1>or Switzerland, and even when they are national referendums, like

0:39:46.320 --> 0:39:51.120
<v Speaker 1>in Switzerland, they had one on capping immigration, and what

0:39:51.239 --> 0:39:54.319
<v Speaker 1>happened was after the people voted for it, it then

0:39:54.400 --> 0:39:57.800
<v Speaker 1>went on to it was watered down when it was applied,

0:39:57.880 --> 0:39:59.400
<v Speaker 1>so they didn't even get where they wanted. So no,

0:39:59.400 --> 0:40:02.479
<v Speaker 1>no referendum. Should there be a cap on the form

0:40:02.480 --> 0:40:05.239
<v Speaker 1>on one population, Yes, there should. I would say it

0:40:05.320 --> 0:40:07.920
<v Speaker 1>should never exceed Well, I would say it should never

0:40:07.920 --> 0:40:10.880
<v Speaker 1>exceed fifteen percent, but we're already over that, so fifteen

0:40:10.920 --> 0:40:14.279
<v Speaker 1>percent we got to work our way down. Anyway. I

0:40:14.320 --> 0:40:17.920
<v Speaker 1>have more great stuff coming up next. On Friday's episode,

0:40:18.160 --> 0:40:22.840
<v Speaker 1>new birth data once again showing Trump's immigration policies are working.

0:40:23.239 --> 0:40:25.719
<v Speaker 1>It is happening. We are seeing declines of immigration. We

0:40:25.760 --> 0:40:28.080
<v Speaker 1>have that and so much more. If you like this podcast,

0:40:28.160 --> 0:40:30.680
<v Speaker 1>please like and subscribe on the iHeartRadio app, Apple podcast

0:40:30.680 --> 0:40:32.200
<v Speaker 1>where every tip of this podcast, or if you're watching

0:40:32.200 --> 0:40:34.360
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube, press subscribe and click the ball so you

0:40:34.360 --> 0:40:37.000
<v Speaker 1>don't miss any episodes. I appreciate you all. Have a

0:40:37.040 --> 0:40:38.200
<v Speaker 1>great Wednesday. Everybody,