WEBVTT - Working In The Dot Com Bubble ft. Matt Rosoff

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Also media.

0:00:04.360 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 2>Hello and welcome to Better Offline. I'm, of course your

0:00:07.160 --> 0:00:22.079
<v Speaker 2>host ed zitron and today I am joined for a

0:00:22.160 --> 0:00:25.360
<v Speaker 2>dot com special by Matt Rosoff, the editor in chief

0:00:25.360 --> 0:00:27.920
<v Speaker 2>of the Register, who has been in Silicon Valley.

0:00:27.960 --> 0:00:31.080
<v Speaker 1>I believe three hundred years. You said it was three

0:00:31.160 --> 0:00:33.920
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twenty five. Yeah, so I'm actually a vampire.

0:00:34.560 --> 0:00:37.920
<v Speaker 2>That's nice. Oh, what like Kevin O'Leary and Martin Supreme. Sorry,

0:00:37.920 --> 0:00:40.559
<v Speaker 2>Martin Supreme. That's a thing he says in it. Have

0:00:40.600 --> 0:00:41.159
<v Speaker 2>you heard about that?

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:43.520
<v Speaker 1>No, I don't know, but I haven't seen that yet.

0:00:43.680 --> 0:00:45.159
<v Speaker 1>Ping Pie doesn't really do it for me.

0:00:45.600 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 2>I didn't really like it, but there is a bit

0:00:47.479 --> 0:00:50.200
<v Speaker 2>in it where Kevin O'Leary goes, I'm a fucking vampire.

0:00:50.520 --> 0:00:53.880
<v Speaker 2>I've lived for this many years and I read about this.

0:00:54.080 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 2>I did not like the movie, but I read about it.

0:00:56.800 --> 0:00:58.920
<v Speaker 2>I was like, oh, I would actually love it if

0:00:58.960 --> 0:01:02.960
<v Speaker 2>this was true. And apparently they did film it with fangs,

0:01:04.200 --> 0:01:05.800
<v Speaker 2>and they should have done that. They should have just

0:01:05.880 --> 0:01:08.200
<v Speaker 2>had him be a vampire at the end. However, he's

0:01:08.240 --> 0:01:09.840
<v Speaker 2>regularly in the sun, so I'm not sure how they

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:14.280
<v Speaker 2>would have squared that circle. AnyWho, my time only computers.

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:17.760
<v Speaker 2>So Matt, you were what were you We're just going

0:01:17.800 --> 0:01:20.360
<v Speaker 2>to go straight into it. What were you doing in

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:21.760
<v Speaker 2>the dot com bubble era?

0:01:21.920 --> 0:01:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Like?

0:01:22.040 --> 0:01:24.479
<v Speaker 2>Where did you begin and where did you find yourself

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:25.200
<v Speaker 2>as it progressed?

0:01:25.720 --> 0:01:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's an interesting blast from my very distant past.

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:34.440
<v Speaker 1>But I moved to San Francisco in nineteen ninety two,

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:37.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of the tail end of the Gulf War recession,

0:01:37.880 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 1>so there wasn't much.

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:39.320
<v Speaker 3>Going on then.

0:01:39.360 --> 0:01:42.920
<v Speaker 1>I was interning doing different kinds of od jobs, copy editing,

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 1>doing some of those kinds of things, and then in

0:01:45.280 --> 0:01:49.840
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety five I joined a little startup that was

0:01:49.960 --> 0:01:53.720
<v Speaker 1>going to publish content on the World Wide Web. They

0:01:53.760 --> 0:01:56.160
<v Speaker 1>didn't call it content then, I guess it was. They

0:01:56.280 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 1>called it.

0:01:56.640 --> 0:01:57.920
<v Speaker 3>An online magazine.

0:01:57.960 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 1>They already had a TV network and that was Senet,

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:03.400
<v Speaker 1>So cnet is still out today in a very different format.

0:02:03.760 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 1>But I was employee number forty two there. Started off

0:02:07.560 --> 0:02:12.399
<v Speaker 1>as an editorial assistant, and my very first task there

0:02:12.560 --> 0:02:15.120
<v Speaker 1>was to come up with an email newsletter, which we

0:02:15.200 --> 0:02:18.440
<v Speaker 1>called Digital Dispatch, and it was mostly summaries of stuff

0:02:18.480 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 1>that we were publishing on the site, and then occasional

0:02:21.560 --> 0:02:24.360
<v Speaker 1>snarky commentary. I remember a couple of years later, we

0:02:24.440 --> 0:02:28.360
<v Speaker 1>did ten reasons why Wired's IPO failed, and one of

0:02:28.360 --> 0:02:31.320
<v Speaker 1>them was the prospectus was printed on neon green and

0:02:31.400 --> 0:02:34.519
<v Speaker 1>red paper, which we thought was OK, funny and cute

0:02:34.520 --> 0:02:35.080
<v Speaker 1>at the time.

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:37.880
<v Speaker 3>So anyway, that was a lot of fun.

0:02:38.040 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 1>We were, you know, growing at a very rapid pace.

0:02:43.240 --> 0:02:46.240
<v Speaker 1>I think I was there from ninety five to ninety nine.

0:02:46.680 --> 0:02:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Like I said, I was employee number forty two on

0:02:48.400 --> 0:02:49.880
<v Speaker 1>the way in, and I think when I left there

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:52.839
<v Speaker 1>were over five hundred people working there with that. One

0:02:52.960 --> 0:02:55.640
<v Speaker 1>was owned by Zif Davis at the time, it was

0:02:55.720 --> 0:02:59.800
<v Speaker 1>not Cnet, was an independent company. It had a number

0:02:59.880 --> 0:03:04.200
<v Speaker 1>of early venture investors, including Paul Allen, the Microsoft co founder.

0:03:04.200 --> 0:03:05.360
<v Speaker 3>I don't remember the other ones.

0:03:05.840 --> 0:03:08.840
<v Speaker 1>The CEO was guy named Halsey Minor, and no, it

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:11.640
<v Speaker 1>was it was completely you know, it was privately held

0:03:11.639 --> 0:03:16.519
<v Speaker 1>and weipo'd in ninety seven or ninety eight, I'm not, oh.

0:03:16.560 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 2>Just before that was just before things started to fall apart, right.

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:24.679
<v Speaker 1>Well, ninety eight was still go go go. I think

0:03:24.720 --> 0:03:30.079
<v Speaker 1>it really kind of went on until two thousand and

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:32.520
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and one was when things started to turn. So,

0:03:33.200 --> 0:03:35.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, it was fun being a company that was

0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 1>growing fast.

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 3>I was able to do a.

0:03:36.680 --> 0:03:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Whole bunch of different kinds of things. I was writing

0:03:39.400 --> 0:03:43.120
<v Speaker 1>TV scripts and doing CD ROM reviews back when multimedia

0:03:43.200 --> 0:03:45.720
<v Speaker 1>was a thing, and writing features and I interviewed a

0:03:45.720 --> 0:03:48.120
<v Speaker 1>two way pager from this little company called Research in

0:03:48.160 --> 0:03:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Motion before the BlackBerry was out, and I interviewed one

0:03:51.640 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 1>of the first MP three players. I think it was

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the Rio, and I was like, Wow, interesting idea, but

0:03:56.120 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 1>it can only hold like twelve songs, so this is

0:03:58.200 --> 0:04:00.560
<v Speaker 1>a complete waste time. It'll never go was before the

0:04:00.600 --> 0:04:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Creative Nomad. Then I think around the same time. I

0:04:04.520 --> 0:04:06.720
<v Speaker 1>don't remember which one was first, but yeah.

0:04:06.640 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 2>I remember the Creative Nomad could have like three hundred

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:11.800
<v Speaker 2>songs on it. I felt like, oh, yes, Sultan of

0:04:11.840 --> 0:04:15.800
<v Speaker 2>BRUNEI I was the fanciest man ever, three hundred songs.

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:16.880
<v Speaker 2>How would I ever choose?

0:04:17.240 --> 0:04:20.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's it, that's right. Yeah. No, this was a

0:04:20.240 --> 0:04:20.960
<v Speaker 3>lot less than that.

0:04:21.040 --> 0:04:22.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we had to sort of do math and

0:04:22.680 --> 0:04:24.800
<v Speaker 1>go backwards and we're like, wait, that's only twelve songs.

0:04:24.839 --> 0:04:29.480
<v Speaker 1>That's worthless. So anyway, and then you know, took some

0:04:29.560 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 1>filthy dot com Luker went backpacking for a little bit

0:04:32.120 --> 0:04:34.880
<v Speaker 1>with my girlfriend at the time, who later became my wife.

0:04:35.000 --> 0:04:38.400
<v Speaker 1>And then when I moved back, moved back to Seattle,

0:04:38.800 --> 0:04:41.280
<v Speaker 1>and I think we came back on the day that

0:04:41.440 --> 0:04:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft lost a verdict during its big antitrust case.

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:48.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the MS one.

0:04:49.000 --> 0:04:52.719
<v Speaker 3>Right, Yeah, this was well, this was anti trust.

0:04:52.800 --> 0:04:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Basically they had a whole bunch of different charges against them.

0:04:56.480 --> 0:04:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Tying the browser to Windows was kind of the big one,

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:02.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, and making deals with PC makers to bundle

0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:06.040
<v Speaker 1>certain software and not allowing them to bundle other software

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:06.640
<v Speaker 1>and all kinds.

0:05:06.800 --> 0:05:12.080
<v Speaker 2>And incentivizing bundling MS dos. Yeah, I vaguely know this story.

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:13.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it was.

0:05:13.920 --> 0:05:16.200
<v Speaker 1>It was really about like Netscape Navigator was the thing,

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:17.760
<v Speaker 1>and you know, that's what we were all using in

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:20.200
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety five. It started with Mosaic and it was Navigator,

0:05:20.520 --> 0:05:23.880
<v Speaker 1>and then Microsoft built Internet Explorer in the Windows ninety

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:26.760
<v Speaker 1>five and four years later Navigator didn't really exist for

0:05:26.800 --> 0:05:28.320
<v Speaker 1>all intents and purposes.

0:05:27.920 --> 0:05:31.080
<v Speaker 3>So it was But anyway, that was the day.

0:05:31.560 --> 0:05:34.560
<v Speaker 1>It was Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson, and he ordered them

0:05:34.640 --> 0:05:38.640
<v Speaker 1>to be broken into two companies, an APPS company, which

0:05:38.680 --> 0:05:41.359
<v Speaker 1>is office and all those products, and an OPS company,

0:05:41.400 --> 0:05:45.440
<v Speaker 1>which was Windows. I believe now maybe remembering this slightly

0:05:45.480 --> 0:05:47.240
<v Speaker 1>wrong and I don't have a resource in front.

0:05:47.000 --> 0:05:50.479
<v Speaker 2>Of YEA very recently covered this and you will back on.

0:05:51.040 --> 0:05:51.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:53.840
<v Speaker 1>So but I think that was kind of the peak,

0:05:53.880 --> 0:05:57.840
<v Speaker 1>and I think that was actually perhaps the beginning of

0:05:57.960 --> 0:06:00.600
<v Speaker 1>the end. So it's even though Microsoft had had very

0:06:00.640 --> 0:06:04.480
<v Speaker 1>little to do directly with the dot com bubble, there

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:08.040
<v Speaker 1>was sort of this sense that, oh, the tightest turning anyway,

0:06:08.080 --> 0:06:11.200
<v Speaker 1>long story short, I moved back to Seattle and I

0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:14.520
<v Speaker 1>found work with this startup. At the time, they were

0:06:14.560 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 1>called a Cadio and the idea was that they were

0:06:16.640 --> 0:06:21.480
<v Speaker 1>going to do online education, so they wanted to have

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:25.320
<v Speaker 1>articles written and I was the computers tech guy. We

0:06:25.320 --> 0:06:28.680
<v Speaker 1>were going to you know, training people on computer technology.

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:34.840
<v Speaker 1>And it was the most incompetently run company I have

0:06:34.960 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 1>ever seen been a part of. I walked in immediately

0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:40.040
<v Speaker 1>realized that I needed to get out.

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 3>So by way of example, they didn't have so you

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:45.480
<v Speaker 3>know what. Yeah, it was this was.

0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:48.719
<v Speaker 1>Early two thousands, so this is still this was when

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:53.039
<v Speaker 1>companies were getting funding on a promise and going public

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:56.200
<v Speaker 1>on powerpoints. Still it was still still at the peak,

0:06:56.480 --> 0:06:59.039
<v Speaker 1>but we could see it starting to turn. So you know,

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 1>these guys had enough money to hire a bunch of people,

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:04.040
<v Speaker 1>and they had a cool loft in Pineer Square, which

0:07:04.080 --> 0:07:07.040
<v Speaker 1>is you know, brick building and all this kind of stuff.

0:07:07.440 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 3>But they didn't.

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:09.960
<v Speaker 1>So they you know, they hired me, and they're like,

0:07:09.960 --> 0:07:12.400
<v Speaker 1>go get some freely, you know, fine, start hiring freelancers,

0:07:12.400 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 1>and we need to get some content up. They had

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:17.120
<v Speaker 1>no way to put the content on the internet. They

0:07:17.160 --> 0:07:20.720
<v Speaker 1>didn't have a CMS, they didn't know what a CMS was.

0:07:21.600 --> 0:07:23.880
<v Speaker 1>And we were using Visual Source Safe, which is a

0:07:23.920 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft product used for you know, creating code and sharing code.

0:07:27.720 --> 0:07:31.040
<v Speaker 1>It was that level. And I remember later here over,

0:07:31.080 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, hearing secondhand that somebody had overheard a very

0:07:34.880 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 1>tense meeting between the CEO and the investors where one

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:40.240
<v Speaker 1>of the investors yelled through a closed door, we might

0:07:40.280 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 1>as well just sell the servers back to the investment bank.

0:07:43.440 --> 0:07:46.400
<v Speaker 1>So I quickly got out of there, found a job

0:07:46.400 --> 0:07:48.480
<v Speaker 1>at Directions on. Microsoft did that for ten years, and

0:07:48.520 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 1>they were out of business by I believe, early two

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:51.600
<v Speaker 1>thousand and one.

0:07:52.520 --> 0:07:55.880
<v Speaker 2>So about when did it become obvious something was wrong.

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:06.400
<v Speaker 1>So it was never obvious that something was wrong large scale,

0:08:06.560 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 1>but it was obvious that a lot of the specific

0:08:09.920 --> 0:08:15.040
<v Speaker 1>individual companies that were part of this were completely hot air.

0:08:15.240 --> 0:08:19.680
<v Speaker 1>There was nothing there. There weren't revenues, there weren't customers,

0:08:19.800 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 1>or they were you know, selling dollars for seventy five

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:27.120
<v Speaker 1>cents basically. So you know, pets dot Com was a

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 1>big one, Cosmo dot Com was another one, And all

0:08:30.480 --> 0:08:34.239
<v Speaker 1>these ideas came around later and were more nearly profitable

0:08:34.240 --> 0:08:36.480
<v Speaker 1>in the second go round. So Cosmo dot Com was

0:08:36.559 --> 0:08:38.319
<v Speaker 1>just home delivery. It was like Instacart.

0:08:38.440 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 2>It's basically Cosmo was Instacom, and pets dot Com was Chewy.

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:45.120
<v Speaker 2>And I looked at Chewy's revenues recently, three point one

0:08:45.280 --> 0:08:48.760
<v Speaker 2>billion dollars in a quarter fifty million dollars of profit,

0:08:48.840 --> 0:08:52.480
<v Speaker 2>which is good. But also one of those business is

0:08:52.520 --> 0:08:54.360
<v Speaker 2>what I hear metrics like that, I get scared.

0:08:55.520 --> 0:08:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's fine, it's a you know, it's a low

0:08:58.200 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 1>margin retail business.

0:08:59.400 --> 0:08:59.920
<v Speaker 3>That's fine.

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Retail retail's good, you know, it's it's okay, it's real. Yeah,

0:09:04.200 --> 0:09:06.480
<v Speaker 1>it's it's you sell things for more than you make

0:09:06.520 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 1>them for. That's that's how it's supposed to work. So

0:09:09.080 --> 0:09:11.080
<v Speaker 1>I think there were just so many of those. The

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:13.280
<v Speaker 1>other one was there was a business and I think

0:09:13.320 --> 0:09:16.480
<v Speaker 1>they were only based in Seattle, called Lackeye dot com.

0:09:16.880 --> 0:09:19.200
<v Speaker 1>And I remember my uh my boss at directions at

0:09:19.200 --> 0:09:21.400
<v Speaker 1>the time said that, you know, this is when I

0:09:21.440 --> 0:09:24.400
<v Speaker 1>knew that the revolution was impending. Is when you have

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 1>a website called Lackeye dot com that is basically a

0:09:27.559 --> 0:09:29.920
<v Speaker 1>personal assistant. I guess it was kind of like task Rabbit,

0:09:30.080 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 1>that kind of thing.

0:09:31.120 --> 0:09:33.599
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but even toss grab it has never really is

0:09:33.920 --> 0:09:35.319
<v Speaker 2>tosk grab it even profitable.

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:38.920
<v Speaker 1>They got bought by Ikea, so it's buried now. I

0:09:38.960 --> 0:09:40.480
<v Speaker 1>don't I don't think they ever were.

0:09:40.400 --> 0:09:45.199
<v Speaker 2>My lackey dot com. Okay, I I hate to interrupt

0:09:45.240 --> 0:09:48.040
<v Speaker 2>to read a Wikipedia page, but it was founded in

0:09:48.080 --> 0:09:49.600
<v Speaker 2>April not you know, you know, by a guy called

0:09:49.640 --> 0:09:52.800
<v Speaker 2>Brian McGarvey and another guy called Brendan Bonnacle.

0:09:54.520 --> 0:09:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I remember that name. Yeah, I remember that name with

0:09:56.520 --> 0:09:58.439
<v Speaker 1>an I right correct, yes.

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:02.720
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yeah. In the memo he had a memo that

0:10:02.760 --> 0:10:05.320
<v Speaker 2>was on fuck Company. It said this is still a startup.

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:07.719
<v Speaker 2>And he complains that it is now six forty five

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 2>PM and they're only twelve people in our office. We

0:10:09.880 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 2>have sixty four people who work here in Seattle. It's

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:16.080
<v Speaker 2>totally unacceptable. So the more things change, the more things

0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:16.680
<v Speaker 2>stay the same.

0:10:17.360 --> 0:10:20.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that's true. Yeah, there are there are absolutely

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:24.440
<v Speaker 1>some similarities and some differences between today and them.

0:10:25.120 --> 0:10:29.040
<v Speaker 2>But what about the the telecom side though, was it

0:10:29.320 --> 0:10:31.199
<v Speaker 2>did everybody just think that was going to work out

0:10:31.280 --> 0:10:33.800
<v Speaker 2>until it didn't? What was their a point when the

0:10:33.880 --> 0:10:36.480
<v Speaker 2>Loosens and the wind stars of the world got scared

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 2>or scary?

0:10:38.240 --> 0:10:38.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:10:38.720 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 1>I was less close to that at the time. I

0:10:41.880 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 1>was pretty focused on end user consumer stuff. But I

0:10:44.040 --> 0:10:47.360
<v Speaker 1>remember having friends who were sort of retail trading and

0:10:47.440 --> 0:10:50.160
<v Speaker 1>talking to me about Siena, Siena Networks, It's going to

0:10:50.240 --> 0:10:55.080
<v Speaker 1>be huge. And I think those busts came a little

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:58.320
<v Speaker 1>bit later, right with WORLDCLM. I think that was maybe

0:10:58.360 --> 0:11:02.320
<v Speaker 1>a bit after the doc Bom bust. And I'm a

0:11:02.400 --> 0:11:04.760
<v Speaker 1>little bit less familiar with how all of that worked.

0:11:04.760 --> 0:11:06.720
<v Speaker 1>But as I understand it, there was a lot of

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:10.040
<v Speaker 1>circular There were a lot of circular deals and deals

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:12.680
<v Speaker 1>that weren't really deals, and deals that were agreements but

0:11:12.920 --> 0:11:15.280
<v Speaker 1>actual no money changing hands.

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:19.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's interesting because as I dig into this, and

0:11:19.679 --> 0:11:21.920
<v Speaker 2>I've spent the last week or two digging into kind

0:11:21.920 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 2>of how we got to this conversation, I realized it

0:11:24.480 --> 0:11:27.040
<v Speaker 2>seems like there were two very specific The dot com

0:11:27.080 --> 0:11:29.440
<v Speaker 2>bubble was actually like two bits. It was the dot

0:11:29.480 --> 0:11:33.360
<v Speaker 2>com website stuff, and then the follow up of the

0:11:33.360 --> 0:11:37.000
<v Speaker 2>the the what was it the telecommunications fiber.

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Boom fiber boom, Yeah, it was, you know, it was

0:11:38.960 --> 0:11:43.120
<v Speaker 1>the it was the the websites. There was definitely some

0:11:43.200 --> 0:11:47.680
<v Speaker 1>circularity there too. Everybody knew that everybody was buying advertisements

0:11:47.720 --> 0:11:52.120
<v Speaker 1>from each other. But you know, you remember AOL bought

0:11:52.200 --> 0:11:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Time Warner and then that valuation collapsed. I mean, there

0:11:55.200 --> 0:11:57.440
<v Speaker 1>were some really huge deals that turned out to be

0:11:57.840 --> 0:11:59.600
<v Speaker 1>in the end worth almost nothing. And then I think

0:11:59.600 --> 0:12:02.520
<v Speaker 1>once you're once, you know, once all of those things

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:06.400
<v Speaker 1>fell apart and the end user picture wasn't there A

0:12:06.440 --> 0:12:10.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of the infrastructure valuations came crashing down as well.

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 2>What was the moment you knew? Like, when was the moment?

0:12:13.559 --> 0:12:15.800
<v Speaker 2>What was was there an event where you went, oh shit,

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:17.080
<v Speaker 2>and yeah?

0:12:17.080 --> 0:12:19.840
<v Speaker 1>When I joined that startup and I wasn't I couldn't

0:12:19.840 --> 0:12:21.800
<v Speaker 1>believe they had any money, So that was that was

0:12:21.880 --> 0:12:24.439
<v Speaker 1>a spring of two thousand. I was like, it felt

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:27.600
<v Speaker 1>like they were just sort of handing money out to anybody,

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:30.120
<v Speaker 1>and I mean, this guy had a record. I think

0:12:30.160 --> 0:12:34.720
<v Speaker 1>he had had a CRM company that competed with Salesforce

0:12:34.800 --> 0:12:37.960
<v Speaker 1>that either sold or went public, So he wasn't a

0:12:38.040 --> 0:12:42.480
<v Speaker 1>total nobody. It's just they couldn't hire enough people to

0:12:42.760 --> 0:12:47.720
<v Speaker 1>actually get anything smart done on time. It just wasn't

0:12:48.000 --> 0:12:50.240
<v Speaker 1>It just wasn't working, and everybody was kind of showing

0:12:50.280 --> 0:12:53.120
<v Speaker 1>up to the office and play acting. There were some

0:12:53.200 --> 0:12:56.240
<v Speaker 1>moments during the nineties that were, you know, kind of crazy,

0:12:56.320 --> 0:12:59.439
<v Speaker 1>like see it they funded this party. I played bass

0:12:59.440 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 1>and I was playing base and sort of this pickup

0:13:02.440 --> 0:13:06.240
<v Speaker 1>band at work, and they basically rented out the.

0:13:06.200 --> 0:13:08.360
<v Speaker 3>Film more for our holiday party.

0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:10.640
<v Speaker 1>And you know, we played on a stage in front

0:13:10.679 --> 0:13:13.120
<v Speaker 1>of twelve hundred or however, maybe the film is not

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 1>that big, five hundred people. And then they had a

0:13:16.440 --> 0:13:18.440
<v Speaker 1>I can't remember the name of the of the you know,

0:13:18.440 --> 0:13:20.760
<v Speaker 1>they had an actual working band come on after us.

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:23.240
<v Speaker 1>But it was a lot of fun. The singer we

0:13:23.280 --> 0:13:25.440
<v Speaker 1>were playing with nailed, Janis Joblin. She did a really

0:13:25.440 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 1>spectacular job. We had a couple of good songs. So

0:13:28.240 --> 0:13:30.520
<v Speaker 1>but that was those kinds of things were regular, like

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 1>that was just expected these big parties, and nobody really

0:13:34.520 --> 0:13:36.600
<v Speaker 1>asked where the money was coming from. I do remember

0:13:37.559 --> 0:13:40.880
<v Speaker 1>after Senet went public. I don't remember what year this was,

0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:44.160
<v Speaker 1>ninety eight or ninety nine. I actually looked at an

0:13:44.160 --> 0:13:49.560
<v Speaker 1>earnings report and I was like, oh, we're losing money.

0:13:49.800 --> 0:13:52.680
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know you could stay in business and lose money.

0:13:52.800 --> 0:13:53.800
<v Speaker 1>How naive I was.

0:13:54.520 --> 0:13:58.040
<v Speaker 2>That's so see, that's the thing I admit as I've

0:13:58.080 --> 0:14:02.840
<v Speaker 2>got further into finance in general and learned stuff the

0:14:02.880 --> 0:14:06.680
<v Speaker 2>amount of companies that just burn cash and then die,

0:14:06.800 --> 0:14:08.839
<v Speaker 2>but also the ones that are burning cash right now,

0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:10.520
<v Speaker 2>and the amount of people who just say, yeah, it's

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:14.400
<v Speaker 2>actually fine, it's good that happens. It's like a completely

0:14:15.760 --> 0:14:19.840
<v Speaker 2>like a completely different world that has only worked a

0:14:19.880 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 2>few times in the past. It's actually not worked many

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:22.840
<v Speaker 2>many more times.

0:14:23.280 --> 0:14:25.040
<v Speaker 3>Right, most of the time it doesn't work.

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:27.480
<v Speaker 1>But I think the bet is when it does work,

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:29.120
<v Speaker 1>it pays off spectacularly.

0:14:29.840 --> 0:14:30.080
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:14:30.840 --> 0:14:33.040
<v Speaker 1>And the question, I don't think Google was ever losing

0:14:33.200 --> 0:14:35.840
<v Speaker 1>huge amounts of money, but Amazon did for some years.

0:14:36.800 --> 0:14:40.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I've I've looked into it, and the companies that

0:14:40.120 --> 0:14:42.960
<v Speaker 2>have actually grown and been successful have never burned anywhere

0:14:43.000 --> 0:14:46.160
<v Speaker 2>near as much money as these AI companies. AWS was

0:14:46.200 --> 0:14:49.520
<v Speaker 2>like sixty nine billion over nine years, and that was

0:14:49.560 --> 0:14:52.480
<v Speaker 2>all of Amazon's Capex, not just AWS focused.

0:14:52.840 --> 0:14:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, no, they yeah, And again there was to me,

0:14:59.800 --> 0:15:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the Internet at large and the World Wide Web as

0:15:03.080 --> 0:15:06.520
<v Speaker 1>we used to call it, was a lot more immediately

0:15:06.800 --> 0:15:10.960
<v Speaker 1>obviously huge, and it was going to change a lot

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:14.040
<v Speaker 1>of things and how business was done and how media

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:15.040
<v Speaker 1>was distributed.

0:15:15.160 --> 0:15:16.240
<v Speaker 3>It was it was clear.

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:19.240
<v Speaker 1>It was just a question of when and where the

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:21.760
<v Speaker 1>technology had to go in which parts had to evolve.

0:15:21.800 --> 0:15:24.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, you needed consumers to have much more bandwidth

0:15:24.880 --> 0:15:28.360
<v Speaker 1>before video became a realistic thing and so forth, and

0:15:28.440 --> 0:15:29.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, they were gonna be fits and starts, but

0:15:29.800 --> 0:15:34.240
<v Speaker 1>I think everybody pretty much knew that it was not

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:37.680
<v Speaker 1>fake like these things, some of these companies were going

0:15:37.760 --> 0:15:41.320
<v Speaker 1>to succeed. Something was gonna happen. When I look at AI,

0:15:41.920 --> 0:15:45.640
<v Speaker 1>to me, it does not seem nearly as revolutionary. I

0:15:45.680 --> 0:15:48.000
<v Speaker 1>don't even really like to call it AI because it's

0:15:48.000 --> 0:15:51.520
<v Speaker 1>not intelligent, but that's the that's the term that we use.

0:15:52.320 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 1>But it's you know, it's right, uh, you know, matrix math,

0:15:58.440 --> 0:16:05.080
<v Speaker 1>determinating determined, you know, basically auto complete. So it's interesting.

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:09.040
<v Speaker 1>It can do some stuff that can be valuable in

0:16:09.080 --> 0:16:13.760
<v Speaker 1>certain situations. But it doesn't to me feel immediately massively

0:16:13.840 --> 0:16:19.000
<v Speaker 1>obvious that this is a huge change the internet did. Yeah,

0:16:19.120 --> 0:16:22.240
<v Speaker 1>web browsers did the iPhone. The first time I played

0:16:22.240 --> 0:16:24.520
<v Speaker 1>with one of those, I was kind of a skeptic

0:16:24.520 --> 0:16:26.520
<v Speaker 1>because I mean, I had a palm pilot and I'd

0:16:26.520 --> 0:16:29.360
<v Speaker 1>been yeah, yeah, I had around, Yeah, I had a

0:16:29.400 --> 0:16:32.280
<v Speaker 1>compact them, so keep going no, no, you know, and

0:16:32.320 --> 0:16:34.360
<v Speaker 1>you're you're you're playing with that stylist. And then someone

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:36.400
<v Speaker 1>brought an iPhone into work and I was like, oh, Apple, whatever,

0:16:36.480 --> 0:16:38.960
<v Speaker 1>they're not going to do this, and I was like, oh, responsive,

0:16:39.000 --> 0:16:42.440
<v Speaker 1>touch screen, email, autocomplete maps, I'm like, this thing's cool.

0:16:42.520 --> 0:16:43.680
<v Speaker 3>And then it got better from there.

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:46.320
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I haven't felt that, and I've used all

0:16:46.360 --> 0:16:46.880
<v Speaker 1>the chatbots.

0:16:46.880 --> 0:16:47.840
<v Speaker 3>I've played around with them.

0:16:48.320 --> 0:16:51.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't code, but you know, from what I understand

0:16:51.600 --> 0:16:54.920
<v Speaker 1>from people who do, is if you're a non coder,

0:16:54.960 --> 0:16:59.280
<v Speaker 1>it can create some serviceable apps just based on your ideas,

0:16:59.280 --> 0:17:02.240
<v Speaker 1>which seems pretty magical. But if you do code and

0:17:02.280 --> 0:17:06.760
<v Speaker 1>you actually look under the hood, they're not maintainable. You know,

0:17:06.840 --> 0:17:09.280
<v Speaker 1>you can't deploy them like they you know, they they

0:17:09.359 --> 0:17:10.880
<v Speaker 1>tend to have a lot of problems unless you sort

0:17:10.920 --> 0:17:12.159
<v Speaker 1>of know what you're doing. And I certainly know as

0:17:12.200 --> 0:17:16.480
<v Speaker 1>a writer, you know, I can immediately detect AI generated

0:17:16.480 --> 0:17:18.760
<v Speaker 1>writing and it's not good.

0:17:30.480 --> 0:17:33.359
<v Speaker 2>That's actually a really good thing to focus on. So

0:17:33.840 --> 0:17:36.640
<v Speaker 2>when you got into the internet industry, was there that

0:17:36.720 --> 0:17:39.200
<v Speaker 2>sense of wonderment. I'm not even being like a shield.

0:17:39.200 --> 0:17:41.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm just like because I remember when I first used

0:17:41.520 --> 0:17:45.040
<v Speaker 2>the internet in like nineteen ninety seven, I want to say, yeah,

0:17:45.160 --> 0:17:47.920
<v Speaker 2>like a child and being amazed by it, but even

0:17:47.960 --> 0:17:49.879
<v Speaker 2>like the iPhone moment as well. But when you were

0:17:49.880 --> 0:17:52.320
<v Speaker 2>getting into it in like the mid to late nineties,

0:17:52.760 --> 0:17:54.840
<v Speaker 2>was there that sense of wonderment and excitement?

0:17:55.200 --> 0:17:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Oh?

0:17:55.480 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely.

0:17:56.480 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 2>So.

0:17:57.119 --> 0:17:59.160
<v Speaker 3>There had been online services for a while.

0:17:59.160 --> 0:18:01.840
<v Speaker 1>People used AOL compu serve, and you know, you hang

0:18:01.880 --> 0:18:04.600
<v Speaker 1>out in chat rooms and you do these keywords and

0:18:04.640 --> 0:18:07.000
<v Speaker 1>it would call up sort of a specific I don't

0:18:07.000 --> 0:18:08.520
<v Speaker 1>even remember what they were called, but i'd call them

0:18:08.560 --> 0:18:13.359
<v Speaker 1>apps now. But the web was interesting because it was

0:18:13.440 --> 0:18:18.120
<v Speaker 1>immediately accessible to everyone. Anyone could theoretically set up a website,

0:18:18.840 --> 0:18:21.639
<v Speaker 1>and it was yeah, immediately huge, and it was a

0:18:21.640 --> 0:18:25.280
<v Speaker 1>little hard to separate some of the hype from legitimate excitement.

0:18:25.280 --> 0:18:28.160
<v Speaker 1>But I remember in San Francisco even in nineteen ninety five,

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:30.199
<v Speaker 1>and you know, you had had wired magazines sort of

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:35.440
<v Speaker 1>sounding sounding the bells for it for several years by

0:18:35.440 --> 0:18:38.119
<v Speaker 1>that point. But in nineteen ninety five, everybody was online,

0:18:38.160 --> 0:18:42.399
<v Speaker 1>everybody was getting online, and you know, you had tons

0:18:42.440 --> 0:18:45.280
<v Speaker 1>of TV commercials, and everybody was talking about the World

0:18:45.320 --> 0:18:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Wide Web on the evening news, and it just it

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:51.439
<v Speaker 1>was immediately clear that this was a new thing and

0:18:51.480 --> 0:18:53.000
<v Speaker 1>it was a new way that we were going to

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:55.879
<v Speaker 1>do a lot of stuff. Right, So, yeah, there was

0:18:55.960 --> 0:18:58.359
<v Speaker 1>there was massive excitement over it.

0:18:58.560 --> 0:19:02.160
<v Speaker 2>Was there any kind of AI sorry, I same leading

0:19:02.240 --> 0:19:05.440
<v Speaker 2>question then? Were there dissenters? Were there people other than

0:19:05.480 --> 0:19:07.919
<v Speaker 2>the obvious news we call call that everyone sends me

0:19:08.000 --> 0:19:11.400
<v Speaker 2>every time, you know, the one I'm talking about the dynalltics,

0:19:11.760 --> 0:19:13.080
<v Speaker 2>weird gloss things now.

0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:18.520
<v Speaker 1>But it was that descent there was, and I think

0:19:18.560 --> 0:19:22.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the descent, interestingly, was centered around some

0:19:22.440 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 1>of the same kinds of criticisms that we've heard over

0:19:24.760 --> 0:19:28.120
<v Speaker 1>the last five, six, seven years. So it wasn't that

0:19:28.320 --> 0:19:30.879
<v Speaker 1>this is stupid or this isn't going to work. It

0:19:30.960 --> 0:19:34.639
<v Speaker 1>was you know, there are no guard rails, there are

0:19:34.680 --> 0:19:37.480
<v Speaker 1>no there's no regulation. This thing is going to run

0:19:37.520 --> 0:19:40.520
<v Speaker 1>a muck. It's gonna you know, how how are we

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:43.280
<v Speaker 1>going to protect against fraud? How are we going to

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:48.080
<v Speaker 1>protect against people, you know, using it for crime? How

0:19:48.080 --> 0:19:51.080
<v Speaker 1>are we going to protect against you know, this kind

0:19:51.160 --> 0:19:54.439
<v Speaker 1>of information that maybe shouldn't be available to everybody. So

0:19:54.560 --> 0:19:57.760
<v Speaker 1>there were those kinds of questions, and people were, you know,

0:19:57.800 --> 0:20:00.159
<v Speaker 1>maybe we should slow down a little bit and put

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:04.560
<v Speaker 1>some guardrails and pass some laws around this thing. Most

0:20:04.560 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 1>of that's that, Yeah, most of it didn't get done.

0:20:07.880 --> 0:20:11.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, the Telecoms Act, you know whatever, Section two

0:20:11.240 --> 0:20:14.439
<v Speaker 1>thirty whatever, the big Omnimus Bill that that was a

0:20:14.440 --> 0:20:16.360
<v Speaker 1>part of that was an attempt to deal with some

0:20:16.400 --> 0:20:17.119
<v Speaker 1>of that stuff.

0:20:17.160 --> 0:20:19.359
<v Speaker 3>But it was pretty it was pretty lenient.

0:20:19.400 --> 0:20:22.720
<v Speaker 1>It was more about sort of protecting companies from from liability.

0:20:24.040 --> 0:20:25.560
<v Speaker 1>But there were some yeah, there was some at least

0:20:25.560 --> 0:20:27.920
<v Speaker 1>some thought around it, but.

0:20:27.560 --> 0:20:29.840
<v Speaker 2>But there wasn't just people saying this won't work in

0:20:29.880 --> 0:20:30.480
<v Speaker 2>the same way.

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:35.639
<v Speaker 1>Very few, very few, I mean there, you know, I

0:20:35.960 --> 0:20:39.680
<v Speaker 1>suppose you could go into the boardroom of a newspaper

0:20:39.720 --> 0:20:43.640
<v Speaker 1>at the time and probably would have heard some arguments

0:20:43.680 --> 0:20:46.639
<v Speaker 1>that now in retrospect sound insane. But you know, who

0:20:46.760 --> 0:20:49.479
<v Speaker 1>wants to read on a screen that was one that

0:20:49.720 --> 0:20:52.240
<v Speaker 1>you sometimes heard people want to have a piece of

0:20:52.280 --> 0:20:55.080
<v Speaker 1>paper in their hand and you know, print is print

0:20:55.119 --> 0:20:57.360
<v Speaker 1>is the way nobody wants to read on a screen,

0:20:57.600 --> 0:21:00.440
<v Speaker 1>or you know, this is this is this is sort

0:21:00.440 --> 0:21:03.360
<v Speaker 1>of a nerd toy. This is never going to take

0:21:03.400 --> 0:21:07.639
<v Speaker 1>off among you know, mainstream people. There were issues with

0:21:07.760 --> 0:21:11.800
<v Speaker 1>internet access. It wasn't available everywhere, especially high speed. I

0:21:11.800 --> 0:21:13.919
<v Speaker 1>mean we were using pretty low speed modems for a

0:21:14.040 --> 0:21:18.560
<v Speaker 1>very very long time, particularly in rural parts of the country.

0:21:19.000 --> 0:21:23.359
<v Speaker 1>So there was some skepticism around that, you know, And

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:26.200
<v Speaker 1>part of it, I have to be honest, is I

0:21:26.240 --> 0:21:28.480
<v Speaker 1>was in my twenties at the time, so I think

0:21:28.880 --> 0:21:31.879
<v Speaker 1>people at that age tend to be much more go

0:21:31.880 --> 0:21:35.320
<v Speaker 1>go about the future than perhaps old cynics as as

0:21:35.320 --> 0:21:35.960
<v Speaker 1>we are now.

0:21:36.359 --> 0:21:38.760
<v Speaker 2>But there wasn't any kind of well maybe there was,

0:21:39.119 --> 0:21:41.920
<v Speaker 2>you can tell me. There wasn't a kind of bifurcation

0:21:42.080 --> 0:21:44.560
<v Speaker 2>between people who were like pro internet anti internet in

0:21:44.600 --> 0:21:45.120
<v Speaker 2>the same way.

0:21:45.720 --> 0:21:45.960
<v Speaker 3>Nah.

0:21:46.040 --> 0:21:48.320
<v Speaker 1>No, I don't remember that anyway, No, I really don't

0:21:48.320 --> 0:21:51.040
<v Speaker 1>think so. Yeah, it was all it was all hands

0:21:51.040 --> 0:21:52.480
<v Speaker 1>on deck. I mean, I mean again, like this was

0:21:52.520 --> 0:21:55.680
<v Speaker 1>on TV. This is like you know, advertisements, there were

0:21:55.800 --> 0:21:58.800
<v Speaker 1>there were commercials. There were people on that evening news,

0:21:58.880 --> 0:22:02.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, reaching, reaching mom. You know my parents who

0:22:02.080 --> 0:22:08.240
<v Speaker 1>are boomers, They were fully aware and gung ho about

0:22:08.320 --> 0:22:11.400
<v Speaker 1>the web by ninety seven or ninety eight, and that's

0:22:11.440 --> 0:22:15.360
<v Speaker 1>I think that's who was investing. So, you know, one

0:22:15.400 --> 0:22:18.119
<v Speaker 1>of the big differences between then and today it was

0:22:18.440 --> 0:22:21.560
<v Speaker 1>these companies were going public and it was really fueled

0:22:22.720 --> 0:22:25.920
<v Speaker 1>in large part by retail investors. You know, you wanted

0:22:26.000 --> 0:22:28.840
<v Speaker 1>to buy stocks on the stock market in these new

0:22:28.880 --> 0:22:32.200
<v Speaker 1>companies that represented the future. So you know, you had

0:22:33.280 --> 0:22:38.040
<v Speaker 1>doctors and dentists and you know, professors with a little

0:22:38.080 --> 0:22:40.960
<v Speaker 1>money and people putting their retirement savings into these things,

0:22:41.040 --> 0:22:43.800
<v Speaker 1>and they were the ones who probably got wiped out

0:22:43.840 --> 0:22:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the most in you know, two thousand and one through

0:22:46.320 --> 0:22:47.240
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and four.

0:22:48.560 --> 0:22:52.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And I mean, was was that before e trade?

0:22:52.760 --> 0:22:53.000
<v Speaker 3>Was it?

0:22:53.160 --> 0:22:55.880
<v Speaker 2>Do you start to call a stockbroker? I literally don't

0:22:55.920 --> 0:22:57.880
<v Speaker 2>know how they bought stock back then.

0:22:57.920 --> 0:23:02.639
<v Speaker 1>I realized, Yeah, I think E trade started in the

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:04.879
<v Speaker 1>dot com boom, if I recall late in.

0:23:04.920 --> 0:23:08.439
<v Speaker 2>Nineties, because I remember in England at the time, the

0:23:08.520 --> 0:23:10.920
<v Speaker 2>story is about how E trade led to people losing

0:23:10.960 --> 0:23:13.560
<v Speaker 2>tons of money, and there was one thing I'll credit

0:23:13.600 --> 0:23:15.560
<v Speaker 2>the press with at the time as being like, yeah,

0:23:15.600 --> 0:23:17.840
<v Speaker 2>you shouldn't bet on the stock market unless you know

0:23:17.840 --> 0:23:19.240
<v Speaker 2>what you're doing, right.

0:23:20.520 --> 0:23:22.399
<v Speaker 3>Yes, index funds hold forever.

0:23:22.560 --> 0:23:25.520
<v Speaker 1>That's the that's the random walk down Wall Street, the

0:23:25.520 --> 0:23:29.240
<v Speaker 1>only investment strategy that works. But yeah, people were playing,

0:23:29.359 --> 0:23:31.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, they wanted they saw these ridiculous returns and

0:23:31.920 --> 0:23:35.960
<v Speaker 1>they wanted a piece of it. So yeah, I think

0:23:36.440 --> 0:23:39.280
<v Speaker 1>online trading was definitely a thing. You know, you had

0:23:39.280 --> 0:23:42.639
<v Speaker 1>the Yahoo Chat forums that's where people would pump and

0:23:42.720 --> 0:23:43.959
<v Speaker 1>dump these penny stocks.

0:23:44.000 --> 0:23:44.800
<v Speaker 3>They were all clad and.

0:23:44.920 --> 0:23:47.600
<v Speaker 2>Really they were like there were actual pump groups back then.

0:23:47.960 --> 0:23:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, I mean yah. Yahoo Chat was sort of

0:23:51.560 --> 0:23:53.720
<v Speaker 1>infamous for it. Like you would hear about something, you'd

0:23:53.720 --> 0:23:55.720
<v Speaker 1>hear it was a lot like what happened with crypto

0:23:55.840 --> 0:23:59.680
<v Speaker 1>in twenty one twenty two. You know, someone issues a

0:23:59.720 --> 0:24:01.720
<v Speaker 1>new time and everybody rushes in to buy it and

0:24:01.720 --> 0:24:03.159
<v Speaker 1>then it crashed. You know, there's a rug pull and

0:24:03.200 --> 0:24:06.400
<v Speaker 1>it crashes, like it was. Those kinds of things were happening.

0:24:06.440 --> 0:24:09.439
<v Speaker 1>But Yahoo, I remember being that was the forum that

0:24:09.520 --> 0:24:12.000
<v Speaker 1>I was the most familiar with back then. It was

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:13.760
<v Speaker 1>probably going on on AOL too.

0:24:14.640 --> 0:24:18.359
<v Speaker 2>That's magical. Oh, the innocent days. It was the I

0:24:18.400 --> 0:24:22.520
<v Speaker 2>remember when I I'm Gonna do the It was a

0:24:22.600 --> 0:24:24.359
<v Speaker 2>Rockahaua speech and the end of Blade round of the

0:24:24.359 --> 0:24:28.240
<v Speaker 2>things I've seen in telegram groups about icos. But it's

0:24:29.040 --> 0:24:31.720
<v Speaker 2>it's kind of it's adorable to hear that stuff happening,

0:24:31.800 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 2>until you remember people lost lots of money. But it

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:39.439
<v Speaker 2>doesn't feel like it doesn't sound like maybe it was

0:24:39.480 --> 0:24:42.159
<v Speaker 2>a different media climate, like there was that kind of

0:24:42.920 --> 0:24:46.320
<v Speaker 2>almost have There wasn't the noxious part of it where

0:24:46.320 --> 0:24:47.879
<v Speaker 2>it's like, oh, if you don't get on the internet,

0:24:47.920 --> 0:24:50.080
<v Speaker 2>you're gonna be left behind, You're an idiot, or maybe

0:24:50.080 --> 0:24:50.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm wrong.

0:24:52.520 --> 0:24:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Not so much of that, but it was it was

0:24:55.920 --> 0:24:59.119
<v Speaker 1>just presumed that this is the future and if you

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:01.119
<v Speaker 1>don't want part of the if you don't want to

0:25:01.160 --> 0:25:03.959
<v Speaker 1>be part of the future, that's fine, But you know,

0:25:04.040 --> 0:25:06.960
<v Speaker 1>why don't you go be a survivalist and live off

0:25:06.960 --> 0:25:09.240
<v Speaker 1>the grid in the woods? Kind of right, It was

0:25:09.359 --> 0:25:12.719
<v Speaker 1>just assumed. I mean, it's like, you know, do you

0:25:12.800 --> 0:25:15.560
<v Speaker 1>watch TV. There was a time when if you said

0:25:15.600 --> 0:25:18.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a TV you were very pretentious and

0:25:18.720 --> 0:25:21.359
<v Speaker 1>very special. Now it seems like everybody's cutting cable. But

0:25:21.880 --> 0:25:23.399
<v Speaker 1>so it was sort of like that. It was just

0:25:23.480 --> 0:25:26.320
<v Speaker 1>presumed that everybody was eventually going to get on board.

0:25:26.400 --> 0:25:29.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, who needs a personal computer in their home?

0:25:29.080 --> 0:25:31.200
<v Speaker 1>That was a real question in the late eighties, right,

0:25:31.480 --> 0:25:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Oh PC on every desktop? Yeah, sure, bill, whatever you say.

0:25:35.440 --> 0:25:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Who wants one of these things? And then you know,

0:25:37.080 --> 0:25:39.959
<v Speaker 1>you find justifications for it. Oh, well you can you know,

0:25:40.000 --> 0:25:42.600
<v Speaker 1>you can pay your bills automatically, and you can do

0:25:42.640 --> 0:25:45.920
<v Speaker 1>this and that. And suddenly when Internet Explorer was built

0:25:45.960 --> 0:25:48.520
<v Speaker 1>into Windows and everybody could get online, that was the thing,

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:50.760
<v Speaker 1>like that was, oh, of course, everybody has to have

0:25:50.800 --> 0:25:52.560
<v Speaker 1>a PC and we're all going to be on the web,

0:25:52.960 --> 0:25:53.800
<v Speaker 1>surfing the web.

0:25:54.440 --> 0:25:58.679
<v Speaker 2>It also feels like it was a genuine too, like

0:25:58.720 --> 0:26:00.560
<v Speaker 2>a lot of these things would just too early and

0:26:00.640 --> 0:26:04.119
<v Speaker 2>run too crazy because the actual fundament of it, it

0:26:04.160 --> 0:26:06.600
<v Speaker 2>sounds like, was people were excited to get on the internet,

0:26:06.680 --> 0:26:10.800
<v Speaker 2>which was which was obviously a beneficial thing and had

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:13.840
<v Speaker 2>immediate returns, like people could use it and say this

0:26:13.920 --> 0:26:16.560
<v Speaker 2>is useful in my life in this manner, right.

0:26:16.720 --> 0:26:19.600
<v Speaker 1>I think the initial thing was access to information. You

0:26:19.600 --> 0:26:21.880
<v Speaker 1>could you could find out a lot of things very

0:26:21.880 --> 0:26:24.680
<v Speaker 1>fast and actually and there were some communication aspects, right,

0:26:24.720 --> 0:26:27.879
<v Speaker 1>You could talk to anybody anywhere in the world pretty easily,

0:26:27.920 --> 0:26:28.639
<v Speaker 1>pretty quickly.

0:26:29.600 --> 0:26:30.400
<v Speaker 3>And then other things.

0:26:30.440 --> 0:26:33.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, e commerce was very early, but you know,

0:26:34.040 --> 0:26:36.320
<v Speaker 1>suddenly you don't have to go to the bookstore and

0:26:36.359 --> 0:26:38.320
<v Speaker 1>ask them to order. I worked at a bookstore for

0:26:38.359 --> 0:26:40.680
<v Speaker 1>a year in nineteen ninety, and you know, it was

0:26:40.720 --> 0:26:42.359
<v Speaker 1>a thing if you don't have the book in stock,

0:26:42.400 --> 0:26:43.960
<v Speaker 1>they come in and you order the book, and then

0:26:44.000 --> 0:26:45.639
<v Speaker 1>they come back a week later, and suddenly you just

0:26:45.680 --> 0:26:48.280
<v Speaker 1>press a button and the you know, the book will come.

0:26:48.359 --> 0:26:51.600
<v Speaker 1>And then they started adding music. There were a lot

0:26:51.640 --> 0:26:55.720
<v Speaker 1>of you know, again, the lack of bandwidth among a

0:26:55.720 --> 0:26:59.159
<v Speaker 1>lot of consumers did sort of stall the idea of

0:26:59.240 --> 0:27:02.280
<v Speaker 1>digital video, but it eventually came around in two thousand

0:27:02.320 --> 0:27:05.080
<v Speaker 1>and one or two. That's when YouTube really took off.

0:27:05.600 --> 0:27:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Real networks had streaming video and Microsoft.

0:27:08.000 --> 0:27:09.679
<v Speaker 3>Oh real real player.

0:27:10.400 --> 0:27:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, buffer, Remember we're all buffering. I interviewed Rob Glazer

0:27:16.240 --> 0:27:17.600
<v Speaker 1>a couple times. You know, he had the right idea.

0:27:17.600 --> 0:27:20.440
<v Speaker 1>But again, Microsoft sort of, you know, took that market

0:27:20.640 --> 0:27:23.760
<v Speaker 1>pretty quickly with Windows Media Player, and then Apple came

0:27:23.760 --> 0:27:27.800
<v Speaker 1>along and I they kind of blew everybody else away. So, yeah,

0:27:27.840 --> 0:27:31.080
<v Speaker 1>all of the ideas were there, and I think most

0:27:31.119 --> 0:27:35.159
<v Speaker 1>of what we were sort of experimenting with later became

0:27:35.240 --> 0:27:41.359
<v Speaker 1>real businesses. I mean, you know LimeWire and all the

0:27:41.400 --> 0:27:45.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of music MP three trading sites that was later

0:27:46.160 --> 0:27:49.720
<v Speaker 1>late nineties, I guess, early two thousands. That all eventually

0:27:49.720 --> 0:27:52.920
<v Speaker 1>became legitimized through Spotify and Apple Music and so on.

0:27:53.000 --> 0:27:56.320
<v Speaker 1>So every idea was already there. It was just maybe

0:27:56.359 --> 0:27:59.120
<v Speaker 1>it's a little bit underground. Maybe it doesn't work quite right,

0:27:59.160 --> 0:28:01.359
<v Speaker 1>it's a little clunky, it's a little cluegy, or maybe

0:28:01.359 --> 0:28:03.480
<v Speaker 1>the companies were just you know, they borrowed too much

0:28:03.520 --> 0:28:05.919
<v Speaker 1>money too fast and couldn't turn it around.

0:28:05.960 --> 0:28:09.600
<v Speaker 2>Which feels almost entirely different to the AI bubble, like

0:28:09.680 --> 0:28:12.720
<v Speaker 2>it's they such in a Dela on the morning of

0:28:12.760 --> 0:28:16.800
<v Speaker 2>recording this, uh At Davos was saying, Yeah, the thing

0:28:16.880 --> 0:28:19.560
<v Speaker 2>that might make the suspeculative bubble if nobody but if

0:28:19.560 --> 0:28:24.680
<v Speaker 2>nobody buys it. But if nobody buys AI. Not really,

0:28:24.760 --> 0:28:27.480
<v Speaker 2>he's so cool. I love that we live in this area.

0:28:27.520 --> 0:28:30.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to read you this sentence actually because this

0:28:30.160 --> 0:28:32.840
<v Speaker 2>really got me. Microsoft chief executive Search and a Delas

0:28:32.880 --> 0:28:35.639
<v Speaker 2>warn that AI risk becoming a speculative bubble unless its

0:28:35.760 --> 0:28:38.960
<v Speaker 2>use is spread beyond big tech companies and wealthy economies.

0:28:39.160 --> 0:28:40.960
<v Speaker 2>For this not to be a bubble, by definition, it

0:28:41.000 --> 0:28:43.520
<v Speaker 2>requires that the benefits of this are much more evenly spread.

0:28:44.680 --> 0:28:46.760
<v Speaker 2>He knowed that a telltale sign of it's abobble would

0:28:46.760 --> 0:28:48.760
<v Speaker 2>be if only tech groups are benefiting from the rise

0:28:48.800 --> 0:28:51.080
<v Speaker 2>of AI rather than the companies and other sectors.

0:28:51.480 --> 0:28:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's good, good shit self evident. Yes, correct, he's

0:28:56.240 --> 0:28:56.680
<v Speaker 1>not wrong.

0:28:57.800 --> 0:29:02.080
<v Speaker 2>Creative perhaps if no one uses also, isn't his job.

0:29:02.360 --> 0:29:06.840
<v Speaker 2>But nevertheless, there was a question I had. So something

0:29:06.880 --> 0:29:10.800
<v Speaker 2>that frustrates me with this whole conversation is how flippantly

0:29:10.960 --> 0:29:15.560
<v Speaker 2>people say, oh, it's a bubble, but sometimes bubbles are good.

0:29:16.040 --> 0:29:17.520
<v Speaker 2>What was the aftermath like?

0:29:20.360 --> 0:29:23.360
<v Speaker 1>So this is where things get a little bit complicated,

0:29:23.440 --> 0:29:28.920
<v Speaker 1>because I don't think that you can really fairly separate

0:29:31.000 --> 0:29:36.239
<v Speaker 1>events from other events that happen at the same time. So,

0:29:36.320 --> 0:29:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the the dot com bubble did burst, but then you

0:29:40.480 --> 0:29:43.040
<v Speaker 1>had nine to eleven happen in September of two thousand

0:29:43.080 --> 0:29:45.000
<v Speaker 1>and one, sort of in the late middle of it,

0:29:45.520 --> 0:29:49.480
<v Speaker 1>and that literally changed everything. It changed confidence, it changed

0:29:49.680 --> 0:29:53.880
<v Speaker 1>where everybody's attention was going. You know, you had money

0:29:53.880 --> 0:29:58.160
<v Speaker 1>flowing into completely different places. Everybody got much more conservative

0:29:58.240 --> 0:29:59.000
<v Speaker 1>and so forth.

0:29:59.120 --> 0:30:01.600
<v Speaker 3>So I think.

0:30:02.880 --> 0:30:05.560
<v Speaker 1>The real effect of the dot com bust, I mean,

0:30:05.600 --> 0:30:08.240
<v Speaker 1>you had a lot of people my age, people who

0:30:08.280 --> 0:30:11.520
<v Speaker 1>were in their twenties and the go go nineties, suddenly

0:30:11.560 --> 0:30:15.400
<v Speaker 1>lose their jobs or suddenly not have the great paychecks

0:30:15.440 --> 0:30:16.320
<v Speaker 1>that they.

0:30:16.200 --> 0:30:17.600
<v Speaker 3>Had become accustomed to.

0:30:19.120 --> 0:30:21.760
<v Speaker 1>And you had a lot of retail traders get wiped out.

0:30:22.000 --> 0:30:25.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, some people lost their lost their life savings

0:30:25.640 --> 0:30:28.040
<v Speaker 1>or a big portion of their life savings. And you know,

0:30:28.160 --> 0:30:31.560
<v Speaker 1>my attitude toward investing has always been caveat empt or

0:30:31.640 --> 0:30:34.160
<v Speaker 1>you shouldn't be betting if you can't afford it. You

0:30:34.200 --> 0:30:36.240
<v Speaker 1>should put your money in an index fund, and you

0:30:36.240 --> 0:30:38.560
<v Speaker 1>should hold on to that until you retire. That's the

0:30:38.600 --> 0:30:41.880
<v Speaker 1>safest thing to do. But you know, some people say, hey,

0:30:41.920 --> 0:30:45.040
<v Speaker 1>I've got ten percent of this of my holdings are

0:30:45.080 --> 0:30:46.760
<v Speaker 1>play money, and I'm just going to make some bets

0:30:46.800 --> 0:30:49.120
<v Speaker 1>and see what happens. And then you find other people

0:30:49.160 --> 0:30:50.840
<v Speaker 1>who who go too far with it.

0:30:51.680 --> 0:30:52.880
<v Speaker 2>But what about people in tech?

0:30:55.120 --> 0:31:00.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, in tech, most those skills didn't become useless, right,

0:31:00.400 --> 0:31:03.600
<v Speaker 1>so the technology was always changing. If you were you know,

0:31:03.680 --> 0:31:07.880
<v Speaker 1>learning HTML and JavaScript and Java programming, and then you

0:31:07.920 --> 0:31:12.560
<v Speaker 1>could transition into new different kinds of things. The technology

0:31:12.600 --> 0:31:15.320
<v Speaker 1>continued to evolve, so people who had those technical skills

0:31:15.360 --> 0:31:19.200
<v Speaker 1>could continue forward and find other interesting things to do.

0:31:19.280 --> 0:31:22.360
<v Speaker 1>And then, you know, honestly, after the sort of telecoms

0:31:22.360 --> 0:31:24.800
<v Speaker 1>bus two thousand and four, two thousand and five, you

0:31:24.920 --> 0:31:27.520
<v Speaker 1>had a pretty long boom. I mean, there was the

0:31:27.720 --> 0:31:31.600
<v Speaker 1>financial collapse of eight around the housing market, but the

0:31:31.720 --> 0:31:36.120
<v Speaker 1>tech industry independently was building a lot of stuff. Tons

0:31:36.120 --> 0:31:38.400
<v Speaker 1>of companies got started in the wake of the dot

0:31:38.480 --> 0:31:41.440
<v Speaker 1>com bust, and many of those companies are still around today.

0:31:41.480 --> 0:31:44.680
<v Speaker 1>So I don't feel like people in the tech industry

0:31:44.760 --> 0:31:48.320
<v Speaker 1>were permanently hurt. You know, there was a couple of

0:31:48.360 --> 0:31:51.120
<v Speaker 1>years set back, and then they generally were able to

0:31:51.160 --> 0:31:53.880
<v Speaker 1>learn new skills, apply what they'd already learned, and go

0:31:53.920 --> 0:31:56.360
<v Speaker 1>find other things that some of which turned out to

0:31:56.400 --> 0:31:57.160
<v Speaker 1>be really lucrative.

0:31:57.960 --> 0:31:58.240
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:31:58.720 --> 0:32:01.880
<v Speaker 2>But I think, I think, how can I phrase this?

0:32:02.840 --> 0:32:05.880
<v Speaker 2>I think that people are very flippant about the consequences

0:32:05.880 --> 0:32:08.920
<v Speaker 2>of a potential bubble collapse. I think that that's really

0:32:08.920 --> 0:32:13.160
<v Speaker 2>what I'm that's where my concern you're talking about today today, Yes,

0:32:13.360 --> 0:32:15.440
<v Speaker 2>because people compare it to the dult com bubble, and

0:32:15.480 --> 0:32:18.440
<v Speaker 2>they say, well, after the dult kombubble, there was that value,

0:32:18.520 --> 0:32:19.800
<v Speaker 2>which is completely correct.

0:32:20.440 --> 0:32:29.040
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, again, I think the other thing is about today.

0:32:29.200 --> 0:32:34.600
<v Speaker 1>So the circumstances around the world are very different. You know,

0:32:34.760 --> 0:32:39.360
<v Speaker 1>ninety two ninety three, the Cold War was over. There

0:32:39.440 --> 0:32:43.000
<v Speaker 1>was this peace dividend. They were turning army bases into

0:32:43.120 --> 0:32:51.560
<v Speaker 1>national parks. Everybody was sort of enjoying, you know, good times.

0:32:51.640 --> 0:32:54.000
<v Speaker 1>There was a book called The End of History by

0:32:54.080 --> 0:32:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Francis Fukuyama that's sort of posited.

0:32:56.200 --> 0:32:57.040
<v Speaker 3>Hey, this is it.

0:32:57.720 --> 0:33:00.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, we're here in this permanent utopia world. Of course,

0:33:00.360 --> 0:33:02.240
<v Speaker 1>events intervened and I think nine to eleven was the

0:33:02.520 --> 0:33:05.080
<v Speaker 1>big turning point there, and there's some other stuff around

0:33:05.080 --> 0:33:06.760
<v Speaker 1>that time, you know.

0:33:06.720 --> 0:33:08.520
<v Speaker 3>The contested election of two thousand.

0:33:08.600 --> 0:33:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Now, contested elections are such a common thing we don't

0:33:10.560 --> 0:33:12.600
<v Speaker 1>really think about them anymore, but that was the first

0:33:12.600 --> 0:33:17.680
<v Speaker 1>big one in my lifetime. The situation today, I think

0:33:17.760 --> 0:33:21.800
<v Speaker 1>you would agree, is very different. You know, we have

0:33:22.560 --> 0:33:27.840
<v Speaker 1>an unprecedentedly chaotic leader in the United States who seems

0:33:27.880 --> 0:33:33.840
<v Speaker 1>to be bent on ripping down old world orders that

0:33:33.960 --> 0:33:38.320
<v Speaker 1>have enabled stability since World War Two. I mean, if

0:33:38.400 --> 0:33:42.520
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about seizing land from a NATO ally, and

0:33:42.560 --> 0:33:45.120
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing Europe strike all these free trade deals with

0:33:45.240 --> 0:33:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the world, and so forth, and so on.

0:33:47.960 --> 0:33:49.880
<v Speaker 1>We could go on and on about this, but I don't.

0:33:50.120 --> 0:33:54.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm not an analytical expert. But the background scenario is

0:33:54.880 --> 0:33:57.200
<v Speaker 1>very different, and I think you could almost make a

0:33:57.240 --> 0:34:03.600
<v Speaker 1>case for AI being sort of the logical outgrowth of

0:34:04.040 --> 0:34:09.320
<v Speaker 1>a certain number of years of rot in the business

0:34:09.360 --> 0:34:12.160
<v Speaker 1>and in the economy. And I think you've made that argument.

0:34:12.800 --> 0:34:15.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, you can decide where that started. Did it

0:34:15.280 --> 0:34:18.080
<v Speaker 1>start in the eighties and nineties when the US started

0:34:18.120 --> 0:34:21.600
<v Speaker 1>off shoring and outsourcing everything to China and other countries.

0:34:21.640 --> 0:34:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Did it start after that? But it's been somewhat clear

0:34:26.640 --> 0:34:29.879
<v Speaker 1>for some time that a lot of the easy sort

0:34:29.880 --> 0:34:32.600
<v Speaker 1>of technological gains that we got from the mobile revolution

0:34:32.719 --> 0:34:39.320
<v Speaker 1>and from the cloud, those have mostly been gathered like those. Yeah,

0:34:39.360 --> 0:34:41.400
<v Speaker 1>and there's not that much more upside. You can get

0:34:41.400 --> 0:34:44.120
<v Speaker 1>a little efficiency here and a little efficiency there. Everybody

0:34:44.160 --> 0:34:46.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of knows how the internet works, you know, what

0:34:46.160 --> 0:34:50.080
<v Speaker 1>advertising looks like, you know, so this sort of to

0:34:50.200 --> 0:34:54.680
<v Speaker 1>me seems like it's it's sort of the last big push.

0:34:54.719 --> 0:34:57.560
<v Speaker 1>And you know, you have a lot of people in

0:34:58.000 --> 0:35:02.040
<v Speaker 1>big bureaucratic jobs who you've written about this, they don't

0:35:02.280 --> 0:35:05.440
<v Speaker 1>really produce much day to day. They produce a lot

0:35:05.440 --> 0:35:07.680
<v Speaker 1>of emails and a lot of presentations, and they sit

0:35:07.719 --> 0:35:10.560
<v Speaker 1>in meeting occasionally they got to make a yes no

0:35:11.280 --> 0:35:13.520
<v Speaker 1>decision and they got to you know, mune some data

0:35:13.560 --> 0:35:15.360
<v Speaker 1>together and say, Okay, it looks wiser if we do

0:35:15.400 --> 0:35:17.920
<v Speaker 1>this instead of doing that. But you know, a lot

0:35:17.920 --> 0:35:20.920
<v Speaker 1>of it is performative, and I think, you know, AI

0:35:21.040 --> 0:35:23.400
<v Speaker 1>is great for that. I don't have to create the

0:35:23.400 --> 0:35:26.400
<v Speaker 1>spreadsheet anymore. I don't have to create the presentation anymore.

0:35:26.840 --> 0:35:28.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't have to write the email that no one's

0:35:28.560 --> 0:35:30.120
<v Speaker 1>going to read, and then they don't have to read

0:35:30.160 --> 0:35:32.560
<v Speaker 1>it because they can have AI summarized for them. I

0:35:32.560 --> 0:35:35.640
<v Speaker 1>think it's good for that kind of good enough stuff.

0:35:35.680 --> 0:35:38.760
<v Speaker 1>And there are a lot of jobs that are good enough.

0:35:39.520 --> 0:35:41.760
<v Speaker 1>But I want to it's a bigger problem with the economy.

0:35:41.800 --> 0:35:43.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's all about AI. I think AI

0:35:43.680 --> 0:35:46.720
<v Speaker 1>is a symptom rather than perhaps a cause.

0:35:47.360 --> 0:35:51.120
<v Speaker 2>But even then, it's like, can it do presentations? Because

0:35:51.520 --> 0:35:53.920
<v Speaker 2>I've never been a like I've genuinely tried just to

0:35:53.920 --> 0:35:55.480
<v Speaker 2>see if it could do it. It's never been able

0:35:55.520 --> 0:35:57.320
<v Speaker 2>to do it. I think it's an interest.

0:35:57.840 --> 0:36:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean I've seen presentations created with AI that

0:36:00.600 --> 0:36:01.279
<v Speaker 1>are pretty good.

0:36:01.280 --> 0:36:02.680
<v Speaker 3>I think you get it, gets you.

0:36:02.600 --> 0:36:04.360
<v Speaker 1>A certain percentage of the way there, and then you

0:36:04.400 --> 0:36:05.200
<v Speaker 1>tweak it a little bit.

0:36:05.719 --> 0:36:08.719
<v Speaker 2>Okay, yeah, it's just that. But but then you kind

0:36:08.760 --> 0:36:10.800
<v Speaker 2>of look at it and say, great, did we really

0:36:10.880 --> 0:36:14.440
<v Speaker 2>need to spend however, many hundreds of billions of dollars

0:36:15.120 --> 0:36:32.320
<v Speaker 2>to get a spreadsheet maker. I also think that people

0:36:32.320 --> 0:36:35.080
<v Speaker 2>are just being flippant about the idea of a financial

0:36:35.080 --> 0:36:40.760
<v Speaker 2>collapse as well. That's what that's what's worrying me as well.

0:36:40.880 --> 0:36:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Right, But again, I think that there are a lot

0:36:43.080 --> 0:36:48.040
<v Speaker 1>of potential reasons for a potential financial collapse, and AI

0:36:48.360 --> 0:36:51.040
<v Speaker 1>is one of some number.

0:36:51.239 --> 0:36:52.480
<v Speaker 3>I don't think it.

0:36:52.560 --> 0:36:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Again, the dot com bust was not entirely attributable to

0:36:58.680 --> 0:37:02.240
<v Speaker 1>ridiculous valuations. There were things going on in other parts

0:37:02.280 --> 0:37:05.239
<v Speaker 1>of the world. There was a change of in confidence,

0:37:05.360 --> 0:37:07.920
<v Speaker 1>and I think here again, you've got you've got a

0:37:07.920 --> 0:37:10.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of disruption and a lot of disorder and a

0:37:10.120 --> 0:37:12.239
<v Speaker 1>lot of chaos. So there are many many things that

0:37:12.880 --> 0:37:16.600
<v Speaker 1>could happen. But I agree, I think people maybe underestimate

0:37:16.680 --> 0:37:20.960
<v Speaker 1>how how deep this is. Then again then again, you know,

0:37:21.120 --> 0:37:23.359
<v Speaker 1>who are the big investors in this? I mean it's

0:37:23.440 --> 0:37:28.360
<v Speaker 1>mostly really large tech companies with massive, massive revenues and massive.

0:37:27.960 --> 0:37:32.640
<v Speaker 2>Cash maybe highly anymore though one hundred and seventy eight

0:37:32.719 --> 0:37:36.239
<v Speaker 2>point five billion dollars of data center credit deals, you've

0:37:36.239 --> 0:37:40.000
<v Speaker 2>got venture capital is actually they yeah, venture capital is

0:37:40.040 --> 0:37:42.600
<v Speaker 2>also half a venture capital is going into it. But

0:37:43.120 --> 0:37:45.240
<v Speaker 2>the other thing that shocked me as well was back

0:37:45.280 --> 0:37:48.000
<v Speaker 2>then in the dot com boom, venture capital was so

0:37:48.120 --> 0:37:48.880
<v Speaker 2>much smaller.

0:37:48.960 --> 0:37:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Oh it was tiny, but yeah, you need it was

0:37:51.640 --> 0:37:54.160
<v Speaker 1>investment banking is where is where you found the money.

0:37:54.239 --> 0:37:58.840
<v Speaker 1>So venture capital though, you know, that's not their money.

0:37:58.920 --> 0:38:01.319
<v Speaker 1>They're they're playing with somebody else's money. So whose money

0:38:01.360 --> 0:38:02.920
<v Speaker 1>are they playing with? Who are the LPs, Well, we

0:38:02.920 --> 0:38:07.040
<v Speaker 1>don't really know, but it's it's personal wealth funds, it's

0:38:07.080 --> 0:38:09.880
<v Speaker 1>sovereign wealth funds, you know, it's it's Middle Eastern and

0:38:10.239 --> 0:38:14.400
<v Speaker 1>other country sovereign wealth funds. Sure, there's teachers pensions, and

0:38:14.400 --> 0:38:17.399
<v Speaker 1>there's university endowments, and there's some other things that that

0:38:17.440 --> 0:38:22.880
<v Speaker 1>that those LPs are holding that will actually harm you know,

0:38:23.320 --> 0:38:24.560
<v Speaker 1>normal working folk.

0:38:25.000 --> 0:38:26.399
<v Speaker 3>But I think a lot of it is.

0:38:28.200 --> 0:38:32.359
<v Speaker 1>Massive excess wealth at the top of society where people

0:38:32.400 --> 0:38:35.399
<v Speaker 1>are looking for new, new kinds of returns, they're looking

0:38:35.400 --> 0:38:38.080
<v Speaker 1>for outsized returns because all the easy all the easy

0:38:38.080 --> 0:38:41.279
<v Speaker 1>money is sort of already taken. So I don't know

0:38:42.200 --> 0:38:44.719
<v Speaker 1>if that. I think where it hurts is when you

0:38:44.719 --> 0:38:47.280
<v Speaker 1>think about, Okay, the you know, the real estate carry

0:38:47.280 --> 0:38:49.880
<v Speaker 1>on effects, all the people who are employed now and

0:38:49.920 --> 0:38:53.640
<v Speaker 1>will be suddenly unemployed. Those those kinds of things could

0:38:53.640 --> 0:38:56.440
<v Speaker 1>really hurt. But I just it doesn't seem to me

0:38:56.560 --> 0:39:01.320
<v Speaker 1>like you have the retail trader exposure as you did

0:39:01.719 --> 0:39:03.680
<v Speaker 1>during the dot com boom. Yeah, okay, if there's a

0:39:03.760 --> 0:39:07.319
<v Speaker 1>huge AI bust and Nvidia loses a massive portion of

0:39:07.320 --> 0:39:10.440
<v Speaker 1>its value, sure people are going to hurt who have

0:39:10.520 --> 0:39:12.879
<v Speaker 1>invested in in video, but they're not going to get

0:39:12.880 --> 0:39:17.440
<v Speaker 1>wiped out. I don't see Nvidia disappearing. I don't see Amazon, Microsoft, Oracle.

0:39:17.640 --> 0:39:20.439
<v Speaker 1>I don't see any of those companies disappearing as a result, and.

0:39:20.360 --> 0:39:23.120
<v Speaker 2>Neither do I. I think the thing that people need

0:39:23.160 --> 0:39:26.920
<v Speaker 2>to understand is that a wipeout isn't going to be

0:39:27.000 --> 0:39:29.799
<v Speaker 2>what hurts. It's going to be a draw down. It's

0:39:29.840 --> 0:39:32.800
<v Speaker 2>going to be because in Vidia eighty eight percent of

0:39:32.840 --> 0:39:36.560
<v Speaker 2>the revenue's data center like and I even looked back

0:39:36.680 --> 0:39:38.879
<v Speaker 2>for a premium I date a few weeks ago where

0:39:38.920 --> 0:39:42.239
<v Speaker 2>it was the amount of revenue that like Loosened or

0:39:43.200 --> 0:39:47.080
<v Speaker 2>Corning or whomever had in those specific segments, or how

0:39:47.160 --> 0:39:50.960
<v Speaker 2>weighted they were on their customers, Like I think Loosen's

0:39:50.960 --> 0:39:53.960
<v Speaker 2>top customers were eight and T and Verizin, but those

0:39:54.040 --> 0:39:57.400
<v Speaker 2>only represented thirteen to fourteen percent. In Nvidia has customers

0:39:57.400 --> 0:40:00.000
<v Speaker 2>that make up fifteen to twenty percent of their revue

0:40:00.040 --> 0:40:03.920
<v Speaker 2>new each quarter. They have massive centralization around four to

0:40:03.960 --> 0:40:08.160
<v Speaker 2>five customers that diversified revenues dropping. It's just it isn't

0:40:08.200 --> 0:40:10.680
<v Speaker 2>that in video is going to die. It's the half

0:40:11.239 --> 0:40:14.360
<v Speaker 2>to eighty percent of their revenue is going to disappear.

0:40:14.480 --> 0:40:18.640
<v Speaker 2>It happened with crypto with them, yeah, I'm really worried.

0:40:18.680 --> 0:40:20.640
<v Speaker 1>They were never as Yeah, they were never as dependent

0:40:20.680 --> 0:40:23.760
<v Speaker 1>on Crypto. They've tried a lot of things over the years.

0:40:23.760 --> 0:40:25.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean right, they were doing so chips for self

0:40:25.600 --> 0:40:27.520
<v Speaker 1>driving cars and all kinds of things.

0:40:27.520 --> 0:40:28.480
<v Speaker 3>I do.

0:40:29.000 --> 0:40:31.719
<v Speaker 1>I am not as technical as the writers on the

0:40:31.760 --> 0:40:34.719
<v Speaker 1>registers staff to bias Man, for example, does a great

0:40:34.760 --> 0:40:39.400
<v Speaker 1>job covering GPUs and data centers. It is positive that

0:40:39.480 --> 0:40:42.279
<v Speaker 1>there are other potential uses for GPUs that could be

0:40:42.400 --> 0:40:44.800
<v Speaker 1>very interesting with in terms of high performance computing and

0:40:45.200 --> 0:40:48.640
<v Speaker 1>some other things that are AI adjacent, you know, different

0:40:48.719 --> 0:40:50.560
<v Speaker 1>kinds of data processing and so forth.

0:40:50.600 --> 0:40:53.120
<v Speaker 3>So it may not what we call AI.

0:40:53.320 --> 0:40:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Even if that you know that those end use cases

0:40:56.200 --> 0:40:59.240
<v Speaker 1>and turn out to be eh, you know, vibe coding, eh,

0:40:59.320 --> 0:41:02.880
<v Speaker 1>chatbots eh, even though those aren't it. Some of these,

0:41:03.640 --> 0:41:05.600
<v Speaker 1>some of the some of the hardware may be repurposable

0:41:05.640 --> 0:41:08.279
<v Speaker 1>into other functions. I don't think it. It's just not

0:41:08.360 --> 0:41:08.600
<v Speaker 1>at this.

0:41:09.040 --> 0:41:11.000
<v Speaker 2>But not at the scale that they're building.

0:41:11.000 --> 0:41:16.319
<v Speaker 1>Though. No, no, again, I would be stunned if all

0:41:16.400 --> 0:41:18.800
<v Speaker 1>of the data centers that are being promised by twenty

0:41:18.880 --> 0:41:20.040
<v Speaker 1>thirty are actually built.

0:41:20.080 --> 0:41:21.400
<v Speaker 3>But maybe I don't know.

0:41:21.520 --> 0:41:24.640
<v Speaker 2>I also just don't think that that will be happening.

0:41:25.000 --> 0:41:28.399
<v Speaker 2>I just don't see it happening. I am looking through

0:41:28.400 --> 0:41:31.360
<v Speaker 2>the old dot com companies, though I really can't find

0:41:31.400 --> 0:41:34.920
<v Speaker 2>anything like open AI. They are truly special.

0:41:35.400 --> 0:41:35.839
<v Speaker 1>They are.

0:41:36.440 --> 0:41:39.000
<v Speaker 2>It's like they took a bit of Global Crossing, a

0:41:39.040 --> 0:41:42.120
<v Speaker 2>bit of Enron, a bit of loosen but also a

0:41:42.160 --> 0:41:46.279
<v Speaker 2>bit of pets dot Com just kind of amazed what

0:41:46.760 --> 0:41:50.000
<v Speaker 2>Silicon Valley can still spoot out. No like innovations but

0:41:50.360 --> 0:41:54.640
<v Speaker 2>financial collapses like these, We've never seen one this big, folks.

0:41:55.200 --> 0:41:57.200
<v Speaker 3>It's massive. Yeah, it's it's there.

0:41:57.560 --> 0:41:59.560
<v Speaker 1>There are there are a lot of commitments there in

0:41:59.600 --> 0:42:04.200
<v Speaker 1>The value is massive, massive, massive. I do think their

0:42:04.280 --> 0:42:08.760
<v Speaker 1>announcement last week or their acknowledgment that they're finally getting

0:42:08.800 --> 0:42:11.680
<v Speaker 1>into advertising is interesting. And I know we've talked about

0:42:11.680 --> 0:42:16.759
<v Speaker 1>this offline before, but when I think about all of

0:42:16.800 --> 0:42:20.800
<v Speaker 1>the information that a chatbot has about a heavy user,

0:42:21.960 --> 0:42:26.759
<v Speaker 1>they actually should theoretically be able to target ads at

0:42:26.840 --> 0:42:29.520
<v Speaker 1>least as well as Facebook and at least as well

0:42:29.560 --> 0:42:30.120
<v Speaker 1>as Google.

0:42:30.280 --> 0:42:31.279
<v Speaker 3>Right, so good to know.

0:42:31.480 --> 0:42:36.200
<v Speaker 2>About that, because Google and Facebook have very hard demographic

0:42:36.360 --> 0:42:40.520
<v Speaker 2>data and very like a nuanced layer of cookies that

0:42:40.560 --> 0:42:43.799
<v Speaker 2>can track I don't know if, especially as these are

0:42:43.840 --> 0:42:49.000
<v Speaker 2>free users, we don't know how much actual personal data.

0:42:49.080 --> 0:42:53.040
<v Speaker 2>Like Facebook's big advantage was that when you registered, you

0:42:53.080 --> 0:42:57.799
<v Speaker 2>gave them the demographic data they needed to target right right.

0:42:57.960 --> 0:43:01.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how much they're collecting, but if they

0:43:01.239 --> 0:43:04.279
<v Speaker 1>can still say, well, I know everything that you're interested in,

0:43:04.320 --> 0:43:07.799
<v Speaker 1>everything that you've been talking about for the last year,

0:43:08.520 --> 0:43:10.640
<v Speaker 1>they should be able to track that back to an

0:43:10.680 --> 0:43:11.719
<v Speaker 1>individual user. I don't know.

0:43:11.760 --> 0:43:12.239
<v Speaker 3>I don't know the.

0:43:12.200 --> 0:43:16.000
<v Speaker 2>Details maybe, but they've said low billions of revenue. But

0:43:16.040 --> 0:43:19.040
<v Speaker 2>it is. It is just interesting because in any I

0:43:19.400 --> 0:43:22.759
<v Speaker 2>maybe you know this, I looking through the history of

0:43:22.800 --> 0:43:25.960
<v Speaker 2>the computer, have never seen a point when everybody was

0:43:26.040 --> 0:43:28.680
<v Speaker 2>just screaming that something that didn't work would work.

0:43:31.120 --> 0:43:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's uh wow, it's hard to it's hard to

0:43:35.160 --> 0:43:38.640
<v Speaker 1>remember something that has been you know, this hyped.

0:43:38.680 --> 0:43:42.480
<v Speaker 3>And again I always leave. I always try to approach

0:43:42.480 --> 0:43:42.719
<v Speaker 3>this with.

0:43:42.719 --> 0:43:46.920
<v Speaker 1>An open mind because I am, you know, older, so

0:43:47.080 --> 0:43:50.719
<v Speaker 1>I tend to be more cynical with experience. But yeah,

0:43:50.840 --> 0:43:53.680
<v Speaker 1>I sort of shrug and I'm like, I don't quite

0:43:53.920 --> 0:43:57.680
<v Speaker 1>understand the big deal here. Doesn't seem to really do

0:43:57.719 --> 0:44:00.480
<v Speaker 1>what it's supposed to do. I mean, I'm still you know,

0:44:00.800 --> 0:44:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Gemini has foist it on me every day when I

0:44:02.920 --> 0:44:08.160
<v Speaker 1>try to do Google searches, and it's nearly almost always

0:44:08.760 --> 0:44:12.560
<v Speaker 1>slightly wrong, which is kind of worse than being completely wrong,

0:44:12.600 --> 0:44:14.840
<v Speaker 1>because it lulls you into this false sense of security

0:44:14.880 --> 0:44:16.440
<v Speaker 1>and you're like, wait a minute, that doesn't seem right,

0:44:16.480 --> 0:44:18.040
<v Speaker 1>and then you go to the source link and it

0:44:18.200 --> 0:44:18.960
<v Speaker 1>just got it wrong.

0:44:19.160 --> 0:44:22.759
<v Speaker 2>Like yeah, the beginning of the Google chapter of my

0:44:22.840 --> 0:44:26.160
<v Speaker 2>book that's coming out next year is I went to

0:44:26.239 --> 0:44:29.239
<v Speaker 2>look for how many people, how many users Google has,

0:44:29.960 --> 0:44:32.719
<v Speaker 2>and it's just me going insane as I get an

0:44:32.719 --> 0:44:37.000
<v Speaker 2>AI generated answer that's generated based on two SEO articles

0:44:37.040 --> 0:44:38.600
<v Speaker 2>that do not cite their sources.

0:44:39.280 --> 0:44:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Right, there's a lot of that, so it's taking what

0:44:42.320 --> 0:44:44.400
<v Speaker 1>all this kind of garbage data. And I mean, as

0:44:45.120 --> 0:44:48.520
<v Speaker 1>an editor, I'm I have for the last fifteen years

0:44:48.560 --> 0:44:53.120
<v Speaker 1>been hounding reporters who try to source stuff off the internet.

0:44:53.200 --> 0:44:54.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, where'd you get that from? How do you

0:44:54.960 --> 0:44:57.920
<v Speaker 1>know that's a reliable source? And AI just sort of

0:44:58.160 --> 0:45:01.799
<v Speaker 1>absorbs it all and presents and Lodi da, here you go.

0:45:02.000 --> 0:45:03.560
<v Speaker 1>They don't have any you know, they don't care, they

0:45:03.560 --> 0:45:07.919
<v Speaker 1>don't have any checks. It just comes from wherever. So yeah,

0:45:08.320 --> 0:45:10.759
<v Speaker 1>the one, the one thing I would what you were

0:45:10.800 --> 0:45:13.480
<v Speaker 1>saying about never seen sort of this much happen. I

0:45:13.480 --> 0:45:17.160
<v Speaker 1>do remember before the Segue came out and people were

0:45:17.160 --> 0:45:19.160
<v Speaker 1>saying I can't remember who, if it was Steve Jobs

0:45:19.239 --> 0:45:21.040
<v Speaker 1>or somebody, but somebody was saying this is going to

0:45:21.280 --> 0:45:24.600
<v Speaker 1>revolutionize transportation and change cities.

0:45:24.640 --> 0:45:27.360
<v Speaker 3>And we were like, WHOA, what could this thing be?

0:45:27.480 --> 0:45:31.040
<v Speaker 1>And then it was the Segue. Maybe not, but that

0:45:31.160 --> 0:45:34.799
<v Speaker 1>was one very small, isolated thing I don't. Yeah, I

0:45:34.800 --> 0:45:37.360
<v Speaker 1>don't recall sort of large scale where everybody in the

0:45:37.360 --> 0:45:40.840
<v Speaker 1>industry was saying this is going to revolutionize everything, and

0:45:40.960 --> 0:45:45.080
<v Speaker 1>end users are kind of going, I don't know how

0:45:45.120 --> 0:45:47.040
<v Speaker 1>many times a day, co pilot comes up on my

0:45:47.880 --> 0:45:50.759
<v Speaker 1>Windows PC and I dismissed it immediately because I didn't

0:45:50.800 --> 0:45:52.279
<v Speaker 1>really want it to show up. It just sort of

0:45:52.320 --> 0:45:55.160
<v Speaker 1>pops up. I hit a key combo too fast. I'm like, thanks, Nah,

0:45:55.280 --> 0:45:55.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm good.

0:45:56.880 --> 0:45:58.719
<v Speaker 2>I keep thinking about the thing you said, though, It's

0:45:58.800 --> 0:46:02.280
<v Speaker 2>like the conditions that different. But at the same time,

0:46:04.680 --> 0:46:07.040
<v Speaker 2>we've read like it's not like we're in a new

0:46:07.080 --> 0:46:10.160
<v Speaker 2>frontier of new ideas where everybody has something new that

0:46:10.280 --> 0:46:13.440
<v Speaker 2>might work. It's where it almost feels like the end

0:46:13.480 --> 0:46:16.520
<v Speaker 2>of something. It feels like the dot com bubble was

0:46:16.560 --> 0:46:19.239
<v Speaker 2>created by the excitement about a beginning rather than this.

0:46:19.960 --> 0:46:22.600
<v Speaker 2>It is people trying to pretend that something's happening and

0:46:22.640 --> 0:46:26.160
<v Speaker 2>that we're not at the end of an ela. I

0:46:26.160 --> 0:46:28.120
<v Speaker 2>should say, I don't think we're at the end of society.

0:46:28.640 --> 0:46:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, I think we are probably seeing probably

0:46:33.200 --> 0:46:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of new pretty major global shifts and power,

0:46:37.080 --> 0:46:42.440
<v Speaker 1>and you know, some of the guiding societal philosophies that

0:46:42.520 --> 0:46:46.000
<v Speaker 1>guide that will change. And yeah, there's there's there's a

0:46:46.000 --> 0:46:49.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of different things going on right now. You know,

0:46:49.560 --> 0:46:51.719
<v Speaker 1>I started a climate section at the NBC and was

0:46:51.840 --> 0:46:55.279
<v Speaker 1>very deeply entrenched in climate tech and some of the

0:46:55.320 --> 0:46:56.880
<v Speaker 1>climate politics.

0:46:56.320 --> 0:46:57.440
<v Speaker 3>And things around that.

0:46:57.600 --> 0:47:00.839
<v Speaker 1>And you talk to the green piled folks and they think,

0:47:00.880 --> 0:47:02.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, eighty years from now, we're all doomed.

0:47:03.160 --> 0:47:04.560
<v Speaker 3>So do I believe that?

0:47:04.600 --> 0:47:06.960
<v Speaker 1>No, not necessarily, but I do feel like things are

0:47:07.080 --> 0:47:09.440
<v Speaker 1>changing pretty rapidly and pretty dramatically on a lot of

0:47:09.440 --> 0:47:12.040
<v Speaker 1>different fronts, and AIS just kind of this, Hey, let's

0:47:12.120 --> 0:47:14.919
<v Speaker 1>let's keep this, let's keep this playbook running this place.

0:47:15.000 --> 0:47:18.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, let's keep doing That's really it. It's like keeping

0:47:18.280 --> 0:47:20.680
<v Speaker 2>let's keep doing what we've done the whole time during

0:47:20.680 --> 0:47:23.160
<v Speaker 2>the dult kombubble, people would trying new shit.

0:47:23.640 --> 0:47:23.960
<v Speaker 3>It was.

0:47:25.320 --> 0:47:27.920
<v Speaker 1>It goes all the way back to semiconductors. I mean, this,

0:47:27.920 --> 0:47:30.600
<v Speaker 1>this tech boom has been going on since the since

0:47:30.640 --> 0:47:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen sixties, really in different waves, but it's been

0:47:33.960 --> 0:47:36.480
<v Speaker 1>going on and on and on. I mean, I do

0:47:36.520 --> 0:47:39.080
<v Speaker 1>think like when Bill Gates said a computer on every

0:47:39.120 --> 0:47:42.800
<v Speaker 1>desktop whenever, that was in the eighties, that was nuts.

0:47:42.960 --> 0:47:44.880
<v Speaker 1>And then it was a computer on every desk and

0:47:44.960 --> 0:47:47.239
<v Speaker 1>in every home, and that was even more nuts, but

0:47:47.400 --> 0:47:50.919
<v Speaker 1>it happened. So, you know, I think that it's been

0:47:51.160 --> 0:47:53.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to say easy, but it's been running

0:47:53.160 --> 0:47:56.440
<v Speaker 1>so well for so long that I think everybody just

0:47:56.719 --> 0:47:58.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of wants it to keep running.

0:47:58.719 --> 0:48:01.040
<v Speaker 3>And I'm not. I don't know, I'm not. I'm with you.

0:48:01.080 --> 0:48:04.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm not seeing it yet. I'm not seeing a ton

0:48:04.280 --> 0:48:06.920
<v Speaker 1>of day to days. I mean, I mean, you know,

0:48:06.760 --> 0:48:09.319
<v Speaker 1>you look at the teenage demographic.

0:48:09.360 --> 0:48:10.480
<v Speaker 3>That's kind of who I always go to.

0:48:10.520 --> 0:48:13.239
<v Speaker 1>And my son is fifteen, and he's very cynical about

0:48:13.360 --> 0:48:16.560
<v Speaker 1>like he jokes about obvious AI writing and like they

0:48:16.600 --> 0:48:20.600
<v Speaker 1>make fun of phrases and terms that are so AI.

0:48:20.680 --> 0:48:22.920
<v Speaker 1>And he'll see a you know, a poster and advertisement

0:48:22.960 --> 0:48:25.600
<v Speaker 1>he's like, that's so AI and it's it's something that

0:48:25.680 --> 0:48:27.320
<v Speaker 1>you scoff at and make it.

0:48:27.440 --> 0:48:31.120
<v Speaker 2>Oh they're fuck, No, okay, AI is fuck. Then I'm sorry.

0:48:31.120 --> 0:48:35.080
<v Speaker 2>If you've got teenagers who are making fun of calling

0:48:35.160 --> 0:48:39.080
<v Speaker 2>bad stuff AI, right, I don't. I'm actually serious. That

0:48:39.320 --> 0:48:45.600
<v Speaker 2>is legitimately lethal. Teenagers dumb people. I'm I'm thirty nine

0:48:45.680 --> 0:48:48.040
<v Speaker 2>years old now, like I was, I've never been cooler

0:48:48.320 --> 0:48:51.200
<v Speaker 2>a year of my life. But I know that when if,

0:48:51.440 --> 0:48:53.200
<v Speaker 2>because that's in because you read a lot of things

0:48:53.239 --> 0:48:56.000
<v Speaker 2>that people try and say, well, young people love AI

0:48:56.560 --> 0:48:57.919
<v Speaker 2>not be my experience either.

0:48:59.160 --> 0:49:05.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't young people love TikTok. Young people love Instagram reels.

0:49:06.560 --> 0:49:08.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, they're on they're on vertical they're scrolling vertical

0:49:08.880 --> 0:49:09.439
<v Speaker 1>video all.

0:49:09.400 --> 0:49:10.880
<v Speaker 3>Day and and commony.

0:49:12.239 --> 0:49:13.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't even want to say they love you know,

0:49:13.960 --> 0:49:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Snap or any social media because it's all you know,

0:49:16.239 --> 0:49:18.799
<v Speaker 1>it's all text change, right, It's all you just get

0:49:18.840 --> 0:49:21.360
<v Speaker 1>your different text strings. Like. There's a lot of stuff

0:49:21.400 --> 0:49:26.440
<v Speaker 1>that they love. Games, huge online games, you know, participatory games.

0:49:27.160 --> 0:49:30.279
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I don't see them hanging out all.

0:49:30.239 --> 0:49:31.200
<v Speaker 3>Day with their chatbot.

0:49:31.440 --> 0:49:32.799
<v Speaker 1>You know, once in a while, if you have something

0:49:32.800 --> 0:49:34.480
<v Speaker 1>you really want to you're curious and you want to

0:49:34.480 --> 0:49:38.319
<v Speaker 1>experiment with something, it'll prototype something quite quickly for you.

0:49:38.360 --> 0:49:40.879
<v Speaker 1>And I think people do that sometimes and find it useful.

0:49:40.880 --> 0:49:42.480
<v Speaker 1>It's like, Okay, this is a prototype, this is cool.

0:49:42.520 --> 0:49:44.040
<v Speaker 1>This would have taken me six hours of grunt work

0:49:44.080 --> 0:49:46.080
<v Speaker 1>to generate. Thanks for doing that for me. So there

0:49:46.080 --> 0:49:47.719
<v Speaker 1>are some you know, I don't want to I don't

0:49:47.719 --> 0:49:49.560
<v Speaker 1>want to slam and say it's totally useless in all

0:49:49.560 --> 0:49:53.120
<v Speaker 1>scenarios because it's not it's a it's just it's sort

0:49:53.120 --> 0:49:55.560
<v Speaker 1>of an extension of a compute. It's just a better computer.

0:49:55.680 --> 0:49:59.200
<v Speaker 1>In some ways it helps you do certain things, some fast.

0:49:59.600 --> 0:50:01.879
<v Speaker 2>But some times it's a better that's the other thing.

0:50:01.920 --> 0:50:06.399
<v Speaker 2>It's like, I have this growing theory about AI psychosis

0:50:06.440 --> 0:50:09.239
<v Speaker 2>being far more common than people think, because I think

0:50:09.280 --> 0:50:11.719
<v Speaker 2>that there is something that happens when people use a

0:50:11.760 --> 0:50:15.400
<v Speaker 2>large language model and what they extrapolate from there that

0:50:15.480 --> 0:50:18.359
<v Speaker 2>makes some people do insane things like I don't know

0:50:19.080 --> 0:50:22.680
<v Speaker 2>by two hundred billion dollars worth of data centers and GPUs.

0:50:23.360 --> 0:50:26.719
<v Speaker 2>And on one hand, you might argue, oh, that's just

0:50:26.800 --> 0:50:30.520
<v Speaker 2>business idiots being business idiots. No, I think such An

0:50:30.520 --> 0:50:34.120
<v Speaker 2>Adela and sun Dar Pashai used an LM and went,

0:50:34.200 --> 0:50:37.000
<v Speaker 2>holy shit, I need to do this. I mean I

0:50:37.040 --> 0:50:40.239
<v Speaker 2>got told once that such An Adella's whole reason that

0:50:40.360 --> 0:50:44.680
<v Speaker 2>he started this facade was because he saw chat GPT

0:50:44.760 --> 0:50:47.000
<v Speaker 2>and wanted it in Bing. I think that there is

0:50:47.040 --> 0:50:51.560
<v Speaker 2>that everyone is experiencing micro versions of Kevin Bruce's Chat

0:50:51.600 --> 0:50:53.719
<v Speaker 2>GPT told me to leave my wife thing. It's just

0:50:54.080 --> 0:50:58.480
<v Speaker 2>what do you believe AI will do next, Like what

0:50:58.560 --> 0:51:00.600
<v Speaker 2>do you think it will do? And what do you

0:51:00.680 --> 0:51:03.160
<v Speaker 2>believe will happen if you don't use it today? And

0:51:03.200 --> 0:51:05.319
<v Speaker 2>it's just very bizarre. Sorry that was that was more

0:51:05.360 --> 0:51:06.799
<v Speaker 2>of a point than a question, I should be clear.

0:51:07.000 --> 0:51:10.279
<v Speaker 1>But how many people are subject to that? I don't

0:51:10.280 --> 0:51:13.440
<v Speaker 1>think it's a huge number. Yeah, to some degree. The

0:51:13.480 --> 0:51:16.280
<v Speaker 1>folks who are, you know, the sachun Adelas of the world,

0:51:16.360 --> 0:51:21.120
<v Speaker 1>are I should say, someone insulated from the trials and

0:51:21.120 --> 0:51:24.160
<v Speaker 1>tribulations that most of us experience. They're insulated from their money.

0:51:24.160 --> 0:51:26.080
<v Speaker 1>And if you are someone like Sam Altman or Elon

0:51:26.160 --> 0:51:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Musk who is surrounded by a cadre of people who

0:51:29.360 --> 0:51:33.040
<v Speaker 1>always say yes to everything you suggest and and you know,

0:51:33.080 --> 0:51:36.000
<v Speaker 1>are constantly saying you are a genius. You're a genius, man,

0:51:36.080 --> 0:51:39.080
<v Speaker 1>You're a genius. I think, you know, some of these

0:51:39.160 --> 0:51:43.120
<v Speaker 1>chatbots almost duplicate that mentality, like it's like, yeah, I

0:51:43.160 --> 0:51:45.560
<v Speaker 1>want someone to tell me that whatever I'm doing, I

0:51:45.640 --> 0:51:49.480
<v Speaker 1>am great and I am special and I have inside

0:51:49.520 --> 0:51:51.240
<v Speaker 1>knowledge that nobody else has.

0:51:51.719 --> 0:51:54.919
<v Speaker 2>That's a nice but that's kind of what I'm getting at.

0:51:55.680 --> 0:51:58.960
<v Speaker 2>Using a large language but convinces some people that they

0:51:59.000 --> 0:52:01.799
<v Speaker 2>are in the field future and creates this kind of

0:52:01.840 --> 0:52:03.160
<v Speaker 2>religious feeling around it.

0:52:03.160 --> 0:52:03.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:52:03.560 --> 0:52:06.120
<v Speaker 2>I hate to explore this idea more. I've just never

0:52:06.440 --> 0:52:09.479
<v Speaker 2>I've seen it in like game FAQs, when people would

0:52:09.560 --> 0:52:14.279
<v Speaker 2>argue between PlayStation and Nintendo and Xbox. I've seen, but

0:52:14.400 --> 0:52:17.120
<v Speaker 2>not like that. You don't have people just saying the

0:52:17.280 --> 0:52:19.680
<v Speaker 2>Xbox can do things things it can't.

0:52:20.000 --> 0:52:21.680
<v Speaker 3>But it's part of what we're seeing.

0:52:21.719 --> 0:52:27.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that feeling it's pervasive in our society right now. Regardless,

0:52:27.440 --> 0:52:31.239
<v Speaker 1>we have this sort of strong current of anti expert

0:52:31.560 --> 0:52:34.560
<v Speaker 1>right the people who've studied this for years are no

0:52:34.760 --> 0:52:38.120
<v Speaker 1>smarter than me. I'm really smart because I have my

0:52:38.239 --> 0:52:40.600
<v Speaker 1>own special knowledge and.

0:52:40.280 --> 0:52:41.239
<v Speaker 3>Nobody else has it.

0:52:41.360 --> 0:52:43.200
<v Speaker 1>And I'm going to tell you the secret that I've

0:52:43.280 --> 0:52:45.600
<v Speaker 1>learned that's, you know, really important.

0:52:45.760 --> 0:52:46.480
<v Speaker 3>I think that.

0:52:47.280 --> 0:52:49.279
<v Speaker 1>Whatever if you want to call it psychosis or that

0:52:49.400 --> 0:52:53.400
<v Speaker 1>narcissism that comes out of fifteen years of social media,

0:52:53.640 --> 0:52:57.799
<v Speaker 1>like that's old enough to remember. In fact, Facebook didn't

0:52:57.800 --> 0:53:00.239
<v Speaker 1>come out until I was already an adult and and

0:53:00.320 --> 0:53:02.640
<v Speaker 1>had a child. I mean, Facebook didn't really become mainstream.

0:53:02.760 --> 0:53:04.400
<v Speaker 1>I had a two year old kid. So I'm old

0:53:04.760 --> 0:53:09.520
<v Speaker 1>and I remember how sort of society changed and how

0:53:09.640 --> 0:53:13.640
<v Speaker 1>people interacting with one another changed dramatically as social media

0:53:13.680 --> 0:53:16.520
<v Speaker 1>became popular, and it was much more about you're on

0:53:16.600 --> 0:53:19.239
<v Speaker 1>stage all the time and look at my life, and

0:53:19.280 --> 0:53:21.239
<v Speaker 1>your life is better than my life. We I mean,

0:53:21.280 --> 0:53:23.560
<v Speaker 1>there's some of that that's always been around, but it

0:53:23.640 --> 0:53:26.759
<v Speaker 1>just wasn't so easy to indulge.

0:53:26.239 --> 0:53:29.400
<v Speaker 3>That side of oneself pre social media.

0:53:29.440 --> 0:53:33.000
<v Speaker 1>So I think, you know, again, everything that was set

0:53:33.200 --> 0:53:37.640
<v Speaker 1>in the past just continues along its way. Like I

0:53:37.680 --> 0:53:41.480
<v Speaker 1>think again, I don't think AI is necessarily, you know,

0:53:41.600 --> 0:53:44.720
<v Speaker 1>the one thing that is different. It's a natural outgrowth

0:53:44.760 --> 0:53:46.960
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of different trends that have been happening

0:53:46.960 --> 0:53:47.880
<v Speaker 1>for a long time.

0:53:49.400 --> 0:53:52.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I keep thinking a long term jok

0:53:52.719 --> 0:53:55.680
<v Speaker 2>I make is posting it's the beginning of history with

0:53:55.719 --> 0:54:00.040
<v Speaker 2>a big smiley face, because I actually worry that that

0:54:00.040 --> 0:54:02.440
<v Speaker 2>that's what like, It's not that everything's coming to an end.

0:54:02.440 --> 0:54:05.000
<v Speaker 2>It's that one era is ending and another is beginning

0:54:05.920 --> 0:54:07.440
<v Speaker 2>aggressively and loudly.

0:54:07.520 --> 0:54:08.120
<v Speaker 3>This is the.

0:54:08.080 --> 0:54:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Dawning of the Aquarius.

0:54:12.480 --> 0:54:15.120
<v Speaker 2>All right, I think that's a great place to end it.

0:54:15.160 --> 0:54:18.200
<v Speaker 2>Matt rose Off, editor in chief of The Register, Thank

0:54:18.200 --> 0:54:19.600
<v Speaker 2>you so much for joining me.

0:54:19.840 --> 0:54:21.439
<v Speaker 3>All right, Thank you ed a lot of fun.

0:54:22.080 --> 0:54:25.000
<v Speaker 2>Thank you everyone to listen. Thank you everyone to listening.

0:54:25.080 --> 0:54:27.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm not going to edit that out. You'll have him

0:54:27.160 --> 0:54:28.680
<v Speaker 2>on log this week as well. Maybe I'll chuck you

0:54:28.760 --> 0:54:31.279
<v Speaker 2>an extra one if I'm feeling generous. Thanks everyone for

0:54:31.960 --> 0:54:34.720
<v Speaker 2>stomaching the four part of last week, and yeah, catch

0:54:34.719 --> 0:54:45.239
<v Speaker 2>you soon. Thank you for listening to Better Offline.

0:54:45.360 --> 0:54:47.799
<v Speaker 4>The editor and composer of the Better Offline theme song

0:54:47.880 --> 0:54:50.520
<v Speaker 4>is Mattasowski. You can check out more of his music

0:54:50.520 --> 0:54:54.200
<v Speaker 4>and audio projects at Mattasowski dot com, m A T

0:54:54.200 --> 0:54:58.640
<v Speaker 4>T O s O W s ki dot com. You

0:54:58.680 --> 0:55:01.320
<v Speaker 4>can email me an easy Better Offline dot com or

0:55:01.400 --> 0:55:03.920
<v Speaker 4>visit Better Offline dot com to find more podcast links

0:55:03.920 --> 0:55:07.080
<v Speaker 4>and of course my newsletter. I also really recommend you

0:55:07.080 --> 0:55:09.239
<v Speaker 4>go to chat dot Where's Youread dot at to visit

0:55:09.280 --> 0:55:11.359
<v Speaker 4>the discord, and go to our slash.

0:55:11.080 --> 0:55:14.200
<v Speaker 2>Better Offline to check out I'll Reddit. Thank you so

0:55:14.320 --> 0:55:15.080
<v Speaker 2>much for listening.

0:55:15.880 --> 0:55:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Better Offline is a production of cool Zone Media. For

0:55:18.719 --> 0:55:21.880
<v Speaker 1>more from cool Zone Media, visit our website cool Zonemedia

0:55:21.920 --> 0:55:24.799
<v Speaker 1>dot com, or check us out on the iHeartRadio app,

0:55:24.840 --> 0:55:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.