WEBVTT - MLB: Leading Off August 9th, 2022 (Ep. 570)

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Leading off starts now right here on Fantasy Pros, brought

0:00:19.520 --> 0:00:22.240
<v Speaker 1>to you by bet MGM. I am Chris Welsh, who

0:00:22.280 --> 0:00:23.840
<v Speaker 1>you could find on Twitter at is it the Welsh

0:00:23.880 --> 0:00:26.759
<v Speaker 1>in joining me today is the illustrious I got a

0:00:26.800 --> 0:00:30.520
<v Speaker 1>beautiful smile right there he is, Kate see Bubba on Twitter.

0:00:30.560 --> 0:00:34.240
<v Speaker 1>I beat the intrick, my great buddy, yours as well, Bubba?

0:00:34.280 --> 0:00:34.800
<v Speaker 1>What's up man?

0:00:35.320 --> 0:00:36.920
<v Speaker 2>Not much, my friend. I've been called a lot of

0:00:36.920 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 2>things in life. I'm not sure illustrious has ever hit

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:40.560
<v Speaker 2>the top of our list. But I appreciate the kind

0:00:40.600 --> 0:00:41.280
<v Speaker 2>words always.

0:00:41.320 --> 0:00:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Great chat you now, now next time you hear that word,

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:46.879
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna think of yourself. That's all that. That's what

0:00:46.920 --> 0:00:49.599
<v Speaker 1>I was going for. Appreciate it now you got it.

0:00:50.000 --> 0:00:51.919
<v Speaker 1>On the show today, we've got a whole bunch of cover.

0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Actually gonna play a little game with Bubba. You guys

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:57.320
<v Speaker 1>in the chat can play along as well. We're gonna

0:00:57.320 --> 0:00:59.400
<v Speaker 1>be going through all the stat heroes. The zero is

0:00:59.440 --> 0:01:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the home run, which maah in another homer that is four.

0:01:04.480 --> 0:01:07.680
<v Speaker 1>By the way, since last Monday, got no idea where

0:01:07.720 --> 0:01:09.640
<v Speaker 1>that puts me up on the leaderboard, because I have

0:01:09.720 --> 0:01:13.560
<v Speaker 1>not been on the leaderboard this entire season, making and

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:16.040
<v Speaker 1>chugging away just a little bit as we keep moving.

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Stupid Joe just keeps getting homers as well, because he's

0:01:19.720 --> 0:01:23.000
<v Speaker 1>got Aaron Judge, and like I said, Judge literally alone

0:01:23.040 --> 0:01:25.840
<v Speaker 1>is beating everybody in the contest. And now you know,

0:01:25.959 --> 0:01:28.559
<v Speaker 1>Joe's just able to carry him over. So we must

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:30.399
<v Speaker 1>end that we've got some bets, and we've got a

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:33.720
<v Speaker 1>whole bunch more. But there is no gift that keeps

0:01:33.720 --> 0:01:38.760
<v Speaker 1>on giving in baseball like Chris Sale. Chris Sale, he

0:01:38.840 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 1>giveth the tiny bit and he taketh away all. Chris

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Sale underwent season ending surgery on Monday after fracturing his

0:01:46.920 --> 0:01:50.640
<v Speaker 1>right wrist last Saturday in a bicycle accident. Yes, you

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 1>heard me correct, a bicycle accident. No, not the rib thing,

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 1>not the punching of the things in the minor league. No,

0:01:58.240 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 1>he was riding a bike. Would love it if it

0:02:00.680 --> 0:02:03.680
<v Speaker 1>was like like a hardcore motorcycle or maybe.

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 2>Like a Madison bum grunner.

0:02:05.000 --> 0:02:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, like something like that. But you know it

0:02:07.280 --> 0:02:10.120
<v Speaker 1>was probably like a twenty six inch mountain bike that

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:13.680
<v Speaker 1>he was cruising around just like angrily, just like reel,

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:16.880
<v Speaker 1>and he fell over something fractures riskies out for the season.

0:02:16.919 --> 0:02:20.079
<v Speaker 1>I mean to laugh, but like you know, everyoneted to

0:02:20.120 --> 0:02:22.160
<v Speaker 1>get me crap about some of the injury guys. There's

0:02:22.160 --> 0:02:25.519
<v Speaker 1>a lot of weird injury stuff that's happening. Chris Saale,

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Bubba is a disaster.

0:02:28.600 --> 0:02:32.600
<v Speaker 2>Yes, it's a. It's a colossal disaster. It's an illustrious disaster,

0:02:32.720 --> 0:02:35.440
<v Speaker 2>if we must say it's a it's quite impressive. When

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:37.119
<v Speaker 2>I saw that headline this morning, I was like, you've

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:40.000
<v Speaker 2>got to be kidding me, Like when it rains, it pours.

0:02:40.200 --> 0:02:42.800
<v Speaker 2>I think the Red Sox paid him thirty million this year.

0:02:43.240 --> 0:02:46.760
<v Speaker 2>So if things weren't going bad enough in Boston, that's

0:02:46.800 --> 0:02:48.840
<v Speaker 2>a ship has sailed, as it was said in the chat.

0:02:49.200 --> 0:02:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, that's a good line, browing the ship has sailed.

0:02:51.840 --> 0:02:54.560
<v Speaker 1>That would be actually a great article headline.

0:02:54.240 --> 0:02:56.040
<v Speaker 2>If you want to guarantee it'll be in the Boston

0:02:56.080 --> 0:02:57.480
<v Speaker 2>Globe or something very quickly.

0:02:57.800 --> 0:02:59.919
<v Speaker 1>Yeah exactly. That would be like a yeah, they'd be

0:02:59.960 --> 0:03:01.440
<v Speaker 1>like what was it? Like the New York Posts, like

0:03:01.480 --> 0:03:04.200
<v Speaker 1>the Post has always got the like crazy ones. You know,

0:03:04.200 --> 0:03:05.640
<v Speaker 1>that would be a really good article if you wanted

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:07.960
<v Speaker 1>to break down all the injuries, and you know this

0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:10.079
<v Speaker 1>used to be Stanton, but now it looks like it's

0:03:10.080 --> 0:03:13.200
<v Speaker 1>turning into Sale in this flukiness. Age has been an

0:03:13.240 --> 0:03:16.120
<v Speaker 1>issue major games. I mean, where did he go. He

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 1>go ten years where everyone's like, oh, the way he throws,

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:21.240
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna break his arm or his arm's gonna blow out.

0:03:21.320 --> 0:03:23.919
<v Speaker 1>Never did, and now he just is breaking every other

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:27.120
<v Speaker 1>step of the way. It's an easy redraft thing. You

0:03:27.200 --> 0:03:29.560
<v Speaker 1>move on, see you bye, nothing to be worried about.

0:03:29.560 --> 0:03:32.799
<v Speaker 1>But as far as Dynasty goes with a week left

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:35.160
<v Speaker 1>or anything, is there any real fantasy? I mean, we

0:03:35.160 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 1>could easily just watch the season off, come back in

0:03:37.600 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 1>next year, start this all thing over and feel good.

0:03:39.960 --> 0:03:42.839
<v Speaker 1>But you feel good into the future with Chris Saale

0:03:42.880 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 1>because there's no hope for the rest of this year.

0:03:45.080 --> 0:03:47.200
<v Speaker 2>There's no hope for this year. I would be willing

0:03:47.240 --> 0:03:49.360
<v Speaker 2>to buy low on him in Dynasty if you could,

0:03:49.360 --> 0:03:51.800
<v Speaker 2>because he still has you know, some some darts in

0:03:51.840 --> 0:03:54.520
<v Speaker 2>that gun. Maybe you'm ount with him. We've play avoid

0:03:54.520 --> 0:03:57.440
<v Speaker 2>guns with that Chris Sale. But I am intrigued with

0:03:57.480 --> 0:03:58.960
<v Speaker 2>what he can still do because then a little bit

0:03:59.000 --> 0:04:00.760
<v Speaker 2>we did see this year he used to very effective.

0:04:01.080 --> 0:04:03.320
<v Speaker 2>Is getting healthy. There's some value there. It's like a

0:04:03.320 --> 0:04:05.560
<v Speaker 2>great question to be would you rather trust Chris Sale

0:04:05.600 --> 0:04:08.560
<v Speaker 2>next year or Jacob de Gram next year? In Dynasty?

0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:12.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean mean to Graham, Yeah, but man.

0:04:12.480 --> 0:04:13.840
<v Speaker 1>No, I know I get it. Like I saw our

0:04:13.880 --> 0:04:16.480
<v Speaker 1>buddy Eric Cross you put out a tweet today and

0:04:16.520 --> 0:04:18.400
<v Speaker 1>he was like, right now is a great time to

0:04:18.480 --> 0:04:22.440
<v Speaker 1>sell him in all fourmats. I don't really agree. I

0:04:22.560 --> 0:04:25.480
<v Speaker 1>just don't know. Like in Dynasty, Sure, Dynasty is actually

0:04:25.560 --> 0:04:29.560
<v Speaker 1>probably the best place to sell Chris Sell Jacob de Groom.

0:04:29.560 --> 0:04:31.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna have my no hitter today for not

0:04:31.040 --> 0:04:34.400
<v Speaker 1>screwing something up verbally, So Chat, we just gave up

0:04:34.440 --> 0:04:36.280
<v Speaker 1>our first hit. Let's see if I give up any

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 1>runs at the end of here when we scorecard the show.

0:04:39.880 --> 0:04:44.200
<v Speaker 1>But like Jacob de Grom, when he's out there, he

0:04:44.360 --> 0:04:47.640
<v Speaker 1>is the best pitcher in baseball from a Dynasty perspective,

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:50.400
<v Speaker 1>based on age, based on the injury risk, based on

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:53.159
<v Speaker 1>what he could do for a team buying for a

0:04:53.200 --> 0:04:56.120
<v Speaker 1>fantasy title. Right now, this is the best time to

0:04:56.200 --> 0:04:58.279
<v Speaker 1>trade him. You could get some great youth, You could

0:04:58.279 --> 0:05:01.320
<v Speaker 1>probably get four or five pieces redraft. Though. I just

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:03.960
<v Speaker 1>don't agree because I think there's too much stigma around

0:05:04.040 --> 0:05:07.160
<v Speaker 1>him that this is me. I would rather hold on

0:05:07.320 --> 0:05:09.560
<v Speaker 1>because no one's gonna give you eighty I don't think

0:05:09.600 --> 0:05:11.280
<v Speaker 1>eighty to eighty five cents on the dollar on it,

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:13.640
<v Speaker 1>And I would rather go in with the opportunity and

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:16.240
<v Speaker 1>chance that I have the best pitcher in baseball going

0:05:16.279 --> 0:05:19.719
<v Speaker 1>into the playoffs. Could he break down? Yes? Is he

0:05:19.760 --> 0:05:22.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna do it off of a bike? No, that's good,

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:25.240
<v Speaker 1>but I would I don't agree with the redraft. I

0:05:25.279 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 1>agree in any other which really is only dynasty. I

0:05:27.680 --> 0:05:30.159
<v Speaker 1>agree on that front. This is a fantastic time. I

0:05:30.200 --> 0:05:32.599
<v Speaker 1>mean they I think it was Codify that just put

0:05:32.640 --> 0:05:35.640
<v Speaker 1>this out. They had the top ten I think it

0:05:35.760 --> 0:05:40.279
<v Speaker 1>was or top eight fastest thrown sliders this season that

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:43.880
<v Speaker 1>had whiffs on him. Every single one was Jacob d Grom.

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Like the top eight were all Jacob de Grom in

0:05:46.040 --> 0:05:47.720
<v Speaker 1>his first two starts, or maybe it was just his

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:50.239
<v Speaker 1>last one he had on the seventh, they're all to Grom.

0:05:50.320 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 1>So yes, totally agree on dynasty. I don't agree on

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:56.919
<v Speaker 1>redraft this season, and if you look at it on

0:05:57.000 --> 0:06:00.200
<v Speaker 1>a scope of just next year, I'm a massacre. I

0:06:00.240 --> 0:06:02.200
<v Speaker 1>would still go Jacob de Grom. I would still I

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:04.760
<v Speaker 1>hope you can finish out this year. Chris sailed to

0:06:04.960 --> 0:06:07.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe be fair, it's a lot of fluky stuff, but

0:06:07.560 --> 0:06:10.600
<v Speaker 1>when's the fluky stuff gonna fall apart? And also bub

0:06:11.160 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 1>like he's a little unstable that whole minor league. Yeah,

0:06:14.120 --> 0:06:16.840
<v Speaker 1>he's like, oh, you know, you guys shouldn't be filming

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:19.239
<v Speaker 1>this stuff, Like the guy doesn't. He's in I don't

0:06:19.279 --> 0:06:22.919
<v Speaker 1>care level of stuff and he's I mean, you probably

0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:24.680
<v Speaker 1>probably shouldn't be righting a bike when he fractured or

0:06:24.720 --> 0:06:27.040
<v Speaker 1>ribs and done a bunch of stuff. Probably shouldn't be

0:06:27.080 --> 0:06:29.320
<v Speaker 1>out doing that. Maybe I'm being too traumatic. Maybe he

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:31.480
<v Speaker 1>was just you know, cruising around the street or something

0:06:31.520 --> 0:06:34.560
<v Speaker 1>like that. But I don't know if the flukiness makes

0:06:34.560 --> 0:06:37.520
<v Speaker 1>you feel any bit better about the injury proneness that

0:06:37.560 --> 0:06:39.160
<v Speaker 1>de Grom is holding. Maybe a better one would be

0:06:39.200 --> 0:06:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Clayton Kershaw or chrisail.

0:06:40.760 --> 0:06:43.200
<v Speaker 2>Good one too. Yeah, Clayton Kersher with the back. But yeah,

0:06:43.200 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 2>that's kind of why I was going to Grom versus Sail.

0:06:45.080 --> 0:06:48.120
<v Speaker 2>The flukiness of sales to Grom. I want him to

0:06:48.120 --> 0:06:50.120
<v Speaker 2>be healthy. He's amazing to watch, he's great, but I'm

0:06:50.120 --> 0:06:52.240
<v Speaker 2>just waiting for that whole thing to just snap and

0:06:52.920 --> 0:06:55.240
<v Speaker 2>He's literally hanging on by a thread right now, and

0:06:55.279 --> 0:06:58.599
<v Speaker 2>that's what's scary. So I'm with you on the regular season,

0:06:58.720 --> 0:07:00.640
<v Speaker 2>keep him Dynasty. I think it's great time to move

0:07:00.680 --> 0:07:03.839
<v Speaker 2>to Groam. I think it's an interesting conversation because Kershaw

0:07:03.920 --> 0:07:07.600
<v Speaker 2>might be a better example with the back issue, and

0:07:07.640 --> 0:07:09.760
<v Speaker 2>you know what, he might even retire after this year,

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 2>Like Kershaw might not even be here for next year,

0:07:12.360 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 2>So there's a lot going on there too.

0:07:14.200 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 1>I hope not. Bogman and I were reliving my shaky

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:21.160
<v Speaker 1>cam picture of Kershaw from the Whole Foods. When I

0:07:21.200 --> 0:07:23.280
<v Speaker 1>caught it was on a Whole Foods. People don't know,

0:07:23.600 --> 0:07:26.280
<v Speaker 1>and this is years and years ago, and nobody there

0:07:26.360 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 1>knew who Jacob de grom are. I keep saying Jack Groam,

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Clayton Kershaw and one of those things where it's like

0:07:31.760 --> 0:07:35.640
<v Speaker 1>you also feel horrifically bad about it. But I was like,

0:07:35.720 --> 0:07:37.480
<v Speaker 1>I gotta go up to him, like no one he's

0:07:37.520 --> 0:07:39.280
<v Speaker 1>just having a great day, no one's bothering him. I

0:07:39.280 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 1>did it really quiet, and now he's just like, I

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:43.000
<v Speaker 1>don't want to cause any attention, But da da da,

0:07:43.040 --> 0:07:44.960
<v Speaker 1>and I have a shaky cam picture and I wish

0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 1>it was clear. I wish I had I got a

0:07:47.120 --> 0:07:49.200
<v Speaker 1>new iPhone. I wish I had the iPhone. I probably

0:07:49.200 --> 0:07:51.560
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have been as a shaky and garbage as it was.

0:07:51.640 --> 0:07:54.720
<v Speaker 1>So Chris sail out for the year by bye see

0:07:54.760 --> 0:07:58.240
<v Speaker 1>yuh also but by Aaron Judge for Baseball's forty fourth

0:07:58.320 --> 0:08:00.360
<v Speaker 1>of the year. That's why Joe keeps going. I think

0:08:00.360 --> 0:08:02.920
<v Speaker 1>our homer on Board the Leaders thirty nine just continuously

0:08:02.920 --> 0:08:05.880
<v Speaker 1>pointing out forty four homers for Aaron Judge. But I

0:08:05.920 --> 0:08:08.480
<v Speaker 1>had mentioned in the there it was a Monday episode

0:08:08.800 --> 0:08:11.560
<v Speaker 1>that Judge had moved. We had a move in the

0:08:11.640 --> 0:08:15.080
<v Speaker 1>MVP stuff again on the al side where Otani moved

0:08:15.080 --> 0:08:17.160
<v Speaker 1>down to around three and a half to one. Judge

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 1>is minus money. Didn't look this morning. It's probably about

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:23.119
<v Speaker 1>the same fools, bet, foolsy fools.

0:08:23.160 --> 0:08:26.840
<v Speaker 2>Bet. I'm not taking any negative money on any kind

0:08:26.880 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 2>of award like this, like Judge deserves it, don't get

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:31.680
<v Speaker 2>me wrong, but show hey, my goodness unless they give

0:08:31.680 --> 0:08:33.679
<v Speaker 2>a show Hey the sy young which he deserves as well.

0:08:34.200 --> 0:08:36.880
<v Speaker 2>It's hard not to give the MVP, it really is. Yeah.

0:08:36.920 --> 0:08:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Actually, just a really easy quick way to think about it.

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Just not taking minus money on this Award.

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:42.959
<v Speaker 2>That's a just go there.

0:08:43.000 --> 0:08:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Whatever the minus money is, play the other side or

0:08:45.400 --> 0:08:48.000
<v Speaker 1>don't play it. I just don't go down there Baltimore.

0:08:48.120 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore beat Toronto, and I believe they are now five

0:08:50.400 --> 0:08:54.200
<v Speaker 1>games over five hundred after that, and they've moved one

0:08:54.360 --> 0:08:57.760
<v Speaker 1>game behind Seattle for the third wild card spot. They're

0:08:57.800 --> 0:08:59.439
<v Speaker 1>a game and a half behind Tampa Bay for the

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:02.199
<v Speaker 1>second wild card spot and three games behind Toronto for

0:09:02.360 --> 0:09:07.319
<v Speaker 1>that first. Pretty amazing what Baltimore is doing and putting

0:09:07.360 --> 0:09:10.880
<v Speaker 1>together offensively. Santandeer's kind of picked back up. Jorge Mateo

0:09:11.000 --> 0:09:13.120
<v Speaker 1>is trying to actually hit for contact. They're doing it

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:15.920
<v Speaker 1>all still as they got rid of Trey Mancini, who's

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:19.199
<v Speaker 1>rocking it out in Houston. So interesting stuff on Baltimore.

0:09:19.679 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 1>And then finally on the big headlines, Cubs announced that

0:09:21.880 --> 0:09:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Jason Hayward is not returning for twenty twenty three or

0:09:24.800 --> 0:09:27.720
<v Speaker 1>this season, and he had about twenty two million dollars

0:09:27.760 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 1>on that contract, so they're eating that money to say

0:09:31.200 --> 0:09:37.079
<v Speaker 1>peace out. Probably in the pantheon of worst contracts in

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:39.720
<v Speaker 1>the I mean, you go all time. It's tough because

0:09:39.760 --> 0:09:41.600
<v Speaker 1>money is weird, But I don't know, would you say

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Jason Hayward maybe top ten worst contract signings in baseball.

0:09:47.280 --> 0:09:48.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean I put like Chris Davis up there is

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:49.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe the number one.

0:09:50.480 --> 0:09:54.320
<v Speaker 2>Chris Davis is bad. Josh Hamilton didn't turn out to

0:09:54.360 --> 0:09:56.080
<v Speaker 2>be so strong by the end of that one. That

0:09:56.120 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 2>was a rough one, but I guess it was good

0:09:57.400 --> 0:09:59.680
<v Speaker 2>at the beginning. Hayward's are a bad one like that

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:01.439
<v Speaker 2>one may no sense out the gate. It was more

0:10:01.520 --> 0:10:03.520
<v Speaker 2>like the Cubs or just spending money to spend money.

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:04.440
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, tough one there.

0:10:04.559 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 1>I know Cubs would mark that one like Cubs fans

0:10:07.040 --> 0:10:09.079
<v Speaker 1>like we brought this up before and talked about it.

0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Maybe not here, but we had talked about, like I

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:13.240
<v Speaker 1>always go to the Chris Davis contract, like what a

0:10:13.240 --> 0:10:16.280
<v Speaker 1>wasat so what a disaster Baltimore. Chris Davis and Cubs

0:10:16.280 --> 0:10:18.240
<v Speaker 1>fans would jump in and go, well about Jason Hayward

0:10:18.240 --> 0:10:19.720
<v Speaker 1>and it's like, yeah, he's on there, He's just not

0:10:20.400 --> 0:10:22.679
<v Speaker 1>the big, big one of it, but they are washing

0:10:22.760 --> 0:10:26.079
<v Speaker 1>their hands of him. Over On the injury front, Matt

0:10:26.120 --> 0:10:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Carpenter broke his foot, no timetable for return, could possibly

0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 1>return for the playoffs. The fantasy season is over and

0:10:34.800 --> 0:10:36.600
<v Speaker 1>I had done it actually a news update on it,

0:10:36.640 --> 0:10:39.160
<v Speaker 1>and I believe the number was like fifteen homers and

0:10:39.200 --> 0:10:41.200
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and twenty seven at bats. He had raised

0:10:41.400 --> 0:10:46.880
<v Speaker 1>the Yankees absolute recovery of his career and as put

0:10:46.920 --> 0:10:49.760
<v Speaker 1>in many articles, Bubba potentially the front runner for the

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 1>comeback Player of the year that ends and that's a

0:10:52.559 --> 0:10:55.520
<v Speaker 1>is that a brutal blow to the Yankees like as

0:10:55.559 --> 0:10:58.000
<v Speaker 1>a whole, But I mean he was a spark plug.

0:10:58.040 --> 0:11:00.640
<v Speaker 1>He was a big spark plug and be a huge

0:11:00.640 --> 0:11:03.880
<v Speaker 1>injection into fantasy rosters that were easily just wiping him

0:11:03.960 --> 0:11:04.960
<v Speaker 1>up on the wire.

0:11:05.559 --> 0:11:07.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, definitely, he was huge this year. Fifteen homers, as

0:11:07.840 --> 0:11:10.720
<v Speaker 2>he mentioned, it's crazy to think about, and they need

0:11:10.720 --> 0:11:12.719
<v Speaker 2>them because Labor Toris is kind of slowing down a

0:11:12.760 --> 0:11:15.520
<v Speaker 2>little bit right now. So Jack Cartmenter was playing a

0:11:15.520 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 2>lot and that's a big, big load of them.

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you know, it's funny. I had this this question

0:11:20.800 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 1>like very beginning of the season. It was right as

0:11:22.880 --> 0:11:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Josh Rojas came back, and it was like Labor or Rojas,

0:11:25.679 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 1>and I was like, listen, I'm still team Rojas. I

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:29.520
<v Speaker 1>think Labor kind of went on that tear for a

0:11:29.559 --> 0:11:32.079
<v Speaker 1>bit and Rojas was just kind of like middle line,

0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:34.000
<v Speaker 1>and then it's all kind of even doubt. You know,

0:11:34.000 --> 0:11:36.720
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't even say Josh Rojas is fantastic, but you know,

0:11:36.760 --> 0:11:39.480
<v Speaker 1>it's what those kind of fringy guys like toys do,

0:11:39.679 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 1>like up and down, up and down, and he's kind of,

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:44.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, the inconsistency. It's been much better. You can

0:11:44.400 --> 0:11:46.800
<v Speaker 1>count on him a little bit more, but they're still inconsistencies.

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:49.959
<v Speaker 1>There a few other injuries. Jesse Winker left with a

0:11:50.000 --> 0:11:52.200
<v Speaker 1>back injury that seems to be pretty consistent this year.

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Monitor that too, because tomorrow Julio Rodriguez is scheduled to

0:11:56.880 --> 0:11:59.679
<v Speaker 1>come back off the IL and they're still holding on

0:11:59.800 --> 0:12:03.480
<v Speaker 1>to Jared Keelnick. They optioned Abraham Toro as Mitch Hanneger

0:12:03.559 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 1>came back, So you know how that whole outfield is

0:12:06.960 --> 0:12:09.920
<v Speaker 1>going to look. They've got Julio Hanneger is probably going

0:12:09.960 --> 0:12:13.120
<v Speaker 1>to play more. DH Winkers consistently getting hurt. They got

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Lewis, Jared Keelnick. Will he stick around. I don't

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:18.280
<v Speaker 1>know if it matters at this point, but Kelnick maybe

0:12:18.360 --> 0:12:21.520
<v Speaker 1>sent down regardless unless this is a bigger thing for Winker.

0:12:21.679 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan India left with a hamstring string possibly going to

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:29.440
<v Speaker 1>be returning today and Anthony Rizzo could be coming back today. Maybe,

0:12:29.480 --> 0:12:31.599
<v Speaker 1>so Yankees need that offensive push. But I got a

0:12:31.640 --> 0:12:36.400
<v Speaker 1>game for you, Okay. I was going through scouring like

0:12:36.480 --> 0:12:40.480
<v Speaker 1>to do two weeks, seven days, thirty markers on different places,

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:43.280
<v Speaker 1>and one of the toughest things I think is overall

0:12:43.440 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 1>value of players, Like what site do you go to

0:12:45.880 --> 0:12:49.160
<v Speaker 1>to value because they use these algorithms. We have this

0:12:49.280 --> 0:12:52.600
<v Speaker 1>hilarious thing earlier in the year where god, what was it.

0:12:52.640 --> 0:12:55.800
<v Speaker 1>The checker reminded me it was like if his ESPN

0:12:55.960 --> 0:12:59.280
<v Speaker 1>or something Mayer had posted about the rankings in a

0:12:59.360 --> 0:13:02.360
<v Speaker 1>points lead and how Johannio Swarz was more valuable than

0:13:02.400 --> 0:13:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Hosier Ramirez and we were like, oh my god, are

0:13:04.360 --> 0:13:06.800
<v Speaker 1>you kidding me? And it's all sometimes about the stupid,

0:13:06.880 --> 0:13:09.720
<v Speaker 1>ridiculous algorithms.

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:09.840
<v Speaker 2>And.

0:13:11.280 --> 0:13:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Oh sorry, I just saw Chuck. This dis distracted me

0:13:13.920 --> 0:13:15.360
<v Speaker 1>that Julio isn't coming back tomorrow.

0:13:15.400 --> 0:13:18.240
<v Speaker 2>This is what they were going to reevaluate them today

0:13:18.280 --> 0:13:21.079
<v Speaker 2>to either come back Wednesday or Friday. That's the latest

0:13:21.120 --> 0:13:21.880
<v Speaker 2>I saw this morning.

0:13:22.320 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 1>So algorithms are always uniquely weird and different, and sometimes

0:13:26.840 --> 0:13:29.000
<v Speaker 1>statistically they might not make sense, but it is all

0:13:29.040 --> 0:13:32.280
<v Speaker 1>about how they weigh them. Fan tracks has one. I

0:13:32.280 --> 0:13:35.199
<v Speaker 1>don't really care for it. It's their score system. If

0:13:35.240 --> 0:13:36.839
<v Speaker 1>you go into a lot of the others you'll see

0:13:36.880 --> 0:13:40.160
<v Speaker 1>it blah blah blah. So Yahoo, I think is always interesting. Yeah,

0:13:40.200 --> 0:13:42.400
<v Speaker 1>So I think this was Yahoo that it was done in,

0:13:42.559 --> 0:13:45.760
<v Speaker 1>and they'll have different score systems across or so. Yahoo

0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:49.080
<v Speaker 1>had said that was the top five value in points.

0:13:49.480 --> 0:13:52.680
<v Speaker 1>So I pulled up Yahoo. They're thirty days and this

0:13:52.720 --> 0:13:55.920
<v Speaker 1>is based on the algorithm. What I've noticed is they

0:13:56.040 --> 0:14:01.079
<v Speaker 1>definitely weigh batting average a bit more. So higher batting

0:14:01.080 --> 0:14:03.079
<v Speaker 1>averages are gonna be a little bit of help. Stolen

0:14:03.120 --> 0:14:06.200
<v Speaker 1>bases don't necessarily push them. So I've got four players

0:14:06.200 --> 0:14:08.440
<v Speaker 1>for you, and I want you to order them for

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:13.119
<v Speaker 1>me over thirty days. How they've ranked on Yahoo's algorithm.

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:15.760
<v Speaker 1>All right, then we can even go through stats after

0:14:16.040 --> 0:14:18.240
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you I'll let you give your order, I'll

0:14:18.240 --> 0:14:19.720
<v Speaker 1>give you the stats, and then i'll let you make

0:14:19.800 --> 0:14:25.600
<v Speaker 1>changes if you want. So the four players in alphabetical order, Bobashett,

0:14:26.240 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Jose Miranda, Matt Olsen, Oneal Cruz. Those are four players again, Bashett, Miranda, Olsen,

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Cruz thirty days last thirty days on Yahoo. Give me

0:14:38.200 --> 0:14:40.440
<v Speaker 1>the order that you think they sit.

0:14:40.400 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 2>In, Miranda Olsen, Bashette, Cruise. That one was tough, Miranda

0:14:47.680 --> 0:14:48.560
<v Speaker 2>for sures number one.

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Dang, you got the Miranda thing. I wanted to try

0:14:51.720 --> 0:14:52.480
<v Speaker 1>to sneak in. Miranda.

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:55.320
<v Speaker 2>What happens when I write an article for some website every.

0:14:55.080 --> 0:14:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Single day, said Miranda.

0:14:58.640 --> 0:15:02.920
<v Speaker 2>Olsen, Cruz, Cruise, and Baschetter are almost interchangeable to me.

0:15:02.960 --> 0:15:05.400
<v Speaker 1>But that's a cool You nailed it, You absolutely nailed it.

0:15:05.400 --> 0:15:09.200
<v Speaker 1>There was no fooling there whatsoever. ONEOK. And this is

0:15:09.240 --> 0:15:13.280
<v Speaker 1>not definitely not a distractor of ONEO Cruz. ONEO Cruz

0:15:13.280 --> 0:15:16.360
<v Speaker 1>has been just no average. Yeah, top one hundred player,

0:15:16.920 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 1>just outside the top seventy five as far as Yahoo's

0:15:19.720 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 1>algorithm goes six homers, three stolen bases, but a two

0:15:22.640 --> 0:15:26.920
<v Speaker 1>to ten batting average, twelve runs, fifteen RBI decent. That's

0:15:26.960 --> 0:15:34.040
<v Speaker 1>a arguably a four category player. You know, maybe maybe

0:15:34.080 --> 0:15:36.560
<v Speaker 1>you could say like three and a half right there.

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:40.360
<v Speaker 1>But a huge albatross, and the biggest albatross is of

0:15:40.480 --> 0:15:42.280
<v Speaker 1>any of the players is the batting average. So that's

0:15:42.280 --> 0:15:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Onneo Cruz, bashet is only two spots higher. He is

0:15:45.560 --> 0:15:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the seventy fifth on Yahoo's algorithm over the last thirty

0:15:48.880 --> 0:15:51.160
<v Speaker 1>days and a standard five x five pointing out. This

0:15:51.240 --> 0:15:55.400
<v Speaker 1>is not points league. Two homers, two stolen bases, fourteen runs,

0:15:55.480 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 1>fifteen RBI two ninety two batting average, So oneo Cruz

0:15:58.440 --> 0:16:02.720
<v Speaker 1>beats him in homers, beats it in stolen bases. They're

0:16:02.800 --> 0:16:06.280
<v Speaker 1>tied in our RBI. But Bashett has the runs and

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:08.480
<v Speaker 1>significant batting average, but it only bumped them up a

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:12.560
<v Speaker 1>couple spots. You nailed the others. And my big thing

0:16:12.640 --> 0:16:16.640
<v Speaker 1>here was about Jose Miranda at kind of an albatrosse

0:16:16.720 --> 0:16:20.440
<v Speaker 1>batting average. He's actually a two category bat albat TRUSS

0:16:20.480 --> 0:16:23.040
<v Speaker 1>two twenty six and zero stolen bases, but eight homers,

0:16:23.400 --> 0:16:28.800
<v Speaker 1>sixteen runs and twenty one RBIs. Those three numbers are

0:16:28.800 --> 0:16:31.760
<v Speaker 1>more than any other player on this list. And Jose Miranda,

0:16:31.840 --> 0:16:34.600
<v Speaker 1>though the number one player top twenty on the algorithm,

0:16:35.000 --> 0:16:39.000
<v Speaker 1>fourteen runs, four homers, twenty RBI, one stolen base, a

0:16:39.160 --> 0:16:42.920
<v Speaker 1>three sixty six batting average, so does the stolen bases

0:16:42.920 --> 0:16:44.960
<v Speaker 1>aren't big markers, but is a little bit of everything

0:16:45.720 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 1>that is very impressive. That is very very impressive that

0:16:48.000 --> 0:16:50.120
<v Speaker 1>you got the Miranda side, but you know, you obviously

0:16:50.120 --> 0:16:51.760
<v Speaker 1>pay attention to those things, and I say.

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:54.120
<v Speaker 2>Why I'm on Fantasy pros. This is what happens.

0:16:53.840 --> 0:16:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Yep, thirty days. You know. It was even more interesting

0:16:56.440 --> 0:16:59.840
<v Speaker 1>was over the last two weeks Jose Miranda on Yahoo

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:03.480
<v Speaker 1>a top ten player. So this was actually a little

0:17:03.480 --> 0:17:04.960
<v Speaker 1>bit of a shocker to me as well. But this

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:06.760
<v Speaker 1>is probably due to dead league, so I don't want

0:17:06.760 --> 0:17:10.480
<v Speaker 1>to think too much about it. Is ownership only seventy

0:17:10.480 --> 0:17:13.440
<v Speaker 1>one percent on Miranda and Yahoo. But something we uncovered

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:16.920
<v Speaker 1>yesterday we were doing the Fancy Baseball ITL podcasts and

0:17:16.960 --> 0:17:22.879
<v Speaker 1>like ESPN's biggest rank changers or acquisition changes, they were big,

0:17:23.280 --> 0:17:26.680
<v Speaker 1>except the ownership numbers were embarrassing. Why is that because

0:17:26.720 --> 0:17:29.040
<v Speaker 1>of dead leagues? So you would have the number one

0:17:29.040 --> 0:17:31.439
<v Speaker 1>picked up player, Number two is Devin Williams, Like, what

0:17:31.440 --> 0:17:32.960
<v Speaker 1>do you think Devin Williams ownership should be? What do

0:17:33.000 --> 0:17:34.320
<v Speaker 1>you think it is on CBS?

0:17:34.520 --> 0:17:36.520
<v Speaker 2>Oh, it should be like close to one hundred percent

0:17:36.560 --> 0:17:38.359
<v Speaker 2>by now, But I know for a fact it was

0:17:38.400 --> 0:17:40.160
<v Speaker 2>probably like thirty five percent or something.

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, CBS it's eighty five percent, ESPN fifty eight percent.

0:17:44.880 --> 0:17:46.879
<v Speaker 1>It was the second biggest changer, so dead league. So

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:49.199
<v Speaker 1>Yahoo can suffer from that as well. So when I

0:17:49.320 --> 0:17:55.560
<v Speaker 1>say when I go and say, what is it seventy

0:17:55.640 --> 0:17:57.879
<v Speaker 1>when I'm saying like, oh, yeah, yeah, seventy one percent

0:17:57.960 --> 0:18:01.280
<v Speaker 1>on Jose Miranda, that doesn't necessarily I mean, he's available everywhere.

0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:03.679
<v Speaker 1>It could be dead leagues, but you lose guys like

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:07.359
<v Speaker 1>Matt Carpenter. There's some other dudes that, you know, leagues

0:18:07.440 --> 0:18:09.440
<v Speaker 1>might be kind of tapering down a little bit. Ten teams,

0:18:09.440 --> 0:18:12.160
<v Speaker 1>twelve teams, Miranda's possibility to sit out there because he's

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:13.919
<v Speaker 1>not as sexy and a season totals are still a

0:18:13.920 --> 0:18:17.600
<v Speaker 1>tiny bit lower. Get Miranda. Randa is such a such

0:18:17.640 --> 0:18:19.960
<v Speaker 1>a good dude. I've got him picked up in a

0:18:19.960 --> 0:18:22.159
<v Speaker 1>couple of leagues, and he was actually at they'll tell

0:18:22.200 --> 0:18:24.679
<v Speaker 1>you off everybody. He was at the controversy of a

0:18:24.720 --> 0:18:27.280
<v Speaker 1>tout issue I had from like two months ago with

0:18:27.400 --> 0:18:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Miranda because his yeah you love the drama because it's yeah,

0:18:32.040 --> 0:18:35.200
<v Speaker 1>because of you know, position eligibility and how I picked

0:18:35.240 --> 0:18:37.760
<v Speaker 1>him up and all this nonsense. You would think when

0:18:37.760 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 1>you pick up a player who has a position on

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:43.399
<v Speaker 1>a site, you'd be good to go, but apparently not

0:18:43.560 --> 0:18:45.280
<v Speaker 1>even though he qualifies at a position I pick him

0:18:45.359 --> 0:18:47.119
<v Speaker 1>up there. Apparently that was a misnomer.

0:18:47.359 --> 0:18:49.520
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't doesn't help that that site's a tough sight.

0:18:49.600 --> 0:18:52.320
<v Speaker 2>To the end of a tough one.

0:18:52.320 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Here's a trivia question. Aaron Judge has forty four homers

0:18:55.840 --> 0:18:59.040
<v Speaker 1>with eleven stolen bases and has not been caught stealing

0:18:59.080 --> 0:19:01.720
<v Speaker 1>this season. Who is the only other player in major

0:19:01.800 --> 0:19:04.840
<v Speaker 1>league history? This is not to Bubba because he can

0:19:04.880 --> 0:19:07.600
<v Speaker 1>see the answer. So the only other player major league

0:19:07.600 --> 0:19:10.520
<v Speaker 1>history to hit forty homers and have ten plus stolen

0:19:10.560 --> 0:19:14.400
<v Speaker 1>bases without being caught. That should be an interesting one.

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:18.600
<v Speaker 1>So you guys throw it out there. Forty ten plus

0:19:18.960 --> 0:19:22.040
<v Speaker 1>no cot stolen bases. Let's see what you guys got.

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Since stat heroes not a ton of anything really yesterday

0:19:26.600 --> 0:19:29.280
<v Speaker 1>other Swarez when seven struck out eight, only gave up

0:19:29.320 --> 0:19:32.280
<v Speaker 1>two hits. Pretty solid for LA. Zach Gallon seven with

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:34.360
<v Speaker 1>eight strikeouts. He was one of the guys. I mean again,

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:36.359
<v Speaker 1>there weren't that many, but you know, pointing out a

0:19:36.359 --> 0:19:38.880
<v Speaker 1>few of the players I did. On the DFS side,

0:19:38.960 --> 0:19:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Zach Gallen was near the top. He had a great day.

0:19:41.600 --> 0:19:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Cole Irvin has had a really, really sneaky year. Go

0:19:44.359 --> 0:19:46.320
<v Speaker 1>and check out Codify has got a really good tweet

0:19:46.359 --> 0:19:49.640
<v Speaker 1>on his earn run totals this year. I think he's

0:19:49.640 --> 0:19:52.680
<v Speaker 1>got like one over four earned runs on like fifteen

0:19:52.800 --> 0:19:55.960
<v Speaker 1>or sixteen starts or something. Eight inning, six strikeouts Alex

0:19:56.000 --> 0:19:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Wood the chat was talking about yesterday six and one

0:19:58.680 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 1>third five strikeouts only give up three hits and Chris

0:20:01.080 --> 0:20:04.199
<v Speaker 1>Bassett eight strikeout, eight innings with eight strikeouts to give

0:20:04.280 --> 0:20:06.720
<v Speaker 1>up eight hits for the Mets, but was still solid.

0:20:07.040 --> 0:20:10.800
<v Speaker 1>We had highlighted Gallon Bassett and Keikon Thompson who didn't

0:20:10.800 --> 0:20:12.480
<v Speaker 1>blow up the world or anything like that, missed the

0:20:12.480 --> 0:20:15.639
<v Speaker 1>strikeout prop, but he was pretty solid. Cole Irvin has

0:20:15.680 --> 0:20:17.800
<v Speaker 1>he been as is he as sneaky as sneaky can be.

0:20:18.840 --> 0:20:20.679
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, It's one guy that I've looked at a lot,

0:20:20.760 --> 0:20:23.800
<v Speaker 2>especially for streaming options. The frustrating part of the strikeouts

0:20:23.840 --> 0:20:26.840
<v Speaker 2>aren't always consistent, but like you mentioned, he limits the

0:20:26.920 --> 0:20:29.640
<v Speaker 2>damage he gets you, you know, five six innings almost every start,

0:20:29.640 --> 0:20:32.080
<v Speaker 2>if not more so. He's formidable as a streamer. It's

0:20:32.080 --> 0:20:33.680
<v Speaker 2>tough to put him out through every start.

0:20:33.680 --> 0:20:36.639
<v Speaker 1>Film you know who he is. He's like broke Logan

0:20:36.720 --> 0:20:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Wilbert or Logan Gilbert Man, there's another hit. I just

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:39.879
<v Speaker 1>gave up.

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:42.240
<v Speaker 2>He's a little, he's a left, he's j happ this

0:20:42.359 --> 0:20:42.879
<v Speaker 2>is who he is.

0:20:43.000 --> 0:20:44.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's a good one. That's a good and I

0:20:44.480 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 1>was thinking of like the like Logan Gilbert's got, you know,

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:48.600
<v Speaker 1>like he can have big, powerful stuff, but then he'll

0:20:48.600 --> 0:20:50.679
<v Speaker 1>just disappear on strikeouts, so he would just be like

0:20:50.720 --> 0:20:53.280
<v Speaker 1>poor Man's. By the way, great guesses in the chat

0:20:53.359 --> 0:20:55.159
<v Speaker 1>so far, none of them are correct, is it can

0:20:55.200 --> 0:21:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Seikoh no, a Rod No, Goldie Nope, Curtis Granderson nope,

0:21:01.000 --> 0:21:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Sorano Nope.

0:21:02.440 --> 0:21:04.200
<v Speaker 2>I was surprised by the answer. I'll say that much.

0:21:04.200 --> 0:21:05.159
<v Speaker 2>People to keep guessing.

0:21:05.640 --> 0:21:07.160
<v Speaker 1>When we get to the end of the stats. I'll

0:21:07.280 --> 0:21:08.600
<v Speaker 1>let you guys know if you want to do any

0:21:08.600 --> 0:21:10.840
<v Speaker 1>more guesses On the hitter side for the big positive

0:21:10.920 --> 0:21:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Josh Donaldson four for five with a homer, three RBIs

0:21:13.440 --> 0:21:17.879
<v Speaker 1>and three runs. Mitch Haniger back with bomb, three for four, homer, RBI,

0:21:18.000 --> 0:21:20.200
<v Speaker 1>two runs, Matt Ryan mount Castle, he had a bomb.

0:21:20.200 --> 0:21:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Mike Mayor celebrating somewhere, Aaron Judge, we know forty four.

0:21:23.560 --> 0:21:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Matt Chapman my home run call to for three with

0:21:25.840 --> 0:21:28.919
<v Speaker 1>a homer and rbi Nelson Velasquez had a bomb, Starling

0:21:29.040 --> 0:21:33.199
<v Speaker 1>Marte homer, Combomel actually with a stolen base, Anthony Santander, Andrew,

0:21:33.200 --> 0:21:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Ben and Tendi did not have homer but had three

0:21:35.200 --> 0:21:39.280
<v Speaker 1>rbiys And it's a beautiful, beautiful number. Seeing Andrew always

0:21:39.280 --> 0:21:41.679
<v Speaker 1>which accounting stats could be higher? With Ben and Tendee,

0:21:41.840 --> 0:21:43.440
<v Speaker 1>I really thought he could be like a twenty twenty

0:21:43.480 --> 0:21:45.480
<v Speaker 1>guy this season. He's gotten a lot of contact and

0:21:45.520 --> 0:21:48.280
<v Speaker 1>stuff under control, but he just never put up big

0:21:48.400 --> 0:21:50.639
<v Speaker 1>major counting stats. Maybe this last little run with New

0:21:50.680 --> 0:21:53.320
<v Speaker 1>York will happen, but just didn't quite live up to Abobba.

0:21:53.480 --> 0:21:55.479
<v Speaker 2>Just not quite there. Nope, not quite there at all.

0:21:55.480 --> 0:21:57.920
<v Speaker 2>It's been a rough go, rough go for Ben and

0:21:58.000 --> 0:21:58.600
<v Speaker 2>Tendy this year.

0:21:59.320 --> 0:22:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Still no answers here on the Zeros Logan Gilbert seven innings,

0:22:04.440 --> 0:22:07.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, four innings, seven earned runs, only two strikeouts,

0:22:07.160 --> 0:22:09.720
<v Speaker 1>you say? Kakuchi gave up three homers with five earned

0:22:09.760 --> 0:22:12.240
<v Speaker 1>runs on the pitching side for the hitters, Jerks and

0:22:12.280 --> 0:22:14.960
<v Speaker 1>pro far Oh for four, Sean Murphy O for four,

0:22:15.240 --> 0:22:17.639
<v Speaker 1>Typrance over four Oneil Cruz. I did not put it

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:21.000
<v Speaker 1>on here, oh for three. The answer you guys are

0:22:21.040 --> 0:22:25.720
<v Speaker 1>looking for that you have not seen Albert Bell nineteen

0:22:25.840 --> 0:22:30.040
<v Speaker 1>ninety six. Albert Bell is the answer all good guesses.

0:22:30.440 --> 0:22:32.880
<v Speaker 1>No chance I would have gotten this. I probably would

0:22:32.920 --> 0:22:36.119
<v Speaker 1>have started with Bonds because Bonds was a pretty proficient like.

0:22:36.200 --> 0:22:37.720
<v Speaker 2>Early year forty guy.

0:22:37.840 --> 0:22:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, stolen base guy. But if you think about it,

0:22:41.760 --> 0:22:43.920
<v Speaker 1>because of that, it might have been tough to get

0:22:44.080 --> 0:22:46.120
<v Speaker 1>like with the amount of stolen bases on there yet

0:22:46.160 --> 0:22:47.680
<v Speaker 1>to be really perfect, So you would have had to say,

0:22:47.680 --> 0:22:50.399
<v Speaker 1>who's a huge power hitter, who is putting up at

0:22:50.480 --> 0:22:52.880
<v Speaker 1>least a minimal amount of stolen base attempts to get

0:22:52.880 --> 0:22:54.720
<v Speaker 1>you to double digits? Soriano, I think is a really

0:22:54.760 --> 0:22:55.200
<v Speaker 1>good guess.

0:22:55.359 --> 0:22:57.040
<v Speaker 2>I'll say Goldie. Goldie was good.

0:22:57.320 --> 0:23:00.080
<v Speaker 1>Goldie's are great. Yeah, Goldie's are really good. One may

0:23:00.200 --> 0:23:03.160
<v Speaker 1>even a rod like Conseiko. I wouldn't have simply because

0:23:03.200 --> 0:23:05.480
<v Speaker 1>of again, going back to the amount of attempts, that's

0:23:05.520 --> 0:23:07.840
<v Speaker 1>a really big amount of attempts. But Albert Bell nineteen

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:11.399
<v Speaker 1>ninety six forty plus homers, ten plus Doolen bases without

0:23:11.520 --> 0:23:16.120
<v Speaker 1>being caught, very very impressive. Over to our home run board,

0:23:16.200 --> 0:23:18.520
<v Speaker 1>let's get the board up here. Home run lead aboard.

0:23:18.920 --> 0:23:21.959
<v Speaker 1>There you go, hikeby got he's got a lead. Oh,

0:23:21.960 --> 0:23:24.440
<v Speaker 1>I didn't even realize that. Yeah, I think someone mentioned

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:26.119
<v Speaker 1>it earlier in the chat. He's up to forty. We

0:23:26.240 --> 0:23:29.040
<v Speaker 1>had a thirty nine, thirty eight or yesterday, High Covey

0:23:29.080 --> 0:23:32.200
<v Speaker 1>has a two home run lead. He is the first

0:23:32.240 --> 0:23:35.080
<v Speaker 1>to reach forty. Wonky forgot to declare the eight to

0:23:35.160 --> 0:23:38.200
<v Speaker 1>eight catcher bonus. We found out, so we will have

0:23:38.240 --> 0:23:41.119
<v Speaker 1>a different bonus tomorrow on the show for Wednesday. So

0:23:41.240 --> 0:23:43.320
<v Speaker 1>that's what I'm told by Wonky that there was supposed

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:45.800
<v Speaker 1>to be a catcher bonus that's not there. Mike Mayer

0:23:45.920 --> 0:23:49.359
<v Speaker 1>is tied for second Frickin' place night King of the

0:23:49.440 --> 0:23:52.200
<v Speaker 1>North kind of falling back, and you guys can see

0:23:52.240 --> 0:23:55.639
<v Speaker 1>the whole list there as things things are getting crazy.

0:23:55.760 --> 0:23:58.760
<v Speaker 1>I think High Kevey had Mitch Haniger, Mayor had Chapman

0:23:58.880 --> 0:24:02.040
<v Speaker 1>with me. We had some judge Mountcastle. Those are the

0:24:02.119 --> 0:24:04.160
<v Speaker 1>top ones on the board for the home run contest,

0:24:04.200 --> 0:24:05.720
<v Speaker 1>and Bubba and I are going to make it. Guess

0:24:05.760 --> 0:24:08.480
<v Speaker 1>have been pretty good so far, Bubba, so you know,

0:24:08.640 --> 0:24:11.800
<v Speaker 1>time to get on the board, Time to get rocking here, Bets,

0:24:12.359 --> 0:24:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I'll say what you think about these, I'm gonna get

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 1>your take. I've got four bets. Two are the leaders

0:24:17.359 --> 0:24:21.000
<v Speaker 1>over at bettingpros dot com the MLB prop cheat sheet.

0:24:21.359 --> 0:24:24.280
<v Speaker 1>These are the top two. Which one is the stolen base,

0:24:24.320 --> 0:24:26.320
<v Speaker 1>one is a total base or one is a total base,

0:24:26.400 --> 0:24:28.320
<v Speaker 1>one is a strikeout. And then I've got two that

0:24:28.520 --> 0:24:33.040
<v Speaker 1>I like for today. So here are your algorithms bettingpros

0:24:33.160 --> 0:24:37.800
<v Speaker 1>dot Com Mlbprop cheat Sheet. Bets number one Alecmanoa over

0:24:37.880 --> 0:24:41.040
<v Speaker 1>on bet MGM. It is over on the strikeouts are

0:24:41.040 --> 0:24:44.800
<v Speaker 1>projecting close to seven against Baltimore. It's four and a half,

0:24:45.359 --> 0:24:47.639
<v Speaker 1>but it's very juiced up. It's at like, you know,

0:24:47.880 --> 0:24:50.840
<v Speaker 1>minus one sixty five, So not the best type of

0:24:50.880 --> 0:24:53.159
<v Speaker 1>straight bet play, but maybe you want to put them

0:24:53.200 --> 0:24:55.240
<v Speaker 1>in with something. It's their number one on their algorithm.

0:24:55.359 --> 0:24:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Number two they like Vladimir Guerrero Junior at Baltimore again,

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Toronto bets total bases. It's minus one fifteen. They've got

0:25:04.240 --> 0:25:06.159
<v Speaker 1>over three and a half as they are total, so

0:25:06.200 --> 0:25:08.439
<v Speaker 1>you got a big over there minus one fifteen one

0:25:08.480 --> 0:25:10.080
<v Speaker 1>and a half. This is at Una Bets, so it's

0:25:10.119 --> 0:25:13.960
<v Speaker 1>probably similar. Bubba My two bets Paul Goldman at Colorado

0:25:14.080 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 1>total bases. I like the one and a half over.

0:25:17.080 --> 0:25:20.120
<v Speaker 1>It's minus one thirty two. The projections agree at two

0:25:20.119 --> 0:25:22.840
<v Speaker 1>and a half and Garrett Cole strikeouts. I've tried to

0:25:22.840 --> 0:25:24.920
<v Speaker 1>play an under yesterday didn't work. I'm gonna go with

0:25:25.040 --> 0:25:27.440
<v Speaker 1>the over seven and a half. It's minus one thirty.

0:25:27.560 --> 0:25:30.200
<v Speaker 1>At Seattle, he gave up eight earned runs against the

0:25:30.240 --> 0:25:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Mariners and still struck out eight in that last one,

0:25:33.200 --> 0:25:35.520
<v Speaker 1>so I'm gonna feel confident he goes over one hundred pitches,

0:25:35.560 --> 0:25:37.880
<v Speaker 1>he strikes out eight. I really like the Garrett Cole

0:25:37.960 --> 0:25:39.919
<v Speaker 1>and my Paul gold Schmidt one. What do you think

0:25:39.960 --> 0:25:42.239
<v Speaker 1>about these four bets mine versus the algorithm? What are

0:25:42.280 --> 0:25:43.200
<v Speaker 1>your favorites?

0:25:43.840 --> 0:25:45.840
<v Speaker 2>I love that Manoa one. It's juice. Maybe you can

0:25:45.880 --> 0:25:47.119
<v Speaker 2>find a five or a five and a half and

0:25:47.200 --> 0:25:49.959
<v Speaker 2>still take it. That's got some nice appeal. But anytime

0:25:50.000 --> 0:25:51.880
<v Speaker 2>you get Goldi and Coors, that's very nice. I don't

0:25:51.880 --> 0:25:53.280
<v Speaker 2>mind a little. I don't even know what the numbers are,

0:25:53.320 --> 0:25:56.280
<v Speaker 2>but an Aeronato returning to Cooors one probably sounds pretty fun.

0:25:57.080 --> 0:25:59.600
<v Speaker 2>But Garrett Cole, yeah, I just do the strikeout monsters,

0:25:59.640 --> 0:26:01.119
<v Speaker 2>so I don't to mind that at all.

0:26:01.480 --> 0:26:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, not a bad one over on the oh and

0:26:04.160 --> 0:26:05.840
<v Speaker 1>by the way, didn't even say it to you guys,

0:26:05.880 --> 0:26:08.720
<v Speaker 1>but obviously the BET's brought to you by bet MGM

0:26:09.119 --> 0:26:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the leader. Go and check them out. Use promo code

0:26:11.320 --> 0:26:13.720
<v Speaker 1>leading off. You get a thousand dollars risk free bet.

0:26:14.080 --> 0:26:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you go put it on one of those bad boys.

0:26:15.760 --> 0:26:19.480
<v Speaker 1>I can't imagine. I can't even like physically fathom if

0:26:19.520 --> 0:26:21.320
<v Speaker 1>you were putting it on like a prop, Like what

0:26:21.480 --> 0:26:23.840
<v Speaker 1>type of fear would be in there if you moved

0:26:23.840 --> 0:26:26.040
<v Speaker 1>away from a game spread? Or would you feel better

0:26:26.240 --> 0:26:29.119
<v Speaker 1>if you Okay, Bubba, if you had a one thousand

0:26:29.160 --> 0:26:32.840
<v Speaker 1>dollars risk free bet right now, would you be honing

0:26:32.920 --> 0:26:35.760
<v Speaker 1>in on a singular prop or would you be honing

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:37.200
<v Speaker 1>in on a GameLine.

0:26:37.320 --> 0:26:39.600
<v Speaker 2>I go a singular prop, that's where you go?

0:26:40.400 --> 0:26:42.200
<v Speaker 1>You would I feel like I would be more GameLine.

0:26:42.240 --> 0:26:43.760
<v Speaker 2>The more I think about this, I want it to

0:26:43.800 --> 0:26:46.320
<v Speaker 2>be either over. If it's a game line, I want

0:26:46.359 --> 0:26:47.800
<v Speaker 2>like a first five. I want it to be quick,

0:26:47.840 --> 0:26:50.400
<v Speaker 2>like give me a team total first five or something

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:51.200
<v Speaker 2>that's rock and roll.

0:26:51.359 --> 0:26:54.240
<v Speaker 1>I'd probably be like a first five. That's probably where

0:26:54.280 --> 0:26:54.840
<v Speaker 1>I would go, Like.

0:26:54.880 --> 0:26:56.359
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't want to sweat the whole game watch the

0:26:56.359 --> 0:26:58.080
<v Speaker 2>bullpen screw it up and then just like really want

0:26:58.119 --> 0:26:59.840
<v Speaker 2>to break things like let me, let me go.

0:27:00.200 --> 0:27:01.760
<v Speaker 1>The worst thing, too, is like some of these low

0:27:01.800 --> 0:27:03.359
<v Speaker 1>ones like Kee and Thompson. Yesterday was three and a

0:27:03.359 --> 0:27:05.400
<v Speaker 1>half strikeouts and he went like five or six, only

0:27:05.440 --> 0:27:07.240
<v Speaker 1>had three. It's like to get one of those, like

0:27:07.400 --> 0:27:09.680
<v Speaker 1>even like the Minoa one it's four and a half.

0:27:09.880 --> 0:27:12.200
<v Speaker 1>He has games where he'll go seven and strikeout three.

0:27:12.440 --> 0:27:15.040
<v Speaker 1>If you're in like the six inning with three strikeouts

0:27:15.080 --> 0:27:17.160
<v Speaker 1>and you've got big money on it, that's the type

0:27:17.200 --> 0:27:19.080
<v Speaker 1>of stuff that'll get the juices flow, and maybe not

0:27:19.200 --> 0:27:21.720
<v Speaker 1>in all the best ways. I'm gonna throw out some

0:27:21.840 --> 0:27:24.440
<v Speaker 1>a couple DFS things, but Bubba, if you've got some takes,

0:27:24.440 --> 0:27:26.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna throw it to you. I just found some

0:27:27.040 --> 0:27:29.680
<v Speaker 1>decent cash prizes that you might want to look for

0:27:29.800 --> 0:27:33.000
<v Speaker 1>as far as pitchers go, whether DK or FanDuel, Shoho

0:27:33.080 --> 0:27:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Tani is at ten to three today on DK, Shane

0:27:35.160 --> 0:27:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Bieber nine to four. I like Miles michaelis at seven

0:27:38.520 --> 0:27:41.560
<v Speaker 1>to nine on FanDuel. A couple of the same guys.

0:27:41.600 --> 0:27:44.000
<v Speaker 1>We got Otani at eleven two, Bieber at ten to two,

0:27:44.800 --> 0:27:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Orkaty at eight seven and michaelis at eight six. If

0:27:48.160 --> 0:27:51.880
<v Speaker 1>you're looking and implied run totals, the number one today

0:27:51.920 --> 0:27:54.159
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a six run implied total is

0:27:54.200 --> 0:27:57.639
<v Speaker 1>the Saint Louis Cardinals, the Braves and Mets both over five,

0:27:57.840 --> 0:28:00.960
<v Speaker 1>So Cardinals, Braves, Mets for some stacks. If you're looking

0:28:01.040 --> 0:28:03.560
<v Speaker 1>there anything else you like on the DFS side today.

0:28:03.680 --> 0:28:06.080
<v Speaker 2>I think Wheeler against Miami is outstanding if you can

0:28:06.119 --> 0:28:07.200
<v Speaker 2>get that, and if you want to be a little

0:28:07.200 --> 0:28:09.600
<v Speaker 2>contrarian and you want to save some money, that Charlie

0:28:09.640 --> 0:28:12.159
<v Speaker 2>Morton's and Carls Carascas of the world could be a

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:14.280
<v Speaker 2>little fun for you on the pitching side and hitting

0:28:14.880 --> 0:28:17.440
<v Speaker 2>you nailed the main stacks. The other one I'd mentioned

0:28:17.480 --> 0:28:22.159
<v Speaker 2>if the weather is good Toronto and Chicago because poloespinarts

0:28:22.160 --> 0:28:24.440
<v Speaker 2>gs up a ton of contacts, so Mubbies could be

0:28:24.520 --> 0:28:27.040
<v Speaker 2>Mubbies could be sneaky on this one for you, especially

0:28:27.080 --> 0:28:28.040
<v Speaker 2>with that Cardinals one.

0:28:28.080 --> 0:28:29.399
<v Speaker 1>Like someone I feel like I was honing in on

0:28:29.640 --> 0:28:32.680
<v Speaker 1>was Dylan Carlson, Like Dylan, Yes, and someone like leading

0:28:32.800 --> 0:28:35.120
<v Speaker 1>off on you know in Colorado. That's someone I would

0:28:35.160 --> 0:28:36.800
<v Speaker 1>try to put in a lineup that was going together.

0:28:37.400 --> 0:28:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Home run call time, Bubba we know Joe has got

0:28:41.040 --> 0:28:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Judge, I've got a wonky call here, I've got

0:28:45.160 --> 0:28:47.320
<v Speaker 1>my call. But you are on the dock at first.

0:28:47.400 --> 0:28:49.320
<v Speaker 1>For the guests, what do you think and who do

0:28:49.360 --> 0:28:50.480
<v Speaker 1>you got hitting a bond today?

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:53.320
<v Speaker 2>I am going with the one and only Austin Riley,

0:28:53.400 --> 0:28:55.800
<v Speaker 2>who has a one point one nine zero ops first

0:28:55.880 --> 0:28:59.000
<v Speaker 2>lefties and faces Rich Hill, who just gets obliterated by

0:28:59.120 --> 0:29:01.840
<v Speaker 2>right handed hitting. So give me, give me Austin Riley,

0:29:01.920 --> 0:29:03.800
<v Speaker 2>go what to what I call ding Dong.

0:29:03.720 --> 0:29:06.680
<v Speaker 1>City, ding Dong City. I call him blister God. By

0:29:06.720 --> 0:29:08.120
<v Speaker 1>the way, Richel is blister God.

0:29:08.240 --> 0:29:09.120
<v Speaker 2>He is the blister God.

0:29:10.360 --> 0:29:12.160
<v Speaker 1>He's held it together for the last like year and

0:29:12.200 --> 0:29:13.760
<v Speaker 1>a half. I feel like we haven't had you know,

0:29:13.880 --> 0:29:18.239
<v Speaker 1>the four to five blister il Stens a year.

0:29:18.360 --> 0:29:20.000
<v Speaker 2>Hasn't pitched enough this year to do that.

0:29:20.440 --> 0:29:22.720
<v Speaker 1>That's a good point. That's a really good point. I'm

0:29:22.720 --> 0:29:24.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna go on that Cardinals game. I'm gonna go with

0:29:24.360 --> 0:29:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Paul Goldschmidt. Wonkey is in the same game. She's going Aeronado.

0:29:27.440 --> 0:29:30.680
<v Speaker 1>So obviously we are very heavily invested in the Cardinals

0:29:30.720 --> 0:29:34.120
<v Speaker 1>today going up against Rockies. Gimme Goldie. Wonkey's got Aeronado,

0:29:34.240 --> 0:29:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Austin Riley, Aaron Judge, all on the board, and that

0:29:37.840 --> 0:29:40.680
<v Speaker 1>is it. Where's the tiara is asked, I will bring

0:29:40.760 --> 0:29:43.960
<v Speaker 1>it back tomorrow just for Kelly, because Kelly did ask

0:29:44.040 --> 0:29:48.000
<v Speaker 1>for the tiara during the vet MGM leading off Reid.

0:29:48.120 --> 0:29:49.640
<v Speaker 1>I will do that. I will bring it on for

0:29:49.720 --> 0:29:52.680
<v Speaker 1>the props. We'll bring back the tiara for sure. And

0:29:53.200 --> 0:29:56.000
<v Speaker 1>I would say today we had some stumbles. My brain

0:29:56.040 --> 0:29:57.880
<v Speaker 1>has been so fried the last two weeks. Bubba, I

0:29:57.960 --> 0:30:00.440
<v Speaker 1>think this was more like a I think I'm six

0:30:00.600 --> 0:30:02.640
<v Speaker 1>is a quality start. I think we went six, probably

0:30:02.680 --> 0:30:04.920
<v Speaker 1>gave up a run with a couple of the messes here,

0:30:05.080 --> 0:30:07.400
<v Speaker 1>so I don't we don't have a stat line. Don't

0:30:07.400 --> 0:30:08.800
<v Speaker 1>give me a stat line, but I'm gonna save my

0:30:08.920 --> 0:30:12.720
<v Speaker 1>performance hosting today. Six and one third gave up a

0:30:12.840 --> 0:30:15.600
<v Speaker 1>run walk to but I think I struck out seven.

0:30:15.600 --> 0:30:17.400
<v Speaker 1>I think is a pretty good fantasy start today as

0:30:17.440 --> 0:30:20.280
<v Speaker 1>a host, Bubba, Bubba, you obviously you came in, you

0:30:20.400 --> 0:30:23.120
<v Speaker 1>closed it out, you saved it. Perfect inning, immaculate inning,

0:30:23.240 --> 0:30:25.040
<v Speaker 1>if I do say so myself, my friend.

0:30:24.880 --> 0:30:27.120
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, thank you. You pulled a col Irvin and

0:30:27.200 --> 0:30:28.480
<v Speaker 2>that I came in and did the rest so.

0:30:28.640 --> 0:30:30.720
<v Speaker 1>Here we go. We lock it down friends. Thanks for

0:30:30.800 --> 0:30:33.160
<v Speaker 1>hanging out, everybody that's in the chat. I definitely want

0:30:33.200 --> 0:30:35.600
<v Speaker 1>to start incorporating maybe some more questions from the chat

0:30:35.640 --> 0:30:37.680
<v Speaker 1>that we can get in live. Hopefully you guys had

0:30:37.720 --> 0:30:40.200
<v Speaker 1>fun with us. Thank you for hanging The Wonky Penguin

0:30:40.360 --> 0:30:42.760
<v Speaker 1>is here tomorrow, Bubba. We'll be back again next week.

0:30:43.080 --> 0:30:45.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm Chris Wels. This is leading off. Thank you everybody,

0:30:46.000 --> 0:30:46.520
<v Speaker 1>we're out here.

0:30:46.720 --> 0:30:47.200
<v Speaker 2>Peace out.