WEBVTT - The Mystery of Mastery with Adam Gopnik

0:00:15.356 --> 0:00:25.316
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin Hello, Hello everyone, Malcolm Glable here. You may have

0:00:25.396 --> 0:00:28.516
<v Speaker 1>noticed that Revisionist History looks a little different this season,

0:00:29.196 --> 0:00:31.876
<v Speaker 1>more things in your podcast feed, but I want to

0:00:31.876 --> 0:00:34.796
<v Speaker 1>make clear you're still going to get your annual dose

0:00:34.836 --> 0:00:39.236
<v Speaker 1>of ten scripted revisionist history jewel boxes. It's just that

0:00:39.596 --> 0:00:41.916
<v Speaker 1>people kept coming up to me in the subway and saying,

0:00:42.236 --> 0:00:46.196
<v Speaker 1>why can't we have more revisionist history, And finally I thought,

0:00:46.996 --> 0:00:49.996
<v Speaker 1>like the man said, give the people what they want.

0:00:50.996 --> 0:00:53.756
<v Speaker 1>So coming up this year we had the standard old

0:00:53.836 --> 0:00:58.156
<v Speaker 1>school revisionist history lineup, including some on education, a crazy

0:00:58.156 --> 0:01:00.716
<v Speaker 1>one about mothers, and a bunch on guns. And I'm

0:01:00.836 --> 0:01:04.396
<v Speaker 1>very excited about it. But we're also doing more episodes

0:01:04.676 --> 0:01:07.356
<v Speaker 1>answering your questions or arguing with you with the help

0:01:07.356 --> 0:01:12.156
<v Speaker 1>of our embarrassingly overqualified ombus person, Maria Konikova. You can

0:01:12.196 --> 0:01:15.796
<v Speaker 1>reach us by the way and Maria at info at

0:01:16.076 --> 0:01:19.596
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin dot fm if you have questions or concerns or

0:01:19.716 --> 0:01:23.196
<v Speaker 1>just want a rant for a while. And one of

0:01:23.196 --> 0:01:25.636
<v Speaker 1>my favorite things we're doing though, is we're bringing you

0:01:25.676 --> 0:01:29.396
<v Speaker 1>a series of conversations live talks or taped live anyway

0:01:29.556 --> 0:01:32.316
<v Speaker 1>with people I admire, people I want to learn something

0:01:32.356 --> 0:01:35.396
<v Speaker 1>from and who I think you'll enjoy as well. We

0:01:35.516 --> 0:01:38.156
<v Speaker 1>had an amazing reaction to the chat with Justin Richmond.

0:01:38.356 --> 0:01:40.836
<v Speaker 1>If you haven't heard that yet, please go back and listen.

0:01:43.156 --> 0:01:46.156
<v Speaker 1>This week and next we're running a match set of

0:01:46.196 --> 0:01:49.756
<v Speaker 1>revisionist history live conversations we taped at the ninety second

0:01:49.796 --> 0:01:54.156
<v Speaker 1>Street Y in New York. The first Today's episode was

0:01:54.196 --> 0:01:57.476
<v Speaker 1>with my old friend New Yorker magazine colleague, and most

0:01:57.476 --> 0:02:01.796
<v Speaker 1>crucially fellow Canadian, Adam Gopnick. Maybe you know his most

0:02:01.836 --> 0:02:04.596
<v Speaker 1>famous book, Paris to the Moon, or perhaps you saw

0:02:04.596 --> 0:02:08.516
<v Speaker 1>his cameo in the film Tar, where he played himself

0:02:09.436 --> 0:02:13.236
<v Speaker 1>convincingly How might add Adam is a new book, The

0:02:13.276 --> 0:02:16.796
<v Speaker 1>Real Work on the Mystery of Mastery, in which he

0:02:16.876 --> 0:02:19.996
<v Speaker 1>follows masters of their craft to find out just how

0:02:20.036 --> 0:02:23.036
<v Speaker 1>they do what they do. So here we go my

0:02:23.196 --> 0:02:26.316
<v Speaker 1>conversation with the one and only Adam Gopnick.

0:02:34.116 --> 0:02:37.196
<v Speaker 2>Thank you all for coming, Adam, it's.

0:02:36.996 --> 0:02:38.316
<v Speaker 3>A pleasure to see you. Malcolm.

0:02:38.316 --> 0:02:41.996
<v Speaker 4>It's the first time we've been together, certainly since the pandemic.

0:02:42.436 --> 0:02:44.836
<v Speaker 1>Yes, the last time we were on stage together was

0:02:45.476 --> 0:02:50.556
<v Speaker 1>Were we not both debating the proposition that cats were

0:02:50.596 --> 0:02:52.436
<v Speaker 1>better than dogs or dogs are better than cats.

0:02:52.476 --> 0:02:55.676
<v Speaker 4>We were, and I took the dog side. I took

0:02:55.676 --> 0:02:57.756
<v Speaker 4>the cat, and you took the cat's side. And I

0:02:57.916 --> 0:03:04.316
<v Speaker 4>ended my puration, my claim by saying that you had

0:03:04.356 --> 0:03:06.556
<v Speaker 4>to understand that not only was it the case that

0:03:07.276 --> 0:03:10.476
<v Speaker 4>on the merit it's all cats were Republicans and all

0:03:10.476 --> 0:03:13.436
<v Speaker 4>dogs were Democrats, but you also had to understand that

0:03:13.476 --> 0:03:16.836
<v Speaker 4>all cats were Buyish and all dogs were Jewish. And

0:03:16.916 --> 0:03:20.236
<v Speaker 4>somehow we won the debate in the middle of Manhattan.

0:03:20.276 --> 0:03:22.116
<v Speaker 3>It was the dirtiest thing somehow you wanted to be.

0:03:22.396 --> 0:03:23.836
<v Speaker 3>I was going to say it was the dirtiest that.

0:03:23.836 --> 0:03:25.596
<v Speaker 2>Is by appealing to Jewish democrats.

0:03:26.876 --> 0:03:28.956
<v Speaker 4>Well, there are so few of them in New York.

0:03:29.076 --> 0:03:32.756
<v Speaker 4>You know that it showed some bravery.

0:03:34.156 --> 0:03:38.276
<v Speaker 1>You were, yes, playing to the crowd. I suspect there'll

0:03:38.276 --> 0:03:40.076
<v Speaker 1>be more than a little of that tonight as well.

0:03:40.356 --> 0:03:43.356
<v Speaker 1>We're here to discuss your book, but as it's always

0:03:43.356 --> 0:03:46.476
<v Speaker 1>the case, we shouldn't really just discuss the book tonight,

0:03:46.516 --> 0:03:48.756
<v Speaker 1>because we want people to read the book. Yes, so

0:03:48.916 --> 0:03:50.316
<v Speaker 1>I thought we'd talk around the book.

0:03:50.516 --> 0:03:52.836
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, it's a book to talk around.

0:03:52.476 --> 0:03:54.836
<v Speaker 2>And I want to do something very specific.

0:03:54.876 --> 0:03:57.436
<v Speaker 1>But before I introduced the specific thing i'd like to

0:03:57.436 --> 0:04:02.396
<v Speaker 1>do I'd like to offer an overly simplistic, highly reductionist

0:04:02.476 --> 0:04:03.316
<v Speaker 1>theory about.

0:04:03.156 --> 0:04:05.876
<v Speaker 3>The difference between dogs and cats.

0:04:05.916 --> 0:04:10.556
<v Speaker 1>No, no, between you and I? Or is it you

0:04:10.596 --> 0:04:12.316
<v Speaker 1>and me?

0:04:12.316 --> 0:04:16.116
<v Speaker 3>Me? Me? Yes, me, that would be one of the differences.

0:04:16.276 --> 0:04:21.156
<v Speaker 2>Right, Yes, here's the theory.

0:04:21.316 --> 0:04:26.356
<v Speaker 1>Right, I start with an idea, I'd like to explore,

0:04:27.076 --> 0:04:30.316
<v Speaker 1>search for someone to be kind of window dressing, someone

0:04:30.316 --> 0:04:32.756
<v Speaker 1>appropriate to dress it up, and then pursue it.

0:04:32.956 --> 0:04:34.396
<v Speaker 2>This is the problem with my writing, of.

0:04:34.356 --> 0:04:38.596
<v Speaker 1>Course, because the reader's senses halfway through that I've chosen

0:04:39.436 --> 0:04:42.796
<v Speaker 1>the subject the person simply as a convenience to advance

0:04:42.876 --> 0:04:43.756
<v Speaker 1>this agenda of mine.

0:04:43.836 --> 0:04:45.756
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to dispute that, But all right, you.

0:04:45.596 --> 0:04:46.516
<v Speaker 2>Do the opposite.

0:04:47.156 --> 0:04:49.556
<v Speaker 1>Essentially, all of your writing is about you meet someone,

0:04:49.596 --> 0:04:51.876
<v Speaker 1>you fall in love with him, and then you come

0:04:51.956 --> 0:04:54.796
<v Speaker 1>up with some elaborate theory to justify your affection for

0:04:54.836 --> 0:04:55.396
<v Speaker 1>your character.

0:04:56.316 --> 0:05:01.276
<v Speaker 3>That I will I will accept that as a roughly true.

0:05:01.756 --> 0:05:03.156
<v Speaker 4>I think that there are a lot of people in

0:05:03.196 --> 0:05:04.876
<v Speaker 4>your stuff, Malcolm, who live on you.

0:05:04.956 --> 0:05:07.676
<v Speaker 2>We're not discussing me, all right. You can only discuss you,

0:05:07.676 --> 0:05:08.636
<v Speaker 2>don't discuss your half.

0:05:09.116 --> 0:05:12.076
<v Speaker 4>I certainly think it's generally true. And I will say this,

0:05:12.196 --> 0:05:16.116
<v Speaker 4>and I will I will say it with a certain

0:05:16.116 --> 0:05:21.116
<v Speaker 4>amount of vanity that I love getting engaged with people,

0:05:21.276 --> 0:05:24.476
<v Speaker 4>odd people, strange people, interesting people, and I you know,

0:05:24.556 --> 0:05:27.036
<v Speaker 4>John Opdyke once said, you know, someone said what's the

0:05:27.076 --> 0:05:30.836
<v Speaker 4>purpose of life? And he answered instantly to give praise?

0:05:31.316 --> 0:05:33.276
<v Speaker 4>And I always thought that was a beautiful.

0:05:33.276 --> 0:05:35.356
<v Speaker 1>Well, this is exactly what I was going to say next,

0:05:35.396 --> 0:05:40.156
<v Speaker 1>which is the other distinctive feature is of your writing,

0:05:40.236 --> 0:05:42.276
<v Speaker 1>is that all of your real pieces, as opposed to

0:05:42.316 --> 0:05:44.116
<v Speaker 1>your critics pieces, which I don't mean they're not real,

0:05:44.156 --> 0:05:47.476
<v Speaker 1>but I mean all the pieces of some journalists.

0:05:47.036 --> 0:05:48.636
<v Speaker 3>That are not the higher homework. Right, yea.

0:05:49.396 --> 0:05:51.596
<v Speaker 1>You always like the subject the subject. You're never at

0:05:51.636 --> 0:05:53.476
<v Speaker 1>odd to the subject. And even when you are at

0:05:53.476 --> 0:05:56.836
<v Speaker 1>obvious of the subject, you've got to great pains to

0:05:56.876 --> 0:05:58.156
<v Speaker 1>suggest you're not really at allous.

0:05:58.156 --> 0:06:01.396
<v Speaker 2>That just happens in his book, but he will get there.

0:06:01.476 --> 0:06:03.676
<v Speaker 3>Yes, Yes, that's interesting you say that, Malcolm. I've never

0:06:03.756 --> 0:06:06.396
<v Speaker 3>quite conceptualized it that way. I think it's true.

0:06:06.396 --> 0:06:09.916
<v Speaker 4>You know, the great kind of transformative moment of my

0:06:09.956 --> 0:06:12.116
<v Speaker 4>life as a writer, my life is a man as

0:06:12.156 --> 0:06:14.556
<v Speaker 4>a person, was when I joined the New Yorker in

0:06:14.636 --> 0:06:17.316
<v Speaker 4>nineteen eighty six, and I was put to work writing

0:06:18.156 --> 0:06:20.116
<v Speaker 4>the Talk of the Town. Back in those days, Talk

0:06:20.156 --> 0:06:23.716
<v Speaker 4>of the Town was beautifully anonymous. That was part of

0:06:23.036 --> 0:06:27.596
<v Speaker 4>the glory of it, because John McPhee would contribute, or

0:06:27.676 --> 0:06:30.236
<v Speaker 4>John Updyke, and then you know, a little schnor like

0:06:30.316 --> 0:06:32.796
<v Speaker 4>me would be thrown into the mix as well. And

0:06:33.756 --> 0:06:36.356
<v Speaker 4>it was the great epiphany of my life because up

0:06:36.436 --> 0:06:38.916
<v Speaker 4>until that moment I had been a graduate student. I mean,

0:06:39.196 --> 0:06:40.836
<v Speaker 4>my whole life, I'd been a graduate student. I was

0:06:40.836 --> 0:06:42.876
<v Speaker 4>a graduate student when I was six years old because

0:06:42.916 --> 0:06:44.556
<v Speaker 4>I come from an like you, I come from an

0:06:44.556 --> 0:06:47.956
<v Speaker 4>academic family, and that was the way I had been raised,

0:06:48.196 --> 0:06:51.636
<v Speaker 4>you know, pursuing a PhD since third grade, and the

0:06:53.116 --> 0:06:56.076
<v Speaker 4>way you become, the way you're trained and taught to

0:06:56.156 --> 0:07:00.636
<v Speaker 4>think and write is argumentative through buts my sister, Allison,

0:07:00.716 --> 0:07:04.156
<v Speaker 4>brilliant mind still works that way, right. Somebody says something

0:07:04.356 --> 0:07:07.236
<v Speaker 4>and you controvert it, you say, but on the other hand,

0:07:07.276 --> 0:07:09.756
<v Speaker 4>that's not entirely true. People say that parenting is the

0:07:09.756 --> 0:07:12.156
<v Speaker 4>most important thing in the world, but in truth, you

0:07:12.196 --> 0:07:12.716
<v Speaker 4>can't parent.

0:07:12.756 --> 0:07:15.956
<v Speaker 1>The difference between improv and academia, yeah, academia is.

0:07:17.596 --> 0:07:21.876
<v Speaker 5>Yes, but yes, improv yes, And and that's what I

0:07:21.996 --> 0:07:24.436
<v Speaker 5>realized when I was thrown out onto the streets to

0:07:24.476 --> 0:07:27.516
<v Speaker 5>go cover table hockey tournaments in Flatbush and wonderful editor

0:07:27.596 --> 0:07:31.956
<v Speaker 5>Chipmograph and you know slack rope walkers lived on house

0:07:31.996 --> 0:07:34.436
<v Speaker 5>boats in the Hudson is that you couldn't argue with

0:07:34.516 --> 0:07:35.116
<v Speaker 5>these people.

0:07:35.356 --> 0:07:38.556
<v Speaker 4>You had to illuminate them. You had to caricature them

0:07:38.596 --> 0:07:40.916
<v Speaker 4>at times in a positive sense. You had to draw

0:07:40.996 --> 0:07:43.516
<v Speaker 4>quick portraits of them. But yes, exactly, it was yes,

0:07:43.596 --> 0:07:46.356
<v Speaker 4>and and that the only way to write beautifully, the

0:07:46.396 --> 0:07:50.916
<v Speaker 4>only way to write descriptively, evocatively, significantly, was to construct small,

0:07:50.956 --> 0:07:56.996
<v Speaker 4>descriptive sentences connected by Ann's not long contentious sentences disrupted

0:07:57.036 --> 0:08:00.116
<v Speaker 4>by butts. And that moment of moving from one to

0:08:00.156 --> 0:08:01.476
<v Speaker 4>the other was the great moment in mind.

0:08:01.476 --> 0:08:03.516
<v Speaker 1>You were the first person to come to the New

0:08:03.556 --> 0:08:05.156
<v Speaker 1>Yorker and be forced to dumb it down.

0:08:06.516 --> 0:08:08.716
<v Speaker 4>Well, yes, there's a truth in that, but dumb it

0:08:08.756 --> 0:08:12.036
<v Speaker 4>down on not in the in ultimate sense. To embrace

0:08:12.076 --> 0:08:15.356
<v Speaker 4>a form of if you like, phone naive writing, To

0:08:15.516 --> 0:08:18.516
<v Speaker 4>embrace a form of minimalism, that wonderful New York And

0:08:18.556 --> 0:08:21.956
<v Speaker 4>tradition that extends from eb White and Thurber right into

0:08:22.116 --> 0:08:24.236
<v Speaker 4>my fingers. At least if no one else is, and

0:08:24.276 --> 0:08:28.276
<v Speaker 4>that with many others, but I mean I esteem it particularly,

0:08:28.476 --> 0:08:30.316
<v Speaker 4>So Yes, I think that's true, and I think it's

0:08:30.316 --> 0:08:33.596
<v Speaker 4>one of the things that makes the New Yorker tradition remarkable,

0:08:33.716 --> 0:08:38.036
<v Speaker 4>is the is its insistence, or it's implied insistence through

0:08:38.036 --> 0:08:42.276
<v Speaker 4>a tradition that the best writing are small, descriptive sentences

0:08:42.316 --> 0:08:43.356
<v Speaker 4>connected by ants.

0:08:43.716 --> 0:08:44.956
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so here's what I want to do.

0:08:45.076 --> 0:08:48.956
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I'm just gonna I'm just going to name names

0:08:49.276 --> 0:08:51.796
<v Speaker 1>from the book, and I would like you to tell

0:08:51.876 --> 0:08:55.796
<v Speaker 1>us something about your relationship with that character. But how

0:08:55.836 --> 0:08:58.036
<v Speaker 1>you met them, why you like them, what they're like.

0:08:58.316 --> 0:09:00.436
<v Speaker 1>You don't need to touch on their role in the book.

0:09:00.716 --> 0:09:01.356
<v Speaker 2>You can get there.

0:09:01.716 --> 0:09:04.596
<v Speaker 1>But there's all these there's a ton of names, and

0:09:04.596 --> 0:09:07.516
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to pick them more or less at random,

0:09:07.916 --> 0:09:09.636
<v Speaker 1>and then some of them my moony pick because I

0:09:09.636 --> 0:09:11.396
<v Speaker 1>have things I want to say about them, just so

0:09:11.436 --> 0:09:12.836
<v Speaker 1>I can be involved in this conversation.

0:09:14.836 --> 0:09:17.476
<v Speaker 2>But let's start with your mother.

0:09:18.156 --> 0:09:21.276
<v Speaker 3>Oh, my mother? Where to begin with my mother?

0:09:21.916 --> 0:09:25.556
<v Speaker 2>First? Describe your mother, like physically, physically.

0:09:25.076 --> 0:09:30.116
<v Speaker 4>My mother is a small woman who is, among other things,

0:09:30.476 --> 0:09:34.236
<v Speaker 4>was a professor of linguistic It's a very distinguished scientist

0:09:35.156 --> 0:09:40.236
<v Speaker 4>instrumental discovering the first gene for Grammar HOFX and P.

0:09:40.556 --> 0:09:42.116
<v Speaker 3>We all had to learn the name of it when

0:09:42.156 --> 0:09:44.436
<v Speaker 3>we were children. But she's a small one.

0:09:44.516 --> 0:09:48.556
<v Speaker 4>She also designs jewelry, and she wears somewhat eccentric clothing.

0:09:48.636 --> 0:09:51.036
<v Speaker 4>So if you saw her, you'd see this woman with long,

0:09:51.116 --> 0:09:53.956
<v Speaker 4>unkempt hair, looks atle like Stregananona, who's wearing all of

0:09:53.996 --> 0:09:56.356
<v Speaker 4>this avant garde jewelry. You can't really approach her to

0:09:56.436 --> 0:09:58.756
<v Speaker 4>hug her because it's too dangerous. The jewelry is a

0:09:58.796 --> 0:10:03.956
<v Speaker 4>little like barbed wire and is an in constant activity,

0:10:04.036 --> 0:10:06.676
<v Speaker 4>constant active. And I should add that she's, you know,

0:10:06.716 --> 0:10:08.756
<v Speaker 4>a little more subdued now at eighty eight than she

0:10:08.836 --> 0:10:11.036
<v Speaker 4>used to be in the book, I go up to

0:10:11.156 --> 0:10:13.436
<v Speaker 4>bake with her because I had never done that. I

0:10:13.476 --> 0:10:15.796
<v Speaker 4>have a complicated relationship with her. I don't mean to

0:10:15.356 --> 0:10:17.996
<v Speaker 4>be sacriine about it at all. You know, we're very

0:10:18.076 --> 0:10:21.756
<v Speaker 4>much alike. And she's a driven person, as am I

0:10:21.796 --> 0:10:24.636
<v Speaker 4>in lots of ways, in every way. But she's an

0:10:24.676 --> 0:10:29.116
<v Speaker 4>amazing baker, and she's an amazingly inventive.

0:10:28.636 --> 0:10:29.716
<v Speaker 3>And impatient person.

0:10:30.156 --> 0:10:32.596
<v Speaker 4>And I thought in this book and in life generally

0:10:32.716 --> 0:10:35.396
<v Speaker 4>that the best way I could connect with her was

0:10:36.076 --> 0:10:39.076
<v Speaker 4>through a shared activity. It's always been only the best

0:10:39.116 --> 0:10:41.516
<v Speaker 4>way to connect with her. You know, can't really can't

0:10:41.556 --> 0:10:44.116
<v Speaker 4>really talk with her. I mean, of course you can,

0:10:44.196 --> 0:10:46.476
<v Speaker 4>but I have a conversation. But the happiest moments were

0:10:46.556 --> 0:10:49.276
<v Speaker 4>always when we were doing something together. I have this

0:10:49.356 --> 0:10:53.596
<v Speaker 4>incredibly intense memory, which is the book begins with, of

0:10:53.796 --> 0:10:56.956
<v Speaker 4>when I'm really little with my I have many sisters,

0:10:56.956 --> 0:10:59.796
<v Speaker 4>but this is my sister Allison, and she was unrolling

0:10:59.956 --> 0:11:03.116
<v Speaker 4>strudle on a table.

0:11:03.156 --> 0:11:05.396
<v Speaker 3>We were living in a housing project at that point, and.

0:11:05.436 --> 0:11:08.836
<v Speaker 4>Just watching her looking up and watching her unroll this

0:11:09.196 --> 0:11:11.596
<v Speaker 4>rule and make it kind of parchment thin. I thought,

0:11:11.796 --> 0:11:15.036
<v Speaker 4>that's real. That was my first experience of mastery. That's

0:11:15.036 --> 0:11:15.436
<v Speaker 4>my mother.

0:11:15.916 --> 0:11:17.316
<v Speaker 1>Since you're talking about you, whether I want to test

0:11:17.316 --> 0:11:21.236
<v Speaker 1>seven ideo. Recently, I have come to believe in the

0:11:21.276 --> 0:11:27.996
<v Speaker 1>asymmetrical theory of parental memories, which is that everyone, when pressed,

0:11:28.516 --> 0:11:31.076
<v Speaker 1>has way more memories of one parent than the other.

0:11:31.356 --> 0:11:33.796
<v Speaker 1>So we all have one not that we one parent

0:11:33.836 --> 0:11:37.916
<v Speaker 1>that we favor, no, but one parent who is who

0:11:38.516 --> 0:11:41.876
<v Speaker 1>is vivid, yes, who consumes all of our kind of storytelling.

0:11:42.076 --> 0:11:44.756
<v Speaker 1>In your case, your mother and your work has loomed

0:11:44.796 --> 0:11:45.676
<v Speaker 1>much larger than your father.

0:11:45.876 --> 0:11:48.556
<v Speaker 4>Yes, although even though in fact I'm extremely close to

0:11:48.596 --> 0:11:52.316
<v Speaker 4>my father and admire him limitlessly, dedicated the book on

0:11:52.356 --> 0:11:54.316
<v Speaker 4>Liberalism to him because he had taught me all of

0:11:54.316 --> 0:11:57.036
<v Speaker 4>those things. But my father is, in his nature a

0:11:57.036 --> 0:12:00.716
<v Speaker 4>more recessive person than my mother. There is one chapter

0:12:00.756 --> 0:12:02.556
<v Speaker 4>that's very much about my father in this and it's

0:12:02.556 --> 0:12:04.956
<v Speaker 4>the first time I've ever really written about him about

0:12:05.156 --> 0:12:07.636
<v Speaker 4>learning to drive, because when I was learning to drive

0:12:07.756 --> 0:12:11.716
<v Speaker 4>in my fifties, with my son Luke getting we got

0:12:11.756 --> 0:12:14.236
<v Speaker 4>our licenses on the same day. I believe that's the

0:12:14.236 --> 0:12:16.916
<v Speaker 4>only time that's ever happened. And my father was haunting

0:12:16.916 --> 0:12:19.396
<v Speaker 4>me the whole time. Because my father is the most

0:12:19.516 --> 0:12:22.236
<v Speaker 4>gently competent human being you will meet. And one of

0:12:22.276 --> 0:12:24.516
<v Speaker 4>the things was he had been driving since he was fourteen,

0:12:24.756 --> 0:12:26.436
<v Speaker 4>and he was the sort of person who thought nothing.

0:12:26.436 --> 0:12:29.636
<v Speaker 4>You know, he has six kids and twenty grandchildren of

0:12:29.756 --> 0:12:33.956
<v Speaker 4>driving to a grandchild in Baltimore from rural Ontario where

0:12:33.996 --> 0:12:37.396
<v Speaker 4>they live for nineteen hours, and we just would do

0:12:37.516 --> 0:12:40.196
<v Speaker 4>things like that. He was an utterly competent man. And

0:12:40.236 --> 0:12:42.516
<v Speaker 4>I think we all make ourselves a little bit in

0:12:42.636 --> 0:12:46.676
<v Speaker 4>the shadow of our father's accomplishments, but also by bending

0:12:46.716 --> 0:12:49.516
<v Speaker 4>away from the shadow into our own sunshine. So my

0:12:49.596 --> 0:12:52.956
<v Speaker 4>father was so super competent in all those ways that

0:12:53.036 --> 0:12:58.116
<v Speaker 4>I made myself notably incompetent in the little tasks of life.

0:12:58.116 --> 0:13:01.716
<v Speaker 4>So my wife Martha did all the driving in our family,

0:13:01.756 --> 0:13:04.476
<v Speaker 4>and I was the one in the as my daughter Olivia,

0:13:04.476 --> 0:13:06.996
<v Speaker 4>who's here someplace? And I would point out the gendered seat,

0:13:07.036 --> 0:13:09.276
<v Speaker 4>which we usually assigned to women in our culture. Sure

0:13:09.276 --> 0:13:12.556
<v Speaker 4>where I'm the one passing out the cookies and saying, hey, kids, kids,

0:13:12.556 --> 0:13:14.676
<v Speaker 4>got to be quiet. Mom's trying to find the exit. Now,

0:13:14.956 --> 0:13:16.916
<v Speaker 4>you know when we would be that will be there soon.

0:13:16.996 --> 0:13:20.076
<v Speaker 4>I promise you will be there soon. Let mom concentrate.

0:13:20.316 --> 0:13:23.756
<v Speaker 4>And I was in that seat for decades, and then

0:13:23.796 --> 0:13:25.836
<v Speaker 4>I wanted to just nudge over to the other seat

0:13:25.876 --> 0:13:27.836
<v Speaker 4>a bit. And so that was very much about my father,

0:13:27.876 --> 0:13:30.676
<v Speaker 4>But absolutely my mother is the vivid person.

0:13:30.796 --> 0:13:33.156
<v Speaker 1>All right, all right, next name on the list. None

0:13:33.196 --> 0:13:35.836
<v Speaker 1>of us knew him, but both of us are fascinated

0:13:35.836 --> 0:13:38.636
<v Speaker 1>by him. Bud Schulberg. Oh we do a Bud Scholberg

0:13:38.716 --> 0:13:39.196
<v Speaker 1>shout out.

0:13:39.276 --> 0:13:41.076
<v Speaker 3>We should definitely do a Bud Shoulberg shout out.

0:13:41.116 --> 0:13:43.276
<v Speaker 4>We're better than at the Why I've been trying to

0:13:43.316 --> 0:13:46.076
<v Speaker 4>get the Library of America to put Bud Schulberg in print,

0:13:46.156 --> 0:13:48.636
<v Speaker 4>you know, for a while, and maybe I still can't.

0:13:48.676 --> 0:13:53.556
<v Speaker 4>Bud Schulberg, as all of you will know, was a writer,

0:13:53.676 --> 0:13:56.836
<v Speaker 4>a journalist, most famous as a screenwriter, wrote the screenplay

0:13:56.876 --> 0:13:59.116
<v Speaker 4>for On the Waterfront and other things.

0:13:59.236 --> 0:14:00.956
<v Speaker 3>But he wrote one of the most beautiful and.

0:14:00.916 --> 0:14:05.796
<v Speaker 4>Forgotten novels in American English, called The Disenchanted, about his

0:14:06.676 --> 0:14:09.676
<v Speaker 4>bizarre adventures writing a screenplay with the then on the

0:14:09.676 --> 0:14:12.916
<v Speaker 4>brink of death Scott Fitzgerald. And it's the most beautiful

0:14:12.996 --> 0:14:16.636
<v Speaker 4>portrait of Scot Fitzgerald that we have, and remarkable.

0:14:16.156 --> 0:14:17.996
<v Speaker 3>Guy, and his stuff should be back in print.

0:14:18.036 --> 0:14:24.156
<v Speaker 4>And I suspect quick parenthetical that his name hurt him.

0:14:24.316 --> 0:14:26.956
<v Speaker 4>One of my pet theories is that writers are very

0:14:26.956 --> 0:14:29.876
<v Speaker 4>dependent on their names. Right, there's a moment there was

0:14:29.916 --> 0:14:32.916
<v Speaker 4>a Dr Johnson says someplace that there was a poet

0:14:32.956 --> 0:14:35.876
<v Speaker 4>laureate in England named Elkana Settle, and no one could

0:14:35.916 --> 0:14:37.676
<v Speaker 4>ever believe that he could write a good poem with

0:14:37.716 --> 0:14:39.076
<v Speaker 4>a name like el Conna Settle.

0:14:39.476 --> 0:14:41.676
<v Speaker 3>And I have struggled with this my whole life.

0:14:41.676 --> 0:14:44.636
<v Speaker 4>Because Gopnik has got to be the single ugliest, most

0:14:44.716 --> 0:14:47.876
<v Speaker 4>non euphonious name there is. And Bud Sholberg, right, it

0:14:47.956 --> 0:14:50.676
<v Speaker 4>sounds like a guy who runs a store, right, Whereas

0:14:50.716 --> 0:14:53.276
<v Speaker 4>you know, J. D. Salinger is clearly a writer of you.

0:14:53.916 --> 0:14:55.516
<v Speaker 4>So that's something we all say.

0:14:55.556 --> 0:14:57.796
<v Speaker 2>There should be a version of Elis Island for writers.

0:14:58.116 --> 0:15:02.756
<v Speaker 4>Yes, exactly, exactly, that's the whole story there about why

0:15:02.756 --> 0:15:04.796
<v Speaker 4>the name got didn't get changed at Elis Island.

0:15:04.796 --> 0:15:06.236
<v Speaker 3>But I'll spare you for the moment.

0:15:08.396 --> 0:15:12.156
<v Speaker 4>Jamie Swiss, Oh, Jamie Swiss is a different I just

0:15:12.236 --> 0:15:15.916
<v Speaker 4>was texting with him. Jamie is the most gifted and

0:15:16.036 --> 0:15:20.436
<v Speaker 4>most irascible magician there's ever been. He's a true intellectual

0:15:20.476 --> 0:15:23.316
<v Speaker 4>of the magic world, and he is a truly contentious person.

0:15:23.596 --> 0:15:26.396
<v Speaker 4>And what I love about Jamie's is he's a magnificent

0:15:26.836 --> 0:15:29.636
<v Speaker 4>sleight of handman, a great teacher. He taught my son

0:15:29.716 --> 0:15:33.356
<v Speaker 4>Luke card magic, and he was the most exacting, demanding

0:15:33.396 --> 0:15:37.836
<v Speaker 4>and rewarding, replenishing teacher you could possibly have. But Jamie's

0:15:37.876 --> 0:15:42.676
<v Speaker 4>just a beautifully irascible person who cannot take anything lightly.

0:15:42.876 --> 0:15:45.356
<v Speaker 4>You know, as you know I say in the book someplace,

0:15:45.436 --> 0:15:48.676
<v Speaker 4>you know that people don't take magicians seriously right. And

0:15:48.716 --> 0:15:50.116
<v Speaker 4>they go up to the magicians say oh, I know

0:15:50.156 --> 0:15:52.796
<v Speaker 4>how you did that, which is like going up to

0:15:52.876 --> 0:15:54.516
<v Speaker 4>yo yo ma and saying, oh, I know how you

0:15:54.556 --> 0:15:57.516
<v Speaker 4>did that. You just scraped that thing along the strings,

0:15:57.516 --> 0:15:59.276
<v Speaker 4>didn't you. I know how you did that. I have

0:15:59.316 --> 0:16:01.636
<v Speaker 4>an uncle who does the same thing all the time.

0:16:02.036 --> 0:16:04.836
<v Speaker 4>And most magicians just kind of bite their lips and say,

0:16:05.116 --> 0:16:07.836
<v Speaker 4>oh good, And I'm glad to hear that. And Jamie

0:16:07.916 --> 0:16:09.356
<v Speaker 4>is the one that says, you have no idea, Yeah,

0:16:09.396 --> 0:16:11.996
<v Speaker 4>how the fuck I did that? You have no fucking

0:16:12.076 --> 0:16:14.916
<v Speaker 4>idea how I did that, So don't tell me you do.

0:16:15.436 --> 0:16:19.356
<v Speaker 4>And he's a contentious magician and it's wonderful and he's brilliant.

0:16:19.356 --> 0:16:21.876
<v Speaker 4>He's one of my dearest friends, and I love him

0:16:22.036 --> 0:16:26.556
<v Speaker 4>exactly because he takes magic at the most serious and

0:16:26.596 --> 0:16:30.516
<v Speaker 4>conceivable level and won't allow it to be minimized or

0:16:30.556 --> 0:16:33.316
<v Speaker 4>condescended to though he did say to me once, the

0:16:33.356 --> 0:16:36.156
<v Speaker 4>only reason mimes exists is so the magicians have someone

0:16:36.196 --> 0:16:38.116
<v Speaker 4>to patronize.

0:16:39.196 --> 0:16:42.436
<v Speaker 1>What I love about your the best way. The chapter

0:16:42.436 --> 0:16:46.236
<v Speaker 1>of this book on magic is magic. It's the thing

0:16:46.276 --> 0:16:49.196
<v Speaker 1>that I never really understood about magic until you wrote

0:16:49.236 --> 0:16:52.476
<v Speaker 1>about it. And I could never tell whether this is

0:16:52.516 --> 0:16:55.596
<v Speaker 1>true of magic or just true of you on magic,

0:16:55.996 --> 0:16:59.556
<v Speaker 1>which is that all these magicians, at least the ones

0:16:59.596 --> 0:17:05.396
<v Speaker 1>you writ about, have thought so deeply and beautifully and

0:17:05.436 --> 0:17:08.836
<v Speaker 1>profoundly about their craft in a way that no other

0:17:09.876 --> 0:17:12.596
<v Speaker 1>you know, I've just spent for pat of reasons the

0:17:12.676 --> 0:17:16.876
<v Speaker 1>last couple of weeks months really interviewing one trauma surgeon

0:17:16.916 --> 0:17:20.836
<v Speaker 1>after another. Uh, and trauma surgents are incredibly interesting.

0:17:20.956 --> 0:17:23.156
<v Speaker 2>The work they do is really, really, really really hard.

0:17:23.796 --> 0:17:26.796
<v Speaker 1>The technology changes every and technique changes every ten minutes.

0:17:27.036 --> 0:17:27.556
<v Speaker 2>But they don't.

0:17:28.436 --> 0:17:32.396
<v Speaker 1>They're not talking about it on a philosophical level. It's

0:17:32.956 --> 0:17:37.276
<v Speaker 1>they've taken something that's beautifully powerfully complicated and they have

0:17:37.396 --> 0:17:39.716
<v Speaker 1>made it intensely practical.

0:17:39.276 --> 0:17:42.036
<v Speaker 4>And they talk about it well. Shop talk is the

0:17:42.036 --> 0:17:44.556
<v Speaker 4>most beautiful talk that there is. One of the reasons

0:17:44.836 --> 0:17:48.076
<v Speaker 4>writers are so occupationally miserable, it's because we have no

0:17:48.116 --> 0:17:52.236
<v Speaker 4>shop talk really to talk about, right, talk about keyboards, computers,

0:17:52.556 --> 0:17:55.596
<v Speaker 4>advances and publishers, and then that's it, right, we don't.

0:17:55.956 --> 0:17:57.836
<v Speaker 3>Magicians have the most beautiful.

0:17:57.396 --> 0:18:00.076
<v Speaker 4>And rapturous shop talk of anyone because they can only

0:18:00.076 --> 0:18:02.356
<v Speaker 4>talk about it to other magicians. They have a high

0:18:02.396 --> 0:18:05.876
<v Speaker 4>level of trauma surgeon like technique. But they can't tell

0:18:06.196 --> 0:18:07.996
<v Speaker 4>you or me about it. They can only talk about

0:18:07.996 --> 0:18:11.236
<v Speaker 4>it to other magicians. There's an intensity, an intellectual intensity,

0:18:11.276 --> 0:18:13.716
<v Speaker 4>of what they do. I will add as well, of course,

0:18:13.756 --> 0:18:18.316
<v Speaker 4>and this is the implicit, if tenderly loving accusation you're making.

0:18:18.556 --> 0:18:21.436
<v Speaker 4>I seek out the intellectual magicians, and they seek and

0:18:21.476 --> 0:18:22.956
<v Speaker 4>they choose to speak to me.

0:18:24.956 --> 0:18:27.476
<v Speaker 2>What is it that drew you to magic? Was it

0:18:27.516 --> 0:18:29.556
<v Speaker 2>that did Luke discovered? Or did you Luke?

0:18:29.796 --> 0:18:33.316
<v Speaker 4>It was simultaneously that my son Luke discovered magic and

0:18:33.396 --> 0:18:37.716
<v Speaker 4>found that he gave him far more meaning, accomplishment, significance

0:18:37.756 --> 0:18:39.916
<v Speaker 4>than anything he was studying in school. So I was

0:18:39.996 --> 0:18:43.996
<v Speaker 4>drawn into it through Luke's obsessive interest in magic. But

0:18:44.076 --> 0:18:46.436
<v Speaker 4>then I loved it too once I started going to

0:18:47.276 --> 0:18:49.836
<v Speaker 4>Monday Night Magic and other things too, because it seemed

0:18:49.836 --> 0:18:54.476
<v Speaker 4>like such a model of art of a very modest kind.

0:18:54.516 --> 0:18:58.356
<v Speaker 4>You know, magicians aren't because they feel oppressed all the time.

0:18:58.676 --> 0:19:02.996
<v Speaker 4>But the idea that you would have a profound technique

0:19:03.356 --> 0:19:06.756
<v Speaker 4>that you kept to yourself, the idea that your primary

0:19:06.796 --> 0:19:13.636
<v Speaker 4>impulse was to entertain rather than to impress or to intimidate,

0:19:14.076 --> 0:19:15.756
<v Speaker 4>That that would be that you would have all of

0:19:15.796 --> 0:19:18.076
<v Speaker 4>these skills, but you would use them for the purposes

0:19:18.076 --> 0:19:21.556
<v Speaker 4>of delight. That spoke somehow to my ideals for writing

0:19:21.596 --> 0:19:24.196
<v Speaker 4>and my ideals for art generally. And I was very taken,

0:19:24.796 --> 0:19:26.916
<v Speaker 4>instantly taken by the company of magicians.

0:19:26.916 --> 0:19:28.396
<v Speaker 3>I loved the company of magicians.

0:19:28.636 --> 0:19:30.996
<v Speaker 4>The people I most have enjoyed hanging out with in

0:19:31.036 --> 0:19:33.916
<v Speaker 4>life are magicians and cooks, and they have a great

0:19:33.916 --> 0:19:34.516
<v Speaker 4>deal in common.

0:19:34.556 --> 0:19:34.956
<v Speaker 3>They both.

0:19:35.236 --> 0:19:38.116
<v Speaker 4>There's an artisanal basis to everything they do. They are

0:19:38.196 --> 0:19:41.356
<v Speaker 4>expert at doing something. But there and there tend to

0:19:41.356 --> 0:19:45.516
<v Speaker 4>be very temperamental people who have very difficult lives. Nothing

0:19:45.556 --> 0:19:48.556
<v Speaker 4>is harder than running a restaurant, except running a magic show.

0:19:49.076 --> 0:19:53.596
<v Speaker 4>And yet the whole purpose of their existence is to delight.

0:19:54.156 --> 0:19:57.196
<v Speaker 4>And I find this something sort of noble and even

0:19:57.196 --> 0:19:57.996
<v Speaker 4>saintly about that.

0:19:58.036 --> 0:19:58.356
<v Speaker 3>I love it.

0:19:58.396 --> 0:20:01.996
<v Speaker 1>There's no high theory attached to the cookiechef.

0:20:02.476 --> 0:20:03.436
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, there is.

0:20:03.476 --> 0:20:06.716
<v Speaker 4>If you get chefs talking that, you know, I don't

0:20:06.716 --> 0:20:08.596
<v Speaker 4>have it as much in this book. But you get

0:20:08.676 --> 0:20:12.796
<v Speaker 4>chefs to talking about the ethics of seasonality or what

0:20:12.916 --> 0:20:15.716
<v Speaker 4>counts as local and what doesn't, or you even get

0:20:15.716 --> 0:20:19.276
<v Speaker 4>them talking about whether you have tarragon leaves or Tarragon

0:20:19.436 --> 0:20:20.916
<v Speaker 4>stems in a Brene sauce.

0:20:21.156 --> 0:20:23.636
<v Speaker 3>They'll go on forever. You know. They have the same

0:20:23.756 --> 0:20:26.316
<v Speaker 3>kind of passionate chop talk which I love to hear.

0:20:29.836 --> 0:20:32.916
<v Speaker 1>More from the real work on the mystery of Mastery

0:20:33.276 --> 0:20:52.916
<v Speaker 1>in a moment. Now back to my conversation on Mastery

0:20:53.156 --> 0:20:55.716
<v Speaker 1>with Adam Gopnik at the ninety second Street Y in

0:20:55.756 --> 0:20:56.196
<v Speaker 1>New York.

0:20:58.116 --> 0:21:01.716
<v Speaker 2>George Plimpton. I bring him up only because.

0:21:02.876 --> 0:21:06.036
<v Speaker 1>In this book, Adam goes in a series of quests

0:21:07.156 --> 0:21:15.996
<v Speaker 1>to master certain activities baking, boxing, magic, et cetera. Driving, drawing, Uh,

0:21:16.116 --> 0:21:19.036
<v Speaker 1>drawing is the first one, and I'm wondering, is it

0:21:19.076 --> 0:21:22.116
<v Speaker 1>an echo of George Plimpton? And how do you feel

0:21:22.116 --> 0:21:22.956
<v Speaker 1>about George Primpton?

0:21:23.156 --> 0:21:26.836
<v Speaker 4>That's a that's such an acute question, because I deliberately

0:21:26.916 --> 0:21:31.556
<v Speaker 4>dropped George Plimpton's name in the opening chapter, thinking no

0:21:31.596 --> 0:21:34.276
<v Speaker 4>one will pick up on my little homage to Plimpton

0:21:34.356 --> 0:21:36.356
<v Speaker 4>in the opening chapter because it goes by very quickly.

0:21:36.476 --> 0:21:39.036
<v Speaker 4>But I put that there exactly for that reason. George

0:21:39.076 --> 0:21:41.836
<v Speaker 4>Plimpton did these wonderful books paper Lin, mad Ducks and

0:21:41.916 --> 0:21:46.356
<v Speaker 4>Bears about his own engagement as an amateur. We'd go

0:21:46.396 --> 0:21:49.116
<v Speaker 4>and he would box, with Archie Moore, or he would

0:21:49.356 --> 0:21:52.076
<v Speaker 4>play quarterback for the Detroit Lions, and so on, and

0:21:52.116 --> 0:21:56.076
<v Speaker 4>so there's certainly an element of plymptoness in this. His

0:21:56.116 --> 0:21:57.636
<v Speaker 4>book Mad Ducks and Bears is one of the most

0:21:57.756 --> 0:22:01.436
<v Speaker 4>entertaining sports books ever written. So I greatly admire his

0:22:01.516 --> 0:22:03.796
<v Speaker 4>prose writing. But it isn't the plimpton like book in

0:22:03.796 --> 0:22:07.196
<v Speaker 4>the sense that Plimpton's comedy came out of his.

0:22:09.356 --> 0:22:10.756
<v Speaker 3>Incapacity to do it.

0:22:10.916 --> 0:22:14.356
<v Speaker 4>You know, Plimpton was making it was had he was

0:22:14.436 --> 0:22:16.196
<v Speaker 4>a wonderful writer, but he had kind of one joke

0:22:16.556 --> 0:22:18.596
<v Speaker 4>to tell, right, I attempt to do this thing, I

0:22:18.676 --> 0:22:21.076
<v Speaker 4>learn a lot, and then I fail at it. And

0:22:21.156 --> 0:22:23.956
<v Speaker 4>I wanted to tell two jokes. I attempt to do

0:22:24.036 --> 0:22:28.276
<v Speaker 4>this thing and I enter into the world of the

0:22:28.316 --> 0:22:28.916
<v Speaker 4>people who do it.

0:22:28.916 --> 0:22:30.316
<v Speaker 3>Well, Plimpton did that too, I guess.

0:22:30.516 --> 0:22:32.596
<v Speaker 4>But yes, certainly Plimpton is one of the ghosts to

0:22:32.756 --> 0:22:35.836
<v Speaker 4>someplace in the back of the book. And I put

0:22:35.916 --> 0:22:39.236
<v Speaker 4>him in one sentence and you caught it.

0:22:39.276 --> 0:22:41.676
<v Speaker 1>But he But I want you to talk a little

0:22:41.676 --> 0:22:44.396
<v Speaker 1>bit more about the difference. So both of you are

0:22:44.516 --> 0:22:47.996
<v Speaker 1>beginning in the same spirit, yes, which is there are

0:22:48.116 --> 0:22:52.276
<v Speaker 1>worlds outside your own experience, that fascinates you, and you

0:22:52.276 --> 0:22:55.916
<v Speaker 1>would like to you would like to bear witness to them,

0:22:56.276 --> 0:22:56.996
<v Speaker 1>to experience.

0:22:57.036 --> 0:22:59.876
<v Speaker 4>I guess, and I say this in there's every reason

0:22:59.916 --> 0:23:03.876
<v Speaker 4>to prefer Plimpton's approach, which is more amateur to my own.

0:23:04.196 --> 0:23:07.476
<v Speaker 4>But I can't resist being a bit of a generalizer,

0:23:07.636 --> 0:23:10.436
<v Speaker 4>a theory producer about it. And the book is full

0:23:10.516 --> 0:23:15.476
<v Speaker 4>of my generalizations, my guesses, my attempts to find the

0:23:15.516 --> 0:23:20.596
<v Speaker 4>commonality across all of these dimensions, boxing and dancing. What

0:23:20.636 --> 0:23:23.116
<v Speaker 4>do they have in common? What's similar about the way

0:23:23.116 --> 0:23:25.916
<v Speaker 4>we learn them? I can't I can't not be my

0:23:25.996 --> 0:23:28.316
<v Speaker 4>mother's son in that way. My mother was a professor,

0:23:28.516 --> 0:23:30.756
<v Speaker 4>my father was a professor. All my brothers and sisters

0:23:30.956 --> 0:23:34.316
<v Speaker 4>are professors. So I am the only one who isn't.

0:23:34.356 --> 0:23:39.356
<v Speaker 4>I'm what's called a Jewish dropout, and the and every

0:23:39.436 --> 0:23:42.956
<v Speaker 4>so I think that that urge to teach, to explicate

0:23:43.436 --> 0:23:45.356
<v Speaker 4>is very strong. Was not at all in you know,

0:23:45.516 --> 0:23:49.716
<v Speaker 4>Plimpton was an aristocratic wasp, and for him teaching and

0:23:49.796 --> 0:23:51.796
<v Speaker 4>explicating I think was a little vulgar.

0:23:51.916 --> 0:23:53.196
<v Speaker 2>He was he's a performer.

0:23:53.276 --> 0:23:54.036
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he's a performer.

0:23:54.116 --> 0:23:56.556
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, a literary performer. And yes you are.

0:23:56.996 --> 0:23:58.716
<v Speaker 3>You're much more of a professor.

0:23:58.836 --> 0:24:02.436
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I'm there's I'm a ham as well, but there's

0:24:02.476 --> 0:24:05.796
<v Speaker 4>more professorialness in my performance than there ever was in his.

0:24:05.916 --> 0:24:06.596
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:24:06.756 --> 0:24:09.836
<v Speaker 1>One thing you don't talk about in this book was

0:24:10.716 --> 0:24:14.196
<v Speaker 1>your foray into music.

0:24:15.276 --> 0:24:16.876
<v Speaker 4>I do talk about it a bit, a little bit,

0:24:16.916 --> 0:24:18.516
<v Speaker 4>a little bit, not a great land.

0:24:18.676 --> 0:24:19.796
<v Speaker 2>I thought I was wondering about.

0:24:19.796 --> 0:24:24.156
<v Speaker 1>There has always been this kind of desire to experiment

0:24:24.316 --> 0:24:28.716
<v Speaker 1>with your experiences in a way that that's not true

0:24:28.756 --> 0:24:31.916
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of very adventurous and one of the

0:24:31.916 --> 0:24:34.516
<v Speaker 1>aterestings you did was describe a little bit about your

0:24:34.596 --> 0:24:35.796
<v Speaker 1>kind of musical adventures.

0:24:35.796 --> 0:24:38.356
<v Speaker 4>And well, when I came to New York, when Martha

0:24:38.356 --> 0:24:40.756
<v Speaker 4>and I came to New York on a bus from Canada,

0:24:41.316 --> 0:24:45.276
<v Speaker 4>like in the Bad Forties movie, I wanted to be

0:24:45.276 --> 0:24:47.796
<v Speaker 4>a songwriter. That was my primary ambition. Well, I wanted

0:24:47.796 --> 0:24:49.716
<v Speaker 4>to be a songwriter and a writer for the New Yorker.

0:24:49.716 --> 0:24:51.596
<v Speaker 4>I figured I could do both. I could be Stephen

0:24:51.676 --> 0:24:55.196
<v Speaker 4>Sondheim and John Updyke simultaneously. It turned out not to

0:24:55.196 --> 0:24:58.116
<v Speaker 4>be the case, but I wanted to do that, and

0:24:58.236 --> 0:25:02.116
<v Speaker 4>I never pursued it adequately. You know. It was one

0:25:02.156 --> 0:25:05.356
<v Speaker 4>of those things that I left behind too soon. So

0:25:05.956 --> 0:25:10.876
<v Speaker 4>in the course of life, a wonderful composer, David Schier,

0:25:10.916 --> 0:25:12.916
<v Speaker 4>approached me about writing a musical with him, and I,

0:25:13.196 --> 0:25:16.036
<v Speaker 4>to somewhat to his shock, I jumped at the opportunity

0:25:16.076 --> 0:25:18.116
<v Speaker 4>because it was the form I love most in the world.

0:25:18.356 --> 0:25:20.436
<v Speaker 4>And we wrote a show called Our Table, which you

0:25:20.476 --> 0:25:23.596
<v Speaker 4>can find on Spotify, and we wrote some sixty songs together,

0:25:24.036 --> 0:25:26.036
<v Speaker 4>and I am I loved it.

0:25:26.076 --> 0:25:27.236
<v Speaker 2>Excuse me how many songs?

0:25:27.236 --> 0:25:28.476
<v Speaker 3>Sixty songs?

0:25:28.596 --> 0:25:33.676
<v Speaker 4>Zero six zero, because that's the usual ratio in Broadway musicals.

0:25:33.836 --> 0:25:35.876
<v Speaker 4>They have a very strong you call them trunk songs.

0:25:35.916 --> 0:25:38.676
<v Speaker 4>You write sixty songs and you throw out forty. I mean,

0:25:38.716 --> 0:25:41.916
<v Speaker 4>that's the standard rate at which it's done. It's a

0:25:41.916 --> 0:25:44.196
<v Speaker 4>funny thing. Not that the forty or worse than the twenty.

0:25:44.236 --> 0:25:47.076
<v Speaker 4>It's a kind of weird, kind of almost religious discipline

0:25:47.116 --> 0:25:48.316
<v Speaker 4>that Broadway people have.

0:25:49.396 --> 0:25:50.396
<v Speaker 3>And in anyway, I love it.

0:25:50.636 --> 0:25:54.436
<v Speaker 2>Hold on, take it over. This sixty.

0:25:54.756 --> 0:25:59.276
<v Speaker 1>So every Broadway play has forty songs. They're just lying

0:25:59.316 --> 0:26:00.156
<v Speaker 1>in a vault somewhere.

0:26:00.716 --> 0:26:03.356
<v Speaker 4>Yes, in a word, yes, And those are called trunk songs.

0:26:03.396 --> 0:26:05.276
<v Speaker 4>I don't know if it's always forty and twenty, it

0:26:05.276 --> 0:26:09.836
<v Speaker 4>could be sometimes thirty and ten. But yes, every songwriting

0:26:09.876 --> 0:26:12.876
<v Speaker 4>team and everybody songwriter will tell you that they even

0:26:12.996 --> 0:26:16.956
<v Speaker 4>Somedheim threw away four different endings for Company before he

0:26:17.076 --> 0:26:18.276
<v Speaker 4>arrived at Being Alive.

0:26:18.636 --> 0:26:20.316
<v Speaker 3>It's part of the discipline of the craft.

0:26:20.356 --> 0:26:22.796
<v Speaker 4>I'm not always sure that it's a productive discipline in

0:26:22.836 --> 0:26:24.756
<v Speaker 4>the sense that the ones you throw away may actually

0:26:24.756 --> 0:26:26.996
<v Speaker 4>be better than the one you arrive at.

0:26:27.036 --> 0:26:30.316
<v Speaker 1>Does anyone independently analyze the ones that are thrown away? Like,

0:26:30.796 --> 0:26:33.116
<v Speaker 1>is there some this should be some central committee of

0:26:33.636 --> 0:26:35.716
<v Speaker 1>Broadway that kind of takes all these in and.

0:26:35.956 --> 0:26:38.916
<v Speaker 4>Like like a FDA inspectors who come in and say,

0:26:38.996 --> 0:26:40.236
<v Speaker 4>you don't have to throw this away.

0:26:40.716 --> 0:26:43.076
<v Speaker 3>This smells good to me, Yes, exactly.

0:26:43.716 --> 0:26:44.716
<v Speaker 2>This is unbelievable.

0:26:44.836 --> 0:26:47.236
<v Speaker 1>It's you know, it's such a it's so show off hee,

0:26:47.236 --> 0:26:49.796
<v Speaker 1>by the way. You know, the rest of us are

0:26:49.836 --> 0:26:52.156
<v Speaker 1>like making use of every last scrap.

0:26:52.476 --> 0:26:54.756
<v Speaker 4>But so I did that, and I loved it, and

0:26:54.796 --> 0:26:56.796
<v Speaker 4>I wrote all the lyrics and I felt, you know,

0:26:56.836 --> 0:27:01.076
<v Speaker 4>and I put myself to work to master that craft

0:27:01.156 --> 0:27:03.676
<v Speaker 4>and that art as much as I could because my

0:27:03.836 --> 0:27:09.116
<v Speaker 4>ultimate heroes, Lorenzo du Ponte, Lorenz Heart, Larry Hart took

0:27:09.156 --> 0:27:09.756
<v Speaker 4>part in that field.

0:27:09.796 --> 0:27:11.436
<v Speaker 2>And I have no fear of embarrassment.

0:27:13.916 --> 0:27:17.156
<v Speaker 4>I live in total fear of embarrassment. But I suppose

0:27:17.196 --> 0:27:20.196
<v Speaker 4>when it comes to the contest between my egotism and

0:27:20.236 --> 0:27:22.676
<v Speaker 4>my embarrassment, my egotism wins somehow.

0:27:22.996 --> 0:27:23.556
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:27:23.676 --> 0:27:26.516
<v Speaker 4>I mean, if I can put it in slightly kind

0:27:26.516 --> 0:27:30.556
<v Speaker 4>of terms to myself, I'm ambitious, you know, and I

0:27:30.636 --> 0:27:33.516
<v Speaker 4>like doing ambitious things. And I you know, it's not

0:27:33.556 --> 0:27:36.756
<v Speaker 4>like I'm out there, you know, trying to compete with

0:27:36.796 --> 0:27:41.796
<v Speaker 4>elon musk and rocketry. You know, what I'm good at,

0:27:42.116 --> 0:27:44.476
<v Speaker 4>or what I believe myself to be good at, is

0:27:44.876 --> 0:27:49.156
<v Speaker 4>shaping sentences. And some of those sentences are essays. That's

0:27:49.196 --> 0:27:50.876
<v Speaker 4>the form I love most in the world is.

0:27:50.876 --> 0:27:53.356
<v Speaker 3>The essay, what's sometimes called the.

0:27:53.276 --> 0:27:58.836
<v Speaker 4>Personal essay and the and the but writing lyrics or

0:27:58.876 --> 0:28:02.636
<v Speaker 4>writing a show is it's the same enterprise, right. It's

0:28:02.716 --> 0:28:06.676
<v Speaker 4>organizing language in ways that express emotion. And for me,

0:28:06.916 --> 0:28:10.396
<v Speaker 4>you know, the thing I love mode is exactly the

0:28:10.436 --> 0:28:14.716
<v Speaker 4>moments in that act when you get an emotion and

0:28:14.756 --> 0:28:18.956
<v Speaker 4>I had an idea humming together. And that's what I

0:28:18.956 --> 0:28:21.036
<v Speaker 4>always tried to do in things, is what you were

0:28:21.036 --> 0:28:23.796
<v Speaker 4>talking about before, and when it's just ideas, it feels

0:28:23.876 --> 0:28:26.556
<v Speaker 4>arrid to me, and when it's just emotions, it feels

0:28:26.596 --> 0:28:29.876
<v Speaker 4>amateurish to me. And there's no form known to man

0:28:29.996 --> 0:28:32.276
<v Speaker 4>in which ideas well you did this, you talked about

0:28:32.276 --> 0:28:35.716
<v Speaker 4>this with in your Paul Simon audiobook. There's no form

0:28:35.756 --> 0:28:40.116
<v Speaker 4>in which ideas and emotions come into such intimate entanglement

0:28:40.556 --> 0:28:42.876
<v Speaker 4>as in a song. So anybody who can write one

0:28:43.476 --> 0:28:46.796
<v Speaker 4>good song, one memorable song, has got a little bit

0:28:46.836 --> 0:28:50.676
<v Speaker 4>of purchase on immortality. And I think I've written one,

0:28:50.876 --> 0:28:52.516
<v Speaker 4>but I will continue to write more.

0:28:53.036 --> 0:28:55.596
<v Speaker 1>On one level, what this book is is about the

0:28:55.716 --> 0:28:57.796
<v Speaker 1>special pleasures of mediocrity.

0:28:58.036 --> 0:29:00.916
<v Speaker 2>Yes, And because you embark on.

0:29:00.916 --> 0:29:03.196
<v Speaker 1>A series of things, and implicit in not all of them,

0:29:03.196 --> 0:29:04.996
<v Speaker 1>but in some of the things that you embark on,

0:29:05.516 --> 0:29:07.516
<v Speaker 1>is that you're not never going to be good.

0:29:07.676 --> 0:29:08.756
<v Speaker 2>You're never going to be good at them.

0:29:09.276 --> 0:29:12.476
<v Speaker 1>And this is the great discovery of my middle aged

0:29:12.476 --> 0:29:15.316
<v Speaker 1>When I was very young, I only pursued things that

0:29:15.356 --> 0:29:19.556
<v Speaker 1>I was good at, and I realized when I hit

0:29:19.636 --> 0:29:22.156
<v Speaker 1>forty that that was a trap. And you know why

0:29:22.156 --> 0:29:23.756
<v Speaker 1>I realized it. I realized it because I went to

0:29:23.836 --> 0:29:26.596
<v Speaker 1>Bard and when I was using the gym, I saw

0:29:26.636 --> 0:29:31.596
<v Speaker 1>the barred lacrosse team practice and I observed them and

0:29:31.596 --> 0:29:36.716
<v Speaker 1>they observed that they were the most laughably inept lacrosse.

0:29:36.276 --> 0:29:37.156
<v Speaker 3>Team I've ever seen.

0:29:37.716 --> 0:29:40.996
<v Speaker 1>And my first thought was, you know, I have all

0:29:41.116 --> 0:29:44.636
<v Speaker 1>kinds of athletic pretensions, so I was looking down my nose.

0:29:44.716 --> 0:29:46.196
<v Speaker 2>And then my second thought.

0:29:45.956 --> 0:29:49.556
<v Speaker 1>Was that is fantastic because it means that anyone who

0:29:49.636 --> 0:29:52.676
<v Speaker 1>wants to play lacrosse at Bard can play lacross at Bard,

0:29:52.956 --> 0:29:55.116
<v Speaker 1>and that is such a better model than every other

0:29:55.196 --> 0:29:57.836
<v Speaker 1>lacrosse team. If you want to play lacrosse at Johns Hopkins,

0:29:57.876 --> 0:29:59.556
<v Speaker 1>it's impossible.

0:29:58.876 --> 0:29:59.876
<v Speaker 3>Because you're never going to be good.

0:30:00.036 --> 0:30:02.476
<v Speaker 2>You're never going to make the team. It's a pleasure

0:30:02.596 --> 0:30:03.436
<v Speaker 2>is denied to you.

0:30:03.876 --> 0:30:09.156
<v Speaker 1>Why, for the completely random and totally unfair reason, the

0:30:09.716 --> 0:30:12.516
<v Speaker 1>number of kids that have been playing lacrosse in you know,

0:30:12.716 --> 0:30:16.116
<v Speaker 1>suburban Baltimore since they were six years old because their

0:30:16.156 --> 0:30:20.276
<v Speaker 1>parents had the nutty notion that mastery.

0:30:19.836 --> 0:30:23.356
<v Speaker 2>Of lacrosse was something they wanted to use their have their.

0:30:23.236 --> 0:30:24.916
<v Speaker 3>Kids and would get them into Johns Hopkins.

0:30:25.796 --> 0:30:28.316
<v Speaker 1>But so what do we do we impoverish the vast

0:30:28.356 --> 0:30:31.036
<v Speaker 1>pool of kids who would really enjoy playing well across

0:30:31.276 --> 0:30:33.196
<v Speaker 1>in favor of a small bart flips.

0:30:33.196 --> 0:30:35.516
<v Speaker 2>It just says we're going to have a bad cross the.

0:30:35.436 --> 0:30:39.356
<v Speaker 4>Same, yes, I know, but not to be pious. But

0:30:39.396 --> 0:30:41.636
<v Speaker 4>that's sort of one of the themes of the book.

0:30:41.836 --> 0:30:43.956
<v Speaker 4>Maybe is the theme of the book, because the truth is,

0:30:43.956 --> 0:30:45.916
<v Speaker 4>and I have a little chapter called the Mystery of

0:30:45.956 --> 0:30:49.716
<v Speaker 4>Interiority where I look into that old folk legend that

0:30:50.116 --> 0:30:52.436
<v Speaker 4>hummingbirds and elephants have the same number of heartbeats in

0:30:52.476 --> 0:30:55.396
<v Speaker 4>the life, and find that there's actually at the University

0:30:55.436 --> 0:30:58.556
<v Speaker 4>of North Carolina State, there's a scientific team that looks

0:30:58.556 --> 0:31:01.556
<v Speaker 4>into this question, that took up this question, and it's true.

0:31:01.916 --> 0:31:04.756
<v Speaker 4>And the point of it, the metaphor of it is,

0:31:04.756 --> 0:31:07.836
<v Speaker 4>is that the hummingbird's sense of existence is just as

0:31:07.876 --> 0:31:10.796
<v Speaker 4>extended as the elephants. It just is only that feels

0:31:10.796 --> 0:31:13.356
<v Speaker 4>that way for the hummingbird, right, not for the elephant.

0:31:13.476 --> 0:31:17.276
<v Speaker 4>And in exactly the same way, the accomplishments that we

0:31:18.476 --> 0:31:21.316
<v Speaker 4>master or attempt to master at which we're no good,

0:31:21.756 --> 0:31:25.396
<v Speaker 4>give us the same sense of, you know, little steps

0:31:25.436 --> 0:31:27.836
<v Speaker 4>turning into a seamless sequence, the sense of the flow,

0:31:28.156 --> 0:31:31.316
<v Speaker 4>which is the key to happiness. Happiness is absorption. Happiness

0:31:31.356 --> 0:31:33.836
<v Speaker 4>is reaching that flow state, and in a weird way,

0:31:34.036 --> 0:31:37.516
<v Speaker 4>any time you achieve it, you have the hummingbird's heartbeat

0:31:37.516 --> 0:31:40.676
<v Speaker 4>inside you, you have a strong interior sense. Like the

0:31:40.756 --> 0:31:43.796
<v Speaker 4>kids in at Bard, right, they didn't know they were

0:31:43.796 --> 0:31:46.116
<v Speaker 4>bad lacrosse players, and I'm sure they talked about lacrosse

0:31:46.116 --> 0:31:48.236
<v Speaker 4>all the time and tried to improve their game.

0:31:48.556 --> 0:31:50.676
<v Speaker 3>And that's exactly bid.

0:31:50.796 --> 0:31:53.196
<v Speaker 2>No, no, no, no, they do know they're bads.

0:31:54.156 --> 0:31:55.796
<v Speaker 1>No, no, I don't mean that it's a joke, right, because

0:31:55.836 --> 0:31:59.756
<v Speaker 1>it's the second The corollary to the observation that there

0:31:59.836 --> 0:32:04.396
<v Speaker 1>is beauty in badness is that the second thing is

0:32:04.436 --> 0:32:09.756
<v Speaker 1>that it is only through pursuing something not badly you

0:32:09.796 --> 0:32:13.476
<v Speaker 1>weren't bad at these things, but inexpertly, yes, that you

0:32:13.836 --> 0:32:15.836
<v Speaker 1>come to a full appreciation of the expert.

0:32:15.876 --> 0:32:16.036
<v Speaker 3>Yes.

0:32:16.156 --> 0:32:18.116
<v Speaker 1>The person who goes up to the magician and says,

0:32:18.436 --> 0:32:20.516
<v Speaker 1>I know how you did that is someone who doesn't

0:32:20.556 --> 0:32:22.956
<v Speaker 1>try to be a mediocre they have If they were

0:32:23.196 --> 0:32:25.996
<v Speaker 1>a mediocre magician, they would know better that they would

0:32:26.036 --> 0:32:27.716
<v Speaker 1>be an how they would be.

0:32:27.676 --> 0:32:29.596
<v Speaker 2>A true awe. It's the same thing I was gonna

0:32:29.596 --> 0:32:31.596
<v Speaker 2>say this with It is only when.

0:32:31.476 --> 0:32:36.076
<v Speaker 1>I became a mediocre runner in my middle age that

0:32:36.156 --> 0:32:38.636
<v Speaker 1>I that I began to appreciate what a world class runner.

0:32:38.676 --> 0:32:41.236
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, exactly, And it's only by being a terrible pianist

0:32:41.316 --> 0:32:43.196
<v Speaker 4>that I have some glimpse of what it is to

0:32:43.196 --> 0:32:45.236
<v Speaker 4>be Bill Evans or Errol Garner.

0:32:45.956 --> 0:32:48.596
<v Speaker 2>This is the greatest case for community theater.

0:32:49.276 --> 0:32:51.156
<v Speaker 3>Yes, this is true.

0:32:51.196 --> 0:32:54.556
<v Speaker 1>Which is the is the kind of whipping boy. Community

0:32:54.596 --> 0:32:57.876
<v Speaker 1>theory is the whipping boy of every pretentious intellectual. I

0:32:57.916 --> 0:33:00.156
<v Speaker 1>grew up with a community theater, and I'm here to

0:33:00.156 --> 0:33:02.316
<v Speaker 1>tell you civilization.

0:33:01.916 --> 0:33:05.716
<v Speaker 4>Is community theater is based on community theory. I mean that,

0:33:06.076 --> 0:33:08.116
<v Speaker 4>but you know that's not you know who said that?

0:33:08.236 --> 0:33:11.716
<v Speaker 4>Forgive me for a professorial moment. Frederick Laul Olmsted, the

0:33:11.756 --> 0:33:13.556
<v Speaker 4>great designer of Central Park and one of the great

0:33:13.556 --> 0:33:18.236
<v Speaker 4>American political thinkers, said that the thing that the commonplace

0:33:18.236 --> 0:33:22.036
<v Speaker 4>civilization of a liberal society depended on community theater. He

0:33:22.116 --> 0:33:25.316
<v Speaker 4>talked about glee clubs, he talked about amateur opera societies.

0:33:25.516 --> 0:33:29.236
<v Speaker 4>That's the living, beating heart of a liberal society.

0:33:29.276 --> 0:33:32.636
<v Speaker 3>Are those things? Yeah, yeah, give me one more name.

0:33:32.716 --> 0:33:35.236
<v Speaker 3>I'm in loving this so much. I'll give you It's

0:33:35.276 --> 0:33:36.356
<v Speaker 3>like being in therapy, and.

0:33:38.356 --> 0:33:40.476
<v Speaker 2>We'll do David Blaine, why not, let's finish on magic.

0:33:40.836 --> 0:33:44.676
<v Speaker 4>David Blaine was so Luca, my wonderful son who is

0:33:44.756 --> 0:33:48.596
<v Speaker 4>now doing his PhD in philosophy at the University of Texas.

0:33:48.676 --> 0:33:51.236
<v Speaker 4>After all of his adventures magic and music, he had

0:33:51.756 --> 0:33:56.196
<v Speaker 4>ended as a philosopher went to work as David Blaine's

0:33:56.276 --> 0:33:59.716
<v Speaker 4>personal assistant. David offered him that job, and it was

0:33:59.756 --> 0:34:05.236
<v Speaker 4>a wonderful learning experience, much better than going to progressive school,

0:34:05.516 --> 0:34:07.276
<v Speaker 4>because he had to learn how to keep you know,

0:34:07.356 --> 0:34:09.756
<v Speaker 4>Russian models away from each other, and how to care

0:34:09.756 --> 0:34:13.676
<v Speaker 4>for an albino alligator, and money other things, and David

0:34:13.756 --> 0:34:15.756
<v Speaker 4>in the middle of it. This is my favorite anecdote

0:34:15.796 --> 0:34:18.636
<v Speaker 4>in the book, was doing a bullet catch, now bullet cap.

0:34:18.636 --> 0:34:20.476
<v Speaker 4>He was doing it for a TV special. And in

0:34:20.516 --> 0:34:24.156
<v Speaker 4>the bullet catch, the magician has a steel cup in

0:34:24.196 --> 0:34:27.356
<v Speaker 4>his mouth or her mouth, and somebody fires a bullet

0:34:27.356 --> 0:34:29.476
<v Speaker 4>from a rifle directly into the cup. You have to

0:34:29.476 --> 0:34:32.876
<v Speaker 4>catch the bullet. And now normally it's done as a trick,

0:34:33.116 --> 0:34:36.356
<v Speaker 4>as a gaff, because it's too dangerous. Twelve magicians were

0:34:36.476 --> 0:34:38.716
<v Speaker 4>killed in the early part of the twentieth century doing

0:34:38.716 --> 0:34:41.476
<v Speaker 4>the bullet catch on stage, so nobody does it that way.

0:34:41.476 --> 0:34:43.236
<v Speaker 4>And Luke explained to me David was going to do

0:34:43.276 --> 0:34:45.916
<v Speaker 4>a true bullet catch, and I said, well, what's how

0:34:45.956 --> 0:34:47.796
<v Speaker 4>do you do a bullet catch? And he said, well,

0:34:47.796 --> 0:34:51.396
<v Speaker 4>it's a very strong titanium cup and it's a very

0:34:51.476 --> 0:34:55.636
<v Speaker 4>low velocity rifle and a very small caliber bullet, and

0:34:55.676 --> 0:34:58.356
<v Speaker 4>it's all laser guided. I said, oh, really, so there's

0:34:58.396 --> 0:35:00.756
<v Speaker 4>no trick to the bullet catch and he said, oh no, Dad,

0:35:00.756 --> 0:35:02.796
<v Speaker 4>there's a trick to the bullet catch. The trick to

0:35:02.836 --> 0:35:07.436
<v Speaker 4>the bullet catch is catching the bullet. And as soon

0:35:07.476 --> 0:35:09.516
<v Speaker 4>as Luke said that to me, I said, that's the

0:35:09.556 --> 0:35:13.596
<v Speaker 4>wisest thing I've ever heard, right, because we all instantly

0:35:13.676 --> 0:35:16.516
<v Speaker 4>know what that means, Right that, after all the preparation

0:35:16.676 --> 0:35:19.156
<v Speaker 4>you do when you're writing or talking or anything, after

0:35:19.236 --> 0:35:22.076
<v Speaker 4>all the ways in which you make sure that you

0:35:22.076 --> 0:35:24.276
<v Speaker 4>will not be killed by the bullet, at some point

0:35:24.276 --> 0:35:26.756
<v Speaker 4>you have to stand there with your mouth open and

0:35:26.796 --> 0:35:29.716
<v Speaker 4>the cup in it while somebody points a rifle at you.

0:35:30.036 --> 0:35:32.516
<v Speaker 4>And that, for me is, you know, the existential leap

0:35:32.556 --> 0:35:35.076
<v Speaker 4>that we all have to make in artistry, mastery, whatever

0:35:35.076 --> 0:35:36.756
<v Speaker 4>we choose to call it. And I thought so, I

0:35:36.796 --> 0:35:39.756
<v Speaker 4>thought it was a wonderful story because everybody knows what

0:35:39.796 --> 0:35:42.476
<v Speaker 4>that moment is of catching the bullet.

0:35:42.596 --> 0:35:45.796
<v Speaker 1>That trick can only be done in certain states.

0:35:46.636 --> 0:35:48.836
<v Speaker 2>Yes, exactly stand your ground laws.

0:35:49.236 --> 0:35:49.796
<v Speaker 3>I can.

0:35:49.796 --> 0:35:52.716
<v Speaker 4>I can I thank you Malcolm for your incredible generosity

0:35:52.716 --> 0:35:54.076
<v Speaker 4>in doing this. And can I tell you a story

0:35:54.076 --> 0:35:57.796
<v Speaker 4>that I don't think you know, is that Malcolm is

0:35:57.876 --> 0:35:59.916
<v Speaker 4>known in our house, as my children were growing up,

0:36:00.196 --> 0:36:03.036
<v Speaker 4>as not that you're not dad, Malcolm, because this is

0:36:03.036 --> 0:36:05.516
<v Speaker 4>the conversation we would always have. Malcolm would come for dinner,

0:36:05.756 --> 0:36:09.316
<v Speaker 4>dazzle Luke and Olivia and then go in and they

0:36:09.356 --> 0:36:12.796
<v Speaker 4>would say, Malcolm tells the most interesting anecdotes and he

0:36:12.876 --> 0:36:15.916
<v Speaker 4>always finds the one right story to illustrate it not

0:36:15.996 --> 0:36:21.196
<v Speaker 4>that you don't dead, or Malcolm always has exactly the

0:36:21.276 --> 0:36:23.756
<v Speaker 4>right question to ask, not that you're not doing that dead,

0:36:24.116 --> 0:36:27.236
<v Speaker 4>And so we in our household, Malcolm Ladwell is known

0:36:27.276 --> 0:36:28.716
<v Speaker 4>as not that you're not dead, Malcolm.

0:36:28.716 --> 0:36:30.676
<v Speaker 3>So thank you. It's not that you're not.

0:36:37.996 --> 0:36:41.356
<v Speaker 1>Adam Gopnik's book, The Real Work on the Mystery of

0:36:41.516 --> 0:36:44.836
<v Speaker 1>Mastery is available now, and be sure to check out

0:36:44.836 --> 0:36:49.676
<v Speaker 1>the audiobook version at pushkin dot fm. Special thanks to

0:36:49.756 --> 0:36:53.796
<v Speaker 1>the ninety second Street Why for hosting us. This episode

0:36:53.836 --> 0:36:56.836
<v Speaker 1>of Revisionist History was produced by Kiara Powell with ben

0:36:56.876 --> 0:37:01.356
<v Speaker 1>Adafh Haffrey Leamingestu and Jacob Smith. Fact checking by Kashelle

0:37:01.356 --> 0:37:05.796
<v Speaker 1>Williams and Tully Emlin. Our showrunner is Peter Clowney. Extra

0:37:05.836 --> 0:37:09.596
<v Speaker 1>special thanks this week to Julia Barton, Morgan Rattner, Kerrie

0:37:09.636 --> 0:37:14.196
<v Speaker 1>Brody and Eric Sandler. Original scoring by Luiscira, mastering by

0:37:14.276 --> 0:37:19.316
<v Speaker 1>Sarah Bruguerer, and engineering by Nina Lawrence. I'm Malcolm Glappa.