WEBVTT - China Takes on the World – and the US

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Crash Course, a podcast about business, political, and

0:00:05.240 --> 0:00:08.680
<v Speaker 1>social disruption and what we can learn from it. I'm

0:00:08.680 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Tim O'Brien. Today's Crash Course China takes on the world

0:00:13.920 --> 0:00:18.160
<v Speaker 1>and the US. Consider the numbers. China is home to

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:21.159
<v Speaker 1>one point four billion people, about eighteen percent of the

0:00:21.160 --> 0:00:24.880
<v Speaker 1>planet's total population. Twenty two point three million people live

0:00:24.920 --> 0:00:28.440
<v Speaker 1>in Shanghai and eleven point seven million in Beijing alone.

0:00:29.080 --> 0:00:31.960
<v Speaker 1>China has the world's second largest economy and has been

0:00:32.000 --> 0:00:36.560
<v Speaker 1>on track to eventually overtake the US, although China's recent

0:00:36.600 --> 0:00:42.159
<v Speaker 1>economic problems may delay that trajectory. Its geographic footprint is vast,

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:46.080
<v Speaker 1>covering more than three point six million square miles. China

0:00:46.120 --> 0:00:49.440
<v Speaker 1>is home to a thriving technology sector that birth such

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:52.360
<v Speaker 1>well known giants as ten Cent and Ali Baba, and

0:00:52.440 --> 0:00:56.520
<v Speaker 1>China's corporate powerhouses collectively spent about two hundred and twenty

0:00:56.600 --> 0:00:59.959
<v Speaker 1>eight billion dollars on research and development in twenty two

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:03.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty two. Over the past forty years, China has lifted

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:07.920
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred million people out of poverty, an epic achievement

0:01:08.040 --> 0:01:11.760
<v Speaker 1>that some analysts consider the biggest reduction in inequality in

0:01:11.800 --> 0:01:16.240
<v Speaker 1>the modern era. China has also built a formidable military

0:01:16.280 --> 0:01:20.840
<v Speaker 1>capacity featuring a world class navy, air force, nuclear missiles,

0:01:20.880 --> 0:01:25.000
<v Speaker 1>and cyber warfare proficiencies. It regards the US as a

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:29.759
<v Speaker 1>robust but flabby economic and military competitor, and America as

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:34.000
<v Speaker 1>beset by social chaos and individualism so extreme that it

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:38.760
<v Speaker 1>undermines civil society. The South China Sea and Taiwan are flashpoints.

0:01:39.360 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 1>But China's economic growth may have plateaued and its politics

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:47.040
<v Speaker 1>have been so reshaped by President Xijinping that a cult

0:01:47.040 --> 0:01:51.360
<v Speaker 1>of personality and raw authoritarianism has recast the country's image

0:01:51.360 --> 0:01:55.840
<v Speaker 1>abroad and its direction at home. Joining me today here

0:01:55.880 --> 0:01:58.880
<v Speaker 1>in Asia to discuss China's path present in future are

0:01:58.880 --> 0:02:03.680
<v Speaker 1>two Bloomberg opinion columnists and wizards, Karishma Vaswani, who is

0:02:03.720 --> 0:02:07.560
<v Speaker 1>a savvy political analyst, and Shulely Wren, who covers markets

0:02:07.600 --> 0:02:12.760
<v Speaker 1>in China's economy. Welcome to crash course, ladies. Shulely, you

0:02:12.800 --> 0:02:15.320
<v Speaker 1>grew up in Shanghai. So as someone who's had a

0:02:15.400 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 1>foot literally on the ground in China and elsewhere over

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the years, how do you think about China when you

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:24.600
<v Speaker 1>look at its whole trajectory during your own lifetime?

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:27.680
<v Speaker 2>So to give you some background, I was born and

0:02:27.720 --> 0:02:30.040
<v Speaker 2>grew up in Shanghai, and then I left for the

0:02:30.120 --> 0:02:33.320
<v Speaker 2>United States for university in nineteen ninety six. By the

0:02:33.440 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 2>time I was leaving for United States, Shanghai was already

0:02:37.320 --> 0:02:41.360
<v Speaker 2>morphing into something I couldn't recognize, basically, like new subways

0:02:41.400 --> 0:02:44.440
<v Speaker 2>and the new hiroads were coming up every year to

0:02:44.480 --> 0:02:47.440
<v Speaker 2>this day. I was just in Shanghai this month, and

0:02:47.680 --> 0:02:50.320
<v Speaker 2>what I saw was that, you know, if you are

0:02:50.400 --> 0:02:53.480
<v Speaker 2>a taxpayer, you will see changes in the city pretty

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:57.600
<v Speaker 2>much every year. They're building new pedestrian walkways, and if

0:02:57.639 --> 0:03:01.720
<v Speaker 2>you go complain about the government civil services, you will

0:03:01.760 --> 0:03:06.840
<v Speaker 2>get responses immediately. Big cities in China have transformed themselves,

0:03:06.919 --> 0:03:09.920
<v Speaker 2>and the China model is basically, I build it and

0:03:09.960 --> 0:03:12.400
<v Speaker 2>the economy will come for you.

0:03:12.440 --> 0:03:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Like what symbolizes that change most visibly? Is it skyscrapers?

0:03:16.040 --> 0:03:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Is it the infrastructure? Like what are the most tangible

0:03:18.600 --> 0:03:22.520
<v Speaker 1>reminders that this incredible change that occurred during your own lifetime?

0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:27.960
<v Speaker 2>I think it's coming hours. The subway is very very efficient.

0:03:28.280 --> 0:03:30.680
<v Speaker 2>If we talk about going from the city center to

0:03:30.760 --> 0:03:34.600
<v Speaker 2>airport express you can take this very fast speed real

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:37.560
<v Speaker 2>at the three hundred kilometers an hour, and you can

0:03:37.640 --> 0:03:40.440
<v Speaker 2>get to the airport in about five six minutes. And

0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:42.960
<v Speaker 2>that high speed real was actually built when I was

0:03:43.000 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 2>still in the US almost twenty years ago, and I

0:03:45.840 --> 0:03:51.840
<v Speaker 2>find that efficiency is very transformative and glaring to visitors' eyes.

0:03:52.720 --> 0:03:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Karishma, you were born in Singapore, raised in Indonesia, You've

0:03:56.920 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 1>had a vast global experience apart from that, just like truly,

0:04:01.000 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 1>when you look at China, what do you think about

0:04:04.080 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 1>the last several decades of profound growth and change there?

0:04:08.160 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you know, just picking up tim on what Schuly

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:14.080
<v Speaker 3>was saying. I remember when I was growing up that

0:04:14.320 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 3>India and China were almost around the same level, right

0:04:17.400 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 3>like forty years ago in terms of how unavailable resources

0:04:21.680 --> 0:04:25.320
<v Speaker 3>were for people, basic sort of poverty levels, all of that.

0:04:25.440 --> 0:04:27.960
<v Speaker 3>And it was as a journalist in India when I

0:04:28.040 --> 0:04:31.359
<v Speaker 3>first went to visit Beijing, and there is always this

0:04:31.440 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 3>comparison between China and India, and it's very envious of

0:04:35.040 --> 0:04:37.800
<v Speaker 3>the achievements that China's been able to make. And I

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:41.440
<v Speaker 3>think nothing was more glaringly obvious in the strides that

0:04:41.520 --> 0:04:44.000
<v Speaker 3>China had made for me at least you talked about

0:04:44.040 --> 0:04:47.240
<v Speaker 3>the commuters and the subway system truly, but for me.

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:51.520
<v Speaker 3>It was the highways, because it was these gigantic highways

0:04:51.520 --> 0:04:56.040
<v Speaker 3>that stretched out into the distance, huge monolithic structures that

0:04:56.200 --> 0:04:59.240
<v Speaker 3>really showed the size and scale of the country and

0:04:59.279 --> 0:05:01.160
<v Speaker 3>what it was able to to achieve and to your

0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:03.680
<v Speaker 3>point about build it and they will come, it was

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 3>exactly that. China's now seen around the world as a

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:10.279
<v Speaker 3>country that has made remarkable strides, and I think it's

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:13.919
<v Speaker 3>really important to remember the fact that when they have

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 3>had a plan, they have managed to achieve that plan.

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:20.200
<v Speaker 3>And that's something that a lot of countries in the

0:05:20.200 --> 0:05:23.240
<v Speaker 3>region one look up to because they are trying to

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:27.000
<v Speaker 3>find an alternative model of economic growth but also a

0:05:27.040 --> 0:05:30.120
<v Speaker 3>political system. There's been a lot of lecturing from the

0:05:30.120 --> 0:05:34.440
<v Speaker 3>West to countries out in Asia about how ideologies should be.

0:05:34.560 --> 0:05:38.160
<v Speaker 3>That democracy is the right way forward. It's not always

0:05:38.160 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 3>seen in the most palatable way for a lot of

0:05:40.520 --> 0:05:42.839
<v Speaker 3>leaders out in this part of the world. But two,

0:05:42.960 --> 0:05:46.160
<v Speaker 3>because it's actually been an achievement, They've done it. They

0:05:46.200 --> 0:05:48.280
<v Speaker 3>said they were going to do it, and they've done it.

0:05:48.320 --> 0:05:51.760
<v Speaker 3>And I think that evidence has helped to solidify the

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:55.200
<v Speaker 3>reputation of China as an economic genius in many ways,

0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:57.599
<v Speaker 3>and that countries in the region have looked up to,

0:05:58.560 --> 0:05:58.919
<v Speaker 3>and what do.

0:05:58.960 --> 0:06:01.520
<v Speaker 1>You think China it's elf wants to be if China

0:06:01.520 --> 0:06:02.919
<v Speaker 1>was a person. This is such a bad way to

0:06:02.960 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 1>frame a question, but it's actually useful. I think in

0:06:05.040 --> 0:06:08.800
<v Speaker 1>this case, who does China want to be accepted?

0:06:09.360 --> 0:06:11.560
<v Speaker 3>Is the sense that I get, you know, like for

0:06:11.600 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 3>the longest time, my impression has been that China consistently

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:17.200
<v Speaker 3>and you see this in some of the rhetoric from

0:06:17.200 --> 0:06:19.919
<v Speaker 3>the Foreign ministry as well, it has a model that

0:06:19.960 --> 0:06:23.039
<v Speaker 3>it wants to show the world is possible, that it

0:06:23.080 --> 0:06:27.880
<v Speaker 3>is achievable, and that alternative way of being and of

0:06:27.920 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 3>doing politics and of growing your economy is something that

0:06:31.000 --> 0:06:34.320
<v Speaker 3>should be considered as on par with the United States,

0:06:34.839 --> 0:06:37.880
<v Speaker 3>if not in some ways superior. And I think what's

0:06:37.880 --> 0:06:40.359
<v Speaker 3>happened in the last couple of years, particularly under the

0:06:40.360 --> 0:06:43.480
<v Speaker 3>administration of Chijin Ping, because that's really where it all changed, right,

0:06:43.600 --> 0:06:45.560
<v Speaker 3>Like I mean, up until that point, there was a

0:06:45.600 --> 0:06:48.200
<v Speaker 3>sense that China was growing very well, there was engagement,

0:06:48.520 --> 0:06:50.719
<v Speaker 3>there were concerns about some of the actions out in

0:06:50.760 --> 0:06:52.880
<v Speaker 3>places like the South China Sea and Taiwan, but not

0:06:52.920 --> 0:06:55.400
<v Speaker 3>to the extent that you have now. And I think

0:06:55.520 --> 0:06:58.839
<v Speaker 3>under Xi Jinping. It's become a lot more difficult for

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:03.719
<v Speaker 3>the outside world to understand. What are the intentions of

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:07.039
<v Speaker 3>this new China? What are the ambitions? Is it a

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:12.360
<v Speaker 3>sort of expansive and territorial empire building policy or is

0:07:12.400 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 3>it a country that is trying to make itself known

0:07:16.120 --> 0:07:19.200
<v Speaker 3>and seen on the global stage. And right now a

0:07:19.200 --> 0:07:21.040
<v Speaker 3>lot of people that I talk to still haven't figured

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 3>out which of the two it is.

0:07:23.920 --> 0:07:27.480
<v Speaker 1>So Shuley Karishma said that China just wants to be accepted.

0:07:28.040 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 1>And I'm far less sophisticated than both of you on

0:07:30.600 --> 0:07:33.240
<v Speaker 1>this topic. That would not have been my first goat

0:07:33.240 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 1>to description of China. I feel like as an American

0:07:36.360 --> 0:07:38.720
<v Speaker 1>watching this, but as someone who's trying to be objective

0:07:38.720 --> 0:07:41.000
<v Speaker 1>beyond just being an American, I also see China as

0:07:41.000 --> 0:07:45.200
<v Speaker 1>a country that wants to dominate certain aspects of its

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:50.040
<v Speaker 1>relationships with commercially and economically and diplomatically with others. You

0:07:50.040 --> 0:07:52.720
<v Speaker 1>don't have to agree with that, but I think Karishma's

0:07:53.280 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 1>introduced to provocative talking point. I wonder what you thought

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:56.280
<v Speaker 1>of it.

0:07:57.080 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 2>I absolutely agree with the Karishma on that. Like going

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:03.720
<v Speaker 2>back to your question about China's identity, Okay, let me

0:08:03.960 --> 0:08:07.000
<v Speaker 2>step back and say, going back to presenting Pin the politician,

0:08:07.080 --> 0:08:11.080
<v Speaker 2>the political leader's sense of identity, he sees China as

0:08:11.120 --> 0:08:14.720
<v Speaker 2>a producer first and then consumer. It's actually a very

0:08:14.800 --> 0:08:18.640
<v Speaker 2>nineteen sixties mentality and ideology that he grew up with,

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:22.720
<v Speaker 2>whereas us it's a consumer based society. The philosophy of

0:08:22.800 --> 0:08:25.840
<v Speaker 2>governors is very different. Like China basically say, let's do

0:08:25.960 --> 0:08:29.960
<v Speaker 2>industrial ambition, industrial policy, and then as we get rich,

0:08:30.240 --> 0:08:33.440
<v Speaker 2>there will be money for the consumers and the workers,

0:08:33.640 --> 0:08:38.280
<v Speaker 2>whereas US basically says, perhaps that's my wrong impression that

0:08:38.400 --> 0:08:40.840
<v Speaker 2>a government's job is more or less to do no

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:44.760
<v Speaker 2>harm and to let people live, and the consumer society

0:08:44.800 --> 0:08:48.720
<v Speaker 2>will flourish and will generate demand for new products, etc.

0:08:49.280 --> 0:08:52.280
<v Speaker 2>So it is an identity issue, and the present sheging

0:08:52.320 --> 0:08:56.200
<v Speaker 2>Pin basically thinks the world have two ways of economic growth,

0:08:56.400 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 2>when on the producer side one on the consumer side.

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 1>You would say that that entire posture on China's part

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:05.760
<v Speaker 1>is about wanting to be accepted.

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:09.360
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I mean, if you look at Belt and Row initiative,

0:09:09.400 --> 0:09:11.559
<v Speaker 2>and he just made a speech in Beijing right with

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:14.520
<v Speaker 2>President putting on his site, he basically said that we

0:09:15.000 --> 0:09:18.520
<v Speaker 2>China are trying to improve the infrastructure, and that's the

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:21.320
<v Speaker 2>only economic growth model that he knows of, and he

0:09:21.440 --> 0:09:24.440
<v Speaker 2>feels that China is doing good to the third world countries.

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:28.800
<v Speaker 1>So, Karushimaban, is there a central thing that animates China?

0:09:29.200 --> 0:09:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Staying on the conversation we just had, like, what is

0:09:31.440 --> 0:09:35.439
<v Speaker 1>propelling China itself forward in terms of its own goals?

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 3>Perhaps it's worth looking at this tim from the perspective

0:09:39.080 --> 0:09:40.840
<v Speaker 3>if I was to ask you that question about the

0:09:40.960 --> 0:09:44.840
<v Speaker 3>United States, right, what is propelling the United States forward

0:09:44.920 --> 0:09:47.640
<v Speaker 3>with its own goals? A desire to show that this

0:09:47.800 --> 0:09:51.080
<v Speaker 3>is a country that is a global leader, a superpower,

0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:55.000
<v Speaker 3>a military power. And China feels the same way. And

0:09:55.080 --> 0:09:57.960
<v Speaker 3>I think that sometimes you know, there is an arrogance

0:09:58.040 --> 0:10:01.520
<v Speaker 3>in the West about the the hierarchy. Right, the US

0:10:01.600 --> 0:10:03.840
<v Speaker 3>is at the top of the tree, and then everybody

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:07.200
<v Speaker 3>else is on the democratic column and on the democratic camp.

0:10:07.240 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 3>And so you are our friends, and you belong in

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:13.160
<v Speaker 3>the in crowd and in the cool crowd and everybody else. Sorry,

0:10:13.640 --> 0:10:16.320
<v Speaker 3>don't want you at the party, right. But for China,

0:10:16.400 --> 0:10:20.199
<v Speaker 3>what it's been able to do is actually achieve a

0:10:20.400 --> 0:10:23.320
<v Speaker 3>remarkable as I'm repeating myself here. But you know, I

0:10:23.360 --> 0:10:27.000
<v Speaker 3>don't think we can make that point enough that it's

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 3>managed to bring, as you said in your introduction, eight

0:10:30.120 --> 0:10:33.080
<v Speaker 3>hundred million people out of poverty and bring them to

0:10:33.120 --> 0:10:36.720
<v Speaker 3>a level where they're creating world class companies, the sorts

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:39.640
<v Speaker 3>of companies that truly writes about every day, you know,

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:42.319
<v Speaker 3>with innovation at a level. The first time I went

0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 3>to China, it was the highways that I remarked on

0:10:44.840 --> 0:10:47.559
<v Speaker 3>the second time, when I went to Shinjin to interview

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:50.720
<v Speaker 3>the boss of Huawei, I was amazed by the fact

0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:54.599
<v Speaker 3>that everything was you know, facial identification in the subways.

0:10:54.640 --> 0:10:57.840
<v Speaker 3>You know, the level of technology is really something to

0:10:57.920 --> 0:10:59.960
<v Speaker 3>remark on. But to go back to that point, right,

0:11:00.480 --> 0:11:04.240
<v Speaker 3>I think it is worth recognizing that China is trying

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:09.559
<v Speaker 3>to showcase its achievements. It wants to be accepted, and

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:12.200
<v Speaker 3>when it comes up against the US, that is where

0:11:12.240 --> 0:11:15.920
<v Speaker 3>the conflict happens. That is where the clash happens. Because

0:11:16.240 --> 0:11:18.840
<v Speaker 3>I think it's not just the Chinese side that is

0:11:18.880 --> 0:11:19.800
<v Speaker 3>responsible for that.

0:11:20.160 --> 0:11:22.199
<v Speaker 1>The US has its own set of issues for sure,

0:11:22.600 --> 0:11:25.360
<v Speaker 1>especially in the kind of shambalic politically era we're in

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:29.120
<v Speaker 1>right now in the United States. Truly how does China

0:11:29.240 --> 0:11:32.880
<v Speaker 1>think about its own recent history? Obviously, with a country

0:11:32.880 --> 0:11:35.320
<v Speaker 1>that has had such a rich and storied past, you

0:11:35.320 --> 0:11:37.400
<v Speaker 1>could say recent history is the last three hundred years,

0:11:37.480 --> 0:11:40.040
<v Speaker 1>and that's still probably not recent. So I'm sort of

0:11:40.080 --> 0:11:42.560
<v Speaker 1>thinking of recent like I was going to say post

0:11:42.600 --> 0:11:46.400
<v Speaker 1>World War two, but I actually think almost postcolonial when

0:11:46.480 --> 0:11:51.319
<v Speaker 1>she looks at nineteenth century China and twentieth century China,

0:11:51.440 --> 0:11:54.760
<v Speaker 1>and now, how does he and the people around him

0:11:55.320 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 1>think about the arc of that history.

0:11:58.520 --> 0:12:01.040
<v Speaker 2>I will say that there a little bit passive aggressive,

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:04.360
<v Speaker 2>aggressive in the sense that they feel that they were

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:08.439
<v Speaker 2>round in the nineteenth century and that China was almost colonialized,

0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:11.160
<v Speaker 2>and then we have World War Two, the ninteen massacre

0:12:11.240 --> 0:12:14.640
<v Speaker 2>by the Japanese Army, etc. Passive in the sense that

0:12:14.720 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 2>they just feel that China is a huge empire. It

0:12:17.320 --> 0:12:20.439
<v Speaker 2>has lasted longer than the Ottoman Empire, longer than the

0:12:20.520 --> 0:12:24.200
<v Speaker 2>Roman Empire, and there is a cultural superiority that the

0:12:24.280 --> 0:12:27.760
<v Speaker 2>Chinese leadership feels that they can leverage on. For instance,

0:12:28.000 --> 0:12:30.800
<v Speaker 2>if we talk about the global supply chain, the Chinese

0:12:30.880 --> 0:12:33.160
<v Speaker 2>workers are stellar. They are the ones who are willing

0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:36.080
<v Speaker 2>to work nine ninety six. You know from nine am

0:12:36.200 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 2>to nine pm for six days a week. They feel

0:12:38.559 --> 0:12:42.000
<v Speaker 2>that there is a very very strong cultural superiority. Last year,

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:44.360
<v Speaker 2>when I was on the reporting trip in Viennam, I

0:12:44.400 --> 0:12:48.000
<v Speaker 2>spoke to quite a few Chinese entrepreneurs who opened factories

0:12:48.040 --> 0:12:51.480
<v Speaker 2>in Vietnam, and it was very politically incorrect. They said

0:12:51.679 --> 0:12:55.360
<v Speaker 2>they prefer to open factories in northern Vietnam because it's

0:12:55.559 --> 0:12:59.800
<v Speaker 2>culturally closer to Chinese Confucian spot and the people there

0:12:59.800 --> 0:13:03.760
<v Speaker 2>were harder working in the southern Saigong area. So there

0:13:03.840 --> 0:13:07.240
<v Speaker 2>is that sense. But sometimes they also get very angry

0:13:07.559 --> 0:13:10.840
<v Speaker 2>if they feel that they are being slighted by global

0:13:10.920 --> 0:13:13.760
<v Speaker 2>powers such as the United States. They will think back

0:13:13.880 --> 0:13:18.079
<v Speaker 2>on the eighteen hundreds, how China was so humiliated by

0:13:18.120 --> 0:13:21.160
<v Speaker 2>the European and later on by the Japanese powers. So

0:13:21.200 --> 0:13:24.079
<v Speaker 2>it's kind of that conflict that I see.

0:13:24.240 --> 0:13:26.400
<v Speaker 3>Just picking up on what Shirley said, because I think

0:13:26.440 --> 0:13:28.240
<v Speaker 3>it can bring us down, you know, the sort of

0:13:28.360 --> 0:13:31.160
<v Speaker 3>understanding of why then China, if it's just trying to

0:13:31.200 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 3>be accepted or recognized for its achievements, get such a

0:13:34.960 --> 0:13:37.840
<v Speaker 3>negative reaction in the outside world, right, Why does it

0:13:37.880 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 3>have this bad press so to speak? That example that

0:13:40.440 --> 0:13:42.880
<v Speaker 3>you brought up of the entrepreneurs that you met in Vietnam,

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:45.800
<v Speaker 3>and you know the Belton Road projects where Chinese companies

0:13:45.840 --> 0:13:49.240
<v Speaker 3>go overseas, but they want to bring Chinese labor with them,

0:13:49.280 --> 0:13:52.199
<v Speaker 3>they want to bring that Chinese expertise. And then these

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:56.160
<v Speaker 3>projects that end up becoming vessels in a way for

0:13:56.440 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 3>an export of Chinese workers to these countries is then

0:14:00.120 --> 0:14:04.440
<v Speaker 3>viewed is not something that's beneficial to that country. Rather,

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:08.199
<v Speaker 3>it's all going back to the empire. And I'm putting

0:14:08.200 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 3>the word empire in quotation marks, and I think that's

0:14:11.000 --> 0:14:14.239
<v Speaker 3>what China struggles with, right It is a rising superpower.

0:14:14.559 --> 0:14:17.600
<v Speaker 3>There's no way we can deny that it's here to stay.

0:14:17.720 --> 0:14:20.080
<v Speaker 3>It's not going anywhere. And I think learning how to

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:24.680
<v Speaker 3>manage China, learning how to navigate it is essential for

0:14:24.800 --> 0:14:28.560
<v Speaker 3>a country like the United States, because Biden has done

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:32.320
<v Speaker 3>a remarkable job of this deterrence and integrated deterrence, getting

0:14:32.360 --> 0:14:34.280
<v Speaker 3>all of the partners in the region to sort of

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:39.440
<v Speaker 3>work together on this, recognizing China is this existential sort

0:14:39.440 --> 0:14:41.560
<v Speaker 3>of conflict that they've got to come up with. But

0:14:41.720 --> 0:14:45.480
<v Speaker 3>nobody wants a conflict between the US and China, right,

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:48.000
<v Speaker 3>Like a lot of the countries in this part of

0:14:48.000 --> 0:14:50.200
<v Speaker 3>the world and wondering why can't you just sort it

0:14:50.240 --> 0:14:51.840
<v Speaker 3>out and get along, right.

0:14:52.360 --> 0:14:54.520
<v Speaker 2>I just want to add one more thing, just like

0:14:54.520 --> 0:14:56.960
<v Speaker 2>a world Karishma said, we do need to think about

0:14:57.040 --> 0:14:59.760
<v Speaker 2>what the Chinese leaders are thinking. They are a little

0:14:59.760 --> 0:15:02.800
<v Speaker 2>bit like people were, like to say, an overconfident in China.

0:15:03.000 --> 0:15:05.640
<v Speaker 2>But I think the outside were also should think about

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 2>China being historically insecure. So when is these aggressive gestures

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 2>from the US, it will overreact. So I think it's

0:15:15.640 --> 0:15:18.760
<v Speaker 2>very important to tone it down on the western side,

0:15:18.840 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 2>on both sides.

0:15:19.560 --> 0:15:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Actually, we'll probably get into this a little bit more

0:15:22.040 --> 0:15:24.160
<v Speaker 1>later in the show, but Hong Kong to me, is

0:15:24.200 --> 0:15:29.000
<v Speaker 1>such an emblematic city state for this very discussion because

0:15:29.920 --> 0:15:33.560
<v Speaker 1>England turned it into a vassal property. They used it

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 1>to introduce opium into mainland China. They used it controlled

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:41.520
<v Speaker 1>China so they could dominate and try to colonize China.

0:15:41.960 --> 0:15:44.560
<v Speaker 1>And China has come out of that era and people

0:15:44.640 --> 0:15:48.200
<v Speaker 1>now criticize China for the way it's pulling Hong Kong

0:15:48.680 --> 0:15:53.040
<v Speaker 1>back into its own orbit. But I also am sympathetic

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 1>to the idea that Chinese have that it was never

0:15:55.880 --> 0:15:59.200
<v Speaker 1>out of our orbit, other people came in and abused

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:02.320
<v Speaker 1>it essentially at different points in our history. And I

0:16:02.360 --> 0:16:04.640
<v Speaker 1>still think you can be critical of the way that

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:08.000
<v Speaker 1>China is trying to absorb it now while also respecting

0:16:08.040 --> 0:16:11.280
<v Speaker 1>I think truly what you just mentioned, that this insecurity

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:14.280
<v Speaker 1>China has that's born out of the way the history

0:16:14.320 --> 0:16:16.320
<v Speaker 1>has played out. You don't have to agree with me

0:16:16.320 --> 0:16:20.160
<v Speaker 1>about that either, but Hong Kong fascinates me in that regard. Sure.

0:16:20.480 --> 0:16:22.840
<v Speaker 2>One thing that's interesting about Hong Kong is I live

0:16:22.880 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 2>in Hong Kong, and you know the twenty nineteen protests.

0:16:25.200 --> 0:16:27.240
<v Speaker 2>I spoke to Hong Kong local people, right, but they're

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 2>ultimately Chinese. Got migrated from the north, and I notice

0:16:31.200 --> 0:16:35.160
<v Speaker 2>a very strong generational divide. Like say, I speak to

0:16:35.320 --> 0:16:37.760
<v Speaker 2>like people who are older, like in their sixties or whatever,

0:16:38.040 --> 0:16:40.880
<v Speaker 2>like my juror mister Ma. He told me, he said,

0:16:41.040 --> 0:16:44.720
<v Speaker 2>before China has Bruce Lee, now we have Chi Jin Pin.

0:16:45.480 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 2>He is actually very patriotic. A lot of old Hong

0:16:48.640 --> 0:16:51.760
<v Speaker 2>Kong Chinese people are very patriotic, but if you move

0:16:51.840 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 2>down to like people in their twenties or even thirties,

0:16:55.920 --> 0:16:59.640
<v Speaker 2>they prefer British rule, believe it or not. And I

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:03.720
<v Speaker 2>think ultimately it's about governors. They see China as being

0:17:03.760 --> 0:17:07.400
<v Speaker 2>too intrusive. The Chinese way of government is being too intrusive,

0:17:07.440 --> 0:17:10.040
<v Speaker 2>whereas the British kind of sort of just left them

0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:10.920
<v Speaker 2>alone and.

0:17:10.920 --> 0:17:13.399
<v Speaker 1>There was free speech, there was a free press, it

0:17:13.440 --> 0:17:16.919
<v Speaker 1>was a very creative community. It was authentically international, and

0:17:16.960 --> 0:17:19.679
<v Speaker 1>there's a real danger now that China is sort of

0:17:19.680 --> 0:17:22.320
<v Speaker 1>squeezing that out of that kind of Hong Kong.

0:17:23.080 --> 0:17:25.880
<v Speaker 2>Yes, absolutely, But on the other side, Hong Kong's Chief

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:29.720
<v Speaker 2>executive Youngly just had his policy address earlier this week, right,

0:17:29.920 --> 0:17:32.240
<v Speaker 2>and you can see the Hong Kong governance is changing.

0:17:32.320 --> 0:17:34.480
<v Speaker 2>They're trying to give you more cash handouts. They're trying

0:17:34.520 --> 0:17:39.040
<v Speaker 2>to build infrastructure. They're trying to incentivize and stimulate you

0:17:39.119 --> 0:17:43.120
<v Speaker 2>through money and the buildings and the new artificial islands.

0:17:43.359 --> 0:17:45.720
<v Speaker 2>You can see the way of a Hong Kong governess

0:17:45.840 --> 0:17:48.800
<v Speaker 2>is heading towards the Chinese way. And I have to say,

0:17:48.920 --> 0:17:52.080
<v Speaker 2>like I personally think of Hong Kong, the infrastructure is

0:17:52.080 --> 0:17:55.400
<v Speaker 2>getting dilapidated. If you go to the Central Business District

0:17:55.480 --> 0:17:58.159
<v Speaker 2>this summer has been terrible. We can smell switch, you know.

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:01.440
<v Speaker 2>But the Hong Kong government much left you alone, and

0:18:01.520 --> 0:18:04.399
<v Speaker 2>I think they are shifting to the mainland China model.

0:18:05.000 --> 0:18:06.919
<v Speaker 1>Couragem. I can see that you have some thoughts on

0:18:06.960 --> 0:18:07.879
<v Speaker 1>that so way in here.

0:18:08.240 --> 0:18:11.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think this idea or the framing of you

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:16.480
<v Speaker 3>can accept and sort of remark positively on aspects of

0:18:16.520 --> 0:18:19.119
<v Speaker 3>how China has done things, but also be clear eyed

0:18:19.160 --> 0:18:22.280
<v Speaker 3>and critical of the way, for example, it's operated in

0:18:22.320 --> 0:18:26.040
<v Speaker 3>Hong Kong is crucial for our understanding of China. From

0:18:26.080 --> 0:18:29.159
<v Speaker 3>the Chinese side, it's very clear. We've discussed that why

0:18:29.200 --> 0:18:31.360
<v Speaker 3>they feel about Hong Kong the way that they do.

0:18:31.720 --> 0:18:34.000
<v Speaker 3>But from young Hong konger's that I spoke to, just

0:18:34.200 --> 0:18:36.720
<v Speaker 3>as you mentioned, surely on some of those reporting trips

0:18:36.720 --> 0:18:39.639
<v Speaker 3>I made there, they do not feel Chinese. They do

0:18:39.680 --> 0:18:43.400
<v Speaker 3>not feel mainland Chinese, even if they are ethnically Chinese.

0:18:43.400 --> 0:18:46.320
<v Speaker 3>And I think the fact that a political system in China,

0:18:46.400 --> 0:18:48.399
<v Speaker 3>this is going to be my sense, is one of

0:18:48.440 --> 0:18:52.240
<v Speaker 3>the biggest issues going forward for young people who've grown

0:18:52.320 --> 0:18:56.000
<v Speaker 3>up in that system but no longer feel that they

0:18:56.640 --> 0:19:00.640
<v Speaker 3>have opportunities the way they saw for their parents. They

0:19:00.680 --> 0:19:03.399
<v Speaker 3>don't feel that they have the ability to say the

0:19:03.480 --> 0:19:05.840
<v Speaker 3>things that you know, we talk about a sort of

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:09.080
<v Speaker 3>closed system in China, but it's become even more closed

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:12.399
<v Speaker 3>now to the extent where you know, somebody says something

0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:16.359
<v Speaker 3>on Wabo and within minutes it's wiped away, right, And

0:19:16.440 --> 0:19:18.760
<v Speaker 3>I think it's really important for us to be clear

0:19:18.880 --> 0:19:21.240
<v Speaker 3>eyed about what is happening there and be able to

0:19:21.320 --> 0:19:23.320
<v Speaker 3>criticize but also to commend.

0:19:24.160 --> 0:19:26.880
<v Speaker 1>I would suspect, And it seems evident in the way

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 1>this has progressed that Chinese government when it sees young

0:19:30.359 --> 0:19:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Hong Kongers who are saying I like the Hong Kong

0:19:33.480 --> 0:19:36.280
<v Speaker 1>my parents had, and I want a Hong Kong that's

0:19:36.320 --> 0:19:40.320
<v Speaker 1>not specifically on the Chinese model, that the Chinese say, well,

0:19:40.359 --> 0:19:43.320
<v Speaker 1>then go live somewhere else, because this is the model

0:19:43.440 --> 0:19:46.040
<v Speaker 1>we're going to have. Whether or not you feel romantic

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:49.919
<v Speaker 1>about the past, am I you know, misinterpreting them to me?

0:19:50.000 --> 0:19:52.679
<v Speaker 1>It just seems patently obvious that that's where we're headed.

0:19:53.160 --> 0:19:55.760
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely the Chinese government, so far head and stop the

0:19:55.760 --> 0:19:58.240
<v Speaker 2>Hong Kongers from leaving. If you don't like this model,

0:19:58.359 --> 0:19:59.640
<v Speaker 2>just please go ahead and leave.

0:20:00.320 --> 0:20:02.679
<v Speaker 3>And I think that's the danger, right because when you

0:20:02.760 --> 0:20:05.679
<v Speaker 3>look at the way that the mainland has operated in

0:20:05.720 --> 0:20:09.040
<v Speaker 3>Hong Kong, it is increasingly clear that that is the

0:20:09.119 --> 0:20:11.320
<v Speaker 3>root that is going to consistently be the way that

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:14.520
<v Speaker 3>they approach politics there. There hasn't been a lessening of

0:20:14.520 --> 0:20:17.480
<v Speaker 3>Beijing's influence in Hong Kong. To the contrary, you see

0:20:17.520 --> 0:20:19.359
<v Speaker 3>it in every aspect of public life.

0:20:19.680 --> 0:20:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Precisely because some of the things I cited in the introduction,

0:20:22.359 --> 0:20:26.639
<v Speaker 1>this incredible economic success that mainland China has had, and

0:20:26.720 --> 0:20:30.800
<v Speaker 1>its muscularity around its military presence and the way it's

0:20:30.840 --> 0:20:34.159
<v Speaker 1>asserting itself in the world. They can point to a

0:20:34.200 --> 0:20:37.320
<v Speaker 1>successful track record as reason for why they want to

0:20:37.359 --> 0:20:40.200
<v Speaker 1>continue to roll the way they have. Though, and we'll

0:20:40.200 --> 0:20:42.119
<v Speaker 1>get into this later in the show, there's starting to

0:20:42.119 --> 0:20:44.399
<v Speaker 1>be a little bit of cracks in the model. On

0:20:44.440 --> 0:20:45.960
<v Speaker 1>that note, I'm going to take a quick break to

0:20:46.000 --> 0:20:48.119
<v Speaker 1>hear from one of our sponsors, and then we'll come

0:20:48.200 --> 0:20:57.359
<v Speaker 1>right back. We're back with karisim of Uswani and Shuley Wren.

0:20:57.359 --> 0:21:01.359
<v Speaker 1>They're both Bloomberg opinion columnists, and we're talking about China.

0:21:01.480 --> 0:21:05.639
<v Speaker 1>So surely, what is the secret sauce in China's economic rives?

0:21:05.680 --> 0:21:08.680
<v Speaker 1>If you were to identify the things that are very

0:21:08.720 --> 0:21:14.240
<v Speaker 1>specifically Chinese that were key to its growth, that differentiated

0:21:14.240 --> 0:21:18.119
<v Speaker 1>it from the growth paths that other countries, including the US,

0:21:18.160 --> 0:21:20.280
<v Speaker 1>has taken. What would those be.

0:21:21.920 --> 0:21:25.800
<v Speaker 2>I would now say it's the Chinese people. I think

0:21:25.840 --> 0:21:30.200
<v Speaker 2>that the Chinese Communist Party can be very very efficient,

0:21:30.520 --> 0:21:33.080
<v Speaker 2>at least in the era when the economic growth was

0:21:33.160 --> 0:21:36.120
<v Speaker 2>very fast. If there was a directive from the top,

0:21:36.760 --> 0:21:39.720
<v Speaker 2>it will get executed very quickly. I remember, I mean

0:21:39.760 --> 0:21:43.360
<v Speaker 2>I saw Chump high transform right, like a highway will

0:21:43.400 --> 0:21:46.120
<v Speaker 2>be built within just a year. There will be all

0:21:46.119 --> 0:21:48.440
<v Speaker 2>sorts of lend issues that people don't want to move.

0:21:48.560 --> 0:21:50.680
<v Speaker 2>What the government would just say, Okay, if you don't

0:21:50.720 --> 0:21:53.800
<v Speaker 2>want to move, I'm just going to cut off water, electricity,

0:21:54.040 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 2>gas and as important you will want to move right,

0:21:56.680 --> 0:21:59.720
<v Speaker 2>So everything gets built very quickly, whereas places that I've

0:21:59.760 --> 0:22:03.520
<v Speaker 2>seen in Vietnam, Indonesia, land rights is always an issue,

0:22:03.560 --> 0:22:06.800
<v Speaker 2>even in like other communist countries. So in that sense,

0:22:06.840 --> 0:22:08.840
<v Speaker 2>I think the Chinese government is very efficient. If it

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:11.159
<v Speaker 2>wants to do something, it will get it done.

0:22:11.440 --> 0:22:14.280
<v Speaker 1>And it's loaded with talented people. It has the kind

0:22:14.280 --> 0:22:17.679
<v Speaker 1>of civil service you want. The UK is famous for

0:22:17.800 --> 0:22:23.120
<v Speaker 1>having a lifelong civil service that tries to be nonpartisan. Singapore,

0:22:23.200 --> 0:22:25.520
<v Speaker 1>I think, is a great example of a very well

0:22:25.560 --> 0:22:29.359
<v Speaker 1>compensated civil service that recruits for talent. And I think

0:22:29.800 --> 0:22:32.760
<v Speaker 1>China has done that at a massive, massive scale, hasn't it.

0:22:33.440 --> 0:22:36.040
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely? Like if you look at Seisha, I'm hi right,

0:22:36.119 --> 0:22:38.280
<v Speaker 2>Like the government has an app and then they have

0:22:38.359 --> 0:22:41.680
<v Speaker 2>also of entries, say like a switch problem, electricity problem.

0:22:41.760 --> 0:22:43.439
<v Speaker 2>You can click on the entry and then you can

0:22:43.560 --> 0:22:47.000
<v Speaker 2>leave a comment. Within twenty five hours, somebody will contact

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:48.960
<v Speaker 2>you and say, what's your problem, and now don't try

0:22:49.000 --> 0:22:50.280
<v Speaker 2>to get a fixed winning a week.

0:22:50.920 --> 0:22:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Wow, So that doesn't happen in the United States. Karishma,

0:22:54.080 --> 0:22:56.720
<v Speaker 1>what are your thoughts about China's economic rise?

0:22:56.920 --> 0:22:59.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I wonder surely whether you'll agree with this, But

0:22:59.480 --> 0:23:02.680
<v Speaker 3>to me, you know, it's also the private entrepreneurs. And

0:23:03.080 --> 0:23:05.679
<v Speaker 3>when you look back at the Ero and China opened

0:23:05.760 --> 0:23:08.760
<v Speaker 3>up and Dougshaoping, etc. There was a real encouragement of

0:23:09.160 --> 0:23:12.320
<v Speaker 3>private industry that governments sort of you know, at least

0:23:12.400 --> 0:23:15.800
<v Speaker 3>to me, it seemed let flourish without too much interference.

0:23:15.840 --> 0:23:18.040
<v Speaker 3>It only started to get involved when these companies became

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:20.840
<v Speaker 3>so big and they started to become more popular, or

0:23:20.840 --> 0:23:23.119
<v Speaker 3>the CEOs became more popular in the mind space of

0:23:23.160 --> 0:23:25.240
<v Speaker 3>young people than Sheijin Ping did you know, the sort

0:23:25.240 --> 0:23:28.640
<v Speaker 3>of jackmasied and ping plash that we can get into later.

0:23:29.040 --> 0:23:33.200
<v Speaker 3>But the companies themselves grew up in this rather messy

0:23:33.280 --> 0:23:37.640
<v Speaker 3>and chaotic environment, which then they had to deal with

0:23:37.680 --> 0:23:40.119
<v Speaker 3>the problems that were apparent to them. In China, they

0:23:40.160 --> 0:23:44.480
<v Speaker 3>had those opportunities, and initially they were servicing that market

0:23:44.640 --> 0:23:48.160
<v Speaker 3>by selling products to the United States, but also leveraging

0:23:48.160 --> 0:23:51.640
<v Speaker 3>off the vast labor force that they had in the country.

0:23:52.000 --> 0:23:55.240
<v Speaker 3>And I think that's also really remarkable. It's the unique

0:23:55.240 --> 0:23:58.040
<v Speaker 3>thing that China had that other countries in the region

0:23:58.560 --> 0:24:02.320
<v Speaker 3>didn't have at the time. The nation of private entrepreneurs,

0:24:02.359 --> 0:24:05.679
<v Speaker 3>government efficiency as you point out, and a huge labor force.

0:24:06.119 --> 0:24:08.960
<v Speaker 1>And in part, I think China studied the Russian model

0:24:09.680 --> 0:24:13.119
<v Speaker 1>and it found it wanting. It was statism, so bureaucratic

0:24:13.480 --> 0:24:17.200
<v Speaker 1>and extreme and corrupt and inefficient, and it didn't really

0:24:17.240 --> 0:24:20.960
<v Speaker 1>allow for free enterprise. It seems to me that Chinese said,

0:24:21.000 --> 0:24:25.200
<v Speaker 1>we can have efficient central planning and an efficient government

0:24:25.640 --> 0:24:28.920
<v Speaker 1>plumbing around our economy, but we will also allow people

0:24:28.960 --> 0:24:31.879
<v Speaker 1>to become wealthy, will allow people to own their own property,

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:35.440
<v Speaker 1>own their own businesses. So it was this unusual hybrid model.

0:24:35.240 --> 0:24:39.880
<v Speaker 2>Right absolutely, I mean, I do agree that private entrepreneurship

0:24:39.960 --> 0:24:42.280
<v Speaker 2>is very important, and I still think there is a

0:24:42.320 --> 0:24:45.440
<v Speaker 2>lot of animal spirits remaining in China based on my

0:24:45.520 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 2>conversations with entrepreneurs, et cetera. But I think that the

0:24:48.840 --> 0:24:51.560
<v Speaker 2>government's role is also very important. Like I think about

0:24:51.560 --> 0:24:55.160
<v Speaker 2>how China got rich. It was world's biggest factory floor, right,

0:24:55.480 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 2>and then to grow rich through manufacturing, you have to

0:24:59.119 --> 0:25:03.080
<v Speaker 2>have the high way, the big deep seap ports, and

0:25:03.280 --> 0:25:07.080
<v Speaker 2>the good cargo planes, etc. And the government has built that.

0:25:07.320 --> 0:25:08.600
<v Speaker 2>So I think it's a combination.

0:25:09.680 --> 0:25:13.160
<v Speaker 1>And Karushima, How has Chinese politics evolved during this time?

0:25:13.240 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 1>During this massive economic boom, we end up at its

0:25:17.840 --> 0:25:22.720
<v Speaker 1>peak state with Shijinping, who is now on his third

0:25:22.800 --> 0:25:26.800
<v Speaker 1>term he comes into power in twenty twelve. Has the

0:25:26.840 --> 0:25:32.960
<v Speaker 1>political architecture in China taken turns that surprise you? Is

0:25:32.960 --> 0:25:35.919
<v Speaker 1>it also strategic or is it more a little bit

0:25:35.920 --> 0:25:38.080
<v Speaker 1>of a cult of personality or some of both?

0:25:39.000 --> 0:25:42.240
<v Speaker 3>Gosha, I think it's really disappointing, actually more than anything else,

0:25:42.280 --> 0:25:45.359
<v Speaker 3>because in some respects if China had continued down a

0:25:45.359 --> 0:25:49.159
<v Speaker 3>path where you didn't have a Shijinping as commander in

0:25:49.240 --> 0:25:51.879
<v Speaker 3>chief for what now looks like life, it would have

0:25:51.960 --> 0:25:55.760
<v Speaker 3>still grown economically strong. It would have still, in my view,

0:25:55.840 --> 0:25:58.760
<v Speaker 3>you get to a point where developing economy reaches a

0:25:58.800 --> 0:26:01.480
<v Speaker 3>sort of mature level. These five percent growth rates that

0:26:01.520 --> 0:26:04.280
<v Speaker 3>we're seeing now, they're excellent growth rates by any account,

0:26:04.520 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 3>But you could have still had a very rich, profitable,

0:26:07.480 --> 0:26:11.199
<v Speaker 3>and thriving China without a Shi Jin pain at the

0:26:11.200 --> 0:26:13.800
<v Speaker 3>helm of China. And I often wonder if you'd had

0:26:13.840 --> 0:26:17.800
<v Speaker 3>a different kind of leader, somebody who doesn't seem as

0:26:17.880 --> 0:26:21.639
<v Speaker 3>inclined as Shei jinping is to build this cultive personality

0:26:22.119 --> 0:26:25.439
<v Speaker 3>around him, around the idea of what the party should

0:26:25.480 --> 0:26:29.080
<v Speaker 3>be in public life, in the minds of people. Then

0:26:29.400 --> 0:26:31.600
<v Speaker 3>you know what kind of country would that be? Would

0:26:31.640 --> 0:26:34.280
<v Speaker 3>that be a nation that would be far more willing

0:26:34.440 --> 0:26:37.840
<v Speaker 3>to cooperate and collaborate with the United States? Would it

0:26:37.880 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 3>have set itself up in this way on a path

0:26:40.880 --> 0:26:45.840
<v Speaker 3>of competition but also conflict rather than competition and cooperation.

0:26:46.440 --> 0:26:48.840
<v Speaker 3>And obviously we'll never know, but I do think there

0:26:48.920 --> 0:26:52.720
<v Speaker 3>was a real turning point when Xijin Pin came into power.

0:26:53.240 --> 0:26:55.639
<v Speaker 1>Talk a little bit more about that, truly, because I

0:26:55.640 --> 0:26:58.760
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about some also some specific things she

0:26:58.920 --> 0:27:01.800
<v Speaker 1>has done recently are I think revelatory, and we can

0:27:01.840 --> 0:27:03.879
<v Speaker 1>get into some of those, But tell me what you

0:27:03.920 --> 0:27:07.600
<v Speaker 1>think about the Shi era, for lack of a better term, I.

0:27:07.600 --> 0:27:12.000
<v Speaker 2>Think she is pretty much a puritan. He is nothing

0:27:12.160 --> 0:27:16.320
<v Speaker 2>like the other Communist political leaders of his era. He

0:27:16.440 --> 0:27:19.440
<v Speaker 2>doesn't go party drink, you know. I mean. There are

0:27:19.520 --> 0:27:23.359
<v Speaker 2>talks of his family's business associations, like in particular his sister,

0:27:23.720 --> 0:27:27.440
<v Speaker 2>but he himself seems a little bit of a more

0:27:27.760 --> 0:27:30.959
<v Speaker 2>anti materialistic, if I may use the term. He is

0:27:31.040 --> 0:27:34.679
<v Speaker 2>more ideologically driven, I think, and he seems to be

0:27:34.880 --> 0:27:40.040
<v Speaker 2>genuinely interested in the everlasting dynasty of the Chinese Communist Party.

0:27:40.520 --> 0:27:43.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean, what we hear is that his mother, who's

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:46.879
<v Speaker 2>in her nineties, she's still alive, and despite all the

0:27:46.920 --> 0:27:50.400
<v Speaker 2>pursion of his own family, right, his mother is still

0:27:50.440 --> 0:27:53.320
<v Speaker 2>a big believer and a very very red heart. So

0:27:53.520 --> 0:27:56.800
<v Speaker 2>the sum perhaps it's just carrying on the family legacy.

0:27:57.800 --> 0:27:59.840
<v Speaker 1>I think. It was two years ago when Hu Jinta

0:28:00.160 --> 0:28:05.000
<v Speaker 1>got publicly embarrassed and escorted out of a major party

0:28:05.040 --> 0:28:08.760
<v Speaker 1>meeting in China in front of the country's political leaders.

0:28:09.040 --> 0:28:12.159
<v Speaker 1>It seemed very calculated and felt to me at the

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:16.679
<v Speaker 1>time like she signaling a demonstrable break from a past,

0:28:16.840 --> 0:28:20.160
<v Speaker 1>a different kind of leadership. More recently, he's been purging

0:28:20.160 --> 0:28:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the military. They say that it's for corruption, that he's

0:28:23.880 --> 0:28:26.679
<v Speaker 1>uncovered corruption, but both of his leading defense ministers had

0:28:26.760 --> 0:28:29.879
<v Speaker 1>very short terms and they were shown the door, most

0:28:29.920 --> 0:28:35.320
<v Speaker 1>recently Li Shangfu. And he's been purging obviously, the business class.

0:28:35.800 --> 0:28:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Some of the entrepreneurs that Kirishima mentioned earlier who had

0:28:40.400 --> 0:28:43.360
<v Speaker 1>been I think symbolic to younger Chinese who wanted to

0:28:43.360 --> 0:28:46.160
<v Speaker 1>get rich, wanted to be creative, wanted to be entrepreneurial,

0:28:46.400 --> 0:28:48.560
<v Speaker 1>wanted to have their own companies, have now seen this

0:28:48.640 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 1>whole class of entrepreneurs sort of defenestrated. What do you

0:28:53.480 --> 0:28:54.240
<v Speaker 1>make of all of that?

0:28:55.880 --> 0:28:59.240
<v Speaker 2>I think ultimately it goes down to his production first,

0:28:59.280 --> 0:29:03.200
<v Speaker 2>consumption second ideology. I mean what you see is he's

0:29:03.320 --> 0:29:06.880
<v Speaker 2>encouraging industrial tech and he wants to build those little

0:29:06.960 --> 0:29:10.640
<v Speaker 2>little deep tech companies that the world's supply chain system

0:29:10.720 --> 0:29:14.360
<v Speaker 2>cannot deal without, and they will be always integrated into

0:29:14.480 --> 0:29:18.000
<v Speaker 2>the world no matter what happens too politically, consumer tach

0:29:18.120 --> 0:29:22.000
<v Speaker 2>he's knocking out. I mean, perhaps it's his own ideas

0:29:22.120 --> 0:29:25.160
<v Speaker 2>about how an economy can grow, but it's also like,

0:29:25.320 --> 0:29:29.640
<v Speaker 2>if you think about China become a very consumer oriented society,

0:29:29.760 --> 0:29:32.120
<v Speaker 2>young people will have their own thoughts, their own ideas,

0:29:32.360 --> 0:29:35.920
<v Speaker 2>and will the CCP's dynasty last. They have lasted for

0:29:36.240 --> 0:29:39.720
<v Speaker 2>fifty sixty years, but how about much longer another hundred

0:29:39.840 --> 0:29:42.800
<v Speaker 2>two hundred. He's thinking about in terms of Chin or

0:29:42.880 --> 0:29:44.400
<v Speaker 2>Ming dynasty terms.

0:29:45.120 --> 0:29:49.000
<v Speaker 1>So he's playing long ball and everyone else is playing shirtball.

0:29:49.720 --> 0:29:52.320
<v Speaker 2>In fact, he is very sensitive when people these days

0:29:52.360 --> 0:29:55.600
<v Speaker 2>talk about the Ming dynasty or Chin dynasty, because China's

0:29:55.600 --> 0:29:59.080
<v Speaker 2>censorship thinks people are just making very veal reference to him,

0:29:59.120 --> 0:30:03.760
<v Speaker 2>for instance, founding father of Ming dynasty. After he became

0:30:03.800 --> 0:30:08.400
<v Speaker 2>the emperor, he basically killed all his comrades. So when

0:30:08.440 --> 0:30:12.240
<v Speaker 2>people make these kind of jokes, they will as censored online.

0:30:12.520 --> 0:30:15.840
<v Speaker 3>And in fact, a book recently has disappeared from bookshops

0:30:15.880 --> 0:30:19.200
<v Speaker 3>in Beijing because it exactly implies the fact that if

0:30:19.240 --> 0:30:22.120
<v Speaker 3>a certain kind of emperor proceeds in this way, you

0:30:22.240 --> 0:30:24.320
<v Speaker 3>end up having an awful end. But just to the

0:30:24.320 --> 0:30:27.720
<v Speaker 3>point of why the party or why Shi Jinping would

0:30:27.800 --> 0:30:31.960
<v Speaker 3>want ideology to be controlled in this way, I think

0:30:31.960 --> 0:30:35.200
<v Speaker 3>it's precisely that that private entrepreneurs and the economy that

0:30:35.240 --> 0:30:38.280
<v Speaker 3>you were talking about just now Shirley. Young people felt

0:30:38.360 --> 0:30:41.840
<v Speaker 3>like they had a way out of the system, and

0:30:42.000 --> 0:30:46.560
<v Speaker 3>when you curtail those opportunities for young people, then the

0:30:46.560 --> 0:30:51.080
<v Speaker 3>party becomes the most important thing inside the minds of

0:30:51.120 --> 0:30:54.440
<v Speaker 3>people as well. It interferes in every aspect of public

0:30:54.480 --> 0:30:56.920
<v Speaker 3>and private life, and I think that's what he is

0:30:56.920 --> 0:30:57.680
<v Speaker 3>attempting to do.

0:30:58.280 --> 0:31:02.000
<v Speaker 1>By the time this episode heirs, I think Joe Biden

0:31:02.040 --> 0:31:06.160
<v Speaker 1>will have already met with Yang Yi, China's foreign minister.

0:31:06.640 --> 0:31:09.120
<v Speaker 1>They're scheduled to meet during the time that we were

0:31:09.120 --> 0:31:12.560
<v Speaker 1>producing this, so we don't have to be specific about

0:31:12.960 --> 0:31:16.600
<v Speaker 1>the outcome of that meeting. But it does feel actually

0:31:16.600 --> 0:31:19.880
<v Speaker 1>significant to me that in this moment where we've got

0:31:19.920 --> 0:31:23.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of geopolitical conflicts Russia and Ukraine, the Gaza

0:31:23.640 --> 0:31:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Strip has flamed up, and there's been constant talk about

0:31:26.520 --> 0:31:29.080
<v Speaker 1>whether or not China wants to invade Taiwan, and if

0:31:29.120 --> 0:31:32.680
<v Speaker 1>it does invade Taiwan, what are the geopolitical knockoff effects

0:31:32.680 --> 0:31:35.640
<v Speaker 1>of that. So within an environment like that, the fact

0:31:35.640 --> 0:31:39.200
<v Speaker 1>that Biden is taking a meeting with a senior, the

0:31:39.400 --> 0:31:43.840
<v Speaker 1>senior Chinese foreign affairs diplomat, it seems significant to me.

0:31:43.920 --> 0:31:45.680
<v Speaker 1>But do you think about it in a different way.

0:31:46.080 --> 0:31:49.200
<v Speaker 3>No, I think it's extremely significant, and it's the latest

0:31:49.240 --> 0:31:51.760
<v Speaker 3>in a series of what I would say are very

0:31:51.800 --> 0:31:57.400
<v Speaker 3>significant engagements between the US and China. Shijinping has met

0:31:57.400 --> 0:32:01.720
<v Speaker 3>with Kevin Yusom from California. A group of US senators

0:32:01.760 --> 0:32:04.239
<v Speaker 3>who were in Beijing also meeting with him. You know,

0:32:04.400 --> 0:32:07.600
<v Speaker 3>it's all leading up to what everybody is hoping will

0:32:07.600 --> 0:32:11.000
<v Speaker 3>be a meeting between chi Jinping and Joe Biden at

0:32:11.040 --> 0:32:14.840
<v Speaker 3>APEX in San Francisco. At the same time, though, going

0:32:14.880 --> 0:32:17.880
<v Speaker 3>back to that point of how we must be clear

0:32:17.920 --> 0:32:20.440
<v Speaker 3>eyed about China and also be willing to criticize when

0:32:20.480 --> 0:32:24.080
<v Speaker 3>the time is right, the Chinese Coastguard has been involved

0:32:24.120 --> 0:32:27.160
<v Speaker 3>in at least two collisions with two ships from the

0:32:27.200 --> 0:32:30.920
<v Speaker 3>Philippine side in the South China Sea, blaming Manila and

0:32:31.000 --> 0:32:34.160
<v Speaker 3>the United States for interfering in what Beijing sees as

0:32:34.200 --> 0:32:36.720
<v Speaker 3>its own water waste. So, on the one hand, you

0:32:36.800 --> 0:32:42.240
<v Speaker 3>see strategic engagement improving, and it's an encouraging sign between

0:32:42.320 --> 0:32:44.760
<v Speaker 3>the United States and China. But you know this isn't

0:32:44.760 --> 0:32:47.000
<v Speaker 3>going to be solved overnight, right. You know, it's going

0:32:47.040 --> 0:32:49.920
<v Speaker 3>to be a situation where Beijing consistently says, this is

0:32:49.960 --> 0:32:52.320
<v Speaker 3>our backyard. The thing I think China would want the

0:32:52.320 --> 0:32:55.840
<v Speaker 3>most is us please leave, please leave from this part

0:32:55.880 --> 0:32:58.200
<v Speaker 3>of the world. We'll manage it. And as long as

0:32:58.240 --> 0:33:00.600
<v Speaker 3>you understand that these are our strategic interests so you

0:33:00.640 --> 0:33:04.280
<v Speaker 3>don't get involved, then we're fine. We can continue to cooperate.

0:33:04.960 --> 0:33:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Does that ring true to you too, Shuley?

0:33:07.360 --> 0:33:10.200
<v Speaker 2>I think one question we can ask is like, why

0:33:10.360 --> 0:33:13.800
<v Speaker 2>is President Chimpin suddenly trying to be friendly with the

0:33:13.920 --> 0:33:17.760
<v Speaker 2>United States again? And I think it's because within China

0:33:18.040 --> 0:33:21.040
<v Speaker 2>there are a lot of concerns about your political risks.

0:33:21.360 --> 0:33:24.520
<v Speaker 2>A lot of Chinese entrepreneurs have told me, they said,

0:33:24.840 --> 0:33:29.320
<v Speaker 2>if we cannot get along with the world's most powerful country,

0:33:29.640 --> 0:33:32.320
<v Speaker 2>the Chinese economy cannot do well and the China has

0:33:32.360 --> 0:33:35.880
<v Speaker 2>no future. And I think presence she needs to address

0:33:35.920 --> 0:33:39.400
<v Speaker 2>that kind of very valid concerns in mainland China. I mean,

0:33:39.480 --> 0:33:42.360
<v Speaker 2>just given an example, there was news that China was

0:33:42.440 --> 0:33:46.840
<v Speaker 2>going to investigate Fox CONT's landues, right and the day after,

0:33:46.960 --> 0:33:49.720
<v Speaker 2>China had our Black Monday on the store market. Because

0:33:49.760 --> 0:33:52.840
<v Speaker 2>people just say, what you're talking about Taiwan and invasion.

0:33:53.160 --> 0:33:56.120
<v Speaker 2>This is very very much on the business people's mind

0:33:56.400 --> 0:33:59.560
<v Speaker 2>and when China is clearly in the recession. Chi Chimpin

0:33:59.680 --> 0:34:04.320
<v Speaker 2>has two to somehow tom down that very aggressive or rhetoric.

0:34:05.160 --> 0:34:08.480
<v Speaker 1>On that happy note of kumbaya and maybe reprochemomp between

0:34:08.719 --> 0:34:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the United States and China. I'm going to take another

0:34:11.120 --> 0:34:19.800
<v Speaker 1>quick break and we'll come right back. We're back with

0:34:19.880 --> 0:34:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Karishma Vaswani and Shuly Ren and we're continuing to discuss

0:34:23.680 --> 0:34:27.799
<v Speaker 1>the ever fascinating subject of China. Surely you have done

0:34:28.120 --> 0:34:34.520
<v Speaker 1>incredible work, original work around China's looming debt problem, and

0:34:35.320 --> 0:34:39.120
<v Speaker 1>you've really wetted great of gum shoe reporting, looking at

0:34:39.160 --> 0:34:42.279
<v Speaker 1>local debt levels, looking at corporate debt levels, looking at

0:34:42.360 --> 0:34:45.400
<v Speaker 1>sectors like the real estate industry, where the debt is

0:34:45.560 --> 0:34:52.600
<v Speaker 1>suffocating and potentially more systemically dangerous. Obviously, China's economic growth

0:34:52.760 --> 0:34:55.480
<v Speaker 1>was fueled by a lot of debt spending, with the

0:34:55.520 --> 0:34:58.279
<v Speaker 1>idea that it was rational spending. It was spending for

0:34:58.320 --> 0:35:01.680
<v Speaker 1>the long term, the country could earned back from that debt.

0:35:01.880 --> 0:35:05.640
<v Speaker 1>It created jobs, it created infrastructure, created new property. But

0:35:05.840 --> 0:35:08.839
<v Speaker 1>maybe the accounting for all of that debt wasn't as

0:35:08.880 --> 0:35:11.200
<v Speaker 1>clear as it should have been. And you've just written

0:35:11.239 --> 0:35:14.120
<v Speaker 1>a series of columns over the last two years, probably

0:35:14.200 --> 0:35:18.719
<v Speaker 1>at least laying out for readers and analysts how bad

0:35:18.800 --> 0:35:23.280
<v Speaker 1>this could get. How do you think now about China's

0:35:23.280 --> 0:35:24.320
<v Speaker 1>debt problem.

0:35:25.160 --> 0:35:28.120
<v Speaker 2>So we talked about China building a lot of infrastructure

0:35:28.200 --> 0:35:30.880
<v Speaker 2>and the public good, and I mentioned the high spirial

0:35:30.960 --> 0:35:33.960
<v Speaker 2>in Shanghai that gets you to the airport in five minutes, right,

0:35:34.280 --> 0:35:36.959
<v Speaker 2>and guess how much it costs. The ticket is only

0:35:37.000 --> 0:35:39.759
<v Speaker 2>five US dollars and then if you go to the

0:35:39.800 --> 0:35:42.280
<v Speaker 2>ticket counter you can get an extra twenty percent disco.

0:35:42.719 --> 0:35:45.560
<v Speaker 2>That's the problem with China. That's the ultimate problem with

0:35:45.719 --> 0:35:49.040
<v Speaker 2>China's step path. So far, the government has built a

0:35:49.120 --> 0:35:52.120
<v Speaker 2>lot of beautiful things and the public we enjoy it

0:35:52.280 --> 0:35:55.239
<v Speaker 2>very very much. Everyone will enjoy it. But the question is,

0:35:55.320 --> 0:35:58.120
<v Speaker 2>as China slows down, who is going to pay for it?

0:35:58.440 --> 0:36:01.839
<v Speaker 2>And it's unclear so far. A lot of bund investors

0:36:02.040 --> 0:36:04.399
<v Speaker 2>they complain they have been paying for and then they

0:36:04.400 --> 0:36:06.520
<v Speaker 2>complain to me why they are the ones that have

0:36:06.600 --> 0:36:08.440
<v Speaker 2>been paid for and on the other hand, like it

0:36:08.480 --> 0:36:10.680
<v Speaker 2>should be the people who have been paying for So

0:36:11.000 --> 0:36:14.479
<v Speaker 2>basically that's the ultimate question. China has buil beautiful things

0:36:14.560 --> 0:36:16.359
<v Speaker 2>and how is it going to pay for this?

0:36:16.840 --> 0:36:18.960
<v Speaker 1>It has about one hundred and thirty seven billion dollars

0:36:19.000 --> 0:36:22.759
<v Speaker 1>in sovereign that it's running its biggest deficits I think

0:36:22.800 --> 0:36:26.239
<v Speaker 1>in decades. At this point, how does that get resolved? Like,

0:36:26.280 --> 0:36:28.319
<v Speaker 1>how do you see this getting cleaned up?

0:36:29.520 --> 0:36:32.520
<v Speaker 2>I think what needs to happen is that China needs

0:36:32.560 --> 0:36:35.520
<v Speaker 2>to have another physical reform. So what happened was that

0:36:35.560 --> 0:36:38.319
<v Speaker 2>in nineteen ninety four, when China was just opening up right,

0:36:38.520 --> 0:36:42.480
<v Speaker 2>the government had a tax reform. Basically, the central government

0:36:42.520 --> 0:36:45.040
<v Speaker 2>will get most of the tax revenue and then the

0:36:45.080 --> 0:36:48.440
<v Speaker 2>local government will do most of the physical spending. That

0:36:48.600 --> 0:36:50.920
<v Speaker 2>is not going to work for the local government. So

0:36:51.000 --> 0:36:53.920
<v Speaker 2>what they've been doing the last thirty years is basically

0:36:53.960 --> 0:36:58.200
<v Speaker 2>relying on lensales to developers, which propel China's property bubble,

0:36:58.480 --> 0:37:02.720
<v Speaker 2>and by borrowing that with this kind of unclear shell

0:37:02.880 --> 0:37:07.160
<v Speaker 2>company's titles. So what will happen is that I think

0:37:07.360 --> 0:37:10.200
<v Speaker 2>the central government will have to put on more that

0:37:10.400 --> 0:37:13.000
<v Speaker 2>on its own balance sheet. And by the way, China's

0:37:13.000 --> 0:37:16.120
<v Speaker 2>Central Bank of People's Bank of China, its balance sheet

0:37:16.160 --> 0:37:19.080
<v Speaker 2>is squeaky cling, unlike the federal reserve. So I think

0:37:19.160 --> 0:37:22.120
<v Speaker 2>inevitably at this point, unless China is willing to have

0:37:22.239 --> 0:37:25.520
<v Speaker 2>local government that blow up, China will have to do

0:37:25.960 --> 0:37:27.440
<v Speaker 2>its own quantitative.

0:37:27.000 --> 0:37:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Easy Let's switch gears a little bit on that Karishma.

0:37:30.920 --> 0:37:34.000
<v Speaker 1>We talked a lot about in this episode China's relationship

0:37:34.040 --> 0:37:36.320
<v Speaker 1>with the US. I want to talk about some of

0:37:36.360 --> 0:37:39.880
<v Speaker 1>the other regional players that are equally important in my

0:37:40.000 --> 0:37:42.000
<v Speaker 1>mind as the US in terms of the future of

0:37:42.040 --> 0:37:45.160
<v Speaker 1>the region, China's place in the region. Let's get the

0:37:45.160 --> 0:37:47.360
<v Speaker 1>big wildcard question out of the way first. Do you

0:37:47.400 --> 0:37:48.920
<v Speaker 1>think China will invade Taiwan.

0:37:49.760 --> 0:37:53.000
<v Speaker 3>I don't think it wants to. I think peaceful reunification.

0:37:53.320 --> 0:37:55.719
<v Speaker 3>I think we should believe that when China says that

0:37:55.800 --> 0:37:58.799
<v Speaker 3>it's serious about that. What it doesn't like is when

0:37:58.840 --> 0:38:02.360
<v Speaker 3>the United States get involved. It does not want any

0:38:02.640 --> 0:38:08.200
<v Speaker 3>declaration of independence from Taiwanese government political parties. The status

0:38:08.280 --> 0:38:11.399
<v Speaker 3>quo would be ideal in the sense that as long

0:38:11.440 --> 0:38:15.560
<v Speaker 3>as Taiwan doesn't declare independence and doesn't make too many noises,

0:38:15.560 --> 0:38:18.760
<v Speaker 3>that makes it far closer to the United States. Beijing would,

0:38:19.080 --> 0:38:22.279
<v Speaker 3>I think accept that. So I think that unless it

0:38:22.360 --> 0:38:25.360
<v Speaker 3>is pushed to invade Taiwan, it won't do so of

0:38:25.400 --> 0:38:26.160
<v Speaker 3>its own volition.

0:38:27.080 --> 0:38:29.160
<v Speaker 1>In that same context, I feel like whenever we talk

0:38:29.200 --> 0:38:32.480
<v Speaker 1>about Taiwan and excluding the US from the discussion for now,

0:38:32.640 --> 0:38:35.200
<v Speaker 1>you also have to talk about Japan, and when I've

0:38:35.680 --> 0:38:38.200
<v Speaker 1>visited the region in the past, I've met with national

0:38:38.200 --> 0:38:42.400
<v Speaker 1>security officials within the Japanese government who are very hawkish

0:38:42.440 --> 0:38:46.680
<v Speaker 1>about the idea, at least that China might invade Taiwan.

0:38:47.120 --> 0:38:50.680
<v Speaker 1>I think the Japanese government has obviously started to ramp

0:38:50.760 --> 0:38:54.120
<v Speaker 1>up their own military spending as a I don't know

0:38:54.160 --> 0:38:57.279
<v Speaker 1>if it's a hedge against an invasion, but certainly to

0:38:57.480 --> 0:39:00.719
<v Speaker 1>just be rational about the possibility of a military action.

0:39:02.280 --> 0:39:04.560
<v Speaker 1>How do you think about Japan as a player in

0:39:04.600 --> 0:39:06.680
<v Speaker 1>the region right now, I think.

0:39:06.480 --> 0:39:08.759
<v Speaker 3>That as a hedge to what you're seeing as a

0:39:08.840 --> 0:39:12.200
<v Speaker 3>ramp up to military build up in China, they have

0:39:12.239 --> 0:39:14.080
<v Speaker 3>to do that. I think it only makes sense to

0:39:14.120 --> 0:39:17.280
<v Speaker 3>do that. What Japan's been able to do quite cleverly,

0:39:17.320 --> 0:39:20.680
<v Speaker 3>I think, is be the proxy for the United States

0:39:20.680 --> 0:39:22.239
<v Speaker 3>in this part of the world. I know you said, like,

0:39:22.320 --> 0:39:24.279
<v Speaker 3>let's leave the US out, but it's impossible to have

0:39:24.320 --> 0:39:27.880
<v Speaker 3>a discussion about this region without bringing Washington into it.

0:39:27.960 --> 0:39:30.120
<v Speaker 3>And I think you can see that, particularly in the

0:39:30.160 --> 0:39:33.719
<v Speaker 3>Strategic Alliance of the Quad, because through the Quad, which

0:39:33.719 --> 0:39:35.640
<v Speaker 3>is actually a Japanese idea to begin with.

0:39:36.040 --> 0:39:39.080
<v Speaker 1>And let's define the quad for our listeners, which is Australia,

0:39:39.160 --> 0:39:42.520
<v Speaker 1>in the ED, Japan, and the US for countries that

0:39:42.560 --> 0:39:45.880
<v Speaker 1>are trying to have an alliance as a bulwark against

0:39:46.400 --> 0:39:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Chinese ambitions in the region exactly.

0:39:49.080 --> 0:39:51.759
<v Speaker 3>And it's supposed to be a sort of unified like

0:39:51.840 --> 0:39:55.279
<v Speaker 3>minded countries coming together working together to be able to

0:39:55.320 --> 0:39:57.799
<v Speaker 3>provide deterrence. And I think that's the key thing, right,

0:39:57.840 --> 0:40:00.520
<v Speaker 3>how do you provide deterrence, because that's the best way

0:40:00.520 --> 0:40:03.800
<v Speaker 3>to avoid conflict, And you're seeing that even with regards

0:40:03.840 --> 0:40:06.360
<v Speaker 3>not just to Taiwan, but also the South China Sea.

0:40:06.520 --> 0:40:09.040
<v Speaker 3>Japan plays a crucial role in all of that because

0:40:09.040 --> 0:40:12.520
<v Speaker 3>it has strategic interests in all of these places. So

0:40:12.800 --> 0:40:17.040
<v Speaker 3>when you hear from national security analysts, for instance, in

0:40:17.080 --> 0:40:19.640
<v Speaker 3>the Japanese government that they're worried about Taiwan, I think

0:40:19.680 --> 0:40:23.879
<v Speaker 3>it's a big a worry about China's militarization in this

0:40:24.040 --> 0:40:25.680
<v Speaker 3>part of the world. And you know, in the latest

0:40:25.680 --> 0:40:29.040
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty three report, China's Military Power Report that's come

0:40:29.040 --> 0:40:31.400
<v Speaker 3>out of the United States, the US has echoed that

0:40:31.440 --> 0:40:34.200
<v Speaker 3>as well. It is the biggest concern going forward. The

0:40:34.239 --> 0:40:37.399
<v Speaker 3>way that the Chinese have built up their militaries, spent

0:40:37.520 --> 0:40:41.560
<v Speaker 3>money on submarines, on fighter jets in the region, and

0:40:41.880 --> 0:40:45.279
<v Speaker 3>it looks if you don't do anything to combat that

0:40:45.440 --> 0:40:48.080
<v Speaker 3>you will be left behind. So it makes sense for

0:40:48.120 --> 0:40:50.520
<v Speaker 3>these countries to take the actions that they're doing.

0:40:51.440 --> 0:40:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Surely another intriguing country to me in the region, not

0:40:54.280 --> 0:40:55.960
<v Speaker 1>just for me, I think, but for anyone looking at

0:40:56.000 --> 0:40:58.799
<v Speaker 1>all these interesting dynamics going on as India. You've done

0:40:58.840 --> 0:41:02.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of travel in the region, specifically that to Vietnam,

0:41:02.320 --> 0:41:05.120
<v Speaker 1>where you sort of looked at other countries in the

0:41:05.160 --> 0:41:09.120
<v Speaker 1>regions that are equally entrepreneurial in both their culture and

0:41:09.160 --> 0:41:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the execution of policy and business growth. Like China, India

0:41:13.880 --> 0:41:17.759
<v Speaker 1>has a very entrepreneurial tradition. It does not have a

0:41:17.880 --> 0:41:20.960
<v Speaker 1>large tradition of an honest and capable civil service. But

0:41:21.400 --> 0:41:24.560
<v Speaker 1>China is India rather is in the midst of its

0:41:24.560 --> 0:41:28.760
<v Speaker 1>own I think, muscularity and thinking about how it wants

0:41:28.800 --> 0:41:32.280
<v Speaker 1>to play a role in the region. Obviously Visa VI Russia,

0:41:32.560 --> 0:41:35.000
<v Speaker 1>visa VI China, visa viv the United States. How do

0:41:35.080 --> 0:41:38.960
<v Speaker 1>you see the Chinese relationship with India playing out?

0:41:39.560 --> 0:41:41.839
<v Speaker 2>I think there are a lot of Chinese entrepreneurs who

0:41:41.840 --> 0:41:45.920
<v Speaker 2>are genuinely interested in investing India. What they see is

0:41:45.960 --> 0:41:48.759
<v Speaker 2>that they're very practical and hard knows people. They don't

0:41:48.760 --> 0:41:51.560
<v Speaker 2>care about democracy or whatever. What they see in Ranger

0:41:51.640 --> 0:41:54.399
<v Speaker 2>Modi is basically somebody who's willing to take the China

0:41:54.440 --> 0:41:57.560
<v Speaker 2>growth model. Produce first and then they will come right

0:41:57.800 --> 0:42:00.359
<v Speaker 2>and then they tell me, oh, you know, is a

0:42:00.360 --> 0:42:04.120
<v Speaker 2>really nice new highway between Eli and Mumbaya and they

0:42:04.120 --> 0:42:08.400
<v Speaker 2>were modeling at it. So I think on the civilian level,

0:42:08.640 --> 0:42:12.360
<v Speaker 2>there is genuine interest in foreign direct investment into India.

0:42:13.360 --> 0:42:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Since we're doing geopolitical bingo Karishma, I also want to

0:42:16.400 --> 0:42:21.120
<v Speaker 1>talk about Russia and China's relationship with Russia, and particularly

0:42:21.160 --> 0:42:24.840
<v Speaker 1>in the context of the Ukraine invasion. It's been hard

0:42:25.040 --> 0:42:28.399
<v Speaker 1>for me watching this to figure out whether or not

0:42:28.680 --> 0:42:31.239
<v Speaker 1>China really wants to step onto the world stage and

0:42:31.320 --> 0:42:36.960
<v Speaker 1>be an authentic broker of complex diplomatic situations. This has

0:42:37.000 --> 0:42:40.080
<v Speaker 1>come up obviously around Gaza. People have wondered whether or

0:42:40.120 --> 0:42:44.680
<v Speaker 1>not that conflict will kind of compel China to step up.

0:42:45.040 --> 0:42:47.840
<v Speaker 1>But it seems even clearer to me in the Ukraine

0:42:47.920 --> 0:42:51.239
<v Speaker 1>conflict because she has gone out of his way to

0:42:51.840 --> 0:42:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Putin up over the years Russia's leader Vladimir Putin. I

0:42:55.880 --> 0:42:59.240
<v Speaker 1>think Putin has maneuvered to where that relationship on his sleeve.

0:43:00.000 --> 0:43:03.600
<v Speaker 1>How do you see China's relationship with Russia evolving and

0:43:03.800 --> 0:43:06.960
<v Speaker 1>does China really want to be a global diplomat or not.

0:43:07.680 --> 0:43:10.920
<v Speaker 3>I think you'll see the relationship with Russia continue to

0:43:10.960 --> 0:43:13.239
<v Speaker 3>grow strong. I think it's interesting in the first days

0:43:13.280 --> 0:43:17.320
<v Speaker 3>after the Ukraine invasion, you didn't actually see Beijing jump

0:43:17.440 --> 0:43:20.319
<v Speaker 3>to Russia's defense right away. I think it was making

0:43:20.440 --> 0:43:23.120
<v Speaker 3>up its mind. And it's the same sort of pattern

0:43:23.160 --> 0:43:26.520
<v Speaker 3>that you've seen post the conflict between Israel and Hamas

0:43:26.560 --> 0:43:29.560
<v Speaker 3>and what you're seeing in Gaza. China doesn't jump right

0:43:29.600 --> 0:43:32.280
<v Speaker 3>away to sort of make a decision about how it feels.

0:43:32.280 --> 0:43:34.239
<v Speaker 3>I think it's still trying to figure itself out and

0:43:34.280 --> 0:43:37.400
<v Speaker 3>figure out what is the foreign policy statement that we

0:43:37.400 --> 0:43:39.600
<v Speaker 3>should make about this. And we can get into that

0:43:39.680 --> 0:43:41.520
<v Speaker 3>in the second part of this answer. But to go

0:43:41.600 --> 0:43:45.239
<v Speaker 3>back to Russia, that relationship serves as a bulwark to

0:43:45.280 --> 0:43:48.960
<v Speaker 3>the United States because it makes Beijing feel like it's

0:43:48.960 --> 0:43:53.040
<v Speaker 3>got a powerful companion that is going to go up

0:43:53.080 --> 0:43:56.799
<v Speaker 3>against the US with it. China on its own is

0:43:56.920 --> 0:44:00.719
<v Speaker 3>in and of itself a strategic concern. A rival competitor

0:44:00.760 --> 0:44:04.799
<v Speaker 3>to the US. China with Russia is even more concerning

0:44:05.000 --> 0:44:07.360
<v Speaker 3>for the United States, so I think it provides it

0:44:07.600 --> 0:44:10.000
<v Speaker 3>a little bit of security. The second part of this

0:44:10.200 --> 0:44:13.480
<v Speaker 3>is is China ready to be a global diplomat? And

0:44:13.520 --> 0:44:15.920
<v Speaker 3>I think yes, it wants to be, but it doesn't

0:44:15.960 --> 0:44:20.560
<v Speaker 3>necessarily have the foreign policy infrastructure that other countries have

0:44:20.640 --> 0:44:23.720
<v Speaker 3>had because it hasn't wanted to get its hands messy

0:44:24.200 --> 0:44:27.200
<v Speaker 3>and get involved in some of these geopolitical struggles that

0:44:27.200 --> 0:44:29.440
<v Speaker 3>you've seen countries like the US do you know, it

0:44:29.440 --> 0:44:31.520
<v Speaker 3>has a long history, obviously with lots of flaws in

0:44:31.560 --> 0:44:34.239
<v Speaker 3>the process. But the problem for China is that on

0:44:34.280 --> 0:44:36.960
<v Speaker 3>the one hand, it says it is this rising superpower,

0:44:37.000 --> 0:44:39.840
<v Speaker 3>it is emerging as a global power, but it hasn't

0:44:39.960 --> 0:44:43.799
<v Speaker 3>had the experience or the foreign policy capacity to be

0:44:43.880 --> 0:44:47.880
<v Speaker 3>able to get involved in complex regional or global issues

0:44:48.160 --> 0:44:51.640
<v Speaker 3>beyond providing solutions like we should have a two state solution,

0:44:51.760 --> 0:44:54.160
<v Speaker 3>for instance, in the Israeli and Gaza. And I think

0:44:54.200 --> 0:44:57.200
<v Speaker 3>that's going to consistently be a problem for China as

0:44:57.239 --> 0:45:00.000
<v Speaker 3>it tries to navigate this role of global diplomat.

0:45:00.160 --> 0:45:03.920
<v Speaker 1>The future surely you perked up during that little conversation

0:45:03.960 --> 0:45:05.799
<v Speaker 1>I was just having with Kurashima. Tell me your thoughts

0:45:05.840 --> 0:45:06.759
<v Speaker 1>on the exact same thing.

0:45:07.120 --> 0:45:10.239
<v Speaker 2>I just think people need to know that Hijinping's Joe

0:45:10.280 --> 0:45:13.839
<v Speaker 2>political also over the United States really has taken its

0:45:13.840 --> 0:45:16.600
<v Speaker 2>toll on the Chinese economy. I was just in Shanghai

0:45:16.640 --> 0:45:19.960
<v Speaker 2>two weeks ago. You know, when you enter the Pudong, beautiful,

0:45:20.080 --> 0:45:23.719
<v Speaker 2>big put On airport, you don't see international rivals. Now

0:45:23.760 --> 0:45:26.880
<v Speaker 2>we're in Tokyo, there's so many foreigners, Americans, you know,

0:45:27.040 --> 0:45:29.520
<v Speaker 2>people from everywhere in the world. And two weeks ago,

0:45:29.560 --> 0:45:31.799
<v Speaker 2>when I was in Shanghai speaking to friends, you know,

0:45:31.920 --> 0:45:34.440
<v Speaker 2>they just say, have you noticed Shanghai has very very

0:45:34.440 --> 0:45:37.560
<v Speaker 2>few foreigners left? And then if you really look carefully,

0:45:37.640 --> 0:45:40.040
<v Speaker 2>they're the wrong kind. I was like, what do you

0:45:40.040 --> 0:45:43.880
<v Speaker 2>mean they're the wrong kind? They said, they're white Russians. Literally,

0:45:43.960 --> 0:45:46.600
<v Speaker 2>it's true. Like in Pudon, at the Mandarin Oriental at

0:45:46.680 --> 0:45:49.000
<v Speaker 2>Risk Carton, if you look at the elevator, people going

0:45:49.160 --> 0:45:51.040
<v Speaker 2>up and down one sing in a while, you see

0:45:51.080 --> 0:45:53.839
<v Speaker 2>like a foreign face and they speak Russian. A lot

0:45:53.880 --> 0:45:57.000
<v Speaker 2>of private entrepreneurs they're very, very concerned about that. I mean,

0:45:57.040 --> 0:46:00.080
<v Speaker 2>I agree with them, Like Shanghai these days feel very

0:46:00.160 --> 0:46:03.480
<v Speaker 2>very insulated, like it's all Chinese people and maybe one

0:46:03.600 --> 0:46:06.359
<v Speaker 2>in a thousand that you see a foreigner, and that

0:46:06.480 --> 0:46:10.200
<v Speaker 2>feels like late nineteen eighties Shamghai, you know, like it's

0:46:10.360 --> 0:46:11.200
<v Speaker 2>very very different.

0:46:12.000 --> 0:46:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this is an easy segue into the last question,

0:46:14.200 --> 0:46:15.440
<v Speaker 1>and I wanted to ask both of you, but I

0:46:15.520 --> 0:46:17.600
<v Speaker 1>always like to ask people at the end of the show,

0:46:17.640 --> 0:46:20.360
<v Speaker 1>since the show is about learning moments and what we

0:46:20.400 --> 0:46:24.440
<v Speaker 1>can learn from epic collisions, what have you learned if

0:46:24.480 --> 0:46:27.160
<v Speaker 1>you look at China over the last couple of years

0:46:27.320 --> 0:46:29.880
<v Speaker 1>and all of the stuff that has surfaced in the

0:46:29.960 --> 0:46:34.280
<v Speaker 1>economy and in its diplomatic relationships, What have you learned

0:46:34.280 --> 0:46:36.279
<v Speaker 1>that you didn't know before? What has been sort of

0:46:36.280 --> 0:46:38.040
<v Speaker 1>a signal sort of aha for you?

0:46:39.040 --> 0:46:43.239
<v Speaker 2>I think shi Jinping's administration is not as efficient as

0:46:43.280 --> 0:46:47.640
<v Speaker 2>the previous administrations, and that China is growing up, but

0:46:47.800 --> 0:46:50.200
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't know where it wants to go the next.

0:46:50.960 --> 0:46:53.960
<v Speaker 3>I think that the world is trying to come to

0:46:54.040 --> 0:46:57.600
<v Speaker 3>grips with this new China and the shi Jinping. I

0:46:57.640 --> 0:47:01.440
<v Speaker 3>think for me what really showed me the difference was

0:47:01.480 --> 0:47:06.640
<v Speaker 3>COVID actually and how China managed COVID under Shijinping was

0:47:06.680 --> 0:47:08.680
<v Speaker 3>the turning point, the sort of a ha moment for

0:47:08.840 --> 0:47:11.600
<v Speaker 3>me about what kind of China we were going to

0:47:11.640 --> 0:47:14.520
<v Speaker 3>see next, Because up until that point we had seen

0:47:14.560 --> 0:47:18.240
<v Speaker 3>Sijinping go out to the Davos's and speak at big

0:47:18.239 --> 0:47:22.719
<v Speaker 3>international conferences that seemed to be implying that he was

0:47:22.800 --> 0:47:26.359
<v Speaker 3>going to consistently take China down a route which would

0:47:26.400 --> 0:47:29.960
<v Speaker 3>be palatable to the global economy and the sort of

0:47:29.960 --> 0:47:33.520
<v Speaker 3>global geopolitical dynamics. But for me, it was COVID that

0:47:33.600 --> 0:47:36.200
<v Speaker 3>sort of made me think, this is something different, the

0:47:36.239 --> 0:47:38.880
<v Speaker 3>way that he managed COVID and how China's come out

0:47:38.920 --> 0:47:39.080
<v Speaker 3>of that.

0:47:40.120 --> 0:47:42.160
<v Speaker 1>We've run out of time, Karishma, will you come back

0:47:42.160 --> 0:47:44.560
<v Speaker 1>again sometime and converse about all this stuff again?

0:47:45.080 --> 0:47:45.319
<v Speaker 3>Sure?

0:47:45.360 --> 0:47:47.719
<v Speaker 1>I would love to. Shulely, thanks for joining us when

0:47:47.719 --> 0:47:52.520
<v Speaker 1>you come back to Absolutely. Shuly Ren and Karashima Vaswani

0:47:52.520 --> 0:47:55.000
<v Speaker 1>our Bloomberg Opinion columnists, and you can find their work

0:47:55.040 --> 0:47:58.240
<v Speaker 1>on the Bloomberg Opinion website and on the Bloomberg terminal.

0:48:00.560 --> 0:48:05.759
<v Speaker 1>Here at Crash Course, we believe the collisions can be messy, impressive, challenging, surprising,

0:48:05.960 --> 0:48:09.880
<v Speaker 1>and always instructive. In today's Crash Course. I learned that

0:48:09.960 --> 0:48:14.400
<v Speaker 1>my own gloomy outlook about China that a hardening of

0:48:14.640 --> 0:48:18.400
<v Speaker 1>sides between the US and China may not be as

0:48:18.440 --> 0:48:21.839
<v Speaker 1>inevitable as I once thought it was. What did you learn?

0:48:22.160 --> 0:48:24.480
<v Speaker 1>We'd love to hear from you. You can tweet the

0:48:24.520 --> 0:48:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Opinion, handle at Opinion or me at Tim O'Brien

0:48:28.760 --> 0:48:32.480
<v Speaker 1>using the hashtag Bloomberg Crash Course. You can also subscribe

0:48:32.480 --> 0:48:34.960
<v Speaker 1>to our show wherever you're listening right now and leave

0:48:35.040 --> 0:48:37.759
<v Speaker 1>us a review. It helps more people find the show.

0:48:38.160 --> 0:48:42.160
<v Speaker 1>This episode was produced by the indispensable Anna Maserakas and me.

0:48:42.960 --> 0:48:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Our supervising producer is Magnus Hendrickson, and we had editing

0:48:46.320 --> 0:48:50.280
<v Speaker 1>help from Sage Bauman, Jeff Grocott, Mike Nize and Christine

0:48:50.360 --> 0:48:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Vanden Bilart. Blake Maples does our sound engineering, and our

0:48:54.200 --> 0:48:58.480
<v Speaker 1>original theme song was composed by Luis Gara. I'm Tim O'Brien.

0:48:58.640 --> 0:49:01.120
<v Speaker 1>We'll be back next week with another Crash Course