1 00:00:01,800 --> 00:00:05,200 Speaker 1: Welcome to Crash Course, a podcast about business, political, and 2 00:00:05,240 --> 00:00:08,680 Speaker 1: social disruption and what we can learn from it. I'm 3 00:00:08,680 --> 00:00:13,760 Speaker 1: Tim O'Brien. Today's Crash Course China takes on the world 4 00:00:13,920 --> 00:00:18,160 Speaker 1: and the US. Consider the numbers. China is home to 5 00:00:18,200 --> 00:00:21,159 Speaker 1: one point four billion people, about eighteen percent of the 6 00:00:21,160 --> 00:00:24,880 Speaker 1: planet's total population. Twenty two point three million people live 7 00:00:24,920 --> 00:00:28,440 Speaker 1: in Shanghai and eleven point seven million in Beijing alone. 8 00:00:29,080 --> 00:00:31,960 Speaker 1: China has the world's second largest economy and has been 9 00:00:32,000 --> 00:00:36,560 Speaker 1: on track to eventually overtake the US, although China's recent 10 00:00:36,600 --> 00:00:42,159 Speaker 1: economic problems may delay that trajectory. Its geographic footprint is vast, 11 00:00:42,479 --> 00:00:46,080 Speaker 1: covering more than three point six million square miles. China 12 00:00:46,120 --> 00:00:49,440 Speaker 1: is home to a thriving technology sector that birth such 13 00:00:49,479 --> 00:00:52,360 Speaker 1: well known giants as ten Cent and Ali Baba, and 14 00:00:52,440 --> 00:00:56,520 Speaker 1: China's corporate powerhouses collectively spent about two hundred and twenty 15 00:00:56,600 --> 00:00:59,959 Speaker 1: eight billion dollars on research and development in twenty two 16 00:01:00,000 --> 00:01:03,800 Speaker 1: twenty two. Over the past forty years, China has lifted 17 00:01:03,880 --> 00:01:07,920 Speaker 1: eight hundred million people out of poverty, an epic achievement 18 00:01:08,040 --> 00:01:11,760 Speaker 1: that some analysts consider the biggest reduction in inequality in 19 00:01:11,800 --> 00:01:16,240 Speaker 1: the modern era. China has also built a formidable military 20 00:01:16,280 --> 00:01:20,840 Speaker 1: capacity featuring a world class navy, air force, nuclear missiles, 21 00:01:20,880 --> 00:01:25,000 Speaker 1: and cyber warfare proficiencies. It regards the US as a 22 00:01:25,120 --> 00:01:29,759 Speaker 1: robust but flabby economic and military competitor, and America as 23 00:01:29,800 --> 00:01:34,000 Speaker 1: beset by social chaos and individualism so extreme that it 24 00:01:34,120 --> 00:01:38,760 Speaker 1: undermines civil society. The South China Sea and Taiwan are flashpoints. 25 00:01:39,360 --> 00:01:43,160 Speaker 1: But China's economic growth may have plateaued and its politics 26 00:01:43,160 --> 00:01:47,040 Speaker 1: have been so reshaped by President Xijinping that a cult 27 00:01:47,040 --> 00:01:51,360 Speaker 1: of personality and raw authoritarianism has recast the country's image 28 00:01:51,360 --> 00:01:55,840 Speaker 1: abroad and its direction at home. Joining me today here 29 00:01:55,880 --> 00:01:58,880 Speaker 1: in Asia to discuss China's path present in future are 30 00:01:58,880 --> 00:02:03,680 Speaker 1: two Bloomberg opinion columnists and wizards, Karishma Vaswani, who is 31 00:02:03,720 --> 00:02:07,560 Speaker 1: a savvy political analyst, and Shulely Wren, who covers markets 32 00:02:07,600 --> 00:02:12,760 Speaker 1: in China's economy. Welcome to crash course, ladies. Shulely, you 33 00:02:12,800 --> 00:02:15,320 Speaker 1: grew up in Shanghai. So as someone who's had a 34 00:02:15,400 --> 00:02:18,600 Speaker 1: foot literally on the ground in China and elsewhere over 35 00:02:18,639 --> 00:02:21,880 Speaker 1: the years, how do you think about China when you 36 00:02:21,919 --> 00:02:24,600 Speaker 1: look at its whole trajectory during your own lifetime? 37 00:02:25,400 --> 00:02:27,680 Speaker 2: So to give you some background, I was born and 38 00:02:27,720 --> 00:02:30,040 Speaker 2: grew up in Shanghai, and then I left for the 39 00:02:30,120 --> 00:02:33,320 Speaker 2: United States for university in nineteen ninety six. By the 40 00:02:33,440 --> 00:02:37,320 Speaker 2: time I was leaving for United States, Shanghai was already 41 00:02:37,320 --> 00:02:41,360 Speaker 2: morphing into something I couldn't recognize, basically, like new subways 42 00:02:41,400 --> 00:02:44,440 Speaker 2: and the new hiroads were coming up every year to 43 00:02:44,480 --> 00:02:47,440 Speaker 2: this day. I was just in Shanghai this month, and 44 00:02:47,680 --> 00:02:50,320 Speaker 2: what I saw was that, you know, if you are 45 00:02:50,400 --> 00:02:53,480 Speaker 2: a taxpayer, you will see changes in the city pretty 46 00:02:53,520 --> 00:02:57,600 Speaker 2: much every year. They're building new pedestrian walkways, and if 47 00:02:57,639 --> 00:03:01,720 Speaker 2: you go complain about the government civil services, you will 48 00:03:01,760 --> 00:03:06,840 Speaker 2: get responses immediately. Big cities in China have transformed themselves, 49 00:03:06,919 --> 00:03:09,920 Speaker 2: and the China model is basically, I build it and 50 00:03:09,960 --> 00:03:12,400 Speaker 2: the economy will come for you. 51 00:03:12,440 --> 00:03:16,000 Speaker 1: Like what symbolizes that change most visibly? Is it skyscrapers? 52 00:03:16,040 --> 00:03:18,520 Speaker 1: Is it the infrastructure? Like what are the most tangible 53 00:03:18,600 --> 00:03:22,520 Speaker 1: reminders that this incredible change that occurred during your own lifetime? 54 00:03:23,680 --> 00:03:27,960 Speaker 2: I think it's coming hours. The subway is very very efficient. 55 00:03:28,280 --> 00:03:30,680 Speaker 2: If we talk about going from the city center to 56 00:03:30,760 --> 00:03:34,600 Speaker 2: airport express you can take this very fast speed real 57 00:03:34,720 --> 00:03:37,560 Speaker 2: at the three hundred kilometers an hour, and you can 58 00:03:37,640 --> 00:03:40,440 Speaker 2: get to the airport in about five six minutes. And 59 00:03:40,520 --> 00:03:42,960 Speaker 2: that high speed real was actually built when I was 60 00:03:43,000 --> 00:03:45,760 Speaker 2: still in the US almost twenty years ago, and I 61 00:03:45,840 --> 00:03:51,840 Speaker 2: find that efficiency is very transformative and glaring to visitors' eyes. 62 00:03:52,720 --> 00:03:56,880 Speaker 1: Karishma, you were born in Singapore, raised in Indonesia, You've 63 00:03:56,920 --> 00:03:59,880 Speaker 1: had a vast global experience apart from that, just like truly, 64 00:04:01,000 --> 00:04:04,040 Speaker 1: when you look at China, what do you think about 65 00:04:04,080 --> 00:04:07,920 Speaker 1: the last several decades of profound growth and change there? 66 00:04:08,160 --> 00:04:10,640 Speaker 3: Yeah, you know, just picking up tim on what Schuly 67 00:04:11,040 --> 00:04:14,080 Speaker 3: was saying. I remember when I was growing up that 68 00:04:14,320 --> 00:04:17,320 Speaker 3: India and China were almost around the same level, right 69 00:04:17,400 --> 00:04:21,640 Speaker 3: like forty years ago in terms of how unavailable resources 70 00:04:21,680 --> 00:04:25,320 Speaker 3: were for people, basic sort of poverty levels, all of that. 71 00:04:25,440 --> 00:04:27,960 Speaker 3: And it was as a journalist in India when I 72 00:04:28,040 --> 00:04:31,359 Speaker 3: first went to visit Beijing, and there is always this 73 00:04:31,440 --> 00:04:35,000 Speaker 3: comparison between China and India, and it's very envious of 74 00:04:35,040 --> 00:04:37,800 Speaker 3: the achievements that China's been able to make. And I 75 00:04:37,839 --> 00:04:41,440 Speaker 3: think nothing was more glaringly obvious in the strides that 76 00:04:41,520 --> 00:04:44,000 Speaker 3: China had made for me at least you talked about 77 00:04:44,040 --> 00:04:47,240 Speaker 3: the commuters and the subway system truly, but for me. 78 00:04:47,400 --> 00:04:51,520 Speaker 3: It was the highways, because it was these gigantic highways 79 00:04:51,520 --> 00:04:56,040 Speaker 3: that stretched out into the distance, huge monolithic structures that 80 00:04:56,200 --> 00:04:59,240 Speaker 3: really showed the size and scale of the country and 81 00:04:59,279 --> 00:05:01,160 Speaker 3: what it was able to to achieve and to your 82 00:05:01,200 --> 00:05:03,680 Speaker 3: point about build it and they will come, it was 83 00:05:03,720 --> 00:05:07,320 Speaker 3: exactly that. China's now seen around the world as a 84 00:05:07,360 --> 00:05:10,279 Speaker 3: country that has made remarkable strides, and I think it's 85 00:05:10,640 --> 00:05:13,919 Speaker 3: really important to remember the fact that when they have 86 00:05:14,080 --> 00:05:17,400 Speaker 3: had a plan, they have managed to achieve that plan. 87 00:05:17,720 --> 00:05:20,200 Speaker 3: And that's something that a lot of countries in the 88 00:05:20,200 --> 00:05:23,240 Speaker 3: region one look up to because they are trying to 89 00:05:23,320 --> 00:05:27,000 Speaker 3: find an alternative model of economic growth but also a 90 00:05:27,040 --> 00:05:30,120 Speaker 3: political system. There's been a lot of lecturing from the 91 00:05:30,120 --> 00:05:34,440 Speaker 3: West to countries out in Asia about how ideologies should be. 92 00:05:34,560 --> 00:05:38,160 Speaker 3: That democracy is the right way forward. It's not always 93 00:05:38,160 --> 00:05:40,440 Speaker 3: seen in the most palatable way for a lot of 94 00:05:40,520 --> 00:05:42,839 Speaker 3: leaders out in this part of the world. But two, 95 00:05:42,960 --> 00:05:46,160 Speaker 3: because it's actually been an achievement, They've done it. They 96 00:05:46,200 --> 00:05:48,280 Speaker 3: said they were going to do it, and they've done it. 97 00:05:48,320 --> 00:05:51,760 Speaker 3: And I think that evidence has helped to solidify the 98 00:05:51,839 --> 00:05:55,200 Speaker 3: reputation of China as an economic genius in many ways, 99 00:05:55,720 --> 00:05:57,599 Speaker 3: and that countries in the region have looked up to, 100 00:05:58,560 --> 00:05:58,919 Speaker 3: and what do. 101 00:05:58,960 --> 00:06:01,520 Speaker 1: You think China it's elf wants to be if China 102 00:06:01,520 --> 00:06:02,919 Speaker 1: was a person. This is such a bad way to 103 00:06:02,960 --> 00:06:05,000 Speaker 1: frame a question, but it's actually useful. I think in 104 00:06:05,040 --> 00:06:08,800 Speaker 1: this case, who does China want to be accepted? 105 00:06:09,360 --> 00:06:11,560 Speaker 3: Is the sense that I get, you know, like for 106 00:06:11,600 --> 00:06:15,520 Speaker 3: the longest time, my impression has been that China consistently 107 00:06:15,560 --> 00:06:17,200 Speaker 3: and you see this in some of the rhetoric from 108 00:06:17,200 --> 00:06:19,919 Speaker 3: the Foreign ministry as well, it has a model that 109 00:06:19,960 --> 00:06:23,039 Speaker 3: it wants to show the world is possible, that it 110 00:06:23,080 --> 00:06:27,880 Speaker 3: is achievable, and that alternative way of being and of 111 00:06:27,920 --> 00:06:31,000 Speaker 3: doing politics and of growing your economy is something that 112 00:06:31,000 --> 00:06:34,320 Speaker 3: should be considered as on par with the United States, 113 00:06:34,839 --> 00:06:37,880 Speaker 3: if not in some ways superior. And I think what's 114 00:06:37,880 --> 00:06:40,359 Speaker 3: happened in the last couple of years, particularly under the 115 00:06:40,360 --> 00:06:43,480 Speaker 3: administration of Chijin Ping, because that's really where it all changed, right, 116 00:06:43,600 --> 00:06:45,560 Speaker 3: Like I mean, up until that point, there was a 117 00:06:45,600 --> 00:06:48,200 Speaker 3: sense that China was growing very well, there was engagement, 118 00:06:48,520 --> 00:06:50,719 Speaker 3: there were concerns about some of the actions out in 119 00:06:50,760 --> 00:06:52,880 Speaker 3: places like the South China Sea and Taiwan, but not 120 00:06:52,920 --> 00:06:55,400 Speaker 3: to the extent that you have now. And I think 121 00:06:55,520 --> 00:06:58,839 Speaker 3: under Xi Jinping. It's become a lot more difficult for 122 00:06:59,040 --> 00:07:03,719 Speaker 3: the outside world to understand. What are the intentions of 123 00:07:03,800 --> 00:07:07,039 Speaker 3: this new China? What are the ambitions? Is it a 124 00:07:07,120 --> 00:07:12,360 Speaker 3: sort of expansive and territorial empire building policy or is 125 00:07:12,400 --> 00:07:15,920 Speaker 3: it a country that is trying to make itself known 126 00:07:16,120 --> 00:07:19,200 Speaker 3: and seen on the global stage. And right now a 127 00:07:19,200 --> 00:07:21,040 Speaker 3: lot of people that I talk to still haven't figured 128 00:07:21,040 --> 00:07:23,040 Speaker 3: out which of the two it is. 129 00:07:23,920 --> 00:07:27,480 Speaker 1: So Shuley Karishma said that China just wants to be accepted. 130 00:07:28,040 --> 00:07:30,600 Speaker 1: And I'm far less sophisticated than both of you on 131 00:07:30,600 --> 00:07:33,240 Speaker 1: this topic. That would not have been my first goat 132 00:07:33,240 --> 00:07:36,160 Speaker 1: to description of China. I feel like as an American 133 00:07:36,360 --> 00:07:38,720 Speaker 1: watching this, but as someone who's trying to be objective 134 00:07:38,720 --> 00:07:41,000 Speaker 1: beyond just being an American, I also see China as 135 00:07:41,000 --> 00:07:45,200 Speaker 1: a country that wants to dominate certain aspects of its 136 00:07:45,240 --> 00:07:50,040 Speaker 1: relationships with commercially and economically and diplomatically with others. You 137 00:07:50,040 --> 00:07:52,720 Speaker 1: don't have to agree with that, but I think Karishma's 138 00:07:53,280 --> 00:07:56,000 Speaker 1: introduced to provocative talking point. I wonder what you thought 139 00:07:56,040 --> 00:07:56,280 Speaker 1: of it. 140 00:07:57,080 --> 00:07:59,840 Speaker 2: I absolutely agree with the Karishma on that. Like going 141 00:08:00,120 --> 00:08:03,720 Speaker 2: back to your question about China's identity, Okay, let me 142 00:08:03,960 --> 00:08:07,000 Speaker 2: step back and say, going back to presenting Pin the politician, 143 00:08:07,080 --> 00:08:11,080 Speaker 2: the political leader's sense of identity, he sees China as 144 00:08:11,120 --> 00:08:14,720 Speaker 2: a producer first and then consumer. It's actually a very 145 00:08:14,800 --> 00:08:18,640 Speaker 2: nineteen sixties mentality and ideology that he grew up with, 146 00:08:18,960 --> 00:08:22,720 Speaker 2: whereas us it's a consumer based society. The philosophy of 147 00:08:22,800 --> 00:08:25,840 Speaker 2: governors is very different. Like China basically say, let's do 148 00:08:25,960 --> 00:08:29,960 Speaker 2: industrial ambition, industrial policy, and then as we get rich, 149 00:08:30,240 --> 00:08:33,440 Speaker 2: there will be money for the consumers and the workers, 150 00:08:33,640 --> 00:08:38,280 Speaker 2: whereas US basically says, perhaps that's my wrong impression that 151 00:08:38,400 --> 00:08:40,840 Speaker 2: a government's job is more or less to do no 152 00:08:41,000 --> 00:08:44,760 Speaker 2: harm and to let people live, and the consumer society 153 00:08:44,800 --> 00:08:48,720 Speaker 2: will flourish and will generate demand for new products, etc. 154 00:08:49,280 --> 00:08:52,280 Speaker 2: So it is an identity issue, and the present sheging 155 00:08:52,320 --> 00:08:56,200 Speaker 2: Pin basically thinks the world have two ways of economic growth, 156 00:08:56,400 --> 00:08:59,000 Speaker 2: when on the producer side one on the consumer side. 157 00:09:00,080 --> 00:09:03,800 Speaker 1: You would say that that entire posture on China's part 158 00:09:04,360 --> 00:09:05,760 Speaker 1: is about wanting to be accepted. 159 00:09:06,559 --> 00:09:09,360 Speaker 2: Yes, I mean, if you look at Belt and Row initiative, 160 00:09:09,400 --> 00:09:11,559 Speaker 2: and he just made a speech in Beijing right with 161 00:09:11,760 --> 00:09:14,520 Speaker 2: President putting on his site, he basically said that we 162 00:09:15,000 --> 00:09:18,520 Speaker 2: China are trying to improve the infrastructure, and that's the 163 00:09:18,559 --> 00:09:21,320 Speaker 2: only economic growth model that he knows of, and he 164 00:09:21,440 --> 00:09:24,440 Speaker 2: feels that China is doing good to the third world countries. 165 00:09:25,040 --> 00:09:28,800 Speaker 1: So, Karushimaban, is there a central thing that animates China? 166 00:09:29,200 --> 00:09:31,400 Speaker 1: Staying on the conversation we just had, like, what is 167 00:09:31,440 --> 00:09:35,439 Speaker 1: propelling China itself forward in terms of its own goals? 168 00:09:36,200 --> 00:09:39,040 Speaker 3: Perhaps it's worth looking at this tim from the perspective 169 00:09:39,080 --> 00:09:40,840 Speaker 3: if I was to ask you that question about the 170 00:09:40,960 --> 00:09:44,840 Speaker 3: United States, right, what is propelling the United States forward 171 00:09:44,920 --> 00:09:47,640 Speaker 3: with its own goals? A desire to show that this 172 00:09:47,800 --> 00:09:51,080 Speaker 3: is a country that is a global leader, a superpower, 173 00:09:51,160 --> 00:09:55,000 Speaker 3: a military power. And China feels the same way. And 174 00:09:55,080 --> 00:09:57,960 Speaker 3: I think that sometimes you know, there is an arrogance 175 00:09:58,040 --> 00:10:01,520 Speaker 3: in the West about the the hierarchy. Right, the US 176 00:10:01,600 --> 00:10:03,840 Speaker 3: is at the top of the tree, and then everybody 177 00:10:03,840 --> 00:10:07,200 Speaker 3: else is on the democratic column and on the democratic camp. 178 00:10:07,240 --> 00:10:09,280 Speaker 3: And so you are our friends, and you belong in 179 00:10:09,320 --> 00:10:13,160 Speaker 3: the in crowd and in the cool crowd and everybody else. Sorry, 180 00:10:13,640 --> 00:10:16,320 Speaker 3: don't want you at the party, right. But for China, 181 00:10:16,400 --> 00:10:20,199 Speaker 3: what it's been able to do is actually achieve a 182 00:10:20,400 --> 00:10:23,320 Speaker 3: remarkable as I'm repeating myself here. But you know, I 183 00:10:23,360 --> 00:10:27,000 Speaker 3: don't think we can make that point enough that it's 184 00:10:27,080 --> 00:10:30,040 Speaker 3: managed to bring, as you said in your introduction, eight 185 00:10:30,120 --> 00:10:33,080 Speaker 3: hundred million people out of poverty and bring them to 186 00:10:33,120 --> 00:10:36,720 Speaker 3: a level where they're creating world class companies, the sorts 187 00:10:36,760 --> 00:10:39,640 Speaker 3: of companies that truly writes about every day, you know, 188 00:10:39,720 --> 00:10:42,319 Speaker 3: with innovation at a level. The first time I went 189 00:10:42,360 --> 00:10:44,800 Speaker 3: to China, it was the highways that I remarked on 190 00:10:44,840 --> 00:10:47,559 Speaker 3: the second time, when I went to Shinjin to interview 191 00:10:47,800 --> 00:10:50,720 Speaker 3: the boss of Huawei, I was amazed by the fact 192 00:10:50,760 --> 00:10:54,599 Speaker 3: that everything was you know, facial identification in the subways. 193 00:10:54,640 --> 00:10:57,840 Speaker 3: You know, the level of technology is really something to 194 00:10:57,920 --> 00:10:59,960 Speaker 3: remark on. But to go back to that point, right, 195 00:11:00,480 --> 00:11:04,240 Speaker 3: I think it is worth recognizing that China is trying 196 00:11:04,360 --> 00:11:09,559 Speaker 3: to showcase its achievements. It wants to be accepted, and 197 00:11:09,640 --> 00:11:12,200 Speaker 3: when it comes up against the US, that is where 198 00:11:12,240 --> 00:11:15,920 Speaker 3: the conflict happens. That is where the clash happens. Because 199 00:11:16,240 --> 00:11:18,840 Speaker 3: I think it's not just the Chinese side that is 200 00:11:18,880 --> 00:11:19,800 Speaker 3: responsible for that. 201 00:11:20,160 --> 00:11:22,199 Speaker 1: The US has its own set of issues for sure, 202 00:11:22,600 --> 00:11:25,360 Speaker 1: especially in the kind of shambalic politically era we're in 203 00:11:25,440 --> 00:11:29,120 Speaker 1: right now in the United States. Truly how does China 204 00:11:29,240 --> 00:11:32,880 Speaker 1: think about its own recent history? Obviously, with a country 205 00:11:32,880 --> 00:11:35,320 Speaker 1: that has had such a rich and storied past, you 206 00:11:35,320 --> 00:11:37,400 Speaker 1: could say recent history is the last three hundred years, 207 00:11:37,480 --> 00:11:40,040 Speaker 1: and that's still probably not recent. So I'm sort of 208 00:11:40,080 --> 00:11:42,560 Speaker 1: thinking of recent like I was going to say post 209 00:11:42,600 --> 00:11:46,400 Speaker 1: World War two, but I actually think almost postcolonial when 210 00:11:46,480 --> 00:11:51,319 Speaker 1: she looks at nineteenth century China and twentieth century China, 211 00:11:51,440 --> 00:11:54,760 Speaker 1: and now, how does he and the people around him 212 00:11:55,320 --> 00:11:57,160 Speaker 1: think about the arc of that history. 213 00:11:58,520 --> 00:12:01,040 Speaker 2: I will say that there a little bit passive aggressive, 214 00:12:02,000 --> 00:12:04,360 Speaker 2: aggressive in the sense that they feel that they were 215 00:12:04,480 --> 00:12:08,439 Speaker 2: round in the nineteenth century and that China was almost colonialized, 216 00:12:08,480 --> 00:12:11,160 Speaker 2: and then we have World War Two, the ninteen massacre 217 00:12:11,240 --> 00:12:14,640 Speaker 2: by the Japanese Army, etc. Passive in the sense that 218 00:12:14,720 --> 00:12:17,280 Speaker 2: they just feel that China is a huge empire. It 219 00:12:17,320 --> 00:12:20,439 Speaker 2: has lasted longer than the Ottoman Empire, longer than the 220 00:12:20,520 --> 00:12:24,200 Speaker 2: Roman Empire, and there is a cultural superiority that the 221 00:12:24,280 --> 00:12:27,760 Speaker 2: Chinese leadership feels that they can leverage on. For instance, 222 00:12:28,000 --> 00:12:30,800 Speaker 2: if we talk about the global supply chain, the Chinese 223 00:12:30,880 --> 00:12:33,160 Speaker 2: workers are stellar. They are the ones who are willing 224 00:12:33,200 --> 00:12:36,080 Speaker 2: to work nine ninety six. You know from nine am 225 00:12:36,200 --> 00:12:38,520 Speaker 2: to nine pm for six days a week. They feel 226 00:12:38,559 --> 00:12:42,000 Speaker 2: that there is a very very strong cultural superiority. Last year, 227 00:12:42,080 --> 00:12:44,360 Speaker 2: when I was on the reporting trip in Viennam, I 228 00:12:44,400 --> 00:12:48,000 Speaker 2: spoke to quite a few Chinese entrepreneurs who opened factories 229 00:12:48,040 --> 00:12:51,480 Speaker 2: in Vietnam, and it was very politically incorrect. They said 230 00:12:51,679 --> 00:12:55,360 Speaker 2: they prefer to open factories in northern Vietnam because it's 231 00:12:55,559 --> 00:12:59,800 Speaker 2: culturally closer to Chinese Confucian spot and the people there 232 00:12:59,800 --> 00:13:03,760 Speaker 2: were harder working in the southern Saigong area. So there 233 00:13:03,840 --> 00:13:07,240 Speaker 2: is that sense. But sometimes they also get very angry 234 00:13:07,559 --> 00:13:10,840 Speaker 2: if they feel that they are being slighted by global 235 00:13:10,920 --> 00:13:13,760 Speaker 2: powers such as the United States. They will think back 236 00:13:13,880 --> 00:13:18,079 Speaker 2: on the eighteen hundreds, how China was so humiliated by 237 00:13:18,120 --> 00:13:21,160 Speaker 2: the European and later on by the Japanese powers. So 238 00:13:21,200 --> 00:13:24,079 Speaker 2: it's kind of that conflict that I see. 239 00:13:24,240 --> 00:13:26,400 Speaker 3: Just picking up on what Shirley said, because I think 240 00:13:26,440 --> 00:13:28,240 Speaker 3: it can bring us down, you know, the sort of 241 00:13:28,360 --> 00:13:31,160 Speaker 3: understanding of why then China, if it's just trying to 242 00:13:31,200 --> 00:13:34,360 Speaker 3: be accepted or recognized for its achievements, get such a 243 00:13:34,960 --> 00:13:37,840 Speaker 3: negative reaction in the outside world, right, Why does it 244 00:13:37,880 --> 00:13:40,400 Speaker 3: have this bad press so to speak? That example that 245 00:13:40,440 --> 00:13:42,880 Speaker 3: you brought up of the entrepreneurs that you met in Vietnam, 246 00:13:42,920 --> 00:13:45,800 Speaker 3: and you know the Belton Road projects where Chinese companies 247 00:13:45,840 --> 00:13:49,240 Speaker 3: go overseas, but they want to bring Chinese labor with them, 248 00:13:49,280 --> 00:13:52,199 Speaker 3: they want to bring that Chinese expertise. And then these 249 00:13:52,240 --> 00:13:56,160 Speaker 3: projects that end up becoming vessels in a way for 250 00:13:56,440 --> 00:13:59,960 Speaker 3: an export of Chinese workers to these countries is then 251 00:14:00,120 --> 00:14:04,440 Speaker 3: viewed is not something that's beneficial to that country. Rather, 252 00:14:04,800 --> 00:14:08,199 Speaker 3: it's all going back to the empire. And I'm putting 253 00:14:08,200 --> 00:14:11,000 Speaker 3: the word empire in quotation marks, and I think that's 254 00:14:11,000 --> 00:14:14,239 Speaker 3: what China struggles with, right It is a rising superpower. 255 00:14:14,559 --> 00:14:17,600 Speaker 3: There's no way we can deny that it's here to stay. 256 00:14:17,720 --> 00:14:20,080 Speaker 3: It's not going anywhere. And I think learning how to 257 00:14:20,160 --> 00:14:24,680 Speaker 3: manage China, learning how to navigate it is essential for 258 00:14:24,800 --> 00:14:28,560 Speaker 3: a country like the United States, because Biden has done 259 00:14:28,760 --> 00:14:32,320 Speaker 3: a remarkable job of this deterrence and integrated deterrence, getting 260 00:14:32,360 --> 00:14:34,280 Speaker 3: all of the partners in the region to sort of 261 00:14:34,920 --> 00:14:39,440 Speaker 3: work together on this, recognizing China is this existential sort 262 00:14:39,440 --> 00:14:41,560 Speaker 3: of conflict that they've got to come up with. But 263 00:14:41,720 --> 00:14:45,480 Speaker 3: nobody wants a conflict between the US and China, right, 264 00:14:45,640 --> 00:14:48,000 Speaker 3: Like a lot of the countries in this part of 265 00:14:48,000 --> 00:14:50,200 Speaker 3: the world and wondering why can't you just sort it 266 00:14:50,240 --> 00:14:51,840 Speaker 3: out and get along, right. 267 00:14:52,360 --> 00:14:54,520 Speaker 2: I just want to add one more thing, just like 268 00:14:54,520 --> 00:14:56,960 Speaker 2: a world Karishma said, we do need to think about 269 00:14:57,040 --> 00:14:59,760 Speaker 2: what the Chinese leaders are thinking. They are a little 270 00:14:59,760 --> 00:15:02,800 Speaker 2: bit like people were, like to say, an overconfident in China. 271 00:15:03,000 --> 00:15:05,640 Speaker 2: But I think the outside were also should think about 272 00:15:05,720 --> 00:15:11,200 Speaker 2: China being historically insecure. So when is these aggressive gestures 273 00:15:11,240 --> 00:15:15,520 Speaker 2: from the US, it will overreact. So I think it's 274 00:15:15,640 --> 00:15:18,760 Speaker 2: very important to tone it down on the western side, 275 00:15:18,840 --> 00:15:19,520 Speaker 2: on both sides. 276 00:15:19,560 --> 00:15:22,000 Speaker 1: Actually, we'll probably get into this a little bit more 277 00:15:22,040 --> 00:15:24,160 Speaker 1: later in the show, but Hong Kong to me, is 278 00:15:24,200 --> 00:15:29,000 Speaker 1: such an emblematic city state for this very discussion because 279 00:15:29,920 --> 00:15:33,560 Speaker 1: England turned it into a vassal property. They used it 280 00:15:33,600 --> 00:15:38,120 Speaker 1: to introduce opium into mainland China. They used it controlled 281 00:15:38,240 --> 00:15:41,520 Speaker 1: China so they could dominate and try to colonize China. 282 00:15:41,960 --> 00:15:44,560 Speaker 1: And China has come out of that era and people 283 00:15:44,640 --> 00:15:48,200 Speaker 1: now criticize China for the way it's pulling Hong Kong 284 00:15:48,680 --> 00:15:53,040 Speaker 1: back into its own orbit. But I also am sympathetic 285 00:15:53,240 --> 00:15:55,840 Speaker 1: to the idea that Chinese have that it was never 286 00:15:55,880 --> 00:15:59,200 Speaker 1: out of our orbit, other people came in and abused 287 00:15:59,240 --> 00:16:02,320 Speaker 1: it essentially at different points in our history. And I 288 00:16:02,360 --> 00:16:04,640 Speaker 1: still think you can be critical of the way that 289 00:16:04,760 --> 00:16:08,000 Speaker 1: China is trying to absorb it now while also respecting 290 00:16:08,040 --> 00:16:11,280 Speaker 1: I think truly what you just mentioned, that this insecurity 291 00:16:11,880 --> 00:16:14,280 Speaker 1: China has that's born out of the way the history 292 00:16:14,320 --> 00:16:16,320 Speaker 1: has played out. You don't have to agree with me 293 00:16:16,320 --> 00:16:20,160 Speaker 1: about that either, but Hong Kong fascinates me in that regard. Sure. 294 00:16:20,480 --> 00:16:22,840 Speaker 2: One thing that's interesting about Hong Kong is I live 295 00:16:22,880 --> 00:16:25,200 Speaker 2: in Hong Kong, and you know the twenty nineteen protests. 296 00:16:25,200 --> 00:16:27,240 Speaker 2: I spoke to Hong Kong local people, right, but they're 297 00:16:27,280 --> 00:16:31,120 Speaker 2: ultimately Chinese. Got migrated from the north, and I notice 298 00:16:31,200 --> 00:16:35,160 Speaker 2: a very strong generational divide. Like say, I speak to 299 00:16:35,320 --> 00:16:37,760 Speaker 2: like people who are older, like in their sixties or whatever, 300 00:16:38,040 --> 00:16:40,880 Speaker 2: like my juror mister Ma. He told me, he said, 301 00:16:41,040 --> 00:16:44,720 Speaker 2: before China has Bruce Lee, now we have Chi Jin Pin. 302 00:16:45,480 --> 00:16:48,560 Speaker 2: He is actually very patriotic. A lot of old Hong 303 00:16:48,640 --> 00:16:51,760 Speaker 2: Kong Chinese people are very patriotic, but if you move 304 00:16:51,840 --> 00:16:55,160 Speaker 2: down to like people in their twenties or even thirties, 305 00:16:55,920 --> 00:16:59,640 Speaker 2: they prefer British rule, believe it or not. And I 306 00:16:59,680 --> 00:17:03,720 Speaker 2: think ultimately it's about governors. They see China as being 307 00:17:03,760 --> 00:17:07,400 Speaker 2: too intrusive. The Chinese way of government is being too intrusive, 308 00:17:07,440 --> 00:17:10,040 Speaker 2: whereas the British kind of sort of just left them 309 00:17:10,040 --> 00:17:10,920 Speaker 2: alone and. 310 00:17:10,920 --> 00:17:13,399 Speaker 1: There was free speech, there was a free press, it 311 00:17:13,440 --> 00:17:16,919 Speaker 1: was a very creative community. It was authentically international, and 312 00:17:16,960 --> 00:17:19,679 Speaker 1: there's a real danger now that China is sort of 313 00:17:19,680 --> 00:17:22,320 Speaker 1: squeezing that out of that kind of Hong Kong. 314 00:17:23,080 --> 00:17:25,880 Speaker 2: Yes, absolutely, But on the other side, Hong Kong's Chief 315 00:17:25,920 --> 00:17:29,720 Speaker 2: executive Youngly just had his policy address earlier this week, right, 316 00:17:29,920 --> 00:17:32,240 Speaker 2: and you can see the Hong Kong governance is changing. 317 00:17:32,320 --> 00:17:34,480 Speaker 2: They're trying to give you more cash handouts. They're trying 318 00:17:34,520 --> 00:17:39,040 Speaker 2: to build infrastructure. They're trying to incentivize and stimulate you 319 00:17:39,119 --> 00:17:43,120 Speaker 2: through money and the buildings and the new artificial islands. 320 00:17:43,359 --> 00:17:45,720 Speaker 2: You can see the way of a Hong Kong governess 321 00:17:45,840 --> 00:17:48,800 Speaker 2: is heading towards the Chinese way. And I have to say, 322 00:17:48,920 --> 00:17:52,080 Speaker 2: like I personally think of Hong Kong, the infrastructure is 323 00:17:52,080 --> 00:17:55,400 Speaker 2: getting dilapidated. If you go to the Central Business District 324 00:17:55,480 --> 00:17:58,159 Speaker 2: this summer has been terrible. We can smell switch, you know. 325 00:17:58,480 --> 00:18:01,440 Speaker 2: But the Hong Kong government much left you alone, and 326 00:18:01,520 --> 00:18:04,399 Speaker 2: I think they are shifting to the mainland China model. 327 00:18:05,000 --> 00:18:06,919 Speaker 1: Couragem. I can see that you have some thoughts on 328 00:18:06,960 --> 00:18:07,879 Speaker 1: that so way in here. 329 00:18:08,240 --> 00:18:11,720 Speaker 3: Yeah, I think this idea or the framing of you 330 00:18:11,760 --> 00:18:16,480 Speaker 3: can accept and sort of remark positively on aspects of 331 00:18:16,520 --> 00:18:19,119 Speaker 3: how China has done things, but also be clear eyed 332 00:18:19,160 --> 00:18:22,280 Speaker 3: and critical of the way, for example, it's operated in 333 00:18:22,320 --> 00:18:26,040 Speaker 3: Hong Kong is crucial for our understanding of China. From 334 00:18:26,080 --> 00:18:29,159 Speaker 3: the Chinese side, it's very clear. We've discussed that why 335 00:18:29,200 --> 00:18:31,360 Speaker 3: they feel about Hong Kong the way that they do. 336 00:18:31,720 --> 00:18:34,000 Speaker 3: But from young Hong konger's that I spoke to, just 337 00:18:34,200 --> 00:18:36,720 Speaker 3: as you mentioned, surely on some of those reporting trips 338 00:18:36,720 --> 00:18:39,639 Speaker 3: I made there, they do not feel Chinese. They do 339 00:18:39,680 --> 00:18:43,400 Speaker 3: not feel mainland Chinese, even if they are ethnically Chinese. 340 00:18:43,400 --> 00:18:46,320 Speaker 3: And I think the fact that a political system in China, 341 00:18:46,400 --> 00:18:48,399 Speaker 3: this is going to be my sense, is one of 342 00:18:48,440 --> 00:18:52,240 Speaker 3: the biggest issues going forward for young people who've grown 343 00:18:52,320 --> 00:18:56,000 Speaker 3: up in that system but no longer feel that they 344 00:18:56,640 --> 00:19:00,640 Speaker 3: have opportunities the way they saw for their parents. They 345 00:19:00,680 --> 00:19:03,399 Speaker 3: don't feel that they have the ability to say the 346 00:19:03,480 --> 00:19:05,840 Speaker 3: things that you know, we talk about a sort of 347 00:19:05,920 --> 00:19:09,080 Speaker 3: closed system in China, but it's become even more closed 348 00:19:09,200 --> 00:19:12,399 Speaker 3: now to the extent where you know, somebody says something 349 00:19:12,440 --> 00:19:16,359 Speaker 3: on Wabo and within minutes it's wiped away, right, And 350 00:19:16,440 --> 00:19:18,760 Speaker 3: I think it's really important for us to be clear 351 00:19:18,880 --> 00:19:21,240 Speaker 3: eyed about what is happening there and be able to 352 00:19:21,320 --> 00:19:23,320 Speaker 3: criticize but also to commend. 353 00:19:24,160 --> 00:19:26,880 Speaker 1: I would suspect, And it seems evident in the way 354 00:19:26,920 --> 00:19:30,320 Speaker 1: this has progressed that Chinese government when it sees young 355 00:19:30,359 --> 00:19:33,400 Speaker 1: Hong Kongers who are saying I like the Hong Kong 356 00:19:33,480 --> 00:19:36,280 Speaker 1: my parents had, and I want a Hong Kong that's 357 00:19:36,320 --> 00:19:40,320 Speaker 1: not specifically on the Chinese model, that the Chinese say, well, 358 00:19:40,359 --> 00:19:43,320 Speaker 1: then go live somewhere else, because this is the model 359 00:19:43,440 --> 00:19:46,040 Speaker 1: we're going to have. Whether or not you feel romantic 360 00:19:46,119 --> 00:19:49,919 Speaker 1: about the past, am I you know, misinterpreting them to me? 361 00:19:50,000 --> 00:19:52,679 Speaker 1: It just seems patently obvious that that's where we're headed. 362 00:19:53,160 --> 00:19:55,760 Speaker 2: Absolutely the Chinese government, so far head and stop the 363 00:19:55,760 --> 00:19:58,240 Speaker 2: Hong Kongers from leaving. If you don't like this model, 364 00:19:58,359 --> 00:19:59,640 Speaker 2: just please go ahead and leave. 365 00:20:00,320 --> 00:20:02,679 Speaker 3: And I think that's the danger, right because when you 366 00:20:02,760 --> 00:20:05,679 Speaker 3: look at the way that the mainland has operated in 367 00:20:05,720 --> 00:20:09,040 Speaker 3: Hong Kong, it is increasingly clear that that is the 368 00:20:09,119 --> 00:20:11,320 Speaker 3: root that is going to consistently be the way that 369 00:20:11,359 --> 00:20:14,520 Speaker 3: they approach politics there. There hasn't been a lessening of 370 00:20:14,520 --> 00:20:17,480 Speaker 3: Beijing's influence in Hong Kong. To the contrary, you see 371 00:20:17,520 --> 00:20:19,359 Speaker 3: it in every aspect of public life. 372 00:20:19,680 --> 00:20:22,240 Speaker 1: Precisely because some of the things I cited in the introduction, 373 00:20:22,359 --> 00:20:26,639 Speaker 1: this incredible economic success that mainland China has had, and 374 00:20:26,720 --> 00:20:30,800 Speaker 1: its muscularity around its military presence and the way it's 375 00:20:30,840 --> 00:20:34,159 Speaker 1: asserting itself in the world. They can point to a 376 00:20:34,200 --> 00:20:37,320 Speaker 1: successful track record as reason for why they want to 377 00:20:37,359 --> 00:20:40,200 Speaker 1: continue to roll the way they have. Though, and we'll 378 00:20:40,200 --> 00:20:42,119 Speaker 1: get into this later in the show, there's starting to 379 00:20:42,119 --> 00:20:44,399 Speaker 1: be a little bit of cracks in the model. On 380 00:20:44,440 --> 00:20:45,960 Speaker 1: that note, I'm going to take a quick break to 381 00:20:46,000 --> 00:20:48,119 Speaker 1: hear from one of our sponsors, and then we'll come 382 00:20:48,200 --> 00:20:57,359 Speaker 1: right back. We're back with karisim of Uswani and Shuley Wren. 383 00:20:57,359 --> 00:21:01,359 Speaker 1: They're both Bloomberg opinion columnists, and we're talking about China. 384 00:21:01,480 --> 00:21:05,639 Speaker 1: So surely, what is the secret sauce in China's economic rives? 385 00:21:05,680 --> 00:21:08,680 Speaker 1: If you were to identify the things that are very 386 00:21:08,720 --> 00:21:14,240 Speaker 1: specifically Chinese that were key to its growth, that differentiated 387 00:21:14,240 --> 00:21:18,119 Speaker 1: it from the growth paths that other countries, including the US, 388 00:21:18,160 --> 00:21:20,280 Speaker 1: has taken. What would those be. 389 00:21:21,920 --> 00:21:25,800 Speaker 2: I would now say it's the Chinese people. I think 390 00:21:25,840 --> 00:21:30,200 Speaker 2: that the Chinese Communist Party can be very very efficient, 391 00:21:30,520 --> 00:21:33,080 Speaker 2: at least in the era when the economic growth was 392 00:21:33,160 --> 00:21:36,120 Speaker 2: very fast. If there was a directive from the top, 393 00:21:36,760 --> 00:21:39,720 Speaker 2: it will get executed very quickly. I remember, I mean 394 00:21:39,760 --> 00:21:43,360 Speaker 2: I saw Chump high transform right, like a highway will 395 00:21:43,400 --> 00:21:46,120 Speaker 2: be built within just a year. There will be all 396 00:21:46,119 --> 00:21:48,440 Speaker 2: sorts of lend issues that people don't want to move. 397 00:21:48,560 --> 00:21:50,680 Speaker 2: What the government would just say, Okay, if you don't 398 00:21:50,720 --> 00:21:53,800 Speaker 2: want to move, I'm just going to cut off water, electricity, 399 00:21:54,040 --> 00:21:56,560 Speaker 2: gas and as important you will want to move right, 400 00:21:56,680 --> 00:21:59,720 Speaker 2: So everything gets built very quickly, whereas places that I've 401 00:21:59,760 --> 00:22:03,520 Speaker 2: seen in Vietnam, Indonesia, land rights is always an issue, 402 00:22:03,560 --> 00:22:06,800 Speaker 2: even in like other communist countries. So in that sense, 403 00:22:06,840 --> 00:22:08,840 Speaker 2: I think the Chinese government is very efficient. If it 404 00:22:08,920 --> 00:22:11,159 Speaker 2: wants to do something, it will get it done. 405 00:22:11,440 --> 00:22:14,280 Speaker 1: And it's loaded with talented people. It has the kind 406 00:22:14,280 --> 00:22:17,679 Speaker 1: of civil service you want. The UK is famous for 407 00:22:17,800 --> 00:22:23,120 Speaker 1: having a lifelong civil service that tries to be nonpartisan. Singapore, 408 00:22:23,200 --> 00:22:25,520 Speaker 1: I think, is a great example of a very well 409 00:22:25,560 --> 00:22:29,359 Speaker 1: compensated civil service that recruits for talent. And I think 410 00:22:29,800 --> 00:22:32,760 Speaker 1: China has done that at a massive, massive scale, hasn't it. 411 00:22:33,440 --> 00:22:36,040 Speaker 2: Absolutely? Like if you look at Seisha, I'm hi right, 412 00:22:36,119 --> 00:22:38,280 Speaker 2: Like the government has an app and then they have 413 00:22:38,359 --> 00:22:41,680 Speaker 2: also of entries, say like a switch problem, electricity problem. 414 00:22:41,760 --> 00:22:43,439 Speaker 2: You can click on the entry and then you can 415 00:22:43,560 --> 00:22:47,000 Speaker 2: leave a comment. Within twenty five hours, somebody will contact 416 00:22:47,040 --> 00:22:48,960 Speaker 2: you and say, what's your problem, and now don't try 417 00:22:49,000 --> 00:22:50,280 Speaker 2: to get a fixed winning a week. 418 00:22:50,920 --> 00:22:54,040 Speaker 1: Wow, So that doesn't happen in the United States. Karishma, 419 00:22:54,080 --> 00:22:56,720 Speaker 1: what are your thoughts about China's economic rise? 420 00:22:56,920 --> 00:22:59,400 Speaker 3: Yeah, I wonder surely whether you'll agree with this, But 421 00:22:59,480 --> 00:23:02,680 Speaker 3: to me, you know, it's also the private entrepreneurs. And 422 00:23:03,080 --> 00:23:05,679 Speaker 3: when you look back at the Ero and China opened 423 00:23:05,760 --> 00:23:08,760 Speaker 3: up and Dougshaoping, etc. There was a real encouragement of 424 00:23:09,160 --> 00:23:12,320 Speaker 3: private industry that governments sort of you know, at least 425 00:23:12,400 --> 00:23:15,800 Speaker 3: to me, it seemed let flourish without too much interference. 426 00:23:15,840 --> 00:23:18,040 Speaker 3: It only started to get involved when these companies became 427 00:23:18,080 --> 00:23:20,840 Speaker 3: so big and they started to become more popular, or 428 00:23:20,840 --> 00:23:23,119 Speaker 3: the CEOs became more popular in the mind space of 429 00:23:23,160 --> 00:23:25,240 Speaker 3: young people than Sheijin Ping did you know, the sort 430 00:23:25,240 --> 00:23:28,640 Speaker 3: of jackmasied and ping plash that we can get into later. 431 00:23:29,040 --> 00:23:33,200 Speaker 3: But the companies themselves grew up in this rather messy 432 00:23:33,280 --> 00:23:37,640 Speaker 3: and chaotic environment, which then they had to deal with 433 00:23:37,680 --> 00:23:40,119 Speaker 3: the problems that were apparent to them. In China, they 434 00:23:40,160 --> 00:23:44,480 Speaker 3: had those opportunities, and initially they were servicing that market 435 00:23:44,640 --> 00:23:48,160 Speaker 3: by selling products to the United States, but also leveraging 436 00:23:48,160 --> 00:23:51,640 Speaker 3: off the vast labor force that they had in the country. 437 00:23:52,000 --> 00:23:55,240 Speaker 3: And I think that's also really remarkable. It's the unique 438 00:23:55,240 --> 00:23:58,040 Speaker 3: thing that China had that other countries in the region 439 00:23:58,560 --> 00:24:02,320 Speaker 3: didn't have at the time. The nation of private entrepreneurs, 440 00:24:02,359 --> 00:24:05,679 Speaker 3: government efficiency as you point out, and a huge labor force. 441 00:24:06,119 --> 00:24:08,960 Speaker 1: And in part, I think China studied the Russian model 442 00:24:09,680 --> 00:24:13,119 Speaker 1: and it found it wanting. It was statism, so bureaucratic 443 00:24:13,480 --> 00:24:17,200 Speaker 1: and extreme and corrupt and inefficient, and it didn't really 444 00:24:17,240 --> 00:24:20,960 Speaker 1: allow for free enterprise. It seems to me that Chinese said, 445 00:24:21,000 --> 00:24:25,200 Speaker 1: we can have efficient central planning and an efficient government 446 00:24:25,640 --> 00:24:28,920 Speaker 1: plumbing around our economy, but we will also allow people 447 00:24:28,960 --> 00:24:31,879 Speaker 1: to become wealthy, will allow people to own their own property, 448 00:24:31,920 --> 00:24:35,440 Speaker 1: own their own businesses. So it was this unusual hybrid model. 449 00:24:35,240 --> 00:24:39,880 Speaker 2: Right absolutely, I mean, I do agree that private entrepreneurship 450 00:24:39,960 --> 00:24:42,280 Speaker 2: is very important, and I still think there is a 451 00:24:42,320 --> 00:24:45,440 Speaker 2: lot of animal spirits remaining in China based on my 452 00:24:45,520 --> 00:24:48,760 Speaker 2: conversations with entrepreneurs, et cetera. But I think that the 453 00:24:48,840 --> 00:24:51,560 Speaker 2: government's role is also very important. Like I think about 454 00:24:51,560 --> 00:24:55,160 Speaker 2: how China got rich. It was world's biggest factory floor, right, 455 00:24:55,480 --> 00:24:59,000 Speaker 2: and then to grow rich through manufacturing, you have to 456 00:24:59,119 --> 00:25:03,080 Speaker 2: have the high way, the big deep seap ports, and 457 00:25:03,280 --> 00:25:07,080 Speaker 2: the good cargo planes, etc. And the government has built that. 458 00:25:07,320 --> 00:25:08,600 Speaker 2: So I think it's a combination. 459 00:25:09,680 --> 00:25:13,160 Speaker 1: And Karushima, How has Chinese politics evolved during this time? 460 00:25:13,240 --> 00:25:17,760 Speaker 1: During this massive economic boom, we end up at its 461 00:25:17,840 --> 00:25:22,720 Speaker 1: peak state with Shijinping, who is now on his third 462 00:25:22,800 --> 00:25:26,800 Speaker 1: term he comes into power in twenty twelve. Has the 463 00:25:26,840 --> 00:25:32,960 Speaker 1: political architecture in China taken turns that surprise you? Is 464 00:25:32,960 --> 00:25:35,919 Speaker 1: it also strategic or is it more a little bit 465 00:25:35,920 --> 00:25:38,080 Speaker 1: of a cult of personality or some of both? 466 00:25:39,000 --> 00:25:42,240 Speaker 3: Gosha, I think it's really disappointing, actually more than anything else, 467 00:25:42,280 --> 00:25:45,359 Speaker 3: because in some respects if China had continued down a 468 00:25:45,359 --> 00:25:49,159 Speaker 3: path where you didn't have a Shijinping as commander in 469 00:25:49,240 --> 00:25:51,879 Speaker 3: chief for what now looks like life, it would have 470 00:25:51,960 --> 00:25:55,760 Speaker 3: still grown economically strong. It would have still, in my view, 471 00:25:55,840 --> 00:25:58,760 Speaker 3: you get to a point where developing economy reaches a 472 00:25:58,800 --> 00:26:01,480 Speaker 3: sort of mature level. These five percent growth rates that 473 00:26:01,520 --> 00:26:04,280 Speaker 3: we're seeing now, they're excellent growth rates by any account, 474 00:26:04,520 --> 00:26:07,320 Speaker 3: But you could have still had a very rich, profitable, 475 00:26:07,480 --> 00:26:11,199 Speaker 3: and thriving China without a Shi Jin pain at the 476 00:26:11,200 --> 00:26:13,800 Speaker 3: helm of China. And I often wonder if you'd had 477 00:26:13,840 --> 00:26:17,800 Speaker 3: a different kind of leader, somebody who doesn't seem as 478 00:26:17,880 --> 00:26:21,639 Speaker 3: inclined as Shei jinping is to build this cultive personality 479 00:26:22,119 --> 00:26:25,439 Speaker 3: around him, around the idea of what the party should 480 00:26:25,480 --> 00:26:29,080 Speaker 3: be in public life, in the minds of people. Then 481 00:26:29,400 --> 00:26:31,600 Speaker 3: you know what kind of country would that be? Would 482 00:26:31,640 --> 00:26:34,280 Speaker 3: that be a nation that would be far more willing 483 00:26:34,440 --> 00:26:37,840 Speaker 3: to cooperate and collaborate with the United States? Would it 484 00:26:37,880 --> 00:26:40,800 Speaker 3: have set itself up in this way on a path 485 00:26:40,880 --> 00:26:45,840 Speaker 3: of competition but also conflict rather than competition and cooperation. 486 00:26:46,440 --> 00:26:48,840 Speaker 3: And obviously we'll never know, but I do think there 487 00:26:48,920 --> 00:26:52,720 Speaker 3: was a real turning point when Xijin Pin came into power. 488 00:26:53,240 --> 00:26:55,639 Speaker 1: Talk a little bit more about that, truly, because I 489 00:26:55,640 --> 00:26:58,760 Speaker 1: want to talk about some also some specific things she 490 00:26:58,920 --> 00:27:01,800 Speaker 1: has done recently are I think revelatory, and we can 491 00:27:01,840 --> 00:27:03,879 Speaker 1: get into some of those, But tell me what you 492 00:27:03,920 --> 00:27:07,600 Speaker 1: think about the Shi era, for lack of a better term, I. 493 00:27:07,600 --> 00:27:12,000 Speaker 2: Think she is pretty much a puritan. He is nothing 494 00:27:12,160 --> 00:27:16,320 Speaker 2: like the other Communist political leaders of his era. He 495 00:27:16,440 --> 00:27:19,440 Speaker 2: doesn't go party drink, you know. I mean. There are 496 00:27:19,520 --> 00:27:23,359 Speaker 2: talks of his family's business associations, like in particular his sister, 497 00:27:23,720 --> 00:27:27,440 Speaker 2: but he himself seems a little bit of a more 498 00:27:27,760 --> 00:27:30,959 Speaker 2: anti materialistic, if I may use the term. He is 499 00:27:31,040 --> 00:27:34,679 Speaker 2: more ideologically driven, I think, and he seems to be 500 00:27:34,880 --> 00:27:40,040 Speaker 2: genuinely interested in the everlasting dynasty of the Chinese Communist Party. 501 00:27:40,520 --> 00:27:43,200 Speaker 2: I mean, what we hear is that his mother, who's 502 00:27:43,240 --> 00:27:46,879 Speaker 2: in her nineties, she's still alive, and despite all the 503 00:27:46,920 --> 00:27:50,400 Speaker 2: pursion of his own family, right, his mother is still 504 00:27:50,440 --> 00:27:53,320 Speaker 2: a big believer and a very very red heart. So 505 00:27:53,520 --> 00:27:56,800 Speaker 2: the sum perhaps it's just carrying on the family legacy. 506 00:27:57,800 --> 00:27:59,840 Speaker 1: I think. It was two years ago when Hu Jinta 507 00:28:00,160 --> 00:28:05,000 Speaker 1: got publicly embarrassed and escorted out of a major party 508 00:28:05,040 --> 00:28:08,760 Speaker 1: meeting in China in front of the country's political leaders. 509 00:28:09,040 --> 00:28:12,159 Speaker 1: It seemed very calculated and felt to me at the 510 00:28:12,240 --> 00:28:16,679 Speaker 1: time like she signaling a demonstrable break from a past, 511 00:28:16,840 --> 00:28:20,160 Speaker 1: a different kind of leadership. More recently, he's been purging 512 00:28:20,160 --> 00:28:23,840 Speaker 1: the military. They say that it's for corruption, that he's 513 00:28:23,880 --> 00:28:26,679 Speaker 1: uncovered corruption, but both of his leading defense ministers had 514 00:28:26,760 --> 00:28:29,879 Speaker 1: very short terms and they were shown the door, most 515 00:28:29,920 --> 00:28:35,320 Speaker 1: recently Li Shangfu. And he's been purging obviously, the business class. 516 00:28:35,800 --> 00:28:40,360 Speaker 1: Some of the entrepreneurs that Kirishima mentioned earlier who had 517 00:28:40,400 --> 00:28:43,360 Speaker 1: been I think symbolic to younger Chinese who wanted to 518 00:28:43,360 --> 00:28:46,160 Speaker 1: get rich, wanted to be creative, wanted to be entrepreneurial, 519 00:28:46,400 --> 00:28:48,560 Speaker 1: wanted to have their own companies, have now seen this 520 00:28:48,640 --> 00:28:53,440 Speaker 1: whole class of entrepreneurs sort of defenestrated. What do you 521 00:28:53,480 --> 00:28:54,240 Speaker 1: make of all of that? 522 00:28:55,880 --> 00:28:59,240 Speaker 2: I think ultimately it goes down to his production first, 523 00:28:59,280 --> 00:29:03,200 Speaker 2: consumption second ideology. I mean what you see is he's 524 00:29:03,320 --> 00:29:06,880 Speaker 2: encouraging industrial tech and he wants to build those little 525 00:29:06,960 --> 00:29:10,640 Speaker 2: little deep tech companies that the world's supply chain system 526 00:29:10,720 --> 00:29:14,360 Speaker 2: cannot deal without, and they will be always integrated into 527 00:29:14,480 --> 00:29:18,000 Speaker 2: the world no matter what happens too politically, consumer tach 528 00:29:18,120 --> 00:29:22,000 Speaker 2: he's knocking out. I mean, perhaps it's his own ideas 529 00:29:22,120 --> 00:29:25,160 Speaker 2: about how an economy can grow, but it's also like, 530 00:29:25,320 --> 00:29:29,640 Speaker 2: if you think about China become a very consumer oriented society, 531 00:29:29,760 --> 00:29:32,120 Speaker 2: young people will have their own thoughts, their own ideas, 532 00:29:32,360 --> 00:29:35,920 Speaker 2: and will the CCP's dynasty last. They have lasted for 533 00:29:36,240 --> 00:29:39,720 Speaker 2: fifty sixty years, but how about much longer another hundred 534 00:29:39,840 --> 00:29:42,800 Speaker 2: two hundred. He's thinking about in terms of Chin or 535 00:29:42,880 --> 00:29:44,400 Speaker 2: Ming dynasty terms. 536 00:29:45,120 --> 00:29:49,000 Speaker 1: So he's playing long ball and everyone else is playing shirtball. 537 00:29:49,720 --> 00:29:52,320 Speaker 2: In fact, he is very sensitive when people these days 538 00:29:52,360 --> 00:29:55,600 Speaker 2: talk about the Ming dynasty or Chin dynasty, because China's 539 00:29:55,600 --> 00:29:59,080 Speaker 2: censorship thinks people are just making very veal reference to him, 540 00:29:59,120 --> 00:30:03,760 Speaker 2: for instance, founding father of Ming dynasty. After he became 541 00:30:03,800 --> 00:30:08,400 Speaker 2: the emperor, he basically killed all his comrades. So when 542 00:30:08,440 --> 00:30:12,240 Speaker 2: people make these kind of jokes, they will as censored online. 543 00:30:12,520 --> 00:30:15,840 Speaker 3: And in fact, a book recently has disappeared from bookshops 544 00:30:15,880 --> 00:30:19,200 Speaker 3: in Beijing because it exactly implies the fact that if 545 00:30:19,240 --> 00:30:22,120 Speaker 3: a certain kind of emperor proceeds in this way, you 546 00:30:22,240 --> 00:30:24,320 Speaker 3: end up having an awful end. But just to the 547 00:30:24,320 --> 00:30:27,720 Speaker 3: point of why the party or why Shi Jinping would 548 00:30:27,800 --> 00:30:31,960 Speaker 3: want ideology to be controlled in this way, I think 549 00:30:31,960 --> 00:30:35,200 Speaker 3: it's precisely that that private entrepreneurs and the economy that 550 00:30:35,240 --> 00:30:38,280 Speaker 3: you were talking about just now Shirley. Young people felt 551 00:30:38,360 --> 00:30:41,840 Speaker 3: like they had a way out of the system, and 552 00:30:42,000 --> 00:30:46,560 Speaker 3: when you curtail those opportunities for young people, then the 553 00:30:46,560 --> 00:30:51,080 Speaker 3: party becomes the most important thing inside the minds of 554 00:30:51,120 --> 00:30:54,440 Speaker 3: people as well. It interferes in every aspect of public 555 00:30:54,480 --> 00:30:56,920 Speaker 3: and private life, and I think that's what he is 556 00:30:56,920 --> 00:30:57,680 Speaker 3: attempting to do. 557 00:30:58,280 --> 00:31:02,000 Speaker 1: By the time this episode heirs, I think Joe Biden 558 00:31:02,040 --> 00:31:06,160 Speaker 1: will have already met with Yang Yi, China's foreign minister. 559 00:31:06,640 --> 00:31:09,120 Speaker 1: They're scheduled to meet during the time that we were 560 00:31:09,120 --> 00:31:12,560 Speaker 1: producing this, so we don't have to be specific about 561 00:31:12,960 --> 00:31:16,600 Speaker 1: the outcome of that meeting. But it does feel actually 562 00:31:16,600 --> 00:31:19,880 Speaker 1: significant to me that in this moment where we've got 563 00:31:19,920 --> 00:31:23,640 Speaker 1: a lot of geopolitical conflicts Russia and Ukraine, the Gaza 564 00:31:23,640 --> 00:31:26,480 Speaker 1: Strip has flamed up, and there's been constant talk about 565 00:31:26,520 --> 00:31:29,080 Speaker 1: whether or not China wants to invade Taiwan, and if 566 00:31:29,120 --> 00:31:32,680 Speaker 1: it does invade Taiwan, what are the geopolitical knockoff effects 567 00:31:32,680 --> 00:31:35,640 Speaker 1: of that. So within an environment like that, the fact 568 00:31:35,640 --> 00:31:39,200 Speaker 1: that Biden is taking a meeting with a senior, the 569 00:31:39,400 --> 00:31:43,840 Speaker 1: senior Chinese foreign affairs diplomat, it seems significant to me. 570 00:31:43,920 --> 00:31:45,680 Speaker 1: But do you think about it in a different way. 571 00:31:46,080 --> 00:31:49,200 Speaker 3: No, I think it's extremely significant, and it's the latest 572 00:31:49,240 --> 00:31:51,760 Speaker 3: in a series of what I would say are very 573 00:31:51,800 --> 00:31:57,400 Speaker 3: significant engagements between the US and China. Shijinping has met 574 00:31:57,400 --> 00:32:01,720 Speaker 3: with Kevin Yusom from California. A group of US senators 575 00:32:01,760 --> 00:32:04,239 Speaker 3: who were in Beijing also meeting with him. You know, 576 00:32:04,400 --> 00:32:07,600 Speaker 3: it's all leading up to what everybody is hoping will 577 00:32:07,600 --> 00:32:11,000 Speaker 3: be a meeting between chi Jinping and Joe Biden at 578 00:32:11,040 --> 00:32:14,840 Speaker 3: APEX in San Francisco. At the same time, though, going 579 00:32:14,880 --> 00:32:17,880 Speaker 3: back to that point of how we must be clear 580 00:32:17,920 --> 00:32:20,440 Speaker 3: eyed about China and also be willing to criticize when 581 00:32:20,480 --> 00:32:24,080 Speaker 3: the time is right, the Chinese Coastguard has been involved 582 00:32:24,120 --> 00:32:27,160 Speaker 3: in at least two collisions with two ships from the 583 00:32:27,200 --> 00:32:30,920 Speaker 3: Philippine side in the South China Sea, blaming Manila and 584 00:32:31,000 --> 00:32:34,160 Speaker 3: the United States for interfering in what Beijing sees as 585 00:32:34,200 --> 00:32:36,720 Speaker 3: its own water waste. So, on the one hand, you 586 00:32:36,800 --> 00:32:42,240 Speaker 3: see strategic engagement improving, and it's an encouraging sign between 587 00:32:42,320 --> 00:32:44,760 Speaker 3: the United States and China. But you know this isn't 588 00:32:44,760 --> 00:32:47,000 Speaker 3: going to be solved overnight, right. You know, it's going 589 00:32:47,040 --> 00:32:49,920 Speaker 3: to be a situation where Beijing consistently says, this is 590 00:32:49,960 --> 00:32:52,320 Speaker 3: our backyard. The thing I think China would want the 591 00:32:52,320 --> 00:32:55,840 Speaker 3: most is us please leave, please leave from this part 592 00:32:55,880 --> 00:32:58,200 Speaker 3: of the world. We'll manage it. And as long as 593 00:32:58,240 --> 00:33:00,600 Speaker 3: you understand that these are our strategic interests so you 594 00:33:00,640 --> 00:33:04,280 Speaker 3: don't get involved, then we're fine. We can continue to cooperate. 595 00:33:04,960 --> 00:33:07,120 Speaker 1: Does that ring true to you too, Shuley? 596 00:33:07,360 --> 00:33:10,200 Speaker 2: I think one question we can ask is like, why 597 00:33:10,360 --> 00:33:13,800 Speaker 2: is President Chimpin suddenly trying to be friendly with the 598 00:33:13,920 --> 00:33:17,760 Speaker 2: United States again? And I think it's because within China 599 00:33:18,040 --> 00:33:21,040 Speaker 2: there are a lot of concerns about your political risks. 600 00:33:21,360 --> 00:33:24,520 Speaker 2: A lot of Chinese entrepreneurs have told me, they said, 601 00:33:24,840 --> 00:33:29,320 Speaker 2: if we cannot get along with the world's most powerful country, 602 00:33:29,640 --> 00:33:32,320 Speaker 2: the Chinese economy cannot do well and the China has 603 00:33:32,360 --> 00:33:35,880 Speaker 2: no future. And I think presence she needs to address 604 00:33:35,920 --> 00:33:39,400 Speaker 2: that kind of very valid concerns in mainland China. I mean, 605 00:33:39,480 --> 00:33:42,360 Speaker 2: just given an example, there was news that China was 606 00:33:42,440 --> 00:33:46,840 Speaker 2: going to investigate Fox CONT's landues, right and the day after, 607 00:33:46,960 --> 00:33:49,720 Speaker 2: China had our Black Monday on the store market. Because 608 00:33:49,760 --> 00:33:52,840 Speaker 2: people just say, what you're talking about Taiwan and invasion. 609 00:33:53,160 --> 00:33:56,120 Speaker 2: This is very very much on the business people's mind 610 00:33:56,400 --> 00:33:59,560 Speaker 2: and when China is clearly in the recession. Chi Chimpin 611 00:33:59,680 --> 00:34:04,320 Speaker 2: has two to somehow tom down that very aggressive or rhetoric. 612 00:34:05,160 --> 00:34:08,480 Speaker 1: On that happy note of kumbaya and maybe reprochemomp between 613 00:34:08,719 --> 00:34:11,040 Speaker 1: the United States and China. I'm going to take another 614 00:34:11,120 --> 00:34:19,800 Speaker 1: quick break and we'll come right back. We're back with 615 00:34:19,880 --> 00:34:23,640 Speaker 1: Karishma Vaswani and Shuly Ren and we're continuing to discuss 616 00:34:23,680 --> 00:34:27,799 Speaker 1: the ever fascinating subject of China. Surely you have done 617 00:34:28,120 --> 00:34:34,520 Speaker 1: incredible work, original work around China's looming debt problem, and 618 00:34:35,320 --> 00:34:39,120 Speaker 1: you've really wetted great of gum shoe reporting, looking at 619 00:34:39,160 --> 00:34:42,279 Speaker 1: local debt levels, looking at corporate debt levels, looking at 620 00:34:42,360 --> 00:34:45,400 Speaker 1: sectors like the real estate industry, where the debt is 621 00:34:45,560 --> 00:34:52,600 Speaker 1: suffocating and potentially more systemically dangerous. Obviously, China's economic growth 622 00:34:52,760 --> 00:34:55,480 Speaker 1: was fueled by a lot of debt spending, with the 623 00:34:55,520 --> 00:34:58,279 Speaker 1: idea that it was rational spending. It was spending for 624 00:34:58,320 --> 00:35:01,680 Speaker 1: the long term, the country could earned back from that debt. 625 00:35:01,880 --> 00:35:05,640 Speaker 1: It created jobs, it created infrastructure, created new property. But 626 00:35:05,840 --> 00:35:08,839 Speaker 1: maybe the accounting for all of that debt wasn't as 627 00:35:08,880 --> 00:35:11,200 Speaker 1: clear as it should have been. And you've just written 628 00:35:11,239 --> 00:35:14,120 Speaker 1: a series of columns over the last two years, probably 629 00:35:14,200 --> 00:35:18,719 Speaker 1: at least laying out for readers and analysts how bad 630 00:35:18,800 --> 00:35:23,280 Speaker 1: this could get. How do you think now about China's 631 00:35:23,280 --> 00:35:24,320 Speaker 1: debt problem. 632 00:35:25,160 --> 00:35:28,120 Speaker 2: So we talked about China building a lot of infrastructure 633 00:35:28,200 --> 00:35:30,880 Speaker 2: and the public good, and I mentioned the high spirial 634 00:35:30,960 --> 00:35:33,960 Speaker 2: in Shanghai that gets you to the airport in five minutes, right, 635 00:35:34,280 --> 00:35:36,959 Speaker 2: and guess how much it costs. The ticket is only 636 00:35:37,000 --> 00:35:39,759 Speaker 2: five US dollars and then if you go to the 637 00:35:39,800 --> 00:35:42,280 Speaker 2: ticket counter you can get an extra twenty percent disco. 638 00:35:42,719 --> 00:35:45,560 Speaker 2: That's the problem with China. That's the ultimate problem with 639 00:35:45,719 --> 00:35:49,040 Speaker 2: China's step path. So far, the government has built a 640 00:35:49,120 --> 00:35:52,120 Speaker 2: lot of beautiful things and the public we enjoy it 641 00:35:52,280 --> 00:35:55,239 Speaker 2: very very much. Everyone will enjoy it. But the question is, 642 00:35:55,320 --> 00:35:58,120 Speaker 2: as China slows down, who is going to pay for it? 643 00:35:58,440 --> 00:36:01,839 Speaker 2: And it's unclear so far. A lot of bund investors 644 00:36:02,040 --> 00:36:04,399 Speaker 2: they complain they have been paying for and then they 645 00:36:04,400 --> 00:36:06,520 Speaker 2: complain to me why they are the ones that have 646 00:36:06,600 --> 00:36:08,440 Speaker 2: been paid for and on the other hand, like it 647 00:36:08,480 --> 00:36:10,680 Speaker 2: should be the people who have been paying for So 648 00:36:11,000 --> 00:36:14,479 Speaker 2: basically that's the ultimate question. China has buil beautiful things 649 00:36:14,560 --> 00:36:16,359 Speaker 2: and how is it going to pay for this? 650 00:36:16,840 --> 00:36:18,960 Speaker 1: It has about one hundred and thirty seven billion dollars 651 00:36:19,000 --> 00:36:22,759 Speaker 1: in sovereign that it's running its biggest deficits I think 652 00:36:22,800 --> 00:36:26,239 Speaker 1: in decades. At this point, how does that get resolved? Like, 653 00:36:26,280 --> 00:36:28,319 Speaker 1: how do you see this getting cleaned up? 654 00:36:29,520 --> 00:36:32,520 Speaker 2: I think what needs to happen is that China needs 655 00:36:32,560 --> 00:36:35,520 Speaker 2: to have another physical reform. So what happened was that 656 00:36:35,560 --> 00:36:38,319 Speaker 2: in nineteen ninety four, when China was just opening up right, 657 00:36:38,520 --> 00:36:42,480 Speaker 2: the government had a tax reform. Basically, the central government 658 00:36:42,520 --> 00:36:45,040 Speaker 2: will get most of the tax revenue and then the 659 00:36:45,080 --> 00:36:48,440 Speaker 2: local government will do most of the physical spending. That 660 00:36:48,600 --> 00:36:50,920 Speaker 2: is not going to work for the local government. So 661 00:36:51,000 --> 00:36:53,920 Speaker 2: what they've been doing the last thirty years is basically 662 00:36:53,960 --> 00:36:58,200 Speaker 2: relying on lensales to developers, which propel China's property bubble, 663 00:36:58,480 --> 00:37:02,720 Speaker 2: and by borrowing that with this kind of unclear shell 664 00:37:02,880 --> 00:37:07,160 Speaker 2: company's titles. So what will happen is that I think 665 00:37:07,360 --> 00:37:10,200 Speaker 2: the central government will have to put on more that 666 00:37:10,400 --> 00:37:13,000 Speaker 2: on its own balance sheet. And by the way, China's 667 00:37:13,000 --> 00:37:16,120 Speaker 2: Central Bank of People's Bank of China, its balance sheet 668 00:37:16,160 --> 00:37:19,080 Speaker 2: is squeaky cling, unlike the federal reserve. So I think 669 00:37:19,160 --> 00:37:22,120 Speaker 2: inevitably at this point, unless China is willing to have 670 00:37:22,239 --> 00:37:25,520 Speaker 2: local government that blow up, China will have to do 671 00:37:25,960 --> 00:37:27,440 Speaker 2: its own quantitative. 672 00:37:27,000 --> 00:37:30,880 Speaker 1: Easy Let's switch gears a little bit on that Karishma. 673 00:37:30,920 --> 00:37:34,000 Speaker 1: We talked a lot about in this episode China's relationship 674 00:37:34,040 --> 00:37:36,320 Speaker 1: with the US. I want to talk about some of 675 00:37:36,360 --> 00:37:39,880 Speaker 1: the other regional players that are equally important in my 676 00:37:40,000 --> 00:37:42,000 Speaker 1: mind as the US in terms of the future of 677 00:37:42,040 --> 00:37:45,160 Speaker 1: the region, China's place in the region. Let's get the 678 00:37:45,160 --> 00:37:47,360 Speaker 1: big wildcard question out of the way first. Do you 679 00:37:47,400 --> 00:37:48,920 Speaker 1: think China will invade Taiwan. 680 00:37:49,760 --> 00:37:53,000 Speaker 3: I don't think it wants to. I think peaceful reunification. 681 00:37:53,320 --> 00:37:55,719 Speaker 3: I think we should believe that when China says that 682 00:37:55,800 --> 00:37:58,799 Speaker 3: it's serious about that. What it doesn't like is when 683 00:37:58,840 --> 00:38:02,360 Speaker 3: the United States get involved. It does not want any 684 00:38:02,640 --> 00:38:08,200 Speaker 3: declaration of independence from Taiwanese government political parties. The status 685 00:38:08,280 --> 00:38:11,399 Speaker 3: quo would be ideal in the sense that as long 686 00:38:11,440 --> 00:38:15,560 Speaker 3: as Taiwan doesn't declare independence and doesn't make too many noises, 687 00:38:15,560 --> 00:38:18,760 Speaker 3: that makes it far closer to the United States. Beijing would, 688 00:38:19,080 --> 00:38:22,279 Speaker 3: I think accept that. So I think that unless it 689 00:38:22,360 --> 00:38:25,360 Speaker 3: is pushed to invade Taiwan, it won't do so of 690 00:38:25,400 --> 00:38:26,160 Speaker 3: its own volition. 691 00:38:27,080 --> 00:38:29,160 Speaker 1: In that same context, I feel like whenever we talk 692 00:38:29,200 --> 00:38:32,480 Speaker 1: about Taiwan and excluding the US from the discussion for now, 693 00:38:32,640 --> 00:38:35,200 Speaker 1: you also have to talk about Japan, and when I've 694 00:38:35,680 --> 00:38:38,200 Speaker 1: visited the region in the past, I've met with national 695 00:38:38,200 --> 00:38:42,400 Speaker 1: security officials within the Japanese government who are very hawkish 696 00:38:42,440 --> 00:38:46,680 Speaker 1: about the idea, at least that China might invade Taiwan. 697 00:38:47,120 --> 00:38:50,680 Speaker 1: I think the Japanese government has obviously started to ramp 698 00:38:50,760 --> 00:38:54,120 Speaker 1: up their own military spending as a I don't know 699 00:38:54,160 --> 00:38:57,279 Speaker 1: if it's a hedge against an invasion, but certainly to 700 00:38:57,480 --> 00:39:00,719 Speaker 1: just be rational about the possibility of a military action. 701 00:39:02,280 --> 00:39:04,560 Speaker 1: How do you think about Japan as a player in 702 00:39:04,600 --> 00:39:06,680 Speaker 1: the region right now, I think. 703 00:39:06,480 --> 00:39:08,759 Speaker 3: That as a hedge to what you're seeing as a 704 00:39:08,840 --> 00:39:12,200 Speaker 3: ramp up to military build up in China, they have 705 00:39:12,239 --> 00:39:14,080 Speaker 3: to do that. I think it only makes sense to 706 00:39:14,120 --> 00:39:17,280 Speaker 3: do that. What Japan's been able to do quite cleverly, 707 00:39:17,320 --> 00:39:20,680 Speaker 3: I think, is be the proxy for the United States 708 00:39:20,680 --> 00:39:22,239 Speaker 3: in this part of the world. I know you said, like, 709 00:39:22,320 --> 00:39:24,279 Speaker 3: let's leave the US out, but it's impossible to have 710 00:39:24,320 --> 00:39:27,880 Speaker 3: a discussion about this region without bringing Washington into it. 711 00:39:27,960 --> 00:39:30,120 Speaker 3: And I think you can see that, particularly in the 712 00:39:30,160 --> 00:39:33,719 Speaker 3: Strategic Alliance of the Quad, because through the Quad, which 713 00:39:33,719 --> 00:39:35,640 Speaker 3: is actually a Japanese idea to begin with. 714 00:39:36,040 --> 00:39:39,080 Speaker 1: And let's define the quad for our listeners, which is Australia, 715 00:39:39,160 --> 00:39:42,520 Speaker 1: in the ED, Japan, and the US for countries that 716 00:39:42,560 --> 00:39:45,880 Speaker 1: are trying to have an alliance as a bulwark against 717 00:39:46,400 --> 00:39:49,000 Speaker 1: Chinese ambitions in the region exactly. 718 00:39:49,080 --> 00:39:51,759 Speaker 3: And it's supposed to be a sort of unified like 719 00:39:51,840 --> 00:39:55,279 Speaker 3: minded countries coming together working together to be able to 720 00:39:55,320 --> 00:39:57,799 Speaker 3: provide deterrence. And I think that's the key thing, right, 721 00:39:57,840 --> 00:40:00,520 Speaker 3: how do you provide deterrence, because that's the best way 722 00:40:00,520 --> 00:40:03,800 Speaker 3: to avoid conflict, And you're seeing that even with regards 723 00:40:03,840 --> 00:40:06,360 Speaker 3: not just to Taiwan, but also the South China Sea. 724 00:40:06,520 --> 00:40:09,040 Speaker 3: Japan plays a crucial role in all of that because 725 00:40:09,040 --> 00:40:12,520 Speaker 3: it has strategic interests in all of these places. So 726 00:40:12,800 --> 00:40:17,040 Speaker 3: when you hear from national security analysts, for instance, in 727 00:40:17,080 --> 00:40:19,640 Speaker 3: the Japanese government that they're worried about Taiwan, I think 728 00:40:19,680 --> 00:40:23,879 Speaker 3: it's a big a worry about China's militarization in this 729 00:40:24,040 --> 00:40:25,680 Speaker 3: part of the world. And you know, in the latest 730 00:40:25,680 --> 00:40:29,040 Speaker 3: twenty twenty three report, China's Military Power Report that's come 731 00:40:29,040 --> 00:40:31,400 Speaker 3: out of the United States, the US has echoed that 732 00:40:31,440 --> 00:40:34,200 Speaker 3: as well. It is the biggest concern going forward. The 733 00:40:34,239 --> 00:40:37,399 Speaker 3: way that the Chinese have built up their militaries, spent 734 00:40:37,520 --> 00:40:41,560 Speaker 3: money on submarines, on fighter jets in the region, and 735 00:40:41,880 --> 00:40:45,279 Speaker 3: it looks if you don't do anything to combat that 736 00:40:45,440 --> 00:40:48,080 Speaker 3: you will be left behind. So it makes sense for 737 00:40:48,120 --> 00:40:50,520 Speaker 3: these countries to take the actions that they're doing. 738 00:40:51,440 --> 00:40:54,200 Speaker 1: Surely another intriguing country to me in the region, not 739 00:40:54,280 --> 00:40:55,960 Speaker 1: just for me, I think, but for anyone looking at 740 00:40:56,000 --> 00:40:58,799 Speaker 1: all these interesting dynamics going on as India. You've done 741 00:40:58,840 --> 00:41:02,280 Speaker 1: a lot of travel in the region, specifically that to Vietnam, 742 00:41:02,320 --> 00:41:05,120 Speaker 1: where you sort of looked at other countries in the 743 00:41:05,160 --> 00:41:09,120 Speaker 1: regions that are equally entrepreneurial in both their culture and 744 00:41:09,160 --> 00:41:13,800 Speaker 1: the execution of policy and business growth. Like China, India 745 00:41:13,880 --> 00:41:17,759 Speaker 1: has a very entrepreneurial tradition. It does not have a 746 00:41:17,880 --> 00:41:20,960 Speaker 1: large tradition of an honest and capable civil service. But 747 00:41:21,400 --> 00:41:24,560 Speaker 1: China is India rather is in the midst of its 748 00:41:24,560 --> 00:41:28,760 Speaker 1: own I think, muscularity and thinking about how it wants 749 00:41:28,800 --> 00:41:32,280 Speaker 1: to play a role in the region. Obviously Visa VI Russia, 750 00:41:32,560 --> 00:41:35,000 Speaker 1: visa VI China, visa viv the United States. How do 751 00:41:35,080 --> 00:41:38,960 Speaker 1: you see the Chinese relationship with India playing out? 752 00:41:39,560 --> 00:41:41,839 Speaker 2: I think there are a lot of Chinese entrepreneurs who 753 00:41:41,840 --> 00:41:45,920 Speaker 2: are genuinely interested in investing India. What they see is 754 00:41:45,960 --> 00:41:48,759 Speaker 2: that they're very practical and hard knows people. They don't 755 00:41:48,760 --> 00:41:51,560 Speaker 2: care about democracy or whatever. What they see in Ranger 756 00:41:51,640 --> 00:41:54,399 Speaker 2: Modi is basically somebody who's willing to take the China 757 00:41:54,440 --> 00:41:57,560 Speaker 2: growth model. Produce first and then they will come right 758 00:41:57,800 --> 00:42:00,359 Speaker 2: and then they tell me, oh, you know, is a 759 00:42:00,360 --> 00:42:04,120 Speaker 2: really nice new highway between Eli and Mumbaya and they 760 00:42:04,120 --> 00:42:08,400 Speaker 2: were modeling at it. So I think on the civilian level, 761 00:42:08,640 --> 00:42:12,360 Speaker 2: there is genuine interest in foreign direct investment into India. 762 00:42:13,360 --> 00:42:16,360 Speaker 1: Since we're doing geopolitical bingo Karishma, I also want to 763 00:42:16,400 --> 00:42:21,120 Speaker 1: talk about Russia and China's relationship with Russia, and particularly 764 00:42:21,160 --> 00:42:24,840 Speaker 1: in the context of the Ukraine invasion. It's been hard 765 00:42:25,040 --> 00:42:28,399 Speaker 1: for me watching this to figure out whether or not 766 00:42:28,680 --> 00:42:31,239 Speaker 1: China really wants to step onto the world stage and 767 00:42:31,320 --> 00:42:36,960 Speaker 1: be an authentic broker of complex diplomatic situations. This has 768 00:42:37,000 --> 00:42:40,080 Speaker 1: come up obviously around Gaza. People have wondered whether or 769 00:42:40,120 --> 00:42:44,680 Speaker 1: not that conflict will kind of compel China to step up. 770 00:42:45,040 --> 00:42:47,840 Speaker 1: But it seems even clearer to me in the Ukraine 771 00:42:47,920 --> 00:42:51,239 Speaker 1: conflict because she has gone out of his way to 772 00:42:51,840 --> 00:42:55,840 Speaker 1: Putin up over the years Russia's leader Vladimir Putin. I 773 00:42:55,880 --> 00:42:59,240 Speaker 1: think Putin has maneuvered to where that relationship on his sleeve. 774 00:43:00,000 --> 00:43:03,600 Speaker 1: How do you see China's relationship with Russia evolving and 775 00:43:03,800 --> 00:43:06,960 Speaker 1: does China really want to be a global diplomat or not. 776 00:43:07,680 --> 00:43:10,920 Speaker 3: I think you'll see the relationship with Russia continue to 777 00:43:10,960 --> 00:43:13,239 Speaker 3: grow strong. I think it's interesting in the first days 778 00:43:13,280 --> 00:43:17,320 Speaker 3: after the Ukraine invasion, you didn't actually see Beijing jump 779 00:43:17,440 --> 00:43:20,319 Speaker 3: to Russia's defense right away. I think it was making 780 00:43:20,440 --> 00:43:23,120 Speaker 3: up its mind. And it's the same sort of pattern 781 00:43:23,160 --> 00:43:26,520 Speaker 3: that you've seen post the conflict between Israel and Hamas 782 00:43:26,560 --> 00:43:29,560 Speaker 3: and what you're seeing in Gaza. China doesn't jump right 783 00:43:29,600 --> 00:43:32,280 Speaker 3: away to sort of make a decision about how it feels. 784 00:43:32,280 --> 00:43:34,239 Speaker 3: I think it's still trying to figure itself out and 785 00:43:34,280 --> 00:43:37,400 Speaker 3: figure out what is the foreign policy statement that we 786 00:43:37,400 --> 00:43:39,600 Speaker 3: should make about this. And we can get into that 787 00:43:39,680 --> 00:43:41,520 Speaker 3: in the second part of this answer. But to go 788 00:43:41,600 --> 00:43:45,239 Speaker 3: back to Russia, that relationship serves as a bulwark to 789 00:43:45,280 --> 00:43:48,960 Speaker 3: the United States because it makes Beijing feel like it's 790 00:43:48,960 --> 00:43:53,040 Speaker 3: got a powerful companion that is going to go up 791 00:43:53,080 --> 00:43:56,799 Speaker 3: against the US with it. China on its own is 792 00:43:56,920 --> 00:44:00,719 Speaker 3: in and of itself a strategic concern. A rival competitor 793 00:44:00,760 --> 00:44:04,799 Speaker 3: to the US. China with Russia is even more concerning 794 00:44:05,000 --> 00:44:07,360 Speaker 3: for the United States, so I think it provides it 795 00:44:07,600 --> 00:44:10,000 Speaker 3: a little bit of security. The second part of this 796 00:44:10,200 --> 00:44:13,480 Speaker 3: is is China ready to be a global diplomat? And 797 00:44:13,520 --> 00:44:15,920 Speaker 3: I think yes, it wants to be, but it doesn't 798 00:44:15,960 --> 00:44:20,560 Speaker 3: necessarily have the foreign policy infrastructure that other countries have 799 00:44:20,640 --> 00:44:23,720 Speaker 3: had because it hasn't wanted to get its hands messy 800 00:44:24,200 --> 00:44:27,200 Speaker 3: and get involved in some of these geopolitical struggles that 801 00:44:27,200 --> 00:44:29,440 Speaker 3: you've seen countries like the US do you know, it 802 00:44:29,440 --> 00:44:31,520 Speaker 3: has a long history, obviously with lots of flaws in 803 00:44:31,560 --> 00:44:34,239 Speaker 3: the process. But the problem for China is that on 804 00:44:34,280 --> 00:44:36,960 Speaker 3: the one hand, it says it is this rising superpower, 805 00:44:37,000 --> 00:44:39,840 Speaker 3: it is emerging as a global power, but it hasn't 806 00:44:39,960 --> 00:44:43,799 Speaker 3: had the experience or the foreign policy capacity to be 807 00:44:43,880 --> 00:44:47,880 Speaker 3: able to get involved in complex regional or global issues 808 00:44:48,160 --> 00:44:51,640 Speaker 3: beyond providing solutions like we should have a two state solution, 809 00:44:51,760 --> 00:44:54,160 Speaker 3: for instance, in the Israeli and Gaza. And I think 810 00:44:54,200 --> 00:44:57,200 Speaker 3: that's going to consistently be a problem for China as 811 00:44:57,239 --> 00:45:00,000 Speaker 3: it tries to navigate this role of global diplomat. 812 00:45:00,160 --> 00:45:03,920 Speaker 1: The future surely you perked up during that little conversation 813 00:45:03,960 --> 00:45:05,799 Speaker 1: I was just having with Kurashima. Tell me your thoughts 814 00:45:05,840 --> 00:45:06,759 Speaker 1: on the exact same thing. 815 00:45:07,120 --> 00:45:10,239 Speaker 2: I just think people need to know that Hijinping's Joe 816 00:45:10,280 --> 00:45:13,839 Speaker 2: political also over the United States really has taken its 817 00:45:13,840 --> 00:45:16,600 Speaker 2: toll on the Chinese economy. I was just in Shanghai 818 00:45:16,640 --> 00:45:19,960 Speaker 2: two weeks ago. You know, when you enter the Pudong, beautiful, 819 00:45:20,080 --> 00:45:23,719 Speaker 2: big put On airport, you don't see international rivals. Now 820 00:45:23,760 --> 00:45:26,880 Speaker 2: we're in Tokyo, there's so many foreigners, Americans, you know, 821 00:45:27,040 --> 00:45:29,520 Speaker 2: people from everywhere in the world. And two weeks ago, 822 00:45:29,560 --> 00:45:31,799 Speaker 2: when I was in Shanghai speaking to friends, you know, 823 00:45:31,920 --> 00:45:34,440 Speaker 2: they just say, have you noticed Shanghai has very very 824 00:45:34,440 --> 00:45:37,560 Speaker 2: few foreigners left? And then if you really look carefully, 825 00:45:37,640 --> 00:45:40,040 Speaker 2: they're the wrong kind. I was like, what do you 826 00:45:40,040 --> 00:45:43,880 Speaker 2: mean they're the wrong kind? They said, they're white Russians. Literally, 827 00:45:43,960 --> 00:45:46,600 Speaker 2: it's true. Like in Pudon, at the Mandarin Oriental at 828 00:45:46,680 --> 00:45:49,000 Speaker 2: Risk Carton, if you look at the elevator, people going 829 00:45:49,160 --> 00:45:51,040 Speaker 2: up and down one sing in a while, you see 830 00:45:51,080 --> 00:45:53,839 Speaker 2: like a foreign face and they speak Russian. A lot 831 00:45:53,880 --> 00:45:57,000 Speaker 2: of private entrepreneurs they're very, very concerned about that. I mean, 832 00:45:57,040 --> 00:46:00,080 Speaker 2: I agree with them, Like Shanghai these days feel very 833 00:46:00,160 --> 00:46:03,480 Speaker 2: very insulated, like it's all Chinese people and maybe one 834 00:46:03,600 --> 00:46:06,359 Speaker 2: in a thousand that you see a foreigner, and that 835 00:46:06,480 --> 00:46:10,200 Speaker 2: feels like late nineteen eighties Shamghai, you know, like it's 836 00:46:10,360 --> 00:46:11,200 Speaker 2: very very different. 837 00:46:12,000 --> 00:46:14,200 Speaker 1: Yeah, this is an easy segue into the last question, 838 00:46:14,200 --> 00:46:15,440 Speaker 1: and I wanted to ask both of you, but I 839 00:46:15,520 --> 00:46:17,600 Speaker 1: always like to ask people at the end of the show, 840 00:46:17,640 --> 00:46:20,360 Speaker 1: since the show is about learning moments and what we 841 00:46:20,400 --> 00:46:24,440 Speaker 1: can learn from epic collisions, what have you learned if 842 00:46:24,480 --> 00:46:27,160 Speaker 1: you look at China over the last couple of years 843 00:46:27,320 --> 00:46:29,880 Speaker 1: and all of the stuff that has surfaced in the 844 00:46:29,960 --> 00:46:34,280 Speaker 1: economy and in its diplomatic relationships, What have you learned 845 00:46:34,280 --> 00:46:36,279 Speaker 1: that you didn't know before? What has been sort of 846 00:46:36,280 --> 00:46:38,040 Speaker 1: a signal sort of aha for you? 847 00:46:39,040 --> 00:46:43,239 Speaker 2: I think shi Jinping's administration is not as efficient as 848 00:46:43,280 --> 00:46:47,640 Speaker 2: the previous administrations, and that China is growing up, but 849 00:46:47,800 --> 00:46:50,200 Speaker 2: it doesn't know where it wants to go the next. 850 00:46:50,960 --> 00:46:53,960 Speaker 3: I think that the world is trying to come to 851 00:46:54,040 --> 00:46:57,600 Speaker 3: grips with this new China and the shi Jinping. I 852 00:46:57,640 --> 00:47:01,440 Speaker 3: think for me what really showed me the difference was 853 00:47:01,480 --> 00:47:06,640 Speaker 3: COVID actually and how China managed COVID under Shijinping was 854 00:47:06,680 --> 00:47:08,680 Speaker 3: the turning point, the sort of a ha moment for 855 00:47:08,840 --> 00:47:11,600 Speaker 3: me about what kind of China we were going to 856 00:47:11,640 --> 00:47:14,520 Speaker 3: see next, Because up until that point we had seen 857 00:47:14,560 --> 00:47:18,240 Speaker 3: Sijinping go out to the Davos's and speak at big 858 00:47:18,239 --> 00:47:22,719 Speaker 3: international conferences that seemed to be implying that he was 859 00:47:22,800 --> 00:47:26,359 Speaker 3: going to consistently take China down a route which would 860 00:47:26,400 --> 00:47:29,960 Speaker 3: be palatable to the global economy and the sort of 861 00:47:29,960 --> 00:47:33,520 Speaker 3: global geopolitical dynamics. But for me, it was COVID that 862 00:47:33,600 --> 00:47:36,200 Speaker 3: sort of made me think, this is something different, the 863 00:47:36,239 --> 00:47:38,880 Speaker 3: way that he managed COVID and how China's come out 864 00:47:38,920 --> 00:47:39,080 Speaker 3: of that. 865 00:47:40,120 --> 00:47:42,160 Speaker 1: We've run out of time, Karishma, will you come back 866 00:47:42,160 --> 00:47:44,560 Speaker 1: again sometime and converse about all this stuff again? 867 00:47:45,080 --> 00:47:45,319 Speaker 3: Sure? 868 00:47:45,360 --> 00:47:47,719 Speaker 1: I would love to. Shulely, thanks for joining us when 869 00:47:47,719 --> 00:47:52,520 Speaker 1: you come back to Absolutely. Shuly Ren and Karashima Vaswani 870 00:47:52,520 --> 00:47:55,000 Speaker 1: our Bloomberg Opinion columnists, and you can find their work 871 00:47:55,040 --> 00:47:58,240 Speaker 1: on the Bloomberg Opinion website and on the Bloomberg terminal. 872 00:48:00,560 --> 00:48:05,759 Speaker 1: Here at Crash Course, we believe the collisions can be messy, impressive, challenging, surprising, 873 00:48:05,960 --> 00:48:09,880 Speaker 1: and always instructive. In today's Crash Course. I learned that 874 00:48:09,960 --> 00:48:14,400 Speaker 1: my own gloomy outlook about China that a hardening of 875 00:48:14,640 --> 00:48:18,400 Speaker 1: sides between the US and China may not be as 876 00:48:18,440 --> 00:48:21,839 Speaker 1: inevitable as I once thought it was. What did you learn? 877 00:48:22,160 --> 00:48:24,480 Speaker 1: We'd love to hear from you. You can tweet the 878 00:48:24,520 --> 00:48:28,400 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Opinion, handle at Opinion or me at Tim O'Brien 879 00:48:28,760 --> 00:48:32,480 Speaker 1: using the hashtag Bloomberg Crash Course. You can also subscribe 880 00:48:32,480 --> 00:48:34,960 Speaker 1: to our show wherever you're listening right now and leave 881 00:48:35,040 --> 00:48:37,759 Speaker 1: us a review. It helps more people find the show. 882 00:48:38,160 --> 00:48:42,160 Speaker 1: This episode was produced by the indispensable Anna Maserakas and me. 883 00:48:42,960 --> 00:48:46,320 Speaker 1: Our supervising producer is Magnus Hendrickson, and we had editing 884 00:48:46,320 --> 00:48:50,280 Speaker 1: help from Sage Bauman, Jeff Grocott, Mike Nize and Christine 885 00:48:50,360 --> 00:48:54,160 Speaker 1: Vanden Bilart. Blake Maples does our sound engineering, and our 886 00:48:54,200 --> 00:48:58,480 Speaker 1: original theme song was composed by Luis Gara. I'm Tim O'Brien. 887 00:48:58,640 --> 00:49:01,120 Speaker 1: We'll be back next week with another Crash Course