WEBVTT - Tech Stocks Post Election and Chip Demand

0:00:01.440 --> 0:00:05.120
<v Speaker 1>From Mahard where Innovation of Money and Power Collie in

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley NBN. This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde

0:00:10.160 --> 0:00:11.080
<v Speaker 1>and Ed Ludlow.

0:00:25.239 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 2>Now from New York and San Francisco. This is Bloomberg

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:31.280
<v Speaker 2>Technology coming up. Tech stocks lead the markets to new highs.

0:00:31.520 --> 0:00:34.479
<v Speaker 3>We discussed the drivers from the elections to earnings and

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:36.040
<v Speaker 3>the FED, and.

0:00:36.000 --> 0:00:39.040
<v Speaker 4>We talked chip demand as ARM and Qualcom give mixed

0:00:39.040 --> 0:00:40.879
<v Speaker 4>signals about the smartphone market.

0:00:41.000 --> 0:00:43.599
<v Speaker 5>We speak to ARMS CEO Rene Has and.

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:45.960
<v Speaker 2>The c suite take on the election. We speak with

0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:49.000
<v Speaker 2>Andreil's at Palmer Lucky. I'm going to focus on defense tech,

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:51.440
<v Speaker 2>but first let's just get back to these publicly traded

0:00:51.479 --> 0:00:53.920
<v Speaker 2>markets that are at new record highs. I shine a

0:00:53.960 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 2>light on the Nastak one hundred. It finally reaches that

0:00:56.560 --> 0:00:59.840
<v Speaker 2>new record yesterday, eclipsing the number it got to back

0:00:59.880 --> 0:01:00.320
<v Speaker 2>in July.

0:01:00.360 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 3>We're at one point three percent.

0:01:01.920 --> 0:01:06.319
<v Speaker 2>The likely magnificent sevens drive this benchmark to yet further

0:01:06.360 --> 0:01:07.320
<v Speaker 2>heights ahead of the FED.

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:08.039
<v Speaker 3>What are you watching?

0:01:08.120 --> 0:01:09.560
<v Speaker 5>End earnings?

0:01:09.560 --> 0:01:12.640
<v Speaker 4>But November fifth an astonishing day to report numbers. Right,

0:01:12.760 --> 0:01:15.479
<v Speaker 4>Lift is up twenty seven percent off session highs where

0:01:15.480 --> 0:01:18.440
<v Speaker 4>it was up thirty percent strong outlook, they're kind of

0:01:18.480 --> 0:01:22.000
<v Speaker 4>finding their niche and growth despite big brother Uber also

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:24.800
<v Speaker 4>doing well. Then there's the chip names qual Common, ARM.

0:01:25.200 --> 0:01:27.920
<v Speaker 4>They've traded very choppy in the session. Qual Comm was

0:01:28.000 --> 0:01:30.160
<v Speaker 4>up a lot, now it's up eight tens percent. Arm

0:01:30.319 --> 0:01:32.600
<v Speaker 4>was down, it's now up five and a half percent.

0:01:33.319 --> 0:01:37.959
<v Speaker 4>Basically consumers in key markets like China buying higher price

0:01:38.040 --> 0:01:39.600
<v Speaker 4>handsets and both benefiting from that.

0:01:39.680 --> 0:01:41.560
<v Speaker 5>But we can get into it later in the program

0:01:41.600 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 5>we can.

0:01:42.000 --> 0:01:43.880
<v Speaker 2>And of course China are a key focus for the

0:01:43.920 --> 0:01:47.199
<v Speaker 2>macro perspective going forward. After the results of the election

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:49.920
<v Speaker 2>came through. Let's get an overview of these markets of roombgs,

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:53.400
<v Speaker 2>Jess meant and just we see big tech leading all

0:01:53.400 --> 0:01:55.880
<v Speaker 2>the benchmarks to new highs as well as small caps.

0:01:55.880 --> 0:01:57.760
<v Speaker 3>But what keeps your eye, Well.

0:01:57.600 --> 0:01:59.400
<v Speaker 6>The big thing is because you'll just touched on when

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 6>it comes to Earth. So the biggest player, obviously we'll

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:04.440
<v Speaker 6>have Invidia coming up on November twentieth, but when you

0:02:04.480 --> 0:02:06.880
<v Speaker 6>look more specifically at when it comes to some of

0:02:06.920 --> 0:02:09.520
<v Speaker 6>its biggest customers, we've already had those earnings when it

0:02:09.560 --> 0:02:12.960
<v Speaker 6>comes to Meta, Microsoft, alphabet as Wolls, Amazon, So when

0:02:12.960 --> 0:02:15.200
<v Speaker 6>it comes to as far as what in totality when

0:02:15.200 --> 0:02:18.519
<v Speaker 6>it comes to what they're plowing into data center binesses

0:02:18.600 --> 0:02:20.840
<v Speaker 6>as well as other fixed assets. I mean, it's around

0:02:20.919 --> 0:02:24.120
<v Speaker 6>fifty nine billion with those forward companies just in the

0:02:24.160 --> 0:02:26.400
<v Speaker 6>third quarter alone, So usually that you can kind of

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:29.239
<v Speaker 6>glean into what that means for in video moving forward.

0:02:29.280 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 3>But obviously on the.

0:02:30.160 --> 0:02:32.480
<v Speaker 6>Back of these election results, there's a lot of questions

0:02:32.520 --> 0:02:34.960
<v Speaker 6>as far as what this could potentially mean for Biden's

0:02:35.000 --> 0:02:37.440
<v Speaker 6>chip back, especially when you think about companies that derive

0:02:37.639 --> 0:02:40.880
<v Speaker 6>different manufacturing from overseas like Apple as wolves when it

0:02:40.919 --> 0:02:44.200
<v Speaker 6>comes to say China and Biden trying to prohibit them

0:02:44.280 --> 0:02:46.480
<v Speaker 6>trying to use Western technology and trying to curb that.

0:02:46.560 --> 0:02:50.880
<v Speaker 4>Right now, Caroline, the headline of the band story today

0:02:50.919 --> 0:02:53.359
<v Speaker 4>is in video is clear winner in a lackluster big

0:02:53.360 --> 0:02:54.200
<v Speaker 4>tech earning season.

0:02:54.760 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 5>Is anyone watching the show? It's been great, Caroline, I've

0:02:58.600 --> 0:02:59.400
<v Speaker 5>had a lot of fun.

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:01.960
<v Speaker 4>The main point is that whatever happens in this next

0:03:02.000 --> 0:03:04.520
<v Speaker 4>administration jests, it doesn't kick in for a while. Is

0:03:04.560 --> 0:03:06.800
<v Speaker 4>there like a theme of the now of the next

0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:09.240
<v Speaker 4>three months, final three months of the year that markets

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:10.160
<v Speaker 4>are looking to well.

0:03:10.240 --> 0:03:12.920
<v Speaker 6>Usually the playbook in an election year is typically once

0:03:13.000 --> 0:03:14.160
<v Speaker 6>you have the election results.

0:03:14.160 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 3>There tends to be a year.

0:03:15.120 --> 0:03:17.520
<v Speaker 6>End rally, but we had quite a bit of a

0:03:17.560 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 6>real not even just when you're thinking about what's happened

0:03:19.720 --> 0:03:21.840
<v Speaker 6>tech and growth stocks, but the first three quarters of

0:03:21.840 --> 0:03:23.520
<v Speaker 6>this year was the best start to a year for

0:03:23.520 --> 0:03:25.920
<v Speaker 6>the S and P five hundred since nineteen ninety seven,

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:27.639
<v Speaker 6>but the Magnetum seven didn't really.

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:29.400
<v Speaker 3>Contribute to that in the third quarter.

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 6>Obviously we've seen a bounce back from that, but even

0:03:31.440 --> 0:03:34.760
<v Speaker 6>when we heard from Microsoft and Meta's results in recent

0:03:34.800 --> 0:03:36.520
<v Speaker 6>weeks on the back of that, we didn't.

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:37.440
<v Speaker 3>Really see those stocks pop.

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 6>But obviously sort of an all tied kind of lifting

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:41.680
<v Speaker 6>bulks here over the last couple of days following those

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:44.040
<v Speaker 6>election results. But moving forward, it's whether or not we

0:03:44.160 --> 0:03:46.760
<v Speaker 6>see that playbook and especially the positioning play out in

0:03:46.800 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 6>the final months of the year like we normally would

0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:49.160
<v Speaker 6>through history.

0:03:50.120 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 4>Boo bos Jess meant and helping us make sense of

0:03:52.360 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 4>tech in markets, Thank you very much. So what does

0:03:55.760 --> 0:03:58.680
<v Speaker 4>Trump two point zero presidency look like for the tech sector?

0:03:59.000 --> 0:04:02.720
<v Speaker 4>Dan ives have web shrites. We expect a strong AI

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:05.600
<v Speaker 4>focus out of the gates from Trump for US big

0:04:05.640 --> 0:04:09.480
<v Speaker 4>tech players can't out of the FTC and Musk's big

0:04:09.480 --> 0:04:12.720
<v Speaker 4>bet on Trump being a home run for Tesla.

0:04:14.040 --> 0:04:14.960
<v Speaker 5>Danaves joins us.

0:04:14.960 --> 0:04:18.560
<v Speaker 4>Now, Dan, regular viewers of this show and network will

0:04:18.600 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 4>know that much of what I just read out is

0:04:20.200 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 4>not a surprise this that you have this thesis.

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:24.880
<v Speaker 5>But let's start on the AI part.

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 4>What gives you such conviction that Trump will focus on

0:04:28.520 --> 0:04:29.520
<v Speaker 4>AI out of the game.

0:04:30.240 --> 0:04:31.640
<v Speaker 7>I mean, I think that that's going to be a

0:04:31.720 --> 0:04:34.680
<v Speaker 7>huge focus within the government. I mean, government's been way

0:04:34.760 --> 0:04:37.160
<v Speaker 7>behind when it comes to AI. That's going to be

0:04:37.279 --> 0:04:41.400
<v Speaker 7>huge initiatives. I think through D O D, through the agency.

0:04:41.560 --> 0:04:45.159
<v Speaker 7>Is that's gonna be borged for Microsoft, borge for Amazon,

0:04:45.240 --> 0:04:46.839
<v Speaker 7>borge for good good Google.

0:04:47.000 --> 0:04:48.200
<v Speaker 5>Names like par and Teer.

0:04:48.720 --> 0:04:51.000
<v Speaker 7>I think that's other names that are going to benefit

0:04:51.080 --> 0:04:55.680
<v Speaker 7>here in what is a gordon aede for AI and Palenteer.

0:04:55.760 --> 0:04:58.039
<v Speaker 4>There's the link with government. I want to ask you

0:04:58.040 --> 0:05:00.320
<v Speaker 4>about Elon Musk, and if you'll allow me, let me

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:02.479
<v Speaker 4>just put it this way. Because the market tried to

0:05:02.480 --> 0:05:06.279
<v Speaker 4>make sense of the Tesla move, It's believed that Trump

0:05:06.279 --> 0:05:10.039
<v Speaker 4>will repeal some or all of what's legislated for on

0:05:10.080 --> 0:05:15.240
<v Speaker 4>the EV consumer incentive side, manufacturing support for the companies themselves,

0:05:15.640 --> 0:05:20.400
<v Speaker 4>there's the association tailwind between Musk and Trump. Why is

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:23.039
<v Speaker 4>it that Tesla survives and stands out to your mind,

0:05:23.279 --> 0:05:26.279
<v Speaker 4>but gm Ford rivian names like that won't do as well.

0:05:26.440 --> 0:05:28.560
<v Speaker 7>Sure, I think it's a great point where it's good

0:05:28.680 --> 0:05:33.800
<v Speaker 7>two parts. One by removing the credits seventy five hundred,

0:05:34.400 --> 0:05:36.359
<v Speaker 7>that's going to give much more even playing field. I

0:05:36.400 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 7>mean task as a scale and scope, They're going to

0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:42.599
<v Speaker 7>be hugely advantaged there versus the Detroit Star Wars. So

0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 7>that's bullege there in terms of giving them that availability.

0:05:46.440 --> 0:05:48.839
<v Speaker 7>And I think option you know, to the automate, they

0:05:48.839 --> 0:05:51.279
<v Speaker 7>can still cut prices more. But the big thing, the

0:05:51.400 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 7>reason that this stock, I believe it's a trillion dollars

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:58.480
<v Speaker 7>of value unlocked when it comes to the AIPS because

0:05:58.680 --> 0:06:01.120
<v Speaker 7>when you look at Trump, this is going to give

0:06:01.160 --> 0:06:04.880
<v Speaker 7>the highway the autobond for autonomous I think he is

0:06:04.920 --> 0:06:08.760
<v Speaker 7>going to fast track autonomous FSD. That is very bullish

0:06:08.839 --> 0:06:12.360
<v Speaker 7>for Tesla. And it comes down to from Musk one

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:16.760
<v Speaker 7>of the best strategic bets he ever made was ultimately

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:18.440
<v Speaker 7>this bet on Trump.

0:06:19.120 --> 0:06:20.320
<v Speaker 3>It's the technology ready.

0:06:21.520 --> 0:06:22.040
<v Speaker 5>I think the.

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:25.320
<v Speaker 7>Technology is not maybe not necessarily ready today in its

0:06:25.360 --> 0:06:28.360
<v Speaker 7>current form, but it's going to a point that this

0:06:28.480 --> 0:06:31.200
<v Speaker 7>is ultimately going to be. When I look at autonomous

0:06:31.200 --> 0:06:35.680
<v Speaker 7>and FSD, it's a trillion dollar incremental valuation. You could

0:06:35.680 --> 0:06:39.599
<v Speaker 7>cyber cabs, you could ultimately see twenty twenty six, twenty

0:06:39.720 --> 0:06:41.960
<v Speaker 7>seven initiatives, get fast tracked.

0:06:42.320 --> 0:06:42.839
<v Speaker 5>Tesla.

0:06:43.400 --> 0:06:47.400
<v Speaker 7>Musk is the big winner in this called Trump sweepstakes,

0:06:47.640 --> 0:06:50.160
<v Speaker 7>along with big tech because the other view is that

0:06:50.320 --> 0:06:53.279
<v Speaker 7>Khan is likely going to be out the FTC and

0:06:53.279 --> 0:06:56.080
<v Speaker 7>that's bullish for deal making across big tech.

0:06:56.960 --> 0:06:59.000
<v Speaker 2>Okay, there's a lot to be butish about, but one

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:02.599
<v Speaker 2>area of concern has been well, yes, AI will be fueled,

0:07:02.600 --> 0:07:04.440
<v Speaker 2>but what about the infrastructure for AI? A lot of

0:07:04.440 --> 0:07:07.880
<v Speaker 2>that comes with growing chip sector here in the United States,

0:07:07.880 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 2>and that's dependent on well, in many ways, the Chips Act.

0:07:11.240 --> 0:07:12.720
<v Speaker 3>Maybe that gets blown out in the water.

0:07:12.920 --> 0:07:15.280
<v Speaker 7>Yes, I think when it comes to Chips or Inflationial

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:17.800
<v Speaker 7>Reduction Act, clearly there's gonna be a lot of revisions there.

0:07:18.000 --> 0:07:20.559
<v Speaker 7>I think probably the biggest loser negative would be names

0:07:20.560 --> 0:07:23.760
<v Speaker 7>like Intel. You're just adding to that pain. But from

0:07:23.800 --> 0:07:25.480
<v Speaker 7>a chip perspective.

0:07:25.000 --> 0:07:27.040
<v Speaker 3>You think Intel will be a loser that well, for.

0:07:27.200 --> 0:07:29.920
<v Speaker 7>I think Intel has been a loser. This is just

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:33.360
<v Speaker 7>putting really adding gasoline to the fire in terms of

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:36.720
<v Speaker 7>IRA was really going to be a huge opportunity for Intel.

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:39.800
<v Speaker 7>I think Intel now is on the wrong side that trend.

0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 7>I think what you're going to see with IRA and

0:07:41.720 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 7>inflacial Reduction act much more focus on chips in the US,

0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:47.760
<v Speaker 7>but really much more focus on the AI build out.

0:07:48.120 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 7>And I think when it comes to some of the

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:52.120
<v Speaker 7>tariffs that we talked about with China, I think there

0:07:52.160 --> 0:07:53.400
<v Speaker 7>will be carve outs.

0:07:53.760 --> 0:07:54.800
<v Speaker 1>That's why I don't.

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:57.600
<v Speaker 7>Think that Nvidia is going to be so negatively impacted.

0:07:57.880 --> 0:07:59.680
<v Speaker 7>I don't think a lot of these other names in

0:07:59.720 --> 0:08:03.160
<v Speaker 7>terms of the tafts, I think Tesla Apple. That's also

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:05.680
<v Speaker 7>why it's so important that Musk is going to be

0:08:05.760 --> 0:08:07.480
<v Speaker 7>a whisper in the White House.

0:08:07.520 --> 0:08:09.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to let you put your ifvback on because

0:08:09.560 --> 0:08:11.600
<v Speaker 2>I know Ed wants to jump in here, but I'm

0:08:11.600 --> 0:08:14.680
<v Speaker 2>interested in basically, you think Trump isn't going to live

0:08:14.760 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 2>up to a lot of the things he promised on

0:08:16.040 --> 0:08:16.560
<v Speaker 2>the campaign.

0:08:16.640 --> 0:08:18.440
<v Speaker 7>I think bar's going to be a lot worse than

0:08:18.480 --> 0:08:21.120
<v Speaker 7>the bite. When it comes to some of the tariffs,

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:24.040
<v Speaker 7>you have some that'll be much more nastier. But when

0:08:24.080 --> 0:08:26.320
<v Speaker 7>it comes to some of the exports that we see.

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 7>I think it's you're gonna see carve outs here. I

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:30.680
<v Speaker 7>don't think it's gonna be as negative for tech and

0:08:30.760 --> 0:08:33.840
<v Speaker 7>supply chain. That's why right now this is a Goldielox

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:38.479
<v Speaker 7>scenario for tech, but it's a champagne moment for Tesla investors.

0:08:39.559 --> 0:08:43.840
<v Speaker 5>Dan, you can hear me? Well, can hearn?

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 4>You?

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:45.040
<v Speaker 5>Give you a second? O? Good?

0:08:45.040 --> 0:08:48.200
<v Speaker 4>All right, here's the question, be honest with me. Can

0:08:48.240 --> 0:08:50.439
<v Speaker 4>Elon Musk have an.

0:08:49.960 --> 0:08:52.080
<v Speaker 5>Informal all formal.

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:55.040
<v Speaker 4>Role in the administration and be the CEO of Tesla,

0:08:55.360 --> 0:08:59.240
<v Speaker 4>SpaceX associated with Neuralink boring company, et cetera.

0:09:00.360 --> 0:09:03.320
<v Speaker 7>Yes, I think he won't clearly have a formal role

0:09:03.360 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 7>from a cabinet perspective. Why not kidding, because then it

0:09:06.920 --> 0:09:10.080
<v Speaker 7>complicates in terms of his ownership and I think some

0:09:10.120 --> 0:09:11.920
<v Speaker 7>of the structure in terms of what we see with

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:14.719
<v Speaker 7>Tesso with space X. But I believe he'll be an

0:09:14.800 --> 0:09:18.760
<v Speaker 7>unofficial whisper. I think he'll have a significant influence within

0:09:18.800 --> 0:09:19.560
<v Speaker 7>the White House.

0:09:20.200 --> 0:09:21.959
<v Speaker 5>And that's why this is going to be.

0:09:21.960 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 7>Known as probably the best strategic bet that Musk ever

0:09:26.120 --> 0:09:29.480
<v Speaker 7>made in terms of betting on Trump. And I think

0:09:29.559 --> 0:09:32.720
<v Speaker 7>you know this is something that is just starting to

0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:38.000
<v Speaker 7>play out in terms of this Trump Musk sort of alliance.

0:09:38.320 --> 0:09:41.440
<v Speaker 3>That i'ves and Webbush. I appreciate you coming on today.

0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:44.520
<v Speaker 2>Meanwhile, coming up, we speak with m CEO Rene has

0:09:44.760 --> 0:09:46.440
<v Speaker 2>hosts the chip designers earnings.

0:09:46.520 --> 0:09:47.000
<v Speaker 3>That's next.

0:09:47.000 --> 0:09:58.520
<v Speaker 8>This is bely Me Technology.

0:10:07.040 --> 0:10:08.800
<v Speaker 2>Let's just dive into the markets a little bit more

0:10:08.840 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 2>and check out chipmakers in particular.

0:10:10.520 --> 0:10:13.880
<v Speaker 3>I'll bring you the socks. Of course. The Semiconductor index currently.

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:15.640
<v Speaker 2>Out one point six percent, having a lovely couple of days,

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:18.240
<v Speaker 2>were up more than almost four point seventy five, call

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:20.440
<v Speaker 2>it five percent over the last couple of training days.

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:22.840
<v Speaker 2>Most in the green qualcom just holding on to its gains.

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:25.199
<v Speaker 2>It has come down from what had been in excess

0:10:25.240 --> 0:10:27.600
<v Speaker 2>of four five percent higher earlier. We're up seven tens

0:10:27.600 --> 0:10:30.480
<v Speaker 2>of percent. They're giving a bullish sales forecast, expecting revenue

0:10:30.520 --> 0:10:32.280
<v Speaker 2>of ten and a half to eleven point three billion

0:10:32.320 --> 0:10:35.440
<v Speaker 2>dollars in the current quarter. They beat analyst expectations and

0:10:35.440 --> 0:10:37.880
<v Speaker 2>their profit came in better than expected as well. Moving

0:10:37.880 --> 0:10:39.960
<v Speaker 2>on to ARM, which has come from what was in

0:10:40.000 --> 0:10:42.959
<v Speaker 2>the red pre market training to a higher three and

0:10:43.000 --> 0:10:45.679
<v Speaker 2>a half percent. Now this is they too really managed

0:10:45.720 --> 0:10:47.640
<v Speaker 2>to beat out the gate when it comes to the

0:10:47.679 --> 0:10:50.720
<v Speaker 2>both the top and bottom line. The company's revenue forecast

0:10:50.840 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 2>was a bit of a concern nine hundred and twenty

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:55.040
<v Speaker 2>million to nine hundred and seventy million, which perhaps just fell.

0:10:54.880 --> 0:10:56.400
<v Speaker 3>Short of some expectations.

0:10:56.600 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 2>But they really are maintaining their annual forecasts of three

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:01.000
<v Speaker 2>point eight to four point one billion dollars in sales.

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:03.319
<v Speaker 2>So let's get into it all a little bit more.

0:11:03.320 --> 0:11:05.960
<v Speaker 4>At Yeah, I think the shares are so interesting for

0:11:06.000 --> 0:11:08.120
<v Speaker 4>maybe it's a company reporting November fifth, and it took

0:11:08.120 --> 0:11:10.199
<v Speaker 4>time for the market to wake up and read the

0:11:10.280 --> 0:11:11.000
<v Speaker 4>numbers a little bit.

0:11:11.000 --> 0:11:14.280
<v Speaker 5>Who knows. The chip maker did give what was seen.

0:11:14.120 --> 0:11:17.640
<v Speaker 4>As a sluggish sales outlook and at first disappointed investors.

0:11:17.640 --> 0:11:20.440
<v Speaker 4>What has changed, Rene Huss is the CEO of ARM

0:11:20.480 --> 0:11:23.000
<v Speaker 4>and joins us. Now it's really interesting, right and the

0:11:23.000 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 4>function of what ARM does on licensing royalties, because sometimes

0:11:27.559 --> 0:11:28.960
<v Speaker 4>it's not about unit growth.

0:11:29.000 --> 0:11:30.199
<v Speaker 5>I look at like revenue.

0:11:30.200 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 4>For example, maybe some evidence renee that the Chinese consumer

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:35.920
<v Speaker 4>in particular is buying higher end handsets.

0:11:36.200 --> 0:11:37.600
<v Speaker 5>How does that help you benefit?

0:11:39.400 --> 0:11:42.240
<v Speaker 9>Well, good morning Eda and Caroline, and we are very

0:11:42.240 --> 0:11:45.040
<v Speaker 9>happy about the quarter. We just reported the high end

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:48.680
<v Speaker 9>of the guidance, and our royalties were at a record number.

0:11:48.760 --> 0:11:51.400
<v Speaker 9>And to your question, you know, one of the things

0:11:51.400 --> 0:11:53.480
<v Speaker 9>that we have seen a huge benefit from with our

0:11:53.520 --> 0:11:56.920
<v Speaker 9>technology going forward has been our Version nine, which commands

0:11:56.960 --> 0:11:59.080
<v Speaker 9>a much higher royalty rate than we have in the past.

0:11:59.160 --> 0:12:02.280
<v Speaker 9>And what that allows to do is not exactly track

0:12:02.360 --> 0:12:05.040
<v Speaker 9>the market from a unit standpoint. One of the proof

0:12:05.040 --> 0:12:08.199
<v Speaker 9>points of that unit sales for smartphones we're up four

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:11.680
<v Speaker 9>percent in the last quarter. Our royalties we're up forty percent.

0:12:12.200 --> 0:12:14.240
<v Speaker 9>So you can get a sense that you're seeing a

0:12:14.320 --> 0:12:17.400
<v Speaker 9>very big difference that's really driven by two factors. One

0:12:17.440 --> 0:12:19.480
<v Speaker 9>is Version nine, as I said, which commands a high

0:12:19.520 --> 0:12:23.280
<v Speaker 9>royalty rate. And second, we're just seeing more arm technology

0:12:23.800 --> 0:12:27.480
<v Speaker 9>inside these smartphones, particularly the premium segment, which also commands

0:12:27.480 --> 0:12:29.719
<v Speaker 9>a high royalty rene.

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:31.439
<v Speaker 4>A lot of investors and people that I speak to

0:12:31.480 --> 0:12:33.760
<v Speaker 4>in the world of technology think you're great. You're a

0:12:33.800 --> 0:12:37.000
<v Speaker 4>great CEO, and you've been embarked on this sort of

0:12:37.080 --> 0:12:40.640
<v Speaker 4>journey for profit and margin. But is there a ceiling

0:12:40.679 --> 0:12:43.319
<v Speaker 4>to that, Like, at some point, how do you keep

0:12:43.440 --> 0:12:46.120
<v Speaker 4>driving those letters? Are you sort of very pricing dependent

0:12:46.200 --> 0:12:46.920
<v Speaker 4>at this point?

0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:49.240
<v Speaker 5>I don't think so.

0:12:49.480 --> 0:12:52.760
<v Speaker 9>You know, the market that we're addressing is very, very large,

0:12:53.360 --> 0:12:55.320
<v Speaker 9>and one of the things that has made it even

0:12:55.400 --> 0:12:58.080
<v Speaker 9>larger has been all things AI. And if you think

0:12:58.120 --> 0:13:00.880
<v Speaker 9>about what ARM does, we do compute, we do the CPU.

0:13:01.160 --> 0:13:04.040
<v Speaker 9>Every digital device has one. And the fact that you're

0:13:04.120 --> 0:13:07.320
<v Speaker 9>running all these AI workloads on devices that are already

0:13:07.360 --> 0:13:09.760
<v Speaker 9>running different applications that they had to in the past,

0:13:10.200 --> 0:13:12.599
<v Speaker 9>that drives a need for more and more compute capacity,

0:13:12.640 --> 0:13:15.680
<v Speaker 9>which ends up ending up with ARM. So as a result,

0:13:15.720 --> 0:13:18.839
<v Speaker 9>we were very, very fortunate to have some tailwinds from

0:13:18.840 --> 0:13:21.800
<v Speaker 9>a technology standpoint driving our growth. So as far as

0:13:21.800 --> 0:13:23.800
<v Speaker 9>the ceiling, I don't think about it quite that way,

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:26.520
<v Speaker 9>but I do think where we are is a market

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:29.559
<v Speaker 9>where we just can't get enough compute capacity for all

0:13:29.559 --> 0:13:31.200
<v Speaker 9>these workloads that are going to be running on every

0:13:31.200 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 9>device in your home or your business.

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:37.640
<v Speaker 2>Meanwhile, though, perhaps some of the tension around compute and

0:13:37.760 --> 0:13:40.600
<v Speaker 2>AI has been whether China is going to quote unquote

0:13:40.600 --> 0:13:43.040
<v Speaker 2>beat out the United States, and that suddenly comes into

0:13:43.559 --> 0:13:46.760
<v Speaker 2>a closer focus, particularly with the results of the US election.

0:13:47.040 --> 0:13:49.280
<v Speaker 2>Does any of that concern you, particularly around the trade

0:13:49.280 --> 0:13:52.920
<v Speaker 2>and embroilment and whether that courtails the industry and going forward.

0:13:54.120 --> 0:13:57.080
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, a little hard to say, Caroline, relative to what

0:13:57.480 --> 0:14:00.560
<v Speaker 9>could happen from perspective of tariffs, etc. I think the

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:04.560
<v Speaker 9>one thing that I'm happy about post the election on

0:14:04.600 --> 0:14:07.080
<v Speaker 9>Tuesday is that here we are on Thursday morning and

0:14:07.120 --> 0:14:10.559
<v Speaker 9>we have a result. We're not debating about what might

0:14:10.600 --> 0:14:13.040
<v Speaker 9>happen or could happen or should happen. We at least

0:14:13.080 --> 0:14:15.760
<v Speaker 9>have a result behind us, which is good for business,

0:14:15.800 --> 0:14:18.520
<v Speaker 9>it's good for the country. Now going forward, we'll just

0:14:18.559 --> 0:14:22.080
<v Speaker 9>have to see what goes forward. In terms of the

0:14:22.120 --> 0:14:24.800
<v Speaker 9>things you mentioned, the China business for US has been

0:14:25.040 --> 0:14:28.560
<v Speaker 9>very resilient and very strong, both in data center and

0:14:28.600 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 9>phones that we've talked about, but also in the automobile sector.

0:14:31.560 --> 0:14:33.840
<v Speaker 9>So regarding your question, we'll just have to wait and see.

0:14:34.680 --> 0:14:35.200
<v Speaker 3>Talk to us a.

0:14:35.200 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 2>Little bit about the phone part, and in particular whether

0:14:38.520 --> 0:14:41.560
<v Speaker 2>or not just us replacing less often but with much

0:14:41.600 --> 0:14:44.400
<v Speaker 2>more expensive phones is going to be able to what

0:14:44.800 --> 0:14:47.440
<v Speaker 2>makes your numbers resilient going forward? Will that continue to

0:14:47.560 --> 0:14:50.080
<v Speaker 2>upset the fact that we're just buying fewer on them.

0:14:50.800 --> 0:14:53.560
<v Speaker 9>I do, and the reason for that is when you

0:14:53.600 --> 0:14:56.600
<v Speaker 9>start thinking about all of these AI agents that will

0:14:56.680 --> 0:14:59.920
<v Speaker 9>increasingly be running on your smartphone, that is going to

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:04.440
<v Speaker 9>drive demand for more and more capability on these premium phones.

0:15:04.800 --> 0:15:07.560
<v Speaker 9>And that's great for ARM because if you think about

0:15:07.640 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 9>a next generation smartphone still has to run games, it

0:15:10.040 --> 0:15:11.880
<v Speaker 9>still has to run apps, it still has to connect

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:14.040
<v Speaker 9>to the internet. But now you want to run a

0:15:14.120 --> 0:15:16.360
<v Speaker 9>large language model or a small language model, and you

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:19.360
<v Speaker 9>need to interface with a cloud and do security. That

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 9>all requires a lot of compute, much more than in

0:15:22.160 --> 0:15:25.600
<v Speaker 9>the past, which is great for ARM because you can't

0:15:25.600 --> 0:15:27.240
<v Speaker 9>do it without using our technology.

0:15:28.640 --> 0:15:33.280
<v Speaker 4>Renee Bloomberg reported that ARM was interested in buying some

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:34.880
<v Speaker 4>or all of Intel.

0:15:35.200 --> 0:15:39.200
<v Speaker 5>What's the latest for that, please? Yeah, I read that.

0:15:39.320 --> 0:15:42.120
<v Speaker 9>I'm not sure exactly where it came from, but I

0:15:42.160 --> 0:15:43.880
<v Speaker 9>can't really comment on those kind of rumors.

0:15:45.560 --> 0:15:50.480
<v Speaker 4>Small recent is a licensed dispute with Qualcom, a longtime

0:15:50.680 --> 0:15:54.160
<v Speaker 4>partner and customer of yours. Wouldn't it just makes sense

0:15:54.200 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 4>for you guys to work it out and settle and

0:15:56.240 --> 0:15:58.600
<v Speaker 4>get something done so you can both just move forward.

0:16:00.680 --> 0:16:00.880
<v Speaker 10>Yeah.

0:16:00.880 --> 0:16:02.880
<v Speaker 9>So it's an ongoing litigation, as you know, and in

0:16:03.000 --> 0:16:04.360
<v Speaker 9>just the baseline things, it's.

0:16:04.280 --> 0:16:05.800
<v Speaker 5>A pretty straightforward case.

0:16:06.720 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 9>Consent is required anytime one company buys another company that

0:16:10.600 --> 0:16:14.440
<v Speaker 9>has ARMED technology. Consent was not granted in this case,

0:16:14.800 --> 0:16:17.480
<v Speaker 9>and just by way of history, every contract we have

0:16:17.560 --> 0:16:20.280
<v Speaker 9>has this clause, and in thirty five years, I think

0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:23.160
<v Speaker 9>we've done one hundred and thirty assignments and one hundred

0:16:23.160 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 9>and thirty times consent has been granted. This time it wasn't.

0:16:27.360 --> 0:16:29.840
<v Speaker 9>We sent a notification to QUALKM that they were in

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:33.040
<v Speaker 9>breach of the license. We're very confident in our case.

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:37.480
<v Speaker 9>But more importantly, this is about fairness. It's about equity

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 9>the ecosystem. We have lots of partners who've license our

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:43.440
<v Speaker 9>technology over the last decades. We need to be fair

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:46.360
<v Speaker 9>and equitable, and we just now have a situation, an

0:16:46.440 --> 0:16:51.400
<v Speaker 9>unprecedented one where consent was not granted, and as a result,

0:16:51.800 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 9>we took the action we felt we needed to take.

0:16:54.120 --> 0:16:57.240
<v Speaker 2>How is it doing business therefore with what is a

0:16:57.320 --> 0:16:59.840
<v Speaker 2>key customer but increasingly becoming more of a front of me.

0:17:01.920 --> 0:17:04.640
<v Speaker 9>Well, you know, in terms of the litigations, I said,

0:17:04.640 --> 0:17:06.480
<v Speaker 9>there's not much more I can add on to it.

0:17:07.080 --> 0:17:11.440
<v Speaker 9>From a financial standpoint, we've made assumptions all along when

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:14.480
<v Speaker 9>we've given guidance and forecast to investors that we will

0:17:14.480 --> 0:17:18.280
<v Speaker 9>not prevail in this case. So we've taken a fairly

0:17:18.800 --> 0:17:22.440
<v Speaker 9>bearish position on the financial outlook, and that's really about

0:17:22.720 --> 0:17:23.800
<v Speaker 9>about all I can say on it.

0:17:24.720 --> 0:17:27.840
<v Speaker 4>RENEE at the end, market level and product level. What

0:17:28.000 --> 0:17:30.760
<v Speaker 4>is the next phase farm, what's the next story that

0:17:30.800 --> 0:17:32.399
<v Speaker 4>you think will carry the company forward?

0:17:34.480 --> 0:17:37.720
<v Speaker 9>Thanks for asking that question. You know, compute subsystems and

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:41.000
<v Speaker 9>these are all about taking the pieces of IP, stitching

0:17:41.000 --> 0:17:44.200
<v Speaker 9>them together together, providing them as a full end solution

0:17:44.800 --> 0:17:48.119
<v Speaker 9>which greatly saves engineering time, time to market, time to

0:17:48.160 --> 0:17:52.240
<v Speaker 9>profit for our partners. That is the direction of the company.

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:55.840
<v Speaker 9>We've seen amazing traction. We've had lots of design wins

0:17:55.880 --> 0:17:59.119
<v Speaker 9>in the data center space. Media Tech just announced their

0:17:59.119 --> 0:18:02.720
<v Speaker 9>first chip set recently using ARM computer subsystems for mobile.

0:18:03.280 --> 0:18:05.960
<v Speaker 9>I see that to be pervasive going forward, and it's

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:08.800
<v Speaker 9>going to allow us to not only get great benefits

0:18:08.800 --> 0:18:12.240
<v Speaker 9>to the customers' markets, but those drive much higher royalties

0:18:12.280 --> 0:18:14.199
<v Speaker 9>than anything we've ever done in the past, which will

0:18:14.280 --> 0:18:15.160
<v Speaker 9>drive growth for us.

0:18:16.320 --> 0:18:19.239
<v Speaker 2>Just paint the picture of where ARM will be in

0:18:19.280 --> 0:18:24.080
<v Speaker 2>the ecosystem five ten years from now. You're still majority

0:18:24.119 --> 0:18:26.679
<v Speaker 2>held by soft Bank in terms of your outstanding shares.

0:18:26.960 --> 0:18:29.520
<v Speaker 2>Massa has some big vision one hundred billion dollars to

0:18:29.520 --> 0:18:33.720
<v Speaker 2>put in in terms of creating an AI behemoth.

0:18:33.200 --> 0:18:34.760
<v Speaker 3>That complements what you do.

0:18:35.200 --> 0:18:37.159
<v Speaker 2>But then there's also the element of whether you just

0:18:37.160 --> 0:18:39.160
<v Speaker 2>stick to the designing part of the business.

0:18:39.320 --> 0:18:41.720
<v Speaker 3>Where do you take this business? Renee as a CEO.

0:18:43.080 --> 0:18:45.280
<v Speaker 9>We have a lot of optionality, Caroline in terms of

0:18:45.320 --> 0:18:46.600
<v Speaker 9>the things that we do, and these are obviously the

0:18:46.640 --> 0:18:50.159
<v Speaker 9>things we talk about all the time internally. Which direction

0:18:50.240 --> 0:18:52.800
<v Speaker 9>do we go, how horizontal do we go, how vertical

0:18:52.840 --> 0:18:55.800
<v Speaker 9>do we go. I'm not able, unfortunately to talk about

0:18:56.000 --> 0:18:58.840
<v Speaker 9>unannounced products this morning with you, although I would love to,

0:18:58.880 --> 0:19:03.080
<v Speaker 9>but I just can't. But we do focus very much.

0:19:03.160 --> 0:19:06.560
<v Speaker 9>We do focus very much on the vertical and horizontal

0:19:06.640 --> 0:19:11.200
<v Speaker 9>nature of the products and also AI and the form

0:19:11.240 --> 0:19:12.320
<v Speaker 9>factors and everything.

0:19:12.040 --> 0:19:12.719
<v Speaker 1>That goes forward.

0:19:12.800 --> 0:19:15.400
<v Speaker 9>So five to ten years ago from five tent years

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:17.240
<v Speaker 9>from now, I do know that ARM will be involved

0:19:17.240 --> 0:19:18.680
<v Speaker 9>in computing in a very large way.

0:19:19.560 --> 0:19:22.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm CEO and A has you appreciate the time today,

0:19:22.240 --> 0:19:22.639
<v Speaker 2>Thank you.

0:19:23.440 --> 0:19:25.600
<v Speaker 11>I think av's are going to be a huge accelerant.

0:19:25.720 --> 0:19:29.520
<v Speaker 11>Actually you say a TAM expander addressable work an expander

0:19:29.560 --> 0:19:31.359
<v Speaker 11>for LYFT, because I think.

0:19:31.200 --> 0:19:33.440
<v Speaker 3>What it's going to do is it's going to bring.

0:19:33.440 --> 0:19:35.919
<v Speaker 11>New product onto the platform that people are going to like.

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:37.840
<v Speaker 11>Some people are going to like being driven by human.

0:19:38.040 --> 0:19:39.720
<v Speaker 11>Some people are going to think being driven by robot

0:19:39.800 --> 0:19:42.480
<v Speaker 11>is pretty cool. Some use cases favor one of the other.

0:19:42.560 --> 0:19:44.760
<v Speaker 11>So anyway, I think the hybrid future is what we're

0:19:44.760 --> 0:19:47.520
<v Speaker 11>looking at over time. Now Mobili they make the sensors,

0:19:47.560 --> 0:19:49.119
<v Speaker 11>they made the tech. You probably have them in your

0:19:49.119 --> 0:19:52.439
<v Speaker 11>car right now, Lay and assist, smart cruise control, all

0:19:52.480 --> 0:19:55.480
<v Speaker 11>that stuff that's level two, level four is full self driving.

0:19:55.520 --> 0:19:56.480
<v Speaker 5>So imagine a world.

0:19:58.359 --> 0:20:01.399
<v Speaker 2>We now go to the President States Biden addressing the

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 2>public from the Rose Garden.

0:20:02.880 --> 0:20:03.479
<v Speaker 8>That's listening.

0:20:04.040 --> 0:20:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Good to see this cabinet and the staff together here.

0:20:09.640 --> 0:20:21.119
<v Speaker 10>Thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, please, thank you,

0:20:21.280 --> 0:20:22.080
<v Speaker 10>thank you, thank you.

0:20:24.560 --> 0:20:26.880
<v Speaker 1>It's good to see you all. Particularly good to see

0:20:26.880 --> 0:20:31.119
<v Speaker 1>my granddaughter sitting in the front row here at Fann Hawaii. Honey.

0:20:31.440 --> 0:20:34.960
<v Speaker 1>For over two hundred years, America has carried on the

0:20:35.040 --> 0:20:39.800
<v Speaker 1>greatest experiment in self government and history of the world.

0:20:40.280 --> 0:20:44.240
<v Speaker 1>That's not hyperbole, that's a fact. For the people. The

0:20:44.280 --> 0:20:47.199
<v Speaker 1>people vote and choose their own leaders, and they do

0:20:47.240 --> 0:20:51.439
<v Speaker 1>it peacefully. And we're in a democracy. The will of

0:20:51.480 --> 0:20:57.400
<v Speaker 1>the people always prevails. Yesterday I spoke with President elect

0:20:57.400 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Trump to congratulate him on his victory, and I assured

0:21:01.640 --> 0:21:05.439
<v Speaker 1>him I direct my entire administration to work with his

0:21:05.560 --> 0:21:10.800
<v Speaker 1>team to ensure a peaceful and orderly transition. That's what

0:21:10.840 --> 0:21:16.360
<v Speaker 1>the American people deserve. Yesterday I also spoke Vice President Harris.

0:21:17.440 --> 0:21:21.520
<v Speaker 1>She's been a partner and a public servant. She ran

0:21:21.560 --> 0:21:24.920
<v Speaker 1>an inspiring campaign and everyone got to see something that

0:21:25.000 --> 0:21:28.520
<v Speaker 1>I've learned early on to respect so much her character.

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:32.480
<v Speaker 1>She has a backbone like a ramrod. She has great character,

0:21:32.640 --> 0:21:36.919
<v Speaker 1>true character. She gave her whole heart and effort, and

0:21:36.960 --> 0:21:38.960
<v Speaker 1>she and her entire team should be proud of the

0:21:38.960 --> 0:21:44.280
<v Speaker 1>campaign they ran. You know, the struggle for the soul

0:21:44.320 --> 0:21:49.160
<v Speaker 1>of America since our very founding has always been an

0:21:49.160 --> 0:21:54.960
<v Speaker 1>ongoing debate and still vital today. I know for some

0:21:55.080 --> 0:21:58.679
<v Speaker 1>people it's a time for victory to state the obvious.

0:21:59.119 --> 0:22:04.000
<v Speaker 1>For others, it's a time of loss. Campaigns, your contest

0:22:04.600 --> 0:22:09.000
<v Speaker 1>of competing visions. The country chooses one or the other.

0:22:10.320 --> 0:22:15.000
<v Speaker 1>We accept the choice the country made. I've said many times,

0:22:15.920 --> 0:22:20.959
<v Speaker 1>you can't love your country only when you win. You

0:22:21.080 --> 0:22:27.040
<v Speaker 1>can't love your neighbor only when you agree something I

0:22:27.080 --> 0:22:29.600
<v Speaker 1>hope we can do. No matter who you voted for

0:22:30.680 --> 0:22:34.760
<v Speaker 1>is see each other not as adversaries, but as fellow Americans.

0:22:35.480 --> 0:22:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Bring down the temperature. I also hope we can later

0:22:39.080 --> 0:22:43.320
<v Speaker 1>rest the question about the integrity of the American electoral system.

0:22:43.800 --> 0:22:48.120
<v Speaker 1>It is honest, it is fair, and it is transparent,

0:22:49.840 --> 0:22:54.320
<v Speaker 1>and it can be trusted, win or lose. I also

0:22:54.359 --> 0:22:57.960
<v Speaker 1>hope we can restore the respect for all our election

0:22:58.080 --> 0:23:02.560
<v Speaker 1>workers who busted their next risks of the outset. We

0:23:02.600 --> 0:23:07.280
<v Speaker 1>should thank them, thank them for staffing voting sites, counting

0:23:07.280 --> 0:23:11.920
<v Speaker 1>the votes, protecting the very integrity of the election. Many

0:23:11.960 --> 0:23:15.439
<v Speaker 1>of them are volunteers who do it simply out of

0:23:15.480 --> 0:23:19.840
<v Speaker 1>love for their country and as they did as they

0:23:19.840 --> 0:23:23.200
<v Speaker 1>did their duty as citizens. I will do my duty

0:23:23.200 --> 0:23:28.399
<v Speaker 1>as president. I'll fulfill my oath and I wanted the Constitution.

0:23:29.320 --> 0:23:33.520
<v Speaker 1>On January twentieth, we'll have a peaceful transfer of power

0:23:33.600 --> 0:23:39.800
<v Speaker 1>here in America. To all our incredible staff, supporters, cabinet members,

0:23:39.840 --> 0:23:41.320
<v Speaker 1>all the people who have been hanging out with me

0:23:41.400 --> 0:23:43.240
<v Speaker 1>for the last forty years. God love you. As my

0:23:43.280 --> 0:23:46.439
<v Speaker 1>mother would say, thank you so much. You put so

0:23:46.600 --> 0:23:48.960
<v Speaker 1>much into the past four years. I know it's a

0:23:48.960 --> 0:23:53.280
<v Speaker 1>difficult time. You're hurting. I hear you, and I see you,

0:23:54.200 --> 0:23:58.840
<v Speaker 1>but don't forget. Don't forget all the we accomplished. It's

0:23:58.880 --> 0:24:03.119
<v Speaker 1>beending historic president, not because I'm president, because what we've done,

0:24:03.400 --> 0:24:08.240
<v Speaker 1>what you've done, a presidency for all Americans. Much of

0:24:08.280 --> 0:24:11.440
<v Speaker 1>the work we've done is already being felt by the

0:24:11.480 --> 0:24:13.560
<v Speaker 1>American people, with the vast majority of it will not

0:24:13.640 --> 0:24:17.480
<v Speaker 1>be felt we felt over the next ten years. We

0:24:17.600 --> 0:24:22.200
<v Speaker 1>have legislation we passed. It's just only now just really

0:24:22.280 --> 0:24:26.160
<v Speaker 1>kicking in. We're going to see over trillion dollars worth

0:24:26.160 --> 0:24:30.800
<v Speaker 1>of infrastructure work done, changing people's lives in rural communities

0:24:30.840 --> 0:24:35.680
<v Speaker 1>and communities that are in real difficulty because it takes

0:24:35.760 --> 0:24:40.080
<v Speaker 1>time to get it done, and so much more. It's

0:24:40.080 --> 0:24:44.119
<v Speaker 1>going to take time, but it's there. The road ahead

0:24:44.200 --> 0:24:48.919
<v Speaker 1>is clear, assuming we sustain it. There's so much, so

0:24:49.040 --> 0:24:51.720
<v Speaker 1>much we can get done and will get done based

0:24:51.760 --> 0:24:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the way the legislation was passed, and it's truly historic.

0:24:56.800 --> 0:25:02.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, we're leaving behind the strongest economy in the world.

0:25:02.920 --> 0:25:08.440
<v Speaker 1>I know people are still hurting, but things are changing rapidly. Together,

0:25:08.480 --> 0:25:12.240
<v Speaker 1>we've changed America for the better. Now we have seventy

0:25:12.280 --> 0:25:16.640
<v Speaker 1>four days to finish the term. Our term. Let's make

0:25:16.680 --> 0:25:20.680
<v Speaker 1>every day count That's the responsibility we have to the

0:25:20.720 --> 0:25:25.200
<v Speaker 1>American people. Look, folks, you all know it in your lives.

0:25:25.680 --> 0:25:32.959
<v Speaker 1>Setbacks are unavoidable, but giving up is unforgivable. Setbacks are unavoidable,

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:37.080
<v Speaker 1>but giving up is unforgivable. We all get knocked down.

0:25:37.840 --> 0:25:39.879
<v Speaker 1>But the measure of our characters, my dad would say,

0:25:39.880 --> 0:25:45.040
<v Speaker 1>is how quickly we get back up. Remember, a defeat

0:25:45.119 --> 0:25:49.120
<v Speaker 1>does not mean we are defeated. We lost this battle.

0:25:50.960 --> 0:25:54.760
<v Speaker 1>America of your dreams is calling for you to get

0:25:54.800 --> 0:25:58.840
<v Speaker 1>back up. That's the story of America for over two

0:25:58.960 --> 0:26:03.760
<v Speaker 1>hundred and forty years years in counting. It's a story

0:26:03.760 --> 0:26:07.119
<v Speaker 1>for all of us, not just some of us. The

0:26:07.119 --> 0:26:12.120
<v Speaker 1>American Experiment endors. We're going to be okay, but we

0:26:12.240 --> 0:26:17.359
<v Speaker 1>need to stay engaged, We need to keep going, and

0:26:17.480 --> 0:26:22.040
<v Speaker 1>above all, we need to keep the faith. So proud

0:26:22.080 --> 0:26:24.760
<v Speaker 1>to have worked with all of you. I really mean it,

0:26:25.320 --> 0:26:30.720
<v Speaker 1>I sincerely mean it. God bless you all, God bless America,

0:26:31.480 --> 0:26:34.040
<v Speaker 1>and may God protect our troops. Thank you, thank you,

0:26:34.119 --> 0:26:34.439
<v Speaker 1>thank you.

0:26:45.640 --> 0:26:48.320
<v Speaker 4>Let's bring in Bloombak's Katie Lions, who joins us from

0:26:48.359 --> 0:26:53.560
<v Speaker 4>New York City. Kaylee Plice, your summary of President Biden's comments, Well.

0:26:53.560 --> 0:26:56.000
<v Speaker 12>The most important point about this speech from Biden at

0:26:56.000 --> 0:26:58.080
<v Speaker 12>the Rose Garden in the White House that follows the

0:26:58.200 --> 0:27:01.360
<v Speaker 12>speech the concession speech from Vice pres A. Kamala Harris yesterday,

0:27:01.400 --> 0:27:04.320
<v Speaker 12>is that they both are acknowledging the decisive victory of

0:27:04.359 --> 0:27:07.760
<v Speaker 12>Donald Trump and pledging for a peaceful transition of power.

0:27:07.760 --> 0:27:09.840
<v Speaker 12>We just heard President Biden say those words that he

0:27:09.920 --> 0:27:12.480
<v Speaker 12>called to congratulate Donald Trump yesterday, that he will do

0:27:12.560 --> 0:27:15.520
<v Speaker 12>his duty on January twentieth to make sure there is

0:27:16.040 --> 0:27:19.080
<v Speaker 12>a peaceful inauguration of Donald Trump in a power transition

0:27:19.600 --> 0:27:22.359
<v Speaker 12>in the United States, similar in rhetoric to what we

0:27:22.400 --> 0:27:25.560
<v Speaker 12>heard from Kamala Harris yesterday. The suggestion while this specific

0:27:25.600 --> 0:27:28.720
<v Speaker 12>fight was lost as he casts this as campaigns being

0:27:28.760 --> 0:27:32.000
<v Speaker 12>a contest between competing ideas, that that did not necessarily

0:27:32.040 --> 0:27:34.879
<v Speaker 12>mean that there won't be ones one in the future.

0:27:34.920 --> 0:27:37.399
<v Speaker 12>And interesting to also see President Biden here trying to

0:27:37.520 --> 0:27:41.359
<v Speaker 12>characterize his legacy as well, talking about the accomplishments he

0:27:41.440 --> 0:27:44.360
<v Speaker 12>sees this administration having completed, the idea that there's more

0:27:44.400 --> 0:27:47.159
<v Speaker 12>work they will do in seventy four days, because in

0:27:47.200 --> 0:27:50.600
<v Speaker 12>part this is the swan song of song of President Biden,

0:27:50.680 --> 0:27:53.320
<v Speaker 12>who is getting a lot of blame within the Democratic

0:27:53.359 --> 0:27:56.240
<v Speaker 12>Party for the loss of Kamala Harris, the suggestion that

0:27:56.320 --> 0:27:59.399
<v Speaker 12>he stayed in the race too long. He ultimately, of course,

0:27:59.400 --> 0:28:01.159
<v Speaker 12>did not bow out of it in tell July, and

0:28:01.200 --> 0:28:03.920
<v Speaker 12>he is getting a great share of the blame for

0:28:03.960 --> 0:28:06.600
<v Speaker 12>what happened this week and the victory of Donald Trump.

0:28:06.680 --> 0:28:09.159
<v Speaker 12>But again that victory is being acknowledged. They are planning

0:28:09.200 --> 0:28:11.760
<v Speaker 12>to work with the Trump transition team to make sure

0:28:11.800 --> 0:28:14.600
<v Speaker 12>that this all happened smoothly. There could still be some hiccups,

0:28:14.600 --> 0:28:17.280
<v Speaker 12>as Donald Trump is specifically a bit skeptical of the

0:28:17.280 --> 0:28:21.040
<v Speaker 12>General Services Administration, for example, the intelligence agencies that would

0:28:21.080 --> 0:28:24.679
<v Speaker 12>oversee things like background checks for those incoming into the administration.

0:28:24.920 --> 0:28:27.040
<v Speaker 12>So there could still be some hiccups here. But by

0:28:27.119 --> 0:28:30.160
<v Speaker 12>and large, they are committing to a peaceful transfer of power.

0:28:30.160 --> 0:28:32.560
<v Speaker 12>They are conceding that Donald Trump won this race, and

0:28:32.600 --> 0:28:34.760
<v Speaker 12>this is something we did not see four years ago

0:28:34.960 --> 0:28:36.879
<v Speaker 12>in twenty twenty, Katie.

0:28:37.440 --> 0:28:40.320
<v Speaker 2>They then also focus on the seventy four days still

0:28:40.360 --> 0:28:43.680
<v Speaker 2>left to enact policies and indeed what has been achieved

0:28:44.760 --> 0:28:47.320
<v Speaker 2>with there was a mention of infrastructure, and that plays

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:49.160
<v Speaker 2>a lot to the technology community here.

0:28:49.560 --> 0:28:51.120
<v Speaker 3>How much do you think there will.

0:28:50.920 --> 0:28:53.360
<v Speaker 2>Be any more passing of anything or any more focus

0:28:53.400 --> 0:28:56.000
<v Speaker 2>on and potentially the future.

0:28:56.040 --> 0:28:58.520
<v Speaker 3>If indeed, say a Chipsack is unraveled.

0:28:58.360 --> 0:28:59.840
<v Speaker 12>Well that's going to be something that would be de

0:29:00.080 --> 0:29:03.040
<v Speaker 12>within the next Congress. Obviously, there are still some months

0:29:03.040 --> 0:29:06.280
<v Speaker 12>remaining here for this administration, in this Congress and House

0:29:06.320 --> 0:29:08.440
<v Speaker 12>of Representatives. What they're likely to deal with in the

0:29:08.480 --> 0:29:11.800
<v Speaker 12>lame dunk section session, which do tend to be more

0:29:11.840 --> 0:29:14.760
<v Speaker 12>productive as the campaign has already completed at that time,

0:29:14.800 --> 0:29:16.840
<v Speaker 12>really is going to surround funding, as there is a

0:29:16.880 --> 0:29:20.320
<v Speaker 12>funding deadline, a government funding deadline on the twenty first

0:29:20.320 --> 0:29:21.960
<v Speaker 12>of December. So they will need to make sure that

0:29:22.000 --> 0:29:24.720
<v Speaker 12>the government stays funded for some period of time into

0:29:24.720 --> 0:29:27.200
<v Speaker 12>the next administration first and foremost. But when the new

0:29:27.240 --> 0:29:29.400
<v Speaker 12>Congress is sad and we do not yet know the

0:29:29.720 --> 0:29:32.120
<v Speaker 12>entire makeup of it, Yes, it will be a Republican Senate.

0:29:32.160 --> 0:29:34.720
<v Speaker 12>Whether it stays a Republican House at this time is

0:29:34.720 --> 0:29:37.120
<v Speaker 12>still unclear, and it would take a Republican House likely

0:29:37.440 --> 0:29:40.480
<v Speaker 12>to unravel any of the accomplishments of this administration. Legislation

0:29:40.520 --> 0:29:43.120
<v Speaker 12>pass including the Chips Act, but the Inflation Reduction Act

0:29:43.160 --> 0:29:43.560
<v Speaker 12>as well.

0:29:43.760 --> 0:29:47.040
<v Speaker 2>Whoms Kendie lines, we appreciate it so much on the

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:49.400
<v Speaker 2>back of that Biden speech. Meanwhile, and let's get back

0:29:49.400 --> 0:29:50.320
<v Speaker 2>to these markets.

0:29:50.720 --> 0:29:53.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and I'd like to go as crypto if that's okay,

0:29:53.440 --> 0:29:55.400
<v Speaker 4>because we didn't have a show twenty four hours ago.

0:29:55.600 --> 0:30:00.240
<v Speaker 4>But within the last twenty four hours, Bitcoin is US

0:30:00.280 --> 0:30:03.120
<v Speaker 4>scott below seventy six thousand US dollars per token and

0:30:03.160 --> 0:30:05.440
<v Speaker 4>it's kind of weird. I'm going to say it out loud,

0:30:05.920 --> 0:30:08.560
<v Speaker 4>but that's all time high, right. I had to pull

0:30:08.600 --> 0:30:10.960
<v Speaker 4>up the GP chart on my Bloomberg terminal and be like, oh,

0:30:11.000 --> 0:30:12.760
<v Speaker 4>this is also happening in real time. And one of

0:30:12.760 --> 0:30:14.960
<v Speaker 4>the big stories, of course of the last twenty four

0:30:14.960 --> 0:30:17.920
<v Speaker 4>hours is some of the crypto related equities or stocks

0:30:18.160 --> 0:30:22.760
<v Speaker 4>companies that either are a marketplace for have exposure to crypto.

0:30:23.000 --> 0:30:26.160
<v Speaker 4>And I think the sentiment is simple, right, Caro, that

0:30:26.840 --> 0:30:29.960
<v Speaker 4>President elect Trump, whether from a policy perspective or his

0:30:30.000 --> 0:30:34.320
<v Speaker 4>own attitude, will approach crypto differently, and largely that's been

0:30:34.320 --> 0:30:37.280
<v Speaker 4>seen as supportive of that industry, even though these specific

0:30:37.360 --> 0:30:39.760
<v Speaker 4>names aren't doing much in either direction in the moment.

0:30:40.240 --> 0:30:43.400
<v Speaker 2>Boy did they move higher yesterday, though we appreciate it.

0:30:43.440 --> 0:30:46.000
<v Speaker 2>And let's go to Noel Aichson who's with US Triple

0:30:46.000 --> 0:30:48.520
<v Speaker 2>Crown digital partner, author of the crypto is macro now

0:30:48.560 --> 0:30:51.000
<v Speaker 2>and someone who put out a great note yesterday that

0:30:51.040 --> 0:30:53.160
<v Speaker 2>I paid a lot of attention to Noel because it

0:30:53.240 --> 0:30:56.520
<v Speaker 2>was outlining what next. Yes, there's a lot of euphoria

0:30:56.600 --> 0:30:59.800
<v Speaker 2>around whether indeed the sec chare will change and be

0:30:59.840 --> 0:31:02.920
<v Speaker 2>more or crypto loving or a nice put in place

0:31:03.400 --> 0:31:07.840
<v Speaker 2>some sort of clarity as to what the future regulation

0:31:07.960 --> 0:31:10.560
<v Speaker 2>will be rather than enforcement. What is next on the

0:31:10.600 --> 0:31:13.760
<v Speaker 2>to do list? What will really substantiate these record highs?

0:31:14.440 --> 0:31:16.840
<v Speaker 13>That's exactly what we're all asking Caroline, Thanks so much

0:31:16.880 --> 0:31:19.680
<v Speaker 13>for having me. What is next very much depends on

0:31:19.840 --> 0:31:22.000
<v Speaker 13>the priorities of the new administration when it gets in.

0:31:22.040 --> 0:31:23.000
<v Speaker 3>I think we can assume that.

0:31:22.960 --> 0:31:24.880
<v Speaker 13>Crep's crypto is not going to be top of their list.

0:31:24.920 --> 0:31:27.240
<v Speaker 13>But he did make some very important promises, and it

0:31:27.280 --> 0:31:30.600
<v Speaker 13>is a very sore thorn in the side of US

0:31:30.600 --> 0:31:33.560
<v Speaker 13>financial infrastructure that this has not ment dealt with. There's

0:31:33.600 --> 0:31:35.760
<v Speaker 13>going to be some limits as to what they can

0:31:35.960 --> 0:31:38.960
<v Speaker 13>do in the short term, and perhaps crypto spirits are

0:31:39.160 --> 0:31:42.400
<v Speaker 13>getting ahead of themselves a bit, but at the very least,

0:31:42.440 --> 0:31:45.240
<v Speaker 13>a change of regime at the SEC would be very

0:31:45.240 --> 0:31:48.360
<v Speaker 13>good news to enable so builders to go in and

0:31:48.400 --> 0:31:51.239
<v Speaker 13>talk to the regulator without fear of an action. This

0:31:51.280 --> 0:31:54.120
<v Speaker 13>would especially be good for assets whose status a spirity

0:31:54.120 --> 0:31:56.520
<v Speaker 13>are lot is currently unclear, as well as those that

0:31:56.560 --> 0:32:00.000
<v Speaker 13>want to provide services for those assets.

0:31:59.800 --> 0:32:02.560
<v Speaker 4>Do you have a good sense of where President electromp

0:32:02.600 --> 0:32:05.520
<v Speaker 4>will start any specific area of focus?

0:32:06.560 --> 0:32:08.720
<v Speaker 13>I think the number one and the either low hanging

0:32:08.760 --> 0:32:10.840
<v Speaker 13>fruit has to be a change at the SEC. I

0:32:10.840 --> 0:32:12.680
<v Speaker 13>think that's pretty much on the cards that would have

0:32:12.720 --> 0:32:15.840
<v Speaker 13>happened to be fair, I think any ways, but the

0:32:15.920 --> 0:32:18.160
<v Speaker 13>type of change now obviously is going to be slightly

0:32:18.200 --> 0:32:20.840
<v Speaker 13>different than had the neglection gone the other way. That's

0:32:20.840 --> 0:32:23.280
<v Speaker 13>a fairly easy one, and again have to remember ever

0:32:23.320 --> 0:32:26.120
<v Speaker 13>since Chevron was overturned, the SEC does have its hands

0:32:26.120 --> 0:32:28.120
<v Speaker 13>tied as to the kind of rule making it can

0:32:28.160 --> 0:32:32.840
<v Speaker 13>engage in. But just removing the fear of action is

0:32:32.880 --> 0:32:34.160
<v Speaker 13>a very big deal.

0:32:35.160 --> 0:32:37.680
<v Speaker 2>Then you articulate in the note that maybe we look

0:32:37.680 --> 0:32:42.280
<v Speaker 2>at stable coin focus and indeed some sort of clarity

0:32:42.640 --> 0:32:45.480
<v Speaker 2>on it going forward. We're also though thinking about what

0:32:45.760 --> 0:32:48.480
<v Speaker 2>Congress looks like. There are a lot of people, a

0:32:48.480 --> 0:32:50.440
<v Speaker 2>lot of races that were backed by an awful lot

0:32:50.480 --> 0:32:53.680
<v Speaker 2>of money coming from the cryptoc community that wanted to

0:32:53.720 --> 0:32:58.160
<v Speaker 2>see well more change From a congressional perspective, Senator Cynthia Loomis.

0:32:58.360 --> 0:33:01.120
<v Speaker 2>She goes on to talk about the strategy bitcoin reserve

0:33:01.240 --> 0:33:04.040
<v Speaker 2>that many of us really wonder how powerful that will

0:33:04.080 --> 0:33:06.680
<v Speaker 2>really be. What do you make of that particular part

0:33:06.680 --> 0:33:08.240
<v Speaker 2>of the promise from Trump.

0:33:08.920 --> 0:33:11.200
<v Speaker 13>I'm hearing a lot of chatter about that, a little peo.

0:33:11.400 --> 0:33:14.440
<v Speaker 13>Everyone's asking when, not if, but when is this going

0:33:14.480 --> 0:33:17.000
<v Speaker 13>to happen. I to be honest, I'm skeptical we're going

0:33:17.040 --> 0:33:19.440
<v Speaker 13>to get one of those. And I also think that

0:33:19.880 --> 0:33:22.800
<v Speaker 13>Trump himself might walk back his promise on that when

0:33:22.840 --> 0:33:26.680
<v Speaker 13>he realizes that it involves selling dollars to buy bitcoin.

0:33:27.040 --> 0:33:29.120
<v Speaker 13>Even if he doesn't, it will be very hard to

0:33:29.160 --> 0:33:31.560
<v Speaker 13>get through Congress. But to be honest, that isn't the

0:33:31.600 --> 0:33:33.840
<v Speaker 13>most important thing. It would be just enough. It would

0:33:33.840 --> 0:33:36.400
<v Speaker 13>be good news for the market if the US decides

0:33:36.440 --> 0:33:39.400
<v Speaker 13>to not sell its current stash. And as for the

0:33:39.400 --> 0:33:41.880
<v Speaker 13>stable coins that you're asking about, that again is low

0:33:41.920 --> 0:33:44.880
<v Speaker 13>hanging fruit. A stable coin bill is bipartisan. This person

0:33:44.960 --> 0:33:47.160
<v Speaker 13>of ironing out the details, what kind of requirements and

0:33:47.200 --> 0:33:50.320
<v Speaker 13>reserves would they insist on. That's going to be pretty easy.

0:33:50.360 --> 0:33:51.840
<v Speaker 13>And I think we're going to get that pretty much

0:33:51.880 --> 0:33:54.200
<v Speaker 13>right out of the bat as well, depending on how

0:33:54.240 --> 0:33:56.600
<v Speaker 13>fast Congress moves the course. And we do as as

0:33:56.600 --> 0:33:59.080
<v Speaker 13>you said, Gary, and we do have the most crypto

0:33:59.120 --> 0:34:02.600
<v Speaker 13>friendly Congress ever. That is really quite astonishing. What is

0:34:02.640 --> 0:34:05.400
<v Speaker 13>really needed, though, is a crypto bill that will recognize

0:34:05.400 --> 0:34:08.279
<v Speaker 13>that the definitions have changed, that new types of rules

0:34:08.280 --> 0:34:08.680
<v Speaker 13>are needed.

0:34:08.800 --> 0:34:11.080
<v Speaker 8>That is going to be more complicated.

0:34:11.160 --> 0:34:12.919
<v Speaker 2>A Jason, We're going to be getting a back entory

0:34:12.920 --> 0:34:14.200
<v Speaker 2>for Crown Digital partner.

0:34:14.280 --> 0:34:17.080
<v Speaker 3>We thank you. Coming up, we're going to be speaking with.

0:34:17.040 --> 0:34:21.319
<v Speaker 2>Parma Lucky, androil founder and President Trump heads back to

0:34:21.400 --> 0:34:26.239
<v Speaker 2>the White House and questions linger around his defense tech starts.

0:34:26.600 --> 0:34:38.560
<v Speaker 2>We discuss President elect Trump. This is Bloomberg Technology.

0:34:44.920 --> 0:34:47.600
<v Speaker 4>As Donald Trump prepares to head back to the White House,

0:34:47.640 --> 0:34:51.400
<v Speaker 4>there are questions around his policies on AI, defense tech

0:34:51.440 --> 0:34:54.480
<v Speaker 4>and spending for More and roll founder Parma Lucky is

0:34:54.520 --> 0:34:58.080
<v Speaker 4>back with us here on Bloomberg Technology, and I want

0:34:58.080 --> 0:35:00.759
<v Speaker 4>to keep it focused on technology, but i'd also like

0:35:00.800 --> 0:35:03.440
<v Speaker 4>to invite you'd start just to give your reaction to

0:35:03.480 --> 0:35:06.359
<v Speaker 4>the outcome of the election, and I guess reflect your

0:35:06.400 --> 0:35:08.840
<v Speaker 4>sentiments about the next four years.

0:35:10.200 --> 0:35:13.319
<v Speaker 14>Well, I think it was obvious to most people who

0:35:13.320 --> 0:35:15.920
<v Speaker 14>have been paying attention to what people are paying attention to.

0:35:16.040 --> 0:35:18.120
<v Speaker 14>I know that that's contentious. A lot of people thought

0:35:18.160 --> 0:35:19.799
<v Speaker 14>it was going to be close. I didn't think it was.

0:35:19.920 --> 0:35:21.880
<v Speaker 14>Of course, I'm biased. I've been a Trump supporter for

0:35:21.920 --> 0:35:23.759
<v Speaker 14>a long time. I supported him in twenty sixteen, I

0:35:23.800 --> 0:35:25.759
<v Speaker 14>supported him in twenty twenty. I actually wrote a letter

0:35:25.760 --> 0:35:27.919
<v Speaker 14>to him while I was in college in twenty eleven

0:35:27.960 --> 0:35:30.360
<v Speaker 14>telling him that he should run for president. So I've

0:35:30.360 --> 0:35:31.640
<v Speaker 14>been a fan of the Master of the Art of

0:35:31.640 --> 0:35:33.239
<v Speaker 14>the Deal for a long time. It's nice to see

0:35:33.239 --> 0:35:34.880
<v Speaker 14>it finding Colman. And I'm also a big fan of

0:35:34.920 --> 0:35:37.120
<v Speaker 14>his pick in JD Vans for vice president.

0:35:37.160 --> 0:35:39.200
<v Speaker 5>He's done an incredible job. Everyone else has got to

0:35:39.200 --> 0:35:39.560
<v Speaker 5>see that.

0:35:40.040 --> 0:35:42.920
<v Speaker 14>But I've known JD for a while and he's an

0:35:42.920 --> 0:35:47.080
<v Speaker 14>incredible person. But my reaction on kind of the more

0:35:47.120 --> 0:35:49.520
<v Speaker 14>business side, the defense side, is it's great to have

0:35:49.640 --> 0:35:54.840
<v Speaker 14>someone inbound who is deeply, i guess, deeply aligned with

0:35:54.880 --> 0:35:56.680
<v Speaker 14>the idea that we need to be spending less on

0:35:56.719 --> 0:35:58.640
<v Speaker 14>defense while still getting more, that we need to do

0:35:58.680 --> 0:36:01.560
<v Speaker 14>a better job for k during the defense tools that

0:36:01.600 --> 0:36:04.720
<v Speaker 14>protect our country. Trump famously got involved in the nitty

0:36:04.760 --> 0:36:07.160
<v Speaker 14>gritty of some of our aircraft carrier design and some

0:36:07.280 --> 0:36:08.919
<v Speaker 14>of the procurement of air Force.

0:36:09.000 --> 0:36:12.040
<v Speaker 5>One. To see that level of involvement from a president.

0:36:11.680 --> 0:36:14.640
<v Speaker 14>Is pretty rare, and I think an indicator of his priorities.

0:36:15.280 --> 0:36:17.920
<v Speaker 3>You wrote a letter to the guy back in twenty eleven.

0:36:17.920 --> 0:36:20.400
<v Speaker 3>Who knows whether that inspired has run Parma.

0:36:20.520 --> 0:36:25.360
<v Speaker 2>But you're close, of course with the VP elect as well.

0:36:25.760 --> 0:36:28.680
<v Speaker 2>Are you talking about anyone to be the Defense secretary?

0:36:28.760 --> 0:36:31.280
<v Speaker 2>Have you got anyone's here? Would you like anyone in particular?

0:36:32.360 --> 0:36:34.839
<v Speaker 5>Look, I've got opinions. I'm in touch with the.

0:36:34.760 --> 0:36:36.279
<v Speaker 14>Transition of team, of course, and I know a lot

0:36:36.280 --> 0:36:38.560
<v Speaker 14>of people who are involved with the transition have known

0:36:38.600 --> 0:36:41.319
<v Speaker 14>them for a long time. In many cases, I've heard

0:36:41.360 --> 0:36:44.000
<v Speaker 14>a few names thrown around for a potential Secretary of Defense,

0:36:44.040 --> 0:36:48.239
<v Speaker 14>but also for the many roles that are in maybe

0:36:48.239 --> 0:36:50.560
<v Speaker 14>not the secretary level. They don't get quite as discussed

0:36:50.600 --> 0:36:55.000
<v Speaker 14>on shows like yours, but it's still very, very important.

0:36:55.680 --> 0:36:56.360
<v Speaker 5>So you know what, I.

0:36:56.320 --> 0:36:58.400
<v Speaker 14>Don't want to throw any names out there because I

0:36:58.400 --> 0:37:00.440
<v Speaker 14>would be happy with all There's not There's not a

0:37:00.480 --> 0:37:02.440
<v Speaker 14>single name that I've heard that I'm unhappy with. And

0:37:02.480 --> 0:37:07.239
<v Speaker 14>I have to I have to play nice and not say, oh, well,

0:37:07.239 --> 0:37:08.520
<v Speaker 14>I prefer this guy or that guy.

0:37:08.719 --> 0:37:10.799
<v Speaker 5>All of the names that I've seen are people who

0:37:10.840 --> 0:37:13.360
<v Speaker 5>are do an incredible job. Thank you, Palmer.

0:37:13.880 --> 0:37:18.680
<v Speaker 4>Anderil has spent years working with the Department of Defense, right,

0:37:18.760 --> 0:37:21.080
<v Speaker 4>and I don't want you to reflect too much on

0:37:21.120 --> 0:37:23.560
<v Speaker 4>the experience that has been, but maybe you could talk

0:37:23.600 --> 0:37:26.759
<v Speaker 4>because through the changes you think are needed in that

0:37:26.800 --> 0:37:31.080
<v Speaker 4>department structurally in terms of how government does business with

0:37:31.200 --> 0:37:32.160
<v Speaker 4>private enterprise.

0:37:32.320 --> 0:37:32.880
<v Speaker 5>Like Anderill.

0:37:33.719 --> 0:37:37.160
<v Speaker 14>Sure, Look, I got into the defense space after I

0:37:37.200 --> 0:37:39.319
<v Speaker 14>sold my first company, Oculus, to Facebook for a few

0:37:39.360 --> 0:37:40.040
<v Speaker 14>billion dollars.

0:37:40.400 --> 0:37:42.239
<v Speaker 5>Was working on VR there for a few years before

0:37:42.280 --> 0:37:42.920
<v Speaker 5>I got fired.

0:37:43.160 --> 0:37:45.160
<v Speaker 14>And the reason I got into national security is because

0:37:45.160 --> 0:37:47.600
<v Speaker 14>I wanted to save taxpayers hundreds of billions of dollars

0:37:47.600 --> 0:37:49.640
<v Speaker 14>a year by making tens of billions of dollars a year.

0:37:49.640 --> 0:37:50.719
<v Speaker 5>And I think that that can be.

0:37:50.640 --> 0:37:54.080
<v Speaker 14>Done by encouraging the creation of defense product companies that

0:37:54.160 --> 0:37:56.399
<v Speaker 14>use their own money to decide what to build, how

0:37:56.400 --> 0:37:59.399
<v Speaker 14>to build it when it's done, and then have skin

0:37:59.480 --> 0:38:01.719
<v Speaker 14>in the game. And they fail, they lose money. When

0:38:01.719 --> 0:38:04.279
<v Speaker 14>they succeed, they make money. I think the set of

0:38:04.280 --> 0:38:07.200
<v Speaker 14>incentives that you see in a lot of defense contracting today.

0:38:07.200 --> 0:38:10.680
<v Speaker 14>Defense procurement today cost plus contracting, where you're paid for

0:38:10.719 --> 0:38:12.640
<v Speaker 14>your fixed time and materials and a fixed percentage of

0:38:12.640 --> 0:38:15.560
<v Speaker 14>profit on top. It rewards exactly the wrong things. You

0:38:15.600 --> 0:38:19.680
<v Speaker 14>make more money by making things more expensive. You make

0:38:19.760 --> 0:38:22.800
<v Speaker 14>more plus by having more cost and that manifests in

0:38:22.840 --> 0:38:25.640
<v Speaker 14>the form of programs that go too long, programs that

0:38:25.680 --> 0:38:28.839
<v Speaker 14>are too expensive, components that are more expensive than need be,

0:38:28.840 --> 0:38:31.160
<v Speaker 14>because it's really the only way to make more money

0:38:31.200 --> 0:38:32.920
<v Speaker 14>on it. In fact, in some cases, they make more

0:38:32.960 --> 0:38:34.560
<v Speaker 14>money with things that break frequently than not.

0:38:34.640 --> 0:38:37.440
<v Speaker 5>And so I think what we really need.

0:38:37.360 --> 0:38:39.799
<v Speaker 14>Is companies that are aligned with the way that we

0:38:39.840 --> 0:38:41.280
<v Speaker 14>do business and the rest of our economy.

0:38:41.280 --> 0:38:43.560
<v Speaker 5>You build a good product, you sell it, you make money.

0:38:44.280 --> 0:38:46.600
<v Speaker 2>So in terms of contracting, if we see a shakeup,

0:38:46.840 --> 0:38:49.479
<v Speaker 2>will you benefit the smaller? The startups benefit a little

0:38:49.480 --> 0:38:50.919
<v Speaker 2>bit more than they have been Who the winners?

0:38:50.960 --> 0:38:51.919
<v Speaker 3>Who are the losers? Do you think?

0:38:53.280 --> 0:38:53.440
<v Speaker 5>Well?

0:38:53.440 --> 0:38:57.080
<v Speaker 14>I think the winners are going to be particularly to

0:38:57.080 --> 0:38:58.480
<v Speaker 14>two things. I think it's going to be a lot

0:38:58.480 --> 0:39:01.080
<v Speaker 14>of these new startups that are up in the wake

0:39:01.120 --> 0:39:04.840
<v Speaker 14>of Androl's success. I often say that other defense startups

0:39:04.840 --> 0:39:07.160
<v Speaker 14>have raised a lot more money off my success than

0:39:07.200 --> 0:39:09.760
<v Speaker 14>I have, which I'm fine with. And I've raised billions,

0:39:09.840 --> 0:39:12.280
<v Speaker 14>but I've seen their pitch decks. They're saying, hey, Androl

0:39:12.320 --> 0:39:15.200
<v Speaker 14>did it. The DoD is moving with this. People understand

0:39:15.200 --> 0:39:17.280
<v Speaker 14>that this is a viable business model. I think another

0:39:17.320 --> 0:39:19.000
<v Speaker 14>beneficiary is going to be companies that have been around

0:39:19.000 --> 0:39:21.040
<v Speaker 14>for a long time that are very very competent, that

0:39:21.120 --> 0:39:22.680
<v Speaker 14>know how to get things done, that know how to

0:39:22.920 --> 0:39:24.600
<v Speaker 14>write a budget, that know how to build a team,

0:39:24.640 --> 0:39:26.520
<v Speaker 14>that know how to build a product. The companies that

0:39:26.560 --> 0:39:28.680
<v Speaker 14>suffer are going to be the ones that try to

0:39:28.800 --> 0:39:32.359
<v Speaker 14>shunt responsibility for their failures over and over and over

0:39:32.400 --> 0:39:34.600
<v Speaker 14>again onto the taxpayer. I think they're the ones who

0:39:34.640 --> 0:39:36.080
<v Speaker 14>are going to struggle. And I don't want to make

0:39:36.080 --> 0:39:37.759
<v Speaker 14>this sound like this is a this is just a

0:39:37.760 --> 0:39:40.279
<v Speaker 14>Trump thing. This is a non partisan idea. I mean,

0:39:40.360 --> 0:39:42.640
<v Speaker 14>Androl's been around for about eight years now. We did

0:39:42.640 --> 0:39:45.399
<v Speaker 14>well under Trump in his first administration, and we did

0:39:45.520 --> 0:39:48.319
<v Speaker 14>even better under Biden and his administration. I think we're

0:39:48.360 --> 0:39:51.440
<v Speaker 14>going to do even better now. It's the defense space

0:39:51.560 --> 0:39:53.000
<v Speaker 14>is one of the few that is I think actually

0:39:53.120 --> 0:39:57.520
<v Speaker 14>successfully remained pretty non partisan, and that's aligned with Androl too.

0:39:57.560 --> 0:39:59.960
<v Speaker 14>You know, I'm a Republican obviously, I'm the founder of ANDROL,

0:40:00.120 --> 0:40:03.480
<v Speaker 14>but our CEO Brianship as a Democrat, He's fundraised for Jamala,

0:40:03.600 --> 0:40:06.560
<v Speaker 14>He's done fundraisers for other Democrat politicians. The idea that

0:40:06.560 --> 0:40:09.080
<v Speaker 14>the United States military should have the strongest military in

0:40:09.120 --> 0:40:11.640
<v Speaker 14>the world, and that we should defend our allies around

0:40:11.680 --> 0:40:14.239
<v Speaker 14>the world, not just with our military, but especially giving

0:40:14.280 --> 0:40:16.320
<v Speaker 14>them the tools that they need to defend themselves.

0:40:16.160 --> 0:40:18.719
<v Speaker 5>It's a pretty non partisan idea.

0:40:19.440 --> 0:40:23.480
<v Speaker 4>Palmer has the election of Donald Trump caused Anderill to

0:40:23.560 --> 0:40:28.400
<v Speaker 4>adjust or change planning for China and allies like taiwan.

0:40:29.960 --> 0:40:30.960
<v Speaker 5>Ah.

0:40:31.440 --> 0:40:34.840
<v Speaker 14>I don't think so, mostly because I was certain he

0:40:34.920 --> 0:40:35.600
<v Speaker 14>was going to win.

0:40:35.719 --> 0:40:39.160
<v Speaker 5>I think it was already big di in Okay.

0:40:39.280 --> 0:40:42.880
<v Speaker 4>And one thing I'm fascinated by, and just bear with

0:40:42.920 --> 0:40:48.040
<v Speaker 4>me on this one elon Musk Okay. There's an association

0:40:48.239 --> 0:40:51.520
<v Speaker 4>between the two. The great unknown is whether Musk will

0:40:51.520 --> 0:40:56.360
<v Speaker 4>hold a formal or informal role in some government department.

0:40:57.080 --> 0:41:00.560
<v Speaker 4>But I guess what's your assumption and planning, how much

0:41:00.600 --> 0:41:05.719
<v Speaker 4>attention he can keep Trump focused on defense space and

0:41:05.760 --> 0:41:07.520
<v Speaker 4>what you kind of think it will actually lead to.

0:41:07.719 --> 0:41:08.480
<v Speaker 5>Do you see what I mean?

0:41:10.440 --> 0:41:16.399
<v Speaker 14>I think that Elon has outperformed every reasonable expectation of him.

0:41:16.440 --> 0:41:18.200
<v Speaker 14>I was one of the people, I have to admit

0:41:18.640 --> 0:41:23.240
<v Speaker 14>that didn't believe that he could successfully work on Twitter

0:41:23.719 --> 0:41:28.799
<v Speaker 14>and SpaceX and Tesla and Solar City and Neurolink and

0:41:28.920 --> 0:41:33.680
<v Speaker 14>politics and everything else and Diablo for Top twenty ranked

0:41:33.719 --> 0:41:34.520
<v Speaker 14>all at the same time.

0:41:35.200 --> 0:41:38.360
<v Speaker 5>But he's done it. And so on the one.

0:41:38.200 --> 0:41:39.839
<v Speaker 14>Hand, it's easy to say, oh, man, I think it's

0:41:39.880 --> 0:41:41.759
<v Speaker 14>going to be really hard for him to do all

0:41:41.800 --> 0:41:45.120
<v Speaker 14>of that and also keep this administration maybe focused on

0:41:45.160 --> 0:41:49.040
<v Speaker 14>things like space making, humanity and multiplanetary species and extra

0:41:49.080 --> 0:41:52.759
<v Speaker 14>solar species eventually. But you know what, everyone who's ever

0:41:52.800 --> 0:41:56.799
<v Speaker 14>bet against Elon has come away crying. So I think

0:41:56.800 --> 0:41:58.719
<v Speaker 14>I'm probably just gonna have to say, yeah, I bet

0:41:58.760 --> 0:42:01.160
<v Speaker 14>he's going to do it somehow, somehow, he's going.

0:42:01.000 --> 0:42:01.399
<v Speaker 5>To do it.

0:42:02.160 --> 0:42:05.719
<v Speaker 2>Andrew Founder Palmer Lucky. We appreciate it. Thank you for

0:42:05.760 --> 0:42:15.959
<v Speaker 2>coming on a sketter Today's Tech Daily. Elon Musk's big

0:42:16.000 --> 0:42:18.600
<v Speaker 2>bet on Donald Trump has paid off if you're looking

0:42:18.600 --> 0:42:21.920
<v Speaker 2>at the count market capitalization of Tesla absolutely rocketing. But

0:42:21.920 --> 0:42:24.000
<v Speaker 2>what does it mean for the value of other areas

0:42:24.040 --> 0:42:27.120
<v Speaker 2>of his control X for example, the platform formerly known

0:42:27.120 --> 0:42:30.239
<v Speaker 2>as Twitter those Max Trafkan discusses what has been a

0:42:30.280 --> 0:42:32.600
<v Speaker 2>massive payoff if you think of one hundred and thirty

0:42:32.640 --> 0:42:35.680
<v Speaker 2>million in and how much as wealth has ballooned by that.

0:42:36.080 --> 0:42:37.960
<v Speaker 3>But what about the other areas of growth.

0:42:38.440 --> 0:42:41.120
<v Speaker 15>Well, I think X we need to stop thinking about

0:42:41.200 --> 0:42:44.880
<v Speaker 15>as a business that exists outside of Elon Musk's you know,

0:42:45.200 --> 0:42:47.799
<v Speaker 15>general empire. You know, X's value has fallen a lot

0:42:47.840 --> 0:42:50.480
<v Speaker 15>over the past two years, but I think at this

0:42:50.520 --> 0:42:54.520
<v Speaker 15>point it's fair to say that it's influence, it's political worth.

0:42:55.440 --> 0:42:59.360
<v Speaker 15>What it gives Elon Musk's other areas is probably worth

0:42:59.440 --> 0:43:02.200
<v Speaker 15>more than the forty four billion dollars he paid for it,

0:43:02.480 --> 0:43:05.000
<v Speaker 15>or at least the money that he's lost in running

0:43:05.000 --> 0:43:07.879
<v Speaker 15>it over the past two years. SpaceX stands to gain

0:43:07.960 --> 0:43:12.520
<v Speaker 15>tremendously from this election. You know, Trump on the stump

0:43:12.640 --> 0:43:16.279
<v Speaker 15>was talking about Mars programs, talking about ordering rockets up

0:43:16.320 --> 0:43:18.640
<v Speaker 15>from Elon, and if that happens, if there is a

0:43:19.320 --> 0:43:21.799
<v Speaker 15>big Mars program that is unveiled, that's going to be

0:43:21.800 --> 0:43:24.360
<v Speaker 15>worth billions, if not tens of billions of dollars to

0:43:24.440 --> 0:43:28.560
<v Speaker 15>Elon Musk neuralink, his you know, brain implant thing that's

0:43:28.600 --> 0:43:33.440
<v Speaker 15>federally regulated, the boring company federally regulated, AI potentially.

0:43:33.040 --> 0:43:38.439
<v Speaker 4>Regulated, federally regulated is like the key point, right.

0:43:38.680 --> 0:43:39.359
<v Speaker 5>You know, in.

0:43:39.400 --> 0:43:42.960
<v Speaker 4>History, high profile people from the private sites of Going's

0:43:42.960 --> 0:43:47.200
<v Speaker 4>government is not new like Gary Cohne Minuchin. Whatever the

0:43:47.320 --> 0:43:49.719
<v Speaker 4>question is, will Musk see it through Max? Will he

0:43:49.840 --> 0:43:53.440
<v Speaker 4>still be with Trump in some role a year from now,

0:43:53.600 --> 0:43:54.879
<v Speaker 4>two or three years from now.

0:43:55.280 --> 0:43:57.440
<v Speaker 15>Well, I think, and I think the comparison with folks

0:43:57.440 --> 0:44:00.440
<v Speaker 15>like Gary Cohn is instructive. You know, there are lots

0:44:00.480 --> 0:44:04.359
<v Speaker 15>of business people who during the last Trump presidency kind

0:44:04.400 --> 0:44:08.400
<v Speaker 15>of navigated themselves towards Trump and ultimately I think had

0:44:08.520 --> 0:44:10.359
<v Speaker 15>a not great experience. You know, this is a guy

0:44:10.400 --> 0:44:11.960
<v Speaker 15>who takes up a lot of space in the room.

0:44:12.280 --> 0:44:16.480
<v Speaker 15>He is, you know, famously strong headed, and you look

0:44:16.480 --> 0:44:19.680
<v Speaker 15>at Elon Musk's personality and Donald Trump's personality, might say,

0:44:19.800 --> 0:44:22.439
<v Speaker 15>how can these two men be in a room together? Now,

0:44:22.640 --> 0:44:24.919
<v Speaker 15>the point I would put, what I would point out

0:44:25.080 --> 0:44:28.600
<v Speaker 15>is that Elon Musk is way richer than any of

0:44:28.600 --> 0:44:31.680
<v Speaker 15>those guys you mentioned, and way more powerful and has

0:44:31.719 --> 0:44:35.680
<v Speaker 15>a real personal brand celebrity. He is as famous as

0:44:35.680 --> 0:44:37.480
<v Speaker 15>some of the most famous people in the world. So

0:44:37.640 --> 0:44:40.799
<v Speaker 15>he has leverage over Trump that maybe some of these

0:44:40.880 --> 0:44:45.040
<v Speaker 15>other business people did not have Elon Musk. Now I

0:44:45.040 --> 0:44:47.920
<v Speaker 15>think very much needs Donald Trump. But I would argue

0:44:47.920 --> 0:44:51.080
<v Speaker 15>that Donald Trump and the Republican Party now needs Elon

0:44:51.200 --> 0:44:51.719
<v Speaker 15>Musk too.

0:44:52.080 --> 0:44:55.640
<v Speaker 2>There are other positions of power within the US government.

0:44:55.640 --> 0:44:57.120
<v Speaker 3>The White House is not all of it. Will that

0:44:57.200 --> 0:44:58.200
<v Speaker 3>be checks and balances?

0:44:59.040 --> 0:45:00.880
<v Speaker 15>I mean, I think you have to look at the

0:45:00.960 --> 0:45:04.120
<v Speaker 15>past Trump presidency and also, just like the character of

0:45:04.160 --> 0:45:07.080
<v Speaker 15>Elon Musk and Donald Trump, these are not guys who

0:45:07.160 --> 0:45:10.240
<v Speaker 15>like following the who necessarily are paying super close attention

0:45:10.560 --> 0:45:13.600
<v Speaker 15>to the rules, and so I think that you know, yeah,

0:45:13.600 --> 0:45:15.680
<v Speaker 15>we're going to see a lot of conversation about potential

0:45:15.719 --> 0:45:19.920
<v Speaker 15>ethics violations. Should a guy who owns a major defense contractor,

0:45:19.920 --> 0:45:22.759
<v Speaker 15>who controls a major defense contractor be giving the US

0:45:22.840 --> 0:45:26.799
<v Speaker 15>government advice on defense personnel, that's probably going to run

0:45:26.800 --> 0:45:29.319
<v Speaker 15>a foul of ethics rules. Now, do I expect that

0:45:29.360 --> 0:45:30.719
<v Speaker 15>to slow down Elon Musk?

0:45:30.840 --> 0:45:33.560
<v Speaker 4>No, I mean, to be fair, Pa Ma Lucky was

0:45:33.600 --> 0:45:35.600
<v Speaker 4>just in the show, and he's a major defense contractor,

0:45:35.640 --> 0:45:38.640
<v Speaker 4>and he was giving loads of advice to the future administration.

0:45:38.840 --> 0:45:42.520
<v Speaker 15>So okay, But there's a difference between giving advice and

0:45:42.960 --> 0:45:44.120
<v Speaker 15>being part of the White House.

0:45:44.280 --> 0:45:45.439
<v Speaker 5>Right, that's I know there.

0:45:45.400 --> 0:45:49.560
<v Speaker 4>Is and it's the only question formal role or informal role.

0:45:49.600 --> 0:45:51.320
<v Speaker 4>And I promise you I'll try and find out Blooma's

0:45:51.320 --> 0:45:53.160
<v Speaker 4>match chaffikin. Thank you very much, Carol.

0:45:53.440 --> 0:45:55.520
<v Speaker 2>That does it for this edition of Blue Big Technology.

0:45:55.560 --> 0:45:58.200
<v Speaker 2>Boy do we get through a lot, whether it's earnings

0:45:58.200 --> 0:46:00.319
<v Speaker 2>that are still on a fed that's to come, but

0:46:00.440 --> 0:46:01.960
<v Speaker 2>also about the election.

0:46:04.000 --> 0:46:05.480
<v Speaker 4>Check out the pod you know where to find it.

0:46:05.640 --> 0:46:06.840
<v Speaker 4>Team in New York and accept.

0:46:06.840 --> 0:46:08.280
<v Speaker 5>Thank you. This is Bloomberg