WEBVTT - Falling for Socialist Chic 

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio the George

0:00:07.000 --> 0:00:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Washington Broadcast Center, Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty.

0:00:10.960 --> 0:00:13.280
<v Speaker 2>Armstrong and Getty and he.

0:00:16.160 --> 0:00:18.360
<v Speaker 3>Armstrong and Jetty.

0:00:24.239 --> 0:00:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Coming up later in the show, a couple of intriguing

0:00:28.720 --> 0:00:33.240
<v Speaker 1>in not two terrifying stories about AI plus some gender

0:00:33.280 --> 0:00:36.320
<v Speaker 1>bending madness. But it's always a pleasure to talk to

0:00:36.360 --> 0:00:39.440
<v Speaker 1>lonhe chenln He is the David and Diane Stephi Fellow

0:00:39.479 --> 0:00:42.400
<v Speaker 1>in American Public Policy Studies at the Hoover Institution and

0:00:42.440 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the Director of Domestic Policy Studies at Stanford University.

0:00:46.640 --> 0:00:47.920
<v Speaker 3>Lon he Welcome, How are you.

0:00:48.440 --> 0:00:49.600
<v Speaker 2>Joe, A very good morning to you.

0:00:50.080 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Also, among your credentials, you are a big Dodgers fan

0:00:52.800 --> 0:00:56.200
<v Speaker 1>and executive producer Mike Hanson is convinced the Dodgers are

0:00:56.320 --> 0:00:58.440
<v Speaker 1>not to be sold and fall apart financially.

0:00:59.840 --> 0:01:02.240
<v Speaker 2>He would be completely wrong in that assumption.

0:01:04.640 --> 0:01:07.000
<v Speaker 3>Ah, everybody roots against the big dog. You have to

0:01:07.040 --> 0:01:07.600
<v Speaker 3>put up with it.

0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:12.360
<v Speaker 4>So you know, in the words of the great was

0:01:12.400 --> 0:01:15.480
<v Speaker 4>it whoever it was that called the last game of

0:01:15.520 --> 0:01:17.320
<v Speaker 4>the World Series, you know, to beat the champ you

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:20.400
<v Speaker 4>got to knock them out, and nobody's knocking out the Dodgers.

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:22.320
<v Speaker 3>This year they win three in a row.

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:25.319
<v Speaker 1>The revolution is coming from Major League Baseball, though the

0:01:25.360 --> 0:01:27.600
<v Speaker 1>proletariat pregan to rise up in the streets.

0:01:27.880 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 3>All right, So let's talk to little politics.

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:34.240
<v Speaker 1>And you know, us getting too far in depth into

0:01:34.480 --> 0:01:37.119
<v Speaker 1>a primary election where four hundred and thirty two people

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:39.840
<v Speaker 1>showed up to vote, and trying to extrapolate that to

0:01:39.920 --> 0:01:43.840
<v Speaker 1>some giant movement I think is just silly. But in

0:01:43.920 --> 0:01:49.240
<v Speaker 1>the recent primaries there have been some kind of intriguing result.

0:01:49.880 --> 0:01:52.279
<v Speaker 1>What do you think is the most significant one?

0:01:53.720 --> 0:01:55.920
<v Speaker 4>Well, I still think it has to do with the

0:01:56.000 --> 0:01:59.560
<v Speaker 4>nationalization of our politics, Joe. And the reason that we

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:04.520
<v Speaker 4>care about the Wisconsin governor's race or the Minnesota Senate race,

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:07.480
<v Speaker 4>or races that otherwise probably wouldn't have a whole lot

0:02:07.480 --> 0:02:09.680
<v Speaker 4>of impact for people who don't live in those states,

0:02:09.800 --> 0:02:12.400
<v Speaker 4>is because of what it means for our national politics.

0:02:12.400 --> 0:02:15.720
<v Speaker 4>And I think, particularly on the left, if you look

0:02:15.800 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 4>at the energy behind a lot of the progressive democratic

0:02:20.680 --> 0:02:23.680
<v Speaker 4>socialist candidates, and I get it, not all of them

0:02:23.720 --> 0:02:26.880
<v Speaker 4>self identifies democratic socialists, but in my book, if you're

0:02:26.919 --> 0:02:29.440
<v Speaker 4>in favor of the government takeover of healthcare, you know

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:32.639
<v Speaker 4>you're pretty much a socialist. And I think that that's

0:02:32.720 --> 0:02:36.000
<v Speaker 4>what we've seen from people like Abdul Sayid in Michigan,

0:02:36.240 --> 0:02:40.239
<v Speaker 4>or Francesca Hang and Wisconsin or others around those various

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 4>Midwestern states. And again the reason we care is because

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 4>of what it says about where the energy is in

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:48.560
<v Speaker 4>the progressive movement and what these races tell us about

0:02:48.680 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 4>national Democratic party politics. So right now it does appear

0:02:52.200 --> 0:02:54.959
<v Speaker 4>to be with the far progressive left, and I think

0:02:55.040 --> 0:02:57.560
<v Speaker 4>that's the lesson. Even though you know, Democrats I think

0:02:57.560 --> 0:03:00.919
<v Speaker 4>dodged a bullet with Francesca Hong apparently losing last night,

0:03:01.680 --> 0:03:04.359
<v Speaker 4>I do think that they that's where the energy is,

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:06.200
<v Speaker 4>and if you look around, you know that's where the

0:03:06.200 --> 0:03:09.120
<v Speaker 4>success has been. And I think it'll be very interesting

0:03:09.160 --> 0:03:11.200
<v Speaker 4>to see how much of that remains as we get

0:03:11.240 --> 0:03:14.000
<v Speaker 4>past the twenty six midterm cycle and start talking about

0:03:14.040 --> 0:03:14.760
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty eight.

0:03:15.400 --> 0:03:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Right, the Francesca Hong thing, and this is the sort

0:03:17.800 --> 0:03:20.480
<v Speaker 1>of every man analysis, So you get here as opposed

0:03:20.520 --> 0:03:23.639
<v Speaker 1>to in Lanhi's world, if she hadn't been a half wit,

0:03:23.760 --> 0:03:26.800
<v Speaker 1>she'd a one. I mean, she lost by a fingernails.

0:03:26.880 --> 0:03:29.520
<v Speaker 1>She was an embarrassing candidate in a lot of ways.

0:03:30.400 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 1>She was the left version of some of those MAGA

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:35.440
<v Speaker 1>candidates that were so terrible a couple of cycles ago.

0:03:36.920 --> 0:03:40.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, well, she it was interesting that she and Mike

0:03:40.080 --> 0:03:43.720
<v Speaker 4>Lindell of my Pillow fame were in the you know,

0:03:43.800 --> 0:03:46.720
<v Speaker 4>sort of running on the same day basically and had

0:03:46.720 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 4>elections on the same day.

0:03:48.560 --> 0:03:50.520
<v Speaker 2>And they're both caricatures.

0:03:50.600 --> 0:03:53.680
<v Speaker 4>I think of whether it's the MAGA right or in

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 4>Francesca Hogg's case, the far progressive left.

0:03:56.280 --> 0:04:00.720
<v Speaker 2>But you're absolutely right about Hong. If she had, you know, basically.

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:02.960
<v Speaker 4>Gone underground for the last two weeks of her campaign,

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 4>she might have won.

0:04:04.640 --> 0:04:05.560
<v Speaker 2>Actually she would have.

0:04:05.640 --> 0:04:08.680
<v Speaker 4>She would have been better off going underground than giving

0:04:08.680 --> 0:04:12.360
<v Speaker 4>the interviews she gave, because what the interviews exposed was

0:04:12.400 --> 0:04:15.720
<v Speaker 4>that the far left caricature in her case wasn't actually

0:04:15.760 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 4>a caricature.

0:04:16.600 --> 0:04:18.400
<v Speaker 2>It was actually the truth. Right.

0:04:18.440 --> 0:04:20.839
<v Speaker 4>I mean, you have somebody who's talked about, you know,

0:04:20.880 --> 0:04:24.159
<v Speaker 4>getting rid of Thanksgiving and you know again government takeover

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:27.240
<v Speaker 4>of health care, you know, being totally comfortable with all

0:04:27.279 --> 0:04:31.080
<v Speaker 4>of the you know, sort of politics of twenty twenty,

0:04:31.120 --> 0:04:33.240
<v Speaker 4>as I like to think about it, the woke politics

0:04:33.279 --> 0:04:36.159
<v Speaker 4>of twenty twenty, being totally comfortable with all of that,

0:04:36.240 --> 0:04:39.160
<v Speaker 4>and the interviews just showed that she gave some disastrous interviews,

0:04:39.680 --> 0:04:42.000
<v Speaker 4>and you're absolutely right. If she was even a tick

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:44.320
<v Speaker 4>better of a candidate, you know, she probably wins.

0:04:44.360 --> 0:04:45.440
<v Speaker 2>That wins that election.

0:04:45.960 --> 0:04:49.440
<v Speaker 1>So let's look next door at Minnesota. I was surprised

0:04:49.680 --> 0:04:53.880
<v Speaker 1>that the lieutenant governor, Penny Peggy Flanagan beat a pretty

0:04:54.040 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 1>solid centrist Democratic candidate, Angie Craig, because Minnesota become a

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:07.599
<v Speaker 1>laughingstock essentially for their horrific levels of fraud per capita.

0:05:07.720 --> 0:05:10.320
<v Speaker 1>California will make them look like amateurs when all the

0:05:10.320 --> 0:05:13.679
<v Speaker 1>accounting has done, And she was sitting at Tim Walz's

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 1>side as all this was going on. You know, my

0:05:17.200 --> 0:05:20.680
<v Speaker 1>analysis is if you're a progressive and you blame everything

0:05:20.839 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 1>on either white people or capitalism or whatever, you never

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:28.760
<v Speaker 1>look in the mirror. But I was surprised that the

0:05:29.560 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 1>lieutenant governor of such a scandal plague, I mean, Tim

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Wawls was gonna run himself, but he couldn't because he's

0:05:35.120 --> 0:05:35.880
<v Speaker 1>so scandal plagued.

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:37.159
<v Speaker 3>I couldn't believe she won.

0:05:39.040 --> 0:05:41.560
<v Speaker 4>Well, again, we have to think about the where the

0:05:41.760 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 4>energy is in the Democratic Party, and I think particularly

0:05:44.440 --> 0:05:47.480
<v Speaker 4>in Minnesota, that was the center of a lot of

0:05:47.720 --> 0:05:50.040
<v Speaker 4>I mean, not just the fraud stuff, but you.

0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:52.120
<v Speaker 2>Know, all of the the.

0:05:51.600 --> 0:05:53.960
<v Speaker 4>Police involved shootings and all the things that we've seen

0:05:54.000 --> 0:05:56.080
<v Speaker 4>over the last couple of years. Minnesota was the epicenter

0:05:56.120 --> 0:05:58.200
<v Speaker 4>for that, and I think in some ways what it

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:02.039
<v Speaker 4>did was to galvanize the left to move even farther left,

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 4>rather than trying to come back to the middle and

0:06:05.040 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 4>trying to say, look, how can we address some of

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:11.040
<v Speaker 4>the challenges that have been created by the failed Walls administration.

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:14.960
<v Speaker 4>Instead of that, they went further left. And actually, I'm

0:06:15.000 --> 0:06:18.080
<v Speaker 4>not surprised that Flanagan was able to win there because

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:21.279
<v Speaker 4>I do think again, it's where the energy is, and

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:25.360
<v Speaker 4>the movement in Minnesota was particularly acute because they sort

0:06:25.360 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 4>of see themselves, you know, with all due respect to California,

0:06:28.960 --> 0:06:31.120
<v Speaker 4>they sort of see themselves as the center of the

0:06:31.160 --> 0:06:34.919
<v Speaker 4>anti Trump resistance. And I think that's why that electric

0:06:35.000 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 4>moved even further left.

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:38.640
<v Speaker 1>So I want to talk about the Republicans in a second.

0:06:38.680 --> 0:06:42.880
<v Speaker 1>But how seriously do you take the prospect of Abdul

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:47.360
<v Speaker 1>al said winning in Michigan, winning a United States Senate state.

0:06:48.800 --> 0:06:50.920
<v Speaker 2>You know, I wouldn't underestimate the guy.

0:06:51.080 --> 0:06:54.560
<v Speaker 4>I mean, if you look at his ability to articulate

0:06:54.600 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 4>a message in a very you know, I don't happen

0:06:57.680 --> 0:06:59.680
<v Speaker 4>to agree with the message, but I think that he

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:02.800
<v Speaker 4>can articulate a message in in a pretty compelling way

0:07:02.839 --> 0:07:06.640
<v Speaker 4>to people who you know otherwise don't follow politics as closely.

0:07:06.720 --> 0:07:10.200
<v Speaker 4>Let's say, you know, I think that Mike Rogers, who

0:07:10.320 --> 0:07:14.080
<v Speaker 4>is the Republican Senate nominee in Michigan, is probably very

0:07:14.080 --> 0:07:17.960
<v Speaker 4>excited to run against Abdul Sae because of his positions. Particularly,

0:07:18.560 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 4>I think he's particularly vulnerable on his positions with respect

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 4>to taking away healthcare by replacing it with this government

0:07:26.160 --> 0:07:26.720
<v Speaker 4>run system.

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:29.720
<v Speaker 2>I do think that is a particular vulnerability for ol Saeed.

0:07:29.840 --> 0:07:32.840
<v Speaker 4>Not to mention his association with people like Ilhan Omar

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 4>and AOC who might be appealing again to the progressive left,

0:07:37.040 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 4>I don't think they're appealing to the vast majority of michiganers.

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 4>So I think Mike Rogers is definitely in a much

0:07:43.960 --> 0:07:46.920
<v Speaker 4>better position because he's running against al said. But I

0:07:46.920 --> 0:07:50.400
<v Speaker 4>would not underestimate the Democrat in that race, just because

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:52.560
<v Speaker 4>you know, he's good on TV, and he's compelling and

0:07:52.600 --> 0:07:54.640
<v Speaker 4>knows how to articulate a message.

0:07:54.200 --> 0:07:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, Donnie ask in a lot of ways. I want

0:07:55.920 --> 0:07:59.120
<v Speaker 1>to talk maybe next segment after we bid you goodbye

0:07:59.160 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 1>on he about the whole Medicare for All and how

0:08:01.800 --> 0:08:05.200
<v Speaker 1>that's really fraud, how it will eliminate private insurance fraud.

0:08:05.200 --> 0:08:08.040
<v Speaker 1>It be covered so it's utterly fraudulent. We'll explain why

0:08:08.080 --> 0:08:10.960
<v Speaker 1>in a second, but let's take a look to the right.

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Does the Republican Party have any idea what it is?

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:08:16.000 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 4>I mean, for all the challenges that the Democratic Party has,

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:20.920
<v Speaker 4>I think that one of the challenges on the Republican

0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:24.360
<v Speaker 4>side is that, you know, we have, for the last

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 4>I don't know, as a movement, probably at least for

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:31.080
<v Speaker 4>the last decade, certainly been a party that's been very

0:08:31.080 --> 0:08:33.440
<v Speaker 4>closely associated with a single person, and that's Donald Trump.

0:08:33.440 --> 0:08:36.400
<v Speaker 4>And I think the question becomes what does the party

0:08:36.480 --> 0:08:39.079
<v Speaker 4>and the movement look like as we start to think

0:08:39.080 --> 0:08:42.120
<v Speaker 4>ahead to twenty twenty eight and you know, when they'll

0:08:42.240 --> 0:08:44.400
<v Speaker 4>be a new set of candidates. And I think that's

0:08:44.440 --> 0:08:47.520
<v Speaker 4>a question that we've got to grapple with now. I've

0:08:47.600 --> 0:08:52.320
<v Speaker 4>always maintained that the movement, the Republican conservative movement, what

0:08:52.320 --> 0:08:54.360
<v Speaker 4>do you want to call it, is that its strongest

0:08:54.440 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 4>when we're thinking about a series of ideas about how

0:08:57.640 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 4>to improve people's lives. And what I worry about a

0:09:00.240 --> 0:09:02.560
<v Speaker 4>little bit is that we've fallen too much into the

0:09:02.559 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 4>politics of personality versus the politics of ideas. And I

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:09.720
<v Speaker 4>would hope that whoever the next nominee is, whoever wants

0:09:09.760 --> 0:09:11.840
<v Speaker 4>to compete for that nomination. And I don't I don't

0:09:11.840 --> 0:09:13.880
<v Speaker 4>have a particular view on, you know, where that's headed,

0:09:13.960 --> 0:09:16.360
<v Speaker 4>but I'll just say that whoever does it, I really

0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:18.560
<v Speaker 4>hope that they focus on, you know, one of the

0:09:18.600 --> 0:09:21.200
<v Speaker 4>ideas that are going to make this movement durable for

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:23.320
<v Speaker 4>the years to come. I mean that that's where I

0:09:23.320 --> 0:09:24.719
<v Speaker 4>think that the party needs to go.

0:09:25.200 --> 0:09:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm a big Marco guy, which we'll be talking

0:09:27.200 --> 0:09:28.440
<v Speaker 1>about next half hour, I think.

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:30.040
<v Speaker 3>But you know, it's funny.

0:09:30.080 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 1>I was just going to say, I heard recently that

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:34.480
<v Speaker 1>the difference between a hack and a writer is a

0:09:34.520 --> 0:09:37.200
<v Speaker 1>hack writes what he thinks his audience wants to read,

0:09:37.640 --> 0:09:40.640
<v Speaker 1>and a writer writes what he actually feels and thinks.

0:09:41.559 --> 0:09:43.120
<v Speaker 1>And I was just going to ask you, and you

0:09:43.160 --> 0:09:48.600
<v Speaker 1>parsonally answered this. But and I have talk show host privilege.

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I can spout high minded ideas and principles and quote

0:09:52.080 --> 0:09:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Thomas Jefferson.

0:09:53.520 --> 0:09:55.480
<v Speaker 3>But I never have to win an election.

0:09:56.120 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Okay, you know, I'm not tasked with with winning election,

0:10:00.920 --> 0:10:03.160
<v Speaker 1>and if we don't, I lose my job.

0:10:03.640 --> 0:10:05.040
<v Speaker 3>So it's easy to be high minded.

0:10:05.200 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 1>But having said that, is the roadback for the Republican

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Party to coherence and relevance and persuading people to come over.

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Is it less about being a hack and more about

0:10:18.480 --> 0:10:19.720
<v Speaker 1>a set of ideas.

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:23.439
<v Speaker 3>I think hackery always ends badly.

0:10:24.360 --> 0:10:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Pandering always ends badly, although it'll always be a part

0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:28.400
<v Speaker 1>of politics.

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:33.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, I think the best combination is ideally

0:10:33.320 --> 0:10:35.480
<v Speaker 4>you have great ideas and a great way of talking

0:10:35.480 --> 0:10:39.359
<v Speaker 4>about them. And you know, I mean, for all of

0:10:37.800 --> 0:10:43.280
<v Speaker 4>the the sort of discussion about Newt Gingrich in the nineties,

0:10:43.280 --> 0:10:45.240
<v Speaker 4>I mean this is like well before the time of

0:10:45.280 --> 0:10:47.840
<v Speaker 4>maybe some of your listeners. But if you go back

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:51.240
<v Speaker 4>to the Contract with America, and you know, Newt had

0:10:51.240 --> 0:10:54.840
<v Speaker 4>a way of really talking about those ideas, and all

0:10:54.880 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 4>of those ideas were you know, sort of solid conservative

0:10:58.840 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 4>ideas if you will, but he would you know, he

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:02.400
<v Speaker 4>managed to package them up and talk about them in

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:04.640
<v Speaker 4>a way that I think a lot of people found compelling.

0:11:05.120 --> 0:11:08.319
<v Speaker 4>And when you combine good ideas with a good message.

0:11:09.040 --> 0:11:12.240
<v Speaker 4>That's sort of the holy grail of politics and policy.

0:11:12.320 --> 0:11:14.920
<v Speaker 4>And so that's really where we've got to go. It's

0:11:14.960 --> 0:11:17.160
<v Speaker 4>not just about having good ideas, because I think good

0:11:17.160 --> 0:11:19.720
<v Speaker 4>ideas are great, But to your point, good ideas alone

0:11:19.880 --> 0:11:22.520
<v Speaker 4>are not enough to win an election. They just they're

0:11:22.559 --> 0:11:23.880
<v Speaker 4>just not in this day and age. You have to

0:11:23.880 --> 0:11:26.800
<v Speaker 4>be able to communicate. And that's why if you look

0:11:26.840 --> 0:11:29.880
<v Speaker 4>at the left, for all of the bad ideas that

0:11:29.920 --> 0:11:32.880
<v Speaker 4>the far far progressive left is talking about, medicare for all,

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:37.920
<v Speaker 4>free grocery stores, you know, getting rid of basically elements

0:11:37.920 --> 0:11:41.800
<v Speaker 4>of private enterprise. The reason why you know those are ideas,

0:11:42.240 --> 0:11:45.120
<v Speaker 4>and the reason why people have really given the far

0:11:45.160 --> 0:11:47.840
<v Speaker 4>progressive left another look is because they've been able to

0:11:47.840 --> 0:11:51.160
<v Speaker 4>communicate those ideas. And so whatever it is that Republicans

0:11:51.160 --> 0:11:53.760
<v Speaker 4>and Conservatives decide to do next, the one thing I

0:11:53.760 --> 0:11:56.800
<v Speaker 4>hope they'll do is I hope they'll marry strong ideas

0:11:57.240 --> 0:11:59.800
<v Speaker 4>with in some ways what President Trump has been able

0:11:59.800 --> 0:12:03.440
<v Speaker 4>to do, which is to communicate effectively, and now he's

0:12:03.480 --> 0:12:05.840
<v Speaker 4>communicated his own agenda. But I guess I would say

0:12:06.000 --> 0:12:08.800
<v Speaker 4>the lesson learned from that is you can communicate about

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:11.240
<v Speaker 4>these ideas in a way that is very compelling and

0:12:11.240 --> 0:12:12.840
<v Speaker 4>powerful to people. So you've got to figure out how

0:12:12.880 --> 0:12:15.000
<v Speaker 4>to combine all these different forces. And whether it's Marco

0:12:15.080 --> 0:12:17.120
<v Speaker 4>Rubio or JD. Vance or whoever it might be next,

0:12:17.360 --> 0:12:18.880
<v Speaker 4>that's they're going to be their challenge. That's going to

0:12:18.920 --> 0:12:21.160
<v Speaker 4>be the fundamental challenge of the next couple of years.

0:12:21.600 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Lani jen of the Hoover Institution, Stanford University a lot.

0:12:24.440 --> 0:12:26.680
<v Speaker 1>He it's always enlightening. Thanks a million for the time.

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:28.280
<v Speaker 2>Good to talk to you, sure, Joe, good to talk

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:28.480
<v Speaker 2>to you.

0:12:29.040 --> 0:12:30.080
<v Speaker 3>More to come stay with us.

0:12:38.000 --> 0:12:39.959
<v Speaker 1>You know, we don't get into a lot of policy

0:12:40.040 --> 0:12:42.840
<v Speaker 1>wonkiness around here because it's a little dullish and would

0:12:42.880 --> 0:12:44.960
<v Speaker 1>put us out of business. But I did want to

0:12:44.960 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 1>touch on this really quickly because I found it enlightening.

0:12:49.960 --> 0:12:51.480
<v Speaker 1>For what it's worth, my wife and I are just

0:12:51.600 --> 0:12:53.280
<v Speaker 1>short of medicare age.

0:12:53.679 --> 0:12:55.160
<v Speaker 3>We'll be there soon, god willing.

0:12:56.679 --> 0:13:00.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm only dimly aware of how it works, and a

0:13:00.320 --> 0:13:03.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of the folks falling for his socialist cheek, whether

0:13:03.240 --> 0:13:06.760
<v Speaker 1>they're Abdul l si aid and as followers or whomever,

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:10.199
<v Speaker 1>are running around talking about medicare for all, among other

0:13:10.240 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 1>things like free childcare and an eight percent wealth tax

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 1>on billionaires and stuff like that, and some of the

0:13:17.840 --> 0:13:22.800
<v Speaker 1>goals that they speak of, good housing, good healthcare, affordable food,

0:13:22.840 --> 0:13:24.160
<v Speaker 1>basic dignity of life.

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:27.120
<v Speaker 3>Okay, nobody disagrees with any of that stuff.

0:13:28.080 --> 0:13:30.920
<v Speaker 1>But it's worth mentioning that this guy who earned a

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:33.680
<v Speaker 1>doctorate in public health from Oxford, for God's sake, and

0:13:33.760 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 1>his wife is a practicing psychiatrist, which means she has

0:13:36.400 --> 0:13:39.920
<v Speaker 1>a medical degree and refuses to take Medicare, which is hilarious.

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:48.000
<v Speaker 3>He knows all this stuff, he says.

0:13:48.040 --> 0:13:50.600
<v Speaker 1>He actually authored a book Medicare for All, a Citizen's Guide,

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:55.680
<v Speaker 1>and it said it would eliminate private insurance. But the

0:13:55.800 --> 0:14:00.080
<v Speaker 1>catchphrase Medicare for all is misleading what he poses. This

0:14:00.120 --> 0:14:03.800
<v Speaker 1>isn't universal Medicare, but a single payer system with no premiums, deductibles,

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:06.280
<v Speaker 1>are cost sharing, and no alternatives, and Medicare has all

0:14:06.280 --> 0:14:09.160
<v Speaker 1>of those things. All seniors who don't also qualify for

0:14:09.240 --> 0:14:12.559
<v Speaker 1>Medicaid have to pay a monthly Medicare Part B premium,

0:14:12.840 --> 0:14:15.840
<v Speaker 1>starting it a couple one hundred dollars in tied upward income.

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Seniors who enroll in traditional Medicare fee for service also

0:14:19.200 --> 0:14:23.120
<v Speaker 1>have a about a seventeen hundred dollars deductible for inpatient

0:14:23.200 --> 0:14:26.960
<v Speaker 1>hospital care, steep cost sharing requirements, and no limit on

0:14:27.000 --> 0:14:30.040
<v Speaker 1>out of pocket spending. They also have to purchase separate

0:14:30.040 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 1>prescription drug plans, whose monthly premiums range from nothing to

0:14:33.640 --> 0:14:35.680
<v Speaker 1>about two hundred and forty bucks depending on income.

0:14:35.720 --> 0:14:36.520
<v Speaker 3>That's per month.

0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Another forty percent of seniors in traditional medicare by supplemental

0:14:40.640 --> 0:14:43.840
<v Speaker 1>insurance policies to cover benefits like dental and vision care

0:14:44.080 --> 0:14:47.040
<v Speaker 1>that are not provided by the government, and for protection

0:14:47.120 --> 0:14:50.080
<v Speaker 1>against catastrophic costs because again there's no out of pocket limit.

0:14:51.360 --> 0:14:56.960
<v Speaker 1>There's all sorts of private insurance involved in medicare to

0:14:57.120 --> 0:15:00.920
<v Speaker 1>make it worth an s. It's a it's a good

0:15:00.960 --> 0:15:03.720
<v Speaker 1>thing for seniors, no doubt, But the idea that hey,

0:15:03.720 --> 0:15:05.520
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have Medicare for all, which means you don't

0:15:05.560 --> 0:15:08.120
<v Speaker 1>have to have private insurance just a lie. We would

0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:12.000
<v Speaker 1>end up with British style universal healthcare where you have

0:15:12.040 --> 0:15:14.600
<v Speaker 1>to wait, you know, six months to get your cancer

0:15:14.640 --> 0:15:19.040
<v Speaker 1>treatment started. And that's as nightmarish as it sounds. Not

0:15:19.160 --> 0:15:21.680
<v Speaker 1>that our current healthcare system isn't screwed up.

0:15:21.720 --> 0:15:23.320
<v Speaker 3>It is. It's so screwed up.

0:15:23.400 --> 0:15:26.400
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna talk to Craig, the healthcare guru, about that,

0:15:26.480 --> 0:15:29.960
<v Speaker 1>I think tomorrow. But Medicare for All is it's a canard.

0:15:29.960 --> 0:15:33.240
<v Speaker 1>It's a sham. It's a scam, like virtually everything they do.

0:15:34.640 --> 0:15:37.240
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned casually to lanhe Chen that I'm a Marco

0:15:37.360 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Rubio guy, until talked out of it. He did an

0:15:40.120 --> 0:15:44.440
<v Speaker 1>interview the other day. It was really something. We're gonna

0:15:44.440 --> 0:15:46.040
<v Speaker 1>play you a couple of bits of that and then

0:15:46.240 --> 0:15:49.320
<v Speaker 1>squeeze and whatever else we can. As always, if you

0:15:49.320 --> 0:15:51.720
<v Speaker 1>can't stick around, grab it via podcast Armstrong and Getty

0:15:51.720 --> 0:15:52.160
<v Speaker 1>on demand.

0:15:52.920 --> 0:15:54.360
<v Speaker 3>Armstrong and Getty.

0:15:55.240 --> 0:15:58.840
<v Speaker 4>Top did rfkiet diet of red meat.

0:15:59.000 --> 0:16:02.160
<v Speaker 5>This is a diet that consists of eating.

0:16:03.480 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 6>Sauer kraut and meat.

0:16:05.800 --> 0:16:08.240
<v Speaker 5>Now you understand, like this is not a sustainable thing,

0:16:08.680 --> 0:16:09.880
<v Speaker 5>Like you can't just walk.

0:16:09.720 --> 0:16:13.640
<v Speaker 6>Into it because he imagine he has to travel with

0:16:13.720 --> 0:16:16.000
<v Speaker 6>coolers of So I'm not going to travel the world

0:16:16.040 --> 0:16:18.720
<v Speaker 6>with a cooler full of sauerkraut. It's ridiculous. I can't

0:16:18.720 --> 0:16:19.920
<v Speaker 6>do it. It's not sustainable.

0:16:20.360 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 1>That is Marco Rubio commenting on RFK Junior's Wackydoodle diet,

0:16:25.920 --> 0:16:28.840
<v Speaker 1>and the interviewer followed up with the next clip, Michael,

0:16:29.080 --> 0:16:29.720
<v Speaker 1>are you Maha.

0:16:30.920 --> 0:16:33.080
<v Speaker 5>I'm in favor of Maha, like I think people should be,

0:16:34.000 --> 0:16:35.440
<v Speaker 5>but I think ultimately he.

0:16:35.520 --> 0:16:38.320
<v Speaker 2>Is completely not pop tarts.

0:16:38.520 --> 0:16:40.880
<v Speaker 6>No, I don't need pop tarts every day. Okay, you

0:16:40.920 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 6>eat sweets.

0:16:41.760 --> 0:16:44.840
<v Speaker 5>Pop tart is one of the great American innovations in history.

0:16:45.040 --> 0:16:46.000
<v Speaker 6>Do you think about it comes to.

0:16:46.120 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 4>Beautiful for all the things you should not be eating,

0:16:48.720 --> 0:16:49.840
<v Speaker 4>every single thing.

0:16:50.560 --> 0:16:54.560
<v Speaker 3>That is his wife, Jeanette sitting in on the interview

0:16:54.600 --> 0:16:58.840
<v Speaker 3>with Marco Rubio calling him out. That is hilarious.

0:16:58.920 --> 0:17:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Jack is fond of repeating the absolutely undeniable wisdom that,

0:17:04.600 --> 0:17:08.560
<v Speaker 1>with few exceptions, in an election, the person who is

0:17:08.640 --> 0:17:14.479
<v Speaker 1>more comfortable in their skin wins. They beat the person

0:17:14.520 --> 0:17:19.480
<v Speaker 1>who seems to be trying to be something because that's

0:17:19.600 --> 0:17:23.200
<v Speaker 1>so hard to pull off. Hillary was the ultimate example

0:17:23.200 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 1>of that. I mean, look, no matter what you think

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:33.720
<v Speaker 1>of her, crazy, smart, tough, mean as a snake, yes, yes, yes,

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Secretary of State, I mean credentials, but she always acted

0:17:42.280 --> 0:17:44.200
<v Speaker 1>like she was. She always seemed like she was putting

0:17:44.280 --> 0:17:46.359
<v Speaker 1>us on or trying to be something she wasn't. So anyway,

0:17:48.400 --> 0:17:51.800
<v Speaker 1>a little more with Marco Rubio, and hey, I'll admit

0:17:52.000 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 1>it's true, I would like him to be president.

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:56.679
<v Speaker 3>I wanted him to be president for a while.

0:17:57.640 --> 0:18:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you'd disagree, but he is a very like chap

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Let's see what.

0:18:01.760 --> 0:18:04.880
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to do too many of these. Let's

0:18:04.920 --> 0:18:05.479
<v Speaker 3>do thirty two.

0:18:06.119 --> 0:18:08.040
<v Speaker 4>You said to Lard Trump if you had a day off,

0:18:08.280 --> 0:18:09.680
<v Speaker 4>that you would watch football all day.

0:18:10.080 --> 0:18:11.640
<v Speaker 6>I answer the question completely wrong.

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Why.

0:18:13.480 --> 0:18:16.280
<v Speaker 5>Well, first of all, the right answer is I would

0:18:16.280 --> 0:18:17.680
<v Speaker 5>spend it with my wife going on.

0:18:17.640 --> 0:18:19.800
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, okay, beautiful answer.

0:18:19.840 --> 0:18:22.040
<v Speaker 5>But the true answer is, and here's why I messed

0:18:22.080 --> 0:18:24.240
<v Speaker 5>up that answer. Okay, because here's the thing. The day

0:18:24.240 --> 0:18:27.480
<v Speaker 5>would actually start much earlier. The greatest show on television

0:18:27.680 --> 0:18:30.800
<v Speaker 5>today in America is College Game Day. Great show starts

0:18:30.840 --> 0:18:33.040
<v Speaker 5>around ten or eleven, and that leads you to noon

0:18:33.160 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 5>and then the noon game, and then there's a three

0:18:34.920 --> 0:18:37.600
<v Speaker 5>thirty game, and then there's a So I messed and

0:18:37.600 --> 0:18:39.320
<v Speaker 5>then the idea like this is a crazy weekend.

0:18:39.320 --> 0:18:41.280
<v Speaker 6>It would never happen. So I'm just putting this out there.

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:44.399
<v Speaker 5>But you could start at ten am on Saturday, you know,

0:18:44.480 --> 0:18:47.200
<v Speaker 5>run the whole college football day, sleep for a few hours,

0:18:47.240 --> 0:18:48.879
<v Speaker 5>then you wake up, and then you're in the NFL

0:18:48.920 --> 0:18:51.119
<v Speaker 5>game day. Then you got the one o'clock game, the

0:18:51.119 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 5>four o'clock game, the NBC game that night. That is

0:18:55.359 --> 0:18:58.160
<v Speaker 5>an incredible weekend in my opinion. In my view, obviously,

0:18:58.200 --> 0:19:01.639
<v Speaker 5>I don't believe that ever I will everage this, certainly

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:02.920
<v Speaker 5>not in the next two and a half years or

0:19:02.960 --> 0:19:06.439
<v Speaker 5>what have you. But and your audience probably doesn't care

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:08.120
<v Speaker 5>anything about what I just said. But I'm just telling

0:19:08.160 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 5>you that that would be a crazy day. But that's

0:19:09.760 --> 0:19:13.959
<v Speaker 5>never going to happen, right, well, yeah, right, you never know.

0:19:15.160 --> 0:19:15.680
<v Speaker 3>I should say.

0:19:15.680 --> 0:19:19.280
<v Speaker 1>He's on the Katie Miller podcast though, and I'm enjoying it.

0:19:19.280 --> 0:19:19.960
<v Speaker 3>It's a good.

0:19:19.800 --> 0:19:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Interview, solid interview, and Katie does a nice job. One more,

0:19:24.560 --> 0:19:27.320
<v Speaker 1>I like the looks of this thirty three Michael.

0:19:27.640 --> 0:19:28.400
<v Speaker 6>So, I have a dog.

0:19:28.600 --> 0:19:30.280
<v Speaker 5>We have two dogs, and then we have one that's

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 5>really smart. You know, these are golden doodles, but this

0:19:32.520 --> 0:19:35.040
<v Speaker 5>one's more poodle than doodles, so than golden.

0:19:35.560 --> 0:19:37.440
<v Speaker 6>Very smart. Knows how to open the door.

0:19:37.840 --> 0:19:40.360
<v Speaker 5>So one day I think Pete and his family were

0:19:40.359 --> 0:19:43.560
<v Speaker 5>just sitting around watching television and they keep their front

0:19:43.560 --> 0:19:46.040
<v Speaker 5>door open because they have cats, which I never took

0:19:46.080 --> 0:19:46.880
<v Speaker 5>Pete for a cat guy.

0:19:46.920 --> 0:19:48.399
<v Speaker 6>But okay, oh my god, and.

0:19:49.960 --> 0:19:53.840
<v Speaker 5>So and anyway, and my dog just walked into their

0:19:53.880 --> 0:19:56.240
<v Speaker 5>living room and looked around, realized I'm in the wrong house,

0:19:56.280 --> 0:19:57.440
<v Speaker 5>and turned around and walked out.

0:19:58.040 --> 0:20:00.159
<v Speaker 3>But yes, so our dog does open the door.

0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:06.639
<v Speaker 1>Many Georgans pete hegzeth cat guy, I would not have

0:20:06.880 --> 0:20:12.160
<v Speaker 1>guessed that. Huh okay, well that's you're right handsome. That

0:20:12.000 --> 0:20:14.880
<v Speaker 1>was that was nice. It was endearing. Does he want

0:20:14.960 --> 0:20:20.760
<v Speaker 1>the job? I know political professional political pundits, I would say, well,

0:20:20.760 --> 0:20:21.760
<v Speaker 1>he pledged if JD.

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:22.960
<v Speaker 3>Van s runs, he will.

0:20:22.800 --> 0:20:29.159
<v Speaker 1>Support him, as Barack Obama had the guts to say,

0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:31.280
<v Speaker 1>and this is one of the few things I credit

0:20:31.359 --> 0:20:33.920
<v Speaker 1>him with. After having said he wouldn't do something, he said, yeah,

0:20:33.960 --> 0:20:35.080
<v Speaker 1>it changed my mind.

0:20:35.359 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 3>There you go. That was hard.

0:20:38.040 --> 0:20:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Which is why I laugh at so many professional political pundits.

0:20:41.080 --> 0:20:43.800
<v Speaker 1>They are so locked into their habits and they're just

0:20:43.880 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 1>repeating what the rest of the herd says.

0:20:45.760 --> 0:20:46.960
<v Speaker 3>It's just absolutely silly.

0:20:47.359 --> 0:20:55.320
<v Speaker 1>A couple of other political notes for you, Abdul al said,

0:20:55.560 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the newly minted Democratic nominee for the Senate in Michigan

0:20:59.760 --> 0:21:04.880
<v Speaker 1>has promoted over and over again a book entitled Let

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:09.760
<v Speaker 1>This Radicalize You. He's plugged it at least ten times

0:21:09.800 --> 0:21:13.639
<v Speaker 1>on his podcast, and they stopped counting after ten. So

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:18.000
<v Speaker 1>he thinks of this book like I think of James

0:21:18.000 --> 0:21:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Lindsay's clinical theories, for instance, were Tim Sanderfer's proclaiming liberty

0:21:25.000 --> 0:21:26.080
<v Speaker 1>just so good.

0:21:26.160 --> 0:21:28.040
<v Speaker 3>I want everybody to know about it.

0:21:28.359 --> 0:21:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Not getting paid, I'm not making any money. It's not

0:21:30.560 --> 0:21:33.960
<v Speaker 1>because anybody's my friend. It's I think it's super great

0:21:34.280 --> 0:21:38.280
<v Speaker 1>that you read these books. So al said feels that

0:21:38.320 --> 0:21:42.520
<v Speaker 1>way about a book called Let This Radicalize You. His

0:21:42.840 --> 0:21:49.120
<v Speaker 1>podcast is called America Dissected. By the way, it's an

0:21:49.119 --> 0:21:54.280
<v Speaker 1>interesting title. So the full title of the book is

0:21:54.359 --> 0:21:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Let This Radicalize You. Organizing in the Revolution of Reciprocal Care,

0:21:58.720 --> 0:22:03.560
<v Speaker 1>authored by Kelly Hayes and Marguerite Casey Foundation scholar Meriam Kabba.

0:22:06.000 --> 0:22:10.000
<v Speaker 1>It's an unabashedly anti American book, published in May of

0:22:10.000 --> 0:22:13.919
<v Speaker 1>twenty three, promises leaders quote readers rather a practical and

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:17.520
<v Speaker 1>imaginative resource for activists and organizers building power in an

0:22:17.560 --> 0:22:22.960
<v Speaker 1>era of destabilization and catastrophe. Chapter six, Violence in Social Movements.

0:22:24.119 --> 0:22:28.240
<v Speaker 1>The authors dismiss peaceful protests as submissive to the state

0:22:28.560 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 1>and argue that violent protesters should not necessarily be considered

0:22:32.400 --> 0:22:37.719
<v Speaker 1>bad and I quote fetishizing distinctions between violence and nonviolence

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:40.479
<v Speaker 1>can lead to the indulgence of rhetoric about good and

0:22:40.560 --> 0:22:45.800
<v Speaker 1>bad protesters, where peaceful protesters are celebrated and violent protesters,

0:22:45.840 --> 0:22:49.679
<v Speaker 1>for example, those who engage in properties destruction that disrupts

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:55.000
<v Speaker 1>profit are viewed as disposable and disreputable, and when they

0:22:55.000 --> 0:22:58.240
<v Speaker 1>refer to peaceful protests, they're talking about cooperative protests that

0:22:58.320 --> 0:23:00.760
<v Speaker 1>obediently stay within the lines drawn by the state, they're

0:23:00.800 --> 0:23:04.119
<v Speaker 1>against that quote. This licenses people to care about the

0:23:04.160 --> 0:23:06.760
<v Speaker 1>cause being protested without caring about what happens to the

0:23:06.760 --> 0:23:10.800
<v Speaker 1>bad protesters. For example, even as significant numbers of people

0:23:10.880 --> 0:23:14.040
<v Speaker 1>supporting the uprisings following the racist murder of George Floyd,

0:23:14.440 --> 0:23:18.320
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't many fewer people vocally defended the rights of

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:21.800
<v Speaker 1>protesters who were arrested for acts of property destruction and

0:23:21.840 --> 0:23:26.960
<v Speaker 1>funneled into the racist carceral system, Meaning people did not

0:23:27.160 --> 0:23:31.360
<v Speaker 1>defend protesters who burned cities to the ground and ended

0:23:31.440 --> 0:23:36.560
<v Speaker 1>up jailed. They rationalize all this by saying there's no

0:23:36.600 --> 0:23:39.120
<v Speaker 1>greater purveyor of violence in the world than the US government,

0:23:39.359 --> 0:23:42.399
<v Speaker 1>from war to policing to incarceration to border violence to

0:23:42.440 --> 0:23:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the slashing of the national safety, social safety net. The

0:23:45.640 --> 0:23:49.720
<v Speaker 1>US government kills untold millions. The violence of rebellion is

0:23:49.800 --> 0:23:56.200
<v Speaker 1>infinitesimal by comparison, meaning it's justified. The maintenance of global

0:23:56.240 --> 0:24:04.240
<v Speaker 1>capitalism necessitates mass death. Good lord, there are times I'm

0:24:04.280 --> 0:24:05.479
<v Speaker 1>disturbed by these people.

0:24:05.800 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 3>Not their.

0:24:07.800 --> 0:24:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Philosophy, although that's plenty disturbing, but the fact that they

0:24:11.080 --> 0:24:16.400
<v Speaker 1>could believe it. Speaking of great books, read Stephen Pinker's

0:24:16.480 --> 0:24:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Enlightenment Now, which is absolutely fantastic, particularly the first section,

0:24:21.960 --> 0:24:27.560
<v Speaker 1>which outlines how many billions of people, billions, the free

0:24:27.560 --> 0:24:31.200
<v Speaker 1>market has lifted out of poverty, misery, and disease and

0:24:31.320 --> 0:24:38.560
<v Speaker 1>death into some pretty good standards of living since the Enlightenment, especially,

0:24:39.440 --> 0:24:44.639
<v Speaker 1>and how liberty political and economic have saved billions and

0:24:44.800 --> 0:24:50.920
<v Speaker 1>billions of lives, and how centrally planned systems inevitably end

0:24:51.080 --> 0:24:55.159
<v Speaker 1>in mass death and jailing, in political dissonance and torture,

0:24:55.160 --> 0:24:57.359
<v Speaker 1>and the rest of it. And so to hear somebody

0:24:57.400 --> 0:24:59.879
<v Speaker 1>say with a straight face, the maintenance of global ca

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:03.280
<v Speaker 1>capitalism necessitates mass death, you know.

0:25:03.320 --> 0:25:06.919
<v Speaker 3>You're dealing with a crazy person. Anyway, I'm gonna read on.

0:25:09.119 --> 0:25:10.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to tell you a little bit more of

0:25:10.480 --> 0:25:16.160
<v Speaker 1>what they're advocating in Hassan or Abdul al Sayid's favorite book,

0:25:17.160 --> 0:25:21.199
<v Speaker 1>The Islamiunist. But first, a word from our friends at

0:25:21.200 --> 0:25:25.480
<v Speaker 1>blue Collar Dollar. You're a working woman, a working man.

0:25:26.640 --> 0:25:29.400
<v Speaker 1>You bust your ass, you get it done, you save,

0:25:30.640 --> 0:25:34.359
<v Speaker 1>you're practical. Well, we'd like to introduce you to Blue

0:25:34.400 --> 0:25:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Collar Dollar because they get what you get. They're building

0:25:37.080 --> 0:25:39.720
<v Speaker 1>a place where hardworking people can share values and financial

0:25:39.800 --> 0:25:42.919
<v Speaker 1>dreams with advisors who talk with you, never at you.

0:25:43.960 --> 0:25:46.639
<v Speaker 1>If you saved five hundred thousand dollars or more. We

0:25:46.720 --> 0:25:49.480
<v Speaker 1>invite you to call Blue Collar Dollar for no cost consultation.

0:25:49.800 --> 0:25:51.800
<v Speaker 1>There's no obligation. If you don't like what's here, there's

0:25:51.840 --> 0:25:54.680
<v Speaker 1>no harm done. You're not signing up. They're very honest,

0:25:54.720 --> 0:25:57.639
<v Speaker 1>straightforward people. From your mobile phone dow pound two to fifteen.

0:25:57.680 --> 0:26:00.119
<v Speaker 1>When you're prompted, say the keywords blue Collar Dollar and

0:26:00.160 --> 0:26:03.680
<v Speaker 1>they will connect you. That's pound two fifty and say

0:26:03.760 --> 0:26:05.520
<v Speaker 1>blue Collar Dollar.

0:26:05.840 --> 0:26:06.680
<v Speaker 3>Ask your questions.

0:26:07.320 --> 0:26:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Advisory service is offered through Talent LLC and SEC registered

0:26:10.720 --> 0:26:13.919
<v Speaker 1>investment advisor. Rocketing is conducted by its affiliate company a

0:26:13.960 --> 0:26:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Blue Dollar Dollar LLC. Or registration as an investment advisor

0:26:18.280 --> 0:26:20.080
<v Speaker 1>does not imply a certain level of scale or training.

0:26:20.119 --> 0:26:26.160
<v Speaker 1>For more important disclosures, visit Triple dub, Bluecollar Dollar dot com.

0:26:26.240 --> 0:26:29.080
<v Speaker 3>So where was I? Oh? That's what these what else?

0:26:29.080 --> 0:26:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Ieed's favorite book advocates, So the maintenance global capitalism necessitates

0:26:33.880 --> 0:26:36.000
<v Speaker 1>mass death. And of course if you're causing mass death,

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:38.760
<v Speaker 1>I am willing to kill you for it, and they

0:26:38.800 --> 0:26:43.480
<v Speaker 1>are willing to kill us for it too. And disobedience

0:26:43.520 --> 0:26:46.479
<v Speaker 1>to Sharia law the other side of his act. But anyway,

0:26:46.560 --> 0:26:48.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to quote the book down directly. If you

0:26:48.800 --> 0:26:53.440
<v Speaker 1>choose to disrupt these capitalist systems passively, destructively or by

0:26:53.480 --> 0:26:56.400
<v Speaker 1>way of extending mutual aid, the concept of violence may

0:26:56.440 --> 0:27:00.280
<v Speaker 1>be stretched, manipulated by the powerful to encompass your work.

0:27:00.800 --> 0:27:03.200
<v Speaker 1>That is why we must not allow the frameworks of

0:27:03.240 --> 0:27:06.600
<v Speaker 1>the powerful to define the balands of our morality in

0:27:06.840 --> 0:27:12.719
<v Speaker 1>our politics and our action. In other words, commit violence,

0:27:12.960 --> 0:27:20.320
<v Speaker 1>it's justified. And they talk about defunding the police and

0:27:20.359 --> 0:27:29.240
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of related quote unquote woke stuff. But yeah, interesting, yeah,

0:27:29.480 --> 0:27:32.720
<v Speaker 1>l Said has also raised eyebrows for his consistent refusal

0:27:32.840 --> 0:27:35.280
<v Speaker 1>to denounce the nine to eleven terrorist attacks or his

0:27:35.359 --> 0:27:39.119
<v Speaker 1>top Sergate Hassan Piker, who said America deserved nine to eleven.

0:27:39.160 --> 0:27:41.159
<v Speaker 1>Now they are kind of disavowing it just because they

0:27:41.200 --> 0:27:43.680
<v Speaker 1>know they have to. But on the eve of the

0:27:43.720 --> 0:27:47.119
<v Speaker 1>primary vote else I joined Piker, an influencer pool rally

0:27:47.200 --> 0:27:50.719
<v Speaker 1>in Pool Party in Detroit. Shortly after his election win.

0:27:50.880 --> 0:27:57.159
<v Speaker 1>Piker dismissed Haley voters his opponent as Islamophobic pieces of s. Okay,

0:27:57.280 --> 0:27:59.440
<v Speaker 1>that's how they try to get you to sit down

0:27:59.440 --> 0:27:59.960
<v Speaker 1>and shut up.

0:28:00.359 --> 0:28:02.960
<v Speaker 3>Sorry, guys, not gonna do it not around here more

0:28:02.960 --> 0:28:06.080
<v Speaker 3>to come, Army, Strong and Getty.

0:28:11.280 --> 0:28:14.679
<v Speaker 1>Very beginning of the show, I was wrong about Jackie

0:28:14.760 --> 0:28:18.120
<v Speaker 1>the Eagle. I was right that eagles don't have names.

0:28:18.680 --> 0:28:21.919
<v Speaker 1>But Katie, I believe you have the transcript of what

0:28:22.000 --> 0:28:23.440
<v Speaker 1>I said yesterday.

0:28:23.040 --> 0:28:26.480
<v Speaker 3>And for which I need to apologize. Yes, how long

0:28:26.640 --> 0:28:26.879
<v Speaker 3>is it?

0:28:27.400 --> 0:28:27.520
<v Speaker 4>Uh?

0:28:28.640 --> 0:28:29.680
<v Speaker 6>Maybe like a minute?

0:28:29.840 --> 0:28:32.280
<v Speaker 3>All right, Jackie has passed.

0:28:32.520 --> 0:28:36.000
<v Speaker 7>I believe in balance and that sort of thing. But look,

0:28:36.280 --> 0:28:39.040
<v Speaker 7>there is no crueler bitch on earth than Mother Nature.

0:28:39.320 --> 0:28:43.560
<v Speaker 7>Pardon my frank terminology. Well, there aren't that many bald eagles.

0:28:43.880 --> 0:28:46.520
<v Speaker 7>I'm just back from Alaska, where I can report that

0:28:46.920 --> 0:28:49.680
<v Speaker 7>they're like crows. There are a lot of them, a

0:28:49.760 --> 0:28:52.200
<v Speaker 7>hell of a lot of them. So if eagles did

0:28:52.200 --> 0:28:55.800
<v Speaker 7>what eagles do, and Jackie's dead. That's just the way

0:28:55.840 --> 0:28:59.200
<v Speaker 7>that it goes. The eagle is dead. I'm sure I'll

0:28:59.200 --> 0:29:02.840
<v Speaker 7>get angry email about how insensitive I am. No, I

0:29:03.920 --> 0:29:07.800
<v Speaker 7>just like nature, and I understand human beings. You don't

0:29:07.800 --> 0:29:12.880
<v Speaker 7>get to tell nature how to be nature. That wasn't terrible.

0:29:13.600 --> 0:29:16.600
<v Speaker 1>So we did get a couple of emails from people

0:29:16.640 --> 0:29:19.280
<v Speaker 1>who were hurt at my lack of sensitivity to the

0:29:19.360 --> 0:29:20.000
<v Speaker 1>dead eagle.

0:29:20.560 --> 0:29:21.480
<v Speaker 3>And I will tell you this.

0:29:21.640 --> 0:29:28.120
<v Speaker 1>I reflected upon my words and realize two things. Number One,

0:29:28.200 --> 0:29:31.760
<v Speaker 1>I have been an enthusiastic consumer of a raptor cam

0:29:32.360 --> 0:29:36.080
<v Speaker 1>that focuses on some nests by my house. And I

0:29:36.120 --> 0:29:38.680
<v Speaker 1>have rooted for the eagles for their eggs to hatch

0:29:38.720 --> 0:29:40.720
<v Speaker 1>and for them to have babies, and the babies to

0:29:40.880 --> 0:29:43.320
<v Speaker 1>be healthy and successful and that sort of thing.

0:29:44.840 --> 0:29:47.920
<v Speaker 3>And so I thought, well, wait a minute, then why.

0:29:47.480 --> 0:29:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Was I a little bit cynical about the reaction? And

0:29:51.440 --> 0:29:54.000
<v Speaker 1>there are two reasons. This is not an excuse, it's

0:29:54.040 --> 0:29:57.560
<v Speaker 1>an explanation. Two reasons. Number one, some of the crazy

0:29:57.600 --> 0:30:02.840
<v Speaker 1>people who play the veterinarians and like went in and

0:30:02.880 --> 0:30:05.440
<v Speaker 1>were trying to insist that they save Jackie. And the

0:30:05.480 --> 0:30:07.280
<v Speaker 1>people are like, we're trying to do would you get

0:30:07.280 --> 0:30:10.120
<v Speaker 1>out of here? There were crazy people in them. But secondly,

0:30:10.160 --> 0:30:14.440
<v Speaker 1>and this is the key point, I realized what queered

0:30:14.440 --> 0:30:18.520
<v Speaker 1>me to the whole thing, what poisoned my attitude, is

0:30:18.600 --> 0:30:23.760
<v Speaker 1>how much I hate David Muir, the anchor of ABC News,

0:30:23.960 --> 0:30:26.120
<v Speaker 1>the bent nosed jackass.

0:30:27.600 --> 0:30:28.640
<v Speaker 3>Who will report that.

0:30:29.000 --> 0:30:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, first of all, he reports that there's severe weather

0:30:31.240 --> 0:30:36.320
<v Speaker 1>every single day, but he uses the same self serious,

0:30:36.440 --> 0:30:41.160
<v Speaker 1>low voice tone whether he's reporting two baby ducks flew

0:30:41.200 --> 0:30:44.920
<v Speaker 1>away from the nest or an earthquake killed one hundred

0:30:44.920 --> 0:30:48.720
<v Speaker 1>thousand people in Detroit. I mean, it's just And he's

0:30:48.760 --> 0:30:51.000
<v Speaker 1>such a lefty and he's so happy with himself.

0:30:51.040 --> 0:30:51.600
<v Speaker 3>I hate him.

0:30:51.800 --> 0:30:54.480
<v Speaker 1>And he's really been hammering the Jackie the Eagle story

0:30:54.960 --> 0:31:03.520
<v Speaker 1>in like a syrupy, dopey way, and it it prejudiced me,

0:31:03.680 --> 0:31:06.800
<v Speaker 1>and it made me cynical about not David Muir, bent

0:31:06.920 --> 0:31:11.160
<v Speaker 1>knows jackass, but about the people who are into the eagles.

0:31:11.520 --> 0:31:14.719
<v Speaker 3>And I apologize for that. I love nature.

0:31:15.160 --> 0:31:18.320
<v Speaker 1>I love watching raptors and shore birds and that sort

0:31:18.360 --> 0:31:22.120
<v Speaker 1>of thing. I spend more time than his normal doing it. Yeah,

0:31:22.080 --> 0:31:22.920
<v Speaker 1>I hate David.

0:31:22.800 --> 0:31:24.880
<v Speaker 3>Muir, you know, I think that's it.

0:31:25.280 --> 0:31:28.520
<v Speaker 7>I had just kind of a bad taste in my

0:31:28.600 --> 0:31:31.160
<v Speaker 7>mouth for David Muir for a while. And now I

0:31:31.200 --> 0:31:33.640
<v Speaker 7>think I'm on your level. And it started with the

0:31:33.800 --> 0:31:36.959
<v Speaker 7>La fires when he had the fire jacket on and

0:31:37.040 --> 0:31:42.040
<v Speaker 7>they turned and he had a fashion clip clap clasp, oh,

0:31:42.120 --> 0:31:45.000
<v Speaker 7>right back of the jacket to make him look more fit.

0:31:46.160 --> 0:31:50.400
<v Speaker 7>And he's standing in front of Holmes burning to the ground. Yeah,

0:31:50.520 --> 0:31:52.440
<v Speaker 7>he's so full of himself.

0:31:53.000 --> 0:31:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Oh that reminds me among the other many things that

0:31:56.280 --> 0:31:57.960
<v Speaker 1>we're probably not gonna be able to squeeze in. Maybe

0:31:58.000 --> 0:32:01.160
<v Speaker 1>we'll try tomorrow. But the the trial or the legal

0:32:01.200 --> 0:32:05.600
<v Speaker 1>proceedings against that confused, dopey leftist piece of crap who

0:32:05.640 --> 0:32:09.720
<v Speaker 1>actually set some of the disastrous fires in southern California,

0:32:10.600 --> 0:32:13.720
<v Speaker 1>it's it's underway, and it is utterly clear he did

0:32:13.720 --> 0:32:17.800
<v Speaker 1>it in the name of socialism and leftist politics. There

0:32:17.880 --> 0:32:21.920
<v Speaker 1>have been reams written about how those fires are the

0:32:21.960 --> 0:32:26.040
<v Speaker 1>product of climate change, yeah right, and fossil fuels and

0:32:26.080 --> 0:32:30.200
<v Speaker 1>the evil, evil conservatives and how climate change threatens us all. Oh,

0:32:30.240 --> 0:32:32.800
<v Speaker 1>they're about to air a big climate change episode of

0:32:32.880 --> 0:32:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Sesame straight.

0:32:34.320 --> 0:32:37.400
<v Speaker 3>Oh good, that's paragosatic. Yeah, that's what they get.

0:32:37.480 --> 0:32:40.800
<v Speaker 1>You terrify the little kids, terrify the little kids who

0:32:40.800 --> 0:32:44.800
<v Speaker 1>can't understand any of this monsters anyway, So you got

0:32:44.840 --> 0:32:49.200
<v Speaker 1>reams written about climate change, and you will you will

0:32:49.960 --> 0:32:54.280
<v Speaker 1>be unsuccessful if you go to La Times or any

0:32:54.320 --> 0:32:58.120
<v Speaker 1>of the major publications to try to find information about

0:32:58.280 --> 0:33:05.680
<v Speaker 1>leftist inspired arson and the disaster, the utter devastation caused

0:33:05.720 --> 0:33:09.280
<v Speaker 1>by that leftist violence, because setting a massive wildfire is

0:33:09.280 --> 0:33:12.400
<v Speaker 1>an act of violence. I mean, my god, it is

0:33:13.080 --> 0:33:20.920
<v Speaker 1>perhaps the greatest mass destruction an individual ken unleash, and

0:33:20.960 --> 0:33:22.200
<v Speaker 1>it was leftist violence.

0:33:22.640 --> 0:33:24.160
<v Speaker 3>But you will not get a word on that.

0:33:24.360 --> 0:33:28.160
<v Speaker 1>So anyway, enough said, I'm appreciate the choir here.

0:33:28.240 --> 0:33:29.480
<v Speaker 3>You all know what I'm talking about.

0:33:30.120 --> 0:33:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Jackie's going to check in from the vacation road to

0:33:32.560 --> 0:33:35.680
<v Speaker 1>kick off next hour. I believe he is still in Canada.

0:33:36.200 --> 0:33:39.960
<v Speaker 1>America's hat soon to be our fifty first state, but

0:33:41.040 --> 0:33:46.160
<v Speaker 1>looking forward to that also, well, I haven't decided one

0:33:46.240 --> 0:33:48.080
<v Speaker 1>hundred percent if I'm going to do this, but I

0:33:48.120 --> 0:33:53.120
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about that fake academic Jason R. Day

0:33:53.320 --> 0:33:57.640
<v Speaker 1>at Cambridge who's now been exposed as a plagiarist and

0:33:57.680 --> 0:34:00.320
<v Speaker 1>a liar and a fabulous and just half a dozen

0:34:00.360 --> 0:34:03.920
<v Speaker 1>kinds of crackpot and it was easily easily seen for

0:34:03.960 --> 0:34:09.960
<v Speaker 1>a long time, but because academia is so desperate, so

0:34:10.480 --> 0:34:14.839
<v Speaker 1>feverishly needing to show how enlightened they are and how

0:34:14.920 --> 0:34:20.680
<v Speaker 1>woke they are, they let this guy scam continue for years,

0:34:21.080 --> 0:34:23.800
<v Speaker 1>and it's a real head scratcher. Like I said before,

0:34:25.480 --> 0:34:27.680
<v Speaker 1>it makes you think these people are so nuts there

0:34:27.880 --> 0:34:32.000
<v Speaker 1>might not be any reaching them. And I'll bring the receipts,

0:34:32.000 --> 0:34:34.200
<v Speaker 1>as they say these days, in the particulars for you.

0:34:34.320 --> 0:34:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Next hour, we'll talk to Jack and I think we'll

0:34:39.440 --> 0:34:42.680
<v Speaker 1>we'll have for you our conversation with James Lindsay from earlier,

0:34:42.719 --> 0:34:45.680
<v Speaker 1>which I will explain. If you're listening via podcast and

0:34:45.719 --> 0:34:47.960
<v Speaker 1>you're like I already heard that, i'll explain why we're

0:34:47.960 --> 0:34:51.000
<v Speaker 1>probably gonna do that again. But hope you can stay tuned.

0:34:51.040 --> 0:34:52.919
<v Speaker 1>And if you can't, as always, maybe you don't get

0:34:53.040 --> 0:34:56.640
<v Speaker 1>our four on your beloved local radio station, just grab

0:34:56.680 --> 0:35:00.239
<v Speaker 1>it via podcast later whenever it's convenient via Armstrong Addy

0:35:00.239 --> 0:35:03.400
<v Speaker 1>on demand if you subscribe to auto downloads, it's super easy.

0:35:03.480 --> 0:35:08.040
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for being here, Armstrong and Getty

0:35:10.480 --> 0:35:10.520
<v Speaker 6>M