WEBVTT - Compliance With OPEC Quotas is Striking, Yergin Says

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Brought you by Bank of America Mary Lynch. Investing in

0:00:03.000 --> 0:00:07.840
<v Speaker 1>local communities, economies and a sustainable future. That's the power

0:00:08.080 --> 0:00:12.360
<v Speaker 1>of global connections. Mary Lynch, Pierce Fenner, and Smith Incorporated

0:00:12.760 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 1>member s I p C. Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast.

0:00:27.840 --> 0:00:31.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tom Keene with David Gura. Daily we bring you

0:00:31.560 --> 0:00:36.600
<v Speaker 1>insight from the best in economics, finance, investment, and international relations.

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Find Bloomberg Surveillance on iTunes, SoundCloud, Bloomberg dot Com, and

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:49.640
<v Speaker 1>of course on the Bloomberg. We begin with an Urgen,

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Vice Chairman h S. Market, author of the prize and

0:00:52.000 --> 0:00:54.000
<v Speaker 1>the Quest, and he joins us here in New York

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:55.720
<v Speaker 1>on bloom Big Surveillance. And Dan, let me start with

0:00:55.720 --> 0:00:58.760
<v Speaker 1>that news we got yesterday about Saudi Arabia telling OPE

0:00:58.800 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 1>could produced production last by the most in eight years,

0:01:01.960 --> 0:01:03.520
<v Speaker 1>more than it had pledged to do. Give us the

0:01:03.760 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 1>significance of that and why were they able to cut

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:09.080
<v Speaker 1>more than they forecast that they'd be able to. What's

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:12.200
<v Speaker 1>going on is a very high degree of compliance within OPEC.

0:01:12.560 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 1>People have always been skeptical with good reason of OPEC cuts,

0:01:16.000 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 1>and two thousand and eight when they cut, they only

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:20.520
<v Speaker 1>cut about sixty percent, and now it looks like they've

0:01:20.560 --> 0:01:23.160
<v Speaker 1>cut over. Saudi Arabia has taken the lead, and I

0:01:23.240 --> 0:01:25.920
<v Speaker 1>think Saudi Arabia is the most important member by far,

0:01:26.280 --> 0:01:29.960
<v Speaker 1>and they want this, uh this, this and this new

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:32.679
<v Speaker 1>type of agreement between OPEC and non OPEC to be

0:01:32.720 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 1>a success. And we can see the impact in the

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:37.080
<v Speaker 1>marketplace more. And this is just one we want to

0:01:37.080 --> 0:01:39.560
<v Speaker 1>break a headline here crossing the Bloomberg, Etna and Humana

0:01:39.600 --> 0:01:42.640
<v Speaker 1>are ending their merger pack that had been called into

0:01:42.720 --> 0:01:44.800
<v Speaker 1>question by the federal government and it's not going to

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:48.280
<v Speaker 1>pay one billion dollar fee. Having spoken Mark Bertolini, the

0:01:48.520 --> 0:01:50.440
<v Speaker 1>CEO of in a couple of weeks ago, it sounded

0:01:50.440 --> 0:01:52.320
<v Speaker 1>like they were weighing whether or not to go forward. Indeed,

0:01:52.440 --> 0:01:54.480
<v Speaker 1>and no human I have decided not to go forward

0:01:54.760 --> 0:01:57.200
<v Speaker 1>with their merger pack. Now back to Dan, you're get

0:01:57.240 --> 0:02:00.320
<v Speaker 1>how surprising was this news about Saudi Arabie said, The

0:02:00.600 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 1>importance can't be understated. How surprising was the news that

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 1>they had cut so much. I don't think it was

0:02:06.120 --> 0:02:09.600
<v Speaker 1>surprising uh so much because you saw that the new

0:02:09.800 --> 0:02:13.320
<v Speaker 1>relatively new Saudi patrollingum minister called alf Fala, that he

0:02:13.400 --> 0:02:16.840
<v Speaker 1>really was taking the lead in making this work, and

0:02:16.919 --> 0:02:19.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that the cuts are demonstration and a message

0:02:19.280 --> 0:02:21.520
<v Speaker 1>to everybody else. And just before they made a deal

0:02:21.600 --> 0:02:23.919
<v Speaker 1>last November, they said, if there's not a deal, we're

0:02:23.919 --> 0:02:25.840
<v Speaker 1>going to produce as much as we can. So the

0:02:25.840 --> 0:02:27.440
<v Speaker 1>other side of it is that there is a deal

0:02:27.480 --> 0:02:30.079
<v Speaker 1>and if it's holding with other people, including the Russians

0:02:30.120 --> 0:02:32.120
<v Speaker 1>by the way, who are cutting back, which there was

0:02:32.160 --> 0:02:35.000
<v Speaker 1>skepticism about. Uh, they want to do their part to

0:02:35.040 --> 0:02:38.720
<v Speaker 1>make this work. We're gonna have the Minister at our

0:02:38.760 --> 0:02:41.160
<v Speaker 1>conference in Houston in a couple of weeks and I

0:02:41.160 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 1>think he's going to give a strong message about wanting

0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:46.000
<v Speaker 1>to see some stability in the oil market. When you

0:02:46.040 --> 0:02:48.720
<v Speaker 1>survey when you look at the parties to that agreement,

0:02:48.720 --> 0:02:51.680
<v Speaker 1>both OPEC and NON who's having the biggest trouble keeping

0:02:51.720 --> 0:02:54.360
<v Speaker 1>up the end of the bargain? Uh, Well, there's certain

0:02:54.360 --> 0:02:57.440
<v Speaker 1>countries that are out of it. Libya and Nigeria were

0:02:57.480 --> 0:03:00.840
<v Speaker 1>given a free pass. I think the al of the cults,

0:03:00.919 --> 0:03:04.080
<v Speaker 1>the most determined people are there, Saudi Arabia and the

0:03:04.080 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 1>other Gulf countries. They're the ones who really stand out.

0:03:06.720 --> 0:03:09.800
<v Speaker 1>People were looking very carefully at the Russians have been

0:03:09.840 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 1>cutting they still have more to cut. And the Iranians.

0:03:12.440 --> 0:03:14.480
<v Speaker 1>It was a very unusual deal because they sort of

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:18.359
<v Speaker 1>there was a kind of a deal or everybody could

0:03:18.360 --> 0:03:20.480
<v Speaker 1>claim a victory. The Iranians could have a higher quota,

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:23.800
<v Speaker 1>except the others field they can't reach that quota. A

0:03:23.880 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 1>couple of nights ago, there was a small matter of

0:03:26.639 --> 0:03:30.120
<v Speaker 1>the Ninth District Court in San Francisco, and I, like

0:03:30.240 --> 0:03:33.239
<v Speaker 1>everybody else, was riveted with a phone call on television

0:03:33.520 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 1>of the appeals court going to the process and David Gura.

0:03:37.040 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 1>The bad news was. I was watching MSNBC and they

0:03:40.240 --> 0:03:43.880
<v Speaker 1>kept playing in the upper right corner the President meeting

0:03:43.920 --> 0:03:47.200
<v Speaker 1>with muckety MUCKs within the oil business, and he walked

0:03:47.200 --> 0:03:50.360
<v Speaker 1>around the table shaking hands. And I swear every time

0:03:50.400 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 1>he walked around the table and shook Dan Jurgen's hand,

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 1>he was there. You handed him a copy of Commanding Heights.

0:03:57.880 --> 0:04:00.240
<v Speaker 1>I only you love that book so much time that

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:02.840
<v Speaker 1>you imagined that you saw it happened. I only wish

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:05.360
<v Speaker 1>that were the case. But it is a very uh.

0:04:05.480 --> 0:04:08.200
<v Speaker 1>That was the media of the Presidential Strategic and Policy community.

0:04:09.040 --> 0:04:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Um I learned that. I mean, there are a couple

0:04:11.240 --> 0:04:13.560
<v Speaker 1>of things that really jumped out. One was just this

0:04:13.680 --> 0:04:18.480
<v Speaker 1>whole question of regulation, not just is there too much regulation,

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:22.320
<v Speaker 1>but contradictory regulation from too many different agencies. And the

0:04:22.360 --> 0:04:26.200
<v Speaker 1>other was a really big focus on infrastructure. Within this

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:29.919
<v Speaker 1>is if you had had handed the president your iconic

0:04:29.920 --> 0:04:33.800
<v Speaker 1>book Commanding Heights, what in it should he learn? Well,

0:04:33.880 --> 0:04:37.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that these things go in cycles. The role

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:40.480
<v Speaker 1>of the frontier between governments and markets is shifting and

0:04:40.560 --> 0:04:43.440
<v Speaker 1>continually shifts, and I think we're seeing that now and

0:04:43.480 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 1>I think kind of right now around the world there's

0:04:46.320 --> 0:04:48.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of confusion about kind of what are the new

0:04:48.600 --> 0:04:51.719
<v Speaker 1>rules of globalization. But your book is the arch non

0:04:51.880 --> 0:04:55.599
<v Speaker 1>zero sum book. Your book is one primal scream about

0:04:55.680 --> 0:05:00.640
<v Speaker 1>anti mercantilism, about a value to cooperation and ord nation.

0:05:00.960 --> 0:05:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Do you see any likelihood of that within this administration? Well,

0:05:04.920 --> 0:05:08.599
<v Speaker 1>I think that if with some of the people, I

0:05:08.640 --> 0:05:11.440
<v Speaker 1>think that there's still the you know, the US. We

0:05:11.520 --> 0:05:13.720
<v Speaker 1>have forty million jobs, over forty million jobs in the

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:16.280
<v Speaker 1>US that the result of foreign trade, and I think

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:18.240
<v Speaker 1>that number has kind of been left out of the debate.

0:05:18.520 --> 0:05:21.080
<v Speaker 1>What have you heard from the administration about energy policy

0:05:21.440 --> 0:05:23.440
<v Speaker 1>at this point? How inco it is it? Do we

0:05:23.480 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 1>have a sense of what it's going to be. Well,

0:05:25.040 --> 0:05:27.240
<v Speaker 1>I think it's gonna be uh not. First of all,

0:05:27.279 --> 0:05:30.039
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be not more regulation. And secondly, I

0:05:30.040 --> 0:05:33.040
<v Speaker 1>think it's going to be trying to solve this bottleneck

0:05:33.080 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 1>about infrastructure where it takes seven years and several billion

0:05:36.400 --> 0:05:39.680
<v Speaker 1>dollars not to approve a pipeline. Things have to be

0:05:39.680 --> 0:05:42.000
<v Speaker 1>done in reasonable times, and there has to be reasonable

0:05:42.040 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 1>times in terms of challenges to it. But there's a

0:05:45.560 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 1>mismatch between where our new supplies are and our infrastructure,

0:05:49.200 --> 0:05:51.719
<v Speaker 1>and we've got to get that fixed. How catalytic is

0:05:51.760 --> 0:05:54.039
<v Speaker 1>that Keystone exhale? In other words, if if Donald Trump

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:56.200
<v Speaker 1>pushes it through, if we get it built, are we

0:05:56.200 --> 0:05:57.640
<v Speaker 1>going to see more like it? What's it going to

0:05:57.760 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 1>lead to? Well, that was a very particular case because

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:02.920
<v Speaker 1>it needed State Department approval to just cross the border.

0:06:03.440 --> 0:06:07.400
<v Speaker 1>And I think it will be a message trans Canada.

0:06:07.440 --> 0:06:09.680
<v Speaker 1>The pipeline company has to decide that it wants to

0:06:09.880 --> 0:06:12.440
<v Speaker 1>go ahead and build it. To some degree, we've seen

0:06:12.680 --> 0:06:16.360
<v Speaker 1>a shift in uh where new supplies coming from it.

0:06:16.400 --> 0:06:18.800
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of new Canadian supplies coming from I

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:20.640
<v Speaker 1>think it would be a big message because you know,

0:06:20.960 --> 0:06:23.600
<v Speaker 1>pipeline approval. It seems to be as exciting as watching

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:29.320
<v Speaker 1>paint dry. But then now that became really a potemic. Well,

0:06:29.360 --> 0:06:32.839
<v Speaker 1>these pipelines that are in the news, will they change

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the price of oil? Uh? If you build yes, I

0:06:37.080 --> 0:06:40.320
<v Speaker 1>mean I think if you if you have more flexible supply, uh,

0:06:40.360 --> 0:06:42.560
<v Speaker 1>and if you can bring more supply to markets, then

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:45.279
<v Speaker 1>that thing called supply and demand will work. It's talked

0:06:45.279 --> 0:06:48.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot about how rex dealers and skills add accent

0:06:48.480 --> 0:06:51.040
<v Speaker 1>moble would be applicable to the State Department. Let's take

0:06:51.040 --> 0:06:52.680
<v Speaker 1>another step back and just look at sort of the

0:06:52.680 --> 0:06:54.320
<v Speaker 1>degree to which the Secretary of State has to deal

0:06:54.360 --> 0:06:57.240
<v Speaker 1>with oil and energy issues. How how how big, how

0:06:57.240 --> 0:06:59.120
<v Speaker 1>big a portion of the plate does that occupy? Well,

0:06:59.120 --> 0:07:02.520
<v Speaker 1>there is an energy aurow in this State Department that

0:07:02.600 --> 0:07:06.200
<v Speaker 1>was set up a few years ago, and so energy

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:10.200
<v Speaker 1>is one of the geopolitical issues that the President the

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Secretary of State will deal with. But I think that

0:07:13.240 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be a relatively small part, and I

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:18.440
<v Speaker 1>think that Mr Tillerson is going to focus on the

0:07:18.600 --> 0:07:21.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, the big complicated questions are out there. He's

0:07:21.120 --> 0:07:24.000
<v Speaker 1>a very experienced person in the global economy. He knows

0:07:24.000 --> 0:07:27.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of countries and UH, and he's very measured

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:29.720
<v Speaker 1>in terms of his decision making. Help us with the

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:32.480
<v Speaker 1>interplay here between the dollar, which is slightly weaker this morning,

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:34.560
<v Speaker 1>and the price of oil. But what's the what's the

0:07:34.600 --> 0:07:38.119
<v Speaker 1>correlation there? Well, there isn't always a correlation, but often

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:41.520
<v Speaker 1>there's a correlation in which a stronger dollar means oil

0:07:41.520 --> 0:07:44.720
<v Speaker 1>prices are down and vice versa. But of course there

0:07:44.720 --> 0:07:46.600
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of other factors that go into it,

0:07:47.000 --> 0:07:49.280
<v Speaker 1>and the predictions about what the dollar is going to

0:07:49.400 --> 0:07:52.440
<v Speaker 1>do is one of the UH factors. In the discussion

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:55.760
<v Speaker 1>about this border adjustment tax, we started out talking about

0:07:55.760 --> 0:07:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Saudi Arabia OPEC and UH and the deal, the agreement. UH.

0:07:59.400 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's mean, why back at the ranch. What's happening here

0:08:01.360 --> 0:08:03.400
<v Speaker 1>in the US? When you look at the energy landscape

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:07.440
<v Speaker 1>right now, it's perman mania. The Permian basin is the

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:10.080
<v Speaker 1>place to be. That's where people are spending money. And

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 1>we've seen that US production has bottomed out and it's

0:08:13.040 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 1>going to start increasing, and it's an industry that's a

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:18.640
<v Speaker 1>lot more efficient than it was a couple of years ago.

0:08:18.680 --> 0:08:21.640
<v Speaker 1>At I H S market we were we just did

0:08:21.640 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 1>this analysis and see if you spend a dollar today,

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:26.280
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna get about two and a half times as

0:08:26.360 --> 0:08:28.560
<v Speaker 1>much oil for that dollar as you would have in

0:08:30.200 --> 0:08:33.679
<v Speaker 1>I have the clearest recollection too many years ago you're

0:08:33.720 --> 0:08:37.480
<v Speaker 1>talking about forty dollar oil and basically being left off

0:08:37.600 --> 0:08:40.920
<v Speaker 1>the show. You were more than right. Okay, the fifty

0:08:40.920 --> 0:08:44.079
<v Speaker 1>plus a minus ten bucks. Who's counting? What is the

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Urgan five year out call the barrel? You know, don't

0:08:49.280 --> 0:08:51.720
<v Speaker 1>have a single number. I think this year we're probably

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:54.440
<v Speaker 1>in a fifty to sixty dollar range. I think at

0:08:54.520 --> 0:08:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the end of the decade we'll see price We should

0:08:56.920 --> 0:09:00.520
<v Speaker 1>probably see prices, uh, you know, higher than they are today,

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:02.840
<v Speaker 1>because you're gonna need it in order to get the

0:09:02.920 --> 0:09:05.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of long, mid term and long term investment that

0:09:05.880 --> 0:09:08.679
<v Speaker 1>isn't happening right now around the world. I mentioned you're

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:10.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna hear from the minister at that conference in Houston.

0:09:10.480 --> 0:09:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Who else you're looking forward to hearing from? When when

0:09:13.080 --> 0:09:15.920
<v Speaker 1>you look at who's talking to whom and where where

0:09:15.960 --> 0:09:18.440
<v Speaker 1>the conversation is at, Well, we're gonna we'll we'll have

0:09:18.760 --> 0:09:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the Russian minister will be there. Uh. The we're hoping

0:09:22.559 --> 0:09:24.680
<v Speaker 1>we'll have the new people from the administration and we'll

0:09:24.679 --> 0:09:27.760
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of the uh CEOs from the major

0:09:28.040 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 1>companies there. So I think it's you know, altogether, we're

0:09:30.880 --> 0:09:33.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna have three hundred speakers, so it's gonna be a

0:09:33.760 --> 0:09:37.560
<v Speaker 1>very rich conference in terms of content. Will have both

0:09:37.600 --> 0:09:39.439
<v Speaker 1>the Secretary General of OPEC and the head of the

0:09:39.480 --> 0:09:43.320
<v Speaker 1>International Energy Agency together and so uh And I think

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:46.400
<v Speaker 1>of what a tension does that create on stage? Well,

0:09:46.520 --> 0:09:48.840
<v Speaker 1>it's you know that used to be budding heads, but

0:09:48.880 --> 0:09:52.400
<v Speaker 1>now it's like a dialogue between the two of them. Uh.

0:09:52.440 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 1>I think the other thing, there's a big question about

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:57.840
<v Speaker 1>what's happening with mobility. Dan, You're gonna thank you so much.

0:09:57.840 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 1>And again, folks, some more modern work I mentioned commanding Eyes.

0:10:00.880 --> 0:10:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Look at the quest It is outstanding. David Gura and

0:10:16.240 --> 0:10:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Tom Keene in New York. This is Bloomberg Surveillance on Bloombergerdy.

0:10:18.640 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at the latest issue of Foreign Affairs magazine,

0:10:20.760 --> 0:10:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the March April issue. Trump Time is the headline. Donald

0:10:24.040 --> 0:10:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Trump picture there surveying his domain and others looking at

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:29.600
<v Speaker 1>the world. We see Vladimir putting their stride a horse.

0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:32.440
<v Speaker 1>A number of great pieces in this issue, including one

0:10:32.480 --> 0:10:35.040
<v Speaker 1>by Peter Fever with whom we spoke yesterday of Duke University.

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:37.000
<v Speaker 1>A great conversation. You can check it out on our

0:10:37.000 --> 0:10:39.480
<v Speaker 1>podcast as well. The editor of Foreign Affairs, Gideon Roses

0:10:39.520 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 1>with us now, and let's pick up with what Chris

0:10:41.360 --> 0:10:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Kirkin was just talking about their the resignation of Michael

0:10:44.000 --> 0:10:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Flynn's national security advisor. How much of Donald Trump's foreign

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:51.880
<v Speaker 1>policy was a Flynn foreign policy? Well, nobody knows, uh.

0:10:51.920 --> 0:10:55.199
<v Speaker 1>And the biggest question that people in my area are

0:10:55.200 --> 0:10:58.199
<v Speaker 1>wondering now is, okay, if Pence was out of the loop,

0:10:58.480 --> 0:11:01.079
<v Speaker 1>was the president out of the loop as well or not?

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 1>And nobody knows. And we will just have to see

0:11:04.320 --> 0:11:05.920
<v Speaker 1>where do we go from here. There were all of

0:11:05.960 --> 0:11:09.520
<v Speaker 1>these allegations that General Flynt had spoken with the ambassador

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:12.320
<v Speaker 1>from Russia to the United States during this interregnum between

0:11:12.360 --> 0:11:15.120
<v Speaker 1>the election and when Donald Trump was sworn in. Will

0:11:15.160 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 1>there be an investigation we have any sense of where

0:11:16.920 --> 0:11:18.920
<v Speaker 1>things go from here? Well, there is going to be investgation.

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:22.280
<v Speaker 1>There already are investigations about contacts between the Trump campaign

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:27.960
<v Speaker 1>and Trump Operation and Russia. Um. Look, basically, there's this

0:11:28.160 --> 0:11:32.600
<v Speaker 1>nagging possibility that keep that can't be denied of something

0:11:32.640 --> 0:11:36.040
<v Speaker 1>truly nefarious, but nobody can really believe that there actually

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 1>is anything nefarious going on, and it so so people

0:11:40.600 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 1>are puzzled. Right, There's been this positive relationship with Russia

0:11:45.360 --> 0:11:48.520
<v Speaker 1>that the Trump campaign has been steadfast about the only

0:11:48.640 --> 0:11:52.880
<v Speaker 1>thing in fact, that they've been really constantly consistent about. Uh,

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:56.080
<v Speaker 1>And no one can quite figure out why. And so

0:11:56.240 --> 0:11:58.720
<v Speaker 1>you can't quite No one can believe the notion that

0:11:58.760 --> 0:12:01.480
<v Speaker 1>there's some weird behind this conspiracy, but no one can

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:04.360
<v Speaker 1>fully dismiss it on the basis of the evidence so far. Either.

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:06.480
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned we were talking with Peter Fever yesterday about

0:12:06.480 --> 0:12:10.440
<v Speaker 1>the National Security Council staff and the reported disarray within.

0:12:11.200 --> 0:12:13.320
<v Speaker 1>What does this mean for that? Fold this into that

0:12:13.360 --> 0:12:15.559
<v Speaker 1>you've got You've got Michael Flynn out now, does that

0:12:15.960 --> 0:12:18.240
<v Speaker 1>stand to complicate things further or is this an opportunity

0:12:18.320 --> 0:12:21.000
<v Speaker 1>for the NSC and its staff to reset. Well. Uh.

0:12:21.040 --> 0:12:24.080
<v Speaker 1>The NSC is basically the president's personal foreign policy and

0:12:24.160 --> 0:12:27.880
<v Speaker 1>national security staff, so the president gets whatever the president wants.

0:12:28.320 --> 0:12:31.360
<v Speaker 1>It'll be fascinating to see who the replacement for Flynn

0:12:31.400 --> 0:12:34.160
<v Speaker 1>will be. One thing that's already interesting is they promoted

0:12:34.320 --> 0:12:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Kellogg to the number one spot, the acting spot, rather

0:12:37.000 --> 0:12:41.160
<v Speaker 1>than the number two. Technically, Katie McFarland, Uh, that would

0:12:41.200 --> 0:12:43.199
<v Speaker 1>suggest that they don't have a whole lot of confidence

0:12:43.360 --> 0:12:46.920
<v Speaker 1>in her necessarily, But we don't know, and um the

0:12:47.760 --> 0:12:50.320
<v Speaker 1>we you know. Look, the best way I can talk

0:12:50.360 --> 0:12:54.480
<v Speaker 1>about the difficulty in analyzing this administration is to look

0:12:54.480 --> 0:12:58.880
<v Speaker 1>at the number two at State. So Rec Tillerson impressive guy,

0:12:58.920 --> 0:13:01.800
<v Speaker 1>but somebody who's never had much foreign policy experience doesn't

0:13:01.840 --> 0:13:05.720
<v Speaker 1>know the building and so forth. So there's been everybody

0:13:05.720 --> 0:13:07.520
<v Speaker 1>has said, well, that's why he's going to get a

0:13:07.559 --> 0:13:11.200
<v Speaker 1>deputy who actually is a farm policy professional. But they've

0:13:11.280 --> 0:13:15.120
<v Speaker 1>kept floating names people like Richard Hass, people like Elliott Abram's,

0:13:15.200 --> 0:13:19.079
<v Speaker 1>people like John Bolton, and the names all get shot down.

0:13:19.160 --> 0:13:21.520
<v Speaker 1>So they still haven't filled that post. But the names

0:13:21.559 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 1>themselves range across the farm policy spectrum, from realists to

0:13:26.240 --> 0:13:29.120
<v Speaker 1>neo conservatives to other things people you would never actually

0:13:29.160 --> 0:13:31.760
<v Speaker 1>think of as being sent up by the same people

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:35.360
<v Speaker 1>for uh, for suggestions. So no one really knows what's

0:13:35.360 --> 0:13:38.480
<v Speaker 1>going on or who they'll actually pick away from General Flynn.

0:13:38.559 --> 0:13:40.240
<v Speaker 1>And we'll all be buried in this in the next

0:13:40.280 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 1>couple of days. You had cell phone national security over

0:13:44.920 --> 0:13:49.440
<v Speaker 1>dessert at Mara Lago. I was stunned that they did

0:13:49.480 --> 0:13:54.880
<v Speaker 1>the photos of the nuclear bag, the atomic bag. How

0:13:54.920 --> 0:13:58.960
<v Speaker 1>to prose like you respond to that nobody who's a

0:13:58.960 --> 0:14:02.559
<v Speaker 1>foreign policy profession and all that I know is anything

0:14:02.600 --> 0:14:07.720
<v Speaker 1>other than just flabbergasted by the last month. They're they're

0:14:07.720 --> 0:14:09.839
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to be like a tech company and fail

0:14:09.960 --> 0:14:13.320
<v Speaker 1>faster because the pace at which this is playing out

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:17.680
<v Speaker 1>is so uh rapid uh that that nobody knows where

0:14:17.679 --> 0:14:20.040
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna go. The visibility, you know, the five day

0:14:20.080 --> 0:14:23.800
<v Speaker 1>forecast is three days. I can't fathom the vice president

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:28.600
<v Speaker 1>doing anything but being stunned at the juvenility of some

0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:31.400
<v Speaker 1>of these actions. Um. The problem is that you know

0:14:31.400 --> 0:14:34.400
<v Speaker 1>what was it? That was it George Bush who GARYT. Trudeau,

0:14:34.560 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 1>George Bush father that Garret Judo said had his manhood

0:14:37.880 --> 0:14:39.680
<v Speaker 1>and the blind trust. A lot of the people of

0:14:39.760 --> 0:14:44.200
<v Speaker 1>this administration, uh unfortunately, seemed to have their manhood or

0:14:44.240 --> 0:14:47.320
<v Speaker 1>femalehood in a in a blind trust because the boss

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:49.160
<v Speaker 1>is doing something and when the boss says that you

0:14:49.200 --> 0:14:52.800
<v Speaker 1>have to go and do whatever the boss says, just

0:14:52.840 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 1>too short to the Guindeon Rose, thank you so much?

0:14:55.440 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 1>What a half hour if a dan you're going to

0:14:57.400 --> 0:15:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Gideon Rose together. I mean, David, is this right? This

0:15:01.240 --> 0:15:04.120
<v Speaker 1>is incredible, by the way it is with the tweets,

0:15:04.120 --> 0:15:08.200
<v Speaker 1>with the little birds tweeting around Foreign Affairs magazine, folks

0:15:08.360 --> 0:15:10.720
<v Speaker 1>check it out, is superb. It's the price of a

0:15:10.800 --> 0:15:12.960
<v Speaker 1>fancy Martini. Geon Rosen was going to go to the

0:15:13.000 --> 0:15:17.400
<v Speaker 1>cheap Martini. But a subscription, a print subscription, is something

0:15:17.480 --> 0:15:20.960
<v Speaker 1>John Tucker looks forward to every month. I don't know

0:15:21.000 --> 0:15:25.160
<v Speaker 1>these days we could use the fancy Martini times Trump times,

0:15:25.600 --> 0:15:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Trump time rather Okay, we like a little tension here.

0:15:41.040 --> 0:15:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Robert Sinch nailing the strong Sterling call and certainly calling

0:15:45.720 --> 0:15:50.920
<v Speaker 1>for Sterling stability, stability. Agreeing with him. Shahab Jollinus at

0:15:51.840 --> 0:15:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Credit sweets really looking for moderate moderation within Sterling, and Shahab,

0:15:58.280 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 1>we've got other houses looking for really dramatically weak Sterling.

0:16:02.280 --> 0:16:06.480
<v Speaker 1>George servelis at Deutsche Bank looking under one ten HSBC's

0:16:06.520 --> 0:16:10.320
<v Speaker 1>at long term one ten call. What is the distinctive

0:16:10.440 --> 0:16:15.520
<v Speaker 1>feature between your call of Sterling stability versus those that

0:16:15.640 --> 0:16:18.880
<v Speaker 1>have a much gloomier outlook. Well, I guess it also

0:16:18.920 --> 0:16:22.400
<v Speaker 1>depends on what time horizon we look at this on.

0:16:22.520 --> 0:16:25.080
<v Speaker 1>In the sense that uh, you know, over the next

0:16:25.200 --> 0:16:28.320
<v Speaker 1>year or so, it's unclear to us what type of

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 1>new political news is going to materialize that dramatically moves

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Sterling relative to the news we've had in the past year.

0:16:35.960 --> 0:16:39.520
<v Speaker 1>And I think if we see in that time period

0:16:39.880 --> 0:16:43.520
<v Speaker 1>obvious signs that is going to be huge disruption in

0:16:43.640 --> 0:16:45.600
<v Speaker 1>terms of the talks between the EU and the UK,

0:16:46.000 --> 0:16:48.800
<v Speaker 1>then I'd be prepared to look again at my forecast.

0:16:49.120 --> 0:16:52.360
<v Speaker 1>But in the absence of that, there's not really a

0:16:52.400 --> 0:16:55.320
<v Speaker 1>strong catalyst for a dramatic fall at this point in time.

0:16:55.560 --> 0:16:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Better in mind, this currency has already had a very

0:16:57.400 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 1>substantial fall in the past year um and kind tend

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:04.200
<v Speaker 1>not to move in straight lines on a permanent basis

0:17:04.240 --> 0:17:07.160
<v Speaker 1>without fresh information how much it is going to change

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:09.520
<v Speaker 1>here when Article fifty is triggered, when this all begins.

0:17:09.520 --> 0:17:11.399
<v Speaker 1>In other words, there's a lot that's priced in, but

0:17:11.400 --> 0:17:14.280
<v Speaker 1>there is still a great, a huge unknown they're living

0:17:14.400 --> 0:17:17.280
<v Speaker 1>on the horizon. Well, certainly an Article fifty, you know,

0:17:17.359 --> 0:17:19.480
<v Speaker 1>has been discussed now for a long time and as

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:22.000
<v Speaker 1>timing as well. And I think the other very important

0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:25.120
<v Speaker 1>dimension here is that for some time the market wasn't

0:17:25.160 --> 0:17:28.960
<v Speaker 1>sure whether we'd see hard brexit or soft Brexit, hard

0:17:28.960 --> 0:17:31.879
<v Speaker 1>Brexit being the idea that you have a more disruptive,

0:17:31.920 --> 0:17:34.760
<v Speaker 1>potentially break in trade links. But what's been chriced in

0:17:34.760 --> 0:17:37.840
<v Speaker 1>now is effectively that is heart Brexit. Nobody is really

0:17:37.880 --> 0:17:40.440
<v Speaker 1>discussing anymore the idea of a of a soft Brexit,

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:43.600
<v Speaker 1>so that's already going a long way towards some of

0:17:43.600 --> 0:17:46.399
<v Speaker 1>the worst scenarios that people had for the pound if

0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:49.520
<v Speaker 1>you go back to un let's say six months ago, um,

0:17:49.680 --> 0:17:51.760
<v Speaker 1>which really means that going forward we have to ask

0:17:51.760 --> 0:17:54.040
<v Speaker 1>ourselves a new question, are you going to see a

0:17:54.040 --> 0:17:57.919
<v Speaker 1>disruptive Brexit or a more benign version of hard Brexit.

0:17:58.160 --> 0:18:02.400
<v Speaker 1>I think disruptive would require very obvious signs of stresses

0:18:02.680 --> 0:18:06.080
<v Speaker 1>um in the negotiations between the rest of the EU

0:18:06.119 --> 0:18:08.120
<v Speaker 1>and the UK UM And as I said, I think

0:18:08.160 --> 0:18:11.280
<v Speaker 1>that will take time to materialize, not least because we

0:18:11.359 --> 0:18:14.880
<v Speaker 1>don't even know what position the EU will take, given

0:18:14.880 --> 0:18:16.480
<v Speaker 1>that many believe that you have to get through the

0:18:16.520 --> 0:18:18.800
<v Speaker 1>French and German elections this year before there's even a

0:18:18.880 --> 0:18:22.000
<v Speaker 1>very clear perspective on that. So that's many many months

0:18:22.000 --> 0:18:24.520
<v Speaker 1>ahead from our perspectives. The bigger driver here now is

0:18:24.560 --> 0:18:26.359
<v Speaker 1>a politics is at Central Bank. I look at the

0:18:26.359 --> 0:18:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Swiss National Bank and we wonder about the potential for

0:18:29.040 --> 0:18:31.360
<v Speaker 1>more intervention. Same thing with the Bank of Japan. I mean,

0:18:32.160 --> 0:18:34.240
<v Speaker 1>is politics trumping everything at this point? I think I

0:18:34.240 --> 0:18:37.359
<v Speaker 1>think that's right. I think politics is now ascendant. UM.

0:18:37.520 --> 0:18:41.840
<v Speaker 1>And really, uh what the Trump election is obviously one

0:18:41.880 --> 0:18:44.800
<v Speaker 1>factor behind that, um, in fact, probably the key factor.

0:18:45.480 --> 0:18:48.919
<v Speaker 1>For example, let's look at the Swiss frank. You mentioned

0:18:48.920 --> 0:18:52.040
<v Speaker 1>that the Swiss National Bank has had an intervention strategy

0:18:52.080 --> 0:18:54.680
<v Speaker 1>on the currency for some period of time, um, even

0:18:54.760 --> 0:18:59.400
<v Speaker 1>after the floor went UM. Now, if the US decides

0:18:59.440 --> 0:19:03.120
<v Speaker 1>to press on the issue of currency manipulation, um, not

0:19:03.200 --> 0:19:05.919
<v Speaker 1>just on China, but on other countries as well. Are

0:19:05.960 --> 0:19:10.159
<v Speaker 1>the trading regions that puts Switzerland in a potentially vulnerable place,

0:19:10.600 --> 0:19:13.320
<v Speaker 1>And I think it makes the market have to consider whether,

0:19:13.760 --> 0:19:16.400
<v Speaker 1>for example, the Swiss National Bank would feel its politically

0:19:16.400 --> 0:19:19.880
<v Speaker 1>expedient to continue with the current strategy. UM. So that's

0:19:19.920 --> 0:19:23.040
<v Speaker 1>one of the areas we need to consider. How will

0:19:23.359 --> 0:19:26.800
<v Speaker 1>politics come through into central bank policy decisions. Another way

0:19:26.840 --> 0:19:29.280
<v Speaker 1>to think about this as well, UM, if for example,

0:19:29.320 --> 0:19:32.439
<v Speaker 1>the US pushes through with border adjust to taxation on

0:19:32.480 --> 0:19:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the fiscal front, and that leads to strong dollar rally.

0:19:36.280 --> 0:19:38.399
<v Speaker 1>Will there be political pressure, for example, in the Federal

0:19:38.400 --> 0:19:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Reserve not to high grates in that type of environment

0:19:42.680 --> 0:19:47.520
<v Speaker 1>as a function of having to acknowledge the unusual physical

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:49.760
<v Speaker 1>reasons that the dollar is rallying. These are all new

0:19:49.800 --> 0:19:52.159
<v Speaker 1>things for the market to digest and not easy to

0:19:52.160 --> 0:19:54.320
<v Speaker 1>do at this point. Where are we in the digestion

0:19:54.440 --> 0:19:57.040
<v Speaker 1>of US policy towards Mexico and how that's playing out

0:19:57.040 --> 0:19:59.639
<v Speaker 1>in in the Mexican currency. We've, as you said, had

0:19:59.680 --> 0:20:02.200
<v Speaker 1>a long relation about article fifties since since back in

0:20:02.280 --> 0:20:06.080
<v Speaker 1>June UM we've seen this sort of the potential for

0:20:06.160 --> 0:20:08.680
<v Speaker 1>a wall or new policies play out in Mexico every

0:20:08.680 --> 0:20:11.320
<v Speaker 1>sometimes as well. Is that priced in there when you

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:14.040
<v Speaker 1>look at at the value of the Mexican currency. Well,

0:20:14.040 --> 0:20:17.200
<v Speaker 1>certainly the Mexican policy felt so substantially last year. It's

0:20:17.200 --> 0:20:20.159
<v Speaker 1>a bit like the pound discussion, um, that it became

0:20:20.240 --> 0:20:23.639
<v Speaker 1>harder for new news to take it even even lower,

0:20:23.760 --> 0:20:25.480
<v Speaker 1>or at least, let's just put it another way, the

0:20:25.560 --> 0:20:27.560
<v Speaker 1>absence of new news was enough reason for it to

0:20:27.560 --> 0:20:31.120
<v Speaker 1>go higher, especially as interest rates in Mexico or relatively

0:20:31.200 --> 0:20:33.600
<v Speaker 1>high as well. So it's not easy to just sit

0:20:33.640 --> 0:20:36.359
<v Speaker 1>there with a short Mexican past of position. Um, I

0:20:36.400 --> 0:20:38.560
<v Speaker 1>think really for the currency to start to fall again,

0:20:38.920 --> 0:20:41.960
<v Speaker 1>you do need to see bad news come through on

0:20:42.000 --> 0:20:46.640
<v Speaker 1>the NAFTA renegotiation front. Now, what we saw yesterday, for example,

0:20:46.680 --> 0:20:50.960
<v Speaker 1>when Canadian Prime Minister Trudeau visited the US was a

0:20:51.000 --> 0:20:53.679
<v Speaker 1>more benign outcome for Canada at least um, and that

0:20:53.720 --> 0:20:55.840
<v Speaker 1>would have raised hopes that maybe in Mexico will get

0:20:55.920 --> 0:20:58.040
<v Speaker 1>will catch a break as well. So I think while

0:20:58.080 --> 0:21:01.879
<v Speaker 1>that feeling persists, the Mexican petsons should hold up quite well.

0:21:01.920 --> 0:21:06.760
<v Speaker 1>We've been getting great currency pair trades off of the

0:21:06.800 --> 0:21:10.040
<v Speaker 1>simple question where's the opportunity right now? We're all buried

0:21:10.040 --> 0:21:12.000
<v Speaker 1>in the politics. I get that you just give us

0:21:12.000 --> 0:21:15.359
<v Speaker 1>a great review. Where's the single trade to make ALFA

0:21:15.440 --> 0:21:18.960
<v Speaker 1>this morning? Well this morning, you know, we we still

0:21:19.000 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 1>like the high Carrie currencies, so that the likes of

0:21:22.440 --> 0:21:25.439
<v Speaker 1>the Brazilian rao are performing well, the Russian rouble, in

0:21:25.440 --> 0:21:28.239
<v Speaker 1>our view, will continue to perform well. These trades are

0:21:28.280 --> 0:21:31.000
<v Speaker 1>seen as crowded trades by some, but in the same

0:21:31.040 --> 0:21:33.440
<v Speaker 1>way that the market believes that, for example, the US

0:21:33.480 --> 0:21:37.240
<v Speaker 1>stock market is very high. Um, that doesn't necessarily mean

0:21:37.240 --> 0:21:39.359
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't have more underline, momentum to go high. So

0:21:39.400 --> 0:21:42.040
<v Speaker 1>which pairer within real and ruble do you like. Well,

0:21:42.080 --> 0:21:45.600
<v Speaker 1>we've for a long time like the ruble best in

0:21:45.600 --> 0:21:49.760
<v Speaker 1>the emerging market space dollar, ruble, euro, ruble, sterling, ruble,

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Euro at the time is our favorite short position um

0:21:52.720 --> 0:21:56.000
<v Speaker 1>and for for a number of reasons. Firstly, the political

0:21:56.080 --> 0:21:59.560
<v Speaker 1>environment in Europe is clearly more more stressful than in

0:21:59.600 --> 0:22:04.119
<v Speaker 1>many other regions. And while people say that the French

0:22:04.160 --> 0:22:07.320
<v Speaker 1>election is now what understood in fully price in our

0:22:07.400 --> 0:22:09.679
<v Speaker 1>view when we look at things like option volatilities, we

0:22:09.720 --> 0:22:11.920
<v Speaker 1>don't we disagree with that. There's more room to price

0:22:12.000 --> 0:22:14.400
<v Speaker 1>in more risk for the era. Of course, you also

0:22:14.440 --> 0:22:16.280
<v Speaker 1>have the fact that you still have the Euro is

0:22:16.320 --> 0:22:19.719
<v Speaker 1>still a negative rate currency. So the combination of offering

0:22:19.760 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 1>negative rates and a lots of political risk that's not

0:22:22.359 --> 0:22:24.600
<v Speaker 1>really a good a good one from a NFX perspective.

0:22:24.680 --> 0:22:27.960
<v Speaker 1>So Euro is definitely a one of our favorite funding currencies.

0:22:28.080 --> 0:22:31.000
<v Speaker 1>And as I mentioned it, right to summarize your strong

0:22:31.160 --> 0:22:33.600
<v Speaker 1>ruble week euro, that's what we like at the moment,

0:22:33.720 --> 0:22:36.480
<v Speaker 1>and we've as I said, buying the Russian ruble was

0:22:36.520 --> 0:22:38.720
<v Speaker 1>one of our trades of the year at the start

0:22:38.760 --> 0:22:41.440
<v Speaker 1>of the year. Uh and I haven't changed my view

0:22:41.480 --> 0:22:44.240
<v Speaker 1>on that one. UM and Euro as we approached the

0:22:44.240 --> 0:22:47.040
<v Speaker 1>French election has much more downside. It's lastly here, how

0:22:47.080 --> 0:22:49.919
<v Speaker 1>are you watching Beijing in the year two thousand and seventeen.

0:22:49.960 --> 0:22:51.359
<v Speaker 1>What are you looking for when you look at the

0:22:51.560 --> 0:22:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Chinese currency? A number of things. Firstly, capital controls. Are

0:22:56.480 --> 0:23:00.360
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese going to increase capital controls? Because if if

0:23:00.400 --> 0:23:02.840
<v Speaker 1>the currency is under downward pressure, one of the most

0:23:02.840 --> 0:23:05.800
<v Speaker 1>effective ways to stop that is to basically stop the

0:23:05.800 --> 0:23:08.040
<v Speaker 1>selling and stop the locals trying to get out of

0:23:08.040 --> 0:23:11.320
<v Speaker 1>their own currency. The second aspect I'm looking at is

0:23:11.400 --> 0:23:14.959
<v Speaker 1>interest rates local interest rates in China. Is China prepared

0:23:14.960 --> 0:23:19.600
<v Speaker 1>to raise rates significantly to alleviate the downward pressure on

0:23:19.600 --> 0:23:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the currency against the backdrop of an economy that many

0:23:23.040 --> 0:23:26.480
<v Speaker 1>believe is still very leveraged and vulnerable to a sharp

0:23:26.600 --> 0:23:29.440
<v Speaker 1>rise in interest rates. UM and I think these two

0:23:29.480 --> 0:23:31.840
<v Speaker 1>factors in the near term of the most important factors

0:23:31.840 --> 0:23:34.120
<v Speaker 1>to consider. In fact, what we've seen so far this

0:23:34.200 --> 0:23:37.359
<v Speaker 1>year is movement on both fronts, and that's one of

0:23:37.440 --> 0:23:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the reasons an argue that Chinese currency has outperformed expectations

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:43.960
<v Speaker 1>so far this year. The question really is Canada, Chinese

0:23:44.000 --> 0:23:48.720
<v Speaker 1>economy tolerate persistent application of these policies. This has been great.

0:23:48.720 --> 0:23:50.760
<v Speaker 1>I just put on a Twitter that chart of the Bloomberg.

0:23:50.760 --> 0:23:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Will do that on Facebook Live and most certainly will

0:23:53.520 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 1>put that on TV. That's tomorrow morning. The idea of

0:23:56.720 --> 0:24:01.000
<v Speaker 1>stronger ruble against weaker You're I love doing that, David.

0:24:01.000 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 1>We get the most interesting things that the pair yesterday

0:24:03.320 --> 0:24:08.639
<v Speaker 1>was something. It was Sterling Kiwia Stronger New Zealand versus

0:24:08.680 --> 0:24:12.360
<v Speaker 1>the Brexity Sterling. Although you just heard jobs, look there

0:24:12.400 --> 0:24:25.040
<v Speaker 1>for some Sterling resilience versus the gloom crowd. Brought you

0:24:25.119 --> 0:24:28.760
<v Speaker 1>by Bank of America, Mary Lynch. Dedicated to bringing our

0:24:28.800 --> 0:24:32.399
<v Speaker 1>clients insights and solutions to meet the challenges of a

0:24:32.440 --> 0:24:36.840
<v Speaker 1>transforming world. That's the power of global connections, Mary Lynch.

0:24:37.000 --> 0:24:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Pierce Federan Smith Incorporated Member s I P. C. Robin

0:24:45.280 --> 0:24:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Niblett with us right now with Chatham House on short notice.

0:24:48.600 --> 0:24:50.840
<v Speaker 1>So good to catch up with you, Robin. After I

0:24:50.960 --> 0:24:56.439
<v Speaker 1>saw General Flynn exit uh last night. Tell us about

0:24:56.440 --> 0:25:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the disarray within any government. When you have to move

0:25:00.680 --> 0:25:05.200
<v Speaker 1>people out abruptly, it's got to be a destabilizer, isn't it. Well,

0:25:05.240 --> 0:25:09.879
<v Speaker 1>I think it will be destabilizing, not least given the

0:25:09.920 --> 0:25:12.119
<v Speaker 1>fact that this is a presidency that obviously did not

0:25:12.359 --> 0:25:16.480
<v Speaker 1>have a deep bench to draw upon from the outset

0:25:16.560 --> 0:25:20.800
<v Speaker 1>when it was establishing its administration. You know, for Hillary

0:25:20.840 --> 0:25:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Clinton had one people say she had the first four

0:25:23.320 --> 0:25:26.480
<v Speaker 1>thousand positions already lined up to to take their their

0:25:26.480 --> 0:25:29.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, their position in the government. The talk of

0:25:29.119 --> 0:25:32.840
<v Speaker 1>the Trump administration is fairly empty corridors in the West wing.

0:25:33.040 --> 0:25:35.879
<v Speaker 1>And so if you lose somebody at such a central

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:38.480
<v Speaker 1>node in government, um, and you don't have a deep

0:25:38.480 --> 0:25:41.760
<v Speaker 1>bench behind it, it's going to make life even more complicated.

0:25:41.800 --> 0:25:44.120
<v Speaker 1>And we have very complicated well to deal with. What

0:25:44.200 --> 0:25:47.840
<v Speaker 1>was appealing to President Trump about General Flynn? What did

0:25:47.880 --> 0:25:51.960
<v Speaker 1>you like about him? I think the loyalty factor. Here's

0:25:51.960 --> 0:25:54.919
<v Speaker 1>somebody you stepped up close to the president right from

0:25:54.960 --> 0:25:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the beginning, uh, you know, stood, took his back, took

0:25:58.240 --> 0:26:03.440
<v Speaker 1>the most ardent and campaign worthy messages, including the locker

0:26:03.520 --> 0:26:08.920
<v Speaker 1>up on Harry Clinton. Uh, completely uncompromising stance on radical Islam,

0:26:08.960 --> 0:26:12.960
<v Speaker 1>but on fighting isis He was really the general that

0:26:13.080 --> 0:26:16.960
<v Speaker 1>gave Trump credibility when at that point the Republican defense

0:26:17.080 --> 0:26:21.560
<v Speaker 1>establishment was best leery and in many cases stepping out

0:26:21.600 --> 0:26:24.159
<v Speaker 1>against him. So I think the loyalty stakes um, and

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:27.879
<v Speaker 1>that kind of get it done military figure who had

0:26:27.920 --> 0:26:30.760
<v Speaker 1>played importantly in Afghanistan with the key issues for him. Yeah,

0:26:30.800 --> 0:26:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the general who gave him credibility with the defense establishment.

0:26:33.480 --> 0:26:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Are you thinking here that the replacement is going to

0:26:35.960 --> 0:26:37.560
<v Speaker 1>be somebody who's been in the military as well? It

0:26:37.600 --> 0:26:40.440
<v Speaker 1>seems like President Trump has an affinity for likes to

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:42.560
<v Speaker 1>to surround himself in the foreign policy round by those

0:26:42.560 --> 0:26:45.280
<v Speaker 1>who have served in the military. Well, just yeah, on

0:26:45.359 --> 0:26:49.399
<v Speaker 1>on the credibility, I think Flynn had credibility in terms

0:26:49.520 --> 0:26:51.280
<v Speaker 1>with President Trump for being a tough guy and with

0:26:51.359 --> 0:26:53.560
<v Speaker 1>somebody who stepped up as part of the defense establishment.

0:26:53.560 --> 0:26:56.320
<v Speaker 1>But of course he was not popular within the defense

0:26:56.440 --> 0:27:00.000
<v Speaker 1>establishment itself, having been in essencis fired from his position

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:03.560
<v Speaker 1>and a head of the Defense Intelligence Agency. So where

0:27:03.600 --> 0:27:06.280
<v Speaker 1>we go here is potentially that if he sticks with

0:27:06.400 --> 0:27:09.679
<v Speaker 1>the military track, and there's a a general who stepped in,

0:27:09.680 --> 0:27:13.440
<v Speaker 1>General Keith Kellogg who stepped in as acting Nation Security Advisor, Um,

0:27:13.840 --> 0:27:16.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, with David Petrays's name in the in the frame,

0:27:16.880 --> 0:27:19.720
<v Speaker 1>another at least Admiral Harward's name as well in the frame.

0:27:20.119 --> 0:27:23.159
<v Speaker 1>It looks highly likely that we would get another military figure,

0:27:23.200 --> 0:27:26.000
<v Speaker 1>and we can clearly see that the present feels comfortable

0:27:26.040 --> 0:27:29.520
<v Speaker 1>with them, given the appointments he's made to Secretary Defense. However,

0:27:29.720 --> 0:27:32.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think he's gonna think very carefully about

0:27:32.480 --> 0:27:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the balance. You know, when we saw Steve Bannon appointed

0:27:36.000 --> 0:27:38.639
<v Speaker 1>as a principal to National Security Council, you felt there

0:27:38.680 --> 0:27:42.320
<v Speaker 1>was a desire to balance let's call it establishment defense

0:27:42.840 --> 0:27:47.240
<v Speaker 1>with the more some more you know, unpredictable and and

0:27:47.480 --> 0:27:50.200
<v Speaker 1>tough voices. So you've got to work out who would

0:27:50.240 --> 0:27:52.000
<v Speaker 1>it be in the defense establishment who could play the

0:27:52.040 --> 0:27:54.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of flint type role and be a counter balance

0:27:54.800 --> 0:27:57.520
<v Speaker 1>to the more uh predictable. How can I put it?

0:27:57.640 --> 0:28:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Um straightforward internationalist realist approach you associate with general matters,

0:28:03.480 --> 0:28:06.240
<v Speaker 1>so picking the right persons can be very complicated. We're

0:28:06.240 --> 0:28:08.600
<v Speaker 1>talking with Peter Fever yesterday from Duke University about the

0:28:08.680 --> 0:28:11.479
<v Speaker 1>NSC and he said that he has gotten pretty size. Well,

0:28:11.520 --> 0:28:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump hasn't been shy about saying he wants to

0:28:13.359 --> 0:28:16.720
<v Speaker 1>reduce its its size. Help us understand how the foreign

0:28:16.800 --> 0:28:20.520
<v Speaker 1>policy landscape changes in Washington, d C. Under President Trump.

0:28:20.520 --> 0:28:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Do we see the Defense Department getting more power back

0:28:23.240 --> 0:28:27.440
<v Speaker 1>power that had been transitioned over to the NSC. Well,

0:28:28.119 --> 0:28:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I you know, my first singing would be to say

0:28:30.119 --> 0:28:33.160
<v Speaker 1>that in all countries, not just in the US, UM

0:28:33.400 --> 0:28:36.520
<v Speaker 1>security and foreign policy is concentrating more and more at

0:28:36.520 --> 0:28:38.600
<v Speaker 1>the heart of the executive. You don't just see this

0:28:38.680 --> 0:28:41.440
<v Speaker 1>in the United States. You saw it under present Obama,

0:28:41.720 --> 0:28:45.600
<v Speaker 1>where in many cases, uh, you know, senior advice was

0:28:45.680 --> 0:28:50.160
<v Speaker 1>coming from Secretary Clinton, Foreign Secretary, from Leon Panetta, mothers

0:28:50.240 --> 0:28:52.840
<v Speaker 1>was ignored, if for example, in the case of Syria.

0:28:53.240 --> 0:28:58.120
<v Speaker 1>So the whole idea of a centralization of power I

0:28:58.160 --> 0:29:01.040
<v Speaker 1>think is going to continue even under President Trump. It

0:29:01.040 --> 0:29:04.600
<v Speaker 1>will be very difficult given the way that people look

0:29:04.680 --> 0:29:07.560
<v Speaker 1>to presidents these days or heads of government in any

0:29:07.600 --> 0:29:10.040
<v Speaker 1>country to take the lead on foreign policy. We're even

0:29:10.040 --> 0:29:13.120
<v Speaker 1>seen this in China, you know, at the momentum, I

0:29:13.280 --> 0:29:15.120
<v Speaker 1>think would be very hard to turn that back and

0:29:15.160 --> 0:29:19.080
<v Speaker 1>suddenly find big power fiefdoms um in other parts of government.

0:29:19.200 --> 0:29:22.360
<v Speaker 1>That being said, the Pentagon has a huge budget. General

0:29:22.400 --> 0:29:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Flynn has great experience, and it's probably likely the most

0:29:25.080 --> 0:29:27.600
<v Speaker 1>powerful agency of the lot at the moment. How did

0:29:27.640 --> 0:29:30.920
<v Speaker 1>the adults get back in the room, if you presume

0:29:31.000 --> 0:29:33.600
<v Speaker 1>they're not there now, how did you get back in

0:29:33.640 --> 0:29:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the room? Well, as I think I was indicating earlier

0:29:37.160 --> 0:29:40.360
<v Speaker 1>to him, I think the if general you know, we're

0:29:40.360 --> 0:29:44.520
<v Speaker 1>General Flynn gone, there's going to be a hope that adults, uh,

0:29:44.640 --> 0:29:47.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, will will will reassert. I think a lot

0:29:47.800 --> 0:29:51.200
<v Speaker 1>depends on whether the president you know who who likes

0:29:51.240 --> 0:29:53.240
<v Speaker 1>to be the leader, the man who's in charge. He

0:29:53.320 --> 0:29:55.360
<v Speaker 1>does not want to be seen as somebody who's having

0:29:55.400 --> 0:29:58.760
<v Speaker 1>to cow chow to advice from more experienced people. He

0:29:58.800 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 1>wants his own voice, especially in the National Security Council,

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:04.960
<v Speaker 1>which really is leave through to the security sector. So

0:30:05.040 --> 0:30:07.160
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, how does how do how do we?

0:30:07.760 --> 0:30:10.160
<v Speaker 1>He may not want a return to the sense of

0:30:10.160 --> 0:30:12.440
<v Speaker 1>adults in the room. The whole idea of a more

0:30:12.520 --> 0:30:15.840
<v Speaker 1>unpredictable foreign policy is one that I think he's championed.

0:30:15.880 --> 0:30:18.480
<v Speaker 1>He feels at the moment the cards have ended up

0:30:18.520 --> 0:30:22.160
<v Speaker 1>being stacked against the US and the very unpredictability he

0:30:22.280 --> 0:30:26.200
<v Speaker 1>brings is part of America reacquiring strength, not least visa

0:30:26.240 --> 0:30:29.920
<v Speaker 1>the Russia. A number of articles about this resignation, including

0:30:30.000 --> 0:30:32.800
<v Speaker 1>artist Bloomberg, reference the Munich Security Conference, which has taken

0:30:32.800 --> 0:30:35.480
<v Speaker 1>place in a couple of days and it made me

0:30:35.480 --> 0:30:39.120
<v Speaker 1>me wonder about how this administration sees multilateral gatherings like

0:30:39.200 --> 0:30:41.240
<v Speaker 1>those versus what we've seen play out here over the

0:30:41.240 --> 0:30:43.960
<v Speaker 1>past few weeks. Meetings with Prime Minister May, meetings with

0:30:44.000 --> 0:30:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Prime Minister Sian zo Abe, meetings with Prime Minister Trudeau yesterday.

0:30:48.240 --> 0:30:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Clearly it seems like the personal relationship is being prioritized,

0:30:51.320 --> 0:30:53.640
<v Speaker 1>at least in these early days, over the multilateral meetings.

0:30:54.640 --> 0:30:58.200
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a time for the to establish

0:30:58.480 --> 0:31:01.080
<v Speaker 1>his personal relationships with the other heads of state, given

0:31:01.080 --> 0:31:02.719
<v Speaker 1>as I said a minute ago, you know, these are

0:31:02.760 --> 0:31:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the people who make the big decisions on foreign security policy. However,

0:31:07.160 --> 0:31:10.120
<v Speaker 1>you know the Munich Security Conference is what it says

0:31:10.120 --> 0:31:13.520
<v Speaker 1>on the tin, it's probably the top security conference takes

0:31:13.520 --> 0:31:15.880
<v Speaker 1>place in Europe each year. This would be a good

0:31:15.880 --> 0:31:18.880
<v Speaker 1>place for General Matthis to to show up. He's at

0:31:18.920 --> 0:31:22.640
<v Speaker 1>some meetings to NATO and Brussels this week. He may

0:31:22.840 --> 0:31:25.560
<v Speaker 1>stop buying. This has been a traditional position for U

0:31:25.560 --> 0:31:28.520
<v Speaker 1>S Secretary Defense to come and share the view of

0:31:28.560 --> 0:31:32.840
<v Speaker 1>the administration with other gathered figures. Now this is different,

0:31:32.920 --> 0:31:36.120
<v Speaker 1>I would say, from the kind of multilateralism that maybe

0:31:36.160 --> 0:31:38.600
<v Speaker 1>the G twenty or NATO or the European Union or

0:31:38.640 --> 0:31:41.160
<v Speaker 1>even the U N represents here. I think we can

0:31:41.200 --> 0:31:44.800
<v Speaker 1>see a more muscular uh U S approach to all

0:31:44.840 --> 0:31:48.440
<v Speaker 1>of those institutions than we've seen in the past. What

0:31:48.480 --> 0:31:50.560
<v Speaker 1>do you make of the role the General Maddis now

0:31:50.600 --> 0:31:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Secretary Madis has played thus far? How well has he

0:31:53.600 --> 0:31:57.160
<v Speaker 1>fit into that new role as Secretary of Defense As

0:31:57.280 --> 0:31:59.200
<v Speaker 1>as somebody looking at this from the outside from London,

0:31:59.240 --> 0:32:01.720
<v Speaker 1>I think he's aided very well. Um. You know, he

0:32:01.880 --> 0:32:05.120
<v Speaker 1>was the person who was sent out to calm nerves

0:32:05.160 --> 0:32:08.920
<v Speaker 1>in East Asia, in particular after the uh you know,

0:32:08.960 --> 0:32:12.000
<v Speaker 1>the uncertainty there would a company the president's arrival, not

0:32:12.000 --> 0:32:15.160
<v Speaker 1>at least giving his comments about Japan being a currency manipulator,

0:32:15.240 --> 0:32:17.600
<v Speaker 1>and his comments about to South Korea and Japan and

0:32:17.640 --> 0:32:19.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe aming to look after their own defense and nuclear weapons.

0:32:20.080 --> 0:32:23.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, these are incendury comments in normal circumstances, but

0:32:23.840 --> 0:32:27.720
<v Speaker 1>with North Korea looking unpredictable, you needed somebody who could

0:32:27.720 --> 0:32:31.280
<v Speaker 1>go out and and and carry the message of continuity.

0:32:31.320 --> 0:32:34.200
<v Speaker 1>And I think without looking like he's on the wrong

0:32:34.240 --> 0:32:37.280
<v Speaker 1>side of the president, without looking like he's overtaking his position,

0:32:37.280 --> 0:32:39.720
<v Speaker 1>he's played it very well. The most striking moment for

0:32:39.760 --> 0:32:42.920
<v Speaker 1>me was when the President in the press conference with

0:32:42.960 --> 0:32:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Prime Minister Treasa Mayor the UK said look, I I

0:32:46.200 --> 0:32:49.400
<v Speaker 1>think what your works, but on this is Hume. General

0:32:49.400 --> 0:32:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Maddis overrides me. I mean that was a powerful statement.

0:32:52.760 --> 0:32:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Rabbin Nibbles, thank you so much, and short notice this

0:32:54.960 --> 0:32:59.080
<v Speaker 1>morning after General Flynn exits last night, Rabbi nibble with

0:32:59.360 --> 0:33:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Chatham House. Uh this morning. Bob Haber, who worked at

0:33:15.840 --> 0:33:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Fortress Johnson for years and essentially invented the oddity of

0:33:20.840 --> 0:33:25.280
<v Speaker 1>convertible and preferred analysis. Bob Haber has worked for years

0:33:25.280 --> 0:33:28.960
<v Speaker 1>at Fidelity. Among other things, he teaches or has taught

0:33:29.000 --> 0:33:33.560
<v Speaker 1>it Tough I should say Toughs University, on Federal Reserve history,

0:33:34.000 --> 0:33:37.080
<v Speaker 1>and most particularly on the board of the Boston Celtics. Bob,

0:33:37.160 --> 0:33:41.440
<v Speaker 1>let's get serious. Nine and one, six fifty five ball.

0:33:41.920 --> 0:33:44.880
<v Speaker 1>The Celtics are the real thing. There's a modest team

0:33:44.920 --> 0:33:47.880
<v Speaker 1>from Cleveland a little bit better than them. Can they

0:33:47.920 --> 0:33:52.200
<v Speaker 1>do it to Cleveland? Well, um, happy Valentine's Day. I

0:33:52.240 --> 0:33:54.719
<v Speaker 1>thought you were going to give us some some trade

0:33:55.320 --> 0:33:58.760
<v Speaker 1>ideas that you know the trade deadlines coming up so

0:34:00.040 --> 0:34:05.520
<v Speaker 1>on fire so yeah, yeah, um, but no, uh, we're

0:34:05.720 --> 0:34:07.480
<v Speaker 1>I think we're right in the mix. Yeah, you're in

0:34:07.480 --> 0:34:09.279
<v Speaker 1>the mix nine and one. It's actually like a real

0:34:09.280 --> 0:34:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Celtics very little grounds for basketball optimism in New York City.

0:34:12.520 --> 0:34:16.960
<v Speaker 1>That's true. Well, we have to talk Celtics. Good morning, Bloomberg, Boston, Bob.

0:34:17.080 --> 0:34:21.239
<v Speaker 1>It is a melt up long ago at Fidelity. You

0:34:21.280 --> 0:34:25.279
<v Speaker 1>didn't witness twenty thousand or twenty one thousand now, but

0:34:25.400 --> 0:34:28.760
<v Speaker 1>you did arguably invent the idea of grabbing a coupon

0:34:28.920 --> 0:34:32.719
<v Speaker 1>in some form of optionality into the future with convertibles

0:34:32.719 --> 0:34:36.960
<v Speaker 1>and preferreds. Tell me about total return right now within

0:34:37.000 --> 0:34:42.440
<v Speaker 1>a melt up? Should I pay respect to total return? Um? Yeah,

0:34:42.640 --> 0:34:45.040
<v Speaker 1>we should, you know, should always pay respect to total return.

0:34:45.080 --> 0:34:48.000
<v Speaker 1>I was looking back up, you know, at some of

0:34:48.080 --> 0:34:50.800
<v Speaker 1>the securities I got to own when I started the

0:34:50.840 --> 0:34:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Fidelity Convertible Securities Final and comparing UH yields and dividends

0:34:55.640 --> 0:34:58.879
<v Speaker 1>and the convertible market to now, and it's it's it's

0:34:58.920 --> 0:35:04.040
<v Speaker 1>an entirely different solar system. Back then, convertibles UH just

0:35:04.120 --> 0:35:06.319
<v Speaker 1>traded not so much on all the Greeks, but they

0:35:06.360 --> 0:35:11.680
<v Speaker 1>actually traded on yield relative to premium. They were spectacular securities.

0:35:11.719 --> 0:35:13.879
<v Speaker 1>They were the best that if you look back over

0:35:13.920 --> 0:35:16.400
<v Speaker 1>that period, I think the Convertible Securities Fund was one

0:35:16.440 --> 0:35:19.760
<v Speaker 1>of the best funds in the country. That's all changed,

0:35:20.160 --> 0:35:25.640
<v Speaker 1>that's obviously all changed, and with great still silly low um,

0:35:25.680 --> 0:35:28.719
<v Speaker 1>a lot of those games have moved on. Do you

0:35:28.800 --> 0:35:33.200
<v Speaker 1>assume when we normalize at some point Bill Gross would

0:35:33.200 --> 0:35:35.800
<v Speaker 1>suggest it's going to be years out, decades out, Others

0:35:35.800 --> 0:35:39.480
<v Speaker 1>would say tomorrow. But when we normalize, do you just

0:35:39.600 --> 0:35:44.320
<v Speaker 1>assume bond prices move, sell sell sells and the only

0:35:44.320 --> 0:35:50.480
<v Speaker 1>place to find protection is equities, you know, normalized um.

0:35:50.760 --> 0:35:52.719
<v Speaker 1>You know. One of the series that I keep is

0:35:52.800 --> 0:35:56.399
<v Speaker 1>that over a long period of time, the twenty year

0:35:56.480 --> 0:36:00.279
<v Speaker 1>government bond UH is attracted to the nominal g DP.

0:36:00.600 --> 0:36:02.960
<v Speaker 1>It's like a magnet. It doesn't happen as you know,

0:36:03.080 --> 0:36:06.080
<v Speaker 1>these things take some time to work, but over long

0:36:06.120 --> 0:36:10.600
<v Speaker 1>periods of time, that's the magnet. So people can think

0:36:10.680 --> 0:36:13.920
<v Speaker 1>what their nominal GDP estimate is right now on the

0:36:13.920 --> 0:36:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg you can look and say that for the gues

0:36:17.280 --> 0:36:21.799
<v Speaker 1>estimates are that nominal will be about five. Well, if

0:36:21.800 --> 0:36:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the if the your bond actually gets the five were

0:36:25.520 --> 0:36:28.000
<v Speaker 1>in trouble and a lot of asset classes, so it

0:36:28.040 --> 0:36:31.080
<v Speaker 1>will take time. UM and it will take a lot

0:36:31.120 --> 0:36:33.400
<v Speaker 1>of action by the FETE, because this still may be

0:36:33.560 --> 0:36:36.920
<v Speaker 1>the easiest fed ever. Yes, you just quickly about the

0:36:36.920 --> 0:36:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Trump trade will come back. But what do you what

0:36:39.400 --> 0:36:42.120
<v Speaker 1>do you make of the Trump trade that we've seen, uh,

0:36:42.200 --> 0:36:44.200
<v Speaker 1>and and the life that it had here and now

0:36:44.200 --> 0:36:45.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of reckoning I think with the reality of the

0:36:45.960 --> 0:36:47.319
<v Speaker 1>fact that tax form is going to take a lot

0:36:47.360 --> 0:36:50.600
<v Speaker 1>of time to get downe. Yeah, that's that's one of

0:36:50.600 --> 0:36:53.640
<v Speaker 1>the things I've written about recently in Forbes that you

0:36:53.680 --> 0:36:56.120
<v Speaker 1>can measure. I mean, I think people understand the Trump

0:36:56.200 --> 0:37:00.160
<v Speaker 1>trade now is coming back. Uh. The idea is going

0:37:00.200 --> 0:37:02.600
<v Speaker 1>to get a full economic cycle, which is before in

0:37:02.600 --> 0:37:04.880
<v Speaker 1>the corner of what was called the new normal, it

0:37:04.960 --> 0:37:07.800
<v Speaker 1>really was nothing we'd seen before. Now I think people

0:37:07.840 --> 0:37:11.239
<v Speaker 1>are imagining a full economic cycle. By that, I mean

0:37:11.719 --> 0:37:15.640
<v Speaker 1>animal spirits, banks making loans to people that really shouldn't

0:37:15.640 --> 0:37:17.120
<v Speaker 1>get them and they don't pay it back, and so

0:37:17.200 --> 0:37:20.239
<v Speaker 1>on and so forth, some inflation of fat eventually having

0:37:20.280 --> 0:37:22.360
<v Speaker 1>to take the punch ball away. That's a full economic

0:37:22.400 --> 0:37:26.080
<v Speaker 1>cycle that we could only dream about when the Trump

0:37:26.120 --> 0:37:29.120
<v Speaker 1>trade started. Right now, what we see in the Trump

0:37:29.160 --> 0:37:33.560
<v Speaker 1>trade is an enormous uh increase in the confidence surveys.

0:37:33.600 --> 0:37:36.040
<v Speaker 1>So surveys. Surveys are way up no matter how you

0:37:36.080 --> 0:37:39.200
<v Speaker 1>look at them. The national um, small business surveys Michigan,

0:37:39.640 --> 0:37:42.399
<v Speaker 1>you know the conference board, but it's a long way

0:37:42.440 --> 0:37:45.880
<v Speaker 1>from there to actual economic um growth. Right now, with

0:37:46.000 --> 0:37:48.680
<v Speaker 1>this bomb Habor, many of you older know the name

0:37:48.760 --> 0:37:53.880
<v Speaker 1>from Fidelity ages ago in convertible securities and preferreds Bob

0:37:53.880 --> 0:37:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Abor with Proficio and of course are not in acquaintance

0:37:56.880 --> 0:38:00.200
<v Speaker 1>with a basketball team from Boston as well. But I

0:38:00.239 --> 0:38:02.600
<v Speaker 1>want to go back to dividends. I believe Mr Lynch

0:38:02.640 --> 0:38:06.240
<v Speaker 1>paid homage to dividends and be Tina Dalton, Will Danoff

0:38:06.239 --> 0:38:10.240
<v Speaker 1>would pay attentions. But now dividend and dividend growth borders

0:38:10.320 --> 0:38:13.919
<v Speaker 1>on religion. How does Bob Behavior respond to the new

0:38:13.960 --> 0:38:19.120
<v Speaker 1>religion that is, dividends are a yield equivalent. Yeah, I

0:38:19.120 --> 0:38:23.920
<v Speaker 1>won't surprise you that our our families UM like yield.

0:38:24.200 --> 0:38:27.080
<v Speaker 1>I like dividend yield. Uh, but we've got to be

0:38:27.120 --> 0:38:30.879
<v Speaker 1>careful where we source it from. Uh. So we've kind

0:38:30.920 --> 0:38:34.520
<v Speaker 1>of come off some of the traditional names and utilities

0:38:34.560 --> 0:38:38.919
<v Speaker 1>and telecom and right now we think people might want

0:38:38.920 --> 0:38:43.080
<v Speaker 1>to take a look at the MLPs and own them individually.

0:38:43.120 --> 0:38:45.560
<v Speaker 1>If they can because there's some good tax benefits. So

0:38:46.200 --> 0:38:48.680
<v Speaker 1>that looks like an area that's had a you know,

0:38:48.719 --> 0:38:53.520
<v Speaker 1>it's had a complete flame out, it's stabilized. And the

0:38:53.600 --> 0:38:57.080
<v Speaker 1>parts of the Trump agenda that looked to be moving

0:38:57.160 --> 0:39:01.359
<v Speaker 1>forward include infrastructure, which tends to include a lot of

0:39:01.360 --> 0:39:04.719
<v Speaker 1>pipelines and the types of stuff the MLPs are involved in.

0:39:04.800 --> 0:39:08.800
<v Speaker 1>So that's an area that we really um are excited about.

0:39:09.000 --> 0:39:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Help me understand how you're regarding volatility right now, I

0:39:11.360 --> 0:39:14.239
<v Speaker 1>look at the vixit of you hovering around eleven. What

0:39:14.280 --> 0:39:15.239
<v Speaker 1>do you make of that? What do you make a

0:39:15.320 --> 0:39:19.200
<v Speaker 1>volatility at this moment? Yeah, so that's both vote both

0:39:19.200 --> 0:39:24.600
<v Speaker 1>for treasuries and um for equities. Almost vix is almost

0:39:24.960 --> 0:39:29.400
<v Speaker 1>record low and treasury volatility is low, so you know,

0:39:29.480 --> 0:39:32.560
<v Speaker 1>it makes UM. It's an opportunity that the market can

0:39:32.560 --> 0:39:35.279
<v Speaker 1>give you. So it's also an indicator. It's not it's

0:39:35.280 --> 0:39:37.120
<v Speaker 1>not an indicator of higher price is usually it's an

0:39:37.120 --> 0:39:40.080
<v Speaker 1>indicator of of you know, a yellow light of caution.

0:39:40.600 --> 0:39:43.680
<v Speaker 1>But just for example, one trade you know that we're

0:39:43.719 --> 0:39:47.919
<v Speaker 1>looking at that people could consider is you can take

0:39:47.960 --> 0:39:50.520
<v Speaker 1>out a lot of capital in the market by some

0:39:50.600 --> 0:39:54.120
<v Speaker 1>short term investment grade paper and combine that with very

0:39:54.200 --> 0:39:58.359
<v Speaker 1>cheap call options and get yourself a terrific asymmetric risk

0:39:58.480 --> 0:40:01.879
<v Speaker 1>trade where you virtually have no downside over a couple

0:40:01.920 --> 0:40:04.480
<v Speaker 1>of three years if you pick the credit correctly, and

0:40:04.560 --> 0:40:07.359
<v Speaker 1>you'll ride in something like three quarters or eight percent

0:40:07.440 --> 0:40:10.440
<v Speaker 1>of the upside. So we try and look for opportunities

0:40:10.480 --> 0:40:13.960
<v Speaker 1>when the market is at these you know, whatever extremes.

0:40:13.960 --> 0:40:17.040
<v Speaker 1>How different is this post election environment than those in

0:40:17.040 --> 0:40:18.400
<v Speaker 1>the past. He had a great line, I think in

0:40:18.400 --> 0:40:20.200
<v Speaker 1>a recent column of your as you said, the twist

0:40:20.280 --> 0:40:22.360
<v Speaker 1>and turns have already begun, because twisty is going to

0:40:22.400 --> 0:40:25.600
<v Speaker 1>be the new reality as you're allocating, as you're looking

0:40:25.600 --> 0:40:30.319
<v Speaker 1>at portfolios. What's different about this moment in time? Well,

0:40:30.400 --> 0:40:34.960
<v Speaker 1>I think what's different is where seven years into a

0:40:35.040 --> 0:40:39.719
<v Speaker 1>bull market and an economic cycle, and just now the

0:40:39.760 --> 0:40:43.000
<v Speaker 1>market seems to want to think we're entering a full

0:40:43.040 --> 0:40:48.440
<v Speaker 1>economic cycle, and assets are expensive, almost all are expensive.

0:40:48.480 --> 0:40:53.440
<v Speaker 1>So we think hedging or thoughts about hedging and really

0:40:53.480 --> 0:40:57.359
<v Speaker 1>paying attention to sentiment are important. But help me here

0:40:57.800 --> 0:41:01.640
<v Speaker 1>with the double digit realities is too thousand nine and

0:41:01.719 --> 0:41:05.279
<v Speaker 1>the cult of a single digit return and actual assumptions

0:41:05.320 --> 0:41:08.759
<v Speaker 1>going down down. We saw Harvard Management step aside from

0:41:08.800 --> 0:41:12.040
<v Speaker 1>fancy investments. I guess to go back to something where

0:41:12.080 --> 0:41:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Bob behabor vanilla, what what what do we do now

0:41:16.640 --> 0:41:19.799
<v Speaker 1>to catch up if we haven't been in a buy

0:41:19.880 --> 0:41:25.839
<v Speaker 1>and holding on the SMP. Yeah, so you know, I'm sure,

0:41:25.920 --> 0:41:27.879
<v Speaker 1>as you know better than me, that you'd never want

0:41:27.920 --> 0:41:30.520
<v Speaker 1>to feel like you've got to catch up. Um. And

0:41:30.600 --> 0:41:35.440
<v Speaker 1>so what we believe in, what we preach is extreme diversification,

0:41:35.600 --> 0:41:40.000
<v Speaker 1>especially at this point in time. So we have holdings

0:41:40.040 --> 0:41:45.520
<v Speaker 1>in equities, bonds, commodities, precious metals, and then truly uncorrelated

0:41:45.640 --> 0:41:50.640
<v Speaker 1>assets as well. And at this point, because the future

0:41:50.680 --> 0:41:53.000
<v Speaker 1>really is so cloudy and so many things are at

0:41:53.120 --> 0:41:56.440
<v Speaker 1>extreme uh, that that's the way we've approached it. We

0:41:56.480 --> 0:41:59.840
<v Speaker 1>think there's value in holding all of those and getting

0:41:59.840 --> 0:42:01.400
<v Speaker 1>an I get of co variance and all those are

0:42:01.400 --> 0:42:04.359
<v Speaker 1>the kind of great mass things and getting h looked

0:42:04.440 --> 0:42:07.200
<v Speaker 1>to risk adjusted return because if you try and catch up,

0:42:07.239 --> 0:42:10.200
<v Speaker 1>if you've missed the bolmarket train catch up, um, you're

0:42:10.200 --> 0:42:14.840
<v Speaker 1>buying everything at very expensive prices. How do you define

0:42:15.080 --> 0:42:19.560
<v Speaker 1>or discover or use a risk adjusted approach, say a

0:42:19.680 --> 0:42:23.960
<v Speaker 1>sharp ratio approach in a time of financial distortion? Do

0:42:24.000 --> 0:42:29.920
<v Speaker 1>you plug in your own guestimate. We we only use

0:42:30.000 --> 0:42:33.959
<v Speaker 1>instruments that have reasonably long trading histories, and that means

0:42:33.960 --> 0:42:37.400
<v Speaker 1>they've got to they must have gone through the you know,

0:42:37.480 --> 0:42:42.120
<v Speaker 1>the recent financial turbulence, so that we can check out

0:42:42.200 --> 0:42:45.480
<v Speaker 1>if they are truly uncorrelated, because as you know, in

0:42:45.520 --> 0:42:48.920
<v Speaker 1>those periods, everything the correlations go to one. So we

0:42:49.000 --> 0:42:51.319
<v Speaker 1>want to make sure we try and battle test it

0:42:51.400 --> 0:42:53.880
<v Speaker 1>that way. And then we use a common sense test,

0:42:54.280 --> 0:42:58.319
<v Speaker 1>so when we buy catastrophe bonds for people, we think, well,

0:42:58.400 --> 0:43:02.000
<v Speaker 1>that really is just common sense, not correlated to the

0:43:02.000 --> 0:43:05.200
<v Speaker 1>equity market. So it's a combination of the mass to

0:43:05.280 --> 0:43:08.200
<v Speaker 1>science and common sense. At the top of the segment

0:43:08.239 --> 0:43:10.000
<v Speaker 1>here Tom mentioned that you taught a course of Tufts

0:43:10.000 --> 0:43:12.600
<v Speaker 1>on the history of the Federal Reserve. Uh, and I

0:43:12.600 --> 0:43:14.360
<v Speaker 1>don't need to tell you. We're a very interesting moment

0:43:14.360 --> 0:43:16.800
<v Speaker 1>for the FED. As Jannet Young prepares to testify on

0:43:16.840 --> 0:43:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Capitol Hill today, we had the resignation of Dan Tarulo

0:43:19.120 --> 0:43:21.359
<v Speaker 1>on on Friday. There are three seats to be filled

0:43:21.400 --> 0:43:24.359
<v Speaker 1>here filled on the Board of Governors. Let's look back

0:43:24.400 --> 0:43:27.080
<v Speaker 1>and look forward, and what does history tell us about

0:43:27.080 --> 0:43:30.480
<v Speaker 1>where the FEED is headed? Do you think the FED

0:43:30.560 --> 0:43:34.560
<v Speaker 1>has entered a tightening cycle, right, so the pace of which, uh,

0:43:35.080 --> 0:43:37.319
<v Speaker 1>you can have like a thousand shows on. But we

0:43:37.360 --> 0:43:40.560
<v Speaker 1>know what the direction is. It's a tightening cycle. But

0:43:40.680 --> 0:43:45.120
<v Speaker 1>it is so incredibly easy because of the excess reserve amount.

0:43:45.920 --> 0:43:48.640
<v Speaker 1>That is no history on this. It's this is all

0:43:49.040 --> 0:43:51.839
<v Speaker 1>the great human experiment the FED has created for us.

0:43:51.880 --> 0:43:55.240
<v Speaker 1>So we know the direction, but we have no idea

0:43:55.480 --> 0:43:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the time frame, and and and the other you know,

0:43:58.120 --> 0:44:00.319
<v Speaker 1>some of the other factors. Bob Heyri thinks so much,

0:44:00.360 --> 0:44:03.719
<v Speaker 1>greatly appreciated for years with fidelity, Bob behavior with Officio

0:44:04.400 --> 0:44:07.000
<v Speaker 1>UH and of course his work on the Pillow Reserve

0:44:07.040 --> 0:44:18.320
<v Speaker 1>at Tough University of Note as well. Thanks for listening

0:44:18.440 --> 0:44:23.120
<v Speaker 1>to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen to interviews

0:44:23.239 --> 0:44:28.600
<v Speaker 1>on iTunes, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast platform you prefer. I'm

0:44:28.600 --> 0:44:31.560
<v Speaker 1>out on Twitter at Tom Keene. David Gura is at

0:44:31.719 --> 0:44:36.040
<v Speaker 1>David Gura. Before the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide.

0:44:36.520 --> 0:44:52.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm Bloomberg Radio, brought you by Bank of America Mary Lynch,

0:44:52.520 --> 0:44:56.799
<v Speaker 1>dedicated to bringing our clients insights and solutions to meet

0:44:56.800 --> 0:45:00.160
<v Speaker 1>the challenges of a transforming world. That's the po were

0:45:00.280 --> 0:45:04.920
<v Speaker 1>of global connections. Mary Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith Incorporated,

0:45:05.080 --> 0:45:06.719
<v Speaker 1>Member s i p C,