WEBVTT - #567 Packers Unscripted: Focus up front

0:00:00.840 --> 0:00:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Hi, everybody. Welcome to another edition of Packers Unscripted from

0:00:14.360 --> 0:00:17.799
<v Speaker 1>Packers dot Com. I am Mike Spofford, joined as always

0:00:17.840 --> 0:00:20.959
<v Speaker 1>by my trusted colleague West had Kowitz. I'm coming to

0:00:20.960 --> 0:00:23.639
<v Speaker 1>you from our studio at lambeau Field West is across

0:00:23.680 --> 0:00:29.120
<v Speaker 1>the hall as we continue our zoom oriented shows here West.

0:00:29.400 --> 0:00:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Sunday afternoon, three pm Central time kickoff, the Philadelphia Eagles

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:37.560
<v Speaker 1>will take on the green Bay Packers at lambeau Field.

0:00:38.080 --> 0:00:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay is eight and three, trying to get to

0:00:40.640 --> 0:00:44.800
<v Speaker 1>nine and three at the three quarter pole of the

0:00:45.640 --> 0:00:48.360
<v Speaker 1>regular season. So let's get right into it. What is

0:00:48.400 --> 0:00:50.760
<v Speaker 1>it going to take? What are the keys to victory

0:00:50.840 --> 0:00:53.519
<v Speaker 1>here for green Bay against Philly. Well, I like that

0:00:53.560 --> 0:00:55.520
<v Speaker 1>you said three quarter pole. We always do the first

0:00:55.600 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 1>quarter pole, and it seems like we always abandoned it.

0:00:59.520 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 1>I did that just for your benefit. Thank you. I

0:01:01.760 --> 0:01:04.520
<v Speaker 1>appreciate that. Um, you know, for the green Bay Packers,

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:06.560
<v Speaker 1>I look at this matchup a lot. In a lot

0:01:06.600 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 1>of ways, Mike, is very similar to last week's game

0:01:08.840 --> 0:01:10.880
<v Speaker 1>against the Chicago Bears and what they need to do

0:01:10.920 --> 0:01:15.039
<v Speaker 1>and what has to happen now. The interesting thing about

0:01:15.120 --> 0:01:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Philadelphia is for is up and down as their seasons

0:01:18.400 --> 0:01:21.640
<v Speaker 1>has been. For as many injuries as they've had, specifically

0:01:21.640 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Speaker 1>on the offensive side of the ball and even more

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 1>specifically on the offensive line, they've kind of been in

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:29.039
<v Speaker 1>the front running spot of the division for most of

0:01:29.040 --> 0:01:31.840
<v Speaker 1>the season. Now they finally fall out of that. So

0:01:32.280 --> 0:01:33.920
<v Speaker 1>you can look at the records, you can talk about

0:01:33.920 --> 0:01:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the records in the NFC East. The truth of the

0:01:35.560 --> 0:01:39.440
<v Speaker 1>matter is that the standpoint of where we're talking, there's

0:01:39.440 --> 0:01:42.880
<v Speaker 1>still very much in the playoff hunts. So I think

0:01:42.920 --> 0:01:45.240
<v Speaker 1>green Bay in this matchup, it really comes down to

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:48.560
<v Speaker 1>again establishing the run, being able to get yards off

0:01:48.600 --> 0:01:51.120
<v Speaker 1>of a Philadelphia defense that is you wrote about, you know,

0:01:51.160 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Speaker 1>has still been playing pretty well this year. Doug Peterson

0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:56.640
<v Speaker 1>even mentioned during his conference called with Green Bay media

0:01:56.640 --> 0:01:58.680
<v Speaker 1>on Wednesday that, you know a lot of ways they've

0:01:58.720 --> 0:02:00.440
<v Speaker 1>been the ones that have sort of paced this year

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:04.639
<v Speaker 1>when you talk about playing you know, full complete football. Uh,

0:02:04.680 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 1>it has really been that the defense that has set

0:02:07.000 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the tone. But for green Bay, I just thought they

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:12.040
<v Speaker 1>really set the blueprint last week. You start out fast,

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 1>you you'd be efficient with the ball, you protect the football,

0:02:14.760 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 1>you get a couple of takeaways. Greenby has had at

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:19.200
<v Speaker 1>least one now in the last four games a total.

0:02:19.320 --> 0:02:22.600
<v Speaker 1>During that time, Carson Wentz has been turning over the

0:02:22.600 --> 0:02:25.920
<v Speaker 1>ball at a pretty prolific rate for two thousand and twenty.

0:02:26.320 --> 0:02:28.160
<v Speaker 1>There's so many things in this matchup that I think

0:02:28.160 --> 0:02:30.840
<v Speaker 1>all signs point to Green Bay, but you actually have

0:02:30.880 --> 0:02:32.440
<v Speaker 1>to go out there and execute that the way they

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 1>did against the Bears in order to take that a reality. Yeah,

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:37.880
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting that you draw the parallel with the Bears

0:02:37.919 --> 0:02:40.799
<v Speaker 1>game because I see that as well from the standpoint

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:44.359
<v Speaker 1>that this Philadelphia Eagles team has a legit top ten

0:02:44.440 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 1>defense and the Chicago Bears at last week, the strength

0:02:48.240 --> 0:02:50.480
<v Speaker 1>of their team in trying to stay in the playoff

0:02:50.480 --> 0:02:53.720
<v Speaker 1>fronto the NFC has been their defense. On the flip side,

0:02:54.320 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 1>it's an offense that has struggled in Philadelphia. They haven't

0:02:57.280 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>really found their footing. You know, you mentioned the injury

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:03.359
<v Speaker 1>reason on the offensive line. They've also just in terms

0:03:03.400 --> 0:03:05.760
<v Speaker 1>of establishing who are the really who are the go

0:03:05.919 --> 0:03:09.959
<v Speaker 1>to guys for Carson Wentz um as the quarterback of

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:13.720
<v Speaker 1>this Eagle's offense, they haven't really found that. And you know,

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:17.200
<v Speaker 1>much like the Bears have been struggling on offense for

0:03:17.240 --> 0:03:20.160
<v Speaker 1>the bulk of the season. When I look at this game,

0:03:20.200 --> 0:03:23.200
<v Speaker 1>I look at a couple of statistics that jump out

0:03:23.200 --> 0:03:26.440
<v Speaker 1>at me. One is that Carson Wentz has been sacked

0:03:26.440 --> 0:03:29.720
<v Speaker 1>forty six times this year, which leads the NFL. The

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:33.800
<v Speaker 1>other is that the Philadelphia Eagles defensively have thirty six sacks,

0:03:33.840 --> 0:03:37.760
<v Speaker 1>which is tied for second in the NFL. So, as

0:03:37.800 --> 0:03:40.920
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned on our Three Things video yesterday, this game

0:03:41.040 --> 0:03:42.840
<v Speaker 1>just kind of kind of jumps out at me from

0:03:42.880 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 1>a matchup perspective, as protect your quarterback, get after the

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:50.400
<v Speaker 1>other guy's quarterback. That that's what That's what this game,

0:03:50.560 --> 0:03:52.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of screams at you. And you know,

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 1>I like the Packers chances in that respect because we've

0:03:55.320 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 1>seen Green Bay's offensive line handle injuries, position, shuffling, everything

0:04:00.000 --> 0:04:03.600
<v Speaker 1>else throughout the course of the season, and Philly's offensive

0:04:03.640 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 1>line has has not handled that nearly as well. I

0:04:06.360 --> 0:04:09.680
<v Speaker 1>think the Packers have a big edge in the in

0:04:09.720 --> 0:04:12.640
<v Speaker 1>the trenches in terms of the offensive lines in this matchup,

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:15.200
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's really what should what should hopefully

0:04:15.240 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 1>carry green madea victory well, and this is what hurts

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 1>for for the Eagles too, is that Mike, you know

0:04:20.120 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 1>you and I mentioned There's a lot of different shuffling

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:25.320
<v Speaker 1>and injuries that have happened with the line this year,

0:04:25.320 --> 0:04:27.520
<v Speaker 1>but for the most part, they've been able to get

0:04:27.520 --> 0:04:30.599
<v Speaker 1>most guys back. Lane Taylor obviously was lost for the

0:04:30.600 --> 0:04:34.120
<v Speaker 1>season to his knee injury in Week one, but you know,

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:35.840
<v Speaker 1>as David Bactieri was out of the line up for

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, Billy Turner missed a game. Now you're

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:42.240
<v Speaker 1>dealing with Corey Linsley and the knee injury, but again

0:04:42.440 --> 0:04:44.359
<v Speaker 1>the Packers are hopeful that he won't be done for

0:04:44.400 --> 0:04:47.279
<v Speaker 1>the season. For the Eagles, they have been so fortunate.

0:04:47.320 --> 0:04:50.240
<v Speaker 1>Now they just lost Lane Johnson again. And the other

0:04:50.279 --> 0:04:53.120
<v Speaker 1>side of things too. You go back to Andre Dillard

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:56.679
<v Speaker 1>missing time. I mean, Brandon Brooks has been out still

0:04:56.720 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 1>on pup hasn't played this season. That those are three

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:02.480
<v Speaker 1>big components of their line that they've not had throw

0:05:02.520 --> 0:05:06.360
<v Speaker 1>and Zach Ertz and these other issues. But that the statistics, Mike,

0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:08.279
<v Speaker 1>when they when you look at them, they just their

0:05:08.320 --> 0:05:11.039
<v Speaker 1>mind boggling for the Eagles this season. I mean, you

0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:14.000
<v Speaker 1>have Carson Wentz at forty six sacks. I think the

0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 1>next closest is Brussel Wilson with maybe thirty five the

0:05:18.400 --> 0:05:22.040
<v Speaker 1>takeaway numbers fifteen interceptions, there's three other quarterbacks that are

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:26.600
<v Speaker 1>tied with eleven. Uh. You know, from Doug Peterson's perspective,

0:05:26.600 --> 0:05:28.599
<v Speaker 1>he boiled it down to three things. It comes down

0:05:28.600 --> 0:05:31.360
<v Speaker 1>to takeaways, there's been too many of them. He comes

0:05:31.360 --> 0:05:33.320
<v Speaker 1>down to injuries, and then he mentions it's just the

0:05:33.360 --> 0:05:36.159
<v Speaker 1>overall execution. When they have protected the football, they just

0:05:36.200 --> 0:05:39.360
<v Speaker 1>haven't produced enough. So seeing exactly what this game plan

0:05:39.480 --> 0:05:41.000
<v Speaker 1>is gonna look like for them, you know, do you

0:05:41.040 --> 0:05:43.520
<v Speaker 1>see Jalen Hurts in this matchup? Are they more committed

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:46.600
<v Speaker 1>to Miles Sanders in this game? And they get Travis

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Fulham going again after he had an impressive part of

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:52.680
<v Speaker 1>the season. But it's kind of gotten quiet here. There's

0:05:52.720 --> 0:05:55.160
<v Speaker 1>so many different things that play into this, but ultimately

0:05:55.279 --> 0:05:57.240
<v Speaker 1>it's going to come down to the turnover margin and

0:05:57.240 --> 0:05:59.479
<v Speaker 1>whether or not Green they can keep their takeaways coming

0:05:59.800 --> 0:06:02.360
<v Speaker 1>and also prevent take you know, giving up the ball

0:06:02.680 --> 0:06:06.800
<v Speaker 1>to a very talented Philadelphia and experience. Yeah, and the

0:06:06.839 --> 0:06:09.680
<v Speaker 1>other thing when you talk about injuries. Now, at the

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:12.440
<v Speaker 1>time we're taping this episode on Thursday morning, we don't

0:06:12.480 --> 0:06:14.920
<v Speaker 1>really know a whole heck of a lot. But Fletcher

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Cox in the middle of that defensive line for the Eagles.

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:20.359
<v Speaker 1>He missed practice on Wednesday. He cropped up on the

0:06:20.400 --> 0:06:23.120
<v Speaker 1>injury report with a neck injury. Not a whole lot

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:25.400
<v Speaker 1>of information right now is to how serious. It is

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:28.359
<v Speaker 1>not entirely unusual for a team coming off of a

0:06:28.360 --> 0:06:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Monday night game to add some guys to the injury report,

0:06:31.320 --> 0:06:33.360
<v Speaker 1>and maybe they won't practice until later in the week,

0:06:33.440 --> 0:06:36.599
<v Speaker 1>so we'll see what happens. But you know, the Packers

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:39.160
<v Speaker 1>caught a break when a Chem Hicks was not available

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:42.480
<v Speaker 1>due to his hamstring injury for the Chicago game. If

0:06:42.520 --> 0:06:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Fletcher Cox is not available for the Philadelphia Eagles, you know,

0:06:47.440 --> 0:06:50.599
<v Speaker 1>that's that's another potential stroke of good fortune here. Now

0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:54.159
<v Speaker 1>that being said, I think, you know, Philadelphia certainly has

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the edge rushers with Brandon Graham and Derek Barnett. You know,

0:06:58.120 --> 0:07:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Javonna Hargrave is the other defensive tackle in the middle

0:07:00.800 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 1>of that front four. Those guys are no slouches either.

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 1>But again, the you know, the Bears have a heck

0:07:06.560 --> 0:07:09.880
<v Speaker 1>of a front four, and when a Chem Hicks was missing,

0:07:10.120 --> 0:07:12.160
<v Speaker 1>the Chicago Bears just didn't look the same. And you

0:07:12.200 --> 0:07:15.240
<v Speaker 1>wonder if Fletcher Cox is unable to go. How much

0:07:15.240 --> 0:07:18.400
<v Speaker 1>of a change to this Philly defense, which is ninth

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:21.120
<v Speaker 1>in the league in total yards, which is fifth in

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:23.240
<v Speaker 1>the league I believe, or tied for fifth and third

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 1>down defense. You wonder how much that would change things

0:07:26.320 --> 0:07:28.800
<v Speaker 1>based on what we saw with Chicago last week. And

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:30.720
<v Speaker 1>there's just no way to replace him that. That's the

0:07:30.720 --> 0:07:33.040
<v Speaker 1>other thing with Hicks, you know, there's just there's there's

0:07:33.240 --> 0:07:35.760
<v Speaker 1>no guys that played the position the way that Fletcher

0:07:35.760 --> 0:07:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Cox plays it. I'm not talking about in Philadelphia, I'm

0:07:38.320 --> 0:07:40.880
<v Speaker 1>talking the National Football League right now. He is among

0:07:41.400 --> 0:07:44.400
<v Speaker 1>a handful of defensive tackles that can not only stop

0:07:44.440 --> 0:07:46.360
<v Speaker 1>the run, but can also get after the past or two.

0:07:46.800 --> 0:07:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Remember Mike exactly where he is on sacks for them

0:07:49.200 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 1>this season? Yeah, he he has five and a half.

0:07:51.960 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 1>He's second right now behind Brandon Graham and sacks. I mean,

0:07:55.240 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 1>that's the dimension he brings to this thing. He is

0:07:57.480 --> 0:07:59.880
<v Speaker 1>just such a force in the middle of that defense.

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 1>As you said to neck injuries are so weird when

0:08:02.480 --> 0:08:04.720
<v Speaker 1>they pop up on the injury report because they can

0:08:04.760 --> 0:08:07.440
<v Speaker 1>be you know, your basic stingers or those type of

0:08:07.440 --> 0:08:09.480
<v Speaker 1>things where guys just take a day off. I think

0:08:09.520 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Kamal Martin had a neck injury on the Packers injury report.

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Not a big deal, or it can be something that

0:08:14.640 --> 0:08:18.200
<v Speaker 1>crops up like Daniel Hunter did, where at first they're thinking, Okay,

0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:20.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe this is something they can play through. Next thing

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:22.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're talking about fusion surgery. So it's so

0:08:23.000 --> 0:08:25.360
<v Speaker 1>vague and ambiguous. We don't know when we're talking about

0:08:25.400 --> 0:08:27.040
<v Speaker 1>this right now, exactly what the week is going to

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:29.640
<v Speaker 1>forecast for him, but certainly Cox being on there. It

0:08:29.680 --> 0:08:32.040
<v Speaker 1>was a short injury report for the Eagles, but a

0:08:32.080 --> 0:08:36.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of guys on that list that are their premier players. Yeah, well,

0:08:36.240 --> 0:08:39.840
<v Speaker 1>quickly here West before I forget some sponsored business. Serious

0:08:40.080 --> 0:08:44.080
<v Speaker 1>x M NFL Radio channel is the only radio outlet

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:46.960
<v Speaker 1>dedicated to the National Football League seven days a week,

0:08:47.440 --> 0:08:50.760
<v Speaker 1>three hundred sixty five days a year, and Packers fans

0:08:50.880 --> 0:08:54.080
<v Speaker 1>score up to five hundred dollars for your devotion to

0:08:54.120 --> 0:08:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the pack when you open a Packers checking account from

0:08:56.920 --> 0:09:00.559
<v Speaker 1>Associated Bank. Learn more at Associated bank dot com. Um

0:09:00.600 --> 0:09:04.600
<v Speaker 1>backslash Packers. All right, another thing we we should uh

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:06.880
<v Speaker 1>talk about here before we move on to the rest

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:10.600
<v Speaker 1>of the schedule in the NFL. For this week, Packers

0:09:10.640 --> 0:09:14.400
<v Speaker 1>have a new addition to their offense, and I'm talking

0:09:14.400 --> 0:09:18.160
<v Speaker 1>about wide receiver Tavon Austin. Packers have signed him, brought

0:09:18.240 --> 0:09:21.000
<v Speaker 1>him into the mix. He did a zoom call with

0:09:21.120 --> 0:09:26.600
<v Speaker 1>reporters on Wednesday after practice. This is an interesting addition

0:09:26.720 --> 0:09:30.000
<v Speaker 1>here West because much like last year, at this time,

0:09:30.320 --> 0:09:32.360
<v Speaker 1>the Packers are looking for some kind of a boost

0:09:32.400 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 1>on special teams, some kind of a spark for the

0:09:34.960 --> 0:09:37.959
<v Speaker 1>return game, because the Packers just had not been able

0:09:38.000 --> 0:09:41.200
<v Speaker 1>to uh, you know, to bust any explosive you know,

0:09:41.480 --> 0:09:45.840
<v Speaker 1>impactful returns so far this year. And we saw last

0:09:45.880 --> 0:09:47.960
<v Speaker 1>year when Tyler Irvin was the guy who came in

0:09:48.040 --> 0:09:51.400
<v Speaker 1>and early December and provided that Matt Lafleur wasted no

0:09:51.559 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 1>time whatsoever in getting him involved in the offense and

0:09:55.160 --> 0:09:59.240
<v Speaker 1>the jet motions and having some packages for for Irvin

0:09:59.600 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 1>down stretch in um this green Bay offense. So what

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:05.640
<v Speaker 1>are your thoughts, I guess at this point on Tavon

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Austin and perhaps what we might see not only potentially

0:10:10.080 --> 0:10:12.480
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday, but as the month of December rolls on

0:10:12.559 --> 0:10:14.560
<v Speaker 1>here for green Bay. Yeah. I like the move for

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:16.160
<v Speaker 1>green Bay and I like the time in which they

0:10:16.200 --> 0:10:19.040
<v Speaker 1>made the move because right now Mike. The Packers are

0:10:19.040 --> 0:10:22.480
<v Speaker 1>actually been relatively healthy. It looks like al Lazard got

0:10:22.520 --> 0:10:24.120
<v Speaker 1>through whatever that issue was at the end of the

0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:26.320
<v Speaker 1>game after that hit he took from Jalen Johnson. He

0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:28.680
<v Speaker 1>was limited on Wednesday with the Corean troum, but nothing

0:10:28.760 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 1>new on that. Cleared to return, he just didn't because

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 1>of the game situation. Appears like Mark Wesveld is scantling

0:10:34.559 --> 0:10:36.960
<v Speaker 1>after a little scare with the achilles appears to be okay,

0:10:37.160 --> 0:10:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Ecunimia st Brown is getting healthier, and Tyler Irvin certainly

0:10:40.400 --> 0:10:42.120
<v Speaker 1>coming back from the rib injury. Is something we have

0:10:42.160 --> 0:10:45.240
<v Speaker 1>to continue to monitor. But all things considered, the Packers

0:10:45.360 --> 0:10:47.760
<v Speaker 1>offense is if the skill positions is as healthy as

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:50.760
<v Speaker 1>it's been all season long. So what is guy like

0:10:51.120 --> 0:10:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Tavan Austin add to this unit? He adds another option.

0:10:55.120 --> 0:10:56.800
<v Speaker 1>He adds a guy that not only can help you

0:10:56.840 --> 0:10:59.960
<v Speaker 1>potentially on returns, specifically punt returns. He's done it every

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:02.200
<v Speaker 1>year he's been in the National Football League, but he

0:11:02.240 --> 0:11:05.160
<v Speaker 1>also could potentially fit into this Matt Lafleur scheme. It's

0:11:05.160 --> 0:11:07.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of that motion guy, the pre snap guy coming

0:11:07.760 --> 0:11:10.439
<v Speaker 1>across the line. He joked about he did not run

0:11:10.440 --> 0:11:13.400
<v Speaker 1>a forty during his workout with Packers, but still feels

0:11:13.400 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 1>like he can run a four three. Now, all those

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:19.920
<v Speaker 1>things being said, him learning this offense and understanding the

0:11:20.040 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 1>nuances of it, that's going to be a big challenge here.

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 1>But you look at what Tyler Irvin did last season,

0:11:24.920 --> 0:11:29.960
<v Speaker 1>coming in late getting claim from the waivers from Jacksonville.

0:11:30.400 --> 0:11:32.880
<v Speaker 1>He brought a lot and by the time the season

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:34.400
<v Speaker 1>was over, he not only had been the guy that

0:11:34.440 --> 0:11:37.480
<v Speaker 1>helped rejuvenate the return units, he also become kind of

0:11:37.480 --> 0:11:40.160
<v Speaker 1>an interesting gadget player in this offense. I think with

0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:42.640
<v Speaker 1>having a guy like Austin in the fold now with

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:45.120
<v Speaker 1>his experience and also having some of those, you know,

0:11:45.200 --> 0:11:48.400
<v Speaker 1>those traits that Irvin has, it's another guy that's in

0:11:48.440 --> 0:11:50.520
<v Speaker 1>this equation for Matt Lafleur to play with during the

0:11:50.559 --> 0:11:53.320
<v Speaker 1>final stretch of the season and if injuries crop up

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:56.320
<v Speaker 1>down the stretch or in the playoffs, here's another veteran

0:11:56.360 --> 0:11:58.160
<v Speaker 1>presence that you have too potential to be able to

0:11:58.160 --> 0:12:01.439
<v Speaker 1>take the workload off some young guys. Yeah, Austin a

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:04.840
<v Speaker 1>guy who he's dealt with some injuries the last few

0:12:04.920 --> 0:12:07.600
<v Speaker 1>years and kind of derailed his career a little bit.

0:12:07.640 --> 0:12:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Now he does have some experience obviously with with Matt

0:12:10.640 --> 0:12:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Lafleur when la Fleur was the offensive coordinator with the Rams,

0:12:13.880 --> 0:12:17.360
<v Speaker 1>also with with Ben Sermons, the Packers running backs coach.

0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Um has some experience with him as well. Um, I'll

0:12:21.240 --> 0:12:23.800
<v Speaker 1>be interested to see just just what he brings to

0:12:23.800 --> 0:12:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the table, because you know, all the athletic ability is there. Maybe,

0:12:28.040 --> 0:12:30.080
<v Speaker 1>as he said, maybe he's not a four two guy

0:12:30.120 --> 0:12:32.400
<v Speaker 1>in the forty anymore, but he thinks he can still

0:12:32.480 --> 0:12:34.960
<v Speaker 1>run a four three. But this is a guy, this

0:12:35.040 --> 0:12:36.679
<v Speaker 1>is a guy with a lot of talent, came into

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 1>the league with a lot of pedigree as a top

0:12:38.440 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 1>ten pick, and quite frankly, he's looking for the restart

0:12:42.280 --> 0:12:44.640
<v Speaker 1>in a sense to his career. He's he's he's looking

0:12:44.640 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 1>to get things back on track. And maybe Green Bay

0:12:47.920 --> 0:12:51.200
<v Speaker 1>is uh is just the right opportunity with an offense

0:12:51.280 --> 0:12:53.880
<v Speaker 1>like Matt Lafleur's well, and that's where my battle Fleur

0:12:53.880 --> 0:12:56.160
<v Speaker 1>has had. This might as touch Mike for finding these

0:12:56.160 --> 0:12:59.319
<v Speaker 1>types of players and being able to find a niche

0:12:59.320 --> 0:13:01.480
<v Speaker 1>for them in the offensive role. And that was something

0:13:01.520 --> 0:13:04.680
<v Speaker 1>that Aaron Rodgers kind of alluded to during his conference

0:13:04.679 --> 0:13:07.560
<v Speaker 1>call with the reporters on Wednesday. The fact that, yeah,

0:13:07.559 --> 0:13:09.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, is Tavon Austin gonna be a guy that

0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:12.640
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be playing sixties snaps offensively a game. Probably not,

0:13:12.640 --> 0:13:15.920
<v Speaker 1>not at least right away. But if you can find

0:13:16.000 --> 0:13:18.760
<v Speaker 1>something that he does well and build packages off of it.

0:13:19.160 --> 0:13:21.880
<v Speaker 1>You saw what Tyler Irvin adds to this unit, especially

0:13:21.920 --> 0:13:25.080
<v Speaker 1>when he's been healthy here. I just that's the intriguing

0:13:25.120 --> 0:13:27.840
<v Speaker 1>aspect to me with this whole thing. You look at

0:13:27.880 --> 0:13:29.760
<v Speaker 1>the body types that the Green Bay Packers have on

0:13:29.800 --> 0:13:32.120
<v Speaker 1>the offensive side of the ball. You have your Mercedes

0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Lewis is of the world, just amazing physical specimens, Uh,

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Robert Tany in the tall tight end, tall receivers, and

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:40.360
<v Speaker 1>now some of these guys that fit on the other

0:13:40.360 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 1>side of the spectrum. When you look at it in

0:13:43.160 --> 0:13:45.319
<v Speaker 1>your game planning, you're creating these types of things for

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 1>opposing defenses. That's another thing that they have to think about.

0:13:48.920 --> 0:13:50.920
<v Speaker 1>But first things first, he has to get healthy here.

0:13:50.960 --> 0:13:52.800
<v Speaker 1>He has to get back in football shape, as he said,

0:13:53.520 --> 0:13:56.280
<v Speaker 1>and show that when that opportunity comes he's still very

0:13:56.360 --> 0:13:59.040
<v Speaker 1>much that first round pick that he was seven years ago. Yeah,

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:02.360
<v Speaker 1>that's definitely his objective. No, question about it. Well, I

0:14:02.400 --> 0:14:04.760
<v Speaker 1>want to get your thoughts West on a handful of

0:14:04.880 --> 0:14:08.679
<v Speaker 1>games across the league. UM, in the NFL here as

0:14:08.720 --> 0:14:10.800
<v Speaker 1>we head into the weekend, because there there are some

0:14:10.880 --> 0:14:14.000
<v Speaker 1>interesting matchups. First right in the NFC North, the Detroit

0:14:14.040 --> 0:14:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Lions at the Chicago Bears. UM. Some are calling this

0:14:17.600 --> 0:14:19.840
<v Speaker 1>the you know, the last stand for the Bears to

0:14:19.840 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 1>to say, you know, hey, we are going to be

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:24.040
<v Speaker 1>a contender. We're going to be in this thing down

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:26.920
<v Speaker 1>the stretch. They're facing a Detroit Lions team that now

0:14:27.000 --> 0:14:30.840
<v Speaker 1>has an interim head coach, the former Wisconsin Badgers Rolls

0:14:30.880 --> 0:14:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Bowl winning quarterback former Packers assistant coach Daryl Bevil now

0:14:35.200 --> 0:14:37.280
<v Speaker 1>taking the reins in Detroit. What are your thoughts on

0:14:37.320 --> 0:14:40.440
<v Speaker 1>this NFC North matchup? Must win game for the Bears, Uh,

0:14:40.520 --> 0:14:43.280
<v Speaker 1>in so many different ways. First off, to be six

0:14:43.320 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 1>and six and still keep yourself in the outside, you know,

0:14:45.760 --> 0:14:48.240
<v Speaker 1>part of the division equation, the playoff equation, you have

0:14:48.320 --> 0:14:51.120
<v Speaker 1>to get this win. But more importantly, Mike, this slide

0:14:51.120 --> 0:14:53.560
<v Speaker 1>that they've been on here. Uh, you know, now five

0:14:53.600 --> 0:14:56.520
<v Speaker 1>and six and this losing streak and not being able

0:14:56.560 --> 0:14:58.520
<v Speaker 1>to really right the ship, and they thought that maybe

0:14:58.600 --> 0:15:01.280
<v Speaker 1>they had the answer with Nick full and obviously he

0:15:01.360 --> 0:15:04.680
<v Speaker 1>led him back in that one game. But the you know,

0:15:04.760 --> 0:15:07.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of the downfall here in the month of November. Uh,

0:15:08.000 --> 0:15:11.280
<v Speaker 1>it has them really reeling here and seeing exactly where

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:13.280
<v Speaker 1>they're going to be able to fit and if Matt

0:15:13.360 --> 0:15:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Nage can kind of corral the horses here and get

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 1>this thing turned back in the right direction, because on

0:15:18.680 --> 0:15:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the other sideline that's gonna be at your own home field,

0:15:22.400 --> 0:15:24.560
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing a Detroit Lions team that just went through

0:15:24.560 --> 0:15:27.560
<v Speaker 1>an incredible amount of upheaval. Now we've covered enough of

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:29.560
<v Speaker 1>these interim coaches, Mike, We've seen it enough in the

0:15:29.640 --> 0:15:32.640
<v Speaker 1>National Football League. These things go one of two ways.

0:15:33.040 --> 0:15:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Either teams come together or they fall apart. Very rarely

0:15:36.720 --> 0:15:38.920
<v Speaker 1>is it somewhere in the middle. It's a big gut

0:15:39.000 --> 0:15:41.360
<v Speaker 1>check for both of these squads, but especially the Bears,

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:44.040
<v Speaker 1>who still want to be in that conversation for a

0:15:44.080 --> 0:15:48.760
<v Speaker 1>playoffs about here in two thousand. Well, speaking of interim coaches,

0:15:48.840 --> 0:15:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the Atlanta Falcons will be hosting the New Orleans Saints

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:54.880
<v Speaker 1>this weekend. And now the Falcons under Raheem Morris, who

0:15:54.920 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 1>took over for Dan Quinn if Todd Gurley falls down

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:03.400
<v Speaker 1>the one yard line against the Detroit Lions, the Falcons

0:16:03.400 --> 0:16:06.480
<v Speaker 1>would be five and one under Raheem Morris. And now

0:16:06.520 --> 0:16:08.960
<v Speaker 1>this is a Saints team that is a top the

0:16:09.040 --> 0:16:11.920
<v Speaker 1>NFC nine and two, one game ahead of the Packers

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:14.480
<v Speaker 1>in the Seahawks for the best record in the conference.

0:16:14.480 --> 0:16:17.080
<v Speaker 1>But the Saints do not have Drew Brees back yet

0:16:17.360 --> 0:16:21.040
<v Speaker 1>at quarterback. The Falcons coming off of a blowout win

0:16:21.320 --> 0:16:25.360
<v Speaker 1>over the Raiders last week, with many people pegging the

0:16:25.440 --> 0:16:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Raiders as a playoff contender in the a f C,

0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 1>having beaten the Chiefs earlier near and taking the Chiefs

0:16:30.960 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 1>to the wire in the rematch. So an interesting one

0:16:34.840 --> 0:16:38.360
<v Speaker 1>year with the Saints trying to stay in that top

0:16:38.400 --> 0:16:43.120
<v Speaker 1>spot in the NFC against a division rival without Drew Brees. Yeah,

0:16:43.160 --> 0:16:45.920
<v Speaker 1>and that's the biggest question here, Taysom Hill. Now that

0:16:46.000 --> 0:16:47.560
<v Speaker 1>teams have had a chance to get a couple of

0:16:47.560 --> 0:16:49.560
<v Speaker 1>weeks of film on him, how are they going to

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:52.520
<v Speaker 1>defend him? Because I always think it's too simplistic to say, well,

0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 1>if someone's been figured out, if a guy is good enough,

0:16:55.120 --> 0:16:56.680
<v Speaker 1>he're not going to be able to figure him out.

0:16:56.680 --> 0:16:59.480
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna be able to pivot and do other things. Differently,

0:16:59.560 --> 0:17:01.960
<v Speaker 1>but last week was certainly a little bit more adversity

0:17:01.960 --> 0:17:04.439
<v Speaker 1>than what he'll had grown accustomed to facing, specifically as

0:17:04.440 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 1>a passer. So how does he fare in a matchup

0:17:07.119 --> 0:17:09.560
<v Speaker 1>like this against an Atlanta Falcons team that whose defense

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:12.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, still is what it is, but now seems

0:17:12.280 --> 0:17:14.120
<v Speaker 1>to have a little bit more of its own swagger back.

0:17:14.280 --> 0:17:17.000
<v Speaker 1>And they have this game and at home in their

0:17:17.040 --> 0:17:20.200
<v Speaker 1>own dome. So, uh, this is gonna be one of

0:17:20.240 --> 0:17:22.400
<v Speaker 1>these teams down the stretch. I think with the Falcons

0:17:22.440 --> 0:17:25.560
<v Speaker 1>that the record might not indicate that they are obviously

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:27.119
<v Speaker 1>going to be in the playoffs or they're even a

0:17:27.119 --> 0:17:30.960
<v Speaker 1>contender at this point, but with Matt Ryan, with those weapons,

0:17:31.160 --> 0:17:33.879
<v Speaker 1>it still makes you think a little bit. So the

0:17:33.880 --> 0:17:36.160
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans Saints have had some ups and they've had

0:17:36.160 --> 0:17:38.600
<v Speaker 1>some downs this season, but seeing how they're able to

0:17:38.640 --> 0:17:41.720
<v Speaker 1>stem this tide to win Drew Brees gets back in

0:17:41.760 --> 0:17:44.320
<v Speaker 1>the lineup, that's gonna be their ultimate test and squarely

0:17:44.359 --> 0:17:47.280
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna fall on the shoulders of Payom Hill. One

0:17:47.280 --> 0:17:49.240
<v Speaker 1>more in the NFC I want to get your thoughts on.

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:52.119
<v Speaker 1>Then also one in the a f C. The Rams

0:17:52.160 --> 0:17:56.000
<v Speaker 1>are at the Cardinals, now just a couple of weeks ago,

0:17:56.400 --> 0:17:59.320
<v Speaker 1>the Cardinals win a big game over Buffalo on a

0:17:59.400 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 1>hail Mary. They're riding high. The Rams get a big

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:05.960
<v Speaker 1>win over the Seahawks. They're riding high. But now since

0:18:06.160 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 1>those wins, both of these teams kind of starting to

0:18:09.400 --> 0:18:12.040
<v Speaker 1>head in the wrong direction a little bit. But yet

0:18:12.080 --> 0:18:15.320
<v Speaker 1>they're both still very much in playoff contention in the NFC,

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:17.240
<v Speaker 1>And you know, you don't want to say it's a

0:18:17.359 --> 0:18:20.040
<v Speaker 1>must win for both teams, so to speak, at this stage.

0:18:20.080 --> 0:18:21.639
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a little bit of a stretch. But

0:18:22.080 --> 0:18:25.399
<v Speaker 1>this is an important game in uh in the NFC West,

0:18:25.440 --> 0:18:28.320
<v Speaker 1>with Seattle sitting on top and both of these teams

0:18:28.359 --> 0:18:31.120
<v Speaker 1>trying to stay within striking distance of the Seahawks. Yeah,

0:18:31.160 --> 0:18:33.600
<v Speaker 1>it's really interesting kind of paradox that those two teams

0:18:33.600 --> 0:18:37.040
<v Speaker 1>find themselves in because from the airline the Arizona Cardinals perspective,

0:18:37.080 --> 0:18:38.520
<v Speaker 1>this is a team that I think is going to

0:18:38.560 --> 0:18:40.159
<v Speaker 1>be good, and I think they are going to be

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:41.920
<v Speaker 1>a team. If I'm the Green of Packers, I meany

0:18:41.920 --> 0:18:43.680
<v Speaker 1>of these squads. I don't want to see the Cardinals

0:18:43.960 --> 0:18:46.679
<v Speaker 1>in the playoffs, just because it has a lot of

0:18:46.680 --> 0:18:49.600
<v Speaker 1>that two thousand nine sort of feel to them where

0:18:49.600 --> 0:18:52.440
<v Speaker 1>they can put up points against anybody, but they still

0:18:52.440 --> 0:18:55.439
<v Speaker 1>haven't quite reached that upper echelon where it's like, okay,

0:18:55.480 --> 0:18:57.520
<v Speaker 1>every single week you can count on them for these

0:18:57.560 --> 0:19:01.400
<v Speaker 1>points for this production to be favor Uh, there's still

0:19:01.400 --> 0:19:03.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of in many ways, especially with Kyler Murge still

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:07.080
<v Speaker 1>learning how to win at this level. Then you look

0:19:07.119 --> 0:19:09.320
<v Speaker 1>at the Rams, who very much felt like last year

0:19:09.359 --> 0:19:11.680
<v Speaker 1>they could have needed for a title, and this year

0:19:11.720 --> 0:19:13.919
<v Speaker 1>they still feel like they're built to heat, you know,

0:19:13.920 --> 0:19:15.520
<v Speaker 1>even though they've had to make a few changes on

0:19:15.600 --> 0:19:17.840
<v Speaker 1>both sides of the ball. This is another one of

0:19:17.880 --> 0:19:19.320
<v Speaker 1>those games Mike that if you look at it from

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:23.200
<v Speaker 1>l A's perspective, they're going into Arizona's home field. Can

0:19:23.240 --> 0:19:24.840
<v Speaker 1>they find a way to get that eighth win of

0:19:24.880 --> 0:19:27.159
<v Speaker 1>the season, Because not only does that keep you then

0:19:27.200 --> 0:19:30.919
<v Speaker 1>in striking distance of the Seahawks, but there's going to

0:19:30.960 --> 0:19:33.960
<v Speaker 1>be some tight matchups here down the stretch and both

0:19:34.040 --> 0:19:37.159
<v Speaker 1>conferences to get those wild card birds. Even though they

0:19:37.200 --> 0:19:39.760
<v Speaker 1>expanded to seven, I still think there's a chance that

0:19:39.760 --> 0:19:41.840
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna end up seeing a decent team or two

0:19:42.160 --> 0:19:44.320
<v Speaker 1>not able to crack that field if it does stay

0:19:44.640 --> 0:19:48.600
<v Speaker 1>at fourteen teams, so yeah, division implications, everything else that

0:19:48.640 --> 0:19:52.040
<v Speaker 1>plays into it. It's definitely a Markett matchup. One game

0:19:52.080 --> 0:19:53.399
<v Speaker 1>in the a f C. I want to get your

0:19:53.400 --> 0:19:57.520
<v Speaker 1>thoughts on Cleveland is at Tennessee. Now we've seen the Titans.

0:19:58.040 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 1>The Titans got off to a hot start this year,

0:20:00.240 --> 0:20:02.040
<v Speaker 1>went through a bit of a lull. They lost three

0:20:02.080 --> 0:20:04.640
<v Speaker 1>out of four games. Now the Titans have come out

0:20:04.720 --> 0:20:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the other side of it, and they look like they're

0:20:06.960 --> 0:20:09.199
<v Speaker 1>looking a lot like that team that was making that

0:20:09.320 --> 0:20:11.920
<v Speaker 1>run last January all the way to the a f

0:20:12.000 --> 0:20:15.080
<v Speaker 1>C title game. The flip side with the Cleveland Browns.

0:20:15.920 --> 0:20:18.240
<v Speaker 1>If you want to announce to the a f C

0:20:18.400 --> 0:20:20.439
<v Speaker 1>and announced to the football world that you're to be

0:20:20.520 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 1>taken seriously as an a f C playoff contender, this

0:20:24.359 --> 0:20:27.719
<v Speaker 1>is a huge opportunity for Cleveland. They have a winning record,

0:20:27.760 --> 0:20:30.720
<v Speaker 1>they are in the mix for a playoff spot. But

0:20:30.760 --> 0:20:34.199
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of people that are skeptical. They

0:20:34.240 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 1>don't really quite believe in the Browns. They're not really

0:20:36.800 --> 0:20:39.680
<v Speaker 1>sure what to think of the Browns. Well, Cleveland, here's

0:20:39.680 --> 0:20:42.160
<v Speaker 1>your chance. Well you shouldn't believe in the Browns because

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:45.239
<v Speaker 1>I think they've started to find their identity offensively. I

0:20:45.280 --> 0:20:47.440
<v Speaker 1>think when you look at Baker, Baker Mayfield doing a

0:20:47.480 --> 0:20:50.320
<v Speaker 1>better job of protecting the ball this season. I think

0:20:50.320 --> 0:20:52.920
<v Speaker 1>he's shown more of the promise that he showed off

0:20:52.920 --> 0:20:55.680
<v Speaker 1>the bat. He's been able to recapture that. And they

0:20:55.680 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 1>have a really potent one to punch in their backfield with,

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:00.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, Kareem Hunting able to kind of get his

0:21:00.880 --> 0:21:03.800
<v Speaker 1>career back on track, and Nick Chubb also has been

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:07.040
<v Speaker 1>one of the more consistent reliable running presences in this league.

0:21:07.280 --> 0:21:10.199
<v Speaker 1>To me, if you're the Cleveland Browns, that's the ticket.

0:21:10.240 --> 0:21:12.159
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't matter if it's two thousand twenty, doesn't matter if

0:21:12.160 --> 0:21:16.160
<v Speaker 1>it's two thousand en Uh. You play in in the Midwest,

0:21:16.240 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 1>your your blue collar city, find your running game and

0:21:18.760 --> 0:21:21.119
<v Speaker 1>build things off of that. You don't need to be Hollywood.

0:21:21.359 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 1>You just need to be black and blue in that division.

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:26.879
<v Speaker 1>So I like the direction they've gone. Now that being said,

0:21:27.119 --> 0:21:28.920
<v Speaker 1>you're going up against a team that does it as

0:21:28.920 --> 0:21:32.440
<v Speaker 1>well as anybody, with Derrick Henry and certainly Ryan Tannehill,

0:21:32.480 --> 0:21:34.879
<v Speaker 1>who has had one of the more unheralded seasons this

0:21:35.000 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 1>here as far as playing the quarterback position, how he

0:21:37.560 --> 0:21:41.080
<v Speaker 1>has reinvented himself in Tennessee. Uh there there, It's something

0:21:41.119 --> 0:21:43.320
<v Speaker 1>that people down the line are going to have to

0:21:43.359 --> 0:21:45.480
<v Speaker 1>look at. When he played for as long as he

0:21:45.520 --> 0:21:48.160
<v Speaker 1>did with Miami not being able to fulfill his potential,

0:21:48.720 --> 0:21:51.080
<v Speaker 1>he got that prove it deal, that backup deal that

0:21:51.119 --> 0:21:53.520
<v Speaker 1>we often talk about with quarterbacks that don't work out

0:21:53.560 --> 0:21:55.760
<v Speaker 1>at their first stop, and it actually ended up turning

0:21:55.800 --> 0:21:59.119
<v Speaker 1>into a franchise quarterback a franchise contract. So it's a

0:21:59.160 --> 0:22:01.680
<v Speaker 1>good matchup in on the other side of this, Mike.

0:22:01.760 --> 0:22:04.639
<v Speaker 1>Like I mentioned with the last the last thing, there's

0:22:04.680 --> 0:22:06.600
<v Speaker 1>probably gonna be a team with a winning record that

0:22:06.640 --> 0:22:09.560
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make the a f C playoffs. Up until last week,

0:22:09.600 --> 0:22:12.159
<v Speaker 1>I think Cleveland was still on the outside looking in

0:22:12.520 --> 0:22:14.720
<v Speaker 1>until they got their eighth win in terms of how

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:17.680
<v Speaker 1>the projected you know, slots are right now in seatings.

0:22:18.160 --> 0:22:20.240
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, they're both teams that are both eight and three,

0:22:20.280 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 1>but there's still a lot on the line here and

0:22:22.119 --> 0:22:24.560
<v Speaker 1>be able to pick up that that next win and

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:27.080
<v Speaker 1>ensure themselves of a winning season. Well, I think the

0:22:27.080 --> 0:22:29.800
<v Speaker 1>reason there's there is the skepticism about the Browns is

0:22:29.840 --> 0:22:32.240
<v Speaker 1>because the last time earlier this year, they had a

0:22:32.280 --> 0:22:35.040
<v Speaker 1>game where they were this hyped and you know, going

0:22:35.080 --> 0:22:37.719
<v Speaker 1>into play the Steelers, they got smacked and you know,

0:22:37.800 --> 0:22:41.119
<v Speaker 1>they got knocked down pretty hard. So this is this

0:22:41.200 --> 0:22:43.680
<v Speaker 1>is definitely a prove it type of game for Cleveland.

0:22:43.800 --> 0:22:45.280
<v Speaker 1>And what's fun for them too is they're gonna have

0:22:45.320 --> 0:22:47.119
<v Speaker 1>a chance to show that that wasn't them. I mean,

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:49.600
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna be able to host the Pittsburgh in that finale.

0:22:49.720 --> 0:22:52.359
<v Speaker 1>Now people will see if whether or not even the

0:22:52.440 --> 0:22:54.520
<v Speaker 1>starters are going to be in that game for Pittsburgh.

0:22:54.520 --> 0:22:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Are they gonna be going for sixteen and all things

0:22:57.000 --> 0:22:58.880
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have to figure out. But if you look

0:22:58.880 --> 0:23:00.560
<v Speaker 1>at the way the schedule lines up for them, Mike,

0:23:00.560 --> 0:23:03.040
<v Speaker 1>they get Tennessee, they're gonna be taking out a Baltimore

0:23:03.040 --> 0:23:04.919
<v Speaker 1>team that's had a lot of adversity, and then they

0:23:04.960 --> 0:23:07.360
<v Speaker 1>go to New York teams back to back. This thing

0:23:07.480 --> 0:23:09.880
<v Speaker 1>set up for Cleveland, have a ten win season, ten

0:23:09.960 --> 0:23:13.840
<v Speaker 1>plus win season, and make that run, that that long

0:23:14.400 --> 0:23:17.440
<v Speaker 1>anticipated run to a playoff birth that I think everybody

0:23:17.480 --> 0:23:19.640
<v Speaker 1>has been sort of hoping for here the last four

0:23:19.720 --> 0:23:22.680
<v Speaker 1>years and in that part of the country. Yeah, alright,

0:23:22.720 --> 0:23:24.639
<v Speaker 1>well with that, we will call it a wrap on

0:23:24.680 --> 0:23:27.760
<v Speaker 1>this edition of Packers Unscripted be sure to follow all

0:23:27.800 --> 0:23:30.400
<v Speaker 1>of our coverage of the team on Packers dot com

0:23:30.440 --> 0:23:32.840
<v Speaker 1>and all of the coverage of Sunday afternoons big game

0:23:32.840 --> 0:23:36.480
<v Speaker 1>from lambeau Field against the Philadelphia Eagles. It will all

0:23:36.520 --> 0:23:39.560
<v Speaker 1>be there for you on Packers dot com for Wes.

0:23:39.600 --> 0:23:42.280
<v Speaker 1>I am Mike. Thank you for tuning in everybody. Let's

0:23:42.280 --> 0:23:43.000
<v Speaker 1>see you next time.