WEBVTT - AI’s Global Capital Race Accelerates

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio, Studios, Podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is live

0:00:15.080 --> 0:00:18.799
<v Speaker 1>from the heart of Silicon Valley with ed Larbow in

0:00:19.000 --> 0:00:20.400
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco.

0:00:22.520 --> 0:00:24.800
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up. All eyes on in

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.120
<v Speaker 2>Video reporting earnings this week, and markets are mixed. As

0:00:28.120 --> 0:00:32.160
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg reports in Video customers have been notified about price hikes.

0:00:32.440 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 2>Plus SoftBank plans a record six point three billion dollar

0:00:35.440 --> 0:00:38.600
<v Speaker 2>retail bond sale, the biggest by any issuer in Japan,

0:00:39.000 --> 0:00:41.960
<v Speaker 2>to raise funds for its investment commitments to open AI,

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:45.320
<v Speaker 2>and Ali Barber's raised ten point two billion dollars in

0:00:45.400 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 2>what was Hong Kong's biggest follow on offering to take

0:00:48.440 --> 0:00:51.720
<v Speaker 2>the lead in the global AI race. Let's get right

0:00:51.800 --> 0:00:54.240
<v Speaker 2>to our top story. Bloomberg reporting over the weekend that

0:00:54.320 --> 0:00:57.960
<v Speaker 2>in Nvidia based AI servers are about to get more expensive.

0:00:58.000 --> 0:01:01.640
<v Speaker 2>Server makers are telling data center customers the prices are

0:01:01.640 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 2>going up more than fifteen percent in some cases, according

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:09.480
<v Speaker 2>to sources who have seen those communications. The reason soaring

0:01:09.520 --> 0:01:12.640
<v Speaker 2>memory costs. Sources say the increases hit systems containing in

0:01:12.720 --> 0:01:17.640
<v Speaker 2>Video's Blackwell and next generation Virorubin platforms. Hikes expected on

0:01:17.720 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 2>shipments starting in early twenty twenty seven. How are markets reacting?

0:01:21.800 --> 0:01:26.399
<v Speaker 2>Very simply? AI infrastructure stocks are falling in Nvidia is

0:01:26.480 --> 0:01:29.839
<v Speaker 2>down significantly. A seventh straight job is longest losing streak

0:01:30.319 --> 0:01:35.039
<v Speaker 2>September twenty twenty two. In Vidia earnings Wednesday. Bloomber's Carmen

0:01:35.080 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 2>Rhinikey here with markets and Carmen, what is driving investor

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:40.200
<v Speaker 2>sentiment towards this space right now?

0:01:40.520 --> 0:01:42.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So we're seeing a lot of selling pressure here

0:01:42.560 --> 0:01:45.399
<v Speaker 3>and there's just so much caution I think baked into

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:48.120
<v Speaker 3>this space. We've seen so much volatility in the AI

0:01:48.160 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 3>trade overall, and in Vidia is the king maker here

0:01:51.400 --> 0:01:54.480
<v Speaker 3>right So a seventh losing day that's the longest streak,

0:01:54.480 --> 0:01:56.920
<v Speaker 3>as you said, since twenty twenty two. Heading into earnings

0:01:56.960 --> 0:02:00.680
<v Speaker 3>on Wednesday, people are worried here about peak earning. Memory

0:02:00.720 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 3>costs are high, in Vidia's you know, looking like it's

0:02:03.520 --> 0:02:06.680
<v Speaker 3>not absorbing those as passing them on to customers. There

0:02:06.680 --> 0:02:08.920
<v Speaker 3>are big questions sort of outstanding about all of the

0:02:08.960 --> 0:02:12.680
<v Speaker 3>financing that it's put into the market lately, and investors

0:02:12.720 --> 0:02:15.080
<v Speaker 3>really just want to hear more about what the future

0:02:15.280 --> 0:02:17.280
<v Speaker 3>is of the artificial intelligence trade.

0:02:17.320 --> 0:02:17.519
<v Speaker 4>There.

0:02:17.800 --> 0:02:20.640
<v Speaker 3>I think can more and more concerns coming online that

0:02:21.120 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 3>you know this could be the peak.

0:02:24.800 --> 0:02:27.679
<v Speaker 2>Our market's team leads its wrap with this idea that

0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:30.600
<v Speaker 2>price is going up for in Vidia based servers. Is

0:02:30.639 --> 0:02:33.880
<v Speaker 2>something in the market. Wednesday is the mega event, right,

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:37.359
<v Speaker 2>the macro level event that is one company's quarterly earnings.

0:02:37.760 --> 0:02:39.600
<v Speaker 2>How a market's kind of preparing for that.

0:02:40.400 --> 0:02:42.120
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's such a huge deal, right, So in

0:02:42.200 --> 0:02:44.600
<v Speaker 3>Nvidia is still the largest stock in the S and

0:02:44.639 --> 0:02:46.720
<v Speaker 3>P five hundred in the Nasdaq, It's the largest stock

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:50.080
<v Speaker 3>in the market. It commands a major amount of weight,

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 3>and how it moves can move the entire market. The

0:02:53.000 --> 0:02:55.359
<v Speaker 3>thing that's really interesting here is that earnings have not

0:02:55.480 --> 0:02:58.519
<v Speaker 3>been a positive catalyst for Nvidia stock for quite some time.

0:02:58.560 --> 0:03:00.560
<v Speaker 3>So you think it's the last. We're out of five

0:03:00.600 --> 0:03:03.959
<v Speaker 3>earnings reports. The shares have actually fallen after results, even

0:03:03.960 --> 0:03:07.040
<v Speaker 3>though they've been strong. What investors are really looking at

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:09.920
<v Speaker 3>is the sentiment around this reports. You know what CEO

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:13.160
<v Speaker 3>Jensen Wong says about the market going forward, If they're

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:16.440
<v Speaker 3>seeing demand, financing questions are going to come in. I'm

0:03:16.480 --> 0:03:18.840
<v Speaker 3>sure there'll be questions around these price hikes as well.

0:03:18.960 --> 0:03:21.720
<v Speaker 3>So a lot of that sentiment. It's really what is

0:03:21.760 --> 0:03:25.600
<v Speaker 3>the next wave of the artificial intelligence trend. That's what's

0:03:25.680 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 3>going to be most important for investors coming up, and

0:03:28.919 --> 0:03:30.680
<v Speaker 3>you know it's going to affect other parts of the

0:03:30.720 --> 0:03:32.720
<v Speaker 3>AI infrastructure trade as well. You know, we're seeing the

0:03:32.760 --> 0:03:35.360
<v Speaker 3>memory stocks falling today as well. Those are the biggest

0:03:35.400 --> 0:03:38.640
<v Speaker 3>laggards on the S and P and the NASDAC that's

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:39.400
<v Speaker 3>really important.

0:03:40.680 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 2>The most common rhyanikey with a preview of everything's come

0:03:43.320 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 2>this week, that is in Vidia, Thank you very much.

0:03:45.440 --> 0:03:47.720
<v Speaker 2>Let's get more on the report than video systems could

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:50.000
<v Speaker 2>see a price hike of fifteen percent. So I'm a

0:03:50.080 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 2>Leopold Managing director of Data Infrastructure at Raymond. James joins us. Now,

0:03:55.320 --> 0:03:58.800
<v Speaker 2>this reporting is based on the OEMs, the server makers

0:03:58.880 --> 0:04:01.600
<v Speaker 2>going to customers and saying this is what we see

0:04:01.640 --> 0:04:04.920
<v Speaker 2>happening in the new year, fifteen percent hike in some

0:04:04.960 --> 0:04:08.600
<v Speaker 2>cases on Blackwell and Reuben systems. Just to start your

0:04:08.600 --> 0:04:09.520
<v Speaker 2>reaction to that.

0:04:10.800 --> 0:04:15.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I'm not surprised by It's It's been very clear

0:04:15.080 --> 0:04:18.359
<v Speaker 5>that the cost of memory has been increasing. We have

0:04:18.600 --> 0:04:23.960
<v Speaker 5>observed and heard the large hyperscale operators forecasting higher capital

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:27.480
<v Speaker 5>spending budgets, and the biggest driver for that has been

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 5>the cost of memory. So there really should be very

0:04:30.240 --> 0:04:33.560
<v Speaker 5>little surprised. As a matter of fact, given the percentage

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:35.440
<v Speaker 5>increase in the cost of memory and the amount of

0:04:35.480 --> 0:04:41.919
<v Speaker 5>memory required in these AI platforms, fifteen percent really doesn't

0:04:41.960 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 5>seem all that demanding when we consider the amount of spending.

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:51.600
<v Speaker 2>Each Blackwell and Reuben GPU has eight corresponding HBM stacks,

0:04:51.600 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 2>which in turn out twelve layers of d RAM fifteen percent.

0:04:55.560 --> 0:04:57.960
<v Speaker 2>Could you see that going high as Simon with that

0:04:58.000 --> 0:04:59.520
<v Speaker 2>in mind.

0:04:59.680 --> 0:05:04.599
<v Speaker 5>Well, I think it's possible. The challenge is is we

0:05:04.640 --> 0:05:07.960
<v Speaker 5>don't know what Nvidia built into the prior pricing, so

0:05:08.720 --> 0:05:11.839
<v Speaker 5>there's a lot we don't know at this point. Recall

0:05:11.960 --> 0:05:17.840
<v Speaker 5>that Jensen one has said repeatedly that they predicted that

0:05:18.000 --> 0:05:21.680
<v Speaker 5>the amount of memory they need two years ago, so

0:05:21.720 --> 0:05:25.320
<v Speaker 5>they've been working unlocking and supply they've formed these long

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:26.880
<v Speaker 5>term agreements with the.

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:28.240
<v Speaker 2>Multiple suppliers of memory.

0:05:28.320 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 5>So there's a significant amount of detail we simply don't know.

0:05:32.000 --> 0:05:35.120
<v Speaker 5>The other factor you have to consider here is the

0:05:35.160 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 5>published prices may go up by fifteen percent, but that

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:41.640
<v Speaker 5>doesn't mean contracted prices are reflecting that same amount.

0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 2>What remains is that demand is running ahead of industry's

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:48.920
<v Speaker 2>ability to supply right, And I think back to your

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 2>note on August eleventh that was in response to the

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:54.760
<v Speaker 2>deal when Video did with those six Wall Street firms

0:05:55.240 --> 0:05:58.800
<v Speaker 2>to be conduits to third party capital. Inevitably, Jensen, one

0:05:58.880 --> 0:06:01.560
<v Speaker 2>is going to get questions on setular financing, right, just

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:05.599
<v Speaker 2>your current downcing about inevitably you're current thinking of the

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:07.680
<v Speaker 2>underpinnings of what's paying for all of this.

0:06:09.240 --> 0:06:12.719
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I have to be clear on this point because

0:06:13.240 --> 0:06:16.480
<v Speaker 5>this is among the bigger concerns for investors, is this

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:21.840
<v Speaker 5>concept of circular financing or vendor financing. And so the

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 5>consortium that was announced with groups like Black Blackstone, Blackrock,

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:31.800
<v Speaker 5>Apollo KKR, it shifts the risk, it shifts it off

0:06:31.800 --> 0:06:35.880
<v Speaker 5>of Nvidia's balance sheet elsewhere, and that is most appropriate.

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:40.200
<v Speaker 5>But to be clear, I don't love circular financing. But

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:43.960
<v Speaker 5>let's look through this in the eyes of Nvidia. Nvidia

0:06:44.040 --> 0:06:47.440
<v Speaker 5>is generating roughly a billion dollars of free cash flow

0:06:48.000 --> 0:06:52.599
<v Speaker 5>every two days. They have a responsibility to put the

0:06:52.680 --> 0:06:55.560
<v Speaker 5>cash on their balance sheet to work. And if they're

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:59.080
<v Speaker 5>big believers in AI like we are, and I'm sure

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:03.480
<v Speaker 5>they are, why not invest in the AI opportunities. So

0:07:03.760 --> 0:07:06.800
<v Speaker 5>sort of the classic eating your own dog food. I

0:07:06.839 --> 0:07:11.520
<v Speaker 5>think the optics of circular financing, that is, putting money

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 5>into your customers to buy your product. It's not a

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:18.240
<v Speaker 5>great look. I totally get that, but in Vidia has

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:21.440
<v Speaker 5>to put its cash to work. I think what would

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 5>soften the blow for investors and make the investment community

0:07:25.520 --> 0:07:28.640
<v Speaker 5>feel better is to see in Nvidia being more aggressive

0:07:29.160 --> 0:07:34.120
<v Speaker 5>in buying back its own stock, and you expect them

0:07:34.160 --> 0:07:39.680
<v Speaker 5>to do that, I do. I want to talk about

0:07:39.720 --> 0:07:45.360
<v Speaker 5>the distinction between depreciation and the economic lifetime of a

0:07:45.440 --> 0:07:47.960
<v Speaker 5>GPU because right now what I see is lots of

0:07:47.960 --> 0:07:52.000
<v Speaker 5>in video executives posting on social media about Vera Rubin being.

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:55.520
<v Speaker 2>In full production. At the same time, like that KKR

0:07:55.920 --> 0:07:59.160
<v Speaker 2>Blackrock deal, they're trying to sell that this is a

0:07:59.280 --> 0:08:03.160
<v Speaker 2>highly utilizes cash flow generating asset for every years to

0:08:03.160 --> 0:08:06.400
<v Speaker 2>come on older obsolete generations. How can both of those

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:07.760
<v Speaker 2>things be true at the same time.

0:08:09.080 --> 0:08:10.920
<v Speaker 5>I think they can be true because of the way

0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:14.160
<v Speaker 5>the market evolves that the most leading edge applications, the

0:08:14.160 --> 0:08:20.080
<v Speaker 5>most demanding, will require the newest generation of accelerator, and

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:22.320
<v Speaker 5>in order to be efficient, in order to have the

0:08:22.360 --> 0:08:27.440
<v Speaker 5>best profitability, one wants to utilize the most leading edge

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:33.680
<v Speaker 5>tool because it will be more efficient, basically, fewer tokens pulled. However,

0:08:34.040 --> 0:08:38.200
<v Speaker 5>we've seen that the older generations, the ampiers, the hoppers,

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:41.680
<v Speaker 5>are still being used, and so what we're observing is

0:08:41.720 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 5>the market's broadening in that the most leading edge applications,

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:50.200
<v Speaker 5>the most demanding applications, will require the newest generation, but

0:08:50.400 --> 0:08:55.760
<v Speaker 5>the older GPUs, the older accelerators have useful lives that

0:08:55.840 --> 0:08:57.440
<v Speaker 5>could extend many years.

0:08:58.800 --> 0:09:01.560
<v Speaker 2>Some of many of your industry colleagues, including our team

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:05.040
<v Speaker 2>at Bloomberg Intelligence, expect to hear something about China. Does

0:09:05.080 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 2>it matter to you if Nvidia can sell some kind

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:09.240
<v Speaker 2>of GPU into the Chinese market.

0:09:10.480 --> 0:09:15.240
<v Speaker 5>Honestly, not really because even if there is incremental sales

0:09:15.240 --> 0:09:18.080
<v Speaker 5>into China, I think we'll look through it and it's

0:09:18.120 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 5>the idea that, well, next quarter they could be shut

0:09:21.400 --> 0:09:24.920
<v Speaker 5>down and cut off. So it's not a predictable stream

0:09:25.320 --> 0:09:28.000
<v Speaker 5>of revenue, so I think it will be discounted.

0:09:28.280 --> 0:09:30.640
<v Speaker 2>It's not a bad thing, but because of.

0:09:30.600 --> 0:09:35.240
<v Speaker 5>The unpredictability of ongoing China business, it will be discounted

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:35.959
<v Speaker 5>by analysts.

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:40.080
<v Speaker 2>Really enjoyed this conversation to start the week. So i'mon Leopool,

0:09:40.120 --> 0:09:42.840
<v Speaker 2>Managing director at Raymond James, thank you very much. Indeed,

0:09:43.080 --> 0:09:44.960
<v Speaker 2>I want to take a look at shares of Paramount,

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:49.520
<v Speaker 2>Skuidance and Warner Brothers Discovery after Rob Bonter, California's Attorney

0:09:49.559 --> 0:09:53.120
<v Speaker 2>General called off a meeting with Paramount that was scheduled

0:09:53.120 --> 0:09:56.120
<v Speaker 2>to happen today. The New York Times, reporting the age,

0:09:56.280 --> 0:09:59.679
<v Speaker 2>accused Paramount of leaking details of a meeting the parties

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 2>held on Friday. Today's meeting was meant to discuss a

0:10:03.480 --> 0:10:06.840
<v Speaker 2>settlement of the state's lawsuit seeking to block the merger

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:09.920
<v Speaker 2>between Paramount and Warner Brothers Discovery. There was more movement

0:10:09.920 --> 0:10:12.440
<v Speaker 2>in the stocks in pre market, kind of more muted

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:16.120
<v Speaker 2>and faded in the actual session. Ali Barber raises ten

0:10:16.160 --> 0:10:18.720
<v Speaker 2>billion dollars in a record Hong Kong share sale. Coming out,

0:10:18.760 --> 0:10:20.920
<v Speaker 2>we'll have the details of that raise and what it

0:10:20.920 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 2>says about China's AI efforts US. Next, this is Bloomberg Tech.

0:10:38.320 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 2>Let's take a look at today's big number. Ten point

0:10:40.920 --> 0:10:43.760
<v Speaker 2>two billion dollars. That's how much Ali Barber's raised in

0:10:43.800 --> 0:10:46.480
<v Speaker 2>what was Hong Kong's biggest follow on offering. The EU

0:10:46.520 --> 0:10:50.120
<v Speaker 2>Commace giant turned AI player looking to outspend and outrun

0:10:50.240 --> 0:10:53.040
<v Speaker 2>Chinese rivals. The shares, which were priced at raffia three

0:10:53.120 --> 0:10:55.440
<v Speaker 2>and a half percent discount to Friday's clothes on the

0:10:55.559 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 2>US listed shares, attracted institutional demand of almost three times offering.

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:04.199
<v Speaker 2>According to sources, The company shares closed down in Hong

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:07.360
<v Speaker 2>Kong roughly eight point five percent. Let's get more on

0:11:07.400 --> 0:11:09.679
<v Speaker 2>what the race says about the global AI race. Riinbo

0:11:09.800 --> 0:11:12.440
<v Speaker 2>Tech editor in DC Mike Shephard a follow on just

0:11:12.480 --> 0:11:15.520
<v Speaker 2>being going to the markets for an already publicly traded

0:11:15.520 --> 0:11:17.480
<v Speaker 2>company that Ali Baba needs capital.

0:11:17.559 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 6>What they want to do with it, Well, they need

0:11:20.280 --> 0:11:23.040
<v Speaker 6>capital just like all the other big AI.

0:11:22.720 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 2>Companies around the world.

0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:28.760
<v Speaker 6>And Ali Baba, ed, it's interesting compared to its Chinese competitors,

0:11:29.000 --> 0:11:32.559
<v Speaker 6>has been willing to spend. They have pledged to put

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:36.160
<v Speaker 6>fifty six point five billion dollars over the next three

0:11:36.280 --> 0:11:39.240
<v Speaker 6>years toward the infrastructure that it will need and then

0:11:39.240 --> 0:11:42.800
<v Speaker 6>includes chips, that includes data centers, and then includes other

0:11:42.920 --> 0:11:45.840
<v Speaker 6>material that will be needed to keep their models running.

0:11:46.040 --> 0:11:48.000
<v Speaker 6>And it has been paying off for them.

0:11:48.160 --> 0:11:48.240
<v Speaker 7>Ed.

0:11:48.320 --> 0:11:50.839
<v Speaker 6>When you look at the most recent rankings that were

0:11:50.880 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 6>released about ten days ago by Hugging Face, Ali Baba's.

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:55.320
<v Speaker 2>Were at the top.

0:11:55.520 --> 0:11:58.400
<v Speaker 6>They had more than three billion downloads globally, and that

0:11:58.520 --> 0:12:01.719
<v Speaker 6>put them far ahead of their Chinese competitors that we've

0:12:01.760 --> 0:12:05.000
<v Speaker 6>been talking about Deep Seek and Moonshot, but also against

0:12:05.000 --> 0:12:08.719
<v Speaker 6>their US rivals that includes Meta and Google. So they

0:12:08.720 --> 0:12:10.880
<v Speaker 6>are trying to lay the groundwork for them to be

0:12:10.920 --> 0:12:14.200
<v Speaker 6>able to compete globally but also in the internal market.

0:12:14.200 --> 0:12:17.680
<v Speaker 2>There it's not as big as what some of the

0:12:17.800 --> 0:12:20.800
<v Speaker 2>US let's say HYPERSCDE is committed to. But we also

0:12:20.840 --> 0:12:23.640
<v Speaker 2>going on this program about ali Baba probably being most

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:26.760
<v Speaker 2>analogous with Amazon. You know, it has e commerce roots

0:12:26.760 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 2>and now a massive cloud computing division where it has

0:12:30.040 --> 0:12:33.840
<v Speaker 2>the mainstay of AI activity. Just describe the company to us.

0:12:34.800 --> 0:12:37.520
<v Speaker 6>Well, they really are diversified and when we were talking

0:12:37.559 --> 0:12:39.880
<v Speaker 6>about ali Baba just a few years ago, we were

0:12:39.920 --> 0:12:43.560
<v Speaker 6>really thinking of it as that online retail powerhouse. But

0:12:43.920 --> 0:12:47.079
<v Speaker 6>just like Amazon, and we've heard Andy Jassey talk about

0:12:47.080 --> 0:12:50.439
<v Speaker 6>their pushing the chips even they are trying to spread

0:12:50.440 --> 0:12:52.880
<v Speaker 6>their wings and spread into a lot of other areas

0:12:52.880 --> 0:12:55.800
<v Speaker 6>and that includes cloud computing. And they have also backed

0:12:55.840 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 6>some of these companies that we're also seeing as AI developers.

0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:02.400
<v Speaker 6>Mini Max and Moon have also gotten an injection of

0:13:02.440 --> 0:13:05.720
<v Speaker 6>support from Ali Baba as well as a way of

0:13:06.000 --> 0:13:10.199
<v Speaker 6>trying to diversify their holdings and their resources. So they

0:13:10.240 --> 0:13:13.520
<v Speaker 6>are really in a lot of ways looking at AI

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:16.360
<v Speaker 6>as the next frontier and also something that they can

0:13:16.440 --> 0:13:19.520
<v Speaker 6>integrate into other platforms. If you think about AI and

0:13:19.600 --> 0:13:22.200
<v Speaker 6>the way that Amazon is trying to integrate it for

0:13:22.320 --> 0:13:25.440
<v Speaker 6>its users, for its consumers, it's really in essential and

0:13:25.480 --> 0:13:28.280
<v Speaker 6>it is also something that it can sell then as

0:13:28.320 --> 0:13:32.000
<v Speaker 6>a cloud computing platform to other customers too.

0:13:32.640 --> 0:13:35.559
<v Speaker 2>Chef is a quick sidebar to the main Ali Baba story.

0:13:35.640 --> 0:13:39.880
<v Speaker 2>We saw leadership management participate in offering by shares. What

0:13:39.920 --> 0:13:40.480
<v Speaker 2>do we need to know?

0:13:41.840 --> 0:13:44.319
<v Speaker 6>Well, I thought that was so interesting too. We looked

0:13:44.320 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 6>at the shares dropping in trading earlier today in Hong Kong.

0:13:50.080 --> 0:13:52.400
<v Speaker 6>It might have raised some questions, well what does that

0:13:52.520 --> 0:13:56.040
<v Speaker 6>mean about appetite overall? But they are putting skin in

0:13:56.080 --> 0:13:58.360
<v Speaker 6>the game, and that is chairman and one of the

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 6>co founders, Josi He bought the US equivalent of ten

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:05.480
<v Speaker 6>million dollars of shares and Eddie Wu, the CEO of

0:14:05.520 --> 0:14:08.160
<v Speaker 6>Ali Barble, brought about five million dollars of shares. So

0:14:08.200 --> 0:14:10.679
<v Speaker 6>they are really putting their own skin in the game,

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:13.480
<v Speaker 6>and they are trying to make sure that they are

0:14:13.520 --> 0:14:16.440
<v Speaker 6>giving their own personal sign of support to this offering

0:14:16.679 --> 0:14:19.200
<v Speaker 6>to signal to other investors that they're in it too.

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:23.360
<v Speaker 2>Bloombergs, Mike Shepherd, thank you very much. Let's stick in Asia.

0:14:23.560 --> 0:14:26.920
<v Speaker 2>SoftBank is fanning the biggest retail bond sale by an

0:14:26.960 --> 0:14:29.760
<v Speaker 2>issuer in Japan. It's seeking to raise a record one

0:14:29.840 --> 0:14:33.320
<v Speaker 2>trillion yen or about six point three billion US dollars,

0:14:33.320 --> 0:14:36.520
<v Speaker 2>in part to fund its investment commitments to Open AI.

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:40.200
<v Speaker 2>Sharon Chen from Bluemeg Intelligence out with a react that

0:14:40.280 --> 0:14:43.640
<v Speaker 2>says the sale will test retail investor interests amid concerns

0:14:43.640 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 2>over both soft banks growing AI spending but its exposure

0:14:47.120 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 2>to open AI as well. Sharon Chen FROMBI joins us. Now,

0:14:51.440 --> 0:14:53.880
<v Speaker 2>I want to start with the basics on Japanese retail

0:14:53.920 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 2>bond market, like why this is a significant story soft

0:14:57.080 --> 0:14:59.840
<v Speaker 2>Bank using that mechanism and testing that market.

0:15:01.440 --> 0:15:04.840
<v Speaker 8>Yep, hi ed, thanks for having me so. I mean,

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:08.320
<v Speaker 8>as you just pointed out, it's the record bond deal

0:15:08.480 --> 0:15:12.480
<v Speaker 8>for this market and soft Bank. What's interesting is that

0:15:13.040 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 8>the company actually has very good access to the retail

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 8>bond market. It is the leading issuer in this market.

0:15:19.440 --> 0:15:23.200
<v Speaker 8>And it has strong brand recognition and also offers higher yields,

0:15:24.360 --> 0:15:27.560
<v Speaker 8>so to as evidence of that, you know, earlier in

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:30.760
<v Speaker 8>the years, already tapped the market twice and raised the

0:15:30.840 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 8>equivalent of about four billion dollars in hybrid notes. So

0:15:36.320 --> 0:15:40.280
<v Speaker 8>and the other thing is it is actually offering lower

0:15:40.320 --> 0:15:43.040
<v Speaker 8>cost funding for soft Bank, So if you swap it

0:15:43.080 --> 0:15:45.720
<v Speaker 8>back into US dollar it's still significantly cheaper than if

0:15:45.760 --> 0:15:48.240
<v Speaker 8>the company had to issue US dollar bonds.

0:15:48.840 --> 0:15:50.600
<v Speaker 2>So for soft Bank, the cost of capital is like

0:15:50.640 --> 0:15:52.440
<v Speaker 2>a big factor. But what like, what are the other

0:15:52.520 --> 0:15:55.280
<v Speaker 2>motivations for them to do this? And I guess for

0:15:55.320 --> 0:15:57.680
<v Speaker 2>the tech and credit desk that you're on, do we

0:15:57.760 --> 0:15:59.600
<v Speaker 2>see them coming back to this market?

0:16:00.960 --> 0:16:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Yep.

0:16:01.280 --> 0:16:05.560
<v Speaker 8>So this brings me to the company's funding shortfall. So

0:16:06.960 --> 0:16:09.920
<v Speaker 8>we calculate that it probably still needs another at least

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:13.320
<v Speaker 8>twenty billion dollars even after disbond deal, and after it

0:16:13.440 --> 0:16:17.040
<v Speaker 8>raised about ten billion dollars from an open AI backed

0:16:17.080 --> 0:16:20.720
<v Speaker 8>margin loan, So that's quite a sizeable amount, and a

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:23.080
<v Speaker 8>lot of that well, it's mainly coming from a forty

0:16:23.320 --> 0:16:26.000
<v Speaker 8>billion dollar bridge loan that matures in March, and that

0:16:26.160 --> 0:16:29.280
<v Speaker 8>was raised mainly to fund the commitment to open AI,

0:16:30.240 --> 0:16:33.320
<v Speaker 8>so yes, we do expect further fundraising from the company.

0:16:34.120 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 8>This could come in the form of the US dollar

0:16:36.240 --> 0:16:40.960
<v Speaker 8>Euro bond market issuance. But also the company has you know,

0:16:41.000 --> 0:16:45.160
<v Speaker 8>a large portfolio of tech stocks, the largest being ARMED,

0:16:45.520 --> 0:16:47.760
<v Speaker 8>so I think it can leverage that portfolio, so for

0:16:47.800 --> 0:16:51.920
<v Speaker 8>example upsizing an ARM backed margin loan or selling down

0:16:51.960 --> 0:16:55.360
<v Speaker 8>some of its minority stakes in companies such as Intel.

0:16:57.600 --> 0:17:00.200
<v Speaker 2>Is there investor demand to support SoftBank.

0:17:02.280 --> 0:17:04.760
<v Speaker 8>It depends which market you're talking about. I mentioned the

0:17:04.880 --> 0:17:08.679
<v Speaker 8>retail yen bond market and how it has proven its

0:17:08.720 --> 0:17:13.399
<v Speaker 8>ability to access that market. Now in the offshore bond market,

0:17:13.400 --> 0:17:16.080
<v Speaker 8>actually it's bonds are trading quite wide, and I think

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:20.320
<v Speaker 8>it faces quite weak technical support because it is the

0:17:20.560 --> 0:17:27.119
<v Speaker 8>second largest offshore bond issue from Japan excluding the banks. So,

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:30.200
<v Speaker 8>you know, being a high company that is quite a

0:17:30.240 --> 0:17:33.159
<v Speaker 8>large amount of debt outstanding, and I think supply is

0:17:33.200 --> 0:17:34.720
<v Speaker 8>also a concern for investors.

0:17:35.720 --> 0:17:38.399
<v Speaker 2>Sharon Chen from Bluemeg Intelligence staying up late for us

0:17:38.400 --> 0:17:40.800
<v Speaker 2>in Singapore is super grateful, Thank you very much. I

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:43.080
<v Speaker 2>want to get over to New York where BLOOMBOTIAIRA and

0:17:43.400 --> 0:17:46.120
<v Speaker 2>is standing by with many more tech stories out of Asia.

0:17:46.160 --> 0:17:46.880
<v Speaker 2>How you hire.

0:17:46.960 --> 0:17:49.840
<v Speaker 9>Exactly, and that's the focus. In talking tech first that

0:17:50.040 --> 0:17:53.400
<v Speaker 9>by Dance is challenging AI rivals like ten Cents by

0:17:53.760 --> 0:17:58.120
<v Speaker 9>consolidating the resources behind two of its AI developer products

0:17:58.119 --> 0:18:01.960
<v Speaker 9>to bolster China's most popular tappot. Sources say the team

0:18:02.080 --> 0:18:05.760
<v Speaker 9>behind the coding platform Trey and agent building tool Cozy

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:10.680
<v Speaker 9>are being merged into Dubao plus. Fast fashion giant Chian

0:18:10.840 --> 0:18:13.120
<v Speaker 9>is seeking to raise as much as one point eight

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:16.399
<v Speaker 9>billion dollars in its long awaited Hong Kong ipo. The

0:18:16.440 --> 0:18:19.400
<v Speaker 9>retailer is offering two hundred and eighty million shares forty

0:18:19.480 --> 0:18:22.480
<v Speaker 9>nine to fifty Hong Kong dollars each, giving the firm

0:18:22.520 --> 0:18:26.080
<v Speaker 9>a market cap of just under twenty seven billion dollars.

0:18:26.119 --> 0:18:30.480
<v Speaker 9>It's a sharp drop from its peak value. And Tesla

0:18:30.480 --> 0:18:34.000
<v Speaker 9>and at least eight other automakers in China are recalling

0:18:34.280 --> 0:18:38.520
<v Speaker 9>millions of cars over safety concerns regarding door handles, which

0:18:38.880 --> 0:18:44.080
<v Speaker 9>have led to multiple fatalities and vehicle entrapments. Four million

0:18:44.119 --> 0:18:47.640
<v Speaker 9>cars are a part of this crackdown, with Tesla accounting

0:18:47.960 --> 0:18:49.920
<v Speaker 9>for nearly three million of those.

0:18:50.240 --> 0:18:54.639
<v Speaker 2>Ed Okay, thank you, Hira. The Trump administration is proposing

0:18:54.680 --> 0:18:57.240
<v Speaker 2>adding a new fee the H one B work is

0:18:57.320 --> 0:19:01.119
<v Speaker 2>haired within the US, disrupting hiring plan for many employers.

0:19:01.520 --> 0:19:04.360
<v Speaker 2>The fee of a little over one hundred thousand dollars

0:19:04.480 --> 0:19:07.159
<v Speaker 2>would apply to all petitions for H one B workers

0:19:07.200 --> 0:19:11.160
<v Speaker 2>subject to an annual statutory CAB, including those with master's degrees,

0:19:11.320 --> 0:19:14.960
<v Speaker 2>and would generate eight point eight billion dollars annually according

0:19:15.040 --> 0:19:19.000
<v Speaker 2>to the Department of Homeland Security. Now coming up, Apples

0:19:19.040 --> 0:19:22.640
<v Speaker 2>cutting jobs to focus on new devices and artificial intelligence.

0:19:22.640 --> 0:19:34.040
<v Speaker 2>We've got the details. Next, this is Bloomberg Tech. Apple's

0:19:34.080 --> 0:19:37.600
<v Speaker 2>cutting jobs across teams responsible for the Siri digital assistant

0:19:37.760 --> 0:19:40.119
<v Speaker 2>and the Vision Pro headset, or this part of an

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:43.760
<v Speaker 2>effort to focus on new devices and on artificial intelligence.

0:19:43.800 --> 0:19:47.040
<v Speaker 2>Bloombog's Mark German, who leads our coverage of Apple, broke

0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:50.240
<v Speaker 2>this story Friday, But I want to recap it. This

0:19:50.320 --> 0:19:53.439
<v Speaker 2>is just reprioritizing, right Mark, What are the details of

0:19:53.480 --> 0:19:54.440
<v Speaker 2>the report you put out?

0:19:55.480 --> 0:19:59.480
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, So Apple's cutting jobs in three central areas. One

0:19:59.560 --> 0:20:02.840
<v Speaker 10>team the Vision Pro team, so the group called VPG

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 10>responsible for the headset. The second is SERI in the

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:10.880
<v Speaker 10>third is a team called Intelligent Systems Experiences, which really

0:20:10.880 --> 0:20:13.879
<v Speaker 10>comes down to integrating AI features through the operating system

0:20:14.200 --> 0:20:16.280
<v Speaker 10>and services. So let me start with the Vision Pro.

0:20:16.920 --> 0:20:20.399
<v Speaker 10>This is more of your traditional layoff where they're cutting

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:24.000
<v Speaker 10>teams and scaling back things in this particular area. So

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:27.440
<v Speaker 10>they had a team working on gaming initiatives for the

0:20:27.480 --> 0:20:32.160
<v Speaker 10>Vision Pro. That team has been completely dismantled and laid off.

0:20:32.480 --> 0:20:34.879
<v Speaker 10>The second is their Immersive Video group. This is the

0:20:34.920 --> 0:20:38.359
<v Speaker 10>team making virtual reality videos for the Vision Pro.

0:20:38.359 --> 0:20:40.960
<v Speaker 2>One of the top selling points. They're scaling that back.

0:20:41.000 --> 0:20:44.320
<v Speaker 10>They're cutting jobs there, they're cutting investments there, and they

0:20:44.359 --> 0:20:46.800
<v Speaker 10>are going to drastically reduce the number of videos they

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:49.520
<v Speaker 10>produce in house for the Vision Pro, instead pushing that

0:20:49.560 --> 0:20:52.880
<v Speaker 10>off to third parties. For Siri in the Intelligent Systems

0:20:52.920 --> 0:20:56.720
<v Speaker 10>Experience team, that's part of the Software Engineering organization, they're

0:20:56.760 --> 0:21:00.320
<v Speaker 10>cutting jobs there as well to open up roles for

0:21:00.400 --> 0:21:03.199
<v Speaker 10>people who can work on the new underlying infrastructure for

0:21:03.440 --> 0:21:06.840
<v Speaker 10>Serie AI. So looking to develop faster, looking to bring

0:21:06.880 --> 0:21:10.240
<v Speaker 10>in talent that is more specific towards that new infrastructure

0:21:10.480 --> 0:21:13.760
<v Speaker 10>for that new Voice assistant and their upgraded Apple Intelligence

0:21:14.240 --> 0:21:16.280
<v Speaker 10>which launches this fall for the first time.

0:21:17.280 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 2>I also really enjoyed this Weekend's power on. What you

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 2>were writing about is the idea of Apple's foldable phone

0:21:23.760 --> 0:21:27.080
<v Speaker 2>and how this products could bring some magic back to

0:21:27.160 --> 0:21:30.040
<v Speaker 2>the Apples story. You've been pulling on your experience with

0:21:30.119 --> 0:21:32.720
<v Speaker 2>Samsung's foldable, You've been thinking about what you know the

0:21:32.760 --> 0:21:35.920
<v Speaker 2>details of the Apple foldable. What can you tell us?

0:21:37.040 --> 0:21:38.920
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I mean, I'm pretty pumped for the foldable phone.

0:21:38.920 --> 0:21:41.679
<v Speaker 10>I think it's going to do particularly well for Apple

0:21:41.720 --> 0:21:45.919
<v Speaker 10>in China as a status symbol. You know, the amount

0:21:45.960 --> 0:21:48.440
<v Speaker 10>of people who use foldable phones globally is not high.

0:21:48.480 --> 0:21:50.639
<v Speaker 10>It's about one and a half percent of a global

0:21:50.640 --> 0:21:54.760
<v Speaker 10>phone market is foldable phones, but it's actually double that

0:21:54.920 --> 0:21:57.760
<v Speaker 10>in China, right, So the vast majority of foldable phones

0:21:57.760 --> 0:21:59.920
<v Speaker 10>in use in the world are in China. So that's

0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:02.639
<v Speaker 10>I'm going to be pretty successful for Uple there, I believe.

0:22:02.680 --> 0:22:04.600
<v Speaker 10>But I'm really into the size of it. I'm really

0:22:04.600 --> 0:22:06.800
<v Speaker 10>into how you have this small thing that can fit

0:22:06.840 --> 0:22:08.439
<v Speaker 10>in your pocket and you open it up and it's

0:22:08.440 --> 0:22:11.240
<v Speaker 10>about the size of an iPad Mini. So all in all,

0:22:11.359 --> 0:22:14.240
<v Speaker 10>pretty pumped for this new device and looking forward to

0:22:14.280 --> 0:22:16.040
<v Speaker 10>getting my hands on it in just a few weeks.

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:19.800
<v Speaker 2>Every Sunday, Mark publishes power On and I really recommend

0:22:19.840 --> 0:22:22.680
<v Speaker 2>you subscribe and read it. Packed full of detail. Bloomberg's

0:22:22.680 --> 0:22:24.760
<v Speaker 2>Mark Guman, thank you very much. Indeed now coming up

0:22:24.760 --> 0:22:27.399
<v Speaker 2>as in video reports earnings this week. It's also facing

0:22:27.440 --> 0:22:30.600
<v Speaker 2>pressure from new competitors, with some of the details in

0:22:30.640 --> 0:22:33.120
<v Speaker 2>the AI chip race coming up next again. The stock

0:22:33.240 --> 0:22:36.400
<v Speaker 2>under pressure, down for a seventh straight session, worst run

0:22:36.440 --> 0:22:39.320
<v Speaker 2>of decline since twenty twenty two. This is what markets

0:22:39.320 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 2>look like broadly and astacks down. It is chip stocks

0:22:42.240 --> 0:22:45.440
<v Speaker 2>that are leading US lower. Bitcoin at almost eighty thousand

0:22:45.480 --> 0:22:47.400
<v Speaker 2>dollars a token. We've got more on that soon. Halftime.

0:22:47.960 --> 0:22:59.880
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech. Okay, welcome back to Bloomberg Tech.

0:23:00.280 --> 0:23:03.160
<v Speaker 2>Markets are treading water a little bit, but we're seeing

0:23:03.160 --> 0:23:06.000
<v Speaker 2>some severe declines in the chip makers that are leading

0:23:06.080 --> 0:23:08.399
<v Speaker 2>US lower overall. There is that Bloomberg report over the

0:23:08.400 --> 0:23:11.680
<v Speaker 2>weekend that some of the server makers have told in

0:23:11.800 --> 0:23:16.440
<v Speaker 2>video customers to expect price hikes into the new year.

0:23:16.800 --> 0:23:19.400
<v Speaker 2>We also have some breaking news that I believes crossing

0:23:19.520 --> 0:23:22.399
<v Speaker 2>the Bloomberg terminal. The US is set to impose a

0:23:22.520 --> 0:23:26.760
<v Speaker 2>seven point five percent tariff on Chinese goods over allegations

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:30.399
<v Speaker 2>of excess manufacturing capacity. That's before a planned summit between

0:23:30.480 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 2>Jijingping and Donald Trump next month. According to sources, the

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:37.480
<v Speaker 2>move would restore Trump's second term duties on China to

0:23:37.600 --> 0:23:41.800
<v Speaker 2>around twenty percent, a level Beijing's previously said is consistent

0:23:41.880 --> 0:23:44.600
<v Speaker 2>with its trade ruts with Washington. Those comme on top

0:23:44.640 --> 0:23:47.400
<v Speaker 2>of other levees imposed during Trump's first term and then

0:23:47.480 --> 0:23:51.520
<v Speaker 2>extended during the Biden administration. I'm looking for some market reaction.

0:23:51.880 --> 0:23:53.639
<v Speaker 2>If we get any, we'll bring it to you and

0:23:53.720 --> 0:23:56.439
<v Speaker 2>Videos earnings on Wednesday are likely to serve as a

0:23:56.480 --> 0:24:00.560
<v Speaker 2>reminder of the company's commanding position in the aichi sector,

0:24:00.680 --> 0:24:04.600
<v Speaker 2>but it's facing pressure from new competitors, startups and big

0:24:04.640 --> 0:24:08.320
<v Speaker 2>tech alike, including some of its own customers. Bloomberg's AI

0:24:08.359 --> 0:24:11.640
<v Speaker 2>infrastructure report Adena bass is with Us just a fascinating read,

0:24:11.800 --> 0:24:14.200
<v Speaker 2>and you open with the case study of Amazon right

0:24:14.240 --> 0:24:17.560
<v Speaker 2>in this boast almost that Amazon has now regularly that

0:24:17.600 --> 0:24:20.679
<v Speaker 2>it's becoming one of the biggest chip makers in Vidia's

0:24:20.680 --> 0:24:22.640
<v Speaker 2>world's changing. Bring us the reporting.

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:26.200
<v Speaker 11>Sure look in Video is still by far the dominant

0:24:26.200 --> 0:24:28.800
<v Speaker 11>player in the AI chip market. But there's a few

0:24:28.840 --> 0:24:31.640
<v Speaker 11>things that are going on here. One, no customer can

0:24:31.680 --> 0:24:34.440
<v Speaker 11>get enough in VideA GPUs, so they're looking for any

0:24:34.560 --> 0:24:38.119
<v Speaker 11>viable alternatives that they can find. Two, the market in

0:24:38.200 --> 0:24:41.840
<v Speaker 11>terms of AI workloads is increasingly shifting to inference workloads

0:24:41.880 --> 0:24:44.040
<v Speaker 11>the running of the models rather than the training of

0:24:44.040 --> 0:24:44.600
<v Speaker 11>the models.

0:24:44.920 --> 0:24:46.720
<v Speaker 2>That's an area where Invidia.

0:24:46.280 --> 0:24:48.240
<v Speaker 11>Has less of a lock and where it's useful to

0:24:48.320 --> 0:24:51.960
<v Speaker 11>have different types of inference chips for you know, that

0:24:52.040 --> 0:24:55.320
<v Speaker 11>are better at different tasks. And you're also actually seeing

0:24:55.320 --> 0:25:00.280
<v Speaker 11>a resurgence around agentic AI workloads of the CPU, which

0:25:00.880 --> 0:25:03.320
<v Speaker 11>you know was basically for a long time ill favored

0:25:03.359 --> 0:25:05.560
<v Speaker 11>for AI tasks. And so so those are some of

0:25:05.560 --> 0:25:08.280
<v Speaker 11>the things that are changing. Apart from Amazon, Google, we're

0:25:08.280 --> 0:25:12.960
<v Speaker 11>seeing a you know, surge in fundings of AI chip startups.

0:25:13.000 --> 0:25:16.399
<v Speaker 11>Last week we saw etched announced that they've quadrupled their

0:25:16.480 --> 0:25:20.400
<v Speaker 11>valuation since December. Bloomberg reported a company out of UK

0:25:20.480 --> 0:25:24.400
<v Speaker 11>called Fractile is raising now also at evaluation that's five

0:25:24.480 --> 0:25:26.880
<v Speaker 11>or six fold where they were raising, you know.

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:28.200
<v Speaker 12>Just half a year ago.

0:25:29.600 --> 0:25:32.440
<v Speaker 2>And the frontier labs are looking at their own silicon.

0:25:32.560 --> 0:25:35.879
<v Speaker 2>You had a report on Friday that Anthropic has brought

0:25:35.880 --> 0:25:38.800
<v Speaker 2>in a veteran of the industry to kind of oversee

0:25:38.840 --> 0:25:41.480
<v Speaker 2>its own push into hardware. Who are we talking about?

0:25:41.560 --> 0:25:42.240
<v Speaker 2>What do we need to know?

0:25:43.280 --> 0:25:46.680
<v Speaker 11>Sure Anthropic confirmed to us on Friday that they've hired

0:25:46.680 --> 0:25:50.560
<v Speaker 11>Amir Salek, who was a founder of the TPU program

0:25:50.560 --> 0:25:53.240
<v Speaker 11>at Google. Also ran the TPU program for a number

0:25:53.280 --> 0:25:56.280
<v Speaker 11>of years before leaving Google a couple of years ago.

0:25:56.720 --> 0:25:59.119
<v Speaker 11>For you know, a private equity firm, you know, one

0:25:59.160 --> 0:26:02.120
<v Speaker 11>of the clearest signs that a company is looking at

0:26:02.119 --> 0:26:05.320
<v Speaker 11>doing its own custom Silicon is watching the hiring and

0:26:05.440 --> 0:26:08.199
<v Speaker 11>order at chips are expensive, they require a lot of

0:26:08.280 --> 0:26:11.000
<v Speaker 11>patients and a lot of expertise, and when you see

0:26:11.000 --> 0:26:13.359
<v Speaker 11>a company start to staff up on people that have

0:26:13.480 --> 0:26:17.320
<v Speaker 11>done this before, it's an indication that they are getting serious.

0:26:17.400 --> 0:26:20.440
<v Speaker 11>Nanthropic has, because of these job listings over the last

0:26:20.440 --> 0:26:23.399
<v Speaker 11>few weeks, finally confirmed that they are looking at this,

0:26:23.520 --> 0:26:27.040
<v Speaker 11>that they are doing this. Open Ai is already further along,

0:26:27.600 --> 0:26:30.360
<v Speaker 11>you know, having unveiled their Jalopenio chip, which they will

0:26:30.400 --> 0:26:34.880
<v Speaker 11>talk about more tomorrow at the Hot Ships conference Bloomberg.

0:26:34.960 --> 0:26:37.959
<v Speaker 2>Stina best, thank you so much. Let's stick with Nvidia

0:26:38.119 --> 0:26:41.720
<v Speaker 2>City Index Financial Market Senior Fionness and Coodo joins us.

0:26:41.760 --> 0:26:45.000
<v Speaker 2>And you know it's a week where in Wednesday we

0:26:45.040 --> 0:26:48.320
<v Speaker 2>have Nvidia's quarterly earnings and on Friday we have Jackson Hole,

0:26:48.480 --> 0:26:50.560
<v Speaker 2>and lots of people in markets with debate which is

0:26:50.560 --> 0:26:54.439
<v Speaker 2>the bigger event. Let's say it's in Vidia, which is

0:26:54.440 --> 0:26:57.320
<v Speaker 2>bigger for you? Do you know what?

0:26:57.480 --> 0:27:00.000
<v Speaker 13>I think in Vidia is going to be extremely important.

0:27:00.480 --> 0:27:03.000
<v Speaker 14>I mean, it does feel like the AI trade has

0:27:03.080 --> 0:27:05.760
<v Speaker 14>sort of been a little bit on the back burner recently.

0:27:05.800 --> 0:27:07.760
<v Speaker 14>It hasn't been front and central, and I think n

0:27:07.840 --> 0:27:11.800
<v Speaker 14>video earnings will bring this very much back to a

0:27:11.840 --> 0:27:15.359
<v Speaker 14>clear firm focus for the markets. But obviously, as we know,

0:27:15.480 --> 0:27:18.960
<v Speaker 14>you know, this not only affects Nvidia. This these earnings

0:27:19.040 --> 0:27:22.520
<v Speaker 14>affect risk sentiment more broadly and impact sort of you know,

0:27:22.560 --> 0:27:25.240
<v Speaker 14>the wider indices, the S and P five hundred than NASAK.

0:27:25.359 --> 0:27:27.560
<v Speaker 14>So I think as far as that's concerned, it is

0:27:27.600 --> 0:27:30.320
<v Speaker 14>going to be really key. Obviously, expectations are high, the

0:27:30.359 --> 0:27:33.600
<v Speaker 14>bar is high, but we've got, as you mentioned, Jackson Hull.

0:27:33.840 --> 0:27:36.720
<v Speaker 14>I think we may be disappointed by Jackson Holl given

0:27:36.800 --> 0:27:39.600
<v Speaker 14>that Fred chair Wash tends to be a little more

0:27:39.720 --> 0:27:43.640
<v Speaker 14>has been less in favor of giving out forward guidance.

0:27:43.680 --> 0:27:44.720
<v Speaker 13>So I think we might find the.

0:27:44.720 --> 0:27:47.360
<v Speaker 14>Actual amount of information we get from him maybe too limited.

0:27:48.840 --> 0:27:51.679
<v Speaker 2>The expectation on Wall Streets and video will have sales

0:27:51.800 --> 0:27:55.639
<v Speaker 2>ninety two to ninety five billion dollars. They will double

0:27:55.680 --> 0:27:58.960
<v Speaker 2>adjusted earnings from the same period a year ago. But

0:27:59.520 --> 0:28:02.040
<v Speaker 2>those are just numbers. What is it Nvidia has to

0:28:02.119 --> 0:28:05.120
<v Speaker 2>say to keep the market believing in this story.

0:28:06.600 --> 0:28:09.040
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, you know, the numbers are expected to be good.

0:28:09.160 --> 0:28:10.639
<v Speaker 13>The bar is high.

0:28:11.400 --> 0:28:14.160
<v Speaker 14>Even forward guidance is going to be very key, expecting

0:28:14.240 --> 0:28:17.040
<v Speaker 14>to succeed a one hundred billion for the first time.

0:28:17.880 --> 0:28:19.879
<v Speaker 14>And I think what's actually going to be key here

0:28:20.080 --> 0:28:23.560
<v Speaker 14>is the level of AI demand. You know, we want

0:28:23.600 --> 0:28:26.439
<v Speaker 14>to see that data center spending by these sort of

0:28:26.520 --> 0:28:31.359
<v Speaker 14>AI hyperscalers is continuing to grow at a level that

0:28:31.440 --> 0:28:34.680
<v Speaker 14>is supportive of valuation. So, I mean, we know that

0:28:34.880 --> 0:28:37.600
<v Speaker 14>the share price has come off the record high slightly,

0:28:37.640 --> 0:28:40.320
<v Speaker 14>but it's still up a good eighteen percent across the year,

0:28:40.400 --> 0:28:43.080
<v Speaker 14>well ahead of the S and P five hundred. So

0:28:43.240 --> 0:28:45.400
<v Speaker 14>you know, we're going to need to see that the

0:28:45.560 --> 0:28:49.720
<v Speaker 14>demand is accelerating at a level that is supportive of

0:28:49.760 --> 0:28:50.600
<v Speaker 14>that share price.

0:28:52.440 --> 0:28:56.520
<v Speaker 2>How worried are you and your clients about the issue

0:28:56.520 --> 0:28:57.719
<v Speaker 2>of circular financing.

0:28:59.440 --> 0:29:03.440
<v Speaker 14>It's definitely I worry that sort of looms in the background.

0:29:03.600 --> 0:29:06.040
<v Speaker 14>I think you know what we see is when we

0:29:06.080 --> 0:29:10.080
<v Speaker 14>get some solid results, that often tends to just push

0:29:10.160 --> 0:29:13.480
<v Speaker 14>those concerns away a little bit, and when the deals

0:29:13.520 --> 0:29:18.040
<v Speaker 14>start coming through that raises more puts more focus back

0:29:18.080 --> 0:29:22.920
<v Speaker 14>onto that circular financing story. Then that can just raise

0:29:22.960 --> 0:29:26.360
<v Speaker 14>those concerns over the bubbles story. But I think at

0:29:26.360 --> 0:29:28.360
<v Speaker 14>the end of the day that you know, we know

0:29:28.600 --> 0:29:31.880
<v Speaker 14>that the AI narrative is very strong, we know that

0:29:31.960 --> 0:29:36.280
<v Speaker 14>it does bring some real world use, and therefore this

0:29:36.400 --> 0:29:39.000
<v Speaker 14>isn't necessarily a bubble in the terms that we've seen

0:29:39.040 --> 0:29:39.760
<v Speaker 14>it previously.

0:29:40.480 --> 0:29:43.320
<v Speaker 13>But I do also think that you know, these earnings.

0:29:42.920 --> 0:29:45.080
<v Speaker 14>Are going to be watched very closely in order to

0:29:45.120 --> 0:29:47.920
<v Speaker 14>make sure that that can sort of smooth over any

0:29:48.000 --> 0:29:49.000
<v Speaker 14>of those concerns.

0:29:49.680 --> 0:29:51.880
<v Speaker 2>We're just showing a chart that you know, video heads

0:29:51.880 --> 0:29:54.440
<v Speaker 2>into the print with a pretty low multiple. Not just

0:29:54.520 --> 0:29:57.400
<v Speaker 2>remind the audience that the stockdown for a seventh straight session,

0:29:57.880 --> 0:30:00.280
<v Speaker 2>worst run of declines or matching the runner decline. It's

0:30:00.280 --> 0:30:03.760
<v Speaker 2>sore in September twenty twenty two. Where's the potential upside

0:30:03.760 --> 0:30:06.840
<v Speaker 2>from video? What can gentsenmong say that gets everyone you

0:30:06.960 --> 0:30:07.600
<v Speaker 2>thoric again?

0:30:09.600 --> 0:30:12.320
<v Speaker 14>I think it's just that idea that the demand is

0:30:12.360 --> 0:30:16.840
<v Speaker 14>growing fast enough to value to justify valuation. That is

0:30:16.880 --> 0:30:19.360
<v Speaker 14>what the market is going to be very very focused

0:30:19.400 --> 0:30:21.880
<v Speaker 14>on because you need to be able to decide that

0:30:22.080 --> 0:30:25.400
<v Speaker 14>forward earnings are going to be growing at a level

0:30:25.480 --> 0:30:29.120
<v Speaker 14>that suits the share price, and that's what the market

0:30:29.160 --> 0:30:30.000
<v Speaker 14>will want to see.

0:30:31.720 --> 0:30:33.880
<v Speaker 2>How interested are you and bitcoin at the moment, we're

0:30:33.880 --> 0:30:37.120
<v Speaker 2>tracking data on ETF flows, biggest in about ten months.

0:30:37.440 --> 0:30:40.880
<v Speaker 2>Anyone in your world really looking at it.

0:30:40.280 --> 0:30:45.840
<v Speaker 14>It's definitely showing signs of revival. I mean, it's been

0:30:45.840 --> 0:30:51.400
<v Speaker 14>a very slow few months as far as our client's

0:30:51.480 --> 0:30:54.320
<v Speaker 14>concerned and as Bitcoin is concerned. But I think, you know,

0:30:54.400 --> 0:30:59.400
<v Speaker 14>we are starting to see potential for the stars aligning.

0:30:59.720 --> 0:31:03.320
<v Speaker 14>You know, as you mentioned, ETF flows are returning. We've

0:31:03.320 --> 0:31:07.240
<v Speaker 14>seen the strongest ETF week last week of inflows since October.

0:31:07.600 --> 0:31:10.520
<v Speaker 14>You've seen this idea of sort of potential of improving

0:31:10.800 --> 0:31:15.320
<v Speaker 14>liquidity expectations due to the comments from the US Treasury

0:31:15.360 --> 0:31:18.320
<v Speaker 14>Department and their support of the bond market.

0:31:19.000 --> 0:31:20.600
<v Speaker 13>And then you've also got this idea of.

0:31:20.560 --> 0:31:25.120
<v Speaker 14>Potentially lower regulatory risk premium, which is also supportive. So

0:31:25.160 --> 0:31:27.520
<v Speaker 14>it does feel that there are several factors which are

0:31:27.520 --> 0:31:31.479
<v Speaker 14>lining up now to support bitcoin. We obviously saw that

0:31:31.600 --> 0:31:34.360
<v Speaker 14>short squeeze last week. What's going to be really key

0:31:34.400 --> 0:31:37.040
<v Speaker 14>now is to see whether we can see this actually

0:31:37.080 --> 0:31:40.640
<v Speaker 14>extend games on buying rather than the short squeeze, and

0:31:40.640 --> 0:31:42.600
<v Speaker 14>I think that's going to come down to core PCE.

0:31:43.200 --> 0:31:45.040
<v Speaker 14>It's also going to come down to what we get

0:31:45.080 --> 0:31:49.200
<v Speaker 14>from Federal Reserve Chair Wash on Friday.

0:31:49.280 --> 0:31:49.840
<v Speaker 13>If anything.

0:31:51.200 --> 0:31:54.240
<v Speaker 2>Fionis and CODI City Index financial market senior analyst setting

0:31:54.320 --> 0:31:56.760
<v Speaker 2>us up for the week, Thank you very much. Indeed,

0:31:56.840 --> 0:32:00.480
<v Speaker 2>let's take a look at trade dot xyz, a little

0:32:00.520 --> 0:32:03.920
<v Speaker 2>known market built on top of crypto exchange hyper Liquid,

0:32:04.160 --> 0:32:07.520
<v Speaker 2>which allows speculators to buy and sell blockchain based oil

0:32:07.560 --> 0:32:12.520
<v Speaker 2>derivatives continuously, even when traditional markets are closed. The platforms

0:32:12.560 --> 0:32:15.960
<v Speaker 2>generated some five hundred billion dollars in trading volume since

0:32:16.040 --> 0:32:20.400
<v Speaker 2>launching in October. Bloomberg's Moahshen is here to tell us

0:32:20.400 --> 0:32:23.040
<v Speaker 2>more about it. Really interesting story. Let's start with the basics,

0:32:23.040 --> 0:32:26.040
<v Speaker 2>the concept of perps, hyper liquid and everything else that

0:32:26.040 --> 0:32:27.600
<v Speaker 2>we need to understand. Yeah.

0:32:27.640 --> 0:32:32.160
<v Speaker 15>Sure, so, proposor swap are a type of features contracts

0:32:32.200 --> 0:32:35.680
<v Speaker 15>that do not expire, and hyperloquit is a trading platform

0:32:36.720 --> 0:32:39.920
<v Speaker 15>with this namesake blockchain where it allows traders to trace

0:32:39.960 --> 0:32:40.720
<v Speaker 15>such products.

0:32:42.200 --> 0:32:45.120
<v Speaker 2>There is a push to bring hyper liquid to the US.

0:32:45.360 --> 0:32:47.080
<v Speaker 2>Like if you look at the headline twenty four to

0:32:47.120 --> 0:32:50.800
<v Speaker 2>seven markets of great interest to all kinds of parts

0:32:50.840 --> 0:32:54.600
<v Speaker 2>of the Bloomberg audience, explain that push.

0:32:54.640 --> 0:32:58.160
<v Speaker 15>So basically what's happening is that because the traditional markets

0:32:58.200 --> 0:33:01.680
<v Speaker 15>are usually close over the weekends, where you know, most

0:33:01.720 --> 0:33:04.280
<v Speaker 15>people cannot really look at or have an idea where

0:33:04.320 --> 0:33:06.840
<v Speaker 15>the market is going to be at when during the weekends,

0:33:06.920 --> 0:33:10.000
<v Speaker 15>especially when there's like breaking news. So places like have

0:33:10.160 --> 0:33:13.800
<v Speaker 15>hyper liquid provide a platform where people can get an

0:33:13.840 --> 0:33:16.920
<v Speaker 15>idea where market is going to be when it opens

0:33:16.920 --> 0:33:19.640
<v Speaker 15>on Monday. I think the idea is that, like, you

0:33:19.640 --> 0:33:22.640
<v Speaker 15>don't want that kind of market remains offshore outside the US,

0:33:22.760 --> 0:33:25.200
<v Speaker 15>right because currently hyper Liquid or trade x y z

0:33:25.640 --> 0:33:28.880
<v Speaker 15>are not like open in the US. So I think

0:33:28.920 --> 0:33:31.520
<v Speaker 15>bringing these type of markets on shore to the US

0:33:31.680 --> 0:33:34.680
<v Speaker 15>is very important, especially you know Wall Street is based

0:33:34.760 --> 0:33:35.800
<v Speaker 15>here in the States.

0:33:36.440 --> 0:33:38.320
<v Speaker 2>Part of your reporting is that trade x y z

0:33:38.520 --> 0:33:42.040
<v Speaker 2>is out there lobbying regulators. What's the argument that they're making.

0:33:43.480 --> 0:33:45.920
<v Speaker 15>I think the main argument is that I think they're

0:33:45.920 --> 0:33:48.720
<v Speaker 15>only show that how important it is. Especially I think

0:33:48.720 --> 0:33:52.360
<v Speaker 15>you have a platform where you can trade futures contracts

0:33:52.360 --> 0:33:55.400
<v Speaker 15>tied to stocks or you know, things like pre ipo.

0:33:55.880 --> 0:33:58.400
<v Speaker 15>These are all happened in the US, but you know

0:33:58.520 --> 0:34:01.120
<v Speaker 15>these platforms that are only out allowed outside of the US.

0:34:01.200 --> 0:34:03.760
<v Speaker 15>So just I think logically speaking, for these people, it

0:34:04.000 --> 0:34:06.120
<v Speaker 15>just don't make a lot of sense. So I think

0:34:06.200 --> 0:34:08.160
<v Speaker 15>there are a lot of pushing regulators, I think to

0:34:08.200 --> 0:34:10.719
<v Speaker 15>be more innovative and to allow these kind of like

0:34:10.800 --> 0:34:13.560
<v Speaker 15>markets to be legally offered here in the States.

0:34:14.560 --> 0:34:17.160
<v Speaker 2>Bloombergs are shamed with the story thank you very much.

0:34:17.239 --> 0:34:20.520
<v Speaker 2>Now coming up as South Korean AI startup aims to

0:34:20.600 --> 0:34:24.759
<v Speaker 2>create K pop robot idols backed by industry veterans like

0:34:24.920 --> 0:34:28.520
<v Speaker 2>g Dragon. Got the details. Next, this is bloombag Tech.

0:34:36.520 --> 0:34:40.000
<v Speaker 2>The AI boom is royaling not only South Korea's markets,

0:34:40.040 --> 0:34:42.880
<v Speaker 2>but it's cultural industries. Here's a look at one entertainment

0:34:42.960 --> 0:34:46.800
<v Speaker 2>startup that is not only embracing AI but betting robot

0:34:46.960 --> 0:34:51.040
<v Speaker 2>idols at the future of K pop. Bloomberg Asia entertainment reporters,

0:34:51.120 --> 0:34:52.400
<v Speaker 2>So he can't reports from.

0:34:52.239 --> 0:34:56.879
<v Speaker 7>Soul as much as Samsung and sk Heinis have thrown

0:34:56.920 --> 0:35:01.319
<v Speaker 7>South Korean markets into the spotlight this year. Worldwide popularity

0:35:01.320 --> 0:35:04.759
<v Speaker 7>of groups like BTS and Black pink shows like Squeaking

0:35:05.120 --> 0:35:08.560
<v Speaker 7>and beloved romantic dramas have been an economic boon long

0:35:08.640 --> 0:35:13.000
<v Speaker 7>before the meteoric rise of large language models. Music films,

0:35:13.120 --> 0:35:16.839
<v Speaker 7>video games, and other Korean cultural industries generated over one

0:35:16.920 --> 0:35:19.920
<v Speaker 7>hundred and thirteen billion dollars in revenue last year and

0:35:20.000 --> 0:35:23.800
<v Speaker 7>more than fifteen billion dollars in exports. They employ about

0:35:23.840 --> 0:35:26.600
<v Speaker 7>six hundred and ninety thousand workers, more than double the

0:35:26.680 --> 0:35:30.480
<v Speaker 7>combined number at the Memory to Giants. South Korea's entertainment

0:35:30.560 --> 0:35:34.960
<v Speaker 7>sector has grown more experimental and ambitious as competition intensifies.

0:35:35.400 --> 0:35:38.600
<v Speaker 7>One startup looking to disrupt K pop's traditional idol system

0:35:38.800 --> 0:35:42.600
<v Speaker 7>is Galaxy Corporation. It's looking to blend AI characters and

0:35:42.680 --> 0:35:46.160
<v Speaker 7>life sized robot idols to create content without the limitations

0:35:46.160 --> 0:35:49.760
<v Speaker 7>of human performers. CEO Cholo says they are not looking

0:35:49.800 --> 0:35:52.239
<v Speaker 7>to replace people, but create up.

0:35:53.520 --> 0:35:56.200
<v Speaker 16>Robots can learn everything at once and immediately perform it

0:35:56.280 --> 0:35:58.439
<v Speaker 16>for people, whereas it might take a person a month

0:35:58.520 --> 0:36:01.360
<v Speaker 16>or two to learn the same material. The time savings

0:36:01.400 --> 0:36:04.920
<v Speaker 16>are enormous, and it all happen simultaneously. Once the training

0:36:04.960 --> 0:36:07.160
<v Speaker 16>is complete, there's no need to do it again, so

0:36:07.160 --> 0:36:10.080
<v Speaker 16>we can immediately have a robot trainee debut in New York.

0:36:10.520 --> 0:36:13.160
<v Speaker 16>It doesn't require the three, five or ten years of

0:36:13.200 --> 0:36:16.760
<v Speaker 16>preparation that humans need. That's how AI is changing everything.

0:36:17.120 --> 0:36:20.120
<v Speaker 7>Galaxy was founded in twenty nineteen and started as a

0:36:20.160 --> 0:36:23.400
<v Speaker 7>TV production studio behind the Netflix hit Physical one hundred.

0:36:23.600 --> 0:36:27.520
<v Speaker 7>Its current roster includes K pop superstar Jed Dragon after

0:36:27.640 --> 0:36:30.880
<v Speaker 7>Songkang Wu from the film Parasite, and San Francisco Giants

0:36:30.960 --> 0:36:34.480
<v Speaker 7>right builder Lito. Galaxy has now opened a sixteen thousand,

0:36:34.520 --> 0:36:37.760
<v Speaker 7>five hundred square meter robot park and Seoul, where visitors

0:36:37.800 --> 0:36:41.280
<v Speaker 7>can interact with around fifty different types of robots. Toy

0:36:41.320 --> 0:36:44.160
<v Speaker 7>plans to open new robot team parks in other major cities,

0:36:44.200 --> 0:36:47.279
<v Speaker 7>including Dubai, and run a robot idol tour from next year.

0:36:47.600 --> 0:36:52.160
<v Speaker 7>Among its partners is Unitry, China's first publicly traded humanoid maker,

0:36:52.400 --> 0:36:53.560
<v Speaker 7>Parly owner mom.

0:36:54.320 --> 0:36:57.040
<v Speaker 16>Even if the hardware the robot is made in China,

0:36:57.400 --> 0:37:00.360
<v Speaker 16>combining it with software made in Korea and joining forces

0:37:00.400 --> 0:37:03.880
<v Speaker 16>to go global holds great significance. Above all, I believe

0:37:03.920 --> 0:37:06.440
<v Speaker 16>these robots will become part of people's lives as new

0:37:06.440 --> 0:37:10.080
<v Speaker 16>relations are released, including special editions of their favorite celebrities

0:37:10.120 --> 0:37:10.920
<v Speaker 16>that they can collect.

0:37:11.200 --> 0:37:13.959
<v Speaker 7>While Galaxy is showcasing one of the first real world

0:37:14.200 --> 0:37:17.880
<v Speaker 7>use cases for these robots. Toy says discussions on global

0:37:17.920 --> 0:37:19.360
<v Speaker 7>guidelines need to take place.

0:37:19.680 --> 0:37:20.480
<v Speaker 12>Lead hire Man.

0:37:20.800 --> 0:37:24.319
<v Speaker 16>AI is al ready part of our lives. What's somewhat disappointing, though,

0:37:24.400 --> 0:37:26.959
<v Speaker 16>is that we don't yet have global guidelines that match

0:37:26.960 --> 0:37:30.720
<v Speaker 16>its development, whether that means global laws, systems to protect

0:37:30.719 --> 0:37:33.960
<v Speaker 16>against risk, or security frameworks. The same wave is now

0:37:34.000 --> 0:37:36.840
<v Speaker 16>coming with physical AI, and we must not make the

0:37:36.880 --> 0:37:40.279
<v Speaker 16>same mistakes again. We need to establish global guidelines to

0:37:40.360 --> 0:37:42.720
<v Speaker 16>ensure that robots do not harm our lives.

0:37:42.880 --> 0:37:45.520
<v Speaker 7>Galaxy is now preparing for what could be the first

0:37:45.560 --> 0:37:48.239
<v Speaker 7>major receis listings by a K pop agency, with the

0:37:48.360 --> 0:37:50.799
<v Speaker 7>goal to file for an IPO in New York and

0:37:50.880 --> 0:37:53.720
<v Speaker 7>solved by in late next year. The company has raised

0:37:53.760 --> 0:37:56.440
<v Speaker 7>about one hundred and fifty million dollars so far and

0:37:56.600 --> 0:37:59.080
<v Speaker 7>is targeting an overseas pre ip around this year.

0:38:00.000 --> 0:38:00.920
<v Speaker 2>Well Let's planned.

0:38:00.719 --> 0:38:03.040
<v Speaker 7>Debute will be a test of whether the next generation

0:38:03.120 --> 0:38:07.280
<v Speaker 7>of entertainment companies creates next stars or codes them. Soy

0:38:07.360 --> 0:38:08.680
<v Speaker 7>Kim Bloomberg.

0:38:08.280 --> 0:38:14.680
<v Speaker 2>News Soul something Else. AI is rewriting applicants, resumes and

0:38:14.719 --> 0:38:18.360
<v Speaker 2>the face of picture perfect AI generated or edited CVS.

0:38:18.840 --> 0:38:23.160
<v Speaker 2>Recruiters are turning traditional techniques to sift through candidates. Bloomberg's

0:38:23.200 --> 0:38:26.920
<v Speaker 2>finance editor in London, Tom Metcalf, joins us with the story, Well,

0:38:26.960 --> 0:38:30.080
<v Speaker 2>that's a problem every single resume on a recruiter's desk

0:38:30.160 --> 0:38:33.040
<v Speaker 2>being perfect. How do they work out what's legit and

0:38:33.040 --> 0:38:33.400
<v Speaker 2>what's not.

0:38:35.080 --> 0:38:37.279
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, effectually they're going back to the old ways. I

0:38:37.360 --> 0:38:41.000
<v Speaker 4>suppose there's a great quote in this story about how frankly,

0:38:41.040 --> 0:38:43.720
<v Speaker 4>if you don't know someone, you know, an actual person

0:38:43.760 --> 0:38:46.120
<v Speaker 4>at the company you're applying for, you know, in many

0:38:46.160 --> 0:38:49.000
<v Speaker 4>cases it is almost not worth applying for. And you know,

0:38:49.040 --> 0:38:51.840
<v Speaker 4>this goes back to those skills that you know, generation

0:38:51.920 --> 0:38:54.839
<v Speaker 4>and generation have always said of the most key like networking,

0:38:55.320 --> 0:38:57.600
<v Speaker 4>making sure you know it's not you know, you actually

0:38:57.600 --> 0:39:00.840
<v Speaker 4>produce those results. And what's interesting and really is just

0:39:01.000 --> 0:39:03.359
<v Speaker 4>you know, the shit quantity of basically, as you say,

0:39:03.440 --> 0:39:05.320
<v Speaker 4>pitch perfect applications.

0:39:04.680 --> 0:39:05.520
<v Speaker 2>That they're coming through.

0:39:06.719 --> 0:39:09.399
<v Speaker 4>So and it's that paradox as well, right like every

0:39:09.440 --> 0:39:12.239
<v Speaker 4>company these days, once people with AI skills for the

0:39:12.320 --> 0:39:15.120
<v Speaker 4>RN ears is those who are deploy them in their applications.

0:39:15.280 --> 0:39:18.160
<v Speaker 4>That's actually in some way almost punishing applicants because no

0:39:18.200 --> 0:39:20.680
<v Speaker 4>one can you know, distinguish or discern them.

0:39:21.040 --> 0:39:24.600
<v Speaker 2>Right In the AI era, there are some telltale signs

0:39:24.680 --> 0:39:28.880
<v Speaker 2>like AI slot video generated from AI and in text

0:39:29.239 --> 0:39:31.800
<v Speaker 2>if you're confronted with a CV, that's that's the result

0:39:31.840 --> 0:39:32.200
<v Speaker 2>of AI.

0:39:32.280 --> 0:39:36.040
<v Speaker 4>How do you know, well as a few kind of

0:39:36.080 --> 0:39:38.280
<v Speaker 4>keywords which you don't think we can all probably recognize,

0:39:38.320 --> 0:39:41.120
<v Speaker 4>like trusted right hand. You know, it's that slight sense

0:39:41.120 --> 0:39:42.719
<v Speaker 4>of the uncanny, which I'm sure we've all had, you know,

0:39:42.719 --> 0:39:46.319
<v Speaker 4>on emails, but it's almost like two perfect right, And

0:39:46.360 --> 0:39:47.960
<v Speaker 4>that's really that's sort of I guess the crux of

0:39:47.960 --> 0:39:50.560
<v Speaker 4>the problem is, you know, one of the most traditionally

0:39:50.640 --> 0:39:53.240
<v Speaker 4>useful ways you know, companies could you know, distinguish between

0:39:53.239 --> 0:39:57.400
<v Speaker 4>people is now effectively redundant. In finance, something like eighty

0:39:57.400 --> 0:40:00.000
<v Speaker 4>four percent of all applications now are run through AI,

0:40:01.120 --> 0:40:05.120
<v Speaker 4>so effective to that huge kind of baseline, and you know,

0:40:05.160 --> 0:40:07.719
<v Speaker 4>the applicants who can kind of succeed that are basically

0:40:08.040 --> 0:40:10.600
<v Speaker 4>the ones of the human skills and the ones who

0:40:10.719 --> 0:40:13.879
<v Speaker 4>kind of really really craft kind of an individual CV

0:40:14.120 --> 0:40:15.800
<v Speaker 4>rather than one, you know, through a machine.

0:40:17.040 --> 0:40:19.880
<v Speaker 2>Is there some kind of great employer clamped down to

0:40:19.920 --> 0:40:23.040
<v Speaker 2>push back against this or at least try and discern

0:40:23.280 --> 0:40:25.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, the real person behind a CV.

0:40:27.000 --> 0:40:29.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, look, it's a reliance on those sort

0:40:29.080 --> 0:40:33.680
<v Speaker 4>of tests, those assessments. Yeah, so effectively everything's probably becoming

0:40:33.719 --> 0:40:36.400
<v Speaker 4>more involved. And you know the other thing they do,

0:40:36.480 --> 0:40:38.960
<v Speaker 4>which is a really interesting debate there is like you know,

0:40:39.000 --> 0:40:41.360
<v Speaker 4>they're looking for any size that has been AI generator,

0:40:41.360 --> 0:40:44.080
<v Speaker 4>which might cut out a whole bunch of applicants. And yeah,

0:40:44.080 --> 0:40:46.120
<v Speaker 4>if eighty four percent the people are kind of relying

0:40:46.080 --> 0:40:48.600
<v Speaker 4>on AI, you know, they've got to all think of

0:40:48.640 --> 0:40:50.279
<v Speaker 4>ways you know that they don't get cut in the

0:40:50.280 --> 0:40:53.680
<v Speaker 4>first could just because you know, quite intelligently they're using

0:40:53.680 --> 0:40:56.399
<v Speaker 4>the tools available to them do both.

0:40:56.440 --> 0:40:58.960
<v Speaker 2>So metcarp in London, thank you so much for joining us.

0:40:59.160 --> 0:41:01.200
<v Speaker 2>Now coming up, we're going to back to Nvidia as

0:41:01.239 --> 0:41:04.799
<v Speaker 2>investors prepare for the super Bowl of earning seasons. Stock

0:41:04.880 --> 0:41:07.759
<v Speaker 2>down two percent, down for a seventh straight day. Who

0:41:07.840 --> 0:41:20.960
<v Speaker 2>have the details? This is Bloomberg Tech. Let's get back

0:41:21.000 --> 0:41:23.440
<v Speaker 2>to the stock everyone will be watching this week in

0:41:23.560 --> 0:41:26.640
<v Speaker 2>video shares right now down two percent, on track for

0:41:26.640 --> 0:41:30.640
<v Speaker 2>a seventh straight day of declines. Earnings print Wednesday after

0:41:30.680 --> 0:41:33.600
<v Speaker 2>the market closed, Bloomberg Equities report around for Steicas with us.

0:41:34.000 --> 0:41:36.720
<v Speaker 2>This is it treading water is probably not the right phrase,

0:41:36.760 --> 0:41:39.280
<v Speaker 2>but all focus this week will be on Nvidia.

0:41:40.560 --> 0:41:42.880
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, this is going to be a very important test

0:41:42.920 --> 0:41:45.960
<v Speaker 12>for people to really gauge the temperature of the AI

0:41:46.160 --> 0:41:48.759
<v Speaker 12>trade as it stands right now. I don't know how

0:41:48.840 --> 0:41:51.279
<v Speaker 12>much people are really expecting in Nvidia to really turn

0:41:51.320 --> 0:41:54.319
<v Speaker 12>around the whole market and really lift centiment here, but

0:41:54.400 --> 0:41:57.680
<v Speaker 12>certainly it is sort of the major company in the industry.

0:41:57.760 --> 0:41:59.719
<v Speaker 12>Everyone's going to be watching it. Everyone wants to know

0:42:00.040 --> 0:42:01.920
<v Speaker 12>what is it seeing as far as its outlook. What

0:42:02.000 --> 0:42:04.600
<v Speaker 12>is it going to say about demand, about pricing, about

0:42:04.640 --> 0:42:06.600
<v Speaker 12>all the components that are out there that build up

0:42:06.640 --> 0:42:09.839
<v Speaker 12>this AI infrastructure. We've got some pretty positive reads from

0:42:09.840 --> 0:42:12.960
<v Speaker 12>the hyperscalers in terms of their commitment to spending, but

0:42:13.000 --> 0:42:16.480
<v Speaker 12>now we really want to see the main supplier of

0:42:16.560 --> 0:42:18.799
<v Speaker 12>AI chips. What do they have to say about where

0:42:18.840 --> 0:42:19.880
<v Speaker 12>things are going from here.

0:42:20.600 --> 0:42:23.400
<v Speaker 2>Let's get stock specific, and Media is up thirteen percent

0:42:23.440 --> 0:42:26.000
<v Speaker 2>year to date, slightly outperforming the S and P five hundred.

0:42:26.320 --> 0:42:28.839
<v Speaker 2>It's down for a seven straight session, so going into

0:42:28.920 --> 0:42:31.920
<v Speaker 2>the print, we're looking at a pretty low multiple ahead

0:42:31.920 --> 0:42:36.240
<v Speaker 2>of the results. Where does the stock sit right now, well, yeah.

0:42:36.040 --> 0:42:38.720
<v Speaker 12>You said seven straight days in the negative. I believe

0:42:38.760 --> 0:42:40.799
<v Speaker 12>that's the longest since twenty twenty two. So this is

0:42:40.840 --> 0:42:43.560
<v Speaker 12>certainly an interesting kind of setup for the stock right here.

0:42:43.640 --> 0:42:43.799
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:42:43.800 --> 0:42:46.440
<v Speaker 12>When I talk to people about what they're expecting, they

0:42:46.440 --> 0:42:49.200
<v Speaker 12>do say, you know, the multiple does look low. They

0:42:49.239 --> 0:42:51.799
<v Speaker 12>say that, you know, we're expected to have growth something

0:42:51.840 --> 0:42:54.279
<v Speaker 12>around ninety percent this year. They're supposed to slow and

0:42:54.320 --> 0:42:57.000
<v Speaker 12>then keep slowing going forward. So this is a company

0:42:57.000 --> 0:43:00.200
<v Speaker 12>that's on sort of a path of growth deceleration. But

0:43:00.200 --> 0:43:03.200
<v Speaker 12>people still view it as a very high quality company,

0:43:03.360 --> 0:43:06.800
<v Speaker 12>especially within AI and chips. It's certainly a lot cheaper

0:43:06.800 --> 0:43:09.640
<v Speaker 12>than names like Intel or AMDs, So there's certainly a

0:43:09.680 --> 0:43:12.799
<v Speaker 12>lot of people who continue to be very positive on it.

0:43:12.800 --> 0:43:14.560
<v Speaker 12>But the fact that we're seeing some air come out

0:43:14.600 --> 0:43:17.239
<v Speaker 12>of it ahead of a report, it just shows you

0:43:17.280 --> 0:43:19.680
<v Speaker 12>that maybe sentiment is just not what it was, certainly

0:43:19.719 --> 0:43:21.640
<v Speaker 12>a couple of years ago, when in Video was just

0:43:21.840 --> 0:43:23.440
<v Speaker 12>the absolute hardest name around.

0:43:24.360 --> 0:43:26.640
<v Speaker 2>And we led the show on the report from Bloomberg

0:43:26.680 --> 0:43:29.239
<v Speaker 2>over the weekend that server makers have been telling in

0:43:29.320 --> 0:43:33.360
<v Speaker 2>Vidia customers price hikes are coming on the latest generation servers.

0:43:33.640 --> 0:43:36.479
<v Speaker 2>Bloomers ran Vasellica with the equities view. Thank you very much.

0:43:36.719 --> 0:43:38.680
<v Speaker 2>That does it for this edition of Bloomberg Tech. Look.

0:43:38.719 --> 0:43:40.480
<v Speaker 2>The story this week will be in Vidia and in

0:43:40.600 --> 0:43:43.879
<v Speaker 2>Vidia's earnings, which are Wednesday after the market close. There

0:43:43.920 --> 0:43:46.080
<v Speaker 2>has been a lot happening in AI infrastructure in that

0:43:46.120 --> 0:43:49.719
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Report is a must read. Recap that conversation and

0:43:49.800 --> 0:43:51.520
<v Speaker 2>all the reporting on the podcast. You know where to

0:43:51.560 --> 0:43:55.200
<v Speaker 2>find it on all the Bloomberg platforms and on iHeart, Spotify,

0:43:55.560 --> 0:43:58.200
<v Speaker 2>and Apple. Stay with us through the week. It is

0:43:58.239 --> 0:43:59.719
<v Speaker 2>a big week and there is a lot more to

0:43:59.760 --> 0:44:02.239
<v Speaker 2>come from San Francisco. This is Bloomberg Tech