WEBVTT - NYC Mayor Eric Adams Indicted on Bribery Fraud Charges

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:09.119
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:09.160 --> 0:00:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Effocarplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app.

0:00:17.079 --> 0:00:20.279
<v Speaker 1>Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch

0:00:20.360 --> 0:00:22.800
<v Speaker 1>us live on YouTube.

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:26.400
<v Speaker 2>It was a bombshelf that happened in the last twenty

0:00:26.440 --> 0:00:30.080
<v Speaker 2>four hours, and that is New York City Mayor Eric

0:00:30.120 --> 0:00:35.199
<v Speaker 2>Adams indicted after federal corruption probe. Are there's video and

0:00:35.320 --> 0:00:40.440
<v Speaker 2>pictures of officers rating Gracie Mansion, where the mayor lives.

0:00:40.840 --> 0:00:43.879
<v Speaker 2>It's something. It is definitely a moment here in New

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:47.280
<v Speaker 2>York political history. So we wanted to talk to Scott Stringer,

0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:49.879
<v Speaker 2>former New York City Comptroller, on.

0:00:49.800 --> 0:00:50.280
<v Speaker 3>All of this.

0:00:50.479 --> 0:00:53.479
<v Speaker 2>Scott, the latest that we've heard is that Mayor Adams

0:00:53.520 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 2>is going to fight this. He definitely doesn't look like

0:00:56.080 --> 0:00:57.920
<v Speaker 2>he's resigning. What is your take on that?

0:00:59.120 --> 0:01:02.800
<v Speaker 3>Look, he should and must fight it. This is his

0:01:02.880 --> 0:01:06.040
<v Speaker 3>life and he has to have full focus on a

0:01:06.160 --> 0:01:09.920
<v Speaker 3>very serious federal indictment. But that is what he has

0:01:10.000 --> 0:01:14.240
<v Speaker 3>to do for himself. Unfortunately, you can't govern the city

0:01:14.680 --> 0:01:16.840
<v Speaker 3>and fight the indictment. And that is why he should

0:01:16.880 --> 0:01:19.720
<v Speaker 3>step aside for the good of the city. I presume

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:22.920
<v Speaker 3>no guilt or no innocence. That's for the courts to decide,

0:01:23.160 --> 0:01:25.480
<v Speaker 3>But I do think we have to be laser focused

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:29.880
<v Speaker 3>on the city. Look, the business community in particular has

0:01:29.959 --> 0:01:33.360
<v Speaker 3>invested billions of dollars in the financial capital of the

0:01:33.360 --> 0:01:37.199
<v Speaker 3>world called New York City. We have citizens, middle class

0:01:37.200 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 3>people who are struggling to pay their rent, struggling to

0:01:40.160 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 3>get their kids through school. The job of mayor is

0:01:43.200 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 3>to be that person who works every single day laser focused.

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 3>That cannot happen anymore in an administration where not only

0:01:51.480 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 3>is the mayor indicted, but almost the entire leadership team

0:01:55.200 --> 0:01:59.120
<v Speaker 3>is under some indictment or federal investigation. So, with great

0:01:59.160 --> 0:02:03.080
<v Speaker 3>respect to the man, recognizing innocent until proven guilty, it

0:02:03.200 --> 0:02:06.960
<v Speaker 3>is time to step aside. We've got to govern this

0:02:07.080 --> 0:02:09.679
<v Speaker 3>town in a way that's never been governed before, and

0:02:09.720 --> 0:02:11.919
<v Speaker 3>I think he's got to just step back and Scott.

0:02:11.960 --> 0:02:14.600
<v Speaker 4>If he doesn't do that, how what's your view on

0:02:14.639 --> 0:02:16.680
<v Speaker 4>the timeline of how these events can unfold? Because I

0:02:16.680 --> 0:02:20.200
<v Speaker 4>just think back to last November when the FBI agents

0:02:20.280 --> 0:02:22.760
<v Speaker 4>rated the home of an Adams campaign fundraiser that's really

0:02:22.800 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 4>what kickstarted that, and that's ten months in the rearview mirror.

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:30.320
<v Speaker 3>Well, look, at the end of the day, that's what

0:02:30.400 --> 0:02:33.840
<v Speaker 3>investigations are for. I mean, the federal government has obviously

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:37.480
<v Speaker 3>taken time to look at all of this. They're announcing

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:43.320
<v Speaker 3>charges probably as we speak. And my concern as a citizen,

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:46.720
<v Speaker 3>as a public school parent, as somebody who's managed the

0:02:46.760 --> 0:02:49.480
<v Speaker 3>finances of this city for eight years. You know, this

0:02:49.560 --> 0:02:53.079
<v Speaker 3>is a tender moment for New York. We have to

0:02:53.120 --> 0:02:56.560
<v Speaker 3>send a signal internationally that we are open and ready

0:02:56.600 --> 0:03:00.840
<v Speaker 3>for business. We cannot play the you know, the political

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:04.080
<v Speaker 3>game back and forth. We need strong leadership now. We

0:03:04.120 --> 0:03:07.560
<v Speaker 3>need leadership and finance. We need leadership to actually get

0:03:07.600 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 3>things done. Look, I love this city. This is a

0:03:10.200 --> 0:03:13.600
<v Speaker 3>sad day for me, but I've seen corruption scandals over

0:03:13.639 --> 0:03:17.280
<v Speaker 3>the years. I fought corruption my entire life, and it's

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:19.400
<v Speaker 3>a very sad moment at this point that we have

0:03:19.480 --> 0:03:20.200
<v Speaker 3>to be going through this.

0:03:21.120 --> 0:03:23.680
<v Speaker 2>So there's a couple of things to unpack to that

0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:25.519
<v Speaker 2>with me. So as a parent of a child in

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:28.640
<v Speaker 2>public school, I totally hear you on that. In terms

0:03:28.680 --> 0:03:31.760
<v Speaker 2>of a business or CEO making an investment in New

0:03:31.840 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 2>York City. I'm struggling to see how this really moves

0:03:34.840 --> 0:03:37.040
<v Speaker 2>the needle in that a lot of us are now

0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:41.080
<v Speaker 2>desensitized to these kind of indictments and scandals, rightly or wrongly.

0:03:41.120 --> 0:03:44.800
<v Speaker 2>When you have a former president also accused and convicted

0:03:44.840 --> 0:03:48.080
<v Speaker 2>of crimes, everyone here is like, yeah, okay, and then

0:03:48.120 --> 0:03:50.120
<v Speaker 2>let's move on. So is it really going to impact

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:52.760
<v Speaker 2>it in the way that maybe twenty years ago we

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:53.640
<v Speaker 2>would or should have.

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:57.600
<v Speaker 3>Well, I'm not going to give up on the sensibilities

0:03:57.720 --> 0:04:02.560
<v Speaker 3>of both the American public and certainly New York City residents.

0:04:02.560 --> 0:04:05.240
<v Speaker 3>First of all, we New Yorkers, we get this stuff.

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 3>We are savvy, We've seen it all. So I don't

0:04:09.400 --> 0:04:11.240
<v Speaker 3>think this is going to sit well with the public.

0:04:11.280 --> 0:04:13.240
<v Speaker 3>I don't think people are going to shrug their shoulders

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:16.400
<v Speaker 3>walking to work today saying it doesn't matter. I don't

0:04:16.400 --> 0:04:19.640
<v Speaker 3>think Trump's getting re elected in part because he's had

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:24.359
<v Speaker 3>criminal conduct. I think people want stable leadership. I mean,

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:26.800
<v Speaker 3>let's talk about the public schools. We have kids who

0:04:26.800 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 3>are still struggling with COVID. I see, I see the

0:04:30.800 --> 0:04:34.040
<v Speaker 3>difference between parents who have some resources and parents that don't.

0:04:34.360 --> 0:04:37.839
<v Speaker 3>The whole public housing developments are collapsing. We're not building

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:42.480
<v Speaker 3>affordable housing fast enough. And look, the job mayor is

0:04:42.520 --> 0:04:47.039
<v Speaker 3>to reach out and get to those entrepreneurs, the tech entrepreneurs,

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:52.120
<v Speaker 3>the communities that we reliant, jumpstart and pump up our economy.

0:04:52.800 --> 0:04:55.839
<v Speaker 3>We want business leaders to say, you know what, we

0:04:55.880 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 3>want that old New York City Compact back. We will

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:02.200
<v Speaker 3>attract the best writers to our workforce. But the job

0:05:02.240 --> 0:05:05.760
<v Speaker 3>of mayor is to provide open space, public space, safety

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:08.559
<v Speaker 3>in the streets, safety in the subways, a real mental

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:11.640
<v Speaker 3>health initiative to help with homelessness. But also we've got

0:05:11.680 --> 0:05:15.240
<v Speaker 3>to make sure that rather than tout a robot called

0:05:15.360 --> 0:05:19.279
<v Speaker 3>K five to do policing, we actually need a policing

0:05:19.360 --> 0:05:23.320
<v Speaker 3>strategy that's fair but strong, and we have to make

0:05:23.360 --> 0:05:27.320
<v Speaker 3>these challenges. This mayor cannot focus on it because rightfully,

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:30.080
<v Speaker 3>he's got to focus on a major federal indictment. And

0:05:30.160 --> 0:05:31.880
<v Speaker 3>I don't blame him for doing that at all.

0:05:31.960 --> 0:05:33.760
<v Speaker 2>All right, Scott, we appreciate it. Thank you very much

0:05:33.800 --> 0:05:36.960
<v Speaker 2>for that insight. Satstringer, former New York City Comptroller.

0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Joining us there, you're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast.

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Catch us live weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar

0:05:45.680 --> 0:05:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Play and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. You

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 1>can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship

0:05:52.000 --> 0:05:55.760
<v Speaker 1>New York station. Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven.

0:05:55.560 --> 0:05:59.719
<v Speaker 2>Thirty and I want to get more with Doctor Basil Smigel,

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:03.200
<v Speaker 2>Professor of Practice at Columbia University School at Professional Studies.

0:06:03.240 --> 0:06:05.960
<v Speaker 2>He's also former executive director of the New York State

0:06:06.120 --> 0:06:09.440
<v Speaker 2>Democratic Party. He's been a political strategist and policy advisor

0:06:09.520 --> 0:06:14.159
<v Speaker 2>for almost twenty years with local, international, and national experience.

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:18.039
<v Speaker 2>This is quite a bombshell here, doctor, What do you

0:06:18.240 --> 0:06:22.360
<v Speaker 2>think this means? How does this unfold? Can Eric Adams

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:23.960
<v Speaker 2>keep a seat?

0:06:24.600 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 5>Well, you know, to the point that June just made.

0:06:27.640 --> 0:06:30.159
<v Speaker 5>I mean, this wouldn't have happened had it not gone

0:06:30.240 --> 0:06:33.080
<v Speaker 5>to the highest levels of the Department of Justice. So

0:06:33.200 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 5>this is serious. It's serious as a lifelong in New Yorker.

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:39.040
<v Speaker 5>This is serious for me just as a voter and

0:06:39.320 --> 0:06:41.359
<v Speaker 5>you know, with care and concern for my city. But

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 5>if he saw his press conference earlier, he had a

0:06:44.160 --> 0:06:47.680
<v Speaker 5>lot of supporters with him, and I think that's really

0:06:47.760 --> 0:06:51.880
<v Speaker 5>what his future hinges on, not just the charges themselves,

0:06:51.880 --> 0:06:56.680
<v Speaker 5>but politically, you know, will his base stick with him?

0:06:57.839 --> 0:07:01.560
<v Speaker 5>And we saw, you know, some prominent democratic leaders, particularly

0:07:01.560 --> 0:07:06.480
<v Speaker 5>African American leaders, standing behind him. So until we start

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 5>to see more, if we ever see more prominent African Americans,

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:14.720
<v Speaker 5>particularly from some of the communities that he did did

0:07:14.920 --> 0:07:17.640
<v Speaker 5>very well in in his election, if they sit down

0:07:17.720 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 5>and saying that he needs to step down he's unable

0:07:20.800 --> 0:07:24.120
<v Speaker 5>to fulfill his duties, then I think you'll see the

0:07:24.120 --> 0:07:26.960
<v Speaker 5>hastening of that decision. But for now, it sounds like

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:30.080
<v Speaker 5>he's doug its heels it in and to this point,

0:07:30.600 --> 0:07:33.480
<v Speaker 5>I don't really see this sort of watershed moment that

0:07:33.640 --> 0:07:35.200
<v Speaker 5>would get him to step down.

0:07:35.320 --> 0:07:38.760
<v Speaker 6>Doctor. What is the governor's role at Governor Hochel's role

0:07:38.880 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 6>in all this? Can she essentially fire him? Would she?

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:44.440
<v Speaker 6>If it comes to that. I mean, you mentioned sort

0:07:44.480 --> 0:07:50.000
<v Speaker 6>of the political delicacy of it all, given his support

0:07:50.280 --> 0:07:53.560
<v Speaker 6>within the African community and elsewhere, and.

0:07:53.560 --> 0:07:55.880
<v Speaker 5>I think it does come down to that she does

0:07:55.960 --> 0:07:58.400
<v Speaker 5>have a role there is that there is a scenario

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:02.920
<v Speaker 5>where the governor can can take him, take him out

0:08:02.960 --> 0:08:06.920
<v Speaker 5>of his seat. There's another sort of opportunity for that

0:08:07.000 --> 0:08:10.240
<v Speaker 5>to happen by a separate committee should that get formed.

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 5>There's a long explanation about that, but the but yes,

0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:17.600
<v Speaker 5>the governor can step in and take and take him

0:08:17.600 --> 0:08:20.360
<v Speaker 5>out of office at some point. But given the fact

0:08:20.480 --> 0:08:24.440
<v Speaker 5>that you know, the governor has always had you know,

0:08:24.520 --> 0:08:27.360
<v Speaker 5>has had a tricky election just a couple of years

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:30.000
<v Speaker 5>ago where it was a lot closer than people expected.

0:08:30.400 --> 0:08:35.200
<v Speaker 5>She relies heavily on the same base that Eric Adams

0:08:35.200 --> 0:08:38.319
<v Speaker 5>has in New York City, and I don't know that

0:08:38.360 --> 0:08:45.080
<v Speaker 5>she would make a decision to to a very drastic

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:48.480
<v Speaker 5>decision like that without really checking with a lot of

0:08:48.520 --> 0:08:51.520
<v Speaker 5>the a lot of the key leaders in those communities

0:08:51.920 --> 0:08:54.800
<v Speaker 5>across the city. Because if she would do that sort

0:08:54.800 --> 0:08:58.320
<v Speaker 5>of unilaterally, I think the blowback would be it would

0:08:58.360 --> 0:09:01.160
<v Speaker 5>be really significant and she would feel it when she's

0:09:01.240 --> 0:09:01.880
<v Speaker 5>up for re election.

0:09:02.920 --> 0:09:05.600
<v Speaker 2>When you take a look at the indictment, what we

0:09:05.720 --> 0:09:10.280
<v Speaker 2>heard from District Attorney Damien Williams, and then excuse me,

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:13.880
<v Speaker 2>yes you Attorney Damian Williams, when we also heard from

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:16.480
<v Speaker 2>New York City Mayor Eric Adams as well his defense,

0:09:18.880 --> 0:09:21.920
<v Speaker 2>what stacks up for you? Like if you were with

0:09:22.200 --> 0:09:24.400
<v Speaker 2>Eric Adams, like what would you be saying, like how

0:09:24.440 --> 0:09:26.840
<v Speaker 2>does the defense work? Like We're going to keep fighting.

0:09:27.559 --> 0:09:29.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to keep fighting I'm going to keep my

0:09:29.160 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 2>day job. This isn't true. They're just kind of stalking

0:09:31.960 --> 0:09:34.480
<v Speaker 2>me like all all of that. Does that hold real water?

0:09:35.800 --> 0:09:38.559
<v Speaker 5>You know? This is I So the short answer for

0:09:38.720 --> 0:09:42.400
<v Speaker 5>me is no, because you know him. You know, for

0:09:42.520 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 5>him to say that this has been he's being targeted

0:09:48.080 --> 0:09:51.400
<v Speaker 5>by the Justice Department, I would remind him that the

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:55.480
<v Speaker 5>president's own son, Hunter Biden, has been indicted. So I

0:09:55.520 --> 0:09:58.560
<v Speaker 5>don't think he's I don't think that that holds a

0:09:58.559 --> 0:10:01.720
<v Speaker 5>lot of water. Number One one. He's also said that

0:10:01.800 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 5>this is a retribution for his challenging of the Biden

0:10:05.320 --> 0:10:08.720
<v Speaker 5>administration on his handling of migrants, and I would I

0:10:08.720 --> 0:10:12.920
<v Speaker 5>would also say that I don't think that given everything

0:10:12.960 --> 0:10:15.800
<v Speaker 5>that's happening in our national politics right now, I don't

0:10:15.840 --> 0:10:19.960
<v Speaker 5>think that the Biden administration nor the Democrats nationally have

0:10:20.080 --> 0:10:23.840
<v Speaker 5>the kind of time to specifically be targeting him in

0:10:23.880 --> 0:10:26.280
<v Speaker 5>this way. They've just got a lot of other things

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:29.240
<v Speaker 5>to do. He's also said that you know this is

0:10:30.360 --> 0:10:33.520
<v Speaker 5>that that cut. The ways in which you've been targeted

0:10:33.559 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 5>are similar to what David Dinkins, the first African American

0:10:37.480 --> 0:10:39.480
<v Speaker 5>mayor of the City of New York, was similar to

0:10:39.520 --> 0:10:42.400
<v Speaker 5>what he went through, and I actually that bothers me

0:10:42.480 --> 0:10:46.200
<v Speaker 5>a bit too, because number one, David Dinkins is not indicted,

0:10:46.559 --> 0:10:50.559
<v Speaker 5>and number two, you know, he also had an antagonist

0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:53.839
<v Speaker 5>in Rudi Giuliani for the entire four years that he

0:10:53.960 --> 0:10:57.200
<v Speaker 5>was mayor, and there was a tremendous racial undertone and

0:10:57.280 --> 0:11:02.200
<v Speaker 5>overtone to that tension, which is not present here. But

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:05.000
<v Speaker 5>I will say that it is it is true that

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:07.920
<v Speaker 5>for a lot of African American voters there is a

0:11:08.000 --> 0:11:14.080
<v Speaker 5>significant amount of apprehension and concern around the ways that

0:11:14.120 --> 0:11:17.040
<v Speaker 5>the community is being treated has been treated by the

0:11:17.080 --> 0:11:20.240
<v Speaker 5>media and by law enforcement. That is that it is

0:11:20.280 --> 0:11:23.000
<v Speaker 5>something that has been well documented over the years. But

0:11:23.120 --> 0:11:26.360
<v Speaker 5>I'm also very mindful as an African American myself, I'm

0:11:26.400 --> 0:11:30.400
<v Speaker 5>also mindful of how that is be how that is used,

0:11:30.400 --> 0:11:33.280
<v Speaker 5>and how that's leveraged in situations like this. So I

0:11:33.320 --> 0:11:36.880
<v Speaker 5>would suggest that he stay away from those kinds of

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:40.280
<v Speaker 5>those defensive tactics in that narrative and kind of just

0:11:40.480 --> 0:11:43.760
<v Speaker 5>focus on saying that he still can run the city,

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:47.640
<v Speaker 5>and he's still in charge, and this is the future

0:11:47.640 --> 0:11:50.559
<v Speaker 5>and envision he has for the upcoming weeks. So I

0:11:50.600 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 5>would stick to that.

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:55.440
<v Speaker 6>Can a city as complex as New York City continue

0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:59.160
<v Speaker 6>to operate with a mayor who's distracted by this, and

0:11:59.240 --> 0:12:03.280
<v Speaker 6>with any of other department leaders in New York City

0:12:03.280 --> 0:12:04.360
<v Speaker 6>who just aren't there.

0:12:05.760 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 5>Well, I mean, that's one of the key concerns because

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:12.160
<v Speaker 5>if you think about the biggest agencies, the most prominent

0:12:12.200 --> 0:12:16.120
<v Speaker 5>agencies in New York Fire, Police, Department of Health, and Education,

0:12:16.440 --> 0:12:19.920
<v Speaker 5>and you know, for full disclosure, the former school's chancellor.

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:22.360
<v Speaker 5>The school chancellor who said he's resigning the end of

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:26.000
<v Speaker 5>the year, I've known for twenty five years and he's

0:12:26.000 --> 0:12:28.520
<v Speaker 5>wanted that job but pretty much his entire career, So

0:12:28.600 --> 0:12:32.720
<v Speaker 5>for him to take that step fairly significant. You know,

0:12:32.800 --> 0:12:38.880
<v Speaker 5>the rating of the current Police Commissioner's House, who himself

0:12:38.920 --> 0:12:41.640
<v Speaker 5>is acting because the previous one stepped down because of

0:12:41.679 --> 0:12:45.440
<v Speaker 5>the investigation. All of these challenges to running the city

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:48.480
<v Speaker 5>will be on the minds of voters in the next

0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:51.360
<v Speaker 5>couple of weeks. My guess, however, is that there's to

0:12:51.480 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 5>go out and be so much focused on the presidential

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:58.600
<v Speaker 5>that it'll be mitigated by that. But just after and unless,

0:12:59.040 --> 0:13:01.480
<v Speaker 5>of course, if something happens tragically, and I hope that

0:13:01.480 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 5>doesn't happen, there will be more attention on his leadership.

0:13:04.679 --> 0:13:07.360
<v Speaker 5>But what he has to wonder right now and hope

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:09.680
<v Speaker 5>for is that a lot of voters are going to

0:13:09.679 --> 0:13:12.400
<v Speaker 5>be focused on more on the presidential than on him.

0:13:12.400 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 5>But once that happened, all eyes quickly turned back to

0:13:15.320 --> 0:13:19.559
<v Speaker 5>him because the male primaries in June, it's really right

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:23.880
<v Speaker 5>upon us and just very quickly. There is a succession plan,

0:13:23.960 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 5>and I think everybody should understand that that the state

0:13:27.880 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 5>and the state constitution, city charter have a succession plan

0:13:32.240 --> 0:13:34.720
<v Speaker 5>built in. If you work stut Down, the New York

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:37.160
<v Speaker 5>City Public Advocate becomes the acting mayor.

0:13:37.840 --> 0:13:40.680
<v Speaker 2>All right, doctor, we really appreciate it. That was extraordinarily helpful,

0:13:40.720 --> 0:13:44.160
<v Speaker 2>Doctor basilsmikel Professor of Practice and Columbia University School of

0:13:44.240 --> 0:13:47.280
<v Speaker 2>Professional Studies, also former executive director of the New York

0:13:47.360 --> 0:13:49.800
<v Speaker 2>State Democratic Party.

0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:54.080
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:13:54.160 --> 0:13:57.480
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on FOCAR playing Android outo

0:13:57.600 --> 0:14:00.480
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever you

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:03.560
<v Speaker 1>get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:14:05.600 --> 0:14:08.000
<v Speaker 2>So let's continue the story. Tom or Lake as Bloomberg

0:14:08.040 --> 0:14:10.920
<v Speaker 2>Economics Chief Economists, and he joins us now now Tom

0:14:11.040 --> 0:14:13.079
<v Speaker 2>had lived in Beision for a very long time. He

0:14:13.320 --> 0:14:16.120
<v Speaker 2>was the chief China economics correspondent over the Wall Street Journal.

0:14:16.320 --> 0:14:20.120
<v Speaker 2>He also headed Bloomberg economics coverage in China, Japan, and Korea,

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:23.040
<v Speaker 2>and now he joins US from DC. But he has

0:14:23.080 --> 0:14:25.240
<v Speaker 2>a long history of looking at these kind of interventions

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:28.880
<v Speaker 2>from the government as well as monetary authority. I hate Tom,

0:14:29.360 --> 0:14:30.080
<v Speaker 2>Is this the end?

0:14:32.080 --> 0:14:33.920
<v Speaker 7>So I think we need to break it down into

0:14:34.240 --> 0:14:38.320
<v Speaker 7>two different problems. So the first problem is the cycle.

0:14:39.520 --> 0:14:43.200
<v Speaker 7>And if we think about the cycle, well, growth was

0:14:43.320 --> 0:14:48.440
<v Speaker 7>very weak, deflation was coming, markets were slumping, and this

0:14:48.680 --> 0:14:52.320
<v Speaker 7>intervention by China's Central Bank and now the Pollit Bureau,

0:14:52.800 --> 0:14:57.440
<v Speaker 7>well it looks pretty decisive. The equity market has broad

0:14:57.600 --> 0:15:02.920
<v Speaker 7>back higher, the Chinese yuan has strengthened, bond yields have

0:15:03.040 --> 0:15:06.680
<v Speaker 7>ticked up, and expectations for growth out to the end

0:15:06.720 --> 0:15:09.600
<v Speaker 7>of twenty twenty four and into twenty twenty five, well

0:15:09.800 --> 0:15:12.520
<v Speaker 7>they're a little bit stronger. So on the cycle, this

0:15:12.680 --> 0:15:16.360
<v Speaker 7>is certainly a positive moment, maybe a decisive moment. The

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:20.040
<v Speaker 7>second set of issues, though, is around structure, right, and

0:15:20.160 --> 0:15:23.560
<v Speaker 7>that's where we have to worry about the massive overhang

0:15:23.920 --> 0:15:32.120
<v Speaker 7>of property supply. The shrinking workforce, the increasingly fractious relations

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:35.120
<v Speaker 7>with the United States. These are the factors which are

0:15:35.160 --> 0:15:37.840
<v Speaker 7>going to be weighing on China's growth, not just in

0:15:37.920 --> 0:15:40.560
<v Speaker 7>twenty twenty four, twenty twenty five, but out into the

0:15:40.600 --> 0:15:44.680
<v Speaker 7>next decade. And on those well, nothing we've seen in

0:15:44.720 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 7>the last few days really changes the picture.

0:15:47.720 --> 0:15:50.359
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Tom, With that in mind, we're seeing a tremendous

0:15:50.520 --> 0:15:53.560
<v Speaker 4>rally across assets, especially in China. Just looking at the

0:15:53.560 --> 0:15:57.000
<v Speaker 4>Shanghai composite up more than nine percent in the last

0:15:57.040 --> 0:16:00.560
<v Speaker 4>three days. Does this have sticking power? It feels like

0:16:00.680 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 4>in the past we've seen these moments were stimulus is

0:16:03.120 --> 0:16:06.160
<v Speaker 4>kind of drummed up in China, talks about injecting money

0:16:06.200 --> 0:16:08.720
<v Speaker 4>into the economy, and then those moments are relatively fleeting.

0:16:10.520 --> 0:16:14.480
<v Speaker 7>So the last couple of years has seen what you

0:16:14.600 --> 0:16:17.320
<v Speaker 7>might call a kind of steady drip drip of micro

0:16:17.520 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 7>policy moves. The PBOC cuts interest rates by ten basis

0:16:22.600 --> 0:16:26.600
<v Speaker 7>points or twenty basis points. The PBOC frees up a

0:16:26.680 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 7>bit more funds for China's banks to lend. The Ministry

0:16:30.720 --> 0:16:33.200
<v Speaker 7>of Finance puts a bit more money in the pockets

0:16:33.280 --> 0:16:36.560
<v Speaker 7>of local governments. What we've seen in the last few

0:16:36.640 --> 0:16:40.880
<v Speaker 7>days is a kind of a package of more powerful

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:46.080
<v Speaker 7>measures rolled out at the same moment, and the Pollit Bureau,

0:16:47.360 --> 0:16:50.480
<v Speaker 7>the twenty four men who kind of call the shots

0:16:50.560 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 7>on China's economy, coming out with some pretty sort of

0:16:54.880 --> 0:16:58.480
<v Speaker 7>firm statements about how they want to turn the cycle round.

0:16:58.960 --> 0:17:03.720
<v Speaker 7>Hold the decline in property, give equities a boost. Right, So,

0:17:04.280 --> 0:17:08.600
<v Speaker 7>if we think about markets, if we think about growth

0:17:08.720 --> 0:17:11.440
<v Speaker 7>for the next few months, maybe even into early twenty

0:17:11.520 --> 0:17:16.720
<v Speaker 7>twenty five, this is a pretty important move. If we

0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:20.480
<v Speaker 7>think about those bigger structural problems, if we think about

0:17:20.880 --> 0:17:23.840
<v Speaker 7>the millions and millions of empty homes in China, we

0:17:23.960 --> 0:17:28.240
<v Speaker 7>think about the shrinking working age population. No, nothing which

0:17:28.240 --> 0:17:30.480
<v Speaker 7>has happened so far is going to move the dial

0:17:30.560 --> 0:17:31.920
<v Speaker 7>on those big structural problems.

0:17:32.400 --> 0:17:34.560
<v Speaker 2>And here's the question we've all been waiting for, right

0:17:34.720 --> 0:17:37.200
<v Speaker 2>when when is China going to cut checks to people?

0:17:37.359 --> 0:17:38.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean, they already mentioned that they're going to do

0:17:39.000 --> 0:17:41.240
<v Speaker 2>it for their low incomes, just to one off, but

0:17:41.359 --> 0:17:43.640
<v Speaker 2>that's literally what needs to happen. No, So like, when

0:17:43.640 --> 0:17:44.280
<v Speaker 2>are they going to do that?

0:17:45.520 --> 0:17:49.600
<v Speaker 7>So it's a great question, Alex so that I'm sure

0:17:49.640 --> 0:17:51.920
<v Speaker 7>we're all familiar with the term pushing on a piece

0:17:51.960 --> 0:17:55.360
<v Speaker 7>of string. Right, At some point, there's just too much

0:17:55.520 --> 0:17:59.440
<v Speaker 7>debt in the economy. And when you cut interest rates, well,

0:17:59.680 --> 0:18:03.119
<v Speaker 7>because debt is already so high, no one rushes to

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:06.520
<v Speaker 7>borrow more, no one rushes to invest more, right, And

0:18:06.640 --> 0:18:10.800
<v Speaker 7>I think that's almost where China is, right. Debt's really high,

0:18:11.520 --> 0:18:14.840
<v Speaker 7>so rate cuts they help a little bit, But there's

0:18:14.920 --> 0:18:18.440
<v Speaker 7>certainly that pushing on a piece of string aspect to it.

0:18:19.160 --> 0:18:22.280
<v Speaker 7>So if you really want to accelerate China's growth, what

0:18:22.400 --> 0:18:24.399
<v Speaker 7>do you have to do? Well, the government has to

0:18:24.480 --> 0:18:29.600
<v Speaker 7>open its checkbook and put money in household's pockets. Now

0:18:30.040 --> 0:18:33.920
<v Speaker 7>we've seen the Polyt Bureau say they're going to amp

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:38.159
<v Speaker 7>up fiscal stimulus, so it seems like the checkbook, the

0:18:38.400 --> 0:18:43.200
<v Speaker 7>government wallet is starting to creak open. The question is, well,

0:18:43.440 --> 0:18:45.240
<v Speaker 7>how much money are they going to put to work

0:18:46.040 --> 0:18:47.600
<v Speaker 7>and where are they going to put it to work.

0:18:47.920 --> 0:18:50.360
<v Speaker 7>Is it going to be a kind of traditional infrastructure

0:18:50.400 --> 0:18:54.600
<v Speaker 7>style stimulus, let's build some more bridges, or is it

0:18:54.680 --> 0:18:57.440
<v Speaker 7>going to be the consumer stimulus, let's put money in

0:18:57.520 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 7>household's pockets so they can upgrade their Electroney baby switch

0:19:01.880 --> 0:19:02.879
<v Speaker 7>to electric vehicle?

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:05.320
<v Speaker 2>All right, Tom, we appreciate that. Thank you very much,

0:19:05.359 --> 0:19:08.280
<v Speaker 2>Tom or like Bloomberg Economics chief economists joining us on

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:09.600
<v Speaker 2>the China Latest.

0:19:11.160 --> 0:19:15.000
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:19:15.119 --> 0:19:18.640
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and Android

0:19:18.680 --> 0:19:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. You can also listen

0:19:21.560 --> 0:19:24.640
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station,

0:19:25.040 --> 0:19:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa Play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:19:29.480 --> 0:19:31.520
<v Speaker 2>We bring you all the tough news and business economics

0:19:31.560 --> 0:19:33.800
<v Speaker 2>and finance through a lens of our Bloomberg Intelligence folks.

0:19:33.840 --> 0:19:35.800
<v Speaker 2>They cover two thousand companies and one hundred and thirty

0:19:35.840 --> 0:19:40.000
<v Speaker 2>industries worldwide. The news that broke yesterday is that open

0:19:40.160 --> 0:19:43.520
<v Speaker 2>ai is going to transition from being a nonprofit organization

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:46.159
<v Speaker 2>to a for profit company. I have no idea what

0:19:46.280 --> 0:19:48.280
<v Speaker 2>that means, but the goal of the company was supposed

0:19:48.320 --> 0:19:51.240
<v Speaker 2>to quote benefit humanity as a whole, unconstrained by a

0:19:51.320 --> 0:19:53.879
<v Speaker 2>need to generate financial return. If that changes, what does

0:19:53.920 --> 0:19:56.040
<v Speaker 2>that due to the actual company? Joining us now, as

0:19:56.080 --> 0:20:01.000
<v Speaker 2>Man Deep Sing, Bloomberg Intelligence senior tech industry analyst joins, now, Okay,

0:20:01.200 --> 0:20:02.439
<v Speaker 2>I don't get it. What does it mean?

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:05.960
<v Speaker 8>Well, I mean they've been looking to do that for

0:20:06.119 --> 0:20:12.359
<v Speaker 8>a while in terms of becoming a profitable company similar

0:20:12.480 --> 0:20:16.480
<v Speaker 8>to other tech companies that are out there. And I

0:20:16.560 --> 0:20:20.480
<v Speaker 8>guess we had hints all along because they never open

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:23.200
<v Speaker 8>source their model. You know, they are the leaders when

0:20:23.240 --> 0:20:26.720
<v Speaker 8>it comes to generative AI, and there are two approaches

0:20:26.840 --> 0:20:31.040
<v Speaker 8>right now with companies keeping their model proprietary versus open source,

0:20:31.119 --> 0:20:34.320
<v Speaker 8>and they are one of those who have kept it proprietary.

0:20:34.440 --> 0:20:37.040
<v Speaker 8>So it's not a surprise that they wanted to convert

0:20:37.080 --> 0:20:41.680
<v Speaker 8>to a profit structure. Given all this has happened, I

0:20:41.760 --> 0:20:45.480
<v Speaker 8>think the bigger thing here is the CTO Mira Murrati

0:20:45.600 --> 0:20:48.080
<v Speaker 8>leaving and pretty much all the co founders of the

0:20:48.160 --> 0:20:52.360
<v Speaker 8>company leaving at this point, with Altmann being the only

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:54.920
<v Speaker 8>one there. So that's to me the bigger news.

0:20:55.440 --> 0:21:00.359
<v Speaker 4>Capitalism strikes again. But real question though, if it's valued

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:03.040
<v Speaker 4>around one hundred and fifty billion dollars and you mentioned

0:21:03.520 --> 0:21:07.200
<v Speaker 4>CTO Mira Muradi resigning, does she keep her stock like

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:10.520
<v Speaker 4>is she leaving the company with a nest egg worth

0:21:10.560 --> 0:21:11.520
<v Speaker 4>a few billion dollars?

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:16.480
<v Speaker 8>Well, again, I think once the entity changes, there are

0:21:16.600 --> 0:21:20.480
<v Speaker 8>a lot more things that will happen subsequently in terms

0:21:20.560 --> 0:21:23.480
<v Speaker 8>of you know, the new profitable structure, what sort of

0:21:23.800 --> 0:21:27.200
<v Speaker 8>equity sam Altman would have. So in terms of the

0:21:27.359 --> 0:21:32.119
<v Speaker 8>prior structure, they already had a subsidiary which was profitable.

0:21:32.240 --> 0:21:36.080
<v Speaker 8>So it's a pretty convoluted structure. So when the November

0:21:36.240 --> 0:21:39.600
<v Speaker 8>thing happened, number twenty twenty three, when sam Altman was

0:21:40.440 --> 0:21:42.880
<v Speaker 8>asked to leave and then he came back, at that time,

0:21:43.000 --> 0:21:47.399
<v Speaker 8>they changed the board composition and they created a profitable subsidiary.

0:21:47.960 --> 0:21:51.760
<v Speaker 8>Now this is like converting the full company to a

0:21:51.840 --> 0:21:55.760
<v Speaker 8>profitable entity, and there will be changes that will come along.

0:21:55.880 --> 0:21:59.560
<v Speaker 8>So hard to say exactly who keeps what at this

0:21:59.640 --> 0:22:02.720
<v Speaker 8>point of time, but suffice to say that you know,

0:22:03.240 --> 0:22:06.520
<v Speaker 8>the Microsoft relationship would come into play as well. I mean,

0:22:06.600 --> 0:22:09.679
<v Speaker 8>they are one of the biggest stakeholders in the company,

0:22:09.760 --> 0:22:14.600
<v Speaker 8>and all the signs are they want more investors in

0:22:14.680 --> 0:22:17.680
<v Speaker 8>the company. So sam Altman is trying to raise more

0:22:17.760 --> 0:22:21.720
<v Speaker 8>money and it will be at a higher valuation one

0:22:21.800 --> 0:22:25.280
<v Speaker 8>hundred and fifty billion dollars. That's expected, and at some

0:22:25.400 --> 0:22:27.240
<v Speaker 8>point I think they will go public as well.

0:22:27.760 --> 0:22:31.480
<v Speaker 2>When you brought up the CTO leaving, wasn't that also expected?

0:22:31.520 --> 0:22:35.240
<v Speaker 2>Hasn't she stayed on longer than everyone had anticipated because

0:22:35.280 --> 0:22:37.320
<v Speaker 2>she covered for Sam Welt when he was out, so

0:22:37.520 --> 0:22:40.040
<v Speaker 2>it was understood that she was leaving once he came back.

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:42.800
<v Speaker 8>Well, I mean, I look at it this week again,

0:22:43.119 --> 0:22:45.960
<v Speaker 8>it's from the outside. I obviously I am not privy

0:22:46.040 --> 0:22:48.680
<v Speaker 8>to anything that's going on inside the company, but there

0:22:48.840 --> 0:22:52.240
<v Speaker 8>is clearly some tension. Whether it's tied to the you know,

0:22:52.440 --> 0:22:56.920
<v Speaker 8>the profitable or non profitable aspect, or any other risks

0:22:57.000 --> 0:23:01.000
<v Speaker 8>related to large language models, whether it's come down to

0:23:01.119 --> 0:23:05.200
<v Speaker 8>safety issues or copyright issues. We don't know that level

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:08.280
<v Speaker 8>of transparency, and I think the fact that all the

0:23:08.400 --> 0:23:12.199
<v Speaker 8>co founders have left clearly there is disagreement and tension.

0:23:12.520 --> 0:23:15.760
<v Speaker 8>And we can only speculate from the outside, but it's

0:23:15.920 --> 0:23:18.600
<v Speaker 8>never a good sign when you know the core team

0:23:18.760 --> 0:23:22.720
<v Speaker 8>that started the company and these are the technical guys

0:23:22.760 --> 0:23:24.920
<v Speaker 8>who have left. So Sam Altman is the face of

0:23:25.000 --> 0:23:27.240
<v Speaker 8>the company, is the CEO, but these are the real

0:23:27.359 --> 0:23:30.960
<v Speaker 8>technical guys who built the product. So I mean, look,

0:23:31.000 --> 0:23:33.920
<v Speaker 8>they have a big bench and the company is much

0:23:33.960 --> 0:23:36.879
<v Speaker 8>bigger now. The fact that we haven't heard a lot

0:23:36.920 --> 0:23:41.000
<v Speaker 8>about GPT five that worries me a little bit because

0:23:41.040 --> 0:23:44.560
<v Speaker 8>when you are a company like open ai, who is

0:23:44.640 --> 0:23:48.320
<v Speaker 8>leading the charge, you want that product roadmap to be

0:23:48.400 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 8>out there. You want to set expectations when is the

0:23:50.920 --> 0:23:53.159
<v Speaker 8>next version of the large anglid model coming out? And

0:23:53.920 --> 0:23:55.760
<v Speaker 8>I think that's where they could be delayed.

0:23:56.080 --> 0:23:58.120
<v Speaker 2>All right, Mandy, really appreciate it. Thank you so much,

0:23:58.200 --> 0:24:02.240
<v Speaker 2>many saying, joining us Boomberg Technology senior analysts for Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:24:03.800 --> 0:24:07.640
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:24:07.760 --> 0:24:11.280
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Applecar Play and Android

0:24:11.320 --> 0:24:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen

0:24:14.200 --> 0:24:17.280
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station.

0:24:17.680 --> 0:24:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:24:22.080 --> 0:24:25.000
<v Speaker 2>In other news, Wells Fargo is said to send some

0:24:25.200 --> 0:24:29.359
<v Speaker 2>fed crucial review for lifting cap. Shares rise by about

0:24:29.359 --> 0:24:30.720
<v Speaker 2>two percent to a session high.

0:24:30.800 --> 0:24:31.880
<v Speaker 5>This is like the deal.

0:24:32.040 --> 0:24:35.560
<v Speaker 2>This is the It's like consistent things that Wells Fargo

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:39.359
<v Speaker 2>has to do, Bailey in order to get that asset

0:24:39.440 --> 0:24:42.479
<v Speaker 2>cap lifted so they can really start to grow again exactly.

0:24:42.600 --> 0:24:44.840
<v Speaker 4>And when you look at kind of some of these updates,

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:46.920
<v Speaker 4>so it's a big step in trying to kind of

0:24:47.000 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 4>write the ship, if you will, for Wells Fargo. As

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:50.840
<v Speaker 4>you mentioned, stock right now at more than four percent

0:24:50.960 --> 0:24:53.800
<v Speaker 4>so when you see these sharp immediate reactions, it's Wall

0:24:53.840 --> 0:24:57.520
<v Speaker 4>Street obviously applauding those deals. And the big thing going

0:24:57.600 --> 0:25:02.320
<v Speaker 4>forward is how can Walls Fargo kind of again re

0:25:02.440 --> 0:25:04.760
<v Speaker 4>emerge from some of those issues that they had a

0:25:05.000 --> 0:25:08.000
<v Speaker 4>number of years ago and the kind of reworking of

0:25:08.040 --> 0:25:10.359
<v Speaker 4>the company that's been taking I believe it's just over

0:25:10.440 --> 0:25:13.159
<v Speaker 4>five years, six years at this point, and trying to

0:25:13.200 --> 0:25:16.800
<v Speaker 4>get over some of these regulatory sanctions. And obviously the

0:25:16.880 --> 0:25:19.080
<v Speaker 4>stock again of four percent. I want to say it's

0:25:19.080 --> 0:25:21.879
<v Speaker 4>been underperforming relative to some comps, but I'm waiting on

0:25:21.960 --> 0:25:23.040
<v Speaker 4>a terminal to load right now.

0:25:23.440 --> 0:25:25.760
<v Speaker 2>And also the idea is that you know, you'd like

0:25:25.920 --> 0:25:27.720
<v Speaker 2>to say that they do this one thing and the

0:25:27.800 --> 0:25:31.040
<v Speaker 2>asset cap is lifted, but in actuality it's going to

0:25:31.119 --> 0:25:37.280
<v Speaker 2>be chipping away at compliance, transparency, getting all their ducks

0:25:37.320 --> 0:25:39.639
<v Speaker 2>in a row, and that it takes a lot of

0:25:39.800 --> 0:25:42.840
<v Speaker 2>time not to be bested. There is other breaking news here.

0:25:42.920 --> 0:25:45.320
<v Speaker 2>FED Vice Chare for Supervision Michael Barr delivers in a

0:25:45.400 --> 0:25:49.240
<v Speaker 2>speech that he says the FED is exploring liquidity rule

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:53.600
<v Speaker 2>tied to uninsured deposit Now that rule would address those

0:25:53.640 --> 0:25:57.560
<v Speaker 2>constraints on hold to maturity assets Part of the issue

0:25:57.640 --> 0:25:59.760
<v Speaker 2>that brought down SVB. At the end of the day,

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:02.119
<v Speaker 2>have an asset on your books, you're holding for safety,

0:26:02.160 --> 0:26:03.680
<v Speaker 2>You're going to hold them till the end of the term.

0:26:04.520 --> 0:26:06.880
<v Speaker 2>Yet when rates move violently up or down, it really

0:26:06.920 --> 0:26:10.920
<v Speaker 2>creates a disparity. Then in that asset price. You also

0:26:11.080 --> 0:26:14.280
<v Speaker 2>have potential requirements that could complement some of the existing rules,

0:26:14.320 --> 0:26:18.440
<v Speaker 2>exploring some large bank requirement on minimum liquidity. So many things,

0:26:18.640 --> 0:26:20.240
<v Speaker 2>so many things happening. It's so exciting.

0:26:20.280 --> 0:26:20.520
<v Speaker 3>Good thing.

0:26:20.560 --> 0:26:25.399
<v Speaker 2>Alison Williams is here Bloomberg Intelligence, chief US Bank's asset

0:26:25.480 --> 0:26:29.080
<v Speaker 2>manager person. She covers all of these things just in

0:26:29.200 --> 0:26:32.640
<v Speaker 2>terms of Wells Fargo moving forward to lifting the cap

0:26:33.320 --> 0:26:35.600
<v Speaker 2>in your estimate, like how close is Wells Fargo to

0:26:35.680 --> 0:26:37.800
<v Speaker 2>actually be able to lift their cap their asset cap.

0:26:38.720 --> 0:26:43.159
<v Speaker 9>You know, it's tough to say, you know, certainly this

0:26:43.280 --> 0:26:47.320
<v Speaker 9>has been unprecedented, right, I mean, this began with a

0:26:47.480 --> 0:26:51.360
<v Speaker 9>fine in twenty sixteen. I think Wells Fargo initially thought

0:26:51.359 --> 0:26:55.080
<v Speaker 9>it would be a few months. It's been several years,

0:26:57.680 --> 0:27:02.320
<v Speaker 9>but you know, they one of the biggest things I think,

0:27:02.600 --> 0:27:04.560
<v Speaker 9>you know, one of the biggest changes I thought was,

0:27:05.000 --> 0:27:06.760
<v Speaker 9>you know, they changed over the boar they brought in

0:27:06.840 --> 0:27:10.639
<v Speaker 9>all new management, Charlie Sharf as the CEO. He was

0:27:10.720 --> 0:27:13.639
<v Speaker 9>the sort of the third CEO in a short time period,

0:27:13.760 --> 0:27:16.840
<v Speaker 9>but almost fully turned over the board, brought in a

0:27:16.920 --> 0:27:20.080
<v Speaker 9>lot of x JP Morgan people, and then it's just

0:27:20.160 --> 0:27:23.240
<v Speaker 9>been sort of locking and tackling since. And we've seen

0:27:23.960 --> 0:27:27.159
<v Speaker 9>a number of the consent orders get resolved, but there

0:27:27.240 --> 0:27:29.040
<v Speaker 9>still are a few more out there that they need

0:27:29.119 --> 0:27:29.800
<v Speaker 9>to take care of.

0:27:30.359 --> 0:27:32.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, just looking at the Bloomberg News story stands out

0:27:33.119 --> 0:27:37.040
<v Speaker 4>the caps lifespan so far, JP Morgan has swelled sixty

0:27:37.160 --> 0:27:39.720
<v Speaker 4>four percent to more than four trillion dollars of assets,

0:27:39.800 --> 0:27:43.119
<v Speaker 4>meaning they've added almost an entire Wells Fargo to the

0:27:43.160 --> 0:27:47.119
<v Speaker 4>balance sheet. What's the timeline for Wells Fargo to potentially

0:27:47.440 --> 0:27:47.879
<v Speaker 4>catch up?

0:27:48.000 --> 0:27:48.680
<v Speaker 6>Is that possible?

0:27:48.720 --> 0:27:49.560
<v Speaker 4>How would that work out?

0:27:49.680 --> 0:27:49.880
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

0:27:49.920 --> 0:27:53.800
<v Speaker 9>I mean to some extent, there was, you know, a

0:27:53.920 --> 0:27:58.560
<v Speaker 9>lost opportunity, right, So, I think the biggest, you know,

0:27:59.520 --> 0:28:03.280
<v Speaker 9>the biggest hurt from the asset cap was during COVID

0:28:03.960 --> 0:28:07.280
<v Speaker 9>when JP Morgan and Bank America were able to add

0:28:07.400 --> 0:28:10.840
<v Speaker 9>all these retail deposits, right and Wills far Ago really

0:28:10.880 --> 0:28:14.040
<v Speaker 9>could not participate because they they did, but it was

0:28:14.080 --> 0:28:17.640
<v Speaker 9>a lot more work right, because it wasn't the loan

0:28:17.720 --> 0:28:19.920
<v Speaker 9>side of the balance sheet. It was really the deposit

0:28:20.040 --> 0:28:22.960
<v Speaker 9>side of the balance sheet that was a constraint because

0:28:22.960 --> 0:28:26.719
<v Speaker 9>they were growing so rapidly, and they did do things

0:28:26.920 --> 0:28:29.760
<v Speaker 9>to try to manage their balance sheet in the most

0:28:29.800 --> 0:28:32.560
<v Speaker 9>profitable way, you know, getting rid of things like non

0:28:32.640 --> 0:28:36.320
<v Speaker 9>operational deposits that are you know, less profitable and less

0:28:36.800 --> 0:28:40.360
<v Speaker 9>valuable long term than core deposits. They have sold off

0:28:40.440 --> 0:28:45.600
<v Speaker 9>businesses over time, so I mean, but for banks such

0:28:45.640 --> 0:28:48.680
<v Speaker 9>as Bank American and JP Morgan, granted, some of those

0:28:48.760 --> 0:28:53.040
<v Speaker 9>balances did go away over time, but they were able

0:28:53.120 --> 0:28:55.960
<v Speaker 9>to retain at least, you know, some of those customers,

0:28:56.040 --> 0:28:58.160
<v Speaker 9>and so I would say that's where sort of the

0:28:58.760 --> 0:29:00.760
<v Speaker 9>big harm from the assa cap has come from. You know,

0:29:00.800 --> 0:29:06.200
<v Speaker 9>if you fast forward to today, the balance sheet constraint

0:29:06.520 --> 0:29:10.720
<v Speaker 9>is not as significant. They have started investing in banks

0:29:10.840 --> 0:29:13.720
<v Speaker 9>like businesses like card and trading where they're under index,

0:29:13.760 --> 0:29:18.040
<v Speaker 9>so they are growing their businesses. So one, you know,

0:29:18.320 --> 0:29:21.360
<v Speaker 9>if the cap was removed, that would certainly give them

0:29:21.400 --> 0:29:25.720
<v Speaker 9>more flexibility in those businesses. But on the deposit, But

0:29:25.880 --> 0:29:28.600
<v Speaker 9>on the deposit point, that's that's really sort of a

0:29:28.680 --> 0:29:29.480
<v Speaker 9>lost opportunity.

0:29:29.880 --> 0:29:30.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Allison.

0:29:31.000 --> 0:29:31.240
<v Speaker 4>Thank you.

0:29:31.320 --> 0:29:33.200
<v Speaker 2>You weren' booked on this, but you came in exactly

0:29:33.280 --> 0:29:35.480
<v Speaker 2>the right time, so thanks so much. We really appreciate you.

0:29:35.560 --> 0:29:38.880
<v Speaker 2>Alson Williams of Bloomberg Intelligence senior analysts for global banks

0:29:39.520 --> 0:29:41.200
<v Speaker 2>and asset managers.

0:29:41.640 --> 0:29:46.120
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast, available on Apples, Spotify,

0:29:46.320 --> 0:29:49.200
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you will get your podcasts. Listen live

0:29:49.320 --> 0:29:52.720
<v Speaker 1>each weekday, ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:29:53.040 --> 0:29:56.400
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:29:56.560 --> 0:29:59.520
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:29:59.760 --> 0:30:05.200
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg trunnem