1 00:00:02,400 --> 00:00:05,600 Speaker 1: This is the Labor Podcast with your host JJ Zacher 2 00:00:06,160 --> 00:00:14,280 Speaker 1: je zacheron. What's up everyone. It's JJ Zachary sin in 3 00:00:14,280 --> 00:00:17,200 Speaker 1: this episode eleven oh one of the Late Round Fantasy 4 00:00:17,200 --> 00:00:21,560 Speaker 1: Football podcast. Thanks for tuning in. I don't care about 5 00:00:21,600 --> 00:00:24,080 Speaker 1: projections as much as others do in the fantasy football space. 6 00:00:24,120 --> 00:00:27,040 Speaker 1: I know that probably seems backwards because of my approach 7 00:00:27,080 --> 00:00:30,440 Speaker 1: to fantasy football being so analytics heavy, but it's true. 8 00:00:30,840 --> 00:00:34,479 Speaker 1: I think projections are often overrated. And the reason I 9 00:00:34,520 --> 00:00:36,800 Speaker 1: feel that way is because they don't capture range of 10 00:00:36,840 --> 00:00:41,120 Speaker 1: outcomes that well, generally speaking, and they don't capture draft strategy. 11 00:00:41,640 --> 00:00:43,720 Speaker 1: If you're in round eight of your fantasy draft, are 12 00:00:43,760 --> 00:00:47,159 Speaker 1: you looking for median outcomes or high end outcomes? Are 13 00:00:47,159 --> 00:00:49,120 Speaker 1: you looking at what's most likely to happen for a 14 00:00:49,159 --> 00:00:52,360 Speaker 1: player or what could happen if things break a certain way. 15 00:00:53,240 --> 00:00:55,600 Speaker 1: This isn't to say that you can't project for range 16 00:00:55,600 --> 00:00:58,600 Speaker 1: of outcomes. You can do a degree. And this isn't 17 00:00:58,600 --> 00:01:01,520 Speaker 1: me throwing shade to the people who build awesome projections. 18 00:01:02,080 --> 00:01:04,440 Speaker 1: They're doing great work and it's not easy work to do. 19 00:01:05,319 --> 00:01:07,600 Speaker 1: I'm just saying that I think people rely on projections 20 00:01:07,600 --> 00:01:10,000 Speaker 1: a little bit too much. In the fantasy football world. 21 00:01:10,319 --> 00:01:14,319 Speaker 1: The application is where I really disagree, but that certainly 22 00:01:14,360 --> 00:01:18,160 Speaker 1: doesn't make them worthless. I do projections every single year. 23 00:01:18,560 --> 00:01:20,959 Speaker 1: I don't maintain them throughout the summer and into the 24 00:01:21,000 --> 00:01:23,440 Speaker 1: season as well as I probably should, because that can 25 00:01:23,480 --> 00:01:26,120 Speaker 1: often just be like a full time job. But I 26 00:01:26,200 --> 00:01:28,800 Speaker 1: have them. I build them out, and I've been doing 27 00:01:28,840 --> 00:01:31,760 Speaker 1: that for years and years, and this year I got 28 00:01:31,760 --> 00:01:34,000 Speaker 1: some help with them from Late Round Zone Brandon Godola. 29 00:01:34,640 --> 00:01:36,680 Speaker 1: That was nice to get some relief with that process, 30 00:01:36,720 --> 00:01:40,720 Speaker 1: So props to Godula for helping me out. I've always said, though, 31 00:01:40,720 --> 00:01:43,920 Speaker 1: that building projections, it's not always about that end number, 32 00:01:44,200 --> 00:01:47,880 Speaker 1: that final fantasy point projection. For me, it's always been 33 00:01:47,920 --> 00:01:50,800 Speaker 1: about understanding the fantasy football landscape on a deeper level. 34 00:01:51,360 --> 00:01:54,040 Speaker 1: When you're sorting through target shairs, when you're sorting through 35 00:01:54,080 --> 00:01:57,840 Speaker 1: efficiency metrics, and when you're projecting team level production, you 36 00:01:57,880 --> 00:01:59,920 Speaker 1: start to see some things the you might not have 37 00:02:00,000 --> 00:02:03,480 Speaker 1: otherwise seen. And that's what this episode is about. Each year, 38 00:02:04,000 --> 00:02:06,000 Speaker 1: I'm not gonna sit here and show you where late 39 00:02:06,080 --> 00:02:09,560 Speaker 1: rounds projections differ from the market. That's not how I operate. 40 00:02:10,040 --> 00:02:12,639 Speaker 1: You'll learn about my players to target and avoid throughout 41 00:02:12,639 --> 00:02:15,359 Speaker 1: the summer. Instead, I want to talk through some of 42 00:02:15,400 --> 00:02:17,880 Speaker 1: the more interesting insights that I thought about and discovered 43 00:02:18,120 --> 00:02:21,360 Speaker 1: while we built projections this season. So, without further ado, 44 00:02:21,919 --> 00:02:26,280 Speaker 1: let's dig in. I want to start today's episode by 45 00:02:26,280 --> 00:02:28,959 Speaker 1: talking about the Raiders, because really, is there anything more 46 00:02:29,000 --> 00:02:31,840 Speaker 1: thrilling than talking about an offense that has Jalen Naylor 47 00:02:31,880 --> 00:02:35,880 Speaker 1: and Trey Tucker as starting wide receivers. The Raiders have 48 00:02:35,919 --> 00:02:38,880 Speaker 1: a brand new coaching staff though, with Clint Kubiak in town, 49 00:02:39,160 --> 00:02:41,320 Speaker 1: and he's obviously going to influence what they do in 50 00:02:41,360 --> 00:02:45,280 Speaker 1: a major way. First off, Vegas ran very few plays 51 00:02:45,360 --> 00:02:47,680 Speaker 1: last year. That obviously had to do with the combination 52 00:02:47,760 --> 00:02:49,960 Speaker 1: of their style but also their efficiency. It was not 53 00:02:50,040 --> 00:02:53,079 Speaker 1: a good offense. They ran the fewest plays per game 54 00:02:53,160 --> 00:02:56,200 Speaker 1: last year, though, at fifty five point eight. Teams who 55 00:02:56,240 --> 00:02:58,320 Speaker 1: have run fewer than fifty eight plays per game since 56 00:02:58,360 --> 00:03:01,480 Speaker 1: twenty eleven have seen that number increased by over five 57 00:03:01,840 --> 00:03:04,880 Speaker 1: the following year on average, So just purely from a 58 00:03:04,919 --> 00:03:09,840 Speaker 1: regression perspective, we should see more plays from Vegas. Now 59 00:03:09,919 --> 00:03:13,400 Speaker 1: that being said, Clint Kubiak has now coordinated three NFL offenses, 60 00:03:13,600 --> 00:03:16,160 Speaker 1: the twenty twenty one Vikings, the twenty twenty four Saints 61 00:03:16,280 --> 00:03:19,840 Speaker 1: and the twenty twenty five Seahawks. At each stop, his 62 00:03:19,919 --> 00:03:22,640 Speaker 1: teams have had well below zero pass rate over expected 63 00:03:22,720 --> 00:03:26,960 Speaker 1: rates last year for Seattle was nearly minus seven percent. 64 00:03:27,760 --> 00:03:30,519 Speaker 1: As we know, they leaned heavily on the run. That's 65 00:03:30,560 --> 00:03:33,919 Speaker 1: led to slightly lower paces and slightly fewer plays per 66 00:03:33,960 --> 00:03:37,840 Speaker 1: game for Kubiak's offenses. So while I do expect Vegas 67 00:03:37,840 --> 00:03:40,160 Speaker 1: to improve on plays per game, I think we should 68 00:03:40,200 --> 00:03:43,440 Speaker 1: realize that Kubiak's offenses aren't like I don't know, Kellen Moors, 69 00:03:44,440 --> 00:03:47,080 Speaker 1: they can run slower. What I do think we're going 70 00:03:47,160 --> 00:03:49,760 Speaker 1: to see from his offense that was more efficiency. Over 71 00:03:49,840 --> 00:03:52,320 Speaker 1: his last two stops, we've seen his offenses improve in 72 00:03:52,440 --> 00:03:55,280 Speaker 1: yards per play year over year by about point two 73 00:03:55,320 --> 00:03:58,480 Speaker 1: and point four yards per play, and he's done this 74 00:03:58,560 --> 00:04:01,720 Speaker 1: through a heavier use of twelve per In twenty twenty four, 75 00:04:02,000 --> 00:04:04,720 Speaker 1: the Saints' year over year use in twelve personnel rose 76 00:04:04,760 --> 00:04:07,880 Speaker 1: by over six percentage points. For the Seahawks from twenty 77 00:04:07,920 --> 00:04:10,720 Speaker 1: twenty four to twenty twenty five, theirs rose by almost 78 00:04:10,800 --> 00:04:14,680 Speaker 1: thirteen percentage points. And the way this team is structured, 79 00:04:15,000 --> 00:04:17,520 Speaker 1: that makes a lot of sense. They don't have super 80 00:04:17,520 --> 00:04:20,200 Speaker 1: strong wide receivers, as I talked about at the top, 81 00:04:20,880 --> 00:04:22,640 Speaker 1: but they have a good running back and elite tight 82 00:04:22,760 --> 00:04:24,960 Speaker 1: end and a great second tight end in Michael Mayer. 83 00:04:25,800 --> 00:04:27,599 Speaker 1: The Raiders are gonna want to pound the rock, but 84 00:04:27,600 --> 00:04:29,880 Speaker 1: then also have the versatility to throw out of those 85 00:04:29,960 --> 00:04:34,320 Speaker 1: heavier sets, which means Brock Bauers and Ashton Genty could 86 00:04:34,400 --> 00:04:37,400 Speaker 1: eat in this offense. But also I wouldn't be surprised 87 00:04:37,400 --> 00:04:39,480 Speaker 1: if Michael Mayer is involved a little bit more this 88 00:04:39,560 --> 00:04:42,680 Speaker 1: year too. The fantasy friendliness of this offense is really 89 00:04:42,720 --> 00:04:45,479 Speaker 1: going to come down to efficiency, but Kubiak has at 90 00:04:45,560 --> 00:04:47,760 Speaker 1: least shown us that he can bring that to the table, 91 00:04:48,080 --> 00:04:49,880 Speaker 1: and I think there's a chance that we see a 92 00:04:49,960 --> 00:04:53,560 Speaker 1: really big season from brock Bauers, which is why he's 93 00:04:53,560 --> 00:04:57,839 Speaker 1: my tight end one right now. Now, stemming from that 94 00:04:57,880 --> 00:05:00,600 Speaker 1: discussion about Kubiak, let's talk about the wide receiver who 95 00:05:00,680 --> 00:05:03,120 Speaker 1: dominated in his offense last year, which is Jackson Smith 96 00:05:03,160 --> 00:05:06,719 Speaker 1: and Jigba. I'm not worried that Jasn is just gonna 97 00:05:06,720 --> 00:05:09,599 Speaker 1: bust this year. He's an elite player who can quite 98 00:05:09,680 --> 00:05:12,480 Speaker 1: literally do anything on an NFL field. What I'm a 99 00:05:12,520 --> 00:05:14,640 Speaker 1: little bit concerned about is what the projections are picking 100 00:05:14,720 --> 00:05:17,919 Speaker 1: up on and that's regression. JSN is not like the 101 00:05:17,960 --> 00:05:20,840 Speaker 1: wide receiver eight or anything, but he's just not as 102 00:05:20,880 --> 00:05:23,800 Speaker 1: clear cut in that top spot as you might think, like, 103 00:05:23,839 --> 00:05:26,200 Speaker 1: for example, the projection is really like Aman Ross Saint 104 00:05:26,200 --> 00:05:29,119 Speaker 1: Brown right now, he's honestly close to the same tier 105 00:05:29,360 --> 00:05:32,839 Speaker 1: as JASN according to those projections. Maybe that's more of 106 00:05:32,880 --> 00:05:35,640 Speaker 1: just a Saint Brown thing being undervalued, which I think 107 00:05:35,680 --> 00:05:38,640 Speaker 1: is part of this, but also there is some natural 108 00:05:38,680 --> 00:05:42,440 Speaker 1: regression that we should expect with JASN. First off, the 109 00:05:42,480 --> 00:05:44,680 Speaker 1: dude had a thirty five percent target share last year, 110 00:05:44,680 --> 00:05:48,240 Speaker 1: almost thirty six percent. Since twenty eleven, players who have 111 00:05:48,240 --> 00:05:50,479 Speaker 1: been over a thirty percent target chair have seen an 112 00:05:50,560 --> 00:05:53,599 Speaker 1: average and median drop of four percentage points in target 113 00:05:53,600 --> 00:05:57,000 Speaker 1: share the following season. That's what the minimum eight games 114 00:05:57,040 --> 00:06:00,520 Speaker 1: played in both seasons. That only gets higher as that 115 00:06:00,600 --> 00:06:04,520 Speaker 1: threshold increases. And obviously JSN was a lot higher than 116 00:06:04,520 --> 00:06:07,960 Speaker 1: a thirty percent target chair. So with JSN he's set 117 00:06:08,040 --> 00:06:10,320 Speaker 1: up well to see a crazy target chair still, but 118 00:06:10,360 --> 00:06:13,039 Speaker 1: it's no guarantee that he's gonna maintain his one hundred 119 00:06:13,040 --> 00:06:15,640 Speaker 1: and sixty three targets total year over year. But even 120 00:06:15,720 --> 00:06:18,960 Speaker 1: if he does, Let's assume that Seattle's more pass heavy 121 00:06:19,120 --> 00:06:22,120 Speaker 1: with their new coordinator. There's no more Kenneth Walker, and 122 00:06:22,200 --> 00:06:25,680 Speaker 1: maybe the defense just doesn't play as well. We typically 123 00:06:25,720 --> 00:06:28,760 Speaker 1: do see that with defense is year over year, Smith 124 00:06:28,760 --> 00:06:32,760 Speaker 1: and Jigba, regardless of volume, was unreal efficient last year. 125 00:06:33,600 --> 00:06:35,760 Speaker 1: We have a sample of eighty five wide outs with 126 00:06:35,800 --> 00:06:38,400 Speaker 1: fifty plus targets and back to back seasons who hit 127 00:06:38,440 --> 00:06:40,839 Speaker 1: ten or more yards per target in that first season. 128 00:06:41,640 --> 00:06:44,920 Speaker 1: On average, we see them dropping yards per target by 129 00:06:45,000 --> 00:06:48,920 Speaker 1: two full yards year over year. JSN became one of 130 00:06:48,960 --> 00:06:51,080 Speaker 1: the best deep threats in the league last year. That 131 00:06:51,160 --> 00:06:54,480 Speaker 1: helped him out tremendously. I'm not expecting him to regress 132 00:06:54,640 --> 00:06:57,760 Speaker 1: to his first two season average year. However, he had 133 00:06:57,800 --> 00:07:01,200 Speaker 1: eleven yards per target last season. Among that same group 134 00:07:01,200 --> 00:07:03,200 Speaker 1: of players who had ten or more yards per target 135 00:07:03,200 --> 00:07:06,400 Speaker 1: in one year, roughly eighty percent of them ended up 136 00:07:06,440 --> 00:07:09,280 Speaker 1: declining year over year in yards per target. And the 137 00:07:09,320 --> 00:07:12,800 Speaker 1: players who typically do improve they're not crazy target hawks, 138 00:07:13,080 --> 00:07:16,920 Speaker 1: they're more deep threats. I still have JSN ranked as 139 00:07:16,920 --> 00:07:19,280 Speaker 1: my wide receiver three, but I do think that Puuka 140 00:07:19,280 --> 00:07:22,679 Speaker 1: and Akua and Jamar Chase they project better than JSM 141 00:07:22,720 --> 00:07:25,200 Speaker 1: this year just because there's a little bit more room 142 00:07:25,240 --> 00:07:29,000 Speaker 1: for air, and don't sleep Phenomena Saint Brown. The projections 143 00:07:29,040 --> 00:07:31,200 Speaker 1: really like him. They think that he should be living 144 00:07:31,200 --> 00:07:36,240 Speaker 1: sort of closer to that JSN tier I just don't 145 00:07:36,240 --> 00:07:38,520 Speaker 1: think that we can use Minnesota's twenty twenty five season 146 00:07:38,520 --> 00:07:40,400 Speaker 1: as the baseline for what we're gonna see here in 147 00:07:40,400 --> 00:07:43,320 Speaker 1: twenty twenty six. Kevin O'Connell's been their head coach now 148 00:07:43,400 --> 00:07:46,560 Speaker 1: for four years. During his first three seasons, the Vikings 149 00:07:46,600 --> 00:07:49,280 Speaker 1: average almost sixty four plays per game, over five and 150 00:07:49,320 --> 00:07:51,560 Speaker 1: a half yards per play, almost two and a half 151 00:07:51,600 --> 00:07:54,640 Speaker 1: touchdowns per game, and an average pass right to overexpected 152 00:07:54,800 --> 00:07:59,160 Speaker 1: of nearly plus three percent. Last year, their plays per 153 00:07:59,200 --> 00:08:02,360 Speaker 1: game fell by twelve percent, their yards per play by 154 00:08:02,400 --> 00:08:05,840 Speaker 1: eleven percent, their touchdowns per game by eighteen percent, and 155 00:08:05,880 --> 00:08:09,160 Speaker 1: their pass rate to overexpected went to minus one point two, 156 00:08:09,720 --> 00:08:12,640 Speaker 1: which was four whole percentage points lower than their previous 157 00:08:12,680 --> 00:08:17,600 Speaker 1: three year average. And obviously this stem from poor quarterback play. Now, 158 00:08:17,600 --> 00:08:20,000 Speaker 1: we don't know exactly what Kyler Murray is going to 159 00:08:20,000 --> 00:08:22,760 Speaker 1: look like in this offense, but it's pretty easy to 160 00:08:22,840 --> 00:08:25,160 Speaker 1: say that it's gonna look better than whatever the heck 161 00:08:25,200 --> 00:08:28,680 Speaker 1: it was last year. Minnesota was fourth worse than EPA 162 00:08:28,760 --> 00:08:31,960 Speaker 1: per dropback last year, when they ranked ninth, sixteenth, and 163 00:08:32,080 --> 00:08:35,280 Speaker 1: twelfth to three years prior, and that was across more 164 00:08:35,320 --> 00:08:39,120 Speaker 1: than just one quarterback. Kyler Murray hasn't given us a 165 00:08:39,160 --> 00:08:42,720 Speaker 1: ton in recent years, but I'm very hopeful that we're 166 00:08:42,720 --> 00:08:45,240 Speaker 1: going to see a much better Minnesota offense this season 167 00:08:45,280 --> 00:08:48,200 Speaker 1: here in twenty twenty six. Last year just stands out 168 00:08:48,240 --> 00:08:51,199 Speaker 1: as such an outlier from what we've seen historically under 169 00:08:51,240 --> 00:08:56,880 Speaker 1: Kevin O'Connell. People were burned by Terry McLaurin last year, 170 00:08:56,880 --> 00:08:59,400 Speaker 1: but I'm here to say that McLaurin was still very 171 00:08:59,440 --> 00:09:03,920 Speaker 1: good at hyde receiver. He himself, when healthy, when active 172 00:09:04,000 --> 00:09:07,920 Speaker 1: at thirty years of age, was actually pretty awesome. Now. 173 00:09:07,920 --> 00:09:09,960 Speaker 1: I talked about this on the show this offseason. Already 174 00:09:10,000 --> 00:09:12,120 Speaker 1: I had him as a by candidate for when Now 175 00:09:12,160 --> 00:09:15,920 Speaker 1: Teams in Dynasty, But McLaurin last season had his second 176 00:09:15,920 --> 00:09:18,720 Speaker 1: best yards per team pass attempt rate of his entire career. 177 00:09:19,280 --> 00:09:22,240 Speaker 1: He had his absolute best yards per rout run rate 178 00:09:22,440 --> 00:09:25,560 Speaker 1: at two point twenty two. This was at thirty years 179 00:09:25,600 --> 00:09:29,840 Speaker 1: old and an offense that had a carousela quarterback. McLaurin 180 00:09:29,880 --> 00:09:31,880 Speaker 1: has still only hit a twenty five percent target share 181 00:09:31,960 --> 00:09:34,160 Speaker 1: once in his career, but I actually think there's a 182 00:09:34,280 --> 00:09:36,560 Speaker 1: chance that we see that again. In twenty twenty six. 183 00:09:37,320 --> 00:09:39,960 Speaker 1: All they did was at Antonio Williams of the wide 184 00:09:39,960 --> 00:09:45,000 Speaker 1: receiver room. Jayden Daniels is healthy and David Blau's offensive coordinator. Now. 185 00:09:45,760 --> 00:09:48,079 Speaker 1: I remember being at Radio Road this year. We interviewed 186 00:09:48,120 --> 00:09:50,800 Speaker 1: Josh Johnson on the Late Round Show, but he was 187 00:09:50,920 --> 00:09:54,400 Speaker 1: very excited about Blow and Washington. We don't know exactly 188 00:09:54,480 --> 00:09:56,440 Speaker 1: what this is going to look like, but from the 189 00:09:56,480 --> 00:10:00,240 Speaker 1: interviews that I've watched, I like what I've heard. Law 190 00:10:00,280 --> 00:10:02,520 Speaker 1: has talked about the importance of play action, which continues 191 00:10:02,559 --> 00:10:05,680 Speaker 1: to be a cheat code, disguising his looks, getting creative 192 00:10:05,720 --> 00:10:09,439 Speaker 1: to confuse defenses and to use motion, and they quite 193 00:10:09,440 --> 00:10:13,400 Speaker 1: literally talked about Terry McLaurin being the centerpiece of this offense. 194 00:10:14,480 --> 00:10:17,560 Speaker 1: In February, Blouse said, quote, this thing's going to be 195 00:10:17,559 --> 00:10:20,959 Speaker 1: built around how do we get Terry ten targets per game? 196 00:10:21,920 --> 00:10:24,800 Speaker 1: Considering McLaurin looked the part last year and looking at 197 00:10:24,840 --> 00:10:28,720 Speaker 1: the competition right now on that team, Jayden Daniels is healthy. 198 00:10:29,120 --> 00:10:34,800 Speaker 1: I'm in and projections reflect that too. Arizona's a tough 199 00:10:34,800 --> 00:10:36,760 Speaker 1: team to wrap my head around right now. On one hand, 200 00:10:36,800 --> 00:10:39,400 Speaker 1: we saw Jacoby Brissett not only allow Michael Wilson to 201 00:10:39,400 --> 00:10:41,800 Speaker 1: be fantasy relevant last year and Trey McBride to just 202 00:10:41,840 --> 00:10:45,240 Speaker 1: put up insane numbers, but he himself was relevant up 203 00:10:45,320 --> 00:10:48,160 Speaker 1: until the end of the season. The backfield was a 204 00:10:48,160 --> 00:10:50,520 Speaker 1: mess with injuries, but it was somewhat of a surprise 205 00:10:50,640 --> 00:10:54,679 Speaker 1: offense for fantasy purposes. Now, in twenty twenty six, we're 206 00:10:54,679 --> 00:10:57,920 Speaker 1: looking at a new coaching staff. Jacoby Brissette is probably 207 00:10:58,000 --> 00:11:00,400 Speaker 1: under center. Then they added Jeremiah Love in the draft. 208 00:11:01,160 --> 00:11:05,160 Speaker 1: Projecting this team is really not easy. Part of the 209 00:11:05,200 --> 00:11:07,480 Speaker 1: problem is that last year the Cardinals were first in 210 00:11:07,520 --> 00:11:11,160 Speaker 1: the league in pass attempts. Typically, given their pass attempt number, 211 00:11:11,400 --> 00:11:13,880 Speaker 1: we've seen teams regress by a few pass attempts per 212 00:11:13,920 --> 00:11:17,640 Speaker 1: game year over year, the majority of them do. If 213 00:11:17,679 --> 00:11:20,200 Speaker 1: that happens, we're looking at the potential for fifty fewer 214 00:11:20,240 --> 00:11:23,720 Speaker 1: pass attempts year over year for Arizona. Meanwhile, there's this 215 00:11:23,840 --> 00:11:27,880 Speaker 1: really weird Michael Wilson problem to solve. Last year, Jacoby 216 00:11:27,920 --> 00:11:30,480 Speaker 1: Brissett took over in week six. From Week one to 217 00:11:30,520 --> 00:11:34,439 Speaker 1: week five, Michael Wilson averaged three point eight PPR points 218 00:11:34,440 --> 00:11:37,400 Speaker 1: per game. That was along the same lines as Josh 219 00:11:37,400 --> 00:11:42,000 Speaker 1: Reynolds and andre Yosibash. Brissette then takes over, and from 220 00:11:42,080 --> 00:11:45,360 Speaker 1: Week six onward, Wilson was the wide receiver eleven in 221 00:11:45,400 --> 00:11:48,560 Speaker 1: Fantasy football with sixteen point four PPR points per game. 222 00:11:49,160 --> 00:11:52,480 Speaker 1: We would take that all day long this year, but 223 00:11:52,559 --> 00:11:55,880 Speaker 1: we have to remember that Marvin Harrison Junior wasn't totally 224 00:11:55,920 --> 00:11:59,520 Speaker 1: active and healthy over that time period. Post Week five, 225 00:11:59,640 --> 00:12:02,160 Speaker 1: man Harrison Junior ran a route on eighty percent or 226 00:12:02,160 --> 00:12:05,520 Speaker 1: more of Arizona's dropbacks in just three games Week seven 227 00:12:05,920 --> 00:12:09,040 Speaker 1: nine to ten. He either missed every other game or 228 00:12:09,040 --> 00:12:11,880 Speaker 1: he was well below that seventy percent mark, which is 229 00:12:11,920 --> 00:12:16,079 Speaker 1: not his norm at all. In those three games, Michael 230 00:12:16,120 --> 00:12:19,840 Speaker 1: Wilson scored nine point one, seven point four and seven 231 00:12:19,880 --> 00:12:23,600 Speaker 1: point zero PPR points. That was on a thirteen point 232 00:12:23,679 --> 00:12:26,240 Speaker 1: eight percent target share per game rate. To put that 233 00:12:26,280 --> 00:12:30,080 Speaker 1: another way, all of Michael Wilson's serious production with Jacoby 234 00:12:30,120 --> 00:12:33,160 Speaker 1: Brissett last year came without Marvin Harrison Junior being one 235 00:12:33,200 --> 00:12:36,360 Speaker 1: hundred percent. And say what you want about Marvin Harrison Junior, 236 00:12:36,559 --> 00:12:39,200 Speaker 1: he clearly has not lived up to the hype, but 237 00:12:39,240 --> 00:12:40,920 Speaker 1: I think if you were to tell someone that last 238 00:12:41,000 --> 00:12:44,440 Speaker 1: year he and Michael Wilson had almost identical yards per 239 00:12:44,480 --> 00:12:47,120 Speaker 1: rout run rates one point five eight versus one point 240 00:12:47,160 --> 00:12:51,400 Speaker 1: five to nine, they'd probably be surprised. Wilson commanded a 241 00:12:51,440 --> 00:12:54,680 Speaker 1: target on twenty percent of his routes run Marvin Harrison 242 00:12:54,760 --> 00:12:58,640 Speaker 1: Junior nineteen percent. And remember there was a large sample 243 00:12:58,720 --> 00:13:02,800 Speaker 1: here where Michael Wilson was playing without Marvin Harrison Junior. 244 00:13:04,080 --> 00:13:06,199 Speaker 1: That's why it's hard for me to feel really bullish 245 00:13:06,200 --> 00:13:09,400 Speaker 1: about Michael Wilson in twenty twenty six, and I, along 246 00:13:09,440 --> 00:13:13,160 Speaker 1: with the projections, we're more bullish on Marvin Harrison Junior 247 00:13:13,280 --> 00:13:17,760 Speaker 1: between the two wide receivers. I pretty actively faded Marvin 248 00:13:17,800 --> 00:13:21,040 Speaker 1: Harrison Junior last year. But at his current cost and 249 00:13:21,080 --> 00:13:25,000 Speaker 1: what projections are saying, he's not a terrible pick because 250 00:13:25,040 --> 00:13:27,280 Speaker 1: this is a brand new offense, a brand new system. 251 00:13:27,640 --> 00:13:30,120 Speaker 1: I'd much rather bet on the high end prospect than 252 00:13:30,160 --> 00:13:32,599 Speaker 1: the guy who only produced when an injury occurred to 253 00:13:32,640 --> 00:13:35,720 Speaker 1: another player last year, and who did if we're just 254 00:13:35,720 --> 00:13:38,800 Speaker 1: being honest with ourselves, he benefited from a team with 255 00:13:38,880 --> 00:13:42,600 Speaker 1: a lot of passing volume. Honestly, guys, last year's Michael 256 00:13:42,600 --> 00:13:45,199 Speaker 1: Wilson season reminds me a lot of twenty twenty four's 257 00:13:45,240 --> 00:13:49,360 Speaker 1: Jerry Judy season. In twenty twenty four, Judy averaged fourteen 258 00:13:49,400 --> 00:13:51,440 Speaker 1: PPR points per game. He had a stretch of games 259 00:13:51,440 --> 00:13:54,040 Speaker 1: where he was dominating in fantasy football at Jamis Winston, 260 00:13:54,320 --> 00:13:57,920 Speaker 1: but his peripherals were never spectacular. His yards per rout 261 00:13:58,000 --> 00:14:00,160 Speaker 1: run rate that year was one point seventy two. Who 262 00:14:01,040 --> 00:14:03,400 Speaker 1: it's not like he got significantly better as a player, 263 00:14:03,920 --> 00:14:07,200 Speaker 1: and Judy also benefited from injuries to his teammates just 264 00:14:07,240 --> 00:14:10,400 Speaker 1: like Michael Wilson, and Judy ended up running the most 265 00:14:10,520 --> 00:14:13,719 Speaker 1: routes in the NFL that year because, like the Cardinals, 266 00:14:13,920 --> 00:14:17,080 Speaker 1: the Browns led the league in pass attempts, and like Judy, 267 00:14:17,520 --> 00:14:20,080 Speaker 1: Michael Wilson was fourth in the NFL last year and 268 00:14:20,160 --> 00:14:23,280 Speaker 1: routes run according to PFF. Now, look, the Cardinals are 269 00:14:23,280 --> 00:14:25,800 Speaker 1: probably gonna still be pass heavy just given how bad 270 00:14:25,840 --> 00:14:29,760 Speaker 1: that defense projects. But with Wilson's peripherals really not being 271 00:14:29,760 --> 00:14:33,320 Speaker 1: spectacular with his splits alongside a healthy Marvin Harrison junior 272 00:14:33,360 --> 00:14:35,600 Speaker 1: last year, looking if he, I can see why the 273 00:14:35,720 --> 00:14:39,680 Speaker 1: projections are just not that into him. Now, I mentioned 274 00:14:39,720 --> 00:14:42,040 Speaker 1: the Brock Bauers stuff earlier, and I think Trey McBride 275 00:14:42,080 --> 00:14:44,840 Speaker 1: he should still be the tight end two. But it's 276 00:14:44,840 --> 00:14:47,480 Speaker 1: funny to say this after how his career started. He's 277 00:14:47,520 --> 00:14:51,440 Speaker 1: probably not gonna score eleven touchdowns again. Now. It's true 278 00:14:51,480 --> 00:14:54,840 Speaker 1: he didn't like harshly outperform as expected touchdowns last year, 279 00:14:55,240 --> 00:14:57,720 Speaker 1: but the Cardinals also set him up well, and I'm 280 00:14:57,720 --> 00:15:01,600 Speaker 1: not convinced that that's easily repeatable, especially because there's a 281 00:15:01,720 --> 00:15:04,440 Speaker 1: very real chance that Jacoby Brissett is not starting for 282 00:15:04,520 --> 00:15:07,880 Speaker 1: that team the entire season. We could get Carson Beck. 283 00:15:08,040 --> 00:15:10,440 Speaker 1: In fact, I think we will get some Carson Beck. 284 00:15:11,080 --> 00:15:12,600 Speaker 1: And then through all of this, there's also a lot 285 00:15:12,640 --> 00:15:16,880 Speaker 1: of ambiguity with Jeremiah Love. That's why this whole thing 286 00:15:17,160 --> 00:15:19,920 Speaker 1: is just really difficult to project. I didn't even mention 287 00:15:20,000 --> 00:15:22,280 Speaker 1: the change in staff and how that comes into play. 288 00:15:22,640 --> 00:15:24,600 Speaker 1: I do think we see a more effective run game, 289 00:15:24,840 --> 00:15:27,360 Speaker 1: and we might see a team that wants to really 290 00:15:27,400 --> 00:15:30,360 Speaker 1: run the football. They wouldn't have taken Love third overall 291 00:15:30,360 --> 00:15:33,240 Speaker 1: if that wasn't the case. But there's also a classic 292 00:15:33,240 --> 00:15:36,480 Speaker 1: case of not getting carried away with just duplicating what 293 00:15:36,560 --> 00:15:38,920 Speaker 1: that team did during the back half of the twenty 294 00:15:38,960 --> 00:15:42,400 Speaker 1: twenty five season. There's a lot of change in Arizona, 295 00:15:42,960 --> 00:15:45,280 Speaker 1: and we can't forget about certain injuries that occurred last 296 00:15:45,360 --> 00:15:48,200 Speaker 1: year that enabled some of these things to be unlocked. 297 00:15:49,400 --> 00:15:51,880 Speaker 1: So the TLDR is that I'm afraid of this offense, 298 00:15:52,200 --> 00:15:54,920 Speaker 1: and I'm definitely afraid of taking Michael Wilson at ADP 299 00:15:55,560 --> 00:16:01,040 Speaker 1: given these projections. I've talked up both Jaden Reid and 300 00:16:01,120 --> 00:16:03,400 Speaker 1: Josh Downs over the last month, but I want to 301 00:16:03,440 --> 00:16:06,000 Speaker 1: call them out here because projections show that there's at 302 00:16:06,080 --> 00:16:09,880 Speaker 1: least some opportunity. Projections are based on median outcomes, and 303 00:16:09,920 --> 00:16:13,080 Speaker 1: the median outcome for Josh Downs and Jaden Reid is 304 00:16:13,080 --> 00:16:15,600 Speaker 1: that they continue their slot roles. They don't grow that 305 00:16:15,680 --> 00:16:19,320 Speaker 1: much from them, and that's it. They're not super relevant 306 00:16:19,320 --> 00:16:22,360 Speaker 1: in fantasy football. But even with that being the assumption, 307 00:16:22,920 --> 00:16:25,760 Speaker 1: Read and Downs are comfortably top fifty wide receivers right 308 00:16:25,800 --> 00:16:28,800 Speaker 1: now in the projections front. And meanwhile, according to Fantasy 309 00:16:28,800 --> 00:16:32,560 Speaker 1: Pro's average draft position data, Read is wide receiver thirty nine, 310 00:16:32,640 --> 00:16:35,920 Speaker 1: Downs wide receiver forty five, which means where they're getting 311 00:16:36,000 --> 00:16:39,360 Speaker 1: drafted right now really isn't that far off from just 312 00:16:39,400 --> 00:16:43,080 Speaker 1: their median projection. But we know there are non injury 313 00:16:43,120 --> 00:16:46,360 Speaker 1: outs for both wide receivers, which doesn't exist for many 314 00:16:46,400 --> 00:16:50,120 Speaker 1: wide receivers in that range in general. For Reed, we're 315 00:16:50,160 --> 00:16:53,000 Speaker 1: assuming that Matthew Golden takes a step he's really able 316 00:16:53,000 --> 00:16:56,560 Speaker 1: to play consistently in two wide receiver sets for Josh downs. 317 00:16:56,720 --> 00:16:58,960 Speaker 1: The only guy in his way in those groupings is 318 00:16:59,040 --> 00:17:03,280 Speaker 1: Nick Westbrook a Keena. There was a fantastic article done 319 00:17:03,280 --> 00:17:06,840 Speaker 1: by Fantasy Points Ryan Heath last week on play caller tendencies, 320 00:17:07,520 --> 00:17:10,200 Speaker 1: and specifically he looked at play callers who often call 321 00:17:10,280 --> 00:17:12,639 Speaker 1: plays with two or fewer wide receivers on the field 322 00:17:12,640 --> 00:17:16,400 Speaker 1: at once. We've known for a while that heavier personnel 323 00:17:16,440 --> 00:17:19,040 Speaker 1: or fewer wide receivers on the field can bring forth 324 00:17:19,119 --> 00:17:21,960 Speaker 1: higher target shairs and better fantasy production for the wide 325 00:17:22,000 --> 00:17:25,000 Speaker 1: receivers who are actually on the field for those plays 326 00:17:25,000 --> 00:17:28,520 Speaker 1: in those situations, because instead of competing with other wideouts 327 00:17:28,560 --> 00:17:31,879 Speaker 1: for targets, they're competing with tight ends or running backs. 328 00:17:33,119 --> 00:17:35,800 Speaker 1: In that article, which everyone should read, hit my Twitter 329 00:17:35,840 --> 00:17:37,760 Speaker 1: account if you want to see it. I quote tweeted it. 330 00:17:38,480 --> 00:17:41,560 Speaker 1: But in it Ryan talks about Christian Watson, who to 331 00:17:41,640 --> 00:17:44,240 Speaker 1: me has the most established role right now in that 332 00:17:44,320 --> 00:17:47,399 Speaker 1: Green Bay offense at wide receiver, but he noted that 333 00:17:47,440 --> 00:17:50,199 Speaker 1: the Packers when Tucker Craft was healthy last year, they 334 00:17:50,280 --> 00:17:53,080 Speaker 1: ran a lot more plays with only two wide receivers 335 00:17:53,080 --> 00:17:56,399 Speaker 1: on the field. That's gonna help Watson, there's no doubt, 336 00:17:56,760 --> 00:18:00,480 Speaker 1: but it's also gonna help whoever wins out outside of Watson. 337 00:18:01,040 --> 00:18:03,760 Speaker 1: And right now, I think throwing that dart at Matthew Golden, 338 00:18:04,080 --> 00:18:07,080 Speaker 1: it's absolutely fine, despite the fact that I thought he 339 00:18:07,119 --> 00:18:09,880 Speaker 1: was an overvalued prospect and he didn't do anything last year. 340 00:18:10,320 --> 00:18:13,280 Speaker 1: But I am still drafting him right now. But because 341 00:18:13,320 --> 00:18:16,359 Speaker 1: he's an overrated prospect and he didn't do anything last year, 342 00:18:16,920 --> 00:18:19,240 Speaker 1: what if this is the year the Packers actually do 343 00:18:19,480 --> 00:18:22,880 Speaker 1: use Jaden Reed more on the outside. He barely has 344 00:18:22,920 --> 00:18:25,520 Speaker 1: played in two wide receiver sets in Green Bay, so 345 00:18:25,600 --> 00:18:28,240 Speaker 1: don't get your hopes up. But Green Bay has historically 346 00:18:28,280 --> 00:18:30,520 Speaker 1: had a lot more depth at wide receiver than they 347 00:18:30,520 --> 00:18:33,639 Speaker 1: do right now. So for the Packers, I just like 348 00:18:33,720 --> 00:18:36,960 Speaker 1: the Packers versus their cost because it's a bankable team. 349 00:18:37,480 --> 00:18:40,560 Speaker 1: Matt Lafleur has had a top half offense in touchdowns 350 00:18:40,560 --> 00:18:43,080 Speaker 1: per game every year that he's been the head coach there, 351 00:18:43,760 --> 00:18:47,200 Speaker 1: and none of these guys, including Josh Jacobs, are super expensive, 352 00:18:47,920 --> 00:18:50,479 Speaker 1: but in front of Jaden Reid is an often injured 353 00:18:50,520 --> 00:18:54,560 Speaker 1: Christian Watson and a completely unproven entity in Matthew Golden. 354 00:18:55,320 --> 00:18:58,800 Speaker 1: It's objectively an interesting setup for a guy who's been very, 355 00:18:58,960 --> 00:19:03,240 Speaker 1: very efficient per out run throughout his NFL career, and 356 00:19:03,280 --> 00:19:06,160 Speaker 1: with Josh Downs. I may not like the situation as much, 357 00:19:06,320 --> 00:19:11,080 Speaker 1: but Nick Westbrook Akine is not tough competition. Again, median 358 00:19:11,119 --> 00:19:14,800 Speaker 1: outcomes show that Reed and Downs are simply slot players. 359 00:19:15,240 --> 00:19:17,639 Speaker 1: That's what the projection is going to show. But I 360 00:19:17,640 --> 00:19:20,840 Speaker 1: wouldn't just make that assumption no matter what, if it 361 00:19:20,960 --> 00:19:23,760 Speaker 1: doesn't happen, there's a chance they do very well against 362 00:19:23,800 --> 00:19:28,720 Speaker 1: their ADP this year. So last season, the Jags acquired 363 00:19:28,760 --> 00:19:31,560 Speaker 1: Jacobe Myers prior to their Week ten matchup against Houston. 364 00:19:31,920 --> 00:19:34,119 Speaker 1: When they did that, Travis Hunter was done for the 365 00:19:34,200 --> 00:19:37,400 Speaker 1: year and they were switching usage around for Parker Washington. 366 00:19:38,119 --> 00:19:41,200 Speaker 1: From Week ten through Week eighteen, the Jags were fifth 367 00:19:41,200 --> 00:19:43,359 Speaker 1: in drives ending in a touchdown, they were fifth in 368 00:19:43,440 --> 00:19:46,680 Speaker 1: drives just ending in a scorer, and Trevor Lawrence averaged 369 00:19:46,720 --> 00:19:49,760 Speaker 1: twenty two point seven standard Fantasy points per game through 370 00:19:49,760 --> 00:19:51,920 Speaker 1: the end of the fantasy season. That was the second 371 00:19:52,000 --> 00:19:56,240 Speaker 1: highest mark in fantasy football. The Jags were unlocked down 372 00:19:56,240 --> 00:19:58,400 Speaker 1: the stretch last year, and I think we should feel 373 00:19:58,480 --> 00:20:01,159 Speaker 1: very bullish about how that team overall is going to 374 00:20:01,200 --> 00:20:04,479 Speaker 1: perform here in year two under Liam Cohen. With that 375 00:20:04,520 --> 00:20:08,320 Speaker 1: being said, totally understanding the deployment for their personnel is 376 00:20:08,359 --> 00:20:11,359 Speaker 1: a pretty tough task. Right now. You could argue that 377 00:20:11,400 --> 00:20:14,359 Speaker 1: Parker Washington is similar to Michael Wilson, and then he 378 00:20:14,440 --> 00:20:17,240 Speaker 1: kind of emerged out of nowhere. He was awesome for fantasy, 379 00:20:17,400 --> 00:20:20,040 Speaker 1: but he didn't do it across the entire season. The 380 00:20:20,119 --> 00:20:23,520 Speaker 1: difference for me with Washington and Wilson is that Washington 381 00:20:23,640 --> 00:20:27,919 Speaker 1: was bawling out with pretty good competition. Wilson splits they 382 00:20:27,960 --> 00:20:31,760 Speaker 1: were pretty brutal when Marvin Harrison Junior was active. That 383 00:20:31,840 --> 00:20:34,800 Speaker 1: led to Washington having much better per route run numbers, 384 00:20:35,160 --> 00:20:37,320 Speaker 1: a two point zero six yards per rout run rate, 385 00:20:37,480 --> 00:20:40,000 Speaker 1: a twenty three percent targets per out run rate. He 386 00:20:40,119 --> 00:20:42,879 Speaker 1: just needed the opportunity and he got that when Travis 387 00:20:42,960 --> 00:20:46,280 Speaker 1: Hunter went down. Now, Washington played roughly half of his 388 00:20:46,320 --> 00:20:49,479 Speaker 1: snaps from the slot last year according to PFF, and 389 00:20:49,520 --> 00:20:51,520 Speaker 1: I think my fear with him, if I'm just gonna 390 00:20:51,520 --> 00:20:54,680 Speaker 1: look at the downside risk is that despite his numbers, 391 00:20:55,200 --> 00:20:57,200 Speaker 1: Jacksonville just doesn't use him as much as we want 392 00:20:57,200 --> 00:21:00,320 Speaker 1: them to use him. They went tight end heavy in theft. 393 00:21:00,359 --> 00:21:04,080 Speaker 1: They clearly are shifting to a heavier personnel offense, and 394 00:21:04,119 --> 00:21:06,600 Speaker 1: that means the potential for fewer wide receivers on the field. 395 00:21:07,240 --> 00:21:10,440 Speaker 1: With Jakobe Myers, Brian Thomas, and even Travis Hunter there, 396 00:21:10,880 --> 00:21:13,200 Speaker 1: that could mean more of a rotation than we want 397 00:21:13,240 --> 00:21:16,480 Speaker 1: for fantasy football. With that being said, I don't think 398 00:21:16,480 --> 00:21:19,080 Speaker 1: I really want to fade anyone from this offense. It 399 00:21:19,200 --> 00:21:21,560 Speaker 1: was so good last year when things started to click, 400 00:21:21,880 --> 00:21:23,480 Speaker 1: and if you want to just capture all of it, 401 00:21:23,680 --> 00:21:26,560 Speaker 1: you could obviously just get Trevor Lawrence too. But I'm 402 00:21:26,560 --> 00:21:29,800 Speaker 1: just being honest right here in May. That passing attack 403 00:21:30,040 --> 00:21:32,840 Speaker 1: is really hard to nail down. But it's a good 404 00:21:32,880 --> 00:21:38,159 Speaker 1: offense and it projects well overall. We all know that 405 00:21:38,200 --> 00:21:41,479 Speaker 1: Saquon Barkley struggled last year. Kevin Bittulo was terrible as 406 00:21:41,520 --> 00:21:44,440 Speaker 1: offensive coordinator. I'm willing to put the blame on him. 407 00:21:45,240 --> 00:21:47,560 Speaker 1: The Eagles were bottom ten in play action rate, they 408 00:21:47,560 --> 00:21:49,879 Speaker 1: were bottom five in their use of motion, and they 409 00:21:49,960 --> 00:21:52,679 Speaker 1: ranked twenty six and percentage drives that ended up in 410 00:21:52,720 --> 00:21:55,760 Speaker 1: a score in twenty twenty four. Within that statistic, they 411 00:21:55,800 --> 00:21:59,200 Speaker 1: were eighth. Now, I'm not saying Jalen Hurts was brilliant, 412 00:21:59,680 --> 00:22:02,320 Speaker 1: but I do expect this Eagles offense to look better 413 00:22:02,320 --> 00:22:07,520 Speaker 1: in twenty twenty six, specifically Sequon Barkley. Barkley in twenty 414 00:22:07,560 --> 00:22:11,800 Speaker 1: twenty five saw very normal volume peripherals and eighty one 415 00:22:11,800 --> 00:22:14,720 Speaker 1: percent running back rush air was nearly identical to what 416 00:22:14,800 --> 00:22:17,159 Speaker 1: he saw in twenty twenty four. In fact, it was 417 00:22:17,160 --> 00:22:20,399 Speaker 1: technically a little bit higher. His target share was eleven 418 00:22:20,400 --> 00:22:22,800 Speaker 1: point six percent in twenty twenty five. It was eleven 419 00:22:22,840 --> 00:22:26,600 Speaker 1: point four percent in twenty twenty four. The usage itself, 420 00:22:26,720 --> 00:22:30,760 Speaker 1: the intent was mostly the same. The difference is that 421 00:22:30,800 --> 00:22:33,879 Speaker 1: none of the explosive plays were there, and hey, maybe 422 00:22:33,920 --> 00:22:36,439 Speaker 1: he's breaking down a little bit, and we knew that 423 00:22:36,480 --> 00:22:38,399 Speaker 1: he was going to regress in some way. His twenty 424 00:22:38,440 --> 00:22:42,320 Speaker 1: twenty four was just too out of control. But Barkley 425 00:22:42,359 --> 00:22:44,840 Speaker 1: saw a twenty plus yard run on only one point 426 00:22:44,880 --> 00:22:46,840 Speaker 1: four percent of his runs last year. That was by 427 00:22:46,920 --> 00:22:49,880 Speaker 1: far a career low. He was able to gain positive 428 00:22:49,960 --> 00:22:52,800 Speaker 1: yards at the second lowest rate of his career. And 429 00:22:52,880 --> 00:22:56,919 Speaker 1: here's the real kicker. Barkley had fourteen attempts inside the 430 00:22:57,000 --> 00:23:00,800 Speaker 1: five at the goal line. He converted just one of them, 431 00:23:01,240 --> 00:23:05,320 Speaker 1: one goal line touchdown on fourteen goal line attempts. Now, 432 00:23:05,359 --> 00:23:09,320 Speaker 1: obviously many of those attempts came outside push push range, 433 00:23:09,760 --> 00:23:13,280 Speaker 1: but it's still a really bad conversion rate. Barkley ended 434 00:23:13,359 --> 00:23:15,920 Speaker 1: up underperforming in the rushing touchdown column last year when 435 00:23:15,960 --> 00:23:19,440 Speaker 1: looking versus expected, I fully expect things to be better 436 00:23:19,520 --> 00:23:23,240 Speaker 1: for Saquon Barkley this year, and projections are showing that too. 437 00:23:25,040 --> 00:23:27,320 Speaker 1: Miami's probably gonna be bad this year, which means they're 438 00:23:27,320 --> 00:23:29,159 Speaker 1: gonna be forced to throw a little bit more than usual. 439 00:23:29,640 --> 00:23:32,240 Speaker 1: But guys, I really think they're gonna just force feed 440 00:23:32,280 --> 00:23:35,080 Speaker 1: their running backs and just let Malik Willnis run wild. 441 00:23:35,880 --> 00:23:37,960 Speaker 1: They just don't have the pass catching depth to do 442 00:23:38,000 --> 00:23:41,639 Speaker 1: anything significant through the air sustainably. And Malik Willis in 443 00:23:41,640 --> 00:23:44,760 Speaker 1: his six career starts, he's thrown no more than twenty 444 00:23:44,800 --> 00:23:48,000 Speaker 1: three pass attempts in a single start. He was at 445 00:23:48,080 --> 00:23:50,960 Speaker 1: ten and sixteen in his first two starts to the Titans. 446 00:23:51,880 --> 00:23:53,920 Speaker 1: But even if he hit that max of twenty three 447 00:23:53,960 --> 00:23:57,600 Speaker 1: across the season, that would finish as the second lowest 448 00:23:57,600 --> 00:24:00,560 Speaker 1: from any team since twenty eleven. If they did that 449 00:24:00,600 --> 00:24:03,680 Speaker 1: per game. Now, this isn't horrible for Willis from a 450 00:24:03,720 --> 00:24:06,280 Speaker 1: fantasy perspective because we know that he can run, and 451 00:24:06,320 --> 00:24:09,160 Speaker 1: Devon a Chan could realistically see like a twenty percent 452 00:24:09,200 --> 00:24:12,199 Speaker 1: target share in that offense. But if you're looking for 453 00:24:12,280 --> 00:24:15,520 Speaker 1: a winner at wide receiver for the Dolphins, sure throw 454 00:24:15,520 --> 00:24:18,280 Speaker 1: a dart at your favorite go for Jalen Tolbert if 455 00:24:18,320 --> 00:24:21,119 Speaker 1: you want to. Just don't assume that someone has to 456 00:24:21,160 --> 00:24:24,320 Speaker 1: emerge in this offense. This is almost definitely gonna be 457 00:24:24,320 --> 00:24:27,040 Speaker 1: a ground and pound offense, which is shots down the field. 458 00:24:27,400 --> 00:24:31,560 Speaker 1: The Malik willis special and the data certainly points that way. 459 00:24:33,880 --> 00:24:36,600 Speaker 1: Let's talk about the Chargers to end today's show. Over 460 00:24:36,600 --> 00:24:38,960 Speaker 1: the last two years, the Chargers had Greg Roman running 461 00:24:38,960 --> 00:24:42,560 Speaker 1: their offense. Now it's Mike McDaniel. Roman is known for 462 00:24:42,680 --> 00:24:46,040 Speaker 1: using heavier personnel his power run game, but he didn't 463 00:24:46,040 --> 00:24:49,359 Speaker 1: do that quite as often with the Chargers. Mike McDaniel 464 00:24:49,440 --> 00:24:52,879 Speaker 1: was actually bottom five and eleven personnel use each year 465 00:24:52,920 --> 00:24:55,680 Speaker 1: in Miami as head coach. That wasn't always due to 466 00:24:55,720 --> 00:24:57,960 Speaker 1: tight end usage, but I do think the recent signing 467 00:24:58,000 --> 00:25:00,359 Speaker 1: of David Njoku tells us that they're o open to 468 00:25:00,400 --> 00:25:03,240 Speaker 1: that and Some of the lack of eleven personnel use 469 00:25:03,320 --> 00:25:07,120 Speaker 1: is undoubtedly due to personnel. They had Tyreek Hill, they 470 00:25:07,119 --> 00:25:09,800 Speaker 1: had Jalen Waddle, and they didn't have that much after them. 471 00:25:10,280 --> 00:25:13,919 Speaker 1: But if you can bine everything McDaniel's historical use, the 472 00:25:14,000 --> 00:25:17,320 Speaker 1: Njoku signing, his use of fullbacks, I don't think this 473 00:25:17,359 --> 00:25:20,719 Speaker 1: is automatically a heavy eleven personnel team because they drafted 474 00:25:20,760 --> 00:25:23,440 Speaker 1: Trey Harris last year and they have Ladd McConkie and 475 00:25:23,520 --> 00:25:27,240 Speaker 1: Quentin Johnston. What that means is that the wide receivers 476 00:25:27,280 --> 00:25:29,680 Speaker 1: who are out there, who are out there in one 477 00:25:29,760 --> 00:25:32,080 Speaker 1: or two wide receiver sets, they're probably gonna see an 478 00:25:32,119 --> 00:25:35,399 Speaker 1: uptick and target share. And I think Ladd McConkie is 479 00:25:35,400 --> 00:25:38,760 Speaker 1: the best wide receiver in that offense. So I've leaned 480 00:25:38,760 --> 00:25:41,440 Speaker 1: into him in early Best Ball drafts. I think he's 481 00:25:41,440 --> 00:25:44,480 Speaker 1: a candidate to make a leap this year. As I've 482 00:25:44,480 --> 00:25:47,679 Speaker 1: noted on shows this offseason, there was a great nugget 483 00:25:47,680 --> 00:25:50,200 Speaker 1: from that Ryan Heath article that I referenced earlier when 484 00:25:50,200 --> 00:25:53,000 Speaker 1: it came to Ladd McConkie. He noted that McConkie ran 485 00:25:53,080 --> 00:25:55,040 Speaker 1: just ten percent of his routes from sets with fewer 486 00:25:55,080 --> 00:25:59,040 Speaker 1: than three wide receivers, and twenty twenty five, Jalen Waddle 487 00:25:59,119 --> 00:26:02,840 Speaker 1: under Mike McDaniel was at forty six percent. So there's 488 00:26:02,880 --> 00:26:05,680 Speaker 1: a lot of room for growth there for McConkey, assuming 489 00:26:05,720 --> 00:26:08,200 Speaker 1: he's the one consistently staying on the field, which I 490 00:26:08,200 --> 00:26:10,240 Speaker 1: think he's capable of doing because I think he's the 491 00:26:10,240 --> 00:26:13,800 Speaker 1: best wide receiver on that team. And then whoever you 492 00:26:13,880 --> 00:26:17,160 Speaker 1: like more Between Quentin Johnson and Trey Harris, their serious 493 00:26:17,240 --> 00:26:20,800 Speaker 1: opportunity for them to make that jump as well. Right now, 494 00:26:20,800 --> 00:26:23,360 Speaker 1: I would lean Quentin Johnston because I think he looked 495 00:26:23,359 --> 00:26:26,960 Speaker 1: a lot better in twenty twenty five. Unlike Greg Roman, 496 00:26:27,000 --> 00:26:30,040 Speaker 1: Mike McDaniel gets awesome efficiency and fantasy relevance from his 497 00:26:30,080 --> 00:26:32,680 Speaker 1: wide receivers, and part of the reason for that is 498 00:26:32,760 --> 00:26:35,560 Speaker 1: McDaniel has been more pass heavy as a coach. His 499 00:26:35,680 --> 00:26:38,000 Speaker 1: Miami teams were seventeenth or higher and pass right over 500 00:26:38,080 --> 00:26:41,480 Speaker 1: expected in all four years there. He had an average 501 00:26:41,480 --> 00:26:44,720 Speaker 1: of plus one point one across his seasons as head coach. 502 00:26:45,560 --> 00:26:48,520 Speaker 1: Roman was about two points below that with the Chargers. 503 00:26:49,359 --> 00:26:53,960 Speaker 1: McDaniel's also known for scheming his guys open Miami ranked first, first, second, 504 00:26:54,040 --> 00:26:56,280 Speaker 1: and first, and their use of motion while he was 505 00:26:56,280 --> 00:27:00,120 Speaker 1: coaching there. For some context, Greg Roman's Chargers were twenty 506 00:27:00,320 --> 00:27:02,600 Speaker 1: last year in their use of motion and shout out 507 00:27:02,600 --> 00:27:06,640 Speaker 1: to Fantasy Life for that data. Basically, McDaniel's offenses will 508 00:27:06,680 --> 00:27:09,760 Speaker 1: isolate wide receivers and allow them to see bigger boosts 509 00:27:09,760 --> 00:27:12,080 Speaker 1: and target share. We have to be open to that 510 00:27:12,119 --> 00:27:15,760 Speaker 1: being personnel driven. But the Chargers move this offseason tell 511 00:27:15,800 --> 00:27:18,120 Speaker 1: me that they're probably still gonna install a similar offense. 512 00:27:19,119 --> 00:27:21,479 Speaker 1: They got a blocking tight end, they snagged alec Engole 513 00:27:21,520 --> 00:27:24,520 Speaker 1: to full back in free agency. They're probably gonna run 514 00:27:24,560 --> 00:27:27,600 Speaker 1: the same Mike McDaniel offense, and I think that's good 515 00:27:27,640 --> 00:27:32,040 Speaker 1: for basically everyone involved. Mconkee could thrive. The run game 516 00:27:32,080 --> 00:27:34,879 Speaker 1: should be efficient. I'm not necessarily super high on a 517 00:27:34,960 --> 00:27:37,479 Speaker 1: Marii and Hampton because I think Chase Brown in that 518 00:27:37,640 --> 00:27:40,560 Speaker 1: range is just a better bet here in May, but 519 00:27:40,640 --> 00:27:45,040 Speaker 1: I definitely haven't faded Hampton at all. Meanwhile, Keaton Mitchell's speed, 520 00:27:45,080 --> 00:27:48,080 Speaker 1: who they signed this offseason. His speed in this offense 521 00:27:48,160 --> 00:27:51,040 Speaker 1: is very alluring as well. There are a lot of 522 00:27:51,040 --> 00:27:54,920 Speaker 1: pieces to like. And then there's the offensive line. The 523 00:27:55,040 --> 00:27:58,399 Speaker 1: Chargers are getting Rashawn Slater and Joe Waltback, which should 524 00:27:58,400 --> 00:28:01,359 Speaker 1: be a massive boost. All played a normal number of 525 00:28:01,359 --> 00:28:04,520 Speaker 1: snaps last year in just four games. In those four games, 526 00:28:04,920 --> 00:28:07,920 Speaker 1: justin Herbert average nearly twenty two standard Fantasy points per game. 527 00:28:08,440 --> 00:28:12,280 Speaker 1: Outside of those four games, Herbert averaged sixteen point seven. 528 00:28:13,359 --> 00:28:15,600 Speaker 1: Now it's a small sample, but we all watched the 529 00:28:15,680 --> 00:28:19,560 Speaker 1: Chargers last year. Herbert finished with the highest quarterback pressure 530 00:28:19,640 --> 00:28:22,120 Speaker 1: rate in football last year at nearly forty four percent 531 00:28:22,320 --> 00:28:26,000 Speaker 1: according to Next Gen Stats. Now pressures they can be 532 00:28:26,160 --> 00:28:29,400 Speaker 1: quarterback driven, so this isn't all on the offensive line, 533 00:28:29,760 --> 00:28:32,320 Speaker 1: but that number was thirty three percent the year prior, 534 00:28:32,840 --> 00:28:35,320 Speaker 1: with the exact same quarterback and the exact same offense. 535 00:28:36,080 --> 00:28:38,560 Speaker 1: So I'm very much in on this Chargers offense this year. 536 00:28:38,600 --> 00:28:40,360 Speaker 1: I think there's a chance that they're going to be 537 00:28:40,400 --> 00:28:45,120 Speaker 1: seriously awesome. So those are my overall notes. There's plenty 538 00:28:45,120 --> 00:28:47,520 Speaker 1: more to talk about. There's plenty more to discuss, but 539 00:28:47,560 --> 00:28:49,240 Speaker 1: I wanted to get through some of the more pressing things. 540 00:28:49,240 --> 00:28:51,400 Speaker 1: There's some of the things that I found most interesting. 541 00:28:51,960 --> 00:28:54,160 Speaker 1: We've got a couple of months to dissect this stuff 542 00:28:54,200 --> 00:28:57,160 Speaker 1: a lot further. That's it for today's show, though, thanks 543 00:28:57,160 --> 00:28:59,040 Speaker 1: to all of you for listening. If you had subscribed 544 00:28:59,040 --> 00:29:01,479 Speaker 1: to a Late Round fantasy football podcast. Make sure you 545 00:29:01,520 --> 00:29:03,880 Speaker 1: are restriching for it pretty much anywhere. Podcasts can be 546 00:29:03,920 --> 00:29:06,080 Speaker 1: found in do for to follow me on Twitter and 547 00:29:06,120 --> 00:29:10,000 Speaker 1: on Blue Sky at Late Round QB. Thanks for listening everyone. 548 00:29:10,120 --> 00:29:12,840 Speaker 1: As a reminder, the Late Round Show will be live 549 00:29:12,880 --> 00:29:15,720 Speaker 1: on Tuesday at noon this week instead of Wednesday. It's 550 00:29:15,720 --> 00:29:18,440 Speaker 1: gonna hit your feeds then on Thursday as usual, and 551 00:29:18,480 --> 00:29:21,840 Speaker 1: then on Friday we've got another episode of Late Round Perspectives. 552 00:29:22,280 --> 00:29:23,360 Speaker 1: I'll talk to you guys then